This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chappell, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dermody, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chappell, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dermody, T. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, September 2000, p. 8472-8479, Vol. 74, No. 18
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Identification of Carbohydrate-Binding Domains in the Attachment Proteins of Type 1 and Type 3 Reoviruses

James D. Chappell,1,2 Joy L. Duong,2 Benjamin W. Wright,2 and Terence S. Dermody1,2,3,*

Departments of Pediatrics1 and Microbiology and Immunology3 and Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for Pediatric Research,2 Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232

Received 1 March 2000/Accepted 20 June 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The reovirus attachment protein, sigma 1, is responsible for strain-specific patterns of viral tropism in the murine central nervous system and receptor binding on cultured cells. The sigma 1 protein consists of a fibrous tail domain proximal to the virion surface and a virion-distal globular head domain. To better understand mechanisms of reovirus attachment to cells, we conducted studies to identify the region of sigma 1 that binds cell surface carbohydrate. Chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins derived from prototype reovirus strains type 1 Lang (T1L) and type 3 Dearing (T3D) were expressed in insect cells by using a baculovirus vector. Assessment of expressed protein susceptibility to proteolytic cleavage, binding to anti-sigma 1 antibodies, and oligomerization indicates that the chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins are properly folded. To assess carbohydrate binding, recombinant sigma 1 proteins were tested for the capacity to agglutinate mammalian erythrocytes and to bind sialic acid presented on glycophorin, the cell surface molecule bound by type 3 reovirus on human erythrocytes. Using a panel of two wild-type and ten chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins, the sialic acid-binding domain of type 3 sigma 1 was mapped to a region of sequence proposed to form the more amino terminal of two predicted beta -sheet structures in the tail. This unit corresponds to morphologic region T(iii) observed in computer-processed electron micrographs of sigma 1 protein purified from virions. In contrast, the homologous region of T1L sigma 1 sequence was not implicated in carbohydrate binding; rather, sequences in the distal portion of the tail known as the neck were required. Results of these studies demonstrate that a functional receptor-binding domain, which uses sialic acid as its ligand, is contained within morphologic region T(iii) of the type 3 sigma 1 tail. Furthermore, our findings indicate that T1L and T3D sigma 1 proteins contain different arrangements of receptor-binding domains.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Mammalian reoviruses display broad cell and tissue tropism in vivo (reviewed in reference 43) and infect numerous types of cultured cells (reviewed in reference 43). Viral attachment is mediated by outer-capsid protein sigma 1 (23, 26, 46), which is encoded by the S1 gene segment (27, 28, 49). Some strain-dependent patterns of reovirus spread and tropism in newborn mice segregate with the S1 gene (20, 44, 47, 48), indicating that sigma 1 plays a key role in the pathogenesis of reovirus-induced disease. Within the murine central nervous system, type 1 reovirus infects ependymal cells, whereas type 3 reovirus infects neurons (47). This difference in cell tropism is determined by receptor specificities of type 1 and type 3 sigma 1 proteins (13, 41). The sigma 1 protein also is responsible for strain-dependent differences in the attachment of virions to mammalian erythrocytes (9, 12, 49) and murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells (9, 38). Sialic acid serves as a receptor for type 3 reovirus on MEL cells (9, 38) and also can function as a receptor on murine L929 (L) cells (11, 18, 30, 32, 33, 37). Type 3 sigma 1 protein also binds another receptor in addition to sialic acid (6, 8, 29, 30), but the identity of this receptor has not been determined.

The sigma 1 protein is a homo-oligomer located at the vertices of the virion icosahedron (3, 16, 17, 24, 40). Electron microscopic analyses of virion-associated sigma 1 (17), sigma 1 isolated from virions (16, 17), and expressed sigma 1 (1) reveal that sigma 1 protein is a fibrous molecule consisting of an elongated tail domain and a virion-distal globular head domain. Five distinct, tandemly arranged morphologic regions of sigma 1, designated T(i), T(ii), T(iii), T(iv), and H, have been discerned using digitized image enhancements of sigma 1 electron micrographs (16). These morphologic regions correlate well with predictions of sigma 1 secondary structure (31). Sequences represented by morphologic regions in the tail are proposed to form an amino-terminal short (~25-residue) alpha -helical coiled-coil and turn/loop [T(i)], a long (~150-residue) alpha -helical coiled-coil [T(ii)], an eight-stranded cross beta -sheet [T(iii), ~65 residues], and two short regions of alpha -helical coiled-coil (two to three heptad repeats each) that flank a four-stranded cross beta -sheet [T(iv), ~75 residues]. Amino acid sequences carboxy terminal to morphologic region T(iv) (~145 residues) are predicted to assume a more complex arrangement of secondary structures corresponding to the globular head domain (H) of sigma 1.

Previous studies of type 3 sigma 1 protein indicate that sequences in the tail bind sialic acid. Treatment of virions of reovirus strain type 3 Dearing (T3D) with protease to generate infectious subvirion particles (ISVPs), which are intermediates in reovirus disassembly, results in cleavage of sigma 1 and loss of the head and part of the T(iv) domain (8, 30). ISVPs retain the capacity for hemagglutination, demonstrating that sequences amino terminal to the cleavage site, which has been identified as residue 245 (8), are sufficient to bind sialic acid. Concordantly, sequence polymorphism within the fourth predicted beta -strand of morphologic region T(iii), amino acid residues 198 to 204, determine the capacity of type 3 reoviruses to mediate hemagglutination and bind and infect MEL cells (9, 12). However, it is not known whether sequences within T(iii) constitute part of a sialic acid-binding domain or control this function at another site. Hemagglutination mediated by type 1 reovirus virions also is dependent on carbohydrate binding (25), although the specific carbohydrate has not been identified. Available evidence indicates that type 1 reovirus does not bind sialic acid (9, 12, 32, 38). Moreover, nothing is known about sequences in type 1 sigma 1 that mediate receptor binding.

To identify sequences in sigma 1 protein that bind carbohydrate, we generated chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins using the sigma 1 sequences of reovirus strains type 1 Lang (T1L) and T3D. Expressed sigma 1 proteins were tested in assays of carbohydrate binding, and morphologic region T(iii) was identified as the minimum structural domain in type 3 sigma 1 required to bind sialic acid. In contrast, sequences in the T(iv) region of type 1 sigma 1 protein were found to be required for hemagglutination, indicating that the minimal carbohydrate-binding domain in type 1 sigma 1 resides in the carboxy-terminal one-half of the molecule. Results from this study confirm the presence of discrete receptor-binding domains in the head and tail domains of type 3 sigma 1 and indicate that the topology of receptor-binding domains differs between type 1 and type 3 sigma 1 proteins.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Cells and viruses. Spinner-adapted L cells were grown in either suspension or monolayer cultures in Joklik's modified Eagle's minimal essential medium (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, Calif.) that was supplemented to contain 5% fetal bovine serum (Intergen, Purchase, N.Y.), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U of penicillin per ml, 100 µg of streptomycin per ml, and 0.25 µg of amphotericin (Irvine) per ml. Spodoptera frugiperda Sf21 and Trichoplusia ni Tn High Five insect cells were grown in either suspension or monolayer cultures using Grace's medium (Gibco, Grand Island, N.Y.) supplemented to contain 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 U of penicillin, 100 µg of streptomycin, and 0.25 µg of amphotericin per ml. Reovirus strains T1L and T3D are laboratory stocks. Purified virion preparations of reovirus were made using second- and third-passage L-cell lysate stocks of twice-plaque-purified reovirus as previously described (17). To obtain purified virions containing 35S-labeled proteins, Easy Tag Express-[35S] protein labeling mix (NEN, Boston, Mass.) was added to cell suspensions (~12.5 µCi per ml) at the initiation of infection. Baculovirus vector strains were derived from Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus (Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, Calif.). Recombinant baculoviruses containing wild-type (wt) and mutant S1 gene cDNAs were generated and propagated as previously described (8).

Construction of recombinant S1 gene cDNAs. Using primers specific for noncoding regions of the S1 gene, sigma 1-encoding S1 gene cDNAs were generated by reverse transcription-PCR (22) and cloned into the pCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.). Cloned T1L and T3D S1 gene cDNAs were used as template to generate chimeric and truncated S1 genes. Cloned chimeric S1 gene cDNAs were used as template to generate two additional chimeric constructs, 1-1-3-3-1 and 1-1-3-1-1.

Chimeric S1 genes were produced using the splice-overlap-extension PCR technique (19) as previously described (8). Primers were designed to facilitate fusion of T1L and T3D S1 sequences and maintain the proper reading frame of sequences 3' to the exchange locus. The same strategy was used to generate the mutant T3D S1 construct 3-Delta -3-3-3, which contains an internal in-frame deletion of sequences in the T(ii) region of the tail. Truncated S1 genes lacking 3' sequences corresponding to the head domain were generated in PCRs using primers that inserted a stop codon at the desired position. S1 gene PCR products were cloned into the pCR2.1 vector and then transferred into baculovirus transfer vectors. Nucleotide sequences were determined for all cDNAs by automated analysis using an ABI model 377 (PE-Applied Biosystems, Norwalk, Conn.) and by manual analysis using phage T7 DNA polymerase (U.S. Biochemical, Cleveland, Ohio) and [35S]ATP. Chimeric and truncated S1 gene constructs used in this study are shown in Fig. 1.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins used for studies of carbohydrate binding. (A) Model of sigma 1 structure depicting predicted secondary structures and correlating primary amino acid sequence with morphologic regions of sigma 1 (T(i), T(ii), T(iii), T(iv), and H) seen in computer-processed electron micrographic images of sigma 1 protein isolated from virions (16, 31). In the simplified version of this model shown below, alpha -helical regions of the tail domain are indicated by horizontal bars and regions of beta -strand/beta -turn are symbolized by ovoid shapes. The globular head domain (H) is depicted as a circle. (B) Sequence features of chimeric and truncated sigma 1 constructs. White symbols represent sequences derived from T1L sigma 1, and black symbols represent sequences derived from T3D sigma 1. Constructs are named according to the parental origin of sigma 1 morphologic regions as previously described (16, 31): 1, sequences derived from T1L sigma 1; and 3, sequences derived from T3D sigma 1. Sequences corresponding to morphologic regions T(i), T(ii), T(iii), T(iv), and H are represented by the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth characters, respectively, of construct names. Delta , deleted sequences. The sequences of T1L and T3D sigma 1 comprising each construct are denoted by numbers corresponding to sigma 1 amino acid residues reported by Nibert et al. (31) (T1L) and Bassel-Duby et al. (2) (T3D).

Expression of and purification of recombinant sigma 1 proteins. Second- or third-passage stocks of recombinant baculovirus were used to infect insect cell monolayers (2.4 × 107 cells) at a multiplicity of infection of >= 5 PFU per cell. After 72 h of incubation, cells were harvested and resuspended in 2 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 8.3 mM Na2HPO4, 1.5 mM KH2PO4) containing 5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and Complete, Mini, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.). Cells were lysed by sonication, and supernatants were cleared of debris by centrifugation. To produce 35S-labeled sigma 1 proteins, culture medium was replaced after 24 h incubation with methionine-free Grace's medium (Gibco) supplemented to contain 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U of penicillin, 100 µg of streptomycin, and 0.25 µg of amphotericin per ml, and 10 µCi of Easy Tag Express-[35S] protein labeling mix per ml. Cells were harvested after 48 h of incubation in 35S-containing medium. Expressed sigma 1 proteins containing an intact head domain were recovered from cell lysates using T1L sigma 1-specific monoclonal antibody (MAb) 5C6 (45) or T3D sigma 1-specific MAb 9BG5 (6) conjugated to cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). Beads containing adsorbed sigma 1 protein were washed five times with buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris (pH 8), 1.2 M NaCl, 0.4% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.2% Triton X-100, and 5 mM EGTA, followed by three washes with a solution of 50 mM triethanolamine (pH 11.6), 0.5 M NaCl, and 0.1% Triton X-100. Beads then were washed three times with virion storage buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris [pH 7.5]). Truncation mutants of sigma 1 lacking the head domain were purified from cell lysates by precipitation with rabbit antiserum raised to virions of strain T1L or T3D. Precipitates were recovered using protein A-Sepharose (Pharmacia) and washed as described above.

Protease treatment of expressed sigma 1 proteins. Aliquots of sigma 1-containing Sepharose beads in virion storage buffer were incubated at 15°C with 0, 0.1, 1.0, or 10 µg of Nalpha -p-tosyl-L-sulfonyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone-treated bovine trypsin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) per ml for 75 min. Reaction mixtures were mixed 1:1 with 2× protein sample buffer (3) and incubated at 100°C for 10 min. Reaction products were resolved by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) in an SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography.

Assessment of sigma 1 multimerization status during SDS-PAGE. 35S-labeled purified reovirus virions (5 × 1010 particles) or expressed sigma 1 proteins adsorbed to MAb-conjugated Sepharose were suspended in protein sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris, 2% SDS, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, 0.01% bromophenol blue [3]) adjusted to pH 6.8 or 8.3 and incubated at 100°C (pH 6.8) or 60°C (pH 8.3) for 10 min. Proteins were resolved in SDS-10% polyacrylamide gels and visualized by autoradiography.

Hemagglutination assay. Clarified insect cell lysates containing expressed sigma 1 proteins were prepared as described above. Lysates were aliquoted into 96-well U-bottom microtiter plates (Costar, Cambridge, Mass.) and serially diluted twofold in 0.05 ml of PBS. Human type O+ erythrocytes or calf erythrocytes (Colorado Serum Co., Denver, Colo.) were washed twice in PBS and resuspended at a concentration of 1% (vol/vol). Erythrocytes (0.05 ml) were added to wells containing expressed protein and incubated at 4°C for at least 2 h. A partial or complete shield of erythrocytes on the well bottom was interpreted as a positive hemagglutination result; a smooth, round button of erythrocytes was interpreted as negative. The highest dilution of lysate sufficient to produce hemagglutination was designated to equal 1 hemagglutination unit (HA unit).

Glycophorin-binding assay. Human type MN glycophorin or asialoglycophorin (Sigma) was biotinylated using ENZOTIN reagent (Enzo Diagnostics, Farmingdale, N.Y.) according to the supplier's instructions. Expressed sigma 1 proteins containing intact head domains were purified from insect cell lysates using MAb-conjugated Sepharose as described above, and 0.004 ml of the sigma 1 preparation was diluted in a total volume of 0.1 ml of PBS supplemented to contain 0.05% Tween 20 (J. T. Baker, Phillipsburg, N.J.) (PBS-T) and 0.034 µg of biotinylated glycophorin or biotinylated asialoglycophorin per ml. Beads were incubated at room temperature (RT) for 15 min, rinsed with three washes in 0.5 ml of PBS-T, then incubated at RT in 0.1 ml of PBS-T with 0.2 U of streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate (Boehringer) per ml for 15 min, and rinsed again with three washes in 0.5 ml of PBS-T. Finally, beads were incubated at RT in 0.1 ml of solution of chromogenic substrate [0.04% (wt/vol) 2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazolinesulfonic acid) (ABTS; Sigma) in 0.05 M phosphate-citrate buffer (pH 5.0) containing 0.0075% H2O2] for 15 min. Absorbance at 405 nm was determined using a Thermomax microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Crawley, United Kingdom). Nonspecific binding of biotinylated glycophorin and biotinylated asialoglycophorin was determined exactly as above, using MAb-conjugated Sepharose without sigma 1 protein.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Expression and folding of chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins. To identify structural domains in sigma 1 that bind carbohydrate, the sigma 1 proteins of reovirus strains T1L and T3D, seven T1L-T3D chimeric sigma 1 proteins, and three sigma 1 truncation mutants shown in Fig. 1 were expressed in insect cells using baculovirus vectors. Sequences exchanged among the sigma 1 chimeras correspond to morphologic regions of sigma 1 identified in electron micrographs (16). The specific exchange loci were at conserved positions between sequence regions distinguished by unique patterns of repeating apolar amino acids (31). MAbs specific for T1L and T3D sigma 1 proteins, 5C6 (45) and 9BG5 (6), respectively, were used to purify expressed sigma 1 proteins from cell lysates. The reactivity of MAbs 5C6 and 9BG5 with chimeric sigma 1 proteins demonstrates that these antibodies recognize epitopes in the sigma 1 head (Fig. 2). MAb 5C6 bound wt T1L sigma 1 and chimera 3-3-3-3-1, which has head-forming sequences derived from only T1L sigma 1. In contrast, MAb 9BG5 bound wt T3D sigma 1 and chimera 1-1-1-1-3, which has head-forming sequences from only T3D sigma 1. Consistent with this pattern, chimera 3-3-3-3-1 was not bound by MAb 9BG5, and chimera 1-1-1-1-3 was not bound by MAb 5C6. Either MAb 5C6 or MAb 9BG5 was capable of recovering sigma 1 proteins containing a head domain (Fig. 3 to 5), thus confirming expression of our panel of recombinant S1 gene constructs. Additionally, these antibodies bind conformationally sensitive epitopes in sigma 1 (4, 35, 45), which suggests that expressed sigma 1 proteins are properly folded.


View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Binding of anti-sigma 1 MAbs to expressed sigma 1 proteins. 35S-labeled wt and chimeric sigma 1 proteins were expressed in insect cells, and cell lysates were incubated with T1L sigma 1-specific MAb 5C6 and T3D sigma 1-specific MAb 9BG5 conjugated to Sepharose. Sepharose was washed under stringent conditions of salt, detergent, and pH to remove nonspecifically associated proteins, followed by incubation in protein sample buffer at 100°C to release antibody-bound sigma 1 protein. Samples were resolved in an SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography. Positions of molecular weight standards (in kilodaltons) are shown.


View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Effect of trypsin treatment on wt and chimeric sigma 1 proteins. 35S-labeled sigma 1 proteins were purified from insect cell lysates using anti-sigma 1 MAb 5C6 or 9BG5 conjugated to Sepharose followed by treatment at 15°C with 0, 0.1, 1.0, or 10 µg of bovine trypsin per ml for 75 min. Reaction mixtures were heated at 100°C in protein sample buffer; digestion products were resolved in an SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography. Sequences corresponding to the T(iv) region of proteins shown in panel A are derived from T1L sigma 1, whereas sequences corresponding to the T(iv) region of proteins shown in panel B are derived from T3D sigma 1. , 0 to 10 µg of trypsin [TRY] per ml. Positions of molecular weight standards (in kilodaltons) are shown.

Identification of a protease-sensitive domain in morphologic region T(iv) of T3D sigma 1. To identify protease-sensitive domains in T3D sigma 1, and to confirm that sequences in chimeric sigma 1 proteins fold into their native conformations, each protein was purified from cell lysates and treated with trypsin. Trypsin cleaves expressed (15) or virion-associated (8) T3D sigma 1 at Arg245 within morphologic region T(iv). T1L sigma 1 is resistant to cleavage by trypsin (5, 8, 14, 15, 30). Likewise, wt T1L sigma 1 and chimeric proteins containing the T(iv) region of T1L sigma 1 were resistant to cleavage (Fig. 3A). T1L sigma 1 truncation mutant 1-1-1-1-Delta , which contains tail-forming sequences only, was resistant to trypsin cleavage at lower enzyme concentrations but exhibited partial cleavage susceptibility at higher concentrations (~10 µg of trypsin per ml) (Fig. 4); the predominant cleavage product migrated slightly faster than untreated protein. The wt T3D sigma 1 protein was cleaved by trypsin, as was each sigma 1 construct containing the T(iv) region of T3D sigma 1 (Fig. 3B and 4). Trypsin treatment of this group of expressed sigma 1 proteins resulted in the generation of stable cleavage products of approximately 25 kDa, which is characteristic of trypsin-treated wt T3D sigma 1 (8, 14, 15, 24, 30, 52). Thus, the pattern of susceptibility of chimeric sigma 1 proteins to cleavage by trypsin confirms the location of a protease-sensitive region in T3D sigma 1, T(iv), and is consistent with native folding of these molecules.


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Effect of trypsin treatment on truncated sigma 1 proteins. 35S-labeled sigma 1 proteins were purified from insect cell lysates using antireovirus serum plus protein A-Sepharose, followed by treatment at 15°C with 0, 0.1, 1.0, or 10 µg of bovine trypsin per ml for 75 min. Reaction mixtures were heated at 100°C in protein sample buffer; digestion products were resolved in an SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography. , 0 to 10 µg of trypsin [TRY] per ml. Positions of untreated sigma 1 deletion mutants are indicated by arrows. Positions of molecular weight standards (in kilodaltons) are shown.

Identification of a domain in sigma 1 important for multimer stability. As an additional test of protein folding, expressed sigma 1 proteins were examined for the capacity to maintain oligomeric structure during SDS-PAGE. In previous studies, it was shown that virion-associated (3, 51) and expressed (3, 24, 40) T3D sigma 1 protein migrates as an oligomer in SDS-polyacrylamide gels after solubilization in protein sample buffer under specific conditions of temperature and pH. When virions of T1L and T3D were disrupted at 60°C in pH 8.3 sample buffer, the sigma 1 protein of T1L migrated as a monomer, whereas T3D sigma 1 migrated as an oligomer (Fig. 5A). Incubation of virions at 100°C in pH 6.8 sample buffer resulted in the appearance of sigma 1 monomers only. This pattern was replicated by wt T1L and T3D sigma 1 proteins expressed in insect cells (Fig. 5B and C). Chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins containing T1L T(i) and T(ii) sequences migrated as monomers under these conditions, and sigma 1 proteins with T(i) and T(ii) sequences derived from T3D migrated as oligomers. Thus, results obtained using chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins show that sequences constituting morphologic regions T(i) and T(ii), which are predicted to form almost exclusively alpha -helical coiled coil, determine the difference in stability of T1L and T3D sigma 1 oligomers in SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Additionally, these results indicate that native tertiary and quaternary structures are maintained in the amino-terminal aspect of the tail domain of expressed sigma 1 proteins used for our studies.


View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.   Oligomer stability of chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins. (A) 35S-labeled purified T1L and T3D virions were incubated at 100°C in pH 6.8 protein sample buffer or 60°C in pH 8.3 protein sample buffer for 10 min. Reaction products were resolved in an SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography. Viral structural proteins are labeled. (B and C) 35S-labeled full-length wt and chimeric sigma 1 proteins were purified from insect cell lysates using anti-sigma 1 MAb 5C6 or 9BG5 conjugated to Sepharose and treated as for panel A. Positions of molecular weight standards (in kilodaltons) are shown. (D) 35S-labeled truncated sigma 1 proteins were purified from insect cell lysates using MAb 9BG5 conjugated to Sepharose or antireovirus serum plus protein A-Sepharose and treated as for panel A. Positions of molecular weight standards (in kilodaltons) are shown. sigma 1*, bands corresponding to sigma 1 oligomers.

Hemagglutination activity of chimeric sigma 1 proteins. To identify sequences in sigma 1 that bind carbohydrate, chimeric and truncated proteins derived from T1L and T3D sigma 1 were expressed in insect cells, and sigma 1 proteins contained in cell lysates were tested for the capacity to mediate hemagglutination. In previous studies, it was shown that virions of T1L agglutinate human but not bovine erythrocytes, whereas virions of T3D agglutinate bovine erythrocytes more efficiently than human erythrocytes (9, 12). In accordance with this profile, wt T1L sigma 1 agglutinated human but not bovine erythrocytes, whereas wt T3D sigma 1 exhibited the reverse pattern (Fig. 6).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.   Hemagglutination activity of chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins. Insect cells (1.2 × 107) were inoculated with sigma 1-expressing recombinant baculoviruses, and cultures were harvested after 4 days of incubation. Cells were resuspended in 1 ml of PBS supplemented with protease inhibitors and disrupted by sonication, followed by centrifugation to clarify lysates. Supernatants were diluted twofold serially, and either human O+ or calf erythrocytes were added to each well. Hemagglutination reactions were scored after incubation at 4°C for at least 2 h. The hemagglutination pattern of each expressed sigma 1 protein was determined in 8 to 20 independent experiments, and a positive result was defined as >= 8 HA units of activity per 100 µl of lysate. For inclusion in the analysis, any given construct was required to display hemagglutination in two or more experiments; otherwise, the construct was deemed hemagglutination negative and assigned an HA titer of zero. Results are expressed as the mean log2 HA titer. Error bars indicate standard deviations of the mean.

Replacement of the T1L or T3D sigma 1 head domain with corresponding sequences from the heterologous protein (chimeras 1-1-1-1-3 and 3-3-3-3-1) did not alter the hemagglutination profile, demonstrating that sequences contained within the tail determine type-specific patterns of hemagglutination. Like wt T1L and 1-1-1-1-3 sigma 1 proteins, sigma 1 chimeras 3-3-1-1-1, 3-3-3-1-1, and 1-1-3-1-1 were capable of agglutinating human erythrocytes, which indicates that each contains the type 1 hemagglutination domain. The only T1L sequences common to all of these proteins correspond to morphologic region T(iv). These results support the conclusion that the T(iv) region of type 1 sigma 1 mediates hemagglutination, and therefore carbohydrate binding, by this protein.

In contrast to type 1 sigma 1 protein, the type 3 pattern of hemagglutination was linked to the presence of morphologic region T(iii). Chimeric proteins that agglutinated bovine erythrocytes, 3-3-3-3-1, 1-1-3-3-3, 3-3-3-1-1, 1-1-3-3-1, and 1-1-3-1-1, share sequences corresponding to the T3D T(iii) region, and no other sequences in T3D sigma 1 are held in common by these proteins. Furthermore, the only T3D sequences in chimera 1-1-3-1-1 are derived from the T(iii) region, which demonstrates that T(iii) sequences can mediate the type 3 reovirus pattern of hemagglutination independently of other sequences in type 3 sigma 1. These results provide strong evidence that a sialic acid-binding domain is located within the T(iii) region of type 3 sigma 1. Moreover, the finding that sigma 1 chimeras 3-3-3-1-1 and 1-1-3-1-1 agglutinated both human and bovine erythrocytes further supports a model of topologically distinct carbohydrate-binding domains in type 1 and type 3 sigma 1 proteins.

To determine whether a full-length sigma 1 molecule is necessary for functionality of the hemagglutination domain, three sigma 1 deletion mutants, 1-1-1-1-Delta , 3-3-3-3-Delta , and 3-Delta -3-3-3 (Fig. 4 and 5D), were tested for their hemagglutination capacity. Both the 3-3-3-3-Delta and 3-Delta -3-3-3 deletion mutants agglutinated bovine erythrocytes, demonstrating that sequences forming the type 3 sigma 1 globular head domain and long, fibrous alpha -helical segment of the tail are dispensable for hemagglutination. These results agree with those from experiments using sigma 1 chimeras in which hemagglutination activity of type 3 sigma 1 segregates with morphologic region T(iii). When tested in hemagglutination assays with human and bovine erythrocytes, truncation mutant 1-1-1-1-Delta failed to agglutinate cells from either species. This result contrasts with the capacity of morphologic region T(iv) of T1L sigma 1 to mediate hemagglutination of human erythrocytes by chimeric sigma 1 proteins and suggests that head-forming sequences (of either T1L or T3D sigma 1) must be present to facilitate the type 1 pattern of hemagglutination mediated by T(iv).

Deletion mutant 3-3-3-3-Delta efficiently agglutinated human erythrocytes in addition to bovine erythrocytes (Fig. 6). Thus, sequences in the tail of T3D sigma 1 are sufficient to mediate hemagglutination of human erythrocytes. Chimeric sigma 1 protein 1-1-3-3-3 also agglutinated both types of erythrocytes efficiently, which indicates either species-independent hemagglutination mediated by T3D sequences or the presence of both type 1 and type 3 hemagglutination domains within this construct. The former mechanism is more consistent with our other results, which do not localize hemagglutination activity of type 1 sigma 1 to morphologic regions T(i) or T(ii) and which show that sequences in the T3D tail can mediate hemagglutination of human erythrocytes (e.g., 3-3-3-3-Delta ).

Binding of expressed sigma 1 proteins to sialic acid. To confirm that sequences in morphologic region T(iii) of type 3 sigma 1 protein bind sialic acid, we performed a quantitative assay to assess sialic acid-dependent binding of expressed sigma 1 proteins to glycophorin. Glycophorin is a highly sialylated glycoprotein on the erythrocyte surface (10), and sialic acid residues of human erythrocyte glycophorin are bound by type 3 reovirus (34). Expressed sigma 1 proteins were captured on Sepharose beads conjugated to MAb 5C6 or 9BG5 and treated with biotinylated human glycophorin or asialoglycophorin. Expressed sigma 1 proteins segregated into two groups according to their capacity to bind glycophorin relative to asialoglycophorin (Fig. 7). The first group, which includes wt T1L sigma 1 and chimeric sigma 1 proteins 1-1-1-1-3 and 3-3-1-1-1, did not exhibit appreciable binding to glycophorin over background. The second group, which includes wt T3D sigma 1 and recombinant sigma 1 proteins 3-Delta -3-3-3, 1-1-3-3-3, 3-3-3-1-1, 1-1-3-3-1, 3-3-3-3-1, and 1-1-3-1-1, bound glycophorin 2- to 40-fold more efficiently than asialoglycophorin. Thus, the latter group of recombinant sigma 1 proteins exhibited sialic acid-dependent glycophorin binding. The only type 3 sigma 1 sequences common to all members of this group correspond to morphologic region T(iii), which indicates that T(iii) sequences are sufficient to mediate binding of sialic acid by type 3 sigma 1 protein. Accordingly, expressed proteins that exhibited only background binding to glycophorin (wt T1L, 1-1-1-1-3, and 3-3-1-1-1) contain T(iii) sequences derived from type 1 sigma 1. It was not possible to test truncation mutants 1-1-1-1-Delta and 3-3-3-3-Delta in the glycophorin-binding assay since these experiments would require domain-specific antibodies that bind the sigma 1 tail, and such antibodies currently are unavailable. Results of the glycophorin-binding and hemagglutination assays demonstrate that sialic acid is bound by sequences within morphologic region T(iii) of the type 3 sigma 1 tail domain, amino acid residues 175 to 234. 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.   Binding of expressed sigma 1 proteins to glycophorin and asialoglycophorin. Expressed wt and chimeric sigma 1 proteins were purified from insect cell lysates using MAb-conjugated Sepharose, followed by treatment of equivalent amounts of sigma 1 with biotinylated glycophorin or biotinylated asialoglycophorin. Sepharose beads then were incubated with streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate, followed by the addition of chromogenic substrate. The reaction was allowed to develop for 15 min, and supernatant absorbance at 405 nm was determined using a microplate reader. Nonspecific binding of glycophorin and asialoglycophorin was determined using MAb-conjugated Sepharose without sigma 1 protein, and raw absorbance data were corrected accordingly to derive values of specific absorbance. The results are presented as the mean log10 ratio of specific glycophorin binding to specific asialoglycophorin binding by sigma 1. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent experiments.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

This study was designed to identify the minimal domain in reovirus attachment protein sigma 1 capable of binding carbohydrate. Using a panel of expressed chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins derived from strains T1L and T3D, we found that sequences predicted to form an eight-stranded beta -sheet in the T3D sigma 1 tail are sufficient to mediate binding of sialic acid by T3D sigma 1; the head domain, which contains sequences that bind an unidentified receptor on L cells (8, 14, 29, 30, 42, 50, 52), is dispensable for sialic acid binding. Carbohydrate binding by type 1 sigma 1 protein also is mediated by sequences in the tail predicted to form a beta -sheet structure; however, these sequences are contained in a morphologic region of the tail, T(iv), that is distinct from that involved in binding sialic acid by type 3 sigma 1. The organization of receptor-binding domains in sigma 1 protein has important implications concerning mechanisms used by reovirus to achieve a stable virus-receptor complex that facilitates viral entry into cells.

T3D sigma 1 protein expressed in prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells retains the capacity to bind sialic acid (29, 34) and mediate hemagglutination (1, 26). Our approach was to exploit differences in carbohydrate specificity of type 1 and type 3 sigma 1 and unique hemagglutination patterns mediated by these proteins to identify sequences in sigma 1 that bind carbohydrate. We took advantage of the unique domain organization of sigma 1 protein (8, 16, 30, 31) to design chimeric molecules and truncation mutants that were likely to isolate independent functional units of sequence. Exchange loci in chimeric proteins were created at positions of conserved residues located between sequence units corresponding to morphologic regions seen in electron micrographic images of sigma 1 protein (16) (Fig. 1). Assays to test proper folding of sigma 1 sequences, including oligomer stability, susceptibility to protease cleavage, and binding to conformationally sensitive MAbs, indicate that natural sigma 1 conformation was preserved in the amino-terminal portion of the tail domain, carboxy-terminal portion of the tail domain, and head domain, respectively, of baculovirus-expressed sigma 1 proteins (Fig. 2 to 5). These results support a model of modular sigma 1 structure (31) and validate the use of chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins to define structure-function relationships.

MAbs 5C6 and 9BG5, specific for type 1 and type 3 sigma 1 proteins, respectively (6, 45), were used to test fidelity of sigma 1 folding and for purification of sigma 1 from insect cell lysates. MAb 9BG5 binds sequences in the T3D sigma 1 head domain (4, 14, 29, 42, 52). Consistent with the epitope specificity of 9BG5, wt T3D sigma 1 and chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins containing the T3D head were bound efficiently and specifically by this MAb (Fig. 2 to 5). Prior to this study, the domain in T1L sigma 1 bound by MAb 5C6 was not known. MAb 5C6 specifically bound expressed sigma 1 proteins containing the T1L sigma 1 head domain, and sequences in the head but not the tail were sufficient for 5C6 binding (Fig. 2). Therefore, these results indicate that MAb 5C6 binds the head domain of T1L sigma 1.

In a previous study, we found that a sequence polymorphism in the T(iv) region of type 3 sigma 1 protein, isoleucine or threonine at amino acid position 249, is a determinant of T3D sigma 1 cleavage susceptibility at Arg245 during treatment of virions with trypsin to generate ISVPs (8). In T3D sigma 1, position 249 is occupied by a threonine residue, which interrupts a heptad repeat sequence predicted to form alpha -helical coiled coil (31). Although the specific amino acid at position 249 regulates cleavage susceptibility of T3D sigma 1 protein, it is possible that sequences outside the T(iv) region are also required. The cleavage profiles of chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins demonstrate that all sequences necessary for cleavage of expressed T3D at Arg245 by trypsin are contained within morphologic region T(iv) (Fig. 3 and 4). These results support the hypothesis that the isoleucine-threonine polymorphism at position 249 is the minimal determinant of T3D sigma 1 susceptibility to protease.

Previous studies of T3D sigma 1 oligomerization demonstrated that oligomer stability under conditions of SDS-PAGE is mediated by sequences corresponding to the amino-terminal half of T3D sigma 1 (24, 40). In agreement with these findings, baculovirus-expressed T3D sigma 1 tail-forming sequences representing morphologic regions T(i) through T(iv) migrated as oligomers in SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Fig. 5C and D). Interestingly, the T1L sigma 1 oligomer is labile under the same conditions. This difference in oligomer stability was mapped to sequences corresponding to the T(i) and T(ii) regions of T1L and T3D sigma 1 proteins, which is consistent with the finding that the amino-terminal 161 amino acids of T3D sigma 1 protein form a stable oligomer (24) and that destabilizing mutations in T3D sigma 1 selected during persistent reovirus infection of cultured L cells occur in the T(ii) region (51). Thus, differences in T1L and T3D sigma 1 oligomer stability are determined by strain-specific properties of the extended region of predicted alpha -helical coiled coil in the tail domain. Accordingly, T3D sigma 1-derived deletion mutant 3-Delta -3-3-3, in which about 75% of region T(ii) sequences are missing, migrated as a monomer under these conditions of SDS-PAGE. Since the entirety of region T(i) sequences are intact in this deletion mutant, these results suggest that region T(ii) sequences alone determine oligomer stability.

The hemagglutination characteristics of chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins used for these studies is the strongest evidence to date that morphologic region T(iii) contains the complete hemagglutination domain of type 3 sigma 1 protein (Fig. 6). These results agree with our previous findings indicating that the hemagglutination domain of type 3 sigma 1 protein is located amino terminal to Arg245 in the tail (8, 30) and that sequence polymorphism within T(iii) is a determinant of hemagglutination capacity (9, 12) and sialic acid-dependent viral infectivity (9). An intriguing finding from the domain mapping experiments was that the T1L hemagglutination pattern segregated with sequences in morphologic region T(iv). Prior to this study, no functions had been ascribed to any specific region of type 1 sigma 1 protein, but these results indicate that a carbohydrate-binding domain resides in the carboxy-terminal aspect of the tail.

Because a construct corresponding to sequences found only in the T1L sigma 1 tail was unable to mediate hemagglutination in our experimental system, it is possible that the head domain is required for proper folding of T(iv) sequences into a conformation functional for carbohydrate binding. Irregular folding of the 1-1-1-1-Delta T(iv) region is suggested by results of trypsin treatment of this construct; at higher concentrations of trypsin, a cleavage product that migrated slightly faster than untreated 1-1-1-1-Delta was produced, which is indicative of subterminal cleavage, possibly within morphologic region T(iv) (Fig. 4). The loss of T1L sigma 1 hemagglutination activity by truncation of head-forming sequences contrasts with the behavior of construct 3-3-3-3-Delta , in which hemagglutination activity remains fully intact (and expanded to include human erythrocytes) in the absence of a head domain. Perhaps this differential effect of the head domain on hemagglutination by type 1 and type 3 sigma 1 proteins reflects the relative proximity of the hemagglutination domain to the head and the potential differences in steric interactions that would follow.

Using wt and chimeric sigma 1 proteins in a quantitative assay of sialic acid binding, we were able to show that specific binding to sialic acid by type 3 sigma 1 also segregates with morphologic region T(iii) (Fig. 7). This finding confirms and extends the results of hemagglutination assays as a biologically relevant assessment of sigma 1 function. Sialic acid is the minimal determinant of type 3 reovirus attachment (33), and results obtained using expressed sigma 1, glycophorin, and asialoglycophorin indicate that virus binding to sialic acid occurs through direct interactions between this carbohydrate and sequences in morphologic region T(iii). In previous studies (9, 12), we identified three amino acid residues within a single predicted beta -strand of T(iii)---Asn198, Arg202, and Pro204---that determine the capacity of reovirus to bind sialic acid and carry out sialic acid-dependent infection of cultured cells. Findings made in the present study indicate that the effect of these residues on receptor binding is a local one, confined to region T(iii), and provide support for a model in which Asn198, Arg202, and Pro204 comprise part of the sigma 1 sialic acid-binding domain.

Among sigma 1 constructs containing the T3D T(iii) region, only truncation mutant 3-3-3-3-Delta and chimeric sigma 1 protein 1-1-3-3-3 agglutinated human erythrocytes in addition to bovine erythrocytes (Fig. 6). Despite this observation, all constructs containing morphologic region T(iii) from T3D sigma 1 were able to bind sialic acid presented on human glycophorin (Fig. 7), which is the sialylated glycoprotein bound by type 3 reovirus on human erythrocytes (34). The glycophorin-binding assay was designed to test the capacity of expressed sigma 1 proteins to specifically bind sialic acid, and the inability of most sigma 1 proteins to agglutinate human erythrocytes may reflect the more complex sigma 1-receptor interactions that occur during hemagglutination when virion-associated sigma 1 molecules cross-link cell surface glycophorin, and perhaps other sialoglycoconjugates, on adjacent cells.

The capacity of constructs 3-3-3-3-Delta and 1-1-3-3-3 to agglutinate both bovine and human erythrocytes suggests that sequences in the head domain of T3D sigma 1 influence hemagglutination capacity of sequences in the tail and that certain combinations of sequences from T1L and T3D sigma 1 proteins enhance agglutination of human erythrocytes by T3D sigma 1-derived sequences. Alternatively, because T3D sigma 1 protein has a lower avidity for human than for bovine erythrocytes (9, 12), relative amounts of chimeric and truncated sigma 1 proteins in insect cell lysates may influence the capacity of T3D sigma 1-derived sequences to mediate agglutination of human erythrocytes.

We observed that sialic acid-dependent binding of glycophorin by expressed sigma 1 proteins spanned a range of 20-fold. This variability may be due to the heterogeneous sequence contexts of sigma 1 proteins containing morphologic region T(iii) of type 3 sigma 1, leading to differences in individual affinities for sialic acid. Although the amount of expressed sigma 1 protein used for the glycophorin-binding assays was not quantitated, the results of sialoglycophorin binding were normalized to asialoglycophorin binding for each construct, which should have minimized the effects of sigma 1 concentration differences on the binding results.

Our findings permit discrete topographical assignment of receptor-binding activities of type 3 sigma 1 protein to morphologic region T(iii) of the tail (this study) and the head domain (8, 14, 29, 30, 42, 50, 52) (Fig. 8). These results explain our previous findings that ISVPs of T3D containing a cleaved sigma 1 protein bind sialylated cellular receptors (8, 30) and that sequences in morphologic region T(iii) determine viral capacity for sialic acid binding (9). Although the two receptor-binding domains are clearly distinct in images of isolated sigma 1 protein (16), the steric relationship of the head and T(iii) on the virion surface is not known. The sigma 1 protein exhibits considerable flexibility (1, 7, 16, 17), and it is possible that sequences in these two regions of the molecule approximate one another when sigma 1 rests in its virion-associated conformation. If so, the relative proximity of receptor-binding domains in the head and tail may influence viral receptor specificity, stability of viral attachment, or subsequent events, such as endocytic uptake of virus and intravesicular viral disassembly. The mechanism of receptor engagement employed by type 3 sigma 1 protein may not be shared by type 1 sigma 1 since the carbohydrate-binding domain of the latter was mapped to more head-proximal sequences, morphologic region T(iv). Thus, diversity in viral attachment strategies may account for some serotype-dependent patterns of reovirus biology that segregate with sigma 1 protein (9, 13, 36, 38, 41, 44, 48). As higher-resolution models of sigma 1 structure are developed, the individual and corporate activities of sigma 1 receptor-binding domains will become clearer. This information will have particular import in the area of reovirus pathogenesis, where viral cell tropism at the level of receptor recognition determines the pathologic outcome of infection (13, 41, 48).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.   Functional domains of the reovirus attachment protein. Morphologic regions of sigma 1 [T(i), T(ii), T(iii), T(iv), and H] seen in computer-processed electron micrographic images of sigma 1 protein isolated from virions (16) are correlated with sigma 1 predicted secondary structure (31). (A) Type 1 sigma 1 protein. Tail-forming sequences adjacent to the head, morphologic region T(iv), are required for binding to carbohydrate, the nature of which has not been identified for type 1 sigma 1. (B) Type 3 sigma 1 protein. All sequences necessary to bind sialic acid are contained in a predicted region of beta -sheet in the tail constituting morphologic region T(iii). The sialic acid-binding domain is discrete from other sequences located in the head that bind an unidentified receptor on L cells (8, 14, 29, 30, 42, 50, 52) and determine viral tropism in the murine central nervous system (CNS) (4, 21, 39). These two receptor-binding domains are bridged by a region of sequence, T(iv), that confers susceptibility of strain T3D sigma 1 to cleavage by trypsin. Filled circles denote amino acid residues Asn198, Arg202, and Pro204, which determine viral capacity for sialic acid-dependent binding and infectivity (9). An arrow denotes the predicted location of amino acid residue 249, which is the minimal determinant of sigma 1 susceptibility to cleavage by intestinal proteases (8). Stability of T3D sigma 1 oligomers in SDS-polyacrylamide gels was mapped to sequences corresponding to morphologic regions T(i) plus T(ii).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Public Health Service Award AI38296 (J.D.C. and T.S.D.) from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for Pediatric Research.

We acknowledge the National Cell Culture Center for purification of monoclonal antibodies.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Lamb Center for Pediatric Research, D7235 MCN, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232. Phone: (615) 343-9943. Fax: (615) 343-9723. E-mail: terry.dermody{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Banerjea, A. C., K. A. Brechling, C. A. Ray, H. Erikson, D. J. Pickup, and W. K. Joklik. 1988. High-level synthesis of biologically active reovirus protein sigma 1 in a mammalian expression vector system. Virology 167:601-612[Medline].
2. Bassel-Duby, R., A. Jayasuriya, D. Chatterjee, N. Sonenberg, J. V. Maizel, Jr., and B. N. Fields. 1985. Sequence of reovirus haemagglutinin predicts a coiled-coil structure. Nature 315:421-423[CrossRef][Medline].
3. Bassel-Duby, R., M. Nibert, C. Homcy, B. Fields, and D. Sawutz. 1987. Evidence that the sigma 1 protein of reovirus serotype 3 is a multimer. J. Virol. 61:1834-1841[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Bassel-Duby, R., D. R. Spriggs, K. L. Tyler, and B. N. Fields. 1986. Identification of attenuating mutations on the reovirus type 3 S1 double-stranded RNA segment with a rapid sequencing technique. J. Virol. 60:64-67[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Bodkin, D. K., M. L. Nibert, and B. N. Fields. 1989. Proteolytic digestion of reovirus in the intestinal lumens of neonatal mice. J. Virol. 63:4676-4681[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Burstin, S. J., D. R. Spriggs, and B. N. Fields. 1982. Evidence for functional domains on the reovirus type 3 hemagglutinin. Virology 117:146-155[CrossRef][Medline].
7. Centonze, V. E., Y. Chen, T. F. Severson, G. G. Borisy, and M. L. Nibert. 1995. Visualization of individual reovirus particles by low-temperature, high-resolution scanning electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 115:215-225[CrossRef][Medline].
8. Chappell, J. D., E. S. Barton, T. H. Smith, G. S. Baer, D. T. Duong, M. L. Nibert, and T. S. Dermody. 1998. Cleavage susceptibility of reovirus attachment protein sigma 1 during proteolytic disassembly of virions is determined by a sequence polymorphism in the sigma 1 neck. J. Virol. 72:8205-8213[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Chappell, J. D., V. L. Gunn, J. D. Wetzel, G. S. Baer, and T. S. Dermody. 1997. Mutations in type 3 reovirus that determine binding to sialic acid are contained in the fibrous tail domain of viral attachment protein sigma 1. J. Virol. 71:1834-1841[Abstract].
10. Chasis, J. A., and N. Mohandas. 1992. Red blood cell glycophorins. Blood 80:1869-1879[Free Full Text].
11. Choi, A. H. C., R. W. Paul, and P. W. K. Lee. 1990. Reovirus binds to multiple plasma membrane proteins of mouse L fibroblasts. Virology 178:316-320[CrossRef][Medline].
12. Dermody, T. S., M. L. Nibert, R. Bassel-Duby, and B. N. Fields. 1990. A sigma 1 region important for hemagglutination by type 3 reovirus strains. J. Virol. 64:5173-5176[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Dichter, M. A., and H. L. Weiner. 1984. Infection of neuronal cell cultures with reovirus mimics in vitro patterns of neurotropism. Ann. Neurol. 16:603-610[CrossRef][Medline].
14. Duncan, R., D. Horne, J. E. Strong, G. Leone, R. T. Pon, M. C. Yeung, and P. W. K. Lee. 1991. Conformational and functional analysis of the C-terminal globular head of the reovirus cell attachment protein. Virology 182:810-819[CrossRef][Medline].
15. Duncan, R., and P. W. K. Lee. 1994. Localization of two protease-sensitive regions separating distinct domains in the reovirus cell-attachment protein sigma 1. Virology 203:149-152[CrossRef][Medline].
16. Fraser, R. D., D. B. Furlong, B. L. Trus, M. L. Nibert, B. N. Fields, and A. C. Steven. 1990. Molecular structure of the cell-attachment protein of reovirus: correlation of computer-processed electron micrographs with sequence-based predictions. J. Virol. 64:2990-3000[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Furlong, D. B., M. L. Nibert, and B. N. Fields. 1988. Sigma 1 protein of mammalian reoviruses extends from the surfaces of viral particles. J. Virol. 62:246-256[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Gentsch, J. R., and A. F. Pacitti. 1985. Effect of neuraminidase treatment of cells and effect of soluble glycoproteins on type 3 reovirus attachment to murine L cells. J. Virol. 56:356-364[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Horton, R. M., H. D. Hunt, S. N. Ho, J. K. Pullen, and L. R. Pease. 1989. Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene 77:61-68[CrossRef][Medline].
20. Kauffman, R. S., J. L. Wolf, R. Finberg, J. S. Trier, and B. N. Fields. 1983. The sigma 1 protein determines the extent of spread of reovirus from the gastrointestinal tract of mice. Virology 124:403-410[CrossRef][Medline].
21. Kaye, K. M., D. R. Spriggs, R. Bassel-Duby, B. N. Fields, and K. L. Tyler. 1986. Genetic basis for altered pathogenesis of an immune-selected antigenic variant of reovirus type 3 Dearing. J. Virol. 59:90-97[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Kowalik, T. F., Y.-Y. Yang, and J. K.-K. Li. 1990. Molecular cloning and comparative sequence analyses of bluetongue virus S1 segments by selective synthesis of specific full-length DNA copies of dsRNA genes. Virology 177:820-823[CrossRef][Medline].
23. Lee, P. W. K., E. C. Hayes, and W. K. Joklik. 1981. Protein sigma 1 is the reovirus cell attachment protein. Virology 108:156-163[CrossRef][Medline].
24. Leone, G., R. Duncan, D. C. Mah, A. Price, L. W. Cashdollar, and P. W. K. Lee. 1991. The amino-terminal heptad repeat region of reovirus cell attachment protein sigma 1 is responsible for sigma 1 oligomer stability and possesses intrinsic oligomerization function. Virology 182:336-345[CrossRef][Medline].
25. Lerner, A. M., J. D. Cherry, and M. Finland. 1963. Haemagglutination with reoviruses. Virology 19:58-65[CrossRef][Medline].
26. Masri, S. A., L. Nagata, D. C. Mah, and P. W. K. Lee. 1986. Functional expression in Escherichia coli of cloned reovirus S1 gene encoding the viral cell attachment protein sigma 1. Virology 149:83-90[CrossRef][Medline].
27. McCrae, M. A., and W. K. Joklik. 1978. The nature of the polypeptide encoded by each of the ten double-stranded RNA segments of reovirus type 3. Virology 89:578-593[CrossRef][Medline].
28. Mustoe, T. A., R. F. Ramig, A. H. Sharpe, and B. N. Fields. 1978. Genetics of reovirus: identification of the dsRNA segments encoding the polypeptides of the µ and sigma  size classes. Virology 89:594-604[CrossRef][Medline].
29. Nagata, L., S. A. Masri, R. T. Pon, and P. W. K. Lee. 1987. Analysis of functional domains on reovirus cell attachment protein sigma 1 using cloned S1 gene deletion mutants. Virology 160:162-168[CrossRef][Medline].
30. Nibert, M. L., J. D. Chappell, and T. S. Dermody. 1995. Infectious subvirion particles of reovirus type 3 Dearing exhibit a loss in infectivity and contain a cleaved sigma 1 protein. J. Virol. 69:5057-5067[Abstract].
31. Nibert, M. L., T. S. Dermody, and B. N. Fields. 1990. Structure of the reovirus cell-attachment protein: a model for the domain organization of sigma 1. J. Virol. 64:2976-2989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32. Pacitti, A., and J. R. Gentsch. 1987. Inhibition of reovirus type 3 binding to host cells by sialylated glycoproteins is mediated through the viral attachment protein. J. Virol. 61:1407-1415[Abstract/Free Full Text].
33. Paul, R. W., A. H. Choi, and P. W. K. Lee. 1989. The alpha -anomeric form of sialic acid is the minimal receptor determinant recognized by reovirus. Virology 172:382-385[CrossRef][Medline].
34. Paul, R. W., and P. W. K. Lee. 1987. Glycophorin is the reovirus receptor on human erythrocytes. Virology 159:94-101[CrossRef][Medline].
35. Pelletier, J., R. Nicholson, R. Bassel-Duby, B. N. Fields, and N. Sonenberg. 1987. Expression of reovirus type 3 Dearing sigma 1 and sigma s polypeptides in Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Virol. 68:135-145[Abstract/Free Full Text].
36. Rodgers, S. E., E. S. Barton, S. M. Oberhaus, B. Pike, C. A. Gibson, K. L. Tyler, and T. S. Dermody. 1997. Reovirus-induced apoptosis of MDCK cells is not linked to viral yield and is blocked by Bcl-2. J. Virol. 71:2540-2546[Abstract].
37. Rubin, D. H., D. B. Weiner, C. Dworkin, M. I. Greene, G. G. Maul, and W. V. Williams. 1992. Receptor utilization by reovirus type 3: distinct binding sites on thymoma and fibroblast cell lines result in differential compartmentalization of virions. Microb. Pathog. 12:351-365[CrossRef][Medline].
38. Rubin, D. H., J. D. Wetzel, C. Dworkin, W. V. Williams, J. A. Cohen, and T. S. Dermody. 1992. Binding of type 3 reovirus by a domain of the sigma 1 protein important for hemagglutination leads to infection of murine erythroleukemia cells. J. Clin. Investig. 90:2536-2542.
39. Spriggs, D. R., R. T. Bronson, and B. N. Fields. 1983. Hemagglutinin variants of reovirus type 3 have altered central nervous system tropism. Science 220:505-507[Abstract/Free Full Text].
40. Strong, J. E., G. Leone, R. Duncan, R. K. Sharma, and P. W. K. Lee. 1991. Biochemical and biophysical characterization of the reovirus cell attachment protein sigma 1: evidence that it is a homotrimer. Virology 184:23-32[CrossRef][Medline].
41. Tardieu, M., and H. L. Weiner. 1982. Viral receptors on isolated murine and human ependymal cells. Science 215:419-421[Abstract/Free Full Text].
42. Turner, D. L., R. Duncan, and P. W. K. Lee. 1992. Site-directed mutagenesis of the C-terminal portion of reovirus protein sigma 1: evidence for a conformation-dependent receptor binding domain. Virology 186:219-227[CrossRef][Medline].
43. Tyler, K. L., and B. N. Fields. 1996. Reoviruses, p. 1597-1623. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
44. Tyler, K. L., D. A. McPhee, and B. N. Fields. 1986. Distinct pathways of viral spread in the host determined by reovirus S1 gene segment. Science 233:770-774[Abstract/Free Full Text].
45. Virgin, H. W., IV, M. A. Mann, B. N. Fields, and K. L. Tyler. 1991. Monoclonal antibodies to reovirus reveal structure/function relationships between capsid proteins and genetics of susceptibility to antibody action. J. Virol. 65:6772-6781[Abstract/Free Full Text].
46. Weiner, H. L., K. A. Ault, and B. N. Fields. 1980. Interaction of reovirus with cell surface receptors. I. Murine and human lymphocytes have a receptor for the hemagglutinin of reovirus type 3. J. Immunol. 124:2143-2148[Medline].
47. Weiner, H. L., D. Drayna, D. R. Averill, Jr., and B. N. Fields. 1977. Molecular basis of reovirus virulence: role of the S1 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:5744-5748[Abstract/Free Full Text].
48. Weiner, H. L., M. L. Powers, and B. N. Fields. 1980. Absolute linkage of virulence and central nervous system tropism of reoviruses to viral hemagglutinin. J. Infect. Dis. 141:609-616[Medline].
49. Weiner, H. L., R. F. Ramig, T. A. Mustoe, and B. N. Fields. 1978. Identification of the gene coding for the hemagglutinin of reovirus. Virology 86:581-584[CrossRef][Medline].
50. Williams, W. V., H. R. Guy, D. H. Rubin, F. Robey, J. N. Myers, T. Kieber-Emmons, D. B. Weiner, and M. I. Greene. 1988. Sequences of the cell-attachment sites of reovirus type 3 and its antiidiotypic/antireceptor antibody: modeling of their three-dimensional structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:6488-6492[Abstract/Free Full Text].
51. Wilson, G. J., J. D. Wetzel, W. Puryear, R. Bassel-Duby, and T. S. Dermody. 1996. Persistent reovirus infections of L cells select mutations in viral attachment protein sigma 1 that alter oligomer stability. J. Virol. 70:6598-6606[Abstract/Free Full Text].
52. Yeung, M. C., D. Lim, R. Duncan, M. S. Shahrabadi, L. W. Cashdollar, and P. W. K. Lee. 1989. The cell attachment proteins of type 1 and type 3 reovirus are differentially susceptible to trypsin and chymotrypsin. Virology 170:62-70[CrossRef][Medline].


Journal of Virology, September 2000, p. 8472-8479, Vol. 74, No. 18
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Guglielmi, K. M., Kirchner, E., Holm, G. H., Stehle, T., Dermody, T. S. (2007). Reovirus Binding Determinants in Junctional Adhesion Molecule-A. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 17930-17940 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Schelling, P., Guglielmi, K. M., Kirchner, E., Paetzold, B., Dermody, T. S., Stehle, T. (2007). The Reovirus {sigma}1 Aspartic Acid Sandwich: A TRIMERIZATION MOTIF POISED FOR CONFORMATIONAL CHANGE. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 11582-11589 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • O'Donnell, S. M., Holm, G. H., Pierce, J. M., Tian, B., Watson, M. J., Chari, R. S., Ballard, D. W., Brasier, A. R., Dermody, T. S. (2006). Identification of an NF-{kappa}B-Dependent Gene Network in Cells Infected by Mammalian Reovirus. J. Virol. 80: 1077-1086 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Danthi, P., Hansberger, M. W., Campbell, J. A., Forrest, J. C., Dermody, T. S. (2006). JAM-A-Independent, Antibody-Mediated Uptake of Reovirus into Cells Leads to Apoptosis. J. Virol. 80: 1261-1270 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Clark, K. M., Wetzel, J. D., Gu, Y., Ebert, D. H., McAbee, S. A., Stoneman, E. K., Baer, G. S., Zhu, Y., Wilson, G. J., Prasad, B. V. V., Dermody, T. S. (2006). Reovirus Variants Selected for Resistance to Ammonium Chloride Have Mutations in Viral Outer-Capsid Protein {sigma}3. J. Virol. 80: 671-681 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • VanCompernolle, S. E., Taylor, R. J., Oswald-Richter, K., Jiang, J., Youree, B. E., Bowie, J. H., Tyler, M. J., Conlon, J. M., Wade, D., Aiken, C., Dermody, T. S., KewalRamani, V. N., Rollins-Smith, L. A., Unutmaz, D. (2005). Antimicrobial Peptides from Amphibian Skin Potently Inhibit Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Transfer of Virus from Dendritic Cells to T Cells. J. Virol. 79: 11598-11606 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pal, K., Kaetzel, C. S., Brundage, K., Cunningham, C. A., Cuff, C. F. (2005). Regulation of polymeric immunoglobulin receptor expression by reovirus. J. Gen. Virol. 86: 2347-2357 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Campbell, J. A., Schelling, P., Wetzel, J. D., Johnson, E. M., Forrest, J. C., Wilson, G. A. R., Aurrand-Lions, M., Imhof, B. A., Stehle, T., Dermody, T. S. (2005). Junctional Adhesion Molecule A Serves as a Receptor for Prototype and Field-Isolate Strains of Mammalian Reovirus. J. Virol. 79: 7967-7978 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Helander, A., Miller, C. L., Myers, K. S., Neutra, M. R., Nibert, M. L. (2004). Protective Immunoglobulin A and G Antibodies Bind to Overlapping Intersubunit Epitopes in the Head Domain of Type 1 Reovirus Adhesin {sigma}1. J. Virol. 78: 10695-10705 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Burmeister, W. P., Guilligay, D., Cusack, S., Wadell, G., Arnberg, N. (2004). Crystal Structure of Species D Adenovirus Fiber Knobs and Their Sialic Acid Binding Sites. J. Virol. 78: 7727-7736 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mercier, G. T., Campbell, J. A., Chappell, J. D., Stehle, T., Dermody, T. S., Barry, M. A. (2004). A chimeric adenovirus vector encoding reovirus attachment protein {sigma}1 targets cells expressing junctional adhesion molecule 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 6188-6193 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Golden, J. W., Bahe, J. A., Lucas, W. T., Nibert, M. L., Schiff, L. A. (2004). Cathepsin S Supports Acid-independent Infection by Some Reoviruses. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 8547-8557 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ebert, D. H., Kopecky-Bromberg, S. A., Dermody, T. S. (2004). Cathepsin B Is Inhibited in Mutant Cells Selected during Persistent Reovirus Infection. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 3837-3851 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hutchings, A. B., Helander, A., Silvey, K. J., Chandran, K., Lucas, W. T., Nibert, M. L., Neutra, M. R. (2004). Secretory Immunoglobulin A Antibodies against the {sigma}1 Outer Capsid Protein of Reovirus Type 1 Lang Prevent Infection of Mouse Peyer's Patches. J. Virol. 78: 947-957 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Forrest, J. C., Campbell, J. A., Schelling, P., Stehle, T., Dermody, T. S. (2003). Structure-Function Analysis of Reovirus Binding to Junctional Adhesion Molecule 1: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE MECHANISM OF REOVIRUS ATTACHMENT. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 48434-48444 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Forrest, J. C., Dermody, T. S. (2003). Reovirus Receptors and Pathogenesis. J. Virol. 77: 9109-9115 [Full Text]  
  • Helander, A., Silvey, K. J., Mantis, N. J., Hutchings, A. B., Chandran, K., Lucas, W. T., Nibert, M. L., Neutra, M. R. (2003). The Viral {sigma}1 Protein and Glycoconjugates Containing {alpha}2-3-Linked Sialic Acid Are Involved in Type 1 Reovirus Adherence to M Cell Apical Surfaces. J. Virol. 77: 7964-7977 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Prota, A. E., Campbell, J. A., Schelling, P., Forrest, J. C., Watson, M. J., Peters, T. R., Aurrand-Lions, M., Imhof, B. A., Dermody, T. S., Stehle, T. (2003). Crystal structure of human junctional adhesion molecule 1: Implications for reovirus binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 5366-5371 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ebert, D. H., Deussing, J., Peters, C., Dermody, T. S. (2002). Cathepsin L and Cathepsin B Mediate Reovirus Disassembly in Murine Fibroblast Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 24609-24617 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Connolly, J. L., Dermody, T. S. (2002). Virion Disassembly Is Required for Apoptosis Induced by Reovirus. J. Virol. 76: 1632-1641 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shmulevitz, M., Yameen, Z., Dawe, S., Shou, J., O'Hara, D., Holmes, I., Duncan, R. (2002). Sequential Partially Overlapping Gene Arrangement in the Tricistronic S1 Genome Segments of Avian Reovirus and Nelson Bay Reovirus: Implications for Translation Initiation. J. Virol. 76: 609-618 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Silvey, K. J., Hutchings, A. B., Vajdy, M., Petzke, M. M., Neutra, M. R. (2001). Role of Immunoglobulin A in Protection against Reovirus Entry into Murine Peyer's Patches. J. Virol. 75: 10870-10879 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nason, E. L., Wetzel, J. D., Mukherjee, S. K., Barton, E. S., Prasad, B. V. V., Dermody, T. S. (2001). A Monoclonal Antibody Specific for Reovirus Outer-Capsid Protein {sigma}3 Inhibits {sigma}1-Mediated Hemagglutination by Steric Hindrance. J. Virol. 75: 6625-6634 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chandran, K., Zhang, X., Olson, N. H., Walker, S. B., Chappell, J. D., Dermody, T. S., Baker, T. S., Nibert, M. L. (2001). Complete In Vitro Assembly of the Reovirus Outer Capsid Produces Highly Infectious Particles Suitable for Genetic Studies of the Receptor-Binding Protein. J. Virol. 75: 5335-5342 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Connolly, J. L., Barton, E. S., Dermody, T. S. (2001). Reovirus Binding to Cell Surface Sialic Acid Potentiates Virus-Induced Apoptosis. J. Virol. 75: 4029-4039 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Barton, E. S., Connolly, J. L., Forrest, J. C., Chappell, J. D., Dermody, T. S. (2001). Utilization of Sialic Acid as a Coreceptor Enhances Reovirus Attachment by Multistep Adhesion Strengthening. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 2200-2211 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chappell, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dermody, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chappell, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dermody, T. S.