Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, July 1999, p. 6089-6092, Vol. 73, No. 7
Laboratory of Experimental and Computational
Biology, Division of Basic Sciences, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Frederick,
Maryland,1 and Department of
Microbiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham,
Alabama2
Received 28 December 1998/Accepted 24 March 1999
We have examined mutations in the ectodomain of the human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmembrane glycoprotein gp41 within a
region immediately adjacent to the membrane-spanning domain for their
effect on the outcome of the fusion cascade. Using the recently
developed three-color assay (I. Muñoz-Barroso, S. Durell, K. Sakaguchi, E. Appella, and R. Blumenthal, J. Cell Biol.
140:315-323, 1998), we have assessed the ability of the mutant gp41s
to transfer lipid and small solutes from susceptible target cells to
the gp120-gp41-expressing cells. The results were compared with the
syncytium-inducing capabilities of these gp41 mutants. Two mutant
proteins were incapable of mediating both dye transfer and syncytium
formation. Two mutant proteins mediated dye transfer but were less
effective at inducing syncytium formation than was wild-type gp41. The
most interesting mutant proteins were those that were not capable of
inducing syncytium formation but still mediated dye transfer,
indicating that the fusion cascade was blocked beyond the stage of
small fusion pore formation. Fusion mediated by the mutant gp41s was
inhibited by the peptides DP178 and C34.
The human immunodeficiency virus
type 1 (HIV-1) gp120-gp41 fusion machine consists of an assembly of
viral envelope glycoprotein oligomers which forms a molecular scaffold
responsible for bringing the viral membrane close to the target cell
membrane and creating the architecture that enables lipid bilayers to
merge (7). The fusion reaction undergoes multiple steps
before the final event occurs which allows delivery of the nucleocapsid
into the cell. In the case of influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA), we
have dissected these steps kinetically and analyzed the molecular
features of the kinetic intermediates (1). In order to
examine the modus operandi of the fusion machine, mutations in various
domains of viral envelope glycoproteins have been examined for their
effect on the outcome of the fusion cascade. For instance, replacement of the membrane-spanning domain of influenza virus HA with a
glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor results in a very stable hemifusion
intermediate (6). Moreover, single-site mutations in the
fusion peptide of HA significantly affect fusion pore dilation
(9). Recently, cytoplasmic tail acylation mutants of
influenza virus HA were identified which induce transfer of lipids and
small aqueous molecules but do not induce syncytium formation
(4a).
High-resolution crystallographic determinations (4, 10, 11)
of gp41 fragments from HIV-1 have revealed a bent-in-half, antiparallel, heterotrimeric coiled-coil structure. This is made up of
a triple-stranded coiled coil of
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Role of the Membrane-Proximal Domain in the Initial
Stages of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope
Glycoprotein-Mediated Membrane Fusion
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
-helices from the leucine zipper-like 4-3 repeat domain in gp41 close to the N-terminal fusion
peptide termed HR1 (8) flanked by
-helices from the domain in gp41 close to the C-terminal membrane anchor termed HR2
(8). Comparison with the crystal structure of the influenza virus HA2 subunits in a low-pH-induced conformation (2)
reveals common structural motifs which provide growing support for the "spring-loaded" type of mechanistic models (3). In this
scenario, activation of the fusion protein results in release of the
fusion peptide and extension of the central coiled-coil structure. The new positioning of the fusion peptides at the tip of the stalk provides
for easy contact with the target cell membrane. A small group of
proximal fusion proteins which are simultaneously inserted into both
the viral and target membranes would constitute a potential fusion
site. A concerted collapse of this protein complex, actuated by the
bending in half of the stalks at a central hinge region, would
presumably position the C-terminal transmembrane anchors and N-terminal
fusion peptides on top of each other in the center, bring the two
membranes into contact, and thus allow formation of the fusion pore
(7). In this study, we examined the effects on the various
stages of the fusion reaction of mutations in the region between HR2
and the transmembrane (TM) anchor (Fig.
1) described in detail by Salzwedel et
al. (8a).

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Amino acid sequence and mutations in gp41. FP is the
predicted fusion peptide region, and HR1 and HR2 (8)
represent, respectively, the N-terminal and C-terminal
-helices
of the triple-stranded coiled coil (4, 11). Mutations in the
region between HR2 and the TM anchor include deletions of amino acids
665 to 682 and 678 to 682, insertion of a FLAG sequence (YKDDDD),
insertion of a DAF sequence (PNKGSGTTS), scrambling of the underlined
sequence to SC7 (INNWNFT), and replacement of the five tryptophans with
alanines [W(1-5)A]. Peptide C34 represents HR2 amino acids 628 to
663, and peptide DP178 represents amino acids 638 to 673.
Mutagenesis of HIV-1 env, construction of plasmids, cell surface expression, CD4 binding, and cell fusion were performed as previously described (8a). The simian virus 40-based env expression plasmids (1 µg of DNA) were transfected into COS-1 cells in 35-mm-diameter plates by using DEAE-dextran (1 mg/ml). At 14 h posttransfection, the cells were replated, and starting at 36 to 48 h posttransfection, they were incubated with 20 µM CMAC (7-amino-4-chloromethylcoumarin) in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium overnight at 37°C. All constructs expressed similar amounts of envelope glycoprotein on the cell surface (8a). The transfected cells were then washed and incubated in fresh medium for 2 h at 37°C before addition of HeLa-CD4 cells which were labeled in the membrane with octadecyl indocarbocyanine (DiI) and in the cytosol with calcein as previously described (7). The method used to detect cell-cell fusion was a three-color assay (7) based on the redistribution of fluorescent probes between effector and target cells upon fusion. The application of three different probes was used to monitor lipid versus cytosolic mixing in the same cell population. Fluorescently labeled gp120-gp41-expressing cells and CD4+ cells were cocultured at a 1:10 ratio for 2 h at 37°C in uncoated microwells (MatTek Corp., Ashland, Mass.). Bright-field and fluorescent images were acquired with an Olympus IX70 microscope coupled to a charge-coupled device camera (Princeton Instruments, Trenton, N.J.) with a 40× UplanApo oil immersion objective. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (exciter, BP470-490; beam splitter, DM505; emitter, BA515-550), rhodamine (exciter, BP530-550; beam splitter, DM570; emitter, BA590), and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (exciter, D360/40; beam splitter, 400DCLP; emitter, D450/60) optical filter cubes were carefully chosen to avoid spillover when observing the fluorescence of the three dyes. For each sample, three or four different fields were collected, and data were analyzed by overlaying the images using Metamorph software (Universal Imaging Corporation, West Chester, Pa.). The percentage of lipid mixing and cytoplasmic mixing was calculated as 100 times the number of COS-1 cells stained with DiI and calcein divided by the total number of COS-1-HeLa-CD4 conjugates. Although not all COS-1 cells express env since the transfection efficiency is not 100%, env-expressing COS-1 cells are more likely to adhere to HeLa-CD4 cells.
Figure 2 shows a montage of video images
taken 2 h following incubation of COS-1 cells expressing wild-type
(WT), W(1-5)A, and +DAF env with HeLa-CD4 cells at
37°C. As described in detail in the legend to Fig. 2, we clearly
observed COS-1 cells attached to HeLa-CD4 cells, which showed
continuity of all three dyes (CMAC, calcein, and DiI). We know that for
+DAF and W(1-5)A env-expressing COS-1 cells, these images do
not represent syncytia since even small heterokaryons will show up in
the MAGI cell assay (6a), which is based on the transfer of
HIV-1 Tat coexpressed with env in COS-1 cells to HeLa-CD4
cells as a result of cell fusion. This transfer induces the expression
of a
-galactosidase reporter gene engineered in HeLa-CD4 (MAGI)
cells under the control of the viral long terminal repeat promoter
(8a). Because the
-galactosidase has been modified to
contain a nuclear targeting signal, the nuclei of the resulting
heterokaryons stain dark blue with
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal)
in situ. The MAGI assay is extremely sensitive and clearly identifies
syncytia as small as two nuclei. Such nuclei were common for the
678-682 mutant, which produced syncytia with an average size of ~5
nuclei (Fig. 3). The assay can detect
even a few of these fusion events per 100,000 cells. In the MAGI assay,
we did not observe any blue nuclei with the W(1-5)A and +DAF
constructs, an experiment repeated several times. The three-color assay
therefore reveals a distinct phenotype exhibited by the +DAF and
W(1-5)A mutant envelope glycoproteins, which form small fusion pores
allowing movement of lipids and small molecules (<1,000 Da) but not of large molecules (HIV-1 Tat is about 14 kDa [4b]).
|
|
We tallied data from many cell pairs similar to those shown in Fig. 2
and plotted the average percentage of COS-1 cells stained with DiI and
calcein. Figure 3 shows the data for the WT and a number of mutants
described by Salzwedel et al. (8a). The data fall into three
groups, in which the envelope glycoproteins mediate (i) both dye and
HIV-1 Tat redistribution (WT,
678-682, and SC7), (ii) neither dye
nor HIV-1 Tat redistribution (
665-682 and +FLAG), or (iii) dye but
not HIV-1 Tat redistribution [W(1-5)A and +DAF]. The latter
represents a nonexpanding fusion pore phenotype.
Dye redistribution induced by WT and mutant gp41s was inhibited by the peptide inhibitors DP178 and C34 (Fig. 4). The latter peptide is from the HR2 sequence (residues 628 to 663) which forms the flanking peptide of the heterotrimeric coiled coil in the crystal structure. DP178 is frameshifted 10 amino acids toward the C terminus (residues 638 to 673). The inhibition data indicate that dye redistribution mediated by WT and mutant gp41 molecules is specific for the gp120-gp41-induced fusion reaction and not due to nonspecific transfer. Interestingly, W(1-5)A and SC7 exhibited greater sensitivity than the WT to DP178 inhibition. In the case of C34, inhibition was about the same for the WT and the two mutants. We observed no inhibition by DP178 or C34 of HIV-2 env-mediated fusion at up to 100 nM peptide (data not shown).
|
Although the crystal structure of the gp41 core (4, 11) is
based on the HR1-HR2 coiled coil, it is possible that in intact gp41
the bundle is extended to include amino acids downstream from HR2 and
upstream from HR1. Extension of the coiled coil might lead to tilting
of the TM anchor, which is presumably important for producing
sufficient lipid curvature to form a fusion junction (1).
Removal of amino acids 665 to 682 may leave no possibility to form this
extended coiled coil. Similarly, insertion of the FLAG sequence, which
contains four aspartic acid residues, would presumably insert charged
residues into a hydrophobic domain, which could also prevent extension
of the coiled coil. The other mutations presumably allow extended
coiled-coil formation but reduce its efficiency because of weaker
interactions between the amino acids in the extended region. The
coiled-coil structure might be so frail in mutant gp41s W(1-5)A and
+DAF that it is not present for a sufficient amount of time to create
the fusion pore dilation necessary to allow transfer of HIV-1 Tat.
Since the
678-682 and SC7 proteins are, to a limited extent, capable of inducing syncytium formation and dye transfer, we surmise that they
possess intermediate extended coiled-coil-forming propensities.
Based on the structural information about the gp41 core (4, 10, 11), it has been proposed that the binding site for the peptide inhibitors is in the HR1 bundle. The C34 and DP178 peptides presumably bind in the same way as the corresponding amino acid sequence regions of the three HR2 helices in the crystal structures. At this position, the peptides would sterically block the regular binding of the HR2 helices to the inner core of HR1 helices and thus prevent formation of the bent-in-half, antiparallel, heterotrimeric coiled-coil structure presumably required to bring the viral and target cell membranes into contact for fusion. Since C34 corresponds to HR2 with no amino acids in the extended region, we do not expect any enhanced inhibitory effect on fusion mediated by the mutant gp41s. Figure 4b shows that this is the case. Since DP178 does contain 10 amino acids downstream from HR2 whose interaction with amino acids upstream from HR1 is weaker in the mutants, we expect greater sensitivity to DP178 inhibition in the mutant proteins. This does seem to be the case, as shown in Fig. 4a.
The recent high-resolution X-ray crystallographic determination of the structure of the gp41 core from HIV-1 provides well-defined landmarks in the terrain the viral envelope glycoproteins navigate following CD4 and coreceptor-induced conformational changes (5). The structures include neither fusion peptides and TM anchors nor regions between those domains and HR1 and HR2, respectively, which are crucial for fusion activity. Therefore, mutagenesis of those undetermined domains combined with sensitive assays for the activity of the modified proteins will lead to refinement of our thinking about the HIV-1 gp120-gp41 fusion machine.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
I.M.-B. was a postdoctoral fellow of the Direccion General de Investigacion Cientifica y Enseñanza Superior, M.E.C., Spain. This work was supported by the AIDS Intramural Targeted Antiviral Program.
We thank K. Sakaguchi and E. Appella for the gift of DP178 and D. Chan and P. Kim for the gift of C34. We are grateful to Anu Puri, Peter Hug, and Thomas Korte for helpful suggestions.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: NCI-FDRDC, Miller Drive, P.O. Box B, Bldg. 469, Rm. 213, Frederick, MD 21702-1201. Phone: (301) 846-1446. Fax: (301) 846-6192. E-mail: blumen{at}helix.nih.gov.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Blumenthal, R.,
D. P. Sarkar,
S. Durell,
D. E. Howard, and S. J. Morris.
1996.
Dilation of the influenza hemagglutinin fusion pore revealed by the kinetics of individual cell-cell fusion events.
J. Cell Biol.
135:63-71 |
| 2. | Bullough, P. A., F. M. Hughson, J. J. Skehel, and D. C. Wiley. 1994. Structure of influenza haemagglutinin at the pH of membrane fusion [see comments]. Nature 371:37-43[Medline]. |
| 3. | Carr, C. M., and P. S. Kim. 1993. A spring-loaded mechanism for the conformational change of influenza hemagglutinin. Cell 73:823-832[Medline]. |
| 4. | Chan, D. C., D. Fass, J. M. Berger, and P. S. Kim. 1997. Core structure of gp41 from the HIV envelope glycoprotein. Cell 89:263-273[Medline]. |
| 4a. | Fischer, C., B. Schroth-Diez, A. Herrmann, W. Garten, and H. D. Klenk. 1998. Acylation of the influenza hemagglutinin modulates fusion activity. Virology 248:284-294[Medline]. |
| 4b. |
Goh, W. C.,
C. Rosen,
J. Sodroski,
D. D. Ho, and W. Haseltine.
1986.
Identification of a protein encoded by the trans activator gene tatIII of human T-cell lymphotropic retrovirus type III.
J. Virol.
59:181-184 |
| 5. |
Jones, P. L.,
T. Korte, and R. Blumenthal.
1998.
Conformational changes in cell surface HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins are triggered by cooperation between cell surface CD4 and co-receptors.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:404-409 |
| 6. | Kemble, G. W., T. Danieli, and J. M. White. 1994. Lipid-anchored influenza hemagglutinin promotes hemifusion, not complete fusion. Cell 76:383-391[Medline]. |
| 6a. |
Kimpton, J., and M. Emerman.
1992.
Detection of replication-competent and pseudotyped human immunodeficiency virus with a sensitive cell line on the basis of activation of an integrated -galactosidase gene.
J. Virol.
66:2232-2239 |
| 7. |
Muñoz-Barroso, I.,
S. Durell,
K. Sakaguchi,
E. Appella, and R. Blumenthal.
1998.
Dilation of the human immunodeficiency virus-1 envelope glycoprotein fusion pore revealed by the inhibitory action of a synthetic peptide from gp41.
J. Cell Biol.
140:315-323 |
| 8. |
Rimsky, L. T.,
D. C. Shugars, and T. J. Matthews.
1998.
Determinants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance to gp41-derived inhibitory peptides.
J. Virol.
72:986-993 |
| 8a. |
Salzwedel, K.,
J. T. West, and E. Hunter.
1999.
A conserved tryptophan-rich motif in the membrane-proximal region of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp41 ectodomain is important for Env-mediated fusion and virus infectivity.
J. Virol.
73:2469-2480 |
| 9. |
Schoch, C., and R. Blumenthal.
1993.
Role of the fusion peptide sequence in initial stages of influenza hemagglutinin-induced cell fusion.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:9267-9274 |
| 10. |
Tan, K.,
J. Liu,
J. Wang,
S. Shen, and M. Lu.
1997.
Atomic structure of a thermostable subdomain of HIV-1 gp41.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:12303-12308 |
| 11. | Weissenhorn, W., A. Dessen, S. C. Harrison, J. J. Skehel, and D. C. Wiley. 1997. Atomic structure of the ectodomain from HIV-1 gp41. Nature 387:426-428[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»