Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, December 2000, p. 11115-11120, Vol. 74, No. 23
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Determining the Role of the Epstein-Barr Virus Cp
EBNA2-Dependent Enhancer during the Establishment of Latency by
Using Mutant and Wild-Type Viruses Recovered from Cottontop Marmoset
Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines
Lina
Yoo and
Samuel H.
Speck*
Department of Pathology and Immunology,
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Received 1 June 2000/Accepted 30 August 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen (EBNA) 2 (EBNA2) is
involved in upregulating the expression of both EBNAs and
latency-associated membrane proteins. Transcription of the six EBNA
genes, which are expressed in EBV-immortalized primary B cells, arises
from one of two promoters, Cp and Wp, located near the left end of the
viral genome. Wp is exclusively used to drive EBNA gene transcription during the initial stages of infection in primary B cells; induction of
transcription from Cp follows. We previously have mapped an EBNA2-dependent enhancer upstream of Cp (M. Woisetschlaeger et al.,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:3942-3946, 1991) and, more recently,
have demonstrated that deletion of this enhancer results in
EBV-immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) that are heavily
biased toward the use of Wp to drive transcription of the EBNA genes
(L. Yoo et al., J. Virol. 71:9134-9142, 1997). To assess the
immortalizing capacity of this mutant EBV and to monitor the early
events after infection of primary B cells, B cells isolated from
cottontop marmosets were used to generate LCLs immortalized with the Cp
EBNA2 enhancer deletion mutant virus. As previously reported, all
EBV-infected marmoset LCLs examined could be triggered to produce
significant levels of virus. Infection of human B cells with wild-type
or Cp EBNA2 enhancer mutant viruses recovered from marmoset B-cell
lines demonstrated that (i) the Cp EBNA2 enhancer mutant virus
immortalizes primary human B cells nearly as efficiently as wild-type
virus and (ii) the Cp EBNA2-dependent enhancer plays an important role
in the induction of Cp activity during the early stages of infection.
The latter is consistent with the phenotype of LCLs immortalized with
the Cp EBNA2 enhancer mutant EBV. Finally, using an established LCL in
which EBNA2 function is regulated by
-estradiol, we showed that the
loss of EBNA2 function results in an ~4-fold decrease in the
steady-state levels of Cp-initiated transcripts and a concomitant
increase in the steady-state levels of Wp-initiated transcripts. Taken
together, these results provide strong evidence that EBNA2 plays an
important role in regulating Cp activity. These results also
demonstrate that diminished induction of Cp activity does not appear to
affect the ability of EBV to immortalize primary B cells in cultures. Finally, as shown here, infection of marmoset B cells with
immortalization-competent mutants of EBV provides a convenient
reservoir for the production of mutant viruses.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection
of resting human B lymphocytes results in the differentiation of
infected B cells into lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), which can be
passaged indefinitely. These LCLs have an activated B-cell phenotype
and express a subset of viral genes which are crucial for the
transformation of the cells. The viral genes known to be critical for
transformation are EBV nuclear antigens (EBNAs) 1, 2, 3A, and 3C and
latency-associated membrane protein 1 (4, 8, 9, 11, 20).
Expression of the EBNAs in LCLs is driven by the BamHI C
promoter (Cp) and the BamHI W promoter (Wp) (Fig.
1). Studies of virus promoter usage at
early times postinfection have shown that Wp activity is readily
apparent by 18 h postinfection, whereas Cp activity is not
detectable until 48 to 72 h postinfection (18, 21).
When Cp activity rises, Wp activity begins to decline (22). One possible explanation for the decrease in Wp-initiated transcripts is that upstream transcription initiation from Cp may interfere with
transcription initiation from Wp (transcriptional interference). This
hypothesis has been supported by the finding that, in transient transfection assays with reporter constructs containing both Cp and Wp,
Wp activity is induced when Cp is either deleted or inverted (17).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(A) Schematic diagram of the linearized EBV genome. EBNA
open reading frames are indicated as gray arrows. The functions of the
various EBNAs for regulating viral promoter activity are indicated with
plus and minus signs. Viral transcription programs during type I, II,
and III latencies are indicated below the genome diagram. TR, terminal
repeat; IR, internal repeat; Qp, Q promoter. (B) Diagram of regulatory
regions controlling Cp and Wp activities. The top diagram shows
wild-type viral DNA sequences. oriP, latency origin of
replication. Gray box I indicates the location of the glucocorticoid
response element. Box II indicates the location of the Cp
EBNA2-responsive enhancer. Box III indicates the location of the shared
Cp-Wp enhancer. The C1, C2, W0, W1, and W2 exons are shown as black
boxes. The bottom diagram represents the targeting plasmid used to
incorporate the Cp EBNA2-responsive enhancer deletion into the viral
genome. Cp*, tagged Cp in which the C1 exon contains a nucleotide
sequence tag as previously described (23).
|
|
The kinetics of Cp upregulation after B-cell infection may be explained
in part by the action of the EBNA2-dependent enhancer located 350 bp
upstream of Cp. Consistent with this hypothesis, we have previously
shown that LCLs harboring a Cp EBNA2 enhancer deletion mutant virus use
Wp almost exclusively to drive EBNA transcription, whereas most
wild-type (wt) EBV-infected LCLs predominantly use Cp to drive
transcription of the EBNA genes (23). A separate characterization of LCLs harboring a mutant EBV in which the RBP-J
binding site in the Cp EBNA2-dependent enhancer was mutated revealed a
more modest impact on Cp activity (6); this result may
reflect either the ability of the other cis elements in the
EBNA2 enhancer to function in the absence of a functional RBP-J
site
or residual activity of the mutated RBP-J
site.
To date, it has not been possible to examine the initial stages of
infection of resting B cells with the Cp EBNA2 enhancer deletion mutant
virus or to rigorously determine whether this virus is impaired for
B-cell immortalization, because of the lack of productively infected
cell lines harboring this mutant. Here we report the generation of
cottontop marmoset LCLs harboring either wt EBV or the Cp EBNA2
enhancer mutant virus and demonstrate the general utility of such cell
lines for producing stocks of EBV that can be used to monitor early
events after infection of primary B cells. This approach was used to
critically compare the immortalizing capacity of the Cp EBNA2 enhancer
mutant virus to that of wt EBV as well as to determine the role of the
Cp EBNA2-dependent enhancer in upregulating Cp-initiated transcription
during the establishment of latency.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Generation of marmoset LCLs.
Cp EBNA2 enhancer deletion
mutant-infected marmoset LCLs (mE2mut) were generated as follows. One
day prior to infection, HS68 fibroblasts were irradiated with 3,000 rads and plated in 96-well plates. Human LCLs (clone 19-112) (7 × 106) harboring the Cp EBNA2 enhancer mutant virus were
resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium, 10% fetal calf serum, 1 µg of
tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate (TPA) per ml, and 1 µM ionomycin. On
the day of infection, 2 to 3 ml of heparinized cottontop marmoset
(Saguinus oedipus) blood (generously provided by Ronald
Desrosiers) was diluted 1:1 in phosphate-buffered saline, and
mononuclear cells were isolated on a Histopaque (Sigma) gradient.
Platelets were removed by spinning the cells at 1,000 × g through a cushion of fetal calf serum and recovering the pellet.
Erythrocytes were lysed by TAC treatment (9 parts 140 mM
NH4Cl, 1 part 17 mM Tris). Marmoset peripheral blood
mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were washed and resuspended in cold (4°C)
complete RPMI 1640 medium. Human LCLs which had been treated with
TPA-ionomycin were washed twice in complete RPMI 1640 medium,
irradiated with 7,000 rads, and cocultured with marmoset PBMCs in
96-well plates in the presence of 1 µg of cyclosporin A per ml
(3). Both the human LCLs and the marmoset PBMCs were plated
at densities of 5 × 104 cells/well. Wells were
monitored for LCL formation over several months, and LCLs were expanded
on feeder layers until they were well established.
mB95 cells were generated by purifying marmoset PBMCs as described
above, infecting them with 10 µl of B95.8 virus stock for 2 h,
washing them, and plating them on a feeder layer in the presence of
cyclosporin A.
Nucleic acid hybridization blots.
Southern blotting was
performed as previously described (23). To quantitate the
amount of viral DNA in virus stocks, 100 µl of virus stock was
treated with DNase I by mixing with 100 µl of 2× DNase I incubation
buffer (100 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 20 mM MgCl2, 100 µg of
bovine serum albumin per ml) and 280 ng of DNase I to remove unpackaged
DNA. The samples were incubated for 30 min at 37°C, mixed, and
incubated for an additional 5 min, followed by the addition of 5 µl
of 0.5 M EDTA (pH 8) to stop DNase I digestion. Virions were
subsequently lysed by mixing with 200 µl of 2× lysis buffer (2%
Sarkosyl, 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 40 mM Tris [pH 7.5],
200 mM NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 100 µg of proteinase K per ml) and
incubation for 1 h at room temperature. Samples were extracted
with 1:1 phenol-CHCl3 and ethanol precipated.
Dilutions of viral DNA were denatured in 0.4 N NaOH-10 mM EDTA (pH 8),
heated for 5 min at 37°C, mixed with 20× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl
plus 0.015 M sodium citrate), and loaded into wells of a Bio-Dot SF
apparatus (Bio-Rad). Hybond membranes (Amersham) were used for sample
binding. Prehybridization, hybridization, and wash protocols were
performed as for Southern blotting. An oriP-specific probe
(bp 7316 to 9135) was used, and signal intensity was quantified with a
PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
S1 nuclease protection.
RNA was prepared as previously
described. S1 nuclease protection assays were performed as previously
described with 10 µg of RNA from each sample in all experiments,
except for the
-estradiol titration experiment with the er/eb 2-5 cell line in which 40 µg of RNA was used. The sequences of the W0-W1
and C1 S1 nuclease probes have been previously published. The sequence
of the C1-C2 S1 nuclease probe was
5'-ACGTGCAGGAGGCTGTTTCTTCAGTCGGTTTAGATGATTTGGTATCGGAGCTGGACCTA-3'. The sequence of the BHLF1 S1 nuclease probe was 5'-GCTGGG
AGGTGTGCACCCCCCGAGCGTCTGGACGAGCTGGCGAGCCGGGCCGG CTCGCC-3'.
Transformation assay.
Partially purified human peripheral B
cells were prepared from leukopaks by E-rosette depletion of T cells
(13). For each virus stock, 100, 10, 1, and 0.1 µl of
virus was used to infect 3 × 106 human B lymphocytes
in a 1-ml volume for 2 h at 37°C. Infected cells were plated on
irradiated fibroblast feeder layers (HS68) in 96-well plates at a
density of 5 × 104 cells/well. After 3.5 weeks,
plates were screened on a weekly basis for the presence of LCLs. At 10 weeks, final counts were made to determine the transforming titer of
the virus stocks at the appropriate dilutions.
 |
RESULTS |
Production of marmoset LCLs.
PBMCs were purified from 2- to
3-ml samples of heparinized cottontop marmoset (S. oedipus)
blood. Marmoset LCLs were generated using one of two protocols. For the
generation of marmoset LCLs infected with the B95.8 strain of EBV,
marmoset PBMCs were directly infected with a high-titer B95.8 cell-free
viral preparation for 2 h, followed by washing and plating of the
cells on irradiated fibroblasts in 96-well plates. This method,
however, was not successful in generating marmoset LCLs that harbor the
Cp EBNA2 enhancer deletion mutant virus. The latter result was
presumably due to the fact that the human LCLs immortalized with the Cp
EBNA2 enhancer deletion mutant virus are tightly latent; thus, it is
difficult to induce reactivation. In addition, marmoset B cells are
more difficult to immortalize with EBV than human B cells. As an
alternative method, we used cocultivation of marmoset B cells with
human LCLs that had been treated with TPA and ionomycin for 24 h,
washed, and irradiated with 7,000 rads. These irradiated LCLs were then cocultured with marmoset PBMCs on fibroblast feeder layers in 96-well
plates in the presence of cyclosporin A. This method was successfully
used to generate multiple marmoset LCLs harboring the Cp EBNA2 enhancer
deletion mutant virus.
The presence of the Cp EBNA2-dependent enhancer deletion in the
marmoset LCLs established with mutant virus recovered from human clone
LCL 19-112 (23) was verified by Southern blot analyses (data
not shown). We investigated the spontaneous lytic activity and
TPA-ionomycin inducibility of the marmoset LCLs. The analysis of
independently derived marmoset LCLs demonstrated that, as a general
rule, marmoset LCLs are significantly more inducible than human LCLs
(data not shown), and most of the newly established marmoset LCLs were
more inducible than the established B95.8 marmoset LCL.
Virus stocks were generated by resuspending 4 × 108
cells in 1.2 liters of complete medium in a roller bottle and leaving
the culture for 11 days without further feeding. The cells were
subsequently spun down, the supernatant was recovered, and the virus
was concentrated 100-fold by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 2 h. The resulting virus stocks were quantified using a
DNA dot blot (Fig. 2), and titers were
determined using a B-cell immortalization assay (Fig. 3). Both assays revealed higher viral
titers in the new marmoset LCL (mB95) stock than in the stock prepared
from the established B95.8 cell line (B95.8). The viral DNA dot blot,
done with a probe containing oriP (the latency origin of
replication), demonstrated that the mB95 stock had about eightfold more
viral DNA than the B95.8 stock (Fig. 2). Consistent with this analysis,
the transformation assay demonstrated that there was a ninefold higher
level of immortalizing units in the mB95 stock than in the B95.8 stock
(Fig. 3). Notably, at higher input virus levels with the mB95 stock
and, to a lesser extent with the mE2mut stock, there was a delay in the
appearance of LCLs, suggesting that either higher virus titers or some
substance present in these stocks may mildly delay LCL outgrowth (Fig.
3). Based on the viral DNA dot blot, the mE2mut stock had about
sevenfold more virus that the B95.8 stock (Fig. 2). Importantly, the
mE2mut stock demonstrated about fivefold more immortalizing units than the B95.8 stock (Fig. 3). Based on the good correlation between viral
DNA content and immortalization titer observed with the B95.8 and mB95
stocks, estimating virus titer by measuring the amount of viral DNA
present in a virus stock appears reasonable. This has been confirmed by
additional analyses of B-cell immortalization with other mB95 and
mutant virus stocks (unpublished data). Although the mE2mut virus and
the B95.8 virus are not isogenic, a previous study has shown that when
an EBNA2 gene from the B95.8 genome is recombined into the P3HR1
genome, the resulting intertypic virus has a transforming efficiency
similar to that of the B95.8 virus (4). The mE2mut virus is
just such an intertypic virus, except that it harbors the Cp
EBNA2-dependent enhancer deletion as well. These data therefore
indicate that little or no reduction in B-cell immortalization is
caused by deletion of the Cp EBNA2-dependent enhancer.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
PhosphorImager analysis of a dot blot measuring the
quantity of viral DNA in viral stocks. B95.8, mB95, and mE2mut stocks
(1, 2, 10, and 20 µl) were lysed, blotted onto a nitrocellulose
membrane, and hybridized with a probe specific for oriP.
Relative signal quantitation is indicated in parentheses.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
B-cell immortalization determining the transformation
titer of viral stocks. Viral stocks at 100 ( ), 10 ( ), 1 ( ), or
0.1 µl ( ) were used to infect 3 × 106 primary B
cells for 2 h. Cells were then plated in 96-well plates and
examined for LCL formation over a period of 10 weeks. LCL-positive
wells were scored on a weekly basis. p.i., postinfection.
|
|
Examination of promoter usage at early times postinfection.
Equivalent amounts of mB95 and mE2mut viruses, as determined by the
viral DNA dot blot, were used to infect 2 × 108
purified human B cells. Cells were harvested at 24, 72, and 120 h
postinfection, and RNA was prepared. S1 nuclease protection assays were
performed using probes specific for transcripts initiating from Cp or
Wp (Fig. 4). The Cp-specific probe spans
the C1-C2 exon junction, while the Wp-specific probe hybridizes to the
5' end of the W0 exon through the W0-W1 exon junction. We did not assay
for the presence of W0-W1' spliced transcripts, since previous analyses
of early viral transcription during the establishment of B-cell latency
indicated that (i) the majority of Wp-initiated transcripts at early
times contain the W0-W1 exon splicing pattern and (ii) there is no
apparent change in the relative ratio of W0-W1 and W0-W1' spliced
transcripts over time (1).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
S1 nuclease protection analysis of promoter activity at
early times after infection with viral stocks. Peripheral blood
lymphocytes were infected with mB95 or mE2mut virus, and cells were
harvested for RNA at 24, 72, and 122 h postinfection. RNA (10 µg) was probed for Cp- and Wp-initiated transcripts. pos. cntl.,
positive control. (A) Representative experiment. (B) Summary of four
experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
|
Analysis of the infection time courses showed that while relatively
high levels of Cp-initiated transcripts were detectable by 120 h
after infection with the mB95 virus, only a low level of Cp activity
was detectable by 120 h after infection with the mE2mut virus
(Fig. 4). In contrast, the mE2mut virus continued to exhibit high
levels of Wp-initiated transcripts at 120 h postinfection, whereas
in mB95-infected B cells, the levels of Wp-initiated transcripts routinely started to fall by this time (Fig. 4). These data are consistent with the previously observed bias of LCLs immortalized with
the Cp EBNA2 enhancer deletion mutant virus toward the use of Wp to
drive EBNA gene transcription and suggest that the Cp EBNA2-dependent
enhancer plays an important role during the establishment of latency in
the upregulation of transcription from Cp. The strong "protection"
of the full-length Wp probe observed at 72 h after infection with
the mB95 virus (Fig. 4A) was not observed in other experiments and thus
likely represents a small amount of probe which was not exposed to S1
nuclease digestion.
Effect of EBNA2 on promoter usage in an established LCL.
The
early-time-point S1 nuclease protection assay, as well as previous
studies of established LCLs harboring the Cp EBNA2 enhancer deletion
mutant virus, have shown that the EBNA2-responsive enhancer is critical
for Cp activity. Previous studies from our laboratory have also
provided evidence that Cp-initiated transcription may directly serve to
downregulate Wp activity by interfering with Wp-initiated transcription
(17). To further investigate this hypothesis, promoter
activity was examined in the EBNA2-conditional LCL er/eb 2-5. This cell
line contains an estrogen receptor-EBNA2 fusion protein which renders
EBNA2 function dependent on the presence of
-estradiol
(10). It has been shown that this cell line growth arrests
and dies within a few days upon withdrawal of
-estradiol. Thus, the
er/eb 2-5 cell line is normally passaged in 1 µM
-estradiol, since
full EBNA2 function is present at this concentration. Control of
-estradiol levels in the cell medium allowed us to manipulate Cp
activity via the EBNA2-responsive enhancer while simultaneously monitoring Wp activity. Cells were incubated for 48 h in 1, 0.1, 0.01, or 0 µM
-estradiol and then harvested for preparation of RNA. Notably, no cell death was evident at this time. In addition, we
determined that the presence of
-estradiol did not affect the levels
of Cp- or Wp-initiated transcripts in three independently generated
LCLs harboring wt EBV (data not shown). RNA samples from the er/eb 2-5 cell line were assayed for promoter activity by an S1 nuclease
protection assay, using probes which hybridized to the C1 exon or the
W0-W1 exon junction, to identify Cp- or Wp-initiated transcripts,
respectively. As expected, Cp activity correspondingly decreased as
-estradiol concentrations were decreased, since EBNA2 function was
diminished (Fig. 5). Furthermore, Wp activity significantly increased as
-estradiol concentrations were
decreased, again demonstrating a direct relationship between decreased
Cp activity and induction of Wp activity.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
S1 nuclease protection assay of er/eb 2-5 cells
incubated with various concentrations of -estradiol for 48 h.
RNA was harvested and probed for Cp- and Wp-initiated transcription.
Undigested probe is in the left lane of each panel. -estradiol
concentrations, from left to right, were 1, 0.1, 0.01, and 0 µM,
respectively. (A) Actual S1 nuclease assay autoradiograph. (B)
PhosphorImager quantitation of data from panel A.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
An increasing number of engineered EBV mutants have been generated
in the past decade. Some of the strategies used to produce these
mutants have involved infecting human B cells with pools of virus from
transfected P3HR1 cells and then screening resulting clonal LCLs for
viral genomes with the desired recombinant mutation. Once the desired
virus is latent in these cells, however, it is difficult to generate
large quantities of viral particles because human LCLs are refractory
to lytic induction with currently known methods. TPA, sodium butyrate,
ionomycin, 5-azacytidine, and dexamethasone (2, 12, 14, 24)
are examples of chemicals with which we have treated human LCLs in
order to boost lytic induction. However, in our experiments, none of
these methods induced newly established LCLs to sufficient levels to
produce high-titer viral stocks.
To circumvent this limitation, we have developed a method for
generating marmoset LCLs that allows the production of relatively large
quantities of mutant virus which can be used for analysis of the early
events in B-cell immortalization. This approach is limited to EBV
mutants that retain immortalizing capacity, since it is dependent on
the immortalization of marmoset B cells. Previous studies have shown
that marmoset LCLs are more spontaneously lytic than human LCLs and
therefore might be useful for virus production (5, 15, 16).
However, marmoset B cells are relatively difficult to transform with
EBV, perhaps due to high levels of spontaneous lytic activity during
initial infection. Using cocultivation of irradiated human LCLs with
marmoset PBMCs, we have been able to generate marmoset LCLs harboring
the virus strain of interest.
We have used this approach to analyze the behavior of the Cp EBNA2
enhancer deletion mutant virus during the early stages of infection of
primary B cells. We have demonstrated, using a robust and quantitative
immortalization assay, that deletion of the Cp EBNA2-dependent enhancer
does not diminish the immortalizing capacity of this virus in vitro.
However, this mutation does affect the induction of Cp-initiated
transcription during the establishment of EBV latency. The latter
observation demonstrates that EBNA2 plays an important role in the
induction of Cp activity and is consistent with our previous analyses
of LCLs harboring the deletion virus, which exhibited only low levels
of Cp-initiated transcription. Based on the current analyses, as well
as previous characterizations of the kinetics of induction of
Cp-initiated transcription during the early stages of B-cell infection
(18, 21), it appears that both EBNA2 and EBNA1 are required
for efficient induction of Cp-initiated transcripts.
Previous analyses of EBNA gene transcription indicated that Wp activity
is directly linked to Cp activity. Notably, here we have shown that the
failure to efficiently induce Cp-initiated transcription during the
early stages of primary infection leads to a continued high level of
transcription from Wp. Thus, upregulation of transcription from the
distal EBNA gene promoter Cp results in diminished transcription from
the proximal EBNA gene promoter Wp, consistent with transcriptional
interference. In support of this hypothesis, we have previously shown,
using reporter constructs, that inversion or deletion of Cp results in
maximal Wp activity (17). Here we have extended this
analysis by examining the impact of diminished EBNA2 activity on
transcription initiation from Cp and Wp. As predicted from the analysis
of the Cp EBNA2 enhancer deletion mutant virus, diminished EBNA2
activity led to decreased levels of Cp-initiated transcripts and
increased levels of Wp-initiated transcripts. Thus, all the available
data strongly argue that transcription initiation from Cp directly
diminishes the level of Wp-initiated transcription.
Several independent lines of evidence indicate that diminished, or
absent, Cp activity does not adversely affect EBV immortalization of
primary B cells in vitro (19, 23). The current data from the
analysis of EBNA gene transcription demonstrate that Wp-initiated EBNA
gene transcripts can fully substitute for Cp-driven EBNA gene
transcripts. Still unresolved is the importance of Cp during EBV
infection in vivo. Analysis of the sequences around Cp in two primate
lymphocryptoviruses has demonstrated the preservation of all the known
cis elements involved in regulating Cp (7). This
finding argues that the functions of Cp that distinguish it from Wp are
well conserved among the related primate viruses and suggests that Cp
plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of these viruses. While
Wp-initiated transcription appears to be regulated largely by cellular
factors, Cp-initiated transcription has evolved to be tightly regulated
by EBNA gene products. Thus, there may be a situation in vivo where
this feedback regulation of EBNA gene expression plays a critical role.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank George Bornkamm and Bettina Kempkes for the er/eb 2-5 cell line. We also thank David Leib, Peggy MacDonald, Lynda Morrison,
Skip Virgin, and members of their laboratories for helpful discussions
during weekly laboratory meetings.
This research was supported by NIH grant R01 CA43143.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathology, Box 8118, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. Phone: (314) 362-0367. Fax: (314) 362-4096. E-mail:
speck{at}pathology.wustl.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alfieri, C.,
M. Birkenbach, and E. Kieff.
1991.
Early events in Epstein-Barr virus infection of human B lymphocytes.
Virology
181:595-608[CrossRef][Medline]. (Erratum, 185:946.)
|
| 2.
|
Ben Sasson, S. A., and G. Klein.
1981.
Activation of the Epstein-Barr virus genome by 5-aza-cytidine in latently infected human lymphoid lines.
Int. J. Cancer
28:131-135[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Chang, R. S., and M. L. Lung.
1994.
A modified procedure for the propagation of wild-type Epstein-Barr virus in cultures of marmoset blood cells.
J. Virol. Methods
46:167-178[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Cohen, J. I.,
F. Wang,
J. Mannick, and E. Kieff.
1989.
Epstein-Barr virus nuclear protein 2 is a key determinant of lymphocyte transformation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:9558-9562[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Desgranges, C.,
G. Lenoir,
G. de The,
J. M. Seigneurin,
J. Hilgers, and P. Dubouch.
1976.
In vitro transforming activity of EBV. I. Establishment and properties of two EBV strains (M81 and M72) produced by immortalized Callithrix jacchus lymphocytes.
Biomedicine
25:349-352[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Evans, T. J.,
P. J. Farrell, and S. Swaminathan.
1996.
Molecular genetic analysis of Epstein-Barr virus Cp promoter function.
J. Virol.
70:1695-1705[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Fuentes-Panana, E. M.,
S. Swaminathan, and P. D. Ling.
1999.
Transcriptional activation signals found in the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latency C promoter are conserved in the latency C promoter sequences from baboon and rhesus monkey EBV-like lymphocryptoviruses (cercopithicine herpesviruses 12 and 15).
J. Virol.
73:826-833[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Hammerschmidt, W., and B. Sugden.
1989.
Genetic analysis of immortalizing functions of Epstein-Barr virus in human B lymphocytes.
Nature
340:393-397[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Kaye, K. M.,
K. M. Izumi, and E. Kieff.
1993.
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 is essential for B-lymphocyte growth transformation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:9150-9154[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Kempkes, B.,
U. Zimber-Strobl,
G. Eissner,
M. Pawlita,
M. Falk,
W. Hammerschmidt, and G. W. Bornkamm.
1996.
Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA2)-oestrogen receptor fusion proteins complement the EBNA2-deficient Epstein-Barr virus strain P3HR1 in transformation of primary B cells but suppress growth of human B cell lymphoma lines.
J. Gen. Virol.
77:227-237[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Lee, M. A.,
M. E. Diamond, and J. L. Yates.
1999.
Genetic evidence that EBNA-1 is needed for efficient, stable latent infection by Epstein-Barr virus.
J. Virol.
73:2974-2982[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Luka, J.,
B. Kallin, and G. Klein.
1979.
Induction of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) cycle in latently infected cells by n-butyrate.
Virology
94:228-231[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Madsen, M.,
H. E. Johnsen,
P. W. Hansen, and S. E. Christiansen.
1980.
Isolation of human T and B lymphocytes by E-rosette gradient centrifugation. Characterization of the isolated subpopulations.
J. Immunol. Methods
33:323-336[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Magrath, I. T.,
P. A. Pizzo,
L. Novikovs, and A. S. Levine.
1979.
Enhancement of Epstein-Barr virus replication in producer cell lines by a combination of low temperature and corticosteroids.
Virology
97:477-481[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Miller, G.,
D. Coope,
J. Niederman, and J. Pagano.
1976.
Biological properties and viral surface antigens of Burkitt lymphoma- and mononucleosis-derived strains of Epstein-Barr virus released from transformed marmoset cells.
J. Virol.
18:1071-1080[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Miller, G., and M. Lipman.
1973.
Release of infectious Epstein-Barr virus by transformed marmoset leukocytes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
70:190-194[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Puglielli, M. T.,
N. Desai, and S. H. Speck.
1997.
Regulation of EBNA gene transcription in lymphoblastoid cell lines: characterization of sequences downstream of BCR2 (Cp).
J. Virol.
71:120-128[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Schlager, S.,
S. H. Speck, and M. Woisetschläger.
1996.
Transcription of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) gene occurs before induction of the BCR2 (Cp) EBNA gene promoter during the initial stages of infection in B cells.
J. Virol.
70:3561-3570[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Swaminathan, S.
1996.
Characterization of Epstein-Barr virus recombinants with deletions of the BamHI C promoter.
Virology
217:532-541[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Tomkinson, B.,
E. Robertson, and E. Kieff.
1993.
Epstein-Barr virus nuclear proteins EBNA-3A and EBNA-3C are essential for B-lymphocyte growth transformation.
J. Virol.
67:2014-2025[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Woisetschlaeger, M.,
X. W. Jin,
C. N. Yandava,
L. A. Furmanski,
J. L. Strominger, and S. H. Speck.
1991.
Role for the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2 in viral promoter switching during initial stages of infection.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:3942-3946[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Woisetschlaeger, M.,
C. N. Yandava,
L. A. Furmanski,
J. L. Strominger, and S. H. Speck.
1990.
Promoter switching in Epstein-Barr virus during the initial stages of infection of B lymphocytes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:1725-1729[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Yoo, L. I.,
M. Mooney,
M. T. Puglielli, and S. H. Speck.
1997.
B-cell lines immortalized with an Epstein-Barr virus mutant lacking the Cp EBNA2 enhancer are biased toward utilization of the oriP-proximal EBNA gene promoter Wp1.
J. Virol.
71:9134-9142[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
zur Hausen, H.,
F. J. O'Neill,
U. K. Freese, and E. Hecker.
1978.
Persisting oncogenic herpesvirus induced by the tumour promoter TPA.
Nature
272:373-375[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, December 2000, p. 11115-11120, Vol. 74, No. 23
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Hutchings, I. A., Tierney, R. J., Kelly, G. L., Stylianou, J., Rickinson, A. B., Bell, A. I.
(2006). Methylation Status of theEpstein-Barr Virus (EBV) BamHI W Latent Cycle Promoter and Promoter Activity: Analysis with Novel EBV-Positive Burkitt and Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines. J. Virol.
80: 10700-10711
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Altmann, M., Pich, D., Ruiss, R., Wang, J., Sugden, B., Hammerschmidt, W.
(2006). Transcriptional activation by EBV nuclear antigen 1 is essential for the expression of EBV's transforming genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
103: 14188-14193
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Elliott, J., Goodhew, E. B., Krug, L. T., Shakhnovsky, N., Yoo, L., Speck, S. H.
(2004). Variable Methylation of the Epstein-Barr Virus Wp EBNA Gene Promoter in B-Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines. J. Virol.
78: 14062-14065
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chau, C. M., Lieberman, P. M.
(2004). Dynamic Chromatin Boundaries Delineate a Latency Control Region of Epstein-Barr Virus. J. Virol.
78: 12308-12319
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Borestrom, C., Zetterberg, H., Liff, K., Rymo, L.
(2002). Functional Interaction of Nuclear Factor Y and Sp1 Is Required for Activation of the Epstein-Barr Virus C Promoter. J. Virol.
77: 821-829
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yoo, L. I., Woloszynek, J., Templeton, S., Speck, S. H.
(2002). Deletion of Epstein-Barr Virus Regulatory Sequences Upstream of the EBNA Gene Promoter Wp1 Is Unfavorable for B-Cell Immortalization. J. Virol.
76: 11763-11769
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nilsson, T., Zetterberg, H., Wang, Y. C., Rymo, L.
(2001). Promoter-Proximal Regulatory Elements Involved in oriP-EBNA1-Independent and -Dependent Activation of the Epstein-Barr Virus C Promoter in B-Lymphoid Cell Lines. J. Virol.
75: 5796-5811
[Abstract]
[Full Text]