Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, August 1999, p. 7080-7086, Vol. 73, No. 8
Molecular Medicine Laboratory,
Received 19 January 1999/Accepted 7 May 1999
The transactivator protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (Tat) is a powerful activator of nuclear factor- Upon infection of susceptible cells
and integration into the host genome, transcription of the human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is dependent on the concerted
action of the cellular transcription machinery and of the viral Tat
transactivator protein. Tat acts as an extremely powerful activator of
viral gene expression. The protein binds to a bulge sequence within
TAR, a highly structured RNA element located at the 5' end of all viral
transcripts (8), and acts by a dual mechanism. From one
side, it increases the levels of transcriptional elongation, by
augmenting the processivity of RNA polymerase II through the
interaction with protein complexes possessing protein kinase activity
and phosphorylating the carboxyl-terminal domain of the large subunit
of the polymerase (13, 21, 36, 43, 46). On the other side,
the protein also acts at the level of transcriptional initiation, by
increasing the rate at which the RNA polymerase II starts transcription
(14). We (33) and others (5, 27) have
recently demonstrated that the latter function of Tat is mediated by
the specific interaction of Tat with the nuclear factor p300-CREB
binding protein and by the recruitment of this acetyltransferase to the
viral long terminal repeat (LTR) for chromatin remodeling.
Besides the above-mentioned interactions of cellular proteins with Tat,
which require an intact TAR element, experimental evidence indicates
that an additional transcriptional function of the protein also occurs
in a TAR-independent manner, provided that the enhancer region of the
LTR is intact (1, 6, 7, 25, 35). This region contains two
tandemly arranged binding sites ( Tat itself is able to activate nuclear translocation of NF- To address the study of the functional domains of the Tat protein
involved in the activation of NF- These mutants were tested either as recombinant proteins obtained as
glutathione S-transferase fusions or after transfection of
the corresponding expression vectors. In the former case, recombinant Tat was delivered to the cells by lipofection, as already described (16, 33). Under these conditions, the protein rapidly enters the cells through an endosome-mediated pathway and subsequently escapes
from the endosomes and enters the nucleus, where it displays its
transactivation capacity.
Wild-type Tat and mutant proteins were delivered into HL3T1 cells
(containing an integrated LTR-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase [CAT]
cassette, the kind gift of B. Felber [20]), and
nuclear extracts were prepared according to the microscale preparation protocol described by Li et al. (31) and used in gel
retardation assays to monitor the binding activity to a
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Tat Protein Activates
Transcription Factor NF-
B through the Cellular
Interferon-Inducible, Double-Stranded RNA-Dependent Protein
Kinase, PKR
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
B (NF-
B),
acting through degradation of the inhibitor I
B-
(F. Demarchi, F. d'Adda di Fagagna, A. Falaschi, and M. Giacca, J. Virol.
70:4427-4437, 1996). Here, we show that this activity of Tat requires
the function of the cellular interferon-inducible protein kinase PKR.
Tat-mediated NF-
B activation and transcriptional induction of the
HIV-1 long terminal repeat were impaired in murine cells in which the
PKR gene was knocked out. Both functions were restored by
cotransfection of Tat with the cDNA for PKR. Expression of a
dominant-negative mutant of PKR specifically reduced the levels of Tat
transactivation in different human cell types. Activation of NF-
B by
Tat required integrity of the basic domain of Tat; previous studies
have indicated that this domain is necessary for specific Tat-PKR interaction.
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
B sites) for the dimeric
transcription factors composed of several combinations of members of
the Rel/NF-
B family of polypeptides (for a review, see reference
3). The predominant complex binding to the LTR
B
sites in activated cells is NF-
B (p50-p65 heterodimer). In
unstimulated cells, NF-
B is retained in the cytoplasm through the
interaction with inhibitor proteins belonging to the I
B family.
Activation of NF-
B occurs through phosphorylation and proteolysis of
the I
B inhibitor, with subsequent translocation of the active factor
into the nucleus, where it can bind to its cognate binding sites
(26). Maximal activation of the HIV LTR requires the
concerted action of Tat and of cellular proteins binding to the
B
sites (1, 10, 19, 32, 44). Accordingly, Tat-mediated
activation of the HIV-1 LTR in Jurkat T cells is strongly inhibited by
a degradation-resistant I
B-
mutant (24).
B
(11, 16, 44). We have observed that treatment of
T-lymphocytic, monocytic, and epithelial cells with recombinant Tat
results in a rapid and transient nuclear translocation of NF-
B which
parallels transcriptional activation of the proviral LTR
(16).
B, we obtained a series of
constructs bearing deletions or point mutations in some of the relevant
portions of the protein. A schematic representation of these constructs
is presented in Fig. 1. They include the
wild-type Tat proteins of 101 amino acids (aa) (present in most primary HIV isolates) and of 86 aa (retaining full activity and present in the
prototype laboratory strain HXB2) and mutated derivatives of the latter
protein having a deletion of the acidic, N-terminal domain [Tat
86
(1-21)], mutations of the cysteines at positions 22, 25, and 27 to alanines [Tat 86 C(22-27)A], and mutations of the arginines in the
basic region at positions 49, 52, 53, 55, 56, and 57 to alanines [Tat
86 R(49-57)A]. The construction and purification of these recombinant
Tat proteins have been already described (16, 33); all these
mutations completely knock out the ability of the protein to
trans-activate the LTR (not shown).

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Tat proteins and mutants. The Tat protein of HIV-1 and
its functional domains are schematically shown. Tat 101 is the
full-length, two-exon Tat of most clinical isolates; Tat 86, lacking 15 amino acids at the C terminus, derives from clone HXB2 and is fully
active for LTR transcription activation. The mutant proteins include
Tat 86
(1-21), which has a truncation in the first 21 amino acids;
Tat 86 C(22-27)A, in which cysteines 22, 25, and 27 were mutated to
alanines; and Tat 86 R(49-57)A, in which arginines at positions 49, 52, 53, 55, 56, and 57 were mutated to alanines. Asterisks indicate the
positions of the mutated amino acids.
B site
oligonucleotide (17). As shown in Fig.
2A, NF-
B induction appeared
considerably reduced when the Tat protein mutated in the basic domain
was used, while the other mutations did not have any remarkable effect.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 2.
The basic domain of Tat is required for NF-
B
activation. The figure shows the results of gel retardation analysis of
NF-
B complexes present in nuclear extracts of HL3T1 cells either
treated with wild-type and mutant Tat proteins (A) or transfected with
plasmids expressing the respective cDNAs (B). The arrows indicate the
specific NF-
B- or USF-containing complexes, or the free probe, as
specified. The asterisks mark unspecific bands. The specificity and
identity of the NF-
B-containing complex have been previously
verified (16). (A) Seven micrograms of nuclear extracts from
control cells (lane 7) or from cells in which 9 µg of GST
protein/15-cm plate (lane 6), or the same amount of the Tat 86 protein
(lane 1) and mutant derivatives (lanes 3 to 6), had been delivered by
lipofection was used in a gel retardation assay with a
-32P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotide specific
for NF-
B (16). (B) HL3T1 cells were transfected with 1 µg of empty vector/15-cm plate (lanes 1 and 2) or with 1 µg of
expression vectors for Tat 86, Tat 86
(1-21) (lane 4), and Tat 86 R(49-57)A (lane 5). Sixteen hours after transfection, serum
concentration was lowered to 0.5% for an additional 24 h. Nuclear
extracts were prepared and used in a gel retardation assay as described
above. Two hours before harvesting, 10% serum was added to control
cells (lane 2).
We also examined whether the effects of mutations in the basic region
could be observed by transfection of an expression vector for the
protein. Transfections were performed by using Lipofectin (Gibco BRL
Life Technologies Ltd., Paisley, Scotland) in accordance with the
procedure suggested by the manufacturer. To reduce the basal level of
NF-
B in cycling HL3T1 cells (shown in Fig. 2, lane 7), 16 h
after transfection cells were put in 0.5% serum. Under these
conditions, NF-
B induction could be obtained by the expression
vectors for Tat 86 and Tat 86
(1-21) to levels comparable to those
obtained by serum addition (Fig. 1B). On the contrary, transfection of
Tat 86 R(49-57)A did not result in the induction of nuclear
translocation of NF-
B.
The experiments described above indicate that the basic domain of Tat
is essential for NF-
B induction. Interestingly, this domain has been
reported to interact with the human RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR
both in vitro (12) and in vivo (34). This protein, also referred to as DAI, P1 kinase, and p68 kinase, is a
serine/threonine kinase that is induced by interferon and is activated
in the presence of double-stranded RNA, polyanions, and some structured
single-stranded RNA (reviewed in reference 40).
Activation of PKR leads to its autophosphorylation and to the
consequent phosphorylation of its cellular targets, which include
eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2) (9, 41) and I
B-
(28), with consequent inhibition of protein synthesis and
activation of NF-
B translocation, respectively.
Given these considerations, we addressed the question of whether the
molecular pathway initiated by Tat and leading to the activation of
NF-
B could be mediated by the activity of PKR. For this purpose, we
took advantage of the availability of murine fibroblasts derived from
Pkr knockout (Pkr0/0) mice (45), the kind gift
of B. Williams. We first checked whether Tat could induce NF-
B in
mouse cells. Mouse NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were transfected with expression
plasmids coding for Tat 101; for activated Rac, a member of the family
of small GTP binding proteins shown to trigger NF-
B nuclear
translocation (37) (the kind gift of Alan Hall); and for
PKR, donated by B. Williams. Transfected and mock-transfected cells
were serum starved for 24 h to reduce the level of constitutive
NF-
B present in cycling 3T3 cells, as described previously
(37). After serum starvation, rich medium was added to one
aliquot of mock-transfected cells to obtain a positive control for
NF-
B nuclear translocation. Nuclear extracts were prepared and
utilized for band-shift assays with the oligonucleotide probe specific
for NF-
B. As shown in Fig. 3A, NF-
B
was almost undetectable in serum-starved cells (lane 3), as well as in
starved cells previously transfected with the PKR expression vector
(lane 4). On the contrary, transfection of both the activated form of
Rac and the Tat-expressing plasmids resulted in a remarkable nuclear
translocation of the factor (lanes 4 and 6, respectively). Thus, Tat
can induce nuclear translocation of NF-
B also in mouse cells,
suggesting that the underlying molecular mechanisms are preserved also
in this species.
|
Contrary to what was observed in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, in
Pkr0/0 mouse cells neither Tat nor PKR alone could trigger
NF-
B activation (Fig. 3B, lanes 1 and 2), while cotransfection of
the two plasmids resulted in a strong synergistic effect (lane 3),
similar to the one obtained by serum addition (lane 4). The activated
factor observed by gel retardation assays in these cells was identified as NF-
B containing the p50 and p65 subunits, since p50 antibody supershifted and p65 antibody abolished the complex (Fig. 3C). Supershift assays were performed with NF-
B p50 and p65 polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif.) by
preincubating the nuclear extracts with 2 µg of the antibody in the
reaction buffer for 30 min prior to the gel retardation assays.
The above results clearly indicate that PKR is involved in Tat-induced
activation of NF-
B in mouse cells. The next step was to test whether
this functional interaction also affects the transcriptional properties
of Tat. For this purpose, we studied the role of Tat and PKR in the
activation of transcription from a transfected LTR-CAT cassette in
mouse cells lacking a functional PKR as well as in control NIH 3T3
cells. Cell extracts were prepared 48 h after transfection, and
CAT assays were performed according to standard protocols
(39) after normalization for transfection efficiency.
The results are shown in Fig. 4. As expected, the effects of Tat on LTR-driven transcription in mouse cells are not as dramatic as in human cells (2, 4). Therefore, the amount of Tat plasmid that was transfected was 10 times higher (5 µg of DNA/10-cm plate) than the one we generally use for human cells. Under these conditions, Tat considerably enhances the transcription driven by the LTR in NIH 3T3 cells, while PKR does not have any effect (Fig. 4A). In PKR knockout cells (Fig. 4B) the transcriptional effect of Tat is impaired with respect to control cells, but it can be fully restored by cotransfection of a wild-type PKR expression plasmid.
|
Altogether, the data described above demonstrate that the functions of
PKR are required for NF-
B nuclear translocation and LTR
transcription activation by Tat in a murine system. Next, it was
important to address the question of whether PKR plays a similar role
in human cells. For this purpose, we exploited the properties of a
series of dominant-negative mutants of different proteins
physiologically involved in different pathways of NF-
B activation.
These proteins included, besides PKR, a set of small GTP binding
proteins of the Rho family (Ras, RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42), which are
known regulators of different protein kinases and act as potent
activators of NF-
B in various cell types (37).
For each of these factors (37), as well as for PKR (29), mutants having a trans-dominant-negative effect on the wild-type proteins have been described. Expression vectors for dominant-negative PKR, Ras, and Rac were kindly donated by B. Williams, C. J. Marshall, and A. Hall, respectively. Dominant negatives for RhoA and CDC42 were the kind gift of G. Bokoch.
These vectors were cotransfected with Tat in human epithelial HL3T1 and monocytic BF24 cells (both of which contain an integrated LTR-CAT cassette [20, 42]) and in T-lymphocytic Jurkat cells together with an LTR-CAT plasmid. In all these cell lines, the PKR dominant-negative mutant caused a net decrease in Tat-mediated activation of LTR-driven transcription (Fig. 5A, B, and C). On the contrary, dominant negatives of Ras, Rac1, RhoA, and Cdc42 did not have any significant effect. As control, all the dominant-negative mutants were previously checked in cotransfection experiments in Jurkat cells for their ability to prevent the activation of the HIV-1 LTR by their respective wild-type counterparts (not shown).
|
The inhibitory effect of the PKR dominant-negative construct on Tat
transactivation was mediated in cis by the enhancer region of the LTR. As shown in Fig. 6, when the
vector expressing Tat 101 was cotransfected in HeLa cells together with
the PKR dominant-negative construct, transactivation from the wild-type
LTR was reduced, while it was unaffected from an LTR promoter bearing
the deletion of the NF-
B sites (30).
|
Altogether the experimental data reported above indicate that PKR is
involved in Tat transactivation of the LTR both in rodent and in human
cells through the activation of NF-
B. Following different
experimental strategies, over the last few years, several laboratories
have suggested that a complex interplay exists between Tat, TAR, and
PKR, although the results obtained have often been controversial. Some
reports showed that TAR activates PKR, resulting in trans
inhibition of translation (18), while others demonstrated that PKR-TAR interaction had a negative effect on activation of the
kinase (22, 23). Also controversial are the findings that the levels and the activity of PKR are decreased (38),
increased (15), or unaffected (34) in
HIV-1-infected and in Tat-expressing cells. These conflicting data are
difficult to reconcile and are likely the results of the different
experimental settings in which they were obtained. As far as Tat and
PKR are concerned, two independent laboratories have recently shown
that a physical interaction exists between the two proteins both in
vitro and in vivo and that this interaction requires the integrity of
the basic domain of Tat (12, 34). This is the same domain
that we found to be essential for the activation of NF-
B in our
experiments. However, it should be pointed out that the same
laboratories have indicated, by in vitro studies, that Tat behaves as
an inhibitor of PKR activation and as a competitive substrate for
phosphorylation, in apparent contradiction with the functional positive
role of the PKR-Tat interplay that we are suggesting here. In this
respect, we believe that the conditions for in vitro functional studies
of the kinase are likely to be considerably different from those found
within the cells, where the relative concentrations of PKR, TAR, Tat, and accessory factors are not easily quantifiable and might vary during
the course of infection. As an alternative explanation, we cannot rule
out the possibility that the functional requirement of PKR for
Tat-mediated NF-
B activation, which clearly stems from the set of
our experiments, is not directly dependent on the PKR-Tat
protein-protein interaction but is mediated by an unidentified
intermediate pathway.
The results presented in this work suggest that both Tat 101, Tat 86, and Tat 72 (one exon; results not shown) are able to activate NF-
B
through the PKR pathway, both in rodent and human cells, and that this
pathway requires the integrity of the basic domain of the protein.
Thus, this mechanism appears to be clearly different from the one
proposed by Westendorp and collaborators (44), which
requires the second exon of the protein and involves the repression of
the Mn-dependent superoxide dismutase and the subsequent alteration of
the redox state of the cell. An alternative pathway proposed to explain
NF-
B activation by Tat is the induction of expression of the tumor
necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) gene and the subsequent activation of
NF-
B through the TNF-
receptor-mediated signaling mechanism
(11). Again, this mechanism is quite distinct from the one
suggested by the data presented here, since TNF-
signals responsive
promoters in both PKR+/+ and PKR0/0 cells,
indicating that this cytokine utilizes a largely non-PKR-dependent transduction pathway (29).
It is conceivable that all the above-mentioned molecular processes of
Tat-induced NF-
B activation could operate in different cell types
and under different conditions. While it is difficult to rank the
relative importance of these mechanisms, we would like to point out
that in murine fibroblasts lacking PKR the induction of NF-
B nuclear
translocation by Tat is almost completely impaired, thus suggesting
that, at least in this cell type, the presence of functional PKR is
likely to be crucial for this function.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Maria Elena Lopez for excellent assistance in tissue
culture and Barbara Boziglav for skillful technical support. We are
grateful to Bryan Williams and Patricia Kessler for the kind gift of
the PKR knockout cells and PKR constructs, to Gary Bokoch for providing
constructs Rho T19N and Cdc42 T17N, to Alan Hall for providing the Rac
N17 and Rac V12 constructs, to Christopher J. Marshall for providing
the Ras N17 construct, and to Barbara Felber for the BF24 and HL3T1
cell lines. We are grateful to K.-T. Jeang for the initial suggestion
to investigate the role of the Tat-PKR interaction in NF-
B induction.
This work was supported by grant 40A.0.50 from the ISS (Istituto Superiore di Sanità), Rome, Italy.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Molecular Medicine Laboratory, ICGEB, Padriciano, 99, 34012 Trieste, Italy. Phone: 390-40-3757.324. Fax: 390-40-226555. E-mail: giacca{at}icgeb.trieste.it.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Alcamí, J.,
T. Laín de Lera,
L. Folgueira,
M. A. Pedraza,
J.-M. Jacqué,
F. Bachelerie,
A. R. Noriega,
R. T. Hay,
D. Harrich,
R. B. Gaynor,
J.-L. Virelizier, and F. Arenzana-Seisdos.
1995.
Absolute dependence on B responsive elements for initiation and Tat-mediated amplification of HIV transcription in blood CD4 T lymphocytes.
EMBO J.
14:1552-1560[Medline].
|
| 2. | Alonso, A., T. Cujec, and B. Peterlin. 1994. Effects of human chromosome 12 on interactions between Tat and TAR of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 66:6505-6513. |
| 3. |
Baeuerle, P. A., and D. Baltimore.
1996.
NF- B: ten years after.
Cell
87:13-20[Medline].
|
| 4. |
Barry, P. A.,
E. Pratt-Lowe,
R. E. Unger, and P. A. Luciw.
1991.
Cellular factors regulate transactivation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
65:1392-1399 |
| 5. |
Benkirane, M.,
R. F. Chun,
H. Xiao,
V. V. Ogryzko,
B. H. Howard,
Y. Nakatani, and K. T. Jeang.
1998.
Activation of integrated provirus requires histone acetyltransferase. p300 and P/CAF are coactivators for HIV-1 Tat.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:24898-24905 |
| 6. | Berkhout, B., A. Gatignol, A. B. Rabson, and K.-T. Jeang. 1990. TAR-independent activation of the HIV-1 LTR: evidence that Tat requires specific regions of the promoter. Cell 62:757-767[Medline]. |
| 7. |
Berkhout, B., and K. T. Jeang.
1992.
Functional roles for the TATA promoter and enhancers in basal and Tat-induced expression of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat.
J. Virol.
66:139-149 |
| 8. | Berkhout, B., R. H. Silverman, and K. T. Jeang. 1989. Tat trans-activates the human immunodeficiency virus through a nascent RNA target. Cell 59:273-282[Medline]. |
| 9. | Berry, M. J., G. S. Knutson, S. R. Lasky, S. M. Munemitsu, and C. E. Samuel. 1985. Purification and substrate specificities of the double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase from untreated and interferon treated mouse fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 260:240-247. |
| 10. |
Biswas, D. K.,
C. M. Ahlers,
B. J. Dezube, and A. B. Pardee.
1993.
Cooperative inhibition of NF- B and Tat-induced superactivation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:11044-11048 |
| 11. |
Biswas, D. K.,
T. R. Salas,
F. Wang,
C. M. Ahlers,
B. J. Dezube, and A. B. Pardee.
1995.
A Tat-induced auto-up-regulatory loop superactivation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 promoter.
J. Virol.
69:7437-7444 |
| 12. |
Brand, S. R.,
R. Kobayashi, and M. B. Mathews.
1997.
The Tat protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is a substrate and inhibitor of the interferon-induced, virally activated protein kinase, PKR.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:8388-8395 |
| 13. |
Cujec, T. P.,
H. Okamoto,
K. Fujinaga,
J. Meyer,
H. Chamberlin,
D. O. Morgan, and B. M. Peterlin.
1997.
The HIV transactivator TAT binds to the CDK-activating kinase and activates the phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.
Genes Dev.
11:2645-2657 |
| 14. | Cullen, B. 1993. Does HIV-1 Tat induce a change in viral initiation rights? Cell 73:417-420[Medline]. |
| 15. |
DeLuca, C.,
A. Roulston,
A. Koromilas,
M. A. Wainberg, and J. Hiscott.
1996.
Chronic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection of myeloid cells disrupts the autoregulatory control of the NF- B/Rel pathway via enhanced I B degradation.
J. Virol.
70:5183-5193 |
| 16. |
Demarchi, F.,
F. d'Adda di Fagagna,
A. Falaschi, and M. Giacca.
1996.
Activation of transcription factor NF- B by the Tat protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
70:4427-4437 |
| 17. |
Demarchi, F.,
P. D'Agaro,
A. Falaschi, and M. Giacca.
1993.
In vivo footprinting analysis of constitutive and inducible protein-DNA interactions at the long terminal repeat of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
67:7450-7460 |
| 18. | Edery, I., R. Petryshyn, and N. Sonenberg. 1989. Activation of double-stranded RNA-dependent kinase (dsl) by the TAR region of HIV-1 mRNA: a novel translational control mechanism. Cell 56:303-312[Medline]. |
| 19. |
El Kharroubi, A.,
G. Piras,
R. Zensen, and M. A. Martin.
1998.
Transcriptional activation of the integrated chromatin-associated human immunodeficiency virus type 1 promoter.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:2535-2544 |
| 20. |
Felber, B. K., and G. N. Pavlakis.
1988.
A quantitative bioassay for HIV-1 based on trans-activation.
Science
239:184-186 |
| 21. |
Gold, M. O.,
X. Yang,
C. H. Herrmann, and A. P. Rice.
1998.
PITALRE, the catalytic subunit of TAK, is required for human immunodeficiency virus Tat transactivation in vivo.
J. Virol.
72:4448-4453 |
| 22. |
Gunnery, S.,
S. R. Green, and M. B. Mathews.
1992.
Tat-responsive region RNA of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 stimulates protein synthesis in vivo and in vitro: relationship between structure and function.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:11557-11561 |
| 23. |
Gunnery, S.,
A. P. Rice,
H. D. Robertson, and M. B. Mathews.
1990.
Tat-responsive region RNA of human immunodeficiency virus 1 can prevent activation of the double-stranded-RNA-activated protein kinase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:8687-8691 |
| 24. |
Harhaj, E.,
J. Blanley,
S. Millhouse, and S. C. Sun.
1996.
Differential effects of I B molecules on Tat-mediated transactivation of the LTR.
Virology
216:284-287[Medline].
|
| 25. | Harrich, D., J. Garcia, R. Mtsuyasu, and R. Gaynor. 1990. Tar independent activation of the human immunodeficiency virus in phorbol ester stimulated T lymphocytes. EMBO J. 9:4417-4423[Medline]. |
| 26. |
Henkel, T.,
T. Machleidt,
I. Alkalay,
M. Kronke,
Y. Ben-Neriah, and P. A. Baeuerle.
1993.
Rapid proteolysis of I B- is necessary for activation of transcription factor NF- B.
Nature
365:182-185[Medline].
|
| 27. |
Hottiger, M. O., and G. J. Nabel.
1998.
Interaction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat with the transcriptional coactivators p300 and CREB binding protein.
J. Virol.
72:8252-8256 |
| 28. |
Kumar, A.,
J. Haque,
J. Lacoste,
J. Hiscott, and B. R. G. Williams.
1994.
Double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase activates transcription factor NF- B by phosphorylating I B.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:6288-6292 |
| 29. |
Kumar, A.,
Y. L. Yang,
V. Flati,
S. Der,
S. Kadereit,
A. Deb,
J. Haque,
L. Reis,
C. Weissmann, and B. R. G. Williams.
1997.
Deficient cytokine signaling in mouse embryo fibroblasts with a targeted deletion in the PKR gene: role of IRF-1 and NF- B.
EMBO J.
16:406-416[Medline].
|
| 30. |
Leonard, J.,
C. Parrott,
A. J. Buckler-White,
W. Turner,
E. K. Ross,
M. A. Martin, and A. B. Rabson.
1989.
The NF- B binding sites in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat are not required for virus infectivity.
J. Virol.
63:4919-4924 |
| 31. |
Li, Y.,
J. Ross,
J. A. Scheppler, and R. Franza, Jr.
1991.
An in vitro transcription analysis of early responses of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat to different transcription activators.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:1883-1893 |
| 32. |
Liu, J.,
N. Perkins,
R. Schmid, and G. Nabel.
1992.
Specific NF- B subunits act in concert with Tat to stimulate human immunodeficiency type 1 transcription.
J. Virol.
66:3883-3887 |
| 33. | Marzio, G., M. Tyagi, M. I. Gutierrez, and M. Giacca. 1998. HIV-1 Tat transactivator recruits p300 and CBP histone acetyl transferases to the viral promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 23:13519-13524. |
| 34. | McMillan, N. A. J., R. F. Chun, D. P. Sideovski, J. Galabru, W. M. Toone, C. E. Samuel, T. W. Mak, A. G. Hovanessian, K. T. Jeang, and B. R. G. Williams. 1995. HIV-1 Tat directly interacts with the interferon-induced, double-stranded RNA-dependent kinase PKR. Virology 213:413-424[Medline]. |
| 35. |
Nabel, G. J.,
S. A. Rice,
D. M. Knipe, and D. Baltimore.
1988.
Alternative mechanisms for activation of human immunodeficiency virus enhancer in T cells.
Science
239:1299-1302 |
| 36. | Parada, C. A., and R. G. Roeder. 1996. Enhanced processivity of RNA polymerase II triggered by Tat-induced phosphorylation of its carboxy-terminal domain. Nature 384:375-378[Medline]. |
| 37. |
Perona, R.,
S. Montaner,
L. Saniger,
I. Sanchez-Perez,
R. Bravo, and J. C. Lacal.
1997.
Activation of the nuclear factor- B by Rho, CDC42, and Rac proteins.
Genes Dev.
11:463-475 |
| 38. |
Roy, S.,
M. G. Katze,
N. T. Parkin,
I. Edery,
A. G. Hovanessian, and N. Sonenberg.
1990.
Control of the interferon-induced 68-kilodalton protein kinase by the HIV-1 tat gene product.
Science
247:1216-1219 |
| 39. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 40. | Samuel, C. E. 1991. Antiviral actions of interferon interferon-regulated cellular proteins and their surprisingly selective antiviral activities. Virology 183:1-11[Medline]. |
| 41. |
Samuel, C. E.
1979.
Mechanism of interferon action. Phosphorylation of protein synthesis initiation factor eIF-2 in interferon-treated human cells by a ribosome-associated kinase possessing site specificity similar to hemin-regulated rabbit reticulocyte kinase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:600-604 |
| 42. |
Schwartz, S.,
B. K. Felber,
E. M. Fenyo, and G. N. Pavlakis.
1989.
Rapidly and slowly replicating human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates can be distinguished according to target-cell tropism in T-cell and monocyte cell lines.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:7200-7203 |
| 43. | Wei, P., M. E. Garber, S.-M. Fang, W. H. Fisher, and K. A. Jones. 1998. A novel CDK9-associated C-type cyclin interacts directly with HIV-1 Tat and mediates its high-affinity, loop-specific binding to TAR RNA. Cell 92:451-462[Medline]. |
| 44. |
Westendorp, M. O.,
V. A. Shatrov,
K. Schulze-Osthoff,
R. Frank,
M. Kraft,
M. Los,
P. H. Krammer,
W. Droge, and V. Lehmann.
1995.
HIV-1 Tat potentiates TNF-induced NF- B activation and cytotoxicity by altering the cellular redox state.
EMBO J.
14:546-554[Medline].
|
| 45. | Yang, Y. L., F. L. Reis, J. Pavlovic, A. Aguzzi, R. Schafer, A. Kumar, B. R. G. Williams, M. Aguet, and C. Weissmann. 1995. Deficient signaling in mice devoid of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase. EMBO J. 14:6095-6106[Medline]. |
| 46. |
Zhu, Y.,
T. Pe'ery,
J. Peng,
Y. Ramanathan,
N. Marshall,
T. Marshall,
B. Amendt,
M. B. Mathews, and D. H. Price.
1997.
Transcription elongation factor P-TEFb is required for HIV-1 tat transactivation in vitro.
Genes Dev.
11:2622-2632 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»