This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlereth, B.
Right arrow Articles by Niewiesk, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlereth, B.
Right arrow Articles by Niewiesk, S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, May 2000, p. 4652-4657, Vol. 74, No. 10
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Successful Vaccine-Induced Seroconversion by Single-Dose Immunization in the Presence of Measles Virus-Specific Maternal Antibodies

Bernd Schlereth,1 John K. Rose,2 Linda Buonocore,2 Volker ter Meulen,1 and Stefan Niewiesk1,*

Institute of Virology and Immunobiology, University of Wuerzburg, 97078 Wurzburg, Germany,1 and Departments of Pathology and Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 065102

Received 13 December 1999/Accepted 14 February 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In humans, maternal antibodies inhibit successful immunization against measles, because they interfere with vaccine-induced seroconversion. We have investigated this problem using the cotton rat model (Sigmodon hispidus). As in humans, passively transferred antibodies inhibit the induction of measles virus (MV)-neutralizing antibodies and protection after immunization with MV. In contrast, a recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) expressing the MV hemagglutinin (VSV-H) induces high titers of neutralizing antibodies to MV in the presence of MV-specific antibodies. The induction of neutralizing antibodies increased with increasing virus dose, and all doses gave good protection from subsequent challenge with MV. Induction of antibodies by VSV-H was observed in the presence of passively transferred human or cotton rat antibodies, which were used as the models of maternal antibodies. Because MV hemagglutinin is not a functional part of the VSV-H envelope, MV-specific antibodies only slightly inhibit VSV-H replication in vitro. This dissociation of function and antigenicity is probably key to the induction of a neutralizing antibody in the presence of a maternal antibody.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Measles virus (MV) is the single most important cause of infant mortality worldwide. Vaccination with an attenuated live virus vaccine has proven to induce protective immunity in seronegative individuals, and even low titers of neutralizing antibodies seem to be protective (4, 12). In developing countries with a high level of infection, infants below the age of 12 months are at high risk for MV infection. In this age group passively transferred maternal immunoglobulins (Ig) pose a problem because declining maternal antibodies interfere with vaccine-induced seroconversion but do not protect against infection with wild-type MV (13, 15). To induce immunity in the presence of maternal antibodies, high-titer vaccines (>104.7 PFU) were administered to infants at the age of 4 to 6 months (1, 17). These infants showed good serological responses and protection against measles. However, especially in female children, an increased mortality due to infections other than measles was observed after immunization with high-titer vaccines (2, 7), and the use of this vaccine was therefore discontinued.

In order to develop vaccine alternatives which induce MV-neutralizing antibodies in the presence of maternal antibodies, we have used MV infection in the cotton rat model (Sigmodon hispidus, inbred strain Cotton NIco) (9). Cotton rats are the only rodents in which MV replicates in the respiratory tract (18). Here we demonstrate that the passive transfer of human serum containing MV-specific antibodies inhibits vaccine-induced seroconversion and abolishes protection against MV. To induce neutralizing antibodies in the presence of MV-specific antibodies, we tested a recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) expressing the MV hemagglutinin (VSV-H) (14). VSV is known for the rapid induction of neutralizing antibodies against its surface protein G, and VSV recombinants expressing influenza virus hemagglutinin induce high neutralizing antibody titers to influenza virus in mice (10, 11). In the recombinant VSV-H, the MV hemagglutinin is incorporated into the bullet-shaped envelope and comprises about one-fourth of the envelope proteins in the envelope but is not needed for replication. Using this vector we show here that intranasal (i.n.) but not intraperitoneal (i.p.) immunization led to the induction of MV-neutralizing antibodies in the presence of maternal antibodies.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Cotton rats: infection, immunization, serum transfer, and virus titration. Cotton rats (inbred strain Cotton/NIco) were obtained from Iffa Credo, Lyon, France. Animals were kept under controlled environmental conditions and used at the age of 6 to 8 weeks (60 to 70 g). The i.n. infection, i.p. infection or serum injection, and retro-orbital blood sampling were done under ether narcosis. To mimic maternal MV-specific antibodies, 1 ml of a human serum (antibody concentration of 16 IU/ml by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]; antibody titer of 320 by neutralization (NT) assay and 256 by hemagglutination inhibition assay) was used. For challenge experiments, 4 days after i.n. infection with 5 × 105 PFU of MV HU2 strain in a volume of 50 to 100 µl, animals were asphyxiated using CO2, lungs were removed, and the 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) was determined as described previously (9).

Viruses. Recombinant VSV and VSV-H (14) were grown and titrated on baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells, and MV strains Edmonston B and HU2 were grown and titrated on Vero cells according to standard procedures (9, 14).

ELISA. ELISAs were performed according to standard procedures. For ELISA 10 µg of gradient-purified, UV-inactivated MV/ml was coated in 200 mM NaCO3 buffer (pH 9.6) at 4°C overnight, blocked with phosphate-buffered saline-10% fetal calf serum-0.05% Tween 20, and incubated with dilutions of human serum at room temperature for 1 h. After being washed, the plate was incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a horseradish peroxidase-coupled rabbit serum specific for human IgG (Dako, Hamburg, Germany) and was subsequently developed with 0.5 mg of ortho-phenyldiamine/ml in buffer (35 mM citrate, 66 mM Na2HPO4 [pH 5,2])-0.01% H2O2. Human sera were standardized using human anti-MV serum (2nd international standard 1990; 5 IU per ml; National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Potters Bar, United Kingdom).

To test for MV-specific cotton rat IgG, coated plates were incubated with dilutions of cotton rat serum at 4°C for 1 h. After being washed, the plate was incubated with rabbit serum specific for cotton rat IgG (Virion Systems, Rockville, Md.) for 1 h at room temperature. After being washed, the plate was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-coupled goat serum specific for rabbit IgG (Zymed, San Francisco, Calif.) for 45 min at room temperature and developed as described above.

NT and PRNT assays. (i) NT assay. Serum dilutions were incubated with 50 PFU of MV Edmonston strain or recombinant VSV or VSV-H for 1 h at 37°C and plated in duplicate onto 104 Vero cells (MV) or BHK cells (VSV) per well of a 96-well plate. Two (VSV) or 5 days (MV) later titers were determined microscopically.

(ii) Plaque reduction neutralization (PRNT) assay. Serum dilutions were incubated with 100 PFU of MV Edmonston strain for 1 h at 37°C and plated onto Vero cells (80 to 90% density) in a six-well plate. Cells were overlayed with agar, and after 5 days the incubation mixture was stained with neutral red (Merck) solution (0.6% in phosphate-buffered saline) and the plaques were counted.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Both cotton rat and human MV-specific antibodies inhibit vaccine-induced seroconversion in cotton rats. Weanling cotton rats from MV-immune dams have high serum titers of both MV-neutralizing antibodies (NT assay titer, 180 ± 60) and total MV-specific antibodies (optical density, 2.1 ± 0.04) at 3 weeks after birth. As in humans, antibody titers decline over time, and no neutralizing antibodies were detectable after 8 weeks. At 3 weeks after birth, animals with high titers of maternal antibodies were immunized i.p. with the MV Edmonston vaccine strain. Seven weeks later no neutralizing antibodies were detectable (data not shown). In contrast, vaccinated animals lacking maternal antibodies developed antibody titers that were detectable for at least 10 months. Although the protection by maternal antibodies is similar to the situation in humans, it is difficult in our model system to distinguish between actively induced antibodies and passively transferred maternal antibodies. Because human and cotton rat antibodies can be distinguished by ELISA, we chose in all initial experiments to use an MV-specific human serum (containing 16 IU/ml as defined by comparison to a World Health Organization standard serum) to mimic maternal antibodies. After transfer of 1 ml (16 IU of antibodies) of human serum into cotton rats, MV-specific antibodies declined over 6 weeks (Fig. 1a). By using the sensitive PRNT assay, neutralizing antibodies were detected for 3 weeks after serum transfer (Fig. 1b). Some of the animals given the neutralizing antibody were also challenged with MV at the time points indicated (Fig. 1c). The presence of antibodies correlated with greater-than-10-fold reductions in viral titers in lungs of infected animals for the first 3 weeks. With declining antibody titers, protection from MV infection declined also and was gone by week 7. As in humans, the NT assay was relatively insensitive compared to the PRNT assay and ELISA and significant reduction in virus replication was still seen when antibody titers were below the threshold of detection. We also measured the inhibition of measles vaccine-induced seroconversion by MV-specific antibodies. One day after serum transfer animals were immunized with 105 PFU of MV i.p., which induced high titers of MV-specific and neutralizing antibodies (Fig. 2).. In the presence of transferred human MV-specific antibodies, however, the generation of total MV-specific antibody titers was reduced more than fourfold and neutralizing antibody titers were abrogated (Fig. 2). In consequence, subsequent protection in these animals was severely reduced compared to that in animals immunized in the absence of MV-specific antibodies (Fig. 2).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   MV-specific human antibodies mimic maternal antibodies and decline after transfer into cotton rats. One milliliter of human serum containing MV-specific antibodies (16 IU/ml) was transferred into naive cotton rats (60 to 70 g). One day later and at weekly intervals from weeks 1 to 7, human MV-specific antibody titers (six animals per time point) were measured by ELISA (a) and virus NT and PRNT assays (b). At the same time points animals were challenged i.n. with MV, and virus titers (TCID50/g of lung tissue ± standard deviation) were determined by titration 4 days later (four animals per time point, except week 1 [one animal]) (c). By NT assay neutralizing antibodies can be demonstrated until week 2, by the more-sensitive PRNT assay they can be demonstrated until week 3, and by ELISA they can be demonstrated until week 6 (26 mIU/ml). In the presence of neutralizing antibodies the virus reduction is more than 10-fold and declines from week 4.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   MV-specific human antibodies inhibit vaccine-induced seroconversion and protection in cotton rats. One milliliter of human serum containing MV-specific antibodies (16 IU/ml) was transferred into naive cotton rats. One day later animals were immunized i.p. with 105 PFU of MV and challenged after 6 weeks with MV i.n. The total MV-specific antibodies were measured by ELISA (1:100 dilution), and the neutralizing antibodies were measured by NT assay. Virus titers in lung tissue (± standard deviations) were determined on day 5 after i.n. infection. Data represent the averages for five animals. The difference in protection was significant between groups with and without serum transfer (P < 0.0003; two-sided paired t test). OD, optical density.

The i.n. immunization with VSV-H results in more-rapid generation of neutralizing antibodies and higher titers than does immunization with MV. Recombinant VSV-H (14) was chosen to be tested for the induction of MV-neutralizing antibodies for the following reasons: the MV hemagglutinin is the most important antigen for the induction of neutralizing antibodies (6), VSV is known for rapid and efficient induction of neutralizing antibody responses directed against its own surface G protein (3), and MV hemagglutinin comprises 25% of the total envelope protein in the recombinant VSV-H (14). First, the ability of VSV-H to induce neutralizing antibodies in comparison to MV was tested after i.p. and i.n. immunization. In comparison with the MV Edmonston strain, VSV-H induced higher titers of neutralizing and total MV-specific antibodies (Fig. 3). The difference was especially striking after i.n. immunization, indicating that VSV-H is a vector well suited for i.n. immunization.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   VSV-H induces higher titers of neutralizing antibodies than MV. After inoculation of 5 × 106 PFU of VSV-H or MV i.p. or i.n., MV-specific antibodies were measured by NT assay (a) and by ELISA (1:100 dilution; b) in weekly intervals from week 1 to 4 after immunization. All data represent the means for five animals ± standard deviations. Four weeks after i.n. immunization with MV, the neutralizing antibody titer, 15, was above the threshold level of detection (>10). The percentage of MV-specific IgA antibodies in whole serum remained constant irrespective of the virus or route of immunization used. OD, optical density.

MV-specific antibodies do not inhibit VSV-H replication in vitro. To induce MV-neutralizing antibodies in vivo, in the presence of MV-specific antibodies, VSV-H would have to escape neutralization by MV-specific antibodies. Although MV hemagglutinin is expressed in considerable quantities as part of the envelope of VSV-H, it is a passenger protein with no function in viral replication. We assumed that replication of VSV-H might therefore not be inhibited by MV-specific antibodies to the same degree as MV replication. In vitro, serum containing antibodies against glycoprotein G of VSV effectively neutralized VSV-H (data not shown). Human and cotton rat sera containing high titers of MV-neutralizing antibodies (1:640) neutralized MV effectively, but only very high serum concentrations neutralized VSV-H (1:20). Thus VSV-H effectively escapes neutralization by antibody concentrations that completely neutralize MV in vitro.

VSV-H induces MV-neutralizing antibodies in the presence of MV-specific antibodies. To test whether VSV-H is able to replicate in the presence of MV-specific antibodies in vivo, cotton rats were immunized with VSV-H either i.p. or i.n. or with MV i.n. 1 day after serum transfer. After i.p. immunization with VSV-H or i.n. immunization with MV, antibody production was severely suppressed as measured by NT assay and ELISA (Fig. 4) compared to immunization in the absence of MV-specific antibodies (Fig. 3). In contrast, after i.n. immunization with VSV-H, total MV-specific as well as neutralizing antibody production started after 4 weeks. This effect was dose dependent. An inoculum of 5 × 105 PFU of VSV-H overcame MV-specific antibodies (NT assay titer, 17.5), but a 40-fold increase in the virus inoculum gave approximately 3-fold-increased titers of neutralizing antibodies (Table 1). Viral replication was shown to be critical for antibody induction, as UV-inactivated VSV-H was not able to induce neutralizing antibodies (data not shown). Although the titers of neutralizing antibodies in animals without serum transfer were higher, no difference in protection between animals with and without serum transfer was seen (Table 1).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Immunization via the i.n. route with VSV-H overcomes maternal antibodies. After transfer of 16 IU of MV-specific human antibodies into cotton rats, animals were immunized 1 day later with 2 × 107 PFU of MV i.n. (three animals) or 2 × 107 PFU of VSV-H i.n. (four animals per group) or 5 × 107 PFU of VSV-H i.p. (four animals per group). On the day of immunization (day 1) and after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 weeks serum samples were obtained and tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies by NT assay (top) and of MV-specific cotton rat antibodies by ELISA (bottom). After 3 weeks neutralizing antibodies fell below the level of detection indicating that neutralizing antibodies from week 4 onwards were produced by cotton rats. This is confirmed by the ELISA data. OD, optical density.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Induction of MV-neutralizing antibodies and protection against MV-infection by VSV-H in the presence of MV-specific antibodiesa

Interestingly, serum transfer of MV-specific antibodies inhibited the generation of hemagglutinin-specific antibodies, as the titers of VSV-neutralizing antibodies were the same in both groups.

Immunization with VSV-H also overcomes maternal (MV-specific) cotton rat antibodies. We performed an experiment to determine if VSV-H was able to overcome homologous cotton rat anti-MV antibodies in addition to human MV-specific antibodies. Cotton rats from MV-immune dams with high titers of maternally derived MV-specific antibodies were given VSV-H i.n. As shown in Fig. 5 an increase in anti-MV antibodies was detectable by NT assay and by ELISA in the vaccinated animals after 3 to 7 weeks, while the maternal antibodies declined in the control animals.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.   Induction of neutralizing antibodies by VSV-H in the presence of maternal (cotton rat) antibodies. Five-week-old cotton rats from MV-immune dams were immunized with 5 × 106 PFU of VSV-H (four animals) or left untreated (three animals) (day 0). At various time points MV-specific antibody titers were tested by NT assay (top) and ELISA (bottom). OD, optical density.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Maternal antibodies are an early line of specific immune defense to protect the newborn against bacterial and viral pathogens which have been encountered by the mother. To immunize against measles in the presence of maternal antibodies has proven to be difficult because declining MV-specific maternal antibodies inhibit vaccine-induced seroconversion but do not confer protection against wild-type MV infection. In addition, maternal antibody titers differ between infants from immunized versus naturally infected mothers. In the latter, titers are higher and persist longer (8). Therefore it is desirable to be able to use a measles vaccine irrespective of the titer of maternal antibodies.

The cotton rat proved to be a suitable animal model to test vaccine candidates. Similar to the situation in human populations, the declining maternal MV-specific antibodies inhibit vaccine-induced seroconversion in cotton rats and protection against MV is severely reduced. In an experimental study with monkeys it was shown that a prime boost strategy (two immunizations with a 4-week interval) overcomes maternal antibodies (16). After immunization with MV or immune system-stimulating complexes containing the MV glycoproteins hemagglutinin and fusion protein, neutralizing antibodies were induced and protection against MV challenge was observed. However, repeated vaccinations are difficult in countries with migrating populations or when mass vaccination campaigns are undertaken. In humans, attempts have been made to immunize in the presence of maternal antibodies by a single aerosol dose of vaccine (for a review see reference 5) or by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of a high-titer vaccine (2, 7). Whereas vaccination by aerosol has not given results superior to s.c. application, high-titer vaccines can achieve seroconversion in the presence of maternal antibodies and protect against measles. However, probably because of the marked immunosuppressive effect of this high-titer vaccine, a subsequent higher mortality due to secondary infections was noted.

We have chosen the highly attenuated recombinant VSV-H to immunize cotton rats against MV challenge (14). In cotton rats the attenuated recombinant VSV-H induces, after i.p. and especially after i.n. immunization, much higher titers of MV-neutralizing antibodies than MV itself. This response could be due to rapid replication and high-level MV hemagglutinin production in vivo by the VSV-H vector, but other factors may be involved also. From studies with mice it is known that VSV induces a T-cell-independent IgM response and high titers of neutralizing antibodies specific for the VSV G protein (3). This response may be due to the highly organized assembly of VSV G protein in the rigid bullet-shaped envelope. In contrast, MV has a very flexible pleomorphic envelope. The incorporation of MV hemagglutinin into the VSV envelope might therefore render MV hemagglutinin more antigenic. Immunization (i.n.) with VSV-H but not with MV induces neutralizing antibodies in the presence of MV-specific antibodies. VSV-H replicates for 5 days in lung tissue at lower titers than MV and does not spread into peripheral organs (data not shown). Immunization with UV-inactivated virus demonstrates that virus replication is essential to induce neutralizing antibodies in the presence of MV-specific antibodies. This is confirmed by the fact that after i.p. inoculation VSV-H replicates abortively (data not shown). MV hemagglutinin is part of the VSV-H envelope but has no function in viral replication (14). The ability of VSV-H to escape MV-specific antibodies in vitro is mirrored in the in vivo situation. These data indicate that a replication-competent vector is required to successfully immunize in the presence of maternal MV-specific antibodies. The strategy of having the appropriate antigen encoded as a passenger protein on the surface of a virus particle may be effective in other cases where a strong antibody response must be generated in the presence of maternal antibodies.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was in part supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie, Pfleger-Stiftung, and by World Health Organization and National Institutes of Health grants to J.K.R.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut für Virologie und Immunbiologie, Versbacher Str. 7, 97078 Würzburg, Germany. Phone: 49 931 201 3441. Fax: 49 931 201 3934. E-mail: niewiesk{at}vim.uni-wuerzburg.de.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Aaby, P., T. Jensen, and H. Hansen. 1988. Trial of high dose Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine in Guinea-Bissau: protective efficacy. Lancet ii:809-811.
2. Aaby, P., K. Knudsen, H. Whittle, et al. 1993. Long-term survival after Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccination in Guinea-Bissau: increased female mortality rate. J. Pediatr. 122:904-908[Medline].
3. Bachmann, M. F., and R. M. Zinkernagel. 1997. Neutralizing antiviral B cell responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15:235-270[CrossRef][Medline].
4. Chen, R. T., L. E. Markowitz, P. Albrecht, J. A. Stewart, L. M. Mofenson, S. R. Preblud, and W. A. Orenstein. 1990. Measles antibody: reevaluation of protective titers. J. Infect. Dis. 162:1036-1042[Medline].
5. Clements, C. J., and F. T. Cutts. 1995. The epidemiology of measles: thirty years of vaccination. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 191:13-33[Medline].
6. Griffin, D. E. 1995. Immune responses during measles virus infection. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 191:117-134[Medline].
7. Halsey, N. 1993. Increased mortality following high titer measles vaccines: too much of a good thing. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 12:462-465[Medline].
8. Katz, S. L., and B. G. Gellin. 1994. Measles vaccine: do we need new vaccines or new programs. Science 265:1391-1392[Free Full Text].
9. Niewiesk, S., I. Eisenhuth, A. Fooks, J. C. S. Clegg, J.-J. Schnorr, S. Schneider-Schaulies, and V. ter Meulen. 1997. Measles virus-induced immune suppression in the cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) model depends on viral glycoproteins. J. Virol. 71:7214-7219[Abstract].
10. Roberts, A. J., L. Buoconore, R. Price, J. Forman, and J. K. Rose. 1999. Attenuated vesicular stomatitis viruses as vaccine vectors. J. Virol. 73:3723-3732[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Roberts, A. J., E. Kretzschmar, A. S. Perkins, J. Forman, R. Price, L. Buoconore, Y. Kawaoka, and J. K. Rose. 1998. Vaccination with a recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus expressing an influenza virus hemagglutinin provides complete protection from influenza virus challenge. J. Virol. 72:4704-4711[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Samb, B., P. Aaby, H. C. Whittle, A. M. Seck, S. Rahman, J. Bennett, L. Markowitz, and F. Simondon. 1995. Serologic status and measles attack rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated children in rural Senegal. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 14:203-209[Medline].
13. Sato, H., P. Albrecht, D. W. Reynolds, S. Stagno, and F. A. Ennis. 1979. Transfer of measles, mumps and rubella antibodies from mother to infant. Its effect on measles, mumps and rubella immunization. Am. J. Dis. Child. 133:1240-1243[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Schnell, M. J., L. Buonocore, E. Kretzschmar, E. Johnson, and J. K. Rose. 1996. Foreign glycoproteins expressed from recombinant vesicular stomatitis viruses are incorporated efficiently into virus particles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:11359-11365[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Schoub, B. D., S. Johnson, J. M. McAnerney, L. A. Wagstaff, W. Matsie, S. G. Reinach, et al. 1990. Measles, mumps and rubella immunisation at nine months in a developing country. Ped. Infect. Dis. J. 9:263-267.
16. van Binnendijk, R. S., M. C. M. Poelen, G. van Amerongen, P. de Vries, and A. D. M. E. Osterhaus. 1997. Protective immunity in macaaques vaccinated with live attenuated, recombinant, and subunit measles vaccines in the presence of passively acquired antibodies. J. Infect. Dis. 175:524-532[Medline].
17. Whittle, H., P. Hanlon, K. O'Neil, L. Hanlon, V. Marsh, and E. Jupp. 1988. Trial of high-dose Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine in Gambia: antibody response and side-effects. Lancet ii:811-814.
18. Wyde, P. R., M. W. Ambrosi, T. G. Voss, H. L. Meyer, and B. F. Gilbert. 1992. Measles virus replication in lungs of hispid cotton rats after intranasal inoculation. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 201:80-87[CrossRef][Medline].


Journal of Virology, May 2000, p. 4652-4657, Vol. 74, No. 10
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Simek, M. D., Rida, W., Priddy, F. H., Pung, P., Carrow, E., Laufer, D. S., Lehrman, J. K., Boaz, M., Tarragona-Fiol, T., Miiro, G., Birungi, J., Pozniak, A., McPhee, D. A., Manigart, O., Karita, E., Inwoley, A., Jaoko, W., DeHovitz, J., Bekker, L.-G., Pitisuttithum, P., Paris, R., Walker, L. M., Poignard, P., Wrin, T., Fast, P. E., Burton, D. R., Koff, W. C. (2009). Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Elite Neutralizers: Individuals with Broad and Potent Neutralizing Activity Identified by Using a High-Throughput Neutralization Assay together with an Analytical Selection Algorithm. J. Virol. 83: 7337-7348 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pasetti, M. F., Ramirez, K., Resendiz-Albor, A., Ulmer, J., Barry, E. M., Levine, M. M. (2009). Sindbis Virus-Based Measles DNA Vaccines Protect Cotton Rats against Respiratory Measles: Relevance of Antibodies, Mucosal and Systemic Antibody-Secreting Cells, Memory B Cells, and Th1-Type Cytokines as Correlates of Immunity. J. Virol. 83: 2789-2794 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Peng, Y., Lin, F.-c., Verardi, P. H., Jones, L. A., Yilma, T. D. (2009). Lower Levels of Gamma Interferon Expressed by a Pseudotyped Single-Cycle Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Enhance Immunogenicity in Rats. J. Virol. 83: 1592-1601 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cooper, D., Wright, K. J., Calderon, P. C., Guo, M., Nasar, F., Johnson, J. E., Coleman, J. W., Lee, M., Kotash, C., Yurgelonis, I., Natuk, R. J., Hendry, R. M., Udem, S. A., Clarke, D. K. (2008). Attenuation of Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vaccine Vectors by Gene Translocations and G Gene Truncation Reduces Neurovirulence and Enhances Immunogenicity in Mice. J. Virol. 82: 207-219 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pueschel, K., Tietz, A., Carsillo, M., Steward, M., Niewiesk, S. (2007). Measles Virus-Specific CD4 T-Cell Activity Does Not Correlate with Protection against Lung Infection or Viral Clearance. J. Virol. 81: 8571-8578 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brandsma, J. L., Shylankevich, M., Su, Y., Roberts, A., Rose, J. K., Zelterman, D., Buonocore, L. (2007). Vesicular Stomatitis Virus-Based Therapeutic Vaccination Targeted to the E1, E2, E6, and E7 Proteins of Cottontail Rabbit Papillomavirus. J. Virol. 81: 5749-5758 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ramsburg, E. A., Publicover, J. M., Coppock, D., Rose, J. K. (2007). Requirement for CD4 T Cell Help in Maintenance of Memory CD8 T Cell Responses Is Epitope Dependent. J. Immunol. 178: 6350-6358 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Simon, I. D., Publicover, J., Rose, J. K. (2007). Replication and Propagation of Attenuated Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Vectors In Vivo: Vector Spread Correlates with Induction of Immune Responses and Persistence of Genomic RNA. J. Virol. 81: 2078-2082 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kohl, W., Grone, A., Moennig, V., Herrler, G. (2007). Expression of the surface glycoprotein E2 of Bovine viral diarrhea virus by recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus. J. Gen. Virol. 88: 157-165 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Natuk, R. J., Cooper, D., Guo, M., Calderon, P., Wright, K. J., Nasar, F., Witko, S., Pawlyk, D., Lee, M., DeStefano, J., Tummolo, D., Abramovitz, A. S., Gangolli, S., Kalyan, N., Clarke, D. K., Hendry, R. M., Eldridge, J. H., Udem, S. A., Kowalski, J. (2006). Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Vectors Expressing Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 gD Elicit Robust CD4+ Th1 Immune Responses and Are Protective in Mouse and Guinea Pig Models of Vaginal Challenge. J. Virol. 80: 4447-4457 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ramsburg, E., Publicover, J., Buonocore, L., Poholek, A., Robek, M., Palin, A., Rose, J. K. (2005). A Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Recombinant Expressing Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Induces Enhanced T-Cell Responses and Is Highly Attenuated for Replication in Animals. J. Virol. 79: 15043-15053 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Publicover, J., Ramsburg, E., Rose, J. K. (2005). A Single-Cycle Vaccine Vector Based on Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Can Induce Immune Responses Comparable to Those Generated by a Replication-Competent Vector. J. Virol. 79: 13231-13238 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Publicover, J., Ramsburg, E., Rose, J. K. (2004). Characterization of Nonpathogenic, Live, Viral Vaccine Vectors Inducing Potent Cellular Immune Responses. J. Virol. 78: 9317-9324 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Roberts, A., Reuter, J. D., Wilson, J. H., Baldwin, S., Rose, J. K. (2004). Complete Protection from Papillomavirus Challenge after a Single Vaccination with a Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Vector Expressing High Levels of L1 Protein. J. Virol. 78: 3196-3199 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Schlereth, B., Buonocore, L., Tietz, A., Meulen, V. t., Rose, J. K., Niewiesk, S. (2003). Successful mucosal immunization of cotton rats in the presence of measles virus-specific antibodies depends on degree of attenuation of vaccine vector and virus dose. J. Gen. Virol. 84: 2145-2151 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pasetti, M. F., Barry, E. M., Losonsky, G., Singh, M., Medina-Moreno, S. M., Polo, J. M., Ulmer, J., Robinson, H., Sztein, M. B., Levine, M. M. (2003). Attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi and Shigella flexneri 2a Strains Mucosally Deliver DNA Vaccines Encoding Measles Virus Hemagglutinin, Inducing Specific Immune Responses and Protection in Cotton Rats. J. Virol. 77: 5209-5217 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gundel, I., Weidinger, G., ter Meulen, V., Heesemann, J., Russmann, H., Niewiesk, S. (2003). Oral immunization with recombinant Yersinia enterocolitica expressing a measles virus CD4 T cell epitope protects against measles virus-induced encephalitis. J. Gen. Virol. 84: 775-779 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ezelle, H. J., Markovic, D., Barber, G. N. (2002). Generation of Hepatitis C Virus-Like Particles by Use of a Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Vector. J. Virol. 76: 12325-12334 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Buonocore, L., Blight, K. J., Rice, C. M., Rose, J. K. (2002). Characterization of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Recombinants That Express and Incorporate High Levels of Hepatitis C Virus Glycoproteins. J. Virol. 76: 6865-6872 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Haglund, K., Leiner, I., Kerksiek, K., Buonocore, L., Pamer, E., Rose, J. K. (2002). High-Level Primary CD8+ T-Cell Response to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag and Env Generated by Vaccination with Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Viruses. J. Virol. 76: 2730-2738 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kahn, J. S., Roberts, A., Weibel, C., Buonocore, L., Rose, J. K. (2001). Replication-Competent or Attenuated, Nonpropagating Vesicular Stomatitis Viruses Expressing Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Antigens Protect Mice against RSV Challenge. J. Virol. 75: 11079-11087 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Skiadopoulos, M. H., Surman, S. R., Riggs, J. M., Collins, P. L., Murphy, B. R. (2001). A Chimeric Human-Bovine Parainfluenza Virus Type 3 Expressing Measles Virus Hemagglutinin Is Attenuated for Replication but Is Still Immunogenic in Rhesus Monkeys. J. Virol. 75: 10498-10504 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • von Messling, V., Zimmer, G., Herrler, G., Haas, L., Cattaneo, R. (2001). The Hemagglutinin of Canine Distemper Virus Determines Tropism and Cytopathogenicity. J. Virol. 75: 6418-6427 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rose, N. F., Roberts, A., Buonocore, L., Rose, J. K. (2000). Glycoprotein Exchange Vectors Based on Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Allow Effective Boosting and Generation of Neutralizing Antibodies to a Primary Isolate of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1. J. Virol. 74: 10903-10910 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlereth, B.
Right arrow Articles by Niewiesk, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlereth, B.
Right arrow Articles by Niewiesk, S.