Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, August 1999, p. 6335-6345, Vol. 73, No. 8
Department of Virology,
Received 24 November 1998/Accepted 12 April 1999
Arteriviruses are positive-stranded RNA viruses with an efficiently
organized, polycistronic genome. A short region between the replicase
gene and open reading frame (ORF) 2 of the equine arteritis virus (EAV)
genome was previously assumed to be untranslated. However, here we
report that this segment of the EAV genome contains the 5' part of a
novel gene (ORF 2a) which is conserved in all arteriviruses. The 3'
part of EAV ORF 2a overlaps with the 5' part of the former ORF 2 (now
renamed ORF 2b), which encodes the GS glycoprotein. Both
ORF 2a and ORF 2b appear to be expressed from mRNA 2, which thereby
constitutes the first proven example of a bicistronic mRNA in
arteriviruses. The 67-amino-acid protein encoded by EAV ORF 2a, which
we have provisionally named the envelope (E) protein, is very
hydrophobic and has a basic C terminus. An E protein-specific antiserum
was raised and used to demonstrate the expression of the novel gene in
EAV-infected cells. The EAV E protein proved to be very stable, did not
form disulfide-linked oligomers, and was not N-glycosylated.
Immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy studies showed that
the E protein associates with intracellular membranes both in
EAV-infected cells and upon independent expression. An analysis of
purified EAV particles revealed that the E protein is a structural
protein. By using reverse genetics, we demonstrated that both the
EAV E and GS proteins are essential for the production of
infectious progeny virus.
Arteriviruses are enveloped,
positive-stranded RNA viruses with a diameter of 40 to 60 nm (for a
review, see reference 54). In addition to the family
prototype, equine arteritis virus (EAV) (20), the recently
established Arteriviridae family contains the lactate
dehydrogenase-elevating virus (LDV) of mice, porcine reproductive and
respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), and simian hemorrhagic fever virus
(SHFV). The gene encoding the arterivirus replicase is related to that
of the Coronaviridae, and despite a considerable difference
in genome size, the replication and genome expression strategies of
these two virus families are strikingly similar (Fig.
1) (14, 17, 54, 55).
Consequently, the two virus groups have recently been united in the
newly created order Nidovirales (9).
The putatively icosahedral arterivirus core (diameter, 25 to 35 nm)
consists of a 12.7- to 15.7-kb nonsegmented RNA genome and a single
nucleocapsid (N) protein of 110 to 128 amino acids. The arterivirus
envelope is relatively smooth and accommodates two main protein
components: (i) the nonglycosylated, triple-spanning membrane protein M
(16 to 20 kDa); and (ii) the major envelope glycoprotein (designated
GL in the case of EAV, VP-3P for LDV, GP5 for
PRRSV, and p54 for SHFV), which differs considerably in size depending
on the virus (16, 18, 23, 30, 42, 47). In addition,
arterivirus particles contain at least one minor membrane glycoprotein,
denoted GS for EAV (19), VP-3M for LDV (23), GP2 for PRRSV (46), and p42 for
SHFV (30). Furthermore, PRRSV particles have been reported
to possess two additional, minor envelope glycoproteins
(GP3 and GP4) (64).
With the exception of a small region of the SHFV genome (29,
53), a fairly consistent genome organization was described for
all arteriviruses. The 5' three-quarters of the polycistronic arterivirus genome (Fig. 1) contain two large open reading frames (ORFs), 1a and 1b, which encode the viral replicase. The replicase ORFs
are translated directly from the genomic RNA, with ORF 1b expression
involving a ribosomal frameshift (14). The resulting nonstructural precursor polyproteins are cleaved by three viral proteases (for reviews, see references 17 and
54). Downstream of the replicase gene, three of the
four arterivirus genomes (those of EAV, LDV, and PRRSV) were reported
to contain six smaller genes (ORFs 2 to 7), which mostly or exclusively
encode structural proteins. The corresponding region of the SHFV genome
contains three additional ORFs (covering about 1.6 kb) between ORF 1b
and the equivalent of EAV/LDV/PRRSV ORF 5 (named ORF 7 in SHFV
[53]). On the basis of limited sequence similarities,
it was postulated that these ORFs (named ORFs 2a, 2b, and 3) arose from
the duplication of the SHFV homologs of EAV/LDV/PRRSV ORFs 2 to 4 by an
RNA recombination event (see Fig. 3B) (29). Except for this
putative gene duplication in SHFV, the genetic compositions and gene
orders of all arteriviruses are identical. The three most 3'-proximal
genes (ORFs 5 to 7; ORFs 7 to 9 in SHFV) encode the three main
structural components of the virus particle: the major membrane
glycoprotein (GL/VP-3P/GP5/p54), the M protein,
and the N protein, respectively (Fig. 1). The minor envelope
glycoprotein (GS/VP-3M/GP2) of 25 to 30 kDa is
encoded by EAV/LDV/PRRSV ORF 2.
The six to nine genes in the 3' quarter of the arterivirus genome are
expressed from a nested set of six to eight subgenomic mRNAs (Fig. 1).
The generation of such a set of subgenomic transcripts is one of the
hallmarks of the nidovirus replication cycle. The subgenomic mRNAs of
arteriviruses and coronaviruses are 3' coterminal, but they also carry
a common 5' leader sequence which is derived from the 5' end of the
viral genome. The leader is fused to the subgenomic mRNA bodies by a
discontinuous transcription mechanism (reviewed in references
17, 37, 54, and 62). With the exception of the smallest mRNA, the nidovirus subgenomic mRNAs are
structurally polycistronic (Fig. 1). However, they are assumed to be
functionally monocistronic; i.e., only the most 5'-proximal gene of
each mRNA is translated. Several exceptions to this rule have been
reported for coronaviruses (reviewed in reference
40). More recently, mRNA 2 of the arterivirus SHFV
was proposed to function as a bicistronic mRNA (29),
although the translation of two ORFs from this mRNA remains to be
confirmed experimentally.
Except for the 5' and 3' untranslated regions of the genome, which are
likely to contain viral replication signals, the genomes of the four
currently known arteriviruses were reported to be almost completely
devoid of noncoding sequences (14, 28, 45, 49, 53). As a
rule, the structural protein genes in the 3' end of the genome overlap
with both adjacent genes over distances that vary from a few to several
hundred nucleotides (Fig. 1; see also Fig. 3B). Due to this extremely
efficient organization of arterivirus genetic information, the
subgenomic mRNA transcription-regulating sequences (TRSs), which
precede every gene and are used to join the leader sequence to the mRNA
body (17, 54), are always located within an upstream gene.
The region between ORF 1b and ORF 2, which separates the replicase from
the structural protein genes (Fig. 1), was one of the few apparently
noncoding gaps in the genomes of EAV, LDV, and PRRSV. However, we have
now obtained convincing evidence that in the case of EAV this region
contains the 5' part of a 201-nucleotide (nt) gene (ORF 2a) which
encodes a largely hydrophobic, 67-residue polypeptide with a basic
C-terminal domain. The 3' part of this novel ORF overlaps with the
previously identified GS gene (ORF 2, now renamed ORF 2b).
Both ORF 2a and ORF 2b appear to be expressed from subgenomic mRNA 2. Homologous genes were identified at corresponding positions in the
genomes of the three other arteriviruses. With the aid of a
monospecific antiserum, the EAV ORF 2a protein was identified in
purified virions. By using reverse genetics, we also showed that it is
indispensable for the generation of infectious virus particles. Thus,
we have identified a novel and essential structural component of
arterivirus particles.
Cells and viruses.
Baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) cells and
chicken embryo fibroblasts were maintained in Glasgow minimum essential
medium (GMEM; Life Technologies) containing 5 to 10% fetal calf serum
(FCS) and antibiotics. Rabbit kidney (RK-13) and OST-7.1 cells
(22) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
(DMEM; Life Technologies) supplemented with 5% FCS and antibiotics.
Infection experiments with the Bucyrus strain of EAV (20)
were performed in BHK-21 or RK-13 cells according to the protocol of de
Vries et al. (16). BHK-21 cells were also used for
transfection experiments with in vitro-generated transcripts from the
EAV infectious cDNA clone pEAV030 (and derivatives thereof), using a
previously described electroporation protocol (63). Modified
vaccinia virus Ankara expressing the bacteriophage T7 DNA-dependent RNA
polymerase (MVA-T7) (58) was propagated and titrated in
chicken embryo fibroblasts. DNA transfection experiments for transient
expression studies were carried out in OST-7.1 or BHK-21 cells.
Antisera.
An antiserum specific for the C terminus of the
EAV ORF 2a protein was generated by injecting rabbits with the bovine
serum albumin-coupled peptide
NH2-Gly-Arg-Ser-Leu-Val-Ala-Arg-Cys-Ser-Arg-Gly-Ala-Arg-Tyr-Arg-Pro-Val-COOH, using a previously described immunization scheme (56). The
production and characterization of rabbit antisera recognizing other
EAV nonstructural and structural proteins have been described before (16, 56). The localization of the EAV ORF 5-encoded
glycoprotein GL was studied with monoclonal antibody (MAb)
93B (26). The protein disulfide isomerase (PDI)-specific MAb
1D3 (65) and MAb F20/65-1-4 (32) were used as
markers for the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi complex, respectively.
Expression vectors.
Recombinant DNA plasmids were generated
by standard techniques and protocols (1, 50). ORF 2a was
placed downstream of a T7 RNA polymerase promoter by ligation of a
0.3-kb ApaI-PstI fragment (nt 9,740 to 10,051 of
the EAV genome) from EAV cDNA clone 535 (15) into
pBluescript SK( Generation and analysis of knockout viruses and revertants.
The translation initiation codons of EAV ORF 2a and ORF 2b were mutated
in the EAV infectious cDNA clone pEAV030 (63) (EMBL database
accession no. Y07862). The ORF 2a start codon (Fig. 2) was changed to ATA (G-9754 to A). In
addition, a T residue 4 nt downstream (T-9758) was replaced by C to
engineer a novel StuI restriction site (AGGCCT)
in pEAV030 which could be used as marker for the ORF 2a knockout
mutation in construct pEAV030-2aKO. In construct pEAV030-2bKO, the ORF
2b start codon was changed to ACG (T-9826 to C) (Fig. 2). A second
mutation, also translationally silent with respect to ORF 2a, was made
3 nt downstream (A-9829 to C) to destroy an Eco47III
restriction site. The ORF 2a and ORF 2b knockout mutations were
engineered in shuttle vectors by PCR mutagenesis (38), after
which fully sequenced restriction fragments carrying the mutations were
placed back into pEAV030. In vitro transcription reactions and RNA
transfections were carried out as described before (63).
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification of a Novel Structural Protein
of Arteriviruses
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Overview of the replication cycle of arteriviruses based
on the family prototype, EAV. The viral genome and the nested set of
subgenomic mRNAs are indicated, with the small black boxes representing
the common 5' leader sequence. The previously identified genes
(14, 16) are depicted, with the white boxes representing the
translationally active ORF(s) for each mRNA.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
) (Stratagene) to produce pAVI02a. The EAV ORF 6 expression vector pAVI16 has been described elsewhere (16).

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 2.
Sequence analysis of the ORF 2a-containing genomic
region of EAV and the corresponding parts of the genomes of the three
other arteriviruses. cDNA sequences as well as amino acid sequences of
significant ORFs are given; potential translation initiation codons
(ATG) are underlined. The arrows indicate the start sites of the newly
identified ORFs in the sequences. The positions of the TRSs of the
relevant mRNAs are also indicated.
DNA transfection experiments. Subconfluent monolayers of OST-7.1 or BHK-21 cells were grown in 10-cm2 dishes or on glass coverslips, washed once with DMEM (OST-7.1 cells) or GMEM (BHK-21 cells), and infected with MVA-T7 at a multiplicity of infection of 5 to 10 PFU per cell. After a 1-h incubation at 37°C, the inoculum was removed and the cells were washed twice with medium lacking serum and antibiotics. The cells were given 200 µl of a transfection mixture consisting of 5 µg of plasmid DNA, 10 µl of Lipofectin (Life Technologies), and 190 µl of DMEM (OST-7.1 cells) or GMEM (BHK-21 cells) and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Next, 800 µl of prewarmed medium was added and the cells were incubated at 37°C, after which they were either fixed for immunofluorescence or metabolically labeled at various time points.
Preparation of radiolabeled cell lysates. Metabolic labeling experiments were carried out with EAV- and mock-infected BHK-21 cells, RNA-transfected BHK-21 cells, and MVA-T7-infected and plasmid-transfected BHK-21 or OST-7.1 cells, using established procedures (19). The DNA-transfected cells were kept at 37°C, and the labeling was started at 6 h after infection with MVA-T7, following a starvation period of 30 min. EAV- and mock-infected cells and RNA-transfected cells were incubated at 39.5°C throughout the experiment. BHK-21 cells transfected with pEAV030, pEAV030-2aKO, or pEAV030-2bKO RNA were labeled from 10 to 14 h posttransfection. Labeling of EAV- and mock-infected BHK-21 cells took place at 7 h post infection (p.i.), again following a 30-min starvation period. In each case the labeling medium (DMEM without L-cystine, L-glutamine, and L-methionine [BioWhittaker], supplemented with 5% dialyzed FCS, 10 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], and 2 mM L-alanyl-L-glutamine) contained 150 µCi of protein labeling mix ([35S]Met-[35S]Cys; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech or New England Nuclear) per ml. After being labeled, the cells were placed on ice, and total lysates of cells and media were prepared. This was done in the absence or presence of the sulfhydryl blocking agent iodoacetamide, as previously described (19), with the modification that the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) concentration in the postnuclear supernatants was increased to 0.5%. Alternatively, cells were rinsed twice with complete medium containing 2 mM L-methionine and 4 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate and incubated for different chase periods prior to lysis. When indicated, the translation inhibitor cycloheximide (500 µM) was present in the chase medium.
Preparation of radiolabeled virions. Subconfluent BHK-21 monolayers (80-cm2 flasks) were infected with EAV at a multiplicity of infection of 20 PFU per cell. At 6 h p.i., the medium was replaced by Met- and/or Cys-free medium containing either 100 µCi of [35S]Met (ICN), 100 µCi of [35S]Cys (ICN), or 100 µCi of [35S]Met-[35S]Cys per ml as indicated in the text. Three hours later, an equal amount of label was added to the medium, followed at 12 h p.i. by one-sixth volume of complete medium. The culture supernatants were harvested at 20 h p.i., and cell debris was removed by low-speed centrifugation. The [35S]Met-[35S]Cys-labeled virus was pelleted through a cushion of 20% (wt/wt) sucrose in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6)-100 mM NaCl-1 mM EDTA (TNE) by overnight centrifugation in an SW 28 rotor (Beckman) at 15,000 rpm and 4°C and used for immunoprecipitation analyses. The [35S]Met- or [35S]Cys-labeled virus preparations were subjected to polyethylene glycol precipitation (16), resuspended in ice-cold TNE, and further purified by ultracentrifugation through a 20 to 50% (wt/wt) sucrose gradient for 16 h at 30,000 rpm and 4°C, using an SW 41 Ti rotor (Beckman). Gradient fractions (500 µl) were collected, and a part of each aliquot was analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (36).
Protein analysis. Immunoprecipitations, endoglycosidase H digestions, and glycopeptidase F treatments were performed by established procedures (19). Immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed in SDS-20% polyacrylamide gels under nonreducing or reducing conditions. Prior to fluorography, gels were fixed in 10% acetic acid-50% methanol-0.005% Coomassie brilliant blue R250 for 30 min, soaked in 1 M sodium salicylate (30 min) (10), and dried.
Immunofluorescence assays. The preparation of cells for indirect immunofluorescence assays was done essentially as described previously (61). The ORF 2a protein-specific rabbit antiserum was used at a dilution of 1:200 to 1:400. Tissue culture supernatants of the anti-EAV GL (MAb 93B), anti-PDI (MAb 1D3), and anti-Golgi protein (MAb F20/65-1-4) hybridoma cell lines were used at dilutions of 1:40, 1:10, and 1:20, respectively. As secondary antibodies, a Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G antibody and a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G antibody (both from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) were used at dilutions of 1:400 to 1:800 and 1:100, respectively. The samples were examined with an Olympus fluorescence microscope.
Electron microscopy. For cryoimmunoelectron microscopy, EAV-infected BHK-21 or RK-13 cells were fixed in 200 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde. Cells were scraped from the dish, pelleted, and incubated in 2.3 M sucrose for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, cell pellets were mounted on silver pins, flash frozen, and stored in liquid nitrogen. The specimens were sectioned with a Reichert Ultracut S ultramicrotome equipped with a Reichert FCS cryo attachment using a Drukker International diamond knife. Immunocytochemical labeling of thawed cryosections was performed essentially as described by Griffiths et al. (31), and specimens were examined in a Philips CM100 transmission electron microscope.
Arterivirus sequences and computer-assisted sequence analyses. The sequence of the structural-protein-coding region of the genome of SHFV strain LVR 42-0/M6941 (53) and the full-length genomic sequences of the EAV Bucyrus strain (14), the Lelystad isolate of PRRSV (45), and the LDV P strain (49) (accession no. U63121, X53459, M96262, and U15146, respectively) were extracted from the EMBL/GenBank database. Deduced protein sequences were analyzed by using DNASIS software (version 2.1; Hitachi Software Engineering) or with the aid of software available from the Dutch National Expertise Center for Computer-Aided Chemistry and Bioinformatics (CAOS/CAMM), Nijmegen, The Netherlands), including the GCG (version 8.1; Genetics Computer Group, Madison, Wis.) and EGCG (extended GCG; version 8.1.0; Peter Rice, The Sanger Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom) packages.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Identification of a previously unnoticed but conserved arterivirus gene. Analysis of the genetic information on the four arteriviruses (14, 28, 45, 49, 53) has resulted in the identification of a set of putative genes and a set of conserved mRNA TRSs in the 3'-terminal portions of their genomes. The coding assignments for many of these relatively large arterivirus genes (Fig. 1 and 3B) have now been firmly established, and the corresponding proteins have been characterized (see reference 54 for a review). Several small but potentially functional ORFs of 50 to 100 codons were also identified. However, since most of these small ORFs completely overlapped with a larger gene and were not the most 5'-proximal ORF in one of the viral subgenomic mRNAs, their expression was considered unlikely.
|
Computer analysis of the EAV E protein and its homologs. Like all other arterivirus structural proteins, the E protein is clearly most conserved between LDV and PRRSV (43% identical residues) (Fig. 4A). The EAV E protein occupies an intermediate position, whereas its SHFV equivalent is most divergent and is also 10 to 13 residues longer than its three homologs. Still, two noticeable properties have been conserved in all four proteins: (i) a central hydrophobic domain of 30 to 40 residues (Fig. 4B) and (ii) a cluster of basic amino acid residues in the hydrophilic C-terminal domain of the protein (Fig. 4A). Although an N-terminal signal sequence is lacking, the presence of the central hydrophobic region strongly suggests that the E protein is an integral membrane polypeptide. In principle, the hydrophobic core of the protein is long enough to span the membrane twice, but computer analyses aimed at predicting the number of transmembrane domains and the topology of the E protein in the membrane produced inconsistent results.
|
Identification and characterization of the EAV E protein. To investigate whether EAV ORF 2a is expressed and to study the characteristics of its product, an antiserum was raised by using a synthetic peptide which represented the 17 most C-terminal residues of the predicted EAV E protein sequence. Immunoprecipitations using this antipeptide serum and the control preimmunization serum were carried out on lysates of EAV- or mock-infected BHK-21 cells which had been labeled with 35S[Met]-35S[Cys] from 7 to 8 h p.i. The antipeptide serum specifically precipitated a protein of the expected size (approximately 8 kDa; predicted size, 7.4 kDa) from the lysate of EAV-infected cells (Fig. 5A, left panel). Both the pre- and postimmunization sera also brought down the 12-kDa EAV N protein. As described before, this is due to the fact that the N protein binds to the protein A molecules on the surface of the Staphylococcus aureus cells used to precipitate the immune complexes (60).
|
Subcellular localization of the EAV E protein. The subcellular localization of the E protein in EAV-infected BHK-21 cells and upon expression in the MVA-T7 system was studied by immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 6A). From the extensive reticular and perinuclear staining, it was clear that the E protein associated with intracellular membranes. Double labeling of EAV-infected cells (Fig. 6A, left panel) for the E and GL proteins revealed that part of the E molecules localized to the Golgi complex (61). Another fraction of the E protein resided in the ER, as evidenced by colocalization with the ER-resident folding factor PDI. The staining pattern strongly resembled that of the EAV M protein, which has been found to localize to the ER and the Golgi complex (unpublished data). Inspection of cells fixed earlier or later in infection did not reveal any clear changes in the subcellular localization of the E protein (data not shown).
|
The EAV E protein is a virion component. To determine whether the E protein is present in virions, 35S[Met]-35S[Cys]-labeled EAV particles were prepared by metabolic labeling of infected BHK-21 cells and purified by sedimentation through a 20% (wt/wt) sucrose cushion. As a negative control, the culture supernatant from mock-infected cells was used. Direct analysis of the virus pellet by SDS-PAGE showed that it contained an 8-kDa protein which comigrated with the E protein from lysates of EAV-infected cells (data not shown). Immunoprecipitations with the E protein-specific antiserum confirmed the identity of this 8-kDa polypeptide (Fig. 7A). To verify that the EAV E protein was a virion protein and not a nonstructural contaminant of virus preparations, 35S[Met]- and 35S[Cys]-labeled virus particles were successively subjected to polyethylene glycol precipitation and sucrose density gradient centrifugation. This analysis revealed that the E protein band was concentrated in the gradient fractions which also contained the bulk of the other known structural polypeptides of EAV (Fig. 7B). Because these fractions also contained the highest level of specific infectivity, we concluded that the EAV E protein is indeed a structural protein.
|
The EAV E and GS proteins are both required for virus infectivity. The recent construction of EAV infectious cDNA clone pEAV030 (63) allowed us to test the importance of EAV ORF 2a expression by means of reverse genetics. To abolish the expression of ORF 2a, its translation initiation codon was mutated from AUG to AUA. This mutation does not affect the translation of ORF 2b or that of replicase ORF 1b, whose termination codon overlaps with the ORF 2a start codon (Fig. 2). As a control, a similar strategy was employed to inactivate the expression of ORF 2b.
Full-length transcripts of the ORF 2a and ORF 2b knockout constructs (pEAV030-2aKO and pEAV030-2bKO, respectively) were generated in vitro and transfected into BHK-21 cells. RNA derived from the wild-type plasmid pEAV030 served as a positive control. The transfected cells were 35S[Met]-35S[Cys] labeled from 10 to 14 h posttransfection, and viral protein synthesis was analyzed by immunoprecipitation with a set of EAV-specific antisera (Fig. 8). This biochemical analysis confirmed the complete inactivation of ORF 2a (E protein) expression in EAV030-2aKO and the abrogation of ORF 2b (GS protein) expression in EAV030-2bKO. The expression of the replicase proteins (e.g., nsp2 [Fig. 8]) and other structural proteins (e.g., M and N [Fig. 8]) was not affected.
|
4 (or less).
In contrast, the EAV030-2aKO transfection yielded 32 and 3 plaques in
dilutions containing 60,000 and 6,000 cells, respectively. Although
this was 1,000-fold less than for the wild-type construct, the
(reproducible) difference with similar knockout mutations for other
genes was remarkable. Since the average size and morphology of the
EAV030-2aKO plaques were similar to those of the wild-type virus, we
consider it unlikely that inactivation of ORF 2a expression results in
reduced or delayed virus yields or in the release of poorly infectious
virus. In view of our observations during the immunofluorescence
analysis (see above), it was more likely that revertants of the ORF 2a
knockout mutation arose with a relatively high frequency (see also Discussion).
Subsequently, three putative EAV030-2aKO revertants were plaque
purified and used to infect fresh BHK-21 cells. Intracellular RNA was
isolated and used to amplify the region containing ORF 2a by reverse
transcription (RT)-PCR. Direct sequence analysis of the RT-PCR product
confirmed that the ORF 2a start codon had been restored in these
revertants: the AUA mutant codon had reverted back to AUG.
Interestingly, an additional, translationally silent mutation 4 nt
downstream (T-9758 to C) which had been introduced to engineer a
StuI marker restriction site had not been repaired. The
latter observation ruled out contamination with the wild-type virus and
confirmed that the G-9754-to-A substitution, which had knocked out ORF
2a expression in the EAV030-2aKO mutant, indeed reverted with an
unusually high frequency.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A newly discovered structural protein of arteriviruses. In this paper, we have described the identification of a previously unnoticed gene (ORF 2a) in the genome of EAV. As expected from its conservation in the other three arteriviruses (Fig. 2 to 4), this novel ORF indeed represents a functional gene, and its product was detected in EAV-infected cells (Fig. 5 and 6) and in virus particles (Fig. 7). Our experiments showed that the protein is very stable and localizes to the ER and Golgi complex both in EAV-infected cells and when expressed independently. Finally, we employed reverse genetics to demonstrate that expression of EAV ORF 2a (and also of ORF 2b) is required to produce infectious progeny virus. In view of its predicted hydrophobic nature, its membrane association, and its presence in virus particles, we have chosen the provisional name envelope (E) protein for the EAV ORF 2a product.
So far, four structural proteins had been identified for EAV, LDV, and SHFV (16, 23, 30), while PRRSV was reported to possess six virion proteins (42, 46, 47, 64). The structural roles of the N protein, M protein, and major glycoprotein (GL/VP-3P/GP5/p54) are undisputed. The last protein has been demonstrated to serve as a target for neutralizing antibodies in EAV, LDV, and PRRSV (see reference 54 for references). The products of EAV/LDV ORF 2b and PRRSV ORF 2a (formerly ORF 2) are only minor structural components (16, 19, 23, 46). In the case of PRRSV, the ORF 4 protein was also shown to be present in virions and was identified as a second target for neutralizing antibodies (48, 64, 68). Recently, the ORF 4 protein was also identified as a structural protein in EAV (unpublished data). The structural role of the ORF 3 protein is still being debated, in view of the apparently conflicting data on its presence in virus particles (21, 33, 41, 64, 68). Mardassi et al. (41) recently reported that the PRRSV ORF 3 protein is a secretory protein that is not associated with virions, and similar claims have been made for the LDV ORF 3 protein (24). In any case, the newly discovered E protein further extends the collection of arterivirus structural proteins, which already was quite unusual among positive-stranded RNA viruses in terms of the number of proteins and their (predicted) structural properties. Arterivirions can now be assumed to contain at least six, and possibly even seven, structural proteins. With the exception of the N protein, all of these polypeptides are integrated into or associated with the viral envelope.The arterivirus E protein is expressed from a bicistronic mRNA. Our data probably constitute the first experimental proof of a functionally bicistronic subgenomic mRNA in arteriviruses, since we have now detected the translation products of EAV ORFs 2a and 2b in infected cells. We cannot formally exclude the possibility that ORF 2a is expressed directly from the viral genome by reinitiation after termination of ORF 1b translation. However, a strong argument against this possibility is the observation that ORF 2a is the most 5'-proximal ORF in subgenomic mRNA 2. If ORF 2a was translated directly from mRNA 1, one would expect leader-to-body joining to occur downstream of the ORF 2a start codon, thereby allowing the efficient translation of ORF 2b from mRNA 2. It is also unlikely that two separate mRNAs are generated to express ORFs 2a and 2b. A previous analysis of the EAV mRNA leader-to-body junctions (13, 15) indicated that there is only one functional signal for subgenomic mRNA synthesis in the region directly upstream of ORF 2b. This TRS is located in the 3' end of ORF 1b, 35 nt upstream of the ORF 2a initiation codon, and not between the ORF 2a and 2b translation start sites (Fig. 2). Thus, it is probably the expression of ORF 2b that requires a less orthodox translational mechanism, whereas ORF 2a is most likely expressed from mRNA 2 by conventional ribosomal scanning (34) and translation of the most 5'-proximal ORF.
A detailed analysis of the situation in the other three arteriviruses strongly suggests that bicistronic mRNAs are also used to express ORFs 2a and 2b in LDV and PRRSV and ORFs 4a and 4b in SHFV. Again, in each of these viruses, only a single functional TRS has been identified upstream of these pairs of genes (11, 29, 44). Remarkably, the relative position of the genes encoding the E protein and the GS homolog (GP2) in PRRSV is reversed compared to that in EAV, LDV, and SHFV (Fig. 3). It is noteworthy, however, that Thr-16 in GP2 of most European PRRSV strains can be aligned with Met-1 of the LDV ORF 2b protein and that American PRRSV isolates even possess a Met residue at this position (data not shown). Thus, compared to its LDV equivalent, PRRSV GP2 appears to contain an N-terminal extension of 15 amino acids, a change which is linked to the reversed gene arrangement. The consequences of the altered gene order for PRRSV ORF 2a and 2b translation are unknown, since their initiation codons are both in a favorable context and are separated by only 2 nt. The mechanism of translation of the second ORF of mRNA 2 in EAV/LDV/PRRSV and mRNA 4 in SHFV is unclear. In all cases, the initiation codon of the upstream ORF (2a or 4a) is in a good context. This argues against a leaky scanning mechanism, even though no additional AUG triplets are present in the region between the initiation codons of the two ORFs in EAV, PRRSV, and SHFV (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the removal of the ORF 2a translation initiation codon in construct pEAV030-2aKO did not have a dramatic effect on the expression level of the GS protein (Fig. 8). The presence of an internal ribosomal entry site which directs translation of the more-downstream ORF is an alternative explanation. Such translation-regulating RNA sequences have been identified in a number of other viral and cellular mRNAs (for a review, see reference 51). However, since the major part of internal ribosomal entry site elements is usually located upstream of the translation initiation codon, the situation in both SHFV (with its presumed gene duplication upstream of ORFs 4a and 4b) and PRRSV (in which the order of ORFs 2a and 2b is reversed) seems to argue against the presence of a conserved RNA structure in this region of the genome.High reversion frequency of the ORF2a knockout mutation. As described above, a significantly larger number of revertants arose in cells transfected with EAV030-2aKO than in EAV030-2bKO-transfected cells. A possible explanation for this difference is the fact that the ORF 2a initiation codon was mutated from AUG to AUA while the ORF 2b AUG codon was changed to ACG. During replication, the EAV genome (and antigenome) may be susceptible to the activity of a double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase(s) which is present in the host cell (3). This enzyme can convert adenosine into inosine, which preferentially forms a base pair with cytidine (instead of uridine), thereby causing a U-to-C transition in the complementary strand and, upon a subsequent round of replication, the replacement of the original A by a G in the plus strand. Thus, the AUA mutant codon at the 5' end of ORF 2a might be preferentially converted into AUG, which would explain the high reversion frequency of this mutation compared to that of the inactivated ORF 2b start codon (ACG). Similar A-to-G hypermutation phenomena have previously been reported for a number of negative-stranded RNA viruses and retroviruses (see reference 3 for a review) but, to our knowledge, not for any positive-stranded RNA virus.
Properties and function of the arterivirus E protein. The apparent molecular mass of the EAV E protein (as estimated by SDS-PAGE) closely matched the molecular mass calculated from the primary amino acid sequence, and no alterations in size were observed during pulse-chase experiments. Still, we cannot exclude the possibility that the E protein undergoes co- or posttranslational modifications which do not have a noticeable effect on its electrophoretic mobility. Indeed, careful inspection of a number of gels revealed that the E protein always migrates as a doublet of between 6.5 and 10.5 kDa. This might indicate that (at least) two forms of the protein exist, which might explain its fuzzy appearance in SDS-PAGE gels. As described in the Results, the N terminus of the arterivirus E proteins invariably contains a potential N-myristoylation site followed by a phosphorylation site for casein kinase II. The possible significance of these sequence elements is underlined by the fact that they are also conserved in a group of PRRSV isolates in which the N terminus of the E protein is extended by 3 amino acids (see, e.g., reference 43). A similar combination of posttranslational modifications has been found in the myristoylated, alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS), which cycles between membrane and cytosolic compartments in a regulated fashion by means of a myristoyl-electrostatic switch (reviewed in reference 4). Modification of the E protein by casein kinase II would require its N terminus to be located on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane. Myristoylation might occur both in the cytoplasm and in the ER (7) and could have many implications for E protein function, in terms of both protein-lipid and protein-protein interactions. Myristoyl moieties, for example, have been reported to play a role in virus particle formation, receptor recognition, virion stability, and virus disassembly (for a review, see reference 12). Likewise, phosphorylation of the E protein could modulate its function as a result of a change in three-dimensional structure or intracellular trafficking.
The hydropathy profile of the E protein suggests that it is an integral membrane protein with an uncleaved signal-anchor sequence in the central part of the molecule. If the protein spans the membrane only once, the large size and hydrophobicity of the internal hydrophobic domain, the small acidic N terminus that may be easily translocated, and the abundance of basic residues at the C-terminal side of the signal-anchor sequence (67) would be most compatible with a type III orientation (NexoCcyt [57]). Alternatively, the E protein may span the lipid bilayer twice, with both termini located at the cytoplasmic face of the membrane. In the latter case, the conserved Asp-25 may interact in the plane of the membrane with the first downstream Arg (residue 51 in EAV) to stabilize the polytopic transmembrane structure. Finally, we cannot exclude the possibility that the E protein can adopt multiple transmembrane configurations, as has been described for some other viral envelope proteins (see, e.g., references 39 and 59). The arterivirus E protein structurally resembles a number of small hydrophobic proteins found in other RNA viruses (for a review, see reference 8). All of these proteins seem to disturb lipid bilayers and have been implicated in diverse processes, such as (i) the formation of aqueous pores or selective ion channels, (ii) the vesiculation of intracellular membranes, (iii) the induction of membrane curvature, and (iv) the pinching-off reaction of budding virions. The expression of these small membrane-active proteins may further result in the development of cytopathic changes and inhibition of the secretory pathway and may be required to enhance particle release or to promote virus uncoating. Interestingly, coronaviruses also code for a small hydrophobic membrane protein (reviewed in reference 52). This so-called E protein was detected both in virus-infected cells and in virions and appears to play a crucial role during virus morphogenesis (25). In recent studies, coexpression of the M and E proteins of mouse hepatitis virus was shown to be both necessary and sufficient to generate coronavirus-like particles (6, 66). In view of the evolutionary relationship between the two virus groups and the structural similarities between their triple-spanning M proteins, it is tempting to speculate that the E proteins of arteriviruses and coronaviruses are functional homologs. On the other hand, the coronavirus E protein seems to be present in virus particles at a much lower rate than the EAV E protein, and the other structural proteins of arteri- and coronaviruses are clearly different (for reviews, see references 9, 17, and 54). Furthermore, the simultaneous expression of EAV ORFs 2a, 5, and/or 6 in vaccinia virus-based expression systems did not result in the production of subviral particles (data not shown). Thus, either the E protein of arteriviruses is functionally distinct from that of coronaviruses or the production of arterivirus-like particles requires the expression of additional viral genes.| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We gratefully acknowledge Fred Wassenaar for preparing the E protein-specific antiserum and Yvonne van der Meer and Hein Sprong for assistance with immunofluorescence microscopy and photography. We thank Brenda Bass, Peter Rottier, Willy Spaan, and Harry Vennema for helpful discussions. We thank Amy Glaser, Emilie Weiland, and Stephen Fuller for providing the anti-EAV GL MAb 93B, anti-Golgi MAb F20/65-1-4, and anti-PDI MAb 1D3, respectively. We are indebted to Gerd Sutter and Bernard Moss for providing the MVA-T7 recombinant virus and the OST-7.1 cell line, respectively.
This research was financially supported (in part) by the Council for Chemical Sciences of The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (CW-NWO) and The Netherlands Technology Foundation (STW).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Virology, Leiden University Medical Center, LUMC P4-26, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 71 5261657. Fax: 31 71 5266761. E-mail: Snijder{at}Virology.AZL.NL.
Present address: Center for Biotechnology (CBT), Department of
Biosciences at Novum, Karolinska Institutet, 14157 Huddinge, Sweden.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1987. Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 2. |
Bairoch, A.,
P. Bucher, and K. Hofmann.
1997.
The PROSITE database, its status in 1997.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25:217-221 |
| 3. | Bass, B. L. 1997. RNA editing and hypermutation by adenosine deamination. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22:157-162[Medline]. |
| 4. | Bhatnagar, R. S., and J. I. Gordon. 1997. Understanding covalent modifications of proteins by lipids; where cell biology and biophysics mingle. Trends Cell Biol. 7:14-20. [Medline] |
| 5. | Bonifacino, J. S., M. S. Marks, H. Ohno, and T. Kirchhausen. 1996. Mechanisms of signal-mediated protein sorting in the endocytic and secretory pathways. Proc. Assoc. Am. Phys. 108:285-295[Medline]. |
| 6. | Bos, E. C. W., W. Luytjes, H. van der Meulen, H. K. Koerten, and W. J. M. Spaan. 1996. The production of recombinant infectious DI-particles of a murine coronavirus in the absence of helper virus. Virology 218:52-60[Medline]. |
| 7. | Boutin, J. A. 1997. Myristoylation. Cell. Signal. 9:15-35[Medline]. |
| 8. | Carrasco, L. 1995. Modification of membrane permeability by animal viruses. Adv. Virus Res. 45:61-112[Medline]. |
| 9. | Cavanagh, D. 1997. Nidovirales: a new order comprising Coronaviridae and Arteriviridae. Arch. Virol. 142:629-633[Medline]. |
| 10. | Chamberlain, J. P. 1979. Fluorographic detection of radioactivity in polyacrylamide gels with the water-soluble fluor, sodium salicylate. Anal. Biochem. 98:132-135[Medline]. |
| 11. |
Chen, Z.,
L. Kuo,
R. R. R. Rowland,
C. Even,
K. S. Faaberg, and P. G. W. Plagemann.
1993.
Sequences of 3' end of genome and of 5' end of open reading frame 1a of lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus and common junction motifs between 5' leader and bodies of seven subgenomic mRNAs.
J. Gen. Virol.
74:643-659 |
| 12. | Chow, M., and N. Moscufo. 1993. Myristoylation of viral proteins, p. 59-81. In M. J. Schlesinger (ed.), Lipid modifications of proteins. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla. |
| 13. | den Boon, J. A., M. F. Kleijnen, W. J. M. Spaan, and E. J. Snijder. 1996. Equine arteritis virus subgenomic mRNA synthesis: analysis of leader-body junctions and replicative-form RNAs. J. Virol. 70:4291-4298[Abstract]. |
| 14. |
den Boon, J. A.,
E. J. Snijder,
E. D. Chirnside,
A. A. F. de Vries,
M. C. Horzinek, and W. J. M. Spaan.
1991.
Equine arteritis virus is not a togavirus but belongs to the coronaviruslike superfamily.
J. Virol.
65:2910-2920 |
| 15. |
de Vries, A. A. F.,
E. D. Chirnside,
P. J. Bredenbeek,
L. A. Gravestein,
M. C. Horzinek, and W. J. M. Spaan.
1990.
All subgenomic mRNAs of equine arteritis virus contain a common leader sequence.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:3241-3247 |
| 16. |
de Vries, A. A. F.,
E. D. Chirnside,
M. C. Horzinek, and P. J. M. Rottier.
1992.
Structural proteins of equine arteritis virus.
J. Virol.
66:6294-6303 |
| 17. | de Vries, A. A. F., M. C. Horzinek, P. J. M. Rottier, and R. J. de Groot. 1997. The genome organization of the Nidovirales: similarities and differences between arteri-, toro-, and coronaviruses. Semin. Virol. 8:33-47. |
| 18. | de Vries, A. A. F., S. M. Post, M. J. B. Raamsman, M. C. Horzinek, and P. J. M. Rottier. 1995. The two major envelope proteins of equine arteritis virus associate into disulfide-linked heterodimers. J. Virol. 69:4668-4674[Abstract]. |
| 19. | de Vries, A. A. F., M. J. B. Raamsman, H. A. van Dijk, M. C. Horzinek, and P. J. M. Rottier. 1995. The small envelope glycoprotein (GS) of equine arteritis virus folds into three distinct monomers and a disulfide-linked dimer. J. Virol. 69:3441-3448[Abstract]. |
| 20. | Doll, E. R., J. T. Bryans, W. H. McCollum, and M. E. W. Crowe. 1957. Isolation of a filterable agent causing arteritis of horses and abortion by mares. Its differentiation from the equine abortion (influenza) virus. Cornell Vet. 47:3-41. |
| 21. |
Drew, T. W.,
J. J. M. Meulenberg,
J. J. Sands, and D. J. Paton.
1995.
Production, characterization and reactivity of monoclonal antibodies to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.
J. Gen. Virol.
76:1361-1369 |
| 22. |
Elroy-Stein, O., and B. Moss.
1990.
Cytoplasmic expression system based on constitutive synthesis of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:6743-6747 |
| 23. | Faaberg, K. S., and P. G. W. Plagemann. 1995. The envelope proteins of lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus and their membrane topography. Virology 212:512-525[Medline]. |
| 24. | Faaberg, K. S., and P. G. W. Plagemann. 1997. ORF 3 of lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus encodes a soluble, nonstructural, highly glycosylated, and antigenic protein. Virology 227:245-251[Medline]. |
| 25. |
Fischer, F.,
C. F. Stegen,
P. S. Masters, and W. A. Samsonoff.
1998.
Analysis of constructed E gene mutants of mouse hepatitis virus confirms a pivotal role for E protein in coronavirus assembly.
J. Virol.
72:7885-7894 |
| 26. |
Glaser, A. L.,
A. A. F. de Vries, and E. J. Dubovi.
1995.
Comparison of equine arteritis virus isolates using neutralizing monoclonal antibodies and identification of sequence changes in GL associated with neutralization resistance.
J. Gen. Virol.
76:2223-2233 |
| 27. | Glaser, A. L., A. A. F. de Vries, M. J. B. Raamsman, M. C. Horzinek, and P. J. M. Rottier. 1999. An infectious cDNA clone of equine arteritis virus: a tool for future fundamental studies and vaccine development., p. 166-176. In U. Wernery, J. F. Wade, J. A. Mumford, and O.-R. Kaaden (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Equine Infectious Diseases, Dubai 1998 R & W Publications, Ltd., Newmarket, England. |
| 28. | Godeny, E. K., L. Chen, S. N. Kumar, S. L. Methven, E. V. Koonin, and M. A. Brinton. 1993. Complete genomic sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus (LDV). Virology 194:585-596[Medline]. |
| 29. |
Godeny, E. K.,
A. A. F. de Vries,
X. C. Wang,
S. L. Smith, and R. J. de Groot.
1998.
Identification of the leader-body junctions for the viral subgenomic mRNAs and organization of the simian hemorrhagic fever virus genome: evidence for gene duplication during arterivirus evolution.
J. Virol.
72:862-867 |
| 30. | Godeny, E. K., L. Zeng, S. L. Smith, and M. A. Brinton. 1995. Molecular characterization of the 3' terminus of the simian hemorrhagic fever virus genome. J. Virol. 69:2679-2683[Abstract]. |
| 31. | Griffiths, G., K. Simons, G. Warren, and K. T. Tokuyasu. 1983. Immunoelectron microscopy using thin, frozen sections: application to studies of the intracellular transport of Semliki Forest virus spike glycoproteins. Methods Enzymol. 96:466-485[Medline]. |
| 32. | Grossmann, A., F. Weiland, and E. Weiland. 1989. Autoimmunity induced by lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus: monoclonal autoantibodies against Golgi antigens and other subcellular elements. Autoimmunity 2:201-211[Medline]. |
| 33. | Katz, J. B., A. L. Shafer, K. A. Eernisse, J. G. Landgraf, and E. A. Nelson. 1995. Antigenic differences between European and American isolates of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) are encoded by the carboxy-terminal portion of viral open reading frame 3. Vet. Microbiol. 44:65-76[Medline]. |
| 34. |
Kozak, M.
1991.
Structural features in eukaryotic mRNAs that modulate the initiation of translation.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:19867-19870 |
| 35. | Kyte, J., and R. F. Doolittle. 1982. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157:105-132[Medline]. |
| 36. | Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (London) 227:680-685[Medline]. |
| 37. | Lai, M. M. C., and D. Cavanagh. 1997. The molecular biology of coronaviruses. Adv. Virus Res. 48:1-100. |
| 38. | Landt, O., H.-P. Grunert, and U. Hahn. 1990. A general method for rapid site-directed mutagenesis using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene 96:125-128[Medline]. |
| 39. |
Liu, N., and D. T. Brown.
1993.
Transient translocation of the cytoplasmic (endo)domain of a type I membrane glycoprotein into cellular membranes.
J. Cell Biol.
120:877-883 |
| 40. | Luytjes, W. 1995. Coronavirus gene expression: genome organization and protein synthesis, p. 33-54. In S. G. Siddell (ed.), The Coronaviridae. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 41. |
Mardassi, H.,
P. Gonin,
C. A. Gagnon,
B. Massie, and S. Dea.
1998.
A subset of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus GP3 glycoprotein is released into the culture medium of cells as a non-virion-associated and membrane-free (soluble) form.
J. Virol.
72:6298-6306 |
| 42. | Mardassi, H., B. Massie, and S. Dea. 1996. Intracellular synthesis, processing, and transport of proteins encoded by ORFs 5 to 7 of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Virology 221:98-112[Medline]. |
| 43. |
Meng, X.-J.,
P. S. Paul,
P. G. Halbur, and I. Morozov.
1995.
Sequence comparison of open reading frames 2 to 5 of low and high virulence United States isolates of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.
J. Gen. Virol.
76:3181-3188 |
| 44. |
Meulenberg, J. J. M.,
E. J. de Meijer, and R. J. M. Moormann.
1993.
Subgenomic RNAs of Lelystad virus contain a conserved leader-body junction sequence.
J. Gen. Virol.
74:1697-1701 |
| 45. | Meulenberg, J. J. M., M. M. Hulst, E. J. de Meijer, P. L. J. M. Moonen, A. den Besten, E. P. de Kluyver, G. Wensvoort, and R. J. M. Moormann. 1993. Lelystad virus, the causative agent of porcine epidemic abortion and respiratory syndrome (PEARS), is related to LDV and EAV. Virology 192:62-72[Medline]. |
| 46. | Meulenberg, J. J. M., and A. Petersen-den Besten. 1996. Identification and characterization of a sixth structural protein of Lelystad virus: the glycoprotein GP2 encoded by ORF2 is incorporated in virus particles. Virology 225:44-51[Medline]. |
| 47. | Meulenberg, J. J. M., A. Petersen-den Besten, E. P. de Kluyver, R. J. M. Moormann, W. M. M. Schaaper, and G. Wensvoort. 1995. Characterization of proteins encoded by ORFs 2 to 7 of Lelystad virus. Virology 206:155-163[Medline]. |
| 48. | Meulenberg, J. J. M., A. P. van Nieuwstadt, A. van Essen-Zandbergen, and J. P. M. Langeveld. 1997. Posttranslational processing and identification of a neutralization domain of the GP4 protein encoded by ORF4 of Lelystad virus. J. Virol. 71:6061-6067[Abstract]. |
| 49. | Palmer, G. A., L. Kuo, Z. Chen, K. S. Faaberg, and P. G. W. Plagemann. 1995. Sequence of the genome of lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus: heterogenicity between strains P and C. Virology 209:637-642[Medline]. |
| 50. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 51. | Sarnow, P. (ed.). 1995. Cap-independent translation. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 203:1-183[Medline]. |
| 52. | Siddell, S. G. 1995. The small membrane protein, p. 181-189. In S. G. Siddell (ed.), The Coronaviridae. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 53. | Smith, S. L., X. Wang, and E. K. Godeny. 1997. Sequence of the 3' end of the simian hemorrhagic fever virus genome. Gene 191:205-210[Medline]. |
| 54. | Snijder, E. J., and J. J. M. Meulenberg. 1998. The molecular biology of arteriviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 79:961-979[Medline]. |
| 55. | Snijder, E. J., and W. J. M. Spaan. 1995. The coronaviruslike superfamily, p. 239-255. In S. G. Siddell (ed.), The Coronaviridae. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 56. |
Snijder, E. J.,
A. L. M. Wassenaar, and W. J. M. Spaan.
1994.
Proteolytic processing of the replicase ORF1a protein of equine arteritis virus.
J. Virol.
68:5755-5764 |
| 57. |
Spiess, M.
1995.
Heads or tails what determines the orientation of proteins in the membrane.
FEBS Lett.
369:76-79[Medline].
|
| 58. | Sutter, G., M. Ohlman, and V. Erfle. 1995. Non-replicating vaccinia vector efficiently expresses bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase. FEBS Lett. 371:9-12[Medline]. |
| 59. | Swameye, I., and H. Schaller. 1997. Dual topology of the large envelope protein of duck hepatitis B virus: determinants preventing pre-S translocation and glycosylation. J. Virol. 71:9434-9441[Abstract]. |
| 60. | van Berlo, M. F., J. J. W. Zeegers, M. C. Horzinek, and B. A. M. van der Zeijst. 1983. Antigenic comparison of equine arteritis virus (EAV) and lactic dehydrogenase virus (LDV); binding of staphylococcal protein A to the nucleocapsid protein of EAV. Zentralbl. Veterinaermed. Reihe B 30:297-304[Medline]. |
| 61. |
van der Meer, Y.,
H. van Tol,
J. Krijnse Locker, and E. J. Snijder.
1998.
ORF1a-encoded replicase subunits are involved in the membrane association of the arterivirus replication complex.
J. Virol.
72:6689-6698 |
| 62. | van der Most, R. G., and W. J. M. Spaan. 1995. Coronavirus replication, transcription, and RNA recombination, p. 11-31. In S. G. Siddell (ed.), The Coronaviridae. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 63. |
van Dinten, L. C.,
J. A. den Boon,
A. L. M. Wassenaar,
W. J. M. Spaan, and E. J. Snijder.
1997.
An infectious arterivirus cDNA clone: identification of a replicase point mutation which abolishes discontinuous mRNA transcription.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:991-996 |
| 64. | van Nieuwstadt, A. P., J. J. M. Meulenberg, A. van Essen-Zandbergen, A. Petersen-den Besten, R. J. Bende, R. J. M. Moormann, and G. Wensvoort. 1996. Proteins encoded by open reading frames 3 and 4 of the genome of Lelystad virus (Arteriviridae) are structural proteins of the virion. J. Virol. 70:4767-4772[Abstract]. |
| 65. | Vaux, D., J. Tooze, and S. Fuller. 1990. Identification by anti-idiotypic antibodies of an intracellular membrane protein that recognizes a mammalian endoplasmic reticulum retention signal. Nature (London) 345:495-502[Medline]. |
| 66. | Vennema, H., G.-J. Godeke, J. W. A. Rossen, W. F. Voorhout, M. C. Horzinek, D.-J. E. Opstelten, and P. J. M. Rottier. 1996. Nucleocapsid-independent assembly of coronavirus-like particles by co-expression of viral envelope protein genes. EMBO J. 15:2020-2028[Medline]. |
| 67. |
Wahlberg, J. M., and M. Spiess.
1997.
Multiple determinants direct the orientation of signal-anchor proteins: the topogenic role of the hydrophobic signal domain.
J. Cell Biol.
137:555-562 |
| 68. | Wieczorek-Krohmer, M., F. Weiland, K. Conzelmann, D. Kohl, N. Visser, P. Van Woensel, H.-J. Thiel, and E. Weiland. 1996. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV): monoclonal antibodies detect common epitopes on two viral proteins of European and U.S. isolates. Vet. Microbiol. 51:257-266[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»