Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, September 1999, p. 7357-7367, Vol. 73, No. 9
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification of Amino Acid Residues of Influenza
Virus Nucleoprotein Essential for RNA Binding
Debra
Elton,
Liz
Medcalf,
Konrad
Bishop,
Deborah
Harrison, and
Paul
Digard*
Division of Virology, Department of
Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, United
Kingdom
Received 22 March 1999/Accepted 25 May 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The influenza virus nucleoprotein (NP) is a
single-strand-RNA-binding protein associated with genome and antigenome
RNA and is one of the four virus proteins necessary for transcription and replication of viral RNA. To better characterize the mechanism by
which NP binds RNA, we undertook a physical and mutational analysis of
the polypeptide, with the strategy of identifying first the regions in
direct contact with RNA, then the classes of amino acids involved, and
finally the crucial residues by mutagenesis. Chemical fragmentation and
amino acid sequencing of NP that had been UV cross linked to
radiolabelled RNA showed that protein-RNA contacts occur throughout the
length of the polypeptide. Chemical modification experiments implicated
arginine but not lysine residues as important for RNA binding, while
RNA-dependent changes in the intrinsic fluorescence spectrum of NP
suggested the involvement of tryptophan residues. Supporting these
observations, single-codon mutagenesis identified five tryptophan, one
phenylalanine, and two arginine residues as essential for high-affinity
RNA binding at physiological temperature. In addition, mutants unable
to bind RNA in vitro were unable to support virus gene expression in
vivo. The mutationally sensitive residues are not localized to any
particular region of NP but instead are distributed throughout the
protein. Overall, these data are inconsistent with previous models
suggesting that the NP-RNA interaction is mediated by a discrete
N-terminal domain. Instead, we propose that high-affinity binding of
RNA by NP requires the concerted interaction of multiple regions of the
protein with RNA and that the individual protein-RNA contacts are
mediated by a combination of electrostatic interactions between positively charged residues and the phosphate backbone and planar interactions between aromatic side chains and bases.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The genome of influenza A virus is
composed of eight strands of negative-sense RNA, which in virions and
infected cells occurs in the form of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes
with the virus-encoded PB1, PB2, and PA proteins and nucleoprotein
(NP). The RNP complexes represent the functional templates for
influenza virus RNA synthesis, and during infection they contain both
negative-sense (vRNA) and positive-sense (cRNA) replicative
intermediate RNA but not virus mRNA (reviewed in reference
31). The four RNP-associated proteins are the only
viral polypeptides necessary for transcription and replication of a
genome segment (24).
PB1, PB2, and PA associate to form a highly regulated RNA-dependent
RNA polymerase capable of switching between two modes of transcription
to produce either capped and polyadenylated mRNA or replicative copies
of the genome segments (31). In contrast, the major
function associated with NP is a nonenzymatic
single-strand-RNA-binding activity, which has no apparent sequence
specificity (3, 27, 43, 49). This RNA-binding activity is
reflected in the stoichiometric quantity of the protein in RNPs, from
which it has been estimated that one polypeptide interacts with around
20 nucleotides of RNA (11). Although NP encapsidates the
RNA, it does not protect it from digestion with RNase (3, 14,
39), suggesting that the RNA is bound on the outside of the
structure. NP is apparently responsible for the higher-order structure
of RNPs, which occur in the form of helices twisted back into a
double-helical hairpin (25, 39), since the structures can
persist following removal of the RNA (39, 41). This implies
protein-protein contacts between NP monomers (41), which is
consistent with the observed cooperative nature of the NP-RNA
interaction (49).
Other functions have been postulated for NP; although the polymerase
complex can efficiently transcribe short templates, NP is required for
synthesis of longer RNAs, leading to the suggestion that it may act as
a processivity factor (23). NP may also play a role in the
regulation of polymerase activity, since cRNA and vRNA (but not mRNA)
synthesis depends on a supply of soluble (i.e., not bound to RNA)
NP (4, 45). Intriguingly, NP has recently been shown to
make direct protein-protein contacts with the PB1 and PB2 subunits of
the polymerase (5, 35), but whether these contacts play a
role in regulating polymerase activity is not yet known. NP also
interacts with at least two cellular proteins. As expected for a
protein that contains nuclear localization signals, it interacts
with polypeptides of the importin
family (36, 47), and
this proximal interaction is capable of directing the nuclear import of
NP-RNA complexes (37). NP also binds filamentous actin, an
interaction that influences the cellular localization of NP
(13).
A molecular characterization of this multifunctional protein is
therefore of some interest, with an analysis of how the polypeptide interacts with RNA being a logical starting point. Two studies have
identified an amino-terminal region of NP that is capable of binding
RNA (1, 29), but this fragment binds RNA with much lower
affinity than the intact polypeptide does, suggesting that other NP
sequences are important for high-affinity binding (1). Also,
little information is available at the amino acid level on how NP
interacts with RNA, and the protein does not contain sequences with
homology to previously characterized RNA-binding motifs (1,
9). However, the protein as a whole is very basic (48), and this has led to a widely accepted hypothesis that the positive charges of lysine and arginine residues are involved in
contacting the negatively charged phosphate backbone. Since our
long-term aim is to understand the mechanisms by which NP exerts its
regulatory effects on polymerase transcription, we decided to further
investigate how the protein interacts with RNA. Our strategy was to
first identify which regions of the full-length polypeptide make direct
contact with RNA, to then test the importance of various classes of
amino acid for binding, and to finally employ site-directed
mutagenesis to identify the important residues. We show here that
direct protein-RNA contacts occur throughout the length of the
polypeptide and not just at the N terminus. Intrinsic fluorescence
spectroscopy and chemical modification experiments indicate the
involvement of tryptophan and arginine residues in binding RNA, and
consistent with this, mutational analysis identified two arginine and
six aromatic residues essential for RNA binding. These mutationally
sensitive residues were not localized to any particular region of the
polypeptide but were found throughout the protein. Thus, high-affinity
RNA binding by NP requires contributions from multiple regions of the polypeptide.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids, RNA, antisera, and viruses.
Plasmids capable of
directing the expression of authentic NP in eukaryotic cells (pKT5) or
fused to maltose-binding protein (MBP) (pMAL-NP) in Escherichia
coli have been described previously (13). Certain NP
point mutants have been described previously (13), while
others were constructed by oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis of
plasmids pKT5 or pMAL-NP by standard procedures (30). For in
vitro RNA-binding assays, a radiolabelled 178-nucleotide synthetic RNA
target corresponding to influenza virus A/PR8/34 segment 8, but with
nucleotides 84 to 795 (inclusive) deleted, and a C-to-A transversion of
the penultimate base was transcribed from plasmid pKT8-
3'5' as
previously described (13). Rabbit antisera raised against
amino acids 340 to 498 of A/PR8/34 NP (13) have been
described previously. Recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing the three
influenza virus A/PR8/34 P proteins (46) or bacteriophage T7
RNA polymerase (vTF-7) (18) have been described previously.
Expression and purification of NP.
NP fused to MBP-NP was
purified from extracts of E. coli TG1 containing plasmid
pMAL-NP by affinity chromatography on amylose resin (New England
Biolabs) as previously described (13). To remove the MBP
moiety, the fusion protein was digested with 0.5% (wt/wt) factor Xa
protease (New England Biolabs). After an 18-h incubation at 14°C, the
protein was loaded onto a MonoQ ion-exchange column (Pharmacia)
equilibrated with 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.6), and the column was eluted
with a linear gradient of 0 to 2 M NaCl in 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.6). MBP
eluted mainly in the flowthrough fractions, while NP eluted as a broad
peak at around 800 mM NaCl.
RNA filter-binding and UV cross-linking assays.
Filter-binding assays were performed by incubating protein samples with
20 fmol of RNA (around 5,000 cpm) in 25 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.6)-50 mM
NaCl-5 mM MgCl2-0.5 mM dithiothreitol DTT-5% glycerol at room temperature (unless otherwise specified) for 20 min. The reaction mixtures were passed through nitrocellulose filters
equilibrated in 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.6)-50 mM NaCl and washed three
times with 200 µl of the same buffer. Bound radioactivity was
quantified by liquid scintillation counting. For UV cross-linking
experiments, reaction mixtures (generally containing 125 nM MBP-NP)
were incubated for 20 min as above and then irradiated at 254 nm for 5 min at an intensity of 4 mW/cm2 in a Spectronics XL-1500 UV
cross-linker. Free RNA was removed by digestion with 2 µg of RNase A
per ml for 30 min at room temperature before being subjected to
analysis by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE) and autoradiography.
Chemical modification of NP.
All modification procedures
included control protein samples that were treated in parallel as
described below, except that the reactive chemical was omitted.
Spectrophotometric measurements were taken with reactions carried out
in the absence of protein as a baseline.
To modify arginine side chains with p-hydroxyphenylglyoxal
(p-HPG [Sigma]), aliquots of MBP-NP in 0.1 M sodium
phosphate (pH 9.0) were treated with 10 mM p-HPG
(approximately a 1,000-fold molar excess) for 90 min at room
temperature in the dark. Unreacted p-HPG was removed by gel
filtration over Sephadex G-25 columns equilibrated in 0.1 M sodium
phosphate (pH 9.0). Incorporation of p-HPG was measured by
spectrophotometry at 340 nm, with a molar absorption coefficient of
1.83 × 104 M
1 cm
1
(50). To determine the percentage of arginine side chains
modified, aliquots of the modified MBP-NP were separated by SDS-PAGE
and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue, and the protein
concentration was determined by densitometry relative to an MBP-NP
dilution series of known concentration run in parallel.
Two procedures were used for the modification of primary amines with
trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS). When only partial
modification of
lysine residues was desired, aliquots of MBP-NP
were mixed with an
equal volume of 0.1 M Na
2B
4O
7 in
0.1 M NaOH
and TNBS (Fisons) was added to a final concentration of 22 mM.
After a 5-min incubation at room temperature, half of each sample
was passed over a Sephadex G-25 column equilibrated in 10 mM HEPES
(pH
7.6)-50 mM NaCl-0.1 mM EDTA-10% glycerol to stop further reaction
and remove unreacted TNBS. The remainder of the samples were treated
by
the addition of 2 volumes of 0.1 M NaH
2PO
4-1.5
mM Na
2SO
3, and
the incorporation of
trinitrobenzene was determined by spectrophotometry
at 420 nm with a
molar absorption coefficient of 1.92 × 10
4
M
1 cm
1 (
17) (potential
absorption resulting from modification of the
polypeptide N terminus
was disregarded). When complete derivatization
of primary amines was
desired, the protein sample (0.1 to 1 mg/ml)
was diluted to 250 µl
with water and an equal volume of 4% NaHCO
3 followed by
250 µl of 0.1% TNBS was added. After a 2-h incubation
at 40°C, the
reaction was stopped by the addition of 250 µl of
10% SDS and 125 µl of 1 M HCl. The absorption was read at 335
nm, and the number of
modified amine groups was determined with
respect to a standard curve
constructed from a dilution series
of bovine serum albumin
(
22).
To modify primary amine groups with acetic anhydride, aliquots of
MBP-NP were mixed with an equal volume of saturated sodium
acetate and
treated with two aliquots of acetic anhydride for
30 min each on ice.
The samples were passed over a Sephadex G-25
column equilibrated in
storage buffer to exchange buffers and
remove unreacted anhydride, and
aliquots were reacted with TNBS
as described above to quantify
remaining unreacted amine
groups.
Fluorescence spectroscopy.
Intrinsic fluorescence
measurements were recorded at 25°C in a Perkin-Elmer LS 50 B
luminescence spectrometer with a thermostatically controlled cuvette
holder. Wavelength scans were taken from protein samples diluted to 1 µg/ml in 50 mM NaCl-20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.6) with an excitation
wavelength of 280 nm (2.5-nm slit width) and an emission slit width of
5 nm. Scans were averaged from at least five repetitions. Quenching
experiments were performed with 5 µg of protein per ml, allowing a
5-min equilibration time after the addition of RNA aliquots.
Fluorescence output was then integrated over 1 min, before the addition
of further RNA.
Polymerase-binding assays.
Xenopus laevis oocytes were
maintained and microinjected with synthetic mRNAs encoding the
influenza virus P proteins (transcribed from plasmids pKT1 to pKT3) as
previously described (6, 12). For precipitation reactions,
2.5 µl of oocyte lysate (corresponding to one-quarter of an oocyte)
was incubated with 0.5 µg of fusion protein in 100 µl of IP buffer
(100 mM KCl, 50 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.6], 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40) for 1 h at room temperature. A
50-µl volume of a 50% (vol/vol) slurry of amylose resin (New England
Biolabs) in phosphate-buffered saline was added, and incubation was
continued for a further 30 min with gentle mixing. The solid phase was
collected by centrifugation and washed three times with 750 µl of IP
buffer. Bound material was eluted by boiling in 40 µl of SDS-PAGE
sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.
Influenza virus gene expression assay.
For in vivo RNA
transcription assays, a synthetic influenza virus genome segment
(flu-CAT) containing an antisense chloramphenicol acetyltransferase
(CAT) gene was produced by in vitro transcription of plasmid pPB2CAT9
(a generous gift of Mark Krystal). BHK cells (in 35-mm-diameter dishes)
were infected for 2 h at 37°C with recombinant vaccinia viruses
expressing the three subunits of the influenza virus polymerase
(PB1-VAC, PB2-VAC, and PA-VAC) (46) and the bacteriophage T7
RNA polymerase (VTF-7) (18) at a multiplicity of infection
of 5 of each virus per cell. The cells were washed three times with
serum-free medium before being subjected to transfection with up to 1 µg of plasmid pKT5 encoding NP (or mutant derivatives), 0.5 µg of
pPB2CAT9 in vitro-transcribed RNA, and 10 µg of a cationic liposome
mixture (Escort; Sigma-Aldrich) as specified by the manufacturer. The
cells were incubated at 37°C for 20 h, washed three times with
ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, and solubilized in 1 ml of CAT
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay lysis buffer (Boehringer Mannheim).
The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C, and CAT expression was quantified relative
to known standards by a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(Boehringer Mannheim).
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of NP sequences in direct contact with RNA.
Previously, we have shown that while MBP alone does not detectably bind
RNA, a fusion of E. coli MBP and influenza virus NP (MBP-NP)
binds RNA with similar affinity to authentic NP purified from influenza
virus virions (Kd
20 nM) (3,
13). To further examine the interaction of NP with RNA, we
digested the fusion protein with factor Xa protease to separate the MBP
and NP domains and purified the NP to near homogeneity by ion-exchange
chromatography (Fig. 1b, lane 1).
Purified NP and MBP-NP were then tested for their RNA-binding activity
by using a UV cross-linking assay. Protein samples were incubated with
a radiolabelled RNA and subjected to UV irradiation to form cross-links
between molecules in direct contact. Following removal of free RNA by
digestion with RNase, polypeptides were separated by SDS-PAGE,
visualized by staining with Coomassie blue dye, and examined for bound
RNA by autoradiography (Fig. 1a). Both MBP-NP and NP became
radiolabelled when subjected to this procedure (lanes 8 and 10, respectively) but did not acquire radiolabel when incubated with RNA in
the absence of UV irradiation (lanes 6 and 7). In addition, binding
could be competed with unlabelled RNA from viral and cellular sources
(data not shown), indicating that the reaction was specific and that
the recombinant NP showed similar sequence-independent binding
properties to those of authentic NP (3, 19, 49). Moreover,
when MBP-NP was irradiated in the presence of RNA and subsequently
incubated with factor Xa protease to separate the MBP and NP moieties,
only NP was radiolabelled (Fig. 1a, lane 9). Therefore, the RNA-binding
activity of MBP-NP depends solely on the NP portion of the fusion
protein, and UV cross-linking provides a convenient and
specific means of examining this activity.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
RNA-binding activity of recombinant NP. (a) UV
cross-linking analysis of RNA binding by MBP-NP and NP. Protein samples
were incubated with radiolabelled RNA and subjected to UV irradiation.
Excess RNA was removed by RNase digestion, and samples were separated
by SDS-PAGE. Radiolabelled proteins were detected by autoradiography
(32P; lanes 6 to 10), and total protein was detected by
staining with Coomassie brilliant blue (Coomassie; lanes 1 to 5).
Lanes: 1 and 6, NP; 2 and 7, MBP-NP (samples in lanes 1 and 2 were
not irradiated); 3 and 8, MBP-NP; 4 and 9, MBP-NP incubated with factor
Xa protease after cross-linking; 5 and 10, NP. Open arrowheads
mark the indicated polypeptides. Solid arrowheads mark a contaminant
protein in the RNase preparation (top) or factor Xa (bottom). Also
shown are the molecular masses (in kilodaltons) of marker
proteins. (b) Chemical fragmentation of NP. NP was cross-linked to a
radiolabelled RNA and analyzed by SDS-PAGE before ( )
or after (+) incubation in 70% formic acid. Total and radiolabelled
proteins were detected as in panel a or by Western transfer to a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and immunoblotting with an
antiserum directed against the C terminus of NP ( -C) or by amino
acid sequencing. Major NP fragments are labelled i to v, and the
N-terminal residue (NH2 residue) is given. (c) Formic acid
cleavage map of NP. Numbered arrows indicate the positions of
aspartyl-prolyl dipeptides in NP, and the bracket gives the sequences
against which anti-NP sera were raised. Thin lines represent the
identities of the numbered NP fragments.
|
|
Previous work has shown that the N-terminal one-third of NP binds RNA,
but with substantially lower affinity than the intact
protein does
(
1,
29). Thus, sequences outside of the N terminus
contribute to RNA binding, either directly by contacting RNA or
indirectly by affecting the folding of the N terminus (
1).
To distinguish between these possibilities, we chemically digested
NP
which had been UV cross-linked to a radiolabelled RNA and examined
the
distribution of radiolabel among the protein fragments. After
treatment
with 70% formic acid, which induces partial hydrolysis
of
aspartyl-prolyl bonds (
32), five major novel polypeptides
were observed (Fig.
1b, compare lanes 1 and 2). The separated
fragments
were further analyzed by transfer to a polyvinylidenefluoride
membrane
and immunoblotting with region-specific anti-NP sera
or N-terminal
amino acid sequencing. The N-terminal sequences
of fragments i to iii
indicated that cleavage had occurred between
the aspartyl-prolyl pairs
at positions 88 and 89, 160 and 161,
and 302 and 303, respectively,
while fragment iv contained the
authentic N terminus (Fig.
1b).
Together with the apparent molecular
weights of the polypeptides and
their reactivities with antisera
directed against the C terminus of NP
(Fig.
1b, lane 5), fragments
i to iv could be unambiguously assigned to
a cleavage map of NP
(Fig.
1c). We could not obtain the N-terminal
sequence of polypeptide
v, but since it did not react with antiserum
directed against
the C terminus (Fig.
1b, lane 5) or against amino
acids 161 to
498 of NP (data not shown), it most probably consists of
the smallest
predicted N-terminal fragment (Fig.
1c). All five cleaved
fragments
were radiolabelled (Fig.
1b, lane 4), indicating that
residues
within the fragments were bound to RNA at the time of UV
irradiation.
The radiolabelling of fragments iv and v from the N
terminus of
the protein is consistent with the ability of this region
to bind
RNA in isolation (
1,
29) and confirms the function
in the
context of the authentic protein. However, the presence of
radiolabel
in fragments ii and iii indicates that the C terminus of NP
also
makes direct contact with RNA. Moreover, the similar amounts of
radiolabel incorporated into the N-terminal fragment iv and the
C-terminal fragment iii (Fig.
1b, lanes 2 and 4) suggest that
they
participate equally in binding
RNA.
Fluorescence spectroscopy of NP.
Next, we wished to examine
the involvement of specific classes of amino acids in NP for RNA
binding. There is much evidence from experiments with other nucleic
acid-binding proteins that aromatic amino acids can interact with
single-stranded nucleic acids either by polar interactions or by planar
stacking with exposed bases (2, 7, 8, 20, 26, 38, 40, 44). To test whether this was the case for NP, we used fluorescence spectroscopy. Tryptophan and to a lesser extent tyrosine residues absorb light at wavelengths around 280 to 300 nm and subsequently emit
some of the absorbed energy at an intensity and wavelength dependent on
the environment of the fluorescing side chain (42).
Initial experiments revealed that emission spectra obtained from NP by
using excitiation wavelengths of 280 and 296 nm were
superimposable
after scaling, suggesting that the majority of
the fluorescence arose
from tryptophan residues and that there
was no significant output from
tyrosine residues (data not shown).
The peak fluorescence emission
(
max) from a 10 nM NP solution
was at 334 nm (Fig.
2a), indicating that on balance, the
fluorescent
tryptophan residues were partially exposed to solvent. In
confirmation
of this, under conditions where the protein would be
expected
to be fully denatured (8 M guanidinium chloride),
max was shifted
to 350 nm, along with an 80% decrease
in fluorescence intensity
(Fig.
2a, data scaled to 100% for
comparison). We also measured
the emission spectrum of NP extracted
from virions and found that
it was almost identical to that of the
recombinant NP (Fig.
2a),
suggesting that the two proteins were of
similar overall conformation.
Next, we investigated whether the
intrinsic fluorescence of NP
was altered when the protein was bound to
RNA. Although
max was
not significantly altered in the
presence of saturating amounts
of RNA, the fluorescence intensity was
reduced by around 35% (Fig.
2b), indicating that the fluorescence of
one or more of the tryptophan
residues was quenched when the protein
was bound to RNA. To investigate
this phenomenon further, we titrated a
solution of NP with increasing
amounts of RNA and measured the
fluorescence output (Fig.
2c).
Addition of RNA caused an initially
sharp but then gradually decreasing
fluorescence, which tended toward a
plateau when the fluorescence
intensity had reached about two-thirds of
its initial value, consistent
with the drop in fluorescent output seen
in Fig.
2b. If the fluorescence
quenching was a direct consequence of
RNA binding, it would be
expected to be reversed under conditions which
disrupted protein-RNA
contacts. We therefore performed a salt back
titration and found
that addition of NaCl resulted in an increase in
fluorescence
intensity, with 50% of the original signal being restored
by 500
mM NaCl (Fig.
2d). This value is similar to the salt
concentration
shown to inhibit RNA binding by 50% (
49),
indicating that fluorescence
quenching directly reflects the NP-RNA
interaction. Thus, the
environment of tryptophan residues in NP is
reversibly altered
by binding to RNA.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Spectroscopic analysis of the interaction of NP with
RNA. (a) Fluorescence spectra of native and denatured NP. Spectra of
recombinant (thick line) and virion (thin line) NP were recorded in the
absence and presence (recombinant NP only [dashed line]) of 8 M
guanidinium chloride. All spectra have been scaled to the same maximum
intensity. (b) Effect of RNA on the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence
of NP. Solutions of NP in the presence (thin line) and absence (thick
line) of saturating amounts of RNA were excited at 296 nm, and
fluorescent emission was measured at the plotted wavelengths. (c)
Titration of fluorescence quenching by RNA. Aliquots of RNA (plotted in
terms of nucleotides of RNA added per protein molecule) were added to a
solution of MBP-NP, and fluorescence emission was measured at 335 nm
after excitation at 280 nm. (d). Salt-dependent reversal of
fluorescence quenching. Aliquots of NaCl were added to a sample of NP
containing saturating amounts of RNA, and fluorescence emission was
measured as in panel c.
|
|
Chemical modification of NP.
NP as a whole is extremely basic
(containing 21 lysine and 49 arginine residues [48]),
consistent with the hypothesis that positive charges on the protein
interact with the negatively charged phosphate backbone of RNA
(19). To test this, we chemically modified the protein with
reagents specific for arginine or lysine residues. We chose
treatments that could be used under relatively mild buffer
conditions, since this approach would be more likely to preserve
the polypeptide structure (avoiding nonspecific loss of
RNA-binding activity) and therefore would preferentially modify surface-exposed residues. Also, to be able to monitor the degree of protein modification, we chose reagents that allowed
spectrophotometric quantification of the reaction. However, since
these procedures required relatively large quantities of protein for
accurate determinations, we used MBP-NP as a substrate since it was
easier to prepare the necessary quantities of the fusion protein
and since the MBP moiety had no apparent effect on the affinity of the
polypeptide for RNA (13).
To investigate the effect of modification of arginine residues on
RNA binding, we treated MBP-NP with
p-HPG, which reacts
with
the guanidyl group of arginine (
50). Aliquots of MBP-NP
were
incubated with a 1,000-fold molar excess of
p-HPG, and
the
amount incorporated into protein was determined by
spectrophotometry
at 340 nm (data not shown). SDS-PAGE analysis
revealed that although
treatment with
p-HPG had not resulted
in appreciable degradation
of the protein relative to the mock-treated
sample, it had slightly
altered its electrophoretic mobility (Fig.
3a). Protein recovery
was quantified, and
in conjunction with the spectrophotometric
incorporation data, it was
determined that 11% of the arginine
residues had been modified (data
not shown). MBP-NP contains 55
arginines (49 of which are in NP
[
15,
21,
48]), so on average,
6 residues per protein
had been modified. The MBP-NP samples were
tested for their
RNA-binding ability in a filter assay, where
it was found that the
modified protein had lost almost all activity
relative to the
mock-treated sample (Fig.
3b). In replicate experiments,
treatment with
p-HPG led to modification of between 11 and 17%
(average,
15 ± 3%) of the arginine residues (corresponding to
an
average of 8 amino acids/protein), and in all cases the modified
polypeptides showed very little RNA-binding activity (data not
shown).
However, the intrinsic fluorescence spectra of the treated
polypeptides were not significantly different from those of the
mock-treated samples, indicating that the modifications had not
affected the overall structure of the polypeptides (data not shown).
Therefore, a small number of arginine residues in NP are accessible
to
modification by
p-HPG and are crucial for RNA binding.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Chemical modification of basic residues in MBP-NP. (a
and b) Modification of arginine side-chains with p-HPG. (a) Samples
treated (T) or mock treated (M) with p-HPG were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and staining with Coomassie blue. The arrow indicates MBP-NP.
Also shown are values measured for the amount of derivatization of the
polypeptide (as a percentage and as residues modified per protein).
Sizes of molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are also shown. (b)
The ability of the polypeptides to bind to a radiolabelled RNA was
measured in a nitrocellulose filter-binding assay. (c and d)
Modification of lysine side chains with TNBS. (c) Samples were treated
(or mock treated) with TNBS at the indicated pH values and analyzed as
in panel a. (d) The RNA-binding activity of TNBS-treated samples was
measured as in panel b. (e and f) Modification of lysine side chains
with acetic anhydride. (e) Samples were treated (or mock treated) with
60- and 250-fold molar excesses of acetic anhydride and analyzed as in
panel a. (f) The RNA-binding activity of acetylated samples was
measured as in panel b.
|
|
To investigate the effect of modification of lysine residues on RNA
binding, we treated MBP-NP with TNBS, which introduces
trinitrobenzene
onto

-amino groups (
17,
22). The reaction
is influenced
by pH, and so we treated MBP-NP at a range of pH
values to generate
polypeptides that were modified to various
extents. MBP-NP at pH 9.6, 8.8, or 8.0 was incubated with or without
TNBS for 5 min. Unreacted
TNBS was removed by gel filtration,
and the amount incorporated was
determined by spectrophotometry.
Aliquots were also analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and staining with Coomassie
blue dye to check for protein
recovery and integrity. The extent
of

-amino group modification
ranged from 32% (pH 9.6) to 13%
(pH 8.0), while there was no apparent
degradation of the polypeptides
(Fig.
3c). The modified proteins were
then tested for their ability
to bind RNA as before. MBP-NP samples
treated at pH 8.0 or 8.8
were not substantially altered in their
ability to retain the
radiolabelled RNA compared to a sample
mock treated at pH 9.6
(Fig.
3d) or samples mock treated at pH 8.8 or
8.0 (data not shown).
However, MBP-NP treated at pH 9.6 showed a
reduced (but not abolished)
ability to bind RNA, retaining only
40% of the RNA at a dose where
unmodified MBP-NP retained over
80% (Fig.
3d). Therefore, modification
of the lysine residues of
MBP-NP with TNBS did alter the ability
of the protein to bind
RNA, but only at relatively high values
of
derivatization.
TNBS modification of lysine replaces the normal positive charge of the
amino acid side chain with a bulky and highly negatively
charged
trinitrobenzene group, which could affect RNA binding
by steric effects
or charge repulsion even if the modified lysines
were not directly
involved in contact with RNA. We therefore tested
the effect of a
smaller, uncharged substitution of amino groups
on RNA-binding
activity. Accordingly, portions of MBP-NP were
treated with acetic
anhydride to acetylate

-amino groups. To
quantify the extent of
modification, aliquots of each reaction
mixture were subsequently
treated with TNBS under conditions which
would be expected to
derivatize all remaining unmodified amino
groups (
22), to
permit spectrophotometric measurement of the
number of remaining
lysines. Protein samples were also analyzed
by SDS-PAGE and staining
with Coomassie blue dye to monitor protein
integrity and recovery. In
the experiment in Fig.
3e, treatment
of MBP-NP with approximately 60- and 250-fold molar excesses of
acetic anhydride led to acetylation of
50 and 66% of the lysine
residues, respectively, and while there was
no obvious degradation
of the polypeptides, their electrophoretic
mobility had decreased
slightly compared to that of mock-treated
MBP-NP. When the modified
polypeptides were tested for their ability to
bind RNA, they displayed
much reduced but not completely abolished
activity compared to
mock-treated MBP-NP (Fig.
3f). While 1 pmol of the
unmodified
sample was sufficient to retain 30% of the input RNA and 10 pmol
was sufficient to retain over 90%, the modified polypeptides
bound
less than 30% of the probe even at a dose of 30
pmol.
Thus, modification of lysines in MBP-NP with either TNBS or acetic
anhydride led to a reduction in the RNA-binding ability
of the
polypeptide, but even the highest levels of derivatization
tested
(66%; Fig.
3f) did not completely abolish RNA binding.
However, MBP
contains significant numbers of lysines (36, compared
to 21 in NP
[
15,
21,
48]), unlike arginine residues. Therefore,
it
was possible that most of the derivatisation in the experiments
in Fig.
3 occurred in the MBP moiety and that the actual modification
levels of
NP were significantly lower than is predicted by simple
proportion.
However, when isolated NP was treated with acetic
anhydride, similar
levels of derivatization were obtained, which
again resulted in no more
than a threefold reduction in RNA-binding
activity (data not
shown). Overall, the data suggest that lysines
do not play
as crucial a role as arginines, where modification
of a much
smaller proportion of the amino acid side chains was
sufficient to
render the polypeptide almost completely unable
to bind RNA (Fig.
3b).
RNA-binding activity of mutant NP polypeptides.
The
experiments described above implicated tryptophan and arginine side
chains as being important in RNA binding. However, they did not address
the question of which particular residues are involved. Since NP
contains only 6 tryptophans (48) (Table 1), we mutated each codon in an attempt
to define the residue(s) involved in RNA binding. A similar approach
did not seem feasible for arginine residues, since the protein contains
49. However, by examining sequence alignments of NPs from influenza A,
B, C, and Dhori orthomyxoviruses (data not shown), we were able to
identify several conserved arginine residues at positions 8, 150, 156, 175, 199, 204, 208, 213, 267, 391, and 416 (Table 1). These and the tryptophan residues encoded by pMAL-NP were altered to alanine. In
addition, to further probe the importance of aromatic amino acids in
binding RNA, we mutated conserved tyrosine and phenylalanine residues at positions 148 and 412, respectively (Table 1).
The desired changes were introduced into pMAL-NP by site-directed
mutagenesis, and the mutant fusion proteins were expressed
in
E. coli and purified by affinity chromatography on amylose
columns as
described above. However, many of the mutants accumulated
to
lower levels than wild-type (WT) MBP-NP did, so that when sample
concentrations were adjusted to contain equal amounts of full-length
fusion protein (assessed by Coomassie blue staining [Fig.
4b]),
they contained larger amounts of
contaminating polypeptides, including
a family of products of around 50 kDa. These polypeptides reacted
with antisera raised against either MBP
or the N terminus of NP
and therefore most probably represent
proteolytic products of
the fusion protein (data not shown). Similar
presumed degradation
products were also observed in some preparations
of WT MBP-NP
(e.g., Fig.
4b, lane 14). The protein samples were tested
for
their ability to bind RNA in solution by a UV cross-linking assay.
As above, the wild-type MBP-NP fusion protein became radiolabelled
when
irradiated in the presence of the probe, indicating that
it had bound
to the added RNA (Fig.
4a, lanes 1, 14, and 15),
while no product was
seen in the absence of protein (lane 6).
The majority of the
arginine-to-alanine mutants became radiolabelled
to the same intensity
as did WT MBP-NP (lanes 2 to 5, 7 to 10,
and 12), suggesting that they
were not significantly altered in
their ability to bind RNA (Table
1).
In contrast, the R267 and
R416 mutants failed to become detectably
radiolabelled (lanes
11 and 13, respectively), indicating that they had
lost the ability
to bind RNA (Table
1). Of the aromatic mutants, the
W104, W207,
and Y148-L mutants bound RNA at essentially WT levels
(lanes 16,
19, and 22, respectively). However, the W330-A and
F412 mutants
possessed very little RNA-binding activity (lanes 20 and
23, respectively),
while the W120, W139, and W386 mutants showed
appreciable but
reduced binding (lanes 17, 18, and 21 respectively).
The reduced
binding of the last three tryptophan mutants was
reproducible
and could be observed across a range of protein
concentrations
(data not shown), suggesting that the polypeptides had a
reduced
affinity for RNA. Thus, consistent with the results of chemical
modification and fluorescence spectroscopy, two arginine, one
phenyalanine, and four tryptophan residues were identified as
being
essential for WT RNA-binding activity. In addition, there
was no clear
correlation between WT RNA-binding activity and the
quantity of
copurifying MBP-NP "stub" (e.g., compare lanes 21
and 22). Also,
the MBP-NP stub possessed very little RNA-binding
activity in this
assay.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
RNA-binding activity of NP mutants containing
single-amino-acid changes. WT and mutated MBP-NP (as labelled) were
expressed and purified from E. coli. Protein samples were
adjusted to contain approximately equal amounts of full-length fusion
protein and assayed for their ability to bind radiolabelled RNA in a UV
cross-linking assay. Polypeptides were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography (a) and staining with Coomassie brilliant blue (b). The
autoradiograms in panel a were taken from the stained gels in panel b.
Also indicated by arrowheads are molecular size markers (in
kilodaltons) and the position of MBP-NP.
|
|
Recently, we have shown that the mutations in the NPs of the
temperature-sensitive (
ts) viruses A/WSN/33
ts56
and A/FPV/Rostock/34
tsG81 render the RNA-binding activity
of the polypeptides
ts (
35).
We therefore tested
certain of the point mutants described here
for
ts
RNA-binding. Mutant MBP-NP fusion proteins were prepared
as above from
E. coli cultures grown at 30°C, and their RNA-binding
activities were compared to those of the polypeptides prepared
from
cultures incubated at 37°C. The abilities of W330-A and W386-A
to
bind RNA were not appreciably improved by synthesis at 30°C
(data not
shown). In contrast, when the R267-A, F412-A, and R416-A
polypeptides
were prepared at 30°C and assayed for their ability
to bind RNA at
30°C, they showed much increased activity compared
to the same
proteins synthesized at 37°C (Fig.
5a,
compare lanes
3 and 4, 5 and 6, 7 and 8), with overall binding activity
approaching
that of the WT protein (lane 1). When the mutant
polypeptides
synthesized at 30°C were assayed for their ability to
bind RNA
at 37°C, F412 retained full activity (compare lanes 5 and
11).
However, the R267 and R416 polypeptides showed reduced affinity
for RNA at the higher temperature, although it was still greater
than
that seen with the same polypeptide prepared at 37°C (compare
lane 9 with lanes 3 and 10, and compare lane 13 with lanes 7 and
14). The
differential binding activities could not be explained
by increased
degradation of the polypeptides at 37°C, either during
expression and
purification or during the cross-linking assay
(Fig.
5b). Thus, the
alteration of residue R267, F412, or R416
induces
ts
RNA-binding activity in NP. The phenotype of the F412
mutant differs
slightly from those of the R267 and R416 mutants
in that F412
synthesized at 30°C is apparently more thermostable
than the last two
polypeptides. To investigate the latter aspect
further, we titrated the
thermal stability of RNA-binding by WT
and mutant NPs. In one set of
experiments, aliquots of MBP-NP
were incubated at various temperatures
in the presence of a radiolabelled
RNA and bound RNA measured using a
nitrocellulose filter-binding
assay. Alternatively, protein was heated
in the absence of RNA
before addition of the radiolabelled probe.
Increasing temperature
caused a gradual loss of RNA-binding activity by
WT MBP-NP, although
RNP complexes were remarkably stable, retaining
52% of their initial
binding activity at 60°C (Fig.
5c). However,
when the WT protein
was heated in the absence of RNA, binding activity
was more thermolabile,
decreasing the temperature at which 50% binding
activity was lost
by almost 10°C (Fig.
5c). In replicate experiments,
WT RNP complexes
were 50% dissociated at 63.5 ± 0.5°C,
compared to 54.5 ± 1.5°C
for protein heated in isolation.
Consistent with the experiment
in Fig.
5a, the R267 mutant (prepared at
30°C) was markedly more
ts than WT NP when the polypeptide
was heated in the absence of
RNA, losing 50% of its RNA-binding
activity at only 38°C (Fig.
5c). However, complexes of R267 and
RNA possessed dramatically
increased thermostability, requiring
heating at 55°C for 50% dissociation.
Thus, the apparent thermal
stability of NP is increased by binding
RNA, especially for a
ts mutant.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Effect of temperature on the NP-RNA interaction. (a and
b) MBP-NP fusion proteins were prepared from E. coli
cultures grown at the indicated temperatures and assayed for their
ability to bind a radiolabelled RNA as in Fig. 4. (a and b) The
autoradiogram (a) and the equivalent Coomassie brilliant blue-stained
gel (b) are presented. (c) Thermal denaturation of RNA-binding
activity. The indicated polypeptides (100 nM) were tested for their
ability to bind a radiolabelled RNA (1 nM) at the indicated
temperatures by filtration through a nitrocellulose filter. Protein was
heated in the presence (solid symbols) or absence (open symbols) of
RNA. Values are plotted as a percentage of the amount bound by each
protein at 30°C.
|
|
Interaction of the NP RNA-binding mutants with the influenza virus
polymerase.
The mutational analysis described above identified
specific residues whose substitution reduced RNA-binding activity,
potentially through direct alteration of an amino acid side chain
normally in contact with RNA. Alternatively, some or all of the
alterations may have exerted an indirect effect on RNA binding by
perturbing the polypeptide structure, a possibility which seemed
especially plausible for the mutations which rendered RNA binding
ts. However, defects which caused gross malfolding of the
polypeptide structure would be expected to affect other functions of
NP. Previously, we have shown that the W120 and R267 mutations have
minimal effect on the ability of NP to bind filamentous actin
(13). Similarly, the W120, W139, R267, W330, W386, and F412
mutations have little effect on the ability of the polypeptides to form
NP-NP oligomers (16). Recent work has shown that NP also
makes direct protein-protein contacts with the PB1 and PB2 subunits of
the influenza virus polymerase (5, 35). We therefore tested
the ability of the RNA-binding mutants to interact with the polymerase
complex. Previously, we have shown that the three influenza virus P
proteins assemble into a complex in X. laevis oocytes
microinjected with the appropriate mRNAs and that this system provides
a convenient source of soluble radiolabelled protein for binding
studies (6, 12, 35). Accordingly, oocyte lysates containing
the polymerase complex were incubated with MBP or with WT and mutant
MBP-NP polypeptides (synthesized at 37°C). After the addition of
amylose resin, the solid phase was collected, washed, and examined for
bound polypeptides. All three P proteins were precipitated by WT MBP-NP
but not by MBP alone (Fig. 6, lanes 2 and
3), indicating a specific association between NP and the polymerase
complex. Furthermore, similar quantities of the polymerase complex were
precipitated by all the mutant MBP-NPs defective for RNA binding (lanes
4 to 10). Therefore the point mutations which disrupt RNA-binding
activity are not associated with the general loss of other NP
functions.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Ability of RNA-binding mutants to interact with the
polymerase complex. Radiolabelled cell lysate containing the three
influenza virus P proteins was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography
before (Total) or after binding to the indicated polypeptides. Open
arrowheads indicate molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons); solid
arrows are as labelled.
|
|
Ability of the NP RNA-binding mutants to support virus gene
expression.
NP is known to be essential for virus RNA synthesis
(reviewed in reference 31), and an artificial system
has been established where NP and the three subunits of the influenza
virus RNA polymerase supplied from recombinant vaccinia viruses are
sufficient to drive transcription and replication of a synthetic
influenza virus genome segment in cells (24). We used an
adaptation of this system where NP is supplied from transfected
plasmids (13) to test the effects of point mutations
disruptive of RNA binding on the ability of NP to support
virus gene expression. The mutant NP genes were subcloned into plasmid
pKT5 (13), which directs the expression of unfused NP under
the control of the bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase promoter. BHK cells
were multiply infected with vaccinia viruses expressing the influenza
virus and bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase subunits (18, 46)
and transfected with WT or mutant pKT5 plasmids and the synthetic
flu-CAT RNA, and 20 h later the cells were lysed and the
accumulation of CAT polypeptide was measured. Figure
7 shows the activities of the NP
RNA-binding mutants relative to the WT polypeptide. All four mutants
which were unable to bind RNA in vitro (Fig. 7a, R267, W330, F412, and R416) failed to support appreciable levels of virus gene expression. Of
the three mutants which displayed reduced RNA-binding activity (RNA +),
one also failed to produce significant levels of CAT polypeptide (Fig.
7a, W120) whereas the other two (W139 and W386) supported appreciable
but diminished levels of gene expression relative to the WT protein.
Western blot analysis of parallel transfections showed that the
majority of the NP mutants (with the exception of W120) accumulated in
similar quantities to WT NP (Fig. 7b), indicating that their diminished
ability to support virus RNA synthesis was not simply the result of
poor expression. Thus, the in vitro phenotypes of the mutants correlate
with their in vivo function, and as expected, the RNA-binding activity
of NP is essential for virus gene expression.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Ability of NP RNA-binding mutants to support virus gene
expression. (a) BHK cells were infected with recombinant vaccinia
viruses expressing the three subunits of the influenza virus RNA
polymerase and T7 RNA polymerase and transfected with 1 µg each of a
synthetic influenza virus segment containing an antisense CAT gene and
plasmid encoding WT or mutant NPs, and the resulting accumulation of
CAT polypeptide was quantified. Results are expressed as the percent
activity ± standard error (n 3) for the
mutants relative to WT NP. (b) Accumulation of WT and mutant NP in
cells. Cells transfected with plasmids encoding WT or mutant NP
molecules (or with empty plasmid vector, pKT0) were examined for NP
accumulation by Western blot analysis with anti-NP serum.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Previously, two studies mapped the minimal sequences of NP capable
of binding RNA to the N-terminal one-third of the polypeptide (Fig.
8) (1, 29). However, this
truncated fragment of NP bound to RNA with lower affinity than did the
WT protein, indicating the necessity for other sequences for full
binding activity (1). In this study, we show by UV
cross-linking and chemical fragmentation that at least two sequences
within the C-terminal two-thirds of NP directly contact RNA (Fig. 1b).
Furthermore, we found that single-amino-acid replacements throughout
much of the length of NP were capable of disrupting the interaction of
the polypeptide with RNA (summarized in Fig. 8). The widespread
mutational sensitivity of RNA-binding activity is in contrast to the
sequence requirements for the characterized protein-protein
interactions mediated by NP, in which for any one ligand, disruptive
point mutations are generally more localized in distribution (Fig. 8).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Summary of single-amino-acid replacements that perturb
macromolecular interactions mediated by NP. Arrows give the locations
of important residues (as labelled). (Top) Mutations affecting
protein-protein interactions. The grey arrow indicates binding to
cellular importin (47); hatched arrows indicate
self-association (16); solid arrows indicate actin binding
(13). (Bottom) Mutations affecting RNA binding (this study
and reference 35). The minimal region of NP capable
of binding RNA (1, 29) is shaded.
|
|
The majority of the RNA-binding mutations do not affect other functions
of NP, arguing against global malfolding of the polypeptide. None of
the lesions described here decrease the ability of NP to interact with
the polymerase complex (Fig. 6). With the exception of R416, which also
decreases oligomerization of the polypeptide, none of the mutations
affecting RNA binding block the ability of the polypeptides to form
NP-NP contacts (16). In addition, the W120 and R267
mutations have little effect on the interactions of the proteins with
filamentous actin (13). Thus, the majority of the mutations
reduce RNA-binding activity specifically. However, some of them do so
in a temperature-dependent fashion, affecting the function
significantly at 37°C but much less so at 30°C. Thus, for these
mutants at least, it seems unlikely that the sequence alterations have
removed an amino acid side chain normally in direct contact with RNA.
Yet, as discussed above, the mutations are clearly not disrupting the
global folding of NP at the elevated temperature, since the
polypeptides retain the other activities associated with NP.
Furthermore, any effects of the mutations on the overall structure of
NP were too subtle to be detected as changes in the resistance of the
polypeptides to partial digestion with trypsin or chymotrypsin
proteases (data not shown).
Overall, these data are not consistent with the hypothesis that RNA
binding by NP is mediated through a discrete N-terminal region of the
protein (1, 29). Instead, we propose that high-affinity binding of RNA by NP requires the concerted interaction of multiple regions of the protein with RNA. This hypothesis is consistent with the
demonstration of direct protein-RNA contacts outside of the N terminus
(Fig. 1b) and the identification of inhibitory mutations throughout the
length of NP (Fig. 4). This model is also consistent with the proposed
wrapping of RNA around NP in a nucleosome-like pattern (25,
49), as well as with the increased thermal stability of WT
protein-RNA complexes and the ability of RNA to rescue the binding
activity of a ts mutant at elevated temperatures (Fig. 5c).
Within this framework, several possibilities exist to explain the
ability of widely separated point mutations to ablate RNA binding
without affecting other functions of NP. One possibility is that
high-affinity binding results from the multiplicative contribution of
independent binding sites, so that the loss of any one interaction
causes a relatively large decrease in binding affinity resulting from
what is effectively a loss of avidity. However, we have recently found
evidence from circular dichroism spectroscopy that NP undergoes a
conformational change on binding RNA (data not shown). Therefore, an
alternative hypothesis is that multiple protein-RNA contacts are
required to drive this conformational change necessary for
high-affinity binding and that the loss of any one interaction
interrupts the process.
Within the model of polyvalent binding, we propose that the individual
protein-RNA interactions are mediated by a combination of
electrostatic interactions between positively charged residues and the
phosphate backbone and planar interactions between aromatic side chains
and bases. This is consistent with the sensitivity of the protein
to chemical modification of arginine residues (Fig. 3), the changes in
the environment of tryptophan residues upon RNA binding (Fig. 2), and
the requirement for specific arginine and aromatic residues (Fig. 4).
In addition, this mode of single-stranded-nucleic-acid binding is well
supported by mutational and structural studies of other DNA- and
RNA-binding proteins (7, 10, 20, 28, 38, 40, 44). Two
studies which probed influenza virus RNP complexes by measuring the
protection afforded the RNA from chemical and enzymatic attack found a
general protection of RNA phosphates but sensitivity of the bases
(3, 28). This was interpreted as indicating that the protein
binds to the phosphate backbone and not to the Watson-Crick positions
of the bases. However, such findings do not rule out contacts between
the protein and other positions of the bases. Indeed, NP binds
preferentially to pyrimidine homopolymers, which suggests an
interaction between the protein and bases (1). Also,
considering that NP is not a sequence-specific RNA-binding protein, RNA
modification experiments may well reflect an average state of
protection for any one position, rather than a static interaction.
Recently, we have determined that the mutations defined as the
ts lesions in the NPs of viruses A/WSN/33 ts56
(S314-N) (33) and A/FPV/Rostock/34 tsG81 (A332-T)
(34) specifically induce ts RNA-binding by NP
(35). Since these viruses are considered specifically
defective for cRNA and vRNA transcription, this finding has
implications for the function of NP during replicative transcription. The panel of NP mutants described here should therefore prove useful
tools for improving our understanding of the functions of NP in
influenza virus transcription.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Anthony Griffiths and Alan Weeds for help with protein
microsequencing. We also thank Ian Brierley and Laurence Tiley for
helpful criticism.
This work was supported by grants from the Royal Society, the Medical
Research Council (grant G9232370), and the Wellcome Trust (grant
048911) to P.D. P.D. is a Royal Society University Research Fellow.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of
Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis
Court Rd., Cambridge CB2 1QP, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 1223 336918. Fax: 44 1223 336926. E-mail:
pd1{at}mole.bio.cam.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Albo, C.,
A. Valencia, and A. Portela.
1995.
Identification of an RNA binding region within the N-terminal third of the influenza A virus nucleoprotein.
J. Virol.
69:3799-3806[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Bandziulis, R. J.,
M. S. Swanson, and G. Dreyfuss.
1989.
RNA-binding proteins as developmental regulators.
Genes Dev.
3:431-442[Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Baudin, F.,
C. Bach,
S. Cusak, and R. W. H. Ruigrok.
1994.
Structure of influenza RNP. I. Influenza virus nucleoprotein melts secondary structure in panhandle RNA and exposes the bases to solvent.
EMBO J.
13:3158-3165[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Beaton, A. R., and R. M. Krug.
1986.
Transcription antitermination during influenza viral template RNA synthesis requires the nucleocapsid proteins and the absence of a 5' capped end.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:6282-6286[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Biswas, S. K.,
P. L. Boutz, and D. P. Nayak.
1998.
Influenza virus nucleoprotein interacts with influenza virus polymerase proteins.
J. Virol.
72:5493-5501[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Blok, V.,
C. Cianci,
K. W. Tibbles,
S. C. Inglis,
M. Krystal, and P. Digard.
1996.
Inhibition of the influenza virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase by antisera directed against the carboxy-terminal region of the PB2 subunit.
J. Gen. Virol.
77:1025-1033[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Bochkarev, A.,
R. A. Pfuetzner,
A. M. Edwards, and L. Frappier.
1997.
Structure of the single-stranded-DNA-binding domain of replication protein A bound to DNA.
Nature
385:176-181[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Brun, F.,
J.-J. Toulme, and C. Helene.
1975.
Interactions of aromatic residues of proteins with nucleic acids. Fluorescence studies of the binding of oligopeptides containing tryptophan and tyrosine residues to polynucleotides.
Biochemistry
14:558-563[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Burd, C. G., and G. Dreyfuss.
1994.
Conserved structures and diversity of functions of RNA-binding proteins.
Science
265:615-621[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Cavarelli, J.,
B. Rees,
M. Ruff,
J.-C. Thierry, and D. Moras.
1993.
Yeast tRNAasp recognition by its cognate class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase.
Nature
362:181-184[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Choppin, P. W., and R. W. Compans.
1975.
The structure of influenza virus, p. 15-51.
In
E. D. Kilbourne (ed.), The influenza viruses and influenza. Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 12.
|
Digard, P.,
V. C. Blok, and S. C. Inglis.
1989.
Complex formation between influenza virus polymerase proteins expressed in Xenopus oocytes.
Virology
171:162-169[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Digard, P.,
D. Elton,
K. Bishop,
E. Medcalf,
A. Weeds, and B. Pope.
1999.
Modulation of nuclear localization of influenza virus nucleoprotein through interaction with actin filaments.
J. Virol.
73:2222-2231[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Duesberg, P.
1969.
Distinct subunits of the ribonucleoprotein of influenza virus.
J. Mol. Biol.
42:485-499[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Duplay, P.,
H. Bedouelle,
A. Fowler,
I. Zabin,
W. Saurin, and M. Hofnung.
1984.
Sequences of the malE gene and its product, the maltose-binding protein of Escherichia coli K12.
J. Biol. Chem.
259:10606-10613[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
| Elton, D., E. Medcalf, K. Bishop, and P. Digard.
Oligomerisation of influenza A virus nucleoprotein: identification of
positive and negative sequence elements. Virology, in press.
|
| 17.
|
Fields, R.
1972.
The rapid determination of amino groups with TNBS.
Methods Enzymol.
25:464-468.
|
| 18.
|
Fuerst, T. R.,
P. L. Earl, and B. Moss.
1987.
Use of a hybrid vaccinia virus-T7 RNA polymerase system for expression of target genes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:2538-2544[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Goldstein, E. A., and M. W. Pons.
1970.
The effect of polyvinylsulphate on the ribonucleoprotein of influenza virus.
Virology
41:382-384[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Gorlach, M.,
M. Wittekind,
R. A. Beckman,
L. Mueller, and G. Dreyfuss.
1992.
Interaction of the RNA-binding domain of the hnRNP C proteins with RNA.
EMBO J.
11:3289-3295[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Guan, C.,
P. Li,
P. D. Riggs, and H. Inouye.
1987.
Vectors that facilitate the expression and purification of foreign peptides in Escherichia coli by fusion to maltose-binding protein.
Gene
67:21-30.
|
| 22.
|
Habeeb, A. F. S. A.
1966.
Determination of free amino groups in proteins by trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid.
Anal. Biochem.
14:328-336[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Honda, A.,
K. Ueda,
K. Nagata, and A. Ishihama.
1988.
RNA polymerase of influenza virus: role of NP on RNA chain elongation.
J. Biochem.
104:1021-1026[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Huang, T.-S.,
P. Palese, and M. Krystal.
1990.
Determination of influenza virus proteins required for genome replication.
J. Virol.
64:5669-5673[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Jennings, P. A.,
J. T. Finch,
G. Winter, and J. S. Robertson.
1983.
Does the higher order structure of the influenza virus ribonucleoprotein guide the sequence rearrangements in influenza viral RNA?
Cell
34:619-627[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Jessen, T. H.,
C. Oubridge,
C. H. Teo,
C. Pritchard, and K. Nagai.
1991.
Identification of molecular contacts between the U1 A small nuclear ribonucleoprotein and U1 RNA.
EMBO J.
10:3447-3456[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Kingsbury, D. W.,
I. M. Jones, and K. G. Murti.
1987.
Assembly of influenza ribonucleoprotein in vitro using recombinant nucleoprotein.
Virology
156:396-403[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Klump, K.,
R. W. H. Ruigrok, and F. Baudin.
1997.
Roles of the influenza virus polymerase and nucleoprotein in forming a functional RNP structure.
EMBO J.
16:1248-1257[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Kobayashi, M.,
T. Toyoda,
D. M. Adyshev,
Y. Azuma, and A. Ishihama.
1994.
Molecular dissection of influenza virus nucleoprotein: deletion mapping of the RNA binding domain.
J. Virol.
68:8433-8436[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Kunkel, T. A.
1985.
Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:488-492[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Lamb, R. A., and R. M. Krug.
1996.
Orthomyxoviridae: the viruses and their replication, p. 1353-1396.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, et al. (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 32.
|
Landon, M.
1977.
Cleavage at aspartyl-prolyl bonds.
Methods Enzymol.
47:145-149[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Li, R.,
P. Palese, and M. Krystal.
1989.
Complementation and analysis of an NP mutant of influenza virus.
Virus Res.
12:97-112[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Mandler, J., and C. Scholtissek.
1989.
Localisation of the temperature-sensitive defect in the nucleoprotein of an influenza A/FPV/Rostock/34 virus.
Virus Res.
12:113[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Medcalf, L.,
E. Poole,
D. Elton, and P. Digard.
1999.
Temperature-sensitive lesions in two influenza A viruses defective for replicative transcription disrupt RNA binding by the nucleoprotein.
J. Virol.
73:7349-7356[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
O'Neill, R. E., and P. Palese.
1995.
NPI-1, the human homologue of SRP-1, interacts with influenza virus nucleoprotein.
Virology
206:116-125[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
O'Neill, R. E.,
R. Jaskunas,
G. Blobel,
P. Palese, and J. Moroianu.
1995.
Nuclear import of influenza virus RNA can be mediated by viral nucleoprotein and transport factors required for protein import.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:22701-22704[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Oubridge, C.,
N. Ito,
P. R. Evans,
C.-H. Teo, and K. Nagai.
1994.
Crystal structure at 1.92 Å resolution of the RNA-binding domain of the U1A spliceosomal protein complexed with an RNA hairpin.
Nature
372:432-438[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Pons, M. W.,
I. T. Schulze,
G. K. Hirst, and R. Hauser.
1969.
Isolation and characterization of the ribonucleoprotein of influenza virus.
Virology
39:250-259[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Predki, P. F.,
L. M. Nayak,
M. B. C. Gottlieb, and L. Regan.
1995.
Dissecting RNA-protein interactions: RNA-RNA recognition by Rop.
Cell
80:41-50[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Ruigrok, R. W. H., and F. Baudin.
1995.
Structure of influenza virus ribonucleoprotein particles. II. Purified RNA-free influenza virus ribonucleoprotein forms structures that are indistinguishable from the intact influenza virus ribonucleoprotein particles.
J. Gen. Virol.
76:1009-1014[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Schmid, F. X.
1989.
Spectral methods of characterising protein conformation and conformational changes, p. 251-285.
In
T. E. Creighton (ed.), Protein structure. A practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
|
| 43.
|
Scholtissek, C., and H. Becht.
1971.
Binding of ribonucleic acids to the RNP-antigen protein of influenza viruses.
J. Gen. Virol.
10:11-16[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Shamoo, Y.,
A. M. Friedman,
M. R. Parsons,
W. H. Konigsberg, and T. A. Steitz.
1995.
Crystal structure of a replication fork single-stranded DNA binding protein (T4 gp32) complexed to DNA.
Nature
376:362-366[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Shapiro, G. I., and R. M. Krug.
1988.
Influenza virus RNA replication in vitro: synthesis of viral template RNAs and virion RNAs in the absence of an added primer.
J. Virol.
62:2285-2290[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Smith, G. L.,
J. Z. Levin,
P. Palese, and B. Moss.
1987.
Synthesis and cellular location of the ten influenza polypeptides individually expressed by recombinant vaccinia viruses.
Virology
160:336-345[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Wang, P.,
P. Palese, and R. E. O'Neil.
1997.
The NPI-1/NPI-3 (karyopherin ) binding site on the influenza A virus nucleoprotein NP is a nonconventional nuclear localization signal.
J. Virol.
71:1850-1856[Abstract].
|
| 48.
|
Winter, G., and S. Fields.
1981.
The structure of the gene encoding the nucleoprotein of human influenza virus A/PR/8/34.
Virology
114:423-428[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Yamanaka, K.,
A. Ishihama, and K. Nagata.
1990.
Reconstitution of influenza virus RNA-nucleoprotein complexes structurally resembling native viral ribonucleoprotein cores.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:11151-11155[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Yamasaki, R. B.,
A. Vega, and R. E. Feeney.
1980.
Modification of available arginine residues in proteins by p-hydroxyphenylglyoxal.
Anal. Biochem.
109:32-40[Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, September 1999, p. 7357-7367, Vol. 73, No. 9
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Li, Z., Watanabe, T., Hatta, M., Watanabe, S., Nanbo, A., Ozawa, M., Kakugawa, S., Shimojima, M., Yamada, S., Neumann, G., Kawaoka, Y.
(2009). Mutational Analysis of Conserved Amino Acids in the Influenza A Virus Nucleoprotein. J. Virol.
83: 4153-4162
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Noton, S. L., Simpson-Holley, M., Medcalf, E., Wise, H. M., Hutchinson, E. C., McCauley, J. W., Digard, P.
(2009). Studies of an Influenza A Virus Temperature-Sensitive Mutant Identify a Late Role for NP in the Formation of Infectious Virions. J. Virol.
83: 562-571
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ng, A. K.-L., Zhang, H., Tan, K., Li, Z., Liu, J.-h., Chan, P. K.-S., Li, S.-M., Chan, W.-Y., Au, S. W.-N., Joachimiak, A., Walz, T., Wang, J.-H., Shaw, P.-C.
(2008). Structure of the influenza virus A H5N1 nucleoprotein: implications for RNA binding, oligomerization, and vaccine design. FASEB J.
22: 3638-3647
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tsfasman, T. M., Markushin, S. G., Akopova, I. I., Ghendon, Y. Z.
(2007). Molecular mechanisms of reversion to the ts+ (non-temperature-sensitive) phenotype of influenza A cold-adapted (ca) virus strains. J. Gen. Virol.
88: 2724-2729
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Noton, S. L., Medcalf, E., Fisher, D., Mullin, A. E., Elton, D., Digard, P.
(2007). Identification of the domains of the influenza A virus M1 matrix protein required for NP binding, oligomerization and incorporation into virions. J. Gen. Virol.
88: 2280-2290
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Severson, W., Xu, X., Kuhn, M., Senutovitch, N., Thokala, M., Ferron, F., Longhi, S., Canard, B., Jonsson, C. B.
(2005). Essential Amino Acids of the Hantaan Virus N Protein in Its Interaction with RNA. J. Virol.
79: 10032-10039
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Reid, A. H., Fanning, T. G., Janczewski, T. A., Lourens, R. M., Taubenberger, J. K.
(2004). Novel Origin of the 1918 Pandemic Influenza Virus Nucleoprotein Gene. J. Virol.
78: 12462-12470
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Portela, A., Digard, P.
(2002). The influenza virus nucleoprotein: a multifunctional RNA-binding protein pivotal to virus replication. J. Gen. Virol.
83: 723-734
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Xu, X., Severson, W., Villegas, N., Schmaljohn, C. S., Jonsson, C. B.
(2002). The RNA Binding Domain of the Hantaan Virus N Protein Maps to a Central, Conserved Region. J. Virol.
76: 3301-3308
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Boon, A. C. M., de Mutsert, G., Graus, Y. M. F., Fouchier, R. A. M., Sintnicolaas, K., Osterhaus, A. D. M. E., Rimmelzwaan, G. F.
(2002). Sequence Variation in a Newly Identified HLA-B35-Restricted Epitope in the Influenza A Virus Nucleoprotein Associated with Escape from Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes. J. Virol.
76: 2567-2572
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Momose, F., Basler, C. F., O'Neill, R. E., Iwamatsu, A., Palese, P., Nagata, K.
(2001). Cellular Splicing Factor RAF-2p48/NPI-5/BAT1/UAP56 Interacts with the Influenza Virus Nucleoprotein and Enhances Viral RNA Synthesis. J. Virol.
75: 1899-1908
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Elton, D., Simpson-Holley, M., Archer, K., Medcalf, L., Hallam, R., McCauley, J., Digard, P.
(2001). Interaction of the Influenza Virus Nucleoprotein with the Cellular CRM1-Mediated Nuclear Export Pathway. J. Virol.
75: 408-419
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Voeten, J. T. M., Bestebroer, T. M., Nieuwkoop, N. J., Fouchier, R. A. M., Osterhaus, A. D. M. E., Rimmelzwaan, G. F.
(2000). Antigenic Drift in the Influenza A Virus (H3N2) Nucleoprotein and Escape from Recognition by Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes. J. Virol.
74: 6800-6807
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Medcalf, L., Poole, E., Elton, D., Digard, P.
(1999). Temperature-Sensitive Lesions in Two Influenza A Viruses Defective for Replicative Transcription Disrupt RNA Binding by the Nucleoprotein. J. Virol.
73: 7349-7356
[Abstract]
[Full Text]