Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, August 2000, p. 7646-7650, Vol. 74, No. 16
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Determination of the Frequency of Retroviral
Recombination between Two Identical Sequences within a
Provirus
Ting
Li and
Jiayou
Zhang*
Department of Microbiology and Immunology and
Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
40536-0096
Received 18 November 1999/Accepted 22 May 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Retroviruses use RNA as their genetic material within viral
particles and DNA (provirus) as their genetic material within cells.
The rate of recombination during reverse transcription between two
identical sequences within the same RNA molecule is very high. In this
study, we have developed a sensitive system to study recombination
occurring within the proviral sequence. This system includes a murine
Moloney leukemia virus vector which contains a neomycin resistance gene
(neo) and two mutated green fluorescent protein genes
(gfp) in tandem positions. The 3' end of the first
gfp and the 5' end of the second gfp gene are
both mutated, so that neither of these two gfp genes is
functional. However, if recombination occurs between the two
gfp genes it will create a functional gfp
protein. Cells containing such a functional recombinant gfp
appear green under fluorescence microscopy. The rate of
recombination between the two gfp sequences during a single
round of replication is as high as 51%. Green cells appear during
proliferation of a clonal clear-cell population and allow a small
portion of these recombinations between sequences of proviral DNA to be
detected. The frequency of recombination at the proviral DNA level is
about 10
5 events/cell division, which is very low
compared with the frequency of recombination (51%) caused by reverse
transcriptase and/or RNA polymerase II.
 |
TEXT |
Retroviruses recombine at a high
rate due to the presence of two identical genomic RNA molecules in
their virions (5). Reverse-transcribed double-stranded viral
DNA which has been integrated into the host chromosomal DNA is called a
provirus. Once integrated, the provirus is replicated along with host
cell DNA and is genetically transmitted as an integral element of the
host genome. During this process, the rate of retroviral recombination
within the provirus has been presumed to be very low. As yet, however,
this rate has not been accurately measured.
Intrachromosomal recombination between two retroviral long terminal
repeats (LTRs) has been described for the somatic and germ line reverse
mutation of the retrovirus-induced dilute (dv) coat color
mutation of DBA mice (3). The dv mutation was
generated by the spontaneous integration of a Moloney leukemia virus
(MLV) into noncoding sequences of the dilute locus. Reversion of the
mutation occurred by recombination between the LTRs, leaving a single
LTR in each revertant chromosome. The intensely colored wild-type
phenotype represented germ line reversion, while the mottled phenotype
represented somatic reversion. More than one million mice were screened
in 5 years to determine the reverse mutation rates as described above.
The germ line reversion rate was 4.5 × 10
6 per
gamete, and the frequency for detecting somatic reversion was 9 × 10
7 events per animal analyzed (17).
MLV provirus excision has also been reported in an in vitro assay
(19). When MLV was studied as an insertional mutagen in a
Rous sarcoma virus-transformed cell line, several reversion mutations
were found. These reverse mutations resulted from various deletions of
the MLV provirus, presumably by homologous recombination between the
MLV LTRs.
Gene deletions cause human genetic diseases (10).
Sequence-directed mutageneses may be mediated by direct repeats.
The size of a deletion can vary from a single base to megabases of DNA. Studies of bacterial DNA show that the frequency of deletion is proportional to the sizes of the identical sequences and inversely proportional to the distance between the repeats (15, 18, 20). In mammalian cells, the frequencies of two intrachromosomal H2 gene conversion events range from 10
5 to
10
6 per DNA molecule analyzed by a PCR assay
(8). Spontaneous intrachromosomal recombination rates in
somatic cells have been reported as 10
5 to
10
3 per cell generation with a plasmid encoding two
tandem mutated lacZ genes (7). In transgenic
animals, the range of frequency of such recombination was determined to
be 0.001 to 2% (6, 14). There are several models proposed
to explain this deletion process (11). Among these models,
some are replication dependent (replication slippage) (9)
and some are not (strand exchange and single-strand annealing). It is
known that multiple proteins are involved in eucaryotic recombination events.
To study recombination between two identical sequences within the same
provirus, a bicistronic MLV-based vector (pJZ481) was constructed. From
the 5' to 3' direction, pJZ481 carried two mutated copies of the color
reporter gene (gfp) (4), an internal ribosome entry segment (IRES) sequence, and a drug resistance gene
(neo) (Fig. 1A). The IRES
sequence from encephalomyocarditis virus allows the ribosome to bind to
an internal AUG and thereby to initiate the translation of the
neo gene independently of the upstream sequences (1,
2). The 3' and 5' gfp sequences contain individual frameshift mutations which encode nonfunctional proteins. The frequency
of the backward frameshift mutation of the gfp gene during a
single round of retroviral replication was less than 10
5
(22).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Structure of a retrovirus vector for determination of
the rate of recombination between two identical sequences within the
same molecule. (A) Structure of a retrovirus vector containing two
mutated gfp genes. JZ481 contains a neo and two
nonfunctional gfp sequences in tandem positions. The 3' end
of the first gfp and the 5' end of the second gfp
are mutated. The neo gene is expressed from the
encephalomyocarditis virus IRES. (B) Structure of recombinant JZ481
provirus. After one round of replication, the downstream gfp
sequence recombines with the identical upstream gfp
sequence. A functional gfp gene is the result of this event.
The lines between JZ481 and the recombinant provirus indicate the
identical sequences.
|
|
Transfection alone caused a high frequency of deletion (or mutation)
between the two identical sequences within the same plasmid DNA
(21). To avoid deletion during transfection, JZ481 was
introduced into the helper cell line PG13 (containing MLV Gag-Pol and
Env of gibbon ape leukemia virus) (13) by infection as
depicted in Fig. 2. The virus released
from each individual PG13 clone, which contained JZ481 virus, was used
to infect D17 cells. The infected D17 cells were selected for the
Neor phenotype, and visible colonies appeared 10 to 12 days
after selection. The individual Neor colonies were examined
under a fluorescence microscope. Neor-selected cells that
contained the parental provirus (i.e., that contained two mutated
gfp sequences) were clear (Fig. 1A and 3A and
B).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Outline of the experimental approach. Plasmid DNA of
pJZ481 was transfected into an MLV amphotropic helper cell line, PA317
(12). Supernatant medium containing the viruses was
collected and used to infect an MLV xenotropic helper cell line, PG13
(13). Viruses released from infected PG13 cells were used to
infect D17 cells. Infected D17 cells were selected for
Neor. Neor cells were examined by fluorescence
microscopy. The clear cells represent the parental type, and the green
cells represent the recombinants. Some green cells were detected during
proliferation of the clear cells.
|
|

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Microscopic analysis of HCT 116 cells infected with
viral vector JZ481 containing the gfp gene. (A)
Visible-light micrograph of a neomycin-resistant colony containing
parental JZ481 provirus. (B) Fluorescent micrograph of the same colony
analyzed in panel A. (C) Visible-light micrograph of a
neomycin-resistant colony which contains recombinant JZ481 provirus.
(D) Fluorescent micrograph of the same colony analyzed in panel C. (E)
Visible-light micrograph of a neomycin-resistant colony containing
parental-type provirus. (F) Fluorescent micrograph of the same colony
analyzed in panel E. Green cells in this colony are the result of a
recombination within the proviral DNA.
|
|
Recombination between two gfp genes led to the deletion of
the mutations, resulting in a functional gfp gene (Fig. 1B).
Cells containing the functional gfp gene were green under
the microscope (16, 21) (Fig. 3C and D). Recombination rates
are the ratio of the number of green colonies to the total number of
colonies examined (green colonies and clear colonies). Results (Table
1) indicated that the rate of
recombination between the two identical sequences within the same RNA
molecule was very high (51% ± 2% per replication cycle). Since the
rate of backward frameshift mutations of the gfp gene is
lower than 10
5, most green cells are the result of a
deletion. Genomic DNAs from clear (parental type) and green
(recombinant) D17 cells were digested with NcoI to determine
the nature of the recombinants. There are two NcoI sites
within the JZ481 vector (Fig. 1). Parental proviruses should generate a
2.7-kb fragment, while recombinant proviruses with the deletion would
create a 1.9-kb fragment. Southern analysis (Fig.
4A) showed that the green cells produced
a distinct 1.9-kb fragment, indicating that most of the green cells
contained recombinant proviruses, with the deletion occurring between
the two gfp gene sequences.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Southern analysis of genomic DNA isolated from
D17 cells infected with JZ481. (A) Cellular DNA was cut with
NcoI and hybridized with a neo gene probe. Green
1, green 2, clear 1, and clear 2 are individual green or clear colonies
formed after infection. Clear 1-g1 and clear 1-g2 are green cells
subcloned from the clear 1 colony. Clear 2-g1 and clear 2-g2 are green
cells subcloned from the clear 2 colony. Molecular sizes are shown on
the left. (B) Cellular DNA was cut with EcoRI and hybridized
with a neo gene probe. Green 1, green 2, clear 1, clear 3, and clear 4 are individual green or clear colonies formed after
infection. Clear 1-g1 and clear 1-g2 are green cells subcloned from the
clear 1 colony. Clear3-g1 and clear3-g2 are green cells subcloned from
the clear 3 colony. Clear4-g1 and clear4-g2 are green cells subcloned
from the clear 4 colony.
|
|
Cells in a single Neor D17 colony were offspring of a
single infected cell, so the integrated proviruses should be the same as those in the original infected cells. However, by using a
fluorescence microscope, the phenotypes of D17 colonies can be divided
into three groups (Fig. 3). The first group, which made up 51% of the colonies analyzed (Table 1), consisted completely of green cells that
resulted from recombinations before proviral integration (Fig. 3C and D
and 5). The second group represented colonies with only clear cells,
which carried the parental-type proviruses (Fig. 3A and B). The third
group was made up by several colonies that contained mostly clear cells
but had a few green cells among them (Fig. 3E and F). The emergence of
green cells in a clear colony implied that an event had occurred after
the integration of the viral DNA into the host chromosomal DNA. Two
possibilities contributed to the appearance of green cells among
offspring from their clear-cell ancestor. First, a recombination may
have occurred within the provirus during cell proliferation (Fig.
5). A second possibility is that viruses
might be released from some infected D17 cells and reinfect D17 cells,
with a recombination occurring during reverse transcription (and/or RNA
transcription by host RNA polymerase II). To rule out this possibility,
a hyg gene expression vector was transfected into D17 cells,
and infected cells were selected for Hygr. Hygr
colonies were isolated after selection. Ten Hygr D17 cells
were mixed with 10 clear (or green) D17 cells infected with JZ481,
which were Hygs and Neor (Fig.
6). Hygr D17 cells without
JZ481 provirus were cocultured with JZ481 provirus-containing Hygs D17 cells for 15 days. Subsequently, the cells were
divided into two portions and selected for Hygr and
Neor, respectively. Sixty green cells were found in
8.2 × 106 Neor cells, while no green
cells were found in the Hygr population 14 days after
selection. If there had been virus produced by D17 cells infected with
JZ481, it would have had the same opportunity to infect
Hygr cells, so that green Hygr cells should
have emerged. Furthermore, if green cells in a clear colony (Fig. 3E
and F) were the result of reinfection, two proviruses should have
integrated into the chromosomal DNA of green cells. One provirus should
be the parental type introduced into the cell during the original round
of infection, with the second provirus resulting from reinfection
followed by a recombination between the two identical gfp
sequences. Since retroviral integration is essentially a random
process, the parental-type provirus and the recombinant provirus should
integrate into different sites in the chromosomal DNA. Cells from a
single clear colony with a few green cells (Fig. 3E and F) were
serially diluted and plated on a petri dish to separate the green cells
from the clear cells. Colonies formed 10 to 12 days after plating.
Well-separated green and clear colonies were cloned, and their genomic
DNAs were isolated and digested with EcoRI and hybridized
with a neo probe. EcoRI cut at the 5' end of the
neo gene within the JZ481 provirus (Fig. 1) and at a site
within the host cellular flanking sequence. Southern analysis indicated
that only one provirus existed in each cell clone (Fig. 4B).
Furthermore, different Neor colonies resulting from
infection and selection contained proviruses integrated into different
sites. In contrast, green cells and clear cells from a single colony
had proviruses integrated into the same site of host chromosomal DNA,
so that the green cells were subclones derived from the clear cells.
They were the outcome of the same infection-integration event. To
further determine the nature of the green cells within a clear colony,
genomic DNAs of green cells and clear cells from the same D17 clear
colony were also digested with NcoI. DNAs from clear cells
formed a 2.7-kb fragment (Fig. 4A), while DNAs of the green cells from
the same colony formed a distinct 1.9-kb band (Fig. 4A). Therefore,
green cells in a Neor D17 clear colony resulted from a
homologous recombination event between the two identical gfp
sequences at the proviral DNA level (Fig. 5).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Schematic illustration of recombination that
occurred at the proviral DNA level. JZ481 virus released from each
individual PG13 clone was used to infect D17 cells. Colonies which
consisted completely of green cells (gray) represent recombinants that
resulted from events before proviral integration. Colonies which
contained only clear cells (white) represent cells containing only the
parental-type proviruses. Colonies which contained mostly clear cells
but had a few green cells among them represent recombination that
occurred within the provirus during cell proliferation.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Schematic illustration of an experimental design to rule
out reinfection among D17 cells. Day 1, Hygr D17 cells were
mixed with clear and green Neor D17 cells (infected with
JZ481). Day 15, the cells were divided into two portions and selected
for hygromycin resistance and neomycin resistance, respectively. Day
27, no green cells were found in the Hygr population, while
green cells were found after proliferation of clear Neor
D17 cells.
|
|
To accurately determine the frequency of recombination within the
proviral DNA, JZ481-infected colonies were pooled after selection for
Neor. The clear cells were isolated by flow cytometry based
on the fluorescence of the green fluorescent protein. Two days after sorting, cells were examined by fluorescence microscopy, and the number
of green cells in the population was determined. The number of cells in
each petri dish was determined by using a hemacytometer. Out of
1.5 × 106 cells screened in this assay, only 12 green
cells were detected. Therefore, we estimate that the frequency of
recombination at the proviral level was about 0.85 × 10
5 events/cell division (Table
2).
Since our system does not involve a replication-competent virus, a
secondary mutational effect was limited (19). In addition, we used a low multiplicity of infection (<1:1,000) that allowed each
infected cell to get only one virus (in contrast to an average of three
in another study) (19), so the possibility of
interchromosomal recombination was also ruled out.
Observations in this study support the notion that retroviral
proviruses behave as any normal integrated part of the host chromosome.
This retroviral system provides a means to introduce two sequences in
tandem positions into the host cell's chromosomal DNA. The
transduction of this DNA was stable and allowed for unambiguous determination of the structure and quantification of the integration. This system can provide a simple and fast assay for the study of
mammalian homologous recombination.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank W. Bargmann, A. Kaplan, M. Purdom, and A. Simmons for
helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank J. Strange for flow
cytometry analysis.
This research was supported by Public Health Service research grant CA7040.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology and Immunology and Markey Cancer Center, 206 Combs
Research Bldg., University of Kentucky, 800 Rose St., Lexington, KY
40536-0096. Phone: (859) 257-4456. Fax: (859) 257-8940. E-mail:
jzhan1{at}pop.uky.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adam, M. A.,
N. Ramesh,
A. D. Miller, and W. R. Osborne.
1991.
Internal initiation of translation in retroviral vectors carrying picornavirus 5' nontranslated regions.
J. Virol.
65:4985-4990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Boris-Lawrie, K. A., and H. M. Temin.
1993.
Recent advances in retrovirus vector technology.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
3:102-109[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Cachon-Gonzalez, M. B.,
S. Fenner,
J. M. Coffin,
C. Moran,
S. Best, and J. P. Stoye.
1994.
Structure and expression of the hairless gene of mice.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:7717-7721[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Chalfie, M.,
Y. Tu,
G. Euskirchen,
W. W. Ward, and D. C. Prasher.
1994.
Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression.
Science
263:802-805[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Coffin, J. M.
1996.
Retroviridae: the viruses and their replication, p. 1767-1847.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 6.
|
Hanneman, W. H.,
K. J. Schimenti, and J. C. Schimenti.
1997.
Molecular analysis of gene conversion in spermatids from transgenic mice.
Gene
200:185-192[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Herzing, L. B., and M. S. Meyn.
1993.
Novel lacZ-based recombination vectors for mammalian cells.
Gene
137:163-169[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Hogstrand, K., and J. Bohme.
1998.
Intrachromosomal gene conversion frequency in the H2 differs between haplotypes.
Immunogenetics
48:47-55[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Klein, H. L.
1995.
Genetic control of intrachromosomal recombination.
Bioessays
17:147-159[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Krawczak, M., and D. N. Cooper.
1991.
Gene deletions causing human genetic disease: mechanisms of mutagenesis and the role of the local DNA sequence environment.
Hum. Genet.
86:425-441[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Lambert, S.,
Y. Saintigny,
F. Delacote,
F. Amiot,
B. Chaput,
M. Lecomte,
S. Huck,
P. Bertrand, and B. S. Lopez.
1999.
Analysis of intrachromosomal homologous recombination in mammalian cell, using tandem repeat sequences.
Mutat. Res.
433:159-168[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Miller, A. D., and C. Buttimore.
1986.
Redesign of retrovirus packaging cell lines to avoid recombination leading to helper virus production.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6:2895-2902[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Miller, A. D.,
J. V. Garcia,
N. von Suhr,
C. M. Lynch,
C. Wilson, and M. V. Eiden.
1991.
Construction and properties of retrovirus packaging cells based on gibbon ape leukemia virus.
J. Virol.
65:2220-2224[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Murti, J. R.,
M. Bumbulis, and J. C. Schimenti.
1992.
High-frequency germ line gene conversion in transgenic mice.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:2545-2552[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Peeters, B. P.,
J. H. de Boer,
S. Bron, and G. Venema.
1988.
Structural plasmid instability in Bacillus subtilis: effect of direct and inverted repeats.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
212:450-458[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Sapp, C. M.,
T. Li, and J. Zhang.
1999.
Systematic comparison of a color reporter gene and drug resistance genes for the determination of retroviral titers.
J. Biomed. Sci.
6:342-348[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Seperack, P. K.,
M. C. Strobel,
D. J. Corrow,
N. A. Jenkins, and N. G. Copeland.
1988.
Somatic and germ-line reverse mutation rates of the retrovirus-induced dilute coat-color mutation of DBA mice.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:189-192[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Singer, B. S., and J. Westlye.
1988.
Deletion formation in bacteriophage T4.
J. Mol. Biol.
202:233-243[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Varmus, H. E.,
N. Quintrell, and S. Ortiz.
1981.
Retroviruses as mutagens: insertion and excision of a nontransforming provirus alter expression of a resident transforming provirus.
Cell
25:23-36[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Whoriskey, S. K.,
M. A. Schofield, and J. H. Miller.
1991.
Isolation and characterization of Escherichia coli mutants with altered rates of deletion formation.
Genetics
127:21-30[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Zhang, J., and C. M. Sapp.
1999.
Recombination between two identical sequences within the same retroviral RNA molecule.
J. Virol.
73:5912-5917[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Zhang, J.,
L. Y. Tang,
T. Li,
Y. Ma, and C. M. Sapp.
2000.
Most retroviral recombinations occur during minus-strand DNA synthesis.
J. Virol.
74:2313-2322[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, August 2000, p. 7646-7650, Vol. 74, No. 16
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lanciault, C., Champoux, J. J.
(2006). Pausing during Reverse Transcription Increases the Rate of Retroviral Recombination. J. Virol.
80: 2483-2494
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lanciault, C., Champoux, J. J.
(2005). Effects of Unpaired Nucleotides within HIV-1 Genomic Secondary Structures on Pausing and Strand Transfer. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 2413-2423
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, T., Zhang, J.
(2002). Intramolecular Recombinations of Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus Occur during Minus-Strand DNA Synthesis. J. Virol.
76: 9614-9623
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
An, W., Telesnitsky, A.
(2002). Effects of Varying Sequence Similarity on the Frequency of Repeat Deletion during Reverse Transcription of a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vector. J. Virol.
76: 7897-7902
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, J., Ma, Y.
(2001). Evidence for Retroviral Intramolecular Recombinations. J. Virol.
75: 6348-6358
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, T., Zhang, J.
(2001). Retroviral recombination is temperature dependent. J. Gen. Virol.
82: 1359-1364
[Abstract]
[Full Text]