Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, August 2000, p. 6875-6884, Vol. 74, No. 15
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Ectodomain of Coxsackievirus and Adenovirus Receptor Genetically
Fused to Epidermal Growth Factor Mediates Adenovirus Targeting to
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Positive Cells
Igor
Dmitriev,1
Elena
Kashentseva,1
Buck E.
Rogers,2
Victor
Krasnykh,1 and
David
T.
Curiel1,*
Division of Human Gene Therapy, Departments
of Medicine, Pathology, and Surgery, Gene Therapy
Center,1 and Department of Radiation
Oncology,2 University of Alabama at
Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-3300
Received 2 February 2000/Accepted 28 April 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Human adenovirus (Ad) is extensively used for a variety of gene
therapy applications. However, the utility of Ad vectors is limited due
to the low efficiency of Ad-mediated gene transfer to target cells
expressing marginal levels of the Ad fiber receptor. Therefore, the
present generation of Ad vectors could potentially be improved by
modification of Ad tropism to target the virus to specific organs and
tissues. The fact that coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR)
does not play any role in virus internalization, but functions merely
as the virus attachment site, suggests that the extracellular part of
CAR might be utilized to block the receptor recognition site on the Ad
fiber knob domain. We proposed to design bispecific fusion proteins
formed by a recombinant soluble form of truncated CAR (sCAR) and a
targeting ligand. In this study, we derived sCAR genetically fused with
human epidermal growth factor (EGF) and investigated its ability to
target Ad infection to the EGF receptor (EGFR) overexpressed on cancer
cell lines. We have demonstrated that sCAR-EGF protein is capable of
binding to Ad virions and directing them to EGFR, thereby achieving
targeted delivery of reporter gene. These results show that sCAR-EGF
protein possesses the ability to effectively retarget Ad via a non-CAR pathway, with enhancement of gene transfer efficiency.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Adenovirus (Ad) represents a large
family of nonenveloped viruses containing a double-stranded DNA genome
of approximately 36 kb (19, 32). Human Ad includes 49 known
viral serotypes grouped into six distinct subgroups, A to F. Ad has
been widely used as a vector for both in vitro and in vivo gene
delivery, largely because of its relatively high infection efficiency
in a variety of cell types and tissues (37, 54). However,
the broad tropism of the virus represents a drawback when gene delivery to a specific tissue is needed. Most of the studies on the mechanism of
Ad infection have concluded that the host range of Ad seems to be
dependent to a large extent on the interaction with primary binding
receptor. In this regard, the initial steps of Ad infection involve at
least two sequential virus-cell interactions, each mediated by a
specific capsid protein of the viral particle. Ad infection is
initiated by the formation of the complexes between globular knob
domain of the fiber protein and a host cell primary receptor (12,
25, 39). Three putative Ad fiber receptors have been described to
date. A fiber receptor for Ad of groups A, C, D, E, and F has been
identified as the coxsackievirus group B and Ad receptor (CAR) (3,
34, 42). In addition to CAR, the major histocompatibility complex
class I (MHC-I)
2 subunit was also proposed as a cell receptor for
subgroup C (18). However, CAR has been suggested to mediate
high-affinity binding to Ad fiber, while the MHC-I
2 subunit has
been hypothesized to facilitate Ad attachment and permissivity to cells
with little or no CAR expression (7). It was shown recently
that Ad serotype 37 (Ad37) of subgroup D uses
(2
3)-linked sialic
acid saccharides on glycoproteins as the cellular receptor moiety
instead of CAR or MHC-I
2 (1). After binding to the fiber
receptor, penton base interaction with
v
integrins
facilitates internalization via receptor-mediated endocytosis (14,
27, 50). These data suggest that, being expressed in a wide range
of human and murine cell types (42), CAR may serve as a
primary cellular receptor for the majority of representatives of known
Ad serotypes. CAR is an integral membrane protein of unknown cellular
function consisting of two extracellular immunoglobulin (Ig)
superfamily domains, a single membrane-spanning region, and one
carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic domain (3, 4, 42). According to
the recent crystallography study of Ad12 fiber knob domain complexed
with CAR amino-terminal Ig1 domain, three CAR monomers bind per knob
trimer, indicating the location of CAR-binding sites on the knob
(5). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the extracellular
domain of CAR is sufficient to allow virus attachment and infection
(11, 34), while the transmembrane and intracellular regions
appear to be dispensable for these functions (44).
Although Ad vectors can infect most cells, a few cell types including
endothelial (23), lung epithelial (38), smooth
muscle (33), neural (22), and T (2)
cells are poorly infected by Ad apparently due to the scarcity of an
appropriate cell surface receptor. The limitations associated with
broad native tropism of Ad and low-efficiency gene delivery to Ad
receptor-deficient cells could be solved by redirecting the binding of
virus to a specific cellular receptor present at sufficient magnitude
on target cells. Several strategies are currently being considered to
redirect the Ad in order to confer targeting capability or to enhance
vector infectivity. In this regard, the incorporation of a targeting
peptide ligand by genetic virion modifications offers a rational
approach (8, 35, 51, 53) but has several limitations; the
capacity for peptide substitution or addition to capsid proteins is
size limited, and such modifications can often interfere with correct
protein folding and consequent virus assembly (53). On the
other hand, the technical achievement of Ad retargeting via bispecific
molecules has been approached by a variety of methods. Chemically
conjugated bispecific antibodies have been used, with viral linkage
accomplished via a peptide epitope incorporated in the penton base
(49, 52) or via specific recognition for the knob domain of
the fiber protein (9, 13, 29, 41). Further refinement of the
strategy of the retargeting complexes has been achieved by the
engineering of recombinant proteins consisting of an antiknob single
chain fragment variable (scFv) of antibody fused with human epidermal
growth factor (EGF) (45) or anti-EGF receptor (EGFR) scFv
(16). Recombinant molecules such as these may offer
advantages for Ad retargeting, since use of the chemical conjugation
method, as well as antibody-containing molecules, increases the
difficulties of producing such retargeting complexes, making this
approach relatively complex and expensive to develop. Consequently, a
simple and efficient method of targeting Ad infection to specific cells
would be of great utility for significantly improving present Ad
vectors for gene therapy.
In this study, we have developed a targeting approach based on
achieving a linkage to the vector particle through a soluble form of
its own cellular receptor. Specifically, we have derived a bispecific
targeting protein consisting of the ectodomain of CAR in fusion with
human EGF. This recombinant fusion protein has the ability to
effectively retarget the vector via non-CAR pathways, with enhancement
of gene transfer efficiency. In addition, this approach may allow the
derivation of different fusion proteins that are capable of Ad
retargeting to other cellular receptors by a simple substitution of
targeting ligand.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells.
The 293 human kidney cell line transformed with Ad5
DNA was purchased from Microbix (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). The human ovarian carcinoma cell line SKOV3.ip1 was obtained from Janet Price
(M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.). The human epidermoid carcinoma cell line (A-431), human squamous carcinoma (SCC-4) cells, and human mammary gland (MDA-MB-453) cells were from the
American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Va.). All cell lines were
grown at 37°C in media recommended by the suppliers in a humidified
atmosphere of 5% CO2.
Enzymes.
Restriction endonucleases, Klenow enzyme, T4 DNA
ligase, and proteinase K were from either New England Biolabs (Beverly,
Mass.) or Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, Ind.).
Antibodies.
Murine monoclonal antibody (MAb) 4D2 to the tail
domain of Ad5 fiber protein (20) and murine polyclonal serum
to baculovirus-produced human soluble CAR (sCAR) protein were generated
at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hybridoma Core Facility.
Murine MAb 425 to human EGFR was a generous gift from Zenon Steplewski
(Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa.).
Viruses.
A recombinant Ad5 vector, AdCMVLuc, containing a
firefly luciferase-expressing cassette in place of the E1 region of the
Ad genome, was obtained from R. D. Gerard (University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas). Ad was propagated on 293 cells
and purified by centrifugation in CsCl gradients by a standard
protocol. Virus particle titer was determined spectrophotometrically by
the method of Maizel et al. (26), using a conversion factor
of 1.1 × 1012 viral particles per absorbance unit at
260 nm. To determine the titer of infectious viral particles, the
plaque assay on 293 cells was performed by the method of Mittereder et
al. (30). Radiolabeled Ad was made by adding 50 µCi of
[methyl-3H]thymidine (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.) per ml to the medium of infected cells at
20 h postinfection at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2.5 PFU/cell. The infected cells were then harvested at 50 h
postinfection, and the virus was purified as described above. The
activity of the labeled virus was approximately 10
4
cpm/virus particle.
Indirect immunofluorescence.
Confluent cells were released
with EDTA and resuspended in HEPES-buffered saline (20 mM HEPES [pH
7.4], 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA)] at 2 × 106
cells/ml. Cells (2 × 105) were incubated with either
MAb 425 (5 µg/ml) or murine anti-CAR serum (1:250) for 1 h at
4°C. Either an isotype-matched IgG (4D2) or normal murine serum was
used as a negative control. Cells were then washed with buffer and
incubated with secondary goat anti-mouse IgG labeled with fluorescein
isothiocyanate (Jackson Laboratories, West Grove, Pa.) at a
concentration 5 µg/ml for 1 h at 4°C. After washing,
104 cells per sample were analyzed by flow cytometry
performed at the University of Alabama at Birmingham FACS Core
Facility. Data were expressed as the geometric mean fluorescence
intensity of the entire gated population. The positive population cells
was determined by gating the right-hand tail of the distribution of the
negative control sample for each cell line at 1%. This gate setting
was then used to determine the percentage of CAR- or EGFR-positive cells in each cell line.
Construction of recombinant plasmids.
To introduce the
six-His purification tag into the carboxy terminus of sCAR,
oligonucleotides 5'GAT CCC CCC GAT ATC ACC ATC ACC ATC ACT AAT AAA 3'
and 5' GAT CTT TAT TAG TGA TGG TGA TGG TGA TAT CGG GGG 3' were designed
to form DNA duplex coding for histidines followed by two in-frame stop
codons. In addition, the generated DNA duplex contained
BamHI-compatible cohesive ends and an EcoRV
restriction site designed to fuse the CAR open reading frame with
six-His coding sequence. The oligonucleotide duplex was cloned into
BamHI-digested pQBI-AdCMV5 (Quantum Biotechnologies Inc.,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada). Plasmid clones were then sequenced in the
region of the insert, and the plasmid containing the duplex in the
correct orientation was designated pQBI-AdCMV5.6h. To generate a gene
encoding the extracellular domain of human CAR, PCR was used. Sense
primer (5' AAA CCG CCT ACC TGC AGC CG 3') complementary to the position
20 of the 5' untranslated region of human CAR cDNA (3) and
antisense primer (5' GAG CTT TAT TTG AAG GAG GGA CAA CG 3')
complementary to position 767 were designed to fuse the CAR open
reading frame with DNA sequence coding for six histidines incorporated
in pQBI-AdCMV5.6h. To construct the plasmid containing the
sCAR-His6 gene, a 751-bp PCR fragment was cloned into
PmeI- and EcoRV-digested pQBI-AdCMV5.6h,
resulting in plasmid pQBIshCAR.6h. This plasmid encodes 236 amino-terminal amino acids (aa) of an extracellular domain of human
CAR, including signal sequence, fused with a carboxy-terminal six-His
purification tag. To express human sCAR, the Bac-to-Bac baculovirus
expression system (Life Technologies, Grand Island, N.Y.) was used. The
recombinant donor plasmid for the generation of baculovirus expressing
human sCAR was made as follows. The base donor plasmid pFastBac1 was
cleaved with Acc65I, and 3' recessed ends were filled in
with the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase
I. The Klenow fragment was heat inactivated, and plasmid was then
cleaved with PstI. Plasmid pQBI-shCAR was cleaved with
BsrDI and treated with Klenow fragment to remove the 3'
overhang. After inactivation of DNA polymerase, the plasmid was cleaved
with PstI and a PstI-BsrDI fragment
(808 bp) and gel purified for cloning into Acc65I- and PstI-digested pFastBac1. After transformation of E. coli strain DH5
(Life Technologies), the resultant plasmid
pFBshCAR6h was isolated and used for generation of the recombinant
baculovirus genome.
To create the gene for the sCAR-EGF fusion protein, the DNA sequence
coding for a short flexible linker and human EGF was amplified from
plasmid pBsF5slEGF (unpublished data) using the primers 5' CCC ATT GGC
CAT CAG CCT CCG CAT C 3' and 5' GCC CCC GCT CGA GGT CGA CGG TAT C 3'.
The PCR-derived DNA fragment contained a unique 5' MscI site
and 3' SalI site introduced into the molecule to facilitate
subsequent cloning. The PCR product was cleaved with MscI
and SalI, and a 282-bp DNA fragment was gel purified for
further cloning. To construct the plasmid containing the gene coding
for sCAR-EGF, primers 5' CCC ACG GTC CGG CAG CCA CCA TG 3' and 5' TCG
GGG GAT CTT TAC ACG TGA TGG TGA TGG 3' were used to reamplify DNA
sequence coding for sCAR-His6 using pFBshCAR as the
template. The PCR product cleaved at the RsrII restriction site introduced into the 5' end of the DNA molecule was then cloned into RsrII- and StuI-digested pFastBac1,
resulting in plasmid pFBshCARfuse. To derive the plasmid containing the
recombinant gene encoding sCAR-EGF, the MscI-SalI
PCR fragment was ligated with PmlI- and
SalI-digested pFBshCARfuse. After transformation of E. coli DH5
, plasmid clones were sequenced in the region of the
insert and the resultant plasmid pFBshCAR-EGF was selected. The
constructed plasmid encoding recombinant sCAR fused with EGF and tagged
with internal His6 was then used for generation of the
recombinant baculovirus genome.
Expression and purification of six-His-tagged recombinant
proteins.
Recombinant sCAR-His6 and sCAR-EGF proteins
were expressed in High Five cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.)
infected with recombinant baculovirus by the method recommended by the
manufacturer. Briefly, High Five cells were maintained in suspension
culture and infected with recombinant baculovirus at an MOI of 10 PFU/cell. The cell suspension was harvested 72 to 96 h
postinfection, and cells were pelleted by centrifugation. Cleared
supernatant medium was concentrated 10-fold and dialyzed against
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.01 M PBS [pH 7.4], 138 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl) using a Hemoflow capillary dialyzer (Fresenius Medical Care AG,
Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, Germany). Recombinant proteins were
then purified by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography on
Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA)-Sepharose (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.) as
recommended by the manufacturer. Protein concentrations were determined
by the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) with bovine gamma globulin as the standard.
ELISA.
Solid-phase binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA) was performed by a method previously described (8).
Either purified sCAR-His6 or sCAR-EGF was diluted in 50 mM
carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) to a concentration of 8.0 pmol/ml, and 100-µl aliquots were added to wells of a 96-well
Nunc-Maxisorp ELISA plate. Plates were incubated overnight at 4°C and
then blocked for 2 h at room temperature by the addition of 200 µl of blocking buffer (0.01 M PBS [pH 7.4], 138 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM
KCl, 0.05% Tween 20, 2% BSA) to each well. Wells were then washed
three times with washing buffer (0.01 M PBS [pH 7.4], 138 mM NaCl,
2.7 mM KCl, 0.05% Tween 20). Purified Ad5 fiber protein diluted in
binding buffer (0.01 M PBS [pH 7.4], 138 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 0.05%
Tween 20, 0.5% BSA) to concentrations ranging from 0.46 to 11 ng/ml was added to the wells in 100-µl aliquots. After 1 h of
incubation at room temperature, the wells were washed three times and
bound fiber was detected by incubation with 1:1,000 dilution of MAb 4D2. Following incubation at room temperature for 1 h, the wells were washed again and incubated with a 1:10,000 dilution of goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Sigma, St. Louis,
Mo.) for 45 min. The wells were then washed four times, and the plate
was developed with p-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma) as
recommended by the manufacturer. Plates were read in a microtiter plate
reader set at 405 nm; results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Competitive inhibition analysis.
The ability of sCAR-EGF to
bind to EGFR was evaluated by competition analysis of radiolabeled EGF
binding to EGFR-positive cells in the presence of increasing
concentrations of sCAR-EGF. Briefly, A-431 cells were harvested and
resuspended in binding buffer (PBS [pH 7.2], 0.1% BSA) at 5 × 106 cells/ml. The cells were aliquoted (100 µl per
sample) in triplicate into polystyrene tubes followed by addition of
10-fold dilutions (~1 pM to 20 µM) of unlabeled human EGF (Pepro
Tech, Inc., Rocky Hill, N.J.), sCAR-EGF, or sCAR-His6 used
as a negative control. [125I]EGF (100 µl; ~0.1 nM;
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was then added, and the cells were
incubated at 4°C for 90 min. The cells were then rinsed once with
ice-cold buffer and centrifuged at 1,700 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was removed. The cells were then counted in a
gamma counter to determine the amount of bound radioactivity.
Radiolabeled Ad binding assay.
Binding of
3H-labeled Ad to 293, MDA-MB-453, A-431, SCC-4, or
SKOV3.ip1 cells was assayed as follows. Three microliters of 3H-labeled AdCMVLuc (~5.6 × 105 cpm)
was preincubated with either sCAR-His6 or sCAR-EGF for
1 h at room temperature. Confluent cells were released with EDTA, washed once with PBS, pelleted, and resuspended to a final
concentration of 107 cells/ml in binding medium (Dulbecco
modified Eagle medium-Ham's F12, [DMEM-F12], 20 mM HEPES, 0.5%
BSA). Then 100-µl aliquots of the cells were transferred to 5-ml test
tubes and kept at 4°C. Virus mixtures were then diluted with binding
medium to 100 µl, and 25-µl aliquots were added to cell samples and
incubated at 4°C with shaking to allow binding. After a 1-h
incubation, the cells were washed with 4 ml of binding buffer and
centrifuged. Supernatant containing unbound virus was aspirated and
cell pellets were solubilized in EcoLume scintillation cocktail (ICN
Biomedicals, Costa Mesa, Calif.); then cell-associated radioactivity
was measured in a liquid scintillation analyzer (Packard, Downers
Grove, Ill.).
Purification of Ad/sCAR-EGF complexes by gel filtration.
A
column of Sephadex G-100 (Sigma) was prepared with a bed volume of 10 ml (size exclusion volume, 3.6 ml) and washed with equilibration buffer
(PBS containing 0.5% BSA). AdCMVLuc preincubated in the presence or
absence 0.4 µg of sCAR-EGF for 30 min was diluted to 2 ml with
equilibration buffer, and a 1-ml sample was loaded onto the column at
gravity flow. Once the sample was loaded onto the column, an additional
1.5 ml of equilibration buffer was applied. The fraction containing the
high-molecular-weight Ad or Ad/sCAR-EGF complexes was eluted with 3.3 ml of equilibration buffer solution. The eluted fraction was used
immediately for the gene transfer assay.
Ad-mediated gene transfer assay.
Ad-mediated infection
experiments using cell lines were performed as follows. Cell monolayers
grown in a 24-well plate (5 × 105 cells/well) were
washed with PBS. AdCMVLuc (5 × 106 PFU) was
preincubated with either sCAR-His6 or sCAR-EGF for 1 h
at room temperature. Virus mixtures were then diluted with DMEM-F12 (Mediatech, Herndon, Va.) containing 2% fetal bovine serum to a final
concentration of 5 × 106 PFU/ml, and 200-µl
aliquots were added to wells (at an MOI of 2 PFU/cell) to allow
internalization of AdCMVLuc for 45 min at room temperature. Virus
complexes were then aspirated, the cells were washed with PBS, and 1 ml
of complete growth medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 2 mM
glutamine was added to each well. The cells were incubated at 37°C to
allow expression of the luciferase gene. Forty hours after the addition
of virus, cells were lysed with 250 µl of lysis buffer and analyzed
for luciferase expression. Luciferase activity in the cell lysates was
analyzed by using the Promega (Madison, Wis.) luciferase assay system
and a Berthold (Gaithersburg, Md.) luminometer.
 |
RESULTS |
Design and generation of sCAR-ligand protein.
As was recently
demonstrated, Ad of subgroups A, C, D, E, and F use CAR as a cellular
fiber receptor. It was also shown that sCAR bound to representatives of
all Ad subgroups except subgroup B (34). To apply this
finding to Ad retargeting, we proposed to design protein molecules
consisting of the extracellular domain of CAR in fusion with a
targeting ligand (Fig. 1A). Our goal was to generate a bispecific CAR-ligand molecule that could block the
cell-binding domain of the fiber knob as well as target the Ad vector
to a novel cellular receptor present at a sufficient level on target
cells. Therefore, the infection of cells by this virus complex would
not be dependent on the presence of CAR on a target cell membrane. The
targeting ligand that we chose to use was EGF because it is well
established that the EGFR is overexpressed on a variety of cancer cells
(46).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(A) Utilization of sCAR-ligand fusion proteins for
receptor-specific targeting of Ad vectors. Ad vectors normally achieve
cell binding via interaction between the knob domain of viral fiber
protein with CAR. To redirect an Ad vector to an alternative cell
surface receptor, a genetically engineered targeting fusion protein
consisting of the CAR ectodomain fused to a receptor-specific targeting
ligand was used. By virtue of its dual binding capacity, this complex
serves as a bridge between an Ad virion and a cell-specific receptor
molecule, thereby providing novel cell-binding capacity to the virion.
(B) Construction of sCAR fusion proteins. The gene coding for either
human sCAR-His6 or sCAR-EGF was constructed in a
baculovirus expression vector. Expression is driven from the polyhedrin
promoter (pPolh). A His6 tag was introduced for
purification purposes into the carboxy terminus of the extracellular
CAR domain (236 aa). To construct sCAR-EGF protein, human EGF (53 aa)
was fused with the CAR ectodomain by a flexible linker (SASASASAPGS)
and tagged with His6. See Materials and Methods for details
of construction.
|
|
To express the sCAR-EGF fusion protein, we designed a gene sequence
coding for the ectodomain of human CAR, six histidines, a short
flexible linker, and human EGF (Fig. 1B). The sequence encoding the
internal six-His tag was incorporated into the recombinant CAR fusion
gene in order to facilitate downstream purification of the product. The
gene coding for sCAR-His6 was created to express the
relevant control protein (Fig. 1B). To produce sCAR-EGF and sCAR-His6, recombinant baculoviruses containing the genes
of interest were created and used to infect insect cells. Infection of
High Five insect cells with recombinant baculoviruses resulted in a high level of sCAR-His6 as well as sCAR-EGF protein
expression in a secreted soluble form. Baculovirus-expressed
sCAR-His6 and sCAR-EGF proteins were recovered from the
infected cell culture media by means of Ni-NTA affinity chromatography
and were then analyzed for purity by gel electrophoresis.
Analysis of sCAR-EGF protein.
Analysis by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of both
sCAR-His6 and sCAR-EGF (Fig.
2A) shows that purified proteins have
molecular masses close to expected of 24.9 and 31.9 kDa, respectively.
Thus, by using the baculovirus expression system and Ni-NTA affinity
purification, we were able to obtain preparative amounts of
homogeneously purified sCAR-EGF fusion protein for subsequent analysis.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Characterization of sCAR fusion proteins. (A) Analysis
of recombinant sCAR-EGF protein by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Soluble CAR-His6 and sCAR-EGF six-histidine-tagged proteins
expressed in insect cells were purified on a Ni-NTA-Sepharose column
and analyzed by electrophoresis on a 12% polyacrylamide gel at
denaturing conditions. The bands were visualized by GELCODE blue stain
reagent. Numbers on the right indicate molecular masses of marker
proteins in kilodaltons. (B) Analysis of interaction between
recombinant sCAR-EGF protein and Ad fiber protein by ELISA.
Baculovirus-expressed sCAR-His6 and sCAR-EGF proteins
absorbed on an ELISA plate were incubated with various concentrations
of purified recombinant Ad5 fiber protein. Bound fiber protein was then
detected with antifiber monoclonal antibody 4D2. Each point represents
the cumulative mean ± SD of triplicate determinations. Error bars
depicting SDs are smaller than the symbols. OD, optical density. (C)
Competitive inhibition analysis. The binding of sCAR-EGF to EGFR was
quantified by competition analysis of radiolabeled EGF binding to A-431
EGFR-overexpressing cells in the presence of various concentrations of
sCAR-EGF. The cells were mixed with 10-fold dilutions (1 pM to 20 µM)
of unlabeled human EGF, sCAR-EGF, or sCAR-His6 (negative
control). [125I]EGF (~0.1 nM) was then added, and
incubation was continued 4°C. The cells were then rinsed and counted
in a gamma counter to determine the amount of bound radioactivity. Each
point represents the cumulative mean ± SD of triplicate
determinations. Some error bars depicting SDs are smaller than the
symbols.
|
|
We first chose to characterize the sCAR-EGF fusion protein with respect
to its ability to bind Ad fiber knob. Therefore, we used it in an ELISA
(Fig. 2B) with purified Ad5 fiber expressed in insect cells
(8). This assay showed that fiber protein efficiently bound
to immobilized sCAR-EGF in a wide range of concentrations. Compared to
the sCAR-His6 protein used as a control, the fiber-binding affinity of sCAR-EGF fusion protein was slightly lower, most probably due to changes in the molecular conformation of the CAR ectodomain. Based on the obtained result, whereby generated sCAR-EGF fusion protein
is able to efficiently interact with Ad fiber knob, we hypothesized
that the affinity of this interaction is sufficient to block the
cell-binding site on the knob domain in order to block viral infection.
To evaluate the ability of sCAR-EGF to bind to EGFR, we performed
competition analysis of radiolabeled EGF binding to EGFR-positive A-431
cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of sCAR-EGF. Equimolar concentrations of unlabeled human EGF or
sCAR-His6 protein (negative control) were tested in a
parallel. Figure 2C shows that EGF and sCAR-EGF inhibited
the binding of [125I]EGF to A-431 EGFR-positive cells
(47), while sCAR-His6 did not. The level of
inhibition was similar for each, with EGF having a 50% inhibitory
concentration of 24.1 nM, compared to 19.5 nM for sCAR-EGF.
sCAR-EGF inhibits Ad binding and gene transfer to 293 cells.
Having established that the sCAR-EGF fusion protein could bind to both
Ad fiber and cellular EGFR, we examined whether the formation of bonds
between Ad and sCAR protein results in any changes in the capacity of
such virus complexes to infect cells. To this end, we first compared
the cell-binding efficiencies of Ad/sCAR fusion complexes. To do so, we
preincubated 3H-radiolabeled Ad with either
sCAR-His6 or sCAR-EGF and then used the formed complexes in
a cell- binding assay. 293 human kidney cells were selected for this
analysis because they express high levels of CAR and readily support Ad
infection (8). The binding assay was performed under
conditions (4°C) allowing the viruses to bind the cells but
preventing virus internalization. As shown in Fig.
3A, the cell-binding capacity of both
Ad/sCAR-His6 and Ad/sCAR-EGF complexes was less than that
of Ad alone and dependent on the sCAR-fusion protein dose; 94 pmol of
both sCAR fusion proteins could block 90% of Ad binding to
CAR-positive 293 cells. According to flow cytometry analysis, 293 cells
express high levels of CAR and EGFR (data not shown). Because of
relatively equivalent expression of CAR and EGFR on the cell membrane,
binding of Ad/CAR-EGF complexes to 293 cells may occur via any
combination of CAR- and EGFR-dependent routes. Therefore, the capacity
of sCAR-EGF molecules to block Ad cell binding through a CAR-dependent
pathway might be diminished by the alternative ability to mediate
binding to EGFR and result in cumulative inhibition of Ad binding and
subsequent gene delivery. As can be seen in Fig. 3A, sCAR-EGF protein
indeed displayed less Ad-blocking ability than the control
sCAR-His6, particularly in the low concentration range.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Functional characterization of sCAR fusion proteins. (A)
Inhibition of Ad binding. 3H-labeled Ad was preincubated
with different amounts of either sCAR-His6 or sCAR-EGF, and
then 3H-Ad/sCAR-ligand complex samples (105
cpm) were mixed with 293 cells (106 cells per aliquot) and
allowed to bind at 4°C. Cell-bound radioactivities were determined as
described in Materials and Methods. Data are presented as the
percentage of input 3H-Ad bound after washing and
calculated as the cumulative mean ± SD of triplicate
determinations. Error bars depicting SDs are smaller than the symbols.
(B) Inhibition of Ad-mediated gene transfer. Recombinant Ad vector
AdCMVLuc, expressing the firefly luciferase reporter gene, was
preincubated with various amounts of either sCAR-His6 or
sCAR-EGF. Monolayers of 293 cells were then exposed to
AdCMVLuc/sCAR-ligand complexes and assayed for luciferase activity as
described in Materials and Methods. Gene transfer indices were
calculated from the ratio of the mean luciferase activity documented in
cells infected with either AdCMVLuc/sCAR-EGF or
AdCMVLuc/sCAR-His6 to those treated with AdCMVLuc alone.
Each point represents the cumulative mean ± SD of triplicate
determinations. Some error bars depicting SDs are smaller than the
symbols.
|
|
To evaluate the ability of the derived fusion protein to
block Ad infection, we performed an infection inhibition
assay. The results showed that sCAR-EGF protein is able to block
AdCMVLuc-mediated luciferase gene transfer to 293 cells, demonstrating
an inhibition profile similar to that for control sCAR-His6
protein (Fig. 3B). Therefore, these experiments confirmed the utility
of sCAR-EGF to efficiently inhibit Ad binding as well as gene transfer
to CAR-positive 293 cells and provided a rationale for further studies.
Analysis of different human cell lines for the expression of CAR
and EGFR.
Several human cell lines of different origins, including
SKOV3.ip1 ovarian carcinoma cells, A-431 epidermoid carcinoma cells, SCC-4 squamous carcinoma cells, and MDA-MB-453 mammary gland cells, were analyzed for cell surface expression of CAR and EGFR by indirect immunofluorescence assay (Fig. 4). The
indicated cell lines were chosen based on previously published data on
levels of CAR and EGFR expression and varying susceptibility to Ad
infection (6, 8). Flow cytometry showed that SCC-4 cells
express moderate levels of CAR and rather large amounts of EGFR (Fig.
4). SKOV3.ip1 cells were CAR negative but high EGFR expressors. A431
cells display a low level of CAR expression while being highest in
levels of EGFR. This agrees with previous reports showing that A-431
cells express as many as 3 × 106 EGFR molecules/cell
(47). MDA-MB-453 cells, known to be EGFR negative
(28), also demonstrated a low level of CAR and were thus
selected as a negative control. Flow cytometry data indicate the
following order for the tested cell lines with respect to relative
expression of EGFR: MDA-MB-453 < SKOV3.ip1 < SCC-4 < A-431. Therefore, for our subsequent experiments, we established a set
of cell lines covering a wide range of EGFR expression.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Relative expression of CAR and EGFR on different human
cell lines. Flow cytometric analysis of MDA-MB-453, SCC-4, SKOV3.ip1,
or A-431 cells using either murine polyclonal serum to CAR or anti-EGFR
MAb was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Positive
staining with anti-CAR or anti-EGFR antibody (black) is seen relative
to an isotype control (white). A representative of three separate
experiments is shown. Flow cytometry assay revealed that SCC-4,
SKOV3.ip1, and A-431 cells express high levels of cell surface EGFR but
moderate to low levels of CAR. MDA-MB-453 cells demonstrated
dramatically lower levels of both CAR and EGFR and were selected as a
negative control.
|
|
sCAR-EGF can mediate EGFR-specific cell binding.
Having
established that sCAR-EGF demonstrates sufficient ability to block Ad
infection, we investigated the ability of the Ad/sCAR-EGF complex to
infect cells through a CAR-independent pathway. To address this issue,
we studied the ability of sCAR-EGF to target Ad binding to EGFR.
Retargeting Ad infection through EGFR on cells normally refractory to
Ad due to lack of CAR expression on their cell membranes may enhance
the level of gene delivery by facilitating Ad binding to EGFR. To
investigate this hypothesis, we estimated the capacity of sCAR-EGF
fusion protein to mediate binding of 3H-radiolabeled Ad to
EGFR-positive cells. To determine the optimum concentration of sCAR-EGF
providing maximal Ad binding, 3H-Ad was preincubated with
increasing amounts of either sCAR-EGF or sCAR-His6 to allow
complex formation. Suspensions of MDA-MB-453, SCC-4, SKOV3.ip1, or
A-431 cells were then exposed to either 3H-Ad/sCAR-EGF or
3H-Ad/sCAR-His6 complexes at 4°C to prevent
virus internalization. As shown in Fig.
5, preincubation with sCAR-EGF resulted
in significant increase of 3H-Ad binding to EGFR-positive
SCC-4, SKOV3.ip1, and A-431 cells compared to EGFR-negative MDA-MB-453
cells. Preincubation of Ad in the presence of sCAR-His6 had
no effect on the level of binding to EGFR-positive cells compared to Ad
alone. Complexing 3H-Ad with increasing amounts of
targeting sCAR-EGF fusion protein increased the level of cell-bound
radioactivity in a dose-dependent manner. Maximal EGFR-targeted Ad
binding occurred with an sCAR-EGF/virus ratio of 12 pmol of sCAR-EGF
protein per 6 × 109 viral particles. Increasing the
sCAR-EGF/virus ratio further proved inhibitory to binding, presumably
because of competition for EGFR binding by excess sCAR-EGF protein. As
shown in Fig. 5, calculated binding indices for Ad targeted to EGFR on
SKOV3.ip1, SCC-4, and A-431 cells were increased 7-, 8-, and 12-fold,
respectively. Bound radioactivities registered in cell samples
incubated with EGF-targeted Ad/sCAR-EGF complexes were dependent on
sCAR-EGF protein dose and significantly higher than in the case of
Ad/sCAR-His6 complexes or Ad alone. These experiments
clearly demonstrated that sCAR-EGF protein is capable of inducing
changes in the initial steps of virus-cell interaction and suggest that
formation of the Ad/sCAR-EGF complexes allows for Ad binding to EGFR.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Comparison of 3H-labeled Ad binding to
MDA-MB-453, SCC-4, SKOV3.ip1, and A-431 cells. 3H-labeled
Ad was preincubated for 30 min at room temperature with different
amounts of sCAR-His6 or sCAR-EGF.
3H-Ad/sCAR-ligand mixtures (105 cpm per sample)
were then added to cells aliquots (106) and allowed to bind
for 1 h at 4°C. Bound radioactivity was determined after
pelleting the cells by centrifugation. Binding indices were calculated
from the ratio of the mean bound radioactivity of 3H-Ad
preincubated in presence of sCAR-ligand versus 3H-Ad
preincubated in absence of sCAR-ligand protein. Each point represents
the cumulative mean ± SD of triplicate determinations. Some error
bars depicting SDs are smaller than the symbols.
|
|
sCAR-EGF mediates specific Ad binding to cellular EGFR.
Since
our ultimate goal was the targeting of Ad vectors to EGFR, we conducted
a competition assay to prove that sCAR-EGF-mediated virus-cell
interactions occurred specifically via EGFR as the alternative cellular
receptor. By blocking Ad/sCAR-EGF interaction with a specific
competitor, the level of EGFR-dependent binding could be determined. In
this regard, analysis of binding of 3H-Ad/sCAR-EGF
complexes to the cells was accomplished at 4°C in the presence of
either human EGF or anti-EGFR neutralizing MAb capable of blocking the
binding to EGFR. To perform this analysis, the optimum sCAR-EGF/virus
ratio determined in the binding assay was used to form
3H-Ad/sCAR-EGF complexes prior to the binding to A-431
cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of either human EGF or anti-EGFR MAb. As shown in Fig. 6,
binding of 3H-Ad in the absence of competitors was not
significantly different from binding in the presence of any tested
concentrations of EGF or anti-EGFR MAb. When binding of the
3H-Ad/sCAR-EGF complex was assayed (Fig. 6), the presence
of EGF as well as anti-EGFR MAb decreased the level of binding in a
dose-dependent manner. Due to significant differences in molar
concentrations of the blocking agents used, EGF protein displayed
higher blocking efficiency than MAb at low concentrations but similar
efficiency at high concentrations tested, blocking 90% of the binding.
These results demonstrate that derived sCAR-EGF protein can be
effectively used to direct Ad binding via a non-CAR pathway to a novel
cellular receptor. Of note, the increased Ad binding efficiency was
shown to occur through specific interaction of the sCAR-EGF targeting protein with EGFR.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Specific inhibition of sCAR-EGF-mediated Ad binding.
3H-Ad was preincubated for 30 min at room temperature with
0.4 µg of sCAR-EGF. Human epidermoid carcinoma A-431 cells,
overexpressing EGFR, were preincubated for 30 min at 4°C in the
presence or absence of either human EGF or anti-EGFR MAb at different
concentrations (0.52 to 13.2 µg/ml). 3H-Ad/sCAR-EGF
samples (105 cpm) were then added and allowed to bind for
1 h at 4°C. Cells were washed by centrifugation, and
radioactivities of cell pellets were determined in a beta counter. Data
are presented as the percentage of input 3H-Ad bound after
washing and calculated as the cumulative mean ± SD of triplicate
determinations.
|
|
sCAR-EGF mediates enhanced gene transfer to human cancer
cells.
We used the same strategy to evaluate the ability of
sCAR-EGF targeting protein to mediate Ad gene delivery to cultured
human cancer cell lines SCC-4, SKOV3.ip1, A-431, and MDA-MB-453. Our previous study showed that these cells are relatively difficult to
infect with Ad vectors (6, 8). These findings were
corroborated by our flow cytometry data, which showed either modest or
low levels of CAR expression. Importantly, rather high levels of EGFR detected in three of these cell lines suggested that low Ad
susceptibility due to relative lack of CAR may be overcome by targeting
to EGFR present at sufficient magnitude. The sCAR-EGF protein was
titered against Ad to ascertain the optimal ratio of targeting
protein to virus as measured by improvements in gene
transfer. The magnitude of gene expression mediated by the
sCAR-EGF-complexed AdCMVLuc was demonstrated on EGFR-positive SCC-4,
SKOV3.ip1, and A-431 cells versus EGFR-negative MDA-MB-453 cells. As
shown in Fig. 7, compared with AdCMVLuc
alone, AdCMVLuc complexed with sCAR-EGF targeting protein
(EGFR-targeted Ad) mediated 8-, 10-, and 50-fold enhancements of
luciferase expression in SKOV3.ip1, SCC-4, and A-431 cells,
respectively. As evidence that the sCAR-EGF promoted gene transfer by
an EGFR-specific mechanism, no enhancement was observed in cells
exposed to AdCMVLuc complexed with sCAR-His6 (untargeted
Ad). Further, the specificity of sCAR-EGF-mediated Ad targeting was
illustrated by the failure of sCAR-EGF to enhance Ad-based gene
transfer to EGFR-negative MDA-MB-453 cells. Thus, this set of assays
demonstrated that the sCAR-EGF targeting protein enables retargeting of
an Ad vector via a CAR-independent pathway, with severalfold
enhancement of gene transfer efficiency specifically to EGFR-positive
cells.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Characterization of sCAR-EGF-mediated Ad gene transfer
to EGFR-positive cell lines. AdCMVLuc was preincubated with various
amounts of either sCAR-EGF targeting protein, or sCAR-His6
as a control, prior to incubation with cells. Then monolayers of
MDA-MB-453, SCC-4, SKOV3.ip1, or A-431 cells were exposed to
Ad/sCAR-ligand complexes mixtures at 2 PFU/cell. Targeting index is
defined as the ratio between mean luciferase activity for Ad
preincubated in the presence of sCAR-ligand versus Ad preincubated in
absence of sCAR-ligand protein. Each point represents the cumulative
mean ± SD of triplicate determinations. Some error bars depicting
SDs are smaller than the symbols.
|
|
Efficiency of sCAR-EGF-mediated Ad gene delivery.
To further
investigate the phenomenon of sCAR-EGF-mediated Ad targeting, we
attempted to evaluate the stability of Ad/sCAR-EGF complexes. As we
observed previously, exceeding the optimal sCAR-EGF/virus ratio proved
to be inhibitory to binding and gene transfer, presumably because of
competition for EGFR binding by uncomplexed sCAR-EGF protein.
Alternatively, a relative excess of targeting protein is required for
optimal formation of Ad/sCAR-EGF complexes. To address this issue, we
purified Ad/sCAR-EGF complexes by gel filtration in order to remove
unbound sCAR-EGF protein. Using the optimum sCAR-EGF/virus ratio
determined with A-431 cells, gene transfer mediated by purified versus
unpurified EGFR-targeted AdCMVLuc was compared among the panel of
EGFR-positive cell lines. It was shown that EGFR-targeted AdCMVLuc
significantly enhanced gene transfer to tested cells (data not shown).
Purified Ad/sCAR-EGF complexes were somewhat less effective than
unpurified EGFR-targeted virus, demonstrating 50% less efficient gene
transfer. In contrast, gene transfer mediated by AdCMVLuc was barely
affected by purification, indicating that there was no significant loss
of Ad during the purification procedure. Nevertheless, even after
purification, Ad-mediated gene transfer efficiency was enhanced when
targeted to EGFR compared to control AdCMVLuc in all three cell types
examined. Specifically, 3-, 4.5-, and 9-fold increases of luciferase
activity were observed in SKOV-3.ip1, SCC-4, and A-431 cells,
respectively. The degree of gene transfer enhancement correlates with
our flow cytometry and binding data and is likely to be dependent on
the CAR/EGFR ratio on the cell surface and on EGFR affinity
(29). The fact that purification of formed Ad/sCAR-EGF
complexes did not ablate enhanced gene transfer capacity indicates that
the sCAR-EGF targeting protein can maintain its association with Ad in
the context of vector purification schemes. This relative stability provides an empiric means to derive vector/complex particles optimized with respect to gene transfer applications.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The infection spectrum of human Ad is wide with respect to
different types of tissues and different age groups of patients (40). However, the present generation of Ad vectors suffer
from three important limitations which have prevented the realization of their full potential. One disadvantage is related to vector-induced inflammatory and immune responses precluding readministration of the
same vector. Second, Ad can infect a wide range of different cells,
which makes it impossible to deliver genes to specific target cell
types. The third limitation is the inability of the vector to infect
the cells which do not express CAR or express it at low levels. Thus,
the primary requirement for the application to gene therapy is the
availability of a vector capable of accomplishing effective and
selective gene delivery. In this regard, there is increasing evidence
that the efficiency of Ad vectors can be limited by a deficiency of
appropriate binding and entry mechanisms on the target cell (10,
48, 50, 55). While CAR is widely expressed in vivo
(42), low CAR levels (17, 24, 31) or its
localization on inaccessible parts of cell (43) can prevent efficient infection by Ad vectors. The requirement for expression of
CAR on the target cell represents a hurdle to genetic modification of
cells that lack CAR, leading to the strategy of modifying the tropism
of Ad vectors. Therefore, the utility of the present generation of Ad
vectors for gene therapy may be significantly improved by achieving
targeted infection of specific cell types by the virus. To develop a
targeted Ad vector, it is necessary both to ablate broad native Ad
tropism and to introduce novel tropism, which will allow targeting of
certain cell types, including cells that are inherently not sensitive
to Ad infection due to a lack of CAR. In this regard, abrogation of Ad
fiber binding to its natural receptor is therefore a prerequisite for
Ad application particularly in vivo. This goal has been addressed by
the development of retargeting complexes which simultaneously recognize
the specific capsomer of the viral particle and the targeted cell
surface molecule. The technical achievement of Ad retargeting via
bispecific molecular complexes has been approached by a variety of
methods. In this regard, chemically conjugated bispecific antibodies
have been used to recognize a FLAG peptide epitope incorporated in the
penton base (49, 52). Such bispecific antibodies with
specific recognition for the knob domain of the fiber protein that
block the knob-receptor interactions and simultaneously serve to
cross-link the virus to alternate cellular receptors were designed
(9). Abrogation of Ad native tropism was achieved by the use
of the antiknob antibody, or its Fab fragment, conjugated with ligands
specific for target cell surface receptors such as folate
(9), fibroblast growth factor 2 (13, 36), CD40
(41), and EpCAM antigen (15), as well as
antibodies for EGFR (6, 29). These recent advances in Ad
vector targeting illustrate the potential utility of employing chemically conjugated bispecific molecular complexes to achieve both an
abrogation of Ad native tropism and delivery of Ad vectors to specific
cell types. However, the use of chemical conjugates increases
production difficulties, making this approach relatively complex and
expensive to develop. The strategy that we have developed could be of
great utility to avoid at least some of these limitations. Recently,
refinements of the strategy of antifiber retargeting complexes have
been proposed. The ability to engineer recombinant antibodies has
facilitated the production of bispecific antibodies or fusion proteins
in bacteria. For example, an "adenobody" consisting of an antiknob
scFv and EGF has been derived and used to target Ad to EGFR
(45). An analogous approach was successfully used to produce
recombinant bispecific scFv comprising both antiknob and anti-EGF scFvs
in a eukaryotic expression system (16). Recombinant molecules such as these may indeed offer advantages for Ad retargeting in terms of vector production and validation. However, there is likely
to be an immune response directed against virus-encoded antigens and
possibly against the scFv molecules.
The novelty of the approach developed in this study is based on the
utilization of native Ad-CAR interaction to provide a linkage between a
targeting ligand and the viral particle. The affinity of CAR binding to
the fiber knob (Kd = 4.75 nM) (21) is
comparable with those determined for the highest-binding antiknob scFvs
(3 to 12 nM) (45). Based on the crystal structure of Ad12 knob complexed with the Ig1 structural domain of human CAR, three Ig1
monomers bind per knob trimer (5). The predicted CAR/knob binding ratio combined with the high affinity of the interaction may
contribute to the efficiency of linkage between Ad particles and
sCAR-ligand and consequently to the target receptor. The sCAR-EGF protein is expected to have a very low immunogenic potential in humans
because of the endogenous origin of its structural components; therefore, it might provide a high-affinity nonimmunogenic linkage to
the viral particle compatible with in vivo gene delivery applications. In addition, carboxy-terminal localization of targeting ligand in the
context of sCAR fusion protein mimics the native mechanism of virion
binding to its high-affinity receptor.
By complexing Ad with sCAR-EGF, we have blocked the natural
cell-binding site of the fiber knob while simultaneously supplying a
binding alternative in EGF. We showed that Ad modification with bifunctional sCAR-EGF molecules overcomes the barrier of inefficient gene transfer into specific cancer cell types. As expected, the enhanced binding properties of the EGFR-targeted Ad vector correlated with its ability to infect EGFR-expressing cells from a selected panel
of cancer cell lines, as seen in gene transfer experiments. Cell
binding of EGFR-targeted Ad could be blocked competitively by
preincubation of the cells with either human EGF or anti-EGFR MAb,
confirming that the redirected Ad binding was specific to EGFR. The
gene transfer efficiency of the Ad when targeted through a non-CAR
pathway was markedly improved in all EGFR-positive cell lines examined
compared to EGFR-negative cells, suggesting that the efficiency of
targeted infection is dependent on EGFR density. Purification of
Ad/sCAR-EGF complexes proved our hypothesis that sCAR is capable of
providing a high-affinity linkage to the viral particle, compatible
with an Ad purification scheme and likely with systemic administration
of Ad vectors. Use of the baculovirus system for expressing targeting
molecules should overcome potential problems associated with partial or
complete insolubility of some protein ligands and lack of glycosylation
upon expression in E. coli. Furthermore, the observation
that sCAR binds to the fiber knob domains derived from certain serotype
representatives from five of the six Ad subgroups (34)
suggests that sCAR may be the protein of choice to serve as a universal
moiety providing a linkage to the majority of Ad serotypes. In
addition, the replacement of EGF with a different ligand should enable
targeting of Ad vectors to various cellular receptors. The enhancement
of transgene expression that we achieved by means of sCAR-EGF-mediated
infection of otherwise refractory cancer cells indicates that this
approach has potential for further studies of targeting Ad gene
delivery to cancer cells in vivo. In this way, it might be possible to
ablate preexisting patterns of Ad infection and establish new ones that
will reduce the initial dose of virus, thereby decreasing immediate
toxicity and increasing the safety and efficiency of Ad vectors.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants
R01 CA74242, R01 HL50255, R01 CA68245, and R01 CA83821, National Cancer
Institute grant N01 CO-97110, and U.S. Army Department of Defense
grants PC 970193 and PC 991018.
We are grateful to Robert Finberg for providing cDNA for CAR. Alex
Pereboev is thanked for fruitful discussions and proofreading the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of
Human Gene Therapy, Departments of Medicine, Pathology, and Surgery,
Gene Therapy Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Ave., South, Room WTI 620, Birmingham, AL 35294-3300. Phone: (205) 934-8627. Fax: (205) 975-7476. E-mail:
David.Curiel{at}ccc.uab.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Arnberg, N.,
K. Edlund,
A. H. Kidd, and G. Wadell.
2000.
Adenovirus type 37 uses sialic acid as a cellular receptor.
J. Virol.
74:42-48[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Arthur, J. F.,
L. H. Butterfield,
M. D. Roth,
L. A. Bui,
S. M. Kiertscher,
R. Lau,
S. Dubinett,
J. Glaspy,
W. H. McBride, and J. S. Economou.
1997.
A comparison of gene transfer methods in human dendritic cells.
Cancer Gene Ther.
4:17-25[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bergelson, J. M.,
J. A. Cunningham,
G. Droguett,
E. A. Kurt-Jones,
A. Krithivas,
J. S. Hong,
M. S. Horwitz,
R. L. Crowell, and R. W. Finberg.
1997.
Isolation of a common receptor for coxsackie B viruses and adenoviruses 2 and 5.
Science
275:1320-1323[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bergelson, J. M.,
A. Krithivas,
L. Celi,
G. Droguett,
M. S. Horwitz,
T. Wickham,
R. L. Crowell, and R. W. Finberg.
1998.
The murine CAR homolog is a receptor for coxsackie B viruses and adenoviruses.
J. Virol.
72:415-419[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Bewley, M. C.,
K. Springer,
Y. B. Zhang,
P. Freimuth, and J. M. Flanagan.
1999.
Structural analysis of the mechanism of adenovirus binding to its human cellular receptor, CAR.
Science
286:1579-1583[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Blackwell, J. L.,
C. R. Miller,
J. T. Douglas,
H. Li,
G. E. Peters,
W. R. Carroll,
T. V. Strong, and D. T. Curiel.
1999.
Retargeting to EGFR enhances adenovirus infection efficiency of squamous cell carcinoma.
Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
125:856-863.
|
| 7.
|
Davison, E.,
I. Kirby,
T. Elliott, and G. Santis.
1999.
The human HLA-A*0201 allele, expressed in hamster cells, is not a high-affinity receptor for adenovirus type 5 fiber.
J. Virol.
73:4513-4517[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Dmitriev, I.,
V. Krasnykh,
C. R. Miller,
M. Wang,
E. Kashentseva,
G. Mikheeva,
N. Belousova, and D. T. Curiel.
1998.
An adenovirus vector with genetically modified fibers demonstrates expanded tropism via utilization of a coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor-independent cell entry mechanism.
J. Virol.
72:9706-9713[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Douglas, J. T.,
B. E. Rogers,
M. E. Rosenfeld,
S. I. Michael,
M. Feng, and D. T. Curiel.
1996.
Targeted gene delivery by tropism-modified adenoviral vectors.
Nat. Biotechnol.
14:1574-1578[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Freimuth, P.
1996.
A human cell line selected for resistance to adenovirus infection has reduced levels of the virus receptor.
J. Virol.
70:4081-4085[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Freimuth, P.,
K. Springer,
C. Berard,
J. Hainfeld,
M. Bewley, and J. Flanagan.
1999.
Coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor amino-terminal immunoglobulin V-related domain binds adenovirus type 2 and fiber knob from adenovirus type 12.
J. Virol.
73:1392-1398[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Gall, J.,
A. Kass-Eisler,
L. Leinwand, and E. Falck-Pedersen.
1996.
Adenovirus type 5 and 7 capsid chimera: fiber replacement alters receptor tropism without affecting primary immune neutralization epitopes.
J. Virol.
70:2116-2123[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Goldman, C. K.,
B. E. Rogers,
J. T. Douglas,
B. A. Sosnowski,
W. Ying,
G. P. Siegal,
A. Baird,
J. A. Campain, and D. T. Curiel.
1997.
Targeted gene delivery to Kaposi's sarcoma cells via the fibroblast growth factor receptor.
Cancer Res.
57:1447-1451[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Greber, U. F.,
M. Willetts,
P. Webster, and A. Helenius.
1993.
Stepwise dismantling of adenovirus 2 during entry into cells.
Cell
75:477-486[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Haisma, H.,
H. Pinedo,
A. Rijswijk,
I. der Meulen-Muileman,
B. Sosnowski,
W. Ying,
V. Beusechem,
B. Tillman,
W. Gerritsen, and D. Curiel.
1999.
Tumor-specific gene transfer via an adenoviral vector targeted to the pan-carcinoma antigen EpCAM.
Gene Ther.
6:1469-1474[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
| Haisma, H. J., J. Grill, D. T. Curiel, S. Hoogeland, V. W. Van Beusechem, H. M. Pinedo, and W. R. Gerritsen. 2000. Targeting of adenoviral vectors through a
bispecific single-chain antibody. Cancer Gene Ther. 7:in
press.
|
| 17.
|
Hidaka, C.,
E. Milano,
P. L. Leopold,
J. M. Bergelson,
N. R. Hackett,
R. W. Finberg,
T. J. Wickham,
I. Kovesdi,
P. Roelvink, and R. G. Crystal.
1999.
CAR-dependent and CAR-independent pathways of adenovirus vector-mediated gene transfer and expression in human fibroblasts.
J. Clin. Investig.
103:579-587[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Hong, S. S.,
L. Karayan,
J. Tournier,
D. T. Curiel, and P. A. Boulanger.
1997.
Adenovirus type 5 fiber knob binds to MHC class I alpha2 domain at the surface of human epithelial and B lymphoblastoid cells.
EMBO J.
16:2294-2306[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Horwitz, M. S.
1996.
Adenovirus, p. 2149-2171.
In
D. M. Knipe, B. N. Fields, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 20.
|
Karayan, L.,
B. Gay,
J. Gerfaux, and P. A. Boulanger.
1994.
Oligomerization of recombinant penton base of adenovirus type 2 and its assembly with fiber in baculovirus-infected cells.
Virology
202:782-795[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Kirby, I.,
E. Davison,
A. J. Beavil,
C. P. Soh,
T. J. Wickham,
P. W. Roelvink,
I. Kovesdi,
B. J. Sutton, and G. Santis.
1999.
Mutations in the DG loop of adenovirus type 5 fiber knob protein abolish high-affinity binding to its cellular receptor CAR.
J. Virol.
73:9508-9514[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Le Gal La Salle, G.,
J. J. Robert,
S. Berrard,
V. Ridoux,
L. D. Stratford-Perricaudet,
M. Perricaudet, and J. Mallet.
1993.
An adenovirus vector for gene transfer into neurons and glia in the brain.
Science
259:988-990[Abstract].
|
| 23.
|
Lemarchand, P.,
H. A. Jaffe,
C. Danel,
M. C. Cid,
H. K. Kleinman,
L. D. Stratford-Perricaudet,
M. Perricaudet,
A. Pavirani,
J. P. Lecocq, and R. G. Crystal.
1992.
Adenovirus-mediated transfer of a recombinant human alpha 1-antitrypsin cDNA to human endothelial cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:6482-6486[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Leon, R. P.,
T. Hedlund,
S. J. Meech,
S. Li,
J. Schaack,
S. P. Hunger,
R. C. Duke, and J. DeGregori.
1998.
Adenoviral-mediated gene transfer in lymphocytes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:13159-13164[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Louis, N.,
P. Fender,
A. Barge,
P. Kitts, and J. Chroboczek.
1994.
Cell-binding domain of adenovirus serotype 2 fiber.
J. Virol.
68:4104-4106[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Maizel, J. V., Jr.,
D. O. White, and M. D. Scharff.
1968.
The polypeptides of adenovirus. I. Evidence for multiple protein components in the virion and a comparison of types 2, 7A, and 12.
Virology
36:115-125[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Mathias, P.,
T. Wickham,
M. Moore, and G. Nemerow.
1994.
Multiple adenovirus serotypes use alpha v integrins for infection.
J. Virol.
68:6811-6814[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
McLeskey, S. W.,
I. Y. Ding,
M. E. Lippman, and F. G. Kern.
1994.
MDA-MB-134 breast carcinoma cells overexpress fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors and are growth-inhibited by FGF ligands.
Cancer Res.
54:523-530[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Miller, C. R.,
D. J. Buchsbaum,
P. N. Reynolds,
J. T. Douglas,
G. Y. Gillespie,
M. S. Mayo,
D. Raben, and D. T. Curiel.
1998.
Differential susceptibility of primary and established human glioma cells to adenovirus infection: targeting via the epidermal growth factor receptor achieves fiber receptor-independent gene transfer.
Cancer Res.
58:5738-5748[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Mittereder, N.,
K. L. March, and B. C. Trapnell.
1996.
Evaluation of the concentration and bioactivity of adenovirus vectors for gene therapy.
J. Virol.
70:7498-7509[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Nalbantoglu, J.,
G. Pari,
G. Karpati, and P. C. Holland.
1999.
Expression of the primary coxsackie and adenovirus receptor is downregulated during skeletal muscle maturation and limits the efficacy of adenovirus-mediated gene delivery to muscle cells.
Hum. Gene Ther.
10:1009-1019[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Philipson, S.,
P. L. Stewart, and R. M. Burnett.
1995.
The molecular repertoire of adenovirus I.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
|
| 33.
|
Quantin, B.,
L. D. Perricaudet,
S. Tajbakhsh, and J. L. Mandel.
1992.
Adenovirus as an expression vector in muscle cells in vivo.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:2581-2584[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Roelvink, P. W.,
A. Lizonova,
J. G. Lee,
Y. Li,
J. M. Bergelson,
R. W. Finberg,
D. E. Brough,
I. Kovesdi, and T. J. Wickham.
1998.
The coxsackievirus-adenovirus receptor protein can function as a cellular attachment protein for adenovirus serotypes from subgroups A, C, D, E, and F.
J. Virol.
72:7909-7915[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Roelvink, P. W.,
G. Mi Lee,
D. A. Einfeld,
I. Kovesdi, and T. J. Wickham.
1999.
Identification of a conserved receptor-binding site on the fiber proteins of CAR-recognizing adenoviridae.
Science
286:1568-1571[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Rogers, B. E.,
J. T. Douglas,
C. Ahlem,
D. J. Buchsbaum,
J. Frincke, and D. T. Curiel.
1997.
Use of a novel cross-linking method to modify adenovirus tropism.
Gene Ther.
4:1387-1392[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Rosenberg, S. A.,
R. M. Blaese,
M. K. Brenner,
A. B. Deisseroth,
F. D. Ledley,
M. T. Lotze,
J. M. Wilson,
G. J. Nabel,
K. Cornetta,
J. S. Economou,
S. M. Freeman,
S. R. Riddell,
E. Oldfield,
B. Gansbacher,
C. Dunbar,
R. E. Walker,
F. G. Schuening,
J. A. Roth,
R. G. Crystal,
M. J. Welsh,
K. Culver,
H. E. Heslop,
J. Simons,
R. W. Wilmott,
N. A. Habib, et al.
1999.
Human gene marker/therapy clinical protocols.
Hum. Gene Ther.
10:3067-3123[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Rosenfeld, M. A.,
K. Yoshimura,
B. C. Trapnell,
K. Yoneyama,
E. R. Rosenthal,
W. Dalemans,
M. Fukayama,
J. Bargon,
L. E. Stier,
L. Stratford-Perricaudet, et al.
1992.
In vivo transfer of the human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene to the airway epithelium.
Cell
68:143-155[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Stevenson, S. C.,
M. Rollence,
B. White,
L. Weaver, and A. McClelland.
1995.
Human adenovirus serotypes 3 and 5 bind to two different cellular receptors via the fiber head domain.
J. Virol.
69:2850-2857[Abstract].
|
| 40.
|
Straus, S. E.
1984.
Adenovirus infections in humans, p. 451-496.
In
H. S. Ginsberg (ed.), The adenoviruses. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 41.
|
Tillman, B. W.,
T. D. de Gruijl,
S. A. Luykx-de Bakker,
R. J. Scheper,
H. M. Pinedo,
T. J. Curiel,
W. R. Gerritsen, and D. T. Curiel.
1999.
Maturation of dendritic cells accompanies high-efficiency gene transfer by a CD40-targeted adenoviral vector.
J. Immunol.
162:6378-6383[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Tomko, R. P.,
R. Xu, and L. Philipson.
1997.
HCAR and MCAR: the human and mouse cellular receptors for subgroup C adenoviruses and group B coxsackieviruses.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:3352-3356[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Walters, R. W.,
T. Grunst,
J. M. Bergelson,
R. W. Finberg,
M. J. Welsh, and J. Zabner.
1999.
Basolateral localization of fiber receptors limits adenovirus infection from the apical surface of airway epithelia.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:10219-10226[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Wang, X., and J. M. Bergelson.
1999.
Coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains are not essential for coxsackievirus and adenovirus infection.
J. Virol.
73:2559-2562[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Watkins, S. J.,
V. V. Mesyanzhinov,
L. P. Kurochkina, and R. E. Hawkins.
1997.
The 'adenobody' approach to viral targeting: specific and enhanced adenoviral gene delivery.
Gene Ther.
4:1004-1012[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Wells, A.
1999.
EGF receptor.
Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
31:637-643[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
West, M. A.,
M. S. Bretscher, and C. Watts.
1989.
Distinct endocytotic pathways in epidermal growth factor-stimulated human carcinoma A431 cells.
J. Cell Biol.
109:2731-2739[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Wickham, T. J.,
M. E. Carrion, and I. Kovesdi.
1995.
Targeting of adenovirus penton base to new receptors through replacement of its RGD motif with other receptor-specific peptide motifs.
Gene Ther.
2:750-756[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Wickham, T. J.,
G. M. Lee,
J. A. Titus,
G. Sconocchia,
T. Bakacs,
I. Kovesdi, and D. M. Segal.
1997.
Targeted adenovirus-mediated gene delivery to T cells via CD3.
J. Virol.
71:7663-7669[Abstract].
|
| 50.
|
Wickham, T. J.,
P. Mathias,
D. A. Cheresh, and G. R. Nemerow.
1993.
Integrins alpha v beta 3 and alpha v beta 5 promote adenovirus internalization but not virus attachment.
Cell
73:309-319[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Wickham, T. J.,
P. W. Roelvink,
D. E. Brough, and I. Kovesdi.
1996.
Adenovirus targeted to heparan-containing receptors increases its gene delivery efficiency to multiple cell types.
Nat. Biotechnol.
14:1570-1573[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Wickham, T. J.,
D. M. Segal,
P. W. Roelvink,
M. E. Carrion,
A. Lizonova,
G. M. Lee, and I. Kovesdi.
1996.
Targeted adenovirus gene transfer to endothelial and smooth muscle cells by using bispecific antibodies.
J. Virol.
70:6831-6838[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Wickham, T. J.,
E. Tzeng,
L. L. Shears II,
P. W. Roelvink,
Y. Li,
G. M. Lee,
D. E. Brough,
A. Lizonova, and I. Kovesdi.
1997.
Increased in vitro and in vivo gene transfer by adenovirus vectors containing chimeric fiber proteins.
J. Virol.
71:8221-8229[Abstract].
|
| 54.
|
Yeh, P., and M. Perricaudet.
1997.
Advances in adenoviral vectors: from genetic engineering to their biology.
FASEB J.
11:615-623[Abstract].
|
| 55.
|
Zabner, J.,
P. Freimuth,
A. Puga,
A. Fabrega, and M. J. Welsh.
1997.
Lack of high affinity fiber receptor activity explains the resistance of ciliated airway epithelia to adenovirus infection.
J. Clin. Investig.
100:1144-1149[Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, August 2000, p. 6875-6884, Vol. 74, No. 15
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Li, H.-J., Everts, M., Pereboeva, L., Komarova, S., Idan, A., Curiel, D. T., Herschman, H. R.
(2007). Adenovirus Tumor Targeting and Hepatic Untargeting by a Coxsackie/Adenovirus Receptor Ectodomain Anti-Carcinoembryonic Antigen Bispecific Adapter. Cancer Res.
67: 5354-5361
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tanaka, T., Huang, J., Hirai, S., Kuroki, M., Kuroki, M., Watanabe, N., Tomihara, K., Kato, K., Hamada, H.
(2006). Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Targeted Selective Gene Therapy for Gastric Cancer through FZ33 Fiber-Modified Adenovirus Vectors.. Clin. Cancer Res.
12: 3803-3813