Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, January 2000, p. 899-913, Vol. 74, No. 2
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Second-Site Changes Affect Viability of
Amphotropic/Ecotropic Chimeric Enveloped Murine Leukemia
Viruses
Lucille
O'Reilly and
Monica J.
Roth*
Department of Biochemistry, University of
Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
Robert Wood Johnson Medical
School, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854
Received 13 November 1998/Accepted 29 September 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Chimeras were previously generated between the ecotropic
(Moloney-MuLV) and amphotropic (4070A) SU and TM proteins of murine leukemia virus (MuLV). After passage in D17 cells, three chimeras with
junctions in the C terminus of SU (AE5, AE6, and AE7), showed improved
kinetics of viral spreading, suggesting that they had adapted.
Sequencing of the viruses derived from the D17 cell lines revealed
second-site changes within the env gene. Changes were detected in the receptor binding domain, the proline-rich region, the C
terminus of SU, and the ectodomain of TM. Second-site changes were
subcloned into the parental DNA, singly and in combination, and tested
for viability. All viruses had maintained their original cloned
mutations and junctions. Reconstruction and passage of AE7 or AE6 virus
with single point mutations recovered the additional second-site
changes identified in the parental population. The AE5 isolate required
changes in the VRA, the VRC, the VRB-hinge region, and the C terminus
of SU for efficient infection. Passage of virus, including the parental
4070A, in D17 cells resulted in a predominant G100R mutation within the
receptor binding domain. Viruses were subjected to titer determination
in three cell types, NIH 3T3, canine D17, and 293T. AE6 viruses with
changes in the proline-rich region initially adapted for growth on D17
cells could infect all cell types tested. AE6-based chimeras with
additional mutations in the C terminus of SU could infect D17 and 293T
cells. Infection of NIH 3T3 cells was dependent on the proline-rich
mutation. AE7-based chimeras encoding L538Q and G100R were impaired in
infecting NIH 3T3 and 293T cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Entry is an integral part of the
life cycle of a virus. Pursuant to entry are the initial requirements
for interaction with a host cell receptor followed by the events of
fusion of the viral and host cell membranes and internalization of the
retroviral particle into the host cell. Murine leukemia viruses (MuLVs)
are divided into five classes, based on receptor usage, by viral
interference assays (52, 53, 57). These classes are
ecotropic, amphotropic, polytropic, xenotropic and 10A1. The receptors
for the ecotropic, amphotropic, and 10A1 MuLVs have been cloned and
denoted MCAT, Pit2, and Pit1 respectively (1, 31, 32, 40, 41,
66). Each has been shown to be sufficient for infection when
expressed in nonpermissive cell lines. Both the MCAT and Pit proteins
are multiple membrane-spanning transporters; MCAT is a cationic amino acid transporter, whereas Pit1 and Pit2 are inorganic phosphate symporters.
The retroviral env gene encodes the surface (SU) and
transmembrane (TM) proteins, required for the binding and entry of
virus into the host cell. Sequence alignments of SU proteins in each class reveal a large diversity of amino acid sequences in the N
terminus, while the C terminus is generally conserved. The study of
functional domains of the envelope proteins has been approached by
mutagenesis (2, 7, 12, 22, 23, 29, 37, 46, 56, 60, 61, 63, 64, 68,
70), as well as by construction of chimeric enveloped MuLVs
(5, 26, 42, 43, 47). Receptor usage is specified by
determinants located in the N-terminal half of SU. The first N-terminal
230 amino acids of the ecotropic MuLV SU protein are sufficient for
binding to the ecotropic receptor, MCAT, as demonstrated by studies
with chimeras (4, 5, 47, 52), binding studies with soluble
truncated SU (4, 14, 27), and interference assays (4,
5, 27). Determinants sufficient for binding to the Pit2 receptor
protein are located within the first N-terminal 208 amino acids of the
amphotropic 4070A SU protein (4-6, 47).
Hypervariable regions within the receptor binding domain, consisting of
complex disulfide-bonded loops, have been identified (5, 34,
35). Recently, the structure of the ecotropic Friend receptor
binding domain (RBD) (17) has been solved, and the individual cysteine loops (34, 35) have been defined as VRA, VRB, and VRC. The entire 236-amino-acid sequence folds as a structural domain and helps to explain the lack of viability of envelope chimeras
with junctions within this region (5, 26, 42, 47).
Particular amino acids within the VRA are critical for binding to the
receptors (3, 15, 37) and are located on a protruding
nonstructured loop. For 4070A SU, binding to Pit2 requires amino acids
78 to 104 (3, 25, 62). While amino acids Y90 and V91 appear
to be critical in the context of chimeric envelope proteins and
chimeric receptors (62), these residues alone are not
determinants for receptor recognition in the context of the wild-type
4070A envelope protein (25). Additional experiments (62) indicate a role for the VRB in receptor recognition.
Amino acids comprising the VRC domain are also located within a helical loop.
The RBD is connected to the conserved C-terminus of SU through the
proline-rich region (PRR). The N-terminus of the PRR is conserved among
the ecotropic, amphotropic, xenotropic, and polytropic classes of
MuLVs, with a consensus sequence of GPR(I/V)PIGPNP (23), and
is essential for viral infection (68). The PRR C terminus is
variable in length and conservation. The amphotropic PRR is 14 amino
acids longer than the ecotropic region. In the cases of polytropic,
xenotropic, and 10A1 viruses, the PRR in the SU protein influences
interactions with receptors as a determinant for entry (4,
45).
The second envelope protein, TM, is involved in the fusion event of
entry and is characterized by a hydrophobic stretch of amino acids at
its extracellularly oriented N terminus, a transmembrane domain, and an
intravirally oriented cytoplasmic domain. The structure of a limited
55-amino-acid region lacking the fusion peptide of the ectodomain has
revealed a trimeric coiled-coil motif consisting of 33 amino acids
within Moloney MuLV (M-MuLV) (L516 to L547) (18). The chain
reverses direction, forming a small alpha helix consisting of residues
L554 to L558, which lies perpendicular to the coiled-coil. Cysteines
555 and 562 are linked by disulfide bonding, while cysteine 563 appears
to be a free thiol, presumably available to form a disulfide bond with
SU (48, 51).
Since MuLVs are currently one of several candidates being explored for
delivery of therapeutic molecules in gene therapy applications, it is
important to understand the basic virology of entry. Many details of
the entry of MuLVs, including SU-TM protein-protein interactions, are
not fully understood. Although the structures of a portion of the
ectodomain of TM and the receptor binding domain of ecotropic MuLV have
been solved, these offer only a limited picture of the
three-dimensional organization of portions of the envelope proteins
under very particular conditions. A series of 22 chimeric ecotropic and
amphotropic envelope proteins were previously constructed (AE series
and EA series) and analyzed for viral spread, host range, viral
interference, and syncytium formation (47). This study
identifies second-site mutations within the amphotropic/ecotropic (AE
series) chimeric enveloped MuLVs which increase viral infectivity. Like
mutational approaches with hemagglutin (13, 20, 59), the
identification of second-site changes in the envelope proteins of
amphotropic/ecotropic chimeras provide insights into regions within SU
and TM which interact, expanding our view of the entry process.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell lines and maintenance.
Canine D17 cells and D17/viral
producer cell lines were maintained at 37°C in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium (DMEM) (pH 7.4) supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 50 U
of penicillin per ml, 50 µg of streptomycin per ml, and 7.5% fetal
bovine serum. A plasmid clone of the ecotropic receptor under the
control of a cytomegalovirus promoter (clone 1475) in the pCDNA 3.1 vector backbone (Invitrogen) was generously provided by L. Albritton (University of Tennessee); the pJET cell line was subsequently generated by introducing this plasmid DNA into D17 cells by calcium phosphate transfection as specified by the directions supplied with the
Stratagene mammalian transfection kit (no. 200385) and selected and
maintained in 400 µg of G418 per ml. NIH 3T3 cells were maintained in
DMEM (pH 7.4) supplemented with 10% calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, and
0.1 mg of gentamicin sulfate per ml. 293T cells were maintained in DMEM
(pH 7.4) supplemented with 10% calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, 0.1 mg of
gentamicin sulfate per ml, and 400 µg of G418 per ml.
DNA and plasmids.
Chimeric proviral DNA clones
(47), pNCA-C (19), and pNCA-Am (47)
were as previously described. pNCA-Am contains the 4070A envelope
within the M-MuLV backbone and is referred to as 4070A in the text and
figures. pHIT456, previously described (58), contains the
4070A envelope sequence under the control of a cytomegalovirus promoter
and was used with the following modifications. The XhoI site
at position 9093 was destroyed by linearizing the plasmid with
XhoI, filling in with T4 DNA polymerase, and self-ligation. An NheI site was created at the 3' end of 4070A
env sequence by the insertion of an NheI adapter
(oligonucleotide 6452; 5'AATTGGCTAGCC 3') at the
3' XbaI site. All DNAs used for transfections were purified
by cesium chloride banding. Nucleotide positions are based on the RNA
sequence of M-MuLV as defined by to Shinnick et al. (55).
The amphotropic envelope sequence is numbered by the system of Ott and
Rein (44).
Transfections.
D17 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 105/60-mm plate or 2 × 105/100-mm
plate 24 h prior to transfections. The cells were incubated with
0.5 µg of DNA/60-mm plate or 1 µg of DNA/100-mm plate in the
presence of 0.5 mg of DEAE-dextran per ml, 0.9 mM CaCl2,
and 0.5 mM MgCl2 at 37°C. After 30 min, the DNA was
removed and replaced with fresh medium (39). Transfections
testing reconstructed second-site changes were performed at least twice.
RT assays.
The presence of virus was monitored by the
release of reverse transcriptase (RT) activity into the culture medium.
The medium was collected up to day 40. RT activity was assayed as
previously described (21). Virus was collected either from
cells transiently transfected with DEAE-dextran at least 40 days
posttransfection or from producer cells 10 days postinfection.
Viral DNA isolation and PCR amplifications.
Unintegrated
viral DNA was isolated by the method of Hirt (28). Cells
were infected in the presence of 8 µg of Polybrene per ml for 2 h and were harvested approximately 48 h postinfection in 100 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) buffer containing 0.6% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 10 mM
EDTA, and 1 M sodium chloride. Low-molecular-weight DNA was isolated by
subsequent centrifugations and phenol-chloroform extractions. Prior to
any analyses, the low-molecular-weight DNA was treated with RNase A and
diethylpyrocarbonate. PCRs were performed to amplify the env
gene with primers within the M-MuLV pol gene (primer 3807;
MuLV bases 4924 to 4938 [5' gatatacatatgGCCGTTAAACAGGGA3']) and the 3' long terminal repeat (primer 6320; MuLV bases 7815 to
7791 [5'ccttaaggCCCCCCTTTTTCTGGAGACTAAATA3']) by using 4.8 U of Taq polymerase (GIBCO/BRL) and PFU polymerase
(recombinant; Stratagene) in a ratio of 20:1, respectively, yielding
the full-length 2.9-kb product. One-hundredth to one-fifth of a plate
of cell Hirt DNA was used in the PCRs. In some instances, the initial PCR product was reamplified before being sequenced.
Sequencing.
Sequencing of the viral PCR product encoding the
env gene amplified from the Hirt DNA was performed with
primers spanning the entire env gene and reagents supplied
in the Perkin-Elmer Amplicycle kit. Base changes from wild-type M-MuLV
ecotropic and 4070A amphotropic envelope genes of MuLV were confirmed
by performing sequencing reactions with primers which read the opposite
strand. Approximately 99 to 99.8% of the coding sequence was read for each PCR-amplified Hirt DNA.
Reconstruction cloning.
Changes detected by sequencing the
viral populations were subcloned into the parental chimeric backbones,
replacing the wild-type sequence. Where more than one mutation was
detected in a viral population, the mutation was reconstructed singly
and in combination within the parental background. All restriction
fragments were isolated by gel electrophoresis, purified by a
glass-milk method (65), and ligated with T4 DNA ligase.
Constructs were screened by restriction digestion to confirm the
chimera backbone and by diagnostic sequencing reactions to identify the
second-site mutations. Amino acids are denoted by the single-letter
code, and the positions are based on Env precursor protein. The
following single mutations were reconstructed into parental backbones
as described below.
(i) N-terminal change.
The amphotropic 4070A G100R mutation
was reconstructed by using a three-fragment ligation of the 1,090-bp
SfiI-EcoRI fragment isolated from the PCR
amplification of the Hirt DNA (containing G100R), the 1,227-bp
EcoRI-BspDI fragment from the parental AE5 or
AE7, and the 8,767-bp BspDI-SfiI fragment from
the parental AE5 or AE7. The change from the wild-type codon GGG
(glycine) to mutant codon aGG (arginine) was sequenced with primer 1559 (5'CCAGTAAGCtTGTCCG3'; bases 463 to 448 of 4070A
env). The AE6 population contained a mixture of the
wild-type glycine and mutant arginine sequences. An alternative scheme
was used to clone the mutation within the AE6 backbone. The 2,771-bp
SalI-EcoRI fragment from the AE5/NCAC clone
containing the G100R mutation was ligated in the presence of the
6,631-bp HindIII-SalI fragment from AE6 and
the 495-bp EcoRI-HindIII fragment from AE6.
(ii) VRB-hinge changes.
The change in the amphotropic G209R
detected in the AE5 population was reconstructed into both the AE5
parental DNA and 4070A Env in the pNCA-Am and pHIT456 backbones. The
G209R region was introduced into AE5 by exchange of the 2,726-bp
SacII-ClaI fragment and into pNCA-Am by exchange
of the 1,128-bp SfiI-BspMI fragment. The change
from wild-type codon GGG (glycine) to aGG (arginine) was detected with
sequencing primer 2846 (5'CCAAGGGGCTACTCGAGGGGG 3'; bases
583 to 603 of 4070A env). The 1,500-bp
XhoI-NheI fragment containing the G209R mutation
from G209R/pNCA-Am replaced the 1,100-bp
XhoI-NheI fragments in the pHIT 456 vector.
(iii) C-terminal changes.
The changes in the amphotropic
R302K,G detected in the AE6 construct and the R302S mutation from the
AE6/3T3/D17 were reconstructed through ligation of the 495-bp
EcoRI-HindIII fragment from the PCR-amplified
Hirt DNA (containing R302K/G/S) with the 2,771-bp SalI-EcoRI and the 6,631-bp
HindIII-SalI fragments from the parental AE6.
The change from wild-type codon AGA (arginine) to AGt (serine) or Gga
(glycine) was detected with sequencing primer 2922 (5'CCCCTACAAGTCCAAG3; bases 893 to 908 of 4070A
env). The mutant codon AaA (lysine) was not observed in the
viral population and was subsequently detected in two of the five
isolates sequenced for the presence of the serine mutation. The change
in AE6 within the M-MuLV coding region, A419V, was reconstructed by
using a three-fragment ligation with the 780-bp
HindIII-BspDI fragment from the PCR-amplified Hirt DNA product (containing A419V), the 8,767-bp
BspDI-SfiI fragment, and the 1,540-bp
SfiI-HindIII fragment from the parental AE6. The change from wild-type codon GCT (alanine) to GtT (valine) was
detected with sequencing primer 4784 (5'ggtctagaTCTTTTGTGTCGGTTGGATC3'; bases 7180 to 7158 of
M-MuLV) (55).
The change observed in the AE5 construct within the M-MuLV sequence at
T392I was reconstructed by ligation of the 420-bp
SalI-HpaI fragment from the PCR-amplified Hirt
DNA product (containing T392I) and the 8,841-bp
HpaI-SacII and 1,826-bp
SacII-SalI fragments of the parental AE5. The
change from the wild-type codon ACA (threonine) to mutant codon AtA
(isoleucine) was detected with sequencing primer 1091 (5'GCTCCAGCCggCTGCTCCGTG3'; bases 6858 to 6878 of M-MuLV)
(55).
The alteration in AE7 within M-MuLV at L538Q was reconstructed by
ligation of the 700-bp BamHI-BspDI fragment from
the PCR-amplified Hirt DNA product (containing L538Q) plus the 8,767-bp
BspDI-SfiI and 1,594-bp
SfiI-BamHI fragments from the parental AE7. The
change from the wild-type codon CTA (leucine) to mutant codon CaA
(glutamine) was detected with sequencing primer 4781 (5'ggtctagaTCTGTTAAACAGTCCCTCAAACC3', bases 7583 to 7561 of
M-MuLV) (55).
Multiple mutations, observed in some viral populations, were
reconstructed into parental backbones as described below. The amphotropic R302K/G/S (AE6 no. 1 and 3 [see Table 1]) changes and the
M-MuLV A419V (AE6 no. 2 [see Table 1]) change observed in independent
AE6 populations were combined within one proviral backbone by ligation
of the 495-bp EcoRI-HindIII fragment from AE6
R302K, R302G, and R302S mutants with the 6,631-bp
SalI-HindIII and the 2,271-bp
SalI-EcoRI fragments of the AE6 (no. 2)/A419V construct. The changes from wild-type codon AGA (arginine) to AGt
(serine), GgA (glycine), or AaA (lysine) were detected with sequencing
primer 2922.
The amphotropic G100R and R302G, observed in the AE6 (no. 3) viral
population was reconstructed by ligation of the 6,631-bp HindIII-SalI fragment of AE6, the 2,044-bp
SalI-EcoRI fragment from the AE5/G100R clone, and
the 495-bp EcoRI-HindIII fragment from the
AE6 (no. 3) PCR-amplified Hirt DNA product. Changes from the wild-type
codons GGG (glycine) and AGA (arginine) to mutant codons aGG (arginine)
and gGA (glycine) were detected with sequencing primers 1559 and 2922, respectively.
Reconstruction of the AE7 viral population was performed by ligation of
the 1,227-bp EcoRI-BspDI fragment from the
AE7/L538Q clone, the 1,093-bp SfiI-EcoRI fragment
from the AE7 PCR-amplified DNA product, and the 8,767-bp
BspDI-SfiI fragment from parental AE7. Changes
from the wild-type codons GGG (glycine) and CTA (leucine) to aGG
(arginine) and CaA (glutamine) were detected with sequencing primers
1559 and 4781, respectively.
Two changes observed in the AE5 population (G100R and T392I) were
reconstructed within one proviral backbone by ligation of the 1,227-bp
EcoRI-BspDI fragment from AE5/T392I clone, the
1,093-bp SfiI-EcoRI fragment from AE5
PCR-amplified Hirt DNA, and the 8,767-bp BspDI-SfiI fragment from the AE5 parent. The
presence of the mutant codons aGG (arginine) and AtA (isoleucine) was
confirmed by sequencing with primers 1559 and 1091, respectively.
Transient expression, metabolic labeling, and
immunoprecipitation.
D17 cells were seeded at a density of 3 × 106 in 100-mm plates. A 5-ml volume of serum-free medium
was added to the cells prior to the addition of the DNA-Lipofectamine
mixture. A 12-µg sample of each DNA per time point was incubated for
15 min with 30 µl of Plus reagent (Gibco Life Technologies) in the
presence of 600 µl of serum-free medium supplemented with 0.1 mM MEM
non-essential amino acids (Gibco/BRL) and then mixed with an additional
600 µl of serum-free medium plus 54 µl of Lipofectamine for another 15 min before being added to cells. The DNA and medium was removed after 3 h and replaced with 10 ml of complete medium. Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline 39 to 40 h after DNA
addition and incubated in 5 ml of Hanks balanced salt solution
(Gibco/BRL) for 20 min at 37°C. Cells were metabolically labeled with
150 µCi of Tran35S-label (ICN) for 40 min at 37°C. The
T = 0 time point is after the 40-min labeling period.
Radioactive medium was replaced with 10 ml of complete medium, and the
cells were harvested at the 2-, 4-, 6-, and 8-h time points by lysis in
3 ml of ice-cold phosphate lysis buffer (10 mM
Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 [pH
7.4], 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.5% deoxycholate,
1% Triton X-100). Extracts were centrifuged for 3 h at 35,000 rpm
in a Beckman Ti50 rotor. Extracts corresponding to half of a 10-cm
plate were precleared with normal goat serum (Gibco/BRL) for 2 h
at 4°C (20 µl) and then immunoprecipitated with 10 µl of 79S-842
(anti-SU antiserum; National Cancer Institute) and 50 µl of 42-114 (anti-TM antiserum) (50). Immunoprecipitated proteins were
separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Molecular weight markers were obtained from Bio-Rad.
Time course infection experiments.
Medium was collected from
near-confluent viral producer cells after an overnight incubation and
assayed for reverse transcriptase activity (21). Based on
the reverse transcriptase activity, equal amounts of each virus were
applied to host cells in the presence of 8 µg of Polybrene per ml.
After 2 h, the viruses were removed and replaced with 10 ml of
fresh medium. Beginning on day 0, supernatants were collected and were
assayed for virus spreading by measuring the release of RT activity.
Virus titers.
D17/pJET cells were used to generate a
lacZ reporter cell line. The ecotropic receptor expressed in
these cells allowed infection with virus from the ecotropic CRE cell
line packaging the MFG/NB lacZ vector (27).
D17/pJET/lacZ cell lines were subsequently infected with the
reconstructed chimeric viruses of amphotropic host range (pJET/MFG).
Viruses collected overnight from the pJET/MFG cell lines were used to
infect 105 NIH 3T3, canine D17, and 293T cells in the
presence of 8 µg of Polybrene per ml for 2 h. The cells were
stained for lacZ 48 h postinfection (47).
Modeling of the 4070A receptor binding domain.
The ecotropic
Friend MuLV receptor binding domain (1aol.pdb) was used as a base
molecule for homology modeling of the corresponding region of 4070A by
using the program GeneMine Look (version 3). The second-site mutations
were substituted into the 4070A structure. The resulting models of the
4070A RBD trimers was based on homology to the Friend MuLV trimer
model, in which the VRC of one monomer interacts with the VRB of a
second monomer (16, 17). Energy minimizations were performed
for both the monomeric and trimeric models of 4070A. The electrostatic
surface potentials of the Friend MuLV RBD and model 4070A molecules
were analyzed by Grasp (version 1.3). The space-filling renditions of
all molecules were generated with the program Sybyl (version 6.5;
MIPS3-IRIX6.2).
 |
RESULTS |
Generation of chimeric virus producer cell lines: transient
expression versus infection.
We had previously generated producer
cell lines of chimeric amphotropic and ecotropic enveloped MuLVs in
both canine D17 cells and NIH 3T3 cells to map host range determinants
(47). Viruses which contained the N-terminal half of 4070A
SU through the proline-rich region were viable and showed viral
interference with the amphotropic virus (47). Virus
viability was assessed after transient expression of plasmid DNA
introduced into cells with DEAE-dextran. Chimeric viruses with
junctions in the C terminus of SU (AE6 and AE7) (Fig. 1A, lanes 4 and 5) were delayed in viral
spreading compared to wild-type 4070A in D17 cells (lane 6). Typical
delays for these chimeras were 10 to 14 days with respect to wild-type
4070A. In contrast, chimeras with junctions corresponding to the RBD
(AE4) (lane 2) and the entire SU protein (AE8) (lane 8) typically
showed only a short delay of 1 to 4 days compared to the wild-type
4070A control (lanes 6 and 9). A chimeric virus with a junction just after the PRR, AE5, was not viable in D17 cells if proviral DNA was
introduced by using DEAE-dextran (lane 3). However, this chimeric virus
was viable in NIH 3T3 cells (47). To examine the block in
viral spreading in the D17 cell line, the AE5 virus released from NIH
3T3 cells was tested for the ability to directly infect D17 cells. It
was reasoned that using a population of high-titer virus may initiate
infection not detected in transient-expression assays. Sequence
analysis of the total population of AE5 virus produced in NIH 3T3 cells
revealed no second-site changes, and the restriction site used to
generate this chimera had been maintained. AE5 virus with equivalent RT
activity to wild-type 4070A from NIH 3T3 producer cells was used to
infect D17 cells. In addition, a 13-fold excess of AE5 was tested. Both
levels of AE5 viruses became RT positive by day 9, representing a delay
of approximately 7 days compared to wild-type 4070A (Fig. 1B, lanes 2 and 3).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Time course of infection of chimeric AE env
series in D17 cells. (A) A 0.5-µg sample of plasmid DNA expressing
the chimeric AE envelope proteins and the wild-type control, 4070A,
within the MuLV provirus was introduced into 105 cells per
60-mm-diameter plates by the DEAE-dextran method, allowing transient
expression of the virus. Supernatant medium was assayed for the
presence of RT as described in Materials and Methods. Constructs are
indicated at the top of each lane. The number of days after
introduction of DNA is indicated on the left. Lanes 7 to 9 show the
results of an independent transfection. A linear schematic of SU and TM
is shown to the left and indicates regions within SU and TM relative to
chimeric junctions, in addition to amino acid joining points in the
amphotropic and ecotropic envelope proteins. (B) Chimeric AE and
wild-type 4070A-envelope-expressing viruses were collected from NIH 3T3
cell culture supernatants. Equivalent levels of virus, standardized by
RT activity, were introduced into D17 cells by infection for 2 h
at 37°C. For chimeric virus AE5 (*), an additional amount of virus
(lane 3), representing a 13-fold excess compared to the other samples,
was used in the infection. Supernatant medium was assayed for the
presence of RT, as described in Materials and Methods. Constructs are
indicated at the top of each lane. The number of days after
introduction of virus is indicated on the left. Arrows on the right
indicate days on which cells were passaged.
|
|
AE6, AE7, and AE8 chimeric viruses from NIH 3T3 cells were also
introduced into D17 cells by infection (Fig. 1B, lanes 4, 5, and 6, respectively). Each chimeric viral population from NIH 3T3 producer
cells was sequenced prior to this infection, and while each had
retained the original restriction sites used to generate the chimera,
no additional second-site changes were detected. Cells infected with
chimera AE6 became positive for RT activity on day 6. This is a delay
of 4 days compared with wild-type 4070A virus isolated from NIH 3T3
cells. Thus, AE6 is delayed in D17 cells both by transient transfection
of plasmid DNA with DEAE-dextran, and by infection. Chimeric virus AE6
originally derived from NIH 3T3 cells is referred to in future analyses
as AE6 no. 3. Chimeric viruses AE7 isolated from infection of NIH 3T3
cells showed a delay in the detection of RT activity in the medium of
only 1 day, while AE8 isolated from NIH 3T3 cells showed no delay
compared to wild-type 4070A.
Second round of infection with virus from producers generated by
transient expression with DEAE-dextran and by infection.
Chimeras
which displayed delayed kinetics for viral spreading either in
transient-transfection experiments with DEAE-dextran (Fig. 1A)
(47) or in infection experiments (Fig. 1B) could have defects in entry and/or assembly. During viral replication, the process
of reverse transcription facilitates an adaptive process within
retroviruses, resulting in the selection of improved viruses. Viruses
which have adapted, in a second round of infection, would display
improved kinetics of viral spread compared with the parental construct.
RT-positive viruses from D17 producer cells (AE5, AE6, AE7, and AE8)
were used in a subsequent infection, each being normalized to wild-type
4070A virus. Similar to the wild-type 4070A control, chimeras AE5 and
AE6 became RT positive around day 2 postinfection (Fig.
2). Chimeras AE7 and AE8 were RT positive by day 3 postinfection. AE7 showed no further improvement in the kinetics of viral spread with subsequent infections (data not shown).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Time course of infection of chimeric AE and 4070A
viruses in D17 cells. Chimeric AE and wild-type viruses were isolated
from culture supernatants of D17 cells. RT activity for each
supernatant was assayed as described in Materials and Methods.
Equivalent amounts of virus, assayed by RT activity, were used to
infect D17 cells. Supernatant medium was assayed for the presence of
RT. Constructs are indicated at the top, and days after introduction of
virus are indicated on the left. Arrows on the right indicate the days
on which cells were passaged.
|
|
Sequencing of the viral populations and detection of second-site
changes.
The results of the time course experiments suggested that
the onset of viral spreading in the DEAE-dextran experiment (Fig. 1A)
(47) and the infection experiment (Fig. 1B) was the result of an adaptive process. Sequence changes within env were
examined, since all of the chimeric proviral constructs contain
wild-type M-MuLV gag and pol sequences. Hirt DNAs
corresponding to the viral populations, including the wild type, were
isolated, PCR amplified, and sequenced. In Table
1, sequencing results are organized by viral population. All viral populations sequenced, except two independent AE6 populations, contained a change at amino acid residue
100 (within the VRA) from a glycine to an arginine. G100R is 5 amino
acids from the last cysteine within VRA. All changes in AE4 (G100R and
E80K) were within the VRA region. E80K is within the first putative
cysteine loop of the SU protein. Replacements of wild-type residues in
the AE5 population occurred in the VRB-hinge vicinity (G209R,
amphotropic region) and the C terminus of SU (T392I) in addition to
G100R (VRA). Two populations of AE6 virus (no. 1 and 3) contained
changes at the same amino acid, R302, within the PRR of SU. This amino
acid was changed to either a lysine, serine, or glycine. The lysine and
serine changes were present within one population of AE6 (no. 1), and
the lysine codon was apparent only upon subcloning of the serine
mutation. An alternative change seen in a third isolate of AE6 (no. 2)
occurs in the C terminus of SU (A419V). Changes in TM occurred in the
AE7 population at L538, a residue located within the putative
coiled-coil region. The wild-type isolate also contained a change in
the ectodomain of TM (G541R).
Reconstruction of second-site changes affects the viability of the
parental chimeras.
Second-site changes detected in the viral
populations were tested for their ability to affect the viability of
the parental chimeric viruses. If the sequenced second-site changes
improve the viability of the virus, the reconstructed viruses should
become RT positive at an earlier time point. Changes detected in
chimeric viruses AE4 and AE8 and in the wild-type control (Table 1)
could not be tested in this system, because the delay in RT activity is
too minimal to see any positive effect. Single and multiple combinations of the second-site changes were reconstructed into the
parental chimeric cDNA constructs of AE5, AE6, and AE7. Virus viability
was tested by the transient expression of the proviral DNA introduced
into cells by DEAE-dextran (Fig. 3).
Parental AE5, not viable by DEAE-dextran, could be improved by the
replacement of either wild-type residue G100 and T392, becoming RT
positive on days 28, and 32 respectively. The presence of both
second-site changes in the same protein further improves the viability
of AE5, which becomes RT positive by day 13 (Fig. 3A, left). Parental AE5 could also be improved by the replacement of wild-type residue G209, becoming RT positive by days 11 to 15 with kinetics similar to
those of wild-type 4070A control for this particular assay (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Time course of infection of reconstructed AE chimeric
env in AE5, AE6, AE7, and 4070A backbones in D17 cells.
Mutations detected in isolated AE chimeric viruses (Table 1) were
reconstructed into parental AE constructs as described in Materials and
Methods. A 1-µg sample of plasmid DNA expressing each AE chimera,
including parental AE chimeras, was introduced per 105
cells into 100-mm-diameter plates by using DEAE-dextran. Supernatant
medium was assayed for the presence of RT as described in Materials and
Methods. Parental constructs are indicated at the top, and mutations
are indicated for each lane. The number of days after introduction of
DNA is indicated on the left. (A) Reconstruction of mutations in AE5
parental DNA and 4070A (pNCA-Am). (B) Reconstruction of mutations in
AE6 parental DNA. (C) Reconstruction of mutations in AE7 parental
DNA.
|
|
The results indicate that the second-site mutations in AE5 were able to
improve the passage of chimeric virus. To test whether the mutations
could be beneficial or detrimental to the wild-type 4070A Env, one of
the single mutations, G209R, was reconstructed into the NCA-Am (4070A)
proviral clone (Fig. 3A, right). Virus viability was tested by
transient expression of the proviral DNA introduced into cells by
DEAE-dextran (Fig. 3A, right). In contrast to the introduction of G209R
into AE5, the introduction of G209R into 4070A impaired viral spread
compared to the wild-type control. All replicates of 4070A with the
G209R mutation were delayed for the release of RT activity, becoming RT
positive between days 15 and 19, compared to a wild-type 4070A control,
which was RT positive by day 11. The cause of the delay of 4070A/G209R
was further examined. The effect of G209R on the processing and
transport of the SU-TM precursor was examined by the release of the
processed TM protein. Processing of the precursor SU-TM occurs in the
trans-Golgi by cellular proteases. Cells were metabolically
labeled, and the TM protein was immunoprecipitated with antibody 42-114 (50). The p15/TM protein was detected after a 2-h chase in
both the 4070A and G209R/4070A extracts (Fig.
4). The processing of the precursor SU-TM
protein paralleled the release of TM (data not shown). The cause of the
delay in 4070A/G209R viral spread therefore occurs after synthesis and
processing of the precursor protein.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Pulse-chase analysis of envelope proteins after
transfection and transient expression. Plasmid DNA encoding G209R/4070A
and wild-type 4070A in the pHIT456 backbone was introduced into D17
cells as described in Materials and Methods. At approximately 40 h
after introduction of DNA, cells were metabolically labeled with
Tran35S-label for 40 min. The zero time point represents
cells harvested after the 40-min labeling period. After 40 min, the
radioactive medium was replaced with 10 ml of complete medium. Cells
were harvested at the times indicated above each lane. Cells were lysed
and immunoprecipitated as described in Materials and Methods. A similar
pulse-chase analysis was performed on the 4070A/D17 producer line.
Molecular mass markers are indicated on the left. Anti-TM ( -TM)
antiserum 42-114 (50) was used to immunoprecipitate TM. As a
positive control for cleaved TM, a 6-h pulse-chase time point for
4070A/D17 producer cell line is shown to the left of the transiently
expressed envelope proteins.
|
|
Parental AE6 viability could be improved through independent pathways.
First, replacement of the wild-type arginine 302 with either lysine,
serine, or glycine improved viability of AE6, with kinetics equivalent
to those of 4070A. Additionally, replacement of alanine 419 with valine
(second-site change detected in an independent population of AE6 no. 2)
improved AE6 to be equivalent to 4070A. The possibility that the
regions where these two independent changes occurred could interact
and/or cooperate was tested. The A419V was reconstructed within AE6
proviral constructs containing R302G, R302S, or R302K. It is important
to note that these combinations were not isolated in vivo.
Interestingly, juxtaposition of A419V with either R302G or R302S
resulted in nonviable virus. Only the conservative R302K remained
infectious, with the same kinetics as 4070A in the presence of A419V.
G100R tested within the AE6 backbone improves parental viability by
almost 2 weeks. In combination with R302G (AE6 no. 3), the virus
improved to be equivalent to the wild type.
Parental AE7 kinetics, delayed by almost 2 weeks compared to wild-type
4070A, is improved to wild-type kinetics by the sole replacement of the
wild-type residue L538. Replacement of G100 with arginine appears have
a similar effect to the parental AE7 control. Similar to AE5, the
presence of both second-site changes, G100R and L538Q, improves the
viability of the parental chimera. In the assay shown, the constructs
containing the L538Q mutation are equal to or better than the control
4070A, while in a second experiment, the L538Q mutant was delayed by 1 day with respect to the wild type (data not shown).
Sequence of the reconstructed viruses after viral spread.
Since reverse transcription is such a dynamic process, it is essential
to determine whether the reconstructed virus maintained the cloned
second-site changes after viral spread. Sequencing results are shown in
Table 2. In general, all viruses had
maintained the cloned second-site changes and restriction sites used to
generate the parental constructs. Additional second-site changes were
acquired in most of the reconstructed viruses bearing second-site
changes (underlined in Table 2). In several instances, the cloning of just one second-site change from the original viral population resulted
in a virus which had acquired a second-site change which was also
present in the original viral population, thus revealing stable sets of
changes. All viral populations acquired the G100R change.
The results for the RT-positive AE5 viral populations reconstructed
with the second-site changes, as identified in Table 1, are shown in
Table 2, and these include two independent isolates of T392I viruses,
three independent isolates of G209R, and one isolate each of G100R and
the double combination G100R and T392I. The G100R isolate acquired an
additional change in the N-terminal leader domain of SU (G51E). The
input of the parent AE5 construct with single or double mutations
results in the appearance of a preferential set of limited changes,
which include a combination of T392I, G100R, G320R, and G209R. These
changes may constitute a stable combination for AE5. It should be noted
that T392I, G100R, and G209R were identified in the initial population
of AE5 (Table 1). Additional changes have been identified in the
reconstructed viruses. These include a change at G122E (VRC domain),
G51E (N-terminal leader), and G341I and G347H (C-terminal domain).
The results for the RT-positive AE6 viral populations, reconstructed
with the second-site changes identified in Table 1, are shown in Table
2. The combination of G100R and R302G (as isolated in the AE6 no. 3 population, Table 1) is stable in that no additional second-site
changes were acquired during viral spread and the reconstruction of
R302G alone results in the recovery of G100R. Two other combinations of
second-site changes which are stable are R302K/G100R and
A419V/R302K/G100R, in that only the G100R is uniformly acquired in
these isolates. The R302S isolate acquired an additional change
proximal in primary sequence to it (G298R) and a wobble change at L235
(within the receptor binding domain). The G100R isolate acquired
additional amino acid changes both within (Q252L) and near (G309E) the
PRR. Q252, downstream of the conserved GPRVPIGP PRR, was mutated to
arginine in a second independent AE6 reconstructed isolate
(AE6/A419V/Q252R).
The results for the RT-positive AE7 viral populations, reconstructed
with the second-site changes identified in Table 1, are shown in Table
2. No additional second-site changes were detected in the G100R/L538Q
isolate. Reconstruction of the single TM change (L538Q) led to the
recovery of the G100R change and the recapitulation of the original AE7
population (Table 1), suggesting that this combination is stable. The
G100R isolate acquired the TM ectodomain change seen in the original
population and an additional change in the proline-rich region (S291I).
Testing the universality of the second-site changes: effect on
viral entry.
The second-site changes were selected by passage of
the virus on D17 cells. The universality of the changes in each
chimeric virus was tested by determining the titer of each on three
different cell lines: NIH 3T3 cells, canine D17 cells (from which they
were derived), and human 293T cells. The relative titers of each virus among the three cell types tested can be compared within these experiments but not between different viral stocks. A universal change
in the env protein would be supported by titers comparable to those of the wild-type 4070A control in each cell type tested. The
results of this analysis are shown in Table
3. The results are organized based on the
region of second-site change within the Env protein. AE6 viruses with
changes in the PRR could infect all three cell types tested and are
biased in their ability to infect cells as follows: D17 < NIH 3T3
cells < 293T cells. AE6 viruses with changes in the C terminus of
SU in addition to PRR could also infect all three cell types. The
A419V/R302K/G100R combination was created in vitro and was not isolated
as a result of viral adaptation. This combination only poorly infects
NIH 3T3 cells. Interestingly, the A419V/Q252R/G100R combination infects NIH 3T3 cells better than D17 cells. The AE5/T392I isolate with additional second-site changes in the VRC, PRR, and hinge region was as
adept in infecting all three cell types as were the AE6 isolates with
the PRR changes. The AE7 isolates containing the TM ectodomain change
were able to preferentially infect canine D17 cells; their ability to
infect NIH 3T3 cells or 293T cells was markedly reduced (by 5- and
25-fold, respectively).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Viral entry by enveloped viruses is a complex event requiring
multiple protein conformations. Recent advances obtained by using X-ray
crystallography have provided snapshot pictures of two isolated domains
of the envelope proteins of MuLV, namely, the RBD of Friend MuLV
(17) and the ectodomain of TM (18). Short of
viewing the structure of the complete SU-TM complex before and after
receptor binding, interactions within the entire SU-TM monomer and
oligomer can only be postulated. Genetic and biochemical data, shown to
complement structural data in the identification of functional
subdomains of HA (8-11, 67), can provide insights into the
functional interactions of the envelope proteins.
Different results for the domains of SU-TM required to yield a
functional chimera have been obtained depending on whether viral
vectors or replication-competent virus were used. When viral vectors,
which can only undergo one round of infection, were used, chimeras
which contain junctions at the beginning of the PRR (around junction 4 in this study) yielded virus with normal titers (42). In
contrast, vectors with junctions within the C terminus of SU yielded
low or no titers (26; L. O'Reilly and M. J. Roth, unpublished data). Chimeric enveloped MuLVs between the ecotropic
M-MuLV isolate (E) and the amphotropic 4070A (A) isolate
(47) were constructed in a replication-competent virus (AE
series and EA series). Although the junctions were initially selected
within relatively conserved regions, the results of this study indicate
that the chimeric viruses were suboptimal and upon passage have adapted
through second-site changes. These changes cannot arise when a viral
vector is used, and they can explain the difference between these two systems.
The HA proteins of influenza virus can switch from a native,
nonfusogenic structure to fusogenic-active state. The native structure
is therefore in a metastable conformation (9).
Destabilization of this conformation can be triggered by low pH or
other factors such as elevated temperature or addition of urea
(9). Maintenance of this metastable conformation would
require multiple protein-protein contacts between the two HA proteins.
In a similar manner, the nonfusogenic structure of the MuLV envelope
proteins would require inter- and intramolecular contacts between the
SU and TM proteins. The generation of chimeric proteins could disturb
the balance in a spring-loaded mechanism. Figure
5 outlines the potential interactions
between the SU and TM proteins, of which at least seven are noted (A to
G). The PRR is drawn schematically as a spring which could facilitate
the conformational changes required for exposure of the fusion peptide.
The positions of the junctions of the chimeras are included in the
schematic. Perturbation of any of these interactions could be
compensated by strengthening or weakening alternative domains. The
results of this study have identified changes which stabilize specific
chimeras.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Model of interactions of viral envelope proteins SU and
TM. A schematic model of potential interactions of SU and TM in their
oligomeric form is shown above. The SU protein is depicted as three
domains, the N terminus (which includes the VRA, VRB, and VRC domains),
the PRR, and the C terminus. The N terminus was drawn based on
predictions of trimer packing as proposed by Fass (16),
where the VRC of one monomer interacts with the VRB of another monomer.
The PRR connects the N and C termini of SU. Glycosylation sites in SU
are indicated by solid ovals. TM is depicted with a hidden fusion
domain (solid rectangles) and a trimeric coiled-coil motif (open
ovals), as discussed in the text (18). Potential
interactions which may play a role in the entry and fusion steps of the
viral life cycle are denoted by capital letters. Junctions used to
construct envelope chimeras are indicated by arabic numbers, with their
approximate location in SU and TM.
|
|
The RBD of the 4070A amphotropic Env was modeled on a computer (Fig.
6B), based on the X-ray crystal structure of the Friend MuLV ecotropic
RBD (17) (Fig. 6A). The
conserved residues (Fig. 6A) are indicated in red and
are not highly surface accessible. The specific changes observed (Fig.
6B and C) and the corresponding residues in Friend MuLV are indicated
in blue. Residues 78 to 104 (VRA) in 4070A are indicated in green.
Exchange of this region from amphotropic to polytropic sequences
results in loss of Pit2 receptor recognition (25). The
modeled RBD of 4070A does not differ significantly from the RBD of
Friend by a space-filled rendition (Fig. 6A to C). However, by using
the program Grasp, the RBDs of Friend MuLV and the modeled 4070A
molecules show striking differences in the distribution of
surface-accessible charges (Fig. 6D to F). The surface of the Friend
MuLV RBD has a large positively charged surface at the top of the
domain, corresponding in part to residues Arg 250 (8
/9
), and Arg
131 (VRA). In contrast, this surface of the modeled 4070A is negatively
charged, corresponding in part to residues Glu 80 (VRA) Glu 81 (VRA),
Glu 126 (VRC), and Asp 174 (VRB). These acidic residues are unique to
all amphotropic and polytropic MuLVs. This negatively charged surface
of the 4070A RBD is thus composed of residues from many different
subdomains. Interestingly, a second-site mutation in AE4 changes E80 to
a positively charged lysine. Additional differences in the surface electrostatic potential between the Friend MuLV and 4070A RBD can be
noted. In the Friend MuLV RBD, two large positively charged regions are
predicted (Arg 160 [VRC] and Arg 259 and 261 [9
]). Mutation of
arginine residues in M-MuLV equivalent to Arg 259 and 261 (Arg 256 and
258) resulted in loss of processing of the SU-TM precursor
(69) yet maintained viral infectivity.




View larger version (38307479K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Comparison of the 4070A RBD model and resolved Friend
MuLV RBD. Structures corresponding to the RBD of both Friend MuLV (A
and D), 4070A (B and E), and 4070A revertants (C and F) are shown.
Friend MuLV (1aol.pdb) was solved previously (17); the
structure of 4070A was computer modeled based on the Friend MuLV
structure, as described in Materials and Methods. Numbering of residues
in the Friend MuLV RBD is inclusive of the N-terminal signal peptide
(34 amino acids) (17). Structures in A to C are presented as
space-filling models. (A) Residues which are conserved between Friend
MuLV and 4070A RBD are red; homologous residues in the Friend MuLV RBD
to the second-site changes detected in AE chimeras are blue. (B and C)
Second-site changes detected in AE chimeras which map to the RBD are
blue in the 4070A models; second-site changes are underlined; residues
which have been previously studied for a role in receptor binding
(3, 25, 62) are green in the 4070A model. (D to F) Modeled
structures depict maps of surface charges, analyzed by the Grasp
program. Positively charged areas are blue; neutral areas are white;
and negatively charged areas are red. (D) Friend MuLV RBD; (E) modeled
4070A RBD; (E) modeled 4070A RBD with second-site revertants
(second-site changes are underlined). (G and H) Structures depict the
RBD trimer of 4070A as space-filling representations, modeled as
described in Materials and Methods. Second-site changes detected in AE
chimeras and homologous residues which map to the RBD are depicted in
the 4070A models as blue.
|
|
RBD.
Most chimeras passaged through canine D17 cells as well
as the wild-type control acquired the G100R change (Tables 1 and 2).
G100 is within VRA of the RBD, on the face of the protein which is
implicated in direct receptor binding. In our molecular modeling (Fig.
6B), the VRA helix D is absent and G100R is surface accessible. The
addition of G100R extends a positively charged surface predicted in the
modeling (Fig. 6E and F). Mutation of residues in 4070A near G100 to
endogenous 10A1 residues expands the host range to use 10A1 receptor
(24). Substitution of the linear sequence between Tyr 94 and
Thr 104 (Fig. 6B) with polytropic sequences decreased the titer of
amphotropic virus to 4.3% (25). Collectively, our data and
that of others (3, 24, 25) support the notion that G100R may
be involved in receptor recognition or stabilization of the receptor
interaction. This second-site change may be specific for the D17 cell
line. Receptor-coreceptor variability between species does exist, and
mutations which alter the binding affinity for specific host cell
proteins are of great interest. For all chimeras except AE7, the
acquisition of the G100R change is sufficient for some low level of
virus to initially spread, allowing the selection of additional
second-site changes which are advantageous to the virus. Future
analysis of G100R will directly monitor binding through
fluorescence-activated cell sorter FACS analysis (30).
N-terminal leader.
The leader domain, up to the first
cysteine, has not been well characterized. However, alternative ligands
for gene therapy applications are frequently inserted within this
region (54) and have not yielded productive viral entry,
suggesting that interactions mediated by this domain are critical for
entry. The histidine residue within the leader domain of ecotropic SU
(H41), absent in the resolved structure of the Friend MuLV RBD
(17), has been implicated in fusion events (2).
An AE5 variant was isolated with a change prior to the first cysteine
of the VRA (G51E). This second-site change generates a negative charge
in the modeled 4070A RBD where the Friend MuLV RBD contains acidic
residues Asp 55 and Glu 57 (Fig. 6D to F).
Base of the RBD.
Quite interestingly, a second charged
residue, G209R, which appears in close proximity to the G51E, was
independently isolated in AE5 chimeras. G209R is in the vicinity of the
I 310 helix by modeling (Fig. 6B). This change switches the
hydrophobic residue conserved in amphotropic and polytropic envelope
proteins to the polar or positively charged residue found in M-MuLV and
the related feline leukemia virus. This charged face of the RBD remains
surface accessible, even within the modeled trimer (Fig. 6G and H)
(16). In the monomer, the G-to-R change results in a change
of both surface topology and charge (Fig. 6E and F). Experiments with G209R substitution in 4070A show that transport and processing are not
affected by this substitution (Fig. 4) but that the half-life of the
cell-associated TM protein was shorter than that of wild-type 4070A.
This phenotype was similar to that found in linker insertions in the C
terminus of SU, which resulted in shedding of SU and slow passage of
the virus (23). Indirectly, this suggests that SU-TM
interactions in the presence of G209R are not stable and is consistent
with the slowing of 4070A/G209R relative to the wild-type control in
the transient-spreading assay (Fig. 3B). Analysis of the potential of
G209R to interact with other envelope protein surfaces would be
facilitated by the structure of the full-length SU or SU-TM complex.
RBD multimerization.
One second-site mutation, G122E, has
occurred in the VRC domain and has the potential to influence the
N-to-N multimerization of the RBD (interaction F in Fig. 5). This is
based on a proposal that the VRC region of one monomer of SU interacts
with the VRB region of another monomer of SU in the trimeric form of
SU-TM (16, 17). This mutation was recovered in one isolate
of AE5 upon subcloning the SU C-terminal change T392I. In the
computer-generated model of 4070A (Fig. 6B), this residue maps in the
vicinity of residues 163 to 168 of the Friend MuLV RBD. By sequence
alignment, G168 of Friend MuLV corresponds to G122E. G168 is implicated
in structural stabilization of the VRC loop through hydrogen bonding to
R160. Additional residues within VRC form the direct contact with VRB
of the adjacent monomers. PVC211, a Friend MuLV variant with extended
host range resulting in neurodegenerative disease, contains a point
mutation E163K within this region of VRC (38). This change
in PVC211 is implicated in either binding to receptor or promotion of
early conformational changes required for fusion. Analysis of the
surface electrostatic potential indicates that the G122E mutation
extends the negative charged surface (Fig. 6F) into the VRC region. If
this surface charge functions in viral entry, a wider surface may
compensate for misaligned chimeric SU trimers.
Hinge and PRR.
Results of both linker insertion mutagenesis
(23), deletion (33, 68), and point mutations
(33) studies of the PRR indicate this region is involved in
stabilizing SU-TM interactions. Two independent mutations of residue
Q252, located at the N terminus of the PRR, were isolated in AE6
chimeras (AE6/G100R/G309E/Q252L and AE6/G100R/A419V/Q252R). In related
studies, introduction of Q252V/P250I point mutations into 4070A Env
resulted in a 5-log-unit decrease in titer and increased shedding of SU
(33). In contrast, in this study the AE6 A419V/G100R/Q252R
construct contains the highest titer on NIH 3T3 cells. Further
investigation of whether the Q252 changes increase shedding within
specific AE6 chimeras and their relation to virus viability are under way.
Second-site changes in the PRR could repair the interaction between the
N and C termini (interaction A in Fig. 5). Additionally, if the PRR is
functioning as a spring or interface between the N and C domains of SU
(interaction B in Fig. 5), mutations which generally improve these
interactions would improve the virus for entry into all cell types. For
AE6, one independent pathway of repair involves changes in the C
terminus of PRR through crossover 5. Each of the single changes
observed at amino acid position 302 (S, K, and G) could restore the
viability of the AE6 chimeric virus to the equivalent of the wild-type
control (Fig. 2). AE6 chimeras with second-site changes in or near the
PRR (Table 3) infected the D17, NIH 3T3 and 293T cell lines efficiently.
C terminus of SU.
The majority of the chimeras studied in this
report contain crossover junctions throughout the C-terminus of SU. The
C terminus of SU associates with TM by covalent and noncovalent
interactions. Linker insertion mutants in the vicinity of crossover 6 were characterized by early shedding of SU from TM, resulting in
decreased syncytium formation with rat XC cells (23).
Crossover 6 is immediately C-terminal of the CWLC-conserved motif
(56), which is involved in the disulfide linkage with TM
(48, 51). Mutagenesis of glycosylation sites within this
region (19, 49) indicated that it is critical to the folding
of the C terminus of SU, resulting in the block of transport of the
precursor SU-TM protein. It would be expected, therefore, that chimeras
with junctions at position 6 could require the repair of SU-TM
interactions (interaction C in Fig. 5) or within the C-terminal domain,
if it functions as a single folding domain, similar to the RBD. It is
interesting that in the AE6 series, five (R302K, R302S, R302G, G298R,
and G309E) of eight second-site changes (Tables 1 and 2) were in the
vicinity of crossover 5 (V307). This region marks the boundary between
the PRR and the beginning of the C-terminal half of SU. A second
independent pathway of repair of AE6 involving the C terminus was
discovered (Tables 1 and 2). The mutation of alanine 419 to valine, a
branched residue, suggests that repair of this portion of SU requires
the addition of a more rigid component, perhaps stabilizing an internal
interaction required for interdomain folding and/or function. The
interaction of the C-terminal change with each change at position 302 (Fig. 3) revealed that the only combination which leads to a viable
virus is with the conservative lysine. This suggests that regions in
the C terminus and near crossover 5 interact.
TM.
Although the majority of chimera junctions and second-site
changes occur within SU, second-site changes within TM have the potential to improve SU-TM interactions (interaction C in Fig. 5).
Notably, in an AE7 chimera, a crossover within SU yielded changes
within the ectodomain of TM at L538Q. Similarly, changes in the
ectodomain of TM have also been observed in the EA7 chimeras passaged
in D17/pJET cells (O'Reilly and Roth, unpublished). The resolved
structure of the ectodomain of ecotropic TM (18) revealed a
trimer of TM through a coiled-coil motif (18). Amino acid 538 is at a b position within the potential coiled coil, which is more
frequently represented by a glutamine than by a leucine (36). L538 extends outward to the surface of the trimer and thus may be available for interactions with SU. L538Q is located 2 amino acids away from an asparagine residue, which was coordinated to a
chloride ion in the structure. It is surprising that the AE7/L538Q
virus has a strong bias for infection of D17 cells. For two independent
isolates, the titer on 293T cells was 11- to 25-fold lower than on D17
cells (Table 3). This suggests that for the AE7 viruses, a more
cell-specific adaptation has occurred. The results for the cell
specificity of the AE7/L538Q virus indicate that the L538Q cannot
simply affect the universal stabilization of the trimers. Further
studies to understand the defects in spreading for the AE7 chimera in
divergent cell types are in progress.
A single change in the ectodomain of the wild-type 4070A TM protein was
observed (G541R), as well as the G100R change in SU (Tables 1 and 2).
The presence of second-site changes in a wild-type control suggest
that, as with the AE7 chimeras, changes may be specific for the D17
cell line.
Dynamic interactions of multiple domains are required for envelope
protein function.
In the AE5 chimera, the designed junction after
the PRR could adversely affect multiple SU interactions (interactions
A, B, C, F, and G in Fig. 5). The interactions of the PRR are most
probably critical for efficient envelope function, since the mere
exchange of the larger (14-amino-acid) PRR of 4070A within an ecotropic isolate (68) decreased the viral titer by one-third.
Chimeras with changes in the C terminus (AE6/A419V) functioned in all
three cell types tested, although each isolate differentially infected NIH 3T3 cells depending on the PRR mutation present. The artificial combination of AE6/A419V/R302K could not infect NIH 3T3 cells well,
whereas AE6/A419V plus Q252R, at the N-terminus of the PRR, preferentially infected NIH 3T3 cells. These results highlight the
complex interrelationships between the subdomains of Env. Chimera AE5
was not viable in D17 cells when cloned proviral DNA was transiently
expressed (47) (Fig. 1A) but can spread, albeit with delayed
kinetics, when introduced by high-titer infection (Fig. 1B), suggesting
that one defect of this chimera may be related to processing and
folding. Attempts to generate a stable cell line producing this chimera
were unsuccessful, implying this construct bears multiple defects. The
range of second-site changes detected, spanning multiple domains of SU
such as VRA, VRC, VRB-hinge, PRR, and C terminus, substantiates these
observations (Tables 1 and 2). Indeed, repair of these multiple domains
yielded a virus which was highly competent in infecting multiple cell
types (Table 3), suggesting that interactions of multiple domains of SU
and TM are required for optimal infectivity.
Stable combinations.
Although the retroviral genome is
constantly in flux, the independent isolation of specific amino acid
changes provides evidence for the positive selection of these changes.
For AE5 chimeras, the isolation of the G100R (VRA), G209R (VRB hinge),
G320R, and T392I (C terminus) combination occurs through independent
events. Similarly, for AE7 chimeras, the isolation of G100R with L538Q occurs after a single round of selection (Tables 1 and 2). The occurrence of this stable set in D17 cells in an AE7 chimera is consistent with the observed lack of further improvement in spreading kinetics in subsequent rounds of infection. Subcloning of one mutation
within a population occasionally leads to a new second-site change in
the vicinity of a change detected in the original population (AE6 G100R
[Table 2]). This data provide insights into the limited number of
changes required for the repair of viruses hampered in their ability to
spread in a transient-infection assay.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This research is supported by NIH grant R01 CA149932 to
M.J.R. L.O. was supported in part by an NIH Predoctoral Training
Grant in Cellular and Molecular Biology (grant T32GM-8360) and by a predoctoral award from the State of New Jersey Cancer Commission.
We thank Ujwal Shinde and Shabir Najmudin for their assistance with
computer modeling programs Sybyl and Grasp.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biochemistry, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New
Jersey
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 675 Hoes Ln., Piscataway,
NJ 08854. Phone: (732) 235-5048. Fax: (732) 235-4783; E-mail:
Roth{at}waksman.rutgers.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Albritton, L. M.,
L. Tweng,
D. Scadden, and J. M. Cunningham.
1989.
A putative murine retrovirus receptor gene encodes a multiple membrane-spanning protein and confers susceptibility to virus infection.
Cell
57:659-666[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bae, Y.,
S. M. Kingsman, and A. J. Kingsman.
1997.
Functional dissection of the Moloney murine leukemia virus envelope protein gp70.
J. Virol.
71:2092-2099[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Battini, J.-L.,
O. Danos, and J. M. Heard.
1998.
Definition of a 14-amino acid peptide essential for the interaction between the murine leukemia virus amphotropic envelope glycoprotein and its receptor.
J. Virol.
72:428-435[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Battini, J.-L.,
O. Danos, and J. M. Heard.
1995.
Receptor-binding domain of murine leukemia virus envelope glycoproteins.
J. Virol.
69:713-719[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Battini, J.-L.,
J. M. Heard, and O. Danos.
1992.
Receptor choice determinants in the envelope glycoproteins of amphotropic, xenotropic, and polytropic murine leukemia viruses.
J. Virol.
66:1468-1475[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Battini, J.-L.,
P. Rodrigues,
R. Muller,
O. Danos, and J. M. Heard.
1996.
Receptor-binding properties of a purified fragment of the 4070A amphotropic murine leukemia virus envelope glycoprotein.
J. Virol.
70:4387-4393[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Berkowitz, R. D., and S. P. Goff.
1993.
Point mutations in Moloney murine leukemia virus envelope protein: effects on infectivity, virion association, and superinfection resistance.
Virology
196:748-757[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Bullough, P. A.,
F. M. Hughson,
J. J. Skehel, and D. C. Wiley.
1994.
Structure of influenza haemagglutinin at the pH of membrane fusion.
Nature
371:37-43[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Carr, C. M.,
C. Chaudhry, and P. S. Kim.
1997.
Influenza hemagglutinin is spring-loaded by a metastable native conformation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:14306-14313[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Carr, C. M., and P. S. Kim.
1994.
Flu virus invasion: halfway there.
Science
266:234-236[Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Carr, C. M., and P. S. Kim.
1993.
A spring-loaded mechanism for the conformational change of influenza hemagglutinin.
Cell.
73:823-832[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Colicelli, J., and S. P. Goff.
1985.
Mutants and pseudorevertants of Moloney murine leukemia virus with alterations at the integration site.
Cell
42:573-580[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Daniels, R. S.,
J. C. Downie,
A. J. Hay,
M. Knossow,
J. J. Skehel,
M. L. Wang, and D. C. Wiley.
1985.
Fusion mutants of the influenza virus hemagglutinin glycoprotein.
Cell
40:431-439[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Davey, R. A.,
C. A. Hamson,
J. J. Healey, and J. M. Cunningham.
1997.
In vitro binding of purified murine ecotropic retrovirus envelope surface protein to its receptor, MCAT-1.
J. Virol.
71:8096-8102[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Davey, R. A.,
Y. Zuo, and J. M. Cunningham.
1999.
Identification of a receptor-binding pocket on the envelope protein of Friend murine leukemia virus.
J. Virol.
73:3758-3763[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Fass, D.
1997.
Ph.D. thesis.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
|
| 17.
|
Fass, D.,
R. A. Davey,
C. A. Hamson,
P. S. Kim,
J. M. Cunningham, and J. M. Berger.
1997.
Structure of a murine leukemia virus receptor-binding glycoprotein at 2.0 A resolution.
Science
277:1662-1666[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Fass, D.,
S. C. Harrison, and P. S. Kim.
1996.
Retrovirus envelope domain at 1.7 A resolution.
Nat. Struct. Biol.
3:465-468[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Felkner, R. H., and M. J. Roth.
1992.
Mutational analysis of the N-linked glycosylation sites of the SU envelope protein of Moloney murine leukemia virus.
J. Virol.
66:4258-4264[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Godley, L.,
J. Pfeifer,
D. Stainhauer,
B. Ely,
G. Shaw,
R. Kaufmann,
E. Suchanek,
C. Pabo,
J. J. Skehel, and D. C. Wiley.
1992.
Introduction of intersubunit disulfide bonds in the membrane-distal region of the influenza hemagglutinin abolishes fusion activity.
Cell
68:635-645[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Goff, S. P.,
P. Traktman, and D. Baltimore.
1981.
Isolation and properties of Moloney murine leukemia virus mutants; use of a rapid assay for release of virion reverse transcriptase.
J. Virol.
38:239-248[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Granowitz, C.,
J. Colicelli, and S. P. Goff.
1991.
Analysis of mutations in the envelope gene of Moloney murine leukemia virus: separation of infectivity from superinfection resistance.
Virology
183:545-554[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Gray, K. D., and M. Roth.
1993.
Mutational analysis of the envelope gene of Moloney murine leukemia virus.
J. Virol.
67:3489-3496[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Han, J.-Y.,
P. M. Cannon,
K.-M. Lai,
Y. Zhao,
M. V. Eiden, and W. F. Anderson.
1997.
Identification of envelope protein residues required for the expanded host range of 10A1 murine leukemia virus.
J. Virol.
71:8103-8108[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Han, J.-Y.,
Y. Zhao,
W. F. Anderson, and P. M. Cannon.
1998.
Role of variable regions A and B in receptor binding domain of amphotropic murine leukemia virus envelope protein.
J. Virol.
72:9101-9108[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Han, L.,
T. Hofmann,
Y. Chiang, and W. F. Anderson.
1995.
Chimeric envelope glycoproteins constructed between amphotropic and xenotropic murine leukemia retroviruses.
Somatic Cell Mol. Genet.
21:205-214[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Heard, J. M., and O. Danos.
1991.
An amino-terminal fragment |