Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, September 1999, p. 7474-7488, Vol. 73, No. 9
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Roles for the E4 orf6, orf3, and E1B 55-Kilodalton
Proteins in Cell Cycle-Independent Adenovirus Replication
Felicia D.
Goodrum and
David A.
Ornelles*
Molecular Genetics Program and Department of
Microbiology and Immunology, Wake Forest University School of
Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
27157-1064
Received 3 March 1999/Accepted 11 June 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Adenoviruses bearing lesions in the E1B 55-kDa protein (E1B 55-kDa)
gene are restricted by the cell cycle such that mutant virus growth is
most impaired in cells infected during G1 and least
restricted in cells infected during S phase (F. D. Goodrum and
D. A. Ornelles, J. Virol. 71:548-561, 1997). A similar
defect is reported here for E4 orf6-mutant viruses. An E4 orf3-mutant virus was not restricted for growth by the cell cycle. However, orf3
was required for enhanced growth of an E4 orf6-mutant virus in cells
infected during S phase. The cell cycle restriction may be linked to
virus-mediated mRNA transport because both E1B 55-kDa- and E4
orf6-mutant viruses are defective at regulating mRNA transport at late
times of infection. Accordingly, the cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of
late viral mRNA was reduced in G1 cells infected with the
mutant viruses compared to that in G1 cells infected with the wild-type virus. By contrast, this ratio was equivalent among cells
infected during S phase with the wild-type or mutant viruses. Furthermore, cells infected during S phase with the E1B 55-kDa- or E4
orf6-mutant viruses synthesized more late viral protein than did cells
infected during G1. However, the total amount of cytoplasmic late viral mRNA was greater in cells infected during G1 than in cells infected during S phase with either the
wild-type or mutant viruses, indicating that enhanced transport of
viral mRNA in cells infected during S phase cannot account for the
difference in yields in cells infected during S phase and in cells
infected during G1. Thus, additional factors affect the
cell cycle restriction. These results indicate that the E4 orf6 and
orf3 proteins, in addition to the E1B 55-kDa protein, may cooperate to
promote cell cycle-independent adenovirus growth.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) early
region 1B 55-kDa oncoprotein (E1B 55-kDa) functions to overcome
restrictions imposed on Ad growth by the cell cycle. In a randomly
cycling population of cells, the E1B 55-kDa-deletion virus
dl338 is restricted for growth such that it produces progeny
virus in only a fraction of infected cells. By contrast, the wild-type
virus produces progeny in nearly every infected cell. By analyzing
virus growth in synchronized populations of cells, we demonstrated that
the growth of the mutant virus was severely restricted in cells
infected during G1 whereas this restriction was partially
relieved in cells infected at the onset of S phase (26).
Furthermore, we have recently demonstrated that the cell cycle
restriction of the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus can be overcome by infecting
cells at 39°C (27). Because the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus is
not defective for viral DNA synthesis, we concluded that the role of
the E1B 55-kDa protein in promoting cell cycle-independent virus growth
resides in the late phase of viral replication (26).
At late times in the lytic infection, the E1B 55-kDa protein
facilitates the transport of late viral transcripts and a subset of
cellular transcripts while inhibiting the transport of most cellular
transcripts (4, 6, 42, 54, 76). The E1B 55-kDa protein
mediates viral and cellular mRNA transport in a complex with the early
region 4 (E4) orf6 protein and possibly primate cell-specific cellular
factors (10, 28, 30, 52). Consequently, viral mutants that
fail to express either the E1B 55-kDa or the E4 orf6 gene products are
defective for late viral gene expression and viral replication
(10, 14, 30, 54). The transport of several cellular messages
also requires the E1B 55-kDa protein late in Ad infection. These
include the heat shock protein 70,
-tubulin, and the
interferon-inducible Mx-A and 6-16 mRNAs. Transport of this subset of
cellular mRNAs correlates with activation of these genes late in
infection (47, 76). The ability of the E1B 55-kDa-mutant
virus to grow selectively in S-phase cells suggests the possibility
that a host cell factor compensates for the defect in virus-mediated
mRNA transport in the absence of the E1B 55-kDa protein
(26). Furthermore, other viral proteins that function in the
control of mRNA transport may also contribute to cell cycle-independent Ad growth.
The E4 orf6 and orf3 proteins have redundant and overlapping functions,
some of which are related to functions of the E1B 55-kDa protein
(10, 11, 14). Each of these E4 gene products independently
augments viral DNA synthesis, late viral gene expression, shutoff of
host protein synthesis, and production of progeny virus (10, 11,
30, 34). Both the orf3 and orf6 proteins stabilize late mRNAs in
the nucleus and thus enhance cytoplasmic accumulation of late Ad mRNAs
(10, 11, 65, 66). Furthermore, the orf3 and orf6 proteins
have been shown to affect mRNA splice site selection (50,
51).
The E1B 55-kDa and E4 orf6 proteins contribute to cellular
transformation in cooperation with E1A. Both the E1B 55-kDa and E4 orf6
proteins independently bind and inhibit transcriptional activation
mediated by the cellular growth suppressor, p53 (16, 37, 48, 77,
79). Inhibition of p53-mediated transactivation by the E1B 55-kDa
protein is required for transformation by both the weakly oncogenic
group C and the highly oncogenic group A Ads (37, 77, 80,
81). In cooperation with the E1A and E1B proteins, the E4 orf6
protein transforms baby rat kidney cells (48), converts the
nontumorigenic 293 cell line (29) into a tumorigenic cell
line in nude mice, and blocks p53-dependent apoptosis (46).
Furthermore, coexpression of the E1B 55-kDa and E4 orf6 proteins
decreases the stability of p53 in both transformed and productively
infected cells (46, 48, 60, 70). Despite the relationship
between these viral proteins and p53, the failure of the E1B
55-kDa-mutant virus to replicate independently of the cell cycle is not
due to a failure to abrogate p53 function (27, 64).
Recently, the E4 orf3 gene has been shown to cooperate with E1A, E1B,
and E4 orf6 in transforming nonpermissive primary rat cells
(49).
In this work, a series of mutant Ads were analyzed to determine if
other Ad gene products related to the E1B 55-kDa protein contributed to
cell cycle-independent virus growth. Mutant viruses that fail to
express the E4 orf6 protein were restricted by the cell cycle for
growth in a manner similar to that of the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus.
Therefore, the cell cycle restriction to virus growth may be linked to
the defect in virus-mediated mRNA transport shared by the E1B 55-kDa-
and E4 orf6-mutant viruses. Consistent with this suggestion, the
cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of late viral mRNA was reduced in
G1 cells infected with the E1B 55-kDa- or E4 orf6-mutant
viruses compared to that in G1 cells infected with the
wild-type virus. By contrast, this ratio, which serves as an indirect
measure of mRNA transport, was equivalent among cells infected during S
phase with the wild-type or mutant viruses. Additionally, cells
infected during S phase with the mutant viruses synthesized more late
viral protein than did cells infected during G1.
Nevertheless, comparison of total cytoplasmic levels of late transcripts suggested that the cell cycle restriction may not result
entirely from the inability to accumulate late viral transcripts in the
cytoplasm. Finally, the growth restriction of mutant viruses that
failed to express both the E4 orf3 and orf6 proteins could not be
overcome by infecting cells during S phase. These results demonstrate a
requirement for E4 orf3 and orf6, as well as the E1B 55-kDa protein, in
promoting cell cycle-independent virus growth.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture.
Cell culture media, cell culture supplements,
and serum were obtained from Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, Md.)
through the Tissue Culture Core Laboratory of the Comprehensive Cancer
Center of Wake Forest University. HeLa (ATCC CCL 2; American Type
Culture Collection, Manassas, Va.), 293 (29), and W162
(72) cells were maintained as monolayers in Dulbecco
modified Eagle's minimal essential medium (DMEM) supplemented with
10% newborn calf serum, 100 U of penicillin, and 100 µg of
streptomycin per ml. Cells were maintained in subconfluent adherent
cultures in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C by passaging
them twice weekly at a 1:10 dilution.
Synchronization of the HeLa cell cycle was achieved by a combination of
mitotic detachment and hydroxyurea block as previously described
(26). The degree of synchrony in each experiment was monitored by the DNA content of individual cells in parallel cell cultures by fluorescence-activated cell sorting as described previously (26). All flow cytometric analyses were conducted by the
Steroid Receptor Laboratory in cooperation with the Hematology Flow
Cytometry Laboratory of North Carolina Baptist Hospital.
Viruses.
The viruses used in these studies are described in
Table 1. The phenotypically wild-type Ad5
parent virus dl309 used in these studies lacks a portion of
the region encoding the E3 region that has been shown to be dispensable
for growth in tissue culture (35). The E1B-mutant virus
dl338 contains a 524-bp deletion in the 55-kDa protein
coding region (54). Mutant virus dl1520D contains
an 827-bp deletion in the region encoding the 55-kDa protein in
combination with a stop codon to ensure that a truncated 55-kDa product
cannot be expressed (5). The E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus
dl110 contains a 472-bp deletion between nucleotide sequence positions 2333 and 2804 of the E1B coding region (4). E1B
55-kDa mutants S380, R443, and A143 were constructed by making in-frame 12-bp insertions in the DNA sequence of the E1B gene (78).
The E1B 19-kDa-mutant virus dl337 contains a 146-bp deletion
in the E1B 19-kDa coding region between nucleotide sequence positions 1770 and 1960 (53).
E4-mutant virus dl355 contains a 14-bp deletion to disrupt
orf6 in the wild-type dl309 background (30). The
E4 mutation in dl355* is the same as that in
dl355; however, the E3 region has been restored in
dl355* (34). The E4-mutant virus
dl366* contains a 2,269-bp deletion to disrupt the entire E4
coding region in a wild-type E3 background (34). The
E4-mutant viruses, dl366*+orf1-2, dl366*+orf3,
and dl366*+orf4, have orf1-2, orf3, and orf4 of E4 restored,
respectively. Mutant virus E4-inorf3 contains an 8-bp insertion at the SspI restriction site (96.4 map units; 1 map unit is approximately 360 bp) disrupting the orf3 coding region. The mutant virus dl355*/inorf3 contains the E4
orf6 14-bp deletion with the 8-bp insertion in E4 orf3. The E4
inorf3/inorf6 contains 8-bp insertions at the
SspI restriction sites at 93.0 map units (orf6) and 96.4 map
units (orf3). The E4 inorf6/inorf6/7 mutant contains a 2-bp insertion at an AccI restriction site (94.6 map units) that disrupts both the E4 orf6 and orf6/7 coding regions (34).
The propagation of these viruses has been described elsewhere (10,
35). In brief, virus stocks were prepared by infecting 293 cells
for E1B-mutant viruses or W162 cells for E4 region-mutant viruses at a
low multiplicity of infection. Virus was harvested 4 to 5 days
postinfection from a concentrated freeze-thaw lysate by sequential
centrifugation in discontinuous and equilibrium cesium chloride
gradients (36). The gradient-purified virus was supplemented
with 5 volumes of 12 mM HEPES (pH 7.4)-120 mM NaCl-0.1 mg of bovine
serum albumin (Fraction V; Life Technologies, Inc.) per ml-50%
glycerol (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa.) and stored at
20°C.
The titer of each virus stock was determined by plaque assays using 293 cells (36) and W162 cells (72) for the E1B- and
E4-mutant viruses, respectively.
For infection with Ad, cells were passaged 16 to 24 h prior to
infection to a density of 3 × 104 cells per
cm2. Cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS), and the final wash was replaced with virus (3 to 20 PFU per
cell) in Ad infection medium (PBS supplemented with 0.2 mM
CaCl2, 0.2 mM MgCl2, 2% calf serum, 100 U of
penicillin, and 100 µg of streptomycin per ml). The virus was added
at one-fourth the normal culture volume, and the cells were gently
rocked for 60 min at 37°C. The virus suspension was then replaced
with normal growth medium, and the infected cells were returned to
37°C.
Electron microscopy.
Infected HeLa cells were processed for
transmission electron microscopy at a time when virus production had
reached a maximum and the integrity of the cell was well preserved. For
most virus infections, cells were processed 24 h postinfection;
for viruses that suffer delays in viral DNA synthesis, cells were
processed 36 h postinfection. The infected HeLa cells were
mechanically removed from the culture dish and pooled with the
supernatant medium before harvesting to ensure quantitative recovery of
the infected cells. The cells were washed with 0.2 M sodium cacodylate, pH 7.2, and fixed with 2.5% gluteraldehyde in the same buffer. The
fixed cells were prepared for transmission electron microscopy as
previously described (26).
Plaque assays for viral yields.
Detailed methods for Ad
plaque assays have been described elsewhere (36). In brief,
virus was harvested from cells in culture medium 48 to 72 h
postinfection by multiple cycles of freezing and thawing. The cell
lysates were clarified by centrifugation and serially diluted in
infection medium for infection of 293 and W162 cells for plaque assay
of E1B 55-kDa- and E4-mutant viruses, respectively. After incubation
with the diluted virus for 1 h, the infected cells were overlaid
with 0.7% SeaKem ME agarose (FMC BioProducts, Rockland, Maine) in DMEM
supplemented with 0.75% sodium bicarbonate and 4% newborn calf serum.
The cells were overlaid with additional agarose in growth medium on the
third day after infection. Plaques were visualized by staining with
neutral red in an agarose overlay on the seventh day after infection.
Data were typically collected from three dilutions in each series of dilutions. The virus yield (PFU per milliliter) was determined by
linear regression and expressed as the number of PFU per infected cell.
Replicate samples were compared with the two-tailed Student t test.
Late viral protein synthesis.
Late viral protein synthesis
was analyzed by pulse-labeling infected HeLa cells for 1 h with
0.1 mCi of 35S-labeled amino acids
(Tran35S-label; ICN Biochemicals) per ml in cysteine- and
methionine-free DMEM supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum at
32 h postinfection. Cells were then scraped into PBS, pelleted,
and lysed in 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-125 mM Tris (pH
6.8)-20% glycerol-5% 2-mercaptoethanol-100 mM
dithiothreitol-0.01% bromophenol blue. Protein from 1 × 105 to 2 × 105 cell equivalents was
separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) on an 8%
polyacrylamide gel with a 36:1 ratio of acrylamide to
N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide (Polysciences, Warrington, Pa.). PAGE gels were fixed in 15% glacial acetic acid-7.5% methanol. Proteins were quantified with the use of a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager and ImageQuant analysis software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.). Ad late proteins were identified by using virion
standards that were synthesized in the presence of
14C-labeled mixed amino acids (Amersham, Arlington Heights,
Ill.) and gradient purified from 293 cells infected with the wild-type Ad, dl309, as described previously (36).
Cell fractionation and RNA isolation.
All solutions used for
RNA purification and in vitro transcription were prepared from diethyl
pyrocarbonate-treated water as described in Ausubel et al.
(3). RNA was isolated from the nucleus and cytoplasm of
Ad-infected HeLa cells at 16 to 18 h postinfection. Approximately
4 × 106 infected cells were scraped in ice-cold PBS,
pelleted at 1,000 × g at 4°C, and then suspended in
0.15 ml of isotonic buffer (140 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.4], 1.5 mM MgCl2) containing 10 mM vanadyl-adenosine complex. An
equal volume of isotonic buffer with 1% (vol/vol) Nonidet P-40
(Calbiochem) was added to the cells on ice with gentle mixing. After 5 min, the nuclei were pelleted at 1,000 × g and briefly
washed with isotonic buffer containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40. After again
the nuclei were again pelleted, the supernatant liquid was pooled as
the cytoplasmic fraction.
Cytoplasmic RNA was isolated with the use of Trizol LS (Life
Technologies) as recommended by the manufacturer, and the purified RNA
was stored in 0.01 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.2. Nuclear RNA was isolated
as described in Ausubel et al. (3). In brief, the nuclear
pellet was resuspended in isotonic buffer containing 10 mM
vanadyl-adenosine complex to which 10 volumes of a solution containing
4 M guanidine thiocyanate (Life Technologies), 20 mM sodium acetate (pH
5.2), 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.5% N-lauroyl sarcosine
was added. The volume was adjusted to 2.5 ml with the same solution,
and the mixture was incubated for 60 to 90 min at room temperature with
gentle mixing. The entire mixture was layered on top of a 5.7 M cesium
chloride cushion in an SW-51 (Beckman) centrifuge tube and centrifuged
at 35,000 rpm at 16°C for 16 to 20 h. The RNA pellet was
recovered and dissolved in 0.01 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.2. The
concentration of nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA was normalized on the
basis of initial cell number at 1.33 × 107 cells per
ml. Polyadenylated RNA was purified from cytoplasmic RNA by three
sequential rounds of purification with oligo(dT) cellulose (New England Biolabs).
RNase protection assays.
DNA fragments obtained by thermal
cycle amplification corresponding to Ad5 DNA spanning the
polyadenylation site of the L3 and L5 gene were subcloned into
pGEM7z(+) (Promega) for transcription in vitro. The primers used for
the L3 gene (5'-TTCCTAACTTTGACGCGGTA-3' and
5'-TTCGACAGGAAACCGTGTG-3') generated a 442-bp thermal cycle product corresponding to bases 27811 through 28252 of the Ad5 genome.
The primers used for the L5 gene (5'-TTCAGCTTATCCAAAATCTCACG-3' and 5'-TTCGCCTTGGTTTGCTT-3') generated a 513-bp
product corresponding to bases 32545 through 33058 of the Ad5 genome.
Radiolabeled RNA complementary to the sequences surrounding the L3 and
L5 polyadenylation site was synthesized in vitro with SP6 RNA
polymerase as recommended by the manufacturer (Promega) with
[
-32P]CTP (ICN; 10 mCi/ml, >400 Ci/mmol). The DNA
template was removed by digestion with RNase-free DNase (RQ1 DNase;
Promega), and the radioactive RNA was purified by sequential ethanol
precipitation from 0.125% SDS, 0.5 M ammonium acetate, 25 µg of tRNA
carrier per ml, and then 2.5 M ammonium acetate. The RNA was
resuspended in 0.04 ml of 0.01 mM sodium acetate, and the amount of
radioactive transcript was quantified by liquid scintillation counting.
The levels of L3 and L5 RNA were determined by RNase protection assays
(9, 45). Hybridization reaction mixtures were prepared in a
final volume of 20 µl containing 5 µl of NaCl-EDTA solution (3.6 M
NaCl, 30 mM EDTA [pH 7.4]) and 15 µl containing an excess (2 × 106 cpm) of 32P-labeled RNA probe
synthesized in vitro and total cytoplasmic or nuclear RNA isolated from
5 × 105 cells. After hybridization overnight at
65°C under a drop of mineral oil, the hybrids were digested with 150 µl of RNase cocktail (5 mM EDTA [pH 7.4], 30 µg of RNase
P1 [500 U/mg; Sigma] per ml, 10 µg of RNase
T1 [300,000 U/mg; Sigma] per ml) for 1 h at room temperature. Digestions were stopped with 20 µl of N-LS
cocktail (1% N-lauroyl sarcosine [Sigma] and 1 µg of
proteinase K [Calbiochem] per ml), and the protected products were
precipitated at
20°C after the addition of 150 µl of GTC solution
(4 M guanidine thiocyanate, 0.5% N-lauroyl sarcosine, 25 mM
sodium citrate, 0.7% 2-mercaptoethanol), 0.05 mg of tRNA per ml as a
carrier, and 0.3 ml of isopropanol (8). The protected RNA
hybrid was precipitated with tRNA carrier and 2.5 volumes of ethanol.
The RNA pellet was resuspended in RNA loading buffer (90% deionized
formamide, 10 mM EDTA [pH 7.4], 0.2% bromophenol blue, 0.2% xylene
cyanol) and denatured at
90°C for 3 min. Protected fragments were
separated on a denaturing 6% polyacrylamide minigel containing urea.
Protected fragments were quantified with the use of a Molecular
Dynamics PhosphorImager and ImageQuant analysis software.
Computer-assisted graphics.
Radioactive samples were
visualized with the use of a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager and
ImageQuant analysis software. Radioactive images were obtained as
16-bit gray-scale images and then converted to 8-bit gray-scale images.
The density ranges were adjusted for printing without further contrast
or image enhancement. The digitized images were imported at 300 dpi
into the graphic software, Canvas (Deneba Software, Miami, Fla.),
operating on a Macintosh microcomputer to create the final figures.
 |
RESULTS |
Ad mutants that exhibit a potential cell cycle restriction for
growth produce virus in only a fraction of infected cells.
The
cell cycle restriction for growth of the E1B 55-kDa mutant virus
dl338 was initially identified by analyzing Ad-infected HeLa
cells by electron microscopy. This approach permits analysis of the Ad
infection at the level of the individual cell. Only 20% of the HeLa
cells infected with dl338 produced progeny virions, although
all cells were infected and synthesized viral DNA. By contrast, the
wild-type virus dl309 produced virus in nearly every infected cell (26). In the work presented here, we evaluated other Ad mutants with defects in viral genes related to the E1B 55-kDa
gene for a potential cell cycle restriction. These include mutant
viruses containing lesions in the E4 orf3 and orf6 genes. Asynchronous
HeLa cells were infected with the wild-type virus dl309, an
E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus, dl1520, an E4 orf3-mutant virus, inorf3, or an E4 orf6-mutant virus, dl355, at
multiplicities of 20 PFU per cell. The cells were then processed for
transmission electron microscopy to determine the fraction of infected
cells producing virus (Fig. 1
and Table 2).


View larger version (345K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
E1B 55-kDa- and E4 orf6-mutant viruses, but not an E4
orf3-mutant virus, produce virus in only a fraction of infected cells.
Monolayers of HeLa cells were infected with the wild-type virus
dl309 (A to D), the E1B 55-kDa mutant virus
dl1520 (E to H), the E4 Orf3-mutant inorf3 (I to
L), or the E4 orf6-mutant virus dl355 (M to P), at a
multiplicity of 20 PFU/cell. At 24 h postinfection, cells were
fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, embedded, and sectioned for transmission
electron microscopy. Nearly all (>95%) of the cells infected with the
wild-type virus contained electron-dense viral particles in the
nucleus. Four representative wild-type virus-infected cells are shown
in panels A through D. Virions can be easily seen in the
high-magnification images, representing a fivefold magnification of the
boxed region of the nucleus from the low-magnification image. Of the
four representative cells infected with the E1B-mutant virus (E to H),
only the cell shown in panel H contains virus particles in the nucleus.
Nearly all (>95%) cells infected with the E4 orf3-mutant virus
produced virus, as can be seen in the four representative cells shown
in panels I through L. Of the five E4 orf6-mutant virus-infected cells
(M to P), only the cell in panel P and one of the cells in panel O
(marked by an asterisk) contained virus particles in their nuclei,
although all cells were infected. Representative viral inclusions are
marked VI. A crystalline array of virus particles in panel J is marked
by an arrowhead, and crystalline aggregates of viral proteins in panels
C and L are marked by dagger ( ). Bars, 2 µm.
|
|
Cells infected with each of the viruses as shown in Fig. 1 exhibit
morphological evidence of virus infection. The nuclear membrane has
become crenulated, chromatin is marginated and displaced to the outer
periphery of the nuclear membrane, and the nucleolus has changed in
appearance. In addition, nuclei of all infected cells contained viral
inclusions (example marked VI in Fig. 1F) which are the intranuclear
sites of viral DNA synthesis and accumulation (12, 57, 71)
and RNA biogenesis (55, 58, 75). The wild-type virus
produced progeny in nearly every infected HeLa cell (Fig. 1A to D and
Table 2). Virus particles are small, densely stained, and uniform in
size and shape as seen in the higher-magnification image below each
cell. As previously reported (26), mock-infected cell nuclei
were devoid of any structures resembling viral inclusions or particles
(data not shown).
More than 1,000 cells infected with the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus
dl1520 were evaluated. Only 21% of these infected cells
contained progeny virions (Table 2). This is similar to results
obtained with the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus dl338
(26). Of the four representative cells shown in Fig. 1E to
H, only the cell in panel H contains virus, as can be seen in the
fivefold-higher-magnification image.
In contrast to cells infected with the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus, nearly
all cells infected with the E4 orf3-mutant virus inorf3 produced progeny virions (Fig. 1I to L and Table 2). These results suggest that, like the wild-type virus, the E4 orf3-mutant virus is not
restricted by the cell cycle for growth. Crystalline arrays of virus
particles (arrowhead, Fig. 1J) and crystalline aggregates of viral
proteins (marked by daggers in Fig. 1C and L) were more commonly
observed in E4 orf3-mutant-infected cells than in cells infected with
other viruses.
In cells infected with the E4 orf6-mutant virus dl355, virus
was produced in 35% of the infected cells (Fig. 1M to P and Table 2).
Of the representative cells infected with dl355 shown in Fig. 1, only one of the cells in panel O (marked by an asterisk) and
the cell in panel P contained progeny virions, indicating that the
growth of this E4 orf6-mutant virus may be restricted by the cell cycle.
Cells were synchronized and infected at the onset of S phase with each
of the mutant viruses to determine if mutant viruses restricted to
growth in a fraction of infected cells were restricted by the cell
cycle (Table 2). We previously demonstrated that cells infected during
S phase with the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus dl338 produced
virus in a greater percentage of infected cells (up to 75%) than did
cells infected during G1 or asynchronous growth
(26) (Table 3). The fraction of dl355-infected
cells producing virus increased from an average of 35% in
asynchronously infected cells to 60% in cells infected during S phase.
Therefore, this mutant is restricted by the cell cycle for growth
similarly to the E1B 55-kDa-mutant viruses. The E4 orf3-mutant virus
inorf3 was not restricted by the cell cycle for growth as
indicated by the experiments whose results are shown in Fig. 1 and
Table 2. In three independent experiments, inorf3 produced
progeny virus in an average of 95% of the cells infected during
asynchronous growth. Not surprisingly, this fraction was not increased
by infecting synchronized HeLa cells during S phase.
A virus bearing mutations in both E4 orf3 and orf6 genes
(inorf3/inorf6) produced progeny virus in 27% of
asynchronous cells (Table 2). This result is similar to the growth
restriction observed for the E4 orf6-mutant virus dl355.
Surprisingly, when cells were infected at the onset of S phase with the
double mutant virus, the fraction of cells producing virus did not
increase. A similar result was obtained with a second E4 orf3-orf6
double-mutant virus, dl355*/inorf3. This mutant
virus was restricted for growth in both cells infected during
G1 and cells infected during S phase, producing virus in 10 and 14% of the infected cells, respectively. Thus, the growth
restriction of the E4 orf3-orf6-mutant viruses cannot be ameliorated by
infecting cells during S phase. These results indicate that the E4 orf3
protein is required for enhanced growth of orf6-mutant viruses in cells
infected during S phase.
The virus lacking all E4 genes, dl366*, produced virus in
only 3% of the infected cells. This result is expected, since viruses that lack the entire E4 coding region fail to synthesize viral DNA
(11, 30, 34). Virus growth is substantially restored for
viruses that contain one or two E4 open reading frames in the
dl366* background. The E4-deletion virus containing only
orf1 and orf2 of E4, dl366*+orf1-2, produced progeny virus
in 24% of the cells infected during asynchronous growth. The
E4-deletion virus with orf3 restored, dl366*+orf3, produced
virus in 28% of the cells infected during asynchronous growth.
Finally, the E4-deletion virus with orf4 restored,
dl366*+orf4, produced progeny in 19% of cells infected
during asynchronous growth. These results indicate that each of these
deletion viruses may be restricted for growth by the cell cycle.
However, like the E4 orf3-orf6-double-mutant viruses, the fraction of
cells infected with dl366*+orf1-2 or dl366*+orf4
did not increase when cells were infected during S phase. By contrast,
S-phase cells infected with dl366*+orf3 produced progeny in
40% of the infected cells. Apparently, inclusion of orf3 in the large
dl366* deletion background conferred a limited ability to
overcome the growth restriction in a cell infected during S phase.
These morphological results suggest a role for the E4 orf3 protein in
abating cell cycle restrictions imposed on virus growth in the absence
of the E4 orf6 protein.
E4-mutant viruses that are restricted by the cell cycle for growth
produce greater yields of virus in cells infected during S phase.
Virus yields were measured from cells infected during G1 or
S phase by plaque assay to confirm the growth restriction of the E4-mutant viruses deduced by electron microscopy. If growth of these
mutant viruses is restricted by the cell cycle, then cells infected
during S phase should produce greater yields of virus. Note that it is
the stage of the cell cycle at the time of infection that determines
the outcome of the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus infection, since cells no
longer continue to progress through the cell cycle shortly after
infection (25). For these experiments, synchronized HeLa
cells were infected during S phase or G1 with each
E4-mutant virus at a multiplicity of infection of 3 to 10. At 48 to
72 h postinfection, viral yields were determined by titer on W162
cells. The two-tailed Student t test was used to determine
if the average yield of virus obtained from S-phase-infected cells and
from G1-infected cells differed. The results shown in Fig.
2 demonstrate a cell cycle restriction
for growth of mutant viruses lacking the E4 orf6 gene.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
HeLa cells infected during S phase produce greater
yields of E4 orf6-mutant virus, but not E4 orf3-mutant virus, than do
cells infected during G1. HeLa cells were synchronized to S
phase or G1. Cells were infected with the wild-type virus
(dl309), the E4-mutant viruses lacking orf6
(dl355*, inorf6/inorf6/7, and
dl366*+orf3), the E4 orf3-mutant virus (inorf3),
or the E4-mutant viruses lacking orf3 and orf6
(inorf3/inorf6,
dl355*/inorf3, dl366*+or4, and
dl366*±orf1-2) at a multiplicity of 3 to 10 PFU per cell.
Cells were lysed 48 to 72 h postinfection, and virus yields were
measured by plaque assays with W162 cells. For the wild-type virus, 1 PFU measured with W162 cells corresponds to approximately 100 infectious units in HeLa cells. The results shown are averages of three
to nine independent infections performed in four independent
experiments. Yields are expressed as PFU per cell. Viruses that
produced significantly different yields between cells infected during S
phase and cells infected during G1 are identified by the
associated P values derived from the two-tailed Student
t test. All other comparisons of S with G1 were
not statistically different, with P values of >0.5. The
status of the E4 orf3 and orf6 genes in each mutant virus is indicated,
where a plus sign indicates a wild-type gene and a minus sign indicates
a functionally null gene.
|
|
The wild-type virus dl309 produced nearly equivalent yields
of virus in cells infected during G1 and in cells infected
during S phase (Fig. 2). By the convention that a P value of
0.05 is significant, growth of the wild-type virus was not
significantly affected by the stage of the cell cycle at the time of
infection. Three mutant viruses that expressed the E4 orf3 protein, but
not the orf6 protein, produced greater amounts of virus in cells
infected during S phase than in cells infected during G1.
The differences in yields from cells infected during S phase and from
cells infected during G1 with these E4 orf6-mutant viruses
were significant (P
0.004). The E4 orf6-mutant virus
dl355* produced 2.9-fold-greater yields of virus in cells
infected during S phase than in cells infected during G1.
This increase is similar to that measured for S-phase cells infected
with the E1B 55-kDa-mutant viruses dl338 and
dl1520 compared to cells infected during asynchronous growth
(Fig. 3). The inorf6/inorf6/7 virus is unable to
express both the orf6 protein and the related orf6/7 protein and
produced 3.3-fold-greater yields of virus in cells infected during S
phase than in cells infected during G1. The contribution of
the mutation in orf6/7 to the growth restriction is not known. However,
since an E4 orf6/7-mutant virus grows to wild-type virus yields
(30) and the inorf6/inorf6/7-mutant
virus is not more restricted for growth than is the
inorf6-mutant virus (34), the predominant defect
in this virus is expected to be due to the mutation in orf6. Finally,
the dl366*+orf3 virus exhibited a similar S-phase enhancement, producing sevenfold more virus in S-phase cells than in
G1 cells. Note that dl366*+orf3 expresses only
the orf3 protein of the E4 region. These results, which indicate that
orf6-mutant viruses grow more effectively in cells infected during S
phase, are consistent with the morphological data of Fig. 1 and Table 2.
The inorf3 virus grew to near-wild-type yields in S-phase or
G1 cells, indicating that inorf3 is not
restricted by the cell cycle for growth (Fig. 2). Although the average
yield of inorf3 virus increased 1.6-fold in cells infected
during S phase over that measured for cells infected during
G1, this value is not likely significant (P = 0.23).
Also in agreement with the results in Table 2, three mutant viruses
(inorf3/inorf6,
dl355*/inorf3, and dl366*+orf4) that fail to express both the E4 orf3 and orf6 proteins failed to produce greater yields of virus in cells infected during S phase than in cells
infected during G1. Indeed, these double-mutant viruses produced slightly reduced yields of virus in cells infected during G1. By contrast, the mutant virus dl366*+orf1-2
produced a greater yield of virus in cells infected during S phase than
in cells infected during G1. Although the associated
P value of 0.03 indicates that this difference is
significant, the 1.9-fold increase in yield from S-phase-infected cells
is not associated with an increase in the fraction of S-phase-infected
cells producing dl366*+orf1-2 (24% ± 8%) over that of
G1-infected cells (24% ± 8%) (Table 2). Nonetheless, it
remains possible that the orf1 or orf2 products affect growth of the
virus in a cell cycle-dependent manner.
We cannot exclude the possibility that the delay in viral DNA synthesis
in cells infected with the E4 orf3-orf6 double-mutant viruses
contributes to the failure of these viruses to replicate to greater
yields in cells infected during S phase. However, a defect in viral DNA
synthesis seems unlikely to be the cause of reduced growth, since viral
yields are measured after 48 h postinfection and, by this time of
infection, the amount of viral DNA in asynchronous cells infected with
the E4 orf3-orf6 double-mutant viruses has nearly reached wild-type
levels (34). Nevertheless, it is possible that mutant
viruses defective for viral DNA synthesis suffer greater competition
for DNA synthetic machinery in the cell infected during S phase, since
cellular DNA synthesis is inhibited less efficiently in cells infected
during S phase than in cells infected during G1
(33).
We could not detect virus production from HeLa cells infected during S
phase with the virus lacking the entire E4 region, dl366*.
However, in four independent infections, the production of
dl366* in cells infected during G1 could be
measured by plaque assay. The yield of virus from cells synchronized to
G1 was comparable to the yield of virus from an
asynchronous population of cells (data not shown). Although not
conclusive, these observations suggest that the dl366* virus
grows best in cells infected during G1 and may not grow
appreciably in cells infected during S phase. In this respect, growth
of the large E4-deletion virus dl366* resembles that of
other E4 orf3-orf6 double-mutant viruses.
These experiments establish a cell cycle restriction for growth of E4
orf6-mutant viruses. As for the E1B 55-kDa-mutant viruses, this cell
cycle restriction can be partially overcome by infecting cells during S
phase. In addition, the growth benefit of the E4 orf6-mutant virus
derived from infecting cells during S phase is dependent on the
presence of the E4 orf3 gene.
Cell cycle restriction for growth of the E1B 55-kDa-mutant viruses
correlates with the defect in virus-mediated mRNA transport.
The
E1B 55-kDa and the E4 orf6 proteins function as a complex to mediate
viral and cellular mRNA transport in the infected cell. Since both the
E1B 55-kDa- and E4 orf6-mutant viruses are defective for mRNA transport
and cell cycle-independent growth, we sought to determine if the cell
cycle restriction may be linked to the defect in virus-mediated mRNA
transport. This notion was further supported by the analysis of three
viruses bearing in-frame insertions in the E1B 55-kDa gene. These
mutant viruses direct the synthesis of a stable E1B 55-kDa protein that
is defective predominantly in one of three properties attributed to the
E1B 55-kDa protein (37, 78). A143 is primarily defective for
late viral gene expression, which may stem from the defect in
virus-mediated mRNA transport. S380 is primarily defective for binding
p53 and transformation, and R443 is defective for transcriptional
silencing. The insertion mutants were evaluated for their ability to
replicate independently of the cell cycle to determine if the loss of a specific property of the E1B 55-kDa protein correlates with cell cycle-restricted virus growth. The fraction of infected HeLa cells producing these mutant viruses was determined by electron microscopy (Table 3), and yield of mutant virus from
HeLa cells infected during S phase or asynchronous HeLa cells were
infected at a multiplicity of 20 PFU per cell. Cells were processed for
transmission electron microscopy at 24 h postinfection. For the
measurements of virus yields, S-phase or asynchronous HeLa cells were
infected at a multiplicity of 3 PFU per cell. Cells were lysed at
48 h postinfection, and viral yields were determined by titer on
293 cells.
As reported previously (26), the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus
dl338 produces virus in approximately 22% of the cells
infected during asynchronous growth (Table 3). However, when cells were infected during S phase, virus was produced in an average of 67% of
the infected cells. By contrast, the wild-type virus dl309 produces virus in nearly every infected cell irrespective of the stage
of the cell cycle at the time of infection.
The insertion mutant virus A143 produced virus in 25% of the cells
infected during asynchronous growth (Table 3). When cells were
synchronized and infected with A143 at the onset of S phase, virus was
produced in 68% of the infected cells, indicating a cell cycle
restriction resembling that of the deletion mutant viruses. The E1B
55-kDa-insertion mutant S380 produced progeny in nearly all infected
cells, similar to the wild-type virus. Additionally, S380-infected
cells typically contained more virus particles than did cells infected
with the wild-type virus (data not shown). This result is consistent
with the results of Berk and associates (78), who found that
cells infected with S380 have a greater burst size and produce greater
yields of virus than do cells infected with the wild-type virus. R443
produced virus in 56% of cells infected during asynchronous growth. It is not clear how this intermediate phenotype should be interpreted. Since the fraction of cells infected with R443 containing virus did not
change when cells were infected during S phase, the ability to silence
transcription may not bear on cell cycle-independent virus growth.
Replication of R443 may be restricted to a fraction of infected cells
by mechanisms other than a cell cycle restriction. Of the
representative insertion mutant viruses analyzed, only A143 exhibited a
restriction to virus growth that was alleviated in cells infected
during S phase. If the defect in late gene expression of A143 stems
from the defect in mRNA transport, this would suggest that the failure
of the virus to regulate viral and cellular mRNA transport may underlie
the cell cycle restriction.
Additionally, asynchronous cells infected with the E1B 19-kDa-mutant
virus dl337 were analyzed by electron microscopy. This mutant virus produced progeny virus in nearly every infected cell. Therefore, this virus was not restricted by the cell cycle for growth.
The E1B 19-kDa protein is a functional homologue of the cellular
protein Bcl-2 and effectively inhibits p53-mediated apoptosis (15,
61). This result further supports the finding that the cell cycle
restriction is not due to the failure to inhibit p53 (27).
The yield of virus obtained from cells infected during S phase compared
to that for cells infected during asynchronous growth is consistent
with the fraction of virus-producing cells measured by electron
microscopy (Fig. 3). The wild-type virus
was not significantly affected by the stage of the cell cycle at the
time of infection. However, within any given experiment, the yield of
wild-type virus from asynchronous or G1-infected cells
exceeded that from S-phase-infected cells. By contrast, both E1B
55-kDa-deletion mutant viruses dl338 and dl1520
produced two- to threefold-greater yields in S-phase-infected cells
than in asynchronously infected cells. Consistent with these results,
we previously reported that cells infected during S phase with
dl338 produced sevenfold-greater yields of virus than did cells infected during G1 (26). Although
S-phase-infected cells exhibit the greatest permissivity for E1B
55-kDa-mutant virus growth, infection of an S-phase cell does not fully
restore growth of the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus to wild-type levels.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
E1B 55-kDa-mutant viruses defective for late gene
expression produce greater yields of virus in S-phase cells than in
asynchronous cells. Asynchronous or S-phase HeLa cells were infected
with either the wild-type virus (dl309), and E1B
55-kDa-mutant virus (dl338, A143, R443, or S380), or an E1B
19-kDa-mutant virus (dl337) at a multiplicity of 3 PFU per
cell. Cells were lysed 48 h postinfection, and virus yields were
measured by plaque assays with 293 cells. Yields are averages from
multiple experiments and are expressed as PFU per cell. Asynchronous
values are derived from five experiments, and S-phase values were
derived from three experiments, except for dl337. Both
asynchronous and S-phase values for dl337 were derived from
three experiments. The standard errors of the means are shown. The
probabilities indicated above each set of bars derived from a
two-tailed Student t test and represent the probabilities
that the two averages are from the same population.
|
|
Each of the E1B-insertion mutant viruses analyzed here was not as
defective for growth as were the deletion mutants. Nonetheless, the
mutant virus A143 produced 1.6-fold more virus in cells infected during
S phase than in cells infected during asynchronous growth. Although
this difference was marginally significant (P = 0.067), the growth restriction of A143 was reduced by infecting cells during S
phase. By contrast, S380 and R443 produced nearly equivalent yields of
virus in both S-phase and asynchronously growing cells. In this
respect, the growth of the S380 and R443 mutant viruses resembled the
growth of the wild-type virus in S-phase and asynchronous cells. The
growth of these insertion mutants is consistent with the suggestion
that the cell cycle restriction is linked to a defect in the control of
mRNA transport. It remains unclear why the difference in yield of A143
failed to reflect the more dramatic changes in virus production
observed by electron microscopy. Compared to asynchronously infected
cells, cells infected during S phase with A143 contained as much as
threefold more cells producing progeny virus (Table 3), although these
cells produced only 1.6-fold more virus (Fig. 3).
Consistent with the findings summarized in Table 3, growth of the E1B
19-kDa-mutant virus dl337 was not enhanced in cells infected
during S phase (Fig. 3). Rather, the yield of this mutant virus was
greater in cells infected during asynchronous growth than in cells
infected during S phase, although this difference is not likely to be
significant (P = 0.34). The growth of dl337 demonstrates that not all viruses that are defective for growth are
restricted by the cell cycle.
Late viral gene expression is partially restored in HeLa cells
infected during S phase with the E1B 55-kDa- or E4 orf6-mutant
viruses.
The E1B 55-kDa- and the E4 orf6-mutant viruses are
defective for late gene expression due, in part, to reduced transport
of late viral messages (14, 30, 43, 54). If the defects in mRNA transport and late gene expression contribute to the cell cycle
restriction for growth of the E1B 55-kDa- and E4 orf6-mutant viruses,
then late viral gene expression should be at least partially restored
in cells infected during S phase with either of these mutant viruses.
The results shown in Fig. 4 and Table 4
are consistent with this idea. The gel shown in Fig. 4 is
representative of four independent experiments that are summarized in
Table 4. For these experiments, cells were infected as an asynchronous
population or synchronized and infected at the onset of S phase with
dl309, dl1520, dl355, or
inorf3 or mock infected. At 32 h postinfection, protein
synthesis was evaluated by metabolically labeling the cells with
35S-amino acids for 1 h. Protein from equivalent
numbers of cells was separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by
phosphorescence imaging.

View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
The E1B 55-kDa-mutant and E4 orf6-mutant viruses
synthesize greater levels of viral late proteins in HeLa cells infected
during S phase than in asynchronous (Async) cells. Asynchronous or
S-phase HeLa cells were mock infected or infected with the wild-type
virus dl309, the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus dl1520,
the E4 orf6-mutant virus dl355, or the E4 orf3-mutant virus
inorf3 at a multiplicity of 20 PFU per cell. At 32 h
postinfection, cells were labeled with 35S-labeled amino
acids for 1 h. Proteins from 105 cells (per lane) were
separated by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were visualized and quantified by
phosphorescence imaging. The migrations and masses (in kilodaltons) or
molecular weight standards are indicated to the right of the gel. The
positions of six Ad late proteins were determined with Ad virion
standards labeled with 14C-amino acids and are indicated to
the left of the gel. The positions of the E2A 72-kDA protein and the
cellular actin protein are also indicated. The gel shown is
representative of four independent experiments.
|
|
In cells infected during asynchronous growth, the E1B 55-kDa- and E4
orf6-mutant viruses synthesized reduced levels of late viral proteins
(Fig. 4). These results are consistent with the defect in
virus-mediated mRNA transport and with the results of others (30,
74). By contrast, cells infected with the E4 orf3-mutant virus
inorf3 appeared to synthesize levels of late viral proteins equivalent to those of wild-type virus-infected cells. Cells infected during S phase synthesized slightly reduced levels of viral late proteins when infected with the wild-type virus but greater levels when
cells were infected with the dl1520 or dl355
mutant virus compared to cells infected during asynchronous growth with
these viruses.
For reasons that are not well understood, the E1B 55-kDa- and the E4
orf6-mutant viruses overproduce the early region 2A (E2A) 72-kDa
DNA-binding protein (14, 43, 74). The E2A protein is readily
identified in Fig. 4. Curiously, expression of this protein at late
times in infection mimicked that of late viral proteins in HeLa cells
infected with the E1B 55-kDa- and E4 orf6-mutant viruses in that its
synthesis was enhanced in cells infected during S phase (Fig. 4;
compare lanes 2 and 3 with 7 and 8).
The synthesis of six late viral proteins was quantified. These results
are summarized in Table 4, where they are
expressed as a relative percentage of the corresponding value for the
wild-type virus measured in cells infected during asynchronous growth.
S-phase cells infected with the wild-type virus synthesize late viral proteins to an average level of 83% of those synthesized in cells infected during asynchronous growth. These results are consistent with
the finding that asynchronous or G1 cells are slightly
better suited for replication of the wild-type Ad than are S-phase
cells (26). Likewise, inorf3 synthesized similar
amounts of late viral proteins in cells infected during S phase and in
cells infected during asynchronous growth, consistent with the lack of
a cell cycle restriction for inorf3 virus growth. By
contrast, late viral gene expression in cells infected during S phase
with either dl1520 or dl355 was increased
relative to that of cells infected during asynchronous growth. The
average level of late viral protein synthesis in cells infected during
S phase increased from 25 to 61% for dl1520 and from 18 to
35% for dl355 compared to that for cells infected during
asynchronous growth. Similar results were obtained for cells labeled at
24 h postinfection (data not shown). These results are consistent
with the suggestion that S-phase cells provide a host factor that may
enhance late gene expression of the E1B 55-kDa- and E4 orf6-mutant
viruses (26).
The effect of Ad infection on cellular gene expression can be seen in
the intensity of the band corresponding to the 42-kDa actin protein
(prominent in mock-infected cells) and by the overall density of the
lane, which is most evident in the portion of the gel above the
resolved protein bands (Fig. 4). The shutoff of host protein synthesis
by the wild-type virus dl309 is especially evident by the
near loss of the actin band in either asynchronously or
S-phase-infected cells. By contrast, the E1B 55-kDa-mutant dl1520 and the E4 orf6-mutant dl355 viruses were
defective for host cell shutoff. For example, actin was more intensely
labeled in cells infected with dl1520 or dl355
than in cells infected with dl309 (Fig. 4; compare lanes 2 and 3 to 1). Cells infected with inorf3 exhibit levels of
cellular gene expression similar to that of cells infected with
dl309 (Fig. 3; compare lanes 4 and 9 to 1 and 6).
Cells infected during S phase were more resistant to the shutoff of
host gene expression than were cells infected during asynchronous growth. The density of cellular background and the actin band increased
two- to threefold in cells infected during S phase with dl309 and inorf3 over those in cells infected
during asynchronous growth (Fig. 4; compare lanes 6 and 9 to 1 and 4).
Furthermore, the cellular protein background was up to fourfold greater
in cells infected during S phase with either the dl1520 or
dl355-mutant virus than in asynchronous cells infected with
the same viruses (Fig. 4; compare lanes 7 and 8 to 2 and 3). The reason
for the increase in cellular gene expression in cells infected during S
phase is not known, but the increase could reflect a diminished ability
of the virus to inhibit host protein synthesis or an overall increase
in the export of mRNA to the cytoplasm.
Cytoplasmic levels of L3 and L5 late viral mRNAs are greater in
cells infected during G1 than in cells infected during S
phase.
Late viral protein synthesis was partially restored in
cells infected during S phase with the E1B 55-kDa- or E4 orf6-mutant virus. To determine if this reflected greater levels of late viral mRNA
in the cytoplasm of cells infected during S phase, cells were
synchronized and infected and RNA was isolated at 16 h
postinfection. Levels of processed late viral transcripts in the
cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were measured by RNase protection
assays with probes that spanned the polyadenylation sites of the L3 and L5 families of late viral transcripts.
Representative results from analyzing L3 and L5 mRNA obtained from
cells infected during S phase or G1 with the wild-type virus dl309 or E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus dl338 are
shown in Fig. 5. For both the
dl309 and the dl338 infections, the 259 (L3)- and
150 (L5)-nucleotide products expected for RNA that was polyadenylated at the L3 and L5 sites, respectively, were present in greater amounts
in the cytoplasmic fraction than in the nuclear fraction of both
S-phase and G1 cells. The 513- and 218-nucleotide products (arrowheads in Fig. 5) were derived from readthrough or precursor transcripts that extended beyond the L3 and L5 polyadenylation sites,
respectively. The readthrough products were more abundant in the
nuclear fraction, consistent with these protected products representing
incompletely processed forms of the transcripts.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Relative levels of cytoplasmic (Cyt) and nuclear (Nuc)
L3 and L5 late viral transcripts determined by RNase protection assays.
S-phase or G1 HeLa cells were mock infected or infected
with the wild-type virus dl309 or the E1B 55-kDa-mutant
virus dl338 at a multiplicity of 10 PFU per cell. At 16 h postinfection, cells were fractionated, and total RNA was isolated
from both cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions. L3 and L5 transcript
levels were determined by RNase protection assays with RNA probes that
span the polyadenylation site of the L3 and L5 families of transcripts,
respectively. Protected hybrids were resolved on polyacrylamide-urea
minigels. Results of a representative protection assay for S-phase and
G1 cells infected with dl309 or dl338
are shown. The positions of readthrough transcripts that extended
beyond the L3 (filled arrowhead) and L5 (open arrowhead)
polyadenylation sites and the mature transcripts (L3 or L5) are
indicated to the left of the gel. The nucleotide length (bases) of each
product is indicated to the right of the gel. Duplicate RNase
protection results are in adjacent lanes.
|
|
Several control experiments established that the RNase-protected
products were specific for viral RNA. No signal was detected in assays
of mock-infected cells, indicating that cellular sequences present did
not protect the L3 or L5 probe (data not shown). In addition, the
protected fragments were due to virus-specific RNA and not to viral
DNA, because the protected products were not affected by digestion with
RNase-free DNase but were abolished by treatment with RNase A. Furthermore, no protected products were detected in RNase protection
assays containing only yeast tRNA and probe RNA (data not shown).
Cells infected with the wild-type virus dl309 during
G1 contained more cytoplasmic L3 and L5 than did cells
infected during S phase. This result seemed reasonable because the
wild-type virus appears to grow best in cells infected during
G1. Therefore, we expected that cells infected during S
phase with the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus dl338 would contain
greater levels of cytoplasmic viral mRNA than would cells infected
during G1. However, the levels of L3 and L5 transcripts
were actually greater in cells infected during G1 than in
cells infected during S phase. These results are similar to those for
the wild-type virus infection (Fig. 5; compare lanes 1 and 2 to 5 and 6 and lanes 9 and 10 to 13 and 14).
The levels of cytoplasmic viral L3 and L5 mRNA in cells infected with
the wild-type virus dl309, the E1B 55-kDa-mutant viruses dl338 and dl1520, the E4 orf6-mutant virus
dl355*, or the E4 orf3-mutant virus inorf3 were
quantified by phosphorescence imaging. The graphs shown in Fig.
6 are averages derived from three
independent experiments for which up to 10 RNase protection experiments
were performed. The cytoplasmic levels of L3 and L5 transcripts from
cells infected during S phase with the wild-type virus were normalized
to 100%. The cytoplasmic levels of the L3 and L5 transcripts from
cells infected with the wild-type virus during G1 or from
cells infected with the mutant viruses during S phase or G1
are therefore represented as percentages of the value measured in
S-phase cells infected with the wild-type virus. For all viruses
analyzed, cells infected during G1 contained greater
cytoplasmic levels of late viral mRNA than did cells infected during S
phase. Cells infected during G1 with the wild-type or
mutant viruses had on average 70% more cytoplasmic L3 (Fig. 6A) and L5
(Fig. 6B) mRNA than did cells infected during S phase. Although the
amount of cytoplasmic viral mRNA varied significantly between
experiments, within each experiment, cells infected during
G1 always had more cytoplasmic L3 and L5 transcripts than
did cells infected during S phase. These results imply that the levels
of cytoplasmic viral mRNA cannot account for the difference in late
viral protein synthesis in cells infected during S phase and
G1 (Fig. 4 and Table 4).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Cytoplasmic fractions from cells infected during
G1 contain greater levels of L3 and L5 viral transcripts
than do those from cells infected during S phase. S-phase or
G1 HeLa cells were infected with the wild-type virus
dl309, the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus dl338 or
dl1520, the E4 orf6-mutant virus dl355, or the E4
orf3-mutant virus inorf3. Total RNA was isolated from
cytoplasmic fractions at 16 h postinfection. L3 and L5 transcript
levels were determined by RNase protection assay as described in Fig.
5. The cytoplasmic levels of L3 and L5 transcripts from S-phase cells
infected with dl309 were normalized to 100 to determine the
relative percentages of L3 (A) and L5 (B) transcripts in cytoplasmic
fractions from cells infected during S phase with the mutant viruses or
infected during G1 with the wild-type or mutant viruses.
The results summarized in panels A and B are averages obtained from 10 experiments for dl309, 5 experiments for dl338, 8 experiments for dl1520, 6 experiments for dl355,
and 2 experiments for inorf3. The standard errors of the
means for each experiment are shown.
|
|
The differences in cytoplasmic levels of late viral mRNAs between cells
infected during S phase and cells infected during G1 cannot
be accounted for by differences in the amount of total RNA present
between cells infected during S phase and cells infected during
G1. Total RNA and poly(A)+ RNA were isolated
from the cytoplasm of infected cells and quantitated by absorption
spectroscopy. Cells infected during S phase with the wild-type or
mutant viruses contained greater amounts of total and
poly(A)+ RNA in the cytoplasm than did cells infected
during G1 (data not shown). These results are consistent
with the observation that total RNA content increases as noninfected
cells progress from G1 through S phase (22, 68).
Furthermore, these findings support the notion that Ad-infected cells
retain characteristics possessed by the cell at the time of infection
(25).
Cells infected during S phase or G1 with the wild-type or
mutant viruses were also analyzed to determine if steady-state
cytoplasmic levels of cellular transcripts were affected by the stage
of the cell cycle at the time of infection. Probes for
-actin and
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were used for RNase protection
assays as described above. In three independent experiments, equivalent
levels of
-actin and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
transcript were measured in the cytoplasm of cells infected during S
phase and cells infected during G1 (data not shown).
The cytoplasmic levels of L3 and L5 mRNA from G1 cells
infected with the mutant viruses dl338, dl1520,
and dl355* were reduced compared to those in cells infected
with the wild-type virus (Fig. 6). This difference most likely stems
from the defect in viral mRNA transport (4, 42, 54).
Interestingly, the amount of late viral mRNA in the cytoplasm of
dl1520-infected cells was considerably less than that
measured for dl338-infected cells, although both viruses are
expected to be functionally null for the E1B 55-kDa protein. This
observation is consistent with dl1520 exhibiting a greater
defect for growth than dl338, as seen in Fig. 3 and as
discussed previously (5, 27).
Late viral mRNA transport is partially restored in cells infected
during S phase with the E1B 55-kDa- and E4 orf6-mutant viruses.
Although cells infected during G1 contained more late viral
mRNA in the cytoplasm than did cells infected during S phase, cells
infected during S phase with the E1B 55-kDa- or E4 orf6-mutant virus
appeared to exhibit enhanced mRNA transport compared to cells infected
during G1 with these mutant viruses. To serve as an
indirect measure of mRNA transport, we determined the
cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of L3 and L5 mRNA. The amount of viral
mRNA in the cytoplasm and nucleus was determined by RNase protection
experiments such as that presented in Fig. 5. Because this RNase
protection assay identifies mRNA only by the polyadenylation event, it
is possible that some of the nuclear mRNA included incompletely
processed forms, whereas all of the specific product in the cytoplasm
was most likely to be mature mRNA. Consequently, the measure of the cytoplasmic-to-nuclear RNA ratio may underestimate the ratio of mature
cytoplasmic mRNA to mature nuclear mRNA.
Greater cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratios were measured for the wild-type
virus when cells were infected during G1 than when cells were infected during S phase. For cells infected during S phase with
the wild-type virus, characteristic cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratios were
2.4 ± 0.5 and 1.9 ± 0.3 for L3 and L5 transcripts, respectively. By contrast, cells infected during G1 with
the wild-type virus typically had cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratios for L3
and L5 mRNAs of 3.3 ± 0.5 and 2.4 ± 0.2, respectively.
The cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratios for L3 and L5 mRNAs from the mutant
virus infections are represented as a fraction of the ratio determined
for the wild-type infection in Fig. 7.
The cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratios for both L3 and L5 mRNAs from cells
infected with the mutant viruses during S phase were statistically
indistinguishable from that of the wild-type virus. This similarity in
the efficiency of mRNA transport is due not only to increased
cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratios for late viral mRNA in cells infected
with the E1B 55-kDa and E4 orf6-mutant viruses during S phase but also
to a corresponding decrease in the cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratios for
late viral mRNA in S-phase cells infected with the wild-type virus. By
contrast, the cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratios of viral L3 and L5
transcripts from cells infected during G1 with the mutant
viruses was as much as fivefold reduced compared to the wild-type virus
infection. These results indicate that the transport of late viral
mRNAs is greater in cells infected during S phase with the E1B 55-kDa- and E4 orf6-mutant viruses than in cells infected during
G1. From these results, we conclude that Ad-mediated mRNA
transport is differentially regulated depending on the stage of the
cell cycle at the time of infection. Nonetheless, this apparent
increase in transport did not result in greater levels of cytoplasmic
viral mRNAs (Fig. 6).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
S-phase cells infected with the E1B 55-kDa-mutant or the
E4 orf6-mutant virus yield greater cytoplasmic (Cyt)-to-nuclear (Nuc)
ratios for L3 and L5 transcripts than do G1 cells. S-phase
or G1 HeLa cells were mock infected or infected with the
wild-type virus dl309, the E1B 55-kDa-mutant virus
dl338 or dl1520, or the E4 orf6-mutant virus
dl355 at a multiplicity of 10 PFU per cell. At 16 h
postinfection, cells were fractionated and total RNA was isolated from
both cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions. L3 and L5 transcript levels
were determined by RNase protection assays with RNA probes that span
the polyadenylation sites of the L3 and L5 families of transcripts,
respectively. Relative levels of cytoplasmic and nuclear L3 and L5
mRNAs were determined by phosphorescence imaging and were normalized to
total RNA to account for inconsistencies in RNA recovery. The
cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratios from representative S-phase (A) and
G1 (B) infections are expressed as percentages of the
ratios for the wild-type infections. The standard errors of the means
are shown.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have demonstrated a role for the E4 orf6 protein similar to
that of the E1B 55-kDa protein in overcoming cell cycle restrictions imposed on virus growth. E1B 55-kDa- and E4 orf6-mutant viruses that
are defective for virus-mediated mRNA transport were restricted by the
cell cycle for growth (Fig. 1 and 2; Tables 2 and 3). Cells infected
during S phase with the E1B 55-kDa- or E4 orf6-mutant viruses had
greater cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratios of L3 and L5 late transcripts
(Fig. 7) and synthesized greater levels of late proteins (Fig. 4 and
Table 4) than did cells infected with these mutant viruses during
G1 or asynchronous growth. Furthermore, these mutant
viruses produced greater yields of virus from cells that were infected
during S phase (Fig. 2 and 3). Nevertheless, factors other than late
viral gene expression are involved in permitting cell cycle-independent
replication, since accumulation of late viral messages in the cytoplasm
of mutant-infected cells did not correlate with enhanced growth in
cells infected during S phase (Fig. 6). An E4 orf3-mutant virus was not
restricted by the cell cycle for replication (Fig. 1 and 2 and Table
2). However, enhanced growth of the E4 orf6-mutant viruses in cells
infected during S phase required expression of the E4 orf3 protein
(Fig. 2 and Table 2). These studies have demonstrated novel roles for the E4 orf6 and orf3 proteins in promoting cell cycle-independent Ad
growth in cooperation with the E1B 55-kDa protein.
In addition to promoting cell cycle-independent growth, the E1B 55-kDa
and E4 orf6 proteins function as a complex to mediate both viral and
cellular mRNA transport (4, 6, 30, 42, 54, 76). The function
of the E1B 55-kDa and E4 orf6 proteins in mediating viral and cellular
mRNA transport, and thus gene expression, late in infection may
underlie cell cycle-independent Ad growth. When cells were infected
during S phase with the E1B 55-kDa- or E4 orf6-mutant virus, the defect
in late viral gene expression was partially restored such that cells
infected during S phase with the mutant virus synthesized greater
levels of late viral proteins than did cells infected during
asynchronous growth (Fig. 4 and Table 4). Interestingly, the defect in
late gene expression and growth can also be ovecome by infecting and
maintaining cells at elevated temperatures during the infection
(27, 32, 42, 74). Furthermore, the cell cycle restriction
was alleviated in cells infected at elevated temperatures in a manner
resembling that observed in cells infected during S phase such that
mutant virus was produced in approximately 70% of the infected cells (27). These findings suggest that a common mechanism may
underlie cell cycle restriction and virus-mediated mRNA transport,
since both defects exhibit a cold-sensitive phenotype.
We measured cytoplasmic and nuclear levels of the L3 and L5 late viral
transcripts in cells infected during S phase or G1 to more
directly analyze the link between virus-mediated mRNA transport and the
cell cycle restriction (Fig. 5). The cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of
viral transcripts reflects the combined contributions of transport from
the nucleus to the cytoplasm and stability of these transcripts in the
respective cellular compartment (54). Because the stability
of late viral mRNA did not vary with the infecting virus or stage of
the cell cycle (data not shown), we conclude that the
cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio provides a reasonable measure of viral
mRNA transport. Cells infected during G1 with the wild-type
virus had greater cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratios of L3 and L5 mRNA than
did cells infected during S phase with either wild-type or mutant virus
(Fig. 7). By contrast, cells infected during S phase with the E1B
55-kDa- or E4 orf6-mutant virus had greater cytoplasmic-to-nuclear
ratios of L3 and L5 mRNA than did cells infected during G1
with these mutant viruses. In addition, this ratio was equivalent among
S-phase cells infected with either wild-type or mutant virus.
Therefore, the apparent ability of the mutant viruses to transport
viral mRNA in cells infected during S phase with wild-type-like
efficiency results from an increase in transport of late viral mRNA in
cells infected with the mutant viruses and a decrease in transport of
late viral mRNA in cells infected with the wild-type virus during S
phase. These results indicate that the transport of late viral mRNA is differentially regulated in response to the stage of the cell cycle at
the time of infection.
Although the transport of late viral mRNA was restored to wild-type
efficiency in S-phase cells infected with the E1B 55-kDa- or E4
orf6-mutant viruses (Fig. 7), greater cytoplasmic levels of late viral
transcripts were measured in cells infected during G1 with
either the wild-type or mutant viruses than in cells infected during S
phase (Fig. 6). The basis for enhanced accumulation of late viral mRNA
in the G1-infected cell is not known, but the accumulation
may, for example, reflect differential rates of viral transcription as
a function of the cell cycle. Nonetheless, the enhanced synthesis of
late viral proteins and enhanced virus growth seen for the
S-phase-infected cell was unique to the cell cycle-restricted mutant
viruses analyzed here. Perhaps other factors contribute to an increased
translational efficiency of the late viral messages in S-phase cells
infected with the RNA transport-defective viruses (Fig. 4 and Table 4).
Also, since the differential transport of mRNA that occurs as a
function of the cell cycle did not impact steady-state levels of
cytoplasmic late viral mRNA, we suggest that this control may have a
greater significance in regulating expression of cellular genes that
impact Ad growth.
Perhaps cells infected during S phase are more promiscuous for the
transport of all mRNA. As a result, late viral transcript levels are
reduced by the increase in cellular message transport and the resulting
competition for limited transport machinery. This suggestion is
consistent with the finding that cells infected during S phase with the
wild-type or mutant Ads synthesize more cellular proteins than do cells
infected during G1 (Fig. 4). If growth of the wild-type
virus is facilitated by host cell shutoff, then the reduced shutoff
seen in S-phase-infected cells may hinder replication of the wild-type
virus (Fig. 3 and 4 and Table 4). The RNA transport-defective viruses,
on the other hand, may derive greater benefit from the promiscuous RNA
transport apparent in the S-phase-infected cell. This benefit may lie
not so much in the transport of late viral genes as in the enhanced
transport and expression of a subset of cellular genes. Conceivably,
expression of these cellular genes requires the E1B 55-kDa-E4 orf6
protein complex in cells infected during stages of the cell cycle other than S phase. Transcripts of several cellular genes, such as the hsp-70
and
-tubulin genes and the interferon-inducible genes Mx-A and 6-16, are selectively transported late in Ad infection. The selective
transport of host transcripts depends on the E1B 55-kDa protein and
stimulation of their transcription in the late phase of infection
(47, 76). Perhaps the transport of host transcripts such as
these is facilitated for the purpose of viral replication.
It has been previously suggested that a positively acting factor may be
recruited to the viral inclusions that are nuclear compartments of
viral RNA processing by the E1B 55-kDa-E4 orf6 complex to facilitate
mRNA transport and cell cycle-independent virus growth (52).
Perhaps this factor is abundant in S-phase cells and can promote the
transport of RNA in the absence of the E1B 55-kDa-E4 orf6 complex. As
suggested by our previous work, such a factor may be unique to primate
cells (28). Several cellular proteins function in both mRNA
transport and cell cycle regulation such that these processes may be
linked to some extent (21, 23, 41,