The X-box element present within the promoter region of genes
belonging to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) plays a pivotal
role in the expression of class II molecules, since it contains the
binding sites for several well-characterized transcription factors. We
have analyzed a randomly selected compilation of viral genomes for the
presence of elements homologous to the X box of the HLA-DRA gene. We
found that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) shows the
highest frequency of X-like box elements per 1,000 bases of genome.
Within the HIV-1 genome, we found an X-like motif in the TAR region of
the HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR), a regulative region playing a
pivotal role in Tat-induced HIV-1 transcription. The use of a decoy
approach for nuclear proteins binding to this element, namely, XMAS
(X-like motif activator sequence), performed by transfection of
multiple copies of this sequence into cells carrying an integrated
LTR-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase construct, suggests that this
element binds to nuclear proteins that enhance Tat-induced
transcription. In this report we have characterized two proteins, one
binding to the XMAS motif and the other to the flanking regions of
XMAS. Mobility shift assays performed on crude nuclear extracts or
enriched fractions suggest that similar proteins bind to XMAS from
HIV-1 and the X box of the HLA-DRA gene. Furthermore, a UV
cross-linking assay suggests that one protein of 47 kDa, termed FAX
(factor associated with XMAS)-1, binds to the XMAS of HIV-1. The other protein of 56 kDa was termed FAX-2. In a decoy ex vivo experiment, it
was found that sequences recognizing both proteins are required to
inhibit Tat-induced HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription. Taken together, the
data reported in this paper suggest that XMAS and nearby sequences modulate Tat-induced HIV-1 transcription by binding to the
X-box-binding proteins FAX-1 and FAX-2. The sequence homology between
XMAS and X box is reflected in binding of a common protein, FAX-1, and similar functional roles in gene expression. To our knowledge, this is
the first report showing that transcription factors binding to the X
box of the MHC class II genes enhance the transcription of HIV-1.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The class II molecules of the major
histocompatibility complex (MHC), a class of transmembrane
glycoproteins expressed on the cell surface as heterodimers of A and B
chains, are very important for immune function (4, 29).
These molecules, encoded by the MHC class II genes HLA-DR, -DP, and
-DQ, are generally expressed only on a small number of specialized
cells, and expression is constitutive for antigen-presenting cells,
including B lymphocytes, Langerhans cells, and monocyte-macrophage
lineage cells, or can be induced or enhanced by different stimuli, such
as gamma interferon (IFN-
) treatment, in endothelial cells,
epithelial cells, fibroblasts, muscle cells, and T lymphocytes
(14, 18). MHC class II molecules play a pivotal role in the
immune response, as demonstrated by the almost complete absence of
circulating CD4+ T cells in MHC class II knockout mice
(6, 17). These molecules are involved in acquisition of the
mature T-cell repertoire through positive and negative selection in the
thymus, in the induction of lymphocyte and macrophage-monocyte
activation and differentiation, and in the presentation of processed
antigens to CD4+ T lymphocytes (19).
Expression of MHC class II genes is primarily regulated at the level of
transcription, via a highly conserved proximal promoter located
upstream of the transcription start site that is sufficient to confer
both constitutive and inducible expression in transient-transfection experiments (1, 14, 41). Two highly conserved cis
sequences, the X and Y boxes, present in all murine and human class II
proximal promoters (1, 25) are positive regulators
interacting with trans-acting factors required for
expression of MHC class II genes (3, 14, 41, 42). The X-box
motif interacts with several well-characterized transcription factors,
including RFX, RFX1, NF-X, NFXc, hXBP-1, X2BP, Jun/Fos, NF-S, and
NF-X3/BCF-1 (29), and for at least one of them, the absence
correlates with the class II-negative phenotype in a hereditary
immunodeficiency disease termed bare lymphocyte syndrome (10,
33).
The level of transcription of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genes is under control of the long terminal repeat (LTR), and
within this region, a trans-activating region (TAR, spanning
nucleotides +1 to +80 with respect to the transcription start site at
+1) is present and plays a pivotal role in viral genes transcription.
In fact, during the earliest phase of infection, the level of viral
gene transcription is quite low, but increases sharply in the presence
of the Tat trans-activating viral protein (5, 12,
21). The Tat protein binds to a structured TAR RNA element
present in all viral transcripts. It has been suggested that Tat
overcomes the premature termination of transcription by increasing the
rate of transcription initiation and by stabilizing transcription
elongation, or through a combination of the two (7, 15, 16, 24,
26, 27, 28, 30, 45). In this process, the TAR element acts as an
enhancer of transcription that recruits viral Tat and cellular protein
cofactors (20, 21, 23, 39). Although TAR RNA is critical for
Tat activation, the role played by TAR DNA in regulating HIV-1 gene
expression is far from being completely understood. It has been
demonstrated that several nuclear proteins bind to the TAR DNA
(13, 32) and also that TAR DNA-binding proteins purified
from HeLa cells and T-lymphocyte nuclear extracts by conventional and
DNA affinity chromatography are transcription factors playing both
activating and repressing roles (13, 32).
In this study we have analyzed a randomly selected compilation of viral
genomes for the presence of elements homologous to the X box of the
HLA-DRA gene. We have focused attention on the HIV-1 genome, which
shows a high frequency of X-box-like elements per 1,000 bases of
genome. Within the HIV-1 genome we found an X-like motif in the TAR
region of the HIV-1 LTR, a regulatory region playing a pivotal role in
Tat-induced viral transcription. Herein we report data demonstrating
that this sequence, termed XMAS for X-like motif activator sequence,
binds to X-box-binding proteins and participates to the enhancement of
Tat-induced HIV-1 gene transcription. A decoy strategy was used in
order to demonstrate that XMAS-binding proteins act as transcription
factors enhancing Tat-induced viral transcription. This is the first
evidence suggesting the involvement of X-box-binding proteins in the
modulation of HIV-1 transcription.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture conditions and nuclear extract preparation.
Cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf
serum at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5%
CO2. Nuclear extracts were prepared by the standard
procedure (8).
Plasmid constructions and preparation of X-HIV DNA concatamer
resin.
Complementary synthetic HIV containing the XMAS motif of
HIV-1 (X-HIV) oligonucleotides (sense strand,
5'-CTGGTTAGACCAGATCTGAGCGT-3', sequence spanning +8 to +31)
were combined in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), heated to 100°C,
and annealed at room temperature for 2 h. Concatamers of annealed
X-HIV oligonucleotides were prepared by single-step kinase-ligase
reaction at 25°C for 16 h, using T4 kinase and T4 ligase (MBI
Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania). The product of the reaction was
blunt-end ligated into the SmaI site of plasmid pUC18, and
recombinant plasmids were sequenced. A clone containing 10 annealed
X-HIV oligonucleotides was selected and termed pUC-XHIV. Biotinylated
X-HIV concatamers were then obtained by PCR using the pUC-XHIV plasmid
as the template and sense (5'-end biotinylated) and antisense X-HIV
oligonucleotides as the primers. The DNA affinity resin was prepared by
extensively coupling the 5'-end biotinylated X-HIV concatamers to 200 µl of streptavidin-conjugated agarose beads in TE buffer (10 mM
Tris-Cl [pH 7.6], 1 mM EDTA) for 16 h at 4°C. Then, the DNA
affinity resin was equilibrated in binding buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH
7.9], 20% glycerol, 0.1 M KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], 0.5 mM dithiothreitol [DTT],
1 µg of leupeptin per ml, 1 µg of aprotinin per ml).
Purification of X-HIV binding proteins.
T-lymphoid Jurkat
cells (1010) were collected during the logarithmic phase of
growth by centrifugation, washed in PBS, and subjected to the Dignam
procedure (8) for nuclear extract preparation. In our hands,
13 mg of protein was obtained. Protein quantification was performed by
the standard Bradford method (2). The X-HIV DNA-binding
activity was determined by band shift. The nuclear extract was
precipitated with ammonium sulfate at 40% saturation and centrifuged
for 20 min at 100,000 × g. The supernatant was precipitated with ammonium sulfate at 60% saturation and centrifuged as above. The pellet was dissolved in Dignam's buffer D (20 mM HEPES
[pH 7.9], 20% glycerol, 0.1 M KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM PMSF, 0.5 mM
DTT, 1 µg of leupeptin per ml, 1 µg of aprotinin per ml) to a final
concentration of about 10 mg/ml and then dialyzed against two changes
of buffer D at 4°C and loaded onto a heparin-Sepharose column
(HiTrap; Pharmacia) preequilibrated in buffer D. After a washing step
with buffer D containing 0.2 M KCl, the proteins bound were stepwise
eluted in buffer D containing 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, or 1 M KCl.
Under these conditions, X-HIV DNA-binding activity was eluted in the
0.3 to 0.5 M KCl fractions. These fractions were pooled, concentrated
on a Microcon 10 device, and dialyzed against two changes of binding
buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2,
0.01% Triton X-100, 1 mM DTT, 0.2 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 0.5 mM PMSF,
1 µg of leupeptin per ml, 1 µg of aprotinin per ml) at 4°C. After
addition of bovine serum albumin, poly(dI-dC) · poly(dI-dC) and
200 µl (packed volume) of X-HIV DNA concatamer resin, the mixture was
incubated for 20 min at room temperature, and the resin was packed by
gravity on a chromatographic support. The DNA affinity column was
washed twice with 5 volumes of binding buffer, and stepwise elution was
performed with buffer D containing, successively, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, and 1 M KCl. Under these conditions, X-HIV DNA-binding
activity was eluted between 0.3 and 0.5 M KCl.
DNase I footprinting assay.
For preparation of the
footprinting probe, the 259-bp DNA fragment mimicking a region of the
HIV-1 LTR was prepared by PCR using 10 ng of plasmid
pTZIIICAT as the template DNA and 150 ng of HIV-1-F and
HIV-1-R primers (see Fig. 2 for locations of the primers within the
HIV-1 LTR) (11). PCR was performed using a
32P-labeled HIV-1-R PCR primer. PCR was performed in 25 µl of 50 mM KCl-10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8)-2.5 mM
MgCl2-0.1% Triton X-100 by using 2 U of Taq
DNA polymerase (Dynazyme; Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland) per reaction. The
cycles were as follows: denaturation for 1 min at 94°C; annealing for
1 min at 60°C; elongation for 1 min at 72°C. The
32P-labeled amplified fragment was analyzed by
electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel, purified by phenol-chloroform
extraction, washed through a Microcon 30 (Amicon Inc.-Grace Company,
Beverly, Mass.) with 400 µl of water, and dissolved in 100 µl of water.
The experimental conditions for the footprinting assay were as follows.
Footprinting reactions were carried out in 50 µl containing 10,000 cpm of 32P-end-labeled DNA, 5% glycerol, 20 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 7.5), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, and 0.01%
Triton X-100. Fifty microliters of 10 mM MgCl2-5 mM
CaCl2 solution was added 1 min before the addition of DNase
I. The footprinting reaction was blocked at room temperature by adding
90 µl of 200 mM NaCl-30 mM EDTA-1% sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS)-100 µg of yeast RNA per ml. Reactions were phenol extracted
and precipitated by adding 2.5 volumes of ethanol. The pellets were
dissolved in 3 µl of loading dye, denatured for 2 min at 90°C, ice
cooled, and layered onto an 8% polyacrylamide-7 M urea sequencing
gel. After electrophoresis, gels were vacuum dried and exposed to Kodak
X-OMAT films. Maxam-Gilbert G+A sequencing reactions were performed in
10 µl of TE buffer, using 3.6 ng of 32P-end-labeled DNA
and 1 µg of calf thymus DNA. One microliter of 4% formic acid (pH 2)
was added, and the reaction mixture was incubated for 25 min at 37°C.
After the addition of 150 µl of 1 M piperidine and further incubation
for 30 min at 90°C, the reaction mixtures were extracted with 1 ml of
butanol. The pellets were washed with 150 µl of 1% SDS and 1 ml of
butanol. After two additional washes with butanol, the pellets were
dried, dissolved in loading dye, and analyzed by electrophoresis on the
8% polyacrylamide-7 M urea sequencing gel.
EMSAs.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were
performed by using double-stranded synthetic oligonucleotides mimicking the X-HIV motif present within the TAR region of the HIV-1 LTR (X-HIV
mer) or the X box sequence of the HLA-DRA promoter (X-DRA mer). The
sense strand sequence of X-DRA mer was
5'-ACCCTTCCCCTAGCAACAGATGCGTCATCT-3'. The synthetic
oligonucleotides were 5'-end labeled using [
-32P]ATP
and T4 polynucleotide kinase. Binding was performed in a total volume
of 25 µl containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM
MgCl2, 0.01% Triton X-100, 1 mM DTT, 0.2 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 1 µg of poly(dI-dC) · poly (dI-dC), crude
nuclear extract or enriched fractions, and 10,000 cpm of labeled
double-stranded oligonucleotides. After 30 min at room temperature, the
samples were electrophoresed at constant voltage (200 V for 2 h)
on a 6% polyacrylamide gel in 0.25× TBE. The gel was dried and autoradiographed.
UV cross-linking assay.
The double-stranded
32P-labeled X-HIV mer probe was prepared by using
[
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase. Binding
conditions were the same as described for the EMSA. Protein samples
from crude nuclear extracts or fractions eluted from the DNA affinity
column in buffer plus 0.3 to 0.5 M were incubated with 2 ng of the
labeled X-HIV DNA (200,000 cpm) probe in a final volume of 25 µl for
30 min at room temperature. The mixture was irradiated for 30 min using a UV transilluminator (254 nm; 7,000 mW/cm2) at a distance
of 5 cm from the UV source. The reaction was blocked by addition of 5 µl of 6× Laemmli gel loading buffer and electrophoresed at constant
voltage (150 V) on a 15% polyacrylamide-SDS gel. After electrophoresis, the gel was fixed, silver stained when appropriate, and dried under vacuum, and the DNA-binding proteins were identified by autoradiography.
Transfection and CAT assay.
HL3T1 cells, containing
integrated copies of the LTR-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT)
retroviral construct, were maintained on complete RPMI 1640 containing
penicillin and streptomycin. Cells were split on the day prior to
transfection so that each well of a six-well plate was 50 to 70%
confluent at the time of transfection. Using 10 µl of Lipofectin
reagent (Gibco-BRL-Life Technologies, Milan, Italy) per well, 2 µg of
pUC-XHIV or 2 µg of plasmid pUC18 DNA (with or without 1 µg of
HIV-1 Tat) was transfected onto identically prepared wells in Optimem
(Gibco-BRL-Life Technologies). As a control for transfection
efficiency, 1 µg of pCMV-SPORT-
-gal (Gibro-BRL-Life Technologies)
was cotransfected in all experiments. Four hours after transfection,
the medium was replaced with RPMI 1640 plus 10% fetal calf serum and
0.5 µg of HIV-1 Tat, and cells were harvested 72 h later.
Cytoplasmic extracts were prepared and assayed for
-galactosidase
expression, and protein amounts containing the same level of
-galactosidase activity were assayed for CAT activity
(37).
RT-PCR assay.
Cell samples were collected for RNA extraction
using the TRIzol reagent from Gibco-BRL-Life Technologies. Total RNA (2 µg) was used for each cDNA synthesis with oligo(dT)15
primer and the cDNA cycle kit from Invitrogen. Aliquots of the cDNA
samples were used as a template for amplifying specific gene fragments
by PCR. The primers used in this study were: for HLA-DRA mRNA
amplification, 5'-CCTGTCACCACAGGAGTGTCAGAG-3' (forward) and
5'-CAGAGGCCCCCTGC GTTCTGCTG-3' (reverse); and for
-actin
amplification, 5'-GTGGGGCGCCCCAGG CACCA-3' (forward) and
5'-CTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTC-3' (reverse).
-Actin mRNA was
used as an internal control for the amount of cDNA synthesized. To
ensure the specificity of mRNA detection, all primers were designed to
cover at least two exons, and parallel samples without reverse
transcription (RT) were run as negative controls. The amplified DNA
products were run on an agarose gel and visualized with ethidium
bromide staining (37).
 |
RESULTS |
Distributions of X-box-like sequences within the HIV-1 genome.
We have studied the presence of X-box-like sequences in a randomly
selected group of viral genomes by screening at 90, 80, and 70%
homology for the X box of the HLA-DRA gene. This search was performed
by using the MacVector Software (IBI Kodak) for Macintosh computers.
The results, summarized in Table 1, show that X-like motifs (sequences 70% homologous to the X box) are present
in many viral genomes, and the HIV-1 genome (GenBank entry HIVHXB2CG)
shows a high frequency of these X-like elements per 1,000 bp. When the
search was performed on other human viral genomes, we found that X-like
elements were present at a lower frequency within most of them (for
instance, HS11CG and HS4 in Table 1). We found 68 X-like elements
within the 9.7 kb of the HIV-1 genome (Fig.
1A), and interestingly, one of these was
found within the HIV-1 TAR region (named XMAS, for X-like motif
activator sequence; see Fig. 1A and B). A noteworthy, low level of
homology was observed between the 5'- and 3'-flanking sequences of the
XMAS motif and the flanking sequences of the X box of the HLA-DRA gene
(Fig. 1B). In addition, we performed a comparative analysis of
different HIV-1 genomes, demonstrating that the XMAS motif is conserved within the TAR regions of different HIV-1 isolates (Table
2).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Distribution of sequences homologous to the X box of MHC
class II genes within the genomes of randomly selected
human viruses
|
|

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(A) Distribution of sequences 70% homologous to the X
box of MHC class II genes within the HIV-1 genome (GenBank entry
HIVHXB2CG). The search was performed with MacVector Software. The 68 X-like elements found within the 9.7 kb of the HIV-1 genome are marked
with solid circles. (B) Structure of the HIV-1 and HLA-DRA promoter
regions. The binding sites for transcription factors binding to the
promoter regions have been boxed. +1, transcription start site. HIV-1
LTR and HLA-DRA genomic regions carrying XMAS and X-box motifs have
been aligned in the middle of the figure. XMAS and X-box motif
homologies are marked by vertical lines. The asterisk represents
mismatched nucleotides.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Sequences homologous to the X box of class II MHC genes
are conserved in the LTRs of different
HIV-1 isolatesa
|
|
Binding of nuclear proteins to the XMAS motif present within the
HIV-1 TAR region.
First, we analyzed the interaction between
nuclear factors present in T-lymphoid Jurkat cells and the HIV-1 LTR by
a DNase I footprinting assay. In order to focus the study on binding of nuclear proteins to the TAR region, the probe was labeled on the noncoding strand. Binding conditions were verified by incubation of the
footprinting probe with recombinant Sp1 protein (Fig.
2), which generates a large footprint at
the level of the LTR Sp1 binding sites. Then, the probe was incubated
in the presence of increasing amounts of nuclear extracts (from 1 to 8 µg/reaction) and digested with DNase I, and the generated fragments
were resolved by electrophoresis on a sequencing gel (Fig. 2). In our
experimental conditions, three major footprints were observed: one
extending from
78 to
46 and covering the Sp1 binding sites; the
other two footprints were observed within the TAR region from +4 to +13
and from +15 to +32 (the last covering the XMAS motif and its
3'-flanking region). It should be mentioned that the XMAS motif
(nucleotides +15 to +24; Fig. 1B) is localized in a region that could
be bound by several nuclear proteins (13, 32). For this
reason, further investigations were undertaken in order to characterize
the protein(s) binding the XMAS element.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Analysis of nuclear protein binding to the HIV-1 LTR
region carrying the XMAS motif, performed by DNase I footprinting. The
footprinting probe was produced by PCR using the HIV-1-R
32P-labeled primer. The probe was incubated in the absence
(control) or in the presence of either recombinant Sp1 protein (Sp1
factor) or increasing amounts of Jurkat cell nuclear extracts. G+A, G+A
sequencing reaction performed on the footprinting probe. I, II, and III
are three major footprints extending from 78 to 46, +4 to +13, and
+15 to +32. The XMAS motif (nucleotides +15 to +24) is also shown.
|
|
In order to determine whether the XMAS-containing region is recognized
by nuclear proteins, we performed an EMSA using an oligonucleotide
mimicking the LTR region (X-HIV, spanning from +8 to +31). In a
preliminary experiment, we inhibited the binding of Jurkat cell nuclear
extracts to X-HIV (carrying the XMAS motif) or X-DRA (carrying the
X-box motif of the HLA-DRA gene) double-stranded oligonucleotides by
adding increasing amounts of poly(dI-dC) · poly (dI-dC) in
the binding reaction. DNA-protein complexes generated in the presence
of 1 µg of poly(dI-dC) · poly(dI-dC) were considered specific.
Although the X-HIV and X-DRA probes generate distinct binding patterns,
as clearly evident in the experiment reported in Fig.
3A, one specific protein-DNA complex
showing the same electrophoretic mobility was generated by both probes
(asterisk, Fig. 3A).

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Comparison of EMSA patterns obtained by using
oligonucleotides carrying the XMAS and X-box motifs. (A) Competition of
nuclear factor binding to oligonucleotides X-HIV, mimicking the LTR
region and spanning from +8 to +31, and X-DRA, carrying the X-box motif
of the HLA-DRA gene, by increasing amounts of poly(dI-dC) · poly(dI-dC). Asterisk, protein-DNA complex generated by both X-HIV and
X-DRA oligonucleotides. (B) Screening for the presence of XMAS and
X-box motif-binding activity in different cell lines expressing or not
MHC class II molecules (upper and middle panels), performed by EMSA. In
the lower panel, the EMSA-grade quality of the nuclear extracts used
with the X-HIV and X-DRA probes has been tested by detecting the
binding of NF- B factor to its target DNA sequence. Lane , free
probe.
|
|
By virtue of the sequence homology of XMAS and the X-box motif, it
should be expected that common proteins bind to both motifs. By EMSA,
we tested the simultaneous presence of XMAS motif- and X-box
motif-binding activity in different cell lines expressing or not MHC
class II molecules, including melanoma (MNT1, MRN1, and Colo38),
T-lymphoid (Jurkat), B-lymphoid (Raji and WIL2), erythroleukemic
(K562), and promyelocytic (HL60) cell lines. As a control, we tested
the EMSA-grade quality of the nuclear extracts by probing the binding
of NF-
B to its target DNA sequence (Fig. 3B, lower panel).
Interestingly, the results (Fig. 3B, upper and middle panels) revealed
the simultaneous presence (in MNT1, MRN1, WIL2, K562, Jurkat cells, and
IFN-
-treated Colo38 melanoma cells) and absence (in HL60 and Raji
cells) of a DNA-protein complex evidenced by the asterisk, suggesting
that common nuclear proteins bind to both the X-HIV and X-DRA probes.
Noteworthy, although Raji cell nuclear extracts do not give retarded
bands in the presence of X-HIV and X-DRA, the same nuclear extracts
generate a specific band when tested in the presence of the
double-stranded oligonucleotide carrying the consensus NF-
B binding
sequence. Taken together, the data support the hypothesis that the
HIV-1 XMAS motif and HLA-DRA gene X-box motif bind to similar nuclear proteins.
In order to verify the hypothesis that similar proteins bind to the
X-HIV and X-DRA oligonucleotides, the competitive EMSAs shown in
Fig. 4 were performed. We used nuclear
extracts from T-lymphoid Jurkat cells. The binding of nuclear proteins
to X-HIV (Fig. 4A, left panel) or to X-DRA (Fig. 4A, right panel) was
inhibited by addition of a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled X-HIV or
X-DRA double-stranded oligonucleotides. Noteworthy, the competitor
X-DRA inhibits the assembly of the X-HIV-protein complex (Fig. 4A, left panel, X-DRA lane, double arrow), whereas a molar excess of unlabeled X-HIV inhibits only the formation of one specific X-DRA-protein complex
(Fig. 4A, right panel, X-HIV lane, double arrow). On the contrary, the
competitor X-DRA inhibits the formation of both arrowhead (Fig. 4A,
right panel, X-DRA lane) and low-speed-migrating X-DRA-protein
complexes. These data suggest that, among the X-box-binding proteins,
only some of them bind to the HIV-1 XMAS motif.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
(A) Competitive band shift assay. The binding of
proteins from Jurkat nuclear extracts to X-HIV (left panel) or X-DRA
(right panel) double-stranded oligonucleotides was inhibited by
addition of a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled X-HIV or X-DRA
double-stranded oligonucleotide. The double arrow indicates the
protein-DNA complex generated by both probes. (B) Binding of Jurkat
nuclear proteins to X-HIV (upper panel) or X-DRA (lower panel)
double-stranded oligonucleotides was inhibited by addition of
increasing amounts of unlabeled X-HIV, X-DRA, or HIV-1 Sp1-binding
site-containing (Sp1) double-stranded oligonucleotides or by addition
of increasing amounts of PCR products mimicking the HIV-1 (PCR-LTR) and
HLA-DRA (PCR-DRA) promoters. Only the band corresponding to the complex
marked by a double arrow in panel A is shown. (C) Competitive UV
cross-linking assay. Crude nuclear extracts from Jurkat cells were
incubated with the X-HIV radiolabeled probe in the absence ( ) or in
the presence of a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled X-HIV or X-DRA
double-stranded oligonucleotide. After the binding reaction, the
assembled protein-DNA complexes were cross-linked by UV light exposure.
The migration of protein size markers is shown on the right side of the
autoradiograph. p47 and p57 are the proteins binding to the X-HIV
probe.
|
|
In Fig. 4B, the X-HIV probe was incubated with Jurkat cell nuclear
extracts in the presence of X-DRA or in the presence of a PCR product
mimicking the entire HIV-1 LTR region or in the presence of a PCR
product mimicking the promoter region of the HLA-DRA gene containing X,
Y, and Z boxes. Control experiments were performed by incubating X-HIV
with nuclear extracts in the presence of a molar excess of X-HIV or
double-stranded oligonucleotide carrying the binding site for HIV-1 Sp1
(Sp1 mer). In these experiments, we focused attention on the retarded
DNA-protein complex marked with an asterisk in Fig. 3, since this
complex contains both X-box- and XMAS-binding proteins. The complex
generated by the binding of nuclear proteins to labeled X-HIV was not
inhibited by Sp1 mer, but was inhibited by X-HIV, X-DRA, and PCR
products mimicking the HIV-1 LTR or the HLA-DRA gene promoter. Fully in
agreement with these results, the complex generated by the binding of
nuclear proteins to labeled X-DRA was not inhibited by Sp1 mer, but was inhibited by X-DRA, X-HIV, and PCR products mimicking the HIV-1 LTR or
the HLA-DRA gene promoter. These data confirm the specificity of the
DNA-protein complex assembled by both X-HIV and X-DRA mers and support
the hypothesis that common proteins bind to both XMAS and X-box motifs.
In addition, we characterized nuclear protein binding to XMAS by a UV
cross-linking assay. Since the covalent linkage of protein to an
oligonucleotide up to 35 bp in length has little effect on the mobility
of proteins in SDS-PAGE, allowing us to establish the molecular weight
of DNA-binding proteins (36), we used labeled X-HIV
double-stranded oligonucleotide and crude nuclear extracts from Jurkat
cells. As shown in Fig. 4C, two proteins of 56 and 47 kDa bind to the
X-HIV mer. Since the assembly of radiolabeled UV cross-linked complexes
was inhibited in the presence of unlabeled X-HIV or X-DRA mers, the
data suggest that both p56 and p47 Jurkat cell nuclear proteins are
X-HIV- and X-box-binding proteins.
Purification of XMAS-binding proteins.
Using a combination of
conventional and DNA affinity chromatography, cellular nuclear proteins
binding to XMAS (spanning from +15 to +24) were purified. A scheme of
the purification protocol is shown in Fig.
5A. We evaluated the purification process
by probing the presence of both X-HIV- and X-box-binding activities by
EMSA. We started the purification procedure using 1010
T-lymphoid Jurkat cells. Thirteen milligrams of nuclear extract was
prepared by the standard Dignam procedure (8). In the
preliminary experiment, we determined the concentration of ammonium
sulfate that precipitates the low-migrating X-DRA-protein complex but not the complex identified by the asterisk in Fig. 5B. Forty percent saturation with ammonium sulfate was sufficient to separate the X-DRA-binding proteins involved in the formation of the
low-speed-migrating complex in the supernatant from those forming the
high-speed-migrating complex in the pellet. Therefore, in the
preparative ammonium sulfate precipitation, we first saturated at 40%,
and the supernatant was then saturated at 60%. The pellet, containing
proteins forming the complex asterisked in Fig. 5B and in Fig. 5C, lane
L, was fractionated by heparin-Sepharose chromatography, using stepwise elution with buffer D (see Materials and Methods) plus increasing concentrations of salt. Under these conditions, X-HIV-binding activity
was eluted with buffers containing 0.3 to 0.5 M KCl (Fig. 5C, lanes c
to e). The X-DRA-binding activity was eluted into the same fractions
that were positive for X-HIV-binding activity. Fractions containing the
X-HIV-binding proteins were pooled and applied to the DNA affinity
column carrying X-HIV concatamers, and the on-column retained proteins
were collected by stepwise elution with buffer D carrying increasing
concentrations of salt. Under these conditions, X-HIV- and
X-DRA-binding activities were eluted in the fractions at 0.3 to 0.5 M
KCl (Fig. 5D, lanes c to e). As shown in Fig. 5D, the proteins eluted
in these fractions generate three distinct DNA-protein complexes in the
EMSA (complexes A, B, and C), with either the X-HIV or X-DRA probe. The
final enrichment of X-HIV-binding proteins was 950-fold with respect to
the crude nuclear extract (Table 3). A
similar amount of protein fractionated after each purification step was
loaded onto SDS-10% PAGE, and the gel was stained by the Coomassie
R250 procedure in order to display the enrichment process (Fig. 5E,
left panel). The reduction in complexity and protein amount observed
during the purification steps correlates inversely to the increase in X-HIV-binding activity (see also Table 3). In Fig. 5E, the fractions eluted from the DNA affinity column were UV cross-linked to the radiolabeled X-HIV mer, and the gel was silver stained and then autoradiographed. Although three major proteins were evidenced by
silver stain, 56, 50, and 47 kDa (Fig. 5E, middle panel),
autoradiography of the gel showed that only p56 and p47 directly
contact the X-HIV probe (Fig. 5E, right panel). Interestingly, these
proteins are the same sizes as the X-HIV-binding proteins detected in
crude nuclear extracts.

View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Enrichment of XMAS-binding proteins by conventional and
DNA affinity chromatography. (A) Scheme of the protocol used for
enrichment of cellular nuclear proteins binding to HIV-1 XMAS. Sup,
supernatant; FLT, flowthrough; AS, ammonium sulfate. (B, C, and D)
Similar volumes of fractions obtained from ammonium sulfate
precipitation (B), heparin-Sepharose chromatography (C) and X-HIV DNA
affinity chromatography (D) were assayed for the presence of X-HIV- and
X-DRA-binding activities by EMSA. (E) In the left panel, similar
amounts of total proteins for the selected fractions were loaded onto
SDS-10% PAGE and the gel was stained with Coomassie R250 stain. In
the middle panel, proteins from the fraction loaded onto DNA affinity
chromatography (HS-0.5M) or eluted from DNA affinity chromatography in
buffer plus 0.5 M KCl (DNA affinity 0.5 M) were fractionated by
SDS-PAGE and the gel was silver stained. In the right panel, proteins
eluted from X-HIV DNA affinity chromatography in buffer plus 0.5 M KCl
(DNA affinity 0.5M) and proteins from Jurkat cell crude nuclear
extracts (Jurkat-N.E.) were UV cross-linked to the X-HIV probe; the
radiolabeled protein-DNA complexes have been evidenced by SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography. Jurkat N.E., crude nuclear extracts; 60% AS-pellet,
proteins present in the pellet obtained after 60% saturation with
ammonium sulfate; HS-FLT, proteins not retained on the
heparin-Sepharose column; HS-0.5M, proteins eluted from the
heparin-Sepharose column with buffer containing 0.5 M KCl; MK, protein
size markers; L, proteins loaded onto heparin-Sepharose column; F, free
probe; W, proteins washed from chromatographic column; a, b, c, d, e,
f, and g, fractions eluted from chromatographic matrix using buffer
containing, respectively, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 M
KCl.
|
|
Modulation of Tat-induced HIV-1 transcription.
The experiments
reported in this section were performed in order to determine whether
the region containing the XMAS motif enhances Tat-induced HIV-1
transcription. The pivotal role played by TAR in the regulation of
Tat-induced HIV-1 transcription is well known. Since constructs
carrying deletions or mutations in the TAR sequence could be reflected
in unstructured TAR RNA, a decoy approach was used in order to study
the effect of protein binding to the region containing the XMAS motif
on Tat-induced HIV-1 transcription. The double-stranded oligonucleotide
X-HIV, mimicking the region from +8 to +31 and containing the XMAS
motif, was used in order to produce concatamers of the XMAS motifs.
These concatamers were ligated into SmaI-linearized plasmid
pUC18 DNA, and recombinant clones were selected. One of them, pUC-XHIV,
carrying 10 repeated XMAS motifs, was used in the decoy experiments
diagrammed in Fig. 6. As a cellular
system mimicking HIV-1 infection, we used HL3T1 cells, which contain
integrated copies of the LTR-CAT construct. The cells were transfected
with plasmid pUC-XHIV or pUC18 DNA in the presence or absence of HIV-1
Tat. Transfections were performed in triplicate, and cells were
harvested 72 h later. Extracts were assayed for CAT activity.
Basal CAT activity was also measured. The CAT activity present in cells
treated with Tat alone was assumed to be 100%. Interestingly, a
significant decrease in CAT activity (up to 40% ± 2% of the control
value) was obtained in cells transfected with plasmid pUC-XHIV, whereas transfection with the backbone vector had only minor effects (up to
92% ± 4% of control). These data suggest that the X-HIV sequence binds transcription factors enhancing Tat-induced HIV-1 transcription.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Effect of decoy of proteins binding to the X-HIV element
on Tat-induced HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription. HL3T1 cells carrying the
LTR-CAT construct were transfected with plasmid pUC-XHIV (containing 10 copies of the X-HIV element) or with pUC18 (plasmid backbone of
pUC-XHIV) in the presence of two-exon HIV-1 Tat. Basal CAT activity was
also measured (w/o Tat). A representative result obtained by thin-layer
chromatography (TLC) is shown in the left panel. In the right panel,
acetylated chloramphenicol (ac. cam) spots were scraped from the TLC
support, and radioactivity was measured. The CAT activity of cells
transfected with pUC18 was set at 100%. The data reported are the
averages of three independent experiments. cam, chloramphenicol.
|
|
Mutational analysis of the XMAS motif.
In order to define the
nucleotides involved in the binding of proteins to the X-HIV mer, we
first synthesized an oligonucleotide (X-HIV-S wild-type mer) in which
the regions flanking the XMAS motif were deleted; second, we
synthesized mutant oligonucleotides in which dinucleotide mutations
were introduced in the XMAS motif (Table
4). The binding of nuclear proteins to
these oligonucleotides was assayed by EMSA and UV cross-linking (Fig.
7). In a preliminary experiment, we
inhibited the binding of Jurkat nuclear proteins to X-HIV-S wild type
(Fig. 7A, left panel), carrying the XMAS motif alone, by addition of an
increasing molar amount of unlabeled X-HIV, carrying both XMAS and
flanking regions, or X-HIV-S wild type. As a control, unrelated cold
Sp1 mer mimicking the Sp1-binding sites present in the HIV-1 LTR was
used. In our experimental conditions, the competitor Sp1 mer did not
inhibit the formation of the specific complex assembled on the XMAS
motif. On the contrary, the competitor X-HIV was able to inhibit the
assembly of the specific X-HIV-S wild-type/protein complex. These data
suggest that X-HIV and X-HIV-S wild type double-stranded
oligonucleotides bind similar proteins. Afterwards, the binding of
Jurkat cell nuclear proteins to the X-HIV-S wild-type probe was
performed in the absence and presence of double-stranded
oligonucleotides carrying dinucleotide mutations within the XMAS motif
(see sequences in Table 4) or in the presence of the double-stranded
X-DRA mer (Fig. 7A, right panel). The specific complex generated by the
binding of nuclear proteins to the 32P-labeled X-HIV-S wild
type was not efficiently inhibited by X-HIV-S mutants 3, 4, and 5; on
the contrary, the binding of nuclear proteins to labeled X-HIV-S wild
type was efficiently inhibited by X-HIV-S mutants 1 and 2. These data
suggest that nucleotides present within the sequence CAGATC
(+19 to +24) are required for the binding of nuclear proteins to
the XMAS motif.

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
(A) Competitive band shift assay. The binding of nuclear
proteins from Jurkat cells to short double-stranded oligonucleotides
carrying the XMAS motif (without flanking regions [X-HIV-S wild
type]) was inhibited by addition of a molar excess of unlabeled X-HIV,
X-HIV-S wild type, or HIV-1 Sp1-binding site-containing (Sp1)
double-stranded oligonucleotide (left panel); in the right panel, the
binding was inhibited by addition of a molar excess of unlabeled
X-HIV-S wild type or mutants (X-HIV-S mut-1 to mut-5) carrying
dinucleotide substitution involving the HIV-1 XMAS motif. (B) The sizes
of the DNA-binding proteins contacting the X-HIV or the X-HIV-S wild
type double-stranded oligonucleotide were compared by a UV
cross-linking assay. The radiolabeled probes were incubated in the
presence (+) or in the absence ( ) of crude nuclear extracts (n.e.)
from Jurkat cells. After the binding reaction, the assembled
protein-DNA complexes were cross-linked by UV light exposure. The
migration of the protein size markers is shown on the right side of the
autoradiograph. The sizes of the protein-DNA complexes detected are
reported on the left side of the autoradiograph. (C) The sizes of the
DNA-binding proteins contacting the X-HIV-S wild type or mutant
double-stranded oligonucleotides were compared by a UV cross-linking
assay, as described above.
|
|
In addition, we have characterized the binding of nuclear proteins to
X-HIV and to X-HIV-S wild type by a UV cross-linking assay. In this
experiment we used labeled X-HIV or X-HIV-S wild type double-stranded
oligonucleotides and crude nuclear extracts from Jurkat cells. As shown
in Fig. 7B, while both p56 and p47 bind to the X-HIV mer, only the
protein termed FAX-1, for factor activating XMAS, binds to X-HIV-S wild
type. Since the oligonucleotide X-HIV-S wild type lacks the regions
flanking the XMAS motif, the results suggest that only FAX-1 binds to
the XMAS motif, while p56 need the presence of the XMAS-flanking
regions in order to obtain efficient interaction. In addition, when the
UV cross-linking assay was performed as described above but using the
X-HIV-S mutants as probes (Fig. 7C), only mutants X-HIV-S mut 1 and 2 directly bind to FAX-1, sustaining the hypothesis that nucleotides
mutated in X-HIV-S mut 3 to 5 (involving the wild-type CAGATC,
+19 to +24) are important for the binding of FAX-1 to the XMAS
motif. On the contrary, the region of the XMAS motif spanning
nucleotides +15 to +18 does not seem to be involved in the binding of
FAX-1. Noteworthy, instead of the region of the X-box motif of the
HLA-DRA gene spanning nucleotides
105 to
100, which contain an
extra nucleotide with respect to the homologous region within the XMAS motif, the sequence
100 to
95 shows good homology to the XMAS motif
(see Fig. 1). Thus, it is not surprising that regions spanning nucleotides
100 to
95 of the X-box motif and nucleotides +19 to +24
of the XMAS motif could bind the same factor.
Oligonucleotides carrying the XMAS motif inhibit IFN-
-induced
HLA-DRA gene expression.
In order to determine whether the XMAS
motif could modulate an X-box-dependent gene transcription, the decoy
effect of double-stranded oligonucleotides carrying the XMAS motif on
the HLA-DRA gene expression was analyzed. As cellular model system we
used the Colo38 cell line, an MHC class II-negative cell line derived
from a human melanoma. In these cells, IFN-
dramatically induces the
expression of HLA-DRA mRNA. To determine whether double-stranded
oligonucleotides carrying the XMAS motif inhibit HLA-DRA gene
transcription, HLA-DRA mRNA levels were evaluated by semiquantitative
RT-PCR (Fig. 8A). Colo38 cells were
treated in the absence or in the presence of the double-stranded
oligonucleotides X-HIV and X-HIV-S wild type (carrying the XMAS motif),
X-HIV-S mut-4 (carrying a dinucleotide mutation that abrogates the
binding of FAX-1), and X-DRA (carrying the X box of the HLA-DRA gene).
Afterwards, expression of the HLA-DRA gene was induced for 24 h by
the addition of IFN-
, and cells were collected for RNA extraction.
Total RNA was used for each cDNA synthesis with the oligo(dT) primer,
and aliquots of the cDNA samples were used as a template for amplifying
the HLA-DRA and
-actin mRNAs. As a control for amplification,
plasmid pIIDR
1 carrying the entire cDNA of the HLA-DRA gene was used
(Fig. 8A, lane a). The induction of HLA-DRA expression is clearly
evident by comparing lanes b and c in Fig. 8A. As expected, the
expression induced by IFN-
is inhibited by pretreating the cells
with double-stranded oligonucleotide X-DRA, carrying the X box of the
HLA-DRA gene (Fig. 8A, lane f). Also, pretreatment with double-stranded
X-HIV and X-HIV-S oligonucleotides was found to inhibit HLA-DRA mRNA accumulation (Fig. 8A, lanes g and e, respectively). On the contrary, accumulation of HLA-DRA mRNA was not inhibited by pretreating the cells
with the double-stranded oligonucleotide X-HIV-S mut-4, carrying a
dinucleotide mutation abrogating the binding of FAX-1 to the XMAS motif
(Fig. 8A, lane d). Taken together, the data demonstrate that the XMAS
motif exhibits a decoy effect leading to inhibition of the
X-box-dependent transcription of the HLA-DRA gene. In addition, these
data suggest that FAX-1 might be important for HLA-DRA gene expression
induced by IFN-
.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
(A) Inhibition of IFN- -inducible MHC class II
expression by decoy oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ODN). Colo38 melanoma
cells, treated with or without decoys (d to g) or not (b and c), were
stimulated with IFN- (c to g) and collected for RT-PCR analysis
24 h later. Cells were stimulated with IFN- at 400 U/ml.
Gene-specific primers were used to amplify the cDNA templates. Lane b,
RT-PCR amplification of the RNA isolated from Colo38 cells not induced
with IFN- . In lane a, plasmid pIIDR 1 carrying the entire HLA-DRA
cDNA was used as the template in a control PCR amplification. Lane M,
size markers. (B) Inhibition of Tat-induced HIV-1 LTR-driven
transcription by decoys. HL3T1 cells were transfected with decoys (a to
e) and induced by Tat. Cells were collected 48 h later and assayed
for CAT activity. A representative result obtained by TLC is shown
(bottom). In the top panel, acetylated chloramphenicol (ac cam) spots
were quantified with a phosphor imager and values were plotted. The
data are the averages of three independent experiments. cam,
chloramphenicol. Lane f, control reaction performed by using purified
CAT.
|
|
Effects of oligonucleotides carrying the XMAS motif on Tat-induced
HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription.
In order to identify the DNA
motifs required to inhibit Tat-induced HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription,
an experiment similar to that in Fig. 8A was performed using
transfection of synthetic oligonucleotides to Tat-induced HL3T1 cells
as a model system. The results of the experiment are shown in Fig. 8B.
As is clearly appreciable, the X-DRA, X-HIV-S wild type, and
X-HIV-S-mut oligonucleotides do not inhibit Tat-induced HIV-1
LTR-driven transcription. By contrast, the X-HIV oligonucleotide, as
expected (see also Fig. 6), leads to about 64% inhibition. This
finding suggests that the XMAS motif is not sufficient to inhibit HIV-1
LTR-driven transcription in decoy experiments. In order to determine
whether the XMAS motif was important for HIV-1 transcription, we
compared the decoy effect of the X-HIV oligonucleotide with that of
X-HIV-mut, which contains the scrambled sequence ATCTGT
instead of CAGATC (Table 4). The results obtained
(Fig. 8B) demonstrate that X-HIV-mut does not lead to any extent of
inhibition of Tat-induced HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription. Taken
together, these findings are in line with the hypothesis that, in decoy
experiments, the XMAS sequence is required and sufficient to inhibit
IFN-
-induced expression of the human HLA-DRA gene (Fig. 8A), but the
same sequence is required but not sufficient for inhibition of
Tat-induced HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription (Fig. 8B). In order to
obtain inhibition of Tat-induced HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription
by using decoy oligonucleotides, both X-MAS and flanking
regions are required, suggesting that both FAX-1 and FAX-2 are
required to enhance HIV-1 transcription.
 |
DISCUSSION |
It has been well established that expression of HIV-1 genes is
modulated by both viral and cellular factors (13).
Accordingly, the identification of cellular transcription factors
modulating Tat function is critical in order to understand the
mechanisms regulating HIV-1 gene expression. Multiple regulatory
elements direct HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription by serving as binding
sites for a variety of cellular transcription factors (9, 22, 24, 32, 34, 35, 38) and influence the degree of transactivation by
the Tat protein. Among these, YY1 (31), USF (9),
TFII-I (34, 35), LBP family proteins (43),
PRDII-BF1 (38), CTF/NF-1 (22), and TDP-43
(32) have been described to bind in the vicinity of the
HIV-1 initiator spanning nucleotides
4 to +25 (40) and function as either repressors or activators of HIV-1 transcription.
In order to gain further insight on the mechanisms regulating HIV-1
gene expression, we screened the HIV-1 genome for the presence of
additional binding sites for cellular transcription factors modulating
Tat function. Since the X-box sequence present within the promoter
region of MHC class II genes plays a pivotal role in transcriptional
modulation, we searched for sequences homologous to this DNA motif in
the HIV-1 genome. In our working hypothesis, a sequence homologous to
this motif present within HIV-1 LTR could retain modulator activity.
The screening showed that the HIV-1 genome is enriched in X-like
elements (Table 1), and interestingly, we identified a sequence within
the TAR region spanning nucleotides +15 to +24, herein termed XMAS for
X-box motif activator sequence. Comparing the XMAS motifs present
within the TAR region of different HIV-1 genomes (Table 2), we found that the sequence was highly conserved. This finding suggests that this
sequence could have a regulatory function. However, conservation of
nucleotide sequence within the TAR region is not surprising since, upon
transcription, the XMAS motif is part of the stem-bulge TAR RNA.
Since XMAS was selected by sequence homology to the X-box element, we
determined whether XMAS mediates interactions with cellular nuclear
proteins, in particular with X-box-binding proteins, and if this
sequence plays a role in modulating HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription.
Some inferences can be drawn from the binding data. The DNase I
footprinting assay performed using T-lymphoid cell nuclear extracts and
shown in Fig. 2 showed the presence of two footprints localized on +4
to +13 and +15 to +32, the last including the XMAS motif (nucleotides
+15 to +24; Fig. 1B) and its 3'-flanking region. The UV cross-linking
assay (Fig. 4C) suggests that two proteins of about 56 and 47 kDa bind
to the X-HIV sequence in T-lymphoid Jurkat cells. These sizes do not
match those of previously described ubiquitous transcription factors
UBP-1/LBP-1 (63 kDa, binding the sequence from
16 to +27), UBP-2 (50 kDa, binding the sequence from +28 to +36), and TDP-43 (43 kDa, binding
the sequence from
6 to +36) (13, 32) that bind in the
region from
16 to +36. The two proteins p56 and p47 could represent previously uncharacterized nuclear proteins present in T-lymphoid cells.
Although competitive EMSAs (Fig. 3A and 4A and B) strongly suggest that
X-box-binding proteins bind to the LTR region (+8 to +31), the
differences in the binding patterns with probes X-HIV (+8 to +31 and
carrying XMAS; see Fig. 1) and X-DRA (carrying the X-box motif and
flanking sequences; see Fig. 1) suggest that sequences flanking the X
box and XMAS contribute to generate different EMSA patterns. In
addition, the data in Fig. 3B highlight a tight correlation between
XMAS- and X-box-binding activities in different cell lines, including
melanoma, T- and B-lymphoid, erythroleukemic, and promyelocytic cells,
that could be explained by sequence homologies between the XMAS and
X-box motifs. In addition, the competitive UV cross-linking assay (Fig.
4C) confirmed these data.
Furthermore, we performed a small-scale enrichment of cellular nuclear
proteins binding to XMAS (Fig. 5) by a combination of conventional and
DNA affinity chromatography in order to characterize the DNA-protein
complexes assembled on XMAS and X-box motifs. It should be noted that
during fractionation, the XMAS and X-box motif-binding activities
always cofractionated (Fig. 5B, C, and D), confirming the hypothesis
that common proteins bind to both motifs. In addition, fractions eluted
from the DNA affinity matrix at 0.3 to 0.5 M KCl give more strongly
labeled complexes in the UV cross-linking assay than the crude Jurkat
nuclear extracts (Fig. 5E), confirming the enrichment for a
XMAS-binding proteins.
The role played by XMAS and flanking regions on Tat-induced HIV-1
LTR-driven transcription was verified by a decoy approach using HL3T1
cells, which contain integrated copies of the LTR-CAT construct, as a
cellular system mimicking HIV-1 infection (Fig. 6). We selected this
approach because plasmid constructs carrying deletions or mutations in
the TAR sequence could be reflected in an unstructured TAR RNA. In this
approach, plasmid DNA carrying 10 repeated XMAS motifs was used as the
decoy molecule. Interestingly, a significant decrease in CAT activity
(up to 40% ± 2% of the control value) was obtained in cells
transfected with the decoy plasmid, whereas transfection with the
backbone vector has only a small effect (up to 92% ± 4% of the
control). These data suggest that the X-HIV sequence binds
transcription factors enhancing Tat-induced HIV-1 transcription.
Furthermore, we performed a mutational analysis in order to define the
nucleotides involved in the binding of proteins to the X-HIV sequence.
Interestingly, deletion of nucleotides flanking the XMAS motif
abrogates the binding of p56 but not the binding of p47, suggesting
that p47 is a factor associated with XMAS (FAX-1). On the contrary, the
binding of p56 requires nucleotides localized outside the XMAS motif
(Fig. 7B and C). Mutational analysis of the XMAS motif revealed that
sequence from +19 to +24 is necessary for the binding of FAX-1 (Fig. 7A
and C).
In order to determine the effects of the XMAS motif on transcription,
we first determined the effects of decoy oligonucleotides on
X-box-dependent transcription of cellular genes. To this end, we
analyzed the decoy effect of XMAS-containing double-stranded oligonucleotides on human HLA-DRA gene expression induced by IFN-
. It should be underlined that recognition of infected CD4+ T
cells requires IFN-
induction of MHC class II expression and that
suppression of IFN-
-inducible MHC class II expression may represent
an efficient immune evasion strategy used by intracellular pathogens to
escape host defenses (44). At least in ex vivo experiments,
we provide data demonstrating that the viral XMAS sequence (X-HIV-S
wild type mer, Fig. 8, lane e) inhibits the transcription of HLA-DRA
gene, a gene in which the X-box motif has been well characterized to
enhance transcription. Thus, the protein binding to the XMAS motif,
FAX-1, could be involved in coordinated activation of the HIV-1 genome
and induction of the HLA-DRA gene.
Finally, in order to identify the DNA motifs required to inhibit
Tat-induced HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription, a similar experiment was
performed using as a model system Tat-induced HL3T1 cells. The results
of the experiment show that the XMAS sequence is required but not
sufficient for inhibition of Tat-induced HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription
(Fig. 8B). In order to obtain inhibition of Tat-induced HIV-1
LTR-driven transcription by using decoy oligonucleotides, both X-MAS
and flanking regions are required, suggesting that both FAX-1 and FAX-2
are required to enhance HIV-1 transcription.
In conclusion, our data suggest that one X-box-binding protein, FAX-1,
binds to the XMAS motif present within the HIV-1 LTR TAR region, in
proximity to the initiator sequence. This sequence, like the X-box
motif in the context of the MHC class II gene promoters, plays an
enhancing role in Tat-induced HIV-1 transcription and binds proteins
involved in the regulation of IFN-
-induced HLA-DRA gene
transcription. This sequence is required but not sufficient to inhibit
Tat-induced HIV-1 LTR-driven transcription. From the theoretical point
of view, this finding suggests that coordinated expression of MHC class
II and HIV-1 genes could be realized by the X-box-binding protein
FAX-1. In this respect, we speculate that in latently infected T
lymphocytes, the induction of MHC class II gene expression could be a
signal provoking active viral replication and AIDS progression.
This work was supported by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità
(AIDS-1998), CNR-P.F. Biotecnologie, PRIN-98, and Finalized Research funds (year 1998) from the Italian Ministry of Health. C.M. was the
recipient of an AIRC fellowship.
We thank Mauro Giacca for kindly providing Tat expression plasmid
pGEX2T-Tat2E (ICGEB, Trieste, Italy). We thank P. G. Balboni for
the generous gift of HL3T1 cells.
| 1.
|
Benoist, C., and D. Mathis.
1990.
Regulation of major histocompatibility complex class-II genes: X, Y and other letters of the alphabet.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
8:681-715[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bradford, M. M.
1976.
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal. Biochem.
72:248[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Cogswell, J. P.,
N. Zeleznik-Le, and J. P.-Y. Ting.
1991.
Transcriptional regulation of the HLA-DRA gene.
Crit. Rev. Immunol.
11:87-112[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Cresswell, P.
1990.
Immunology: questions of presentation.
Nature (London)
343:593-594[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cullen, B. R.
1990.
The HIV-1 Tat protein: an RNA sequence-specific processivity factor?
Cell
63:655-657[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Dardell, S.,
M. Merkenschlager,
H. Bodmer,
S. Chan,
D. Cosgrove,
C. Benoist, and D. Mathis.
1994.
The immune system of mice lacking conventional MHC class II molecules.
Adv. Immunol.
55:423-440[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Das, A.
1993.
Control of transcription termination by RNA-binding proteins.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
62:893-930[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Dignam, J. D.,
R. M. Lebovitz, and R. G. Roeder.
1983.
Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:1475-1489[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Du, H.,
A. L. Roy, and R. G. Roeder.
1993.
Human transcription factor USF stimulates transcription through the initiator elements of the HIV-1 and the Ad-ML promoters.
EMBO J.
12:501-511[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Durand, B.,
M. Kobr,
W. Reith, and B. Mach.
1994.
Functional complementation of major histocompatibility complex class II regulatory mutants by the purified X-box-binding protein RFX.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:6839-6847[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Feriotto, G.,
C. Mischiati, and R. Gambari.
1994.
Sequence-specific recognition of the HIV-1 long terminal repeat by distamycin: a DNase I footprinting study.
Biochem. J.
299:451-458.
|
| 12.
|
Frankel, A. D.
1992.
Activation of HIV transcription by Tat.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
2:293-298[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Gaynor, G.
1992.
Cellular transcription factors involved in the regulation of HIV-1 gene expression.
AIDS
6:347-363[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Glimcher, L. H., and C. J. Kara.
1992.
Sequences and factors: a guide to MHC class II transcription.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
10:13-49[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Graeble, M. A.,
M. J. Churcher,
A. D. Lowe,
M. J. Gait, and J. Karn.
1993.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 trans-activator protein Tat stimulates transcriptional read-through of distal terminator sequences in vitro.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:6184-6188[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Greenberg, M. E., and M. B. Mathews.
1997.
Effects of heterologous downstream sequences on the activity of the HIV-1 promoter and its response to Tat.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25:5017-5024[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Grusby, M. J., and L. H. Glimcher.
1995.
Immune responses in MHC class II-deficient mice.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
13:417-435[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Guardiola, J., and A. Maffei.
1993.
Control of MHC class II gene expression in autoimmune, infectious, and neoplastic diseases.
Crit. Rev. Immunol.
13:247-268[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Itoh-Lindstrom, Y.,
B. M. Peterlin, and J. P.-Y. Ting.
1995.
Affinity enrichment and functional characterization of TRAX1, a novel transcription activator and X1-sequence-binding protein of HLA-DRA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:282-289[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Jeang, K. T.,
H. Xiao, and E. Rich.
1999.
Multifaceted activities of the HIV-1 transactivator of transcription, Tat.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:28837-28840[Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Jones, K. A., and B. M. Peterlin.
1994.
Control of RNA initiation and elongation at the HIV-1 promoter.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
63:717-743[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Jones, K. A.,
P. A. Luciw, and N. Duchange.
1988.
Structural arrangements of transcription control domains within the 5'-untranslated leader regions of the HIV-1 and HIV-2 promoters.
Genes Dev.
2:1101-1114[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Karn, J.
1999.
Tackling Tat.
J. Mol. Biol.
293:235-254[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Kato, H.,
H. Sumimoto,
P. Pognonec,
C.-H. Chen,
C. A. Rosen, and R. G. Roeder.
1992.
HIV-1 Tat acts as a processivity factor in vitro in conjunction with cellular elongation factors.
Genes Dev.
6:655-666[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Kelly, A., and J. Trowsdale.
1985.
Complete nucleotide sequence of a functional HLA-DP gene and the region between the DP 1 and DP 1 genes: comparison of the 5' ends of HLA class II genes.
Nucleic Acids Res.
13:1607-1620[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Laspia, M. F.,
A. P. Rice, and M. B. Mathews.
1990.
Synergy between HIV-1 Tat and adenovirus E1a is principally due to stabilization of transcriptional elongation.
Genes Dev.
4:2397-2408[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Laspia, M. F.,
A. P. Rice, and M. B. Mathews.
1989.
HIV-1 Tat protein increases transcriptional initiation and stabilizes elongation.
Cell
59:283-292[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Laspia, M. F.,
P. Wendel, and M. B. Mathews.
1993.
HIV-1 Tat overcomes inefficient transcriptional elongation in vitro.
J. Mol. Biol.
232:732-746[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Mach, B.,
V. Steimle,
E. Martinez-Soria, and W. Reith.
1996.
Regulation of MHC class II genes: lessons from a disease.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14:301-331[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Marciniak, R. A., and P. A. Sharp.
1991.
HIV-1 Tat protein promotes formation of more-processive elongation complexes.
EMBO J.
10:4189-4196[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Margolis, D. M.,
M. Somasundaran, and M. R. Green.
1994.
Human transcription factor YY1 represses human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcription and virion production.
J. Virol.
68:905-910[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Ou, S.-H. I.,
F. Wu,
D. Harrich,
L. F. Garcia-Martinez, and R. B. Gaynor.
1995.
Cloning and characterization of a novel cellular protein, TDP-43, that binds to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 TAR DNA sequence motifs.
J. Virol.
69:3584-3596[Abstract].
|
| 33.
|
Reith, W.,
S. Satola,
C. Herrero-Sanchez,
I. Amaldi,
B. Lisowska-Grospierre,
C. Griscelli,
M. R. Hadam, and B. Mach.
1988.
Congenital immunodeficiency with a regulatory defect in MHC class II gene expression lacks a specific HLA-DR promoter binding protein, RF-X.
Cell
53:897-906[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Roy, A. L.,
S. Malik,
M. Meisterernst, and R. G. Roeder.
1993.
An alternative pathway for transcription initiation involving TFII-I.
Nature (London)
365:355-359[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Roy, A. L.,
P. Meisterernst,
P. Pognonec, and R. G. Roeder.
1991.
Cooperative interaction of an initiator-binding transcription initiator factor and the helix-loop-helix activator USF.
Nature (London)
354:245-248[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Sagami, I.,
S. Y. Tsai,
H. Wang,
M.-J. Tsai, and B. W. O'Malley.
1986.
Identification of two factors required for transcription of the ovalbumin gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6:4259-4267[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 38.
|
Seeler, J. S.,
C. Muchardt,
A. Suessle, and R. B. Gaynor.
1994.
Transcription factor PRDII-BF1 activates human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gene expression.
J. Virol.
68:1002-1009[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Sharp, P. A., and R. A. Marciniak.
1989.
HIV TAR: an RNA enhancer?
Cell
59:229-230[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Sheldon, M.,
R. Ratnasabapathy, and N. Hernandez.
1993.
Characterization of the inducer of short transcripts, a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcriptional element that activates the synthesis of short RNAs.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:1251-1263[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Ting, J. P.-Y., and A. S. Baldwin.
1993.
Regulation of MHC gene expression.
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
5:8-16[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Tsang, S. Y.,
M. Nakanishi, and B. M. Peterlin.
1990.
Mutational analysis of the DRA promoter: cis-acting sequences and trans-acting factors.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:711-719[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Yoon, J. B.,
G. Li, and R. G. Roeder.
1994.
Characterization of a family of related cellular transcription factors which can modulate human immunodeficiency virus type 1&nbs |