Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, January 2000, p. 245-253, Vol. 74, No. 1
0022-538X/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification of a Short, Hydrophilic Amino Acid Sequence
Critical for Origin Recognition by the Bovine Papillomavirus E1
Protein
Annika
Gonzalez,
Cynthia
Bazaldua-Hernandez,
Michael
West,
Kelly
Woytek, and
Van G.
Wilson*
Department of Medical Microbiology and
Immunology, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center,
College Station, Texas 77843-1114
Received 7 June 1999/Accepted 4 October 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The E1 protein of bovine papillomavirus (BPV) is a site-specific
DNA binding protein that recognizes an 18-bp inverted repeat element in
the viral origin of replication. Sequence-specific DNA binding function
maps to the region from approximately amino acids 140 to 300, and
isolated polypeptides containing this region have been shown to retain
origin binding in vitro. To investigate the sequence and structural
characteristics which contribute to sequence-specific binding, the
primary sequence of this region was examined for conserved features.
The BPV E1 DNA binding domain (E1DBD) contains three major hydrophilic
domains (HR1, amino acids 179-191; HR2, amino acids 218 to 230; and
HR3, amino acids 241 to 252), of which only HR1 and HR3 are conserved
among papillomavirus E1 proteins. E1DBD proteins with lysine-to-alanine
mutations in HR1 and HR3 were severely impaired for DNA binding
function in vitro, while a lysine-to-alanine mutation in HR2 had a
minimal effect on DNA binding. Mutation of adjacent threonine residues in HR1 (T187 and T188) revealed that these two amino acids made drastically different contributions to DNA binding, with the T187 mutant being severely defective for origin binding whereas the T188
mutant was only mildly affected. Helical wheel projections of HR1
predict that T187 is on the same helical face as the critical lysine
residues whereas T188 is on the opposing face, which is consistent with
their respective contributions to DNA binding activity. To examine E1
binding in vivo, a yeast one-hybrid system was developed. Both
full-length E1 and the E1DBD polypeptide were capable of specifically
interacting with the E1 binding site in the context of the yeast
genome, and HR1 was also critical for this in vivo interaction.
Overall, our results indicate that HR1 is essential for origin binding
by E1, and the features and properties of HR1 suggest that it may be
part of a recognition sequence that mediates specific E1-nucleotide contacts.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Bovine papillomavirus (BPV)
replication requires only two viral proteins, E1 and E2
(40), with the rest of the replication machinery supplied by
the host cell (27). Both the E1 and E2 proteins are
site-specific DNA binding proteins which recognize sequences in the
viral origin of replication (1, 41, 42). The E2 binding site
(E2BS) is a 12-bp partial palindrome (1, 22), while E1 binds
to an 18-bp imperfect inverted repeat sequence (18, 19, 34).
In vitro, only the E1 protein is absolutely required, indicating that
the E2 protein does not supply a requisite replication function
(3, 5). Instead, E2 appears to act as an auxiliary factor
that interacts directly with E1 (24, 35, 44) and increases
binding site specificity (5, 32). Moreover, at low protein
concentrations, E2-E1 complexes facilitate loading and assembly of
additional E1 molecules on the origin to form the active initiation
complex (30). Initial binding of E1 induces distortion in
the origin DNA that is a likely prelude to origin unwinding, and this
distortion of the origin DNA is also enhanced by E2 (13,
30). Ultimately, a hexameric E1 complex with ATP-dependent
helicase activity is assembled (11, 33), though the precise
steps in the formation of this hexamer are undefined. E1 also interacts
with several host cell proteins, including DNA polymerase
and
replication protein A (4, 14, 29), and presumably recruits
these host replicative factors to the viral initiation complex.
The origin binding function of E1 is central to its role in viral
genomic replication. Truncation studies of the 605-amino-acid BPV E1
protein localized the DNA binding domain (DBD) of E1 (the E1DBD) to
approximately amino acids 140 to 300 (21, 31). Isolated polypeptides expressing this DBD region in the absence of other E1
sequences retain origin-specific binding activity (7, 21, 31,
39). Since the ATP binding site and helicase activity map to the
C-terminal portion of E1 and are not present in the DBD, neither of
these activities is required for origin recognition (39).
The E1DBD does retain the ability to interact with E2 protein
(21), and this interaction cooperatively enhances origin binding (7). Clearly then, the E1DBD is a functional
subdomain with binding properties similar to those of full-length E1 protein.
In contrast to the E2DBD, which has been crystallized and studied in
detail (15-17), little is known about the structure of the
E1DBD or the sequences which mediate origin binding. A previous study
identified a pair of conserved, heptad repeats of hydrophobic residues
from amino acids 249 to 282 (39). A triple mutant with substitutions at two of the conserved hydrophobic residues failed to
bind origin DNA, consistent with a role for these elements in origin
binding. However, the third mutation in this triple mutant changed a
conserved proline located between the heptads to an alanine. The
proline-to-alanine substitution could likely have a significant effect
on protein folding in this region and makes interpretation of the role
of the heptad repeats uncertain. Two additional mutants with basic
residue-to-alanine substitutions in the region adjacent to the
N-terminal side of the first heptad (amino acids 241 to 247) were both
severely defective for origin binding, demonstrating that this
hydrophilic region was critical for E1-DNA interaction. One additional
mutation at a distal site, an arginine 180-to-alanine substitution,
reduced E1 DNA binding activity to less than 1% of the wild-type (WT)
E1 level, though this region was not investigated further
(39). In the present study, the hydrophilic region that
includes E1 amino acid 180 was investigated in detail and was shown to
be critical for site-specific DNA binding both in vitro and in vivo.
Features of this region suggest that it may be part of a recognition
sequence that mediates specific contact with nucleotides in the E1BS.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids and mutant construction.
The DNA fragment encoding
the WT E1DBD region from amino acids 121 to 311 (E1121-311) was amplified under standard conditions from a
cloned E1 gene, using Ultma DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer) and
primers E1AA121 (5'-GAGCTGAATTCGCTAACCGTGTTCTTACGCCC-3') and E1AA311 (5'-CGTCCGTCGACCGCGAATTTCTCGGTCTGCAAGCT-3').
The amplified product was ligated directly to pCRBLUNT
(Invitrogen) and transformed into TOP10 cells (Invitrogen). A
recombinant clone was identified, and the E1DBD fragment was
excised from purified plasmid DNA by EcoRI digestion. The
E1DBD fragment was ligated to pGEX-5X-1 DNA (Pharmacia Biotech) that
had been linearized by EcoRI digestion and was transformed
into TOP10F' (Invitrogen) cells. Clones were screened for the
presence of the insert fragment, and a recombinant clone with the
correctly oriented fragment was identified. The entire sequence of the
insert fragment was determined and found to be the correct, WT sequence
and to be in frame with the glutathione S-transferase (GST)
coding region. This clone, designated pGEX-E1DBD, was used for the
production of all point mutants. Ten individual point mutations were
constructed in pGEX-E1DBD by site-directed mutagenesis using mutagenic
oligonucleotides and a QuikChange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) as
specified by the manufacturer. Mutant clones were identified by direct
DNA sequencing of plasmid minipreparations; for each clone, only the
desired mutation was present in the E1DBD coding region.
For in vivo expression in yeast, E1 and the E1DBD were produced as
fusions with the GAL4 activation domain (AD), using the pGAD424 vector
(Clontech). For full-length E1, the 2,185-bp
NruI-to-FspI fragment encompassing the E1
coding region was isolated from pdBPV.1 DNA by gel purification.
BamHI linkers were added to the fragment, and it was ligated
to BamHI-digested pGAD424. Two clones were identified with
the insert in either the correct, forward orientation [pGAD-E1(F)] or
the reverse orientation [pGAD-E1(R)]. The vector-insert junctions were sequenced to confirm the insert orientation and to
ensure that the forward clone could produce the AD-E1 fusion protein.
For the E1DBD, the E1121-311 fragment was excised from the above pCRBLUNT clone by EcoRI digestion and ligated
to EcoRI-digested pGAD424. Again, forward (pGAD-E1DBD) and
reverse [pGAD-E1DBD(R)] clones were identified and confirmed by DNA
sequencing. The expression of both the AD-E1 and the AD-E1DBD proteins
from these vectors in yeast was confirmed by Western blotting (data not
shown). pGAD53m (Clontech) expresses the AD-p53 protein (mouse p53).
Purification of E1DBD proteins.
For expression of WT and
mutant E1DBD proteins, the respective pGEX-E1DBD plasmids were
transformed into Escherichia coli BL21. BL21 transformants
were grown to mid-log phase at 37°C in 2XYT medium with ampicillin
(50 µg/ml) and then induced by addition of
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside to 1 mM. After a 2-h
induction, cultures were packed in ice for 30 min and harvested by
centrifugation (15 min at 10,000 × g), and the pellets
were frozen at
20°C. For lysis and extraction, the cell pellets
were thawed on ice, resuspended in a minimal volume of cold GST-C
buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM
dithiothreitol [DTT], 10 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF],
10% glycerol), and incubated on ice for 60 to 120 min with lysozyme at
a final concentration of 0.1 mg/ml. After the lysozyme digestion, the
cell suspensions were subjected to two rounds of passage through a
prechilled French press cell at 16,000 lb/in2 followed by
addition of NP-40 to 0.1%. Alternatively, some preparations were lysed
by resuspension of the original cell pellets in B-Per reagent (Pierce)
followed by lysozyme treatment. To further solubilize the proteins
extracted by either procedure, the extracts were sonicated twice for
15 s at maximum power with a microtip in an Ultrasonics sonicator.
The extracts were clarified by centrifugation for 30 min at
20,000 × g, and the supernatants were rotated
overnight at 4°C with glutathione-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia).
Subsequently, the beads were collected at 4°C by centrifugation for 5 min at 500 × g and were washed twice with 10 ml of
cold GST-C, three times with 10 ml of cold GST-D (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH
8.0], 200 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, 10 mM PMSF, 10% glycerol),
three times with 10 ml of cold GST-E (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1.0 M
NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, 10 mM PMSF, 10% glycerol), and twice with 10 ml of cold GST-C. The washed beads were incubated for 10 min at room
temperature in 500 µl of GST-C with 10 mM reduced glutathione followed by centrifugation for 1 min in a microcentrifuge. The supernatant containing the GST-E1DBD fusions was collected, adjusted to
a final concentration of 50% glycerol, and stored at
20°C. Protein
concentration was determined by a Bradford assay (6), and
purity was assessed by scanning sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS)-polyacrylamide gels with an IS1000 digital imaging system
(Innotech Corp.). For removal of the GST moiety, factor Xa cleavage was
performed as specified by Pharmacia. However, GST-E1DBD was found to be
much more stable in gel shift assays than the free E1DBD, and so the fusion proteins was used for all the studies reported here. Comparison of the properties of GST-E1DBD and free E1DBD will be reported elsewhere.
Probes.
Two double-stranded oligonucleotide substrates,
E1BS1-4 and E1BS0, were prepared for the gel mobility shift assay.
E1BS1-4 corresponds to 50 bp of BPV sequence from nucleotides 7926 to 29 which includes the 18-bp E1BS and the low-affinity E2BS12. E1BS0 is
a 60-bp substrate corresponding to BPV sequences 7916 to 29 with the
18-bp E1BS replaced by an unrelated 18-bp palindromic sequence. Each of
these double-stranded oligonucleotides was prepared by incubating equal
molar amounts of the following complementary single-stranded
oligonucleotides at 70°C for 5 min and then slow cooling to room
temperature: E1BS1-4U
(5'-TAATTGTTGTTAACAATAATCACACCATCACCGTTTTTTC-3') plus
E1BS1-4L (5'-TGATGGTGTGATTATTGTTAACAACAATTATTCACTGGGA-3'); and E1BS0U (5'-TATCACACCGACTGTGAGCACACACCATCACCGTTTTTTC-3')
plus E1BS0L
(5'-TGCTCACAGTCGGTGTGATATTCACTGGGAAAAAATACAT-3'). The
hybridized oligonucleotides have 5' overhangs which were subsequently
radiolabeled and made blunt by incubating 1 pmol of substrate in 12.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), 5 mM MgCl2, 10 µM DTT, 32 µM each
dATP, dGTP, and dTTP, 0.33 µM [
-32P]dCTP, and 2 U of
Klenow polymerase for 60 min at 25°C followed by addition of 32 µM
dCTP and incubation for another 10 min. Full-length, radiolabeled,
double-stranded substrates were purified by excision and elution from
12% nondenaturing Tris-borate-EDTA gels into gel shift assay buffer
(20 mM potassium phosphate [pH 7.0], 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1%
NP-40, 10% glycerol).
Gel mobility shift assay.
Mobility shift assays were
performed basically as described by Chen and Stenlund (7).
Purified WT or mutant GST-E1DBD proteins were incubated with 2.5 fmol
of radiolabeled substrate and 20 ng of pUC18 DNA in 10-µl reaction
mixtures consisting of gel shift assay buffer supplemented to a final
concentration of 5 mM DTT and 0.07% bovine serum albumin. Samples were
incubated for 30 min at 25°C and then loaded onto 8% polyacrylamide
gels in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA buffer. The 10× Tris-borate stock used
for both the gel and the tank buffer was adjusted to pH 7.5, as this pH provided better resolution of protein-DNA complexes. Gels were electrophoresed at 100 V for 4 to 5 h. Dried gels were visualized and quantitated with a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager.
Yeast one-hybrid system.
Plasmid p53BLUE (Clontech) contains
three tandem copies of the p53 binding site (p53BS) inserted into a
minimal yeast promoter (PCYC1) upstream of
the lacZ gene in plasmid pLacZi. A similar E1 reporter
plasmid was constructed by cloning a double-stranded oligonucleotide
consisting of three tandem copies of the 18-bp E1BS into the
PCYC1 region of pLacZi. The sequence of the
resultant recombinant, designated pLacZi-E1BST, was confirmed by DNA
sequencing. Purified p53BLUE and pLacZi-E1BST DNAs were linearized by
NcoI digestion to promote vector integration and transfected
into Saccharomyces cerevisiae YM4271 by the polyethylene glycol-lithium acetate procedure (12). Transformants were
selected on minimal medium lacking uracil and were passaged several
times on this medium to eliminate cells harboring unintegrated vector. The resulting yeast reporter strains containing either the integrated p53BS promoter-lacZ gene or the E1BST
promoter-lacZ gene were designated p53BS-LACZ and
E1BST-LACZ, respectively. Purified plasmid DNAs encoding the various
GAL4 AD fusions were transfected into both of the reporter strains, and
transformants were isolated on minimal medium lacking uracil and leucine.
Western blots.
Whole-cell extracts were prepared from the
yeast transformants by freeze-thawing cell pellets three times and then
boiling them for 10 min in cracking buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8],
0.1 mM EDTA, 8 M urea, 5% SDS, 0.04% bromophenol blue, 0.88%
-mercaptoethanol, 0.077% PMSF). Equivalent amounts of protein from
each sample were electrophoresed on a 12% polyacrylamide gel,
and the proteins were electrophoretically transferred to a Protran
nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell) as previously described
(21). The blots were probed with a 1/1,000 dilution of
anti-GAL4 AD (Upstate Biotechnology) and visualized by enhanced
chemiluminescence with Super Signal (Pierce).
-Galactosidase assays.
Two procedure were used for
assessing the interaction of AD fusion protein with the E1BST or p53
promoter in the yeast reporter strains, a colony lift filter assay, and
a liquid culture CPRG (chlorophenol
red-
-D-galactopyranoside) assay. Both assays were performed as described in the Clontech Yeast Protocols
Handbook. A brief description of each assay follows.
(i) Colony-lift filter assay.
Transformants were inoculated
onto an appropriate selective medium and grown for 2 to 3 days at
30°C until colonies were 1 to 2 mm in diameter. Colonies were replica
lifted onto Whatman filter paper and lysed by freezing in liquid
nitrogen followed by a thaw at room temperature. Subsequently the
filter was wetted by incubation on top of a second filter soaked in Z
buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate [pH 7.0], 10 mM KCl, 1 mM
MgSO4, 0.27%
-mercaptoethanol) with 330 µg of
X-Gal
(5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside) per ml. Development of blue color was monitored visually, and the
filter was photographed with an IS1000 digital imaging system (Innotech).
(ii) Liquid culture CRPG assay.
Overnight cultures were
grown in the appropriate selective medium for each transformant, and
the optical density at 600 nm was recorded for later normalization.
Cultures (1.5 ml) were harvested by centrifugation in microcentrifuge
tubes, washed one time with buffer 1 (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.3], 150 mM
NaCl, 0.065% L-aspartate, 1% bovine serum albumin, 0.05%
Tween 20), and resuspended in 300 µl of buffer 1. Cells were lysed by
three cycles of alternating between liquid nitrogen and a 37°C water
bath. Aliquots of 100 µl of lysed cells were mixed with 700 µl of
buffer 1 containing 2.23 mM CPRG and vortexed thoroughly. Samples were
incubated at room temperature until visible color formation was
observed or for up to 3 h. After color formation, or at 3 h
if no color was observed, the reactions were stopped by addition of 500 µl of 3 mM ZnCl2. Cell debris was removed by
centrifugation for 1 min in a microcentrifuge, the optical density at
578 nm of the supernatants was read for each sample, and the
-galactosidase units were calculated. All samples were assayed in
triplicate, and the values reported are the average.
 |
RESULTS |
Conservation of hydrophilic domains in the E1DBD.
We
previously showed that the origin-specific DNA binding activity of the
BPV E1 protein resides in the E1121-311 fragment and that
this isolated polypeptide retained site-specific recognition function
(21). To initiate a functional study of the E1DBD, the
primary sequence was examined for physical features. Hydropathy plots
of the BPV E1DBD were prepared by using six different algorithms. All
six plots were very similar (data not shown) and revealed three
subregions with a high degree of intrinsic hydrophilicity, possibly
reflecting accessible sequences capable of interacting with origin
nucleotides. In the Kyte-Doolittle plot shown in Fig. 1A, the hydrophilic regions are
designated HR1, HR2, and HR3. Given the cross-species functional
conservation of E1 proteins (2, 8, 38) and the sequence
conservation of the E1BS among different papillomaviruses
(18), it was likely that subregions of the E1DBD critical
for origin interaction would show some conservation of overall
properties and specific primary amino acid sequence. Consequently,
similar examination of hydropathy plots was conducted for the predicted
DBDs of eight human papillomavirus (HPV) E1 proteins (Table
1). All eight HPV E1 proteins had
significant hydrophilic character in the regions corresponding to HR1
and HR3 of BPV E1, while only three of the eight were hydrophilic in
the region corresponding to HR2. This conservation of HR1 and HR3
implicates them both as potentially important for E1 DNA function, while HR2 may be of lesser or no significance. Consistent with this
prediction, amino acids within HR3 have already been shown to be
critical for origin binding by BPV E1 (39). HR1 has not been
thoroughly investigated, although mutation of amino acid 180 at the
N-terminal boundary of HR1 dramatically reduced the origin binding
ability of E1 in an earlier study (39).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Sequence features of the E1DBD. (A) Kyte-Doolittle
hydropathy plot of the BPV E1121-311 protein. There are
three major hydrophilic peaks, designated HR1, HR2, and HR3. HR1 and
HR3 are conserved among papillomavirus E1 proteins, and HR2 is
nonconserved. Mutations previously shown to impair E1 DNA binding
(39) are marked with asterisks. Numbered vertical arrows
indicate the amino acid number of lysine residues mutated to alanine in
this study. (B) Amino acid conservation and the relative hydrophilicity
of the flanking sequence regions for each lysine analyzed.
|
|
Charge-to-alanine mutations identify critical amino acids for E1DBD
origin recognition function.
To investigate the contribution of
HR1 to origin binding, lysine-to-alanine mutations were constructed at
conserved residues 183 and 186 in the context of the isolated E1DBD
polypeptide (Fig. 1B). Additional lysine-to-alanine mutations were
created elsewhere in the DBD at both conserved and nonconserved
residues located in sequence contexts of varying hydrophilicity. Each
mutant E1DBD protein was expressed as a GST fusion and affinity
purified to greater than 90% homogeneity (Fig.
2). The purified proteins were assayed
for in vitro DNA binding activity using a gel shift assay with short
(50- or 60-bp) double-stranded oligonucleotides as the substrates (Fig.
3). Oligonucleotides of this length were previously shown to be sufficient for efficient binding of E1 protein
(18). The binding test substrate contained the authentic BPV
origin sequence consisting of the AT-rich element, the E1BS, and the
low-affinity E2BS12, while the control substrate was identical except
that the 18-bp E1BS was replaced with an unrelated palindromic sequence.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Analysis of purified WT and mutant GST-E1DBD proteins.
Each protein was expressed and purified on glutathione-Sepharose as
described in Materials and Methods; 100 ng of each protein was
electrophoresed on an SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel and then stained
with Coomassie blue. The molecular masses of the marker proteins (lane
M) are indicated in kilodaltons.
|
|

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
DNA binding by WT and mutant E1DBD proteins. (A) Gel
mobility shift assays of WT and mutant E1DBD proteins. Each protein was
assayed at 37.5 and 150 ng. Lanes marked had no E1DBD added to
the reaction and show the input unbound substrate; lanes 1, 2, 11, and
12 contain reactions using the E1BS0 substrate that lacks the E1BS,
while all the other lanes have the complete origin substrate, E1BS1-4.
(B) Quantitation of the binding results from panel A. The total amount
of bound oligonucleotide was determined for the 37.5- and 150-ng
samples with a PhosphorImager. The value for WT E1DBD was set as 100%,
and the others are expressed relative to this value. Shown are the
average results for the 150-ng samples from two experiments; error bars
for the WT and 279A samples are too small to be seen. The relative
results were similar with the 37.5-ng samples (not shown).
|
|
At low concentrations of WT E1DBD, a single predominant E1-DNA complex
was observed with the origin substrate, while at higher concentrations
additional retarded complexes were formed (Fig. 3, lanes 3, 4, 14, and 15). Mixing studies with GST-E1DBD and a
GST-E11-311 protein indicate that the
predominant complex is a monomer of GST-E1DBD bound to the
substrate (C. Bazaldua-Hernandez and V. G. Wilson,
unpublished results). This suggests that the more slowly
migrating complexes represent bound dimers and trimers of
GST-E1DBD; more detailed studies of the various WT E1DBD-DNA complexes will be presented elsewhere. Under the assay conditions used,
there was no binding of WT E1DBD to the control substrate (lanes 1, 2, and 12), demonstrating the specificity of the E1DBD-DNA complexes. Both
the K183A and K186A mutations in HR1 severely impaired origin binding
function to less than 5% of WT activity (lanes 7 to 10). The K241A
mutation in HR3 showed a similar reduction in DNA binding (lanes 18 and
19), and its impairment was comparable to that previously observed by
Thorner et al. for a K241A/R243A double mutant in the context of
full-length E1 (39). In contrast, a lysine-to-alanine
mutation at position 222 in the nonconserved HR2 had only a minimal
effect on overall DNA binding activity. The K222A mutant exhibited the
same qualitative pattern of protein-DNA complexes and showed only a 10 to 20% reduction in amount of complexes formed at the higher protein
concentration (lanes 16 and 17). Similarly, nonconserved lysine K157
appeared to make no significant contribution to origin binding since
the K157A mutant E1DBD protein bound the origin substrate as well as
the WT protein, both qualitatively and quantitatively (lanes 5 and 6).
Interestingly, E1DBD proteins with alanine mutations at conserved
lysines 267 or 279 showed only modest reduction in binding activity
(lanes 20 to 23), suggesting that these lysines may be conserved for
some function(s) besides direct DNA binding. Overall, the in vitro
binding results are consistent with HR1 and HR3 being critical motifs
for E1 DNA binding activity.
Both full-length E1 and the E1DBD exhibit site-specific DNA
binding activity in vivo.
The above results, as well as
previously published reports of E1 DNA binding, were all in vitro
studies of E1-DNA interactions. Little is known about the interaction
of the E1 protein with its binding site in an in vivo context where the
host cell milieu might influence E1 binding activity. In vivo transient
replication assays are sensitive to E1 binding ability but are not
useful for direct comparison of mutant binding activities since each mutation may also affect other E1 replication functions. Consequently, to evaluate the DNA binding activity of E1 protein in vivo more directly, we developed a yeast one-hybrid assay. An E1 reporter strain,
designated E1BST-LACZ, was constructed with three tandem copies of the
18-bp E1BS integrated into the yeast genome within a minimal promoter
sequence adjacent to a lacZ gene. The control strain had a
similar organization except that it contained three copies of a p53BS
rather than the E1BS and was designated p53BS-LACZ. Both the reporter
and control strains were transfected with a series of plasmids
expressing various fusions between the GAL4 AD and either p53 or E1.
Transformants were isolated and replated on selective medium, and the
colonies were assayed for
-galactosidase activity by an X-Gal
overlay procedure (Fig. 4). Both the
E1BST-LACZ and the p53BS-LACZ reporter strains expressing the AD
protein alone produced no detectable
-galactosidase, and the
colonies remained white even after overnight incubation with X-Gal. The absence of
-galactosidase activity demonstrated the extremely low
endogenous expression from either the E1BS promoter or the p53BS
promoter and confirmed that the AD alone showed no interaction with
these promoter elements.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Yeast one-hybrid analysis of E1 DNA binding in vivo. Six
GAL4AD vectors expressing the AD alone or as a fusion with E1
[AD-E1(F), forward clone; AD-E1(R), reverse clone], E1DBD
[AD-E1DBD, forward clone; AD-E1DBD(R), reverse clone], or p53
(AD-p53) were transfected into both the E1BST-LACZ and p53BS-LACZ
reporter strains. Individual transformants were regrown on selective
medium for 48 h and photographed with an IS1000 digital imaging
system (Colonies). The colonies themselves are actually white but
appear darkish in the photograph. The colonies were replica transferred
to filter paper and tested for -galactosidase activity with the
colony lift filter assay as described in Materials and Methods. The
results of the -galactosidase ( -gal) assay are shown in the right
two columns. Three colonies turned blue; these three
-galactosidase-positive clones appear dark in the photo, while the
white colonies are not visible.
|
|
In contrast to the AD alone, expression of the AD-p53 fusion and the
AD-E1 fusion resulted in
-galactosidase production in their
respective binding site promoter strains. In each case, dark blue color
was observed within 1 h after incubation with X-Gal. Neither
fusion protein activated transcription from the promoter lacking its
cognate binding site, demonstrating the specificity of these
interactions. Furthermore, a clone with the E1 gene in the reverse
orientation failed to activate transcription of either strain. This
control confirmed that the production of
-galactosidase seen with
the AD-E1 fusion in the E1BST-LACZ strain required expression of the E1
protein and was not due to some intrinsic property of the expression
vector sequences. Therefore, full-length E1 protein is capable of
specifically recognizing and binding to its binding site in vivo in a
yeast genomic background.
Since the full-length E1 protein showed specific in vivo binding
activity, we tested whether the in vitro-defined DBD also functioned in
vivo. Like full-length E1, the AD-E1DBD fusion specifically activated
the E1BS-containing promoter but not the p53BS promoter. Again, the
reverse E1DBD clone failed to activate either promoter. These results
demonstrate that amino acids 121 to 311 constitute a functional DBD
capable of specific in vivo recognition of the E1BS in the nuclear
environment. Interestingly, the E1DBD fusion was two- to threefold more
active than the full-length E1 fusion in quantitative
-galactosidase
assays when data were normalized for fusion protein expression levels
(Bazaldua-Hernandez and Wilson, unpublished results). This discrepancy
could be the result of trivial differences relating to folding or
aggregation of the individual fusion proteins, or it might reflect an
actual difference in activity due to biologically relevant processes
such as posttranslational modification. Further studies are in progress
to address the basis of our observation.
HR1 is critical for E1 DNA binding in vivo.
Our in vitro
results with the E1DBD identified sequences in HR1 as critical for
E1-E1BS interaction. To examine the importance of this region in vivo,
the E1 K183A mutation was constructed in the AD-E1DBD fusion for
analysis in the one-hybrid system. As a control, the K157A mutation,
which had no effect on E1DBD binding in vitro, was also transferred to
the AD-E1DBD protein. Each mutant vector was transfected into both the
E1BST-LACZ and p53BS-LACZ strains, and 10 transformants from each set
were tested for
-galactosidase activity (Fig.
5A). All 10 transformants expressing AD-E1DBDK157A in the E1BST-LACZ strain were
-galactosidase positive within 1 h; however, the
AD-E1DBDK183A transformants remained white for up to 8 h. After overnight incubation, the AD-E1DBDK183A transformants exhibited faint blue color indicative of very low level of
-galactosidase expression. Neither the
AD-E1DBDK157A nor the AD-E1DBDK183A
transformants produced any detectable
-galactosidase activity
in the p53BS-LACZ strain, even after overnight incubation.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
In vivo activity of E1DBD mutants. (A) The E1
K157A and K183A mutations were constructed in the AD-E1DBD background
and transfected into both the E1BST-LACZ and p53BS-LACZ reporter
strains. Ten transformants from each transfection were picked
onto a grid plate (1-10, E1DBDK157A/E1BST-LACZ; 11-20, E1DBDK157A/p53BS-LACZ; 21-30, E1DBDK183A/E1BST-LACZ; 31-40, E1DBDK183A/p53BS-LACZ) and assayed for -galactosidase
activity as in Fig. 4. -Galactosidase-positive, blue colonies (1-10)
appear dark in this photo, while the negative, white colonies (11-40)
are not visible. (B) Quantitative -galactosidase assay for
representative transformants from panel A. The reporter strains,
E1BST-LACZ (designated E1BST) and p53BS-LACZ (designated p53BS),
expressing either AD-E1DBDK175A (K157A bars),
AD-E1DBDK183A (K183A bars), or the WT AD-E1DBD fusion (WT
bars) were grown in liquid medium and assayed for -galactosidase
activity as described in Materials and Methods. (C) Western blot of the
mutant transformants used in panel B. Cell extracts were prepared,
electrophoresed on an SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel, transferred, and
probed with an anti-AD serum. Lane 1 is a control extract from the
E1BST-LACZ strain without an AD expression vector; lanes 2 to 5 are the
four transformants of the two reporter strains with the E1DBD K157A or
K183A mutations as indicated. The arrow marks the AD-E1DBD fusion
protein.
|
|
To more accurately compare the binding activities of the K157A and
K183A mutants, individual transformants were grown in liquid culture
and tested by a quantitative spectrophotometric assay for
-galactosidase (Fig. 5B). Consistent with both the plate assay and
in vitro results, the K157A mutant exhibited WT levels of
-galactosidase activity whereas the level for the K183A mutant was
reduced approximately 25-fold. No activity was detected with either
mutant in the p53BS-LACZ strain. The dramatically decreased binding
activity of the K183A mutant was not due to reduced expression of the
AD-E1DBD protein, as comparable amounts of the fusions were observed by
Western blotting in each of the four transformants tested (Fig. 5C).
Orientation of the critical residues in HR1.
The in vitro and
in vivo studies implicated HR1 as critical for DNA binding activity of
the BPV E1 protein. Projection of this region of E1 in a helical wheel
format revealed an extremely hydrophilic face which included all three
of the residues whose mutation abolished site-specific DNA binding:
K180, K183, and K186 (Fig. 6). All three
of these residues also are highly conserved in E1 proteins among all
papillomavirus groups, which supports a critical functional role for
this region. To further evaluate the possible importance of this
hydrophilic surface, additional mutations were constructed. In the
helical projection, threonine 187 lies on the hydrophilic face between
critical residues R180 and K183, while threonine 188 is on the opposing
half of the helix. Thus, these two threonines which are adjacent in the
primary sequence are potentially located in very different environments
with respect to possible DNA interaction. Supporting this possible
functional difference, threonine at the position corresponding to amino
acid 187 in BPV E1 is absolutely conserved whereas the 188 position is
variable. However, there are also conserved residues on the opposing
face such as tryptophan 192 and aspartic acid 185. To determine if a
conserved residue on this opposing face contributes significantly to
DNA binding activity, D185 was chosen for analysis since it is located
within the short stretch of critical primary sequence defined by
inactivating mutations (residues 180 to 186) yet projects to the
opposite face from these essential residues. Each of these three
residues, D185, T187, and T188, was mutated to an alanine in the
context of the E1DBD protein and then tested for in vitro DNA binding
activity (Fig. 7). Mutation of T187
completely abolished DNA binding activity (<2% of the WT level),
while the nonconserved T188 mutation showed only a modest 20 to 40%
reduction in origin binding. The D185A mutant was more impaired than
the T188 mutant but still exhibited 30 to 50% of WT binding activity in repeated trials, and it was substantially more active than the T187A
mutant. These result are consistent with the helical wheel prediction
that the amino acids critical for DNA binding in HR1 are located on a
common surface. The greater impact of the D185A mutation on binding
than of the T188A mutation may reflect the effect of charge loss on
overall structure in this region.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Helical projection and conservation of amino acids in
HR1. Amino acids 176 to 193 of BPV E1 protein are displayed on the left
in a helical wheel projection. The horizontal line divides the helix
into two halves: an upper, highly basic, hydrophilic face, and a lower,
more hydrophobic face. Lysine and arginine residues shown to be
critical for DNA binding activity are marked with asterisks. The arrows
indicate the two consecutive threonines and the aspartic acid that are
functionally evaluated in Fig. 7. On the right is a comparison of the
BPV E1 sequence from amino acids 176 to 193 aligned with the
corresponding regions from the papillomavirus groups A to E and
unclassified. The sequence shown for each papillomavirus group is the
consensus sequence for these BPV E1-equivalent regions. Numbered
residues refer to the BPV E1 amino acid number. Boxes indicate residues
that are absolutely conserved with the exception of positions 183 and
185, which diverge in the group C and group B sequences,
respectively.
|
|

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
DNA binding activity of aspartic acid 185, threonine
187, and threonine 188 mutants. (A) D185, T187A, and T188A mutations
were constructed into the E1DBD protein. Purified mutant and WT
proteins were tested for origin binding activity by the mobility shift
assay described in the legend to Fig. 3 with the complete origin
oligonucleotide, E1BS1-4, as the substrate. The series of three lanes
for each sample contained 20, 40, and 80 ng of protein. The lane
marked lacked E1DBD in the binding reaction. (B) The total of
bound complexes for each sample in panel A was quantitated with a
PhosphorImager and plotted as a function of protein amount.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Papillomavirus E1 proteins are absolutely critical for
initiation of viral DNA replication, serving as both origin recognition factors and helicases (36, 39, 41, 42, 44, 45). While several functional domains of E1 proteins have been defined (21, 25, 45), little is known about the actual three-dimensional structure of these proteins. Definition of the primary, secondary, and
tertiary structures required for various biochemical activities and
molecular interactions will be essential for understanding how
initiation complexes assemble on the viral origin. Previously we showed
that the DBD of BPV E1 is functional as an isolated polypeptide of
approximately 190 amino acids (21). The E1DBD protein
specifically recognizes the E1BS sequence in origin DNA fragments in
vitro and also interacts with the viral E2 protein (21). A
subsequent study with a slightly smaller E1DBD confirmed these
properties and also demonstrated cooperative origin binding between the
E1DBD and both full-length E2 and the E2DBD (7). The ability
of the isolated E1DBD to function in origin recognition and E2
interaction in the same fashion as full-length E1 enables studies
of E1-DNA interactions to be performed with this smaller molecule that
is more easily expressed, purified, and analyzed.
In this study we examined predicted HRs of the E1DBD as potential
molecular surface tracts that might be directly involved in DNA
contact. The BPV E1DBD has three major HRs, two of which, HR1 (BPV E1
amino acids 179 to 191) and HR3 (amino acids 241 to 252), are well
conserved among papillomavirus E1 proteins. A previous mutational
analysis showed that conserved basic residues in HR3 are critical for
E1 DNA binding activity (39), and we now demonstrate a
similar requirement for basic residues in HR1. In contrast, mutation of
a lysine residue in nonconserved HR2 caused only a small decrease in
origin binding activity, indicating that this hydrophilic region is not
as important for E1-DNA interaction. Inspection of the HR1 sequence
suggested that all three basic residues known to be required for DNA
binding could be physically juxtaposed on the helical face. Consistent
with this prediction, mutation of T187 located on the same predicted
face as the basic residues produced an E1DBD protein severely impaired
for sequence-specific DNA binding in vitro. In contrast, the adjacent
T188 residue is predicted to be on the opposing helical face, and its
mutation had a relatively small effect on DNA binding activity.
Likewise, mutation of a conserved residue on the same face as T188,
D185, also resulted in a protein that was substantially more active than the T187A mutant. From these results, residue D185 is clearly not
as critical for DNA binding as those on the hydrophilic helical face,
though its high conservation suggests that it may function in some
other E1 activity. While the actual secondary structure of HR1 is
unknown, these mutational results support the existence of a
hydrophilic face including at least four residues critical for E1 DNA
binding function: R180, K183, K186, and T187.
In the absence of crystallographic or spectroscopic data on the
structure of E1, it is useful to compare E1 with the simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen, with which it shares sequence and functional
homology (9, 26). Even though these two proteins recognize completely different nucleotide sequences, there are some intriguing parallels to their DBDs (Fig.
8). First, their DBDs are of similar
size, and each comprises a relatively small portion of the full-length
protein: approximately 130 amino acids out of 708 for SV40 T antigen
(20, 28) versus approximately 170 out of 605 for E1 (7,
21). (Note that the boundaries for the E1DBD might actually be
even slightly smaller, as they have not been precisely defined.)
Furthermore, the two DBDs are located in similar positions in the
primary sequences, both beginning approximately 130 to 140 amino acids
from the N terminus. Mutational analysis of T antigen defined two sets
of critical amino acids for specific origin DNA binding, regions A
(residues 152 to 155) and B2 (residues 203 to 207) (37, 43).
Recent solution nuclear magnetic resonance studies on the isolated
T-antigen DBD indicate that the A and B2 elements form a
juxtaposed surface region that is the likely pentanucleotide
contact site (23). Our present results, combined with
those of Thorner et al. (39), identify two separate regions
necessary for E1 binding activity, HR1 and HR3. HR1 and HR3 are
separated by 49 intervening residues, compared to 47 amino acids
between T-antigen regions A and B2. These similarities in organization
of the DBDs for T antigen and E1 suggest that they could possess
related three-dimensional structures. As the T-antigen DBD structure
shares folding features with the DBDs of papillomavirus E2 proteins and
the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (10, 23), the E1DBD
may also be part of this superfamily.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Organization of the DBD regions of SV40 large T antigen
and BPV E1. The DBD domains of each protein are shaded, and the ATPase
regions are striped. Within the DBDs, the open rectangles labeled A and
B2 for T antigen and HR1 and HR2 for E1 indicate the locations of
sequence regions critical for DNA binding activity (see text for
details). The double-headed arrows between the open rectangles
represent the similar spacing of approximately 50 amino acids in both
proteins. Numbers refer to amino acids of each protein.
|
|
In addition to the in vitro DNA binding studies, a yeast one-hybrid
system was developed to assay E1-DNA interactions in vivo. The
full-length E1 protein exhibited site-specific DNA binding activity,
which is the first direct demonstration that the minimal 18-bp E1BS
sequence is sufficient to mediate E1-DNA interaction in the environment
of the host cell nucleus. Given the relatively modest sequence
specificity of E1 protein in vitro (32), the ability of E1
to locate and specifically bind the E1BS in the background of the yeast
genome, and in the absence of E2 protein, was initially somewhat
surprising. While the yeast genome is approximately 250-fold smaller
than mammalian genomes, the absolute ratio of total nuclear DNA to E1BS
DNA in the yeast strain is still at least a 1,000-fold larger than the
ratio of competitor DNA to E1BS DNA that will prevent E1 binding in
vitro (32). One factor that may facilitate the in vivo
binding of E1 is that the E1BS sequence in the E1BST-LACZ reporter
strain is a tandem triplet which should provide a higher local
concentration of the target sequences. A second factor is that much of
the vast excess of nuclear DNA may be inaccessible due to association
with histones and host cell regulatory proteins, while the promoter
region would naturally be more available. Because of this uncertainty
in the actual amount of functional competitor, it is difficult to make quantitative comparisons between the in vivo and in vitro binding results.
Like the full-length E1 protein, the E1DBD specifically interacted with
the E1BS in the one-hybrid system. These results confirmed that this in
vitro-defined DBD domain is also stable and functional in vivo. The
activity of the E1DBD in the yeast system allowed us to examine the
role of HR1 in vivo. Mutation of K183 in HR1 severely impaired binding
by the AD-E1DBD fusion, demonstrating that this region is as essential
in vivo as it was in vitro. Furthermore, mutations in HR1 are the most
frequently obtained clones when the one-hybrid system is used to screen
for randomly generated mutants lacking DNA binding activity (M. West,
unpublished data). In contrast to the K183A mutant, the K157A mutant
was equivalent to WT both in vitro and in vivo. The concordance between
the in vitro and in vivo binding activities indicates that the in vitro defects in binding are not simply the result of reduced stability of
the mutant proteins during extraction and purification and instead
represent intrinsic properties of the proteins. Overall, our results
strongly implicate HR1 as a critical element for origin-specific binding by E1 protein and, by analogy with SV40 T antigen, suggest that
the HR1 comprises at least part of the recognition sequence.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
Michael West and Kelly Woytek contributed equally to this work.
This work was supported by grant RPG-96-125-05-MBC from the American
Cancer Society.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, College Station, TX 77843-1114. Phone: (409) 845-5207. Fax: (409) 845-3479. E-mail: v-wilson{at}tamu.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Androphy, E. J.,
D. R. Lowy, and J. T. Schiller.
1987.
Bovine papillomavirus E2 transacting gene product binds to specific sites in papillomavirus DNA.
Nature
325:70-73[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Berg, M., and A. Stenlund.
1997.
Functional interactions between papillomavirus E1 and E2 proteins.
J. Virol.
71:3853-3863[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Bonne-Andrea, C.,
S. Santucci, and P. Clertant.
1995.
Bovine papillomavirus E1 protein can, by itself, efficiently drive multiple rounds of DNA synthesis in vitro.
J. Virol.
69:3201-3205[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Bonne-Andrea, C.,
S. Santucci,
P. Clertant, and F. Tillier.
1995.
Bovine papillomavirus E1 protein binds specifically DNA polymerase but not replication protein A.
J. Virol.
69:2341-2350[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Bonne-Andrea, C.,
F. Tillier,
G. D. McShan,
V. G. Wilson, and P. Clertant.
1997.
Bovine papillomavirus type 1 DNA replication: the transcriptional activator E2 acts in vitro as a specificity factor.
J. Virol.
71:6805-6815[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Bradford, M. M.
1976.
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal. Biochem.
72:248-254[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Chen, G., and A. Stenlund.
1998.
Characterization of the DNA-binding domain of the bovine papillomavirus replication initiator E1.
J. Virol.
72:2567-2576[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Chiang, C. M.,
M. Ustav,
A. Stenlund,
T. F. Ho,
T. R. Broker, and L. T. Chow.
1992.
Viral E1 and E2 proteins support replication of homologous and heterologous papillomaviral origins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:5799-5803[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Clertant, P., and I. Seif.
1984.
A common function for polyomavirus large-T and papillomavirus E1 proteins?
Nature
311:270-279.
|
| 10.
|
Edwards, A. M.,
A. Bochkarev, and L. Frappier.
1998.
Origin DNA-binding proteins.
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
8:49-53[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Fouts, E. T.,
X. Yu,
E. H. Egelman, and M. R. Botchan.
1999.
Biochemical and electron microscopic image analysis of the hexameric E1 helicase.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:4447-4458[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Gietz, D.,
A. Jean,
R. A. Woods, and R. H. Schiestl.
1992.
Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:1425[Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Gillette, T. G.,
M. Lusky, and J. A. Borowiec.
1994.
Induction of structural changes in the bovine papillomavirus type 1 origin of replication by the viral E1 and E2 proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:8846-8850[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Han, Y.,
Y.-M. Loo,
K. T. Militello, and T. Melendy.
1999.
Interactions of the papovavirus DNA replication initiator proteins, bovine papillomavirus type 1 E1 and simian virus 40 large T antigen, with human replication factor A.
J. Virol.
73:4899-4907[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Hegde, R. S.,
S. R. Grossman,
L. A. Laimins, and P. B. Sigler.
1992.
Crystal structure at 1.7 A of the bovine papillomavirus-1 E2 DNA-binding domain bound to its DNA target.
Nature
359:505-512[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Hegde, R. S.,
A. F. Wang,
S. S. Kim, and M. Schapira.
1998.
Subunit rearrangement accompanies sequence-specific DNA binding by the bovine papillomavirus-1 E2 protein.
J. Mol. Biol.
276:797-808[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Hines, C. S.,
C. Meghoo,
S. Shetty,
M. Biburger,
M. Brenowitz, and R. S. Hegde.
1998.
DNA structure and flexibility in the sequence-specific binding of papillomavirus E2 proteins.
J. Mol. Biol.
276:809-818[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Holt, S. E.,
G. Schuller, and V. G. Wilson.
1994.
DNA binding specificity of the bovine papillomavirus E1 protein is determined by sequences contained within an 18-base-pair inverted repeat element at the origin of replication.
J. Virol.
68:1094-1102[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Holt, S. E., and V. G. Wilson.
1995.
Mutational analysis of the 18-base-pair inverted repeat element at the bovine papillomavirus origin of replication: identification of critical sequences for E1 binding and in vivo replication.
J. Virol.
69:6525-6532[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Joo, W. S.,
X. Luo,
D. Denis,
H. Y. Kim,
G. J. Rainey,
C. Jones,
K. R. Sreekuman, and P. A. Bullock.
1997.
Purification of the simian virus 40 (SV40) T antigen DNA-binding domain and characterization of its interactions with the SV40 origin.
J. Virol.
71:3972-3985[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Leng, X.,
J. H. Ludesmeyers, and V. G. Wilson.
1997.
Isolation of an amino-terminal region of bovine papillomavirus type 1 E1 protein that retains origin binding and E2 interaction capacity.
J. Virol.
71:848-852[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Li, R.,
J. Knight,
G. Bream,
A. Stenlund, and M. Botchan.
1989.
Specific recognition nucleotides and their DNA context determine the affinity of E2 protein for 17 binding sites in the BPV-1 genome.
Genes Dev.
3:510-526[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Luo, X. L.,
D. G. Sanford,
P. A. Bullock, and W. W. Bachovchin.
1996.
Solution structure of the origin DNA-binding domain of SV40 T-antigen.
Nat. Struct. Biol.
3:1034-1039[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Lusky, M., and E. Fontane.
1991.
Formation of the complex of bovine papillomavirus E1 and E2 proteins is modulated by E2 phosphorylation and depends upon sequences within the carboxyl terminus of E1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:6363-6367[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
MacPherson, P.,
L. Thorner,
L. M. Parker, and M. Botchan.
1994.
The bovine papilloma virus E1 protein has ATPase activity essential to viral DNA replication and efficient transformation in cells.
Virology
204:403-408[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Mansky, K. C.,
A. Batiza, and P. F. Lambert.
1997.
Bovine papillomavirus type 1 E1 and simian virus 40 large T antigen share regions of sequence similarity required for multiple functions.
J. Virol.
71:7600-7608[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Melendy, T.,
J. Sedman, and A. Stenlund.
1995.
Cellular factors required for papillomavirus DNA replication.
J. Virol.
69:7857-7867[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Morrison, B.,
M. Kress,
G. Khoury, and G. Jay.
1983.
Simian virus 40 tumor antigen: isolation of the origin-specific DNA-binding domain.
J. Virol.
47:106-114[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Park, P.,
W. Copeland,
L. Yang,
T. Wang,
M. R. Botchan, and I. J. Mohr.
1994.
The cellular DNA polymerase alpha-primase is required for papillomavirus DNA replication and associates with the viral E1 helicase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:8700-8704[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Sanders, C. M., and A. Stenlund.
1998.
Recruitment and loading of the E1 initiator protein: an ATP-dependent process catalysed by a transcription factor.
EMBO J.
17:7044-7055[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Sarafi, T. R., and A. A. McBride.
1995.
Domains of the BPV-1 E1 replication protein required for origin-specific DNA binding and interaction with the E2 transactivator.
Virology
211:385-396[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Sedman, J., and A. Stenlund.
1995.
Co-operative interaction between the initiator E1 and the transcriptional activator E2 is required for replicator specific DNA replication of bovine papillomavirus in vivo and in vitro.
EMBO J.
14:6218-6228[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Sedman, J., and A. Stenlund.
1998.
The papillomavirus E1 protein forms a DNA-dependent hexameric complex with ATPase and DNA helicase activities.
J. Virol.
72:6893-6897[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Sedman, T.,
J. Sedman, and A. Stenlund.
1997.
Binding of the E1 and E2 proteins to the origin of replication of bovine papillomavirus.
J. Virol.
71:2887-2896[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Seo, Y.-S.,
F. Müller,
M. Lusky,
E. Gibbs,
H.-Y. Kim,
B. Phillips, and J. Hurwitz.
1993.
Bovine papilloma virus (BPV)-encoded E2 protein enhances binding of E1 protein to the BPV replication origin.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:2865-2869[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Seo, Y. S.,
F. Müller,
M. Lusky, and J. Hurwitz.
1993.
Bovine papilloma virus (BPV)-encoded E1 protein contains multiple activities required for BPV DNA replication.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:702-706[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Simmons, D. T.,
G. Loeber, and P. Tegtmeyer.
1990.
Four major sequence elements of simian virus 40 large T antigen coordinate its specific and nonspecific DNA binding.
J. Virol.
64:1973-1983[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Sverdrup, F., and S. A. Khan.
1994.
Replication of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNAs supported by the HPV type 18 E1 and E2 proteins.
J. Virol.
68:505-509[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Thorner, L. K.,
D. A. Lim, and M. R. Botchan.
1993.
DNA-binding domain of bovine papillomavirus type 1 E1 helicase: structural and functional aspects.
J. Virol.
67:6000-6014[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Ustav, M., and A. Stenlund.
1991.
Transient replication of BPV-1 requires two viral polypeptides encoded by the E1 and E2 open reading frames.
EMBO J.
10:449-457[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Ustav, M.,
E. Ustav,
P. Szymanski, and A. Stenlund.
1991.
Identification of the origin of replication of bovine papillomavirus and characterization of the viral origin recognition factor E1.
EMBO J.
10:4321-4329[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Wilson, V. G., and J. Ludes-Meyers.
1991.
A bovine papillomavirus E1-related protein binds specifically to bovine papillomavirus DNA.
J. Virol.
65:5314-5322[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Wun-Kim, K.,
R. Upson,
W. Young,
T. Melendy,
B. Stillman, and D. T. Simmons.
1993.
The DNA-binding domain of simian virus 40 tumor antigen has multiple functions.
J. Virol.
67:7608-7611[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Yang, L.,
R. Li,
I. J. Mohr,
R. Clark, and M. R. Botchan.
1991.
Activation of BPV-1 replication in vitro by the transcription factor E2.
Nature
353:628-632[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Yang, L.,
I. Mohr,
E. Fouts,
D. A. Lim,
M. Nohaile, and M. Botchan.
1993.
The E1 protein of bovine papilloma virus 1 is an ATP-dependent DNA helicase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:5086-5090[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, January 2000, p. 245-253, Vol. 74, No. 1
0022-538X/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Schuck, S., Stenlund, A.
(2006). Surface mutagenesis of the bovine papillomavirus e1 DNA binding domain reveals residues required for multiple functions related to DNA replication.. J. Virol.
80: 7491-7499
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Auster, A. S., Joshua-Tor, L.
(2004). The DNA-binding Domain of Human Papillomavirus Type 18 E1: CRYSTAL STRUCTURE, DIMERIZATION, AND DNA BINDING. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 3733-3742
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Titolo, S., Brault, K., Majewski, J., White, P. W., Archambault, J.
(2003). Characterization of the Minimal DNA Binding Domain of the Human Papillomavirus E1 Helicase: Fluorescence Anisotropy Studies and Characterization of a Dimerization-Defective Mutant Protein. J. Virol.
77: 5178-5191
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sheikh, S., Van Horn, G., Naqvi, A., Sheahan, L., Khan, S. A.
(2003). Purification and biochemical characterization of the E1 replication initiation protein of the cutaneous human papillomavirus type 1. J. Gen. Virol.
84: 277-285
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
West, M., Flanery, D., Woytek, K., Rangasamy, D., Wilson, V. G.
(2001). Functional Mapping of the DNA Binding Domain of Bovine Papillomavirus E1 Protein. J. Virol.
75: 11948-11960
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Woytek, K. J., Rangasamy, D., Bazaldua-Hernandez, C., West, M., Wilson, V. G.
(2001). Effects of mutations within two hydrophilic regions of the bovine papillomavirus type 1 E1 DNA-binding domain on E1-E2 interaction. J. Gen. Virol.
82: 2341-2351
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, G., Stenlund, A.
(2001). The E1 Initiator Recognizes Multiple Overlapping Sites in the Papillomavirus Origin of DNA Replication. J. Virol.
75: 292-302
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Titolo, S., Pelletier, A., Pulichino, A.-M., Brault, K., Wardrop, E., White, P. W., Cordingley, M. G., Archambault, J.
(2000). Identification of Domains of the Human Papillomavirus Type 11 E1 Helicase Involved in Oligomerization and Binding to the Viral Origin. J. Virol.
74: 7349-7361
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McShan, G. D., Wilson, V. G.
(2000). Contribution of bovine papillomavirus type 1 E1 protein residue 48 to replication function. J. Gen. Virol.
81: 1995-2004
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rangasamy, D., Wilson, V. G.
(2000). Bovine Papillomavirus E1 Protein Is Sumoylated by the Host Cell Ubc9 Protein. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 30487-30495
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rangasamy, D., Woytek, K., Khan, S. A., Wilson, V. G.
(2000). SUMO-1 Modification of Bovine Papillomavirus E1 Protein Is Required for Intranuclear Accumulation. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 37999-38004
[Abstract]
[Full Text]