Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, June 2000, p. 5412-5423, Vol. 74, No. 12
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Rubella Virus Nonstructural Protein Protease
Domains Involved in trans- and cis-Cleavage
Activities
Yuying
Liang,
Jiansheng
Yao, and
Shirley
Gillam*
Department of Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine, Research Institute, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 4H4
Received 12 January 2000/Accepted 20 March 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Rubella virus (RV) genomic RNA contains two large open
reading frames (ORFs): a 5'-proximal ORF encoding nonstructural
proteins (NSPs) that function primarily in viral RNA replication and a 3'-proximal ORF encoding the viral structural proteins. Proteolytic processing of the RV NSP ORF translation product p200 is essential for
viral replication. Processing of p200 to two mature products (p150 and
p90) in the order NH2-p150-p90-COOH is carried out by an
RV-encoded protease residing in the C-terminal region of p150. The RV
nonstructural protease (NS-pro) belongs to a viral papain-like protease
family that cleaves the polyprotein both in trans and in
cis. A conserved X domain of unknown function was found
from previous sequence analysis to be associated with NS-pro. To define the domains responsible for cis- and
trans-cleavage activities and the function of the X domain
in terms of protease activity, an in vitro translation system was
employed. We demonstrated that the NSP region from residue 920 to 1296 is necessary for trans-cleavage activity. The domain from
residue 920 to 1020 is not required for cis-cleavage
activity. The X domain located between residues 834 and 940, outside
the regions responsible for both cis- and trans-cleavage activities of NS-pro, was found to be
important for NS-pro trans-cleavage activity but not for
cis-cleavage activity. Analysis of sequence homology and
secondary structure of the RV NS-pro catalytic region reveals a folding
structure similar to that of papain.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Rubella virus (RV) is a
single-strand, positive-polarity RNA virus classified in the
Togaviridae family as the only member of the genus
Rubivirus (12). The overall genome organization of RV (Fig. 1A) is similar to that of
members of Alphavirus, the only other genus in the
Togaviridae family (40), in terms of containing a
nonstructural protein (NSP) open reading frame (ORF) and structural
protein (SP) ORF at the 5' and 3' termini, respectively. In RV
genomic RNA (9,762 nucleotides [nt]), the 5'-proximal NSP ORF
extends from nt 41 to 6388, and the 3'-proximal SP ORF extends from nt
6512 to 9700 (10, 13, 42). Upon infection, the RV NSP is
first translated from the input genomic RNA as a
2,116-amino-acid polyprotein, p200 (200 kDa), which is subsequently
processed by an RV protease (NS-pro) contained within p200 into two
mature protein products, p150 (residues 1 to 1301, 150 kDa) and p90
(residues 1302 to 2116, 90 kDa) (5, 7, 11, 25). The single
cleavage occurs after G1301 in the sequence
G1300-G1301-G1302 (7).
p150 contains the proposed methyltransferase and protease sequences at
its N and C termini, respectively (14, 21, 36). p90 contains the predicted helicase and RNA polymerase at its N- and C-terminal regions, respectively (15, 18, 21). Therefore, the order of
conserved motifs of RV NSP, i.e.,
methyltransferase-protease-helicase-polymerase, differs from that of
alphavirus NSP, which is
methyltransferase-helicase-protease-polymerase. Along with host
factors, RV NSPs form replication complexes that function to synthesize
three species of viral RNAs. A full-length negative-strand RNA is first
produced and serves as the template for the synthesis of 40S
positive-strand genomic RNA and 24S subgenomic RNA
(13). Cleavage of p200 by NS-pro plays a critical role in this process.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
RV genome organization and PCR primers used for
mutagenesis and amplification of different regions of RV NSP. (A) The
RV genome contains an NSP ORF at its 5' terminus and an SP ORF at its
3' terminus. The NSPs are translated as a p200 polyprotein, which
undergoes a single cleavage (indicated by a vertical arrow) into p150
and p90. The SPs are translated from a 24S subgenomic RNA
accumulated during virus replication. Its starting position (nt 6436)
is indicated by an arrow. Site-directed mutagenesis was by fusion PCR,
which employed pBRM33 DNA as a template and two pairs of primers. For
the C1152S mutation, paired primer, JSY-13-JSY-3 and JSY-2-JSY-12
were employed. For the G1301S mutation, paired primers JSY-13-JSY-5
and JSY-4-JSY-12 were used. For the G1302stop mutation, paired
primers, JSY-13-YL-10 and YL-9-JSY-12 were used. All primers are
shown as arrows indicating their polarities and nucleotide positions on
RV genome RNA (numbered from the 5' end of the M33 genome). Primer
sequences are given in Table 1. The amplified 1.47-kb fragments
containing the desired mutations were replaced back into pBR-NSP by
using the NheI and EcoRV sites indicated above
the genome. (B) The RV NSP ORF encodes a 200-kDa polyprotein to be
processed into p150 (residues 1 to 1301) and p90 (residues 1302 to
2116). PCR primers used for making deletions from either end of p150
are shown by arrows indicating their polarities and relative amino acid
positions on the NSP ORF.
|
|
Two groups of viral papain-like cysteine proteases (PCPs) have been
distinguished on the basis of their ability to function in
cis or in trans (14). Leader, or
L-group, PCPs, located at the N terminus of the polyprotein, can
function only in cis. Main, or M-group, PCPs, located in the
central region of the polyprotein, can function both in cis
and in trans (14). Sequence analysis also
revealed an X domain (a novel conserved domain of unknown function)
associated with M-group PCPs (14). On the basis of comparative sequence analysis, Gorbalenya et al. (14)
proposed that RV NS-pro is an M-group PCP and identified an X domain
(residues 834 to 940) adjacent to the RV NS-pro domain. Our previous
studies demonstrated that RV NS-pro could function both in
cis and in trans (44), a feature
consistent with M-group PCPs. The catalytic dyad residues of NS-pro,
C1152 and H1273, have been proposed on the
basis of sequence alignment (14) supported by site-directed mutagenesis (7, 25).
Viral PCPs include members with highly variable protein size and
sequence except for the close vicinity of catalytic residues (14). Only recently the tertiary structure of a viral PCP,
the foot-and-mouth virus (FMDV) leader protease (Lpro), was solved as
adopting a modified cellular papain fold (16). The diversity of primary sequence among PCP members prevents a direct tertiary structural prediction for other viral PCPs. Information on more PCPs is
needed for a clear understanding of this protease family. RV NS-pro is
located in the central region of polyprotein, and the functional
proteolytic domains of RV NS-pro, in either cis- or
trans-cleavage activity, have not been defined. RV NS-pro
also constitutes parts of the domains mediating viral RNA synthesis. Therefore, the characterization of NS-pro functional domains
contributes not only to the knowledge of the viral PCP family but also
to the understanding of the biological roles of the RV NSP. In this study, we defined the regions required for cis- and
trans-cleavage activities of NS-pro as well as the
functional role of the X domain in both cis and
trans cleavages. We have generated a panel of in-frame
deletion mutants with mutations corresponding to either the N or C
terminus of the p150-coding region. An in vitro translation system was
used in both cis- and trans-cleavage analyses.
The domain responsible for trans-cleavage activity of NS-pro
was mapped to residues 920 to 1296. However, the domain for
cis-cleavage activity was found to start from residue 1020, suggesting that the domain from residue 920 to 1020 is dispensable for
cis cleavage. Although the X domain was found to play an
important role in trans-cleavage activity, it has no effect
on cis processing. We also present a predicted secondary
structure for the RV NS-pro catalytic region.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmid construction.
Standard recombinant DNA techniques
were used to generate all of the plasmid constructs (37). An
RV infectious cDNA clone (pBRM33) (43) was used in the
plasmid construction. Plasmid pBR-NSP was derived from pBRM33 after
removing the SP ORF by deleting nt 6965 to 9336 after StuI
digestion and religation. Site-directed mutations and deletions were
accomplished by PCR using primers that contain designed substitutions
and restriction enzyme sites. All primer sequences and relative
positions on the RV genome are given in Table
1.
All PCRs were carried out using native
Pfu DNA polymerase
(Strategene) under the manufacturer's recommended conditions. PCR
fragments were purified with the QIAquick Spin PCR purification
kit
(QIAgen).
(i) Plasmids pBR-200(C1152S), pBR-200(G1301S), and
pBR-150.
To substitute S for catalytic C1152, to
mutate G1301 to S, or to change G1302 codon GCC
into the stop codon TAA, fusion PCR (43) was employed with
pBRM33 DNA as a template and two pairs of primers (schematically shown
in Fig. 1A). In brief, to make the C1152S mutation, two pairs of
primers, JSY-13-JSY-3 and JSY-2-JSY-12, were used in two PCRs to
generate two products of 738 and 758 bp, respectively; the two
partially overlapping PCR products were annealed to serve as the
template for amplification of the 1.47-kb fragment using JSY-13 and
JSY-12. To make the G1301S mutation, two pairs of primers,
JSY-13-JSY-5 and JSY-4-JSY-12, were used in two PCRs to generate
products of 1.19 kb and 311 bp, respectively; the two partially
overlapping PCR products were annealed to serve as the template for
amplification of the 1.47-kb fragment encoding the G1301S mutation
using JSY-13 and JSY-12. To make the G1302stop mutation, two paired
primers, JSY-13-YL-10 and YL-9-JSY-12, were used in two PCRs to
generate products of 1.19 kb and 311 bp, respectively; the two
partially overlapping PCR products were annealed to serve as the
template for amplification of the 1.47-kb fragment encoding the
G1302stop mutation using JSY-13 and JSY-12. The resulting 1.47-kb PCR
products containing the desired mutations (C1152S, G1301S, and
G1302stop) were cut with NheI and EcoRV and
inserted into pBR-NSP (minus the NheI/EcoRV
fragment) (Fig. 1A) to produce pBR-200(C1152S),
pBR-200(G1301S), and pBR-150, respectively.
(ii) Truncated plasmids.
A series of in-frame deletions
corresponding to either the N or C terminus of the p150-coding region
was generated by amplifying the corresponding DNA fragment from pBR-150
(containing a stop codon between p150 and p90) using available
restriction sites in RV cDNA and the NcoI site containing
the initiation codon of p200. The relative positions of PCR primers on
the RV NSP ORF are schematically shown in Fig. 1B. To make deletions
from the N terminus of p150, amplification reactions were carried out
on a pBR-150 DNA template using individual N-terminal deletion primers paired with an appropriate downstream 3'-end primer (Table 1 and Fig.
1B). The N-terminal deletion primers carried the initiation codon ATG
(NcoI site) followed by nucleotide sequences downstream from
nt 1082, 2518, 2798, 2960, 3098, or 3344 (the respective starting
positions for A348, M827, V920,
A974, A1020, or G1102). In brief,
to clone the construct encoding residues from A348 to G1301, primer YL-11 was paired with JSY-16 in PCR, and the
resulting 675-bp product was used to replace the NcoI (nt
39)-NotI (nt 1686) fragment of pBR-150 to make
pBR-A348/G1301. To clone a construct encoding
residues from M827 to G1301, primer YL-30 was
paired with JSY-7 in PCR, and the resulting 1.1-kb fragment was used to
replace the NcoI (nt 39)-SphI (nt 3391) fragment
of pBR-150 to generate pBR-M827/G1301. To make
the construct encoding sequences from V920,
A974, A1020, or G1102 to
G1301, the primer JSY-25, YL-25, YL-21, or YL-22,
respectively, was paired with JSY-12 in individual PCR, and the
resulting product was used to replace the NcoI (nt
39)-NcoI (nt 4023) fragment of pBR-150 in the correct orientation. The constructed plasmids were named
pBR-V920/G1301, pBR-A974/G1301,
pBR-A1020/G1301, and
pBR-G1102/G1301, respectively. To make
deletions from the C terminus of p150, 5' PCR primer JSY-25 was paired
with each C-terminal deletion primer (YL-23, YL-24, YL-26, YL-27, or
YL-28) in individual PCRs (Table 1 and Fig. 1B). The C-terminal
deletion primers were complementary to nucleotide sequences consisting
of sequences encoding the desired C-terminal amino acid
(H1290, V1295, P1296,
L1297, or R1299) plus its upstream residues,
followed by stop codon TAA and the StuI restriction site.
Each of the five PCR fragments was subsequently used to replace the
NcoI (nt 39)-StuI (nt 6965) fragment of pBR-150
to generate plasmid pBR-V920/H1290,
pBR-V920/V1295,
pBR-V920/P1296, pBR-V920/L1297, or
pBR-V920/R1299.
To make protease constructs encoding sequences from nested N termini
(V
920, A
974, A
1020, or
G
1102) to I
1773, amplification
using N-terminal
deletion primers (JSY-25, YL-25, YL-21, and YL-22)
and the subsequent
cloning were as described above for making
N-terminal deletions of
p150, except that pBR-NSP (encoding RV
wild-type NSP, without a stop
codon between p150 and p90) rather
than pBR-150 was used for both the
PCR template and cloning vector.
The resultant plasmids were further
modified to remove the C-terminal
half of the p90 sequence by
BglII (nt 5355)/
StuI (nt 9336) digestion,
end gap
filling, and religation. The derived ORFs, being terminated
by a stop
codon at nt 9466 (numbered according to the M33 genome),
encode protein
products starting from residue V
920, A
974,
A
1020,
or G
1102 to I
1773 of the NSP
sequence, followed by a 43-amino-acid
sequence resulting from the shift
in reading frame after deletion
of nt 5355 to 9336. The plasmids were
named pBR-V
920/I
1773,
pBR-A
974/I
1773,
pBR-A
1020/I
1773, and
pBR-G
1102/I
1773. All protease constructs
are
shown in Fig.
2.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Plasmids and protease-encoding constructs. All protease
constructs were given a two-letter name; their lengths and relative
positions on the RV NSP ORF are schematically shown, labeled with
starting and ending protein residues (numbered according to NSP
residues).
|
|
In vitro transcription.
The cDNA clones were linearized at
the unique HindIII site and transcribed with SP6 RNA
polymerase (Promega) in the presence of a cap analog,
7mG5'ppp5'G (Promega), using the protocol recommended by
the manufacturer. RNA transcripts were extracted once with
phenol-chloroform, precipitated with ethanol, and resuspended in
H2O to be used for in vitro translation.
In vitro translation.
In vitro translation was performed
according to the manufacturer's (Promega) protocol in 50-µl reaction
mixtures containing nuclease-treated rabbit reticulocyte lysates, an
amino acid mixture minus methionine, RNasin (an RNase inhibitor), and
in vitro RNA transcripts in the presence of either 400 µCi of
[35S]methionine (NEN) per ml or 20 µg of cold
methionine per ml. Radiolabeled proteins were visualized by
fluorescence autoradiography after sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis. In
vitro translation using a TNT Quick coupled transcription-translation
system was performed according to the manufacture's (Promega) protocol.
Image analysis and cleavage efficiency comparison.
Image
analysis was performed on a PC computer using the Scion Image program
for Windows (Beta 3b)
(http://www.scioncorp.com/frames/fr_download_now.htm), the PC version
of the public domain NIH Image program (developed at the National
Institutes of Health and available on the Internet at
http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/). The cleavage ratio at certain
incubation times for each protease construct was calculated as the
percentage of the quantity of the cleaved products with respect to the
total remaining substrate and cleaved products. The cleavage ratio was
plotted against the incubation time for each construct.
Sequence analysis.
Initial alignment of primary sequences
for papain (SWISS-PROT accession number P00784) and the catalytic
region of RV NS-pro (M33 strain [GenBank accession number S38480 with
corrections as in reference 29] and Therien strain
[GenBank accession number P13889 with correction as in reference
29]) was done with the ALIGN program
(27) and modified manually. Secondary-structure predictions
were performed using the EMBL protein structure prediction service
(http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/predictprotein/predictprotein.html). The
service was described by Rost et al. (32-35).
 |
RESULTS |
Processing of RV NSP by in vitro translation.
The RV NS-pro is
a PCP encoded in the NSP ORF that cleaves the NSP ORF translation
product (p200) at a single site to produce p150 and p90
(11). Many viral PCPs were found to be active following in
vitro translation using rabbit reticulocyte lysates (4, 8, 9,
17). We therefore monitored the activity of RV-pro after
translating RV NSP in vitro using the genomic-length RNA transcripts synthesized from an RV infectious cDNA clone derived from
RV strain M33 (pBRM33) (43). pBRM33 was linearized with HindIII, and full-length RNA transcripts were
synthesized using SP6 RNA polymerase in the presence of cap analog. In
vitro translation and processing of NSP were programmed using rabbit
reticulocyte lysates with synthesized RNA transcripts. A time course
experiment was performed to monitor the kinetics of p200 processing.
Translation of p200 was completed after 40 min (Fig.
3, lane 2); cleavage was observed at 60 min (Fig. 3, lane 3) and continued efficiently (Fig. 3, lanes 4 to 6).
Liu et al. (22) suggested that activity of RV NS-pro in
vitro depended on the addition of Zn2+. However, in our in
vitro translation system, addition of Zn2+ was not found to
be required for NS-pro activity, nor did it have a significant
influence on the processing efficiency of RV NSP (Fig. 3, compare lanes
1 to 6 to lanes 7 to 12). Furthermore, using the TNT Quick coupled
transcription-translation system (Promega), we also observed efficient
processing of RV NSP without the addition of Zn2+ (data not
shown), in contrast to the findings of Liu et al. (22) that
addition of Zn2+ was essential for RV NS-pro activity in
the same translation system. In addition, we found the same efficient
processing of NSP from strain Therien in vitro without the addition of
Zn2+, using infectious cDNA clone Robo302 (30)
or its derived RNA in either the TNT transcription-translation system
or rabbit reticulocyte lysate (data not shown). Liu et al.
(22) used a different Therien strain cDNA construct,
Robo102, and its derived subclones in their studies. However, Robo102
has a substantially lower infectivity than Robo302 (30),
which might account for the observed discrepancy. Nevertheless, the
exact reasons behind these contradictions need further investigation.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
RV NSP processing in in vitro translation systems with
or without addition of Zn2+. In vitro translation reactions
with genome-length RV RNA (transcribed in vitro from pBRM33) in the
absence (lanes 1 to 6) or presence (lanes 7 to 12) of 200 µM
Zn2+. Aliquots were removed at 20 (lanes 1 and 7), 40 (lanes 2 and 8), 60 (lanes 3 and 9), 90 (lanes 4 and 10), 120 (lanes 5 and 11), and 180 (lanes 6 and 12) min during incubation and subjected
to SDS-8% PAGE analysis. Protein products were visualized by
fluorescence autoradiography. Positions of molecular mass markers and
cleavage products are indicated. Images were scanned using a UMAX Astra
1220U scanner with Adobe Photoshop 5.0 software.
|
|
We have shown previously (
44) that NS-pro can function in
trans in vivo by coexpression within BHK-21 cells of a
construct,
p200(G1301S), that contains a cleavage site mutation (to
serve
as a protease) together with a construct, p200(C1152S), that
contains
a protease mutation (to serve as a substrate). To demonstrate
the NS-pro
trans-cleavage activity in vitro, three
full-length
mutants with alterations in the NSP ORF were constructed.
pBR-200(G1301S)
is a cleavage site mutant carrying a G-to-S
mutation at residue
1301, pBR-200(C1152S) is a protease-inactive
mutant carrying a
G-to-S mutation at its catalytic C
1152
residue, and pBR-150 is
a mutant carrying a stop codon corresponding to
residue
1302.
To assay for
trans-cleavage activity of NS-pro, two separate
translation reactions were carried out. Radiolabeled p200(C1152S)
was synthesized in vitro in the presence of
[
35S]methionine to serve as a source of substrate for
protease, and
p200(G1301S) or p150 was synthesized in the absence
of [
35S]methionine to serve as a source of protease.
After a 1-h incubation
at 30°C, both in vitro translation reactions
were terminated by
the addition of RNase A and cycloheximide. When the
radiolabeled
p200(C1152S) was added to the unlabeled
p200(G1301S) or p150 translation
reaction mixture, the cleavage
products of p150 and p90 were detected
after a 1-h incubation (Fig.
4A and B), indicating that
trans cleavage of p200(C1152S) catalyzed by
p200(G1301S) or p150 protease
had occurred. No cleavage product was
observed when p200(C1152S)
was incubated alone for 5 h (Fig.
4C). For a control, p200(G1301S)
or p150 was synthesized in the
presence of [
35S]methionine at 30°C and incubated
alone for 5 h (Fig.
4A and
B, lanes 1).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
RV p200(G1301S) and p150 cleave substrate protein in
trans. In vitro translation was carried out as described in
the legend to Fig. 3 with slight modifications. Protein products were
labeled by synthesis in the presence of
[35S]methionine or were unlabeled. After incubation
at 30°C for 1 h, translation was terminated by the addition of
RNase A and cycloheximide to final concentrations of 1 and 0.6 mg/ml,
respectively. Protein product p200(G1301S) or p150 (synthesized in
the absence of [35S]methionine) was mixed with
radiolabeled substrate p200(C1152S) and incubated at 30°C for up
to 5 h. Samples removed at various times were subjected to
SDS-PAGE analysis. (A) RV p200(G1301S) was labeled in the presence
of [35S]methionine and incubated alone for 5 h
(lane 1). After translation reactions were terminated, unlabeled
p200(G1301S) was mixed with 35S-labeled substrate
p200(C1152S) and incubated at 30°C. Aliquots were removed at
intervals from 0 to 5 h and subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis (lanes
2 to 7). (B) RV p150 was labeled in the presence of
[35S]methionine and incubated alone for 5 h
(lane 1). After translation reactions were terminated, unlabeled p150
was mixed with 35S-labeled substrate p200(C1152S) and
further incubated at 30°C. Aliquots were removed from 0 to 5 h
(lanes 2 to 7) and subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis. (C) In vitro
transcription and translation of p200(C1152S) were carried out as
described in the legend to Fig. 3. Samples were taken at the indicated
times and subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis. Positions of molecular mass
markers and cleavage products are indicated. Images were scanned using
a UMAX Astra 1220U scanner with Adobe Photoshop 5.0 software.
|
|
Construction of truncated NS-pro cDNA clones.
In order to
identify the minimal domains required for functional protease
activities, a panel of protease constructs was generated and expressed
in vitro for protease activity analysis. The cDNA fragments encoding NS
protease constructs were generated by PCR as described in Materials and
Methods. The constructed plasmids were inserted downstream of the SP6
RNA polymerase promoter and RV 5' untranslated region. Sequences from
nt 9336 to poly(A) sequences of the RV full-length cDNA clone (pBRM33)
were also preserved to provide poly(A) addition sites in these cDNA
clones. The plasmids, protease products, and their relative positions
on the RV NSP ORF are shown in Fig. 2. All of the protease constructs
are designated by a two-letter name indicating starting and ending
amino acid positions. A348/G1301,
M827/G1301, V920/G1301,
A974/G1301,
A1020/G1301, and
G1102/G1301 are protein fragments starting from
A348, M827, V920, A974,
A1020, and G1102, respectively, and extending
to G1301, the end of p150. Fragments
V920/H1290, V920/V1295,
V920/P1296, V920/L1297,
and V920/R1299 extend from V920 to
positions H1290, V1295, P1296,
L1297, and R1299, respectively. These fragments did not contain a cleavage site and were examined for their
trans-cleavage capacity. Fragments
V920/I1773, A974/I1773,
A1020/I1773, and
G1102/I1773 extend from A348,
V920, A974, A1020, and
G1102, respectively, to I1773 of the NSP
sequence. They contain cleavage sites and C-terminal tails to be used
for cis-cleavage analysis.
Defining the NS-pro domain required for trans
cleavage.
To determine the trans-cleavage activity of
the generated protease constructs, six protease constructs with nested
N-terminal deletions (A348/G1301,
M827/G1301, V920/G1301,
A974/G1301,
A1020/G1301, and
G1102/G1301) were translated in vitro
separately, producing protein products with apparent molecular masses
of 102, 50, 41, 35, 30, and 21 kDa, respectively (Fig.
5, lanes 1). Each was examined for
trans protease activity against substrate by cotranslation with p200(C1152S). In the cases of
A348/G1301, M827/G1301,
and V920/G1301, cleavage products p150 and p90
were detected after a 1-h incubation and increased with incubation
time, suggesting that these constructs possess
trans-cleavage activity (Fig. 5A, B, and C, lanes 2 to 6).
No detectable cleavage products (p150 or p90) could be observed in the
reactions of A974/G1301,
A1020/G1301, and
G1102/G1301 (Fig. 5D, E, and F, lanes 2 to 6),
suggesting that they could not form active protease to cleave in
trans. Our data suggested that the domain containing active
trans protease starts at V920 or after, but at
least upstream of A974.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
In vitro translation of protease constructs
(A348/G1301,
M827/G1301, V920/G1301,
A974/G1301,
A1020/G1301, and
G1102/G1301) and examination of their
trans-cleavage activities. In vitro transcription and
translation were carried out as described in Materials and Methods.
A348/G1301 (A),
M827/G1301 (B),
V920/G1301 (C),
A974/G1301 (D),
A1020/G1301 (E), and
G1102/G1301 (F) were translated individually to
give 102-, 50-, 41-, 35-, 30-, and 21-kDa products, respectively (lanes
1). Cotranslation of each construct with substrate p200(C1152S) was
carried out at 30°C for 0 to 5 h. Samples were removed at each
time point and subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis (lanes 2 to 7). Positions
of molecular mass markers and cleavage products are indicated. Images
were scanned using a UMAX Astra 1220U scanner with Adobe Photoshop 5.0 software.
|
|
Five protease constructs (V
920/H
1290,
V
920/V
1295, V
920/P
1296,
V
920/L
1297, and
V
920/R
1299) extending from V
920 to
different
C termini were of the same molecular mass, 41 kDa, when
expressed
in vitro (Fig.
6, lanes 1). As
described above, each of them was
examined for potential
trans-cleavage activity by cotranslation
with
p200(C1152S) for up to 5 h (Fig.
6). The appearance of
cleavage
products (p150 and p90) in the reactions of
V
920/P
1296, V
920/L
1297,
and V
920/R
1299 demonstrated that they preserve
protease activity
(Fig.
6C, D, and E, lanes 2 to 6). In contrast,
neither V
920/H
1290 nor
V
920/V
1295 was able to cleave substrate p200
(Fig.
6A and
B, lanes 2 to 6). We therefore mapped the C terminus of
the active
RV NS-pro domain exactly to P
1296. The weak
trans-cleavage activity
observed in
V
920/P
1296, V
920/L
1297,
and V
920/R
1299 could be due
to the absence of
the X domain in these constructs (see "Effect
of N-terminal regions
on cleavage efficiency" below).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
In vitro translation of protease constructs
(V920/H1290,
V920/V1295, V920/P1296,
V920/L1297, and
V920/R1299) and examination of their
trans-cleavage activities. In vitro transcription and
translation were as described in Materials and Methods.
V920/H1290 (A),
V920/V1295 (B),
V920/P1296 (C),
V920/L1297 (D), and
V920/R1299 (E) were translated in vitro
separately to yield a 40-kDa product (lanes 1). Cotranslation with
substrate p200(C1152S) was carried out for 0 to 5 h (lanes 2 to 7), and samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis. Positions of
molecular mass markers and cleavage products are indicated. Images were
scanned using a UMAX Astra 1220U scanner with Adobe Photoshop 5.0 software.
|
|
Domains required for cis cleavage.
RV NS-pro is
known to possess both trans- and cis-cleavage
activities (44). The cotranslation experiments described
above identified the NS-pro domain required for trans
cleavage within the fragment from V920 to
P1296. This domain may or may not be the exact domain
required for cis cleavage. Since the C terminus of the
cis protease construct must extend beyond the cleavage site,
we therefore examined the N-terminal domain requirement for
cis cleavage by analysis of in vitro translation of the
protease constructs V920/I1773,
A974/I1773,
A1020/I1773, and
G1102/I1773. Processing of these protein
constructs would accumulate a cleavage product with an apparent
molecular mass of 58 kDa (p58, the C-terminal fragment extending from
residue 1302 to 1773) throughout the incubation time. We found that
V920/I1773 and
A974/I1773 underwent efficient processing.
V920/I1773 was translated as a 98-kDa
polyprotein, which was then cleaved into 58- and 41-kDa products within
a 1-h incubation (Fig. 7A).
A974/I1773 was translated as a 92 kDa product and cleaved into 58- and 35-kDa products efficiently (Fig. 7B). Self-cleavage of A1020/I1773 (87 kDa) into 58- and 29-kDa products was less efficient (Fig. 7C). The band above p29
seems to be a translation by-product rather than a cleavage product,
since its amount did not increase with time as the p29 band did. No
cleavage could be observed in the case of
G1102/I1773 (78 kDa) (Fig. 7D). Of these
constructs, only V920/I1773 contains a protease
domain (V920 to G1301) that can cleave in
trans at low efficiency (Fig. 5C). Therefore, the highly
efficient processing of V920/I1773 represents
cis-cleavage activity rather than trans-cleavage
activity. The other two constructs, A974/I1773
and A1020/I1773, do not contain the necessary
domain (V920 to R973) for trans
cleavage and can function only in cis. To confirm that
constructs V920/I1773,
A974/I1773, and
A1020/I1773 function in cis, a
dilution experiment was performed (Fig. 7E). Translation reactions with
V920/I1773 (Fig. 7E, lanes 1 to 5),
A974/I1773 (Fig. 7E, lanes 6 to 10), and
A1020/I1773 (Fig. 7E, lanes 11 to 15) were
carried out using serial dilutions (0, 1:20, 1:100, 1:200, and 1:500)
of each RNA transcript. For each of them, the total translation
products decreased correspondingly when more-diluted RNA was added.
However, cleavage products were clearly demonstrated, and the cleavage
ratio (determined as described in Materials and Methods) remained
roughly unchanged from that for to nondiluted samples, suggesting that
these cleavages occur in cis. Our results suggest that a
construct starting from A1020 to a residue after the
cleavage site such as to include the N terminus of p90 is sufficient
for cis processing. Comparison between domains required for
cis- and trans-cleavage activities of NS-pro indicated that the domains involved in cis- and
trans-cleavage activities are different. Obviously, the
cis protease domain must contain a cleavage site and
C-terminal tail for cis cleavage to occur. This is not the
case for the trans protease domain. However, it is
interesting that the N-terminal domains are different between cis and trans cleavage for RV NS-pro. The domain
from V920 to A1020 is required for
trans cleavage but is dispensable for cis cleavage. It will be of interest to examine the functions of the domain
from V920 to A1020 in trans
cleavage.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Autolytic processing of protease constructs
V920/I1773, A974/I1773,
A1020/I1773, and
G1102/I1773. V920/I1773
(A), A974/I1773 (B),
A1020/I1773 (C) and
G1102/I1773 (D) were transcribed and translated
as described in Materials and Methods for 5 h in the presence of
[35S]methionine. Samples were removed at the
indicated times and subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis. (A)
V920/I1773 was translated as a 98-kDa protein
and subsequently processed into 58- and 41-kDa fragments. Positions of
V920/I1773, p58, and p41 are indicated by
arrows. (B) A974/I1773 gave a 92-kDa product,
which was autocleaved into p58 and p35, as indicated by arrows. (C)
A1020/I1773 was translated into an 87-kDa
product, whose processing generated p58 and p29 as indicated. (D)
G1102/I1773 gave a 78-kDa protein, whose
autolytic processing was undetectable. (E) Translation reactions of
V920/I1773, A974/I1773,
and A1020/I1773 were each programmed with input
RNA at 0, 1:20, 1:100, 1:200, and 1:500 dilutions, and mixtures were
incubated for 4 h. Positions of molecular mass markers and
cleavage products are indicated. Images were scanned using a UMAX Astra
1220U scanner with Adobe Photoshop 5.0 software.
|
|
Effect of N-terminal regions on cleavage efficiency.
The
protease constructs examined in this study were found to have variable
cleavage efficiencies, depending on the region and length deleted.
Cleavage efficiency was compared among different protease constructs by
using the percentage of cleaved products with respect to total
proteins, expressed as a cleavage ratio. The cleavage ratio for each
protease construct at certain incubation time was calculated as
described in Materials and Methods and plotted against time.
Figure
8A compares the
trans-cleavage efficiency among positive controls
[p200(G1301S) and p150], A
348/G
1301,
M
827/G
1301,
V
920/G
1301,
V
920/P
1296, V
920/L
1297,
and V
920/R
1299. For p200(G1301S)
and p150,
the function time began when the protease and substrate
were mixed.
However, for A
348/G
1301,
M
827/G
1301, V
920/G
1301,
V
920/P
1296,
V
920/L
1297,
and V
920/R
1299, the protease functioned only
after
it had been translated, which took about 40 to 60 min. Therefore,
the effective function time was taken as the real incubation time
minus
60 min. The eight protease constructs could be separated
into two
groups according to their proteolytic activity: one group
with high
cleavage ratios (70 to 90%), including p200(G1301S),
p150,
A
348/G
1301, and
M
827/G
1301, and the other group with low
cleavage ratios (5 to 17%), including
V
920/G
1301, V
920/P
1296,
V
920/L
1297, and
V
920/R
1299. A
348/G
1301
and M
827/G
1301 had cleavage
efficiencies
comparable to those of p200(G1301S) and p150, the
positive controls
for
trans-cleavage activity, whereas
V
920/G
1301,
differing from
M
827/G
1301 in lacking an X domain, had a
substantially
lower cleavage ratio (17%) than
M
827/G
1301 (82%). These results
suggest an
important role of the X domain in
trans cleavage.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Cleavage efficiencies of protease constructs. Protein
bands of substrate and cleavage products on SDS-PAGE gel were
quantitated using the Scion image program. The cleavage ratio for each
protease construct was calculated as described in Materials and Methods
and plotted against incubation time. (A) trans-cleavage
efficiency comparisons. , p200(G1301S); , p150; ,
A348/G1301; ×,
M827/G1301; ,
V920/G1301; ,
V920/P1296; ,
V920/L1297; ,
V920/R1299. (B) cis-cleavage
efficiency comparisons. and , wild-type NSP in the absence or
presence, respectively, of Zn2+; ,
V920/I1773; *,
A974/I1773; ,
A1020/I1773.
|
|
As discussed above, the processing of
V
920/I
1773 is largely by
cis
cleavage, and the processing of A
974/I
1773 or
A
1020/I
1773 is the consequence of
cis cleavage only. Therefore, the processing
efficiencies of
V
920/I
1773, A
974/I
1773,
and A
1020/I
1773 (Fig.
8B) reflected their
respective
cis-cleavage abilities. The constructs
compared
in Fig.
8B can be classified into two groups: one with
high processing
ratios (60 to 70%), including wild-type NSP,
V
920/I
1773,
and
A
974/I
1773, and the other
(A
1020/I
1773) with a processing
ratio as low as
35%. The fact that V
920/I
1773 and
A
974/I
1773 had
as efficient
cis
cleavage as wild-type NSP suggested that the
lack of and X domain in
V
920/I
1773 and
A
974/I
1773 had no significant
influence on
their self-processing. However, the domain from residue
974 to 1020, although not required absolutely, had a substantial
effect on
cis cleavage.
Secondary-structure prediction for RV NS-pro.
Gorbalenya et
al. (14) reported sequence similarity between papain, a
cellular cysteine protease, and RV NS-pro in the vicinity of catalytic
C and H residues as determined through local alignment. The catalytic C
and H residues are separated by 133 residues in papain and 120 residues
in RV NS-pro (14). There are 24 residues upstream of the
catalytic C residue in papain. The active RV NS-pro domain identified
in this work was larger than papain, with about 230 residues upstream
of the catalytic C1152 that are required for
trans cleavage or about 130 residues upstream of
C1152 that are required for cis cleavage. It has
been reported that through sequence alignment and secondary-structure
comparison to known protein structures, topologic prediction of
uncharacterized proteins is possible (38). Skern et al.
(38) proposed a papain-like fold for the FMDV Lpro, a viral
cysteine protease, from the analyses of predicted secondary structure.
This prediction was confirmed by a recent crystallographic analysis of
FMDV Lpro showing a globular papain-like catalytic domain with
adaptation for the specific requirements of the virus (16).
In the hope of obtaining initial structural information on RV NS-pro,
we compared the primary and secondary structures of RV NS-pro to those
of papain. The analyses were performed with strains M33 and Therien,
both of which are wild-type isolates of RV and differ from each other
by two residues (A1140V and R1201W, M33 versus Therien) within the
examined NS-pro catalytic region (from residue 1128 to 1301), with
identical results. Only the result for RV strain M33 is presented here
(Fig. 9).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Comparison of primary and secondary structures between
RV NS-pro and papain. The protein sequence of papain (SWISS-PROT
accession number P00784) was aligned to that of NS-pro (strain M33;
GenBank accession number S38480 with corrections as in reference
29) using ALIGN software with manual adjustment. The
papain sequence is numbered as for mature protease, and the RV-NS-pro
sequence is numbered as for the NSP ORF. :, identical residues;
., conserved amino acids. Cys and His at the catalytic sites
are in boldface and shaded. Features of the secondary structure of
papain (20) are illustrated above the sequence. Secondary
structure for RV NS-pro was calculated by the EMBL protein prediction
server (32-35) and is illustrated below the NS-pro
sequence. -helices are shown as curves, and -sheets are shown as
arrows. -helices are named according to the nomenclature of Kamphuis
et al. (20); -sheets are named as described by Skern et
al. (38).
|
|
To determine the global similarity between papain and RV NS-pro with
respect to their catalytic sites, sequence alignment
between papain and
the RV NS-pro catalytic region (residues 1128
to 1296) was made using
the ALIGN program (
27) with manual modification
(Fig.
9).
The alignment gave an identity of 18.1%, and, as expected,
the two
sequences exhibited most similarity around C and H, the
catalytic
sites. The derived alignment was further supported by
the analysis of
the predicted secondary structure of RV NS-pro
(Fig.
9). RV NS-pro was
predicted to have the

-

structural organization
found in cellular
PCPs. This prediction has three

-helices (

L1,

L2/3, and

R1)
and six

-sheets (A to F) in RV NS-pro. Most of
these were present in
the papain structure at corresponding, positions
including

A,

L1,

R1,

C,

D,

E, and

F (
20,
21). The match
was
highest in the catalytic C and H regions, with differences
occurring in
the linker regions and the C end. In NS-pro, an

-helix,

L2/3,
took the place where two helices,

L2 and

L3, occurred
in papain.

B1 and

B2 for NS-pro did not match the position of

B for
papain well. Furthermore, the

R2 in the linker region
and

G at
the C end were missing in the NS-pro prediction. RV
NS-pro had a
shorter linker region (120 residues) between catalytic
C and H residues
than papain (133 residues) and a shorter tail
after the catalytic H
residue (23 residues) than papain (53 residues),
which explained the
discrepancies. It was proposed (
38) that
loops between the
secondary elements that define the papain topology
can be modified, by
insertions or deletions, without interfering
with the overall folding
of the molecule. Therefore, the global
similarity of their secondary
structures suggested that RV NS-pro
might maintain a papain-like
topology for its catalytic region,
whereas those differences may come
from the adaptive changes for
the viral specificity. Crystallographic
data are necessary for
precise structure determination for RV NS-pro.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have used an in vitro translation system to identify domains
important for cis- and trans-cleavage activities
of RV NS-pro. The results are summarized in Fig.
10. Through analysis of protease activity using RNA transcripts from cloned material with serial deletions from either end of p150, we have demonstrated that RV NS-pro
requires a region from residue 920 to 1296 to perform functional trans cleavage (Fig. 5 and 6). The N-terminal region of
NS-pro was roughly determined to reside between residues 920 and 974 (Fig. 5C and D). The C end was precisely determined to be
P1296 (Fig. 6B and C). However, the minimal NS-pro domain
(residues 920 to 1296) for trans cleavage processed only 5 to 17% of substrate after 4 h of incubation, compared to the 70 to 96% for the positive controls, p200(G1301S) and p150 (Fig. 8A).
The minimal NS-pro domain that maintains as high
trans-cleavage ability as the positive controls is found in
the construct M827/G1301 (80% cleavage at 4 h), starting from around residue M827 (Fig. 8A).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
Functional domains of RV NS-pro and comparison with
complete papain sequence. Residues of RV NS-pro are numbered as for the
RV NSP ORF. The X domain (residues 834 to 940) is shown by the dotted
line, positioned outside the essential protease domains of NS-pro shown
as a solid heavy line. The essential domains for either
trans- or cis-cleavage activity are indicated by
the arrows starting from residue 920 or 1020. The region from residue
1128 to 1301 is compared to the mature papain protease in this work,
and the boundary is indicated by vertical dotted lines. The predicted
catalytic residues Cys and His of RV NS-pro and catalytic residues Cys
and His of papain are represented by open squares. For a complete
papain sequence, residues 1 to 18 encode the signal peptide shown as a
heavy line, residues 19 to 133 are the pro region, and residues 134 to
345 contain the mature papain sequence.
|
|
RV NS-pro possesses both cis and trans activities
(44). Both use the same cysteine protease cleavage mechanism
and thus should employ the same core catalytic structure
(19). They may vary in other external domain requirements.
In addition to the protease domain, the cis protease must
include intact cleavage site and substrate regions. The most
significant difference between cis and trans
cleavage for RV NS-pro lies at the N-terminal domains. When a panel of
protease constructs with nested N-terminal deletions (V920/I1773,
A974/I1773,
A1020/I1773, and
G1102/I1773), with weak or no
trans-cleavage activity, were examined for autoprocessing, V920/I1773, A974/I1773,
and A1020/I1773 were active in cis,
while G1102/I1773 was not (Fig. 7). Thus,
protease active in trans starts after residue 920 but before
residue 974, while that in cis begins after residue 1020. These results suggested that the core protease domain (required for
both cis and trans activity) ranges from around
residue 1020 to residue 1296, and that the fragment from residue 920 to
1020 is required only for trans cleavage while being
dispensable for cis processing (Fig. 10). Our data are the first to show that RV NS-pro uses different domains for cis
and trans cleavage. Since trans cleavage is a
bimolecular interaction, it is likely that the domain of residues 920 to 1020 is involved in protein-protein interaction, required to
position substrate protein into the trans protease catalytic
site. For cis cleavage, this protein-protein interaction is
not necessary in order to hold substrate and enzyme together.
Identification of the trans-specific domain facilitates
future studies on the biological significance of
trans-cleavage activity.
Sequence analysis on M-group PCPs of several virus families (such as
alphavirus and coronavirus, etc.) had identified a conserved X domain
near the protease domain (14, 39). In RV, this X domain lies
N-terminal to the protease domain, ranging from residue 834 to 940 (Fig. 10) (14). Functions of the X domain remain to be
characterized. Association of the X domain with M-group PCPs (possessing both cis and trans activity) rather
than L-group PCPs (containing only cis activity) encouraged
the speculation that the X domain might be involved in the regulation
of polyprotein processing (14). Elimination of the X domain
from PLP-1 of mouse hepatitis virus reduced cleavage by 22 to 63%
(3, 4, 41). In our experiments, RV NS-pro remained
enzymatically active after all or most of the X domain had been
removed. V920/G1301 cleaved substrate in
trans, and A974/I1773 processed
itself efficiently (Fig. 5C and 7B). However, cleavage efficiencies
differed considerably. In trans cleavage, the absence of the
X domain in V920/G1301 caused a substantially
decreased cleavage ratio (17%) compared to that for
M827/G1301 (82%), which contains the X domain
(Fig. 8A). In contrast, cis cleavage was not affected
significantly by the presence of the X domain, since
V920/I1773 and
A974/I1773 (both missing the X domain)
processed themselves almost as efficiently as the positive control,
wild-type NSP (Fig. 8B). Our results demonstrate the importance of the
X domain in trans cleavage. Although it is unclear at
present what function it could play in RV NS-pro trans
cleavage, we speculate that this proline-rich region might provide a
protein-protein interaction domain that enhances the opportunity for
protease to meet its trans cleavage substrate and thus
decreases the Km of protease. Further studies of
the biologic significance and functional mechanism of the X domain in
NSP processing and virus replication are indicated.
The PCP family include a group of cellular and viral proteases which
employ the catalytic C and H dyad. The distant relationship between
viral and cellular PCPs was suggested from many primary sequence
comparisons (2, 14) and from the crystal structure of FMDV
Lpro, the only structure determined on a viral PCP (16). Sequence alignment showed that the catalytic region of RV NS-pro (from
residue 1128 to 1296) has global sequence similarity with papain (Fig.
9). Secondary-structure comparison also supported their topologic
relationship (Fig. 9). It is possible that the catalytic region of RV
NS-pro exhibits a papain-like folding with adapted modifications. To
obtain the full tertiary structural information of RV NS-pro will
require crystallographic analysis.
The additional N-terminal region of the RV NS-pro core domain (from
A1020 to A1127) has no corresponding sequence
in papain and was excluded from alignment with it. It is likely that
this N domain may not contain sequences directly required for protease activity. Rather, it may serve other subsidiary functions, such as
folding assistance, conformational stability, and/or protein-protein interactions. Papain, as well as other proteases, is translated as a
proprotease with an additional N-terminal region (115 residues of pro
region for papain) (SWISS-PROT accession number P00784) (Fig. 10). In
many proteases, the pro region plays an active role in protein folding.
Subtilisin (6),
-lytic protease (1), carboxypeptidase A1 (28), and carboxypeptidase Y
(31) do not fold into active conformations in the absence of
their pro regions. The pro region is essential for folding of at least
one PCP (cathepsin L) (40). The pro regions of PCPs can also
perform other biologic roles, such as stabilization (23, 40)
and subcellular targeting (24, 26). It would be interesting
to determine whether the region from A1020 to
A1127 of RV NS-pro serves subsidiary roles similar to those
of the pro regions for many other proteases.
In summary, our work identifies the domains required by RV NS-pro for
trans and cis cleavage (Fig. 10). Both cleavages
require a core catalytic domain from A1020 to
P1296, while containing different N and C ends. Protease
cleaving in trans needs an additional domain
(V920 to A1020) at the N end, while
cis protease contains a four-residue linker, the cleavage
site G1301, and the substrate region at the C end. We also
demonstrated that the X domain is important in trans
cleavage of RV NS-pro but has no significant influence on
cis cleavage. Defining the regions and roles of
protease-related domains of RV NS-pro clarifies our understanding of
this specific viral PCP and provides a basis for comparison with other
protease members. A remote homology to papain is noticed from primary
sequence analysis and predicted secondary structure, suggesting that
the RV NS-pro catalytic region has a papain-like topology.
Crystallographic data are needed for a precise three-dimensional
structure determination.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by a grant from the Medical Research
Council of Canada. Y.L. is supported by a studentship from the British
Columbia Children's Hospital Foundation. S.G. is an investigator of
the British Columbia Children's Hospital Foundation.
We thank T. K. Frey for providing Therien strain infectious clone
Robo302 and for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 4H4. Phone:
(604) 875-2473. Fax: (604) 875-2496. E-mail:
sgillam{at}interchange.ubc.ca.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baker, D.,
J. L. Sohl, and D. A. Agard.
1992.
A protein-folding reaction under kinetic control.
Nature
356:263-265[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Berti, P. J., and A. C. Storer.
1995.
Alignment/phylogeny of the papain superfamily of cysteine proteases.
J. Mol. Biol.
246:273-283[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bonilla, P. J.,
S. A. Hughes, and S. R. Weiss.
1997.
Characterization of a second cleavage site and demonstration of activity in trans by the papain-like protease of the murine coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus A59.
J. Virol.
71:900-909[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Bonilla, P. J.,
S. A. Hughes,
J. F. Pinon, and S. R. Weiss.
1995.
Characterization of the leader papain-like proteinase of MHV-A59: identification of a new in vitro cleavage site.
Virology
209:489-497[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Bowden, D. S., and E. G. Westaway.
1984.
Rubella virus structural and nonstructural proteins.
J. Gen. Virol.
65:933-943[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Bryan, P.,
L. Wang,
J. Hoskins,
S. Ruvinov,
S. Strausberg,
P. Alexander,
O. Almog,
G. Gilliland, and T. Gallagher.
1995.
Catalysis of a protein reaction: mechanistic implications of the 2.0 A structure of the subtilisin-prodomain complex.
Biochemistry
34:10310-10318[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Chen, J.-P.,
J. H. Strauss,
E. G. Strauss, and T. K. Frey.
1996.
Characterization of the rubella virus nonstructural protease domain and its cleavage site.
J. Virol.
70:4707-4713[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Choi, G. H.,
D. M. Pawlyk, and D. L. Nuss.
1991.
The autocatalytic protease p29 encoded by hypovirulence-associated virus of the chestnut blight fungus resembles the potyvirus-encoded protease HC-Pro.
Virology
183:747-752[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Den Boon, J. A.,
K. S. Faaberg,
J. J. M. Meulenberg,
A. I. M. Wassenaar,
P. G. W. Plagemann,
A. E. Gornalenya, and E. J. Snijder.
1995.
Processing and evolution of the N-terminal region of the arterivirus replicase ORF1a protein: identification of two papain-like cysteine proteases.
J. Virol.
69:4500-4505[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Dominguez, G.,
C. Y. Wang, and T. K. Frey.
1990.
Sequence of the genome RNA of rubella virus: evidence for genetic rearrangement during Togavirus evolution.
Virology
177:225-238[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Forng, R.-Y., and T. K. Frey.
1995.
Identification of the rubella virus nonstructural proteins.
Virology
206:843-853[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Francki, R. I. B.,
C. M. Fauquet,
D. L. Knudson, and F. Brown (ed.).
1991.
Classification and nomenclature of viruses. Fifth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Arch. Virol. Suppl. 2.
Springer-Verlag, Vienna, Austria.
|
| 13.
|
Frey, T. K.
1994.
Molecular biology of rubella virus.
Adv. Virus Res.
44:69-160[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Gorbalenya, A. E.,
E. V. Koonin, and M. M.-C. Lai.
1991.
Putative papain-related thiol proteases of positive-strand RNA viruses.
FEBS Lett.
288:201-205[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Gorbalenya, A. E.,
E. V. Koonin, and Y. I. Wolf.
1990.
A new superfamily of putative NTP-binding domains encoded by genomes of small DNA and RNA viruses.
FEBS Lett.
262:145-148[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Guarne, A.,
J. Tormo,
R. Kirchweger,
D. Pfistermueller,
I. Fita, and T. Skern.
1998.
Structure of the foot-and-mouth disease virus leader protease: a papain-like fold adapted for self-processing and eIF4G recognition.
EMBO J.
17:7469-7479[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Hardy, W. R., and J. H. Strauss.
1989.
Processing the nonstructural polyproteins of Sindbis virus: nonstructural protease is in the C-terminal half of nsP2 and functions both in cis and in trans.
J. Virol.
63:998-1007.
|
| 18.
|
Kamer, G., and P. Argos.
1984.
Primary structural comparison of RNA-dependent polymerase from plant, animal and bacterial viruses.
Nucleic Acids Res.
12:7269-7282[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Kamphuis, I. G.,
J. Drenth, and E. N. Baker.
1985.
Thiol proteases. Comparative studies based on the high-resolution structures of papain and actinidin, and on amino acid sequence information for cathepsins B and H, and stem bromelain.
J. Mol. Biol.
182:317-329[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Kamphuis, I. G.,
K. H. Kalk,
M. B. A. Swarte, and J. Drenth.
1984.
Structure of papain refined at 1.65 A resolution.
J. Mol. Biol.
179:233-256[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Koonin, E. V., and V. V. Dolja.
1993.
Evolution and taxonomy of positive-strand RNA viruses: implications of comparative analysis of amino acid sequences.
Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
28:375-430[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Liu, X.,
S. L. Ropp,
R. J. Jackson, and T. K. Frey.
1998.
The rubella virus nonstructural protease requires divalent cations for activity and functions in trans.
J. Virol.
72:4463-4466[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Mach, L.,
J. S. Mort, and J. Glossl.
1994.
Noncovalent complexes between the lysosomal proteinase cathepsin B and its propeptide account for stable, extracellular, high molecular mass forms of the enzyme.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:13036-13040[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Mao, P. L.,
Y. Jiang,
B. Y. Wee, and A. G. Porter.
1998.
Activation of caspase-1 in the nucleus requires nuclear translocation of pro-caspase-1 mediated by its prodomain.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:23621-23624[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Marr, L. D.,
C.-Y. Wang, and T. K. Frey.
1994.
Expression of the rubella virus nonstructural protein ORF and demonstration of proteolytic processing.
Virology
198:1-7[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
McIntyre, G. F., and A. H. Erickson.
1993.
The lysosomal proenzyme receptor that binds procathepsin L to microsomal membranes at pH5 is a 43-kDa integral membrane protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:10588-10592[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Myers, E., and W. Miller.
1988.
Optimal alignments in linear space.
CABIOS
4:11-17[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Phillips, M. A., and W. J. Rutter.
1996.
Role of the prodomain in folding and secretion of rat pancreatic carboxypeptidase A1.
Biochemistry
35:6771-6776[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Pugachev, K. V.,
E. S. Abernathy, and T. K. Frey.
1997.
Genomic sequence of the RA27/3 vaccine strain of rubella virus.
Arch. Virol.
142:1165-1180[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Pugachev, K. V.,
E. S. Abernathy, and T. K. Frey.
1997.
Improvements of the specific infectivity of the rubella virus (RUB) infectious clone: determinants of cytopathogenicity induced by RUB map to the nonstructural proteins.
J. Virol.
71:562-568[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Ramos, C.,
J. R. Winther, and M. C. Kielland-Brandt.
1994.
Requirement of the propeptide for in vivo formation of active yeast carboxypeptidase Y.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:7006-7012[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Rost, B., and C. Sander.
1993.
Improved prediction of protein secondary structure by use of sequence profiles and neural networks.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:7558-7562[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Rost, B., and C. Sander.
1993.
Prediction of protein structure at better than 70% accuracy.
J. Mol. Biol.
232:584-599[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Rost, B., and C. Sander.
1994.
Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure.
Proteins
19:55-72[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Rost, B.,
C. Sander, and R. Schneider.
1994.
PHD an automatic mail server for protein secondary structure prediction.
CABIOS
10:53-60[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Rozanov, M. N.,
E. V. Koonin, and A. E. Gorbalenya.
1992.
Conservation of the putative methyltransferase domain: a hallmark of the "Sindbis-like" supergroup of positive-strand RNA virus.
J. Gen. Virol.
73:2129-2134[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 38.
|
Skern, T.,
I. Fita, and A. Guarne.
1998.
A structural model of picornavirus leader proteinases based on papain and bleomycin hydrolase.
J. Gen. Virol.
79:301-307[Abstract].
|
| 39.
|
Strauss, J. H., and E. G. Strauss.
1994.
The alphaviruses: gene expression, replication, evolution.
Microbiol. Rev.
58:491-562[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Tao, K.,
N. A. Stearns,
J. Dong,
Q. L. Wu, and G. G. Sahagian.
1994.
The proregion of cathepsin L is required for proper folding stability, and ER exit.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
311:19-27[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Teng, H.,
J. D. Pinon, and S. R. Weiss.
1999.
Expression of murine coronavirus recombinant papain-like proteinase: efficient cleavage is dependent on the lengths of both the substrate and the proteinase polypeptides.
J. Virol.
73:2658-2666[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Wolinsky, J. S.
1996.
Rubella, p. 899-921.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, et al. (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed. Lipincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 43.
|
Yao, J., and S. Gillam.
1999.
Mutational analysis, using a full-length rubella virus cDNA clone, of rubella virus E1 transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains required for virus release.
J. Virol.
73:4622-4630[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Yao, J.,
D. Yang,
P. Chong,
D. Hwang,
Y. Liang, and S. Gillam.
1998.
Proteolytic processing of rubella virus nonstructural proteins.
Virology
246:74-82[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, June 2000, p. 5412-5423, Vol. 74, No. 12
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Zhou, Y., Tzeng, W.-P., Yang, W., Zhou, Y., Ye, Y., Lee, H.-w., Frey, T. K., Yang, J.
(2007). Identification of a Ca2+-Binding Domain in the Rubella Virus Nonstructural Protease. J. Virol.
81: 7517-7528
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, M.-H., Icenogle, J. P.
(2004). Rubella Virus Capsid Protein Modulates Viral Genome Replication and Virus Infectivity. J. Virol.
78: 4314-4322
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tzeng, W.-P., Frey, T. K.
(2003). Complementation of a Deletion in the Rubella Virus P150 Nonstructural Protein by the Viral Capsid Protein. J. Virol.
77: 9502-9510
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tuittila, M., Hinkkanen, A. E.
(2003). Amino acid mutations in the replicase protein nsP3 of Semliki Forest virus cumulatively affect neurovirulence. J. Gen. Virol.
84: 1525-1533
[Abstract]
[Full Text]