Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, December 2000, p. 11858-11872, Vol. 74, No. 24
Henry Vogt Cancer Research Institute,
University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky,1
and Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical
Center, Durham, North Carolina2
Received 10 December 1999/Accepted 15 September 2000
The evolution of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection is
associated with a shift in the target cell population, driven by
variability in coreceptor utilization resulting from diversity in
env. To elucidate the potential consequences of these
changes for Env-mediated fusion over the course of AIDS, we examined
the biological properties of serial viral isolates and determined coreceptor utilization by the products of env cloned from
two individuals, followed from the detection of seroconversion
throughout the course of their infection. One had a typical course, and
the other had an accelerated progression. Early isolates were
non-syncytium inducing, and the corresponding Env exclusively utilized
CCR5, whereas Env from late phases of infection showed restricted
utilization of CXCR4 in both patients. Env from subject SC24, who had a
standard progression, demonstrated multitropism, manifested by
utilization of CCR3, CXCR4, and CCR5 in the intervening period. In
contrast, Env from patient SC51, who experienced early conversion to
the syncytium-inducing phenotype, developed dualtropic coreceptor utilization of CCR5 and CXCR4. Genetic analysis of env from
each isolate revealed that those with an X4 phenotype formed a distinct subcluster within each subject. Analysis of chimeras constructed from
R5 and multispecific env from patient SC24 demonstrated
that while the V3 domain played a dominant role in determining
coreceptor utilization, sequences in the V4-V5 region also contributed
to the latter phenotype. Immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed that
the hybrid Env proteins were expressed at similar levels. These
experiments demonstrate that progression from the R5 to X4 phenotype
may occur through a multi- or dual-tropic intermediate and that
multiple domains contribute to this process.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is initiated by entry of the viral genome following
merging of the lipid bilayer that circumscribes the virus with the
plasma membrane of the target cell. The product of the env
gene, which is processed into two noncovalently associated subunits,
gp120 and gp41, mediates this membrane fusion process (25).
This complex undergoes a series of conformational shifts that result
from the interaction of gp120 with cellular receptors and culminate in
membrane fusion (38, 53). The association of gp120 with the
primary receptor, CD4, results in the exposure of cryptic protein
surfaces in Env (40). The finding that human CD4 is
necessary but not sufficient to confer sensitivity to infection led to
the ultimate recognition that the role of coreceptor is performed by a
cadre of serpentine receptors that transmit the signals of
chemoattractant cytokines, or chemokines (1, 13, 20, 23, 24,
28). The conformation of Env induced by engagement of CD4 is
permissive for interaction with coreceptors, which triggers terminal
events in the fusion process, presumably extension of the hydrophobic
peptide of gp41 (38). The front-line coreceptor for commonly
transmitted strains of HIV-1 is CCR5 (1, 13, 20, 23, 24),
and the importance of this function is illustrated by the high degree
of resistance to infection of individuals homozygous for a 32-bp
deletion in the gene encoding CCR5 (36, 52), who
consequently lack a functional receptor.
Whereas the binding of gp120 to CD4 is virtually universal among HIV-1
isolates (18, 37, 39), there is variability in the
interaction between coreceptors and this glycoprotein over the course
of AIDS (6, 17). Selective pressures exerted by neutralizing
antibodies (3, 7, 44, 59, 63) and other immunological
responses coupled with imperfect fidelity of reverse transcriptase
(4, 47) are likely contributors to the genetic and
biological diversification of env (56). This
diversity in coreceptor utilization is manifested as the entry block
associated with target cell tropism. Env derived from isolates obtained
early in the evolution of HIV-1 infection demonstrate exclusive
utilization of CCR5, while those arising later often use CXCR4 for
membrane fusion, and correspond to macrophage (M)-tropic and T
cell-tropic (T-tropic) strains, respectively. The designations of R5
and X4 for M- and T-tropic Env reflect this functional
relationship (discussed previously by E. A. Berger, R. W. Doms, E. M. Fenyo, B. T. Korber, D. R. Littman,
J. P. Moore, Q. J. Sattentau, H. Schuitemaker, J. Sodroski,
and R. A. Weiss, Letter, Nature 391:240, 1998). Although several chemokine receptors have been found to function as
coreceptors in vitro, CCR5 and CXCR4 are recognized as the primary
coreceptors for HIV-1 infection in vivo at this time, because all
available cloned Env have been shown to use either one or both as
coreceptors and simultaneous antagonism of these receptors blocks
infection of primary cells (70; discussed previously by
N. L. Michael and J. P. Moore, Letter, Nat. Med.
5:740-742, 1999).
The molecular determinants specifying HIV-1 tropism have been studied
extensively (11, 30, 31, 43, 57, 65, 66). Early reports
demonstrated that the V3 region of gp120 is a major, but not the sole,
determinant of tropism that determines the target cell repertoire
(11, 30, 43, 57, 65, 66). More recently, several
laboratories have demonstrated that this region is a key factor
differentiating coreceptor utilization as well (13, 15). There is emerging evidence that other regions of gp120 also have a
critical role in programming tropism and coreceptor utilization (9, 31, 41, 58). Recent crystallographic studies have provided tremendous insight into the surface of the gp120 core structure that is involved in the association with CD4 and, coupled to
mutagenesis experiments, have implicated structures involved in the
interaction with coreceptors (35, 46, 67, 68). However,
these experiments were limited by the need to delete critical variable
loop segments of gp120, including V3 itself. While analysis of serial
isolates has provided some insight into changes in env that
are associated with shifts in tropism, our understanding of the precise
mechanism for the metamorphosis of coreceptor utilization from CCR5 to
CXCR4 by Env is limited. In addition, characterization of the
utilization of ancillary coreceptors by ENV in vivo or in vitro may
further elucidate this process.
Thus far, most of the insights concerning virus tropism and coreceptor
utilization have been gained from studies employing laboratory strains
and unrelated primary isolates as the starting points for analysis and
genetic engineering of variants (5, 12, 13, 49). The present
study addresses the question of env evolution during the
course of AIDS through characterization of coreceptor utilization by
the products of cloned env genes obtained from serial
samples from two individuals identified during the earliest stages of
primary HIV-1 infection. The subjects were members of an
acute-infection cohort in Trinidad and Tobago. The average time from
infection to progression to AIDS in this cohort is approximately 5 years, which may be more representative of rates of disease progression
in developing nations (2) than of those observed in North
America and Europe (42, 48, 50). These patients exhibited a
phenotypic switch in their virus isolates from non-syncytium-inducing
(NSI) to syncytium-inducing (SI), demonstrating that there is an
evolution of coreceptor utilization from an initial M-tropic/R5 strain
to one that includes CXCR4. In one case, there was acquisition of
multitropic coreceptor utilization (CCR3, CCR2b, and CXCR4 in addition
to CCR5), followed by Env that had lost the ability to utilize
coreceptors other than CXCR4. However, such multispecific coreceptor
utilization was not apparent in infectivity studies with these Env. In
the second case there was early conversion to the SI phenotype that was
associated with emergence of a dual-tropic Env able to use CCR5 and
CXCR4 in both fusion and infection experiments, but promiscuous
utilization of other coreceptors was not apparent. Analysis of chimeric
Env indicated that elements in the V3 loop made an important
contribution to multitropic coreceptor utilization, but sequences
within the V4-V5 region also impart this phenotype independent of the
V3 sequences. These findings provide critical insights into the
utilization of coreceptors during the course of AIDS required to
understand the pathogenesis of target cell specificity that will be
critical to the design of antagonists of viral entry.
(This work represents partial fulfillment of requirements for a Ph.D.
in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology for Zi-xuan Wang.)
Preparation and phenotypic characterization of low-passage
primary virus isolate stocks.
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells
(PBMC) were prepared from venous blood obtained from HIV-1-positive
study subjects and seronegative donors by standard Ficoll-Hypaque
density separation. Low-passage primary virus isolates were prepared by
coculturing 5 × 106 freshly prepared (or, in some
instances, viably cryopreserved) PBMC from a study subject with
phytohemagglutinin-activated seronegative donor PBMC in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS),
5% interleukin 2, and gentamicin. Twice weekly, half the culture
supernatants were harvested and replaced with fresh medium alone (once
per week) or medium containing 107
phytohemagglutinin-activated activated donor PBMC (once per week). HIV-1 p24 antigen levels were monitored in culture supernatants twice
per week until two successive readings exceeded 30 pg/ml and the levels
were increasing. The cells were then pelleted and cocultured in 20 to
30 ml with 1 × 107 to 1.5 × 107
CD8+ cell-depleted PBMC from a pool of 10 seronegative
donors that had been prepared and activated as follows. The PBMC from a
pool of normal donors were activated for 3 days with a mixture of
anti-CD3 (50 ng/ml) and anti-CD28 (100 ng/ml) antibodies in medium
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 20 U of recombinant
interleukin 2 (Genzyme) per ml, and penicillin-streptomycin (pen/strep)
at 37°C in a humidified incubator. The PBMC were depleted of CD8 T
cells with anti-CD8-coated magnetic microspheres (Dynal) according to
the manufacturer's recommendations. At daily intervals, the cells were
pelleted, supernatants were harvested and filtered, and the cells were
resuspended in fresh medium. Supernatants were monitored for the
presence and amount of viral reverse transcriptase (RT) activity with a micro-RT assay (10) to estimate virus replication.
Supernatants containing significant amounts of viral RT activity were
subsequently characterized with respect to infectious virus titer in a
PBMC-based assay. Virus harvests possessing 103 50% tissue
culture infective doses (TCID50)/ml were aliquoted and
stored at
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evolution of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope
during Infection Reveals Molecular Corollaries of Specificity for
Coreceptor Utilization and AIDS Pathogenesis


![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
70°C until used in biological experiments.
Infectivity studies with primary virus isolates. Virus isolates were titrated on U87 cells and/or HeLa-CD4 cells to assess their ability to use CCR5 and/or CXCR4 to initiate productive infection. U87 cell lines stably expressing CD4 alone (obtained through the AIDS Reagent Program, DAIDS, NIAID, NIH, from HongKui Deng and Dan Littman), CD4 and CCR5, or CD4 and CXCR4 (both gifts from Dan Littman) were seeded in 48-well plates (Costar) 24 h prior to infection. Cells were seeded at 7.5 × 103 cells/well in 150 µl of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% heat-inactivated FCS. The U87-CD4 cells were maintained and initially seeded in medium containing G418 (300 µg/ml), whereas the U87-CD4-CCR5 cells and the U87-CD4-CXCR4 cells were maintained and initially seeded in medium containing G418 (300 µg/ml) and puromycin (1 µg/ml). Medium containing selective agents was removed 24 h later and replaced with 150 µl of DMEM containing 10% FCS. Serial dilutions of virus isolates (150-µl volumes) were added to duplicate wells, bringing the volume of each test well to 300 µl. Cells were fed on days 2, 4, 7, and 10 with fresh DMEM containing 10% FCS. Aliquots of supernatants were taken on days 4, 7, and 11, adjusted to 1% Triton X-100, and assayed for RT activity as previously described (10). Infectious virus titers, expressed as TCID50 per milliliter, were determined by the end-point dilution technique and calculated by the method of Reed and Muench (45).
In addition to the U87-based infectivity studies, we examined the ability of the primary virus isolates to replicate in the HeLa-CD4 indicator cell line (MAGI) originally described by Kimpton and Emerman (32) (obtained from the AIDS Reagent Program, DAIDS, NIAID, NIH, from Michael Emerman). As the HeLa cells express the CXCR4 coreceptor, this analysis scores specifically for the ability of virus isolates to infect via the CXCR4 coreceptor. MAGI cells were seeded 24 h prior to infection in a 48-well plate (Costar) at 2.5 × 104 cells per well in 300 µl of DMEM containing 10% FCS, pen/strep (100 U and 100 µg/ml, respectively), 300 µg of L-glutamine per ml and 12.5 µg of DEAE per ml. Duplicate wells were infected with 100 µl of the appropriate virus. At 24 h after infection, DP178, an HR2 peptide mimetic and inhibitor of gp41-mediated fusion (C. Wild, T. Greenwell, and T. J. Matthews, AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 9:1051-1053, 1993), was added to a final concentration of 5 µg/ml to ensure that infection readouts reflected a single round of replication. The cells were incubated for an additional 48 h and then fixed for 5 min with 1% formaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cells were stained in situ at 37°C for 50 min with X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside), 0.4 mg/ml 2 mM MgCl2, 4 mM potassium ferricyanide, and 4 mM
potassium ferrocyanide in PBS. Infection resulted in intense nuclear
staining, and the number of stained nuclei was interpreted as being
equal to the number of infectious virions in the challenge inoculum. Infected cells were enumerated using a charge-coupled device imager and
Image Pro software (Georgia Instruments).
Direct sequencing of primary env genes. The nucleotide sequence of a segment of the HIV-1 env gene that includes the V3 loop of gpl20 was determined from amplification products obtained from proviral DNA templates using primers E100 (5'-ACACATGGAATTAAGCCAGT) and E130c (5'-CCTGCCACATGTTTATAATTTGT). The PCR products were excised from agarose gels, purified, and concentrated. An oligonucleotide designed from sequences at the 5' end of this segment, E110 (5'-CTGTTAAATGGCAGTCTAGCAGAA), was used to prime the sequencing reaction, which was performed using a Thermo Sequenase radiolabeled terminator cycle sequencing kit (Amersham).
Molecular cloning of primary env genes. Proviral DNA templates were prepared from activated normal donor PBMC infected with the various primary isolates. Cell pellets were lysed in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 0.001% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 0.5% Triton X-100 (pH 8.0). Proteinase K was added to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml, and the lysates were incubated at 60°C for 3 h. The proteinase K was heat inactivated by treating the lysates at 100°C for 10 min. In some cases the DNA was further purified by standard phenol-chloroform extraction techniques. The full-length env gene containing the gp160 open reading frame was amplified by PCR using proviral DNA as templates. A region flanking env was amplified using upstream and downstream primers designed from sequences in tat (5'-TGCTGTTTATCCATTTCAGAATTGG) and nef (5'-TCCAGTCCCCCCTTTTCTTTTAAAAA), respectively. Standard conditions were employed for PCR amplification that included 1.5 mM MgCl2. PCR cycles were preceded by rapid heating to 95°C and consisted of the following intervals: denaturation, 30 s at 95°C; cooling ramp to 55°C, 60 s; annealing, 30 s at 55°C; heating ramp to 72°C; and synthesis, 7 min. Thirty-five amplification cycles were performed using the hot-start method. The 3.3-kb amplification product encompassed tat, rev, vpu, and part of the nef gene in addition to env. The annealing temperature was optimized for each template. The amplification products were molecularly cloned into the pCR2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen Corp.).
The open reading frame encoding gp160 was amplified from this cloned template using Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene). Restriction sites for EcoRI and XhoI were incorporated into the upstream and downstream primers, respectively. Expression constructs encoding Env were prepared in pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen Corp.). In some cases, full-length env was cloned from purified DNA templates as follows. Purified cellular DNA (0.5 µg) was used as the target for amplification of proviral env DNA using a nested PCR approach. Briefly, first-round amplification was performed with the E0 5'-primer (5'-TAGAGCCCTGGAAGCATCCAGGAAGTCAGCCTA) and the Nef 9023 3'-primer (5'-CATTGGTCTTAAAGGTACCTGAGGT), each at 0.1 µM final concentration. Two units of the eLONGase enzyme mix (Gibco-BRL) per reaction was employed for PCR, with 200 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) and 1.5 mM MgSO4. An initial denaturation for 3 min at 94°C preceded 40 amplification cycles performed as follows: denaturation for 1 min at 94°C, annealing at 57°C for 1 min, and extension for 5 min at 70°C. These cycles were followed by a final 10-min extension at 70°C. One microliter of the first-round reaction was amplified for 25 cycles in a second-round reaction employing nested primers. Second-round primers were the 5'-ENF primer (5'-AAAGAGCAGAAGACAGTGGCAATGAGAGTGAAGG) used in conjunction with either the 3'-ENR primer (5'-CAATCACACTACTTTTTGACCACTTGCCACCCAT) or the 3'-NL4-38917R primer (5'-AGGTCTCGAGATACTGCTCCCA). The concentrations of all components and reaction conditions for the second-round amplifications were identical to those described above for the first-round PCR except for the number of cycles employed. Amplified env was gel purified and recovered using the QIAEX II gel extraction kit (Qiagen Inc.) and cloned into the pCDNA3.1/V5/His-TOPO expression vector (Invitrogen Corp.). Throughout the text and figures, individual env clones may be designated either as c.X (for clone no. X) or simply as #X (for clone no. X). For example, QH1503c.1 (a designation appearing in Fig. 1A and B) refers to the same env clone as designation QH1503#1 (a designation appearing in Table 2 and Fig. 2A).Sequencing cloned full-length env genes and chimeric env constructs. Cloned env genes were sequenced completely with an ABI 377 automated sequencer using the Taq Dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (ABI Prism) chemistries. All sequences were determined from both sense and antisense DNA strands to ensure the accuracy of the sequence determinations. Primers used to determine the env sequences were as follows: ENF, 5'-AAAGAGCAGAAGACAGTGGCAATGAGAGTGAAGG; E155R, 5'-CTGTTCTACCATGTCATTTTTCCACATGT; E70, 5'-GGGATCAAAGCCTAAAGCCATGTGTAA; E90, 5'-CACAGTACAATGTACACATGGAAT; E145R, 5'-AGCAGTTGAGTTGATACTACTGG; NL437500, 5'-AAGTAGGAAAAGCAATGTATGCCCCTCCCAT; HXB21299R, 5'-ATGGGAGGGGCATACATT; E180, 5'-GTCTGGTATAGTGCAGCA; E55R, 5'-GCCCCAGACTGTGAGTTGCAACAGATG; E220, 5'-TAACAAATTGGCTGTGGTATATAA; HXB28562R, 5'-CTCGTTACAATCAAGAGTAAGTCTCTCAA; ENR, 5'-CAATCACACTACTTTTTGACCACTTGCCACCCAT; T7, 5'-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG; and PCR3.1, 5'-TAGAAGGCACAGTCGAGG. An R at the end of a primer name indicates a reverse primer. ENF and ENR were used only in direct sequencing of PCR products. Primers residing in the cloning vector (T7 and PCR3.1) were used to sequence full-length env clones in the immediate 5' and 3' regions. Derived DNA sequences were initially analyzed and aligned using software packages from ABI. Gaps were inserted into the alignment as needed, and those regions were eliminated from the subsequent analysis. Phylogenetic analysis was performed, and consistency of the branching order of the phylogenetic trees was evaluated using the SEQBOOT, DNADIST, NEIGHBOR, CONSENSE, and DRAWGRAM modules of the Phylip Package (V3.572) (26, 27). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using neighbor-joining (51), and the stability of the nodes was assessed with the bootstrap value (26). Bootstrap values in excess of 70% were considered significant.
Reverse transcription, PCR amplification, and direct sequencing
of plasma virus env regions.
Plasma was prepared from
acid citrate dextrose-anticoagulated whole venous blood within 2 h
of sample collection and stored at
70°C until analyzed. HIV-1 RNA
was extracted with the Roche Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Assay system (Roche
Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, N.J.) as specified by the
manufacturer and stored at
70°C. A 25-µl amount of the RNA
extract was reverse transcribed and PCR amplified in a total volume of
75 µl with the Perkin-Elmer GeneAmp Gold RNA PCR kit with the
following reaction components and conditions: 1X RT PCR Buffer
(Perkin-Elmer), 1.75 mM MgCl2, 0.35 mM each dNTP, 10 U of
RNase inhibitor (Perkin-Elmer), 10 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.5 µM
MG-12 3'-primer [5'-AA(T/C)(T/A)GTCTGGCCTGTACCGTCAGCGT-3'] and 0.5 µM MG-6 5'-primer
[5'-GGT(A/G)TCCTTTGA(G/T)CCAATTCCCAT-3'], 2.5 U of
AmpliTaq Gold, and 150 U of murine leukemia virus RT enzyme. Reverse
transcription was carried out at 42°C for 60 min. Reaction components
were heated to 95°C for 10 min, and then PCR was performed with 50 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 57°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 2 min. A final extension at 72°C for
10 min was employed after the last cycle. The PCR mix (7.5 µl) was
transferred to a separate tube for a second round of amplification with
nested primers. Reaction conditions and components for the second-round
PCR were 1X PCR buffer II (Perkin-Elmer), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM each dNTP, 0.2 µM MG-10 3'-primer
[5'-CACTT(C/T)TCCAATTGTCCCTCAT(A/G)TCTCCTCCT-3'] and 0.2 µM MG-7 5'-primer [5'-GTCAGCACAGTACAATGTACACAT-3'], and 2.5 U of AmpliTaq Gold (Perkin-Elmer). Denaturation for 10 min at
95°C preceded 10 cycles of amplification using 95°C for 45 s
for denaturation, 59°C for 1 min for annealing, and 72°C for 1.5 min for extension. These were followed by 20 to 40 cycles of
amplification using 94°C for 45 s for denaturation, 59°C for 1 min for annealing, and 72°C for 1.5 min for extension. A final extension at 72°C for 10 min was employed. Direct sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the amplified plasma viral env
region were performed as described above for the full-length
env genes using the MG-7, MG-10, E110, and HXB21129R
(5'-AAATTCCCCTCCACAATT-3') primers for sequencing.
Genetic engineering of Env chimeras and mutants. Env chimeras between QH0648#1 and QH1520#2 and between QH0515#1 and QH1520#2 were generated using sites that were present in these env genes, including EcoRI, AccI, SauI, and XhoI. A DraI site was introduced at the 3' boundary of the V3 region as a silent mutation that did not alter the amino acid programmed by the codons at this position using the Chameleon double-stranded site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The identity of all chimeras and mutants was confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Reporter gene assay for analysis of Env-mediated fusion. The coreceptor utilization of the products encoded by the primary env genes, chimeras, and mutants was determined using a cell-cell fusion assay employing a luciferase reporter gene, as described previously (22, 61, 62), with modifications. Briefly, QT6 effector cells were prepared by infection with vTF1.1, which encodes T7 polymerase, for 1 h following transfection with pcDNA3 constructs containing the primary env clones. Target cells consisted of QT6 cells transfected with pcDNA3 constructs encoding CD4, coreceptors, and a luciferase reporter gene under the transcriptional control of the T7 promoter. The effector and target cell populations were mixed at 16 to 18 h following transfection, and the luciferase activity of cell lysates was determined approximately 9 h later using a LucLite luciferase reporter gene assay kit (Packard). Absolute light units emitted were measured using a Top Count luminometer (Packard).
Production of pseudotyped reporter viruses and infectivity
assays.
Stocks of pseudotyped reporter viruses were prepared as
follows. 293T cells (a gift from Robert Doms) were maintained in DMEM containing 10% heat-inactivated FCS and 1% pen/strep (Gibco-BRL). 293T cells were seeded at 1.5 × 106 cells per well in
a six-well dish (Costar) 1 day prior to transfection. Cells were
cotransfected with 10 µg of an env expression vector and 5 µg of plasmid pNL4-3.Luc.R
E
(obtained
from the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, DAIDS, NIAID,
NIH, from Nathaniel Landau) by the calcium phosphate precipitation
method essentially as described (16). Virus-containing supernatants were harvested 48 h posttransfection, mixed with heat-inactivated FCS to bring the concentration to 20% (vol/vol), filtered, and stored at
80°C until used for infection. The ability of cloned env to mediate infection via the CCR5 and/or CXCR4
coreceptor was assessed in U87 astroglioma cells stably expressing the
CD4 receptor and either the CCR5 or CXCR4 coreceptor or neither
chemokine receptor. U87 cells were seeded at 1.5 × 104 cells per well in a 96-well plate and infected with 100 µl of pseudotyped virus-containing supernatant. Cells were harvested 48 to 72 h postinfection and assayed with either the Promega
luciferase assay system (Promega) in a Berthold Lumat 9501 (Wallac) or
the LucLite luciferase assay kit (Packard) in a Top Count luminometer (Packard).
Metabolic labeling and immunoprecipitation of Env. The expression of wild-type and chimeric Env glycoproteins was analyzed by metabolic labeling and immunoprecipitation. Briefly, QT6 or HeLa cells (2 × 105) were seeded in six-well plates and grown to 80 to 90% confluence. Monolayers were infected with the vTF1.1 vaccinia virus, which directs the expression of T7 polymerase, for approximately 1 h and then transfected with the env constructs. These were prepared in the pcDNA3 vector, which contains a T7 promoter downstream of the cytomegalovirus promoter, which is typically employed in mammalian cells. The cells were allowed to incubate for 18 h at 37°C. The transfectants were then depleted of methionine and cysteine by growth in medium lacking these amino acids for 1 h. The cultures were then metabolically labeled in 1 ml of this medium supplemented with 100 µCi of [35S]methionine/[35S]cysteine (NEN Life Science) for 1 h. Complete medium was then added, and the cells were incubated for an additional 1 h at 37°C. Lysates of metabolically labeled cells were clarified by centrifugation in a microcentrifuge and then incubated with HIVIG (obtained from the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program) or normal immunoglobulin fractions, followed by protein G-Sepharose (Pharmacia) overnight at 4°C. Immune complexes bound by the protein G-Sepharose were washed, resuspended in SDS sample buffer, and resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), and the dried gels were analyzed by autoradiography.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. All sequences described were deposited in the GenBank database under accession no. AF310108 to AF310132.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
env genes from sequential primary isolates.
To
examine the functional consequences of the diversification in
env that occurs during HIV-1 disease, we examined the
biological and molecular characteristics of serial virus isolates
obtained from two individuals in a cohort of acute seroconverters in
Trinidad and Tobago. Cohort subjects were identified by virtue of
exhibiting HIV-1 p24 antigenemia in the absence of a positive Western
blot, and their status was confirmed by subsequent documentation of seroconversion to HIV-1 antigens. From a cohort of 22 HIV-positive individuals, we examined serial viral isolates and env
clones from two subjects whose isolates exhibited a phenotypic switch from NSI to SI during the period of observation. As shown in Table 1, the isolates studied spanned the
evolution from NSI to SI, which occurred over an interval of 875 days
(~29 months) for patient SC24, but within a much shorter time frame,
12 months, for the second subject, SC51. Thus far, five subjects in the
cohort have evidenced a switch in virus phenotype from an initial NSI
isolate to a subsequent SI isolate. The mean time from infection to
recovery of an SI isolate from the five subjects in the original cohort has been 31 months (range, 12 to 41 months), which appears to be
considerably shorter than that observed in a recent study of nine
individuals from the MACS cohort (56), and may reflect a
more rapid pace of disease progression in developing versus developed
countries. The NSI and SI designations in Table 1 are based on the
ability of the virus isolates to induce syncytia in the MT-2 cell line.
|
|
|
Coreceptor utilization of primary Env during the evolution of HIV-1
infection.
The utilization of front-line HIV-1 coreceptors by the
128 env-encoded glycoproteins was determined in cell-cell
fusion assays. Biological activity (Env-mediated cell-cell fusion) was
detected with 40 of these clones (Table
3), and data from 21 representative clones are shown in Fig. 2.
|
|
|
Multiple domains of Env contribute to coreceptor specificity.
The availability of genetically related env that were
derived from successive viral isolates during the evolution of
infection in a single patient offered a unique opportunity to study the domains that participate in determining the specificity of coreceptor utilization in vivo. To extend our initial observations, env
clones from patient SC24 encoding R5 (QH0648#1) and multitropic
(QH1520#1) products (Fig. 4A) were used
to generate chimeras, which are depicted in Fig. 4B. As shown in Fig.
5A, whereas the chimeric
Env composed of the N-terminal segment of QH1520#2 through the V3 loop
[1520(1-3)/0648] demonstrated significant utilization of CXCR4 and
CCR3, the fusogenic activity of that extending to the region between
the V2 and V3 loops [1520(1-2)/0648] was limited to CCR5.
Replacement of the V3 loop of QH1520#2 with that of QH0648#1
[0648(3)/1520] resulted in a multitropic Env with increased CCR5
utilization and mildly decreased use of CXCR4 and CCR3 in comparison to
the wild-type QH1520#2 Env. Substitution of QH0648#1 sequences for the
V3 loop and the segment containing the V4 and V5 domains of QH1520#2
[0648(3, 4-5)/1520] resulted in coreceptor utilization essentially
limited to CCR5. The effect of the V4-V5 segment on coreceptor
utilization is further illustrated by the ability of the hybrid Env
containing the V1-V2 and V4-V5 domains of QH1520#2 [1520(1-2,
4-5)/0648] to utilize CXCR4 and CCR3 as coreceptors in addition to
CCR5. A similar effect was noted with 1520(4-5)/0648, although the
total fusogenic activity of this hybrid was less than that observed with the parental Env. Several of the hybrid Env had limited fusogenic activity. These chimeras appeared to be expressed at intermediate [0648(1-3)/1520 and 1520(3)/0648] or low [0648(1-2)/1520 and
1520(4-5)/0648] levels in metabolic labeling experiments (Fig. 5B).
All of the hybrids, including those with low levels of fusogenic
activity, were expressed at levels similar to or greater than that of
the parental QH1520#2 Env (Fig. 5B).
|
|
S conversion in the C4 region to coreceptor
usage (9), both envelopes examined in the current studies
possessed an R in this position (Fig. 4). The V1-V2 region of QH1520#2
Env failed to contribute to the multitropic phenotype, as was noted in
the panel of chimeras engineered with QH0648#1. All hybrid Env were expressed at levels similar to or greater than those observed for the
wild-type parental Env in immunoprecipitation experiments (Fig. 5B and E).
The coreceptor activity of hybrid Env derived from QH0648#1
and QH1520#2 was also tested in infection experiments (Fig. 5C). The 1520(1-3)/0648 Env used CXCR4, and 1520(1-2)/0648 used CCR5, as
shown in the cell-cell fusion model. The substitution of V3 sequences
in QH0648#1 with those from QH1520#2 was sufficient to confer
utilization of CXCR4. Conversely, the substitution of V3 sequences in
QH1520#2 with those from QH0648#1 did not significantly alter
utilization of CXCR4 but markedly increased the utilization of CCR5.
Swaps of the V1 and V2 regions did not modify the coreceptor utilization of QH0648#1 or QH1520#2. Replacement of the V4-V5 region
of QH0648#1 with the corresponding sequence from QH1520#2 did not
alter CCR5 utilization but was sufficient to confer the ability
to use CXCR4. Similarly, the removal of V3 and V4-V5 segments from
QH1520#2 and insertion of the analogous domains of QH0648#1 resulted in
fusogenic activity with CCR5. The 1520(4-5)/0648 and 1520(1-2, 4-5)
hybrids also support the contribution of the V4-V5 domains (of 1520#2)
to the multitropic phenotype. These data provide evidence for the
participation of the V3 and V4-V5 regions in determining the
repertoire of coreceptor utilization for Env-mediated fusion through
both gain- and loss-of-function experiments. In contrast, they fail to
establish a role for the V1-V2 segment in determining this phenotype.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We examined the temporal relationships between the biological, genetic, and functional characteristics of sequential HIV-1 isolates and cloned env genes from two individuals who exhibited evolution in their virus phenotype from an initial NSI isolate to subsequent SI isolates during the course of their disease. The conversion in virus phenotype occurred with dramatically different kinetics in the two subjects and was paralleled by a similar divergence in their clinical courses. Both subjects were enrolled in a study of acute HIV-1 infection and were followed from the earliest ascertainable stages of acute infection throughout their disease course. The initial virus isolates were obtained at a time when each individual exhibited p24 antigenemia but prior to conversion to positive Western blot status. Plasma virus load assessments documented that the initial viral samples from both subjects were obtained at or near the peak of plasma viremia that usually accompanies acute HIV-1 infection. Consistent with prior reports, the initial isolates from each individual were of the NSI phenotype and restricted to replication in target cells expressing CCR5 (6, 17, 54, 60). Subject SC24 exhibited a switch in virus phenotype to SI after approximately 2.4 years, while this switch occurred much more rapidly in subject SC51, as SI variants were recovered after about 1 year of infection. As documented in Table 1, infectivity studies of the isolates from both patients confirmed that recovery of SI isolates coincided with the emergence of strains that infect target cells expressing CXCR4, but also revealed that the SI isolates were composed of differing proportions of subpopulations that used CCR5. However, in both subjects there was a progression with time to populations that were much more efficient in infecting through the CXCR4 receptor rather than CCR5. Characterization of coreceptor usage by the products of cloned env genes demonstrated that the SI phenotype represents the emergence of viral Env capable of using both CXCR4 and CCR5, as well as individual Env restricted to CXCR4, and the persistence of species that use CCR5. These studies amplify the recent findings of Shankarappa et al. (56) but also highlight the possibility that the time frame for the three distinct phases identified during progression by those investigators may be significantly altered in cohorts from developing regions where rates of progression appear to be more rapid.
In addition to the biological studies on the virus isolates, the genetic and functional studies of cloned env genes have provided novel insights on the nature of variants that make up these populations and the evolution of this gene in vivo. For subject SC24, we did not recover individual envelopes that were capable of efficiently infecting via both CCR5 and CXCR4 coreceptors (i.e., dual-tropic Env). This result suggests that the virus quasispecies in these SI isolates are composed of subpopulations that mediate infection through either CXCR4 or CCR5. In contrast to these findings, analysis in the cell-cell fusion model system revealed that the progression from R5 to X4 Env occurred via an intermediate that had multitropic coreceptor usage that included CCR5, CCR3, and CXCR4 as well as CCR2b at levels above background with CD4 alone. As they assess fusogenic activity in different contexts, the fusion assay may be a more sensitive measure of biochemical interactions that can occur between Env and coreceptors, although this surrogate may not predict productive Env-coreceptor interactions in the context of virus infection. In the second subject (SC51), we observed a different picture for the 1-year transition from NSI R5 strains to the development of SI X4 variants. Molecular env clones from the QH1521 isolate of SC51 revealed a mixture in both fusion and infection assays that included R5X4 dual-tropic species in addition to an R5 Env variant. Utilization of CCR3 and CCR2b was not observed in the cell-cell fusion model. Taken together, the results suggest that there may be multiple pathways for HIV-1 to evolve in vivo from an initial CCR5 population to a CXCR4-permissive population during the course of disease. This interpretation must be tempered by the fact that our examination of env clones was not exhaustive, and it is possible that dual-tropic or multitropic Env variants existed in both subjects but were not recovered.
A substantial proportion of HIV-1-infected individuals progress to AIDS without making the phenotypic switch to SI variants (21, 33, 55). In these subjects, the env genes may not evolve to use coreceptors other than CCR5, as suggested by a recent report (21). It is possible that in such individuals, subtle changes in the virus Env may alter the nature or efficiency of its interaction with the CCR5 coreceptor in a way that leads to increased virus replication. Indeed, we have observed an unusual case of an individual who experienced an extremely rapid disease course (time from infection to death from AIDS of less than 7 months), characterized by persistently high virus loads without any evidence for use of CXCR4 (J. F. Demarest, N. Jack, F. R. Cleghorn, M. L. Greenberg, T. L. Hoffman, L. Fantry, J. Edwards, T. R. O'Brien, K. Cao, B. Muhabir, W. A. Blattner, C. Bartholomew, and K. J. Weinhold, submitted for publication). Thus, our findings indicate that R5 NSI HIV variants, R5/X4 SI dual-tropic variants, and X4 SI variants are all capable of eliciting AIDS in the proper host. Moreover, they highlight the fact that CXCR4 usage per se is not a prerequisite for HIV-1 to cause disease and that CCR5 variants can be quite pathogenic.
The evolution of coreceptor utilization during the course of HIV-1
infection represents a key mechanism for extension of the spectrum of
target cells. Multiple studies have implicated the V3 loop of gp120 as
a major determinant of tropism (8, 11, 30, 31, 43, 57, 65,
66). These findings were extended to demonstrate that this domain
plays a dominant role in governing coreceptor utilization (13,
15). Recent crystallographic analysis coupled with mutational
evidence has identified amino acid residues in gp120 that are
accessible to solvent following association with CD4 and are critical
to coreceptor utilization (35, 46, 67, 68). The indirect
contribution of the V3 loop is evidenced by the finding that only one
of these amino acid residues is located in this domain. Whereas
truncation of the V1 and V2 loops of gp120 yielded a variant that
retained the ability to bind CD4 and CCR5, further truncation of the V3
loop abolished the ability to bind this coreceptor. Thus, it is likely
that the V3 loop controls the availability or conformation of residues
that interact with coreceptor structures. Previous studies using
genetically engineered hybrid env genes have confirmed the
role of the V3 loop and also implicated the V1-V2 region (12,
49). These chimeric Env were typically composed of segments of
different molecularly cloned, genetically unrelated laboratory strains
of HIV-1. One study employed a parental simian-HIV hybrid that showed
exclusive utilization of CXCR4 and a pathogenic isolate that lacked
utilization of both front-line coreceptors, CCR5 and CXCR4, and
employed CCR2b, CCR3, STRL33, and APJ in infection experiments
(29). While other groups have correlated sequence variation
in the various domains of sequential isolates with tropism (17,
54), the current study is unique in that it examined multiple
molecular clones from serial isolates from the same patients and used
these genetically related env to engineer chimeras. In
addition to the dominant effect of the V3 loop, our data provide direct
evidence that the V4-V5 region can also contribute to coreceptor
utilization, which was also demonstrated by Smyth et al.
(58) and reported for an R
S conversion in the C4 region
by Carrillo and Ratner (9). The R5 and multitropic env
examined in these studies did not demonstrate this R
S
conversion in the C4 domain (Fig. 4). The changes in amino acid
residues between the two R5 Env, QH0515 and QH0648, did not involve any of the residues that have been shown to be essential to coreceptor binding activity but did include deletion of charged amino acids and
the loss of a potential N-linked glycosylation site.
The conformation of Env is controlled by many influences, including primary structure and posttranslational modifications. It is also clear that a variety of indirect effects can modify the conformation of this glycoprotein so as to alter its interaction with coreceptors. Therefore, it is not unexpected that multiple types of alterations in primary structure can change the ability of a set of nonlinear residues to assume a conformation that is permissive for utilization of different coreceptors. Our data suggest that during the evolution of HIV-1 infection, genetic variability in sequences encoding the V4-V5 hypervariable regions may contribute to the progression of coreceptor utilization from exclusive employment of CCR5 to the development of a multispecific phase, to the ultimate, exclusive utilization of CXCR4. The current studies, as well as those of Carrillo and Ratner (9), raise the possibility of a direct or indirect interaction between these regions and the V3 loop which is not inconsistent with the crystallographic structures for gp120 that have been determined (35, 67).
To further investigate the basis for the observed switch in coreceptor usage by the virus env genes and to identify the determinants involved, we constructed chimeras from genetically linked Env exhibiting differential coreceptor use that were recovered from subject SC24. Although a significant body of work exists examining Env determinants of coreceptor usage, most of the studies have employed unrelated viruses to construct chimeric Env. We took advantage of the opportunity to use genetically linked viruses that evolved naturally in vivo to ascertain whether this approach might provide additional information about the nature of the determinants involved.
The mechanisms responsible for the diversification of the viral
env gene and the interactions driving the in vivo evolution of HIV-1 are imperfectly understood. The high level of virus
replication and the error-prone nature of the HIV-1 RT are surely
contributing factors but appear insufficient in and of themselves to
account for the observed env diversity and the switch in
coreceptor usage that often occurs during the course of HIV-1 disease.
Such a conclusion is consistent with the relatively stable
env genotype observed in progressive disease as the immune
system collapses and immune pressure decreases (19). We have
also observed a lack of env diversity in a subject (SC50)
who exhibited high virus loads but failed to mount significant cellular
and humoral responses to HIV-1 infection (Demarest et al., submitted).
Thus, it appears that an appropriate selective pressure is required, in
addition to the replication characteristics of HIV-1, to bring about
diversification in env and alterations in coreceptor usage.
What might these pressures be? The
-chemokines are one possibility
(14, 54, 69). However, if these were significant sources of
selective pressure driving the evolution of the viral env
gene, it is difficult to understand why it usually takes years for
CXCR4 variants to emerge when so few changes in the V3 loop could
effect the switch from CCR5 to CXCR4. In contrast, under the potent
selective pressure of the nonnucleoside RT inhibitor nevirapine, escape
variants with mutations in the relatively conserved RT gene arise
within a matter of weeks (64). In light of these
considerations, it may be more likely that pressure exerted by the
cellular and/or humoral components of the immune system is more
intimately involved with the diversification of the viral
env gene. In this context, we note that both study subjects
developed neutralizing antibodies to their autologous viruses (M.L.G.,
unpublished observations). Such reactivities are directed towards the
viral env gene, and neutralization escape variants can
develop within a period of months. Another subject (SC42) whom we have
followed as a member of the cohort of acute seroconverters did not
develop an autologous neutralizing antibody response. Despite
persistently high levels of viremia in this subject (>105
copies/ml) since the time of infection and continuing for more than 4 years, his virus isolates have remained NSI, indicating an absence of
CXCR4-using variants (M.L.G., unpublished observations). The
possibility that alterations in coreceptor usage may be linked to
escape from immune pressure remains largely unexplored.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We acknowledge Courtney Bartholomew, Noreen Jack, Jeffery Edwards, William Blattner, and Farley Cleghorn and their staff for their tireless efforts in assembling, following, and caring for the Trinidad cohort of acute seroconverters. In addition, we thank Kent J. Weinhold and his laboratory for recovery of primary isolates from patient samples and Derrick Goodman and Rosemary Bennetts for technical assistance with cloning, sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis.
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (RO1-AI41346 to S.C.P., RO1-AI40017 to M.L.G., and PO1-AI40237), from the Duke Center for AIDS Research (P30-AI28662), and from the Agnes Brown Dugan Endowment and the Humana Fund for Excellence.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center For AIDS Research, Box 2926, Rm. 113 SORF Bldg., Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. Phone: (919) 681-5598. Fax: (919) 684-4288. E-mail: green030{at}mc.duke.edu.
Present address: Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Wuhan 430071, People's Republic of China.
Present address: Yerkes Regional Primate Center, Emory University,
Atlanta, GA 30329.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Alkhatib, G., C. Combadiere, C. C. Broder, Y. Feng, P. E. Kennedy, P. M. Murphy, and E. A. Berger. 1996. CC CKR5: a RANTES, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1. Science 272:1955-1958[Abstract]. |
| 2. | Anzala, O. A., N. J. Nagelkerke, J. J. Bwayo, D. Holton, S. Moses, E. N. Ngugi, J. O. Ndinya-Achola, and F. A. Plummer. 1995. Rapid progression to disease in African sex workers with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Infect. Dis. 171:686-689[Medline]. |
| 3. | Arendrup, M., C. Nielsen, J. E. Hansen, C. Pedersen, L. Mathiesen, and J. O. Nielsen. 1992. Autologous HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies: emergence of neutralization- resistant escape virus and subsequent development of escape virus neutralizing antibodies. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 5:303-307. |
| 4. |
Bebenek, K.,
J. Abbotts,
J. D. Roberts,
S. H. Wilson, and T. A. Kunkel.
1989.
Specificity and mechanism of error-prone replication by human immunodeficiency virus-1 reverse transcriptase.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:16948-16956 |
| 5. | Bieniasz, P. D., R. A. Fridell, I. Aramori, S. S. Ferguson, M. G. Caron, and B. R. Cullen. 1997. HIV-1-induced cell fusion is mediated by multiple regions within both the viral envelope and the CCR-5 co-receptor. EMBO J. 16:2599-2609[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Bjorndal, A., H. Deng, M. Jansson, J. R. Fiore, C. Colognesi, A. Karlsson, J. Albert, G. Scarlatti, D. R. Littman, and E. M. Fenyo. 1997. Coreceptor usage of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates varies according to biological phenotype. J. Virol. 71:7478-7487[Abstract]. |
| 7. | Burns, D. P., and R. C. Desrosiers. 1994. Envelope sequence variation, neutralizing antibodies, and primate lentivirus persistence. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 188:185-219[Medline]. |
| 8. |
Cann, A. J.,
M. J. Churcher,
M. Boyd,
W. O'Brien,
J. Q. Zhao,
J. Zack, and I. S. Chen.
1992.
The region of the envelope gene of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 responsible for determination of cell tropism.
J. Virol.
66:305-309 |
| 9. | Carrillo, A., and L. Ratner. 1996. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tropism for T-lymphoid cell lines: role of the V3 loop and C4 envelope determinants. J. Virol. 70:1301-1309[Medline]. |
| 10. | Chen, C. H., K. J. Weinhold, J. A. Bartlett, D. P. Bolognesi, and M. L. Greenberg. 1993. CD8+ T lymphocyte-mediated inhibition of HIV-1 long terminal repeat transcription: a novel antiviral mechanism. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 9:1079-1086[Medline]. |
| 11. | Cheng-Mayer, C., D. Seto, and J. A. Levy. 1991. Altered host range of HIV-1 after passage through various human cell types. Virology 181:288-294[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Cho, M. W.,
M. K. Lee,
M. C. Carney,
J. F. Berson,
R. W. Doms, and M. A. Martin.
1998.
Identification of determinants on a dualtropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein that confer usage of CXCR4.
J. Virol.
72:2509-2515 |
| 13. | Choe, H., M. Farzan, Y. Sun, N. Sullivan, B. Rollins, P. D. Ponath, L. Wu, C. R. Mackay, G. LaRosa, W. Newman, N. Gerard, C. Gerard, and J. Sodroski. 1996. The beta-chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 facilitate infection by primary HIV-1 isolates. Cell 85:1135-1148[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Cocchi, F.,
A. L. DeVico,
A. Garzino-Demo,
S. K. Arya,
R. C. Gallo, and P. Lusso.
1995.
Identification of RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, and MIP-1 beta as the major HIV- suppressive factors produced by CD8+ T cells.
Science
270:1811-1815 |
| 15. | Cocchi, F., A. L. DeVico, A. Garzino-Demo, A. Cara, R. C. Gallo, and P. Lusso. 1996. The V3 domain of the HIV-1 gp120 envelope glycoprotein is critical for chemokine-mediated blockade of infection. Nat. Med. 2:1244-1247[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. | Connor, R. I., B. K. Chen, S. Choe, and N. R. Landau. 1995. Vpr is required for efficient replication of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 in mononuclear phagocytes. Virology 206:935-944[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. |
Connor, R. I.,
K. E. Sheridan,
D. Ceradini,
S. Choe, and N. R. Landau.
1997.
Change in coreceptor use coreceptor use correlates with disease progression in HIV-1-infected individuals.
J. Exp. Med.
185:621-628 |
| 18. | Dalgleish, A. G., P. C. Beverley, P. R. Clapham, D. H. Crawford, M. F. Greaves, and R. A. Weiss. 1984. The CD4 (T4) antigen is an essential component of the receptor for the AIDS retrovirus. Nature 312:763-767[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Delwart, E. L., H. Pan, H. W. Sheppard, D. Wolpert, A. U. Neumann, B. Korber, and J. I. Mullins. 1997. Slower evolution of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 quasispecies during progression to AIDS. J. Virol. 71:7498-7508[Abstract]. |
| 20. | Deng, H., R. Liu, W. Ellmeier, S. Choe, D. Unutmaz, M. Burkhart, P. Di Marzio, S. Marmon, R. E. Sutton, C. M. Hill, C. B. Davis, S. C. Peiper, T. J. Schall, D. R. Littman, and N. R. Landau. 1996. Identification of a major co-receptor for primary isolates of HIV-1. Nature 381:661-666[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. | de Roda Husman, A. M., R. P. van Rij, H. Blaak, S. Broersen, and H. Schuitemaker. 1999. Adaptation to promiscuous usage of chemokine receptors is not a prerequisite for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 disease progression. J. Infect. Dis. 180:1106-1115[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Doranz, B. J., Z. H. Lu, J. Rucker, T. Y. Zhang, M. Sharron, Y. H. Cen, Z. X. Wang, H. H. Guo, J. G. Du, M. A. Accavitti, R. W. Doms, and S. C. Peiper. 1997. Two distinct CCR5 domains can mediate coreceptor usage by human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 71:6305-6314[Abstract]. |
| 23. | Doranz, B. J., J. Rucker, Y. Yi, R. J. Smyth, M. Samson, S. C. Peiper, M. Parmentier, R. G. Collman, and R. W. Doms. 1996. A dual-tropic primary HIV-1 isolate that uses fusin and the beta- chemokine receptors CKR-5, CKR-3, and CKR-2b as fusion cofactors. Cell 85:1149-1158[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. | Dragic, T., V. Litwin, G. P. Allaway, S. R. Martin, Y. Huang, K. A. Nagashima, C. Cayanan, P. J. Maddon, R. A. Koup, J. P. Moore, and W. A. Paxton. 1996. HIV-1 entry into CD4+ cells is mediated by the chemokine receptor CC- CKR-5. Nature 381:667-673[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Einfeld, D., and E. Hunter. 1991. Transport of membrane proteins to the cell surface. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 170:107-139[Medline]. |
| 26. | Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791[CrossRef]. |
| 27. | Felsenstein, J. 1989. PHYLIP-phylogenetic inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164-166. |
| 28. | Feng, Y., C. C. Broder, P. E. Kennedy, and E. A. Berger. 1996. HIV-1 entry cofactor: functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptor. Science 272:872-877[Abstract]. |
| 29. |
Hoffman, T. L.,
E. B. Stephens,
O. Narayan, and R. W. Doms.
1998.
HIV type I envelope determinants for use of the CCR2b, CCR3, STRL33, and APJ coreceptors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:11360-11365 |
| 30. |
Hwang, S. S.,
T. J. Boyle,
H. K. Lyerly, and B. R. Cullen.
1991.
Identification of the envelope V3 loop as the primary determinant of cell tropism in HIV-1.
Science
253:71-74 |
| 31. | Kim, F. M., D. L. Kolson, J. W. Balliet, A. Srinivasan, and R. G. Collman. 1995. V3-independent determinants of macrophage tropism in a primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolate. J. Virol. 69:1755-1761[Abstract]. |
| 32. |
Kimpton, J., and M. Emerman.
1992.
Detection of replication-competent and pseudotyped human immunodeficiency virus with a sensitive cell line on the basis of activation of an integrated beta-galactosidase gene.
J. Virol.
66:2232-2239 |
| 33. |
Koot, M.,
I. P. Keet,
A. H. Vos,
R. E. de Goede,
M. T. Roos,
R. A. Coutinho,
F. Miedema,
P. T. Schellekens, and M. Tersmette.
1993.
Prognostic value of HIV-1 syncytium-inducing phenotype for rate of CD4+ cell depletion and progression to AIDS.
Ann. Intern. Med.
118:681-688 |
| 34. | Koot, M., A. H. Vos, R. P. Keet, R. E. de Goede, M. W. Dercksen, F. G. Terpstra, R. A. Coutinho, F. Miedema, and M. Tersmette. 1992. HIV-1 biological phenotype in long-term infected individuals evaluated with an MT-2 cocultivation assay. AIDS 6:49-54[Medline]. |
| 35. | Kwong, P. D., R. Wyatt, J. Robinson, R. W. Sweet, J. Sodroski, and W. A. Hendrickson. 1998. Structure of an HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the CD4 receptor and a neutralizing human antibody. Nature 393:648-659[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 36. | Liu, R., W. A. Paxton, S. Choe, D. Ceradini, S. R. Martin, R. Horuk, M. E. MacDonald, H. Stuhlmann, R. A. Koup, and N. R. Landau. 1996. Homozygous defect in HIV-1 coreceptor accounts for resistance of some multiply-exposed individuals to HIV-1 infection. Cell 86:367-377[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 37. | Maddon, P. J., A. G. Dalgleish, J. S. McDougal, P. R. Clapham, R. A. Weiss, and R. Axel. 1986. The T4 gene encodes the AIDS virus receptor and is expressed in the immune system and the brain. Cell 47:333-348[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 38. | Matthews, T. J., C. Wild, C. H. Chen, D. P. Bolognesi, and M. L. Greenberg. 1994. Structural rearrangements in the transmembrane glycoprotein after receptor binding. Immunol. Rev. 140:93-104[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 39. | McDougal, J. S., P. J. Maddon, A. G. Dalgleish, P. R. Clapham, D. R. Littman, M. Godfrey, D. E. Maddon, L. Chess, R. A. Weiss, and R. Axel. 1986. The T4 glycoprotein is a cell-surface receptor for the AIDS virus. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 51:703-711. |
| 40. |
Moore, J. P.,
Q. J. Sattentau,
P. J. Klasse, and L. C. Burkly.
1992.
A monoclonal antibody to CD4 domain 2 blocks soluble CD4-induced conformational changes in the envelope glycoproteins of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-1 infection of CD4+ cells.
J. Virol.
66:4784-4793 |
| 41. |
Mori, K.,
D. J. Ringler,
T. Kodama, and R. C. Desrosiers.
1992.
Complex determinants of macrophage tropism in env of simian immunodeficiency virus.
J. Virol.
66:2067-2075 |
| 42. |
Munoz, A.,
M. C. Wang,
S. Bass,
J. M. Taylor,
L. A. Kingsley,
J. S. Chmiel, and B. F. Polk.
1989.
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-free time after human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) seroconversion in homosexual men. Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study Group.
Am. J. Epidemiol.
130:530-539 |
| 43. | O'Brien, W. A., Y. Koyanagi, A. Namazie, J. Q. Zhao, A. Diagne, K. Idler, J. A. Zack, and I. S. Chen. 1990. HIV-1 tropism for mononuclear phagocytes can be determined by regions of gp120 outside the CD4-binding domain. Nature 348:69-73[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 44. | Poignard, P., R. Sabbe, G. R. Picchio, M. Wang, R. J. Gulizia, H. Katinger, P. W. Parren, D. E. Mosier, and D. R. Burton. 1999. Neutralizing antibodies have limited effects on the control of establised HIV-1 infection in vivo. Immunity 10:431-438[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 45. | Reed, L. J., and H. Muench. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg. 27:493-497. |
| 46. |
Rizzuto, C. D.,
R. Wyatt,
N. Hernandez-Ramos,
Y. Sun,
P. D. Kwong,
W. A. Hendrickson, and J. Sodroski.
1998.
A conserved HIV gp120 glycoprotein structure involved in chemokine receptor binding.
Science
280:1949-1953 |
| 47. |
Roberts, J. D.,
K. Bebenek, and T. A. Kunkel.
1988.
The accuracy of reverse transcriptase from HIV-1.
Science
242:1171-1173 |
| 48. | Rosenberg, P. S., J. J. Goedert, and R. J. Biggar. 1994. Effect of age at seroconversion on the natural AIDS incubation distribution. Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study and the International Registry of Seroconverters. AIDS 8:803-810[Medline]. |
| 49. |
Ross, T. M., and B. R. Cullen.
1998.
The ability of HIV type 1 to use CCR-3 as a coreceptor is controlled by envelope V1/V2 sequences acting in conjunction with a CCR-5 tropic V3 loop.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:7682-7686 |
| 50. | Rutherford, G. W., A. R. Lifson, N. A. Hessol, W. W. Darrow, P. M. O'Malley, S. P. Buchbinder, J. L. Barnhart, T. W. Bodecker, L. Cannon, L. S. Doll, S. D. Holmberg, J. S. Harrison, M. F. Rogers, D. Werdegar, and H. W. Jaffe. 1990. Course of HIV-I infection in a cohort of homosexual and bisexual men: an 11 year follow up study. Br. Med. J. 301:1183, 1990. |
| 51. | Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425[Abstract]. |
| 52. | Samson, M., F. Libert, B. J. Doranz, J. Rucker, C. Liesnard, C. M. Farber, S. Saragosti, C. Lapoumeroulie, J. Cognaux, C. Forceille, G. Muyldermans, C. Verhofstede, G. Burtonboy, M. Georges, T. Imai, S. Rana, Y. Yi, R. J. Smyth, R. G. Collman, R. W. Doms, G. Vassart, and M. Parmentier. 1996. Resistance to HIV-1 infection in caucasian individuals bearing mutant alleles of the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene. Nature 382:722-725[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 53. | Sattentau, Q. J., and J. P. Moore. 1993. The role of CD4 in HIV binding and entry. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 342:59-66[Medline]. |
| 54. | Scarlatti, G., E. Tresoldi, A. Bjorndal, R. Fredriksson, C. Colognesi, H. K. Deng, M. S. Malnati, A. Plebani, A. G. Siccardi, D. R. Littman, E. M. Fenyo, and P. Lusso. 1997. In vivo evolution of HIV-1 co-receptor usage and sensitivity to chemokine-mediated suppression. Nat. Med. 3:1259-1265[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 55. |
Schuitemaker, H.,
M. Koot,
N. A. Kootstra,
M. W. Dercksen,
R. E. de Goede,
R. P. van Steenwijk,
J. M. Lange,
J. K. Schattenkerk,
F. Miedema, and M. Tersmette.
1992.
Biological phenotype of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clones at different stages of infection: progression of disease is associated with a shift from monocytotropic to T-cell-tropic virus population.
J. Virol.
66:1354-1360 |
| 56. |
Shankarappa, R.,
J. B. Margolick,
S. J. Gange,
A. G. Rodrigo,
D. Upchurch,
H. Farzadegan,
P. Gupta,
C. R. Rinaldo,
G. H. Learn,
X. He,
X-L. Huang, and J. I. Mullins.
1999.
Consistent viral evolutionary changes associated with the progression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection.
J. Virol.
73:10489-10502 |
| 57. | Shioda, T., J. A. Levy, and C. Cheng-Mayer. 1991. Macrophage and T cell-line tropisms of HIV-1 are determined by specific regions of the envelope gp120 gene. Nature 349:167-169[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 58. |
Smyth, R. J.,
Y. Yi,
A. Singh, and R. G. Collman.
1998.
Determinants of entry cofactor utilization and tropism in a dual-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primary isolate.
J. Virol.
72:4478-4484 |
| 59. | Tsang, M. L., L. A. Evans, P. McQueen, L. Hurren, C. Byrne, R. Penny, B. Tindall, and D. A. Cooper. 1994. Neutralizing antibodies against sequential autologous human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates after seroconversion. J. Infect. Dis. 170:1141-1147[Medline]. |
| 60. |
van 't Wout, A. B.,
H. Blaak,
L. J. Ran,
M. Brouwer,
C. Kuiken, and H. Schuitemaker.
1998.
Evolution of syncytium-inducing and non-syncytium-inducing biological virus clones in relation to replication kinetics during the course of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection.
J. Virol.
72:5099-6107 |
| 61. |
Wang, Z.,
B. Lee,
J. L. Murray,
F. Bonneau,
Y. Sun,
V. Schweickart,
T. Zhang, and S. C. Peiper.
1999.
CCR5 HIV-1 coreceptor activity. Role of cooperativity between residues in N-terminal extracellular and intracellular domains.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:28413-28419 |
| 62. |
Wang, Z. X.,
J. F. Berson,
T. Y. Zhang,
Y. H. Cen,
Y. Sun,
M. Sharron,
Z. H. Lu, and S. C. Peiper.
1998.
CXCR4 sequences involved in coreceptor determination of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 tropism. Unmasking of activity with M-tropic Env glycoproteins.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:15007-15015 |
| 63. |
Watkins, B. A.,
M. S. Reitz, Jr.,
C. A. Wilson,
K. Aldrich,
A. E. Davis, and M. Robert-Guroff.
1993.
Immune escape by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from neutralizing antibodies: evidence for multiple pathways.
J. Virol.
67:7493-7500 |
| 64. | Wei, X., S. K. Ghosh, M. E. Taylor, V. A. Johnson, E. A. Emini, P. Deutsch, J. D. Lifson, S. Bonhoeffer, M. A. Nowak, B. H. Hahn, et al. 1995. Viral dynamics in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Nature 373:117-122[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 65. |
Westervelt, P.,
H. E. Gendelman, and L. Ratner.
1991.
Identification of a determinant within the human immunodeficiency virus 1 surface envelope glycoprotein critical for productive infection of primary monocytes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:3097-3101 |
| 66. |
Westervelt, P.,
D. B. Trowbridge,
L. G. Epstein,
B. M. Blumberg,
Y. Li,
B. H. Hahn,
G. M. Shaw,
R. W. Price, and L. Ratner.
1992.
Macrophage tropism determinants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in vivo.
J. Virol.
66:2577-2582 |
| 67. | Wyatt, R., P. D. Kwong, E. Desjardins, R. W. Sweet, J. Robinson, W. A. Hendrickson, and J. G. Sodroski. 1998. The antigenic structure of the HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein. Nature 393:705-711[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 68. |
Wyatt, R., and J. Sodroski.
1998.
The HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins: fusogens, antigens, and immunogens.
Science
280:1884-1888 |
| 69. |
Zagury, D.,
A. Lachgar,
V. Chams,
L. S. Fall,
J. Bernard,
J. F. Zagury,
B. Bizzini,
A. Gringeri,
E. Santagostino,
J. Rappaport,
M. Feldman,
S. J. O'Brien,
A. Burny, and R. C. Gallo.
1998.
C-C chemokines, pivotal in protection against HIV type 1 infection.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:3857-3861 |
| 70. |
Zhang, Y. J., and J. P. Moore.
1999.
Will multiple coreceptors need to be targeted by inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 entry?
J. Virol.
73:3443-3448 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»