Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, September 2000, p. 8011-8017, Vol. 74, No. 17
Hepatitis Research Unit and Australian Centre
for Hepatitis Virology, Macfarlane Burnet Centre for Medical
Research, Fairfield 3078, Victoria, Australia
Received 28 December 1999/Accepted 30 May 2000
Antibody to the capsid (PORF2) protein of hepatitis E virus (HEV)
is sufficient to confer immunity, but knowledge of B-cell epitopes in
the intact capsid is limited. A panel of murine monoclonal antibodies
(MAbs) was generated following immunization with recombinant ORF2.1
protein, representing the C-terminal 267 amino acids (aa) of the 660-aa
capsid protein. Two MAbs reacted exclusively with the conformational
ORF2.1 epitope (F. Li, J. Torresi, S. A. Locarnini, H. Zhuang, W. Zhu, X. Guo, and D. A. Anderson, J. Med. Virol. 52:289-300,
1997), while the remaining five demonstrated reactivity with epitopes
in the regions aa 394 to 414, 414 to 434, and 434 to 457. The antigenic
structures of both the ORF2.1 protein expressed in Escherichia
coli and the virus-like particles (VLPs) expressed using the
baculovirus system were examined by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) using five of these MAbs and HEV patient
sera. Despite the wide separation of epitopes within the primary
sequence, all the MAbs demonstrated some degree of cross-inhibition with each other in ORF2.1 and/or VLP ELISAs, suggesting a complex antigenic structure. MAbs specific for the conformational ORF2.1 epitope and a linear epitope within aa 434 to 457 blocked convalescent patient antibody reactivity against VLPs by approximately 60 and 35%,
respectively, while MAbs against epitopes within aa 394 to 414 and 414 to 434 were unable to block patient serum reactivity. These results
suggest that sequences spanning aa 394 to 457 of the capsid protein
participate in the formation of strongly immunodominant epitopes on the
surface of HEV particles which may be important in immunity to HEV infection.
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is
responsible for epidemic and sporadic cases of enterically transmitted
viral hepatitis, particularly in the developing world (17,
31). HEV is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus, with the
genome encoding three open reading frames (ORFs), of which ORF2 encodes
the major structural or capsid protein, PORF2. Antibody is sufficient
to confer immunity to HEV infection (38), but little is
known of the structure of the viral particle or of the antibody
specificities which contribute to humoral immunity, which could pose a
major hurdle in the development and clinical evaluation of effective vaccines.
The use of peptide scanning has led to the identification of a number
of linear epitopes within the capsid protein of HEV, with many of these
being type specific (4, 12, 13, 15). More recently, the use
of larger overlapping peptides has revealed some conformational
epitopes which are reactive with acute-phase sera (16).
Linkage of a number of such peptide epitopes from different strains of
HEV into an artificial "mosaic" protein improves the detection of
acute-phase HEV antibody (5, 14), but the antibodies induced
with this protein do not appear to be neutralizing in a cell culture
system which measures virus-cell binding (26). In addition,
it is not known whether antibodies to any of these linear and
conformational peptide epitopes can bind to intact viral particles, or
indeed whether this antibody repertoire is maintained during the
convalescent phase after HEV infection and thus contributes to humoral immunity.
Expression of PORF2 with an N-terminal truncation of 111 amino acids
(aa) in the baculovirus system results in the production of virus-like
particles (VLPs), which, in contrast to synthetic peptides or
full-length PORF2, appear to mimic the antigenicity and immunogenicity
of the native virus (24, 25, 32). Most significantly,
immunization of macaques with VLPs confers immunity to both homologous
and heterologous virus challenge (37, 38, 43). The improved
antibody reactivity and immunogenicity of VLPs have been attributed to
conformational epitopes which are not presented by synthetic peptides,
full-length PORF2, and most HEV proteins expressed in Escherichia
coli (24, 25), but the relevant epitopes have not been identified.
Expression of the ORF2.1 fragment of PORF2 (aa 394 to 660) in E. coli also results in the presentation of conformational epitopes (2, 22, 23). Since antisera from animals immunized with ORF2.1 are able to inhibit the reactivity of HEV patient sera against
VLPs by as much as 97% (21), it appears likely that the
major epitopes within VLPs and the ORF2.1 antigen expressed in E. coli may be the same or closely overlapping.
In this study we have used monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to study the
antigenic structure of HEV in more detail. We show that the
conformational ORF2.1 epitope involving aa residues 394 to 457 and a
linear epitope in the region of aa 434 to 457 are not only present on
the surface of VLPs, but immunodominant in the humoral immune response
of convalescent HEV patients.
Preparation of antigen.
The AC2.1 fragment from pGEX-AC2.1
(23) was subcloned into the pET-30a(+) vector (Novagen
Inc.), to encode a fusion protein (ET-2.1) comprising the ORF2.1
fragment (aa 394 to 660) of PORF2 with a hexahistidine tag. ET-2.1
protein was expressed in E. coli, solubilized in 5 M urea,
and purified in the presence of 5 M urea using TALON resin (Clontech
Laboratories, Palo Alto, Calif.) as described previously for the
protein GST-ORF2.1 (GST-ORF2.1-6xHis) (2). The purified
ET-2.1 protein was then refolded by dialysis in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)
(21).
Production of MAbs.
Eight-week-old female BALB/c mice were
immunized at 0 and 4 weeks by intraperitoneal inoculation with equal
volumes of antigen (100 µg in 100 µl) and Hunter's Titermax (Sigma
Chemicals, St. Louis, Mo.). Four weeks later, a final boost of equal
volumes of antigen and 0.85% saline was administered into the tail
vein. Three days after the final intravenous inoculation, mouse spleen cells were fused with sp2/0-Ag 14 mouse myeloma cells using
polyethylene glycol 1500 (50% [wt/vol]) (Boehringer, Mannheim,
Germany) essentially as described by Adler and Faine (1).
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification of Immunodominant and Conformational
Epitopes in the Capsid Protein of Hepatitis E Virus by Using
Monoclonal Antibodies

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
70°C. MAb 1H1, an immunoglobulin G2a (IgG2a)
specific for the L protein of duck hepatitis B virus (a gift from J. Pugh), was prepared in the same way and included as a negative control
in all subsequent experiments.
Biotinylation of antibodies.
Purified MAbs were concentrated
to 1 mg/ml in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) using 30K Nanosep
microconcentrators (Pall Filtron, Northborough, Mass.). MAbs were then
biotinylated using EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS(N-hydroxysuccinimide)-LC-Biotin
(Pierce, Rockford, Ill.) in accordance with the manufacturer's
protocol, separated from free biotin by gel filtration over PD-10
columns (Pharmacia), and stored at
70°C until use.
Immunoassays. (i) ELISAs for human and murine IgG anti-HEV. ELISA plates coated with GST-ORF2.1 (2) or baculovirus-expressed VLPs (24) were prepared as previously described. Samples (0.1 ml) containing undiluted hybridoma supernatants or purified MAbs or human convalescent patient sera diluted in C-PBST (1% casein, PBS [pH 7.4], 0.5% Tween 20) were added to duplicate ELISA wells for 1 h at 37°C (VLP) or 21°C (GST-ORF2.1). Plates were washed with PBST (PBS [pH 7.4], 0.05% Tween 20), and bound IgG was detected with horseradish peroxidase (HRPO)-conjugated sheep anti-mouse IgG (Amersham International) diluted 1:5,000 in C-PBST or with HRPO-conjugated sheep anti-human IgG (Amersham) diluted 1:6,000 in C-PBST for 1 h at 21°C. Antibody complexes were detected using tetramethylbenzidine substrate (AMRAD Biotech, Melbourne, Australia), reactions were stopped with H2SO4, and absorbance was read at 450 and 620 nm.
(ii) Blocking ELISAs. The spatial relationships of epitopes recognized by each of the MAbs were investigated by a blocking ELISA in which antigen was incubated with saturating levels of unlabeled MAbs (as determined in the experiment shown in Fig. 2) prior to the addition of biotinylated MAbs, and residual binding of biotinylated MAbs was detected using HRPO-conjugated streptavidin. Samples of unlabeled MAbs (100 µl, 20 µg/ml in C-PBST) were added to VLP- or GST-ORF2.1-coated plates for 1 h at 37 or 21°C, respectively, followed by the addition of 100 µl of biotinylated MAbs diluted in C-PBST for a further 1 h at the same temperature. Biotinylated MAbs were used at a dilution which gave an ELISA result of approximately 2.0 optical density (OD) units against the corresponding antigen type (results not shown). Plates were then washed with PBST, and residual binding of biotinylated antibodies was detected using HRPO-conjugated streptavidin (Amersham) diluted 1:1,000 in C-PBST. To quantitate the residual binding of each biotinylated MAb, dilutions of biotinylated MAbs representing 10% activity (90% inhibition), 30% activity (70% inhibition), 70% activity (30% inhibition), and 100% activity were prepared in C-PBST containing 10 µg of irrelevant MAb 1H1 per ml and assayed in the same plate.
The proportion of convalescent patient antibody directed against each of the MAb epitopes present on VLPs was determined by a second blocking ELISA, in which antigen was incubated with saturating levels of MAbs prior to the addition of patient sera, and residual binding of human IgG was detected using HRPO-conjugated anti-human IgG. Samples of MAbs (75 µl, 10 µg/ml in C-PBST) were added to VLP-coated plates for 1 h at 37°C, followed by the addition of 75 µl of patient serum diluted 1:150 (patients G31 and G37 from Nepal) or 1:500 (patient NIH116 from Mexico) in C-PBST for a further 1 h. Dilutions of patient sera were chosen in order to give an ELISA result of approximately 1.2 OD units (results not shown). Plates were then washed with PBST, and residual binding of patient IgG was detected as before using HRPO-conjugated sheep anti-human IgG, which was shown to be unreactive with murine IgG (results not shown). To quantitate the residual binding of patient IgG, each plate included in triplicate a dilution series of the International Reference HEV Serum 95/584 (100 IU/ml), from which a standard curve was constructed to relate ELISA OD to HEV-specific IgG reactivity in milli-international units per milliliter (2). Any difference in the level of human IgG binding between the control (irrelevant MAb 1H1) and specific MAbs is therefore a measure of the proportion of total HEV-specific IgG directed against epitopes which are altered or blocked by binding of the specific MAb.SDS-PAGE and Western immunoblotting.
The epitope
specificities of MAbs were determined by Western immunoblotting using
GST-ORF2 fusion proteins representing different fragments of
full-length ORF2 as described previously (23). Briefly,
equimolar amounts of each fusion protein were subjected to sodium
dodecyl sulfate-10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-10%
PAGE), transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with MAb
culture supernatant diluted 1:10 in C-PBST. Immune complexes were
detected with HRPO-conjugated sheep anti-mouse IgG and enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham). For clarity, PORF2 fragments with the
exception of ORF2.1 will be referred to by their N- and C-terminal amino acids: for example, P394-473 was previously described as 2.1
2.1-4 (23) and represents aa 394 to 473 of PORF2.
Indirect immunofluorescence. Because HEV cannot be grown in cell culture, the full-length PORF2 protein was expressed in HepG2 cells using plasmid pCI-ORF2. The coding sequence of full-length PORF2 was released from plasmid pSFV1/ORF2K (37) by partial digestion with EcoRI and cloned into the EcoRI site of plasmid pCI-neo (Promega, Madison, Wis.), generating plasmid pCI-ORF2, and the insert was confirmed by restriction enzyme digestions and sequencing. HepG2 cells were grown on glass coverslips until 60% confluent, transfected with 1 µg of DNA per cm2 using the calcium phosphate method (6), and incubated for 40 h at 37°C. Cultures were fixed in acetone for 2 min at 4°C, dried, and then stained with HEV-specific MAbs or MAb 1H1, specific for duck hepatitis B virus L protein (30), at a final concentration of 5 µg/ml in PBS containing 2% fetal calf serum for 1 h at 21°C. The slides were washed for 30 min in PBS and counterstained with a 1:50 dilution of fluorescein-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark) and 5 µg of propidium iodide (Sigma) per ml for 1 h. The slides were washed for a further 30 min, mounted with PBS-buffered glycerol, and examined with an Axiovert 100 microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation and biophysical characterization of MAbs. The ORF2.1 fragment of PORF2 in the form of protein QE2.1 can induce antibodies against immunodominant epitopes in HEV (21), and an analogous protein, ET-2.1, containing the same HEV-specific amino acids but with a shorter N-terminal fusion protein, was used here as the immunogen for production of MAbs to facilitate studies of HEV antigenic structure. Splenocytes from BALB/c mice immunized with purified ET-2.1 protein were fused with murine myeloma cells to generate hybridomas secreting anti-ORF2.1. Seven hybridomas giving initial ELISA reactivities against GST-ORF2.1 protein of >0.25 OD were identified and subcloned; five MAbs were IgG1 (1C7, 3B2, 4B5, 2E2, and 4B2), and two were IgG2b (1E6 and 1E7).
As a first step in examining the specificity of the MAbs, they were used in indirect immunofluorescence against full-length PORF2 expressed in HepG2 cells using plasmid pCI-ORF2 (Fig. 1). MAb 4B2 was only weakly reactive (Fig. 1B), and the reactivity of MAb 2E2 was barely detectable (Fig. 1C), whereas the other MAbs showed very strong reactivity, as shown for MAb 1E6 (Fig. 1A and results not shown). This difference in reactivities for 4B2 and 2E2 was found using a variety of fixation conditions and was also seen using PORF2 expressed using the Semliki Forest virus expression system (36) (results not shown) and is therefore due to inefficient presentation of the 4B2 and 2E2 epitopes in full-length PORF2. It has been shown previously that full-length PORF2 is less reactive with patient sera than is the truncated PORF2 assembled into VLPs (24, 25, 32), suggesting that the epitopes for MAbs 4B2 and 2E2 are of particular interest.
|
|
Epitope mapping.
To determine the epitope specificities of the
MAbs, a series of GST fusion proteins containing either full-length
PORF2 or partially overlapping fragments of PORF2 (2, 21,
22) were probed with each MAb in Western blots (Fig.
3). Two MAbs each were reactive with
proteins having N-terminal truncations extending to aa 414 to 660 or aa
434 to 660, consistent with epitopes in the regions of aa 414 to 434 (MAbs 1C7 and 3B2; Fig. 3D and E) and aa 434 to 457 (MAbs 1E6 and 1E7;
Fig. 3F and G), respectively. All of these MAbs were reactive with all
larger fragments of PORF2 and with P394-473 and are thus directed
against linear peptide epitopes. MAbs 2E2 and 4B2 were exclusively
reactive with the ORF2.1 fragment, in a manner identical to
convalescent-phase sera analyzed by this method (2, 21), and
are thus directed against the conformational ORF2.1 epitope, which is
ablated when smaller or larger fragments of PORF2 are expressed in
E. coli (2, 21, 22). MAb 4B5 was reactive with
all fragments beginning upstream of aa 394, and we conclude that it is
directed against an epitope in the region of aa 394 to 414, but its
lack of reactivity with P394-473 suggests that this epitope is not
correctly modeled in the absence of C-terminal sequences. We therefore
consider that this epitope is conformational but within aa 394 to 414.
|
Antigenic structure of HEV.
The availability of MAbs with
known specificities allowed us to examine the antigenic structure of
HEV. Five of the MAbs were purified, biotinylated, and used in blocking
ELISAs to determine the spatial relationship of the antigenic sites in
both the purified GST-ORF2.1 fusion protein and, more importantly, VLPs
which mimic the native particle structure. For this purpose, saturating
levels of unlabeled MAbs were bound to GST-ORF2.1 (Fig.
4A) or VLPs (Fig. 4B) prior to the
addition of labeled MAbs, and the level of residual binding was
estimated by comparison with the binding achieved with 100, 70, 30, and
10% of the corresponding labeled MAb.
|
Comparison of MAb epitope specificities with those of HEV-infected
patients.
To compare the epitope specificities of these MAbs with
those of convalescent-phase patient IgG, we performed similar blocking ELISAs in which saturating amounts of MAbs were added to plates coated
with VLPs prior to the addition of patient sera. Two patients (G31 and
G37) were infected in Nepal, while patient NIH116 was infected with the
divergent Mexico strain of HEV. The residual binding of patient IgG was
detected with human IgG-specific secondary antibodies and quantitated
by comparison with a standard curve (Fig.
5).
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study provides detailed information on the antigenic structure of HEV particles, implicating aa residues between 394 and 457 of PORF2 in the formation of immunodominant epitopes, including the conformational ORF2.1 epitope, on the surface of VLPs. It must be noted that such VLPs differ in size and some other physical properties from authentic HEV virions, including arrangement of subunits in a T=1 capsid containing 60 molecules of PORF2 rather than the T=3 180 molecules of PORF2 suspected in virions (41), and the PORF2 in VLPs is truncated at both the N and C termini (24), whereas nothing is known of the processing of PORF2 in virions; however, in the absence of reliable cell culture models for HEV and more detailed physical information on the infectious viral particle, they represent a useful model with which to study HEV antigenicity (24). We have previously shown that polyclonal antisera induced with the ORF2.1 protein can inhibit both acute-phase and convalescent-phase reactivity to VLPs by between 74 and 97% (21), but it is clear from the present study that the majority of the convalescent IgG repertoire is in fact directed to just a few epitopes in the viral capsid, with a minimum 60% directed against the conformational ORF2.1 epitope defined by MAbs 2E2 and 4B2 and at least 28% against the partially overlapping linear epitope within aa 434 to 457 defined by MAb 1E6 (Fig. 5).
It has been noted previously that VLPs have unique antigenic properties compared to full-length PORF2 expressed in eukaryotic cells, presumably due to the formation of conformational epitopes during assembly of the truncated PORF2 into particles (24, 25, 32). Interestingly, VLPs had approximately equivalent reactivity with saturating levels of all the MAbs studied (Fig. 2), whereas full-length PORF2 expressed in HepG2 cells had very low levels of reactivity with MAbs 2E2 and 4B2 compared with the other MAbs (Fig. 1). Taken together with the strong inhibition of VLP ELISA reactivity by MAbs 2E2 and 4B2 (Fig. 5), these results suggest that the conformational ORF2.1 epitope contributes most of the increased antigenic reactivity of VLPs compared to full-length PORF2.
Extensive competition was observed between the MAbs for binding to VLPs or GST-ORF2.1 (Fig. 4) despite the wide separation of epitopes, with the sequences recognized by 4B5 and 1E6 separated by a minimum of 19 nonoverlapping aa. These results suggest that the sequences between aa 394 and 457 are highly folded in order to bring supposedly distal epitopes close together, as well as contributing to the formation of the conformational ORF2.1 epitope. Computer-assisted secondary structure and hydrophilicity predictions of PORF2 (MacVector 3.5; Stratagene) do not reveal any striking features in this region, with beta sheets from aa 410 to 415 and 437 to 442 and random coils elsewhere, although the epitopes recognized by 3B2 (aa 414 to 434) and 1E6 (aa 434 to 457) fall within regions containing prominent peaks of hydrophilicity and flexibility (results not shown). However, the requirement for more C-terminal sequences in the correct formation of the ORF2.1 epitope (indicated by the lack of reactivity for P394-473; Fig. 3) suggests that more distal sequences may thus contribute to the overall structure of the epitope, perhaps by forming a scaffold for correct folding of sequences within individual protein chains or by promoting the juxtaposition of multiple protein chains in subunit-subunit interactions. Interestingly, the structure of HEV VLPs has recently been solved at 22 Å resolution by cryoelectron microscopy, revealing a T=1 particle with protruding dimers at the icosahedral twofold axes (16), and it is therefore possible that the ORF2.1 epitope is formed in the process of dimerization.
The linear epitopes recognized by MAbs in this study lie within domain 4 of PORF2, as defined by Khudyakov and colleagues (16), but domain 4 represents only a small fraction of the acute-phase response detected in that study, with much greater reactivity found in the N-terminal (domain 1) and extreme C-terminal (domain 6) regions of the protein. These results suggest that the humoral response to PORF2 is initially broad but then matures to a very limited spectrum of epitopes, of which the conformational ORF2.1 epitope on the surface of VLPs is immunodominant. This has obvious implications for the serological detection of past HEV infections, and the presence of the conformational ORF2.1 epitope undoubtedly contributes to the high sensitivity of both VLP (7, 24, 42) and ORF2.1 (2) ELISA for this purpose.
An understanding of antigenic structure will be important in the clinical evaluation of HEV vaccines. The development and implementation of effective vaccines for hepatitis A virus and hepatitis B virus over the past 20 years have been aided by serological assays which are highly predictive of immunity. For hepatitis A virus, it was shown that the majority of total antibody was directed against a small number of epitopes, with good correlation between reactivity in ELISA (and other serological assays) and protective, neutralizing antibody (19, 20, 27, 28, 34), while for hepatitis B virus, it is known that antibody to the highly immunodominant a determinant of small surface antigen is protective (10, 11, 39, 40). No such information is available for HEV, but if the ORF2.1 conformational and/or aa 434 to 457 epitopes are protective, then it is obviously important to measure their specific responses. Conversely, if these epitopes are not protective, then reactivity to these immunodominant epitopes might obscure the measurement of more important but minor responses. Experimental vaccines based on VLPs are clearly effective in animal models of HEV infection (37, 38, 43), and further study of the antibody responses induced by these and other vaccines with respect to the epitopes identified here will be useful for determining protective epitopes. The use of MAbs to block patient reactivity to one or more epitopes might prove useful in monitoring the responses of human vaccinees.
The abundance in convalescent-phase patient sera of antibody to the conformational ORF2.1 epitope leads us to speculate that vaccines which elicit a strong response to this epitope might represent the most promising candidates for broadly protective HEV vaccines, and we have shown that purified QE2.1 protein elicits such responses (21). Although the corresponding studies have not yet been performed for animals receiving the candidate VLP (37, 38, 43) or TrpE-C2 vaccines (30), we note that VLPs are more reactive with MAbs 2E2 and 4B2 than is the GST-ORF2.1 protein (Fig. 2) and might thus be expected to induce strong responses to the conformational ORF2.1 epitope, whereas C2 (aa 225 to 660) is completely unreactive with these MAbs, at least in Western immunoblotting (Fig. 3). DNA vaccines have been the focus of intense research, and this approach has also been used for HEV (9). Subsequent work by the same group has demonstrated that antibodies induced with a plasmid encoding full-length PORF2 are able to bind authentic HEV particles (8), but our results suggest that the majority of such antibodies are unlikely to be directed to the conformational ORF2.1 epitope, as this is very poorly modeled when full-length PORF2 is expressed in mammalian cells (Fig. 1). In addition, the majority of full-length PORF2 is rapidly degraded following heterologous expression in mammalian cells (35), and such rapid degradation tends to favor the induction of cellular rather than humoral immune responses (33). In order to induce antibodies to the conformational ORF2.1 epitope, we believe that a DNA or protein vaccine against HEV may need to be based on truncated forms of PORF2, such as aa 112 to 660 or ORF2.1. Preliminary studies have shown that the ORF2.1 fragment expressed in mammalian cells is indeed highly reactive with all the MAbs used in this study (F. Li and D. A. Anderson, unpublished data).
In this and previous studies (2, 21, 22), we have speculated that antibodies of the most abundant specificities during convalescence are likely to be protective, but it must be noted that while passive immunization with high-titer convalescent-phase macaque plasma was protective against HEV disease, it did not prevent infection (38), and passive immunization with IgG from a single convalescent-phase patient serum also failed to protect macaques from HEV infection (3). These results may suggest the importance of less immunodominant epitopes (and thus less abundant antibodies) and/or cellular immune responses in preventing HEV infection. Whether or not antibody to the conformational ORF2.1 epitope proves to be protective against disease, its strong immunodominance must be taken into account in studies towards the further development of HEV vaccines, and the MAbs described here should also prove useful in further studies of HEV biology, replication, and assembly.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Tian-Cheng Li, Naokazu Takeda, and Tatsuo Miyamura for the gift of purified VLPs; Morag Ferguson for the international reference HEV serum; Robert Purcell for patient sera; Scott Bowden for advice on MAb production; Heng-Fong Seow and Bo Lin for helpful discussions; Elizabeth Grgacic for critical reading of the manuscript; and Jenalle Chandler, Michelle Snooks, and Raquel Cowan for technical assistance.
These studies were supported in part by Project Grant number 950876 (D.A.A.) and the Dora Lush Postgraduate Research Scholarship (F.L.) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and by the Research Fund of the Macfarlane Burnet Centre for Medical Research.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Hepatitis Research Unit, Macfarlane Burnet Centre for Medical Research. P.O. Box 254, Fairfield 3078, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Phone: (61 3) 9282 2239. Fax: (61 3) 9282 2100. E-mail: anderson{at}burnet.edu.au.
Present address: Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference
Laboratory, North Melbourne 3051, Australia.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Adler, B., and S. Faine. 1983. A pomona serogroup-specific, agglutinating antigen in Leptospira, identified by monoclonal antibodies. Pathology 15:247-250[Medline]. |
| 2. | Anderson, D. A., F. Li, M. A. Riddell, T. Howard, H.-F. Seow, J. Torresi, G. Perry, D. Sumarsidi, S. M. Shrestha, and I. L. Shrestha. 1999. ELISA for IgG-class antibody to hepatitis E virus based on a highly conserved, conformational epitope expressed in Escherichia coli. J. Virol. Methods 81:131-142[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. | Chauhan, A., J. B. Dilawari, R. Sharma, M. Mukesh, and S. R. Saroa. 1998. Role of long-persisting human hepatitis E virus antibodies in protection. Vaccine 16:755-756[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. | Coursaget, P., Y. Buisson, N. Depril, P. le Cann, M. Chabaud, C. Molinie, and R. Roue. 1993. Mapping of linear B cell epitopes on open reading frames 2- and 3-encoded proteins of hepatitis E virus using synthetic peptides. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 109:251-255[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. | Favorov, M. O., Y. E. Khudyakov, E. E. Mast, T. L. Yashina, C. N. Shapiro, N. S. Khudyakova, D. L. Jue, G. G. Onischenko, H. S. Margolis, and H. A. Fields. 1996. IgM and IgG antibodies to hepatitis E virus (HEV) detected by an enzyme immunoassay based on an HEV-specific artificial recombinant mosaic protein. J. Med. Virol. 50:50-58[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. |
Gazina, E. V.,
J. E. Fielding,
B. Lin, and D. A. Anderson.
2000.
Core protein phosphorylation modulates pregenomic RNA encapsidation to different extents in human and duck hepatitis B viruses.
J. Virol.
74:4721-4728 |
| 7. | Ghabrah, T. M., S. Tsarev, P. O. Yarbough, S. U. Emerson, G. T. Strickland, and R. H. Purcell. 1998. Comparison of tests for antibody to hepatitis E virus. J. Med. Virol. 55:134-137[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | He, J., L. N. Binn, J. D. Caudill, L. V. Asher, C. F. Longer, and B. L. Innis. 1999. Antiserum generated by DNA vaccine binds to hepatitis E virus (HEV) as determined by PCR and immune electron microscopy (IEM): application for HEV detection by affinity-capture RT-PCR. Virus Res. 62:59-65[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | He, J., S. L. Hoffman, and C. G. Hayes. 1997. DNA inoculation with a plasmid vector carrying the hepatitis E virus structural protein gene induces immune response in mice. Vaccine 15:357-362[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Howard, C. R., and L. M. Allison. 1995. Hepatitis B surface antigen variation and protective immunity. Intervirology 38:35-40[Medline]. |
| 11. | Iwarson, S., E. Tabor, H. C. Thomas, A. Goodall, J. Waters, P. Snoy, J. W. Shih, and R. J. Gerety. 1985. Neutralization of hepatitis B virus infectivity by a murine monoclonal antibody: an experimental study in the chimpanzee. J. Med. Virol. 16:89-96[Medline]. |
| 12. |
Kaur, M.,
K. C. Hyams,
M. A. Purdy,
K. Krawczynski,
W. M. Ching,
K. E. Fry,
G. R. Reyes,
D. W. Bradley, and M. Carl.
1992.
Human linear B-cell epitopes encoded by the hepatitis E virus include determinants in the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:3855-3858 |
| 13. | Khudyakov, Y. E., M. O. Favorov, D. L. Jue, T. K. Hine, and H. A. Fields. 1994. Immunodominant antigenic regions in a structural protein of the hepatitis E virus. Virology 198:390-393[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Khudyakov, Y. E.,
M. O. Favorov,
N. S. Khudyakova,
M. E. Cong,
B. P. Holloway,
N. Padhye,
S. B. Lambert,
D. L. Jue, and H. A. Fields.
1994.
Artificial mosaic protein containing antigenic epitopes of hepatitis E virus.
J. Virol.
68:7067-7074 |
| 15. | Khudyakov, Y. E., N. S. Khudyakova, H. A. Fields, D. Jue, C. Starling, M. O. Favorov, K. Krawczynski, L. Polish, E. Mast, and H. Margolis. 1993. Epitope mapping in proteins of hepatitis E virus. Virology 194:89-96[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. |
Khudyakov, Y. E.,
E. N. Lopareva,
D. L. Jue,
T. K. Crews,
S. P. Thyagarajan, and H. A. Fields.
1999.
Antigenic domains of the open reading frame 2-encoded protein of hepatitis E virus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:2863-2871 |
| 17. | Krawczynski, K. 1993. Hepatitis E. Hepatology 17:932-941[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. |
Lee, J. W.,
K. Kim,
S. H. Jung,
K. J. Lee,
E. C. Choi,
Y. C. Sung, and C. Y. Kang.
1999.
Identification of a domain containing B-cell epitopes in hepatitis C virus E2 glycoprotein by using mouse monoclonal antibodies.
J. Virol.
73:11-18 |
| 19. | Lemon, S. M. 1993. Immunologic approaches to assessing the response to inactivated hepatitis A vaccine. J. Hepatol. 18(Suppl. 2):S15-S19. |
| 20. | Lemon, S. M., P. C. Murphy, P. J. Provost, I. Chalikonda, J. P. Davide, T. L. Schofield, D. R. Nalin, and J. A. Lewis. 1997. Immunoprecipitation and virus neutralization assays demonstrate qualitative differences between protective antibody responses to inactivated hepatitis A vaccine and passive immunization with immune globulin. J. Infect. Dis. 176:9-19[Medline]. |
| 21. | Li, F., M. A. Riddell, H. F. Seow, N. Takeda, T. Miyamura, and D. A. Anderson. 2000. Recombinant subunit ORF2.1 antigen and induction of antibody against immunodominant epitopes in the hepatitis E virus capsid protein. J. Med. Virol. 60:379-386[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Li, F., J. Torresi, S. A. Locarnini, H. Zhuang, W. Zhu, X. Guo, and D. A. Anderson. 1997. Amino-terminal epitopes are exposed when full-length open reading frame 2 of hepatitis E virus is expressed in Escherichia coli, but carboxy-terminal epitopes are masked. J. Med. Virol. 52:289-300[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. |
Li, F.,
H. Zhuang,
S. Kolivas,
S. A. Locarnini, and D. A. Anderson.
1994.
Persistent and transient antibody responses to hepatitis E virus detected by Western immunoblot using open reading frame 2 and 3 and glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2060-2066 |
| 24. | Li, T. C., Y. Yamakawa, K. Suzuki, M. Tatsumi, M. A. Razak, T. Uchida, N. Takeda, and T. Miyamura. 1997. Expression and self-assembly of empty virus-like particles of hepatitis E virus. J. Virol. 71:7207-7213[Abstract]. |
| 25. | McAtee, C. P., Y. Zhang, P. O. Yarbough, T. Bird, and T. R. Fuerst. 1996. Purification of a soluble hepatitis E open reading frame 2-derived protein with unique antigenic properties. Protein Expr. Purif. 8:262-270[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. | Meng, J., J. Pillot, X. Dai, H. A. Fields, and Y. E. Khudyakov. 1998. Neutralization of different geographic strains of the hepatitis E virus with anti-hepatitis E virus-positive serum samples obtained from different sources. Virology 249:316-324[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. |
Ping, L. H.,
R. W. Jansen,
J. T. Stapleton,
J. I. Cohen, and S. M. Lemon.
1988.
Identification of an immunodominant antigenic site involving the capsid protein VP3 of hepatitis A virus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:8281-8285 |
| 28. |
Ping, L. H., and S. M. Lemon.
1992.
Antigenic structure of human hepatitis A virus defined by analysis of escape mutants selected against murine monoclonal antibodies.
J. Virol.
66:2208-2216 |
| 29. | Pugh, J. C., Q. Di, W. S. Mason, and H. Simmons. 1995. Susceptibility to duck hepatitis B virus infection is associated with the presence of cell surface receptor sites that efficiently bind viral particles. J. Virol. 69:4814-4822[Abstract]. |
| 30. | Purdy, M. A., K. A. McCaustland, K. Krawczynski, J. Spelbring, G. R. Reyes, and D. W. Bradley. 1993. Preliminary evidence that a trpE-HEV fusion protein protects cynomolgus macaques against challenge with wild-type hepatitis E virus (HEV). J. Med. Virol. 41:90-94[Medline]. |
| 31. |
Reyes, G. R.,
M. A. Purdy,
J. P. Kim,
K. C. Luk,
L. M. Young,
K. E. Fry, and D. W. Bradley.
1990.
Isolation of a cDNA from the virus responsible for enterically transmitted non-A, non-B hepatitis.
Science
247:1335-1339 |
| 32. | Robinson, R. A., W. H. Burgess, S. U. Emerson, R. S. Leibowitz, S. A. Sosnovtseva, S. Tsarev, and R. H. Purcell. 1998. Structural characterization of recombinant hepatitis E virus ORF2 proteins in baculovirus-infected insect cells. Protein Expr. Purif. 12:75-84[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 33. | Rodriguez, F., J. Zhang, and J. L. Whitton. 1997. DNA immunization: ubiquitination of a viral protein enhances cytotoxic T-lymphocyte induction and antiviral protection but abrogates antibody induction. J. Virol. 71:8497-8503[Abstract]. |
| 34. |
Stapleton, J. T.,
V. Raina,
P. L. Winokur,
K. Walters,
D. Klinzman,
E. Rosen, and J. H. McLinden.
1993.
Antigenic and immunogenic properties of recombinant hepatitis A virus 14S and 70S subviral particles.
J. Virol.
67:1080-1085 |
| 35. | Torresi, J., F. Li, S. A. Locarnini, and D. A. Anderson. 1999. Only the non-glycosylated fraction of hepatitis E virus capsid (open reading frame 2) protein is stable in mammalian cells. J. Gen. Virol. 80:1185-1188[Abstract]. |
| 36. | Torresi, J., J. Meanger, P. Lambert, F. Li, S. A. Locarnini, and D. A. Anderson. 1997. High level expression of the capsid protein of hepatitis E virus in diverse eukaryotic cells using the Semliki Forest virus replicon. J. Virol. Methods 69:81-91[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 37. | Tsarev, S. A., T. S. Tsareva, S. U. Emerson, S. Govindarajan, M. Shapiro, J. L. Gerin, and R. H. Purcell. 1997. Recombinant vaccine against hepatitis E: dose response and protection against heterologous challenge. Vaccine 15:1834-1838[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 38. |
Tsarev, S. A.,
T. S. Tsareva,
S. U. Emerson,
S. Govindarajan,
M. Shapiro,
J. L. Gerin, and R. H. Purcell.
1994.
Successful passive and active immunization of cynomolgus monkeys against hepatitis E.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:10198-10202 |
| 39. | Waters, J. A., S. E. Brown, M. W. Steward, C. R. Howard, and H. C. Thomas. 1992. Analysis of the antigenic epitopes of hepatitis B surface antigen involved in the induction of a protective antibody response. Virus Res. 22:1-12[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. | Waters, J. A., S. M. O'Rourke, S. C. Richardson, G. Papaevangelou, and H. C. Thomas. 1987. Qualitative analysis of the humoral immune response to the "a" determinant of HBs antigen after inoculation with plasma-derived or recombinant vaccine. J. Med. Virol. 21:155-160[Medline]. |
| 41. | Xing, L., K. Kato, T. Li, N. Takeda, T. Miyamura, L. Hammar, and R. H. Cheng. 1999. Recombinant hepatitis E capsid protein self-assembles into a dual-domain T = 1 particle presenting native virus epitopes. Virology 265:35-45[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 42. | Yarbough, P. O., E. Garza, A. W. Tam, Y. Zhang, P. McAtee, and T. R. Fuerst. 1996. Assay development of diagnostic tests for IgM and IgG antibody to hepatitis E virus, p. 294-296. In Y. Buisson, P. Coursaget, and M. Kane (ed.), Enterically-transmitted hepatitis viruses. La Simarre, Joue-les-Tours, France. |
| 43. | Yarbough, P. O., K. Krawczynski, A. W. Tam, C. P. McAtee, K. A. McCaustland, Y. Zhang, N. Garcon, J. Spellbring, D. Carson, F. Myriam, J. D. Lifson, M. Slaoui, J. P. Prieels, H. Margolis, and T. R. Fuerst. 1997. Prevention of hepatitis E using r62K ORF 2 subunit vaccine: full protection against heterologous HEV challenge in cynomolgus macaques, p. 650-655. In M. Rizzetto, R. H. Purcell, J. L. Gerin, and G. Verme (ed.), Viral hepatitis and liver disease. Edizioni Minervi Medica, Turin, Italy. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»