JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moraleda, G.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moraleda, G.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, June 2000, p. 5509-5515, Vol. 74, No. 12
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Interactions between Hepatitis Delta Virus Proteins

Gloria Moraleda,1 Kate Dingle,1 Preetha Biswas,1 Jinhong Chang,1 Harmon Zuccola,2 James Hogle,2 and John Taylor1,*

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111-2497,1 and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 021152

Received 15 December 1999/Accepted 9 March 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The 195- and 214-amino-acid (aa) forms of the delta protein (delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L, respectively) of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) differ only in the 19-aa C-terminal extension unique to delta Ag-L. delta Ag-S is needed for genome replication, while delta Ag-L is needed for particle assembly. These proteins share a region at aa 12 to 60, which mediates protein-protein interactions essential for HDV replication. H. Zuccola et al. (Structure 6:821-830, 1998) reported a crystal structure for a peptide spanning this region which demonstrates an antiparallel coiled-coil dimer interaction with the potential to form tetramers of dimers. Our studies tested whether predictions based on this structure could be extrapolated to conditions where the peptide was replaced by full-length delta Ag-S or delta Ag-L, and when the assays were not in vitro but in vivo. Nine amino acids that are conserved between several isolates of HDV and predicted to be important in multimerization were mutated to alanine on both delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L. We found that the predicted hierarchy of importance of these nine mutations correlated to a significant extent with the observed in vivo effects on the ability of these proteins to (i) support in trans the replication of the HDV genome when expressed on delta Ag-S and (ii) act as dominant-negative inhibitors of replication when expressed on delta Ag-L. We thus infer that these biological activities of delta Ag depend on ordered protein-protein interactions.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Human hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is a satellite virus of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and requires HBV envelope proteins for packaging, secretion and infection (reviewed in reference 24). HDV particles contain a ribonucleoprotein core composed of the circular 1.7-kb RNA genome and multiple copies of the only HDV-encoded protein, delta antigen (delta Ag) (23). There are two forms of the delta Ag. The first is a 195-amino-acid (aa) species, known as the small delta protein (delta Ag-S), which is essential for replication of the RNA genome (11). The second is 19 aa longer at its C terminus (delta Ag-L) and arises as a consequence of a posttranscriptional RNA editing event (17). This delta Ag-L is a dominant-negative inhibitor of genome replication (4), but it is essential for particle assembly (2).

These two delta Ag species share 195 aa of primary sequence and thus have some common features. These include (i) a coiled-coil domain located at aa 12 to 60, which facilitates protein-protein interactions (21); (ii) a bipartite nuclear localization signal, between aa 68 and 88 (28); and (iii) a bipartite RNA-binding domain, consisting of aa 97 to 107 and 136 to 146 (3).

The coiled-coil domain has been shown to be required for a number of the functions of both small and large delta antigens. (i) Mutations that destroy or alter this dimerization domain reduce or eliminate the ability of delta Ag-S to function as a trans activator of HDV replication (15). (ii) These same mutations when presented on delta Ag-L prevent the antigen from inhibiting HDV RNA replication and also block the ability to coassemble delta Ag-S into viral particles (15).

Biophysical studies by Rozzelle et al. showed that the synthetic peptide that corresponds to aa 12 to 60 of delta Ag was alpha  helical in structure and was sufficient for dimerization and even multimerization (21). Recently, Zuccola et al. solved the crystal structure for this peptide and confirmed that it contains a long N-terminal and a short C-terminal alpha -helical segment separated at aa 49 by proline (29). To form a dimer, the long helices of each of two monomers wrap around each other, forming an antiparallel coiled-coil (29). In addition, each dimer associates with three other dimers, forming what has been called a "doughnut-like octamer" (29). In support of this model, they used recombinant delta Ag-S, and chemical cross-linking followed by mass spectrometry, to show that octamers could form in vitro. Finally, based on the alignment of several different delta Ag sequences of this region, they noted that certain amino acids were both conserved and predicted to be important for dimerization and/or multimerization. Based on their study, we have selected nine such critical amino acids and evaluated their importance in the context of both full-length delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L. Each of these single amino acids was changed to alanine in order to avoid altering the secondary structure of the protein while disrupting the intermolecular associations. This series of delta Ag mutants was then evaluated by in vivo assays to determine whether they still (i) supported HDV replication, (ii) acted as dominant-negative inhibitors, (iii) had the ability to coassemble into particles, (iv) made complexes with an affinity-tagged form of delta Ag-S, and (v) were able to increase the accumulation of processed HDV RNA species. We consider that the results of (i), (ii), and to some extent (iv) are supportive of the predictions based upon the crystal structure, while those of (iii) reveal the diversity and complexity of delta Ag interactions in vivo and those of (v) indicate separate functions that are independent of such interactions.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Plasmids. Most constructs were based on the vector pSVL (Pharmacia). pTW148 expresses 1.2× unit-length HDV cDNA and has a frameshift in the delta Ag-S open reading frame; thus, HDV replication can be achieved only by supplying delta Ag-S in trans (26). pDL444 and pDL445 were used to express the wild-type delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L, respectively (15). Plasmids pDL448 and pDL449 express delta Ag-S(Delta 19-31) and delta Ag-L(Delta 19-31), respectively, that have a deletion of 13 aa from the coiled-coil region (15). pDL480 expresses antigenomic HDV RNA with a deletion spanning the region between nucleotides 215 and 1380 (14). The following constructs were based on the vector pcDNA3 (Invitrogen). Constructs pPB102 and pPB105 express delta Ag-S(Delta 19-31) and delta Ag-S(FLAG), respectively. The latter species is a form of delta Ag-S with the FLAG epitope (Asp-Tyr-Lys-Asp-Asp-Asp-Asp-Lys) at the N terminus. Plasmids pTW198 and pTW199 express wild-type delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L, respectively.

Construction of plasmids expressing delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L with amino acid substitutions in the coiled-coil region. To construct mutated plasmids, primers containing the sequences corresponding to the amino acid substitution were used to amplify that part of the delta Ag corresponding to aa 9 to 58, numbered according to the sequence of Kuo et al. (11). The PCR fragments were then inserted between the EcoRI and SacII sites of pDL444 or pDL445 to get the mutated forms of delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L, respectively. All mutants were confirmed by nucleotide sequencing.

DNA transfections. For all experiments, transfection of the human hepatoma cell line Huh7 (20) was performed using FuGENE 6 (Roche) following the manufacturer's instructions.

RNA analysis. Total cell RNA was isolated with Tri Reagent (Molecular Research Center), glyoxalated, and analyzed electrophoretically on gels of 1.7% agarose as previously described (15). RNA was transferred to a nylon membrane (Zeta-probe GT; Bio-Rad) and immobilized by UV cross-linking. Hybridization was performed with 32P-labeled RNA probe specific for antigenomic HDV RNA. Levels of antigenomic RNA were detected and quantitated using a Bio-Imaging system (Fuji).

Protein analysis. Samples were resuspended in Laemmli buffer (13) and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-12.5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Proteins were electrotransferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and delta Ag was detected by using a rabbit polyclonal antiserum and by incubation with 125I-labeled protein A (Du Pont). Quantitation was via a Bio-Imaging system.

Coassembly of delta Ag into virus-like particles. Huh7 cells were transfected with plasmid pSV45H (from Don Ganem) for the expression of all three HBV envelope proteins, along with the appropriate plasmids expressing wild-type or mutant forms of delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L. Tissue culture medium was collected at 4, 6, and 8 days after transfection and clarified by low-speed centrifugation for 10 min. Then virus-like particles were collected through a 20% sucrose cushion containing 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and 1 mM EDTA by centrifugation for 18 h at 23,000 rpm in a Beckman SW28 rotor at 4°C. The pellet was analyzed for delta proteins as described above.

Immunoaffinity purification of delta Ag complexes. Huh7 cells were cotransfected with (i) pPB105, which expresses delta Ag-S(FLAG), and (ii) pPB102, which expresses delta Ag-S(Delta 19-31), with a deletion in the coil-coiled domain (15), in combination with (iii) wild-type or mutant forms of delta Ag-S or delta Ag-L, as indicated in Fig. 6. At 5 days after transfection, we used a modification of the method described by Chiang et al. (5) to purify complexes containing the FLAG epitope. About 106 cells were resuspended in 1 ml of 100 mM KCl in BC buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 20% glycerol, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) plus 0.1% NP-40 and then lysed by sonication (five times for 30 s each, at microtip setting) on ice with a 550 Sonic Dismembrator (Fisher Scientific). After clarification for 5 min at 1,500 rpm, one-third of the supernatant was incubated with 50 µl of anti-FLAG M2-agarose (Sigma), which contains the anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody conjugated onto the agarose, at 4°C for 16 h with rotation. After being washed four times in BC300 (BC buffer including 300 mM KCl) plus 0.1% NP-40, once in BC100 (BC buffer containing 100 mM KCl) plus 0.1% NP-40 and once in BC buffer, the bound protein was eluted directly with Laemmli buffer. Aliquots of both total protein and bound protein were subjected by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis as described above.

Accumulation of processed genomic RNA circles in the presence of mutant and wild-type forms of delta Ag-S. Huh7 cells were cotransfected with plasmid pDL480, to express multimeric HDV RNA, along with a construct expressing one of the delta Ag-S mutants. Cells were harvested at days 2 and 4 after transfection, and total RNA was assayed by SDS-PAGE and Northern analysis as described above.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Negative controls. For the following in vivo assays of delta Ag interactions, we used as negative controls specific deleted forms of delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L that were unable to dimerize. These mutants, which have a deletion of aa acids 19 to 31, were characterized in the earlier study of Lazinski and Taylor (15). These previous studies showed that (i) both truncated proteins could be stably expressed in Huh7 cells, (ii) delta Ag-S(Delta 19-31) did not support replication, (iii) delta Ag-L(Delta 19-31) could not coassemble wild-type delta Ag-S, and (iv) delta Ag-L(Delta 19-31) was not a dominant-negative inhibitor. Further studies show that delta Ag-S(Delta 19-31) cannot be coassembled by wild-type delta Ag-L (data not shown).

Design of delta Ag mutants. The design was based on a two-step process, essentially as used by Zuccola et al. (29). First, they considered sequence conservation. The sequences of 10 independent HDV isolates were aligned through the region of the delta antigen, and many conserved amino acids were detected. Second, they used the determined three-dimensional structure to predict which of these conserved amino acids might be needed to maintain dimerization and multimerization. Figure 1A shows two HDV sequences through this region: first, the sequence used for the crystal structure (18); and second, the sequence used for our subsequent in vivo studies (12). Also indicated are the conserved amino acids and the nine individual ones chosen for mutagenesis to alanine. The intent of these substitutions was to maintain the primary and secondary structures while testing the predictions regarding tertiary structure. As summarized in Fig. 1B, we assigned a hierarchy of effects for each of these nine mutations, in terms of their potential role in dimerization and multimerization of delta Ag.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Predictions and observed consequences of mutating single amino acids of delta Ag that are both conserved and possibly critical for protein dimerization and/or multimerization. (A) Sequence at aa 12 to 60 of the coiled-coil domain of delta Ag of Makino et al. (18). Underlined are the amino acids predicted, using the data of Zuccola et al. (29), to be critical for dimerization and/or multimerization. Also shown is the corresponding sequence of delta Ag from Kuo et al. (12), which is subsequently used as the backbone for the construction of mutant proteins. (B) Individual amino acids that were changed to alanine to test the prediction that they were involved in either dimerization or multimerization. Also shown is a predicted ranking of their importance for multimerization. (C) Mutant proteins organized according to three subsequently observed in vivo distinguishing characteristics (Fig. 3, 4B, and 6) and summarized in Tables 2 and 4.

The rationale for the hierarchy was as follows. Based on the crystal structure of the delta Ag oligomerization domain, W20, W50, and R13 play essential roles in stabilizing the delta Ag octamer. W50 is buried within the monomer/monomer interface as well as the dimer/dimer interface. R13 blocks solvent from the hydrophobic core at both the monomer/monomer interface and dimer/dimer interface. W20 not only is buried in the hydrophobic pocket of the monomer/monomer interface but also is involved in a hydrogen bond to a strictly conserved glutamic acid at position 45, in the monomer partner of W20.

Other important residues include L17, R24, I51, I54, and I57. L17 is in both the monomer/monomer interface and the dimer/dimer interface. I54 is buried deep in the middle of the helix bundle in the dimer/dimer interface. R24 plays a role similar to that of R13 in protecting the hydrophobic core but only at the monomer/monomer interface. I57 is buried in the dimer/dimer interface but is more accessible to solvent than I54. L51 is sandwiched between the two tryptophans at positions 20 and 50. Residues V21 is at the very edge of the dimer/dimer interface and probably substitution of the valine by an alanine does not greatly affect the structure.

Expression and stability of delta Ag mutants. With this strategy in mind, the next question was to determine whether the mutant proteins were stably expressed. Vectors expressing the nine mutated forms of delta Ag-S and the corresponding nine forms of delta Ag-L were cotransfected into Huh7 cells, and the levels of accumulation of the individual proteins assayed at 4 days by immunoblotting to detect delta protein. As an internal control, each cotransfection included a plasmid that expressed delta Ag-S(Delta 19-31). Typical immunoblot results are shown in Fig. 2. From quantitation as presented in Table 1, it can be seen that for most cases somewhat less of the mutant protein accumulated. Furthermore, in most cases the levels of the large mutant were less than the corresponding mutant in small. In order to avoid artifacts due to such differences, in all subsequent cotransfection experiments we increased the input of plasmid DNA so that more equal amounts of protein might be accumulated.


View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Intracellular expression and accumulation of mutated forms of delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L. Huh7 cells were cotransfected with combinations of two plasmids that expressed different forms of delta Ag. Four days later, the proteins were assayed by electrophoresis and immunoblotting to detect delta Ag species. In each cotransfection, as an internal standard, we used a third plasmid which expressed delta Ag-S(Delta 19-31). Relative to this standard, the cells received threefold-greater amounts of the two plasmids that express forms of delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L. As indicated for lanes 1 to 10, these two forms were either wild type (wt) or one of the nine mutants.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Intracellular accumulation of mutated forms of delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L

trans support of genome replication by delta Ag-S mutants. The most demanding test for a mutant delta Ag-S is whether it can support the replication of a mutated HDV genome that is unable to express wild-type delta Ag-S. This test was applied to the nine mutants of delta Ag-S. As shown in Fig. 3 and summarized in Table 2, only three of the nine mutants supported the synthesis and accumulation of HDV genomes. Two of these, L17 and V51, were equivalent to wild type. For reasons we do not understand, the third mutant, V21, reproducibly supported 10 to 20% accumulation of antigenomic RNA relative to wild type.


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Northern analysis to detect HDV replication supported in trans by delta Ag-S mutants. Huh7 cells were cotransfected with pTW148, which expresses 1.2× unit-length cDNA and has a frameshift in the delta Ag-S open reading frame, along with constructs expressing different forms of delta Ag-S. At 4 days after transfection, total cellular RNA was isolated and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods to detect antigenomic HDV RNA. Lanes 2 to 13 represent cells transfected with pTW148 alone (lane 2) or with constructs expressing wild-type delta Ag-S (lane 3), the indicated nine mutant constructs (lanes 4 to 12), or a construct expressing delta Ag-S(Delta 19-31) (lane 13). Lane M shows 5'-labeled single-stranded DNA size markers. Lane 1 is 2 ng of 1.7-kb HDV cDNA.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Distinguishing properties of mutated forms of delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L

The six mutants that no longer supported genome replication were, according to the predictions, the six mutants most likely to be of importance for multimerization (Fig. 1B and C).

Dominant-negative inhibition of replication by delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L mutants. Previous studies have shown that like delta Ag-L, most altered forms of delta Ag-S lose the ability to support replication. Furthermore, relative to delta Ag-S, even low amounts can act as potent dominant-negative inhibitors (4, 15). When tested in the presence of wild-type delta Ag-S, none of the nine mutants were able to act as dominant-negative inhibitors, even when present in amounts approximately comparable to that of wild-type delta Ag-S (Fig. 4A).


View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Northern analysis to detect dominant-negative inhibition of HDV replication by delta Ag mutants. (A) Huh7 cells were cotransfected with plasmid pTW148, plasmid pDL444 (which expresses delta Ag-S), and a construct expressing one of the delta Ag-S mutants. At 4 days after transfection, total RNA was analyzed and detected as for Fig. 3. Lane M, 5'-labeled single-stranded DNA size markers; lane 1, 2 ng of 1.7-kb HDV cDNA; lane 2, cells transfected with pTW148 alone; lane 3, cells cotransfected with pTW148 and the construct expressing wild-type delta Ag-S; lanes 4 to 6, triple cotransfections with pTW148, the construct expressing wild-type delta Ag-S, and a construct expressing delta Ag-L (lane 4), delta Ag-S(Delta 19-31) (lane 5), or delta Ag-L(Delta 19-31) (lane 6); lanes 7 to 15, alanine mutants as indicated. (B) Experiments essentially as for panel A except that the mutations were expressed on delta Ag-L rather than delta Ag-S. Lanes 1 to 4, as in panel A; lanes 5 to 13, alanine mutants as indicated.

As expected, L17, V21, and L51, which support replication, were not dominant-negative inhibitors. To distinguish between the other six mutants, we repeated the dominant-negative inhibition assays under conditions where each of the mutations was expressed not from delta Ag-S but from delta Ag-L. The results are shown in Fig. 4B and summarized in Table 2. As expected, L17, V21, and L51 were now dominant-negative inhibitors. Four of the other six mutants, R13, R24, I54, and I57, were dominant-negative inhibitors, indicating at least some ability to make protein interactions. In contrast, the remaining two mutants, W20 and W50, were inactive, suggesting that the efficiency of incorporation of these mutants into multimers is very low. Thus, we can now rank the nine mutations according to their effect on the assay of dominant-negative inhibition (Fig. 1C). In the original predictions of importance in multimerization (Fig. 1B), W20 and W50 were in the top three. Thus, we would again conclude that the predictions are in good agreement with the in vivo data.

Coassembly of delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L mutants. Our next test was whether mutants expressed on delta Ag-S would, in the presence of the envelope proteins of HBV, be coassembled by wild-type delta Ag-L and released as virus-like particles. We observed that each of the nine mutants expressed on delta Ag-S could be coassembled (Fig. 5). Quantitation of these data showed that the efficiencies were within a factor of 3 of that for wild-type delta Ag-S (Table 3). We do not consider these as significant differences. Furthermore, the molar ratio of mutant delta Ag-S to wild-type delta Ag-L in the released particles was less than 1 (Table 3). This was also true when the amount of mutant delta Ag-S expressed within the cell was increased fourfold (data not shown; see also reference 22). One interpretation of these data would be that coassembly efficiency reflects not multimerization ability but only dimerization, and that this dimerization was not affected by the nine mutations.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.   Immunoblot analysis to detect coassembly of delta Ag-S mutants into virus-like particles. Cotransfection of Huh7 cells was carried out using pSV45H (to express the envelope proteins of HBV) along with pDL445 (to express wild-type delta Ag-L) and constructs expressing mutants of delta Ag-S. As described in Materials and Methods, virus-like particles released by the transfected cells were subsequently collected and assayed by electrophoresis and immunoblotting to detect delta Ag species. Lane 1, particles from cells expressing wild-type delta Ag-S in the absence of delta Ag-L; lane 2, both delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L; lane 3, delta Ag-S(Delta 19-31) and delta Ag-L; lane 4, delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L(Delta 19-31); lanes 5 to 12, wild-type delta Ag-L and the indicated mutants in delta Ag-S. The mobilities of delta Ag-L and delta Ag-S are indicated at the right.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3.   Effect of mutations on efficiency of coassembly into virus-like particles

However, the data and their interpretation became more complex when we used two variants of the coassembly assay. We now asked whether each mutant, as expressed on delta Ag-L, could coassemble either the wild-type delta Ag-S or the corresponding mutant as expressed on delta Ag-S. The quantitation of these data (Table 3) reveals major differences in coassembly efficiency. Consider first the coassembly of wild-type delta Ag-S. It can be seen that with the exception of V21 and R24, the delta Ag-L mutants demonstrated a reduction in coassembly efficiency; for I57, it was as much as 40-fold. Next consider the coassembly of mutant delta Ag-S by the corresponding mutant in delta Ag-L. Again V21 and R24 were the same as for wild type, but for all the others, the reductions in efficiency were even greater than in the previous experiment.

In summary, these three forms of the coassembly assay provide different answers in terms of the effects of the mutations. Furthermore, none of these effects are as predicted from the crystal structure (Fig. 1B). However, as considered in Discussion, both the different answers and the disagreement with predictions might be largely a consequence of the coassembly assay, with its additional dependence on interactions of the delta Ag-L with the envelope proteins of HBV.

Immunoaffinity purification of complexes formed between delta Ag-S(FLAG) and delta Ag-S or delta Ag-L mutants. Another way to assay the interactions between delta Ag species is via immunoaffinity. We expressed within transfected cells both delta Ag-S(FLAG) and each of the mutants of either delta Ag-S or delta Ag-L. As shown in Fig. 6, we were able to demonstrate the formation of these complexes. As an indicator of the specificity of these complexes, we also expressed in these cells the protein delta Ag-S(Delta 19-31), which is known to be unable to make dimers (15). As shown in Fig. 6, this protein was present in the total sample but virtually absent from the fraction of bound protein.


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.   Immunoblot analysis to detect complexes formed between delta Ag-S(FLAG) and mutant forms of delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L. (A) Huh7 cells were cotransfected with plasmids pPB102 [expressing delta Ag-S(Delta 19-31)] and pPB105 [expressing delta Ag-S(FLAG)], along with pTW198 (expressing wild-type delta Ag-S; lane 1) or plasmids expressing the indicated mutants of delta Ag-S (lanes 2 to 10). At 5 days after transfection, we isolated that protein which bound via the FLAG epitope to an immunoaffinity column. Samples of total and bound protein were assayed by gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting to detect all forms of delta Ag. The three electrophoretic forms of delta Ag-S are indicated at the right. Note that delta Ag-S(Delta 19-31) acts as a negative control which fails to bind to delta Ag-S(FLAG). (B) Experiments essentially as for panel A except that the mutations were expressed on delta Ag-L rather than delta Ag-S. That is, we used pTW199 (expressing wild-type delta Ag-L; lane 1) or plasmids expressing the indicated mutants of delta Ag-L (lanes 2 to 10).

We quantitated these data (Table 4) to determine the effect of each of the mutations on the ability of both delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L to make complexes with delta Ag-S(FLAG). From an average of the effects on both delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L, we deduced a hierarchy of importance, as summarized in Fig. 1C. This is not exactly the same as the predicted hierarchy presented in Fig. 1B, but it is very close.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4.   Effect of mutations on ability to form complexes with delta Ag-S(FLAG)

Ability of delta Ag-S mutants to enhance the accumulation of processed HDV RNA circles. In conclusion, these assays were carried out as a negative control, that is, to determine whether the mutagenesis of delta Ag-S interfered with a biological property that does not depend on dimerization and multimerization.

Previous studies have shown that when nonreplicating multimeric forms of HDV RNA are expressed in cells, there can be processing of these RNA by the HDV ribozymes and, somehow, the formation of unit-length RNA circles (14). Furthermore, the simultaneous expression of delta Ag-S or delta Ag-L is known to increase the accumulation of such circles as much as 16-fold (8, 14). Thus, our strategy was to cotransfect cells with the mutant forms of delta Ag-S along with a construct that can express multimers of a deleted form of HDV RNA. As previously shown, this deleted RNA can be processed to form a unit-length circle of about 1,200 nucleotides (14). We assayed the accumulation of unit-length circles at days 2 and 4 after transfection. Our results (Table 5) indicate that each of the mutants produced an 8- to 25-fold increase in accumulation relative to expression in the absence of any form of delta Ag-S. Thus, they demonstrated just as much of this particular biological activity as did wild-type delta Ag-S or the deleted form of delta Ag-S, Delta 19-31, which does not dimerize (15). Incidentally, this is the first reported evidence that this biological property of delta Ag is independent of dimerization.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5.   Accumulation of processed HDV RNA in the presence of mutated forms of delta Ag-S


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The aim of this study was to evaluate predictions for the dimerization and multimerization of delta Ag. These predictions were based on intermolecular interactions detected in the crystal structure of the domain of aa 12 to 60 on the delta Ag (29). We considered mutagenesis to alanine at nine sites that were (i) conserved between different isolates of HDV and (ii) predicted to be important for dimerization and/or multimerization (Fig. 1A). We tested these mutants in the context of both full-length delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L, via biological assays, using transfected cells.

The top six mutants of delta Ag-S, in terms of their predicted importance for dimerization/multimerization (Fig. 1B), were the ones that could no longer support replication (Fig. 3). To this extent these results followed the predictions. We also note that four of these mutations were of hydrophobic amino acids predicted to be important in the interactions that form the dimer (Fig. 1B).

Another consistent correlation was obtained when the nine mutants, as expressed on delta Ag-L, were tested as dominant-negative inhibitors of replication, as supported by wild-type delta Ag-S (Fig. 4B). Seven mutants were inhibitors. Three of these (L17, V21, and L51) were the same as those that when expressed on delta Ag-S were able to support replication. However, it was unexpected that the four additional mutants (R13, I54, R24, and I57) were dominant-negative inhibitors. One explanation might be that, as for mutants in the nucleocapsid of tomato spotted wilt virus (25), the heterotypic interaction between the mutant and the wild type (as in the dominant-negative inhibition assay) could be stronger than the homotypic interaction between two mutants (as in the support of replication assay).

Results of the dominant-negative inhibition assays also showed that mutations of W20 and W50 were the most potent of the nine amino acid mutations tested (Fig. 1C and 3B). This ranking also agrees with the predictions based on the crystal structure (Fig. 1B). It is important to note that it was originally suggested from examination of the structure that dimerization was stabilized by the hydrophobic interactions of I16, L17, and W20 from one monomer to W50, L51, and I54 on a second monomer, and vice versa (29). Therefore, the present data not only support this interpretation but also indicate that the two tryptophans, W20 and W50, are critical residues.

In contrast to the above good correlations between prediction and experiment, there were also less favorable situations. First, we found that none of the mutants, when expressed on delta Ag-S, was a dominant-negative inhibitor (Fig. 4A; Table 2). In contrast, when expressed on delta Ag-L, we did observe inhibition for L17, V21, and L51 (Fig. 4B; Table 2), and this was as expected, since these, as expressed on delta Ag-S, were able to support genome replication (Fig. 3; Table 2). We speculate that for these three mutations, as expressed on delta Ag-S, there was insufficient structural difference from wild-type delta Ag-S to produce any inhibition.

A second discrepancy arose when we tested the mutants in three different assays of protein coassembly into virus-like particles in the presence of the envelope proteins of HBV (Table 3). The first assay was for the coassembly by wild-type delta Ag-L of mutants expressed on delta Ag-S. Each mutant was coassembled as efficiently as wild-type delta Ag-S. This was unexpected since six of these mutants could neither support replication (Fig. 3) nor act as dominant-negative inhibitors (Fig. 4A). Since we consider that the coassembly assay detects dimerization but not multimerization, it may be unable to distinguish functional from nonfunctional dimers. Therefore, one interpretation is that the six mutants were able to make only nonfunctional dimers. In addition, it must be remembered that the coassembly assay involves more than just interactions between delta Ag species; there are also essential interactions with the envelope proteins of the helper virus in order to achieve assembly into the virus-like particles (9). Moreover, recent studies show that delta Ag-L is significantly more hydrophobic than delta Ag-S, and that some of the delta Ag-L species have to undergo isoprenylation as a prerequisite for interaction with the envelope proteins of the helper virus (7, 19). These factors might contribute to the diversity of results obtained for the coassembly by mutant delta Ag-L, of wild-type delta Ag-S, or of mutant delta Ag-S (Table 3).

Our interpretation of the subset of the present in vivo studies specifically concerned with the support of genome replication and the dominant-negative inhibition is that the essential interactions between the delta Ag species are not random but ordered and consistent with the predictions based on the crystal structure for the 12-60 peptide. Independent of these studies, from application of an immunoaffinity strategy, we obtained direct in vivo evidence for the ability of the mutated forms of delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L to make complexes with a form of delta Ag-S containing at its N terminus a FLAG epitope. These data show that all the mutated forms were able to bind to the tagged protein (Fig. 6; Table 5) and thus were at least able to form dimers. (Incidentally, this agrees with the results obtained by coassembly [Fig. 5].) Furthermore, analysis of the quantitation of these data (Table 4) reveals that the predicted hierarchy (Fig. 1B) is close to the directly observed values (Fig. 1C). This immunoaffinity strategy also allows us to begin to address the question of in vivo complexes larger than dimers. The wild-type forms of delta Ag-S and delta Ag-L made complexes with the tagged delta Ag-S that on average were at least greater than tetramers (Fig. 6, lane 1; Table 4, footnotes). Further studies using the same strategy, indicate complexes of at least decamers (data not shown). It will be necessary to determine to what extent these multimers are ordered. At this stage there is no in vivo evidence to suggest that delta Ag can behave like the core protein of the helper virus, HBV, and form ordered multimeric capsid structures (27). In contrast, we have already seen from electrophoretic analyses under nondenaturing conditions that within transfected cells delta Ag can become associated with high-molecular-weight complexes (6). Maybe delta Ag, like other proteins when expressed to high levels in bacterial or mammalian cells, can produce multimeric aggregates that are disordered (10). Furthermore, there may be additional components in the delta Ag complexes and some of the delta Ag interactions may be indirect. After all, we know that delta Ag species have to interact with HDV RNAs and, during assembly, interact with the envelope proteins of the helper virus. In addition, the delta Ag can also interact with host proteins; others have described candidate host protein interactors, namely, nucleolin (16) and delta-interacting protein A (1).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants AI-26522 and CA-06927 from the NIH and by an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Thanks go to Cheng-Ming Chiang for advice regarding immunoaffinity purification and to Don Ganem for the plasmid pSV45H. We also thank Severin Gudima, William Mason, and Glenn Rall for constructive comments on the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Fox Chase Cancer Center, 7701 Burholme Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111-2497. Phone: (215) 728-2436. Fax: (215) 728-3105. E-mail: jm_taylor{at}fccc.edu.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Brazas, R., and D. Ganem. 1996. A cellular homolog of hepatitis delta antigen: implications for viral replication and evolution. Science 274:90-94[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Chang, F. L., P. J. Chen, S. J. Tu, M. N. Chiu, C. J. Wang, and D. S. Chen. 1991. The large form of hepatitis delta  antigen is crucial for the assembly of hepatitis delta  virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:8490-8494[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Chang, M.-F., S. C. Baker, L. H. Soe, T. Kamahora, J. G. Keck, S. Makino, S. Govindarajan, and M. M. C. Lai. 1988. Human hepatitis delta antigen is a nuclear phosphoprotein with RNA binding activity. J. Virol. 62:2403-2410[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Chao, M., S.-Y. Hsieh, and J. Taylor. 1991. The antigen of hepatitis delta virus: examination of in vitro RNA-binding specificity. J. Virol. 65:4057-4062[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Chiang, C.-M., H. Ge, Z. Wang, A. Hoffmann, and R. G. Roeder. 1993. Unique TATA-binding protein-containing complexes and cofactors involved in transcription by RNA polymerases II and III. EMBO J. 12:2749-2762[Medline].
6. Dingle, K., G. Moraleda, V. Bichko, and J. Taylor. 1998. Electrophoretic analysis of the ribonucleoproteins of hepatitis delta virus. J. Virol. Methods 75:199-204[CrossRef][Medline].
7. Glenn, J. S. 1995. Prenylation and virion morphogenesis, p. 83-94. In G. Dinter-Gottlieb (ed.), The unique hepatitis delta virus. R. G. Landes Co., Austin, Tex.
8. Jeng, K.-S., P.-Y. Su, and M. M. C. Lai. 1996. Hepatitis delta antigen enhances the ribozyme activities of hepatitis delta virus RNA in vivo. J. Virol. 70:4205-4209[Abstract].
9. Jenna, S., and C. Sureau. 1999. Mutations in the carboxyl-terminus domain of the small hepatitis B virus envelope protein impair the assembly of hepatitis delta virus particles. J. Virol. 73:3351-3358[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Kazantsev, A., E. Preisinger, A. Dranovsky, D. Goldgaber, and D. Housman. 1999. Insoluble detergent-resistant aggregates form between pathological and nonpathological length of polyglutamine in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:11404-11409[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Kuo, M. Y.-P., M. Chao, and J. Taylor. 1989. Initiation of replication of the human hepatitis delta virus genome from cloned DNA: role of delta antigen. J. Virol. 63:1945-1950[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Kuo, M. Y.-P., J. Goldberg, L. Coates, W. Mason, J. Gerin, and J. Taylor. 1988. Molecular cloning of hepatitis delta virus RNA from an infected woodchuck liver: sequence, structure, and applications. J. Virol. 62:1855-1861[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685[CrossRef][Medline].
14. Lazinski, D. W., and J. M. Taylor. 1994. Expression of hepatitis delta virus RNA deletions: cis and trans requirements for self-cleavage, ligation, and RNA packaging. J. Virol. 68:2879-2888[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Lazinski, D. W., and J. M. Taylor. 1993. Relating structure to function in the hepatitis delta virus antigen. J. Virol. 67:2672-2680[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Lee, C.-H., S. C. Chang, C.-J. Chen, and M.-F. Chang. 1998. The nucleolin binding activity of hepatitis delta antigen is associated with nucleolus targeting. J. Biol. Chem. 273:7650-7656[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Luo, G., M. Chao, S.-Y. Hsieh, C. Sureau, K. Nishikura, and J. Taylor. 1990. A specific base transition occurs on replicating hepatitis delta virus RNA. J. Virol. 64:1021-1027[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Makino, S., M. F. Chang, C. K. Shieh, T. Kamahora, D. M. Vannier, and M. M. C. Lai. 1987. Molecular cloning and sequencing of a human hepatitis delta (delta ) virus RNA. Nature 329:343-346[CrossRef][Medline].
19. Moraleda, G., S. Seeholzer, V. Bichko, R. Dunbrack, J. Otto, and J. Taylor. 1999. Unique properties of the large antigen of hepatitis delta virus. J. Virol. 73:7147-7152[Abstract/Free Full Text].
20. Nakabayashi, H., K. Taketa, K. Miyano, T. Yamane, and J. Sato. 1982. Growth of human hepatoma cell lines with differentiated functions in chemically defined medium. Cancer Res. 42:3858-3863[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21. Rozzelle, J., J.-G. Wang, D. Wagner, B. Erickson, and S. Lemon. 1995. Self-association of a synthetic peptide from the N terminus of the hepatitis delta virus protein into an immunoreactive alpha-helical multimer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:382-386[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Ryu, W.-S., M. Bayer, and J. Taylor. 1992. Assembly of hepatitis delta virus particles. J. Virol. 66:2310-2315[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23. Ryu, W. S., H. J. Netter, M. Bayer, and J. Taylor. 1993. Ribonucleoprotein complexes of hepatitis delta virus. J. Virol. 67:3281-3287[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Taylor, J. M. 1999. Human hepatitis delta virus: structure and replication of the genome. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 239:108-122.
25. Uhrig, J. F., T.-R. Soellick, C. J. Minke, C. Phillipp, J.-W. Kellmann, and P. H. Schreier. 1999. Homotypic interaction and multimerization of nucleocapsid protein of tomato spotted wilt tospovirus: identification and characterization of two interacting domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:55-60[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26. Wu, T.-T., H. J. Netter, D. W. Lazinski, and J. M. Taylor. 1997. Effects of nucleotide changes on the ability of hepatitis delta virus to transcribe, process, and accumulate unit-length, circular RNA. J. Virol. 71:5408-5414[Abstract].
27. Wynne, S. A., R. A. Crowther, and A. G. Leslie. 1999. The crystal structure of the human hepatitis B virus capsid. Mol. Cell 3:771-780[CrossRef][Medline].
28. Xia, Y.-P., C.-T. Yeh, J.-S. Ou, and M. M. C. Lai. 1992. Characterization of nuclear targeting signal of hepatitis delta antigen: nuclear transport as a protein complex. J. Virol. 66:914-921[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29. Zuccola, H. J., J. E. Rozzelle, S. M. Lemon, B. W. Erickson, and J. M. Hogle. 1998. Structural basis of the oligomerization of hepatitis delta antigen. Structure 6:821-830[Medline].


Journal of Virology, June 2000, p. 5509-5515, Vol. 74, No. 12
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moraleda, G.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moraleda, G.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS