Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, October 2000, p. 8893-8903, Vol. 74, No. 19
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Promoter-Specific Targeting of Human SWI-SNF
Complex by Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Protein 2
Daniel Y.
Wu,1,2
Anton
Krumm,3 and
William H.
Schubach1,2,*
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of
Medicine, Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System,
Seattle Division, Seattle, Washington 98108,1
and Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine,
University of Washington Medical Center,2 and
Division of Radiation Oncology, University of
Washington,3 Seattle, Washington 98195
Received 26 April 2000/Accepted 7 July 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The multiprotein human SWI-SNF (hSWI-SNF) complex is a
chromatin-remodeling machine that facilitates transcription by
overcoming chromatin-mediated gene repression. We had previously shown
that hSNF5/INI1, an intrinsic, consistent component of the hSWI/SNF complex, is associated with Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA2) and
have proposed that EBNA2 directs this complex to key EBNA2-responsive viral and cellular genes. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation and
quantitative PCR, we show that antibodies directed against components
of the hSWI-SNF complex preferentially precipitate chromatin-associated
DNA that contains a targeted EBNA2-responsive element in the context of
both episomal and cellular chromatin. This enrichment does not occur in
EBNA2-negative cells or when the EBNA2-responsive element is mutated.
The stable association of the hSWI-SNF complex with the
EBNA2-responsive promoter can also be disrupted by deletion of the TATA
element, suggesting that EBNA2 in itself is insufficient to mediate
stable targeting of the hSWI-SNF complex. These results demonstrate
that recruitment of the hSWI-SNF complex to selected promoters can
occur in vivo through its interaction with site-specific activator
proteins and that stable targeting may require the presence of basal
transcription factors.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)
immortalizes B lymphocytes, with attendant expression of a small subset
of viral genes including Epstein-Barr nuclear protein 2 (EBNA2), which
is required for immortalization (14). EBNA2 contains an
acidic transcriptional activation domain (8) and activates
several viral and cellular genes that are involved in the
immortalization process (9, 23, 51, 52, 66). The activation
domain of EBNA2 binds to TFIIH, TATA binding protein
(TBP)-associated factor TAF40, and TFIIB and to a protein that
binds TFIIE (46, 47) and can interact both functionally and
in vitro with transcription coactivators p300/CBP and P/CAF (4,
18, 53). EBNA2 is tethered to a subset of EBNA2-responsive
promoters through its association with RBP-J
/CBF1 (13, 15, 49,
65). This interaction is mediated by a domain of EBNA2 that is
conserved among various gammaherpesviruses (CR6) that is distinct from
the transactivation domain (27, 37). Another factor, SKIP,
binds to a distinct conserved region of EBNA2 (CR5) to direct
transcription repressor complexes to sites of EBNA2 action
(67). Through these interactions, EBNA2 serves the pivotal
function of acting as an adapter molecule that can direct various
multiprotein complexes to its sites of action to integrate both
transcriptional activation and repression functions that are required
to maintain the growth-transformed state. We had shown that a
phosphorylated fraction of nuclear EBNA2 in lymphocytes is associated
with an invariant member of the human SWI-SNF (hSWI-SNF) complex,
hSNF5/INI1, the human homologue of yeast SNF5 protein (60).
The association with hSNF5/INI1 is also mediated through a region of
EBNA2 that is distinct from its transactivation domain.
The hSWI-SNF complex is one of a family of multiprotein complexes that
are conserved in evolution and serve to remodel chromatin in a
catalytic, energy-dependent fashion. Overcoming the barrier to
transcription imposed by chromatin is a pivotal aspect of the control
of gene expression. Derepression can occur by perturbing the
interaction between nucleosomes and DNA through histone acetylation by
the coactivators p300/CBP and P/CAF (5, 34), by activator binding, or by remodeling by multiprotein complexes (reviewed in
reference 66). The chromatin-remodeling complexes of
both yeast and higher eukaryotes share several features. Each includes a homologue of the yeast SNF2-SWI2 protein that contains DNA-dependent ATPase and a helicase motif (19, 30, 54) and encodes the core catalytic activity of the complex (38) and is
invariably associated with three other proteins in all of the SWI-SNF
homologous complexes studied to date: SNF5 or its human homologue
hSNF5/INI1 (29), SWP73 or its human homologue BAF60, and
SWI3 or its homologues BAF170 and BAF155 (54).
The SWI-SNF complex in yeast is required for the induced expression of
a small number of genes but is dispensable for growth under normal
condition (57). The relatively low abundance (100 to 2,000 copies per cell) of SWI-SNF complexes suggests that some form of
targeting is required to bring the complex to specific genes or
families of genes. It has been proposed that the SWI-SNF complex is
recruited to promoters as a part of the RNA polymerase II (Pol II)
holoenzyme (7, 56), although some biochemical data and in
vitro analyses of SWI-SNF complexes have been at variance with this
model (31, 64). The complex might also be targeted through
its association with site-specific DNA binding proteins. The latter
hypothesis is supported by the requirement of SWI-SNF proteins for
glucocorticoid receptor function in yeast cells (30, 63), by
its activation of several nuclear receptors in mammalian cells (6,
55), and by recruitment of yeast SWI-SNF in vitro by a peptide in
the glucocorticoid receptor (48). Targeting of SWI-SNF has
recently been substantiated by several reports demonstrating that
components of the yeast and human SWI-SNF complexes can be targeted by
their association with the activation domains of general (32, 33,
64) or gene-specific (1, 10, 20, 25, 36) transcription
factors. In all examples to date, targeting is mediated through SWI-SNF
interaction with the activation domain of the associated transcription factor.
To determine whether the hSWI-SNF complex is targeted to
EBNA2-responsive promoters through its association with EBNA2, we have
generated multicopy episomal chromatin templates that contain the
EBNA2-responsive element of the EBV terminal protein 1 (TP1/LMP2A) gene. EBNA2 activates TP1/LMP2A through a promoter that contains two
RBP-J
/CBF1 binding sites (GTGGGAA) (24, 65).
Using quantitative PCR, we show that antibodies directed against
hSWI-SNF components preferentially immunoprecipitate
chromatin-associated DNA that is at least 5- to 10-fold enriched for
the targeted EBNA2-responsive sequence. We also show that the hSWI-SNF
complex is targeted to cellular chromatin of the CD23 gene, which is
induced by EBNA2. The region of EBNA2 that mediates this interaction is
distinct from the activation domain. These data show that EBNA2 acts as an adapter protein that can target the hSWI-SNF complex to a specific region in chromatin. Targeting of hSWI-SNF by EBNA2 is consistent with
its playing a significant role in regulating gene expression from viral
or cellular chromatin.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cloning of plasmids and generation of Raji cell sublines.
The reporter gene TpTATAMG was generated within plasmid pSp1TATAMG by
removing the 12 tandem Sp1 binding sites with HpaI and BglII, blunt ending, and ligating with the double-stranded
54-bp oligodeoxyribonucleotide derived from TP1/LMP2A promoter with the
sequence
CTCGCGACTCGTGGGAAAATGGGCGGAAGGGCACCGTGGGAAAATAGTTCCAGG. The TpTATAMG insert was then removed from this vector by
digestion with NruI and NdeI, blunt ended, and
ligated into the HindIII site of pHeBO, creating plasmid
pTpTATAMG. Plasmid pTpmutTATAMG, containing mutated
CBF1/RBP-J
binding sites, was made in the same manner using the
oligonucleotide
CTCGCGACTCGTTTTAAAATGGGCGGAAGGGCACCGTTTTAAAATAGTTCCAGG. Plasmid pTATAMG lacks the TP1/LMP2A sequence and was generated without the oligonucleotide insert. Plasmid pTpMG lacks the TATA element and was made by digesting pSp1TATAMG with HpaI and
EcoRI to remove the Sp1 sites and the TATA element and
ligating with the TP1/LMP2A oligonucleotide. All plasmids were
transferred into Raji cells by electroporation and then selected and
maintained in hygromycin B. The episome copy number in each cell line
was determined by Southern blot analysis.
Generation and purification of chromatin fragments.
The
procedures to generate purified chromatin fragments were modified from
the method of Grandori et al. (12). Episome-containing Raji
cells (1.5 × 108 to 2 × 108 cells)
washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were lysed with 10 ml of
reticulocyte standard buffer (RSB) (10 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 10 mM NaCl,
3 mM MgCl2) with 0.25% NP-40, and nuclei were collected by
centrifugation at 300 × g and 4°C for 5 min. The nuclear pellet was resuspended in 5 ml of RSB-10% glycerol, adjusted to 10 mM MgCl2 and CaCl2, and digested with
micrococcal nuclease (50 to 100 U/107 nuclei) for 10 min at
30°C. Reactions were terminated with an equal volume of ice-cold TEE
(20 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 60 mM EDTA, 30 mM EGTA) and centrifuged at
450 × g for 5 min. The nuclear pellet was then lysed
with TEP (12 mM Tris [pH 7.7], 3 mM sodium-free EDTA) containing 1 µM leupeptin and 0.2 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride at
107 nuclei/5 ml for 5 min and homogenized in a Dounce
homogenizer. Nuclear debris was removed by centrifugation at
3,000 × g for 15 min, and the supernatant was adjusted
to final concentrations of 0.1 mg of bovine serum albumin per ml, 20 mM
Tris (pH 7.5), 125 mM KCl, 5% glycerol, and 0.1% NP-40. The
suspension was then concentrated to 1 ml in a Millipore Ultrafree
filtration concentrator, and the optical density at 260 nm was
determined. Equal amounts of DNA were layered onto 10-ml 5 to 30%
sucrose gradients (20 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 125 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA) and
centrifuged at 25,000 × g and 4°C for 16 to 20 h. Fractions of 0.5 ml, each containing 2 to 10 µg of DNA, were
collected for immunoprecipitation.
Immunoprecipitation of chromatin fragments and PCR analysis.
Sucrose gradient-purified chromatin preparations containing equal
amounts (±10%) of DNA were incubated with antibodies directed against
hSNF5/INI1 (Rb2464), BRG1, TFIID (SI-1; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or
Pol II (8WG16; Research Diagnostics, Inc.) or with control antibodies
(preimmunized rabbit serum or anti-FLAG antibody M2) at 1:25 dilution
for 2 h at 4°C. The immune complexes were precipitated with
protein A-Sepharose, washed three times with wash buffer (20 mM Tris
[pH 7.5], 125 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% NP-40), and digested with
proteinase K in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) stop buffer (10 mM Tris
[pH 7.4], 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS) overnight at 37°C. DNA
was isolated by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation
and then resuspended in Tris-EDTA.
Quantitative PCR analysis.
Quantitative PCR was performed
with appropriate primer pairs on 2 to 5 µl of the DNA sample and
appropriate plasmid controls (10
14 to 10
12
M). PCRs were carried out for 26 to 29 cycles (for episomal analysis) or 30 to 34 cycles (for genomic analysis) in the presence of 0.5 µM
primer, 100 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (with or without [
-32P] dATP [1 µCi/20 nmol]), 1.25 mM
MgCl2, and either 0.5 U of Taq (Perkin-Elmer) or
1.0 U of Platinum-Taq (Gibco-BRL) polymerase in a final
volume of 100 µl. Each cycle consisted of 1 min at 65°C, 2 min at
72°C, and 1 min at 92°C. PCR primers sequences are listed in Table
1. To determine the abundance of the
Myc-globin sequence, we used primers 5'MycGb1 and 3'MycGb1; for the
-lactamase gene, we used primers 5' AmpR and 3' AmpR. The three PCR
primer sets used to analyze the promoter region of the CD23 gene,
CD23A, CD23B, and CD23C, are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 5. Quantitation of the PCR products was performed by radionucleotide incorporation or by Southern blot analysis with radiolabeled DNA fragments derived from pTpTATAMG, pTpMG, pTATAMG, pH5, or pFE1. pH5 is a plasmid containing a 5-kb HindIII fragment of the CD23 (
1.3 kb
through exon 6), and pFE1 contains a 3.5-kb
SalI-HindIII fragment (
4.8 to
1.3)
upstream from CD23. Radioactivity signals were quantitated by
PhosphorImager analysis.
Metabolic labeling of nuclear proteins.
Raji cells
(108) harboring pTpTATAMG were washed in PBS plus
methionine-cysteine-free RPMI 1640 with 20% dialyzed fetal calf serum
and incubated for 2 h in the same medium. The cells were transferred to 5 ml of fresh medium containing 1 mCi of
Tran35S-label (1,175 Ci/mmol; ICN) and grown overnight.
Nuclear isolation, micrococcal nuclease digestion, and sucrose gradient
purification were carried out as described above. Then 300 µl of each
fraction was immunoprecipitated with 3 µl of Rb2464-protein
A-Sepharose, washed, and eluted with 20 µl of 2× SDS sample buffer.
The labeled proteins were separated by polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PAGE) on an SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel and
visualized by autoradiography.
Micrococcal nuclease analysis.
Nuclei were prepared as
described above, resuspended at 2 × 107 nuclei/ml in
RSB-10% glycerol-10 mM CaCl2-10 mM MgCl2,
and digested with increasing amounts of micrococcal nuclease (0 to 180 U/5 × 106 nuclei) for 5 min at 37°C. The reactions
were terminated with SDS stop buffer and digested with proteinase K
overnight. DNA was phenol-chloroform extracted and ethanol
precipitated; 20 µg of each sample was digested with NotI
and NsiI, Southern blotted, and probed with a 237-bp
NsiI/BamHI fragment probe of pTpTATAMG.
S1 nuclease assay.
Transcription from the Myc-globin
reporter gene was determined by measuring the steady-state mRNA by S1
assay (21, 22). The S1 nuclease assay was performed as
reported previously with a 162-nucleotide single-stranded DNA probe
corresponding to positions
36 to +126 of the Myc-globin transcription
start site. Myc-globin mRNA transcribed from the proper initiation site
results in the protection of a 126-nucleotide
5'-32P-labeled probe fragment. The samples from the S1
nuclease assay were subjected to 6% neutral polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. The results of the S1 nuclease assays were then
normalized with respect to the level of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA present in each sample and the relative copy
number of the episomal reporter construct present in the Raji cell sublines.
 |
RESULTS |
Incorporation of reporter episomes in Raji cells.
To study
targeting of the hSWI-SNF complex by EBNA2 to an EBNA2-responsive
element in vivo, we used an artificial reporter gene consisting of
multicopy episomal chromatin templates that contain sequences derived
from a well-characterized EBNA2-responsive element (24, 66).
The episomal templates contain EBV Ori-P (44) and are
maintained in Raji Burkitt lymphoma cells at 50 to 200 copies per cell
(data not shown). The reporter gene, TpTATAMG, contains a 54-bp
sequence from the EBV TP1/LMP2A promoter (24) placed
directly upstream from the adenovirus major late promoter TATA element
and a Myc-globin fusion gene (Fig. 1A)
(21). The promoter contains two RBP-J
/CBF1 binding sites
(GTGGGAA), which are mutated by triplet substitutions
(GGG
TTT) in the pTpmutTATAMG construct. Micrococcal
nuclease digestion and indirect end-labeling analysis (59)
of Raji cells harboring these constructs showed that the episomes are
assembled into ordered arrays of positioned nucleosomes (Fig. 1B).
Mutations at the RBP-J
/CBF1 binding sites did not result in
detectable alterations in the micrococcal nuclease sensitivity
patterns. The inferred positions of nucleosomes in the upstream region
of the reporter gene are depicted in Fig. 1B.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of pTpTATAMG and micrococcal
nuclease digestion of pTpTATAMG and pTpmutTATAMG. (A) Main
features of plasmid pTpTATAMG. The sequence of the EBV TP1/LMP2A
promoter, TATA box, upstream Myc-globin reporter gene, and heptameric
RBP-J /CBF1 binding sites within the TP1/LMP2A promoter are
indicated. Substitutions in plasmid pTpmutTATAMG (mut)
replace the GGG sequence within the RPB-J site with TTT. (B)
Micrococcal nuclease (Mnase) digestion and indirect end labeling of the
upstream region of the Myc-globin reporter gene. The probe for
hybridization was derived from the 237-bp
NsiI/BamHI fragment of pTpTATAMG (position
indicated). The eight micrococcal nuclease-hypersensitive sites
identified are numbered 1 to 8. Proposed positions of the nucleosomes
(circles) are depicted in the lower panel. Marker lanes (1 and 2)
contain 10 and 2 pg of pTpTATAMG digested with NotI and
NsiI.
|
|
Targeting analysis of the hSWI-SNF proteins.
Chromatin
fragments from Raji cells were prepared by digestion with micrococcal
nuclease, lysis with hypotonic buffer, and separation of chromatin
fragments on a sucrose gradient. This procedure generated a
predominance of mono-, di-, and trinucleosomes (Fig.
2A). To ensure that hSNF5/INI1 remained
associated with the oligonucleosomes through the purification, we
metabolically labeled the Raji cells with
[35S]methionine-cysteine prior to these procedures. The
fractions (7 to 11) containing hSNF5/INI1 (47- to 49-kDa doublet) were
identified by immunoprecipitation with an anti-hSNF5/INI1 antibody
(Rb2464) as previously described (60) and corresponded to
the highest concentration of oligonucleosomes (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Purification of chromatin fragments. (A) Aliquots of DNA
extracted from chromatin fractions derived from sucrose gradient
purification were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel and stained with
ethidium bromide. Migration of mono- and dinucleosomes is indicated at
the right. Lane B designates the bottom gradient fraction, which
includes chromatin fragment sediments; lanes M contain size markers.
(B) Immunoprecipitation of sucrose gradient fractions with
anti-hSNF5/INI1 antibodies. 35S-labeled chromatin fragments
were prepared and purified on the sucrose gradient as described for
panel A. Each sucrose gradient fraction was then immunoprecipitated
with Rb2464 (anti-hSNF5 antibody), separated by SDS-PAGE, and
visualized by autoradiography.
|
|
To determine if the hSWI-SNF complex is preferentially associated with
EBNA2-responsive promoter sequences, we carried out
chromatin
immunoprecipitation with antibodies directed against
two components of
the hSWI-SNF complex, hSNF5/INI1 and BRG1, on
the pooled sucrose
gradient fractions 8 to 13. Quantitative PCR
was then performed on DNA
purified from the immune complexes and
analyzed on Southern blots with
sequence-specific probes. Figure
3A shows
a blot of the PCR products obtained with these primers
on the naked
pTpTATAMG plasmid (lanes 1 to 4) and immunoprecipitated
sample DNA
(lanes 5 to 10) derived from Raji cells harboring either
pTp
mutTATAMG or pTpTATAMG. The PCR assay is quantitative
over
2 orders of magnitude (10
14 to 10
12
M), and the control lanes were used to generate a standard curve
for
PhosphorImager analysis of the relative signals in lanes 5
to 10. In
Raji cells harboring the unaltered pTpTATAMG episomes,
anti-hSNF5/INI1
antibody preferentially enriched the Tp1/LMP2A
promoter sequence (10- to 70-fold in four independent experiments)
compared to the preimmune
serum (compare lanes 8 and 9 in Fig.
3A). Anti-BRG1 antibody also
enriched the Tp1/LMP2A sequence (5-
to 40-fold in four independent
experiments) relative to the preimmune
serum (compare lanes 10 and 8).
When the EBNA2-responsive element
within the Tp1/LMP2A sequence was
mutated, the antibody-specific
enrichment of Tp1/LMP2A sequence was
reduced (lanes 5 to 7). The
small but persistent enrichment of the
promoter target sequence
by both anti-hSNF5/INI1 and anti-BRG1
antibodies in the mutated
RBP-J

/CBF1 construct suggests that some
association of hSWI-SNF
complex with this DNA region may occur
independently of EBNA2
and RBP-J

/CBF1. As an additional control, we
determined whether
the

-lactamase gene sequences that lie 3 kb from
the Tp1/LMP2A
sequence on the episome were enriched in
immunoprecipitates. We
found no enrichment with anti-hSNF5/INI1
antibody (Fig.
3B). In
these experiments, equal amounts of DNA were
subjected to sucrose
gradient purification prior to
immunoprecipitation. The episome
copy number was found to be 1.5-fold
higher in Raji/pTpTATAMG
cells than in
Raji/pTp
mutTATAMG cells (data not shown). This
disparity
does not account for the observed differences obtained from
the
PCR analysis.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Quantitative PCR of DNA from immunoprecipitated
chromatin fractions. Sucrose gradient-purified chromatin fragments
pooled from fractions 8 to 13 were immunoprecipitated with preimmune
serum (Preimmune), anti-hSNF5 antibody ( -hSNF5), or anti-BRG1
antibody ( -BRG1). DNA isolated from immunoprecipitates was subjected
to quantitative PCR to determine relative abundance of the TP1/LMP2A
promoter and -lactamase sequences. Control PCR series were performed
with plasmid pTpTATAMG (10 14 to 10 11 M) as
the template. The results were analyzed on a PhosphorImager and are
reported as the relative amount of PCR product compared with preimmune
control (indicated below of each lane). (A) Autoradiogram of
quantitative PCR of Myc-globin sequences from Raji/pTpTATAMG (Wt [wild
type]; lanes 8 to 10) and Raji/pTpmutTATAMG (Mut
[mutant]; lanes 5 to 7) chromatin fragments immunopurified with
preimmune or hSNF5- or BRG1-specific antibodies. (B) Autoradiogram of
PCR of -lactamase sequence from immunopurified Raji/pTpTATAMG (Wt;
lanes 7 and 8) and Raji/ pTpmutTATAMG (Mut; lanes 5 and 6) chromatin fragments using the AmpR primer set. (C) Autoradiogram
of PCR of Myc-globin sequence from chromatin immunoprecipitation of
BL41/B95 (EBNA2-positive) or BL41/P3HR1 (EBNA2-negative) cells that
harbor the episomal pTpTATAMG.
|
|
To determine whether the association of hSNF5/INI1 with the TP1/LMP2
promoter is EBNA2 dependent, we performed the same analysis
on the
Burkitt lymphoma (BL41) sublines that had been converted
with either
the EBNA2-negative (P3HR1) or EBNA2-positive (B95)
EBV strain (Fig.
3C). These cells support lower episome copy numbers
(5 to 20 copies per
cell) than Raji cells (50 to 200 copies per
cell). Quantitative PCR
performed on chromatin immunoprecipitation
samples derived from the
BL41 cells shows that anti-hSNF5/INI1
antibody (Fig.
3C, lane 7)
enriched the Tp1/LMP2A target sequence
fivefold relative to the
preimmune serum (lane 6) in the EBNA2-positive
BL41/B95 cells but not
in the EBNA2-negative BL41/P3HR1 cells
(lanes 8 and 9). We consistently
found a more pronounced targeting
effect in Raji cells than in BL41/B95
cells. We presume that this
disparity results from the differences in
episome copy number
between Raji and BL41 cells. The experiment shown
in Fig.
3 demonstrates
that the hSNF5/INI1 and BRG1 proteins are
preferentially associated
with the promoter region of the
pTpTATAMG reporter gene. This
association can be disrupted by
mutations introduced into the
RBP-J

/CBF1 elements within the
TP1/LMP2A promoter and is dependent
on the expression of
EBNA2.
The TATA element is necessary for hSWI-SNF targeting.
The
yeast SWI-SNF complex has been shown to alter chromatin structure at
the TATA element in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SUC2
promoter (61). Furthermore, both RBP-J
/CBF1 and EBNA2 can
associate with TFIID (35, 47). Because of these
observations, we determined whether binding of TBP at the TATA element
is required for stable targeting of the hSWI-SNF complex. To test this
hypothesis, we constructed episomes lacking either the TP1/LMP2A
promoter (pTATAMG) or the TATA sequence (pTpMG) and compared
these to the unaltered pTpTATAMG episome with respect to both
transcriptional activation of the Myc-globin reporter gene and the
presence of hSNF5/INI1, TBP, and RNA Pol II at the promoter region. The
steady-state levels of properly initiated mRNA from the Myc-globin
reporter gene of these constructs were measured by a quantitative S1
nuclease protection assay (21). Myc-globin mRNA from the
normal transcription initiation site of pTpTATAMG results in the
protection of a 126-nucleotide fragment (Fig.
4A). The S1 nuclease assays were
normalized for the relative copy number of each reporter episome. The
relative steady-state levels of properly initiated Myc-globin mRNA
adjusted for the episome copy number are depicted below the
autoradiogram. The results in Fig. 4A demonstrate that TP1/LMP2A is a
functional promoter in the pTpTATAMG reporter episome and that low
levels of reporter gene expression persist even from a promoterless
episome, pTATAMG.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Analysis of the contribution of TP1/LMP2A promoter and
TATA elements to reporter expression and targeting of the hSWI-SNF
complex. (A) The steady-state levels of Myc-globin and GAPDH mRNA
of Raji/pTpTATAMG, Raji/pTpmutTATAMG, Raji/pTATAMG,
and Raji/pTpMG cells were determined by the S1 nuclease assay. The
results were normalized for the relative copy number of reporter
episomes present in these cells (4.8 for pTATAMG, 4.0 for pTpMG, 0.5 for pTpmutTATAMG, and 1.0 for pTpTATAMG) and reported as
relative mRNA levels with respect to the mRNA in the promoterless
Raji/pTATAMG cells. (B) Targeting of hSNF5/INI1, TBP, and Pol II was
determined by immunoprecipitation and PCR incorporation of
[ -32P]dATP. Input DNA prior to immunoprecipitation was
quantitated by PCR for both Myc-globin and -lactamase (AmpR)
sequences, showing nearly equal input DNA in cells harboring the four
episomal constructs. Quantitative incorporation of
[ -32P]dATP is linear over 2 orders of magnitude of
template concentrations for both AmpR and MycGb primer sets (lower
panel).
|
|
In an effort to correlate components of the transcription complex with
gene expression, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation
assays with
antibodies directed against hSNF5/INI1, TBP, and RNA
Pol II. In this
experiment, quantitation was done by radionucleotide
incorporation of
PCR products. The lower panel of Fig.
4B shows
that this assay is
quantitative over 2 orders of magnitude using
a plasmid
template.
As shown in Fig.
4B, mutation (pTp
mutTATAMG) or deletion
(pTATAMG) of the Tp promoter sequence does not influence the binding
of
TBP to the promoter region but does disrupt the targeting of
the
hSNF5/INI1 protein to this region. By contrast, when the TATA
element
is removed from the promoter (pTpMG), neither TBP nor
hSNF5/INI1 is
found to be associated with the promoter DNA. These
observations
suggest that binding of TBP may stabilize the association
between
hSWI-SNF and the target site in the promoter, possibly
through an
indirect association with the basal transcription complex.
RNA Pol II
was not preferentially bound in the promoter region,
and it is not
required for the targeting of the hSWI-SNF complex.
Since transcription
persists from the TP1/LMP2A promoterless construct
(pTATAMG) (Fig.
4A),
this result implies that the hSWI-SNF complex
is not required for basal
transcription of the Myc-globin reporter
gene. Taken together, these
results demonstrate that EBNA2 is
necessary but not sufficient for
targeting of hSWI-SNF complexes
to the EBNA2-responsive
promoter.
Targeting of the hSWI-SNF complex to the cellular CD23
promoter.
CD23 is an EBNA2-responsive cellular gene (9)
whose product can act as an autocrine growth factor for
EBV-immortalized B lymphocytes (45). It contains an
RBP-J
/CBF1 site 171 bp upstream from the CD23 transcription start
site (Fig. 5A). Another RBP-J
/CBF1 site lies in the opposite
orientation at position
2471. To test whether the hSWI-SNF complex is
targeted to these sequences by EBNA2, we performed the same targeting
analysis directed at these two sites and at a third sequence in intron
I that does not contain the RBP-J
/CBF1 site. We performed this
analysis in both EBNA2-positive (BL41/B95) and EBNA2-negative
(BL41/P3HR1) cells. CD23 mRNA expression was found to be 50-fold
greater in BL41/B95 cells than in BL41/P3HR1 cells (data not shown).
Three sets of PCR primers, CD23A, CD23B, and CD23C (Table 1), were used
for these analyses; their positions are depicted in Fig.
5A. The chromatin immunoprecipitation
analysis shows that anti-hSNF5/INI1 antibody specifically enriched the exon I (CD23B locus) sequence fivefold compared to the preimmune serum
in BL41/B95 but not in BL41/P3HR1 cells (Fig. 5B and C). PCR analyses
using the CD23A and CD23C primers show that neither the upstream
RBP-J
/CBF1 site nor the intron I sequence was enriched by
anti-hSNF5/INI1 antibody regardless of EBNA2 expression (Fig. 5C). The
quantitative results from triplicate immunoprecipitations (Fig. 5C)
show that the hSWI-SNF complex is targeted to a specific region of the
CD23 gene in an EBNA2-dependent manner. Because there was no targeting
to the RBP-J
/CBF1 sequence residing 2,471 bp upstream from the exon
I start site (Fig. 5C), these results further demonstrate that other
cis-acting elements are required for stable hSWI-SNF complex
targeting.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Targeting of the hSWI-SNF complex to the CD23 gene. (A)
Schematic of the upstream region of the CD23 gene containing exons I,
II, and b. The two RBP-J /CBF1 binding sites present in this region
are indicated by solid rectangles. The upstream sequence from exon I is
shown with the RPB-J /CBF1 and TATA elements. Positions of the PCR
primers (sequences shown in Table 1) and their product lengths are also
shown. (B) Targeting of the hSWI-SNF complex to three regions on the
CD23 gene in BL41/B95 and BL41/P3HR1 cells were measured by
immunoprecipitation and quantitative PCR with specific primer sets. The
autoradiogram of quantitative PCR using the CD23B primer set is
depicted. Lanes 1 to 4, PCR of template controls; lanes 5 and 8, PCR
results from the preimmunoprecipitated input (1/5 of total) chromatin;
lanes 6, 7, 9, and 10, PCR results from the immunoprecipitated samples.
(C) Results of PhosphorImager analysis of PCR performed with CD23A,
CD23B, and CD23C primer sets on chromatin immunoprecipitation samples.
Results are reported as the percentage of signal obtained from
chromatin prior to immunoprecipitation.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The hSWI-SNF complex is targeted to EBNA2-responsive promoters
through EBNA2 and RBP-J
/CBF1.
The low abundance and catalytic
rate of remodeling of nucleosomal arrays by hSWI-SNF suggest that some
mechanism exists for directing the complex to its targets. Because
continuous action of the SWI-SNF is required to maintain transcription
of SWI-SNF-inducible genes, the complex must be retained beyond the
point of assembly of the initiation complex (3, 43). Here we
show that the hSWI-SNF complex is targeted to the EBNA2-responsive
sequences of both reporter episomes and the lymphocyte CD23 gene in
vivo by demonstrating that antibodies directed against components of the hSWI-SNF complex selectively precipitate chromatin fragments containing RBP-J
/CBF1 binding sites of EBNA2-responsive promoters. This preferential association of the hSWI-SNF complex with these DNA
sequences was not observed in an EBNA2-negative cell line and was
diminished by mutations at the RBP-J
/CBF1 binding sites that disrupt
binding of this factor. These results extend our previous observation
that a phosphorylated fraction of nuclear EBNA2 is associated the
hSNF5/INI1 subunit of the hSWI-SNF complex in lymphocytes
(60) and suggest the participation of the hSWI-SNF complex
in the transcriptional activation function of EBNA2. While this work
was being completed, several reports appeared demonstrating targeting
of SWI-SNF complexes by binding to acidic activation domains through
binding to the SWI2-SNF2 or SNF5 homologues of either yeast or
mammalian SWI-SNF complexes (20, 33, 48).
The role of hSWI-SNF complex in EBNA2-mediated
transactivation.
The control of transcription by local chromatin
structure has been shown to be an essential feature of many eukaryotic
genes. In this respect, the EBV transcriptional program in latently
infected B cells must proceed in the same chromatin-repressed promoter environment. If recruitment of the hSWI-SNF complex by EBNA2 to responsive promoter chromatin is one strategy that EBV has adopted to
overcome chromatin-mediated transcriptional repression, this would
explain the marked effects of EBNA2 expression on cellular and viral
gene expression compared with its modest effects on transiently
transfected reporter constructs. Also, the acidic activation domain of
EBNA2 interacts with p300/CBP and P/CAF histone acetyltransferases
(HATs) to enhance the transactivation of the viral LMP1 promoter
(53). It is unclear if hSWI-SNF and HAT proteins are
selectively used by EBNA2 at a subset of EBNA2-responsive genes or if
they are functionally overlapping. Thus, EBNA2 emerges as a pivotal
mediator of coordinated assembly of factors in a combinatorial fashion
acting at its target promoters. Through its interaction with
RBP-J
/CBF1, it mediates derepression (16). Interactions
between the activation domain of EBNA2 and basal transcription factors
act to assemble the transcription initiation complex (46,
47). The acidic activation domain also interacts with accessory
factors such as p300/CBP and P/CAF to transduce HAT activity
(53). The present work shows that a distinct region of EBNA2
recruits a chromatin-remodeling complex to EBNA2 targets. EBNA2 also
appears to compete with the interaction between histone deacetylase and
the SKIP protein that is tethered to RBP-J
/CBF1 (67).
Presumably additional promoter-specific factors determine which of
these EBNA2-mediated functions predominates at distinct EBNA2-regulated promoters.
Stable targeting of the hSWI-SNF complex by EBNA2 requires
TBP.
Deletion of the TATA element from the episomal promoter
abolishes both transcription and targeting of hSNF5/INI1 (Fig. 4). This
finding suggests that binding of TBP to the TATA element is a
prerequisite both for transcription and for stabilization of hSNF5/INI1
binding to chromatin in this region. Although EBNA2 binds weakly to
TBP, it interacts with TAF40 through its acidic activation domain
(47). RBP-J
/CBF1 has also been reported to bind the
TAFII110 component of TFIID complex (35). In
addition, partially purified hSWI-SNF has been shown to facilitate in
vitro binding of TBP to the TATA element in nucleosomes (17)
and yeast SWI-SNF complex alters the chromatin structure over both the
enhancer and the TATA elements of the SUC2 gene
(61). These reports and our results suggest that TBP may be
associated with both EBNA2 and hSWI-SNF in a complex over the
EBNA2-responsive promoters. The presence of both hSNF5/INI1 and TBP at
the transcriptionally active episomal promoter also suggests that both
the hSWI-SNF complex and TBP are retained beyond the point of
transcription initiation.
Influence of the hSWI-SNF complex on transcription of the reporter
gene in artificial episomes.
Despite the apparent targeting of the
hSWI-SNF complex to the promoter region in our reporter episome, we did
not find dramatic enhancement in the steady-state level of
transcription of the linked reporter gene that was similar to that seen
for EBNA2-responsive genes in vivo (Fig. 4). For instance, the
steady-state transcription of the CD23 gene in EBNA-positive BL41/B95
cells is at least 50-fold greater than the level in EBNA2-negative
BL41/P3HR1 cells (data not shown). The relatively meager
transcriptional enhancement by the EBNA2-responsive TP1/LMP2A promoter
in episomes could be due to a basal chromatin structure that is
unusually permissive to transcription and is relatively independent of
hSWI-SNF complex remodeling. The permissive nature of the episomal
chromatin is supported by three observations. First, restriction
endonuclease digestion of nuclei shows that these sites in plasmids are
far more sensitive to digestion than the level of nuclease sensitivity of chromosomal sites or reconstituted nucleosomal sites (data not
shown). We also could not detect significant differences in the
restriction endonuclease sensitivity of the TP1/LMP2 region of the
episomes that distinguish normal or mutated RBP-J
/CBF1 sites (data
not shown). The episomes in these Raji cells may thus reside in an open
chromatin conformation that is minimally influenced by hSWI-SNF
remodeling. Second, we found that the promoterless pTATAMG episomes can
direct a low level of reporter gene transcription. This construct
contains a TATA element but no other enhancer or promoter element to
drive transcription of the reporter gene. The finding of reporter
transcription in this context suggests that the episomal chromatin may
lack elements that normally repress transcription. Third, DNase I
digestion of the episomes in Raji cells showed that they lack
hypersensitive sites in the region of the reporter gene (data not
shown). This suggests that despite being packaged into an ordered array
of nucleosomes, the DNA in these nucleosomes is uniformly accessible to
nuclease and is in this regard structurally distinct from chromosomal DNA.
Although previous studies showed minimal differences that distinguish
the transcriptional regulation and structure of cellular
chromatin from
those properties of amplified episomal chromatin
(
41), two
features of the cellular environment of our experimental
system could
result a relatively open chromatin conformation in
the episomal
constructs: deletion of the EBNA3C gene from Raji
cells and the OriP
enhancer residing in the episomes. EBNA3C is
a viral protein that also
binds indirectly to DNA through RBP-J

/CBF1
(
2,
39) and
acts as an expression silencer by opposing the
activating effects
of EBNA2 (
26,
42,
50) in part through
its ability to
associate with histone deacetylase I (
40). Binding
of EBNA1
to OriP, the plasmid origin of replication, permits stable
plasmid
replication and segregation (
62) but also activates
an
enhancer in OriP (
11). Thus, the binding of EBNA1 to OriP
may exert a widespread effect resulting in derepression of the
plasmid
chromatin. Although our work clearly demonstrates targeting,
the
functional consequences of high-level transcriptional activation
and
chromatin remodeling may be inapparent due to these effects.
Nonetheless, these episomes do not reside in an unrestricted open
conformation since prior studies using OriP episomes in Raji cells
showed that addition of a potent enhancer could activate transcription,
increase nuclease sensitivity, and cause histone hyperacetylation
(
28). As discussed above, targeting of the hSWI-SNF complex
and HAT activity may be functionally redundant at this episomal
promoter, and this could also result in inapparent chromatin structural
alteration in this experimental
system.
Role of the activation domain in recruitment of SWI-SNF
complexes.
The region of EBNA2 that mediates its interaction with
hSWI5/INI1 is distinct from its transcription activation domain
(60). In this regard, EBNA2 acts as an adapter protein that
may recruit the complex to sites of action similar to the recruitment
of SWI-SNF by Swi5p in yeast cells (10). By contrast,
several in vitro and in vivo studies of recruitment of SWI-SNF
components showed strict dependence on the activation domain (20,
33, 48, 64). These results suggest that EBNA2 may activate
transcription both by recruiting basal transcription factors and
cofactors through the activation domain and by association with
hSNF5/INI1 and recruitment of the hSWI-SNF complex. Analysis of
targeting and expression in cells expressing EBNA2 mutants that
separately disrupt the activation and hSNF5/INI1 binding domains will
define the relative importance of these separate means of recruitment.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Gerald Crabtree for the anti-BRG1 antibody, Carla
Grandori for helpful suggestions regarding the experimental procedures, and Sarah Gimmestad and William Tuttle for expert technical assistance.
This work was supported by grants from the Department of Veterans
Affairs (W.H.S.) and Public Health Service grants (CA719829 [D.Y.W.],
CA54337 [A.K.], and CA82459 [W.H.S.]) from the National Cancer Institute.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: 111-ONC,
Division of Oncology, Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care
System, Seattle Division, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108. Phone: (206) 764-2709. Fax: (206) 764-2598. E-mail:
wschu{at}u.washington.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Armstrong, J. A.,
J. J. Bieker, and B. M. Emerson.
1998.
A SWI/SNF-related chromatin remodeling complex, E-RC1, is required for tissue-specific transcriptional regulation by EKLF in vitro.
Cell
95:93-104[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bain, M.,
R. J. Watson,
P. J. Farrell, and M. J. Allday.
1996.
Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C is a powerful repressor of transcription when tethered to DNA.
J. Virol.
70:2481-2489[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Biggar, S. R., and G. R. Crabtree.
1999.
Continuous and widespread roles for Swi-Snf complex in transcription.
EMBO J.
18:2254-2264[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Chakravarti, D.,
V. J. LaMorte,
M. C. Nelson,
T. Nakajima,
I. G. Schulman,
H. Juguilon,
M. Montminy, and R. M. Evans.
1996.
Role of CBP/P300 in nuclear receptor signalling.
Nature
383:99-103[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chakravarti, D.,
V. Ogryzko,
H. Y. Kao,
A. Nash,
H. Chen,
Y. Nakatani, and R. M. Evans.
1999.
A viral mechanism for inhibiting p300 and PCAF acetyltransferase activity.
Cell
96:393-403[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Chiba, H.,
M. Muramatsu,
A. Nomoto, and H. Kato.
1994.
Two human homologues of Saccharomyces cerevisiae SWI2/SNF2 and Drosophila brahma are transcriptional coactivators cooperating with the estrogen receptor and the retinoic acid receptor.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:1815-1820[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Cho, H.,
G. Orphanides,
X. Sun,
X. J. Yang,
V. Ogryzko,
E. Lees,
Y. Nakatani, and D. Reinberg.
1998.
A human RNA polymerase II complex containing factors that modify chromatin structure.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5355-5363[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Cohen, J. I.,
F. Wang, and E. Kieff.
1991.
Epstein-Barr virus nuclear protein 2 mutations define essential domains for transformation and transactivation.
J. Virol.
65:2545-2554[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cordier, M.,
A. Calendar,
M. Billaud,
U. Zimber,
G. Rousselet,
O. Pavlish,
J. Banchereau,
T. Tursz,
G. W. Bornkamm, and G. M. Lenoir.
1990.
Stable transfection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen 2 in lymphoma cells containing the EBV P3HR1 genome induces the expression of B-cell activation molecules CD21 and CD23.
J. Virol.
64:1002-1013[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Cosma, M. P.,
T. Tanaka, and K. Nasmyth.
1999.
Ordered recruitment of transcription and chromatin remodeling factors to a cell cycle- and developmentally regulated promoter.
Cell
97:299-311[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Gahn, T. A., and B. Sugden.
1995.
An EBNA-1-dependent enhancer acts from a distance of 10 kilobase pairs to increase expression of the Epstein-Barr virus LMP gene.
J. Virol.
69:2633-2636[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Grandori, C.,
J. Mac,
F. Siebelt,
D. E. Ayer, and R. N. Eisenman.
1996.
Myc-Max heterodimers activate a DEAD box gene and interact with multiple E box-related sites in vivo.
EMBO J.
15:4344-4357[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Grossman, S. R.,
E. Johannsen,
X. Tong,
R. Yalamanchili, and E. Kieff.
1994.
The Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2 transactivator is directed to response elements by the J kappa recombination signal binding protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:7568-7572[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Hammerschmidt, W., and B. Sugden.
1989.
Genetic analysis of immortalizing functions of Epstein-Barr virus in human B lymphocytes.
Nature
340:393-397[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Henkel, T.,
P. D. Ling,
S. D. Hayward, and M. G. Peterson.
1994.
Mediation of Epstein-Barr virus EBNA2 transactivation by recombination signal-binding protein J kappa.
Science
265:92-95[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Hsieh, J. J.,
T. Henkel,
P. Salmon,
E. Robey,
M. G. Peterson, and S. D. Hayward.
1996.
Truncated mammalian Notch1 activates CBF1/RPB J -repressed genes by a mechanism resembling Epstein-Barr virus EBNA2.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:952-959[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Imbalzano, A. N.,
H. Kwon,
M. R. Green, and R. E. Kingston.
1994.
Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA.
Nature
370:481-485[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Jayachandra, S.,
K. G. Low,
A. E. Thlick,
J. Yu,
P. D. Ling,
Y. Chang, and P. S. Moore.
1999.
Three unrelated viral transforming proteins (vIRF, EBNA2, and E1A) induce the MYC oncogene through the interferon-responsive PRF element by using different transcription coadaptors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:11566-11571[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Khavari, P. A.,
C. L. Peterson,
J. W. Tamkun,
D. B. Mendel, and G. R. Crabtree.
1993.
BRG1 contains a conserved domain of the SWI2/SNF2 family necessary for normal mitotic growth and transcription.
Nature
366:170-174[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Kowenz-Leutz, E., and A. Leutz.
1999.
A C-EBP beta isoform recruits the SWI/SNF complex to activate myeloid genes.
Mol. Cell
4:735-743[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Krumm, A.,
L. B. Hickey, and M. Groudine.
1995.
Promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II defines a general rate-limiting step after transcription initiation.
Genes Dev.
9:559-572[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Krumm, A.,
L. Madisen,
X. J. Yang,
R. Goodman,
Y. Nakatani, and M. Groudine.
1998.
Long-distance transcriptional enhancement by the histone acetyltransferase PCAF.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:13501-13506[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Larcher, C.,
B. Kempkes,
E. Kremmer,
W. M. Prodinger,
M. Pawlita,
G. W. Bornkamm, and M. P. Dierich.
1995.
Expression of Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen-2 (EBNA2) induces CD21/CR2 on B and T cell lines and shedding of soluble CD21.
Eur. J. Immunol.
25:1713-1719[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Laux, G.,
F. Dugrillon,
C. Eckert,
B. Adam,
U. Zimber-Strobl, and G. W. Bornkamm.
1994.
Identification and characterization of an Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2-responsive cis element in the bidirectional promoter region of latent membrane protein and terminal protein 2 genes.
J. Virol.
68:6947-6958[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Lee, C. H.,
M. R. Murphy,
J. S. Lee, and J. H. Chung.
1999.
Targeting a SWI/SNF-related chromatin remodeling complex to the beta-globin promoter in erythroid cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:12311-12315[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Le Roux, A.,
B. Kerdiles,
D. Walls,
J. F. Dedieu, and M. Perricaudet.
1994.
The Epstein-Barr virus determined nuclear antigens EBNA-3A, -3B, and -3C repress EBNA-2-mediated transactivation of the viral terminal protein 1 gene promoter.
Virology
205:596-602[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Ling, P. D., and S. D. Hayward.
1995.
Contribution of conserved amino acids in mediating the interaction between EBNA2 and CBF1/RBP J .
J. Virol.
69:1944-1950[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Madisen, L.,
A. Krumm,
T. R. Hebbes, and M. Groudine.
1998.
The immunoglobulin heavy chain locus control region increases histone acetylation along linked c-myc genes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:6281-6292[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Muchardt, C.,
C. Sardet,
B. Bourachot,
C. Onufryk, and M. Yaniv.
1995.
A human protein with homology to Saccharomyces cerevisiae SNF5 interacts with the potential helicase hbrm.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:1127-1132[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Muchardt, C., and M. Yaniv.
1993.
A human homologue of Saccharomyces cerevisiae SNF2/SWI2 and Drosophila brm genes potentiates transcriptional activation by the glucocorticoid receptor.
EMBO J.
12:4279-4290[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Myers, L. C.,
C. M. Gustafsson,
D. A. Bushnell,
M. Lui,
H. Erdjument-Bromage,
P. Tempst, and R. D. Kornberg.
1998.
The Med proteins of yeast and their function through the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain.
Genes Dev.
12:45-54[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Natarajan, K.,
B. M. Jackson,
H. Zhou,
F. Winston, and A. G. Hinnebusch.
1999.
Transcriptional activation by Gcn4p involves independent interactions with the SWI/SNF complex and the SRB/mediator.
Mol. Cell
4:657-664[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Neely, K. E.,
A. H. Hassan,
A. E. Wallberg,
D. J. Steger,
B. R. Cairns,
A. P. Wright, and J. L. Workman.
1999.
Activation domain-mediated targeting of the SWI/SNF complex to promoters stimulates transcription from nucleosome arrays.
Mol. Cell
4:649-655[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Ogryzko, V. V.,
R. L. Schiltz,
V. Russanova,
B. H. Howard, and Y. Nakatani.
1996.
The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases.
Cell
87:953-959[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Olave, I.,
D. Reinberg, and L. D. Vales.
1998.
The mammalian transcriptional repressor RBP (CBF1) targets TFIID and TFIIA to prevent activated transcription.
Genes Dev.
12:1621-1637[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
O'Neill, D.,
J. Yang,
H. Erdjument-Bromage,
K. Bornschlegel,
P. Tempst, and A. Bank.
1999.
Tissue-specific and developmental stage-specific DNA binding by a mammalian SWI/SNF complex associated with human fetal-to-adult globin gene switching.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:349-354[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Peng, R.,
A. V. Gordadze,
E. M. Fuentes-Penana,
F. Wang,
J. Zong,
G. S. Hayward,
J. Tan, and P. D. Ling.
2000.
Sequence and functional analysis of EBNA-LP and EBNA2 proteins from nonhuman primate lymphocryptoviruses.
J. Virol.
74:379-389[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Phelan, M. L.,
S. Sif,
G. J. Narlikar, and R. E. Kingston.
1999.
Reconstitution of a core chromatin remodeling complex from SWI/SNF subunits.
Mol. Cell
3:247-253[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Radkov, S. A.,
M. Bain,
P. J. Farrell,
M. West,
M. Rowe, and M. J. Allday.
1997.
Epstein-Barr virus EBNA3C represses Cp, the major promoter for EBNA expression, but has no effect on the promoter of the cell gene CD21.
J. Virol.
71:8552-8562[Abstract].
|
| 40.
|
Radkov, S. A.,
R. Touitou,
A. Brehm,
M. Rowe,
M. West,
T. Kouzarides, and M. J. Allday.
1999.
Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C interacts with histone deacetylase to repress transcription.
J. Virol.
73:5688-5697[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Richard-Foy, H., and G. L. Hager.
1987.
Sequence-specific positioning of nucleosomes over the steroid-inducible MMTV promoter.
EMBO J.
6:2321-2328[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Robertson, E. S.,
S. Grossman,
E. Johannsen,
C. Miller,
J. Lin,
B. Tomkinson, and E. Kieff.
1995.
Epstein-Barr virus nuclear protein 3C modulates transcription through interaction with the sequence-specific DNA-binding protein J .
J. Virol.
69:3108-3116[Abstract].
|
| 43.
|
Saudarsanam, P.,
Y. Cao,
L. Wu,
B. C. Laurent, and R. Winston.
1999.
The nucleosome remodeling complex, Snf/Swi, is required for the maintenance of transcription in vivo and is partially redundant with histone acetyltransferase GCN5.
EMBO J.
18:3101-3106[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Sugden, B.,
K. Marsh, and J. Yates.
1985.
A vector that replicates as a plasmid and can be efficiently selected in B-lymphoblasts transformed by Epstein-Barr virus.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5:410-413[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Swendeman, S., and D. A. Thorley-Lawson.
1987.
The activation antigen BLAST-2, when shed, is an autocrine growth BCGF for normal and transformed B-lymphoblasts.
EMBO J.
6:1637-1642[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Tong, X.,
R. Drapkin,
D. Reinberg, and E. Kieff.
1995.
The 62- and 80-kDa subunits of transcription factor IIH mediate the interaction with Epstein-Barr virus nuclear protein 2.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:3259-3263[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Tong, X.,
F. Wang,
C. J. Thut, and E. Kieff.
1995.
The Epstein-Barr virus nuclear protein 2 acidic domain can interact with TFIIB, TAF40, and RPA70 but not with TATA-binding protein.
J. Virol.
69:585-588[Abstract].
|
| 48.
|
Wallberg, A. E.,
K. E. Neely,
A. H. Hassan,
J. A. Gustafsson,
J. L. Workman, and A. P. Wright.
2000.
Recruitment of the SWI-SNF chromatin remodeling complex as a mechanism of gene activation by the glucocorticoid receptor 1 activation domain.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:2004-2013[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Waltzer, L.,
F. Logeat,
C. Brou,
A. Israel,
A. Sergeant, and E. Manet.
1994.
The human J kappa recombination signal sequence binding protein (RBP-J kappa) targets the Epstein-Barr virus EBNA2 protein to its DNA responsive elements.
EMBO J.
13:5633-5638[Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Waltzer, L.,
M. Perricaudet,
A. Sergeant, and E. Manet.
1996.
Epstein-Barr virus EBNA3A and EBNA3C proteins both repress RBP-J -EBNA2-activated transcription by inhibiting the binding of RBP-J to DNA.
J. Virol.
70:5909-5915[Abstract].
|
| 51.
|
Wang, F.,
H. Kikutani,
S. F. Tsang,
T. Kishimoto, and E. Kieff.
1991.
Epstein-Barr virus nuclear protein 2 transactivates a cis-acting CD23 DNA element.
J. Virol.
65:4101-4106[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Wang, F.,
S. F. Tsang,
M. G. Kurilla,
J. I. Cohen, and E. Kieff.
1990.
Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2 transactivates latent membrane protein LMP1.
J. Virol.
64:3407-3416[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Wang, L.,
S. R. Grossman, and E. Kieff.
2000.
Epstein-Barr virus nuclear protein 2 interacts with p300, CBP, and PCAF histone acetyltransferases in activation of LMP1 promoter.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:430-435[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Wang, W.,
J. Cote,
Y. Xue,
S. Zhou,
P. A. Khavari,
S. R. Biggar,
C. Muchardt,
G. V. Kalpana,
S. P. Goff,
M. Yaniv,
J. L. Workman, and G. R. Crabtree.
1996.
Purification and biochemical heterogeneity of the mammalian SWI-SNF complex.
EMBO J.
15:5370-5382[Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Wang, W.,
Y. Xue,
S. Zhou,
A. Kuo,
B. R. Cairns, and G. R. Crabtree.
1996.
Diversity and specialization of mammalian SWI/SNF complexes.
Genes Dev.
10:2117-2130[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Wilson, C. J.,
D. M. Chao,
A. N. Imbalzano,
G. R. Schnitzler,
R. E. Kingston, and R. A. Young.
1996.
RNA polymerase II holoenzyme contains SWI/SNF regulators involved in chromatin remodeling.
Cell
84:235-244[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 57.
|
Winston, F., and M. Carlson.
1992.
Yeast SNF-SWI transcriptional activators and the SPT/SIN chromatin connection.
Trends Genet.
8:387-391[Medline].
|
| 58.
|
Workman, J. L., and R. E. Kingston.
1998.
Alteration of nucleosome structure as a mechanism of transcriptional regulation.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67:545-579[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Wu, C.
1980.
The 5' end of Drosophila heat shock genes in chromatin are hypersensitive to DNAse I.
Nature
286:854-860[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 60.
|
Wu, D. Y.,
G. V. Kalpana,
S. P. Goff, and W. H. Schubach.
1996.
Epstein-Barr virus nuclear protein 2 (EBNA2) binds to a component of the human SNF-SWI complex, hSNF5/Ini1.
J. Virol.
70:6020-6028[Abstract].
|
| 61.
|
Wu, L., and F. Winston.
1997.
Evidence that Snf-Swi controls chromatin structure over both the TATA and UAS regions of the SUC2 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25:4230-4234[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 62.
|
Yates, J. L.,
N. Warren, and B. Sugden.
1985.
Stable replication of plasmids derived from Epstein-Barr virus in various mammalian cells.
Nature
313:812-815[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 63.
|
Yoshinaga, S. K.,
C. L. Peterson,
I. Herskowitz, and K. R. Yamamoto.
1992.
Roles of SWI1, SWI2, and SWI3 proteins for transcriptional enhancement by steroid receptors.
Science
258:1598-1604[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 64.
|
Yudkovsky, N.,
C. Logie,
S. Hahn, and C. L. Peterson.
1999.
Recruitment of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex by transcriptional activators.
Genes Dev.
13:2369-2374[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 65.
|
Zimber-Strobl, U.,
L. J. Strobl,
C. Meitinger,
R. Hinrichs,
T. Sakai,
T. Furukawa,
T. Honjo, and G. W. Bornkamm.
1994.
Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2 exerts its transactivating function through interaction with recombination signal binding protein RBP-J kappa, the homologue of Drosophila Suppressor of Hairless.
EMBO J.
13:4973-4982[Medline].
|
| 66.
|
Zimber-Strobl, U.,
K. O. Suentzenich,
G. Laux,
D. Eick,
M. Cordier,
A. Calender,
M. Billaud,
G. M. Lenoir, and G. W. Bornkamm.
1991.
Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2 activates transcription of the terminal protein gene.
J. Virol.
65:415-423[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 67.
|
Zou, S.,
M. Fujimuro,
J. J. Hsieh,
L. Chen, and S. D. Hayward.
2000.
A role for SKIP in EBNA2 activation of CBF1-repressed promoters.
J. Virol.
74:1939-1947[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, October 2000, p. 8893-8903, Vol. 74, No. 19
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lucchesi, W., Brady, G., Dittrich-Breiholz, O., Kracht, M., Russ, R., Farrell, P. J.
(2008). Differential Gene Regulation by Epstein-Barr Virus Type 1 and Type 2 EBNA2. J. Virol.
82: 7456-7466
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Boccellato, F., Anastasiadou, E., Rosato, P., Kempkes, B., Frati, L., Faggioni, A., Trivedi, P.
(2007). EBNA2 Interferes with the Germinal Center Phenotype by Downregulating BCL6 and TCL1 in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cells. J. Virol.
81: 2274-2282
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zraly, C. B., Middleton, F. A., Dingwall, A. K.
(2006). Hormone-response Genes Are Direct in Vivo Regulatory Targets of Brahma (SWI/SNF) Complex Function. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 35305-35315
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Peng, R., Moses, S. C., Tan, J., Kremmer, E., Ling, P. D.
(2005). The Epstein-Barr Virus EBNA-LP Protein Preferentially Coactivates EBNA2-Mediated Stimulation of Latent Membrane Proteins Expressed from the Viral Divergent Promoter. J. Virol.
79: 4492-4505
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pages, F., Galon, J., Karaschuk, G., Dudziak, D., Camus, M., Lazar, V., Camilleri-Broet, S., Lagorce-Pages, C., Lebel-Binay, S., Laux, G., Fridman, W.-H., Henglein, B.
(2005). Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2 induces interleukin-18 receptor expression in B cells. Blood
105: 1632-1639
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, H., Huang, J., Wu, F. Y., Liao, G., Hutt-Fletcher, L., Hayward, S. D.
(2005). Regulation of Expression of the Epstein-Barr Virus BamHI-A Rightward Transcripts. J. Virol.
79: 1724-1733
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, J. M., Lee, K.-H., Farrell, C. J., Ling, P. D., Kempkes, B., Park, J. H., Hayward, S. D.
(2004). EBNA2 Is Required for Protection of Latently Epstein-Barr Virus-Infected B Cells against Specific Apoptotic Stimuli. J. Virol.
78: 12694-12697
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kwiatkowski, B., Chen, S. Y. J., Schubach, W. H.
(2004). CKII Site in Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Protein 2 Controls Binding to hSNF5/Ini1 and Is Important for Growth Transformation. J. Virol.
78: 6067-6072
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gordadze, A. V., Onunwor, C. W., Peng, R., Poston, D., Kremmer, E., Ling, P. D.
(2004). EBNA2 Amino Acids 3 to 30 Are Required for Induction of LMP-1 and Immortalization Maintenance. J. Virol.
78: 3919-3929
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Farrell, C. J., Lee, J. M., Shin, E.-C., Cebrat, M., Cole, P. A., Hayward, S. D.
(2004). Inhibition of Epstein-Barr virus-induced growth proliferation by a nuclear antigen EBNA2-TAT peptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 4625-4630
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rosendorff, A., Illanes, D., David, G., Lin, J., Kieff, E., Johannsen, E.
(2004). EBNA3C Coactivation with EBNA2 Requires a SUMO Homology Domain. J. Virol.
78: 367-377
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Alazard, N., Gruffat, H., Hiriart, E., Sergeant, A., Manet, E.
(2003). Differential Hyperacetylation of Histones H3 and H4 upon Promoter-Specific Recruitment of EBNA2 in Epstein-Barr Virus Chromatin. J. Virol.
77: 8166-8172
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hwang, S., Lee, D., Gwack, Y., Min, H., Choe, J.
(2003). Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus K8 protein interacts with hSNF5. J. Gen. Virol.
84: 665-676
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, J. M., Lee, K.-H., Weidner, M., Osborne, B. A., Hayward, S. D.
(2002). Epstein-Barr virus EBNA2 blocks Nur77- mediated apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 11878-11883
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wu, D. Y., Tkachuck, D. C., Roberson, R. S., Schubach, W. H.
(2002). The Human SNF5/INI1 Protein Facilitates the Function of the Growth Arrest and DNA Damage-inducible Protein (GADD34) and Modulates GADD34-bound Protein Phosphatase-1 Activity. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 27706-27715
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Spender, L. C., Cornish, G. H., Sullivan, A., Farrell, P. J.
(2002). Expression of Transcription Factor AML-2 (RUNX3, CBF{alpha}-3) Is Induced by Epstein-Barr Virus EBNA-2 and Correlates with the B-Cell Activation Phenotype. J. Virol.
76: 4919-4927
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Voss, M. D., Hille, A., Barth, S., Spurk, A., Hennrich, F., Holzer, D., Mueller-Lantzsch, N., Kremmer, E., Grasser, F. A.
(2001). Functional Cooperation of Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigen 2 and the Survival Motor Neuron Protein in Transactivation of the Viral LMP1 Promoter. J. Virol.
75: 11781-11790
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Spender, L. C., Cornish, G. H., Rowland, B., Kempkes, B., Farrell, P. J.
(2001). Direct and Indirect Regulation of Cytokine and Cell Cycle Proteins by EBNA-2 during Epstein-Barr Virus Infection. J. Virol.
75: 3537-3546
[Abstract]
[Full Text]