Journal of Virology, August 2000, p. 7085-7095, Vol. 74, No. 15
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Institute of Zoology, University of Zürich, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
Received 24 February 2000/Accepted 28 April 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Disassembly is a key event of virus entry into cells. Here, we have investigated cellular requirements for the first step of adenovirus type 2 (Ad2) disassembly, the release of the fibers. Although fiber release coincides temporally with virus uptake, fiber release is not required for Ad2 endocytosis. It is, however, inhibited by actin-disrupting agents or soluble RGD peptides, which interfere with integrin-dependent endocytosis of Ad2. Fiber release occurs at the cell surface. Actin stabilization with jasplakinolide blocks Ad2 entry at extended cell surface invaginations and efficiently promotes fiber release, indicating that fiber release and virus endocytosis are independent events. Fiber release is not sufficient for Ad2 escape from endosomes, since inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC) prevents Ad2 escape from endosomes but does not affect virus internalization or fiber release. PKC-inhibited cells accumulate Ad2 in small vesicles near the cell periphery, indicating that PKC is also required for membrane trafficking of virus. Taken together, our data show that fiber release from incoming Ad2 requires integrins and filamentous actin. Together with correct subcellular transport of Ad2-containing endosomes, fiber release is essential for efficient delivery of virus to the cytosol. We speculate that fiber release at the surface might extend the host range of Ad2 since it is associated with the separation of a small fraction of incoming virus from the target cells.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adenoviruses (Ads) are among the
best-characterized viral systems (24, 49). Both past and
ongoing Ad studies have significantly contributed to concepts in
molecular and cellular biology and have facilitated the development of
Ad vectors for preclinical and clinical trials (3). Ads are
nonenveloped icosahedral particles of about 90 nm in diameter
(8). The main capsid component is the facette-associated
hexon protein, which is assembled and stabilized by various minor
proteins. Hexon largely protects a double-stranded linear DNA genome,
which is packed inside the capsid together with additional viral
proteins including the cysteine protease L3/p23. The bases of the
capsid vertices are built from the penton base protein from which
fibers emanate. Of the six Ad subgroups, comprising almost 50 serotypes, the subgroup C viruses such as Ad2 and Ad5 have been studied
the most extensively. It was realized relatively early that subgroup C
Ad entry requires two receptors, a primary receptor, CAR
(coxsackie-adenovirus receptor), for attachment (4, 56) and
secondary receptors,
v
5 or
v
3 integrins, for internalization
(62). While the primary receptor determines virus tropism
and is a major aim in current retargeting studies of Ad (for a recent
review, see reference 12), the secondary receptor
plays more subtle but less well understood roles in the infection
process. Besides facilitating virus internalization, most probably via
clathrin-coated pits (41, 58),
v
5 integrins contribute to Ad-dependent
permeabilization of the plasma membrane (61), activation of
phosphatidylinositol 3-OH kinase (29), and small G proteins
of the Rho family (28) and the activation of the
Raf/extracellular receptor kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1,2) pathway (6). While the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway of ERK1,2 is not required for Ad entry, activated integrins play a role in
virus uptake and intracellular transport.
Endocytosis of Ad requires integrins, assembly of clathrin-coated pits, and invagination and fission of the plasma membrane, followed by routing of the emerging vesicle toward early endosomes. The entire process is regulated by lipid kinases, actin-modulating small GTPases, and the large GTPase dynamin (28, 29). Like Ad endocytosis, integrin-mediated endocytosis is complex and can involve the recruitment of the clathrin internalization machinery, dynamin (38, 48), dynamic rearrangement of cortical actin filaments, and, finally, vesicular movement through the cell cortex controlled by lipid and protein kinases and small GTPases (27, 36, 51). Unlike physiological extracellular integrin ligands, internalized Ad2 escapes from acidified endocytic vesicles (5, 41). It is then translocated as a naked particle along microtubules to the nucleus (54) and docks at nuclear pore complexes (9), where the capsid is disassembled (20) and the DNA genome is imported into the nucleoplasm (19).
In contrast to wild-type (wt) Ad2, an Ad2 mutant, ts1, fails to escape from the endocytic system (33, 60). ts1 has a point mutation in the L3/p23 protease, preventing protease packaging and proper processing of the viral capsid structure at the restrictive temperature (for a review, see reference 18). After passing the cell cortex, ts1 endosomes are transported to a perinuclear region by microtubule-dependent motors (54) and ts1 is eventually degraded in lysosomes (20). Part of the reason why ts1 fails to escape from endosomes could be the failure to release fibers, although it binds to CAR and internalizes via integrins much like wt Ad2 (20, 29). Here we have analyzed cellular requirements for the first step of wt Ad2 disassembly, the release of the fibers. We show that besides cortical actin filaments, integrins play a crucial role in detaching fibers at the cell surface. Following fiber detachment, Ad2 is endocytosed and transported through the actin cortex in a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent fashion to finally escape from endosomes and reach the cytosol.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cells, viruses, and infections.
HeLa cells (American Type
Culture Collection) were grown on glass coverslips or 30-mm-diameter
petri dishes in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Gibco-BRL)
containing 7% fetal calf serum (HyClone) and L-glutamine
in a humidified 5% CO2-air atmosphere. In some
experiments, cells were treated for 30 min at 37°C in growth medium
with 2 µM cytochalasin D (CD) (Calbiochem, Juro Supply) 180 nM
jasplakinolide (Jas) (a gift from Phil Crews, Santa Cruz, Calif.), 0.5 mM cyclic arginine-glycine-aspartate peptide (cRGD) (a gift from J. Glass, Telios Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, Calif.), 1 mM linear
arginine-glycine-glutamate-serine peptide (RGES) (Sigma), the PKC
inhibitor calphostin C (5 µM) (Calbiochem, Juro Supply) or
bisindolylmaleimide (BIM) (5 µM) (Sigma, Fluka), the myristoylated
pseudosubstrate of PKC
and PKC
(10 µg/ml) (Promega, Catalys
AG), which inhibits all classical PKCs, or a control myristoylated
autocamptide-related inhibitory peptide (10 µg/ml) (Calbiochem, Juro
Supply). The cold-synchronized infection with Ad in RPMI-bovine serum
albumin (BSA) medium containing drugs was followed by a warming period
in DMEM-0.2% BSA containing drugs as indicated.
Quantitative fluorescence microscopy.
Cell-associated Ad2-TR
was quantitated in the cell periphery, in the cytoplasm, and at the
nucleus as described previously (37). In brief, HeLa cells
were infected with Ad2-TR, fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde in
phosphate-buffered saline, permeabilized for 2 min with 0.5% Triton
X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline including 20 mM ammonium chloride to
reduce autofluorescence, and stained for the nuclear DNA with
4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (0.5 µg/ml) (Sigma), and for the
plasma membrane Ca-ATPase 1 with an affinity-purified antibody kindly
provided by D. Guerini (ETH Zurich) (53) and goat
anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G coupled to Alexa 488 (Molecular Probes,
Leiden, The Netherlands). Specimens were embedded in 0.2%
p-phenylendiamine-0.02 M Tris-HCl-85% glycerol (pH 8.8)
and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy using an inverted motorized
Leica DMIRBE microscope equipped with a 100× objective (N.A. 1.3 PL
Fluotar) and a back-illuminated MicroMax-controlled charge-coupled
device camera (800 by 1,000 pixels of 15 by 15 µm [Princeton
Instruments, Visitron GmbH]), which was operated in 16-bit mode at
25°C. Excitation occurred through band-pass excitation filters for
DAPI (330/80; Omega XF03), Alexa 488 (475/40; Omega XF100), and TR
(560/55; Omega XF101), and emitted light was collected either through a
single-pass (DAPI, 425LP, dichroic 400; Omega XF03) or a double-pass
(green and red, 528/30 and 633/60; dichroic 490/575; Omega XF53)
emission filter. The TR images were recorded sequentially throughout
the entire cell sample (z-stack) at 1-µm steps. Alexa 488, DAPI, and
differential interference contrast images were obtained from sections
toward the cell bottom or the middle to indicate cell and nuclear
dimensions, respectively. Each TR image was processed by fast Fourier
transformation (FFT) to remove out-of-focus information and to correct
for uneven illumination as described previously (37).
FFT-processed images were merged using the summation function, and
background was subtracted by setting the lowest pixel value to 0. Pixel
values of TR were determined in regions of interest, which were defined
by a thresholding function using the plasma membrane and the nuclear
strains, respectively.
CLSM. Confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM) was performed with a confocal unit (TCS SP; Leica), on an inverted microscope (Leica DMIRBE) using the 63× lens (N.A. 1.32). Optical sections were collected at step sizes of 0.5 µm. For DAPI imaging, a UV laser with excitation lines at 351 and 364 nm was used. For detection of the emission, the spectrophotometer was set to 410 to 530 nm. The plasma membrane marker Ca ATPase 1 was visualized by indirect immunofluorescence using an Alexa 488-tagged secondary antibody. Alexa 488- and TR-coupled Ad2 were recorded with the 488- and 568-nm laser lines of an argon/krypton laser, respectively. The settings of the spectrophotometer were 495 to 560 nm for Alexa 488 and 580 to 640 nm for TR. The pinhole for all recordings was set to 1.0. Images of the three fluorochromes were taken sequentially to exclude cross talk between the channels.
EM. Electron microscopy (EM) was carried out as described previously (54). For quantification, micrographs were recorded in sections across the middle of the cells by a slow-scan charge-coupled device camera (Gatan, Gloor AG) at ×30,000 magnification using the DigitalMicrograph software package (version 3.3.1; Gatan, Pleasanton, Calif.). Morphometry of single sections from 11 to 14 randomly selected entire cells was carried out for each of the drug conditions as specified. All the cell-associated virus particles were quantitated. This required 90 to 179 micrographs depending on the number of virus particles present in the analyzed cells.
Statistics. Statistical analyses were conducted using a one-sided t test with indicated confidence intervals, standard error of the mean (SEM), and sample size (n).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dissociation of the fibers from the capsid is the first event in the stepwise uncoating program of Ad2 (21). Although it coincides with virus endocytosis, the cellular requirements or functional implications are unknown.
Cellular requirements for fiber release.
Since Ad uptake into
cells requires an intact actin cytoskeleton and is facilitated by
v integrins (28, 42), we first analyzed
whether filamentous actin (F-actin) and integrins were implicated in
fiber release from incoming Ad2. To disrupt actin filaments, HeLa cells
were treated with CD, which caps F-actin, stimulates ATP hydrolysis on
globular actin, and also affects the small G protein rho A (44,
47). Alternatively, cells were incubated in low concentrations of
Jas, which binds to and stabilizes F-actin in a similar fashion to the
cell-impermeable phalloidin (7, 11). The efficiency of CD in
disrupting F-actin and the ability of Jas to bind to F-actin were
examined by staining cells with phalloidin-Alexa 488 following fixation
with paraformaldehyde and permeabilization with Triton X-100.
Jas-treated cells showed no phalloidin staining at all, although stress
fibers and cortical actin were readily visualized using anti-actin
antibodies (data not shown). CD-treated cells contained large amounts
of phalloidin-positive actin aggregates. To measure fiber release,
[35S]methionine-labeled Ad2 was bound to drug-treated
cells in the cold and internalized at 37°C for 0, 15, or 30 min.
Immunocomplexes containing fiber epitopes were collected from
Empigen-lysed cells using a specific antifiber antibody (R72,2), which
recognizes intact Ad2 particles (21). The amounts of
immunoadsorbed [35S]methionine-labeled fiber and
coprecipitated hexon were quantitated by SDS-PAGE and PhosphorImager
analysis as described earlier (21). The hexon-to-fiber ratio
derived from intact [35S]methionine-labeled virus (not
incubated with cells) was set to 100% (Fig. 1, lane
1). As expected, control cells
efficiently promoted the dissociation of fiber from hexon within 30 min
(more than sixfold) and with a half-maximal efficiency at 12 min
postinfection (p.i.) (lanes 2 to 4). In contrast, fiber dissociation
from hexon was slowed in CD-treated cells, reaching half-maximal
efficiencies after 30 min of warming (lanes 5 to 7). However, no delay
of fiber release was detected in infections in Jas-treated cells (lanes 8 to 10), suggesting that fiber release is promoted by an intact rather
than dynamic F-actin cytoskeleton. We then asked if integrins were
directly or indirectly involved in triggering fiber release. Cells were
incubated with cRGD peptides or control RGE peptides to inhibit Ad2
endocytosis (1, 62), and fiber dissociation was determined
as described above. The results demonstrated that cRGD peptides were
efficient inhibitors, since control RGE peptides had no effect on fiber
release (lanes 11 to 16). The data showed that fiber release correlated
with virus uptake and required an intact actin cytoskeleton.
|
Fiber release occurs at the cell surface.
To test if Ad uptake
was required for fiber release from incoming capsids, we examined Ad2
endocytosis by three different assays, a biochemical cell surface
trypsinization assay, a quantitative combined CLSM-fluorescence
microscopy assay, and quantitative EM. In the first assay,
[35S]methionine-labeled Ad2 was bound to CD- or
Jas-treated cells and the amount of trypsin-resistant hexon was
determined at different times of infection (21). Since this
assay measures the trypsin accessibility of the major capsid protein
hexon at 4°C, it estimates the amount of protease-sensitive virus on
the cell surface. Note, however, that the trypsinizations did not
remove virus particles from control cells (Fig. 2A, and
D), although the hexons were quantitatively cleaved at the potential trypsin cleavage sites in loop
1 near the N terminus (26). Using this assay, typical times
for half-maximal Ad2 internalization (t1/2) into
control cells were around 10 to 12 min and efficiencies were near 80% at 60 min p.i. (Fig. 2A and G). Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton by
CD, however, completely blocked the appearance of trypsin-resistant hexon up to 60 min p.i. (Fig. 2B and G), consistent with earlier results (28).
|
|
|
|
|
Fiber release is not sufficient for virus escape from
endosomes.
Vitronectin is a physiological ligand of the Ad
coreceptor
v
5 integrin (39).
Endocytosis of a conformationally altered vitronectin has been reported
to be
v
5 integrin dependent, and subsequent vitronectin degradation in lysosomes requires PKC
(40). We therefore asked if HeLa cells treated with PKC
inhibitors were able to induce fiber release from Ad2 and deliver Ad2
to the cytosol. As indicated in Fig. 1 (lanes 17 to 22), the PKC
effector site inhibitor calphostin C or a competitive inhibitor for the
ATP binding site BIM had no drastic effect on the efficiency of fiber release from [35S]methionine-labeled Ad2, although both
drugs slightly lowered the rate of fiber release. Likewise, the PKC
inhibitors did not significantly affect the efficiency of Ad2 uptake at
30 min p.i., although they slightly reduced the internalization rate
measured by the trypsin cleavage assay (Fig. 2D to F). Interestingly,
the total amount of Ad2 associated with PKC-inhibited cells decreased to about 60% at 60 min p.i. whereas control cells contained 85% of
the originally cell-bound virus (Fig. 2H). This loss of cell-associated virus was most probably not due to intracellular degradation, since we
did not detect any of the typical hexon proteolysis products due to
lysosomal degradation (20). It is possible that Ad2 was endocytosed and then delivered back to the surface, where it was removed by trypsin as originally described for ts1 Ad2
(20).
(PKC-myr) (14), infected cells
with Ad2 at high MOI for 30 min, and subjected them to EM analysis
(Fig. 5D). The quantitated data indicated that 34% the virus particles
found in PKC-myr-treated cells were located within vesicles compared to
11% in control cells (P < 0.01) (Fig. 6D). Correspondingly, the levels of cytosolic Ad2 were significantly reduced
(14%) compared to those in the control cells (31%) (P < 0.01). As expected from the biochemical data (Fig. 2), the amounts of extracellular virus particles were not significantly different in
control and PKC-inhibited cells (58 and 52%, respectively) and the
numbers of Ad2 in plasma membrane invaginations and coated pits were
comparable to those in control cells (P = 0.1). Similar results were obtained with other PKC inhibitors, such as calphostin C
and BIM (data not shown). Our results are consistent with the notion
that PKC inhibition had no severe effect on Ad2 endocytosis but
inhibited Ad escape from endosomes. A close inspection of electron
micrographs of PKC-inhibited cells revealed that half of the
intracellular particles (vesicular plus cytosolic Ad2), namely, 24% of
all the cell-associated Ad2, were located within vesicles smaller than
200 nm (Fig. 6D), reminiscent of endocytic transport vesicles
(22).
To address the possibility that PKC inhibition affected the
intracellular transport of Ad2-containing vesicles, we determined the
subcellular location of fluorescently labeled Ad2-TR. CLSM analysis at
60 min p.i. suggested an inhibition of nuclear transport of wt Ad2
(Fig. 3E). Quantitative subcellular analysis of Ad2-TR indicated that
PKC-myr decreased Ad transport from the periphery to the cytoplasm and
also to the nucleus at 60 min p.i. (Fig. 4B) (P = 0.05). The amounts of Ad2 in the cytoplasmic area were not
affected by PKC inhibition and remained in the same range as those
observed at 0 min p.i. The effects of PKC-myr were specific since a
myristoylated pseudosubstrate for calmodulin (Cam) kinase II
(autocamptide [25]) had no effects on the transport of
wt Ad2 (Fig. 4B).
To further test if PKC was specifically required for transport of
endosomal Ad2, we analyzed the subcellular localization of mutant Ad2
ts1, which is known to remain in the endocytic system (33). ts1-containing vesicles are transported to
a perinuclear region by microtubule-dependent motors, but
ts1 does not escape or bind to the nuclear envelope
(37, 54). Results in Fig. 4C indicate that PKC inhibition
decreased the clearance of ts1 from the cell periphery
(P = 0.025) but had no effect on ts1
transport to or from the cytoplasmic and nuclear regions. Cytoplasmic
and nuclear levels of ts1 in PKC-inhibited cells were not
significantly different from the levels at 0 min p.i. (Fig. 4C).
Surprisingly, autocamptide inhibition of Cam kinase II enhanced the
clearance of ts1 but not wt Ad2 from the cell periphery
(P < 0.01). Since autocamptide did not affect the
cytoplasmic and perinuclear levels of ts1 and since
ts1 is known to cycle from an endocytic compartment back to
the surface even in control cells (20), the data might suggest that Cam kinase II is involved in the transport of
ts1 vesicles in the periphery. Additional studies are,
however, needed to clarify the precise role of Cam kinase II in Ad
entry. Taken together, our data showed that PKC is not involved in
fiber release and virus endocytosis but is specifically required for
transport of endosomal Ad2-containing vesicles in the periphery.
Possibly, the transport deficiency of PKC-inhibited cells is the
underlying reason for the failure of Ad2 to escape from endosomes.
Alternatively, PKC might activate a cell-based membrane lysis machinery.
Fiber release correlates with virus shedding from the target
cell.
In cold-synchronized infections, Ad2 internalization
coincides with the shedding of 15 to 20% of the cell-bound virus
particles into the medium (21). To ask if virus shedding
correlated with fiber release, we overexpressed dominant negative
dynamin I K44A, which has a reduced rate of GTP hydrolysis affecting
both clathrin- and non-clathrin-dependent endocytosis (13,
48) including Ad uptake and gene expression (58). K44A
or wt dynamin I expression was induced by derepressing a transfected
HeLa cell line for 4 days in tetracycline-free medium (13).
The cells were then incubated with TR-labeled wt Ad2 for 1 h in
the cold and warmed for 5 or 60 min. Cells overexpressing dominant
negative dynamin were identified by the lack of internalized
transferrin-Alexa 488, which was present during the warming period at
100 µg/ml. With this assay, we found that about 40% of the K44A
dynamin I-transfected cells actually overexpressed the K44A mutant
protein (data not shown). Total cell-associated Ad2-TR was then
quantitated in single cells by fluorescence microscopy (37).
At 5 and 60 min p.i., control cells expressing wt dynamin contained an
average of 23 and 17 TR fluorescence units, respectively (Fig.
7A). The difference was significant
(P = 0.05) and was in good agreement with earlier results measuring the dissociation of radiolabeled Ad2 particles from
cells (21). In contrast, K44A dynamin-expressing cells contained similar amounts of Ad2-TR at 5 and 60 min p.i., namely, 12.4 and 10.7 fluorescence units per area (Fig. 7A). Likewise, there was no
difference in the amount of cell-associated Ad2-TR on RGD
peptide-incubated cells at 5 or 60 min p.i., suggesting that integrins
are involved in the shedding of Ad2 (data not shown). Importantly, the
mutant ts1 was not dissociated from wt or K44A dynamin-expressing cells (Fig. 7B), consistent with its failure to
release fibers upon entry (20). Together, the data suggested that Ad2 shedding from the target cells required functional endocytosis and correlated with fiber release.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite ongoing progress in elucidating virus cell interactions, there are still major deficits in our understanding of Ad biology, including entry and disassembly of the capsid. In this study we have analyzed cellular factors involved in the initial step of Ad2 disassembly, the release of the fibers. Fiber release is a hallmark of the stepwise Ad disassembly program culminating in the dissociation of the capsid and the release of the viral DNA into the nucleoplasm (21, 55).
Surface events for fiber release. We show here that fiber release requires an intact actin cytoskeleton and proper contacts of the incoming capsid to cell surface integrins but is independent of virus endocytosis. Fiber release from incoming Ad2 capsids occurs at the plasma membrane following attachment of the distal fiber knob domains of virus to the surface receptor CAR (4, 15). The proximal fiber region is anchored in the capsid via the vertex protein penton base. While Ad2 binding to CAR occurs independently of physiological temperatures, fiber release requires warming of the cells and proper contacts of the penton base protein with cell surface integrins. These contacts can be inhibited by soluble RGD peptides or the calcium chelator EGTA inhibiting Ad2 endocytosis (19, 20, 62). These treatments also inhibit fiber release, suggesting that integrin contacts with the penton base in the context of CAR-bound virus can trigger the dissociation of fibers. It is possible but unlikely that the penton base is released together with fibers, since the penton base but not the fiber was detected by indirect immunofluorescence and cryoimmuno-EM on Ad particles near the nuclear envelope (data not shown). That the underlying actin cytoskeleton is also instrumental for fiber release is indicated by the strong inhibition of fiber release in cells treated with actin-destabilizing agents, including CD and latrunculin B (data not shown).
Earlier studies indicated that fiber release coincides with virus internalization (21). These results and our present data showing that fiber release occurs in the absence of virus internalization, e.g., in cells treated with the actin-stabilizing drug Jas, clearly establish that the trigger for fiber release occurs at the cell surface. Virus binding to the primary receptor CAR alone is unlikely to trigger fiber release, since fiber release can be effectively prevented by conditions which inhibit proper contacts of virus with
v integrins without affecting virus binding
to CAR. CAR may, however, be required to hold the virus particle in a
proper position, allowing
v integrins to contact the
penton base. CAR and integrins may in fact synergize the efficiency of
infection, as suggested by fiber swap experiments where the fiber of a
slowly infecting subgroup B virus (Ad7) was transferred to a quickly infecting subgroup C virus particle (Ad5). The result was somewhat surprising in that the chimeric particle now had the slow nuclear transport characteristics of the subgroup B particles (34). Analysis of whether fiber was released from the chimeric particles and
particles had escaped to the cytosol will be interesting. In any case,
fiber release is expected to generate particles which are infectious
provided that they attach to a suitable receptor, as suggested by
experiments with fiberless Ad2 particles infecting integrin-positive
monocytic cells (57). Soluble
v
5 integrin fragments have been
visualized as diffuse densities in cryoelectron micrographs of isolated
Ad2 (32), but it is not clear if integrins play a direct or
an accessory role in triggering fiber release and internalization.
Consistent with earlier studies with SW480 cells (28), our
inhibition experiments with HeLa cells using the actin stabilizer Jas
confirmed that filamentous or growing actin alone did not support Ad2
endocytosis. In contrast to CD, which depolymerizes F-actin
by decreasing the rate of actin growth at the barbed end of the
filament and also severs filaments, Jas potently induces de novo actin
nucleation and polymerization, decreasing monomeric actin and lowering
the dynamics of actin filaments (7). Both inhibitors blocked
Ad2 endocytosis in several different cell types, indicating that
filamentous actin plays an obligatory role in Ad2 endocytosis.
Interestingly, Ad2 was trapped in extensive plasma membrane
invaginations of Jas-treated cells (Fig. 5). Similar cell surface
changes were also observed in noninfected polarized cells treated with
Jas (50). Viruses in these invaginations were not accessible
to the extracellular trypsin used in standard internalization assays
(21). Only direct analysis of the infected cells by
quantitative EM and measurements of infectivity revealed the effect of
Jas on Ad infection. Although CD and Jas were almost equally effective
at restricting Ad2 entry at the surface, Jas-treated cells showed some
apparent nuclear transport of fluorescent Ad2 (Fig. 4). This was most
probably not due to intracellular Ad2 transport but, rather, was caused
by cell contraction in response to Jas treatment. Notably, CD caused
cell contraction as well, but this contraction occurred much faster
than with Jas treatment and was essentially complete after the
preincubation period before Ad2 was added to the cells.
While a disrupted actin cytoskeleton did not allow fiber release,
filamentous or growing actin (Jas treatment) supported fiber release at
the cell surface. This event was associated with the shedding of 15 to
25% of the initially bound Ad2 particles to the medium. It was
unlikely that the shed particles had incorrectly attached to the cell
surface, since virus binding to HeLa cells was inhibited by more than
95% on preincubation with soluble fiber knob. About half of the
released capsids were able to bind to and infect new target cells, but
the rest did not bind back to CAR-positive cells, suggesting that these
particles had lost most of their fibers. Virus shedding to the medium
was completely blocked by overexpression of the dominant negative
dynamin I mutant (K44A), which inhibits both clathrin- and
caveola-dependent endocytosis and might also affect intracellular
transport of vesicles (48). Possibly, K44A dynamin
expression interfered with integrin transport to the cell surface or
alternatively altered the affinity of cell surface receptors for Ad2,
by analogy to observations with epidermal growth factor receptor and
epidermal growth factor (45).
Relevance of fiber release. Fiber shedding at the cell surface may have several functions. The first function could be to promote capsid internalization independently of the primary receptor CAR or perhaps of major histocompatibility complex class I (4, 23, 56). It is not known whether the CAR receptor has the capacity to internalize, but the intracellular CAR domain is not required for infection (59). However, this does not exclude the notion that CAR remains permanently at the plasma membrane. Ad2 ts1 mutants bound to CAR-positive HeLa cells can be internalized without the apparent loss of fibers, indicating that fiber release is not required for interaction with an internalization receptor (20). Another reason why Ad2 would want to release its fibers at the surface could be to shed particles from a target cell and thus have the potential to infect neighboring cells expressing a different set of cell surface receptors. Fiber release is also associated with the ability of incoming Ad to escape from endosomes, as indicated by the results with the ts1 mutant, which fails to release fibers but enters by an integrin-dependent pathway (20, 29, 33). The reason for the failure of ts1 to release its fibers is not clear. Possibly, there are multiple contact sites between integrins and the penton base, one for uptake and another perhaps for fiber release. Alternatively, ts1 might fail to release its fibers due to its nonprocessed capsid structure or because it lacks contacts with unknown surface molecules.
PKC is required for vesicular trafficking and Ad escape from
endosomes but not fiber release.
Following fiber release, Ad is
internalized by an integrin dependent pathway. Although fiber release
per se is not required for internalization it may be required for
capsid escape from endosomes. Carboxylic ionophores or primary amines
neutralizing the acidic pH of intracellular compartments have no
effects on the efficiency and the kinetics of fiber release
(21), but they inhibit Ad escape from endosomes if the virus
is present at low MOI (17, 46), suggesting that fiber
release is not sufficient for Ad2 escape from endosomes. In contrast to
pH-neutralizing procedures, inhibition of cellular PKCs was an
effective treatment to limit Ad2 escape from endosomes even when Ad2
was present at high MOI. Given the observations that
v
integrins contribute to Ad-mediated release of cytosolic contents
(61) and PKC can be a downstream effector of
v integrins (38), it is possible that
combined signaling of integrins and PKC activates a membrane lytic
function effecting Ad release to the cytosol. Alternatively, but not
exclusively, Ad2-mediated endosome lysis may require PKC-dependent trafficking of virus-containing endosomes and may be related to proper
endosome acidification, which can be increased by PKC stimulation (63). This scenario would be in agreement with earlier
studies suggesting that subgroup C Ads escape from a mildly acidic
compartment, possibly the tubulovesicular early endosomal compartment
(5, 22, 41), and that membrane trafficking in the cell
periphery can be limited by the cortical actin cytoskeleton (16,
31, 35). Consistently, the early endosomal marker rab5 has been suggested to interact with actin filaments (36) and affect
Ad5-mediated gene delivery (43). More recently, increasing
evidence indicates that actin-dependent endocytic events in the cell
cortex can also be regulated by calcium and PKC (38, 52).
For example, movement of intracellular vesicles containing
v
3 integrins seems to be affected by
calcium (27), and calcium has been implicated in endosomal
fusion (10). Given our observations that three different inhibitors of classical PKCs, namely, an ATP analogue (BIM), an effector site inhibitor (calphostin C), and a PKC
pseudosubstrate mimicking the catalytic site (PKC-myr peptide), all inhibited Ad escape
from endosomes without affecting virus endocytosis or fiber release, we
speculate that a calcium-dependent classical PKC plays a role in
peripheral trafficking of endocytic vesicles containing Ad2. In
addition, our EM analysis indicated that the disruption of the actin
cytoskeleton gave rise to a modest number of small peripheral endocytic
vesicles containing Ad2, which were indistinguishable from those
present in the PKC-inhibited cells. Together, these results may suggest
that cytosolic calcium can be involved in Ad infection, despite the
report that global calcium influx does not occur during the first 10 to
15 min of subgroup C Ad infections (43). It is, however,
possible that local increases in the concentration of cytosolic
calcium, perhaps in the vicinity of endocytic vesicles, are sufficient,
together with additional unknown factors, to execute the proper
endocytic trafficking and stimulate virus escape to the cytosol.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The first two authors contributed equally to this work.
We thank Stephan Keller, Danilo Guerini, Marshall Horwitz, Christophe Lamaze, Sandy Schmid, and Joe Weber for the gifts of viruses, cell lines, and antibodies; Oliver Meier for discussions and for sharing unpublished data; and Urs Ziegler and Peter Groscurth for generous access to the CLSM instrument. Jasplakinolide was kindly provided by Phil Crews (UCSC).
The work was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Kanton of Zürich (to U.F.G.).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Cell Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland. Phone: 41 1 635 4841. Fax: 41 1 635 6822. E-mail: ufgreber{at}zool.unizh.ch.
Present address: Department of Biosciences at Novum, Section of
Cell Biology, Karolinska Institute, S-141 57 Huddinge, Sweden.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Bai, M.,
B. Harfe, and P. Freimuth.
1993.
Mutations that alter an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence in the adenovirus type 2 penton base protein abolish its cell-rounding activity and delay virus reproduction in flat cells.
J. Virol.
67:5198-5205 |
| 2. |
Baum, S. G.,
M. S. Horwitz, and J. V. Maizel.
1972.
Studies of the mechanism of enhancement of human adenovirus infection in monkey cells by simian virus 40.
J. Virol.
10:211-219 |
| 3. | Benihoud, K., P. Yeh, and M. Perricaudet. 1999. Adenovirus vectors for gene delivery. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10:440-447[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. |
Bergelson, J. M.,
J. A. Cunningham,
G. Droguett,
E. A. Kurt-Jones,
A. Krithivas,
J. S. Hong,
M. S. Horwitz,
R. L. Crowell, and R. W. Finberg.
1997.
Isolation of a common receptor for Coxsackie B viruses and adenoviruses 2 and 5.
Science
275:1320-1323 |
| 5. | Blumenthal, R., P. Seth, M. C. Willingham, and I. Pastan. 1986. pH-dependent lysis of liposomes by adenovirus. Biochemistry 25:2231-2237[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Bruder, J. T., and I. Kovesdi. 1997. Adenovirus infection stimulates the Raf/MAPK signaling pathway and induces interleukin-8 expression. J. Virol. 71:398-404[Abstract]. |
| 7. |
Bubb, M. R.,
I. Spector,
B. B. Beyer, and K. M. Fosen.
2000.
Effects of jasplakinolide on the kinetics of actin polymerization. An explanation for certain in vivo observations.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:5163-5170 |
| 8. | Burnett, R. M. 1997. The structure of adenovirus, p. 209-238. In W. Chiu, R. M. Burnett, and R. L. Garcea (ed.), Structural biology of viruses. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. |
| 9. | Chardonnet, Y., and S. Dales. 1970. Early events in the interaction of adenoviruses with HeLa cells. I. Penetration of type 5 and intracellular release of the DNA genome. Virology 40:462-477[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. |
Colombo, M. I.,
W. Beron, and P. D. Stahl.
1997.
Calmodulin regulates endosome fusion.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:7707-7712 |
| 11. | Crews, P., L. V. Manes, and M. Boehler. 1986. Jasplakinolide, a cyclodepsipeptide from the marine sponge Jaspis SP. Tetrahedron Lett. 27:2797-2800[CrossRef]. |
| 12. |
Curiel, D. T.
1999.
Strategies to adapt adenoviral vectors for targeted delivery.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
886:158-171 |
| 13. |
Damke, H.,
T. Baba,
D. E. Warnock, and S. L. Schmid.
1994.
Induction of mutant dynamin specifically blocks endocytic coated vesicle formation.
J. Cell Biol.
127:915-934 |
| 14. |
Eichholtz, T.,
D. B. de Bont,
J. de Widt,
R. M. Liskamp, and H. L. Ploegh.
1993.
A myristoylated pseudosubstrate peptide, a novel protein kinase C inhibitor.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:1982-1986 |
| 15. |
Freimuth, P.,
K. Springer,
C. Berard,
J. Hainfeld,
M. Bewley, and J. Flanagan.
1999.
Coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor amino-terminal immunoglobulin V-related domain binds adenovirus type 2 and fiber knob from adenovirus type 12.
J. Virol.
73:1392-1398 |
| 16. | Geli, M. I., and H. Riezman. 1998. Endocytic internalization in yeast and animal cells: similar and different. J. Cell Sci. 111:1031-1037[Abstract]. |
| 17. | Greber, U. F. 1998. Delivery of animal virus DNA into the nucleus, p. 89-114. In L. Seymour, A. Kabanov, and P. Felgner (ed.), Self-assembling complexes for gene delivery: from chemistry to clinical trial. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, United Kingdom. |
| 18. | Greber, U. F. 1998. Virus assembly and disassembly: the adenovirus cysteine protease as a trigger factor. Rev. Med. Virol. 8:213-222[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Greber, U. F., M. Suomalainen, R. P. Stidwill, K. Boucke, M. Ebersold, and A. Helenius. 1997. The role of the nuclear pore complex in adenovirus DNA entry. EMBO J. 16:5998-6007[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Greber, U. F., P. Webster, J. Weber, and A. Helenius. 1996. The role of the adenovirus protease in virus entry into cells. EMBO J. 15:1766-1777[Medline]. |
| 21. | Greber, U. F., M. Willetts, P. Webster, and A. Helenius. 1993. Stepwise dismantling of adenovirus 2 during entry into cells. Cell 75:477-486[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Gruenberg, J., and F. R. Maxfield. 1995. Membrane transport in the endocytic pathway. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7:552-563[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. | Hong, S. S., L. Karayan, J. Tournier, D. T. Curiel, and P. A. Boulanger. 1997. Adenovirus type 5 fiber knob binds to MHC class I alpha2 domain at the surface of human epithelial and B lymphoblastoid cells. EMBO J. 16:2294-2306[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. | Horwitz, M. S. 1990. Adenoviruses, p. 1723-1740. In B. N. Fields, and D. M. Knipe (ed.), Virology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. Raven Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 25. | Ishida, A., I. Kameshita, S. Okuno, T. Kitani, and H. Fujisawa. 1995. A novel highly specific and potent inhibitor of calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 212:806-812[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. | Jörnvall, H., and L. Philipson. 1980. Limited proteolysis and a reactive cysteine residue define accessible regions in the native conformation of the adenovirus hexon protein. Eur. J. Biochem. 104:237-247[Medline]. |
| 27. | Lawson, M. A., and F. R. Maxfield. 1995. Ca(2+)- and calcineurin-dependent recycling of an integrin to the front of migrating neutrophils. Nature 377:75-79[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. |
Li, E.,
D. Stupack,
G. M. Bokoch, and G. R. Nemerow.
1998.
Adenovirus endocytosis requires actin cytoskeleton reorganization mediated by Rho family GTPases.
J. Virol.
72:8806-8812 |
| 29. |
Li, E.,
D. Stupack,
R. Klemke,
D. A. Cheresh, and G. R. Nemerow.
1998.
Adenovirus endocytosis via (V) integrins requires phosphoinositide-3-OH kinase.
J. Virol.
72:2055-2061 |
| 30. | Marsh, M., E. Bolzau, and A. Helenius. 1983. Penetration of Semliki Forest virus from acidic prelysosomal vacuoles. Cell 32:931-940[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 31. | Marsh, M., and R. Bron. 1997. SFV infection in CHO cells: cell-type specific restrictions to productive virus entry at the cell surface. J. Cell Sci. 110:95-103[Abstract]. |
| 32. |
Mathias, P.,
M. Galleno, and G. R. Nemerow.
1998.
Interactions of soluble recombinant integrin v 5 with human adenoviruses.
J. Virol.
72:8669-8675 |
| 33. | Miles, B. D., R. B. Luftig, J. A. Weatherbee, R. R. Weihing, and J. Weber. 1980. Quantitation of the interaction between adenovirus types 2 and 5 and microtubules inside infected cells. Virology 105:265-269[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 34. |
Miyazawa, N.,
P. L. Leopold,
N. R. Hackett,
B. Ferris,
S. Worgall,
E. Falck-Pedersen, and R. G. Crystal.
1999.
Fiber swap between adenovirus subgroups B and C alters intracellular trafficking of adenovirus gene transfer vectors.
J. Virol.
73:6056-6065 |
| 35. |
Muallem, S.,
K. Kwiatkowska,
X. Xu, and H. L. Yin.
1995.
Actin filament disassembly is a sufficient final trigger for exocytosis in nonexcitable cells.
J. Cell Biol.
128:589-598 |
| 36. | Murphy, C., R. Saffrich, M. Grummt, H. Gournier, V. Rybin, M. Rubino, P. Auvinen, A. Lutcke, R. G. Parton, and M. Zerial. 1996. Endosome dynamics regulated by a Rho protein. Nature 384:427-432[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 37. | Nakano, M. Y., and U. F. Greber. 2000. Quantitative microscopy of fluorescent adenovirus entry. J. Struct. Biol. 129:57-68[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 38. | Ng, T., D. Shima, A. Squire, P. I. Bastiaens, S. Gschmeissner, M. J. Humphries, and P. J. Parker. 1999. PKCalpha regulates beta1 integrin-dependent cell motility through association and control of integrin traffic. EMBO J. 18:3909-3923[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 39. |
Panetti, T. S., and P. J. McKeown-Longo.
1993.
The alpha v beta 5 integrin receptor regulates receptor-mediated endocytosis of vitronectin.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:11492-11495 |
| 40. |
Panetti, T. S.,
S. A. Wilcox,
C. Horzempa, and P. J. McKeown-Longo.
1995.
Alpha v beta 5 integrin receptor-mediated endocytosis of vitronectin is protein kinase C-dependent.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:18593-18597 |
| 41. | Pastan, I., P. Seth, D. FitzGerald, and M. Willingham. 1986. Adenovirus entry into cells: some new observations on an old problem. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y. |
| 42. |
Patterson, S., and W. C. Russell.
1983.
Ultrastructural and immunofluorescence studies of early events in adenovirus-HeLa cell interactions.
J. Gen. Virol.
64:1091-1099 |
| 43. |
Rauma, T.,
J. Tuukkanen,
J. M. Bergelson,
G. Denning, and T. Hautala.
1999.
rab5 GTPase regulates adenovirus endocytosis.
J. Virol.
73:9664-9668 |
| 44. | Ren, X. D., W. B. Kiosses, and M. A. Schwartz. 1999. Regulation of the small GTP-binding protein Rho by cell adhesion and the cytoskeleton. EMBO J. 18:578-585[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 45. |
Ringerike, T.,
E. Stang,
L. E. Johannessen,
D. Sandnes,
F. O. Levy, and I. H. Madshus.
1998.
High-affinity binding of epidermal growth factor (EGF) to EGF receptor is disrupted by overexpression of mutant dynamin (K44A).
J. Biol. Chem.
273:16639-16642 |
| 46. | Rodriguez, E., and E. Everitt. 1996. Adenovirus uncoating and nuclear establishment are not affected by weak base amines. J. Virol. 70:3470-3477[Abstract]. |
| 47. | Sampath, P., and T. D. Pollard. 1991. Effects of cytochalasin, phalloidin, and pH on the elongation of actin filaments. Biochemistry 30:1973-1980[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 48. | Schmid, S. L., M. A. McNiven, and P. De Camilli. 1998. Dynamin and its partners: a progress report. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10:504-512[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 49. | Shenk, T. 1996. Adenoviridae, p. 979-1016. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fundamental virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven, New York, N.Y. |
| 50. |
Shurety, W.,
N. L. Stewart, and J. L. Stow.
1998.
Fluid-phase markers in the basolateral endocytic pathway accumulate in response to the actin assembly-promoting drug Jasplakinolide.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:957-975 |
| 51. |
Siddhanta, U.,
J. Mcllroy,
A. Shah,
Y. Zhang, and J. M. Backer.
1998.
Distinct roles for the p110alpha and hVPS34 phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinases in vesicular trafficking, regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, and mitogenesis.
J. Cell Biol.
143:1647-1659 |
| 52. |
Song, J. C.,
B. J. Hrnjez,
O. C. Farokhzad, and J. B. Matthews.
1999.
PKC-epsilon regulates basolateral endocytosis in human T84 intestinal epithelia: role of F-actin and MARCKS.
Am. J. Physiol.
277:C1239-C1249 |
| 53. |
Stauffer, T. P.,
D. Guerini, and E. Carafoli.
1995.
Tissue distribution of the four gene products of the plasma membrane Ca2+ pump. A study using specific antibodies.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:12184-12190 |
| 54. |
Suomalainen, M.,
M. Y. Nakano,
K. Boucke,
S. Keller,
R. P. Stidwill, and U. F. Greber.
1999.
Microtubule-dependent minus and plus end-directed motilities are competing processes for nuclear targeting of adenovirus.
J. Cell Biol.
144:657-672 |
| 55. | Sussenbach, J. S. 1967. Early events in the infection of adenovirus type 5 in HeLa cells. Virology 33:567-574[CrossRef]. |
| 56. |
Tomko, R. P.,
R. Xu, and L. Philipson.
1997.
HCAR and MCAR: the human and mouse cellular receptors for subgroup C adenoviruses and group B coxsackieviruses.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:3352-3356 |
| 57. |
Von Seggern, D. J.,
C. Y. Chiu,
S. K. Fleck,
P. L. Stewart, and G. R. Nemerow.
1999.
A helper-independent adenovirus vector with E1, E3, and fiber deleted: structure and infectivity of fiberless particles.
J. Virol.
73:1601-1608 |
| 58. |
Wang, K. N.,
S. Huang,
A. Kapoormunshi, and G. Nemerow.
1998.
Adenovirus internalization and infection require dynamin.
J. Virol.
72:3455-3458 |
| 59. |
Wang, X. H., and J. M. Bergelson.
1999.
Coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains are not essential for coxsackievirus and adenovirus infection.
J. Virol.
73:2559-2562 |
| 60. |
Weber, J.
1976.
Genetic analysis of adenovirus type 2. III. Temperature sensitivity of processing of viral proteins.
J. Virol.
17:462-471 |
| 61. |
Wickham, T. J.,
E. J. Filardo,
D. A. Cheresh, and G. R. Nemerow.
1994.
Integrin v 5 selectively promotes adenovirus mediated cell membrane permeabilization.
J. Cell Biol.
127:257-264 |
| 62. | Wickham, T. J., P. Mathias, D. A. Cheresh, and G. R. Nemerow. 1993. Integrin-alpha-v-beta-3 and integrin-alpha-v-beta-5 promote adenovirus internalization but not virus attachment. Cell 73:309-319[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 63. |
Zen, K.,
J. Biwersi,
N. Periasamy, and A. S. Verkman.
1992.
Second messengers regulate endosomal acidification in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts.
J. Cell Biol.
119:99-110 |
This article has been cited by other articles: