Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, July 1999, p. 5875-5886, Vol. 73, No. 7
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Functional Analysis of Carboxy-Terminal Deletion Mutants of
c-Myb
Duen-Mei
Wang,
John W.
Dubendorff,
Colleen H.
Woo, and
Joseph S.
Lipsick*
Department of Pathology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5324
Received 28 December 1998/Accepted 12 April 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The c-myb gene is implicated in the differentiation and
proliferation of hematopoietic cells. Truncations of the N and/or C
terminus of c-Myb, found in v-Myb, can potentiate its transforming ability. Two negative regulatory subregions, located in the C terminus,
were mapped previously by using GAL4-c-Myb fusion proteins in
transient transfection assays for the transcriptional activation of a
GAL4-responsive reporter gene. To dissect the C terminus of c-Myb in
terms of its involvement in transcriptional activation and oncogenic
transformation, a series of C-terminal deletion mutants of c-Myb were
analyzed. In addition, linker insertion mutants within the
transactivation domain and/or heptad leucine repeat of c-Myb were
examined along with those deletion mutants. In this study, we
demonstrated that the removal of both of the two previously mapped
negative regulatory subregions from the native form of c-Myb not only
supertransactivates a Myb-responsive reporter gene but also potentiates
its transforming ability in culture. However, in contrast to previous
results, cells transformed by all of the mutants analyzed here except
v-Myb itself exhibited the same phenotype as those transformed by
c-Myb. The proliferating cells were bipotenial and differentiated into
both the granulocytic and monocytic lineages. This result implies that
the C terminus of c-Myb alone has no effect on the lineage
determination. Finally, the transactivation activities of these mutants
correlated with their transforming activities when a mim-1
reporter gene was used but not when a model promoter containing five
tandem Myb-binding sites was used. In particular, a very weakly
transforming mutant with a linker insertion in the heptad leucine
repeat superactivated the model promoter but not the mim-1
reporter gene.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The nuclear proto-oncogene
c-myb is implicated in the differentiation and proliferation
of hematopoietic cells (34). The expression of c-Myb is high
in immature hematopoietic cells and decreases as differentiation
progresses (18, 63). Two naturally arising avian
retroviruses, avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) and E26, carry a
transduced myb gene and cause acute monoblastic leukemia and
erythroblastosis in chickens, respectively (58). The
transduced v-myb oncogenes of AMV and E26 encode N- and
C-terminally truncated forms of c-Myb. In the case of AMV, v-Myb
contains 10 amino acid substitutions throughout the protein, whereas
E26 v-Myb contains a single unrelated substitution. A proviral
insertion within the c-myb locus can lead to B-cell
lymphomas and myeloid leukemias in chickens and mice, respectively. In
both cases, the insertional activations cause the expression of
truncated forms of c-Myb (35, 58). Recently, a truncation of
the C terminus of c-Myb was observed during the progression of a case
of human chronic myelogenous leukemia (62). Further analyses
of in vitro transformation by mutants of c-Myb imply that the N- and/or
C-terminal truncation is important for tumorigenesis (15, 27,
29).
c-Myb and its transduced version, v-Myb, can bind to the same DNA
sequence (YAAC[G/T]G) and mediate transcriptional activation (5,
25, 56, 64). The DNA-binding domain of c-Myb, located at the N
terminus, is composed of three imperfect repeats, each with a
helix-turn-helix structure (55). This domain is the most conserved region among Myb-related proteins. Part of the first repeat
is deleted in v-Myb. Next to the DNA-binding domain is the centrally
localized transcriptional activation (TA) domain. The minimal
transactivation domain, mapped by fusion with the GAL4 DNA-binding
domain, is 50 amino acids and contains 15 charged residues with a
predicted amphipathic helix (64). However, a much larger
region encompassing the minimal TA domain was found to be essential for
a native v-Myb protein to exert its transactivational function
(10, 32). Interestingly, it was shown that the
transcriptional coactivator CREB binding protein can bind to c-Myb
through a region containing the TA domain (12, 54). The part
of c-Myb C-terminal to the TA domain has a negative regulatory role in
terms of transactivation and transformation (17, 28, 29,
56). The N-terminal region of the negative regulatory domain
contains a heptad leucine repeat (HLR). The disruption of the HLR can
potentiate the transcriptional and transforming activities in cell
culture with a murine c-Myb from which the first 17 amino acids at its
N-terminal end have been deleted (27, 36). However, the HLR
region has a positive role in transcriptional activation and
transformation by AMV v-Myb (4, 22). Also, E26 virus, which
lacks this region, does not transform in the absence of the
v-ets oncogene (48). The deletion of the FAETL
motif, which is in the region of the HLR, from AMV v-Myb renders the
protein incapable of transactivation and transformation in cell culture
(22). The substitution of alanine for leucine in this region
causes v-Myb to lose its leukemogenicity in vivo but not its
transformation ability in cell culture, presumably due to temperature
sensitivity (4, 22).
The rest of the C terminus, following the HLR of c-Myb, is absent in
both the AMV and E26 Myb proteins. The truncation of this region has
been linked to the activation of the proto-oncogene, and analyses of
various deletion mutants imply a negative regulatory function. Finer
deletions of the C-terminal domain of c-Myb fused to the GAL4
DNA-binding domain were previously tested for their abilities to
transactivate a GAL4-responsive promoter (17). Two
subregions (positions corresponding to residues 425 to 464 and 499 to
558 of c-Myb) in the C terminus were important in negatively regulating
the transcriptional activity of GAL4-Myb fusion proteins. These two
noncontiguous regions flank a domain that is highly conserved among
vertebrate A-, B-, and c-Myb as well as Drosophila Myb
proteins (43). The same study also pointed out that the negative regulatory effect mediated by the C terminus is c-Myb DNA-binding domain independent and can be exerted in trans.
In addition, it was previously demonstrated that either the N- or C-terminal truncation (dCC or CCd, respectively) can promote the transforming activity of c-Myb, particularly the former (15, 29). Both the dCC- and CCd-transformed cells exhibited a
promyelocytic or granulocytic phenotype rather than the monocytic
phenotype displayed by v-Myb-transformed cells. This result raised the
interesting question of whether the C terminus of c-Myb controls
lineage determination.
Recently it was shown that the constitutive expression of the
full-length chicken c-Myb from an internal ribosomal binding site
(IRES)-containing retroviral vector can transform myelomonocytic cells in cultures (21). Similar results were observed with
full-length murine c-Myb in fetal liver cell cultures (20).
Because of these results, we sought to further investigate the
subregions of the C-terminal part of c-Myb with regard to their
transactivating and transforming abilities in the context of
full-length chicken c-Myb. Furthermore, two linker insertion mutations
that disrupt the central transactivation domain (Gly-Pro
insertion at residue 304) and the HLR (Gly-Pro-Asp at residue
389) were also tested for oncogenic transformation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmid constructions.
The avian retroviral constructs and a
series of C-terminal deletion and linker insertion mutants of c-Myb
have been previously described or were constructed from GAL4-c-Myb
fusions (17). An additional deletion mutant, CCC-dPSBB, was
made by digesting the double c-Myb deletion CCC-dPSBN in the pSP73
vector with NsiI and BamHI (3' of the c-Myb
coding sequence), treating it with Klenow fragment and deoxynucleoside
triphosphates, and reclosing the plasmid by ligation to an
SpeI linker with stop codons in all three reading frames. To
construct the other undescribed mutant, CCC-dMN, a partial
MscI digestion was performed, followed by heat inactivation
of the MscI enzyme and digestion with Ppu10I. The latter enzyme is an isoschizomer of NsiI that maintains the
c-Myb reading frame when it is filled in with Klenow fragment and
deoxynucleoside triphosphates and fused to the MscI blunt
end. To convert the previously described splice acceptor-driven
C-terminal deletion or insertion mutants into IRES-driven ones, the
BstEII fragments containing the deletion(s) or insertion(s)
were swapped with the BstEII fragment from N-I-CCC
(21).
Cells and media.
QT6 cells, a quail fibroblast cell line,
were used for transient transfection assays and virus production. The
cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified essential medium with 5%
fetal calf serum, 4.5 g of glucose per liter, 1× MEM nonessential
amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM glutamine, 100 µg of
streptomycin per ml, and 100 U of penicillin per ml at 37°C in a
humidified 10% CO2-90% air incubator. Yolk sac and bone
marrow cells were obtained from 10- to 13- and 19-day-old White Leghorn
chicken embryos, respectively. Both types of the primary cells were
grown in Iscove's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum, 5%
heat-inactivated chicken serum, 1× MEM vitamins, and other medium
supplements as described above for QT6 cells at 37°C in a humidified
5% CO2-90% air incubator.
Transfections, immunoblotting, and assays for
transactivation.
A calcium phosphate-mediated procedure described
previously was used for the transient transfection of QT6 cells
(9, 32). To assay the transactivation activity of c-Myb
mutants in QT6 cells, each reaction included 3 µg of activator
plasmid, 1 µg of reporter plasmid, and 0.5 µg of pCMV-
-Gal as an
internal control for transfection efficiency. Yeast tRNA was added to
bring the total nucleic acid level to 10 µg. Cells from a
10-cm-diameter plate were harvested 48 h after transfection. Half
of the cells from each transfection were extracted and subjected to
-galactosidase (
-Gal) and luciferase assays as described
previously (1, 57). The other half of the cells were lysed
and boiled in 1× sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) loading dye for immunoblotting. Cell lysates
from transfected QT6 cells were normalized to equal
-Gal activities
to account for differences in transfection efficiency and then
subjected to SDS-PAGE on 10% polyacrylamide gels. The resolved
proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose (BA85; Schleicher and
Schuell, Keene, N.H.) and probed with mouse monoclonal anti-Myb
antibodies (2.7 and 5E) (19, 59) or a rabbit polyclonal
anti-Mim-1 antibody (51). Proteins were detected by alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G with
the use of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate-nitroblue tetrazolium
as substrates (Promega). Alternatively, the ECL Western blotting
detection system was employed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham Life Science).
Transformation assays.
The transformation assays were
performed by the cocultivation of chicken hematopoietic cells from
either yolk sac or bone marrow with mitomycin C-treated,
virus-producing QT6 cells. To produce infectious viruses, QT6 cells
were cotransfected with 1 µg of helper virus (pMAV-dX) and 9 µg of
a replication-defective retroviral construct expressing both the
neomycin resistance protein and c-Myb or a c-Myb variant. The
supernatant of the 2-day-old transfected culture was collected and used
to infect fresh QT6 cells (45). Either the transfected or
the virally infected QT6 cells were selected with G418 at a
concentration of 200 µg/ml for two weeks. The G418-resistant QT6
cells were treated with 10 µg of mitomycin C per ml for 2 h,
washed, and then used for overnight cocultivation with primary
hematopoietic cells as previously described (31, 44). The
yolk sac or bone marrow cells were fed by partially changing the medium
every 2 to 3 days. The growth of the transformed cells was monitored by
cell counting. Rapidly growing cells from liquid culture were harvested
for immunoblotting and fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS)
analysis. To determine the colony-forming ability, a methylcellulose
assay was carried out. After 8 days of cocultivation, 105
cells from each plate were seeded into 4 ml of a medium with 0.8%
methylcellulose (MethoCult H4100; Stem Cell Technologies, Inc.) per
5-cm-diameter dish. The colonies were counted after 2 weeks at 37°C.
Cytocentrifugation and FACS analyses.
The morphology of the
transformed cells was observed by performing a cytocentrifugation
(Cytospin 2; Shandon) of 5 × 104 cells onto a glass
slide at 500 × g for 5 min followed by modified Wright-Giemsa staining (Diff-Quick; Baxter). To determine the cell
surface markers, FACS analyses were carried out with a Coulter EPICS
XL-MCL instrument. The preparation and staining of cells with 1C3 and
HLO72 antibodies were described previously (21). A
fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Cappel) at a
250× dilution was used for the detection of primary antibodies. The
final cell pellet was resuspended in Hanks' balanced salt solution
containing 1 µg of propidium iodide per ml for gating out dead cells.
 |
RESULTS |
Construction, expression, and transcriptional activity of c-Myb
mutants with linker insertions or C-terminal deletions.
To use
retroviral vectors for gene expression, one commonly places more than
one gene onto a vector. For our in vitro transformation assay, a
retroviral vector derived from myeloblastosis-associated virus type 1 was used (45). This retroviral vector contains a neomycin
resistance selectable marker gene and a tester gene. It has been
demonstrated that an IRES element can mediate the expression of a
second gene from a retroviral vector more efficiently than an internal
promoter or splice acceptor (26). Previous data showed that
the constitutive expression of c-Myb through the encephalomyocarditis
virus IRES renders the protein weakly transforming (21).
Because IRES-driven c-Myb is a weak transformer, this provided us a
means to map the C-terminal negative regulatory subregions
of c-Myb with respect to transformation. We therefore constructed a series of encephalomyocarditis virus IRES-driven c-Myb mutants encoded by the myeloblastosis-associated virus-derived vector as described in Materials and Methods.
Many of the c-Myb mutants used here were previously tested for
transcriptional activation in the context of GAL4-Myb fusion proteins
(17). Two negatively regulating subregions were mapped, and
the deletion of both of them was required for the activation of the
GAL4-c-Myb fusion protein. These two subregions, corresponding to the
residues 425 to 464 and 499 to 558 (PS and BN), flank a very highly
conserved domain found in c-Myb, A-Myb, B-Myb, and Drosophila Myb. A series of C-terminal deletions used
previously as GAL4-Myb fusions were reconstructed back into the native
form of protein and expressed from the IRES-containing retroviral
vector. In addition, a small set of linker insertion mutants of c-Myb was examined. The linkers were introduced into the acidic region and/or
HLR of c-Myb. Schematic diagrams for all the c-Myb mutants are shown in
Fig. 1A.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Transactivation of the EW5 reporter gene by c-Myb
mutants. (A) A series of deletion or insertion mutants of c-Myb
expressed from a retroviral vector were assayed for transcriptional
activity in QT6 cells by transient transfection. For each transfection,
3 µg of activator and 1 µg of EW5 reporter were cotransfected into
QT6 cells, along with 0.5 µg of a -galactosidase-expressing vector
(CMV- -Gal) as an internal control. Half of the cells from each
transfection were used to determine transactivation activity, as
described in Materials and Methods. The other half of the cells were
reserved for immunoblotting. Relative luciferase activities were
obtained by assigning the luciferase activity of CCd a value of 1. Shown are the mean values of relative luciferase activities from at
least three transfections and average deviations (error bars) from the
mean. Schematic diagrams of c-Myb mutants are shown at the left. The
point mutations in v-Myb are indicated as short bars above the v-Myb
diagram. The gray boxes represent the DNA-binding domain and are also
marked by repeats. The C-terminal most highly conserved domain is shown
as a black box. The linker insertions are indicated as bars above the
diagrams for CCC-304GP, CCC-389GPN, and CCC-304GP/389GPN. (B)
Representative immunoblot of transiently transfected QT6 cells from the
experiments whose results are shown in panel A. Cell lysates with equal
amounts of -Gal activity were resolved on an SDS-10% PAGE gel and
immunoblotted with anti-Myb antibodies (5E and 2.7). The relative
mobilities of protein markers are indicated in kilodaltons.
|
|
To test for transcriptional activation by the c-Myb mutants, transient
transfection assays were carried out with QT6 quail
fibroblasts with a
Myb-responsive reporter gene (EW5 reporter
gene). The EW5 reporter
gene uses a recombinant promoter with
five concatamerized
mim-1A binding sites (the strongest Myb-binding
site from
the
mim-1 promoter) and an E1B TATA box to drive a
luciferase
gene (
11). A retroviral vector (N-Cla)
(
15) bearing the gene
encoding only the neomycin resistance
gene product was used as
a negative control in all transfection and
transformation assays.
All transfection assays were performed at least
three times, and
an internal pCMV-

-Gal control was used to
normalize for transfection
efficiency. Relative luciferase activities
were obtained by assigning
the luciferase activity of CCd a value of 1. CCd is a truncated
c-Myb with a C-terminal deletion similar to that of
AMV v-Myb.
As we observed before, the level of transactivation by
full-length
c-Myb (CCC) was fairly low (Fig.
1A). The removal of the C
terminus
in CCd increased the transactivation by two- to threefold. The
removal of the two negative regulatory subregions previously deleted
in
the GAL4-Myb fusion, PS and BN, superactivated c-Myb. A single
deletion
in either of these two subregions could activate c-Myb,
but only to an
extent similar to that of the activation by C-terminal
truncation
(CCd). The double deletion had a much greater effect
than the single
deletions. The transactivation by CCC-dPSBN was
four times greater than
that of CCd and up to 15 times that of
CCC. All of the other deletion
mutants had activities in the range
of c-Myb and CCd. The other
superactivating c-Myb mutant was CCC-389GPN,
which has a linker
insertion (Gly-Pro-Asn) within the HLR. The
linker insertion
(Gly-Pro) mutant at position 304 inactivated
c-Myb as previously
observed in v-Myb (
40). The double linker
insertion
mutant (CCC-304GP/389GPN) appeared to have competing
effects from
the inactivation by the 304 insertion and superactivation
by the 389 insertion and as a result had an activity similar to
that of
CCd.
To confirm the proper expression of all these mutants, immunoblotting
was performed on the transiently transfected QT6 cells.
After
harvesting the transfected QT6 cells, half of each sample
was used for
the transactivation assay and the other half was
reserved for the
protein assay. Figure
1B shows an immunoblot
probed with anti-Myb
antibodies on a representative set of transient
transfections with a
loading of equal

-Gal activity to normalize
for variations in
transfection efficiency. From the immunoblot,
the protein level of each
mutant varied somewhat. This may be
due to the variation of protein
stability from mutant to mutant.
No other assays of protein stability
were performed, but the patterns
of the mutant protein levels were
consistent among different sets
of transfection experiments. Most
importantly, each mutant migrated
per its predicted relative
molecular weight and at a correct position
relative to the others.
Also, the superactivation by CCC-dPSBN
and CCC-389GPN was clearly
not due to increased protein levels
relative to that of wild-type c-Myb
(CCC).
In vitro transformation assay of c-Myb mutants.
To
determine the transforming activity of the c-Myb mutants, a yolk sac
assay was carried out. The yolk sac cells obtained from 13-day-old
chicken embryos are rich in myelomonocytic progenitor cells. It is
known that v-Myb efficiently transforms primary yolk sac cells and
blocks the differentiation process at the monoblast stage. The
infection of primary yolk sac cells was performed by cocultivation with
virus-producing QT6 cells. Then, the infected yolk sac cells were
cultured by a partial change of media every 2 to 3 days, and no
exogenous growth factor was included in the media. Cell proliferation
was monitored directly by cell counting. However, cells transformed by
c-Myb and some of the weak mutants exhibited a tendency to rely on
feeder cells to grow. This made the growth of transformed cells
somewhat variable with weaker mutants when assayed in different
experiments. The only c-Myb mutant that consistently displayed a robust
growth was CCC-dPSBN (determined by cell counting, as shown in Table
1). In order to further assess the
relative transforming potential of CCC-dPSBN, a methylcellulose
colony-forming assay was used. This assay is more stringent and
quantitative. The averages of normalized colony numbers from three
independent assays of a 5-cm-diameter tissue culture dish seeded with
105 cocultivated yolk sac cells are listed in Table 1. The
viral titers of the cultures used for cocultivation in the
methylcellulose assay were determined by the formation of
G418-resistant colonies in QT6 cells. Two independent sets were
examined and exhibited similar levels of viral titers for all the
tested viruses (data not shown). The overall transforming activity was
determined by cell number at day 22 or 23, the frequency of liquid
culture outgrowth, and the colony count on methylcellulose assay.
v-Myb, our positive control in the yolk sac assay, transformed every
time and gave the highest colony count in each set of
methylcellulose
assays. c-Myb and CCd were very weak transformers
as previously
reported (
15,
21,
29). Although the C terminus
of c-Myb was
assigned a negative role in Myb-mediated transformation,
the removal of
the C terminus from c-Myb only slightly improved
the transforming
activity, as seen in CCd. The nontransforming
mutants, including
CCC-dMN, CCC-dNN, CCC-304GP, and CCC-304GP/389GPN,
generally had lower
transactivation activities than that of c-Myb
on our model Myb promoter
assay (with the exception of CCC-304GP/389GPN).
The
superactivating double deletion mutant, CCC-dPSBN, was
consistently
demonstrated to be a better transformer than c-Myb
and the other
c-Myb deletion mutants in terms of cell count, frequency
of liquid
culture outgrowth, and colony count by a methylcellulose
assay.
Surprisingly, the other superactivating mutant,
CCC-389GPN, had
only a weak transforming activity similar to that of
c-Myb. The
double linker insertion mutant, CCC-304GP/389GPN, exhibited
a
transforming ability similar to that of CCC-389GPN.
To test whether the transcriptional activity of Myb is essential for
the transformation process, two Myb mutants that lacked
transactivation
activity were specifically analyzed for transformation.
c-Myb mutants
with a disrupted transactivation domain (CCC-304GP)
or a missing
transactivation domain (CCC-dSM) with a deletion
from the
SmaI site to the
MscI site of c-
myb
failed to transactivate
the EW5 reporter gene and transform primary
yolk sac cells (Table
1 and data not shown). The linker insertion at
position 389,
which was predicted to disrupt the HLR and abolish a
negative
regulatory activity of c-Myb, affected only transcriptional
activation
but not oncogenic
transformation.
The transforming activities of all other c-Myb deletion mutants were
lower than that of CCC-dPSBN. This demonstrated that
the two previously
mapped subregions, with a negative regulatory
activity in
transcription, are also involved in transformation.
The deletion of
both negative regulatory subregions not only superactivates
transcription but also greatly potentiates its transforming activity.
To look into the possibility of an effect by c-Myb mutants on
other
hematopoietic lineages, a bone marrow transformation assay
was also
carried out. The results of outgrowth from the bone marrow
assay were
similar to those observed with yolk sac cells, and
the data are shown
in Table
1.
To confirm that the outgrowth of primary yolk sac cells arises from the
expression of the predicted forms of c-Myb, the transformed
cells were
subjected to an immunoblotting analysis with anti-Myb
antibodies. A
representative immunoblot for all the yolk sac cells
transformed by
c-Myb and its mutants is shown in Fig.
2.
The transformed
yolk sac cells expressed mutant Myb proteins with the
predicted
molecular sizes and mobilities relative to each other.
Primary
yolk sac cells freshly isolated from 13-day-old chicken embryos
were used as an endogenous source of c-Myb. Furthermore, the
mobility
of each Myb mutant from transformed cells was verified by
coelectrophoresis
on an SDS-PAGE gel with transiently transfected QT6
cells expressing
the corresponding form of Myb (data not shown).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Immunoblotting analysis of c-Myb mutant-transformed
chicken yolk sac cells. From the above yolk sac assays, v-Myb, c-Myb,
and c-Myb mutant-transformed yolk sac cells were collected and
subjected to immunoblot analysis. All yolk sac cell lysates were
derived from 5 × 105 cells with the exception of
primary yolk sac cells obtained from a 13-day-old chicken embryo
(6 × 106 cells/lane) and CCC-dPS (3 × 105 cells/lane). The cell lysates were resolved on an
SDS-10% PAGE gel and immunoblotted with Myb antibodies (5E and 2.7).
The relative mobilities of protein markers are indicated in
kilodaltons.
|
|
Characterization of the yolk sac cells transformed by c-Myb
mutants.
To characterize the phenotypes of the transformed cells,
three different assays were used. First, the cell morphology was examined by cytocentrifugation followed by a modified Wright-Giemsa staining. Second, the expression of two cell surface markers was determined by FACS analysis with the use of 1C3 (granulocyte-specific marker [47]) and HLO72 (monoblast-specific marker
[46]) antibodies. Third, the expression of Mim-1, a
promyelocyte- or granulocyte-specific marker, was examined by
immunoblotting with an anti-Mim-1 antibody.
As previously reported, v-Myb-transformed cells are exclusively
monoblasts, whereas c-Myb-transformed cells are heterogeneous
in nature
and exhibit cell types with characteristics of either
granulocytic or
monocytic lineage (
14,
21). Cells transformed
by all of the
c-Myb mutants displayed a phenotype similar to that
of c-Myb,
with the one exception of CCC-389GPN. However, because
CCC-389GPN had a
very weak transforming activity and grew out
only once in four
assays, the exclusively granulocytic phenotype
seen here may be
dependent upon culture conditions. Two representative
c-Myb mutants,
CCd and CCC-dPSBN, transformed yolk sac cells similar
to c-Myb, with
heterogeneous populations resembling both the granulocytic
and
monocytic lineages, as shown in Fig.
3.
The FACS profiles
of the same representative set shown in Fig.
3 are
shown in Fig.
4. v-Myb-transformed cells
were stained positively only for a
monocytic cell surface marker
(HLO72) but not a granulocytic marker
(1C3). In contrast, cells
transformed by c-Myb, CCd, and CCC-dPSBN
were stained positively for
both the granulocytic and monocytic
cell surface markers. Furthermore,
since the entire populations
were shifted with both 1C3 and HLO72
stainings, it followed that
all cells transformed by c-Myb, CCd, and
CCC-dPSBN are double
positive. In addition, the expression of
Mim-1 was examined by
immunoblotting. v-Myb-transformed cells did not
express Mim-1,
whereas cells transformed by c-Myb and its mutants
were Mim-1
positive (Table
2). As
mentioned previously, one bone marrow
assay was carried out and the
cells transformed by c-Myb mutants
also displayed a heterogeneous
granulocytic and monocytic phenotype
(data not shown). In addition, the
proliferating cells transformed
by CCC-dBN and CCC-dPSBN were double
positive for granulocytic
and monocytic cell surface markers (data not
shown). Together,
there was no significant difference between the
results from bone
marrow and yolk sac assays in terms of the
transforming ability,
cell morphology, and expression of cell surface
markers. Table
2 presents all the results obtained from the above
assays with
v-Myb, c-Myb, and c-Myb mutants. Occasionally, we also saw
the
exclusive outgrowth of granulocytes from the yolk sac assays in
mutants CCd and CCC-dPS. This may be due to feeder cells, which
may
provide cytokines that promote the growth and/or differentiation
of one
particular type of cell. In summary, cells transformed
by c-Myb and
most of its C-terminal deletion mutants, including
CCd, have a
bilineage phenotype as determined by cell morphology
and cell surface
markers.

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Morphology of yolk sac cells transformed by dGE, CCC,
CCd, and CCC-dPSBN. The morphologies of a representative set of
transformed yolk sac cells are shown. The yolk sac cells from liquid
culture outgrowth were cytocentrifuged onto glass slides and stained
with Diff-Quick (DADE). The v-Myb-transformed cells (dGE) are a
homogeneous population of monoblasts. The cells transformed by c-Myb
(CCC), a double deletion mutant of c-Myb (CCC-dPSBN), and a C-terminal
truncation of c-Myb (CCd) exhibited heterogeneous phenotypes. Cells of
one type (marked with arrowheads) resemble granulocytes with distinct
cytoplasmic granules. The rest of the cells are macrophage-like and
have an eccentric nucleus with many vacuoles in the cytoplasm.
|
|

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
FACS analysis of cell surface markers on yolk sac cells
transformed by dGE, CCC, CCd, and CCC-dPSBN. The same representative
set of Myb-transformed yolk sac cells shown in Fig. 3 were stained with
antibodies specific for cell surface markers. The antibodies 1C3 and
HLO72 were used to detect granulocytic and monocytic lineages,
respectively. Fluorescence profiles are shown after the cells were
stained with wash medium control (a), 1C3 (b), or HLO72 (c).
|
|
Transactivation by c-Myb mutants with a mim-1 reporter
gene.
The transactivation of the EW5 reporter gene did not
correlate well with the transforming activity of c-Myb mutants.
For example, CCC-389GPN superactivated the EW5 reporter but failed to
consistently transform primary yolk sac cells. Since all the
c-Myb mutant-transformed cells expressed Mim-1, we wanted to see
whether the transactivation of the mim-1 reporter gene
correlated better with oncogenic transformation. We therefore conducted
transient transfections in the same way as shown in Fig. 1, except that
we used a mim-1 reporter gene to score for transactivation.
This mim-1 reporter gene comprises a sequence from
nucleotide
242 to +102 of mim-1 and a luciferase gene
(51). Figure 5 displays the
results from three different independent transfections. It shows that
the mim-1 promoter had a much higher basal activity than the
EW5 reporter in QT6 cells with our control retroviral vector. For most
of the c-Myb mutants, the transactivating profiles were very similar
between EW5 and mim-1 reporters. c-Myb, CCC-dMN,
CCC-dNN, and CCC-304GP were still fairly inactive. Most of the
c-Myb mutants, having a transactivational activity between those of
c-Myb and CCd on the EW5 reporter, remained at similar levels of
activity on the mim-1 reporter. The double deletion mutant,
CCC-dPSBN, had the highest level of activity among the constructs
tested on the mim-1 reporter. Its level of activity was
about twofold higher than the activity of CCd, which was less of an
increase than we had observed with the EW5 reporter. The decrease in
the degree of superactivation for CCC-dPSBN may relate to the high
basal activity of the mim-1 promoter. Interestingly, CCC-389GPN was no longer superactivating and exhibited an activity similar to that of CCd.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Transactivation by c-Myb mutants with the
mim-1 reporter gene. The same series of c-Myb mutants shown
in Fig. 1 was analyzed in QT6 cells for transactivation with a reporter
promoter derived from mim-1. The transfections were
performed in the way mentioned previously, except for the use of a
mim-1 reporter gene. Relative luciferase activities were
obtained by assigning the luciferase activity of CCd a value of 1. Shown are the mean values of relative luciferase activities from at
least three transfections and average deviations (error bars) from the
mean.
|
|
In order to compare the activation of these two different reporters
despite the high-level basal activity of the
mim-1 promoter,
the transcriptional activity obtained from the control retroviral
vector (N-Cla) was subtracted from the transcriptional activities
of
c-Myb, CCd, CCC-dPSBN, and CCC-389GPN. All the subtracted activities
are shown relative to the subtracted activity of CCd and plotted
in
Fig.
6A. The EW5 reporter gene was
superactivated equally well
by CCC-dPSBN and CCC-389GPN, whereas the
mim-1 reporter gene was
superactivated only by CCC-dPSBN. To
determine whether the change
in the transactivation was due to
differences in protein levels,
cell lysates from the transfected cells
normalized for equal

-Gal
activities were resolved on an SDS-PAGE
gel and examined by immunoblotting
with anti-Myb antibodies (Fig.
6B). Regardless of the reporters
used in the transfection, the
intensities of the Myb-specific
bands were similar. It is clear that
CCC-389GPN failed to superactivate
the
mim-1 promoter,
despite an equivalent protein level. This
result implies that the
superactivating activity of CCC-389GPN
on the EW5 reporter
gene does not correlate with transformation,
whereas the
transactivational activities of c-Myb mutants on the
mim-1 promoter correlate better with their transforming
abilities.
However, this correlation did not hold for v-Myb, which
transformed
primary hematopoietic cells with a high level of efficiency
but
transactivated both of the reporter genes only moderately.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Differential activation of promoters by CCC-dPSBN and
CCC-389GPN. (A) Transfections were repeated with both reporters in the
same experiment to show the differential effect of CCC-389GPN on EW5
and mim-1 reporter genes. Because the mim-1
reporter gene has a high-level basal activity, we subtracted the
activity obtained from the vector (N-Cla). Relative luciferase
activities were then calculated by assigning the subtracted luciferase
activity of CCd a value of 1. Shown are the mean values of relative
luciferase activities from at least three transfections and average
deviations (error bars) from the mean. (B) Cell lysates prepared from
the same transfection assays were resolved by SDS-10% PAGE and
immunoblotted with anti-Myb antibodies. The relative mobilities of
protein markers are indicated in kilodaltons. M, mim-1; E,
EW5.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
c-Myb is a nuclear protein and mediates transcriptional activation
through a specific DNA sequence. The truncation of either terminus of
c-Myb as found in AMV v-Myb activates its transcriptional and
transforming activities in culture. Therefore, a negative regulatory
function has been ascribed to the C terminus of c-Myb. We have now
studied two linker insertions and a series of C-terminal deletion
mutants within the context of full-length c-Myb with the use of an
IRES-containing retroviral vector. Both the transcriptional activities
and oncogenic transformation abilities of these mutants were analyzed
in cell culture.
We previously showed that a linker insertion mutant (CCC-304GP) at
position 304 in the TA domain abolishes the transactivation by c-Myb,
whereas a linker insertion mutant (CCC-389GPN) at position 389 within
the HLR can superactivate the transcriptional activity of c-Myb on a
model reporter gene. The double insertion mutant (CCC-304GP/389GPN)
restores part of the transactivating activity but not to the full
extent of CCC-389GPN (16). This implies that c-Myb can
regulate transcription through at least two different domains. One
domain, involved in the activation of transcription, contains many
charged residues and a predicted helical structure. The other domain
having a negative regulatory activity comprises a HLR also referred to
as the leucine zipper (36, 52). Because of the increased
transcriptional activation by these linker insertion mutants, we
further looked into their transforming activities in this study. It was
first reported by Kanei-Ishii et al. that the disruption of the HLR
with substitutions of proline for leucine led to an increase in both
transcriptional and transforming activities of murine c-Myb
(36). However, our CCC-389GPN mutant displayed an increase
of activity only in transactivation and not in oncogenic transformation. This is similar to our recent studies of an
alternatively spliced form of c-Myb, which contains an insertion of an
additional 120 amino acids (encoded by exon 9A) within the C-terminal
end of the HLR (65). The expression of exon 9A in the
context of c-Myb results in an elevated level of transcriptional
activity without an effect on transformation.
The differences between the results of Kanei-Ishii et al. and the lack
of activation of oncogenic transformation by CCC-389GPN may be ascribed
to the nature of mutations (substitutions of Pro for Leu versus
Gly-Pro-Asn linker insertion) in the HLR and the assay systems (mouse
versus chicken). However, we have previously shown that the same linker
insertion and similar leucine substitutions in v-Myb are both
compatible with oncogenic transformation (22, 40). In
addition, the murine c-Myb mutants used in the assays done by
Kanei-Ishii et al. were generated from a c-Myb background (Red
[FLmyb]), lacking the N-terminal 17 amino acids (28). A recent report showed that a truncation as small as 20 amino acids at
the N-terminal end of c-Myb can cause rapid-onset B-cell lymphomas at a
high frequency in chickens (35). Thus, it is possible that the 17-amino-acid truncation in Red(FLmyb) may potentiate its transforming activity in conjunction with a leucine repeat disruption. The HLR has been implicated in mediating the interaction with a
negative regulatory protein. Thus far, the only protein that has been
shown to interact directly with Myb in this region is p160
(61). However, p160 localizes mainly in nucleolus, whereas Myb localizes diffusely in the nucleus while sparing the nucleolus (7, 39). Therefore, the biological significance of the
interaction of c-Myb with p160 remains to be determined.
As mentioned previously, the deletion of both the PS and BN subregions
potentiates the transcriptional activation by GAL4-Myb fusions. We now
report that CCC-dPSBN, a double deletion in both the PS and BN
subregions of c-Myb, contains an increased activity in both
transactivation and oncogenic transformation. We have previously shown
that at least the BN subregion can block the transactivation by v-Myb
or LexA-Myb in trans (17). These results imply
that the negative regulatory effect of the C terminus of c-Myb is Myb
DNA-binding domain independent and may be involved in protein-protein
interactions. Additionally, c-Myb is a very good transactivator on a
Myb-responsive reporter gene in yeast but behaves in an opposite manner
in animal cells. Indeed, the deletion of the C terminus of c-Myb
decreased transcription in yeast (11). These results suggest
the presence of an animal cell protein that specifically interacts with
the C terminus of c-Myb and mediates the negative regulatory function.
Together with our observations here, this hypothetical interaction of
the C terminus of c-Myb with an animal repressor protein may most likely reside in the PS and/or BN subregion.
A number of the functions of the C terminus have been mapped near the
PS and/or BN subregion. First, the effect of the C terminus on the
DNA-binding activity was analyzed by Ishii's group with an
electrophoretic mobility shift assay (60). Three C-terminal truncation mutants (CT1, CTV, and CT2) used in that assay elevated relative DNA-binding activity levels by progressive deletion. Interestingly, the negative regulatory domain NRD2 (equivalent to
chicken c-Myb residues 477 to 505) appears to lie largely between PS
(residues 425 to 464) and BN (residues 499 to 558). Furthermore, the deletion of PS and BN greatly increases the transcriptional activation of GAL4-Myb fusion proteins that do not contain the Myb DNA-binding domain (17).
Second, an EVES domain (residues 513 to 563) mapped by Dash et al.
coincides closely with the BN subregion and can interact with
N-terminal Myb DNA-binding repeats in a yeast two-hybrid assay
(13). Dash et al. further implicated another EVES-containing protein, p100, in the process of negatively regulating c-Myb activity. Therefore, they have proposed that the EVES motif itself is involved in
regulating c-Myb activity intramolecularly and intermolecularly.
Third, it has also been reported that serine-533 residing in the EVES
motif of the BN subregion of chicken c-Myb can be phosphorylated in
vitro and in vivo by the 42-kDa mitogen-activated protein kinase (p42mapk) (3). A mutation to alanine at the
homologous residue results in a promoter-specific superactivation
of c-Myb (2). This phosphorylation-dependent regulation
of Myb transactivation in vitro suggests a mechanism for signal
integration by phosphorylation of the C-terminal portion of
c-Myb. However, no increase in oncogenic transformation by an in vitro
assay was observed with this mutation (22a).
Fourth, the BS69 protein was found to interact with the C terminus of
c-Myb by a yeast two-hybrid assay (39a). The
interaction of c-Myb with BS69 was mapped to the PS and BN subregions
with a transient transfection assay. The deletion of the PS and/or BN
subregion confers the ability to evade the transcriptionally inhibitory
effect of BS69 on Myb proteins. The biological function of BS69 is not
clear at this point, but the protein was first identified as a
transcriptional repressor that interacts with the adenoviral E1A
protein and contains a number of conserved protein domains found in
other transcriptional regulators.
Finally, although the BN subregion also contains a predicted PEST
domain, this region of c-Myb has not been implicated in the regulation
of c-Myb protein stability (6). Consistent with this, our
immunoblotting analysis shows no evidence of increased protein levels
of CCC-dBN and CCC-dPSBN. Therefore, the regulation of the c-Myb
activity by the BN subregion does not appear to depend upon protein
stability. In summary, the negative regulatory activity that is
disrupted by the removal of the PS and BN subregions may be due to
protein-protein interaction and phosphorylation.
The c-Myb mutant CCC-dPSBB not only contains deletions in the PS and BN
subregions but also extends further from BN to the C-terminal end of
the protein. This extra deletion of the C-terminal distal part of c-Myb
also contains a small conserved domain shared by vertebrate A-, B-, and
c-Myb and Drosophila Myb (24). It is interesting
that CCC-dPSBB did not exhibit transcription superactivation or a
strong transforming phenotype as seen for CCC-dPSBN. These results
suggest that an additional regulatory activity resides in the extreme C
terminus of c-Myb. Two other lines of evidence point to the importance
of this region. One comes from a report by Nazarov and Wolff that a
minimal 38-amino-acid truncation at the C-terminal end of c-Myb
correlates with promonocytic leukemias by retroviral insertions (Friend
MuLV) in immunocompromised mice (49). In addition, one of
the two temperature-sensitive, recessive lethal mutants in
Drosophila Myb falls in this extreme C-terminal subregion (38).
The yolk sac cells transformed by c-Myb (21) and various
C-terminal deletion mutants of c-Myb all displayed the same phenotype. They all expressed Mim-1 and cell surface markers of both the granulocytic and monocytic lineages. In contrast, v-Myb, which has
sustained point mutations and both N- and C-terminal truncations, exclusively transforms cells of the monocytic lineage
(14, 33). Thus, it is clear that the C terminus of
c-Myb alone does not have a functional impact on the lineage
determination. Other alterations of the protein are needed in order to
confer the phenotype of v-Myb. This is consistent with other reports
that the amino acid substitutions in v-Myb are responsible for the
distinct monocytic phenotype and autocrine growth of transformed cells
(14, 33). It is worth noting that CCd-transformed cells in
our assays were of dual lineage. This is different from our previous
report that CCd, CCC-dSH, and CCC-dBH transformed only cells of the
granulocytic lineage (29). The difference in phenotype in
our previous study may have been due to the inclusion of crude chicken
myelomonocytic growth factor in the culture media. Molecular cloning
and sequence analysis have shown that chicken myelomonocytic growth
factor is most closely related to the mammalian granulocyte
colony-stimulating factor (41). The cells transformed by
c-Myb and c-Myb deletion mutants generally have a growth
dependency on feeder cells which secrete cytokines. Depending on the
type and number of feeder cells present during the
culturing, we occasionally observed an exclusively granulocytic
phenotype with CCd-transformed cells. In both cases, the cytokine(s)
may drive the growth of the transformed cells to one particular
lineage. However, our results with c-Myb and CCd agree with the
observation that four murine myeloid cell lines generated from c-Myb
and C-terminally truncated c-Myb express cell surface markers of both
the monocytic and granulocytic lineages (28).
The transcriptional activation by the c-Myb mutants generally
correlated well with their transforming activities. The only exception
was the linker insertion mutant CCC-389GPN. This disruption of the HLR
strongly activated transcription when we used a recombinant Myb-responsive reporter gene (EW5) containing only Myb-binding sites
but not a natural mim-1 reporter gene. However, CCC-389GPN was a very weak transformer. It seems that the transforming ability of
these c-Myb mutants correlates better with the transactivating ability
on the mim-1 reporter gene. The mim-1 promoter
contains three Myb-binding sites, with one of them juxtaposed to a
CAAT/enhancer-binding protein
(C/EBP
) binding site. Two other
Myb target genes, tom-1 and the elastase gene, have a
similar composition in their promoters (8, 53). C/EBP
was
shown to play an important role in the commitment to the myelomonocytic
lineage and to synergize with Myb on the mim-1 promoter in
vitro (37, 50). The loss of the cooperativity with C/EBP
may in part account for the decreased transcriptional activity of
CCC-389GPN on the mim-1 promoter. However, the correlation
between transcription and transformation does not extend to
v-Myb. In this study, AMV v-Myb efficiently transformed
monoblasts but only moderately activated both the EW5 and
mim-1 reporter genes. Furthermore, cells transformed by v-Myb lacked the expression of Mim-1. This suggests that the
transformation by v-Myb involves mechanisms other than cooperation with
C/EBP
in transcription. Overall, c-Myb mutant-transformed cells are bipotential in myelocytic and monocytic lineages and express Mim-1. This phenotype agrees with our findings in transactivation assays with
the mim-1 reporter gene, in which the activity correlates with transformation.
In summary, the transforming activities of the C-terminal mutants of
c-Myb correlate well with their transactivational activities on the
mim-1 reporter genes. A linker insertion mutant that is disrupted in the HLR superactivates transcription on the EW5 reporter gene but fails to strongly activate the mim-1 promoter and
potentiate its transforming ability. All the C-terminal deletion
mutants of c-Myb tested here induce a bilineage phenotype similar to
that of full-length c-Myb. This indicates that the C terminus alone does not have a functional impact on lineage determination. However, the removal of the two negative regulatory subregions PS and BN can
markedly improve the transactivational and transforming activities of
c-Myb in culture. By demonstrating the importance of these two
subregions in a biological assay, this paper provides a framework for
future studies on the negative regulatory mechanism of c-Myb. It will
now be interesting to determine how these regions affect the
interaction of c-Myb with putative Myb-interacting proteins, including
p100, p160, cyclin D, Maf (23, 30, 42, 61), and BS69
(39a).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank members of the Lipsick laboratory for helpful
discussions and Sara Roberts for expert technical assistance. We also thank Scott Ness for providing the mim-1 reporter and antiserum.
This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service research grant
R01 CA56509, training grants T32 CA09151 (D.-M.W) and T32 CA09176
(J.W.D.), and a Markey Fellowship in Molecular Mechanisms of Disease
(C.H.W.).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
94305-5324. Phone: (650) 723-1623. Fax: (650) 725-6902. E-mail:
lipsick{at}stanford.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. G. Seidman,
J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl.
1989.
Current protocols in molecular biology.
John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
|
| 2.
|
Aziz, N.,
M. R. Miglarese,
R. C. Hendrickson,
J. Shabanowitz,
T. W. Sturgill,
D. F. Hunt, and T. P. Bender.
1995.
Modulation of c-Myb-induced transcription activation by a phosphorylation site near the negative regulatory domain.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:6429-6433[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Aziz, N.,
J. Wu,
J. W. Dubendorff,
J. S. Lipsick,
T. W. Sturgill, and T. P. Bender.
1993.
c-Myb and v-Myb are differentially phosphorylated by p42mapk in vitro.
Oncogene
8:2259-2265[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bartunek, P.,
V. Karafiat,
M. Dvorakova,
V. Zahorova,
S. Mandikova,
M. Zenke, and M. Dvorak.
1997.
The Myb leucine zipper is essential for leukemogenicity of the v-Myb protein.
Oncogene
15:2939-2949[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Biedenkapp, H.,
U. Borgmeyer,
A. E. Sippel, and K. H. Klempnauer.
1988.
Viral myb oncogene encodes a sequence-specific DNA-binding activity.
Nature
335:835-837[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Bies, J.,
V. Nazarov, and L. Wolff.
1999.
Identification of protein instability determinants in the carboxy-terminal region of c-Myb removed as a result of retroviral integration in murine monocytic leukemias.
J. Virol.
73:2038-2044[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Boyle, W. J.,
M. A. Lampert,
J. S. Lipsick, and M. A. Baluda.
1984.
Avian myeloblastosis virus and E26 virus oncogene products are nuclear proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:4265-4269[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Burk, O.,
S. Worpenberg,
B. Haenig, and K. H. Klempnauer.
1997.
Tom-1, a novel v-Myb target gene expressed in Amv- and E26-transformed myelomonocytic cells.
EMBO J.
16:1371-1380[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Chen, C. H., and H. Okayama.
1987.
High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:2745-2752[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Chen, R. H.,
S. Fields, and J. S. Lipsick.
1995.
Dissociation of transcriptional activation and oncogenic transformation by v-Myb.
Oncogene
11:1771-1779[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Chen, R.-H., and J. S. Lipsick.
1993.
Differential transcriptional activation by v-Myb and c-Myb in animal cells and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:4423-4431[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Dai, P.,
H. Akimaru,
Y. Tanaka,
D. X. Hou,
T. Yasukawa,
C. Kanei-Ishii,
T. Takahashi, and S. Ishii.
1996.
CBP as a transcriptional coactivator of c-Myb.
Genes Dev.
10:528-540[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Dash, A. B.,
F. C. Orrico, and S. A. Ness.
1996.
The EVES motif mediates both intermolecular and intramolecular regulation of c-Myb.
Genes Dev.
10:1858-1869[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Dini, P. W.,
J. T. Eltman, and J. S. Lipsick.
1995.
Mutations in the DNA-binding and transcriptional activation domains of v-Myb cooperate in transformation.
J. Virol.
69:2515-2524[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Dini, P. W., and J. S. Lipsick.
1993.
Oncogenic truncation of the first repeat of c-Myb decreases DNA binding in vitro and in vivo.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:7334-7348[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
| Dubendorff, J., and J. Lipsick. Transcriptional
regulation by the carboxyl terminus of c-Myb depends upon both the Myb
DNA-binding domain and the DNA recognition site. Oncogene, in press.
|
| 17.
|
Dubendorff, J. W.,
L. J. Whittaker,
J. T. Eltman, and J. S. Lipsick.
1992.
Carboxy-terminal elements of c-Myb negatively regulate transcriptional activation in cis and in trans.
Genes Dev.
6:2524-2535[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Duprey, S. P., and D. Boettiger.
1985.
Developmental regulation of c-myb in normal myeloid progenitor cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:6937-6941[Abstract/Free Full Text]. (Erratum, 83:2281, 1986.)
|
| 19.
|
Evan, G. I.,
G. K. Lewis, and J. M. Bishop.
1984.
Isolation of monoclonal antibodies specific for products of avian oncogene myb.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
4:2843-2850[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Ferrao, P.,
E. M. Macmillan,
L. K. Ashman, and T. J. Gonda.
1995.
Enforced expression of full-length c-Myb leads to density-dependent transformation of murine haemopoietic cells.
Oncogene
11:1631-1638[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Fu, S. L., and J. S. Lipsick.
1997.
Constitutive expression of full-length c-Myb transforms avian cells characteristic of both the monocytic and granulocytic lineages.
Cell Growth Differ.
8:35-45[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Fu, S.-L., and J. S. Lipsick.
1996.
FAETL motif required for leukemic transformation by v-Myb.
J. Virol.
70:5600-5610[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22a.
| Fu, S.-L., and J. S. Lipsick.
Unpublished data.
|
| 23.
|
Ganter, B.,
S. Fu, and J. Lipsick.
1998.
D-type cyclins repress transcriptional activation by the v-Myb but not the c-Myb DNA-binding domain.
EMBO J.
17:255[Medline].
|
| 24.
| Ganter, B., and J. Lipsick. Myb and oncogenesis.
Adv. Cancer Res., in press.
|
| 25.
|
Garcia, A.,
K. LaMontagne,
D. Reavis,
U. Stober-Grasser, and J. S. Lipsick.
1991.
Determinants of sequence-specific DNA-binding by p48v-myb.
Oncogene
6:265-273[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Ghattas, I. R.,
J. R. Sanes, and J. E. Majors.
1991.
The encephalomyocarditis virus internal ribosome entry site allows efficient coexpression of two genes from a recombinant provirus in cultured cells and in embryos.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:5848-5859[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Gonda, T. J.,
C. Buckmaster, and R. G. Ramsay.
1989.
Activation of c-myb by carboxy-terminal truncation: relationship to transformation of murine haemopoietic cells in vitro.
EMBO J.
8:1777-1783[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Gonda, T. J.,
R. G. Ramsay, and G. R. Johnson.
1989.
Murine myeloid cell lines derived by in vitro infection with recombinant c-myb retroviruses express myb from rearranged vector proviruses.
EMBO J.
8:1767-1775[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Grässer, F. A.,
T. Graf, and J. S. Lipsick.
1991.
Protein truncation is required for the activation of the c-myb proto-oncogene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:3987-3996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Hegde, S. P.,
A. Kumar,
C. Kurschner, and L. H. Shapiro.
1998.
c-Maf interacts with c-Myb to regulate transcription of an early myeloid gene during differentiation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:2729-2737[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Ibanez, C. E.,
A. Garcia,
U. Stober-Grässer, and J. S. Lipsick.
1988.
DNA-binding activity associated with the v-myb oncogene product is not sufficient for transformation.
J. Virol.
62:4398-4402[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Ibanez, C. E., and J. S. Lipsick.
1990.
trans activation of gene expression by v-myb.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:2285-2293[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Introna, M.,
J. Golay,
J. Frampton,
T. Nakano,
S. A. Ness, and T. Graf.
1990.
Mutations in v-myb alter the differentiation of myelomonocytic cells transformed by the oncogene.
Cell
63:1289-1297[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Introna, M.,
M. Luchetti,
M. Castellano,
M. Arsura, and J. Golay.
1994.
The myb oncogene family of transcription factors: potent regulators of hematopoietic cell proliferation and differentiation.
Semin. Cancer Biol.
5:113-124[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Jiang, W.,
M. R. Kanter,
I. Dunkel,
R. G. Ramsay,
K. L. Beemon, and W. S. Hayward.
1997.
Minimal truncation of the c-myb gene product in rapid-onset B-cell lymphoma.
J. Virol.
71:6526-6533[Abstract].
|
| 36.
|
Kanei-Ishii, C.,
E. M. MacMillan,
T. Nomura,
A. Sarai,
R. G. Ramsay,
S. Aimoto,
S. Ishii, and T. J. Gonda.
1992.
Transactivation and transformation by Myb are negatively regulated by a leucine-zipper structure.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:3088-3092[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Katz, S.,
E. Kowenz-Leutz,
C. Muller,
K. Meese,
S. A. Ness, and A. Leutz.
1993.
The NF-M transcription factor is related to C/EBP beta and plays a role in signal transduction, differentiation and leukemogenesis of avian myelomonocytic cells.
EMBO J.
12:1321-1332[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Katzen, A. L.,
J. Jackson,
B. P. Harmon,
S. Fung,
G. Ramsay, and J. M. Bishop.
1998.
Drosophila myb is required for the G2/M transition and maintenance of diploidy.
Genes Dev.
12:831-843[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Klempnauer, K. H.,
G. Symonds,
G. I. Evan, and J. M. Bishop.
1984.
Subcellular localization of proteins encoded by oncogenes of avian myeloblastosis virus and avian leukemia virus E26 and by chicken c-myb gene.
Cell
37:537-547[Medline].
|
| 39a.
| Ladendorff, N., and J. S. Lipsick. Submitted
for publication.
|
| 40.
|
Lane, T.,
C. Ibanez,
A. Garcia,
T. Graf, and J. Lipsick.
1990.
Transformation by v-myb correlates with trans-activation of gene expression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:2591-2598[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Leutz, A.,
K. Damm,
E. Sterneck,
E. Kowenz,
S. Ness,
R. Frank,
H. Gausepohl,
Y. C. Pan,
J. Smart,
M. Hayman, et al.
1989.
Molecular cloning of the chicken myelomonocytic growth factor (cMGF) reveals relationship to interleukin 6 and granulocyte colony stimulating factor.
EMBO J.
8:175-181[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Leverson, J.,
P. Koskinen,
F. Orrico,
E. Rainio,
K. Jalkanen,
A. Dash,
R. Eisenman, and S. Ness.
1998.
Pim-1 kinase and p100 cooperate to enhance c-Myb activity.
Mol. Cell
2:417-425[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Lipsick, J. S.
1996.
One billion years of Myb.
Oncogene
13:223-235[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Lipsick, J. S., and C. E. Ibanez.
1987.
env-encoded residues are not required for transformation by p48v-myb.
J. Virol.
61:933-936[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Lipsick, J. S.,
C. E. Ibanez, and M. A. Baluda.
1986.
Expression of molecular clones of v-myb in avian and mammalian cells independently of transformation.
J. Virol.
59:267-275[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Liu, J. L.,
P. A. Klein,
M. G. Moscovici, and C. Moscovici.
1992.
Monoclonal antibodies recognizing normal and retrovirus-transformed chicken hematopoietic cells.
Virology
189:583-591[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Mandi, Y.,
T. Veromaa,
K. Baranji,
A. Miczak, and I. Beladi.
1987.
Granulocyte-specific monoclonal antibody inhibiting cytotoxicity reactions in the chicken.
Immunobiology
174:292-299[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Metz, T., and T. Graf.
1991.
Fusion of the nuclear oncoproteins v-Myb and v-Ets is required for the leukemogenicity of E26 virus.
Cell
66:95-105[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Nazarov, V., and L. Wolff.
1995.
Novel integration sites at the distal 3' end of the c-myb locus in retrovirus-induced promonocytic leukemias.
J. Virol.
69:3885-3888[Abstract].
|
| 50.
|
Ness, S. A.,
E. Kowenz-Leutz,
T. Casini,
T. Graf, and A. Leutz.
1993.
Myb and NF-M: combinatorial activators of myeloid genes in heterologous cell types.
Genes Dev.
7:749-759[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Ness, S. A.,
A. Marknell, and T. Graf.
1989.
The v-myb oncogene product binds to and activates the promyelocyte-specific mim-1 gene.
Cell
59:1115-1125[Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Nomura, T.,
N. Sakai,
A. Sarai,
T. Sudo,
C. Kanei-Ishii,
R. G. Ramsay,
D. Favier,
T. J. Gonda, and S. Ishii.
1993.
Negative autoregulation of c-Myb activity by homodimer formation through the leucine zipper.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:21914-21923[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Nuchprayoon, I.,
C. P. Simkevich,
M. Luo,
A. D. Friedman, and A. G. Rosmarin.
1997.
GABP cooperates with c-Myb and C/EBP to activate the neutrophil elastase promoter.
Blood
89:4546-4554[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Oelgeschlager, M.,
R. Janknecht,
J. Krieg,
S. Schreek, and B. Luscher.
1996.
Interaction of the co-activator CBP with Myb proteins: effects on Myb-specific transactivation and on the cooperativity with NF-M.
EMBO J.
15:2771-2780[Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Ogata, K.,
S. Morikawa,
H. Nakamura,
A. Sekikawa,
T. Inoue,
H. Kanai,
A. Sarai,
S. Ishii, and Y. Nishimura.
1994.
Solution structure of a specific DNA complex of the Myb DNA-binding domain with cooperative recognition helices.
Cell
79:639-648[Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Sakura, H.,
C. Kanei-Ishii,
T. Nagase,
H. Nakagoshi,
T. J. Gonda, and S. Ishii.
1989.
Delineation of three functional domains of the transcriptional activator encoded by the c-myb protooncogene.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:5758-5762[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 58.
|
Shen-Ong, G. L.
1990.
The myb oncogene.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1032:39-52[Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Sleeman, J. P.
1993.
Xenopus A-myb is expressed during early spermatogenesis.
Oncogene
8:1931-1941[Medline].
|
| 60.
|
Tanaka, Y.,
T. Nomura, and S. Ishii.
1997.
Two regions in c-myb proto-oncogene product negatively regulating its DNA-binding activity.
FEBS Lett.
413:162-168[Medline].
|
| 61.
|
Tavner, F. J.,
R. Simpson,
S. Tashiro,
D. Favier,
N. A. Jenkins,
D. J. Gilbert,
N. G. Copeland,
E. M. Macmillan,
J. Lutwyche,
R. A. Keough,
S. Ishii, and T. J. Gonda.
1998.
Molecular cloning reveals that the p160 Myb-binding protein is a novel, predominantly nucleolar protein which may play a role in transactivation by Myb.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:989-1002[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 62.
|
Tomita, A.,
T. Watanabe,
H. Kosugi,
H. Ohashi,
T. Uchida,
T. Kinoshita,
S. Mizutani,
T. Hotta,
T. Murate,
M. Seto, and H. Saito.
1998.
Truncated c-Myb expression in the human leukemia cell line TK-6.
Leukemia
12:1422-1429[Medline].
|
| 63.
|
Westin, E. H.,
R. C. Gallo,
S. K. Arya,
A. Eva,
L. M. Souza,
M. A. Baluda,
S. A. Aaronson, and F. Wong-Staal.
1982.
Differential expression of the amv gene in human hematopoietic cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79:2194-2198[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 64.
|
Weston, K., and J. M. Bishop.
1989.
Transcriptional activation by the v-myb oncogene and its cellular progenitor, c-myb.
Cell
58:85-93[Medline].
|
| 65.
|
Woo, C. H.,
L. Sopchak, and J. S. Lipsick.
1998.
Overexpression of an alternatively spliced form of c-Myb results in increases in transactivation and transforms avian myelomonoblasts.
J. Virol.
72:6813-6821[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, July 1999, p. 5875-5886, Vol. 73, No. 7
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Iñiguez-Lluhí, J. A., Pearce, D.
(2000). A Common Motif within the Negative Regulatory Regions of Multiple Factors Inhibits Their Transcriptional Synergy. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 6040-6050
[Abstract]
[Full Text]