Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, June 2000, p. 5569-5576, Vol. 74, No. 12
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Rubella Virus Capsid Associates with Host Cell
Protein p32 and Localizes to Mitochondria
Martin D.
Beatch and
Tom C.
Hobman*
Department of Cell Biology, University of
Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada
Received 28 December 1999/Accepted 14 March 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Togavirus nucleocapsids have a characteristic icosahedral structure
and are composed of multiple copies of a capsid protein complexed with
genomic RNA. The assembly of rubella virus nucleocapsids is unique
among togaviruses in that the process occurs late in virus assembly and
in association with intracellular membranes. The goal of this study was
to identify host cell proteins which may be involved in regulating
rubella virus nucleocapsid assembly through their interactions with the
capsid protein. Capsid was used as bait to screen a CV1 cDNA library
using the yeast two-hybrid system. One protein that interacted strongly
with capsid was p32, a cellular protein which is known to interact with
other viral proteins. The interaction between capsid and p32 was
confirmed using a number of different in vitro and in vivo methods, and the site of interaction between these two proteins was shown to be at
the mitochondria. Interestingly, overexpression of the rubella virus
structural proteins resulted in clustering of the mitochondria in the
perinuclear region. The p32-binding site in capsid is a potentially
phosphorylated region that overlaps the viral RNA-binding domain of
capsid. Our results are consistent with the possibility that the
interaction of p32 with capsid plays a role in the regulation of
nucleocapsid assembly and/or virus-host interactions.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Rubella virus (RV) is a
positive-strand RNA virus of the family Togaviridae. Despite
routine vaccination programs which have been in place for 30 years, the
virus persists in the human population and remains an important human
pathogen (11). The most serious medical consequences of RV
infection occur when seronegative women contract the virus during the
first trimester of pregnancy. RV is highly teratogenic and causes a
characteristic pattern of defects in the fetus which are collectively
known as congenital rubella syndrome. The molecular basis of RV
pathology remains poorly understood, but several recent reports have
shown that the virus induces apoptosis in a cell type-dependent manner
(9, 19, 33, 45). This pattern of apoptosis could potentially
explain the organ-specific malformations observed in congenital rubella syndrome.
Virions contain three structural proteins that are translated from a
24S subgenomic RNA; two membrane-spanning glycoproteins (E2 and E1) and
a capsid protein (38). The capsid protein is multifunctional
and is involved in several different types of intermolecular
interactions. First, it contains an RNA-binding domain and is
responsible for packaging the genomic RNA into nucleocapsids (11,
28). Second, by analogy with other togaviruses, capsid must
engage in homo-oligomeric (capsid-capsid) interactions during nucleocapsid formation. Finally, it must also interact with E2 and/or
E1 during budding (37, 40).
The nucleocapsids of togaviruses have a characteristic icosahedral
structure which has been extensively studied in alphaviruses (41). Although the overall structures of RV and alphavirus
capsids are similar, their assembly pathways are quite different.
Whereas alphavirus capsids are released into the cytosol after
self-catalyzed cleavage from the structural protein precursor
(34), the RV capsid does not possess protease activity and
remains largely membrane associated after a signal peptidase-mediated
cleavage from the E2-E1 precursor (16, 52). Moreover, the
nucleocapsids of alphaviruses form in the cytoplasm of infected cells
well before budding occurs (51), while RV nucleocapsid
assembly occurs on the surface of intracellular membranes and is
coincident with virus budding (11). Recent studies indicate
that RV capsid can oligomerize in the absence of other viral and
mammalian proteins: (i) RV nucleocapsid assembly can be partially
reconstituted in vitro using lysates from Escherichia coli
that are expressing capsid (39), and (ii) capsid-capsid
interactions can be demonstrated using the yeast-two hybrid system
(4). These data are consistent with our hypothesis that
assembly of RV nucleocapsids is regulated by interaction with host cell
proteins. Such interactions with host cell proteins have been shown to
modulate the nucleocapsid assembly pathways of other, unrelated viruses
(26, 27).
To identify host cell proteins that interact with the RV capsid, we
screened a CV1 cDNA library using the yeast two-hybrid method. Multiple
capsid-binding clones were isolated which contained the cDNA
corresponding to a previously identified human protein known as p32.
Interestingly, p32 has been shown to bind a variety of other virus
phosphoproteins that complex with nucleic acids. In addition, p32 has a
putative role in apoptosis through regulation of the mitochondrial
permeability transition pore (21). We have confirmed the
interaction between p32 and capsid using in vitro and in vivo methods
and provide evidence that the interaction between these two proteins
occurs at the mitochondria.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Reagents.
Reagents and supplies were from the following
sources. Protein A- and G-Sepharose and glutathione-Sepharose were
purchased from Pharmacia (Alameda, Calif.). Phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, fibronectin, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), bovine serum
albumin, glucose oxidase, and cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose 4B
were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.). Promix
[35S]methionine-cysteine (1,000 Ci/mmol), translation
grade [35S]methionine (1,000 Ci/mmol), and
14C-labeled protein standards were purchased from Amersham
Corp. (Arlington Heights, Ill.). Minimal essential medium lacking
cysteine and methionine was purchased from ICN Biomedicals (Irvine,
Calif.). Sf-900 II serum-free medium, OptiMEM, and fetal bovine serum
were obtained from Life Technologies Inc. (Gaithersburg, Md.). Fugene 6 transfection reagent and Pwo polymerase were purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Laval, Quebec, Canada). Rabbit antiserum to p32 was a gift from Willie Russell (University of St. Andrews, St.
Andrews, United Kingdom). Monoclonal antibody to HSP 60 was purchased
from StressGen (Victoria, British Columbia, Canada). Monoclonal
antibodies to RV capsid (H15 C22) and E1 (B2) were gifts from John
Safford (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.) and Barbara
Pustowoit, (University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany), respectively.
Double-labeling-grade Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-mouse
immunoglobulin G (IgG) and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated
donkey anti-rabbit IgG were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch
Laboratories (West Grove, Pa.). Mitotracker Red CXMRos was from
Molecular Probes (Eugene, Oreg.). Vero and COS cells were obtained from
the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Va.). The M33 strain of
RV was obtained from Shirley Gillam (University of British Columbia).
Recombinant baculovirus (OB504-1) encoding capsid was a gift of
Christian Oker-Blom (VTT Biotechnology and Food Research, Espoo, Finland).
Plasmid construction. (i) Two-hybrid constructs.
The cDNA
encoding amino acids 1 to 277 of capsid was amplified by PCR using the
gene-specific primers Capsid-F
(5'-CGCGAATTCATGGCTTCCACTACCC-3') and C-E2SP-R
(5'-ACTGAGATCTAGCGGATGCGCCAAGGATG-3'),
containing an in-frame stop codon. The EcoRI
(GAATTC) and BglII (AGATCT) sites are
underlined in all of the primers. The PCR product was digested with
EcoRI and BglII and ligated into the
EcoRI and BamHI sites of pGBT9 (Clontech) to
create pGBT9-capsid. Capsid deletion mutant cDNAs generated by PCR were
also digested with EcoRI and BglII and subcloned
into the EcoRI and BamHI sites of pGBT9 or pGBKT7
as indicated. The primers used for each construct were as follows:
pGBT9-C1-88, Capsid-F and CM11
(5'-GATCAGATCTCTAGCGACTTTCTTGCCGCTC-3'); pGBT9-C87-171, CM12
(5'-GATCGAATTCAGTCGCTCCCAGACTCCG-3') and CM13 (5'-GATCAGATCTCTAGTCGACGCGGTAGAAGAC-3');
pGBT9-C167-277, CM14 (5'-GATCGAATTCTACCGCGTCGACCTG-3') and C-E2SP-R;
pGBKT7-C1-45, Capsid-F and CR45
(5'-GGTCAGATCTCTAGGAGTCGCGCTGTCGC-3'); and
pGBKT7-C46-89, Capsid-46
(5'-GGTCGAATTCAGCACCTCCGGAGATGAC-3') and CR89
(5'-GGTCAGATCTCTAGGAGCGACTTTCTTGCCGC-3').
(ii) Constructs for in vitro transcription-translation.
The
capsid cDNA was amplified by PCR from pCMV5-24S (17) using
the primers AV11 (5'-TACGGTGGGAGGTCTATATAGC-3') and
C-E2SP-R, and the PCR product was blunt-end ligated into the
EcoRV site of pBluescript KS(+) (Stratagene). The resulting
plasmid, pBLU-capsid, encoded RV capsid under the transcriptional
control of the T3 promoter. A plasmid encoding green fluorescent
protein (GFP) under the control of the T3 promoter, pBLU-GFP, was
created by excising GFP from pEGFP-1 (Clontech) with EcoRI
and NotI and ligating it into pBluescript KS(+).
(iii) Constructs for expression in bacteria.
p32 was cloned
in frame into the vector pGEX-4T1 (Pharmacia). The coding sequence for
p32 was amplified from clone 10 using the gene-specific primer P32F2
(5'-GATCGAATTCATGCTACCTCTGCTGCGC-3') and the
vector-specific primer GAD-PRV (5'-GCATCGTGCACCATCTCAA-3'). The PCR product was digested with EcoRI and
NotI and ligated into pGEX4T1 to create pGEX-p32.
(iv) Constructs for expression in mammalian cells.
The RV
expression plasmids pCMV5-24S and pCMV5-E2E1 have been described
previously (7, 16). PCB6+p32 was created by excising the
EcoRI/NotI fragment from pGEX-p32 and ligating it
into pCB6+ (42).
Yeast two-hybrid screening.
Yeast strain HF7c was
sequentially transformed with pGBT9-capsid and then with a CV1 cDNA
library in the vector pGAD10 (Clontech). Approximately 7 × 106 transformants were screened. Plasmids were isolated
from His+ LacZ+ colonies and then retransformed
with or without pGBT9-capsid into yeast strain SFY526, followed by
testing for
-galactosidase activity. Plasmid clones that activated
LacZ only in the presence of pGBT9-capsid were characterized by DNA
sequencing or restriction endonuclease mapping. Interactions between
capsid deletions (subcloned into pGBT9 or pGBKT7) and p32 (subcloned
into pGAD10) were assayed by cotransfecting AH109 cells and testing for
the ability to grow on medium lacking adenine, histidine, leucine, and
tryptophan.
-Galactosidase filter assays were also used to confirm
the interactions. All media, screening techniques, and
-galactosidase assays were performed according to the protocols
described in the Clontech MATCHMAKER system.
In vitro binding interactions.
Capsid and GFP were
synthesized using coupled transcription-translation systems (Promega or
Ambion) in the presence of [35S]methionine. The
35S-labeled proteins were incubated with Sepharose beads
coated with glutathione S-transferase (GST), GST-p32, or
glucose oxidase on a rotating device overnight at 4°C. The beads were
washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 8.0) (PBS)
containing 0.1% Triton-X100. The bound proteins were eluted by boiling
in SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) sample buffer for
5 min. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography as
described previously (12).
Generation of polyclonal antibodies to capsid.
Capsid
protein containing a His6 sequence was expressed in Sf9
cells using baculovirus as described previously (47). The His6-tagged capsid was purified by SDS-PAGE and
electroelution (6). Rabbits were immunized with 70 µg of
capsid protein, followed by booster injections (70 µg) at 4-week
intervals. The antiserum used in this study is 7W7.
Transient transfection of cell cultures.
COS and Vero cells
were transiently transfected using Fugene 6 transfection reagent as
described by the manufacturer.
RV infection of Vero cells.
Vero cells were infected with
the M33 strain of RV (multiplicity of infection of 1) for 2 h. The
virus inoculum was removed, and cells were then incubated at 35°C for
2 days before use in radioimmunoprecipitation experiments.
Metabolic labeling and coimmunoprecipitation.
Transfected
COS cells or infected Vero cells were metabolically labeled with
[35S]methionine-cysteine and radioimmunoprecipitated as
described previously (18). Immune complexes were washed with
PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 to preserve protein-protein interactions.
Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy.
Vero cells grown
on coverslips were processed for indirect immunofluorescence microscopy
24 h after transfection. To visualize mitochondria, Mitotracker
Red CXMRos (Molecular Probes) was added to the cell culture medium at a
final concentration of 30 ng/ml and incubated for 20 min at 37°C
prior to fixation. Cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde for 20 min,
followed by quenching with PBS containing 50 mM ammonium chloride. The
samples were washed two times with PBS containing Ca2+ and
Mg2+. Plasma membranes were permeabilized by treatment with
PBS containing 25 µg of digitonin per ml for 5 min followed by
washing with PBS containing Ca2+ and Mg2+. To
permeabilize the intracellular membranes, cells were treated with PBS
containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min before incubation with primary
and secondary antibodies. Samples were examined using a Zeiss Axioskop
2 instrument, and images were captured using a digital camera
(Diagnostic Laboratories, Inc., Sterling Heights, Mich.). In some
cases, samples were examined using a Zeiss 510 confocal microscope.
Images from optical sections (0.8 µm) were processed using Adobe
Photoshop 5.0.
DNA sequencing.
Plasmids were sequenced using core
facilities within the departments of Cell Biology and Biochemistry
(University of Alberta).
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The GenBank accession
number for the simian p32 cDNA sequence is AF238300.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of capsid-binding proteins.
The yeast
two-hybrid assay was used to identify potential host cell
capsid-binding proteins. This method was chosen since it is able to
detect both transient and stable interactions between proteins
(14). Vero cells are one of the few types of cultured cells
in which RV is able to establish a productive infection, but two-hybrid
Vero cDNA libraries are not commercially available. Since we wanted to
screen cDNA from a cell type as close to Vero as possible, we chose to
use a cDNA library prepared from CV1 cells, which, like Vero cells, are
derived from African green monkey kidney. Bait (capsid) and prey (CV1
cDNA) plasmids were sequentially transformed into the yeast strain
HF7c. Plasmids were isolated from transformants that grew on medium
lacking leucine, tryptophan, and histidine. These plasmids were
retransformed into SFY526 and assayed for
-galactosidase activity as
a secondary test. Of 32 positive clones obtained from the screen, 16 were characterized in further detail. Fifteen of these plasmid clones were found to encode the full-length cDNA for a previously
characterized protein, p32 (20, 23). The simian p32 cDNA
encodes a protein of 282 amino acids which is 95% identical to the
human p32 protein. The normal physiological function of this protein is
not known, but is has been shown to interact with numerous cellular and
virus proteins. The 16th clone encoded the carboxy-terminal region of Par-4 (49). Par-4 is up-regulated in cells committed to
apoptosis and interacts with atypical isoforms of protein kinase C
(8, 48). The nature of the interaction between capsid and
Par-4 is currently under investigation in our laboratory and will not be discussed further in this paper.
Previous studies showed that the majority of p32 localizes to the
mitochondrial matrix (35). We were therefore initially surprised to find that the capsid would interact with this type of
protein. However, a recent report by Lee et al., which was published
during the course of this work, demonstrated that a significant
proportion of RV nucleocapsids are associated with mitochondria during
infection (25). To demonstrate that the capsid-p32
interaction was not limited to the yeast two-hybrid system, we employed
an in vitro binding assay to measure the interaction of radiolabeled
capsid with p32 immobilized on Sepharose beads. 35S-labeled
capsid or GFP was incubated with either GST or GST-p32 prebound to
glutathione-Sepharose beads. The beads were washed, and bound proteins
were eluted and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography. In this assay
35S-labeled capsid was bound by GST-p32 but not by GST
(Fig. 1, lanes 2 and 3).
35S-labeled GFP, which served as a negative control, was
bound by neither GST-p32 nor GST (Fig. 1, lanes 6 and 7). We were
concerned that the interaction between the capsid, which contains a
large basic region, and p32, which is acidic, might be the result of nonspecific electrostatic interactions. This was shown not to be the
case, since capsid did not bind to glucose oxidase, which, like p32, is
an acidic soluble protein (Fig. 1, lane 4). Together, these results
demonstrate that the capsid interaction with p32 is specific.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Capsid binds to p32 in vitro. Sepharose beads coated
with GST (lanes 2 and 6), GST-p32 (lanes 3 and 7), or glucose oxidase
(GOD) (lanes 4 and 8) were mixed with 35S-labeled capsid
(lanes 2 to 4) or GFP (lanes 6 to 8). The beads were washed, and bound
proteins were eluted and visualized by SDS-PAGE and fluorography. Five
percent of the capsid and GFP in vitro translation reaction mixtures
were loaded in lanes 1 and 5, respectively.
|
|
Capsid and p32 interact in vivo.
Coimmunoprecipitation studies
were used to determine if capsid interacts with p32 in vivo. COS cells
were cotransfected with expression vectors encoding p32 and 24S
(capsid, E2, and E1) or E2-E1 (E2 and E1). Alternatively, cells were
transfected with the 24S or p32 expression vectors alone. At 40 h
posttransfection, cells were biosynthetically labeled with
[35S]methionine-cysteine and cell lysates were prepared
using nondenaturing conditions. Lysates were subjected to
radioimmunoprecipitation with antibodies specific for capsid or p32,
and the immune complexes were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography.
Capsid-p32 complexes were coimmunoprecipitated from cells expressing
all three RV structural proteins, using antibodies to capsid or p32
(Fig. 2A, lanes 2, 3, and 9). Neither
capsid nor p32 were immunoprecipitated by preimmune rabbit serum (Fig.
2A, lanes 1 and 7). For negative controls, the immunoprecipitations
were performed on E2-E1- or p32-transfected and mock-transfected COS
cells (Fig. 2A, lanes 4 to 6 and 10 to 12). Capsid was not
immunoprecipitated from these lysates, and p32 was immunoprecipitated
only using anti-p32 (Fig. 2A, lane 6). To confirm that the capsid-p32
interaction is relevant in the context of viral infection,
immunoprecipitations were repeated using lysates prepared from
RV-infected Vero cells. Similar to the results obtained using
transfected cells, capsid and p32 were coimmunoprecipitated using
antibodies specific for capsid or p32 in a reciprocal fashion from
infected cells but not from mock-infected cells (Fig. 2B, lanes 1, 2, 5, and 6). In addition, neither capsid nor p32 was immunoprecipitated
by preimmune rabbit serum or a monoclonal antibody specific for E1
(Fig. 2B, lanes 3, 4, 7 and 8). Although capsid and p32
coimmunoprecipitated in a reciprocal fashion, the amount of p32
immunoprecipitated with anticapsid antibodies was much lower than the
amount of capsid immunoprecipitated with anti-p32 antibodies. One
possibility is that binding of the polyclonal antibodies to capsid
results in disruption of the capsid-p32 complexes. However, given that
very small amounts of p32 were also coimmunoprecipitated when the
experiments were performed using several different anticapsid
monoclonal antibodies (data not shown), this scenario seems unlikely.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Capsid and p32 associate in vivo. (A) COS cells were
transfected (Tfxn) with expression vectors encoding the RV structural
proteins (24S) and p32 (lanes 1 to 3), the RV envelope proteins (E2-E1)
and p32 (lanes 4 to 6), or 24S alone (lanes 7 to 9) or were mock
transfected (lanes 10 to 12). At 24 h posttransfection the cells
were biosynthetically labeled with
[35S]methionine-cysteine, lysed and then subjected to
immunoprecipitation with preimmune serum (PI) (lanes 1, 4, 7, and 10),
or antibodies (Ab) specific for capsid (lanes 2, 5, 8, and 11) or p32
(lanes 3, 6, 9, and 12). Immune complexes were subjected to SDS-PAGE
and fluorography. (B) Vero cells were infected or mock infected with RV
at a multiplicity of infection of 1. At 48 h postinfection, the
cells were biosynthetically labeled with
[35S]methionine-cysteine. Immunoprecipitations were
performed using lysates from infected cells (lanes 1 to 4) and
mock-infected cells (lanes 5 to 8) as described above, using antibodies
specific for capsid (lanes 1 and 5), p32 (lanes 2 and 6), E1 (lanes 3 and 7), or preimmune serum (lanes 4 and 8). The positions of
E1, capsid, and p32 are indicated to the left of the gels. E2 which
coprecipitates with E1 (lane 3) is indicated with an arrowhead.
The asterisk indicates an unknown protein that comigrates with E2
in lanes 1, 2, and 4.
|
|
Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy was used to determine the
intracellular site(s) of capsid-p32 interaction in transiently
transfected cells. In cells expressing RV structural proteins
and p32,
a significant proportion of capsid colocalized with p32
to cytoplasmic
vesicular structures in the perinuclear region
(Fig.
3A and B, arrows). These structures were
identified as mitochondria,
since p32 colocalized with HSP60, a
resident mitochondrial protein
(data not shown), and the
mitochondrion-specific dye Mitotracker
Red CXMRos (Fig.
3C and D). No
colocalization was observed between
p32 and the RV envelope protein E1
(Fig.
3E and F). Capsid also
colocalized with p32 to the mitochondria
in cells transfected
with 24S alone, showing that these results are not
due to overexpression
of p32 (Fig.
3G and H). Interestingly, the
mitochondria in cells
expressing RV structural proteins were more
spherical and were
clustered in the perinuclear region, in contrast to
those in nontransfected
cells, which were more lacy and peripherally
localized (Fig.
3B,
F, and H). This effect was specific for RV
structural proteins,
since cells overexpressing p32 alone did not
exhibit this phenotype
(data not shown).

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Capsid colocalizes with p32 at the mitochondria. Vero
cells were transfected with expression vectors encoding the RV
structural proteins (24S) and p32 (A to F) or 24S alone (G and H).
Cells were incubated with antibodies to capsid (A and G), p32 (B, D, F,
and H) or E1 (E). For samples shown in panels E and F, mitochondria
were labeled prior to fixation with Mitotracker Red (C) followed by
staining with anti-p32. Primary antibodies were detected with Texas
Red-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG and FITC-conjugated donkey
anti-rabbit IgG. The Texas Red channel is shown on the left (A, C, E,
and G), and the FITC channel is shown on the right (B, D, F, and H).
Areas of colocalization are shown by arrows, whereas the arrowhead
indicates a perinuclear pool of capsid which does not overlap with p32.
Bar, 20 µm.
|
|
To determine whether p32 and capsid interact on the cytoplasmic surface
or within the matrix of the mitochondria, cells were
fixed and treated
with digitonin to permeabilize only the plasma
membrane or with
digitonin followed by Triton X-100 to permeabilize
intracellular
membranes. Using this method, mitochondrial staining
of capsid was
observed in both digitonin and digitonin- plus Triton
X-100-permeabilized cells (Fig.
4A and
C). In contrast, p32 was
only visible in digitonin- and Triton
X-100-treated cells. These
results indicate that p32, but not capsid,
is translocated into
the mitochondria, and they can potentially explain
why the distributions
of these two proteins are slightly different
(Fig.
3 and
4). This
conclusion is supported by confocal microscopy
analysis, which
showed that anticapsid and anti-p32 antibodies stained
different
regions of the mitochondria (Fig.
4E, F, and G). Capsid
staining
was often localized to the periphery of mitochondria (Fig.
4E),
whereas p32 staining was more central and extended into the
interior
of these structures (Fig.
4G).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Capsid is associated with the cytoplasmic side of the
mitochondria. Vero cells were transfected with expression vectors
encoding the RV structural proteins (24S) and p32, and fixed with 3%
paraformaldehyde. (A to D) The plasma membranes were permeabilized with
digitonin (A and B). To permeabilize intracellular membranes, cells (C
and D) were treated with Triton X-100 (+TX100). Cells were double
labeled with antibodies specific for capsid (A and C) and p32 (B and
D). Primary antibodies were detected with Texas Red-conjugated donkey
anti-mouse IgG and FITC-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG. The Texas
Red channel is shown on the left (A and C), and the FITC channel is
shown on the right (B and D). Bar, 20 µm. (E to G) Confocal images of
Triton X-100-treated cells. The arrowheads in panel E indicate capsid
staining at the periphery of mitochondria which does not coincide with
p32 staining (G). Panel F is a merge of the images shown in panels E
and G.
|
|
The amino terminus of capsid binds p32.
We used the yeast
two-hybrid system to identify the region of capsid that binds p32.
Three different but similarly sized regions of capsid cDNA were
amplified by PCR and subcloned into GAL4 DNA binding domain plasmids
(pGBKT7 or pGBT9). The capsid constructs were cotransfected into AH109
cells and tested for the ability to grow on medium lacking adenine,
leucine, tryptophan, and histidine. These interactions were further
tested using the
-galactosidase filter assay. Full-length capsid and
the amino-terminal region of capsid (amino acids 1 to 88) interacted
with p32 in these assays (Fig. 5). In
contrast, the middle and carboxy-terminal regions of capsid (amino
acids 87 to 171 or 167 to 277, respectively) did not interact with p32.
The amino-terminal 88 amino acids of capsid were subdivided into two
smaller regions and tested using the same assays. A weak interaction
between amino acids 46 to 89 of capsid and p32 occurred as evidenced by
the presence of smaller, slow-growing colonies on medium lacking
adenine, leucine, tryptophan, and histidine (Fig. 5). In contrast, no
growth was observed when a construct encoding capsid residues 1 to 45 was used (Fig. 5). These results indicate that the minimal region of
capsid which can interact with p32 is located within amino acids 46 to
89.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
The p32-binding site is located in the amino-terminal
region of capsid. AH109 yeast cells were transformed with pGAD-p32 and
GAL4 DNA binding domain plasmids encoding full-length capsid
(pGBKT7-capsid) or portions of capsid. The capsid constructs are named
according to the amino acids in capsid which they encode. For example,
1-45 is pGBKT7 plus the coding region for amino acids 1 to 45 of
capsid. The transformants were plated onto medium lacking tryptophan
and leucine (-Trp-Leu) or medium lacking tryptophan, leucine,
histidine, and adenine (-Trp-Leu-His-Ade). The positive control (+) is
a Clontech system control that utilizes two strongly interacting
proteins, p53 (in pGBKT7) and simian virus 40 large T antigen (in
pGAD). As a negative control ( ), AH109 was transformed with two
plasmids which do not interact, pGBKT7-p53 and pGAD-ABP280. Growth on
the -Trp-Leu-His-Ade plates is indicative of a strong interaction
between the two proteins being tested.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study we have shown that RV capsid interacts with the
mitochondrial protein p32. A number of in vitro and in vivo methods
were used to confirm the interaction between these two proteins. Our
data indicate that the interaction takes place at the mitochondria. In
light of the recent discovery that RV nucleocapsids associate with
mitochondria in infected Vero cells (25), it seems quite
likely that capsid-p32 interactions may be important for this process.
However, not all of the capsid was associated with p32, since a
significant proportion of this protein was not localized to the
mitochondria (Fig. 3). This is to be expected, since much of the capsid
will be engaged in productive virus assembly, in which case it must be
recruited to the site of virus budding, the Golgi (17).
p32 was originally identified through its association with the human
mRNA splicing factor ASF/SF2 (23). The physiological function of p32 is not known, but it has been shown to complex with
other cellular and viral proteins (for a complete list, see reference
32). The binding of p32 to several of these proteins has been shown to regulate their intermolecular interactions by modulating their phosphorylation states. For example, p32 has an
inhibitory effect on the phosphorylation of ASF/SF2 which in turn
regulates its binding to both RNA and other proteins (43). In addition, p32 is thought to regulate interactions between members of
the lamin B receptor complex in a manner which is also dependent on
phosphorylation of lamin B receptor (36). The common feature among p32-binding proteins is that they are phosphoproteins, which in
many cases bind to nucleic acids and other proteins. RV capsid is also
a phosphoprotein (12, 30), and the p32-binding region (amino
acids 45 to 89) contains several potential phosphorylation sites as
predicted using the PROSITE algorithm (1). This region of
capsid also contains part of the genomic RNA-binding domain (28). Interestingly, the RNA-binding activity of hepatitis B virus capsid protein is modulated by phosphorylation (22).
By analogy, p32 may regulate the binding of genomic RNA to RV capsid by
modulating its level of phosphorylation. This in turn may have an
effect upon capsid oligomerization and, ultimately, virus assembly.
Previous studies are consistent with the possibility that p32 is able
to leave the mitochondria and bind to other proteins in such places as
the nucleus and the cell surface (13, 32). Indeed, numerous
other mitochondrial proteins have been shown to leave this organelle
under certain conditions (50). However, in the present study
we observed that the majority of p32 is localized to the mitochondria
and that the interaction with capsid occurs at this location. p32
contains a 74-amino-acid amino-terminal domain which is required for
targeting to the mitochondria (35). During translocation
into the mitochondrial matrix, this amino-terminal domain is cleaved to
yield the mature form of p32. Our data suggest that capsid associates
with the mature form of p32 but is not translocated into the
mitochondria. This observation is consistent with those of Lee et al.
(25), who showed that capsid antibodies stain the
cytoplasmic face of mitochondrial membranes in RV-infected cells.
Accordingly, we hypothesize that capsid binds to the carboxy terminus
of newly synthesized p32 in the cytoplasm, leaving the amino-terminal
region of p32 available to target the complex to mitochondria. Upon
docking at this organelle, the bulk of p32 is translocated into
mitochondria, where cleavage of the leader peptide occurs. Capsid
remains bound to the cytoplasmic side of the mitochondria still
attached to the carboxy terminus of p32. Alternatively, capsid may
associate with mitochondria independently where it binds to a pool of
p32 as it leaves this organelle. This scenario seems unlikely, since
there is no obvious mechanism to target capsid to this organelle
independently of p32.
The localization of capsid to the mitochondria and association with a
mitochondrial protein is intriguing in light of previous studies which
document a link between RV replication complexes and mitochondrial
function and localization (2, 3, 24, 25). In RV-infected
cells, clustering of mitochondria occurs and electron-dense plaques
form between the membranes of apposing mitochondria and between
mitochondria that associate with the endoplasmic reticulum. Moreover,
the mitochondria cluster around RV replication sites which are modified
endosomes or lysosomes and are located in the perinuclear region
(29). This phenomenon is unique to RV and does not occur
with other togaviruses. Lee et al. proposed that recruitment of the
mitochondria to RV replication sites could provide the energy required
for virus replication (24). It follows that the capsid-p32
interactions may play a role in the formation of these plaques and/or
association of mitochondria with RV replication sites. In the present
study we showed that clustering of mitochondria in the perinuclear
region requires expression of RV structural proteins but does not
require virus replication.
Interactions between viral capsids and host cell proteins can also have
important consequences for viral pathogenesis and the host immune
response (5, 10, 31, 53, 54). Several recent studies have
shown that RV is able to induce apoptosis in certain types of cultured
cells (9, 19, 33, 45). Interestingly, similar to expression
of RV structural proteins, translocation of proapoptotic proteins such
as truncated Bid to mitochondria causes clustering of these organelles
in the perinuclear region prior to breakdown of mitochondrial membrane
integrity (44). This is particularly intriguing in light of
the hypothesis that p32 regulates opening of the permeability
transition pore of the mitochondrial inner membrane (21), a
process which is known to have a critical role in apoptosis
(15). In this regard, p32 may act as a calcium buffer that
modulates the concentration of divalent metal ions and consequently the
permeability of mitochondria. Accordingly, binding to capsid may affect
the ability of p32 to act as a calcium buffer. At this point it is
unclear whether the interaction between p32 and capsid is pro- or
antiapoptotic, and resolving this issue may not be straightforward
given that numerous virus proteins have been shown to have both pro-
and antiapoptotic functions (46). Nevertheless, if
capsid-p32 complexes are involved in apoptosis, a more detailed study
of how these two proteins interact should provide important insight
into how RV initiates persistent infections or congenital defects.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Barbara Pustowoit, Shirley Gillam, Christian Oker-Blom,
John Safford, and Willie Russell for their generous gifts of reagents.
We also thank Bruce Stevenson for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council of
Canada. M.D.B. is the recipient of a graduate studentship award from
the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Cell Biology, 5-14 Medical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada. Phone: (780) 492-6485. Fax: (780)
492-0450. E-mail: tom.hobman{at}ualberta.ca.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Appel, R. D.,
A. Bairoch, and D. F. Hochstrasser.
1994.
A new generation of information retrieval tools for biologists: the example of the ExPASy WWW server.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19:258-260[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bardeletti, G.
1977.
Respiration and ATP level in BHK21/13S cells during the earliest stages of rubella virus replication.
Intervirology.
8:100-109[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bardeletti, G., and D. C. Gautheron.
1976.
Phospholipid and cholesterol composition of rubella virus and its host cell BHK 21 grown in suspension cultures.
Arch Virol.
52:19-27[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Beatch, M., and T. C. Hobman.
1998.
Association of rubella virus capsid protein with host cell proteins, p. 1-39.
In
Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Positive Strand RNA Viruses.
|
| 5.
|
Chen, C.-M.,
L.-R. You,
L. H. Hwang, and Y.-H. W. Lee.
1997.
Direct interaction of hepatitis C virus core protein with the cellular lymphotoxin- receptor modulates the signal pathway of the lymphotoxin- receptor.
J. Virol.
71:9417-9426[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Cikaluk, D. E.,
N. Tahbaz,
L. C. Hendricks,
G. E. DiMattia,
D. Hansen,
D. Pilgrim, and T. C. Hobman.
1999.
GERp95, a membrane-associated protein that belongs to a family of proteins involved in stem cell differentiation.
Mol. Biol. Cell
10:3357-3372[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Clarke, D. M.,
T. W. Loo,
I. Hui,
P. Chong, and S. Gillam.
1987.
Nucleotide sequence and in vitro expression of rubella virus 24S subgenomic messenger RNA encoding the structural proteins E1, E2 and C.
Nucleic Acids Res.
15:3041-3057[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Diaz-Meco, M. T.,
M. M. Municio,
S. Frutos,
P. Sanchez,
J. Lozano,
L. Sanz, and J. Moscat.
1996.
The product of par-4, a gene induced during apoptosis, interacts selectively with the atypical isoforms of protein kinase C.
Cell
86:777-786[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Duncan, R.,
J. Muller,
N. Lee,
A. Esmaili, and H. L. Nakhasi.
1999.
Rubella virus-induced apoptosis varies among cell lines and is modulated by Bcl-XL and caspase inhibitors.
Virology
255:117-128[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Everett, H., and G. McFadden.
1999.
Apoptosis: an innate immune response to virus infection.
Trends Microbiol.
7:160-165[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Frey, T. K.
1994.
Molecular biology of rubella virus.
Adv. Virus Res.
44:69-160[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Garbutt, M.,
L. M. Law,
H. Chan, and T. C. Hobman.
1999.
Role of rubella virus glycoprotein domains in assembly of virus-like particles.
J. Virol.
73:3524-3533[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Ghebrehiwet, B.,
B. L. Lim,
E. I. Peerschke,
A. C. Willis, and K. B. Reid.
1994.
Isolation, cDNA cloning, and overexpression of a 33-kD cell surface glycoprotein that binds to the globular "heads" of C1q.
J. Exp. Med.
179:1809-1821[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Guarente, L.
1993.
Strategies for the identification of interacting proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:1639-1641[Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Heiden, M. G. V., and C. B. Thompson.
1999.
Bcl-2 proteins: regulators of apoptosis or of mitochondrial homeostasis?
Nat. Cell Biol.
1:E209-E216[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Hobman, T. C., and S. Gillam.
1989.
In vitro and in vivo expression of rubella virus E2 glycoprotein: the signal peptide is located in the C-terminal region of capsid protein.
Virology
173:241-250[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Hobman, T. C.,
M. L. Lundstrom, and S. Gillam.
1990.
Processing and intracellular transport of rubella virus structural proteins in COS cells.
Virology
178:122-133[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Hobman, T. C.,
L. Woodward, and M. G. Farquhar.
1993.
The rubella virus E2 and E1 spike glycoproteins are targeted to the Golgi complex.
J. Cell Biol.
121:269-281[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Hofmann, J.,
M. W. Pletz, and U. G. Liebert.
1999.
Rubella virus-induced cytopathic effect in vitro is caused by apoptosis.
J. Gen. Virol.
80:1657-1664[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Honore, B.,
P. Madsen,
H. H. Rasmussen,
J. Vandekerckhove,
J. E. Celis, and H. Leffers.
1993.
Cloning and expression of a cDNA covering the complete coding region of the P32 subunit of human pre-mRNA splicing factor SF2.
Gene
134:283-287[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Jiang, J.,
Y. Zhang,
A. R. Krainer, and R. M. Xu.
1999.
Crystal structure of human p32, a doughnut-shaped acidic mitochondrial matrix protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:3572-3577[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Kann, M., and W. H. Gerlich.
1994.
Effect of core protein phosphorylation by protein kinase C on encapsidation of RNA within core particles of hepatitis B virus.
J. Virol.
68:7993-8000[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Krainer, A. R.,
A. Mayeda,
D. Kozak, and G. Binns.
1991.
Functional expression of cloned human splicing factor SF2: homology to RNA-binding proteins, U1 70K, and Drosophila splicing regulators.
Cell
66:383-394[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Lee, J. Y.,
D. S. Bowden, and J. A. Marshall.
1996.
Membrane junctions associated with rubella virus infected cells.
J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol.
28:101-108[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Lee, J. Y.,
J. A. Marshall, and D. S. Bowden.
1999.
Localization of rubella virus core particles in vero cells.
Virology
265:110-119[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Lingappa, J. R.,
R. L. Martin,
M. L. Wong,
D. Ganem,
W. J. Welch, and V. R. Lingappa.
1994.
A eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonin is associated with a high molecular weight intermediate in the assembly of hepatitis B virus capsid, a multimeric particle.
J. Cell Biol.
125:99-111[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Liu, B.,
R. Dai,
C. J. Tian,
L. Dawson,
R. Gorelick, and X. F. Yu.
1999.
Interaction of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid with actin.
J. Virol.
73:2901-2908[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Liu, Z.,
D. Yang,
Z. Qiu,
K. T. Lim,
P. Chong, and S. Gillam.
1996.
Identification of domains in rubella virus genomic RNA and capsid protein necessary for specific interaction.
J. Virol.
70:2184-2190[Abstract].
|
| 29.
|
Magliano, D.,
J. A. Marshall,
D. S. Bowden,
N. Vardaxis,
J. Meanger, and J. Y. Lee.
1998.
Rubella virus replication complexes are virus-modified lysosomes.
Virology
240:57-63[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Marr, L. D.,
A. Sanchez, and T. K. Frey.
1991.
Efficient in vitro translation and processing of the rubella virus structural proteins in the presence of microsomes.
Virology
180:400-405[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Matsumoto, M.,
T. Y. Hsieh,
N. Zhu,
T. VanArsdale,
S. B. Hwang,
K. S. Jeng,
A. E. Gorbalenya,
S. Y. Lo,
J. H. Ou,
C. F. Ware, and M. M. Lai.
1997.
Hepatitis C virus core protein interacts with the cytoplasmic tail of lymphotoxin-beta receptor.
J. Virol.
71:1301-1309[Abstract].
|
| 32.
|
Matthews, D. A., and W. C. Russell.
1998.
Adenovirus core protein V interacts with p32 a protein which is associated with both the mitochondria and the nucleus.
J. Gen. Virol.
79:1677-1685[Abstract].
|
| 33.
|
Megyeri, K.,
K. Berencsi,
T. D. Halazonetis,
G. C. Prendergast,
G. Gri,
S. A. Plotkin,
G. Rovera, and E. Gonczol.
1999.
Involvement of a p53-dependent pathway in rubella virus-induced apoptosis.
Virology
259:74-84[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Melancon, P., and H. Garoff.
1987.
Processing of the Semliki Forest virus structural polyprotein: role of the capsid protease.
J. Virol.
61:1301-1309[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Muta, T.,
D. Kang,
S. Kitajima,
T. Fujiwara, and N. Hamasaki.
1997.
p32 protein, a splicing factor 2-associated protein, is localized in mitochondrial matrix and is functionally important in maintaining oxidative phosphorylation.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:24363-24370[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Nikolakaki, E.,
G. Simos,
S. D. Georgatos, and T. Giannakouros.
1996.
A nuclear envelope-associated kinase phosphorylates arginine-serine motifs and modulates interactions between the lamin B receptor and other nuclear proteins.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:8365-8372[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Nolandt, O.,
V. Kern,
H. Muller,
E. Pfaff,
L. Theilmann,
R. Welker, and H. G. Krausslich.
1997.
Analysis of hepatitis C virus core protein interaction domains.
J. Gen. Virol.
78:1331-1340[Abstract].
|
| 38.
|
Oker-Blom, C.,
N. Kalkkinen,
L. Kaariainen, and R. F. Pettersson.
1983.
Rubella virus contains one capsid protein and three envelope glycoproteins, E1, E2a, and E2b.
J. Virol.
46:964-973[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Ostendorp, R.,
R. Kuhn, and M. Rossman.
1998.
Capsid proteins from rubella virus and hepatitis C virus: an efficient strategy for isolating proteins with high isoelectric points, p. P1-38.
In
Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Positive Strand RNA Viruses.
|
| 40.
|
Owen, K. E., and R. J. Kuhn.
1997.
Alphavirus budding is dependent on the interaction between the nucleocapsid and hydrophobic amino acids on the cytoplasmic domain of the E2 envelope glycoprotein.
Virology
230:187-196[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Paredes, A. M.,
D. T. Brown,
R. Rothnagel,
W. Chiu,
R. J. Schoepp,
R. E. Johnston, and B. V. Prasad.
1993.
Three-dimensional structure of a membrane-containing virus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:9095-9099[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Patwardhan, S.,
A. Gashler,
M. G. Siegel,
L. C. Chang,
L. J. Joseph,
T. B. Shows,
M. M. Le Beau, and V. P. Sukhatme.
1991.
EGR3, a novel member of the Egr family of genes encoding immediate-early transcription factors.
Oncogene
6:917-928[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Petersen-Mahrt, S. K.,
C. Estmer,
C. Ohrmalm,
D. A. Matthews,
W. C. Russell, and G. Akusjarvi.
1999.
The splicing factor-associated protein, p32, regulates RNA splicing by inhibiting ASF/SF2 RNA binding and phosphorylation.
EMBO J.
18:1014-1024[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Porter, A. G.
1999.
Protein translocation in apoptosis.
Trends Cell Biol.
9:394-401[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Pugachev, K. V., and T. K. Frey.
1998.
Rubella virus induces apoptosis in culture cells.
Virology
250:359-370[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Roulston, A.,
R. C. Marcellus, and P. E. Branton.
1999.
Viruses and apoptosis.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
53:577-628[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Schmidt, M.,
N. Tuominen,
T. Johansson,
S. A. Weiss,
K. Keinanen, and C. Oker-Blom.
1998.
Baculovirus-mediated large-scale expression and purification of a polyhistidine-tagged rubella virus capsid protein.
Protein Expr. Purif.
12:323-330[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Sells, S. F.,
S. S. Han,
S. Muthukkumar,
N. Maddiwar,
R. Johnstone,
E. Boghaert,
D. Gillis,
G. Liu,
P. Nair,
S. Monnig,
P. Collini,
M. P. Mattson,
V. P. Sukhatme,
S. G. Zimmer,
D. P. Wood, Jr.,
J. W. McRoberts,
Y. Shi, and V. M. Rangnekar.
1997.
Expression and function of the leucine zipper protein Par-4 in apoptosis.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:3823-3832[Abstract].
|
| 49.
|
Sells, S. F.,
D. P. Wood, Jr.,
S. S. Joshi-Barve,
S. Muthukumar,
R. J. Jacob,
S. A. Crist,
S. Humphreys, and V. M. Rangnekar.
1994.
Commonality of the gene programs induced by effectors of apoptosis in androgen-dependent and -independent prostate cells.
Cell Growth Differ.
5:457-466[Abstract].
|
| 50.
|
Soltys, B. J., and R. S. Gupta.
1999.
Mitochondrial-matrix proteins at unexpected locations: are they exported?
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24:174-177[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Strauss, J. H., and E. G. Strauss.
1994.
The alphaviruses: gene expression, replication and evolution.
Microbiol. Rev.
58:491-562[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Suomalainen, M.,
H. Garoff, and M. D. Baron.
1990.
The E2 signal sequence of rubella virus remains part of the capsid protein and confers membrane association in vitro.
J. Virol.
64:5500-5509[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
You, L. R.,
C. M. Chen, and Y. H. W. Lee.
1999.
Hepatitis C virus core protein enhances NF-kappaB signal pathway triggering by lymphotoxin-beta receptor ligand and tumor necrosis factor alpha.
J. Virol.
73:1672-1681[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Zhu, N.,
A. Khoshnan,
R. Schneider,
M. Matsumoto,
G. Dennert,
C. Ware, and M. M. Lai.
1998.
Hepatitis C virus core protein binds to the cytoplasmic domain of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor 1 and enhances TNF-induced apoptosis.
J. Virol.
72:3691-3697[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, June 2000, p. 5569-5576, Vol. 74, No. 12
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Tzeng, W.-P., Frey, T. K.
(2009). Functional Replacement of a Domain in the Rubella Virus P150 Replicase Protein by the Virus Capsid Protein. J. Virol.
83: 3549-3555
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ilkow, C. S., Mancinelli, V., Beatch, M. D., Hobman, T. C.
(2008). Rubella Virus Capsid Protein Interacts with Poly(A)-Binding Protein and Inhibits Translation. J. Virol.
82: 4284-4294
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tzeng, W.-P., Matthews, J. D., Frey, T. K.
(2006). Analysis of rubella virus capsid protein-mediated enhancement of replicon replication and mutant rescue.. J. Virol.
80: 3966-3974
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Beatch, M. D., Everitt, J. C., Law, L. J., Hobman, T. C.
(2005). Interactions between Rubella Virus Capsid and Host Protein p32 Are Important for Virus Replication. J. Virol.
79: 10807-10820
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Valentin, C., Dunoyer, P., Vetter, G., Schalk, C., Dietrich, A., Bouzoubaa, S.
(2005). Molecular Basis for Mitochondrial Localization of Viral Particles during Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus Infection. J. Virol.
79: 9991-10002
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, M.-H., Icenogle, J. P.
(2004). Rubella Virus Capsid Protein Modulates Viral Genome Replication and Virus Infectivity. J. Virol.
78: 4314-4322
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Laine, S., Thouard, A., Derancourt, J., Kress, M., Sitterlin, D., Rossignol, J.-M.
(2003). In Vitro and In Vivo Interactions between the Hepatitis B Virus Protein P22 and the Cellular Protein gC1qR. J. Virol.
77: 12875-12880
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tzeng, W.-P., Frey, T. K.
(2003). Complementation of a Deletion in the Rubella Virus P150 Nonstructural Protein by the Viral Capsid Protein. J. Virol.
77: 9502-9510
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Law, L. M. J., Everitt, J. C., Beatch, M. D., Holmes, C. F. B., Hobman, T. C.
(2003). Phosphorylation of Rubella Virus Capsid Regulates Its RNA Binding Activity and Virus Replication. J. Virol.
77: 1764-1771
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Salanueva, I. J., Novoa, R. R., Cabezas, P., Lopez-Iglesias, C., Carrascosa, J. L., Elliott, R. M., Risco, C.
(2002). Polymorphism and Structural Maturation of Bunyamwera Virus in Golgi and Post-Golgi Compartments. J. Virol.
77: 1368-1381
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hall, K. T., Giles, M. S., Calderwood, M. A., Goodwin, D. J., Matthews, D. A., Whitehouse, A.
(2002). The Herpesvirus Saimiri Open Reading Frame 73 Gene Product Interacts with the Cellular Protein p32. J. Virol.
76: 11612-11622
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bouchard, M. J., Wang, L.-H., Schneider, R. J.
(2001). Calcium Signaling by HBx Protein in Hepatitis B Virus DNA Replication. Science
294: 2376-2378
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tahbaz, N., Carmichael, J. B., Hobman, T. C.
(2001). GERp95 Belongs to a Family of Signal-transducing Proteins and Requires Hsp90 Activity for Stability and Golgi Localization. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 43294-43299
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nanda, S. K., Leibowitz, J. L.
(2001). Mitochondrial Aconitase Binds to the 3' Untranslated Region of the Mouse Hepatitis Virus Genome. J. Virol.
75: 3352-3362
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Law, L. M. J., Duncan, R., Esmaili, A., Nakhasi, H. L., Hobman, T. C.
(2001). Rubella Virus E2 Signal Peptide Is Required for Perinuclear Localization of Capsid Protein and Virus Assembly. J. Virol.
75: 1978-1983
[Abstract]
[Full Text]