Next Article 
Journal of Virology, October 2000, p. 8785-8792, Vol. 74, No. 19
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nucleocapsid
Protein Can Prevent Self-Priming of Minus-Strand Strong Stop DNA by
Promoting the Annealing of Short Oligonucleotides to Hairpin
Sequences
Mark D.
Driscoll
and
Stephen H.
Hughes*
ABL-Basic Research Program, NCI-Frederick
Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, Maryland
21702-1201
Received 12 April 2000/Accepted 18 June 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Understanding how viral components collaborate to convert the human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 genome from single-stranded RNA into
double-stranded DNA is critical to the understanding of viral
replication. Not only must the correct reactions be carried out, but
unwanted side reactions must be avoided. After minus-strand strong stop
DNA (
sssDNA) synthesis, degradation of the RNA template by the RNase
H domain of reverse transcriptase (RT) produces single-stranded DNA
that has the potential to self-prime at the imperfectly base-paired TAR
hairpin, making continued DNA synthesis impossible. Although nucleocapsid protein (NC) interferes with
sssDNA self-priming in
reverse transcription reactions in vitro, NC alone did not prevent
self-priming of a synthetic
sssDNA oligomer. NC did not influence DNA
bending and therefore cannot inhibit self-priming at hairpins by
directly blocking hairpin formation. Using DNA oligomers as a model for
genomic RNA fragments, we found that a 17-base DNA fragment annealed to
the 3' end of the
sssDNA prevented self-priming in the presence of
NC. This implies that to avoid self-priming, an RNA-DNA hybrid that is
more thermodynamically stable than the hairpin must remain within the
hairpin region. This suggests that NC prevents self-priming by
generating or stabilizing a thermodynamically favored RNA-DNA
heteroduplex instead of the kinetically favored TAR hairpin. In support
of this idea, sequence changes that increased base pairing in the DNA
TAR hairpin resulted in an increase in self-priming in vitro. We
present a model describing the role of NC-dependent inhibition of
self-priming in first-strand transfer.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) synthesizes minus-strand strong stop
DNA (
sssDNA) by extending tRNA3Lys bound at the
primer binding site (PBS) in the RNA genome (8, 15, 37). To
synthesize
sssDNA, RT copies the U5 and R regions; the R region
contains two large hairpins known as the poly(A) hairpin and the TAR
hairpin (9). When this RNA is copied into DNA, hairpins that
correspond to the TAR and poly(A) hairpins of the RNA can form in the
nascent
sssDNA; the formation of these hairpins depends on the
digestion of the template RNA (17). The RNase H activity of
RT cleaves the RNA portion of the RNA-DNA heteroduplex during
polymerization, and there is additional RNase H cleavage after
sssDNA
synthesis is complete (8, 12, 18, 27, 33). Although it is
possible for either the nascent TAR and poly(A) DNA to form hairpins
that could self-prime, such self-priming events are not detected when
the HIV-1 genome is copied into DNA in infected cells. Because the TAR
DNA hairpin forms at the end of R, the likelihood of self-priming is
higher for TAR than for the poly(A) hairpin. Instead of self-priming,
the 3' end of the nascent DNA is efficiently transferred to the R
sequence on the 3' end of the template RNA, where synthesis continues.
This event is known as the first-strand transfer. Nucleocapsid protein
(NC) has been shown to prevent synthesis of self-primed products and promote strand transfer in vitro (17, 23, 26, 30). However, NC does not require a strand transfer acceptor to prevent self-priming. NC can inhibit self-priming of
sssDNA in reverse transcription reactions in vitro in the absence of an acceptor
(17; this report). Therefore, the annealing of a
strand transfer acceptor cannot be the only mechanism that prevents
self-priming. One possibility is that NC interferes with the formation
of hairpins by preventing bending of the hairpin DNA (24,
40). However, we present evidence that this is not the mechanism
that prevents self-priming. Instead, using DNA oligomers as a model for
genomic RNA fragments, we show that NC requires complementary
oligonucleotides to prevent self-priming. In in vitro transcription
reactions, NC must therefore inhibit self-priming by maintaining
RNA-DNA duplexes within TAR that are sufficient to prevent hairpin
formation. In experiments performed in vitro in the absence of NC,
digestion of the RNA in the RNA-DNA duplex results in loss of the RNA
from the heteroduplex and leads to self-priming at the TAR hairpin.
However, NC promotes the retention of an RNA-DNA hybrid that inhibits
self-priming. For NC to successfully prevent self-priming, the
stability of the residual RNA-DNA hybrid must be greater than the
stability of the TAR hairpin. Therefore, the template must be subjected
to only a limited amount of RNase H digestion. This implies that the
extent of RNase H digestion of the RNA genome during reverse
transcription directly influences whether or not self-priming occurs at
the TAR hairpin. If the RNA genome was extensively digested by RNase H,
the stability of the remaining RNA-DNA hybrids would be less than that
of the TAR hairpin, and NC would promote hairpin formation instead of RNA-DNA annealing. In addition to affecting the annealing of nucleic acids, NC may protect the RNA-DNA hybrid from RNase H digestion (10, 22, 23, 34; this report), which could affect
the digestion of genomic RNA after
sssDNA synthesis.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Wild-type HIV-1 RT (p66/51) was expressed in Escherichia
coli and purified as described previously (5). HIV-1 NC
(p7 Zn2+ holoenzyme) was generously provided by Robert
Gorelick, Louis Henderson, and Larry Arthur (SAIC Frederick, Frederick,
Md.). NC was reconstituted from lyophilized powder in 1× RT binding buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, [pH 8.0], 80 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 100 µM bovine serum albumin) at a concentration of 30 µM and stored in
4-µl aliquots in 150-µl tubes at
80°C. Fresh aliquots of NC were thawed immediately prior to use. Oligonucleotides were purchased from Life Technologies (Rockville, Md.). HIV-1 sequences were subcloned
from the pNL4-3 clone (3; GenBank accession no.
AF033819) into the LITMUS 28 plasmid (New England Biolabs, Beverly,
Mass.) and sequenced. The R-PBS template RNA was synthesized according to the instructions contained in the Ambion Megashortscript kit (Ambion, Austin, Tex.). In brief, an oligomer containing a T7 promoter
modified so that it contained the correct sequence for the 5' end of
the R region
(5'-TTACGCCAAGCTACG TAATACGAC TCAC TATAGG TC TC TC TGG T TAGACCAGATCTGAGCCTGGGA-3')
and a second oligomer containing the PBS sequence
(5'-AGTCCCTGTTCGGGCGCCA-3') were used to generate a PCR
fragment from the pNL4-3 sequence cloned into LITMUS. The PCR fragment
was used as the template for RNA synthesis. RNA was purified by
electrophoresis on a 5% denaturing gel, visualized using SYBR Green
(Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.), excised, and eluted using an RNaid
kit from Bio 101 (Vista, Calif.). RNA was quantitated by both UV
spectrophotometry and Ribogreen fluorescence as measured by a Storm 860 PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.). Oligomers were
32P labeled using [
-32P]ATP (Amersham
Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.) and T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs).
RT/NC assays.
PBS-R template RNA, either wild type or
mutant, was mixed with fivefold molar excess [32P]PBS
(5'-AGTCCCTGTTCGGGCGCCA-3'), incubated at 65°C, and
allowed to cool to 23°C over 30 min. A 20-fold molar excess of RT was added to the annealed template-primer and allowed to bind for 5 min at
37°C. Increasing amounts of NC were added to aliquots of the
template-primer-RT reaction and incubated at 37°C for 7 min.
Synthesis was initiated with the addition of RT start solution containing deoxynucleoside triphosphates (80 µM, final concentration) and MgCl2 (6 mM, final concentration). Reactions were
stopped at the indicated times by the addition of an equal volume of a 90% formamide stop solution containing 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 4 µg of plasmid DNA/ml, bromophenol blue, and xylene cyanol. Reactions were heated to 95°C for 4 min, fractionated by
electrophoresis on a denaturing acrylamide gel containing 0.05% SDS,
dried under vacuum, and exposed to a PhosphorImager screen (Molecular Dynamics).
Circularization assays.
32P-labeled
circularization substrate
(5'-GCGAATTCTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTGAAGACATAGTCCCTGTTCGGGCGCCAC-3')
was mixed in 1× ligase buffer (New England Biolabs) with
increasing concentrations of NC. The bridge primer
(5'-AAGAATTCGCGTGGCGCCCG-3') was incubated with NC in a
separate reaction. After 20 min at 37°C, the NC-oligomer reactions
were mixed and incubated at 37°C for 8 min. T4 DNA ligase (New
England Biolabs) was added in 50-fold molar excess, and the reactions
were incubated at 22°C for 30 min. Ligase was inactivated by heating
to 65°C, and the reactions were placed on ice. Then 0.3 U of
exonuclease VII (Exo VII; Gibco/BRL, Rockville, Md.) was added, and the
mixture was incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Reactions were stopped by
the addition of an equal volume of formamide loading dye containing
0.1% SDS and fractionated by electrophoresis on a 12% denaturing
acrylamide gel. The gels were dried under vacuum and exposed to a
PhosphorImager screen.
In the circularization control assays, 15 fmol of an oligomer
representing the upstream sequence of the circularization substrate (5'-CGGGCGCCAC-3') and 1 fmol of the 32P-labeled
oligomer representing the downstream sequence of the circularization
substrate (5'-[32P]GCGAATTCTT-3') were mixed
in 1× ligase buffer and incubated with increasing concentrations of
NC. In a separate reaction, 7.5 fmol of the bridge primer
(5'-AAGAATTCGCGTGGCGCCCG-3'), to which the upstream and
downstream oligomers could anneal to form a ligatable nick, was coated
with NC. After a 20-min incubation at 37°C, the oligomer-NC mixtures
were combined and incubation was continued at 37°C for 8 min. T4 DNA
ligase (New England Biolabs) was added in 50-fold molar excess and
incubated at 22°C for 30 min. The reactions were stopped by the
addition of an equal volume of formamide loading dye containing 0.1%
SDS and fractionated by electrophoresis on a 20% denaturing acrylamide
gel. The gels were dried under vacuum and exposed to a PhosphorImager screen.
Self-priming assays.
Fifteen femtomoles of
32P-labeled 100-nucleotide (nt) DNA complementary to bases
1 to 100 of pNL4-3 (GenBank accession no. AF033819), containing either
wild-type or mutant TAR sequences, was mixed with 70-fold excess of the
indicated blocking primers in 1× RT binding buffer. The mixtures were
heated to 65°C for 10 min and allowed to cool slowly to 22°C. A
20-fold molar excess of RT was added and incubated at 37°C for 5 min.
NC was added to the template-primer-RT mix, at a one- to fourfold
coating level (assuming 7 nt/NC as onefold) as indicated, and allowed
to incubate for 10 min before the addition of RT start solution
containing MgCl2 and deoxynucleoside triphosphates. The
reactions were incubated at 37°C for 40 min and stopped by the
addition of an equal volume of formamide loading dye containing 0.1%
SDS. Electrophoresis was performed on a 6% denaturing acrylamide gel.
The gels were dried under vacuum and exposed to a PhosphorImager screen.
 |
RESULTS |
NC inhibits the synthesis of self-primed products.
A synthetic
RNA encompassing the U5-R region of the HIV-1 genome from the PBS
through TAR was synthesized and designated PBS-R RNA. Complete reverse
transcription of PBS-R RNA starting from a 19-base DNA primer annealed
at the PBS produced a 200-base-long DNA product. A representative
reverse transcription experiment is shown in Fig.
1A. Products larger than 200 bases were
the result of self-primed synthesis (lanes 2 to 8). NC was added in
increasing concentrations in lanes 3 to 8. In calculating the relative
amounts of NC and nucleic acid, we have assumed that each NC covers 7 nt (39). Actual NC coating levels of DNA and RNA varied
during the course of the reactions because the amounts and sizes of DNA and RNA varied as RT synthesized DNA and degraded RNA.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
NC inhibits formation of self-primed products during
reverse transcription. (A) A 5' 32P-labeled 19-base DNA
containing the PBS sequence was annealed to RNA containing the genomic
HIV-1 R-PBS sequence. RT and either no NC (lane 2) or increasing
amounts of NC (lanes 3 to 8) were subsequently allowed to bind.
Theoretical coating levels of NC/primer-template were as follows: lane
2, none; lane 3, 0.25-fold; lane 4, 0.50-fold; lane 5, 1.0-fold; lane
6, 2.0-fold; lane 7, 4-fold; lane 8, 8-fold. Reverse transcription was
initiated, allowed to proceed for 60 min at 37°C, quenched, and
visualized on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The positions of the
200-base full-length sssDNA and self-primed products are indicated at
the right. Positions of DNA size markers (in bases) are shown in lane
1. (B) Quantitation of full-length and self-primed product. The amount
of full-length 200-base product and self-primed product in panel A was
quantitated using a PhosphorImager and plotted as a function of NC
coating level, where 1 NC/7 bases is a onefold coating level. (C) Sum
of full-length and self-primed products in panel A, quantitated using a
PhosphorImager and graphed as a function of initial NC coating level.
|
|
The addition of NC had significant effects on the synthesis of DNA by
HIV-1 RT. Increasing amounts of NC resulted in a corresponding
decrease
in the amount of the self-primed products (Fig.
1A, lanes
3 to 8). A
fourfold excess of NC (lane 7) virtually eliminated
self-priming in
these assays. The amount of self-primed product
was quantitated using a
PhosphorImager (Fig.
1B). As NC levels
increased from zero (lane 2) to
a twofold excess (lane 6), the
amount of full-length product increased
to more than twice its
initial level (Fig.
1B). In reactions containing
less than twice
the amount of NC required to coat the RNA (lanes 2 to
5), two
separate mechanisms increased the amount of 200-base product
produced.
First, the 200-base DNA, once made, was less likely to be
extended
because self-priming was inhibited by NC. Second, there was a
slight (less than 1.4-fold) increase in the total synthesis of
products
200 bases and longer (Fig.
1C). The increase in the amount
of large
products could have been caused by NC assisting RT through
secondary
structure, or it could have been the result of increased
levels of
primer-template annealing facilitated by NC, or
both.
As NC levels were increased from two- to eightfold above the amount
required to coat the RNA and primer, however, there was
a decline in
the amount of the full-length (200-base DNA) product
produced (Fig.
1A,
lanes 6 to 8; quantitated in Fig.
1B and C).
High NC coating levels
resulted in lower levels of polymerization.
Very high levels of NC
resulted in a marked decrease in extension
by RT (data not shown). This
is in agreement with published reports
that NC can protect the
substrate from RT binding, as well as
from enzymatic digestion or
modification (
22,
33,
34) (see
below).
The major self-primed product did not migrate on a denaturing gel to
the position corresponding to the expected size of 343
nt. Instead, the
major product migrated as though it had an apparent
size of 275 nt. We
believe that the high level of secondary structure
within the newly
synthesized DNA prevented the completion of the
self-primed product. To
test this possibility, the sequence of
the 200-base RNA used in Fig.
1A
was changed so that base pairing
within the poly(A) hairpin was
disrupted. The TAR hairpin was
still formed, as evidenced by the strong
pause seen at 143 bases
at the foot of TAR. These sequence changes that
disrupted the
poly(A) hairpin permitted the synthesis of the
full-length 343-base
self-primed product (Fig.
2). These data imply that

sssDNA folds
into a structure similar to that proposed for viral RNA.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Destabilizing the poly(A) hairpin sequence allows
completion of self-primed products. The sequence of the poly(A) RNA
hairpin was changed so that base pairing between the arms of the
hairpin was disrupted. 5' 32P-labeled PBS DNA was annealed
to the RNA, start solution and RT were added, and the mixture was
incubated for 60 min at 37°C, as for Fig. 1A. The reaction was loaded
in lane 1, and DNA markers were loaded in lane 2. Sizes of the markers
are indicated in bases.
|
|
Does NC binding influence DNA bending?
Clearly, NC is able to
prevent self-priming from the TAR hairpin. How is this accomplished? NC
can promote the annealing of thermodynamically stable structures
(36). This would suggest that the addition of NC to an
oligomer capable of forming a stable hairpin should actually promote
hairpin formation. One possibility is that NC could unfold
single-stranded DNA and hold it in a linear form, in a manner similar
to the adenovirus DNA binding protein (40). This would also
be consistent with reports that NC can unfold secondary structures in
RNA and DNA, leading to increased RT polymerization rates through
regions containing secondary structure (19, 38). To test
this possibility, two substrates were created. The first was a linear
substrate constructed of three synthetic DNA oligonucleotides, two of
which were 10 bases long and were designed to anneal to a 20-base
oligonucleotide, creating a double-stranded DNA with a nick that could
be sealed by T4 DNA ligase. The second substrate contained a 56-base
oligonucleotide designed such that its ends annealed to the same
20-base DNA used to make the first substrate. The 56-base
oligonucleotide and the 20-base oligonucleotide were annealed to form a
circular substrate with the same ligatable nick present in the linear
substrate. In this assay, the ability of ligase to form the circular
product depended on the ability of both ends of the linear 56-base DNA
to anneal to the same 20-base DNA, forming a circle. If NC binding
produced a rigid linear DNA structure, formation of a ligatable circle
would be inhibited relative to the ligation of the linear substrate
with an identical nick. DNA components of both linear and circular
substrates were first coated with NC and then mixed together and
allowed to anneal. Increasing amounts of NC were added to the
substrates, and the amount of circularized substrate was quantitated
and compared with the amount of ligation obtained using linear
substrate. To ensure that the ligation product was a circle, the
completed ligation reactions were digested with Exo VII, which can
digest single-stranded DNA from both 5' and 3' exposed ends. The only
ligated product resistant to Exo VII was the circular 56-base DNA,
which migrated on a sequencing gel at an apparent size of 70 nt (data
not shown). As can be seen in Fig. 3,
both the linear and circular substrates were ligated with the same
efficiency by T4 DNA ligase in the presence of NC. Although increasing
levels of NC were able to interfere with T4 DNA ligase, presumably by
blocking access to the nick, the degree of inhibition was the same for
both substrates. This shows that NC does not affect the ability of the
56-base DNA to form a circle and implies that NC does not prevent
self-priming by preventing TAR DNA from forming a hairpin. These
results also show that NC can protect DNA from modification by ligase.
Substantial (i.e., 60 to 70%) protection of the ends of the DNA was
obtained at only a one- to twofold NC coating level (in these
experiments, twofold is 1 NC/3.5 bp). These results are similar to
those reported by Lapadat-Tapolsky et al. (22),
who showed that interior of the DNA is completely protected from
restriction enzyme digestion by twofold excess NC (1 NC/ 4 bp).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
NC does not inhibit circularization of DNA. The effects
of NC on the formation of a linear and circular ligation product were
compared. The 5' end of the circularization substrate ( ) and the 5'
end of the downstream 10-base DNA of the linear substrate ( ) were
32P labeled as described in Materials and Methods. Both DNA
substrates, which contained the same ligatable nick, were incubated
with increasing concentrations of NC. The reactions were incubated with
ligase and fractionated by electrophoresis, and the ligated products
were quantitated using a PhosphorImager as described in Materials and
Methods.
|
|
NC requires an annealed oligomer to block TAR self-priming.
Since NC does not directly inhibit the formation of DNA hairpins, it
must block the self-priming of the TAR hairpin by another mechanism. We
noticed that in reactions in vitro where
sssDNA was synthesized by
copying an RNA template, NC blocked self-priming. However, for NC to
inhibit self-priming in reactions containing synthetic
sssDNA in the
absence of RNA, it was necessary to include an oligonucleotide
complementary to the sequence that forms the hairpin. This indicated
that both NC and an oligomer (either DNA or RNA) were required to block
self-priming. Either NC alone or an oligomer alone was not capable of
blocking self-priming of DNA hairpin. To demonstrate this, a
32P-labeled synthetic 100-nt
sssDNA oligomer, consisting
of the entire TAR sequence plus part of the poly(A) hairpin, was
synthesized. This oligomer could self-prime by forming a hairpin
involving the TAR sequence and be extended by RT to produce a product
of 143 nt (Fig. 4A). A 70-fold excess of
unlabeled DNA oligomers of increasing length was included in the
experiments shown in Fig. 4A, lanes 2 to 15. The unlabeled DNA
oligomers were intended to mimic the RNA fragments remaining after
RNase H digestion of the template. They either had no complementarity
to the 100-base DNA (lanes 2 and 3, M13 primer) or could base pair with
sequences at the 3' end of TAR (Fig. 4B). The length of the
complementary segment was either 21, 17, 13, 9, or 6 nt, as indicated
in Fig. 4B. In the absence of a complementary oligonucleotide (Fig. 4A, lanes 2 and 3), the addition of NC caused a slight reduction in the
formation of 143-base self-primed product, which is most likely due to
inhibition of polymerization, similar to what was seen in Fig. 1A.
Likewise, in lanes 10 to 15, the inclusion of short complementary
oligonucleotides also had little or no effect on the ability to
self-prime, either in the presence or in the absence of NC. In lanes 4 to 7, however, the self-priming of the 100-base DNA was significantly
reduced by the addition of oligomer and NC. In the absence of NC,
self-priming at the TAR hairpin resulted in the formation of
significant amounts of self-primed product (lanes 4 and 6), even in the
presence of a 70-fold excess of competing unlabeled oligomer. In the
presence of NC, however (lanes 5 and 7), the annealing of either the
17- or the 21-base DNA blocked self-priming. This implies that
annealing of the 17- or 21-base DNA produced structures that were
thermodynamically more stable than the hairpin, whereas the oligomers
13 bases and smaller did not. In this case, NC was acting to promote
annealing, not simply protecting the annealed structure from RNase H,
because the DNA oligomers are not susceptible to RNase H.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
NC blocks self-priming by promoting the annealing of
complementary oligomers that are more stable than the hairpin. (A) A
synthetic oligonucleotide comprising the 3' 100 bases of the sssDNA
was end labeled, heated, and slowly cooled in the presence of either a
21-nt M13 DNA primer (lanes 2 and 3) or DNA competitor of decreasing
length, complementary to the 3' end of the sssDNA (lanes 4 to 15; see
panel B). The length of each oligonucleotide is indicated at the top,
and the site of annealing to the hairpin is shown in panel B. 17+T has
the same sequence as 17, with the addition of a 7-nt unannealed tail at
the 3' end (see text). Each reaction was performed both in the presence
and in the absence of enough NC to coat the primer-template at 7 bases/NC, as indicated at the top. Positions of migration of the 100-nt
sssDNA and the 143-nt self-primed product are shown at left. Lane 1 contains unmodified, labeled 100-base DNA. (B) The sssDNA sequence
which folds into a structure resembling the TAR hairpin. The lengths
and sites of annealing of the competitor DNA oligomers discussed above
are shown at the left. The sequence of the competitor DNA oligomer used
to block self-priming is identical to the genomic RNA sequence. The
sites of modifications of the hairpin discussed in the text are
indicated by arrows at the right.
|
|
The oligomer 17+Tail (17+T) was included in the experiments in Fig.
4A
as a control. This oligomer is identical to the 17-base
DNA except for
the addition of seven T residues at the 3' end.
The 3' tail will not
anneal to the template. This oligonucleotide
was used to test the
possibility that the decrease in production
of self-primed products
observed for the reactions containing
NC was due, at least in part, to
an increase in extendable 3'
ends created by annealing perfectly
complementary competitor oligomers
to the TAR hairpin. In addition to
interfering with hairpin formation,
the short, fully annealed oligomers
created an additional site
for RT to bind. The presence of the
unannealed 3' tail in 17+T
should have interfered with the ability of
RT to bind and extend
the 3' end of this oligomer. However, the results
obtained with
the 17+T oligonucleotide were indistinguishable from
those seen
with the 17-base DNA. This demonstrated that increasing in
the
amount of extendable substrate did not influence the ability of
NC
to inhibit self-priming at the TAR
hairpin.
Improvements in base pairing within the TAR hairpin prevent NC from
blocking TAR self-priming.
If there is a competition between the
formation of the TAR hairpin and oligomers annealing to TAR that is
affected by NC, then changes to either the length of the oligomers or
the extent of base pairing in TAR should change whether NC can block
self-priming. It is clear from Fig. 4A that changing the length of the
oligomer annealed to TAR determines whether or not NC can block
self-priming. To test the possibility that stabilizing the TAR hairpin
could promote self-priming, we constructed a second hairpin based on the TAR sequence but with an increase in base pairing between the arms
of the hairpin. Sequence changes (Fig. 4B) were introduced on the 5'
arm of the TAR hairpin so that the competitor oligomers used in the
experiments shown in Fig. 4A could be used in the self-priming assays
with increased TAR base pairing. The mutant TAR sequence contained
three changes, eliminating a single-nucleotide bubble at base 4 by the
addition of a complementary base at position 55, and eliminating the
mismatches between bases 7 to 52 and 10 to 49 by making changes at
positions 49 and 52 (Fig. 4B). These three changes abolished the
ability of NC to block the formation of the hairpin, even in the
presence of the complementary 21-base DNA (Fig.
5). This shows that the ability of NC to
block self-priming at the TAR hairpin depends on the fact that the
hairpin is imperfect.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Oligomers cannot block self-priming of more stable
mutant TAR hairpin. A 99-base DNA containing the changes in the TAR
hairpin sequence indicated in Fig. 4B was subjected to the same
conditions as for Fig. 4A. Sizes of the 99-base starting material and
the 143-base self-primed product are indicated at the left.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Self-priming of the DNA copied from the 5' end of the HIV-1 RNA
genome requires the formation of a TAR hairpin in the newly synthesized
sssDNA. Because NC impedes self-priming of
sssDNA in vitro, we
considered the possibility that NC directly interferes with hairpin
formation by forcing the DNA to adopt a rigid, linear structure, in a
manner similar to that of the adenovirus DNA binding protein
(40), but we found that this was not the case. There was
other evidence to support the idea that NC did not constrain the RNA in
a rigid linear structure. Although NC could block self-priming from
sssDNA generated by RT copying an RNA template in vitro, NC alone
could not prevent the self-priming of synthetic
sssDNA. NC by itself
was not sufficient to block self-priming of
sssDNA; there was an
additional component in the reactions containing an RNA template that
was necessary for NC to inhibit self-priming. The additional component
is a complementary oligonucleotide. Substituting DNA oligomers for the
RNase H-susceptible RNA in our model reactions, we found that a 17-base
DNA primer annealed to the 3' end of the TAR hairpin was sufficient to
block self-priming of
sssDNA in the presence of NC (Fig.
6). NC is a nucleic acid chaperone which facilitates the formation of the most stable nucleic acid structures; under these circumstances, NC promotes the annealing of a
thermodynamically more stable
sssDNA-blocking primer duplex
even in the presence of the kinetically favored hairpin competitor
(36). Formation of the hairpin in the
sssDNA is a
first-order, unimolecular reaction, whereas the equilibrium for the
RNA-DNA duplex is dependent on the concentrations of both the RNA and
DNA, a second-order reaction. As a result, in the absence of NC, the
equilibrium of the RNA-DNA exchange favors hairpin formation, in spite
of the fact that the hairpin is less thermodynamically stable.
Essentially, displacement of the more stably annealed RNA fragment in
favor of the less stable DNA hairpin formation is driven by the high
local concentration of complementary strands in the hairpin DNA. NC may
facilitate the aggregation of nucleic acids, which could affect the
local concentrations of the oligonucleotides relative to the hairpin itself; this could reduce the kinetic advantage of hairpin formation (25, 32). It has been proposed that NC destabilizes
secondary structures in RNA and DNA, which could facilitate the
progression of RT through the genome (20, 36). However, more
recent reports have demonstrated that NC does not unwind secondary
structures in RNA, suggesting that NC binding has little or no effect
on RNA folding (7, 16). After RT extends the DNA hairpin,
the hairpin becomes increasingly stable due to the additional base pairing; thus this process, once begun, is not readily reversible.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Blocking primer prevents self-priming of sssDNA and
promotes specific strand transfer. The 100-base sssDNA forms a
hairpin similar to the TAR RNA hairpin, which can self-prime and be
extended by RT. NC promotes the annealing of a blocking primer 17 bases
or longer to the 3' end of the sssDNA, preventing self-priming. The
blocking primer is released in the presence of NC only if it is
displaced by an acceptor which has greater complementarity to the
sssDNA. During reverse transcription, the blocking primer(s) would be
a fragment or fragments of the RNA genome that remained annealed to the
sssDNA after synthesis was complete.
|
|
Combining our data with data from the literature, we can propose a
model describing how the polymerase and RNase H activities of RT
collaborate with NC and the TAR hairpin to produce efficient, selective
strand transfer (Fig. 6). During DNA synthesis, RNase H cuts relatively
infrequently, leaving relatively large RNA oligomers (11,
33), one or more of which may serve as blocking primers in the
presence of NC. Fu and Taylor showed that HIV-1 RT leaves a 14- to
18-base RNA oligomer annealed to the end of a newly synthesized DNA
strand in the absence of NC (14). NC could protect the RNA oligomers from being displaced by the formation of the hairpin by the
same mechanism we observed with the DNA blocking primers (Fig. 6). NC
may also block hairpin formation by limiting the extent of RNase H
digestion; it has been shown by other investigators that NC can protect
RNA from RNase A (10, 28, 33). However, because RT generates
genomic RNA fragments of the correct size (14 to 18 nt) at the 3' end
of the
sssDNA even in the absence of NC (14), NC-mediated
protection of the RNA may not be necessary.
Transfer of the completed
sssDNA to the 3' R region RNA is required
for the continuation of reverse transcription. This step must be
performed without releasing the TAR hairpin sequence in a fashion that
would allow self-priming. In this context, it is important to remember
that hairpin formation is kinetically favored. The ability of NC to
promote the thermodynamically favored event means that as long as the
complementarity between the
sssDNA and the RNA acceptor is greater
than that of the
sssDNA and the digested RNA, transfer will occur (as
illustrated in Fig. 6). Long regions of complementarity are known to
promote more efficient strand transfer (4, 21). Since NC
promotes the formation of the thermodynamically favored duplex, the
extensive base pairing between the nascent DNA and the strand transfer
acceptor is favored over either the annealing of the digested RNA or
hairpin formation. Thus, targeted and efficient strand transfer is accomplished.
Although in some cases NC altered the degree of RT pausing at secondary
structures, NC had either a neutral or inhibitory effect on
polymerization in our assays. Other investigators have also reported
that NC either had no effect on or inhibited polymerization by RT
(29, 31, 33). High concentrations of NC reduced the numbers
of initiation events, and the amount of full-length product formed
after a given initiation event, in a dose-dependent manner. However,
lower levels of NC can promote the annealing of the primer-template, increasing the availability of the nucleic acid substrate and offsetting the inhibition of polymerization, as has been reported for
primer tRNA (2, 6, 13, 23). NC not only promotes annealing
of primer-template but also inhibits the formation of self-primed
products that would prevent completion of the full-length HIV genome
(17). An appropriate amount of NC can block self-priming while only slightly inhibiting reverse transcription. As shown in Fig.
1B, almost 90% of the self-primed products were eliminated at a
fourfold NC coating level, while the amount of full-length product
(200-base DNA) was reduced by only 15%. An eightfold excess of NC over
the amount needed to coat the RNA virtually eliminated self-priming but
allowed the synthesis of 65% of the maximal amount of full-length DNA
product. In our assays we selected conditions where NC displayed the
ability to inhibit self-priming while still allowing high levels of
polymerization to occur.
Completion of the full-length DNA hairpin was dependent on the DNA
sequence. The wild-type HIV-1 DNA sequence caused RT to pause,
producing predominantly a 275-base self-primed product instead of the
expected 343-base product. The pause may be caused by secondary
structure within the self-primed DNA template. This proposal was
supported by the finding that sequence changes within the poly(A)
hairpin eliminated the pause, leading to the formation of the 343-base product.
Introducing mutations that stabilized the structure of the TAR hairpin
resulted in the efficient production of self-primed products that could
not be inhibited by a 21-base blocking primer and NC. The increased
stability of the mutated hairpin made hairpin formation the favored
reaction both kinetically and thermodynamically. Significantly, this
indicates that a more stable hairpin is likely to be detrimental to the
virus, presenting the possibility that in mutants in which the TAR
hairpin is more stable than the strand transfer intermediate, NC may
favor hairpin formation over RNA-DNA heteroduplex formation. Normally,
this is not an issue; however, if mutations are introduced into either
the upstream or the downstream R region (but not in both), this may
diminish the stability of the acceptor RNA-donor DNA duplex required
for strand transfer, interfering with the strand transfer reaction. In
support of this idea, at least some mutations that both increase TAR
stability and block viral replication if they are present only in one
TAR element have no discernible effect on HIV-1 replication when
introduced into both the upstream and downstream TAR elements (Jared
Clever, personal communication).
Although strand transfer is possible in vitro with unstructured
complementary regions as short as 2 to 7 bases (1), the ability to form the TAR hairpin would restrict the use of such short
regions as strand transfer acceptors at the end of R. HIV-1 has
relatively long R regions compared to other retroviruses (8, 35). Longer R regions promote more efficient strand transfer (4, 21). Long R regions may be necessary for efficient
strand transfer in the presence of the TAR structure. In retroviral
genomes that have highly structured elements in the R region, R is
long. This is true for HIV-1 and for two viruses with more complex
structures in R, HIV-2 and human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1).
In all three viral genomes, R is longer than the structural element (TAR in HIV-1 and HIV-2; Rex response element for HTLV-1). A long R
region would ensure that, in the strand transfer reaction, the strand
transfer intermediate is more stable than any structure that would be
created from
sssDNA.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to Robert Gorelick, Louis Henderson, and Larry
Arthur for the gift of the HIV-1 NC used in this study and for helpful
discussions. We are grateful to Hilda Marusiodis for preparing the manuscript.
Research in S. Hughes' laboratory was sponsored by the National Cancer
Institute, DHHS, under contract with ABL, and by the National Institute
of General Medical Sciences.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Present address: HIV Drug
Resistance Program, NCI-Frederick Cancer Research and Development
Center, P.O. Box B, Frederick, MD 21702-1201. Phone: (301) 846-1619. Fax: (301) 846-6966. E-mail: hughes{at}ncifcrf.gov.
Present address: HIV Drug Resistance Program, National Cancer
Institute-FCRDC, Frederick, MD 21702-1201.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Allain, B.,
M. Lapadat-Tapolsky,
C. Berlioz, and J. L. Darlix.
1994.
Transactivation of the minus-strand DNA transfer by nucleocapsid protein during reverse transcription of the retroviral genome.
EMBO J.
13:973-981[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Barat, C.,
O. Schatz,
S. Le Grice, and J. L. Darlix.
1993.
Analysis of the interactions of HIV1 replication primer tRNA(Lys,3) with nucleocapsid protein and reverse transcriptase.
J. Mol. Biol.
231:185-190[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Benn, S.,
R. Rutledge,
T. Folks,
J. Gold,
L. Baker,
J. McCormick,
P. Feorino,
P. Piot,
T. Quinn, and M. Martin.
1985.
Genomic heterogeneity of AIDS retroviral isolates from North America and Zaire.
Science
230:949-951[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Berkhout, B.,
J. van Wamel, and B. Klaver.
1995.
Requirements for DNA strand transfer during reverse transcription in mutant HIV-1 virions.
J. Mol. Biol.
252:59-69[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Boyer, P. L.,
C. Tantillo,
A. Jacobo-Molina,
R. G. Nanni,
J. Ding,
E. Arnold, and S. H. Hughes.
1994.
Sensitivity of wild-type human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase to dideoxynucleotides depends on template length; the sensitivity of drug-resistant mutants does not.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:4882-4886[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cen, S.,
Y. Huang,
A. Khorchid,
J. L. Darlix,
M. A. Wainberg, and L. Kleiman.
1999.
The role of Pr55gag in the annealing of tRNA3Lys to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomic RNA.
J. Virol.
73:4485-4488[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Chan, B.,
K. Weidemaier,
W. T. Yip,
P. F. Barbara, and K. Musier-Forsyth.
1999.
Intra-tRNA distance measurements for nucleocapsid protein-dependent tRNA unwinding during priming of HIV reverse transcription.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:459-464[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Coffin, J. M.,
S. H. Hughes, and H. E. Varmus.
1997.
Retroviruses.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.
|
| 9.
|
Das, A. T.,
B. Klaver,
B. I. Klasens,
J. L. van Wamel, and B. Berkhout.
1997.
A conserved hairpin motif in the R-U5 region of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA genome is essential for replication.
J. Virol.
71:2346-2356[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
DeStefano, J. J.
1996.
Interaction of human immunodeficiency virus nucleocapsid protein with a structure mimicking a replication intermediate. Effects on stability, reverse transcriptase binding, and strand transfer.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:16350-16356[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
DeStefano, J. J.,
R. G. Buiser,
L. M. Mallaber,
T. W. Myers,
R. A. Bambara, and P. J. Fay.
1991.
Polymerization and RNase H activities of the reverse transcriptases from avian myeloblastosis, human immunodeficiency, and Moloney murine leukemia viruses are functionally uncoupled.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:7423-7431[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
DeStefano, J. J.,
L. M. Mallaber,
P. J. Fay, and R. A. Bambara.
1994.
Quantitative analysis of RNA cleavage during RNA-directed DNA synthesis by human immunodeficiency and avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptases.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:3793-3800[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Feng, Y. X.,
S. Campbell,
D. Harvin,
B. Ehresmann,
C. Ehresmann, and A. Rein.
1999.
The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag polyprotein has nucleic acid chaperone activity: possible role in dimerization of genomic RNA and placement of tRNA on the primer binding site.
J. Virol.
73:4251-4256[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Fu, T. B., and J. Taylor.
1992.
When retroviral reverse transcriptases reach the end of their RNA templates.
J. Virol.
66:4271-4278[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Goff, S. P.
1990.
Retroviral reverse transcriptase: synthesis, structure, and function.
J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr.
3:817-831.
|
| 16.
|
Gregoire, C. J.,
D. Gautheret, and E. P. Loret.
1997.
No tRNA3Lys unwinding in a complex with HIV NCp7.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:25143-25148[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Guo, J.,
L. E. Henderson,
J. Bess,
B. Kane, and J. G. Levin.
1997.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid protein promotes efficient strand transfer and specific viral DNA synthesis by inhibiting TAR-dependent self-priming from minus-strand strong-stop DNA.
J. Virol.
71:5178-5188[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Hughes, S. H.,
Z. Hostomsky,
S. F. Le Grice,
K. Lentz, and E. Arnold.
1996.
What is the orientation of DNA polymerases on their templates?
J. Virol.
70:2679-2683[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Ji, X.,
G. J. Klarmann, and B. D. Preston.
1996.
Effect of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) nucleocapsid protein on HIV-1 reverse transcriptase activity in vitro.
Biochemistry
35:132-143[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Khan, R., and D. P. Giedroc.
1992.
Recombinant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid (NCp7) protein unwinds tRNA.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:6689-6695[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Klaver, B., and B. Berkhout.
1994.
Premature strand transfer by the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase during strong-stop DNA synthesis.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:137-144[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Lapadat-Tapolsky, M.,
H. De Rocquigny,
D. Van Gent,
B. Roques,
R. Plasterk, and J. L. Darlix.
1993.
Interactions between HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein and viral DNA may have important functions in the viral life cycle.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:831-839[Abstract/Free Full Text]. (Erratum, 21:2024.)
|
| 23.
|
Lapadat-Tapolsky, M.,
C. Gabus,
M. Rau, and J. L. Darlix.
1997.
Possible roles of HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein in the specificity of proviral DNA synthesis and in its variability.
J. Mol. Biol.
268:250-260[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Lapadat-Tapolsky, M.,
C. Pernelle,
C. Borie, and J. L. Darlix.
1995.
Analysis of the nucleic acid annealing activities of nucleocapsid protein from HIV-1.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:2434-2441[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Le Cam, E.,
D. Coulaud,
E. Delain,
P. Petitjean,
B. P. Roques,
D. Gerard,
E. Stoylova,
C. Vuilleumier,
S. P. Stoylov, and Y. Mely.
1998.
Properties and growth mechanism of the ordered aggregation of a model RNA by the HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein: an electron microscopy investigation.
Biopolymers
45:217-229[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Li, X.,
Y. Quan,
E. J. Arts,
Z. Li,
B. D. Preston,
H. de Rocquigny,
B. P. Roques,
J. L. Darlix,
L. Kleiman,
M. A. Parniak, and M. A. Wainberg.
1996.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid protein (NCp7) directs specific initiation of minus-strand DNA synthesis primed by human tRNA3Lys in vitro: studies of viral RNA molecules mutated in regions that flank the primer binding site.
J. Virol.
70:4996-5004[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Palaniappan, C.,
G. M. Fuentes,
L. Rodriguez-Rodriguez,
P. J. Fay, and R. A. Bambara.
1996.
Helix structure and ends of RNA/DNA hybrids direct the cleavage specificity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase RNase H.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:2063-2070[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Peliska, J. A.,
S. Balasubramanian,
D. P. Giedroc, and S. J. Benkovic.
1994.
Recombinant HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein accelerates HIV-1 reverse transcriptase catalyzed DNA strand transfer reactions and modulates RNase H activity.
Biochemistry
33:13817-13823[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Raja, A., and J. J. DeStefano.
1999.
Kinetic analysis of the effect of HIV nucleocapsid protein (NCp) on internal strand transfer reactions.
Biochemistry
38:5178-5184[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Rein, A.,
L. E. Henderson, and J. G. Levin.
1998.
Nucleic-acid-chaperone activity of retroviral nucleocapsid proteins: significance for viral replication.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23:297-301[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Rodriguez-Rodriguez, L.,
Z. Tsuchihashi,
G. M. Fuentes,
R. A. Bambara, and P. J. Fay.
1995.
Influence of human immunodeficiency virus nucleocapsid protein on synthesis and strand transfer by the reverse transcriptase in vitro.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:15005-15011[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Stoylov, S. P.,
C. Vuilleumier,
E. Stoylova,
H. De Rocquigny,
B. P. Roques,
D. Gerard, and Y. Mely.
1997.
Ordered aggregation of ribonucleic acids by the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid protein.
Biopolymers
41:301-312[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Suo, Z., and K. A. Johnson.
1997.
Effect of RNA secondary structure on RNA cleavage catalyzed by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.
Biochemistry
36:12468-12476[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Tanchou, V.,
C. Gabus,
V. Rogemond, and J. L. Darlix.
1995.
Formation of stable and functional HIV-1 nucleoprotein complexes in vitro.
J. Mol. Biol.
252:563-571[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Temin, H. M.
1981.
Structure, variation and synthesis of retrovirus long terminal repeat.
Cell
27:1-3[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Tsuchihashi, Z., and P. O. Brown.
1994.
DNA strand exchange and selective DNA annealing promoted by the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid protein.
J. Virol.
68:5863-5870[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Whitcomb, J. M., and S. H. Hughes.
1992.
Retroviral reverse transcription and integration: progress and problems.
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
8:275-306[CrossRef].
|
| 38.
|
Wu, W.,
L. E. Henderson,
T. D. Copeland,
R. J. Gorelick,
W. J. Bosche,
A. Rein, and J. G. Levin.
1996.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid protein reduces reverse transcriptase pausing at a secondary structure near the murine leukemia virus polypurine tract.
J. Virol.
70:7132-7142[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
You, J. C., and C. S. McHenry.
1993.
HIV nucleocapsid protein. Expression in Escherichia coli, purification, and characterization.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:16519-16527[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Zijderveld, D. C.,
M. H. Stuiver, and P. C. van der Vliet.
1993.
The adenovirus DNA binding protein enhances intermolecular DNA renaturation but inhibits intramolecular DNA renaturation.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:2591-2598[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, October 2000, p. 8785-8792, Vol. 74, No. 19
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Darugar, Q., Kim, H., Gorelick, R. J., Landes, C.
(2008). Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 Nucleocapsid Protein-Induced Structural Changes in Transactivation Response DNA Hairpin Measured by Single-Molecule Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer. J. Virol.
82: 12164-12171
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stewart-Maynard, K. M., Cruceanu, M., Wang, F., Vo, M.-N., Gorelick, R. J., Williams, M. C., Rouzina, I., Musier-Forsyth, K.
(2008). Retroviral Nucleocapsid Proteins Display Nonequivalent Levels of Nucleic Acid Chaperone Activity. J. Virol.
82: 10129-10142
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Song, M., Basu, V. P., Hanson, M. N., Roques, B. P., Bambara, R. A.
(2008). Proximity and Branch Migration Mechanisms in HIV-1 Minus Strand Strong Stop DNA Transfer. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 3141-3150
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wu, T., Heilman-Miller, S. L., Levin, J. G.
(2007). Effects of nucleic acid local structure and magnesium ions on minus-strand transfer mediated by the nucleic acid chaperone activity of HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein. Nucleic Acids Res
35: 3974-3987
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Song, M., Balakrishnan, M., Chen, Y., Roques, B. P., Bambara, R. A.
(2006). Stimulation of HIV-1 Minus Strand Strong Stop DNA Transfer by Genomic Sequences 3' of the Primer Binding Site. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 24227-24235
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cruceanu, M., Urbaneja, M. A., Hixson, C. V., Johnson, D. G., Datta, S. A., Fivash, M. J., Stephen, A. G., Fisher, R. J., Gorelick, R. J., Casas-Finet, J. R., Rein, A., Rouzina, I., Williams, M. C.
(2006). Nucleic acid binding and chaperone properties of HIV-1 Gag and nucleocapsid proteins. Nucleic Acids Res
34: 593-605
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Purohit, V., Balakrishnan, M., Kim, B., Bambara, R. A.
(2005). Evidence That HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Employs the DNA 3' End-directed Primary/Secondary RNase H Cleavage Mechanism during Synthesis and Strand Transfer. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 40534-40543
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, Y., Balakrishnan, M., Roques, B. P., Bambara, R. A.
(2005). Acceptor RNA Cleavage Profile Supports an Invasion Mechanism for HIV-1 Minus Strand Transfer. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 14443-14452
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Heilman-Miller, S. L., Wu, T., Levin, J. G.
(2004). Alteration of Nucleic Acid Structure and Stability Modulates the Efficiency of Minus-Strand Transfer Mediated by the HIV-1 Nucleocapsid Protein. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 44154-44165
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, Y., Balakrishnan, M., Roques, B. P., Bambara, R. A.
(2003). Steps of the Acceptor Invasion Mechanism for HIV-1 Minus Strand Strong Stop Transfer. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 38368-38375
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, N., Gorelick, R. J., Musier-Forsyth, K.
(2003). Zinc finger-dependent HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein-TAR RNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res
31: 4847-4855
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Post, K., Guo, J., Howard, K. J., Powell, M. D., Miller, J. T., Hizi, A., Le Grice, S. F. J., Levin, J. G.
(2003). Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Reverse Transcriptase Activity in Model Systems That Mimic Steps in Reverse Transcription. J. Virol.
77: 7623-7634
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Derebail, S. S., Heath, M. J., DeStefano, J. J.
(2003). Evidence for the Differential Effects of Nucleocapsid Protein on Strand Transfer in Various Regions of the HIV Genome. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 15702-15712
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, Y., Balakrishnan, M., Roques, B. P., Fay, P. J., Bambara, R. A.
(2003). Mechanism of Minus Strand Strong Stop Transfer in HIV-1 Reverse Transcription. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 8006-8017
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fu, W., Hu, W.-S.
(2002). Functional Replacement of Nucleocapsid Flanking Regions by Heterologous Counterparts with Divergent Primary Sequences: Effects of Chimeric Nucleocapsid on the Retroviral Replication Cycle. J. Virol.
77: 754-761
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Roda, R. H., Balakrishnan, M., Kim, J. K., Roques, B. P., Fay, P. J., Bambara, R. A.
(2002). Strand Transfer Occurs in Retroviruses by a Pause-initiated Two-step Mechanism. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 46900-46911
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, W.-h., Hwang, C. K., Hu, W.-S., Gorelick, R. J., Pathak, V. K.
(2002). Zinc Finger Domain of Murine Leukemia Virus Nucleocapsid Protein Enhances the Rate of Viral DNA Synthesis in Vivo. J. Virol.
76: 7473-7484
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Guo, J., Wu, T., Kane, B. F., Johnson, D. G., Henderson, L. E., Gorelick, R. J., Levin, J. G.
(2002). Subtle Alterations of the Native Zinc Finger Structures Have Dramatic Effects on the Nucleic Acid Chaperone Activity of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nucleocapsid Protein. J. Virol.
76: 4370-4378
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hameau, L., Jeusset, J., Lafosse, S., Coulaud, D., Delain, E., Unge, T., Restle, T., Le Cam, E., Mirambeau, G.
(2001). Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Central DNA Flap: Dynamic Terminal Product of Plus-Strand Displacement DNA Synthesis Catalyzed by Reverse Transcriptase Assisted by Nucleocapsid Protein. J. Virol.
75: 3301-3313
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Driscoll, M. D., Golinelli, M.-P., Hughes, S. H.
(2001). In Vitro Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Minus-Strand Strong-Stop DNA Synthesis and Genomic RNA Processing. J. Virol.
75: 672-686
[Abstract]
[Full Text]