Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, July 2000, p. 5939-5948, Vol. 74, No. 13
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Reovirus Protein
NS Binds in Multiple Copies to
Single-Stranded RNA and Shares Properties with Single-Stranded DNA
Binding Proteins
Anne Lynn
Gillian,1
Stephen C.
Schmechel,2
Jonathan
Livny,1
Leslie A.
Schiff,2 and
Max L.
Nibert1,*
Department of Biochemistry and Institute for
Molecular Virology, The College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, and
The Graduate School, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison,
Wisconsin 53706,1 and Department of
Microbiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 554552
Received 14 December 1999/Accepted 5 April 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Reovirus nonstructural protein
NS interacts with reovirus
plus-strand RNAs in infected cells, but little is known about the nature of those interactions or their roles in viral replication. In
this study, a recombinant form of
NS was analyzed for in vitro binding to nucleic acids using gel mobility shift assays. Multiple units of
NS bound to single-stranded RNA molecules with
positive cooperativity and with each unit covering about 25 nucleotides at saturation. The
NS protein did not bind preferentially to reovirus RNA over nonreovirus RNA in competition experiments but did
bind preferentially to single-stranded over double-stranded nucleic
acids and with a slight preference for RNA over DNA. In addition,
NS
bound to single-stranded RNA to which a 19-base DNA
oligonucleotide was hybridized at either end or near the middle. When
present in saturative amounts,
NS displaced this
oligonucleotide from the partial duplex. The strand displacement
activity did not require ATP hydrolysis and was inhibited by
MgCl2, distinguishing it from a classical ATP-dependent
helicase. These properties of
NS are similar to those of
single-stranded DNA binding proteins that are known to
participate in genomic DNA replication, suggesting a related role
for
NS in replication of the reovirus RNA genome.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Mammalian orthoreoviruses
(reoviruses) encode three nonstructural proteins, µNS,
NS, and
1s, whose roles during viral infection remain poorly understood.
This report concerns
NS, which is known to be essential for reovirus
replication based on the phenotype of a conditionally lethal
(temperature-sensitive) mutant with its lesion in the
NS-encoding S3
gene segment (9, 27). The
NS protein comprises 366 amino
acids and has a molecular mass of 41 kDa. Interaction of
NS with the
viral plus-strand RNAs in infected cells is well documented (3,
14). Moreover, when
NS from infected cells is used to bind
those RNAs in vitro, it protects 20- to 40-nucleotide fragments of the
RNAs from RNase T1 digestion (34). Since the protected
fragments include the 3' ends of at least some of the plus-strand RNAs,
it was proposed that
NS binds specifically to those regions
(34). In addition,
NS and two other reovirus proteins,
µNS and
3, are found to associate with the viral plus-strand RNAs
shortly after they are transcribed in infected cells and before
minus-strand synthesis converts them into the double-stranded RNA
(dsRNA) genome segments (3). These findings have led to a
hypothesis that
NS plays a role in selecting or condensing the viral
plus-strand RNAs for packaging during early stages of particle
morphogenesis (3, 14, 28, 34). A role for
NS in
translation of proteins from the reovirus plus-strand RNAs has also
been suggested (10, 14).
Evidence for a direct role of
NS in minus-strand synthesis is
limited. The temperature-sensitive mutant whose lesion maps to the S3
gene segment (27) produces little or no dsRNA at restrictive temperatures (9, 15), but this indicates only that
NS
provides a required function at or before minus-strand synthesis in the replication cycle. Other previous work demonstrated that
NS-containing ribonucleoprotein complexes isolated from
reovirus-infected cells display a poly(C)-dependent poly(G) polymerase
activity (12, 13). However, recombinant
NS expressed in
Escherichia coli or insect cells does not display this
activity (10, 28), whereas recombinant reovirus
protein
3 obtained from mammalian or insect cells does
(35; D. L. Farsetta and M. L. Nibert,
unpublished data). These findings suggest that the
NS-containing complexes characterized by Gomatos et al. (12,
13) also contained
3, which is a known component of the
reovirus RNA polymerase (22, 35). Thus, despite not having
polymerase activity itself,
NS might play a role in minus-strand
synthesis within these
3-containing complexes.
In the present study, we performed additional characterizations of the
RNA-binding properties of
NS to learn more about its roles in
reovirus replication. In initial experiments, we analyzed purified,
baculovirus-expressed
NS (10) for its capacity to bind
single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) molecules in gel mobility shift assays. The
results indicated that multiple units of
NS bind to single molecules
of ssRNA with positive cooperativity and in numbers dependent on RNA
length such that each unit of
NS covered approximately 25 nucleotides at saturation. Competition experiments with various nucleic
acids addressed the specificity of
NS binding. These studies
revealed a preference for
NS to bind single-stranded over
double-stranded nucleic acids, with a slight preference for RNA over
DNA, but they showed no preference for
NS to bind reovirus over
nonreovirus RNA. We also characterized the capacity of
NS to
bind ssRNA to which short DNA oligonucleotides were hybridized. Displacement of these oligonucleotides from the partial duplexes was
observed, and further characterizations demonstrated that this
strand displacement activity of
NS is distinct from that of a
classical helicase. The observed activities of
NS are similar to
those of several well-characterized single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding
proteins, which are known to be involved in genomic double-stranded DNA
(dsDNA) replication, suggesting that
NS may play a related role in
replication of the reovirus dsRNA genome.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Overexpression and purification of
NS.
NS was
overexpressed in insect cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus
containing the
NS-encoding reovirus type 1 Lang S3 gene and
purified as described previously (10). Although RNase A was
used in the purification procedure, no nuclease activity was detected
in the final purified preparations of
NS. As noted in the previous
study (10), the
NS protein obtained by this protocol was
95% pure according to results with Coomassie-stained sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gels and appeared to be relatively homogeneous
in that it migrated between 7- and 9S in 5 to 20% sucrose gradients in
the absence of RNA. Nonetheless, whether these complexes represent one
discrete type of
NS oligomer (e.g., tetramer or hexamer) or a
mixture and whether or not they can self-associate under some
conditions to form higher-order multimers remain to be determined.
Construction of the plasmids pGEM-DS4 and pGEM-3'DS4.
The
reovirus type 3 Dearing S4 gene was amplified from a linearized plasmid
(19) by PCR (29) with Vent DNA polymerase (New
England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.) and primers (Integrated DNA
Technologies, Coralville, Iowa) representing the 5' and 3' ends of S4
plus EcoRI and PstI sites, respectively. The
purified PCR product was digested with EcoRI and
PstI, again purified, and ligated into those sites in the
pGEM-4 plasmid (Promega, Madison, Wis.). A PCR with other primers was
used to amplify nucleotides 738 to 1196 of the S4 gene from the new
plasmid as well as the majority of pGEM-4 sequences between the
PstI and EcoRI sites. Another PCR was used to
amplify nucleotides 1 to 536 of the S4 gene. A final PCR was used to
join and amplify the purified products from the first two
reactions (8). The purified product from the final reaction
was digested with SpeI and XhoI and ligated to
the purified SpeI-XhoI fragment of the cloned S4
gene to generate new plasmid pGEM-DS4, with the entire S4 gene
positioned immediately 3' to the SP6 RNA polymerase promoter such that
the first nucleotide of the SP6 transcript was S4 nucleotide 1 (23).
For subcloning the 3' end of S4 from pGEM-DS4, we performed PCR with
two primers (Integrated DNA Technologies) and Deep Vent DNA polymerase
(New England Biolabs). One primer represented the plus strand of
pGEM-DS4 from S4 nucleotides 1061 to 1096, except for two nucleotide
substitutions that generated a new EcoRI site at S4
nucleotides 1082 to 1087, and the second primer represented the minus
strand of pGEM-DS4 in vector sequences 3' to the S4 gene and an
intervening HindIII site. The amplified product was digested with EcoRI and HindIII and ligated
into those sites in the pGEM-4Z vector to generate new plasmid
pGEM-3'DS4. The first 6 nucleotides of the SP6 transcript from this
plasmid were from pGEM-4Z, the next 6 were the EcoRI site,
and the next 109 were from the S4 3' end, beginning with S4 nucleotide
1088 and ending with the final S4 nucleotide, 1196.
Generation of RNA probes and competitors by in vitro runoff
transcription.
To synthesize linear DNA templates with the desired
termini for in vitro runoff transcription, we performed PCR with
different primer pairs (Integrated DNA Technologies) (Table
1) and Deep Vent DNA polymerase (New
England Biolabs). For making either full-length or partial (5'S4-121,
5'S4-151, 5'S4-181, 5'S4-211, 5'S4-271, and 3'S4-121) S4 plus-strand
transcripts, one primer represented the plus strand of pGEM-DS4 or
pGEM-3'DS4 in vector sequences 5' to the SP6 promoter and the second
primer represented the minus strand of pGEM-DS4 or pGEM-3'DS4 in S4
sequences beginning either at the 3' end (relative to the plus strand)
or the indicated (Table 1) internal position of S4. For making the
121-nucleotide vector transcript (pGEM-121), one primer represented the
plus strand of pGEM-4Z in sequences 5' to the SP6 promoter and the
second primer represented the minus strand of pGEM-4Z in the
appropriate downstream sequences. The fragments were isolated from 1%
agarose gels and purified using the Qiaex II kit (Qiagen, Valencia,
Calif.).
To generate RNA transcripts from each amplified DNA fragment, 1 to 2 µg of the purified fragment was combined with transcription
buffer
(50 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 16 mM MgCl
2, 2 mM spermidine, 40
mM dithiothreitol); 3 mM ATP, CTP, and UTP; 1 mM GTP (Pharmacia
Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.); 200 U of SP6 RNA polymerase (Epicentre,
Madison, Wis.); 20 U of RNasin (Promega); and 0.1 U of inorganic
pyrophosphatase (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.). To radiolabel the RNA
transcripts, 0.13 nmol of [

-
32P]GTP (specific
activity, 3,000 Ci/mmol) (NEN, Boston, Mass.)
was also added. The
reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for
90 min prior to the
addition of another 130 U of SP6 RNA polymerase,
13 U of RNasin, and
0.067 U of inorganic pyrophosphatase. The
reaction mixtures were then
incubated for another 90 min, after
which they were extracted with
phenol-chloroform, and the RNA
was precipitated with 1 volume of 7.5 M
ammonium acetate and 2
volumes of 100% ethanol. The RNAs were gel
isolated from a 5%
polyacrylamide Tris-glycine native gel (25 mM Tris,
192 mM glycine)
and eluted overnight at room temperature in elution
buffer (0.1%
sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.5 M ammonium acetate, 10 mM
magnesium
acetate, 1 mM EDTA; filter sterilized). The eluted RNA was
then
extracted with phenol-chloroform and precipitated with 0.3 M
sodium
acetate and 2 volumes of 100% ethanol. The RNA concentration
was
determined by scintillation counting (
11).
Gel mobility shift assays.
Various amounts of purified
NS
in phosphate-buffered saline (137 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 8.4 mM
Na2HPO4, 1.6 mM KH2PO4)
were incubated with various amounts of 32P-labeled RNA in
gel shift buffer (12 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 0.1 mg of bovine serum
albumin/ml, 10 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 0.2% Tween 20, 10 U of RNasin)
(32) for 15 min at room temperature in a total volume of 10 µl. The samples were mixed with gel loading buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 0.25% bromophenol blue, 0.25% xylene cyanole FF, 30%
glycerol) and subjected to electrophoresis through either a 1%
agarose-Tris-acetate-EDTA gel (40 mM Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA) at 90 V
or a 5% polyacrylamide Tris-glycine native gel (described above) at 10 mA. The times of electrophoresis varied depending on the size of the
RNA probe used in the assay. The gels were dried onto filter paper
under vacuum, and the samples were visualized by
phosphorimaging (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.). The amount
of radioactivity in the samples was quantitated using ImageQuant
software (Molecular Dynamics). Concentrations of NaCl from 0 to 300 mM
had little effect on the binding of
NS to RNA. The standard binding
reaction mixture used throughout this study contained less than 30 mM NaCl.
Immunoblots.
Proteins in the 5% Tris-glycine polyacrylamide
gels were blotted onto a nylon membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) at
30 V overnight at 4°C in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM
glycine). The membrane was probed with the anti-
NS antibody
(10) at a dilution of 1/500 using the protocol supplied with
the Bio-Rad color development reagent kit. The secondary antibody was
visualized with color development reagents
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoylphosphate p-toluidine salt and
p-nitroblue tetrazolium chloride (Bio-Rad).
Hill plots.
A Hill plot was generated for the 121-, 151-, and 181-nucleotide RNAs in Fig. 3 as well as for three other assays
done with a 121-nucleotide RNA and
NS amounts from 0.24 to 6.0 pmol
(1 µg
24 pmol) (26). The amount of bound
NS
was calculated as follows. First the amount of radiolabeled RNA in each
shifted band was quantitated and expressed as a percentage of total RNA in the reaction mixture. Next the percentage was multiplied by the
number of
NS units in each band (e.g., one
NS unit in the fastest-migrating band and four in the slowest). Finally, the amounts
of
NS in all four bands were summed and the sum was divided by the
total amount of protein added to each sample. The amount of unbound
NS = 1
the amount of bound
NS. The log10
(bound
NS/unbound
NS) versus the log10 (
NS
concentration) was plotted, and the best-fit line to the linear portion
of the graph was calculated using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Wash.).
The slope of the line is the Hill coefficient (40) and was
calculated for all six assays and averaged.
Competition assays.
A radiolabeled RNA probe (0.24 pmol
each) was mixed with the unlabeled competitors in various relative
amounts, after which 4.8 pmol of
NS was added, and the samples were
incubated for 15 min at room temperature. For one set of samples,
NS
was combined with radiolabeled RNA probe and incubated for 15 min as
described above. The competitor was then added, and the samples were
incubated for an additional 15 min or 2 h. Equivalent weights of
RNA (concentration determined by A260
[30]) were used. The radiolabeled RNA probe used for
both competition experiments was the 121-nucleotide fragment from the
5' end of S4 in the pGEM-DS4 plasmid. The nucleic acid competitors used
for competition between ss- and dsRNA and ss- and dsDNA were the
following: ssRNA, full-length in vitro-transcribed S4 gene; dsRNA,
reovirus type 3 Dearing genomic RNAs; ssDNA, circular M13 plasmid
containing rhinovirus sequences; dsDNA, SmaI-linearized pGEM-4Z vector containing the reovirus type 1 Lang S3 gene
(10). The unlabeled RNA competitors used for competitions
were the following: the 5' 121 nucleotides of S4 (same RNA used as the
labeled probe), the 3' 121 nucleotides of S4, and 121 nucleotides from
the multiple-cloning region of the pGEM-4Z vector (Promega) that did
not contain reovirus sequences. The amount of radiolabeled RNA bound
was determined as the amount of RNA in the upper four shifted bands
versus the total amount of RNA. All results are expressed relative to
the sample containing no competitor.
RNA-DNA and RNA-RNA partial duplexes.
Nineteen-nucleotide
DNA oligonucleotides (Integrated DNA Technologies) were designed to be
complementary to the 3' end, the middle, or the 5' end of the 5'S4-121
RNA (Table 2). The oligonucleotides were
5'-end-labeled with polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs) and
[
-32P]ATP, extracted with phenol-chloroform, and
precipitated with ethanol. The oligonucleotides were then hybridized to
the 5'S4-121 RNA in hybridization buffer (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl,
2 mM EDTA) at 90°C for 5 min and cooled to room temperature.
To synthesize linear DNA templates for transcribing the 17-nucleotide
RNA oligonucleotide (T7-17) (Table
2) and the 146-nucleotide
RNA
(SP6-146) to which T7-17 was later hybridized, we performed
PCR with
different primer pairs (Integrated DNA Technologies)
(Table
1) and Deep
Vent DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs).
For making T7-17, one primer
represented the minus strand of pGEM-3'DS4
in vector sequences 5' to
the T7 promoter and the second primer
represented the plus strand of
pGEM-3'DS4 in the appropriate downstream
vector sequences. For making
SP6-146, one primer represented the
plus strand of pGEM-3'DS4 in vector
sequences 5' to the SP6 promoter
and the second primer represented the
minus strand of pGEM-3'DS4
in the appropriate downstream vector
sequences. Both RNA transcripts
were generated by runoff transcription
in vitro as described above
except that T7 RNA polymerase (Epicentre)
and 12 mM MgCl
2 were
used in making T7-17.
[

-
32P]GTP was included in the reaction mixture to
provide radiolabeling
of T7-17, SP6-146, or both in different
experiments. T7-17 was
hybridized to the 3' end of SP6-146 as described
above for the
RNA-DNA
hybrids.
ATPase and displacement assays.
In the
NS samples for the
ATPase assay, 75 pmol of purified
NS was incubated with 3 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP (NEN) in gel shift buffer with or without
EDTA (12.5 mM). In the core samples for the ATPase assay, 6 × 109 reovirus cores were incubated with 3 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP (NEN) in nucleoside triphosphatase buffer
(50 mM Tris-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid [MES] [pH 8.5], 5 mM
MgCl2) (25) with or without EDTA (12.5 mM). The
RNA-DNA hybrid (0.11 pmol) was added to all samples, which were
incubated at room temperature or 35°C (cores) for 30 min in a total
volume of 5 µl each. One microliter of each sample was then spotted
onto a polyester-backed polyethyleneimine-cellulose thin-layer
chromatography plate (Sigma) and developed with ascending solvent (1 M
formic acid, 0.5 M LiCl). The reaction products were visualized by
phosphorimaging (Molecular Dynamics). To assay for DNA oligonucleotide
displacement activity in parallel with ATPase assays, samples were
prepared in the same manner except that no [
-32P]ATP
was added. The entire volume of each sample was then analyzed on a 5%
polyacrylamide Tris-glycine native gel as described above. For other
experiments in which DNA or RNA oligonucleotide displacement activity
was measured, various amounts of purified
NS and 0.24 to 0.26 pmol
of RNA-DNA or RNA-RNA were added to gel shift buffer in a total volume
of 10 µl and then the mixtures were incubated at room temperature for
15 min before running the entire sample on a 5% polyacrylamide
Tris-glycine native gel.
 |
RESULTS |
Gel mobility shift assays for
NS binding to 1,196- or
151-nucleotide ssRNAs.
The RNA-binding activity of purified
NS was examined using an agarose gel mobility shift assay. In
initial experiments, increasing amounts of
NS were incubated with
runoff transcripts representing full-length ssRNA plus strands of
the reovirus type 3 Dearing S4 gene (data not shown). More than one
band was seen in the mobility shift assay with this long RNA (1,196 nucleotides); however, most of the intermediate-size complexes migrated
as a smear, making it difficult to distinguish the number of different complexes.
To improve resolution of the intermediate-size complexes, we decreased
the length of the ssRNA and assayed for

NS binding
using a
polyacrylamide gel mobility shift assay (Fig.
1A). For
initial experiments with smaller
ssRNA molecules, we used runoff
transcripts representing the 5' 151 nucleotides of the S4 plus
strand (5'S4-151). As the amount of

NS
was increased, the mobility
of the 5'S4-151 RNA was progressively
retarded and clearly distinguishable,
intermediate-size complexes were
observed. At the larger amounts
of

NS (>12 pmol), a lowest-mobility
complex was formed, accumulated,
and was not further retarded with the
addition of more protein.
Based on the detection of more than one
shifted RNA band over
the range of

NS amounts added, we concluded
that more than one
unit of

NS can bind per molecule of 5'S4-151
plus-strand RNA.
In addition, we concluded that the lowest-mobility
complex represents
RNA molecules that have each been saturatively bound
by the same
maximum number of

NS units. Each binding unit of

NS
is hypothesized
to be a small oligomer of that protein based on the
sedimentation
properties of the purified protein (
10).

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Gel mobility shift assay with a 151-nucleotide fragment
of reovirus S4 plus strand and immunoblot analysis of a similar assay
with anti- NS serum. (A) Increasing amounts of purified NS were
incubated with 0.21 pmol of radiolabeled ssRNA comprising the 5'
151 nucleotides of the reovirus S4 plus strand (5'S4-151). The samples
were then subjected to electrophoresis in a 5% Tris-glycine
polyacrylamide native gel until the free RNA was near the bottom of the
gel. The radiolabeled RNA in the dried gel was visualized by
phosphorimaging. NS-RNA complexes with six distinct mobilities are
indicated at left. (B) Increasing amounts of NS were incubated
with and without unlabeled 5'S4-151 RNA (0.8 pmol) and subjected to
electrophoresis as described above. An immunoblot assay was performed
to detect the protein. The amounts of RNA and protein in these samples
were increased so that the ratios were similar to those in panel A but
the protein was more easily detected. Arrows, comparable bands in
panels A and B.
|
|
To confirm that the shifted bands contain

NS, a gel from a mobility
shift assay with unlabeled 5'S4-151 RNA was subjected
to
immunoblotting using a polyclonal antiserum for

NS (
10).
The antiserum detected protein migrating in distinct bands (Fig.
1B, + RNA) with the same mobilities as the radiolabeled,
protein-shifted
RNA bands in Fig.
1A. The

NS protein did not show
this pattern
of banding in the absence of ssRNA (Fig.
1B,

RNA),
although

NS did appear to concentrate in several distinct bands
when excess
amounts of the protein were present. Bands of similar
mobility
were visible in the presence of RNA as well (Fig.
1B, + RNA).
The nature of these protein-specific bands is not known, but they
may
reflect a capacity of

NS to self-associate into higher-order
multimers in the absence of RNA under these conditions. Their
appearance only with excess amounts of

NS suggests that they
hold
limited significance for the RNA-binding results. The findings
confirm
that

NS was present in the shifted RNA-protein
complexes.
Gel mobility shift assay for
NS binding to ssRNAs of other
lengths.
The 5'S4-151 RNA appeared to be shifted into six distinct
bands over the range of amounts of
NS (Fig. 1A). The presence of six
shifted bands suggested that if the larger amounts of
NS were fully
saturating the RNA, then a maximum of six units of
NS were binding
to each RNA molecule. Moreover, since the RNA was 151 nucleotides long,
each unit of
NS must be covering about 25 nucleotides if the
NS
units are evenly distributed. To test this hypothesis, three additional
plus-strand RNAs, differing in length by 30 nucleotides (5'S4-121,
5'S4-181, and 5'S4-211), were generated as runoff transcripts from the
same S4 clone used to generate the 5'S4-151 RNA. The new RNAs were
incubated with increasing amounts of
NS and were analyzed in the
polyacrylamide gel mobility shift assay. As predicted from initial
findings with 5'S4-151 (Fig. 1A), 5'S4-121 was shifted into five
distinguishable complexes, 5'S4-151 was shifted into six
distinguishable complexes, 5'S4-181 was shifted into seven
distinguishable complexes, and 5'S4-211 was shifted into eight
distinguishable complexes with increasing amounts of
NS (Fig.
2A). To compare the mobilities of the
different complexes formed with each RNA, all four RNAs were incubated
with the same amount of
NS (18 pmol) and subjected to
electrophoresis in adjacent lanes of the same gel (Fig. 2B). This
analysis demonstrated that with each 30-nucleotide increase in RNA
length over this range, one new lower-mobility complex was seen. In
later experiments, 5'S4-271 RNA was also tested and found to be shifted
into 11 distinguishable complexes with increasing amounts of
NS
(data not shown). Considering the size of each RNA and the number of
distinguishable complexes formed with each, we concluded that the
binding unit of
NS covers a 24- to 27-nucleotide region of RNA and
that the total number of
NS units that bound per RNA molecule is
determined by the overall length of the RNA.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Gel mobility shift assays with S4 plus-strand RNA
fragments ranging in size from 121 to 211 nucleotides in 30-base
increments. Radiolabeled ssRNA fragments comprising the following
5' portions of the S4 plus strand were synthesized: 121 nucleotides,
5'S4-121; 151 nucleotides, 5'S4-151; 181 nucleotides, 5'S4-181; and 211 nucleotides, 5'S4-211. (A) Increasing amounts of purified NS were
separately incubated with 0.21 to 0.22 pmol of each RNA, and the
samples were analyzed as described for Fig. 1A. NS-RNA complexes
with five to eight distinct mobilities are indicated to the left of
each gel. (B) Purified NS (18 pmol) was incubated with each of the
four RNAs as described for panel A (RNA sizes are indicated above the
lanes) and subjected to electrophoresis as described for Fig. 1A. To
provide better separation of the shifted complexes, the gel was run
longer in this experiment such that the free RNA was run off the
bottom.
|
|
Binding cooperativity.
Since multiple units of
NS bound to
a single RNA molecule, the binding could have exhibited positive,
negative, or no cooperativity. To address these possibilities, the
ratio of bound to total
NS in each sample was calculated for the
121-, 151-, and 181-nucleotide RNAs from Fig. 2A. In addition, three
other experiments using the 121-nucleotide RNA and smaller protein
amounts were performed. Hill plots were generated for all six data sets
(40). A representative plot for the 121-nucleotide RNA is
shown (Fig. 3). The linear region of this
curve has a slope >1 indicating that
NS binds ssRNA with
positive cooperativity. When the data from all six experiments were
averaged and
NS was assumed to bind ssRNA as a monomer, the Hill
coefficient was calculated at 1.43 ± 0.10. Since the RNA-binding
unit of
NS is thought to be a small oligomer (10), the
calculations were also done for
NS binding as a dimer, trimer, and
tetramer. The Hill coefficient increased by 0.02 to 0.03 unit with each
step in oligomer order (data not shown), indicating that
NS binding
to ssRNA exhibited positive cooperativity regardless of the
oligomeric nature of the binding unit.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Hill plot of NS binding to ssRNA to determine
cooperativity. A gel shift assay with 0.24 pmol of radiolabeled
5'S4-121 RNA was performed as described for Fig. 2A except that the
concentrations of purified NS ranged from 0.24 to 6 pmol. The amount
of NS bound at each concentration was calculated as described in
Materials and Methods. Log10 (bound NS/1 bound
NS) was plotted relative to log10 ( NS concentration),
and a best-fit line was calculated for the linear portion of the graph
(the equation and coefficient of determination for the line are shown
in the box).
|
|
Competition assays with single- and double-stranded nucleic
acids.
Previous work demonstrated that
NS does not bind
detectably to dsRNA or dsDNA in filter-binding or sedimentation assays
(14, 28) but does bind to ssDNA in the filter-binding assay
(28). To compare the affinities of
NS for ssRNA and
other nucleic acids in a more quantitative fashion, we performed
competition assays. Radiolabeled 5'S4-121 RNA was combined with
unlabeled competitor nucleic acids (reovirus ssRNA, reovirus dsRNA,
ssDNA, or dsDNA) before the addition of
NS. The RNA-protein
complexes were then analyzed using the polyacrylamide gel mobility
shift assay (Fig. 4A). Both ssRNA and
ssDNA competed efficiently with the labeled ssRNA probe for
NS
binding, whereas dsRNA and dsDNA competed much less efficiently (Fig.
4A). For example, when 10-fold more ssRNA or ssDNA competitor was
added only 23% ± 2% or 37% ± 11%, respectively, of the
radiolabeled 5'S4-121 RNA was bound. In contrast, when 20-fold more
dsRNA or dsDNA competitor was added, 82% ± 7% or 98% ± 4%,
respectively, of the radiolabeled 5'S4-121 RNA was bound. In addition,
with either single- or double-stranded competitors, RNA competed with
only a slightly greater efficiency for binding to
NS than did DNA
(Fig. 4A). In summary,
NS bound efficiently to single-stranded, but
not double-stranded, nucleic acids and exhibited a slight preference
for RNA over DNA.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Competition assays for NS binding to ssRNA
using ssRNA, dsRNA, ssDNA, or dsDNA as the competitor. Each
data point represents the mean from three experiments, and the error
bars represent the standard deviation of the mean. (A) Increasing
concentrations of unlabeled competitor ssRNA, dsRNA, dsDNA, or
ssDNA (see Materials and Methods) were combined with 0.24 pmol of
radiolabeled 5'S4-121 ssRNA. Purified NS (4.8 pmol) was added to
each sample, and the sample was incubated. The samples were subjected
to electrophoresis and visualized as described for Fig. 1A. The upper
four shifted RNA bands were included in the quantitation of bound RNA.
The ratios of competitor to probe RNA were calculated from weights
rather than molar amounts of nucleic acid to reflect numbers of
potential NS binding sites rather than numbers of nucleic acid
molecules. (B) The assay was performed as described for panel A except
that the unlabeled competitor ssRNAs were 121 nucleotides from the
5' end of the S4 plus strand (5'S4-121), the 3' end of the S4 plus
strand (3'S4-121), or the vector sequence (pGEM-121). For one set of
samples, NS was added to the labeled RNA prior to addition of the
5'S4-121 competitor.
|
|
Competition assays with reovirus and nonreovirus ssRNAs.
Previous work demonstrated
NS binding to reovirus RNA in infected
cells (3, 14) and to nonreovirus RNA in vitro (14, 28). However, no experiments addressed whether
NS exhibits a
preference for reovirus RNA (14, 28). Sequences at the 5' and 3' termini of all 10 reovirus RNAs are conserved (2) and therefore may be involved in distinguishing reovirus from nonreovirus RNA for binding by proteins such as
NS during steps in reovirus replication. To test this hypothesis, we used a competition assay to
compare the affinities of
NS for RNAs representing the 5' end of the
reovirus S4 plus strand, the 3' end of the reovirus S4 plus strand, and
nonreovirus sequences derived from pGEM-4Z. Radiolabeled 5'S4-121 RNA
was incubated with unlabeled competitor RNAs (5'S4-121, 3'S4-121, or
pGEM-121) before addition of
NS. The RNA-protein complexes were then
analyzed using the polyacrylamide gel mobility shift assay (Fig. 4B).
In this assay, all three competitor RNAs competed to approximately the
same level with radiolabeled 5'S4-121 RNA for binding to
NS. For
example, when fivefold more 5'S4-121 competitor RNA was added, only
13% ± 3% of the radiolabeled 5'S4-121 RNA was bound by
NS. When
fivefold more 3'S4-121 competitor RNA was added, only 22% ± 12% of
the radiolabeled 5'S4-121 RNA was bound. Last, when fivefold more
pGEM-121 competitor RNA was added, only 13% ± 9% of the radiolabeled
5'S4-121 RNA was bound. Although these data suggested that
NS does
not preferentially bind reovirus sequences, it was possible that both
ends of the RNA together might be required to confer specificity.
However, the amount of 5'S4-121 RNA bound to
NS in the presence of
the full-length ssRNA competitor in Fig. 4A was similar to the
amount bound in the presence of each of the competitor RNAs in Fig. 4B. Thus, all ssRNAs appeared to compete to about the same level with radiolabeled 5'S4-121 RNA for binding to
NS. This suggests that
NS does not distinguish between RNA sequences corresponding to the
5' and 3' ends of the S4 gene and does not exhibit preference for
binding to reovirus sequences.
To investigate the stability of preformed RNA-protein complexes,
radiolabeled 5'S4-121 RNA was incubated with

NS prior to
addition of
competitor (Fig.
4B). Unlabeled 5'S4-121 RNA did not
displace
radiolabeled 5'S4-121 RNA that was already bound to

NS,
even when
the competitor was added in 10-fold excess. The complex
of 5'S4-121 RNA
and

NS was stable for at least 2 h after addition
of this
competitor (data not shown). These results suggest that,
once

NS
bound to RNA, it formed a stable complex that could not
be easily
disrupted by subsequent addition of other
RNA.
Gel mobility shift assays for
NS binding to partially duplex
RNA-DNA hybrids and evidence for a strand displacement activity.
We hypothesized that
NS may require a single-stranded 5' or 3' end
of RNA to initiate binding. To test this hypothesis, an end-radiolabeled DNA oligonucleotide complementary to 19 nucleotides at
the 3' end of the 5'S4-121 RNA (Table 2) was hybridized to that RNA.
The RNA-DNA hybrid was then incubated with increasing amounts of
NS
and analyzed using the polyacrylamide gel mobility shift assay (Fig.
5). The mobility of this RNA-DNA hybrid
with a duplex region at the RNA 3' end was retarded by the smaller amounts of
NS (Fig. 5A). Moreover, the amount of
NS that shifted the majority of this RNA-DNA hybrid (30 pmol of
NS to shift 0.26 pmol of hybrid in Fig. 5A) was comparable to the amount that shifted the majority of the 121-nucleotide RNA (24 pmol of
NS to shift 0.22 pmol of RNA in Fig. 2A). Similar results were observed when other
end-radiolabeled DNA oligonucleotides (Table 2) were hybridized to
either the middle or the 5' end of the 5'S4-121 RNA (data not shown).
We therefore concluded that
NS does not require a large single-stranded region at either the 5' or the 3' end of RNA to initiate binding.

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Gel shift assay with ssRNA having an RNA-DNA duplex
region at its 3' end. A 19-nucleotide DNA oligonucleotide that was
exactly complementary to the 3' end of the RNA was
32P-labeled at its 5' end. (A) The oligonucleotide was
hybridized to unlabeled ssRNA (5'S4-121) and purified. Differing
amounts of purified NS were then mixed with 0.26 pmol of hybrid and
assayed as described for Fig. 1A. (B) An unhybridized
32P-labeled oligonucleotide was incubated in the presence
of increasing amounts of NS and also assayed as described for Fig.
1A. For both panels, the amounts of NS added to samples are
indicated beneath the lanes, and the positions of the RNA-DNA hybrid
and the DNA oligonucleotide are also indicated.
|
|
Interestingly, when larger amounts of

NS were incubated with the
RNA-DNA hybrid having a duplex region at the 3' end, the
shifted
hybrids disappeared and increasing amounts of free oligonucleotide
were
observed (Fig.
5A). This suggests that, as the final unit
of

NS was
binding to each molecule of the hybrid, it destabilized
the duplex
region and caused the DNA oligonucleotide to be released.
The DNA
oligonucleotides bound to the middle or the 5' end of
the RNA were also
released when saturating amounts of

NS were
incubated with the
respective hybrids (data not shown), suggesting
that the displacement
activity was not direction
dependent.
Evidence that
NS is not an ATP-dependent helicase.
Since
NS displaced DNA oligonucleotides from RNA-DNA hybrids, we
recognized that the protein might possess helicase activity. If so,
then
NS like other RNA or DNA helicases, should require hydrolysis
of ATP as a source of energy for the displacement activity (reviewed in
reference 16). Although ATP was not added to the displacement assay mixtures described in the previous section, it is
possible that there was contaminating ATP from the reaction mixture
used to radiolabel the DNA oligonucleotides (see Materials and
Methods). To investigate whether ATP hydrolysis was required for
NS
to displace the DNA oligonucleotides, the displacement assay was
repeated in the absence or presence of EDTA, a known inhibitor of
ATPase and RNA helicase functions through its chelation of divalent
cations (16, 25). In addition, [
-32P]ATP
was added to parallel samples, which were then analyzed by thin-layer
chromatography to determine if ATP had been hydrolyzed. The
NS
protein displaced DNA from the RNA-DNA hybrid in the absence or
presence of EDTA (Fig. 6A) but did not
detectably hydrolyze ATP in either case (Fig. 6B). Reovirus cores,
which were analyzed as a positive control for EDTA-sensitive ATPase
activity (25), hydrolyzed ATP in the absence, but not in the
presence, of EDTA (Fig. 6B). These data suggest that
NS does not
require hydrolysis of ATP during displacement of the DNA
oligonucleotide from the RNA-DNA hybrid.

View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Analysis of ATP hydrolysis during strand displacement by
NS. Either 12.5 mM EDTA (+) or H2O ( ) was added to 75 pmol of purified NS ( NS) or 6 × 109
reovirus core particles (cores) in each sample. Cores were included
as a positive control for ATP hydrolysis. All samples were analyzed in
duplicate. (A) The RNA-DNA hybrid described for Fig. 5 (0.11 pmol) was
added to each sample in one set. These samples were then analyzed as
described for Fig. 1A. The positions of the RNA-DNA hybrid and the DNA
oligonucleotide are indicated. (B) Three microcuries of
[ -32P]ATP and 0.11 pmol of the RNA-DNA hybrid were
added to each sample in the other set. Products of the reaction with
ATP were resolved by thin-layer chromatography and analyzed by
phosphorimaging. The positions of unlabeled ATP, ADP, and AMP markers,
as determined by UV absorption, are indicated.
|
|
To assess the effect of MgCl
2 on the

NS-associated
strand displacement activity, the displacement assay was performed in
the presence of increasing concentrations of MgCl
2. The
activity
was progressively decreased with increasing MgCl
2
(data not shown).
At 10 mM MgCl
2, for example, only 30% of
the DNA oligonucleotide
was displaced relative to the amount displaced
in the absence
of MgCl
2 (data not shown), suggesting that
Mg
2+ inhibited rather than stimulated the displacement
activity. This
response to MgCl
2 provided additional
evidence that the strand
displacement activity of

NS is
distinguishable from that of a
classical helicase (
16).
Test for strand displacement activity of
NS using a partially
duplex RNA molecule.
Regions of RNA-RNA duplex are generated
during the normal course of reovirus replication, certainly in the
genomic dsRNA segments and probably also in regions of secondary
structure within the free plus-strand transcripts. The strand
displacement activity that we demonstrated for
NS using RNA-DNA
hybrids may therefore reflect an essential activity of this protein at
disrupting regions of RNA-RNA duplex during one or more steps in
reovirus replication. The poor capacity of
NS to bind to fully
duplex RNA molecules (Fig. 4A) suggested that partial duplexes were
more appropriate for further testing. In experiments with one such
partially duplex RNA, we found that
NS could not displace
a fully complementary 17-nucleotide RNA oligonucleotide
(Table 2) from the 3' end of a longer RNA to which it was hybridized
(data not shown). Notably, however, this RNA-RNA duplex had a
higher calculated melting temperature than the RNA-DNA duplexes used in
the preceding experiments (Table 2), which may have limited the
capacity of
NS to act on it. Further experiments are warranted
before concluding that
NS can or cannot disrupt dsRNA regions in
partially duplex molecules.
 |
DISCUSSION |
NS binds in multiple copies to single ssRNA molecules, but
there are unresolved questions about the nature of these
complexes.
Results from the gel mobility shift assays indicate
that multiple units of
NS can bind to a single ssRNA molecule.
Such molecules, bound by multiple units of
NS, may represent the
large nucleoprotein complexes obtained from both reovirus-infected
mammalian cells (14) and insect cells infected with a
recombinant baculovirus expressing
NS (10). By binding in
multiple units to the viral plus-strand RNAs (minus-strand RNAs are not
released from template plus strands during reovirus replication
[1, 31]),
NS may provide multiple sites for
interactions with other viral or cellular proteins that may play roles
in translation, packaging, or minus-strand synthesis. Questions
remaining to be answered include whether the multiple units of
NS
that bind to an RNA molecule stretch out like beads on a necklace or
self-associate to form a more compact structure.
The positive cooperativity demonstrated for

NS binding to ssRNA
may arise either from changes in RNA conformation upon

NS
binding
that promote subsequent

NS units to bind more readily
or from

NS-

NS interactions, similar to the case for poliovirus
RNA
polymerase (
4,
26). Certain observations are consistent
with
each possibility. Data indicating that

NS destabilizes short
regions
of a nucleic acid duplex and thereby alters the RNA conformation
are
consistent with an RNA-based explanation for cooperativity.
On the
other hand, evidence that

NS oligomers might self-associate
to form
higher-order multimers under certain conditions (Fig.
1B) suggests that
positive cooperativity may arise from such

NS-

NS
interactions.
Additional analyses of

NS-RNA and

NS-

NS interactions
are
needed to establish the basis of the observed
cooperativity.
One curious feature of the results is that saturative binding occurred
at between 12 and 24 pmol of

NS for each RNA, despite
their
different sizes (Fig.
2A). Assuming that

NS was present
in limiting
amounts but not limiting concentrations in these experiments,
we would
expect saturation of the 211-nucleotide RNA to have required
approximately twice the amount of

NS as saturation of the
121-nucleotide
RNA. However, since the interval between amounts of
added

NS
in the saturation range was large (twofold), the
experimental
findings are reasonable. For example, if the
121-nucleotide RNA
was saturatively bound by five units of

NS when
15 pmol of

NS
was added in this assay, then the 211-nucleotide RNA
should have
been saturatively bound by eight units of

NS when 24 pmol of

NS was added. This is consistent with the data in Fig.
2A.
Another interesting feature of the results is that a faint ladder of
higher-mobility complexes was seen even when saturative
amounts of

NS were added (Fig.
1A and
2). These complexes showed
mobilities
distinct from the major ones seen with smaller amounts
of

NS (Fig.
1A and
2A). Moreover, the higher-mobility complexes
seen with
saturative amounts of

NS showed the same mobilities
regardless of
the size of added RNA and also comigrated with the
saturated
complexes of each smaller added RNA over the range at
which those were
analyzed (Fig.
2B). There are several possible
explanations for these
observations, but by far the most likely
would seem to be that these
higher-mobility complexes represent
small amounts of partially degraded
RNA molecules that were present
in each sample and to which

NS was
also saturatively bound. Enumeration
of these complexes in Fig.
2B
lends support to the conclusion
that each

NS binding unit covers
about 25 nucleotides of
RNA.
What are the unit of
NS that binds to ssRNA and the number
of nucleotides of RNA that each unit contacts?
The purified
NS
protein migrates as 7- to 9S complexes in 5 to 20% sucrose gradients
(10), consistent with oligomers containing three to six
41-kDa monomers of
NS. As stated earlier, whether these complexes
represent one discrete type of
NS oligomer or a mixture and whether
they can self-associate to form higher-order multimers in the absence
of RNA remain unknown. We nonetheless hypothesize that one of these
oligomers or multimers represents the unit of
NS that binds to
ssRNA in a number of copies dependent on RNA length. The molar
ratio of
NS to RNA at saturation in this study may indicate the
number of
NS subunits in the binding unit, that is, if the
concentrations of
NS are not limiting and if most or all of the
added
NS is competent for RNA binding. In this case, we can
calculate that saturative binding was achieved with
NS in 60- to
120-fold molar excess to each RNA in Fig. 2A (12 to 24 pmol of
NS
for about 0.2 pmol of RNA). Considering that only five to eight units
of
NS were bound to each RNA in the 121- to 211-nucleotide range at
saturation, we can further calculate that each binding unit contained 8 to 24 subunits of
NS. If the RNA-free, 7- to 9S
NS oligomer is a
tetramer, for example, this suggests that a multimer comprising two to
six tetramers constitutes each binding unit. Given that some of the
purified
NS in our preparations might not have been competent for
RNA binding, we recognize that these numbers indicate an upper limit for the size of the binding unit. It remains possible that each binding
unit comprises one copy of a discrete type of
NS oligomer that
sediments in the 7- to 9S range in the absence of RNA (10).
The finding that each binding unit of

NS covers about 25 nucleotides
of RNA is consistent with previous work demonstrating
that

NS
protects 20 to 40 nucleotides of reovirus ssRNAs from
RNase T1
degradation (
34). However, it is important to distinguish
this 25-nucleotide region of ssRNA covered by

NS from the number
of nucleotides that constitutes the minimum or preferred size
of
binding site for each unit of

NS. No experiments in this report
directly address the latter, but further analyses of

NS binding
to
different-size RNAs might be used to establish this number.
For
example, if a 140-nucleotide RNA binds five

NS units covering
25 nucleotides each, are the 15 "extra" nucleotides enough to
bind a
sixth

NS
unit?
No evidence for sequence specificity in
NS binding to
ssRNA.
Since reovirus replication is cytoplasmic (reviewed
in reference 24), there is no selective advantage
for
NS to have a strong preference for binding ssRNA over ssDNA.
Accordingly, we found that
NS binds to ssRNA with only slightly
greater efficiency than to ssDNA. Our evidence that neither dsRNA nor
dsDNA is an efficient competitor for
NS binding to ssRNA is
consistent with previous findings (28), but our further
evidence for strand displacement from short duplex regions is novel
(see below).
Although previous work suggested that

NS can bind nonreovirus
RNA (
14,
28), this study provides the first evidence that
nonreovirus RNA efficiently competes with reovirus RNA
sequences
for binding. Previous authors suggested that

NS binds
specifically
to the 3' end of the reovirus plus-strand RNAs
(
34). Our findings
suggest that the reason reovirus 3'
RNA ends were protected from
nuclease degradation in the previous study
is that

NS protects
many regions along the length of the RNAs,
including the 3' ends.
We have in fact demonstrated that

NS binding
to ssRNA partially
protects it from in vitro digestion with RNase A
(data not shown).
Since our data indicate that

NS does not bind
specifically to
the short conserved sequences at the 5' and 3' ends of
all reovirus
plus-strand RNAs (
2), we hypothesize that

NS is not involved
in recognizing these sequences during packaging
or minus-strand
synthesis. Thus, these sequences are likely to be
recognized by
other viral or cellular
proteins.
NS displaces DNA oligonucleotides from RNA-DNA hybrids but is
not a classical helicase.
Since the strand displacement activity
of
NS bound to RNA-DNA hybrids occurred independently of ATP
hydrolysis and was inhibited by MgCl2 but not by EDTA, the
data strongly suggest that
NS is not a classical, ATP-dependent
helicase. Consistent with this conclusion is the fact that
NS lacks
the nucleoside triphosphate-binding motifs characteristic of those
enzymes (16). Instead, it appears most likely that
NS
melts duplex regions as it completes its cooperative and saturative
binding to a primarily ssRNA molecule, with the energy for melting
provided by the binding event(s).
From the data in this study, we hypothesize that only short duplex
regions, with low thermodynamic stability, are subject
to melting by

NS (Table
2). We favor this explanation for why
unwinding activity
was not demonstrated by

NS on the one type
of partially duplex
RNA-RNA molecule that we examined in this
study. Rather than concluding
that

NS is inactive at melting
any RNA-RNA duplexes, we propose that
the duplex we analyzed was
simply too stable to be unwound by

NS. In
future work, we will
more systematically test for the potential
RNA-melting activity
of

NS by using molecules containing shorter
duplex regions with
lower predicted melting temperatures. Such duplexes
may be more
relevant to reovirus replication in any case since
regions of
continuous duplex shorter than 17 bp are much more likely to
form
within the reovirus plus strands according to RNA-folding
predictions
(J.-Y. Sgro and M. L. Nibert, unpublished data). We
will also
examine molecules having shorter duplex regions at the 5'
end,
the middle, or the 3' end of the longer RNA strand in order to
increase our chances of seeing a specific type of strand displacement
activity. If RNA-RNA melting activity can be shown for

NS in
vitro,
then its role in reovirus-infected cells may be in melting
short
regions of intra- or intermolecular secondary structure
within the
viral plus-strand RNAs, regions which might otherwise
interfere with
the use of the RNAs in packaging and/or minus-strand
synthesis during
formation of progeny virions.

NS almost certainly
does not
destabilize the reovirus dsRNA genome for transcription,
since this process occurs within the inner capsid of assembled
reovirus particles (
6,
33), where

NS is not
packaged.
Similarities between
NS and ssDNA binding proteins involved in
dsDNA replication.
The adenovirus DNA binding protein Ad-DBP
(21, 42), the herpes simplex virus type 1 protein
ICP8 (5), and the Epstein-Barr virus ssDNA-binding protein
BALF-2 (38) are all similar to
NS in that they can
destabilize regions of a nucleic acid duplex independently of ATP
hydrolysis and in a manner that is inhibited by MgCl2
(5, 21, 38, 42). In addition to ATP-independent strand
displacement activity, Ad-DBP and ICP8 share the following properties
with
NS: (i) binding in multiple units to a nucleic acid molecule in
a sequence-independent manner; (ii) protection of the single-stranded
nucleic acid from nuclease degradation (data for
NS are not shown in
this paper), (iii) strong preference for single-stranded over
double-stranded nucleic acids; and (iv) positive cooperativity for
nucleic acid binding (reviewed in references 7 and
20). These and other ssDNA binding proteins have
been shown to be involved in dsDNA replication. For example, both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that Ad-DBP is required for elongation of ssDNA by the adenovirus polymerase (7, 20), possibly involving the ATP-independent helix-destabilizing properties of Ad-DBP (21, 42). Two prokaryotic ssDNA binding
proteins, E. coli SSB and bacteriophage T4 gene 32 protein (gp32), are also required for dsDNA replication and share
nucleic acid-binding properties with the noted DNA animal virus
proteins and
NS but cannot destabilize DNA duplexes (7).
Of course, a clear difference between
NS and ssDNA binding proteins
is the nucleic acid substrate for genome replication (RNA versus DNA).
Nonetheless, considering the large number of similarities, we propose
that
NS plays a role in genome replication similar to that played by
the ssDNA binding proteins. Specifically,
NS may bind to the
reovirus plus-strand RNAs and stabilize them in a conformation that
allows the reovirus RNA polymerase and other potential cofactors to
mediate minus-strand synthesis to produce the dsRNA gene segments. Some
secondary structures in the plus-strand RNAs may be unwound directly by
NS (similarly to Ad-DBP [21, 42]), whereas others
may need to be unwound by another viral or cellular protein and then
stabilized in the single-stranded state by
NS binding (similarly to
gp32 [7]). Studies to address interactions among
NS, the polymerase, and other proteins should provide further
insight into the potential role of
NS in reovirus genome replication.
Similarities to the nonstructural proteins of other
Reoviridae members.
Other members of the virus family
Reoviridae, all of which have dsRNA genomes, also encode
nonstructural proteins with ssRNA-binding activity. For instance,
the bluetongue virus (orbivirus) nonstructural protein NS2 (41 kDa)
binds ssRNA and forms 7S complexes (39). Similarly, the
rotavirus nonstructural protein NSP2 (35 kDa) has sequence-independent
ssRNA-binding activity (18), forms 10S multimers
(17), and interacts with the rotavirus RNA polymerase VP1
(17). Recent data indicate that the binding activities of NSP2 are in fact very similar to those of
NS shown in this study, including binding to single ssRNA molecules in multiple copies, with positive cooperativity, with little or no specificity for rotavirus sequences, and with substantially greater affinity for ssRNA than dsRNA (37). NSP2 has not yet been reported to
destabilize nucleic acid duplexes, as was
NS in this study, but was
reported to have nucleoside triphosphatase and autophosphorylation
activities (37). The latter have not been demonstrated for
NS (Fig. 6). It remains to be determined whether reovirus
NS,
rotavirus NSP2, bluetongue virus NS2, and similar nonstructural
proteins from other Reoviridae members play strictly
analogous roles in the replication cycles of their respective viruses.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by NIH research grants AI-39533 (M.L.N.)
and AI-32139 (L.A.S.), by ACS grant RPG-98-12701-MBC (L.A.S.), by a
Hatch grant from USDA funds awarded to the College of Agricultural and
Life Sciences (M.L.N.), and by a grant from the Lucille P. Markey
Charitable Trust to the Institute for Molecular Virology (M.L.N.).
A.L.G. received additional support as a Department of Biochemistry
Steenbock Fellow. S.C.S. was supported by NIH Medical Scientist
Training Program grant GM-08244 and by NIH Microbiology/Cancer Research
training grant CA-09138. J.L. received additional support as a
University of Wisconsin/Hilldale Undergraduate/Faculty Research Fellow.
M.L.N. received additional support as a Shaw Scientist from the
Milwaukee Foundation.
We thank T. Broering, D. Farsetta, and C. Luongo for useful discussions
and comments on the manuscript. We especially acknowledge T. Baumstark
and P. Ahlquist for advice on work with RNA, T. Broering for assistance
in determining melting temperatures for the RNA-DNA and RNA-RNA
duplexes, and S. Melcher for help with the Hill plots. Assistance in
producing the S4 clone was provided by M. Moses and K. Thoemke. We also
thank M. Chute, S. J. Harrison, J. Lugus, K. Thoemke, and X. Zhou
for technical support and other members of our laboratories for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute for
Molecular Virology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1525 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706. Phone: (608) 262-1536. Fax: (608) 262-7414. E-mail:
mlnibert{at}facstaff.wisc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Acs, G.,
H. Klett,
M. Schonberg,
J. Christman,
D. H. Levin, and S. C. Silverstein.
1971.
Mechanism of reovirus double-stranded ribonucleic acid synthesis in vivo and in vitro.
J. Virol.
8:684-689[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Antczak, J. B.,
R. Chmelo,
D. J. Pickup, and W. K. Joklik.
1982.
Sequence at both termini of the 10 genes of reovirus serotype 3 (strain Dearing).
Virology
121:307-319[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Antczak, J. B., and W. K. Joklik.
1992.
Reovirus genome segment assortment into progeny genomes studied by the use of monoclonal antibodies directed against reovirus proteins.
Virology
187:760-776[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Beckman, M. T. L., and K. Kirkegaard.
1998.
Site size of cooperative single-stranded RNA binding by poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:6724-6739[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Boehmer, P. E., and I. R. Lehman.
1993.
Herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP8: helix-destabilizing properties.
J. Virol.
67:711-715[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Borsa, J., and A. F. Graham.
1968.
Reovirus: RNA polymerase activity in purified virions.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
33:895-901[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Chase, J. W., and K. R. Williams.
1986.
Single-stranded DNA binding proteins required for DNA replication.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
55:103-136[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Cormack, B.
1991.
Mutagenesis by the polymerase chain reaction, p. 8.5.1-8.5.9.
In
F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.), Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 9.
|
Cross, R. K., and B. N. Fields.
1972.
Temperature-sensitive mutants of reovirus type 3: studies on the synthesis of viral RNA.
Virology
50:799-809[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Gillian, A. L., and M. L. Nibert.
1998.
Amino terminus of reovirus nonstructural protein NS is important for ssRNA binding and nucleoprotein complex formation.
Virology
240:1-11[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Gillian-Daniel, D. L.,
N. K. Gray,
J. Astrom,
A. Barkoff, and M. Wickens.
1998.
Modifications of the 5' cap of mRNAs during Xenopus oocyte maturation: independence from changes in poly(A) length and impact on translation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:6152-6163[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Gomatos, P. J.,
O. Prakash, and N. M. Stamatos.
1981.
Small reovirus particle composed solely of NS with specificity for binding different nucleic acids.
J. Virol.
39:115-124[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Gomatos, P. J.,
N. M. Stamatos, and N. H. Sarkar.
1980.
Small reovirus-specific particle with polycytidylate-dependent RNA polymerase activity.
J. Virol.
36:556-565[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Huismans, H., and W. K. Joklik.
1976.
Reovirus-coded polypeptides in infected cells: isolation of two native monomeric polypeptides with affinity for single-stranded and double-stranded RNA, respectively.
Virology
70:411-424[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Ito, Y., and W. K. Joklik.
1972.
Temperature-sensitive mutants of reovirus. I. Patterns of gene expression by mutants of groups C, D, and E.
Virology
50:189-201[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Kadare, G., and A.-L. Haenni.
1997.
Virus-encoded RNA helicases.
J. Virol.
71:2583-2590[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Kattoura, M. D.,
X. Chen, and J. T. Patton.
1994.
The rotavirus RNA-binding protein NS35 (NSP2) forms 10S multimers and interacts with the viral RNA polymerase.
Virology
202:803-813[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Kattoura, M. D.,
L. L. Clapp, and J. T. Patton.
1992.
The rotavirus non-structural protein, NS35, possesses RNA-binding activity in vitro and in vivo.
Virology
191:698-708[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Kedl, R.,
S. Schmechel, and L. Schiff.
1995.
Comparative sequence analysis of the reovirus S4 genes from 13 serotype 1 and serotype 3 field isolates.
J. Virol.
69:552-559[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Kornberg, A., and T. A. Baker.
1991.
DNA replication, 2nd ed.
W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, N.Y.
|
| 21.
|
Monaghan, A.,
A. Webster, and R. T. Hay.
1994.
Adenovirus DNA binding protein: helix destabilising properties.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:742-748[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Morozov, S. Y.
1989.
A possible relationship of reovirus putative RNA polymerase to polymerases of positive-strand RNA viruses.
Nucleic Acids Res.
17:5394[Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Nam, S. C., and C. Kang.
1988.
Transcription initiation site selection and abortive initiation cycling of phage SP6 RNA polymerase.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:18123-18127[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Nibert, M. L.,
L. A. Schiff, and B. N. Fields.
1996.
Reoviruses and their replication, p. 1557-1596.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 25.
|
Noble, S., and M. L. Nibert.
1997.
Characterization of an ATPase activity in reovirus cores and its genetic association with core shell protein 1.
J. Virol.
71:2182-2191[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Pata, J. D.,
S. C. Schultz, and K. Kirkegaard.
1995.
Functional oligomerization of poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.
RNA
1:466-477[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Ramig, R. F.,
T. A. Mustoe,
A. H. Sharpe, and B. N. Fields.
1978.
A genetic map of reovirus. II. Assignment of the double-stranded RNA-negative mutant groups C, D, and E to genome segments.
Virology
85:531-534[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Richardson, M. A., and Y. Furuichi.
1985.
Synthesis in Escherichia coli of the reovirus nonstructural protein NS.
J. Virol.
56:527-533[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Saiki, R. K.,
D. H. Gelfand,
S. Stoffel,
S. J. Sharf,
R. Hiuchi,
G. T. Horn,
K. B. Mullis, and H. A. Erlich.
1988.
Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase.
Science
239:487-491[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 31.
|
Schonberg, M.,
S. C. Silverstein,
D. H. Levin, and G. Acs.
1971.
Asynchronous synthesis of the complementary strands of the reovirus genome.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
68:505-508[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Schoumacher, F.,
C. Erny,
A. Berna,
T. Godefroy-Colburn, and C. Stussi-Garaud.
1992.
Nucleic acid-binding properties of the alfalfa mosaic virus movement protein produced in yeast.
Virology
188:896-899[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Shatkin, A. J., and J. D. Sipe.
1968.
RNA polymerase activity in purified reoviruses.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
61:1462-1469[Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Stamatos, N. M., and P. J. Gomatos.
1982.
Binding to selected regions of reovirus mRNAs by a nonstructural reovirus protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79:3457-3461[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Starnes, M. C., and W. K. Joklik.
1993.
Reovirus protein lambda 3 is a poly(C)-dependent poly(G) polymerase.
Virology
193:356-366[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Sugimoto, N.,
S. Nakano,
M. Katoh,
A. Matsumura,
H. Nakamuta,
T. Ohmichi,
M. Yoneyama, and M. Sasaki.
1995.
Thermodynamic parameters to predict stability of RNA/DNA hybrid duplexes.
Biochemistry
34:11211-11216[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Taraporewala, Z.,
D. Chen, and J. T. Patton.
1999.
Multimers formed by the rotavirus nonstructural protein NSP2 bind to RNA and have nucleoside triphosphatase activity.
J. Virol.
73:9934-9943[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Tsurumi, T.,
J. Kishore,
N. Yokoyama,
M. Fujita,
T. Daikoku,
H. Yamada,
Y. Yamashita, and Y. Nishiyama.
1998.
Overexpression, purification and helix-destabilizing properties of Epstein-Barr virus ssDNA-binding protein.
J. Gen. Virol.
79:1257-1264[Abstract].
|
| 39.
|
Uitenweerde, J. M.,
J. Theron,
M. A. Stoltz, and H. Huismans.
1995.
The multimeric nonstructural NS2 proteins of Bluetongue virus, African horsesickness virus, and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus differ in their single-stranded RNA-binding ability.
Virology
209:624-632[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
van Holde, K. E.
1985.
Physical biochemistry, 2nd ed.
Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
|
| 41.
|
Xia, T.,
J. SantaLucia, Jr.,
M. E. Burkard,
R. Kierzek,
S. J. Schroeder,
X. Jiao,
C. Cox, and D. H. Turner.
1998.
Thermodynamic parameters for an expanded nearest-neighbor model for formation of RNA duplexes with Watson-Crick base pairs.
Biochemistry
37:14719-14735[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Zijderveld, D. C., and P. C. van der Vliet.
1994.
Helix-destabilizing properties of the adenovirus DNA-binding protein.
J. Virol.
68:1158-1164[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, July 2000, p. 5939-5948, Vol. 74, No. 13
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kobayashi, T., Chappell, J. D., Danthi, P., Dermody, T. S.
(2006). Gene-specific inhibition of reovirus replication by RNA interference.. J. Virol.
80: 9053-9063
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fenner, B. J., Goh, W., Kwang, J.
(2006). Sequestration and Protection of Double-Stranded RNA by the Betanodavirus B2 Protein. J. Virol.
80: 6822-6833
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Broering, T. J., Arnold, M. M., Miller, C. L., Hurt, J. A., Joyce, P. L., Nibert, M. L.
(2005). Carboxyl-Proximal Regions of Reovirus Nonstructural Protein {micro}NS Necessary and Sufficient for Forming Factory-Like Inclusions. J. Virol.
79: 6194-6206
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Touris-Otero, F., Martinez-Costas, J., Vakharia, V. N., Benavente, J.
(2005). Characterization of the nucleic acid-binding activity of the avian reovirus non-structural protein {sigma}NS. J. Gen. Virol.
86: 1159-1169
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Butan, C., van der Zandt, H., Tucker, P. A.
(2004). Structure and Assembly of the RNA Binding Domain of Bluetongue Virus Non-structural Protein 2. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 37613-37621
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Eichwald, C., Rodriguez, J. F., Burrone, O. R.
(2004). Characterization of rotavirus NSP2/NSP5 interactions and the dynamics of viroplasm formation. J. Gen. Virol.
85: 625-634
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Broering, T. J., Kim, J., Miller, C. L., Piggott, C. D. S., Dinoso, J. B., Nibert, M. L., Parker, J. S. L.
(2004). Reovirus Nonstructural Protein {micro}NS Recruits Viral Core Surface Proteins and Entering Core Particles to Factory-Like Inclusions. J. Virol.
78: 1882-1892
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Becker, M. M., Peters, T. R., Dermody, T. S.
(2003). Reovirus {sigma}NS and {micro}NS Proteins Form Cytoplasmic Inclusion Structures in the Absence of Viral Infection. J. Virol.
77: 5948-5963
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Miller, C. L., Broering, T. J., Parker, J. S. L., Arnold, M. M., Nibert, M. L.
(2003). Reovirus {sigma}NS Protein Localizes to Inclusions through an Association Requiring the {micro}NS Amino Terminus. J. Virol.
77: 4566-4576
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Qanungo, K. R., Kundu, S. C., Mullins, J. I., Ghosh, A. K.
(2002). Molecular cloning and characterization of Antheraea mylitta cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus genome segment 9. J. Gen. Virol.
83: 1483-1491
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Parker, J. S. L., Broering, T. J., Kim, J., Higgins, D. E., Nibert, M. L.
(2002). Reovirus Core Protein {micro}2 Determines the Filamentous Morphology of Viral Inclusion Bodies by Interacting with and Stabilizing Microtubules. J. Virol.
76: 4483-4496
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Taraporewala, Z. F., Patton, J. T.
(2001). Identification and Characterization of the Helix-Destabilizing Activity of Rotavirus Nonstructural Protein NSP2. J. Virol.
75: 4519-4527
[Abstract]
[Full Text]