This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Takebe, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Takebe, Y.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, July 1999, p. 5520-5526, Vol. 73, No. 7
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Role of Naturally Occurring Basic Amino Acid Substitutions in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype E Envelope V3 Loop on Viral Coreceptor Usage and Cell Tropism

Kayoko Kato, Hironori Sato, and Yutaka Takebe*

Laboratory of Molecular Virology and Epidemiology, AIDS Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Shinjuku, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan

Received 6 October 1998/Accepted 17 March 1999


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

To assess the role of naturally occurring basic amino acid substitutions in the V3 loop of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) subtype E on viral coreceptor usage and cell tropism, we have constructed a panel of chimeric viruses with mutant V3 loops of HIV-1 subtype E in the genetic background of HIV-1LAI. The arginine substitutions naturally occurring at positions 8, 11, and 18 of the V3 loop in an HIV-1 subtype E X4 strain were systematically introduced into that of an R5 strain to generate a series of V3 loop mutant chimera. These chimeric viruses were employed in virus infectivity assays using HOS-CD4 cells expressing either CCR5 or CXCR4, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, T-cell lines, or macrophages. The arginine substitution at position 11 of the V3 loop uniformly caused the loss of infectivity in HOS-CD4-CCR5 cells, indicating that position 11 is critical for utilization of CCR5. CXCR4 usage was conferred by a minimum of two arginine substitutions, regardless of combination, whereas arginine substitutions at position 8 and 11 were required for T-cell line tropism. Nonetheless, macrophage tropism was not conferred by the V3 loop of subtype E R5 strain per se. We found that the specific combinations of amino acid changes in HIV-1 subtype E env V3 loop are critical for determining viral coreceptor usage and cell tropism. However, the ability to infect HOS-CD4 cells through either CXCR4 or CCR5 is not necessarily correlated with T-cell or macrophage tropism, suggesting that cellular tropism is not dictated solely by viral coreceptor utilization.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

CD4-positive T lymphocytes and cells of monocyte-macrophage lineages are the primary targets of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in vivo (22, 34). During the early phase of infection, non-syncytium-inducing (NSI) and macrophage (M)-tropic HIV-1 strains are predominant (27, 34, 41). T-cell (T)-tropic, syncytium-inducing (SI) isolates emerge in the late phase of infection (6, 26). Changes in cellular tropism by HIV-1 strains in vivo seem to be a key event in the pathogenesis of HIV-1 disease (11, 16, 31, 32), whereby the transition from M tropism to T tropism occurs in association with rapid progression to AIDS (6).

It has been reported that the third variable (V3) region of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 is the most critical determinant for cellular tropism (7, 14) or coreceptor use (3-5, 30, 39), although other regions of envelope glycoprotein are suggested to have some role in conjunction with the V3 loop sequence contexts (4, 12, 15, 29). Specific amino acid variations in the V3 loop, especially distribution of charged amino acids, have been shown to correlate with viral phenotype (2, 7, 8, 10) and coreceptor usage (30, 39). The V3 loop amino acid sequences of HIV-1 SI isolates are more positively charged than those of NSI isolates (2, 10, 19, 20). The basic amino acids at positions 11 and 25 (numbering from the amino-terminal cysteine residue) of the V3 loop were reported to confer an SI phenotype on an NSI virus in the genetic background of HXB2 recombined with a patient-derived V3 loop (7). However, most of these studies were carried out in the genetic background of subtype B isolates, and therefore it is not known whether the V3 regions of other subtypes determine such viral characteristics.

In a previous study, we identified an epidemiologically linked case of intrafamilial infection of HIV-1 subtype E and isolated genetically closely related HIV-1 subtype E strains from each family member (24, 25). The X4 virus (HIV-1NH1) was isolated from the father (NH1; the index case), who had developed AIDS. The R5 virus (HIV-1NH2) was isolated from mother (NH2), who was an asymptomatic carrier at the time of virus isolation. Both isolates were phylogenetically closely related, indicating that the virus was transmitted directly from NH1 to NH2 sexually (24, 25).

Close comparison between V3 loop amino acid sequences of these nearly isogenic X4 and R5 isolates implied the importance of the basic amino acid residues at positions 8, 11, and 18 in the V3 loop for phenotypic transition from R5 (NSI) to X4 (SI) (23). Furthermore, we showed that the V3 loop of HIV-1 subtype E envelope glycoproteins can specify viral coreceptor usage and MT2 cell tropism in chimeric viruses in the genetic background of HIV-1LAI (23). In this study, we investigated the role of the naturally occurring basic amino acid substitutions on the HIV-1 subtype E V3 loop by using chimeric viruses with mutated V3 loop in the genetic background of HIV-1LAI. We found that specific combinations of these amino acid changes at specific loci in the HIV-1 subtype E env V3 loop were indeed critical for determining viral coreceptor usage and cell tropism.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Construction of V3 loop recombinant DNA clones. For systematic generation of chimeric viruses with various types of V3 loop mutations, pLAI (21)-derived subclones constructed previously (23) were used. These include (i) pUC-LAI/SB, where the 2.7-kb SalI-BamHI fragment harboring the env region of LAI is cloned into pUC18, and (ii) pUC-LAI/NH2V3, constructed by replacing the V3 loop gene of pUC-LAI/SB with that of the HIV-1 subtype E R5 strain HIV-1NH2 (23) (Fig. 1).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.   Schematic representation of the construction of LAI-based infectious molecular clones with mutated HIV-1 subtype E V3 loops. Plasmid pUC-LAI/NH2V3 (23) was used as the template for PCR to generate DNA fragments containing the mutation(s) of interest. The PCR primers are listed in Table 1. The mt primers contain a series of mutations (closed triangle) to introduce the amino acid substitution(s). The native StuI site was mutated (open triangle) in the Delta StuI primer. Outer A and outer B primers have the original sequence of the LAI env gene. The mixture of the first-round PCR products generated by either primer pair, Outer A and an mt primer or Delta StuI and Outer B, is subsequently amplified with outer A and outer B primers. Two forms of amplified products are generated. The upper form containing the mutation(s) of interest is readily cleaved with the restriction enzymes, StuI and NheI and thus selectively cloned into StuI-NheI-cleaved pUC-LAI/SB (23). Subsequently, the SalI-BamHI fragment of the resultant plasmid is cloned into SalI-BamHI-cleaved pLAI to reconstitute the LAI-based chimeric molecular clones with mutated V3 loops of HIV-1 subtype E.

StuI-NheI fragments with the V3 loop mutations were generated by the overlap extension method (13), using a primer (mt series) with the point mutation(s) of interest listed in Table 1. In the Delta StuI primer, the StuI site present in pLAI at nucleotide position 6879 (21) was mutated (23). Outer A and Outer B primers have the original sequences flanking the V3 loop region of the LAI env gene (Table 1; Fig. 1). For introduction of mutations, pUC-LAI/NH2V3 was PCR amplified with two sets of primer pairs, either Outer A and an mt primer or Delta StuI and Outer B (Fig. 1). The PCR products were then subjected to a second round of PCR with Outer A and Outer B primers, yielding two forms of PCR products; one retains the StuI site and the other does not. PCR product with a mutated V3 loop is readily cleaved with restriction enzymes StuI and NheI and thereby selectively cloned into StuI-NheI-cleaved pUC-LAI/SB (Fig. 1). The SalI-BamHI fragment of the resultant plasmid was inserted into SalI-BamHI-cleaved pLAI to reconstitute the V3 loop mutant chimeric molecular clones. The nucleotide sequences of the PCR fragments and sequences around the cloning sites of each V3 mutant were confirmed with an ABI PRISM 310 automated sequencer (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, Conn.).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1.   PCR primers for introduction of V3 loop mutations by the overlap extension method

Preparation of cell-free virus stocks. HeLa cells (5 × 105 cells) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium with 10% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS) in a T25 flask for 1 day and transfected with 30 µg of plasmid DNA by the calcium phosphate coprecipitation method (GIBCO, Grand Island, N.Y.). The culture supernatants were collected at 48 and 72 h after transfection, filtered through 0.45-µm-pore-size filters, and subjected to virion-associated reverse transcriptase (RT) assay (37). The supernatants were kept at -152°C before use.

Cell culture and virus infections. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and CD8-depleted PBMCs were prepared from whole blood of HIV-1-seronegative donors by Ficoll-Hypaque (Pharmacia LKB) density centrifugation. Before use, they were stimulated with 1 µg of phytohemagglutinin (PHA) per ml for 3 days and grown in RPMI 1640 with 10% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated FCS and 20 U of recombinant human interleukin-2 (a kind gift from Shionogi Pharmaceutical Co.) per ml. The human CD4+ T-lymphocyte cell lines MT2, H9, M8166, Molt4, and PM1 were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated FCS. CD4+ human osteosarcoma (HOS-CD4) cell lines expressing either human CCR5 or CXCR4 (9) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium DMEM with 10% FCS and 1.0 µg of puromycin per ml. Monocyte-derived macrophage cultures were prepared as previously described (18).

Infectivity assay. PHA-stimulated PBMCs (2 × 106) and macrophages (105) were incubated in 0.1 ml of cell-free supernatant containing each recombinant virus (2 × 105 to 5 × 105 32P cpm of RT activity) (37) for 2 to 16 h at 37°C, washed once with phosphate-buffered saline, and grown in 2 and 0.5 ml of the growth medium in 24- and 48-well plates, respectively. The CD4+ human T-cell lines MT2, H9, M8166, Molt4, and PM1 (5 × 104 cells) were incubated in 50 µl of cell-free supernatant containing one of the recombinant viruses (4 × 105 32P cpm of RT activity) (37) for 2 h at 37°C and grown in 0.2 ml of medium in 96-well plates. Half of the volume of the culture medium was replaced by fresh medium every 2 to 3 days for either 25 (PBMCs) or 16 (macrophages and T-cell lines) days after infection. In all infections, a portion of culture supernatant was collected every 2 to 3 days, stored at -80°C until all samples were collected at the indicated time points, and analyzed for virion-associated RT activities. The results were shown as a average of duplicated or triplicated experiments; variations were within 10% of the average.

Virus infectivity on the HOS cell lines was determined by endpoint dilution of virus stocks. The infections were done in triplicate in 96-well plates. HOS-CD4 cells (6 × 103 in 200 µl/well) expressing either CCR5 or CXCR4 were incubated in medium containing serially diluted (fivefold) recombinant virus stocks corresponding to 1 × 106 to 8 × 103 cpm of virion-associated RT activity, washed once with phosphate-buffered saline, fed with 0.2 ml of culture medium, and monitored for RT production in the culture supernatants. The highest dilution required to produce an RT-positive culture was taken as the endpoint, and HIV-1 titers of infectious recombinants on the HOS-CD4 cells were expressed as 2, 10, 50, or 250 tissue culture infective doses (TCID) per 5 × 105 32P cpm of RT activity.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Construction of pLAI-based infectious molecular clones with a mutated V3 loop derived from HIV-1 subtype E. To assess the contributions of the naturally occurring basic amino acid substitutions found at positions 8, 11, and 18 of the V3 loop of HIV-1 subtype E on viral coreceptor usage and cell tropism, we have constructed a panel of V3 loop mutant chimeras in the genetic background of HIV-1LAI (21) by the overlap extension method (13) (Fig. 1). The V3 loop substitutions and mutagenesis were designed so that only sequences between two cysteine residues flanking the V3 loop were altered. The predicted amino acid sequences of the V3 loops of the mutants generated in this study are listed in Fig. 2. In mt1, the threonine residue at position 8 in the V3 loop of the R5 strain HIV-1NH2, which constitutes a highly conserved potential N-glycosylation site, was replaced with alanine. In mutants mt2 through mt8, various combinations of arginine substitutions at position 8, 11, or 18 were introduced into the V3 loop of HIV-1NH2.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.   Amino acid sequences of the V3 loops of chimeric molecular clones. The positions (shadowed) of the amino acid substitutions of V3 loops are indicated by the numbers (with arrow) starting from the N-terminal cysteine residue of the loop. The potential N-linked glycosylation site (box) and the net charge in each V3 loop amino acid sequence are shown.

Coreceptor usage of V3 loop mutant chimeras in the HOS-CD4 cell assay. To assess the contributions of V3 loop mutations in coreceptor usage, infectivities of mutant viruses on HOS-CD4 cell lines expressing either CCR5 or CXCR4 (9) were assayed by endpoint dilution infection (23). The chimeric viruses generated in this study were infective in HOS-CD4 cells expressing either CCR5 or CXCR4, except for mt3, in which serine at position 11 was replaced with arginine (Fig. 3). Since the protein profiles of the virions produced by transfection of the mt3 recombinant DNA clone appeared to be normal according to Western blot analysis (data not shown), the loss in infectivity of mt3 is not due to incorrect or inefficient processing during viral production. The mutant chimeras which retain a serine residue at position 11 (mt1, mt2, mt4, and mt6) could grow in HOS-CD4-CCR5 cells, whereas the mutants in which a serine residue at position 11 was replaced with arginine uniformly lost the ability to utilize CCR5 (Fig. 3). It is noted that the infectivity to HOS-CCR5 cells was reduced fivefold in mt1, where the threonine residue at position 8, which constitutes a potential N-glycosylation site, was changed to alanine (Fig. 3).


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.   Coreceptor usage of mutant V3 loop chimeric virus in the HOS-CD4 cell infectivity assay. Virus stocks were generated by transfecting HeLa cells with each recombinant plasmid DNA. HOS-CD4 cell lines expressing either CCR5 or CXCR4 were seeded in a 96-well plate 1 day prior to infection and were infected with 1:5 serially diluted virus inocula (ranging from 1 × 106 to 8 × 103 cpm of virion-associated RT activity). After overnight incubation, the inoculum was removed and 200 µl of culture medium was added. Medium was replaced on day 2 postinfection, and virus replication was monitored by virion-associated RT activity on day 5 postinfection. TCID normalized by RT activity of the virus inoculum is plotted. Assays were done in triplicate. Since all assays gave identical TCIDs, error bars are not shown. Each amino acid substitution (amino acid position in the V3 loop with the substituting amino acid residue denoted in one-letter code) introduced into the V3 loop of HIV-1 subtype E R5 strain HIV-1NH2 is shown at the top.

The mutants with two or three arginine substitutions (mt5 through mt8) were able to replicate in HOS-CD4-CXCR4 cells, whereas mutants with only one arginine substitution (mt2 to mt4) were not (Fig. 3). This result indicates that a minimum of two basic substitutions are required to confer CXCR4 usage. In addition, mt5 was less infective than mt6, mt7, and mt8 (Fig. 3), suggesting that a basic substitution at position 8 may be required for efficient utilization of CXCR4.

mt6, in which the residues at both position 8 and position 18 were replaced with arginine but the serine residue at position 11 was retained, showed usage of both CXCR4 and CCR5 (Fig. 3). This dual coreceptor usage is consistent with our observation that the serine residue at position 11 is critical for CCR5 usage and that the minimal two arginine substitutions are required for the acquisition of CXCR4 utilization (Fig. 3).

Infectivities of the mutant V3 loop chimeric viruses in PBMCs, T-cell lines, and macrophages. The tropic properties of the mutant viruses were examined by infectivity assay in three human cell types: PBMCs, macrophages, and T-cell lines MT2, H9, M8166, Molt4, and PM1 cells. Mutant viruses replicated on PBMCs to various extents (Fig. 4A). We detected no difference in the pattern of replication kinetics of each chimeric virus between PBMCs and CD8-depleted PBMCs. As shown in Fig. 4A, mt2, mt4, mt6, and mt8 grew well, but mt1 and mt7 replicated very poorly in PBMCs. Notably, mt3 was not able to establish infection in PBMCs, consisting with its lack of usage of both CCR5 and CXCR4 in the HOS-CD4 cell assay (Fig. 3). In most cases, the degree of infectivity on PBMCs paralleled that on HOS-CD4 cell lines expressing either CCR5 or CXCR4, except for mt7, which replicated efficiently in HOS-CXCR4 cells but poorly in PBMCs (Fig. 4A). mt7 showed delayed replication kinetics in most T-cell lines (Fig. 4C; Table 2).


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4.   Replication kinetics of chimeric viruses in PBMCs, macrophages, and T-cell lines. Virus stocks used to infect the indicated cell types were generated by transfecting HeLa cells with recombinant plasmid DNAs. The CD8-depleted PBMCs stimulated with PHA (A), macrophages (B), and T-cell lines MT2, H9, M8166, Molt4, and PM1 (C) were infected with each virus stock containing equal amounts of RT activity, and progeny virus production was monitored by RT activity released into the culture medium at the indicated time points. Each plot represents the average of duplicated or triplicated assays.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2.   Infectivities of HIV-1 subtype E V3 loop mutant chimeras in various cell types

The chimeric virus LAI-NH1V3, harboring the V3 loop from the HIV-1 subtype E X4 strain, replicated efficiently in all T-cell lines, while LAI-NH2V3, with the V3 loop from the HIV-1 subtype E R5 strain, did not replicate in any of T-cell lines except PM1 (Table 2; Fig. 4C). The PM1 cells were permissive to both X4- and R5-type recombinants, including LAI-NH1V3, LAI-NH2V3, and LAI-AD8V3 as well as parental LAI and AD8, and to broader ranges of HIV-1 subtype E V3 loop chimeras, including mt4 through mt8 (Table 2; Fig. 4C). This finding is consistent with the observation that PM1 cells, a derivative of HUT78, are known to be permissive to certain NSI-type HIV-1 isolates, presumably because of the presence of CCR5 as well as CXCR4 on the cell surface (5, 17). In contrast, other T-cell lines, including MT2, H9, M8166, and Molt4, were permissive only to mt8 and mt7 (Table 2; Fig. 4C). The V3 loop mutant chimeras mt5 and mt6, which utilize CXCR4 in HOS cell infectivity (Fig. 3), showed no or little infectivity in T-cell lines except for PM1 (Table 2; Fig. 4C), indicating that not all CXCR4-utilizing viruses are T tropic (3).

To assess infectivities to primary macrophages, we prepared monocyte-derived macrophages as described previously (18). None of the V3 loop chimeras generated in this study were infective to macrophages (Fig. 4B). Moreover, the chimeric virus LAI-AD8V3, harboring the V3 loop of M-tropic HIV-1 strain AD8 in a genetic background of HIV-1LAI (23), also could not establish an infection on macrophages (Fig. 4B). These results indicate that M tropism could not be conferred by replacement of the V3 loop per se, at least in a genetic background of HIV-1LAI (29, 33).


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

From this study using a pLAI-based chimeric virus with a mutated V3 loop derived from HIV-1 subtype E, we have determined the following structure-function relationships.

First, CXCR4 usage was conferred by any combination of two arginine substitutions at either position 8, 11, or 18 of the V3 loop. This finding is consistent with the previous observation that the overall charge around the tip of the V3 loop appeared to be responsible for viral syncytium-inducing ability, cell tropism, and coreceptor usage (2, 28). This may imply that the V3 region, independent of the backbone, directly interacts with CXCR4 during virus entry. Alternatively, the presence of two or more positively charged amino acids at those critical sites in the V3 loop may alter the conformation of the chimeric gp120 and thereby enable interaction with CXCR4.

The data seemed to support a central role of the overall increase in charge of the V3 loop in determining the interaction with CXCR4. However, the structure of the V3 loop could affect the strength of this interaction, as observed in mt5, where infectivity was fivefold lower than that for mt6 and mt7, although the net charges of the V3 loops of mt5, mt6, and mt7 are the same (Fig. 2 and 3).

The arginine substitution at position 8 appeared to be required for efficient use of CXCR4 (Fig. 3, mt6 through mt8). The residues at position 8 in the HIV-1 subtype E V3 region, which constitute a highly conserved potential N-glycosylation site in NSI variants of HIV-1 subtype E, are uniformly lost in all SI viruses (40). It has been reported that the N-glycan at this site interferes the viral binding of neutralizing antibodies and thereby facilitates viral escape from host immunity (1). Our results suggest that the loss of this potential N-glycosylation site and the acquisition of a basic amino acid at position 8 may provide a structural advantage for efficient interaction of X4 viruses with CXCR4.

Earlier studies of HIV-1 subtype B indicated that basic changes at position 25 in the V3 loop were required for MT2 cell tropism (7) or CXCR4 utilization (30). In contrast, we found that CXCR4 usage by HIV-1 subtype E was conferred by two positively charged amino acid substitutions without changing the negatively charged residue (aspartic acid) at position 25 in the V3 loop. Therefore, the determinants for CXCR4 utilization may differ based on the genetic background of Env proteins.

Among the mutant chimeras constructed in the present study, mt4, mt5, mt6, and mt8 carry a GPGR motif at the tip of the V3 loop, which is typical of HIV-1 subtype B (Fig. 2). Since mt5 grew poorly in the HOS cell assay compared with other mutant chimeras carrying a GPGR motif (Fig. 3), the GPGR motif does not necessarily make the virus more robust like subtype B viruses.

Second, CCR5 usage was abrogated by the arginine substitution at position 11 (Fig. 3, mt3, mt5, mt7, and mt8). Residues at positions 11 and 25 in the V3 loop have been implicated in determining the usage for CCR5 or other coreceptors, since the most viral isolates of various subtypes which exclusively use CCR5 had uncharged amino acids at position 11 and negatively charged amino acids at position 25, in addition to the consensus GPG motif at the tip of the V3 loop (39). This finding is consistent with our observations (Fig. 3, mt1, mt2, mt4, and mt6). However, the site-specific basic substitution at position 11 (from serine to arginine) in an HIV-1 subtype B R5 strain did not alter CCR5 usage (39). Taken together, the results indicate that position 11 of the V3 loop may be critical for modulating viral CCR5 usage in a context-specific manner. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that the structural balance is very delicate, being restrained in a very narrow range of genetic variation for efficient transmission of infection even though the virus is rapidly changing.

Third, T tropism was conferred only when positions 8 and 11 were changed to arginine (Table 2, mt7 and mt8). It has been reported that the introduction of positively charged amino acid residues at position 11 and/or 25 was required for acquisition of the SI phenotype in the HIV-1 subtype B V3 loop, where arginine is present at position 18 (7). Thus, the T tropism of HIV-1 is conferred by positively charged amino acids in the V3 loop, but the pattern of changes responsible for T tropism varies depending on the viral genetic background.

Fourth, replacement of the V3 loop with that of M-tropic or R5 virus and any of the V3 loop mutations could not confer M tropism to LAI (Fig. 4B, LAI-AD8V3, LAI-NH2V3, and LAI-NH2V3mt1-8). This finding is consistent with the observation that the dualtropic 89.6 env V3 domain conferred the ability to use CCR5 for viral entry but not the ability to establish productive infection in macrophages in the genetic background of HXB2 (29). Similarly, the V1 and V2 envelope sequences of the M-tropic Ba-L strain were shown to enhance the ability to spread in macrophage cultures (33). Taken together with our observations on HIV-1 subtype E, these data show that sequences other than the env V3 loop are involved in productive macrophage infection (2).

Finally, some chimeric viruses utilized CXCR4 to infect HOS-CD4 cells but showed no or little infectivity in T-cell lines (Fig. 3 and Table 2, mt5 and mt6). However, our recent study with patient-derived V3 loop sequences of HIV-1 subtype E revealed that CXCR4 usage perfectly correlated with MT2 cell tropism (27a). Since the site-directed mutations introduced in this study created nonnatural sequences, it is possible that the mutations which we introduced could render Env glycoproteins defective in certain properties such as affinity for coreceptors. Moreover, the infectivity of HIV-1 is known to be highly dependent on cell surface concentrations of CCR5 and CD4 (38). Therefore, the discrepancy between infectivity in the HOS-CD4 cell assay and cellular tropism may be explained in part by the possibility that HOS-CD4 cells are excessively permissive to viral infections (e.g., because of overexpression of the chemokine receptors). Alternatively, the cell-type-specific differences in certain postentry mechanisms governed by the V3 loop sequences might influence the infection and replication processes.

In the present study, we have demonstrated that the naturally occurring basic amino acid substitutions found at specific residues in the V3 loop of HIV-1 subtype E in fact influence coreceptor utilization and cellular tropism. Since infectious molecular clones of HIV-1 subtype E are presently not available, additional studies are required for a better understanding of coreceptor utilization and cellular tropism of HIV-1 subtype E, one of the major strains causing the current epidemic of HIV-1 infection throughout southeast Asia (35, 36).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The first two authors contributed equally to this work.

We thank Kiyoko Akagawa for preparation of monocyte-derived primary macrophage cultures and Keith Peden for providing pLAI. We also thank Roger Pomerantz and Yoshiyuki Nagai for critical reading of the manuscript and Teiichiro Shiino, Tatsuo Shioda, and Hiroshi Yoshikura for stimulating discussions.

This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, and the Science Technology Agency of Japan. Kayoko Kato is a recipient of research resident fellowship from the Japanese Foundation for AIDS Prevention.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Molecular Virology and Epidemiology, AIDS Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Toyama 1-23-1, Shinjuku, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan. Phone: (81) 3-5285-1111. Fax: (81) 3-5285-1129. E-mail: takebe{at}nih.go.jp.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Back, N. K., L. Smit, J. J. De Jong, W. Keulen, M. Schutten, J. Goudsmit, and M. Tersmette. 1994. An N-glycan within the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 V3 loop affects virus neutralization. Virology 199:431-438[Medline].
2. Chesebro, B., K. Wehrly, J. Nishio, and S. Perryman. 1992. Macrophage-tropic human immunodeficiency virus isolates from different patients exhibit unusual V3 envelope sequence homogeneity in comparison with T-cell-tropic isolates: definition of critical amino acids involved in cell tropism. J. Virol. 66:6547-6554[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Cho, M., M. Lee, M. Carney, J. Berson, R. Doms, and M. Martin. 1998. Identification of determinants on a dualtropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein that confer usage of CXCR4. J. Virol. 72:2509-2515[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Choe, H., M. Farzan, Y. Sun, N. Sullivan, B. Rollins, P. D. Ponath, L. Wu, C. R. Mackay, G. LaRosa, W. Newman, N. Gerard, C. Gerard, and J. Sodroski. 1996. The beta-chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 facilitate infection by primary HIV-1 isolates. Cell 85:1135-1148[Medline].
5. Cocchi, F., A. DeVico, A. Garzino-Demo, A. Cara, R. Gallo, and P. Lusso. 1996. The V3 domain of the HIV-1 gp120 envelope glycoprotein is critical for chemokine-mediated blockade of infection. Nat. Med. 2:1244-1247[Medline].
6. Connor, R. I., and D. D. Ho. 1994. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants with increased replicative capacity develop during the asymptomatic stage before disease progression. J. Virol. 68:4400-4408[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. de Jong, J.-J., A. de Ronde, W. Keulen, M. Tersmette, and J. Goudsmit. 1992. Minimal requirements for the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 V3 domain to support the syncytium-inducing phenotype: analysis by single amino acid substitution. J. Virol. 66:6777-6780[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. de Jong, J.-J., J. Goudsmit, W. Keulen, B. Klaver, W. Krone, M. Tersmette, and A. de Ronde. 1992. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clones chimeric for the envelope V3 domain differ in syncytium formation and replication capacity. J. Virol. 66:757-765[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Deng, H., R. Liu, E. Wilfried, S. Choe, D. Unutmaz, M. Burkhart, P. Di Marzio, S. Marmon, R. Sutton, M. Hill, C. Davis, S. Peiper, T. Schall, D. Littman, and N. Landau. 1996. Identification of a major co-receptor for primary isolates of HIV-1. Nature 381:661-666[Medline].
10. Fouchier, R. A. M., M. Groenink, N. A. Kootstra, M. Tersmette, H. G. Huisman, F. Miedema, and H. Schuitemaker. 1992. Phenotype-associated sequence variation in the third variable domain of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 molecule. J. Virol. 66:3183-3187[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Goudsmit, J. 1995. The role of viral diversity in HIV pathogenesis. J. Acquired Immune Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retrovirol. 10(Suppl. 1):S15-S19.
12. Groenink, M., R. A. Fouchier, S. Broersen, C. H. Baker, M. Koot, A. B. van't Wout, H. G. Huisman, F. Miedema, M. Tersmette, and H. Schuitemaker. 1993. Relation of phenotype evolution of HIV-1 to envelope V2 configuration [see comments]. Science 260:1513-1516[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Ho, S., H. Hunt, R. Horton, J. Pullen, and L. Pease. 1989. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene. 77:51-59[Medline].
14. Hwang, S. S., T. J. Boyle, H. K. Lyerly, and B. R. Cullen. 1991. Identification of the envelope V3 loop as the primary determinant of cell tropism in HIV-1. Science. 253:71-74[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Koito, A., L. Stamatatos, and C. Cheng-Mayer. 1995. Small amino acid sequence changes within the V2 domain can affect the function of a T-cell line-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope gp120. Virology. 206:878-884[Medline].
16. Koot, M., A. B. van't Wout, N. A. Kootstra, R. E. de Goede, M. Tersmette, and H. Schuitemaker. 1996. Relation between changes in cellular load, evolution of viral phenotype, and the clonal composition of virus populations in the course of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Infect Dis. 173:349-354[Medline].
17. Lusso, P., F. Cocchi, C. Balotta, P. D. Markham, A. Louie, P. Farci, R. Pal, R. C. Gallo, and M. S. Reitz, Jr. 1995. Growth of macrophage-tropic and primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates in a unique CD4+ T-cell clone (PM1): failure to downregulate CD4 and to interfere with cell-line-tropic HIV-1. J Virol. 69:3712-3720[Abstract].
18. Matsuda, S., K. Akagawa, M. Honda, Y. Yokota, Y. Takebe, and T. Takemori. 1995. Suppression of HIV replication in human monocyte-derived macrophages induced by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 11:1031-1038[Medline].
19. Milich, L., B. Margolin, and R. Swanstrom. 1997. Patterns of amino acid variability in NSI-like and SI-like V3 sequences and a linked change in the CD4-binding domain of the HIV-1 Env protein. Virology 239:108-118[Medline].
20. Milich, L., B. Margolin, and R. Swanstrom. 1993. V3 loop of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Env protein: interpreting sequence variability. J. Virol. 67:5623-5634[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21. Peden, K., M. Emerman, and L. Montagnier. 1991. Changes in growth properties on passage in tissue culture of viruses derived from infectious molecular clones of HIV-1LAI, HIV-1MAL, and HIV-1ELI. Virology 185:661-672[Medline].
22. Roos, M. T. L., J. M. A. Lange, R. E. Y. Goede, R. A. Coutinho, P. T. A. Schellekens, F. Miedema, and M. Tersmette. 1992. Viral phenotype and immune response in primary immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Infect. Dis. 165:427-432[Medline].
23. Sato, H., K. Kato, and Y. Takebe. 1999. Functional complementation of the envelope hypervariable V3 loop of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype B by subtype E V3 loop. Virology 257:491-501[Medline].
24. Sato, H., T. Shiino, N. Kodaka, K. Taniguchi, Y. Tomita, K. Kato, T. Miyakuni, and Y. Takebe. 1999. Evolution and biological characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype E gp120 V3 sequences following horizontal and vertical virus transmission in a single family. J. Virol. 73:3551-3559[Abstract/Free Full Text].
25. Sato, H., K. Taniguchi, Y. Tomita, T. Shiino, T. Miyakuni, and Y. Takebe. 1997. Evidence for the selective pressure to reduce heterogeneity of HIV-1 subtype E envelope V3-loop sequences in an intrafamilial infection case. AIDS 11:396-397[Medline].
26. Schuitemaker, H., M. Koot, N. A. Kootsra, M. Wouter-Dercksen, R. E. de Goede, R. P. van Steenwijk, J. M. Lange, J. K. Schattenkerk, F. Miedema, and M. Tersmette. 1992. Biological phenotype of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clones at different stages of infection: progression of disease is associated with a shift from monocytotropic to T-cell-tropic virus populations. J. Virol. 66:1354-1360[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27. Schuitemaker, H., N. A. Kootstra, R. E. de Goede, F. de Wolf, F. Miedema, and M. Tersmette. 1991. Monocytotropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) variants detectable in all stages of HIV-1 infection lack T-cell line tropism and syncytium-inducing ability in primary T-cell culture. J. Virol. 65:356-363[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27a. Shiino, T., et al. Unpublished data.
28. Shioda, T., J. A. Levy, and C. Cheng-Mayer. 1992. Small amino acid changes in the V3 hypervariable region of gp120 can affect the T-cell-line and macrophage tropism of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:9434-9438[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29. Smyth, R. J., Y. Yi, A. Singh, and R. G. Collman. 1998. Determinants of entry cofactor utilization and tropism in a dualtropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primary isolate. J. Virol. 72:4478-4484[Abstract/Free Full Text].
30. Speck, R., K. Wehrly, E. Platt, R. Atchison, I. Charo, D. Kabat, B. Chesebro, and M. Goldsmith. 1997. Selective employment of chemokine receptors as human immunodeficiency virus type 1 coreceptors determined by individual amino acids within the envelope V3 loop. J. Virol. 71:7136-7139[Abstract].
31. Tersmette, M., R. E. Y. de Goede, B. J. M. Al, I. N. Winkel, R. A. Gruters, H. T. Cuypers, H. G. Huisman, and F. Miedema. 1988. Differential syncytium-inducing capacity of human immunodeficiency virus isolates: frequent detection of syncytium-inducing isolates in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and AIDS-related complex. J. Virol. 62:2026-2032[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32. Tersmette, M., J. M. A. Lange, R. E. de Goede, F. de Wolf, J. K. Eeftink-Schattenkerk, P. T. Schellenkens, R. A. Coutinho, J. G. Huisman, J. Goudsmit, and F. Miedema. 1989. Association between biological properties of human immunodeficiency virus variants and risk for AIDS and AIDS mortality. Lancet i:983-985.
33. Toohey, K., K. Wehrly, J. Nishio, S. Perryman, and B. Chesebro. 1995. Human immunodeficiency virus envelope V1 and V2 regions influence replication efficiency in macrophages by affecting virus spread. Virology 213:70-79[Medline].
34. Valentin, A., J. Albert, E. M. Fenyo, and B. Asjo. 1994. Dual tropism for macrophages and lymphocytes is a common feature of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and 2 isolates. J. Virol. 68:6684-6689[Abstract/Free Full Text].
35. Weniger, B. G., and T. Brown. 1996. The march of AIDS through Asia. N. Engl. J. Med. 335:343-345[Free Full Text]. (Editorial; comment.)
36. Weniger, B. G., Y. Takebe, C.-Y. Ou, and S. Yamazaki. 1994. The molecular epidemiology of HIV in Asia. AIDS 8(Suppl. 2):S13-S28.
37. Willey, R. L., D. H. Smith, L. A. Lasky, T. S. Theodore, P. L. Earl, B. Moss, D. J. Capon, and M. A. Martin. 1988. In vitro mutagenesis identifies a region within the envelope gene of the human immunodeficiency virus that is critical for infectivity. J. Virol. 62:139-147[Abstract/Free Full Text].
38. Wu, L., G. LaRosa, N. Kassam, C. Gordon, H. Heath, N. Ruffing, H. Chen, J. Humblias, M. Samson, M. Parmentier, J. Moore, and C. Mackay. 1997. Interaction of chemokine receptor CCR5 with its ligands: multiple domains for HIV-1 gp120 binding and a single domain for chemokine binding. J. Exp. Med. 186:1373-1381[Abstract/Free Full Text].
39. Xiao, L., S. Owen, I. Goldman, A. Lal, J. deJong, J. Goudsmit, and R. Lal. 1998. CCR5 coreceptor usage of non-syncytium-inducing primary HIV-1 is independent of phylogenetically distinct global HIV-1 isolates: delineation of consensus motif in the V3 domain that predicts CCR-5 usage. Virology 240:83-92[Medline].
40. Yu, X.-F., Z. Wang, C. Beyrer, D. D. Celentano, C. Khamboonruang, E. Allen, and K. Nelson. 1995. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from patients with AIDS in northern Thailand. J. Virol. 69:4649-4655[Abstract].
41. Zhu, T., H. Mo, N. Wang, D. S. Nam, Y. Cao, R. A. Koup, and D. D. Ho. 1993. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of HIV-1 patients with primary infection. Science 261:1179-1181.

Journal of Virology, July 1999, p. 5520-5526, Vol. 73, No. 7
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Johnston, E. R., Zijenah, L. S., Mutetwa, S., Kantor, R., Kittinunvorakoon, C., Katzenstein, D. A. (2003). High Frequency of Syncytium-Inducing and CXCR4-Tropic Viruses among Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype C-Infected Patients Receiving Antiretroviral Treatment. J. Virol. 77: 7682-7688 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gordon, M., De Oliveira, T., Bishop, K., Coovadia, H. M., Madurai, L., Engelbrecht, S., Janse van Rensburg, E., Mosam, A., Smith, A., Cassol, S. (2003). Molecular Characteristics of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype C Viruses from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Implications for Vaccine and Antiretroviral Control Strategies. J. Virol. 77: 2587-2599 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Spira, S., Wainberg, M. A., Loemba, H., Turner, D., Brenner, B. G. (2003). Impact of clade diversity on HIV-1 virulence, antiretroviral drug sensitivity and drug resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 229-240 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yang, R., Kusagawa, S., Zhang, C., Xia, X., Ben, K., Takebe, Y. (2002). Identification and Characterization of a New Class of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Recombinants Comprised of Two Circulating Recombinant Forms, CRF07_BC and CRF08_BC, in China. J. Virol. 77: 685-695 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Basmaciogullari, S., Babcock, G. J., Van Ryk, D., Wojtowicz, W., Sodroski, J. (2002). Identification of Conserved and Variable Structures in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus gp120 Glycoprotein of Importance for CXCR4 Binding. J. Virol. 76: 10791-10800 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jekle, A., Schramm, B., Jayakumar, P., Trautner, V., Schols, D., De Clercq, E., Mills, J., Crowe, S. M., Goldsmith, M. A. (2002). Coreceptor Phenotype of Natural Human Immunodeficiency Virus with Nef Deleted Evolves In Vivo, Leading to Increased Virulence. J. Virol. 76: 6966-6973 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gorry, P. R., Bristol, G., Zack, J. A., Ritola, K., Swanstrom, R., Birch, C. J., Bell, J. E., Bannert, N., Crawford, K., Wang, H., Schols, D., De Clercq, E., Kunstman, K., Wolinsky, S. M., Gabuzda, D. (2001). Macrophage Tropism of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolates from Brain and Lymphoid Tissues Predicts Neurotropism Independent of Coreceptor Specificity. J. Virol. 75: 10073-10089 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shiino, T., Kato, K., Kodaka, N., Miyakuni, T., Takebe, Y., Sato, H. (2000). A Group of V3 Sequences from Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype E Non-Syncytium-Inducing, CCR5-Using Variants Are Resistant to Positive Selection Pressure. J. Virol. 74: 1069-1078 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Takebe, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Takebe, Y.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»