Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, July 2000, p. 6520-6527, Vol. 74, No. 14
Departments of Medicine, Pathology, and
Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine,
St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Received 5 January 2000/Accepted 19 April 2000
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Vpr regulates nuclear
transport of the viral preintegration complex, G2 cell
cycle arrest, and transcriptional transactivation. We asked whether phosphorylation could affect Vpr activity. Vpr was found to be phosphorylated on serine residues in transiently transfected and infected cells. Residues 79, 94, and 96 were all found to be
phosphorylated, as assessed by alanine mutations. Mutation of Ser-79 to
Ala abrogated effects of Vpr on cell cycle progression, whereas
mutation of Ser-94 and Ser-96 had no effect. Simultaneous mutation of
all three Vpr serine residues attenuated HIV-1 replication in
macrophages, whereas single and double Ser mutations had no effect.
Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) primarily targets CD4 T cells and macrophages (10,
30). Like genomes of other lentiviruses, its genome exhibits
greater complexity than those of oncoretroviruses. In addition to the
common retroviral structural proteins (Gag, Pol, and Env), HIV-1
contains at least six auxiliary proteins (Vif, Vpr, Tat, Rev, Vpu, and
Nef) that are important in viral replication and infection (9,
51). HIV-1 Vpr is a 96-amino-acid protein present at a high copy
number in HIV-1 virions (8, 56). Virion-associated Vpr plays
an important role in the early stages of HIV-1 infection in terminally
differentiated macrophages. Several investigators have shown that Vpr
is a nuclear protein (22, 32, 37, 38, 57). Both traditional
and nontraditional nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been
identified within Vpr (27, 45). Further studies indicated
that the coordination of HIV-1 Vpr with other nucleophilic virion
proteins including the Gag matrix (MA) and integrase (IN) proteins
account for the infection of nonreplicating cells (5, 16, 17,
22). In addition, de novo and virion-packaged Vpr can enhance
virus production by upregulating the HIV long terminal repeat or a wide
range of other promoters (1, 23, 44, 52). Another important
feature of HIV Vpr is its ability to arrest infected cells in the
G2 phase, resulting in increased HIV-1 production (11,
21, 46, 50). Other proposed activities of HIV-1 Vpr include
formation of ion channels (43), interference with DNA
mutation (18, 28, 40), and induction of micronuclei and
aneuploidy (49).
Phosphorylation plays a critical role in the NLS-mediated nuclear
transport, cell cycle progression, and gene expression (20, 26,
42, 48). The phosphorylation-regulated NLSs have been shown to
control nuclear transport in eukaryotic cells from yeast and plants to
higher mammals (26). For example, the archetypal NLS-containing simian virus 40 large T antigen is regulated, by the CcN
motif, which comprises the T-antigen NLS (N), a casein kinase II (CKII)
phosphorylation site (C) 13 amino acids N terminal to the NLS,
modulating the rate of the nuclear import, and a cyclin-dependent kinase site (c) adjacent to the NLS regulating the maximal level of
nuclear accumulation. Phosphorylation regulates cell cycle progression
and gene expression by changing the nuclear localization of various
proteins, as well as their association with transcriptional activation
factors. The importance of protein phosphorylation has been shown for
other HIV-1 proteins, such as MA, capsid, Rev, Nef, and Vpu (6,
17, 33, 41). In addition, protein kinases have been found in HIV
virions, suggesting that protein phosphorylation may be important for
regulating virion maturation and supporting early steps of infection
(6, 25). This study provides the first evidence that Vpr is
phosphorylated and that this modification is important for its
biological activity.
DNA constructs.
The vpr gene of HIV-1 NL4-3 and
the SRIG mutant with a deletion of codons 79 to 82 were cloned into
pTM-3 or pcDNA1.1 to generate pTM-VPR, pTM-VPR(SRIG), and pcDNA-Vpr as
previously described (32, 53, 59). pTM-VPR79A, pTM-VPR94A,
pTM-VPR96A, pTM-VPR79S, pTM-VPR94S, and pTM-VPR96S mutants were
generated by PCR mutagenesis using primers Vpr79Adn
(5'-TGTCGACATGCTAGAATAGGC-3'), Vpr94Aup (5'-CAGGATCCTAGGATCTGNCGGCTCCATT-3'), Vpr96Aup
(5'-CAGGATCCTAGNCTCTTGAGGCTCCATT-3'), and Vpr94/96Aup
(5'-CAGGATCCTAGNCTCTGNCGGCTCCATT-3') (2). The PCR
products were digested with SalI/BamHI and then
cloned into pTM-VPR SalI/BamHI sites. pTM-28S was
generated by PCR mutagenesis using primers Vpr79Adn
(5'-TGTCGACATGCTAGAATAGGC-3') and Vpr94/96Aup (5'-CAGGATCCTAGNCTCTGNCGGCTCCATT-3') and then cloned in
pTM-VPR SalI and BamHI sites. pTM-VPR28A was
constructed by sequential PCR using the primer pairs Vpr-NC-dn
(5'-AATACCATGGAACAAGCCCCAGAAGA-3')/Vpr28up (5'-TCTAACAGCTTCAGCCTTAAGTTCCTC-3') and Vpr28dn
(5'-GAGGAACTTAAGGCTGAAGCTGTTAGA-3')/Vpr-down (5'-GATGCTTCCAGGGATCCGTCTAGGATCTACTG-3') for the first
round. Vpr28A (Vpr fragment 28A mutation) was obtained by a second
round PCR with Vpr-NC-dn/Vpr-down using the mixture of the first round PCR products as the template (2). The PCR product was
digested with NcoI/EcoRI and cloned into pTM-VPR
NcoI/EcoRI sites. To obtain pTMVPR4S(
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Phosphorylation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Type 1 Vpr Regulates Cell Cycle Arrest
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
),
vpr SalI/BamHI fragment from pTM-VPR28S was
cloned into the pTM-VPR28A SalI/BamHI site.
)up
(5'-GCCTTGTTCCACATATCCT-3') and Vpr(
)dn
(5'-AGGATAGGTGGAACAAGCC-3')/HXB2-5999up
(5'-CTTCGTCGCTGTCTCC-3') followed by PCR with primer pairs
HXBII-5251dn/HXBII5999up. The PCR product was digested with
PflMI/SalI and cloned into p125 or p125-TTK
PflMI/SalI sites to get p125-Vpr(
) or
p125-TTK/Vpr(
).
), p125-TVpr79A,
p125-TVpr94G (Vpr94Gdn, 5'-ATGGAGCCGGTAGATCCTAG-3'; Vpr94Gup,
5'-CTAGGATCTACCGGCTCCAT-3'), p125-TVpr96P (Vpr96Pdn,
5'-ATGGAGCCAGTAGACCCTAG-3'; Vpr94Pup, 5'-CTAGGGTCTACTGGCTCCAT-3'), p125-TVpr79S (Vpr94G/96Pdn,
5'-ATGGAGCCGGTAGACCCTAG-3'; Vpr94G/96Pup
5'-CTAGGGTCTACCGGCTCCAT-3'), p125-TVpr94S, p125-TVpr96S were
constructed in two steps. First, the mutations were introduced into
vpr by PCR (79A and 79S constructs) or sequential PCR
mutagenesis using Vpr-NC-dn and HXBII-5999up as first- and second-round
PCR primers. The PCR products were digested with
SalI/EcoNI (positions 5785 to 5891), mixed with
p125 EcoNI/BamHI fragments (positions 5891 to
8474), and cloned into pUC12 SalI/BamHI sites.
Second, the SalI/BamHI fragments (positions 5785 to 8474) were cloned into p125-TTK SalI/BamHI
(positions 5891 to 8474) sites to obtain the proviral DNAs with
different vpr mutations. All proviral constructs were
confirmed by restriction mapping with
Bsu36I/HincII, and the PCR fragments were sequenced.
To express Vpr in the ecdysone-inducible expression system, pTM-VPR was
digested with NcoI and treated with Klenow DNA polymerase followed by BamHI digestion. The Vpr fragment was then
cloned into pIND (Invitrogen) HindIII/BamHI
sites after blunting the HindIII site with Klenow DNA
polymerase. To generate the episomal plasmid with the ecdysone response
element, pIND-VPR was digested with BglII/XhoI
and cloned into pZY-1 BglII/XhoI sites to get pZY-VPR. (The pZY-1 vector was derived from two plasmids, pIND [Invitrogen] and pDR2 [Clontech]. pDR2 was digested with
NruI to purify the DNA fragment with EBNA1/oriP. The pIND
vector was digested with HincII, and the fragment with the
ecdysone-inducible promoter and G418 resistant gene was purified. After
ligation, the structure of pZY-1 was confirmed by restriction enzyme
mapping.) The relevant mutation sequences in pUC12 as described earlier were digested with SalI/EcoNI and cloned into
pZY-Vpr SalI/BamHI sites after the
BamHI site was partially filled in with Klenow DNA
polymerase I Exo
in the presence of dGTP, dATP, and TTP.
The additional Vpr mutants at residues 78, 79, and 80 were generated by
PCR mutagenesis using p125-79S as the template with primers Vpr79D
(5'-GGGTGTCGACATGACAGAATAGGCGT-3'), Vpr79F
(5'-GGGTGTCGACATTTCAGAATAGGCGT-3'), Vpr79T
(5'-GGGTGTCGACATACCAGAATAGGCGT-3'), Vpr79Q
(5'-GGGTGTCGACATCAGAGAATAGGCGT-3'), Vpr80K
(5'-GGGTGTCGACATAGCAAAATAGGCGT-3'), Vpr80A
(5'-GGGTGTCGACATAGCGGAATAGGCGT-3'), and Vpr78Q
(5'-GGGTGTCGACAAAGCAGAATAGGCGT-3'). The
SalI/EcoNI fragments were cloned into pZY-Vpr
SalI/BamHI as described earlier.
PCR. PCRs were carried out with 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 0.1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 pmol of each primer, template plasmid DNA, 0.25 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 2.5 U of Taq polymerase (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.). The reaction was carried out in a total volume of 50 µl. The first cycle, at 94°C for 3 min, 72°C for 2 min, and 55°C for 1.5 min, was followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 72°C for 2 min, and 55°C for 1 min. The last (extension) cycle was at 72°C for 10 min.
Cell lines and DNA transfection. HEK293, 293T, BSC40, MAGI, and MAGI5 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 U of penicillin-streptomycin per ml, plus the selection agent as described elsewhere (59). 293VE (ecdysone-inducible) cell lines were obtained by cotransfecting pVgRXR (Invitrogen), which encodes the ecdysone receptor, and pCMV-EBNA1 (Clontech), which encodes the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1, with Lipofectamine into HEK293 cells (59). The transfected cells were split into 96-well plates (50 to 100 cells/well) and cultured for 2 days followed by Zeocin (200 µg/ml) selection for 12 days. The individual colonies were amplified and tested for the gene expression according to the protocol provided by manufacturer (Invitrogen). The cell lines were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 U of penicillin-streptomycin per ml, and 100 µg of Zeocin (Invitrogen) per ml. To induce gene expression, 1 µM muristerone A (Invitrogen) was used.
Immunoprecipitation.
The infection-transfection protocol for
the vaccinia virus expression system was as described elsewhere
(59). Briefly, BSC40 cells were grown to 90% confluence on
60-mm-diameter plates, infected for 1 h at 37°C with vTF7-3, a
vaccinia virus expressing T7 RNA polymerase (15), at a
multiplicity of infection of 10, and then transfected with pTM-VPR or
relevant Vpr mutant constructs. Four hours after transfection, the
cells were labeled for 16 h with 1.5 ml of Met/Cys-free DMEM
containing 150 µCi of Tran[35S]label (ICN) or
phosphate-free DMEM containing 0.5 mCi of 32Pi
(ICN), 10% dialyzed FCS, and antibiotics. HEK293 cells were transfected with pcDNA-VPR and labeled with
Tran[35S]label or 32Pi as
described earlier. The cells were harvested and lysed into 1× sodium
dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) buffer
(0.125 M Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 20% glycerol, 10% [vol/vol] 2-mercaptoethanol, 4% [wt/vol] SDS); with 0.2 mM
Na2VO4 added to
32Pi-labeled samples). After boiling for 10 min
and a brief microcentrifugation, the sample was diluted 40-fold with
radioimmunoprecipitation (RIPA) buffer without SDS (1% [vol/vol]
Triton X-100, 0.5% [wt/vol] deoxycholate, and 0.2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride in PBS, with 0.2 mM
Na2VO4 added to
32Pi-labeled samples). Then 5 µl of anti-Vpr
antiserum was added, and the mixture was incubated for 4 h or
overnight at 4°C (32). Twenty microliters of immobilized
protein A beads (rproteinA; Repligen Co., Boston, Mass.) was added, and
the mixture was incubated for 60 min at 4°C with gentle rotation.
Immunoprecipitates were collected at 500 × g for
30 s at room temperature and washed three times with RIPA buffer
and once with PBS. All buffers contained 0.2 mM
Na2VO4 for 32Pi-labeled
samples. The beads were resuspended in 30 µl of SDS-PAGE sample
buffer treated at 100°C for 10 min before loading onto a 15%
polyacrylamide gel. The gels were dried on filter paper and exposed to
a XAR-5 film (Kodak) at
80°C or exposed on a Bio-Rad phosphorimager. Due to high background from the 32P-labeled
cells, secondary immunoprecipitation was carried out to detect the
labeled protein from the cell lysates. After extensive washing of the
beads, the antibody-Vpr complex was eluted with 360 µl of glycine
buffer (50 mM glycine, 0.1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl [pH 2.8]) and
neutralized with 40 µl of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 9.0). Then 20 µl of
protein A beads in 800 µl of RIPA buffer was added, and the mixture
was incubated at 4°C for another 30 to 60 min. The beads were washed
twice with RIPA buffer and once with PBS before sample loading.
)
proviral DNA. The cells were continued in culture for 24 h in the
presence of the inducer and labeled with 32Pi
or Tran[35S]label overnight. The supernatant containing
HIV-1 virions was harvested to test for Vpr expression and
phosphorylation as described earlier.
Phosphoamino acid analysis. To determine the phosphorylated residue(s), the 32P-labeled Vpr was immunoprecipitated from pcDNA-VPR-transfected HEK293 cells, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore). The Vpr bands were excised and hydrolyzed in 6 N HCl at 110°C for 2 h. The hydrolysate was dried and dissolved in 10 µl of H2O containing 0.5 µg each of phosphoserine, phosphothreonine, and phosphotyrosine and then spotted onto a cellulose plate to perform phosphoamino acid analysis (PAA) (2). The first-dimension electrophoresis was run in pH 1.9 buffer (0.58 M formic acid, 1.36 M acetic acid). The second-dimension electrophoresis was carried out in pH 3.5 buffer (0.87 M acetic acid, 0.5% pyridine, 0.5 mM EDTA). The three phosphoamino acid locations were shown by staining the plate with 0.25% ninhydrin, while the 32P-phosphoamino acids were shown by exposure of the plate to a phosphorimager screen (Bio-Rad).
Infection of human PBMCs and macrophages.
All viral stocks
were prepared by transfecting 293T cells overnight using Lipofectamine
(GIBCO BRL). The next day, fresh medium was added and cultured for 3 days. The supernatants were harvested and spun (1,000 × g) for 10 min to discard cell debris. Viral titers were determined
by a p24-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit
(Coulter, Miami, Fla.) or MAGI5 infection and then aliquoted into a
small volume and stored at
80°C for later analysis as described
elsewhere (24).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HIV-1 Vpr is phosphorylated in vivo.
We hypothesized that the
different Vpr functions (nuclear transport of the preintegration
complex, G2 cell cycle arrest, transactivation, etc.) may
be performed by differently modified versions of HIV-1 Vpr. Computer
analysis of HIV-1 NL4-3 Vpr using the ScanProsite program (ExPASy
molecular biology server) revealed a CKII phosphorylation domain, TYGD,
at positions 49 to 52 of Vpr (the positions are according to HIV-1
NL4-3 Vpr) (Fig. 1). This suggested that
threonine 49 (T49) may be phosphorylated in vivo. Further analysis
indicated that the potential phosphorylation sites (47Y, 49T, 50Y, 53T, and 79S) are highly conserved among almost all of the HIV and simian
immunodeficiency virus (SIV) isolates. 94S and 96S are found in HIV-1
isolates but not in HIV-2 and SIV Vpr. Other sites (15Y, 19T, 28S, and
84T) are much less conserved between different isolates (Fig. 1). It is
interesting that the highly conserved residues are mostly located in
the C-terminal half of Vpr while the relative poorly conserved sites
are located in the N-terminal half of the protein.
|
|
Serine residue(s) phosphorylation.
To determine the
phosphorylated residue(s), the 32P-labeled Vpr was
immunoprecipitated from pcDNA-VPR-transfected HEK293 cells, separated
by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane to perform PAA.
Only [32P]phosphoserine was detected; no 32P
signal was detected at the position of phosphotyrosine or
phosphothreonine (Fig. 3). The same
result was obtained from the Vpr expressed with the vaccinia virus
expression system (data not shown). In both cases, no signal was
detected in the three phosphoamino acid positions in the negative
controls. Therefore, the serine residue(s) is phosphorylated in HIV-1
Vpr, while the putative CKII phosphorylation site, T49, is not
modified.
|
Mapping the phosphorylation site(s).
To map the
phosphorylation site(s), all four serine residues at positions 28, 79, 94, and 96 in HIV-1 Vpr were mutated to alanines to construct Vpr4S(
)
(Fig. 4A). Vpr4S(
) was expressed in
BSC40 cells with the vaccinia virus expression system and labeled with
Tran[35S]label or 32Pi. No Vpr
phosphorylation was detected from 32Pi-labeled
pTM-VPR4S(
)-transfected cells although Vpr was expressed well in the
Tran[35S]label cells (Fig. 4B, lane 8). This result
further confirmed that only serine residues are phosphorylated.
However, none of the single mutants (Vpr28A, Vpr79A, Vpr94A, and
Vpr96A) or the SRIG deletion mutant could completely abolish the
phosphorylation, indicating that multiple sites are phosphorylated
(Fig. 4B, lanes 3 to 6 and 10). To further define the phosphorylation
sites, the triple serine mutants with only one serine remaining,
Vpr28S, Vpr79S, Vpr94S, and Vpr96S, were expressed and labeled. Besides Vpr28S, the other three mutants could be phosphorylated, but the signal
was lower than that of wild-type Vpr (Fig. 4B, lanes 9, 11, 12, and
13). The 35S-labeling results indicated that all of the
mutant Vpr proteins could be expressed well. These results indicated
that S79, S94, and S96 are phosphorylation sites but S28 is not.
|
Phosphorylation and infection of nonreplicating cells.
Since
phosphorylated Vpr was detected in the virion, it could play a role in
the infection of macrophages. To determine the role of phosphorylation
of Vpr on infection of nonreplicating cells, positions S79, S94, and
S96 were changed to A, G, and P, respectively, to avoid any amino acid
changes in the overlapping tat gene (Fig.
5A). The mutants were cloned into a
macrophagetropic proviral plasmid, p125-TTK, a chimeric virus with
HIV-1 NL4-3 Vpr and ADA envelope V3 sequence with KKQ-to-TTK mutations
at the putative MA NLS domain (22). Viruses stocks from
HIV-1 p125 containing MA-NLS and Vpr mutations (Fig. 5B) were prepared
and titered with MAGI5 cells (24). Equal numbers of blue
plaque units of viruses were used to infect PBMCs or terminally
differentiated MDMs. The infection was analyzed by the p24 antigen
assay. All of the mutant viruses could infect PBMCs at similar levels
(Fig. 5C). However, differences were observed in macrophage infection. The Vpr-ablated virus, p125-TVpr(
), exhibited a much lower level of
infection than p125-TTK but was still detectable. The Vpr
phosphorylation site mutant viruses p125-TVpr79S, -TVpr94S, and
-TVpr96S infected macrophages similarly to wild-type viruses (Fig. 5C).
However, the triple Vpr mutant virus, p125-TVpr3S(
), infected
macrophages at a lower level, similar to that of p125-TVpr(
) virus
(Fig. 5C).
|
) only packaged about on third as
much Vpr as p125 or p125-TTK.
Position 79 phosphorylation is important for Vpr G2
cell cycle arrest.
To test whether phosphorylation is important
for Vpr-mediated G2 cell cycle arrest, Vpr79A, -94G, -96P,
-79S, -94S, -96S, and -3S(
) (Fig. 5A) were separately cloned into
pZY-1 and then transfected into 293VE cells. After a 5-day selection
with G418, the cells were split and continued in culture for 36 h
in the presence or absence of the inducer, 1 µM muristerone A. Cell
cycle arrest activity was analyzed by propidium iodide staining and FACScan analysis (59) (Fig. 5D). In the absence of
muristerone A, no effect on the cell cycle was observed. However, when
wild-type Vpr was expressed from one of two different wild-type
constructs, pZY-Vpr or pZY-125 (pZY-125 has additional 170 bp
downstream of Vpr from the HIV-1 provirus), the cells were arrested in
the G2 phase (Fig. 5D). The three single mutants Vpr79A,
-94G, and -96P had different effects on the cell cycle. Vpr79A was
unable to arrest the cell cycle, but Vpr94G and Vpr96P could arrest
cells as well as the wild-type Vpr. These results suggested that 79S is
critical for the G2 cell cycle arrest (Fig. 5D). Vpr79S
could arrest the cell cycle as well as wild-type Vpr, but neither
Vpr94S nor Vpr96S could arrest the cell cycle, further suggesting that 79S, but not 94S and 96S, is critical for cell cycle arrest. As expected, Vpr3S(
), with mutations at all three phosphorylation sites,
had no significant effect on the cell cycle.
), the resistant cells
were labeled overnight with Tran[35S]label and chased in
the absence of radioisotope. The cells were harvested at different time
points, and immunoprecipitations were carried out. The proportion of
Vpr protein or mutant Vpr protein at different points was determined by
a phosphorimager (Fig. 5A). Wild-type Vpr, 79A, and 79S were similarly
stable, while Vpr3S(
) was slightly less stable.
To confirm that Vpr could be phosphorylated in the same pattern in
293VE as in BSC40 cells, 32Pi labeling was also
performed. The single mutation Vpr79A could be phosphorylated,
indicating that 94S and/or 96S are phosphorylated (Fig. 5B, lane 2).
Furthermore Vpr79S could be phosphorylated, confirming that 79S is a
phosphorylation site. However, no phosphorylation signal could be
detected from the double mutations Vpr94S and Vpr96S. Since, Vpr79A
could be phosphorylated, it is possible that the 94G or 96P mutation
disrupted the phosphorylation motifs at the C terminus of Vpr.
Since our results indicated that 79S is critical for the Vpr
G2 cell cycle arrest function, it is possible that either
the serine residue is required at this position or phosphorylation is
important for the Vpr cell cycle arrest. To study the correlation between position 79 phosphorylation and Vpr G2 cell cycle
arrest function, additional Vpr mutants at positions 78, 79, and 80 were generated and cloned into pZY-1 (Fig.
6A). Since phosphorylation of serines at
positions 94 and 96 has no effect on Vpr G2 cell cycle
arrest, to simplify the analysis, positions 94S and 96S were mutated to
G and P, respectively for all mutants. The plasmids were transfected
into 293VE cells, and the resistant cells were tested for
G2 cell arrest as described earlier. As shown earlier, Vpr
and Vpr79S could arrest cells in the G2/M phase (Fig. 6A). All mutants at positions 79 or 80 disrupted the ability of Vpr to
arrest the cell cycle in the G2 phase. However, the Vpr78Q mutation still had full G2 cell cycle arrest activity (Fig.
6A). To analyze whether or not serine 79 was phosphorylated in these Vpr mutants, the stable transfected cells were transfected with p125-Vpr(
) constructs in the presence of the inducer to test virion
incorporation of 32P-labeled Vpr (Fig. 6B). Mutants
pZY-Vpr79S and pZY-Vpr78Q exhibited a phosphorylation signal that was
strong but weaker than that of wild-type Vpr (Fig. 6B, lanes 5 and 12).
Mutant 79T exhibited much less phosphorylation (lane 9), while all
other mutants were not phosphorylated. These results further indicated
that there is a good correlation between G2 cell cycle
arrest and phosphorylation.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we have shown that Vpr is a phosphorylated protein.
The mutations pTM-VPR4S(
) and pZY-Vpr3S(
) totally abolished Vpr
phosphorylation, suggesting that only the serine residues are
phosphorylated. Since we did not detect any threonine phosphorylation, the predicted CKII domains (TYGD) in HIV-1 Vpr may not be
phosphorylated. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that CKII
may phosphorylate Vpr only under some circumstances. In this study, we
did not detect tyrosine phosphorylation, and no tyrosine
phosphorylation domain has been predicted in HIV-1 Vpr.
The triple mutant pTM-Vpr79S and the double mutant pZY-Vpr79S are phosphorylated, indicating that 79S is one of several phosphorylation sites. The finding that both pTM-VPR79A and pZY-VPR79A could be phosphorylated implied that at least one site at positions 94S or 96S was phosphorylated, although neither pZY-VPr94S or pZY-Vpr96S could be phosphorylated. However, pTM-Vpr94S and pTM-Vpr96S were phosphorylated, suggesting that both 94S and 96S in the HIV-1 Vpr are phosphorylated. These differing observations could be due to the fact that in the pTM-constructs, both sites were substituted with alanines, while in the pZY- constructs, the sites were changed to glycine and proline, respectively. Since S94 and S96 are separated by only a single residue, different amino acid residues at position 94 could affect 96S phosphorylation or vice versa. It is unlikely that a new serine phosphorylation site was created by mutation of its adjacent site to alanine. Therefore, our results indicate that serines at positions 79, 94, and 96 in the HIV-1 Vpr are phosphorylated.
Phosphorylation may change the protein charge and result in a
difference in migration on SDS-PAGE in some but not all cases (13). We did not observe any migration differences in
35S- and 32P-labeled Vpr proteins (data not
shown). It is unlikely that Vpr is fully phosphorylated, because
Vpr4S(
) and Vpr3S(
) had the same electrophoretic mobilities as the
other Vpr mutants as well as wild-type Vpr in the
35S-labeled analysis.
Phosphorylation is one the most important posttranslational
modifications for proteins. It plays an important role in protein stability, protein-protein association, protein localization, and
transcriptional regulation (26). Kewalramani et al. have shown that HIV-2 Vpr protein has less effect on cell cycle arrest than
HIV-1 Vpr due to a lower level of stability (29). Sequence analysis shows that the C-terminal 20 amino acid residues represent the
most diverse domains comparing HIV-1 and HIV-2 Vpr, and both 94S and
96S absent from HIV-2 Vpr (Fig. 1). Moreover, truncation of Vpr at
position 76 or deletion of the last three amino acids, residues 94 to
96, result in unstable proteins, suggesting that the C terminus of Vpr
is important for protein stability (39). However, no
difference in protein stability was observed between Vpr79A and Vpr79S,
suggesting that the 94G/96P replacement may not cause Vpr instability.
Since both Vpr79A and Vpr79S are slightly less stable than wild-type
Vpr, the cumulative effect resulted in Vpr3S(
) being somewhat more
unstable than any of the other mutants. However, it is still unclear
whether Vpr phosphorylation alone regulates HIV-1 Vpr turnover.
Vpr is located in the nucleus and perinuclear membrane (22, 32,
37, 38, 57). Both the N- and C-terminal domains of HIV-1 Vpr are
important for nuclear localization (27). The basic domain in
the C terminus of Vpr has a putative traditional NLS (31).
Furthermore, the C terminus of Vpr has a similar structure as a
phosphorylation-regulated protein, the CcN motif (26). Upstream of the putative NLS is 79S, and downstream is 94/96S. Phosphorylation of 79S, 94S, and 96S may regulate this putative NLS
function and further control HIV-1 Vpr localization. This may account
for the impaired replication of p125-TVpr3S(
) in macrophages.
However, protein instability and reduction of Vpr3S(
) packaged into
virions may also contribute to the impaired replication of
p125TVpr3S(
) in macrophages.
Phosphorylation regulates the cell cycle progression. Vpr G2 cell cycle arrest function appears to be regulated through phosphorylation of S79. This is in agreement with previous studies that showed that the C terminus of HIV-1 Vpr is important for G2 cell cycle arrest (11, 37, 59). Furthermore, the H(S/F)RIG domains has been identified to be important for G2 cell cycle arrest (3, 34, 35). Deletion of the SRIG (79 to 82) sequence or mutation of all arginines in the C-terminal portion of Vpr impaired the Vpr G2 arrest activity (59). S79I and R80A mutations were also defective in G2 cell cycle arrest activity (14). In addition, the HSRIG sequence is highly conserved in all HIV-1, HIV-2, and SIV isolates (Fig. 1).
The loss of Vpr G2 cell cycle arrest in our mutants could be due to mutation of the phosphorylation site, S79, or effects on phosphorylation by mutations in the adjacent sequences. Both Vpr80A and Vpr80K mutations impair G2 cell cycle arrest and phosphorylation, indicating that position 80 belongs to the 79S phosphorylation motif. It is also suggested that the phosphorylation motif is very restricted since similar amino acid residues at position 80, lysine or alanine substitutions abolished phosphorylation and G2 cell cycle arrest activities. The glutamine (Q)-to-histamine (H) substitution at position 78 did not affect Vpr function, suggesting that position 78 is less restrictive on the G2 arrest domain than 79S and 80R. It is interesting that the threonine substitution Vpr79T exhibits only a very low level of phosphorylation, although both serine and threonine may be phosphorylated by the same serine/threonine kinase. Aspartate (D) is structurally similar to phosphoserine and has been used to replace serines in the phosphorylated proteins to mimic phosphoserine function (12). However, Vpr79D could not arrest cells in the G2 phase.
In both yeast and mammalian cells, the HFRIGHSRIG motif in Vpr is critical for G2 cell cycle arrest (3, 34, 35). In the yeast model, Vpr79A arrested the cell cycle in the G2 phase like the wild-type Vpr (7). However, our results indicated that Vpr79A abolished the G2 cell cycle arrest function in mammalian cells. Several cellular factors have been identified to interact with HIV-1 Vpr, such as Vpr-interacting protein, uracil DNA glycosylase, human Vpr-interacting protein, and the human homologue of the yeast repair protein RAD23 (4, 19, 36, 47, 55, 58). These factors may be important for Vpr G2 cell cycle arrest or other Vpr functions. Studies of the interaction of these proteins in mammalian cells with the phosphorylated Vpr may provide insights into their role in cell cycle regulation. It is also not known whether one of these factors has the kinase activity for Vpr. The identification of the Vpr kinase will be important for defining the mechanisms of Vpr arrest of cells in the G2 phase.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Robert Horton, Nancy Vander Heyden, and Mark Dalton for critical technique support.
This work is supported by PHS grants, and Yi Zhou is supported by NIH training grant CA09547-12.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Box 8069, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110. Phone: (314) 362-8836. Fax: (314) 747-2797. E-mail: lratner{at}imgate.wustl.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Agostini, I., J. M. Navarro, F. Rey, M. Bouhamdan, B. Spire, R. Vigne, and J. Sire. 1996. The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr transactivator: cooperation with promoter-bound activator domains and binding to TFIIB. J. Mol. Biol. 261:599-606[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.). 1989. Current protocols in molecular biology. Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley-Interscience, New York, N.Y. |
| 3. | Berglez, J. M., L. A. Castelli, S. A. Sankovich, S. C. Smith, C. C. Curtain, and I. G. Macreadie. 1999. Residues within the HFRIGC sequence of HIV-1 vpr involved in growth arrest activities. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 264:287-290[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. | Bouhamdan, M., S. Benichou, F. Rey, J. M. Navarro, I. Agostini, B. Spire, J. Camonis, G. Slupphaug, R. Vigne, R. Benarous, and J. Sire. 1996. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr protein binds to the uracil DNA glycosylase DNA repair enzyme. J. Virol. 70:697-704[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Bukrinsky, M. I., S. Haggerty, M. P. Dempsey, N. Sharova, A. Adzhubel, L. Spitz, P. Lewis, D. Goldfarb, M. Emerman, and M. Stevenson. 1993. A nuclear localization signal within HIV-1 matrix protein that governs infection of non-dividing cells. Nature 365:666-669[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Camaur, D., P. Gallay, S. Swingler, and D. Trono. 1997. Human immunodeficiency virus matrix tyrosine phosphorylation: characterization of the kinase and its substrate requirements. J. Virol. 71:6834-6841[Abstract]. |
| 7. |
Chen, M.,
R. T. Elder,
M. Yu,
M. G. O'Gorman,
L. Selig,
R. Benarous,
A. Yamamoto, and Y. Zhao.
1999.
Mutational analysis of Vpr-induced G2 arrest, nuclear localization, and cell death in fission yeast.
J. Virol.
73:3236-3245 |
| 8. |
Cohen, E. A.,
G. Dehni,
J. G. Sodroski, and W. A. Haseltine.
1990.
Human immunodeficiency virus vpr product is a virion-associated regulatory protein.
J. Virol.
64:3097-3099 |
| 9. | Cullen, B. R., and W. C. Green. 1990. Functions of the auxiliary gene products of the human immunodeficiency virus type-1. Virology 178:1-5[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Dalgleish, A. G., P. C. Beverley, P. R. Clapham, D. H. Crawford, M. F. Greaves, and R. A. Weiss. 1984. The CD4 (T4) antigen is an essential component of the receptor for the AIDS retrovirus. Nature 312:763-767[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | Di Marzio, P., S. Choe, M. Ebright, R. Knoblauch, and N. R. Landau. 1995. Mutational analysis of cell cycle arrest, nuclear localization, and virion packaging of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr. J. Virol. 69:7909-7916[Abstract]. |
| 12. | Dumaz, N., and D. W. Meek. 1999. Serine15 phosphorylation stimulates p53 transactivation but does not directly influence interaction with HDM2. EMBO J. 18:7002-7010[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. |
Eissenberg, J. C.,
Y. W. Ge, and T. Hartnett.
1994.
Increased phosphorylation of HP1, a heterochromatin-associated protein of Drosophila, is correlated with heterochromatin assembly.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:21315-21321 |
| 14. |
Felzien, L. K.,
C. Woffendin,
M. O. Hottiger,
R. A. Subbramanian,
E. A. Cohen, and G. J. Nabel.
1998.
HIV transcriptional activation by the accessory protein, VPR, is mediated by the p300 co-activator.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:5281-5286 |
| 15. |
Fuerst, T. R.,
E. G. Niles,
F. W. Studier, and B. Moss.
1986.
Eukaryotic transient-expression system based on recombinant vaccinia virus that synthesizes bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:8122-8126 |
| 16. | Gallay, P., V. Stitt, C. Mundy, M. Oettinger, and D. Trono. 1996. Role of the karyopherin pathway in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nuclear import. J. Virol. 70:1027-1032[Abstract]. |
| 17. | Gallay, P., S. Swingler, J. Song, F. Bushman, and D. Trono. 1995. HIV nuclear import is governed by the phosphotyrosine-mediated binding of matrix to the core domain of integrase. Cell 83:569-576[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Goh, W. C., M. E. Rogel, C. M. Kinsey, S. F. Michael, P. N. Fultz, M. A. Nowak, B. H. Hahn, and M. Emerman. 1998. HIV-1 Vpr increases viral expression by manipulation of the cell cycle: a mechanism for selection of Vpr in vivo. Nat. Med. 4:65-71[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Gragerov, A., T. Kino, G. Ilyina-Gragerova, G. P. Chrousos, and G. N. Pavlakis. 1998. HHR23A, the human homologue of the yeast repair protein RAD23, interacts specifically with Vpr protein and prevents cell cycle arrest but not the transcriptional effects of Vpr. Virology 245:323-330[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Graves, J. D., and E. G. Krebs. 1999. Protein phosphorylation and signal transduction. Pharmacol. Ther. 82:111-121[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. |
Gummuluru, S., and M. Emerman.
1999.
Cell cycle- and Vpr-mediated regulation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 expression in primary and transformed T-cell lines.
J. Virol.
73:5422-5430 |
| 22. |
Heinzinger, N. K.,
M. I. Bukinsky,
S. A. Haggerty,
A. M. Ragland,
V. Kewalramani,
M. A. Lee,
H. E. Gendelman,
L. Ratner,
M. Stevenson, and M. Emerman.
1994.
The Vpr protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 influences nuclear localization of viral nucleic acids in nondividing host cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:7311-7315 |
| 23. |
Hrimech, M.,
X. J. Yao,
F. Bachand,
N. Rougeau, and E. A. Cohen.
1999.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Vpr functions as an immediate-early protein during HIV-1 infection.
J. Virol.
73:4101-4109 |
| 24. | Hung, C. S., S. Pontow, and L. Ratner. 1999. Relationship between productive HIV-1 infection of macrophages and CCR5 utilization. Virology 264:278-288[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Jacque, J. M., A. Mann, H. Enslen, N. Sharova, B. Brichacek, R. J. Davis, and M. Stevenson. 1998. Modulation of HIV-1 infectivity by MAPK, a virion-associated kinase. EMBO J. 17:2607-2618[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. |
Jans, D. A., and S. Hubner.
1996.
Regulation of protein transport to the nucleus: central role of phosphorylation.
Physiol. Rev.
76:651-685 |
| 27. |
Jenkins, Y.,
M. McEntee,
K. Weis, and W. C. Greene.
1998.
Characterization of HIV-1 vpr nuclear import: analysis of signals and pathways.
J. Cell Biol.
143:875-885 |
| 28. |
Jowett, J. B.,
Y. M. Xie, and I. S. Chen.
1999.
The presence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr correlates with a decrease in the frequency of mutations in a plasmid shuttle vector.
J. Virol.
73:7132-7137 |
| 29. | Kewalramani, V. N., C. S. Park, P. A. Gallombardo, and M. Emerman. 1996. Protein stability influences human immunodeficiency virus type 2 Vpr virion incorporation and cell cycle effect. Virology 218:326-334[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. | Klatzmann, D., E. Champagne, S. Chamaret, J. Gruest, D. Guetard, T. Hercend, J. C. Gluckman, and L. Montagnier. 1984. T-lymphocyte T4 molecule behaves as the receptor for human retrovirus LAV. Nature 312:767-768[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 31. | Lu, Y. L., R. P. Bennett, J. W. Wills, R. Gorelick, and L. Ratner. 1995. A leucine triplet repeat sequence (LXX)4 in p6gag is important for Vpr incorporation into human immunodeficiency virus type 1 particles. J. Virol. 69:6873-6879[Abstract]. |
| 32. |
Lu, Y. L.,
P. Spearman, and L. Ratner.
1993.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viral protein R localization in infected cells and virions.
J. Virol.
67:6542-6550 |
| 33. | Luo, T., J. R. Downing, and J. V. Garcia. 1997. Induction of phosphorylation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef and enhancement of CD4 downregulation by phorbol myristate acetate. J. Virol. 71:2535-2539[Abstract]. |
| 34. | Macreadie, I. G., C. K. Arunagiri, D. R. Hewish, J. F. White, and A. A. Azad. 1996. Extracellular addition of a domain of HIV-1 Vpr containing the amino acid sequence motif H(S/F)RIG causes cell membrane permeabilization and death. Mol. Microbiol. 19:1185-1192[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. |
Macreadie, I. G.,
L. A. Castelli,
D. R. Hewish,
A. Kirkpatrick,
A. C. Ward, and A. A. Azad.
1995.
A domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr containing repeated H(S/F)RIG amino acid motifs causes cell growth arrest and structural defects.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:2770-2774 |
| 36. |
Mahalingam, S.,
V. Ayyavoo,
M. Patel,
T. Kieber-Emmons,
G. D. Kao,
R. J. Muschel, and D. B. Weiner.
1998.
HIV-1 Vpr interacts with a human 34-kDa mov34 homologue, a cellular factor linked to the G2/M phase transition of the mammalian cell cycle.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:3419-3424 |
| 37. | Mahalingam, S., V. Ayyavoo, M. Patel, T. Kieber-Emmons, and D. B. Weiner. 1997. Nuclear import, virion incorporation, and cell cycle arrest/differentiation are mediated by distinct functional domains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr. J. Virol. 71:6339-6347[Abstract]. |
| 38. | Mahalingam, S., R. G. Collman, M. Patel, C. E. Monken, and A. Srinivasan. 1995. Functional analysis of HIV-1 Vpr: identification of determinants essential for subcellular localization. Virology 212:331-339[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 39. | Mahalingam, S., R. G. Collman, M. Patel, C. E. Monken, and A. Srinivasan. 1995. Role of the conserved dipeptide Gly75 and Cys76 on HIV-1 Vpr function. Virology 210:495-500[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. | Mansky, L. M. 1996. The mutation rate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is influenced by the vpr gene. Virology 222:391-400[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 41. | Paul, M., and M. A. Jabbar. 1997. Phosphorylation of both phosphoacceptor sites in the HIV-1 Vpu cytoplasmic domain is essential for Vpu-mediated ER degradation of CD4. Virology 232:207-216[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 42. | Peterson, R. T., and S. L. Schreiber. 1999. Kinase phosphorylation: keeping it all in the family. Curr. Biol. 9:R521-R524[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 43. |
Piller, S. C.,
G. D. Ewart,
A. Premkumar,
G. B. Cox, and P. W. Gage.
1996.
Vpr protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 forms cation-selective channels in planar lipid bilayers.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:111-115 |
| 44. |
Poon, B.,
K. Grovit-Ferbas,
S. A. Stewart, and I. S. Y. Chen.
1998.
Cell cycle arrest by Vpr in HIV-1 virions and insensitivity to antiretroviral agents.
Science
281:266-269 |
| 45. | Popov, S., M. Rexach, G. Zybarth, N. Reiling, M. A. Lee, L. Ratner, C. M. Lane, M. S. Moore, G. Blobel, and M. Bukrinsky. 1998. Viral protein R regulates nuclear import of the HIV-1 pre-integration complex. EMBO J. 17:909-917[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 46. | Re, F., D. Braaten, E. K. Franke, and J. Luban. 1995. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr arrests the cell cycle in G2 by inhibiting the activation of p34cdc2-cyclin B. J. Virol. 69:6859-6864[Abstract]. |
| 47. | Selig, L., S. Benichou, M. E. Rogel, L. I. Wu, M. A. Vodicka, J. Sire, R. Benarous, and M. Emerman. 1997. Uracil DNA glycosylase specifically interacts with Vpr of both human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and simian immunodeficiency virus of sooty mangabeys, but binding does not correlate with cell cycle arrest. J. Virol. 71:4842-4846[Abstract]. |
| 48. | Shackney, S. E., and T. V. Shankey. 1999. Cell cycle models for molecular biology and molecular oncology: exploring new dimensions. Cytometry 35:97-116[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 49. |
Shimura, M.,
Y. Onozuka,
T. Yamaguchi,
K. Hatake,
F. Takaku, and Y. Ishizaka.
1999.
Micronuclei formation with chromosome breaks and gene amplification caused by Vpr, an accessory gene of human immunodeficiency virus.
Cancer Res.
59:2259-2264 |
| 50. | Stivahtis, G. L., M. A. Soares, M. A. Vodicka, B. H. Hahn, and M. Emerman. 1997. Conservation and host specificity of Vpr-mediated cell cycle arrest suggest a fundamental role in primate lentivirus evolution and biology. J. Virol. 71:4331-4338[Abstract]. |
| 51. |
Subbramanian, R. A., and E. A. Cohen.
1994.
Molecular biology of the human immunodeficiency virus accessory proteins.
J. Virol.
68:6831-6835 |
| 52. |
Subbramanian, R. A.,
A. Kessous-Elbaz,
R. Lodge,
J. Forget,
X. J. Yao,
D. Bergeron, and E. A. Cohen.
1998.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr is a positive regulator of viral transcription and infectivity in primary human macrophages.
J. Exp. Med.
187:1103-1111 |
| 53. |
Wang, J. J.,
Y. Lu, and L. Ratner.
1994.
Particle assembly and Vpr expression in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected cells demonstrated by immunoelectron microscopy.
J. Gen. Virol.
75:2607-2614 |
| 54. |
Westervelt, P.,
H. E. Gendelman, and L. Ratner.
1991.
Identification of a determinant within the human immunodeficiency virus 1 surface envelope glycoprotein critical for productive infection of primary monocytes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:3097-3101 |
| 55. | Withers-Ward, E. S., J. B. Jowett, S. A. Stewart, Y. M. Xie, A. Garfinkel, Y. Shibagaki, S. A. Chow, N. Shah, F. Hanaoka, D. G. Sawitz, R. W. Armstrong, L. M. Souza, and I. S. Chen. 1997. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr interacts with HHR23A, a cellular protein implicated in nucleotide excision DNA repair. J. Virol. 71:9732-9742[Abstract]. |
| 56. | Wong-Staal, F., P. K. Chanda, and J. Ghrayeb. 1987. Human immunodeficiency virus type III. The eighth gene. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 3:33-39[Medline]. |
| 57. | Yao, X. J., R. A. Subbramanian, N. Rougeau, F. Boisvert, D. Bergeron, and E. A. Cohen. 1995. Mutagenic analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr: role of a predicted N-terminal alpha-helical structure in Vpr nuclear localization and virion incorporation. J. Virol. 69:7032-7044[Abstract]. |
| 58. |
Zhao, L. J.,
S. Mukherjee, and O. Narayan.
1994.
Biochemical mechanism of HIV-1 Vpr function. Specific interaction with a cellular protein.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:15577-15582 |
| 59. | Zhou, Y., Y. Lu, and L. Ratner. 1998. Arginine residues in the C-terminus of HIV-1 Vpr are important for nuclear localization and cell cycle arrest. Virology 242:414-424[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»