Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, November 2000, p. 10122-10131, Vol. 74, No. 21
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Dominant-Negative Herpesvirus Protein Inhibits Intranuclear
Targeting of Viral Proteins: Effects on DNA Replication and Late
Gene Expression
Elizabeth E.
McNamee,
Travis J
Taylor, and
David M.
Knipe*
Committee on Virology and Department of
Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Received 11 April 2000/Accepted 14 August 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The d105 dominant-negative mutant form of the herpes
simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) single-stranded DNA-binding protein, ICP8
(d105 ICP8), inhibits wild-type viral replication, and it
blocks both viral DNA replication and late gene transcription, although
to different degrees (M. Gao and D. M. Knipe, J. Virol.
65:2666-2675, 1991; Y. M. Chen and D. M. Knipe, Virology
221:281-290, 1996). We demonstrate here that this protein is also
capable of preventing the formation of intranuclear prereplicative
sites and replication compartments during HSV infection. We defined
three patterns of ICP8 localization using indirect immunofluorescence
staining of HSV-1-infected cells: large replication compartments, small
compartments, and no specific intranuclear localization of ICP8. Cells
that form large replication compartments replicate viral DNA and
express late genes. Cells that form small replication compartments
replicate viral DNA but do not express late genes, while cells without
viral replication compartments are incapable of both DNA replication and late gene expression. The d105 ICP8 protein blocks
formation of prereplicative sites and large replication compartments in 80% of infected cells and formation of large replication compartments in the remaining 20% of infected cells. The phenotype of
d105 suggests a correlation between formation of large
replication compartments and late gene expression and a role for
intranuclear rearrangement of viral DNA and bound proteins in
activation of late gene transcription. Thus, these results provide
evidence for specialized machinery for late gene expression within
replication compartments.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) is a
double-stranded DNA virus with a 150-kbp genome. During productive
infection, it replicates in the nucleus of the host cell. HSV gene
expression occurs in a temporally regulated cascade in which viral
genes are transcribed in a specific order, and their expression
is tightly controlled by other HSV gene products. The immediate-early
(IE) genes are transcribed first after viral DNA is deposited in the
nucleus and encode multiple activators of viral gene expression. These proteins stimulate expression of the early (E) genes, which
include the viral DNA replication proteins. Seven viral proteins are
required for HSV DNA replication: the helicase-primase complex (UL5,
UL8, and UL52), the origin-binding protein (UL9), the
single-stranded DNA-binding protein (UL29 or ICP8), the
DNA polymerase (UL30), and the polymerase processivity factor (UL42).
In addition to these seven proteins, unknown host cell factors are
likely to be required, as it has not been possible to initiate
origin-dependent HSV DNA replication outside an intact cell nucleus.
Once viral DNA has been replicated, the late (L) genes are expressed.
DNA replication and late gene expression have always been considered to
be tightly linked, and it had been difficult to separate the two
processes genetically (36).
Viral DNA replication in HSV-infected cells occurs within specific
regions of the cell nucleus. When the locations of viral replication
proteins and viral DNA are visualized in infected cells by indirect
immunofluorescence or with a viral protein fused to the green
fluorescent protein (GFP), they are all observed to congregate in
compartments that start as small dots early in infection (termed
prereplicative sites) and grow to eventually fill the nucleus
(8, 33; T. J Taylor, E. E. McNamee, and D. M. Knipe, unpublished data). These globular structures were named replication compartments (33). Viral DNA replication
(8) and much of the late gene transcription occur within the
boundaries of these structures (21, 32, 34, 39). When viral
replication is blocked, the replication proteins are still targeted to
and remain in the small punctate prereplicative sites (33).
A study of binucleate cells demonstrated that the shape and location of replication compartments within the nucleus are determined by the host
cell nuclear architecture (9). It has also been demonstrated that some of the prereplicative sites observed early in infection are
localized adjacent to the nuclear ND10 sites (26, 30, 40).
ND10 sites are nuclear matrix-associated complexes containing PML,
Sp100, and other proteins (1, 11, 22, 41). Their function in
uninfected cells is not yet known, but in HSV-infected cells they are
disrupted by proteasomal degradation in a pathway requiring the HSV
immediate-early gene product ICP0 (12, 13, 28, 29). It is
thought that ND10 proteins serve as markers of a specific site of viral
DNA deposition upon entry into the cell nucleus, as the genomes
of other DNA viruses are also known to be present next to ND10
(19).
ND10 sites serve as the initial site of HSV DNA deposition, and
immediate-early and early gene transcription occurs at these sites
(30). Once the immediate-early genes are expressed,
ICP0 leads to the disruption of the ND10 sites, but the viral DNA and viral replication proteins remain, and prereplicative sites are formed
adjacent to the original ND10 site locations (2, 30, 40).
Viral DNA replication is initiated here, and replication compartments
are formed (2, 30, 33, 40).
ICP8, the single-stranded DNA-binding protein, is an essential part of
the DNA replication machinery (5, 7). ICP8 plays several
additional roles in the HSV lytic life cycle. Genetic studies have
demonstrated that ICP8 is required for the localization of viral
replication and cellular proteins to replication compartments (3,
8). ICP8 is also implicated in the regulation of gene expression
by exerting a negative effect on transcription from the parental genome
(16-18) and a positive effect on late gene expression from
progeny genomes (15).
This report continues the description of the d105 mutant of
ICP8 and this mutant's ability to differentially affect DNA
replication and late gene expression. The d105 ICP8 mutant
contains a deletion near its C terminus (residues 1082 to 1169), which
leaves the nuclear localization signal intact. Previous reports have
demonstrated that d105 ICP8 acts as a dominant-negative
repressor of wild-type ICP8 activity (6, 15). When expressed
in Vero cells, either by transient transfection or in a stably
transfected cell line, d105 ICP8 inhibits the replication of
wild-type virus by 50- to 100-fold. d105 ICP8 can bind
single-stranded DNA with an affinity similar to that of wild-type ICP8,
and transfection of large amounts of the wild-type ICP8 gene can
overcome its inhibitory effect, indicating that d105 ICP8 is
most likely acting as a competitive inhibitor of wild-type ICP8.
d105 ICP8 manifests its repression of ICP8 function with
effects on both DNA replication and late gene expression. To study
these effects, we isolated a cell line that stably expresses the
d105 ICP8 protein (V2.6 cell line) (15). When
V2.6 cells are infected with wild-type HSV-1, there is a fivefold
reduction in DNA replication and a 50- to 100-fold reduction in late
gene expression (15), which is manifested at the
transcriptional level (6). Previous experiments have
demonstrated that the 50- to 100-fold repression of late gene
expression in V2.6 cells is far greater than what would occur in normal
infection with DNA replication levels reduced to 20% of the wild-type
level (6, 15). Here, we demonstrate that the d105
ICP8 protein fails to localize to replication compartments and prevents
wild-type ICP8 and the other replication proteins and transcription
factors from localizing to prereplicative sites and replication
compartments as well.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells and viruses.
Vero (American Type Culture Collection
[ATCC]) and CV-1 (ATCC) monkey kidney cells were grown and maintained
as described previously (20). The S2 and V2.6 cell lines
expressing wild-type ICP8 and d105 ICP8, respectively, were
derived from Vero cells (14, 15). The C8 and C105 cell lines
expressing ICP8 and d105 ICP8, respectively, were derived
from CV-1 cells, as described below. All transformed cell lines were
grown in Dulbecco's modification of Eagle's medium (DMEM; Media Tech,
Herndon, Va.)-10% fetal bovine serum containing 500 µg of G418
(GIBCO) per ml. The HSV-1 wild-type strain KOS was propagated and
titered as described previously (20). The 8GFP virus
containing an ICP8-GFP fusion in the ICP8 locus of HSV-1 wild-type
strain KOS1.1 was propagated on S2 cells, and the titers of the virus
were determined on both Vero cells and S2 cells (Taylor et al.,
unpublished). The n212 ICP0 mutant virus containing a
nonsense mutation in the ICP0 gene of HSV-1 KOS (4) was
kindly provided by Priscilla Schaffer (University of Pennsylvania). The
titer of the n212 virus was determined by titration on a
complementing cell line (U20S cells). The n212 virus was
used a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2, which was shown to be
sufficient for the formation of replication compartments (data not shown).
Plasmids.
The p8B-S (ICP8 gene in a
BamHI-SacI fragment), pSVneo (neomycin gene
driven by the simian virus 40 promoter) plasmids were described
previously (14). The pSVd105 (d105
ICP8 gene driven by the simian virus 40 promoter) plasmid was described
previously (15).
Isolation of stably transfected cell lines.
The C8 CV-1 cell
line expressing wild-type ICP8 and the C105 CV-1 cell line expressing
d105 ICP8 were constructed by transfecting CV-1 cells with
either p8B-S and pSVneo or pSVd105 and pSVneo plasmids,
respectively. Cells were incubated in medium containing G418 (500 µg/ml) until colonies of cells formed. Colonies of cells were picked,
expanded, and tested for either complementation of an ICP8 mutant virus
(C8 cells) or repression of wild-type virus infection (C105 cells).
Infections.
Infections were performed at an MOI of 2 PFU per
cell. Virus was diluted in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
containing 0.1% glucose and 1% heat-inactivated newborn calf serum
and incubated with cells for 1 h at 37°C. The overlay medium was
then changed to medium 199 containing 1% heat-inactivated calf serum.
In infections containing n-butyrate to block the host cell
cycle in the G1 phase (37), the growth medium
was replaced with medium 199 containing 1% calf serum supplemented
with 100 µM n-butyric acid and 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.6)
12 to 15 h prior to infection as described previously
(40). A 100× n-butyric acid-HEPES solution was
made up fresh for each experiment. For bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)
incorporation, a 100× (10 mM) stock was made up in DMEM and frozen in
aliquots. BrdU was added to the medium 30 min prior to harvesting cells.
Indirect immunofluorescence and antibodies.
Cells were grown
on glass coverslips in 24-well plates. At the times indicated, the
coverslips were washed in PBS, and the cells were fixed in 2%
formaldehyde in PBS for 5 min and then permeabilized in 100% acetone
at
20°C for 2 min. When necessary, cells were treated with 4 N HCl
for 10 min to expose the BrdU epitopes. Cells were then incubated with
the indicated primary antibodies for 30 min at 37°C, washed three
times, and incubated with either fluorescein- or rhodamine-labeled
secondary antibodies for 30 min at 37°C. The coverslips were washed
three times and mounted on glass slides in glycerol gelatin (Sigma)
containing 1.3 mg of p-phenyldiamine (Sigma) per ml to
reduce photobleaching. The 3-83 rabbit antiserum against ICP8 was
described previously (21) and was used at a 1:300 dilution.
The ICP8 monoclonal antibody (MAb) 39S (38) was prepared
from ascitic fluid samples from animals inoculated with 39S hybridoma
cells originally obtained from the ATCC and was used at a 1:30
dilution. The ICP4 MAb 58S a gift from Neal DeLuca, University of
Pittsburgh, was used at a 1:20 dilution. The gC MAb C3 a gift from
Joseph Glorioso, University of Pittsburgh, was used at a 1:100
dilution. The PML rabbit antiserum, a gift from Anne Dejean, Institut
Pasteur, was used at a 1:200 dilution. The BrdU MAb was purchased
from Becton Dickinson and used at a 1:10 dilution. Rhodamine
isothiocyanate (RITC)- and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated
goat anti-rabbit and RITC- and FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse
secondary antibodies were all purchased from ICN and used at a 1:100 dilution.
Microscopy.
All microscopic images were obtained with a
Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope, captured with a Hamamatsu ORCA
digital camera, colorized and processed with Improvision Openlab
software, and printed with Adobe Photoshop.
 |
RESULTS |
Construction of the transformed cell lines.
All previous
experiments examining d105 ICP8 repression of viral
replication had been performed in the Vero-derived S2 and V2.6 cells
(6, 15). In this work, we used multiple cell lines (Table
1) expressing either wild-type ICP8 or
d105 ICP8. It was necessary to generate the CV-1-derived C8
and C105 cell lines for experiments involving the use of a cell cycle
inhibitor (n-butyrate) to block cellular DNA replication so
that specifically viral DNA replication could be visualized, as Vero
cells are not susceptible to n-butyrate
(40; E. McNamee and D. M. Knipe, data not
shown). After constructing the C8 and C105 cell lines, we
determined that the amount of ICP8 protein expressed by these cells
after infection was very similar to the amount expressed in S2 and V2.6
cells (15; McNamee and Knipe, data not shown).
The d105 ICP8 block in viral replication is not
overcome at late times in infection.
All previous experiments had
been performed at 10 hours postinfection (hpi). To ensure that
d105 ICP8 was blocking viral replication as opposed to
simply delaying infection, we measured the amount of infectious virus
present in Vero, S2, V2.6, CV-1, C8, and C105 cells (Table 1) at
various times postinfection (Fig. 1).
Cells were infected at an MOI of 2, and progeny virus was harvested at
5-h intervals until 30 hpi. The titer of virus produced by each cell
line at each time point on Vero cells was then determined. Virus yields
in V2.6 cells and C105 cells were 10- to 100-fold lower than those in
control cells through 30 hpi. In all experiments, the CV-1-derived cell
lines and the Vero-derived cell lines always behaved similarly. This
indicated that the effect of d105 ICP8 was not to delay the
replication of the virus due to slowed rates of DNA replication and/or
late gene expression; instead, it was capable of maintaining a
long-term inhibition of virus production.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Growth of HSV-1 in Vero, CV-1, S2, C8, V2.6, and C105
cells infected with HSV-1 wild-type strain KOS. All cells were infected
at an MOI of 2 and harvested at the indicated times. Viral yield was
measured by plaque assay titration of total intracellular plus
extracellular virus on Vero cells.
|
|
ICP8 does not localize to prereplicative sites and replication
compartments in d105 ICP8-expressing cell lines.
When
d105 ICP8 is expressed during HSV-1 infection, it blocks DNA
replication and late gene expression of wild-type virus, although to
different degrees (15). We hypothesized that the d105 ICP8 mutant may be unable to form the same interactions
with the cell that wild-type ICP8 does and thus may not be capable of
localizing to the replication compartments containing the seven essential viral replication proteins that form in infected-cell nuclei.
To examine the localization of ICP8 in the presence of d105
ICP8, the wild-type ICP8-expressing S2 cells and the d105 ICP8-expressing V2.6 cells were infected with wild-type HSV-1 at an MOI
of 2, harvested at 10 hpi, and stained for ICP8 by immunofluorescence. These infection conditions were chosen because at higher MOIs, wild-type ICP8 from the virus is expressed at a level high enough to
overcome the competitive inhibition of viral replication by d105 ICP8 (15). At 10 hpi, ICP8 was localized to
replication compartments in S2 cells (Fig.
2A), as is normally seen during wild-type
viral infections. In the presence of d105 ICP8, ICP8 staining was distributed diffusely throughout the nucleus, with occasional punctate sites in some nuclei (Fig. 2B). Thus,
d105 ICP8 exhibited an effect on ICP8 localization, in
addition to blocking DNA replication and late gene transcription.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Localization of ICP8 in S2 and V2.6 cells. Cells were
infected with HSV-1 KOS strain at an MOI of 2 and harvested at 10 hpi.
ICP8 was detected with the anti-ICP8 rabbit antiserum 3-83.
|
|
In infected S2 and V2.6 cells, three general patterns of ICP8 staining
were observed. These were defined as large replication
compartments
(Fig.
3A and B), small replication
compartments (Fig.
3C and D), and diffuse staining (Fig.
3E and F).
When we quantified
the type of intranuclear staining in infected cells,
we observed
that under these conditions nearly one half of the infected
S2
cells contained large replication compartments, while fewer cells
contained small compartments or diffuse ICP8 (Fig.
4). In contrast,
in V2.6 cells, 85% of
the infected cells exhibited a diffuse ICP8
distribution (Fig.
4),
showing that the lack of replication compartment
formation in the
d105 ICP8-expressing V2.6 cells was a general
observation.
The diffuse distribution for ICP8 in V2.6 cells was
not simply due to
inhibition of viral DNA synthesis because inhibition
of viral DNA
synthesis by inhibitors or genetic defects causes
ICP8 to accumulate in
punctate prereplicative sites (
33). Thus,
d105
ICP8 appeared to block the localization of wild-type ICP8
to both
prereplicative sites and replication compartments.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Examples of different patterns of intranuclear
localization of replication proteins in S2 and V2.6 cells infected with
HSV-1 KOS strain. Cells were stained with the ICP8 antiserum 3-83. S2
cells expressing wild-type ICP8 (left) and V2.6 cells expressing
d105 ICP8 (right) were used. Examples of large compartments
(A and B), small compartments (C and D), and diffuse staining (E and F)
are depicted.
|
|

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Percentages of infected cells in each class of
intranuclear localization of replication proteins. Cells were stained
by immunofluorescence for ICP8 with 3-83 rabbit serum, and infected
cells were counted and classified as containing large compartments,
small compartments, or diffuse staining. The percentage of each in S2
and V2.6 cells are shown. More than 400 cells were counted for each
cell line in three separate experiments with at least two coverslips of
infected cells per sample per experiment. The error bars show standard
deviations of the results of three experiments.
|
|
d105 ICP8 prevents wild-type ICP8 and other replication
proteins from localizing to replication compartments.
Figure 2
demonstrated that the ICP8 visualized in those experiments was not
localizing to replication compartments. However, the anti-ICP8 antibody
used was reactive with both wild-type and d105 ICP8. Thus,
it was conceivable that the d105 ICP8 was obscuring the
wild-type ICP8. To ensure that this was not the case, we infected C8
and C105 cells with an HSV-1 recombinant expressing an ICP8-GFP fusion
protein, known to localize to replication compartments as efficiently
as wild-type ICP8 (Taylor et al., unpublished). The infected cells were
fixed, and GFP was visualized. As observed previously by
immunofluorescence, the ICP8-GFP fusion protein localized to
replication compartments in S2 cells and was diffuse in V2.6 cell
nuclei (Fig. 5). This demonstrated that
d105 ICP8 was actually capable of blocking the localization
of wild-type ICP8 to replication compartments. Similarly, infected C8
and C105 cells were also stained by immunofluorescence for ICP4, the
major viral transactivator (Fig. 6), and
UL42, the polymerase accessory factor (data not shown), two proteins
known to be localized to replication compartments. Staining for these
proteins showed them in replication compartments in both S2 and C8
cells but diffusely distributed in V2.6 and C105 cells.

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Localization of the ICP8-GFP fusion protein after
infection with the 8GFP virus in C8 and C105 cells. The 8GFP-infected
cells were harvested and fixed.
|
|

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Localization of ICP4. Localization of IE protein ICP4 in
C8 and C105 cells after HSV-1 KOS infection. The cells were stained for
ICP4 with the MAb 58S.
|
|
DNA replication occurs in large and small compartments.
Having
shown that formation of large replication compartments was blocked in
d105 ICP8-expressing cells, we wished to determine the
location of the residual viral DNA synthesis (20% of wild-type levels)
observed in these cells. This was accomplished using indirect immunofluorescence to visualize the incorporation of the nucleoside analog BrdU into replicating DNA. To visualize viral DNA synthesis specifically, it was necessary to block the host cell's DNA
replication. This can be done with n-butyrate, which stops
the cell cycle in the G1 phase but does not have any effect
on HSV DNA replication (37). Unfortunately,
n-butyrate did not efficiently block the cell cycle in Vero
cells (results not shown), so we used CV-1 cells, which have been shown
to be susceptible to n-butyrate (40; data
not shown). We used the C8 and C105 cell lines expressing wild-type
ICP8 and d105 ICP8, respectively, to identify sites of viral
DNA replication. In both C8 and C105 cell lines, we observed BrdU
labeling only in those cells that contained defined replication compartments, as seen by ICP8 staining (Fig.
7). Both small and large replication
compartments supported DNA replication. BrdU labeling was also seen in
the few large compartments in C105 cells (data not shown). In the
numerous C105 cells that contained diffuse ICP8, BrdU incorporation was
not observed (Fig. 7G to I). C8 cells containing diffuse ICP8 also did
not contain replicating viral DNA (Fig. 7D to F). Thus, the DNA
replication observed in the C105 cells within small replication
compartments and the few large replication compartments may account for
the 20% level of wild-type DNA replication previously observed by
biochemical analyses (15; data not shown).

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Colocalization of ICP8 and sites of DNA synthesis in C8
(A to F) and C105 (G to I) cells. Examples of the three classes of
intranuclear ICP8 localization and visualization of DNA replication are
shown. ICP8 is shown in green, and BrdU is shown in red. Rabbit
antiserum 3-83 was used to visualize ICP8, and anti-BrdU was used to
visualize BrdU. The yellow staining in the merged images demonstrates
the sites of overlap in the staining for ICP8 and BrdU.
|
|
Late gene expression in C105 cells correlated with the formation of
large replication compartments.
Biochemical analyses had
demonstrated that d105 ICP8 reduced viral DNA replication
and late gene transcription to 20 and 2% of wild-type levels,
respectively (6, 15). Previously, it had been believed that
these two viral processes were completely linked, but these data
indicated that there is an additional factor beyond DNA replication
required for successful viral late gene expression. We used
immunofluorescence to examine the relationship between replication
compartment formation and late gene expression in both C8 and C105
cells. Infected cells were fixed at 10 hpi and stained with antibodies
specific for ICP8 and the late glycoprotein, gC. In both the C8 and
C105 cell populations, gC staining was observed only in those cells
that formed large replication compartments (Fig.
8). Thus, the viral DNA replication in
small compartments was not sufficient to stimulate late gene
expression. Thus, the limited number of large replication compartments
in d105 ICP8-expressing cells explained the near-total lack
of late gene expression.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Examples of different classes of intranuclear
localization of ICP8 and gC expression in these cells. Cells were
infected with HSV-1 KOS and dual labeled with antibodies to ICP8 (3-83)
and gC (C3). gC is shown in green, and ICP8 is shown in red. (A and B)
Two different fields of C8 cells, demonstrating the expression of gC in
cells that form large compartments but not in cells with small
compartments (arrow). (C and D) Two fields of C105 cells showing
expression of gC in one cell with large compartments and the lack of gC
expression in cells with small compartments or diffuse staining.
|
|
ICP8 localizes near ND10 sites in a minor population of
d105 ICP8-expressing cells.
d105 ICP8 blocked
prereplicative site and replication compartment formation in 80% of
infected cells, and as a result of the lack of formation of large
replication compartments, DNA replication and late gene expression were
inhibited. To define the site of ICP8 localization in the remaining
cells, we determined if ICP8 could localize to ND10 sites in the
presence of d105 ICP8. To avoid the ICP0-induced disruption
of ND10 epitopes such as PML, we infected cells with an ICP0 mutant
virus, n212. After harvesting at 10 hpi, the cells were
processed for immunofluorescence and double labeled with antibodies
specific for ICP8 and PML. In C105 cells that showed specific sites of
ICP8 localization, these sites were located adjacent to the punctate
PML staining (Fig. 9A to C), indicating
that in these cells, d105 ICP8 did not block localization of
wild-type ICP8 to sites near ND10. However, most of the cells showed no
specific intranuclear localization of ICP8 (Fig. 9A to C). Therefore,
while most d105-expressing cells do not contain ICP8
localized to any specific intranuclear sites, including those near
ND10, in the small population of cells that do contain specific sites
of ICP8 localization, these sites do correlate with ND10 sites.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Dual staining of ICP8 and PML in C105 cells infected
with the ICP0 null mutant virus n212. A representative cell
that formed small replication compartments dually stained with
antibodies against ICP8 (39S) and PML. The yellow staining in the
merged image indicates colocalization of the two proteins.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We conducted these experiments to explore the nature of the defect
in viral replication induced by the dominant-negative mutant d105 ICP8, but the results have also provided information
about the role of replication compartments in viral growth. The
d105 mutant ICP8 blocks localization of wild-type ICP8 and
other viral proteins to replication structures in most infected cells,
which explains at least in part, the ability of d105 ICP8 to
reduce viral DNA synthesis and late gene expression. Late gene
expression correlated with formation of large replication compartments,
indicating that progeny viral DNA seems to undergo a change in location
or molecular contacts in the large replication compartments that allow
increased transcription of late genes.
In the population of d105 ICP8-expressing cells where no
specific replication protein localization is observed, approximately 80% of the infected cells, d105 ICP8 appears to prevent the
formation of prereplicative sites and replication compartments. The
primary effect of d105 in these cells is likely to be on
localization rather than inhibition of DNA synthesis because many prior
studies have shown that inhibition of DNA synthesis by antiviral drugs or genetic defects in other HSV proteins causes ICP8 to localize to
prereplicative sites (3, 8, 25, 27, 33). The d105 ICP8 defect could be due to a defect in localization per se or an
interaction with a viral or cellular protein involved in prereplicative site formation.
Approximately 20% of d105 ICP8-expressing cells do form
small compartments, indicating that there may be a second site of d105 ICP8 inhibition. This second block occurs after the
formation of prereplicative sites and the initiation of DNA synthesis
but before late gene expression. These blocks at different stages would
have different effects on the status of DNA replication in the cells.
When d105 ICP8 blocks prior to the assembly of replication proteins, the replication proteins remain diffusely distributed and
there is no DNA replication. This could account for the fivefold reduction in viral DNA replication seen in the presence of
d105 ICP8. In the population of cells where the first block
can be overcome, a limited amount of DNA is replicated in the small
replication compartments that form in these cells. This may account for
the 20% level of DNA replication that remains in the presence of
d105 ICP8.
The two d105 ICP8-induced blocks in the viral life cycle
would have different effects on late gene expression than on DNA replication. In this case, blocking either before prereplicative site
formation or after the initiation of DNA synthesis is sufficient to
completely prevent late gene expression in those cells. The only cells
that can support late gene expression are those in which there is no
inhibition of large replication compartment formation. This
subpopulation of cells may have lost the ability to express the mutant
d105 ICP8. In those cells that maintain DNA replication yet
lack late gene expression, there may be insufficient DNA replication to
trigger the initiation of late gene expression. Alternatively, there
may be a joint signal that acts to stimulate both the formation of
large compartments and late gene expression through separate pathways.
The level of late gene expression in d105 ICP8-expressing
cells is lower than that in cells infected with wild-type virus and
treated with phosphonoacetic acid to reduce DNA synthesis to 20% of
control levels (6, 15). This supports the latter hypothesis
that there is a common signal that controls both large replication
compartment formation and late gene expression and this signal is
inhibited by d105 ICP8. One possible mechanism may be a
rearrangement of the structure of replicating DNA which allows
interactions with different proteins. This could involve increased
access to DNA by replication proteins and transcription factors,
therefore stimulating DNA replication and late gene transcription.
There are a number of ways in which d105 ICP8 may exert its
dominant-negative activity. These include the following: (i) binding other viral proteins and preventing their proper intranuclear localization; (ii) binding viral DNA but not viral proteins, therefore displacing wild-type ICP8; (iii) lack of the ability to bind an unknown
cellular factor required for proper targeting of viral DNA replication
proteins; or (iv) a combination of mechanisms ii and iii. We believe
that d105 ICP8 is capable of binding to other viral
proteins, because it is recognized by the 39S antibody, which
specifically recognizes ICP8 when it is in replication complexes with
DNA and the other replication proteins (S. L. Uprichard and D. M. Knipe, unpublished data). In addition, d105 ICP8
can bind DNA in vitro with the same affinity as that of wild-type ICP8 (15). Therefore, d105 ICP8 appears to be capable
of forming normal interactions with herpesvirus replication proteins
and viral DNA. This leaves the loss of ability to interact with a cellular protein. d105 ICP8 may be able to interact with
viral proteins initially but lacks the ability to maintain those
interactions during a rearrangement of proteins required for the
formation of either prereplicative sites or replication compartments.
Each of these possibilities is feasible, and further studies into the relationships between ICP8 and both host cell proteins and viral proteins are under way.
Model for nuclear events in HSV-infected cells.
These results
and previous studies have led to a model of nuclear events in
HSV-infected cells (Fig. 10), and we
can use this to identify steps in the progression of infection where
d105 ICP8 may be exerting its inhibitory effect. Initially,
the viral DNA is uncoated from the capsid, transported into the
nucleus, and localized adjacent to ND10 proteins (30).
Immediate-early and early gene transcription occurs here, and ICP0
causes disruption of ND10 structures (12, 13, 28, 29). Once
the replication proteins are synthesized, they assemble on the viral
DNA to form prereplicative sites and replication is initiated
(40). This leads to the formation of small replication
compartments. A limited amount of DNA replication occurs here, but this
accumulation of primary replication machinery is not sufficient to
initiate late gene expression. An unknown stimulus allows the formation
of larger replication compartments, either by the growth of smaller
compartments or the coalescence of multiple small compartments (Taylor
et al., unpublished). Large compartments contain new interactions
between viral DNA and cellular and/or viral proteins. ICP8 and
specifically the region deleted in the d105 mutation are
required for this transformation. The formation of large compartments
allows high levels of DNA replication and initiation of late gene
transcription. After late genes are expressed and all viral DNA is
replicated, the progeny genomes are packaged into capsids and they exit
the nucleus.
The correlation between formation of large replication compartments and
late gene expression provides further evidence that
specialized
transcriptional machinery is assembled in replication
compartments for
late gene expression (
32). Prior evidence for
late
transcriptional machinery in HSV-1-infected cells includes
the
localization of ICP4 (
21,
24,
34), host RNA polymerase
II
(
24,
35), ICP27 (
10), and ICP22 (
24,
35) to replication
compartments. This work shows that ICP8 plays
a role in promoting
the formation of this new late transcriptional
machinery in the
large
compartments.
Potential implication for HSV infection of neuronal cells.
The
late transcriptional machinery may also play a role in expression of
immediate-early and early genes under certain conditions. We and others
have shown that immediate-early and early gene expression in neuronal
cells is stimulated by DNA replication (23, 31). The
transcriptional sites near the ND10 sites (Fig. 10) may be absent or
unavailable in neurons, making transcription of immediate-early and
early genes very inefficient. However, if sufficient viral gene
products are expressed to allow viral DNA replication and formation of
large replication compartments, this may allow transcription of the
viral genome in these compartments and greatly increase expression of
immediate-early and early mRNAs as well as late mRNAs. Thus, the
specialized transcriptional machinery may play a role in late gene
transcription in permissive cells and in expression of all HSV genes in
nonpermissive neuronal cells. d105 ICP8 provides us with a
unique tool to probe the role of ICP8 interactions with both cell and
viral proteins in the formation of replication compartments, DNA
replication, and late gene expression.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank David Spezzano for technical assistance in isolation of
the C8 and C105 cell lines and William Lucas for helpful discussions.
This work was supported by NIH grant CA26345 from the National Cancer Institute.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 432-1934. Fax: (617)
432-0223. E-mail: david_knipe{at}hms.harvard.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ascoli, C. A., and G. G. Maul.
1991.
Identification of a novel nuclear site.
J. Cell Biol.
112:785-795[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Burkham, J.,
D. M. Coen, and S. K. Weller.
1998.
ND10 protein PML is recruited to herpes simplex virus type prereplicative sites and replication compartments in the presence of viral DNA polymerase.
J. Virol.
72:10100-10107[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bush, M.,
D. R. Yager,
M. Gao,
K. Weisshart,
A. I. Marcy,
D. M. Coen, and D. M. Knipe.
1991.
Correct intranuclear localization of herpes simplex virus DNA polymerase requires the viral ICP8 DNA-binding protein.
J. Virol.
65:1082-1089[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Cai, W. Z., and P. A. Schaffer.
1989.
Herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP0 plays a critical role in the de novo synthesis of infectious virus following transfection of viral DNA.
J. Virol.
63:4579-4589[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Challberg, M. D.
1986.
A method for identifying the viral genes required for herpesvirus DNA replication.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:9094-9098[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Chen, Y. M., and D. M. Knipe.
1996.
A dominant mutant form of the herpes simplex virus ICP8 protein decreases viral late gene transcription.
Virology
221:281-290[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Conley, A. J.,
D. M. Knipe,
P. C. Jones, and B. Roizman.
1981.
Molecular genetics of herpes simplex virus. VII. Characterization of a temperature-sensitive mutant produced by in vitro mutagenesis and defective in DNA synthesis and accumulation of gamma polypeptides.
J. Virol.
37:191-206[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
de Bruyn Kops, A., and D. M. Knipe.
1988.
Formation of DNA replication structures in herpes virus-infected cells requires a viral DNA binding protein.
Cell
55:857-868[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
de Bruyn Kops, A., and D. M. Knipe.
1994.
Preexisting nuclear architecture defines the intranuclear location of herpesvirus DNA replication structures.
J. Virol.
68:3512-3526[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
de Bruyn Kops, A.,
S. L. Uprichard,
M. Chen, and D. M. Knipe.
1998.
Comparison of the intranuclear distributions of herpes simplex virus proteins involved in different viral functions.
Virology
252:162-178[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Dyck, J. A.,
G. G. Maul,
W. H. J. Miller,
J. D. Chen,
A. Kakizuka, and R. M. Evans.
1994.
A novel macromolecular structure is a target of the promyelocyte-retinoic acid receptor oncoprotein.
Cell
76:333-343[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Everett, R. D.,
P. Freemont,
H. Saitoh,
M. Dasso,
A. Orr,
M. Kathoria, and J. Parkinson.
1998.
The disruption of ND10 during herpes simplex virus infection correlates with the Vmw110- and proteasome-dependent loss of several PML isoforms.
J. Virol.
72:6581-6591[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Everett, R. D., and G. G. Maul.
1994.
HSV-1 IE protein VMW 110 causes redistribution of PML.
EMBO J.
13:5062-5069[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Gao, M., and D. M. Knipe.
1989.
Genetic evidence for multiple nuclear functions of the herpes simplex virus ICP8 DNA-binding protein.
J. Virol.
63:5258-5267[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Gao, M., and D. M. Knipe.
1991.
Potential role for herpes simplex virus ICP8 DNA replication protein in stimulation of late gene expression.
J. Virol.
65:2666-2675[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Godowski, P. J., and D. M. Knipe.
1985.
Identification of a herpes simplex virus function that represses late gene expression from parental viral genomes.
J. Virol.
55:357-365[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Godowski, P. J., and D. M. Knipe.
1983.
Mutations in the major DNA-binding protein gene of herpes simplex virus type 1 result in increased levels of viral gene expression.
J. Virol.
47:478-486[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Godowski, P. J., and D. M. Knipe.
1986.
Transcriptional control of herpesvirus gene expression: gene functions required for positive and negative regulation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:256-260[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Ishov, A. M., and G. G. Maul.
1996.
The periphery of nuclear domain 10 (ND10) as site of DNA virus deposition.
J. Cell Biol.
134:815-826[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Knipe, D. M.
1982.
Cell growth transformation by herpes simplex virus.
Prog. Med. Virol.
28:114-144[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Knipe, D. M.,
D. Senechek,
S. A. Rice, and J. L. Smith.
1987.
Stages in the nuclear association of the herpes simplex virus transcriptional activator protein ICP4.
J. Virol.
61:276-284[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Korioth, F.,
C. Gieffers,
G. G. Maul, and J. Frey.
1995.
Molecular characterization of NDP52, a novel protein of the nuclear domain 10, which is redistributed upon virus infection and interferon treatment.
J. Cell Biol.
130:1-13[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Kosz-Vnenchak, M.,
J. Jacobson,
D. M. Coen, and D. M. Knipe.
1993.
Evidence for a novel regulatory pathway for herpes simplex virus gene expression in trigeminal ganglion neurons.
J. Virol.
67:5383-5393[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Leopardi, R.,
P. L. Ward,
W. O. Ogle, and B. Roizman.
1997.
Association of herpes simplex virus regulatory protein ICP22 with transcriptional complexes containing EAP, ICP4, RNA polymerase II, and viral DNA requires posttranslational modification by the UL13 protein kinase.
J. Virol.
71:1133-1139[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Liptak, L.,
S. L. Uprichard, and D. M. Knipe.
1996.
Functional order of assembly of herpes simplex virus DNA replication proteins into prereplicative site structures.
J. Virol.
70:1759-1767[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Lukonis, C. J.,
J. Burkham, and S. K. Weller.
1997.
Herpes simplex virus type 1 prereplicative sites are a heterogeneous population: only a subset are likely to be precursors to replication compartments.
J. Virol.
71:4771-4781[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Lukonis, C. J., and S. K. Weller.
1996.
Characterization of nuclear structures in cells infected with herpes simplex virus type 1 in the absence of viral DNA replication.
J. Virol.
70:1751-1758[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Maul, G. G., and R. D. Everett.
1994.
The nuclear location of PML, a cellular member of the C3HC4 zinc-binding domain protein family, is rearranged during herpes simplex virus infection by the C3HC4 viral protein ICPO.
J. Gen. Virol.
75:1223-1233[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Maul, G. G.,
H. H. Guldner, and J. G. Spivack.
1993.
Modification of discrete nuclear domains induced by herpes simplex virus type 1 immediate early gene 1 product (ICP0).
J. Gen. Virol.
74:2679-2690[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Maul, G. G.,
A. M. Ishov, and R. D. Everett.
1996.
Nuclear domain 10 as preexisting potential replication start sites of herpes simplex virus type 1.
Virology
217:67-75[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Nichol, P. F.,
J. Y. Chang,
E. M. Johnson, Jr., and P. D. Olivo.
1996.
Herpes simplex virus gene expression in neurons: viral DNA synthesis is a critical regulatory event in the branch point between the lytic and latent pathways.
J. Virol.
70:5476-5486[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Phelan, A.,
J. Dunlop,
A. H. Patel,
N. D. Stow, and J. B. Clements.
1997.
Nuclear sites of herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA replication and transcription colocalize at early times postinfection and are largely distinct from RNA processing factors.
J. Virol.
71:1124-1132[Abstract].
|
| 33.
|
Quinlan, M. P.,
L. B. Chen, and D. M. Knipe.
1984.
The intranuclear location of a herpes simplex virus DNA-binding protein is determined by the status of viral DNA replication.
Cell
36:857-868[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Randall, R. E., and N. Dinwoodie.
1986.
Intranuclear localization of herpes simplex virus immediate-early and delayed-early proteins: evidence that ICP 4 is associated with progeny virus DNA.
J. Gen. Virol.
67:2163-2177[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Rice, S. A.,
M. C. Long,
V. Lam, and C. A. Spencer.
1994.
RNA polymerase II is aberrantly phosphorylated and localized to viral replication compartments following herpes simplex virus infection.
J. Virol.
68:988-1001[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Roizman, B., and A. Sears.
1996.
Herpes simplex viruses and their replication, p. 2231-2296.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 37.
|
Shadan, F. F.,
L. M. Cowsert, and L. P. Villarreal.
1994.
n-Butyrate, a cell cycle blocker, inhibits the replication of polyomaviruses and papillomaviruses but not that of adenoviruses and herpesviruses.
J. Virol.
68:4785-4796[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Showalter, S. D.,
M. Zweig, and B. Hampar.
1981.
Monoclonal antibodies to herpes simplex virus type 1 proteins, including the immediate-early protein ICP 4.
Infect. Immun.
34:684-692[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Spencer, C. A.,
M. E. Dahmus, and S. A. Rice.
1997.
Repression of host RNA polymerase II transcription by herpes simplex virus type 1.
J. Virol.
71:2031-2040[Abstract].
|
| 40.
|
Uprichard, S. L., and D. M. Knipe.
1997.
Assembly of herpes simplex virus replication proteins at two distinct intranuclear sites.
Virology
229:113-125[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Weis, K.,
S. Rambaud,
C. Lavau,
J. Jansen,
T. Carvalho,
M. Carmo-Fonseca,
A. Lamond, and A. Dejean.
1994.
Retinoic acid regulates aberrant nuclear localization of PML-RAR alpha in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells.
Cell
76:345-356[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, November 2000, p. 10122-10131, Vol. 74, No. 21
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Cohrs, R. J., Wischer, J., Essman, C., Gilden, D. H.
(2002). Characterization of Varicella-Zoster Virus Gene 21 and 29 Proteins in Infected Cells. J. Virol.
76: 7228-7238
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
del Rio, T., Werner, H. C., Enquist, L. W.
(2002). The Pseudorabies Virus VP22 Homologue (UL49) Is Dispensable for Virus Growth In Vitro and Has No Effect on Virulence and Neuronal Spread in Rodents. J. Virol.
76: 774-782
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ehmann, G. L., Burnett, H. A., Bachenheimer, S. L.
(2001). Pocket Protein p130/Rb2 Is Required for Efficient Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Gene Expression and Viral Replication. J. Virol.
75: 7149-7160
[Abstract]
[Full Text]