JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Carstens, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Carstens, E. B.

Journal of Virology, July 1999, p. 5473-5480, Vol. 73, No. 7
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Replication, Integration, and Packaging of Plasmid DNA following Cotransfection with Baculovirus Viral DNA

Yuntao Wu,dagger Ge Liu,Dagger and Eric B. Carstens*

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada

Received 10 February 1999/Accepted 13 April 1999


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Infection-dependent replication assays have been used to identify numerous putative origins of baculovirus replication. However, plasmid DNA, when cotransfected into insect cells with Autographa californica multinucleocapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) DNA, replicates independently of any viral sequence in cis (11). Cotransfection of transfer plasmids and baculovirus DNA is a common procedure used in generating recombinant viruses and in measuring the level of gene expression in transient-expression assays. We have examined the fate of a series of vector plasmids in cotransfection experiments. The data reveal that these plasmids replicate following cotransfection and the replication of plasmid DNA is not due to acquisition of viral putative origin sequences. The conformation of plasmid DNA replicating in the cotransfected cells was analyzed and found to exist as high-molecular-weight concatemers. Ten to 25% of the replicated plasmid DNA was integrated into multiple locations on the viral genome and was present in progeny virions following serial passage. Sequence analysis of plasmid-viral DNA junction sites revealed no homologous or conserved sequences in the proximity of the integration sites, suggesting that nonhomologous recombination was involved during the integration process. These data suggest that while a rolling-circle mechanism could be used for baculovirus DNA replication, recombination may also be involved in this process. Plasmid integration may generate large deletions of the viral genome, suggesting that the process of DNA replication in baculovirus may be prone to generation of defective genomes.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The baculovirus Autographa californica multinucleocapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) has been widely used as an eukaryotic expression vector (27) and has been engineered as an alternative biopesticide (41). More recently, baculovirus has been investigated as a potential gene transfer vector for human gene therapy (30). All of these applications rely on the genetic manipulation of the viral genome, usually in the presence of prokaryotic plasmid DNA. AcMNPV contains a closed-circular, double-stranded DNA genome (134 kb) that is tightly associated with a highly basic protein to form a chromatin-like structure (35, 40). Eight A+T-rich, homologous regions (hr) (hr1, hr1a, hr2, hr3, hr4a, hr4b, hr4c, and hr5), interspersed along the genome, were predicted to function as viral origins of replication (7). Utilization of an infection-dependent replication assay led to the identification of hr as putative origins of viral DNA replication (1), supporting this hypothesis. However, other regions on the AcMNPV genome also act as viral infection-dependent replicating sequences (15, 21, 42) so it is still unknown whether each or any of the identified replicating sequences also functions as a DNA replication origin in vivo. For instance, deletion of hr5 from the AcMNPV genome has no apparent effect on virus replication (32). Nevertheless, plasmid replication in virus-infected cells is strictly dependent upon the presence of specific viral sequences such as hr (22, 31), regions within the HindIII K fragment (16, 20), or viral early gene regions (42). Although it is believed that the viral replication machinery specifically interacts with cognate replication origins, there is evidence to suggest that initiation of early viral gene expression and viral DNA replication may be coupled (42).

The demonstration that purified viral genomic DNA is infectious when transfected into insect cells (6) has been exploited for the production of recombinant baculoviruses (34). In addition, cotransfection of insect cells with AcMNPV DNA and a transplacement vector or a reporter plasmid is routinely used in generating recombinant baculoviruses or in measuring the level of reporter gene expression or reporter replication. However, the consequences of plasmid replication on these applications have not been investigated. It has been observed that pUC-based plasmids without baculovirus inserts replicate when cotransfected with viral DNA into insect cells (11, 17). The basis of this plasmid DNA replication is unknown, although it has been speculated that it may result from the acquisition of hr sequences following cotransfection (14). We thought that these results might reflect differences in the specificity of plasmid replication in cotransfected versus infected cells so we have investigated this phenomenon further. An understanding of the nature of plasmid replication in cotransfected cells may shed light on the specificity and mechanism of baculovirus DNA replication. In this report, we describe bacterial plasmid DNA replication in insect cells and its relationship with the viral DNA replication process. The data demonstrate that plasmid replication is independent of the presence of viral DNA sequences in cis but is initiated by the viral replication machinery. The replicated plasmid DNA has a concatenated structure that can be incorporated into the viral genome where it is packaged into mature virions and continuously passaged with the viral DNA following subsequent rounds of replication.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Cells and virus. Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf21) cells were maintained by passage in TC-100 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. AcMNPV (strain HR3) was prepared and titrated as previously described (9). Extracellular budded virus was purified from infected cell supernatants through 25 to 65% sucrose gradients as previously described (36). DNA was prepared from purified virions by standard protocols (38).

Plasmids. All plasmids were propagated in Escherichia coli DH5alpha cells and purified on Qiagen Tip 500 columns following the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen Inc.). The AcMNPV HindIII Q fragment was cloned into the HindIII site of pUC18 to generate pAchr5.

DNA cotransfection and replication assays. Sf21 cells were cotransfected by mixing plasmid DNA with AcMNPV DNA and 10 µl of Lipofectin (Gibco-BRL) in a total volume of 75 µl and then adding the mixture to washed cell monolayers (106 cells per cotransfection assay). After 6 h of incubation at 28°C, the DNA-Lipofectin mixture was removed, the cells were washed twice, overlaid with fresh medium, and incubated at 28°C for 48 h. Total intracellular DNA was purified, and the ability of plasmid DNA to replicate in Sf21 cells was monitored by its differential susceptibility to DpnI digestion as previously described (23). The relative amounts of viral and plasmid DNA present in total intracellular DNA preparations were determined by densitometry of the hybridization signals of calibrated amounts of plasmid and viral DNA in 1 µg of either total intracellular DNA or purified viral DNA by using the public domain computer program NIH Image (version 1.54). In some cases, DNA concentrations were determined by phosphorimaging analysis of Southern blots.

Subcloning of integrated plasmid DNA. About 2 to 3 µg of passage-three (P3)-purified budded virus DNA was digested to completion with MluI, and then the restriction enzyme was inactivated by incubation at 85°C for 20 min. ATP was added to a final concentration of 1 mM, and the mixture was incubated in the presence of T4 DNA ligase for 12 h at 16°C. The ligation products were desalted and then transformed into competent E. coli DH5alpha with an ElectroPorator (Invitrogen) under the conditions recommended by the manufacturer. The transformants were selected in the presence of 100 µg of ampicillin/ml.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Plasmid replication is independent of specific viral sequences. To confirm that superhelical plasmid DNA lacking any baculovirus sequence could replicate in the presence of baculovirus DNA, plasmid pUC18, pBSK-, or pBR322 DNA was cotransfected with viral DNA into Sf21 cells, and total intracellular DNA was analyzed at 48 h postcotransfection by digestion with DpnI. All three plasmids replicated in the presence of viral DNA almost as efficiently as the reporter plasmid carrying an hr (pAchr5) (Fig. 1, lanes 5 to 12). Plasmid replication was dependent upon the presence of viral DNA since pUC19 did not replicate in the absence of viral DNA in the transfection mixture (Fig. 1, lane 3). Because it has been clearly shown that plasmid DNA replication is absolutely dependent upon the presence of certain viral DNA sequences in cis when plasmid transfected cells are postinfected with virions (14), these results suggested that initiation of plasmid DNA replication in cells cotransfected with viral DNA was different than that in infected cells.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.   Relative replication efficiency of plasmid DNA in cotransfected insect cells. Sf21 cells (106) were transfected with 0.5 µg of AcMNPV DNA (lanes 1 and 2) or 0.5 µg of pUC19 DNA (lanes 3 and 4) or were cotransfected with 0.5 µg of AcMNPV DNA plus equal molar equivalents of pAchr5 (lanes 5 and 6), pUC19 (lanes 7 and 8), pBSK- (lanes 9 and 10), or pBR322 (lanes 11 and 12) DNA. Total intracellular DNA was purified at 48 h posttransfection and digested with EcoRI (DpnI-) or EcoRI plus DpnI (DpnI+). After electrophoresis, the DNA fragments were transferred to a Qiagen nylon membrane and hybridized with 32P-labeled pUC18 DNA. The positions of marker DNA (sizes in kilobases) are indicated on the left of the blot.

To exclude the possible involvement of hr in the replication of plasmid DNA following cotransfection, pUC18Delta E (a pUC18-based plasmid in which the EcoRI site was deleted) was tested in similar cotransfection experiments. The replicated pUC18Delta E DNA was resistant to EcoRI digestion, indicating that acquisition of an hr sequence (which would contain 1 to 8 EcoRI sites) by recombination had not occurred (data not shown). The possible involvement of other viral sequences in the replication of pUC18Delta E was examined by digestion of the total intracellular DNA with HindIII, PstI, SmaI, or BamHI. These enzymes were chosen because each would linearize pUC18Delta E into a unit-length 2.7-kb fragment. When digested with DpnI plus any one of these enzymes, the replicated plasmid DNA did not reveal any detectable changes either in the restriction fragment pattern or DNA size (data not shown). Taken together, these results indicate that specific viral sequences on plasmids were not required for the initiation process in cotransfected cells but viral genomic DNA was required for replication of the plasmid DNA. We confirmed that cotransfection of plasmids containing viral sequences coding for baculovirus replication genes including ie-1, p143, dnapol, lef-1, lef-2, lef-3, p35, ie-2, and pe38 was sufficient for replication of pUC19 DNA (data not shown) as has been shown for replication of hr-containing plasmids (13).

Structure of the replicated plasmid DNA in cotransfected cells. It has been suggested that baculovirus may use a rolling-circle mechanism to replicate its genome because plasmids containing hr replicated into high-molecular-weight concatemers in virus-infected cells (22) and multimers of viral DNA have been detected in virus-infected cells (29). In order to determine whether these criteria extended to plasmids that did not carry any viral sequences, we studied the structure of the replicated plasmid DNA by restriction digestion of total intracellular DNA from cells cotransfected with pUC19 and viral DNA. HindIII or PstI digested the replicated plasmid DNA (DpnI resistant) into a 2.7-kb fragment that comigrated with the EcoRI-digested input pUC19 (Fig. 2A, lanes 3 to 5 [left]). When digested with only DpnI, the replicated plasmid DNA migrated to the position of high-molecular-weight DNA, similar in size to undigested viral genomic DNA (Fig. 2A, lane 6 [left]). Because these gels were not capable of resolving large DNA molecules, the comigration of high-molecular-weight plasmid DNA and viral DNA was confirmed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (data not shown). In comparison, undigested input plasmid DNA migrated as supercoiled and relaxed forms when undigested (Fig. 2A, lane 2 [left]) or as small fragments when completely digested with DpnI (data not shown). These results suggest that the plasmid DNA was replicated into high-molecular-weight concatemers. To confirm this hypothesis, total intracellular DNA was completely digested with DpnI and partially digested with SmaI (Fig. 2B). Distinct fragments of 2.7, 5.4, 8.1, and 10.7 kb as well as a high-molecular-weight smear were detected, indicating that multimers of replicated plasmid DNA were formed during replication (Fig. 2B). Quantification of the hybridization signals obtained from calibrated amounts of purified plasmid and viral DNA in 1 µg of cellular DNA revealed that for every microgram of viral DNA, there was 400 to 500 pg of replicated plasmid DNA in the cotransfected cells.


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.   Replicated plasmid in cotransfected Sf21 cells exists as high-molecular-weight DNA. (A) Sf21 cells were transfected with 0.5 µg of AcMNPV DNA (lane 1), 0.5 µg of pUC19 DNA (lanes 2 and 3), or cotransfected with 0.5 µg of AcMNPV and pUC19 DNA (lanes 4 to 9). Total intracellular DNA was purified at 48 h postcotransfection and digested with DpnI plus HindIII (D+H, lane 4), DpnI plus PstI (D+P, lane 5), DpnI alone (D, lane 6), DpnI plus NotI (D+N, lane 7), DpnI plus EagI (D+Ea, lane 8), or DpnI plus MluI (D+M, lane 9). One microgram of purified, undigested input AcMNPV DNA (U, lane 1), 200 pg of undigested pUC19 DNA (U, lane 2), or 200 pg of pUC19 DNA digested with EcoRI (E, lane 3) were included as controls. After electrophoresis, DNA samples were blotted and probed with 32P-labeled pUC18 DNA (left). After the exposure shown on the left, the membrane was stripped and reprobed with 32P-labeled AcMNPV DNA to confirm the positions of viral DNA fragments (right). The positions of marker DNA (sizes in kilobases) are indicated between the blots. (B) Total intracellular DNA, purified at 48 h posttransfection from cells cotransfected with 0.5 µg of AcMNPV DNA and 0.5 µg of pUC19 DNA, was completely digested with DpnI (lane 1) and then partially digested with increasing amounts of SmaI (lanes 2 to 9). The fragments were separated by electrophoresis and then blotted and probed as described in the legend for Fig. 1. The positions of size markers (kilobases) are indicated on the left of the blot while the positions of various forms of concatenated plasmid DNA are indicated on the right.

Integration of replicated plasmid DNA into viral genomes. The presence of DpnI-resistant plasmid DNA, in the absence of digestion with any other enzymes, comigrating with undigested viral genomic DNA (Fig. 2A, lane 6) suggested that some pUC19 DNA molecules might be integrated into the viral genome. To test this possibility, total intracellular DNA from cotransfected cells was digested with DpnI and NotI, EagI, or MluI (enzymes that digest viral genomic DNA but not pUC19 DNA). If replicated pUC19 DNA was integrated, digestion of viral DNA would release fragments carrying plasmid DNA and the released DNA would have a different size than its integrated form. On the other hand, if the replicated plasmid DNA was not covalently integrated, digestion of viral DNA would not affect the mobility of pUC19 DNA. The results revealed that the replicated plasmid DNA migrated as a smear ranging from about 6 to more than 20 kb after digestion with NotI or from 4 to 19 kb when digested with EagI or MluI (Fig. 2A, lanes 7 to 9). These results suggest that significant amounts of replicated plasmid DNA were integrated into the viral genomic DNA. Since no particular band of plasmid DNA was detected after digestion, either the integration occurred at multiple sites around the viral genome or the integrated pUC19 DNA existed in different sizes or both.

If replicated plasmid DNA was integrated into viral DNA, then this DNA might be packaged with the viral genomic DNA into progeny virions. To test this possibility, budded virus released from cells cotransfected with viral plus pUC19 DNA was harvested and serially passaged undiluted or at different multiplicities of infection (MOI, 0.01 to 10). Budded virus DNA from each passage was purified and analyzed for the presence of plasmid DNA. A 2.7-kb fragment was detected in all viral DNA samples following digestion with SmaI (Fig. 3, lanes 3 to 11), indicating the presence and retention of the pUC19 DNA within the progeny virions. In addition, a smear of high-molecular-weight DNA appeared in each lane of the digested viral DNA, suggesting fragments of pUC19 DNA were also linked to viral DNA after SmaI digestion. The results of experiments where an hr5-containing plasmid (pAchr5) was cotransfected with viral DNA were similar (Fig. 3, lanes 12), confirming that replication of plasmid DNA was not dependent upon the presence of any specific viral sequences on the plasmid.


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.   Detection of replicated plasmid DNA in progeny budded virus particles. Sf21 cells (106) were cotransfected with 0.5 µg of AcMNPV DNA plus 0.5 µg of pUC19 DNA (lanes 3 to 11) or pAchr5 (lane 12). Progeny virions were harvested at 72 h postcotransfection (lanes 3 and 12). The supernatant from the pUC19-transfected cells was serially passaged undiluted four times (lanes 4 to 7) or passaged with different amounts of viruses (lanes 8 to 11). Budded virions from each passage supernatant were purified by sucrose gradient centrifugation, and the virion DNA was purified and doubly digested with SmaI plus DpnI (lanes 3 to 12). Following agarose gel electrophoresis, the fragments were blotted onto a Qiagen nylon membrane and hybridized with 32P-labeled pUC18 probe. The positions (in kilobases) of SmaI-digested pUC18 (lanes 1) and pAchr5 (lane 2) DNA, included as the molecular weight markers and hybridization controls, are indicated on the left. The arrows on the right indicate the positions of SmaI-linearized plasmid DNA (pUC19 or pAchr5) contained in the viral DNA and the fragments of the digested pUC19 or pAchr5 DNA likely covalently linked to viral DNA (high-molecular-weight DNA).

A series of restriction digestions and Southern blotting analyses of P3 virion DNA further supported the hypothesis that plasmid DNA was integrated into the viral genome. Digestion with EcoRI, HindIII, or PstI generated a 2.7-kb plasmid band plus a smear of high-molecular-weight DNA fragments (Fig. 4, lanes 4 to 6 [left]). As discussed above, digestion with NotI, EagI, or MluI revealed that all the replicated plasmid DNA formed smears of high-molecular-weight DNA fragments on the gel (Fig. 4, lanes 8 to 10 [left]). Furthermore, when digested with Sse8387I, a restriction enzyme that specifically cuts pUC19 but not viral DNA, plasmid DNA was resolved into a 2.7-kb fragment plus a high-molecular-weight DNA band comigrating with the undigested viral DNA (Fig. 4, lane 11 [left]). If isolated from the viral DNA, the plasmid DNA would have been resolved into only the 2.7-kb fragment. Therefore, the appearance of high-molecular-weight DNA hybridizing with plasmid DNA indicated the presence of integrated copies of plasmid sequences. The sensitivity of this high-molecular-weight DNA to MluI digestion confirmed that it consisted of both viral (MluI-sensitive) and plasmid (hybridization with pUC19 DNA) sequences (Fig. 4, lane 12 [left]). Probing the Southern blots with AcMNPV DNA confirmed the presence of the expected viral DNA fragments in each restriction digestion (Fig. 4, right). When the structure of the integrated plasmid DNA was further examined by partial digestion with SmaI under the same conditions as described in the legend for Fig. 2B, products of 2.7, 5.4, and 8.1 kb were detected (data not shown), confirming the presence of integrated concatemers of plasmid sequences in genomic DNA. Quantification of the hybridization signals obtained from calibrated amounts of purified plasmid and viral DNA revealed that for every microgram of virion DNA, there was 50 to 100 pg of replicated plasmid DNA.


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4.   Conformation of plasmid DNA packaged into budded virions. P3 budded virions from serially passaged virus stocks originally obtained from cells cotransfected with pUC19 and AcMNPV DNA were purified, and the virus DNA was isolated. Samples of undigested virion DNA (U, lane 6) or virion DNA digested with EcoRI (E, lane 4) HindIII (H, lane 5), PstI (P, lane 6) NotI (N, lane 8), EagI (Ea, lane 9), MluI (M, lane 10), Sse8387I (Se, lane 11), or Sse8387I plus MluI (Se+M, lane 12) were resolved on agarose gels and Southern blots were prepared. Controls included undigested purified AcMNPV DNA (AcMNPV, lane 1) and undigested pUC19 DNA (U, lane 2) or pUC19 DNA digested with EcoRI (E, lane 3). The blots were first probed with pUC19 DNA (left) and then stripped and reprobed with AcMNPV DNA (right).

Sequence of integration junction sites. These data clearly demonstrated that plasmid sequences had integrated into the viral genome because of coreplication. To investigate the location and specificity of the integration site(s) on the AcMNPV genome, we developed a strategy to clone regions of viral DNA which contained junctions between viral and plasmid DNA. P3 virion DNA (Fig. 3, lane 5) was digested with MluI, which restricted viral but not pUC19 DNA (Fig. 4, lane 10), to release DNA fragments including those potentially carrying plasmid DNA. The digestion fragments were treated with T4 DNA ligase and selected for the presence of plasmid DNA by transforming E. coli DH5alpha cells. Any fragments retaining the ampicillin resistance gene and the plasmid origin of replication were selected in the presence of ampicillin. Fifty recombinant colonies were selected, and the plasmid DNAs were purified and mapped by digestion with HpaII to localize the viral insert within the remaining plasmid sequences (Fig. 5). By comparison with pUC19 cut with HpaII, 22 of the 50 clones revealed a single missing (or possibly shifted) HpaII fragment (4 were missing A, 4 were missing B, 4 were missing C, 8 were missing D, and 2 were missing H). Another three clones were missing two bands, either the HpaII A and D (pM5), B and H (pM7), or D and H (pM25) bands. Therefore, in these clones, the junction sites between pUC19 DNA and AcMNPV DNA were likely located within these specific regions of pUC19. The junction sites for the other 25 clones could not be determined by this approach because no obvious changes in the HpaII fragment patterns were detected. It is likely that the integrated plasmid DNA in these clones was multimeric, resulting in multiple copies of all HpaII fragments obscuring the presence of viral DNA in a specific HpaII fragment region.


View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5.   Restriction mapping of recombinant plasmids with HpaII digestion. Purified P3 viral DNA carrying integrated plasmid DNA was digested with MluI, treated with T4 DNA ligase, and transformed into DH5alpha cells to selectively amplify viral sequences carrying pUC19 DNA. Recombinant clones were selected in the presence of ampicillin, and purified plasmid DNA from these clones was digested with HpaII and separated on 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels. The migration positions and the relative sizes of pUC19 HpaII fragments are indicated on the left and right, respectively. The missing HpaII fragment(s) detected in each lane, indicating the location of an insertion of viral DNA, is shown at the bottom of each figure for certain clones.

Four different sequencing primers including standard pUC forward (pUC19, nucleotides [nt] 364 to 386) and reverse (pUC19, nt 500 to 478) primers and two other oligonucleotide primers (pUC19, nt 1035 to 1015; pUC19, nt 2 to 22) were used to identify the two junction sites between plasmid DNA and viral DNA on seven clones (pM2, pM3, pM8, pM12, pM20, pM27, and pM46) (Fig. 6A). The nonplasmid DNA sequences were compared with the complete AcMNPV sequence (2) to identify the exact locations where the plasmid-viral DNA junctions occurred. In most cases, the plasmid sequences were followed immediately by AcMNPV genomic DNA from either the plus or the minus strand. In pM2, pM12, and pM20, the two ends of the plasmid DNA were linked with regions of viral DNA separated by 15 to 50 kb, suggesting that the integration of plasmid resulted in the deletion of large genomic regions. In pM3, pM8, and pM27, the orientation and sequence of the viral DNA with respect to the plasmid sequences suggested that viral genomic fragments, ranging from 10 to 32 kb, were linked to plasmid DNA. If only one copy of the plasmid DNA was present in the original chimera, these molecules would represent defective genomes that had been packaged into virions. In pM46, the two junction sites were located at viral nucleotides 128746 and 74046, but the sequences in both regions were in the plus-strand direction of the viral genome. Because the DNA was sequenced from two different directions with the primers M13F and R1015, a portion of the viral sequences within pM46 must have been inverted during recombination although the actual regions of inversion could not be predicated from the sequence data.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 6.   DNA sequence analysis of the junction sites between pUC19 and AcMNPV DNA. (A) The HpaII map of pUC19 is shown at the top, and below are maps of recombinant plasmids that were predicted to carry viral inserts. Downward arrowheads indicate the approximate locations of viral inserts on these plasmids. The dashed lines indicate regions that were sequenced to determine the junction sites between pUC19 and viral DNA. Arrows indicate the specific primers and directions of the sequencing reactions. (B) Each nucleotide sequence is presented as a continuous sequence in the direction of 5' to 3' from either end of a specific insert. The name of each plasmid and the corresponding primers used for sequencing are indicated at the beginning of the sequence. pUC19 sequences are in italics, and viral DNA sequences are underlined. The numbers above the sequences indicate the nucleotide positions on pUC19 (43) or the AcMNPV genome (2). The bold letters represent insertion elements that do not align with either pUC19 or viral DNA sequences. The numbers between slashes represent numbers of continuous nucleotides which are not shown due to space limits.

Comparison of the sequences at the integration sites did not reveal any consensus insertion sequence, and no obvious homology was found between the pUC19 and AcMNPV DNA in the vicinity of any of the junction sites (Fig. 6B). Short sequences of unidentified origin were found inserted between the plasmid and viral DNA in pM8, pM12, pM20, and pM27 (Fig. 6B). Cloning and sequencing of the junction sites from eight more plasmids with primer M13F or M13R did not reveal any consensus or homologous sequences at the junction regions (Fig. 6B). Other short DNA sequences of unknown origin were inserted at the junction between the plasmid and viral DNA on some of these clones (pM7, pM9, pM22, pM25, and pM38). In general, these inserts varied between 2 and 116 nt in length and were 68 to 90% A+T.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In this report, we confirm previous reports that plasmids, when cotransfected with baculovirus DNA into insect cells, can replicate even when no putative viral origin of DNA replication in cis is present on the plasmid (11, 13, 17). These data are in full agreement with our previous results which demonstrated that nonspecific plasmid replication took place even in the presence of virus infection, if the infection occurred within about 4 h of plasmid transfection (42). In addition, our data are consistent with previous observations that the baculovirus DNA replication machinery supported the replication of plasmids carrying the simian virus 40 (SV40) origin in infected insect cells expressing the large T antigen (25). Apparently, when SV40 T antigen was synthesized, it recognized the SV40 origin on plasmid DNA, and replication, coupled with recombination, occurred in the presence of the baculovirus replication machinery. Together, these data suggest that during the early period of baculovirus infection, input DNA may be compartmentalized in a manner that could allow nonspecific initiation to occur on any naked DNA once the viral proteins for DNA replication are synthesized and transported to these nuclear sites.

The replicated plasmid DNA detected in our experiments was concatenated, could be integrated into viral genomes at multiple locations with no particular sequence specificity, and was packaged with viral genomic DNA into budded virions. This extends previous studies where hr-directed virus-dependent plasmid DNA replication revealed concatemer formation of plasmid DNA following replication but without any evidence of integration or packaging of plasmid DNA (22). Our data are consistent with a rolling-circle mechanism for replication of plasmid molecules resulting in the formation of multimeric molecules that then could be integrated into the viral genome. These multimeric inserts could also be formed either by plasmid-plasmid recombination followed by integration into a viral genome or by unequal crossing-over between two AcMNPV genomes that already contained plasmid inserts. Homology-independent packaging of head-to-tail multimers of pBR322 DNA into T4 phage particles has been detected by a transduction assay (37). Transduction of pBR322 did not occur when recombination-negative mutants were used, suggesting that recombination was required for this process to occur. The homology-independent packaging detected in our experiments was probably the result of illegitimate recombination between plasmid DNA and one or more sites on the AcMNPV genome. Because the only viral gene products required for replication and integration of plasmid DNA were those also essential for viral DNA replication (data not shown), the same minimal set of virus-encoded enzymes function during both recombination and replication, although cellular enzymes such as topoisomerases, ligase, and nucleases are probably involved in these two processes.

By comparing the percentages of the replicated plasmid DNA contained in progeny virions with the amounts found in the cotransfected cells, the incorporation rate of replicated plasmid DNA into virions was estimated to be 10 to 25% of the total replicated plasmid DNA. Although it is possible that some of the plasmid DNA was packaged into virion-like particles without integration, the presence of integrated plasmid DNA suggests a high degree of involvement of illegitimate recombination during DNA replication supported by the baculovirus replication machinery. These data are consistent with observations that the bacterial transposon Tn5, when inserted into the baculovirus genome as an indicator for recombination, exhibits high levels of Tn5 inversion (26). Our results suggest that while baculovirus may use a rolling-circle mode to replicate its DNA, resulting in concatemeric DNA as shown for the replicated plasmid DNA, recombination is also involved. This is reminiscent of herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA replication where, although concatemeric forms of replicated viral DNA can be easily detected, newly replicated viral DNA is composed of highly branched, complex networks (3, 33, 44). Thus, there is increasing evidence to show that the successful growth of large DNA viruses such as T4 and herpes simplex virus requires both DNA replication and recombination (28, 39). Our data suggest that recombination also plays an important role during baculovirus replication.

Analysis of the integration sites revealed that plasmid DNA was linked with different regions of the viral DNA, some of which were separated by as much as 50 kb. These data suggest that nonhomologous recombination between plasmid DNA and viral DNA could lead to deletion of large portions of the viral genome and possible amplification of multimers of plasmid DNA. If there are certain limits to the amount of DNA that can be packaged within the virion, the packaging of concatenated plasmid DNA might be limited by its ultimate length and the presence of specific packaging signals. The genomes of some defective baculoviruses contain large deletions of the viral genome (5, 18), although the arrangement of this DNA within virions has not been investigated. A similar mechanism of nonhomologous recombination could be responsible for the generation of these defective genomes in both cases. Our data also suggest that integration is unlikely to rely on any specific target sequence since no particular pattern of sequence was observed at any of the junction sites analyzed, either on the plasmid or the viral DNA. These results support the concept that the integration of plasmid DNA into the viral genome is a result of random nonhomologous recombination.

Plasmid replication, recombination, and integration in cotransfected cells may suggest a way by which baculoviruses have acquired nonhomologous DNA sequences from host cells during evolution and may also account for the differences in gene content among various baculovirus species (19). For instance, the viral genes encoding proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and ubiquitin may derive from the cellular homologues by such a mechanism. It has been clearly shown that cellular repeated sequences have inserted into the AcMNPV 25K gene region at a high frequency, generating few polyhedra (FP) mutants (4, 10). In this case, the 25K gene mutations were easily detectable because of obvious changes in polyhedron morphogenesis. If more selection markers were available, more integration events would likely be revealed. For example, in the polyhedra morphology mutant M5, two identical host cellular repetitive sequences of 290 bp were found inserted at the 2.6 and 46 map unit regions (5). These results suggest that cellular sequences as well as plasmid sequences can insert at multiple locations in the viral genome.

The insertion elements contained in the clones pM9, pM22, and pM25 as well as pM7 aligned with sequences from different organisms including humans, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and yeast. Some of these aligned sequences were repeated sequences, such as telomeric-repeat-like internal eliminated sequence (12), or sequences from mitochondrial DNA (8), suggesting but not proving that these unknown insertion sequences were likely derived from the host insect cells. Insertion of unknown sequences has also been observed in the genome of defective viruses (5, 18). The integration of certain cellular sequences may supply an evolutionary advantage to baculoviruses replication. Our results suggest that the baculovirus DNA replication mechanism can be promiscuous in template choice and/or recombination partners. The fact that cotransfected DNA was replicated and integrated into the viral genome could also explain the occurrence of unstable recombinant baculoviruses that cannot be plaque purified, for example while trying to identify essential viral genes by gene insertion (24). Our results are also relevant to the safety aspect of using genetically engineered baculoviruses as biopesticides or delivery vectors for gene therapy since many of these agents are constructed by cotransfection of viral and plasmid DNAs. In addition, if cellular homologues of oncogenes or retrovirus-like repeated sequences integrated into the genome of baculoviruses during scale-up, these elements might be persistently maintained in the population of viruses as demonstrated in this study. The implications and consequences of the integration of these foreign elements would certainly deserve close attention.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Richard Casselman for technical assistance and Joyce Wilson and Renée Lapointe for their valuable discussions.

This research was supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC) of Canada. Yuntao Wu was supported by funds from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3Y6, Canada. Phone: (613) 533-2463. Fax: (613) 533-6796. E-mail: carstens{at}post.queensu.ca.

dagger Present address: Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Animal Disease Research Institute, Nepean, Ontario K2H 8P9, Canada.

Dagger Present address: Laboratory of Viral Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Ahrens, C. H., D. J. Leisy, and G. F. Rohrmann. 1996. Baculovirus DNA replication, p. 855-872. In M. L. DePamphilis (ed.), DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
2. Ayres, M. D., S. C. Howard, J. Kuzio, M. Lopez-Ferber, and R. D. Possee. 1994. The complete DNA sequence of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Virology 202:586-605[Medline].
3. Bataille, D., and A. L. Epstein. 1995. Herpes simplex virus type 1 replication and recombination. Biochimie 77:787-795[Medline].
4. Bauser, C. A., T. A. Elick, and M. J. Fraser. 1996. Characterization of hitchhiker, a transposon insertion frequently associated with baculovirus FP mutants derived upon passage in the TN-368 cell line. Virology 216:235-237[Medline].
5. Carstens, E. B. 1987. Identification and nucleotide sequence of the regions of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus genome carrying insertion elements from Spodoptera frugiperda. Virology 161:8-17[Medline].
6. Carstens, E. B., S. T. Tjia, and W. Doerfler. 1980. Infectious DNA from Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Virology 101:311-314.
7. Cochran, M. A., and P. Faulkner. 1983. Location of homologous DNA sequences interspersed at five regions of the baculovirus AcMNPV genome. J. Virol. 45:961-970[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. de Zamaroczy, M., and G. Bernardi. 1986. The primary structure of the mitochondrial genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae---a review. Gene 47:155-177[Medline].
9. Erlandson, M. A., P. Skepasts, J. Kuzio, and E. B. Carstens. 1984. Genomic variants of a temperature-sensitive mutant of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus containing specific reiterations of viral DNA. Virus Res. 1:565-584.
10. Fraser, M. J., G. E. Smith, and M. D. Summers. 1983. Acquisition of host cell DNA sequences by baculoviruses: relationship between host DNA insertions and FP mutants of Autographa californica and Galleria mellonella nuclear polyhedrosis viruses. J. Virol. 47:287-300[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Guarino, L. A., and M. D. Summers. 1988. Functional mapping of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus genes required for late gene expression. J. Virol. 62:463-471[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Klobutcher, L. A. 1995. Developmentally excised DNA sequences in Euplotes crassus capable of forming G quartets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:1979-1983[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Kool, M., C. H. Ahrens, R. W. Goldbach, G. F. Rohrmann, and J. M. Vlak. 1994. Identification of genes involved in DNA replication of the Autographa californica baculovirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:11212-11216[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Kool, M., C. H. Ahrens, J. M. Vlak, and G. F. Rohrmann. 1995. Replication of baculovirus DNA. J. Gen. Virol. 76:2103-2118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Kool, M., R. W. Goldbach, and J. M. Vlak. 1994. A putative non-hr origin of DNA replication in the HindIII-K fragment of Autographa californica multiple nucleocapsid nuclear polyhedrosis virus. J. Gen. Virol. 75:3345-3352[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Kool, M., J. T. M. Voeten, R. W. Goldbach, J. Tramper, and J. M. Vlak. 1993. Identification of seven putative origins of Autographa californica multiple nucleocapsid nuclear polyhedrosis virus DNA replication. J. Gen. Virol. 74:2661-2668[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Kool, M., J. T. M. Voeten, R. W. Goldbach, and J. M. Vlak. 1994. Functional mapping of regions of the Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis viral genome required for DNA replication. Virology 198:680-689[Medline].
18. Kool, M., J. W. Voncken, F. L. J. Van Lier, J. Tramper, and J. M. Vlak. 1991. Detection and analysis of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus mutants with defective interfering properties. Virology 183:739-746[Medline].
19. Kuzio, J., M. N. Pearson, S. H. Harwood, C. J. Funk, J. T. Evans, J. M. Slavicek, and G. F. Rohrmann. 1999. Sequence and analysis of the genome of a baculovirus pathogenic for Lymantria dispar. Virology 253:17-34[Medline].
20. Lee, H., and P. J. Krell. 1994. Reiterated DNA fragments in defective genomes of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus are competent for AcMNPV-dependent DNA replication. Virology 202:418-429[Medline].
21. Lee, H. Y., and P. J. Krell. 1992. Generation and analysis of defective genomes of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus. J. Virol. 66:4339-4347[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Leisy, D. J., and G. F. Rohrmann. 1993. Characterization of the replication of plasmids containing hr sequences in baculovirus-infected Spodoptera frugiperda cells. Virology 196:722-730[Medline].
23. Liu, G., and E. B. Carstens. 1999. Site-directed mutagenesis of the AcMNPV p143 gene: effects on baculovirus DNA replication. Virology 253:125-136[Medline].
24. Lu, A., A. Craig, R. Casselman, and E. B. Carstens. 1996. Nucleotide sequence, insertional mutagenesis, and transcriptional mapping of a conserved region of the baculovirus Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus (map unit 64.8-66.9). Can. J. Microbiol. 42:1267-1273[Medline].
25. Martin, D. W., and P. C. Weber. 1997. Replication of simian virus 40 origin-containing DNA during infection with a recombinant Autographa californica multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus expressing large T antigen. J. Virol. 71:501-506[Abstract].
26. Martin, D. W., and P. C. Weber. 1997. DNA replication promotes high-frequency homologous recombination during Autographa californica multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus infection. Virology 232:300-309[Medline].
27. Miller, L. K. 1993. Baculoviruses: high-level expression in insect cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 3:97-101[Medline].
28. Mosig, G. 1987. The essential role of recombination in phage T4 growth. Annu. Rev. Genet. 21:347-371[Medline].
29. Oppenheimer, D. I., and L. E. Volkman. 1997. Evidence for rolling circle replication of Autographa californica M nucleopolyhedrovirus genomic DNA. Arch. Virol. 142:2107-2113[Medline].
30. Palombo, F., A. Monciotti, A. Recchia, R. Cortese, G. Ciliberto, and N. La Monica. 1998. Site-specific integration in mammalian cells mediated by a new hybrid baculovirus-adeno-associated virus vector. J. Virol. 72:5025-5034[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Pearson, M., R. Bjornson, G. Pearson, and G. Rohrmann. 1992. The Autographa californica baculovirus genome: evidence for multiple replication origins. Science 257:1382-1384[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32. Rodems, S. M., and P. D. Friesen. 1993. The hr5 transcriptional enhancer stimulates early expression from the Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus genome but is not required for virus replication. J. Virol. 67:5776-5785[Abstract/Free Full Text].
33. Severini, A., D. G. Scraba, and D. L. J. Tyrrell. 1996. Branched structures in the intracellular DNA of herpes simplex virus type 1. J. Virol. 70:3169-3175[Abstract].
34. Smith, G. E., M. D. Summers, and M. J. Fraser. 1983. Production of human beta interferon in insect cells infected with a baculovirus expression vector. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3:2156-2165[Abstract/Free Full Text].
35. Summers, M. D., and D. L. Anderson. 1973. Characterization of nuclear polyhedrosis virus DNAs. J. Virol. 12:1336-1346[Abstract/Free Full Text].
36. Summers, M. D., and G. E. Smith. 1987. A manual of methods for baculovirus vectors and insect cell culture procedures. Texas A&M University, College Station.
37. Takahashi, H., and H. Saito. 1982. High-frequency transduction of pBR322 by cytosine-substituted T4 bacteriophage: evidence for encapsulation and transfer of head-to-tail plasmid concatemers. Plasmid 8:29-35[Medline].
38. Tjia, S. T., E. B. Carstens, and W. Doerfler. 1979. Infection of Spodoptera frugiperda cells with Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus. II. The viral DNA and the kinetics of its replication. Virology 99:391-409.
39. Weller, S. K. 1995. Herpes simplex virus DNA replication and genome maturation, p. 189-213. In G. M. Cooper, G. R. Temin, and B. Sugden (ed.), The DNA provirus: Howard Temin's scientific legacy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
40. Wilson, M. E., and L. K. Miller. 1986. Changes in the nucleoprotein complexes of a baculovirus DNA during infection. Virology 151:315-328[Medline].
41. Wood, H. A., and R. R. Granados. 1991. Genetically engineered baculoviruses as agents for pest control. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 45:69-87[Medline].
42. Wu, Y., and E. B. Carstens. 1996. Initiation of baculovirus DNA replication: early promoter regions can function as infection-dependent replicating sequences in a plasmid-based replication assay. J. Virol. 70:6967-6972[Abstract/Free Full Text].
43. Yanisch-Perron, C., J. Vieira, and J. Messing. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33:103-119[Medline].
44. Zhang, X., S. Efstathiou, and A. Simmons. 1994. Identification of novel herpes simplex virus replicative intermediates by field inversion gel electrophoresis: implications for viral DNA amplification strategies. Virology 202:530-539[Medline].

Journal of Virology, July 1999, p. 5473-5480, Vol. 73, No. 7
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Carstens, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Carstens, E. B.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS