Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, July 1999, p. 5448-5458, Vol. 73, No. 7
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Human and Rodent Transcription Elongation Factor P-TEFb:
Interactions with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Tat and
Carboxy-Terminal Domain Substrate
Y.
Ramanathan,
Syed M.
Reza,
Tara M.
Young,
Michael B.
Mathews, and
Tsafi
Pe'ery*
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and
Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey 07103
Received 18 November 1998/Accepted 4 March 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcriptional regulator
Tat increases the efficiency of elongation, and complexes containing
the cellular kinase CDK9 have been implicated in this process. CDK9 is
part of the Tat-associated kinase TAK and of the elongation factor
P-TEFb (positive transcription elongation factor-b), which consists
minimally of CDK9 and cyclin T. TAK and P-TEFb are both able to
phosphorylate the carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II,
but their relationships to one another and to the stimulation of
elongation by Tat are not well characterized. Here we demonstrate that
human cyclin T1 (but not cyclin T2) interacts with the activation
domain of Tat and is a component of TAK as well as of P-TEFb. Rodent
(mouse and Chinese hamster) cyclin T1 is defective in Tat binding and
transactivation, but hamster CDK9 interacts with human cyclin T1 to
give active TAK in hybrid cells containing human chromosome 12. Although TAK is phosphorylated on both serine and threonine residues,
it specifically phosphorylates serine 5 in the CTD heptamer. TAK is
found in the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of human cells as a
large complex (~950 kDa). Magnesium or zinc ions are required for the
association of Tat with the kinase. We suggest a model in which Tat
first interacts with P-TEFb to form the TAK complex that engages with TAR RNA and the elongating transcription complex, resulting in hyperphosphorylation of the CTD on serine 5 residues.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The human immunodeficiency virus
type 1 (HIV-1) regulatory protein Tat, the transactivator of
transcription, dramatically increases the production of viral RNA (for
a review, see reference 26). This effect is
dependent on the transactivation response element (TAR) located
downstream of the promoter in the HIV long terminal repeat (LTR). TAR
is an RNA element, and TAR RNA binds directly to Tat (17,
72). Although Tat may also exert a stimulatory effect on
transcriptional initiation, its predominant effect in vivo appears to
be at the level of transcriptional elongation (42, 46, 47).
In one model, Tat serves to promote the formation of highly processive
RNA polymerase complexes at the HIV LTR. In the absence of Tat,
HIV-directed transcripts tend to terminate prematurely at apparently
random sites (45). This model is supported by experiments
conducted with cell-free transcription systems (28, 44, 50,
51). A unique feature of the stimulation of HIV-directed
transcription in vitro is the observation that it is preferentially
inhibited by
5,6-dichloro-1-
-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB), an
adenosine analogue that targets RNA polymerase II (pol II)-mediated
elongation in vitro and in vivo (5, 51).
Efforts to uncover the mechanism of Tat action have included extensive
searches for cellular components that interact with Tat in vivo and in
vitro. This approach disclosed structural and functional interactions
with several general transcription factors as well as other proteins
with as-yet-unknown roles in transcription (8, 23, 38, 41,
43). Outstanding among these Tat-interacting proteins is a novel
Tat-associated protein kinase, TAK, found by Herrmann and Rice
(35, 36). This kinase is able to phosphorylate the
carboxy-terminal repeat domain (CTD) of pol II and is highly sensitive
to DRB.
The mammalian CTD consists of a series of 52 heptad repeats, YSPTSPS,
located on the large subunit of pol II. It participates in gene
expression at several levels and appears to coordinate the machinery of
transcription and posttranscriptional RNA processing (37, 55,
57). The CTD can be extensively phosphorylated at multiple sites,
predominantly on serine but also on threonine and tyrosine residues
(11). Its phosphorylation plays a dominant role in
transcription regulation: the hyperphosphorylated form of the large
subunit (IIo) is associated with transcription elongation complexes,
while only the hypomodified form (IIa) can assemble into the
preinitiation complex (60). During the transition from initiation to elongation, or soon after, IIa is converted to IIo (10). The role of the CTD in transcription is not entirely
understood, however, and it is possible that more than one round of
phosphorylation is required, perhaps with intervening
dephosphorylation. The CTD is essential for cell viability in yeast and
for transcription from TATA-less promoters in vitro but is nonessential
for TATA-containing promoters in vitro (1, 48, 59, 70). It
is required for Tat transactivation (7, 61, 75).
At least 10 kinases which can phosphorylate the CTD in vitro are known,
and 3 of them have an established connection with the transcription
machinery. These are CDK7/cyclin H, subunits of the CDK-activating
kinase (CAK) complex, which is a subassembly of transcription factor
TFIIH; CDK8/cyclin C, a component of the pol II holoenzyme; and
CDK9/cyclin T, now identified as components of the positive
transcription elongation factor P-TEFb. P-TEFb was first recognized in
Drosophila Kc cell extract as an activity needed to overcome
abortive elongation and allow formation of long transcripts
(53). P-TEFb is distinguished from other transcription factors by its sensitivity to very low doses of DRB (52). It differs from TFIIH, which exhibits less sensitivity to DRB, in that
TFIIH functions in initiation and promoter clearance while P-TEFb has
the attributes of an elongation factor (18, 53, 54, 62).
The possibility that TAK corresponds to human P-TEFb was suggested by
the functional similarity between the stimulation of elongation by Tat
and the shift to productive elongation by P-TEFb. Circumstantial
support for this inference was provided by the observations that both
P-TEFb and TAK are CTD kinases and that low concentrations of DRB
inhibit P-TEFb, TAK, and the Tat effect (35, 51-53).
Conclusive evidence came when Zhu et al. (80) cloned the
catalytic subunit of Drosophila P-TEFb and showed that its
human homologue (PITALRE) is identical to the kinase subunit of TAK.
PITALRE, now called CDK9 (67, 73), was first cloned by
Graña et al. (29) as a CDC2-related kinase of unknown function.
Most of the kinases in this family have cyclin-regulating subunits, and
the cyclin partners of human and Drosophila CDK9 were recently cloned and studied (66). The human cyclins T1, T2a, and T2b were all identified as functional partners of CDK9, and almost
all of the CDK9 in HeLa nuclear extracts is associated with either
cyclin T1 or T2 (67). Cyclin T1 can also bind directly to
the activation domain of Tat (73). Several additional
proteins are also associated with CDK9 in immunocomplexes (24, 78, 80), suggesting that human P-TEFb is a multiprotein complex or
that there are other CDK9-containing complexes in addition to P-TEFb.
It is also likely that Tat binds other factors in addition to
CDK9/cyclin T (79). The gene for human cyclin T1 maps to chromosome 12, and this chromosome is necessary for a strong Tat effect
on transcription from the HIV LTR in mouse and Chinese hamster ovary
(CHO) cells (73). Transfection of CHO and mouse cells with
the cyclin T1 gene overcomes the poor Tat response that was previously
noticed in these cells (73). The species specificity of the
Tat response is also partially complemented in mouse cells harboring
human chromosome 6, but the factor(s) responsible is unknown.
Our study addresses the interaction of CDK9/cyclin T1 with Tat and its
CTD substrate. We demonstrate that human Tat-associated P-TEFb contains
cyclin T1 and that rodent P-TEFb is deficient in binding to Tat. Human
cyclin T1 as part of the P-TEFb complex in CHO cells complements this
deficiency and thus contributes to HIV-1 species specificity. We also
show that human TAK is part of a large complex that phosphorylates
serine 5 in the CTD heptad and is itself phosphorylated on serine and
threonine residues. Our data suggest that TAK and CAK differentially
phosphorylate the CTD substrate.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Materials.
Nucleoside triphosphates were purchased from
Pharmacia-LKB. [
-32P]ATP was obtained from ICN
Pharmaceuticals Inc. Thin-layer cellulose plates were purchased from EM
Science, Gibbstown, N.J. Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride
membrane was from Millipore. CTD3 peptides were synthesized at the
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey Molecular Resource
Facility with an ABI 433A synthesizer and were purified by
high-pressure liquid chromatography on a C18 column.
Affinity-purified anti-CDK9 immunoglobulin G (IgG) (anti-PITALRE-CT)
was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Drosophila RNA
pol II and cyclin T1 and T2 antisera were gifts from D. Price (67,
80).
Cells, plasmids, and viruses.
Rodent-human hybrid cell lines
and the parental human lymphoblast cell line (GM07890) were obtained
from Coriell Cell Repositories, Camden, N.J. Glutathione
S-transferase (GST)-Tat constructs (68) were
obtained from the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, National
Institutes of Health, and from the laboratory of K. Jones (GST-Tat-1K41A). Baculoviruses harboring recombinant CDK7, cyclin H,
and MAT-1 were gifts from D. Morgan (20, 21).
Preparation of cell extracts.
Cell extracts were prepared
essentially as described by Harlow and Lane (31). Cell
monolayers were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and then lysed
for 30 min with occasional rocking by using prechilled EBCD buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 120 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40 [NP-40], 5 mM
dithiothreitol [DTT]) containing 4 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 1 µg (each) of aprotinin,
pepstatin A, and leupeptin per ml. The lysate was centrifuged for 10 min at 2,500 × g, and the supernatant was collected.
Cytoplasmic (S-100) and nuclear extracts were prepared as described by
Dignam et al. (15) except that the dialysis step was omitted
for the cytoplasmic extract. Glycerol was added to 10%, and the
extracts were stored at
80°C. For gel filtration and glycerol
gradient experiments, the nuclear extract was clarified by
centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 30 min in a Beckman
SW 50.1 rotor.
Partial purification of TAK.
TAK purification was as
described previously (80) with an additional chromatographic
step. The peak fractions from the POROS 20 SP column were pooled, and
the KCl concentration was adjusted to 100 mM. The pooled fractions were
loaded on a Reactive Blue (Sigma) column equilibrated with column
buffer (25 mM HEPES [pH 7.6], 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM PMSF, 4 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitors [1 µg
{each} of aprotinin, pepstatin A, and leupeptin per ml])
containing 100 mM KCl. The active fractions were eluted in the same
buffer containing 0.5 to 1 M KCl.
TAK assay.
The production of GST-Tat fusion proteins and the
TAK activity assay were carried out as described by Zhu et al.
(80). For nucleotide usage experiments, unlabeled
nucleotides were added at various concentrations. The gels were dried,
quantified on a Packard Instant Imager, and exposed to X-ray film.
Immunoprecipitation (IP)-kinase assays.
Protein A-Sepharose
beads (Pharmacia) were washed three times with EBCD buffer and
incubated at 4°C for 30 min with anti-CDK9 antibody (0.5 to 1 µg of
IgG/10 µl of packed beads). The beads were washed four times with
EBCD buffer containing 0.2 mM PMSF, incubated for 1 h with cell
extract at 4°C, washed five times with EBCD containing 0.03% sodium
dodecyl sulfate, and subjected to a kinase assay as described
previously (80).
Western blot analysis.
Proteins from polyacrylamide gels
were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes by using the semidry
transfer protocol (4). The membranes were blocked for 1 h with blocking buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 7.6], 150 mM NaCl, 2.3%
low-fat milk, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, 0.5% NP-40, 0.05% Tween 20)
and incubated for 4 to 6 h at room temperature or overnight at
4°C with primary antibody. This was followed by three 10-min washes
with TBST (20 mM Tris [pH 7.6], 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) and
incubation for 20 min with blocking buffer. Secondary antibody (Bio-Rad
goat anti-rabbit IgG-horseradish peroxidase conjugate) was added to
the blocking buffer at a 1:3,000 dilution, and the membranes were
incubated for an additional hour. After three 15-min washes with TBST,
membranes were reacted with chemiluminescence reagent (NEN Life Science Products) and exposed to Kodak Biomax film.
EDTA-Mg experiments.
EDTA was added to 293 cell S-100
fractions (15 µl [225 µg of protein]) to a final concentration of
5 or 10 mM in a total volume of 100 µl of EBCD buffer containing 0.2 mM PMSF. After incubation at room temperature for 5 to 30 min,
MgCl2 was added to a final concentration of 10 or 20 mM.
The samples were incubated for an additional 5 to 30 min at room
temperature, after which they were added to 50 µl of beads containing
GST-Tat48
in EBCD buffer without magnesium; this was followed by the
standard TAK assay. Thus, the final concentrations of MgCl2
and EDTA were two-thirds of those specified.
Phosphoamino acid analysis.
Phosphoamino acid analysis was
performed essentially as described by Ausubel et al. (4).
Briefly, phosphorylated peptide and CDK9 were transferred from gels to
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, hydrolyzed in 6 M HCl, dried in a
vacuum, and resuspended in 2 to 5 µl of water. In some experiments,
the membranes were treated with alkali before acid hydrolysis. A
portion of the digest containing 1,000 to 5,000 cpm was spotted on a
cellulose thin-layer chromatography plate, and 1 µl of a solution
containing about 1 µg of each unlabeled phosphoamino acid was spotted
as a reference. The amino acids were resolved by two-dimensional
electrophoresis (HTLE 7000; CBS Scientific). The amino acid standards
were visualized by ninhydrin staining, and 32P-labeled
amino acids were detected by autoradiography and quantified with a
Packard Instant Imager.
Expression of recombinant CDK7 complexes and preparation of Sf9
cell extracts.
Monolayers of Sf9 insect cells (2 × 107 cells) were infected with recombinant baculoviruses
harboring the gene for CDK7 or cyclin H or with a mixture of viruses
encoding the CAK complex (CDK7, cyclin H, and MAT-1) at a multiplicity
of infection of 5 to 10 PFU/cell. Two days after infection, the cells
were lysed in hypotonic buffer (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, and 1 µg of leupeptin per ml), NaCl was added to
a 150 mM final concentration, and the lysates were clarified by centrifugation.
Fractionation of cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts.
Nuclear
or cytoplasmic extracts were diluted into 0.5 ml of HKMEG column
running buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.6], 150 mM KCl, 4 mM
MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 0.01% NP-40, 0.1 mM
PMSF, 1 mM DTT, 1 µg [each] of aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin
A per ml) and applied to a 45-ml column of Sephacryl S-300 Superfine (Pharmacia) equilibrated in the same buffer. The void volume was determined by using blue dextran, the column was calibrated by using
the high-molecular-mass marker kit from Sigma (MW GF-100), and the
molecular masses of complexes were determined by extrapolation. Fractions (0.5 ml) were collected at flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Glycerol
gradient ultracentrifugation was carried out in 4 ml of a 20 to 50%
glycerol gradient in HKMEG buffer. Nuclear or cytoplasmic extracts (3 mg of protein) were diluted into 0.2 ml of HKMEG and loaded on the
gradient. An identical gradient was loaded with high-molecular-weight
marker proteins, and both gradients were centrifuged at 45,000 rpm for
18 h in a Beckman SW 50.1 rotor. Fractions (0.1 ml) were collected
by pumping from the bottom of each tube.
 |
RESULTS |
Association of CTD kinase with HIV-1 Tat.
The Tat-associated
kinase TAK binds to full-length Tat (Tat86), first-exon Tat (Tat72), or
its activation domain (Tat48
) and hyperphosphorylates a model
substrate, GST-CTD (35). We used the TAK assay, a GST-Tat
pull-down kinase assay, to examine the interactions of TAK with its
substrates and different GST-Tat fusion proteins. Figure
1A shows that TAK phosphorylates intact pol II (lane 7), as well as a synthetic peptide, CTD3
[ACS(YSPTSPS)3KK], containing three copies of the CTD
heptad (lanes 1 and 3). TAK binding requires all three regions of the
activation domain and is abolished by mutations in the cysteine-rich
region (Tat48
Cys22) (lanes 2 and 8), the core region (Tat86Lys41)
(lane 4), and the N terminus (80).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Specificity of CTD phosphorylation by TAK/P-TEFb. (A)
Detection of TAK activity with CTD3 and RNA pol II substrates. The
indicated GST-Tat or GST-Tat mutant fusion proteins (lanes 1 to 4, 7, and 8) were used to isolate TAK from cytoplasmic fractions of 293 cells
by the GST pull-down procedure. For comparison, IP-kinase assays were
conducted with immunoprecipitates prepared with anti-CDK9 or control
antibodies (lanes 5 and 6, respectively). Kinase reaction mixtures
contained 13.5 µg of CTD3 (lanes 1 to 6) or 20 ng of purified
Drosophila RNA pol II (lanes 7 and 8) as the substrate. (B)
CTD3 phosphorylation by TAK eluted from immunoprecipitated CDK9
complexes. The immunoprecipitates were washed extensively, and
complexes were eluted for 18 h with the indicated amounts of CDK9
C-terminal peptide. The eluate was subjected to TAK assay, and the
supernatant was examined by gel electrophoresis and autoradiography.
The control was the standard TAK assay with 293 cell S100 and
GST-Tat48 . (C) Detection of CDK9 in the eluates after binding to
GST-Tat48 beads. The proteins bound to the beads in panel B were
examined by Western blotting with anti-CDK9 antibody.
|
|
We showed recently that CDK9 (PITALRE) binds to GST-Tat48

and is the
only CTD kinase present in TAK (
74,
80). TAK activity
can be
depleted from cell extracts by treatment with immobilized
anti-CDK9
antibody (
74,
80) or GST-Tat48

. CTD3 is also specifically
phosphorylated by CDK9 complexes isolated by immunoprecipitation
from
HeLa cell nuclear extract (
80) or 293 cell cytoplasmic
extract (Fig.
1A, lanes 5 and 6). To determine whether these complexes
contain all of the components necessary for association with Tat,
the
immune complexes were eluted with CDK9 C-terminal peptide
and assayed
for TAK activity. Increasing concentrations of the
antigenic peptide
released corresponding levels of TAK activity,
measured by
phosphorylation of CTD3 (Fig.
1B, lanes 2 to 4), and
CDK9 protein,
revealed by Western blotting of the proteins bound
to the GST-Tat48

beads (Fig.
1C, lanes 2 to 4). Thus, the immunoprecipitated
CDK9-containing complexes possess the ability to bind the Tat
activation domain and phosphorylate the CTD
heptad.
Species specificity of the interaction between Tat and CDK9/cyclin
T-containing complexes.
TAK activity is found in human HeLa and
293 cell extracts (36, 80) and Jurkat lymphocyte extracts
(our unpublished data) as well as in monkey (COS) cell extracts
(36). Since neither hamster nor mouse cells support
efficient Tat transactivation (58), we examined CHO and 3T3
cell extracts for TAK activity. Figure 2A
shows that extracts prepared from 3T3 and CHO cells (lanes 4 and 5)
gave rise to greatly reduced levels of CTD3 phosphorylation compared to
293, HeLa, and COS cell extracts (lanes 1 to 3). Kinase assays
demonstrated that the diminished TAK activity of the rodent cell
extracts correlated with very poor phosphorylation of CDK9 bound to the
GST-Tat48
beads (Fig. 2A, lanes 1 to 5) despite the presence of
comparable levels of CDK9 in the extracts, as shown by Western blotting
(Fig. 2C, lanes 1 to 5). Mixing experiments, in which increasing
amounts of CHO cell extracts were added to 293 cell extracts, ruled out
the possibility that the CHO extracts contain an inhibitor of TAK
activity (data not shown). Furthermore, CDK9 immunoprecipitated from
rodent cell extract phosphorylated CTD3 with an efficiency similar to
that of human CDK9 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 2D), demonstrating that
rodent cells have active CDK9 complexes. Thus, the species specificity
must be conferred by another component of these complexes.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
TAK in CHO-human hybrid cell extracts. (A) CTD3
phosphorylation by TAK pulled down from different cell extracts: human
(293, HeLa, and GM07890), monkey (COS), rodent (3T3 and CHO), and the
rodent-human hybrids CHO(6) and CHO(12). (B) Western blotting of
proteins bound to GST-Tat48 beads from the indicated cell extracts
by using anti-CDK9 and anti-cyclin T1 antibodies. (C) Western blot
analysis of proteins in unfractionated cell extracts with the same
antibodies as in panel B. (D) IP-kinase assays conducted with the same
cell extracts with CTD3 as the substrate.
|
|
Human chromosome 12, and to a lesser extent human chromosome 6, can
complement the defect in CHO and mouse cells that precludes
efficient
Tat transactivation in these cells (
58). To determine
whether these human chromosomes also restore TAK activity to CHO
cell
extracts, we assayed cell extracts from the CHO-human cell
hybrids
CHO(12) and CHO(6), which contain human chromosomes 12
and 6, respectively. As shown in Fig.
2A (lane 7), CTD3 phosphorylation
by TAK
from CHO(12) cell extract was comparable to TAK activity
in human and
simian cell extracts (293, HeLa, GM07890, and COS).
Correspondingly,
the level of CDK9 phosphorylation was dramatically
increased in CHO(12)
extracts compared to CHO extracts (Fig.
2A,
lanes 5 and 7). Thus,
CHO(12) cells contain CDK9 complexes that
can bind to
Tat.
Since human cyclin T1 resides on chromosome 12 and complements rodent
cells for Tat transactivation (
73), we next probed
GST-Tat-bound complexes for CDK9 and cyclin T1 by Western blotting
(Fig.
2B). High levels of both proteins were present in such complexes
isolated from CHO(12) cell extract, as from the human and simian
cell
extracts, but these proteins were detected weakly if at all
in GST-Tat
complexes from extracts of CHO cells (Fig.
2B). Comparable
levels of
both proteins were detected in all cell extracts tested
(Fig.
2C),
indicating that the antibodies recognize the rodent
as well as human
and simian proteins. Thus, the binding of CDK9
and cyclin T1 to the Tat
activation domain correlates with TAK
activity and requires a factor(s)
encoded on human chromosome
12. These data show that TAK complexes
contain cyclin T1 as well
as CDK9; furthermore, human cyclin T1 can
form an active chimeric
complex with Chinese hamster CDK9 that binds
efficiently to the
Tat activation
domain.
In CHO(6) cell extract the level of TAK activity was about threefold
higher than that in CHO cell extract but was still considerably
less
than that observed in CHO(12) cell extract (Fig.
2A), consistent
with
the Tat transactivation levels observed in these cells (
58).
Western blotting showed that the binding of CHO CDK9 to the Tat
activation domain increased in CHO(6) cell extract relative to
CHO cell
extract (Fig.
2B), in correspondence with the CTD3 phosphorylation
activity, but the level of bound cyclin T1 was similar to that
observed
with the control CHO cell extract. One possible explanation
is that
human chromosome 6 supplies cyclin T2 but human cyclin
T2-containing
complexes fail to bind to GST-Tat beads in our assays
(data not shown).
Furthermore, we have been unable to detect cyclin
T2 in CHO(6) extracts
by using antibody to human cyclin T2. Thus,
the partial complementation
of Tat transactivation in CHO cells
by human chromosome 6 could be
attributable to an unidentified
accessory factor, e.g., one that
stabilizes Tat-TAK
interactions.
CDK9 exclusively phosphorylates serine residues in CTD3 but is
phosphorylated on both serine and threonine.
The CTD of RNA pol II
is phosphorylated by various CTD kinases on serine, threonine, or
tyrosine residues (12, 13). We used CTD3 as a model
substrate to identify the CTD residues that are phosphorylated by TAK
complexes. CTD3 gives rise to two phosphorylated bands when separated
in sodium dodecyl sulfate gels (see, for example, Fig. 1B).
Two-dimensional phosphoamino acid analysis of the upper and lower
phosphorylated bands revealed phosphorylation of serine residues only
(Fig. 3A and B, respectively).
Identification of the specific serine residue that is targeted is
described below. Contrary to an earlier report (14), CDK9
itself is phosphorylated on both serine and threonine residues when
bound to Tat (Fig. 3D) or anti-CDK9 antibody (Fig. 3C). The same result
was obtained with chromatographically purified CDK9 (Reactive Blue
column fraction; data not shown). Phosphotyrosine was not detected.
These findings agree with the conclusion that CDK9 (PITALRE) is a
Ser/Thr proline-directed kinase (25), since in the heptad
serines but not threonines are followed by prolines (Fig.
4A). Moreover, the detection of phosphorylated threonine in CDK9 is consistent with the prediction, based on its sequence (29), that the kinase contains a
typical T loop in which Thr 186 is a potential phosphorylation site.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Phosphoamino acid analysis of CTD3 peptide and CDK9.
CTD3, phosphorylated in TAK assays, resolved into two bands upon gel
electrophoresis. The upper band (A) and lower band (B) were analyzed
separately. Positions of phosphoamino acid markers are circled. CDK9
was phosphorylated in IP-kinase assays (C) or TAK assays (D) and
examined in the same way.
|
|

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Selectivity of CTD3 phosphorylation by CDK9 and CDK7.
(A) Sequence of wild-type (WT) CTD3 and mutant peptides. Substitutions
are denoted by the underlined boldface letters. (B) Phosphorylation of
the indicated CTD3 peptides in TAK assays. (C) Comparison of CTD3
phosphorylation by CDK9 and CDK7 complexes. CDK9 was monitored in TAK
assays conducted with various amounts of 293 cell S100 (15 µg/ml).
CDK7 was monitored by using Sf9 cell extracts (~60 µg) containing
either recombinant CAK or recombinant CDK7 and cyclin H. The control
was the kinase assay with mock-infected Sf9 cell extract.
|
|
Serine 5 in the CTD heptad is essential for phosphorylation by
TAK.
The CTD heptad contains three serine residues (Fig. 4A), and
human CTD kinases specific for serine 5, serines 2 and 7, or serines 2 and 5 have been characterized (27, 65, 77). To identify the
serine residue(s) that is phosphorylated by CDK9, we generated a series
of CTD3 mutant peptides in which serines were replaced by alanines
(Fig. 4A). In peptides S2A, S5A, and S7A, all three serines at
positions 2, 5, and 7, respectively, were changed to alanines.
Comparison with wild-type CTD3 shows that serine 5 is essential for
heptad phosphorylation by TAK and that the serines at positions 2 and 7 are dispensable (Fig. 4B). Next, we replaced all six serines at
positions 2 and 7 in the three heptad repeats; this peptide, S2,7A, was
also efficiently phosphorylated by TAK (Fig. 4A and B), implying that
serine 5 is the only serine in the heptad that is recognized by TAK.
To confirm this deduction, we synthesized a peptide that contains only
one serine 5. Peptide S5[1,3]A retains all six serines
at positions 2 and 7 as well as the central serine 5 residue,
while both serine 5 residues in the flanking heptads are changed
to alanine (Fig.
4A).
Figure
4B shows that TAK phosphorylated
S5[1,3]A and gave rise to a
single band, as expected if serine
5 is the only target for
phosphorylation by Tat-bound CDK9/cyclin
T.
Phosphoamino acid analysis of the phosphorylated mutant peptides
confirmed that phosphorylation was directed exclusively to
serine
residues (data not shown), as in wild-type CTD3 (Fig.
3).
For further
comparison, we examined the kinetics of CTD3 phosphorylation
by TAK.
Figure
5A shows a typical 60-min time
course of CTD3 phosphorylation.
Phosphorylation increased continuously
with time up to at least
120 min (not shown). Longer exposures showed
that CTD3 was detectably
phosphorylated by 1 min, consistent with
earlier assays using
GST-CTD as a substrate and TAK isolated from
nuclear extracts
by binding to GST-Tat 2 (
35). The same
phosphorylation kinetics
were obtained with the mutant peptides S2A and
S7A (not shown).
Thus, we conclude that serine 5 is the target for TAK
phosphorylation
and that serines 2 and 7 are not important for CTD3
phosphorylation.
Despite slight mobility differences among the mutant
phosphopeptides,
probably due to the serine-to-alanine substitutions,
the pattern
of phosphorylation was little affected by mutation of all
of the
serine residues at positions 2 and 7 (Fig.
4B).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Kinetics of TAK activity and nucleotide usage by TAK.
(A) Time course of CTD3 phosphorylation by TAK from 293 cell S100.
Reactions were stopped at the indicated time points. (B) Kinase
reaction mixtures containing [ -32P]ATP were
supplemented with the indicated unlabeled nucleotides at the
concentrations shown. Control, no unlabeled nucleotides added.
|
|
The phosphorylated CTD3 peptides migrate as two bands, the faster of
which incorporates two to three times as much radioactive
phosphate as
the slower band. We used CTD3 as a model substrate
to compare TAK with
another CTD kinase. CDK9 and CDK7 are both
catalytic subunits of CTD
kinases that function in transcription,
but they play different roles.
While CDK9 complexes participate
in transcription elongation, CDK7 is a
component of CAK and of
TFIIH, an initiation factor that is also
implicated in promoter
clearance (
18). CAK was shown to
phosphorylate exclusively serine
5 in the CTD heptad (
71).
Both recombinant CAK (CDK7/cyclin
H/MAT-1) and CDK7/cyclin H
phosphorylate CTD3, giving rise predominantly
to the slower band,
whereas TAK predominantly yields the faster
band (Fig.
4C). This
indicates that the enzymes differ in their
target within an array of
CTD repeats. One possible interpretation
of these data is that CAK
prefers to phosphorylate CTD3 at a single
site, whereas TAK yields
multiply phosphorylated forms of the
substrate, consistent with
observations that purified TFIIH preferentially
hypophosphorylates the
full-length CTD while purified P-TEFb prefers
to hyperphosphorylate a
partially phosphorylated target (
52,
64). An alternative
interpretation is that TFIIH preferentially
phosphorylates CTD3 at one
of the serine 5 sites, whereas TAK
selectively phosphorylates another
serine 5 residue(s) in the
substrate. In accordance with this view is
the finding that the
two serine 5 residues of a CTD diheptad are
unequally phosphorylated
by TFIIH (
71). Although further
work is needed to define the
phosphorylation specificities of CDK9 and
CDK7 in detail, it is
clear that their different functions are
reflected in different
phosphorylation site
preferences.
Nucleotide usage by Tat-associated CDK9/cyclin T complex.
Most
protein kinases utilize only ATP as a phosphate donor (40).
This was shown to be true for purified Drosophila P-TEFb, which contains the CDK9/cyclin T complex (52). For
comparison, we tested the nucleotide utilization by human CDK9/cyclin T
complexes in competition experiments by adding an excess of unlabeled
nucleotides over [
-32P]ATP and monitoring CTD3
phosphorylation. As shown in Fig. 5B, the efficiency of ATP utilization
in the TAK assay was at least fivefold higher than that of dATP and at
least 50-fold higher than that of GTP and dGTP. The pyrimidine
nucleotides CTP, dCTP, UTP, and dTTP were not utilized at 500 µM
(Fig. 5B) or even at concentrations of as high as 1 mM (data not
shown). These data are very similar to results obtained with
purified Drosophila P-TEFb (52), indicating that
this elongation factor and Tat-bound human CDK9 complexes have the same
phosphate donor specificity. GTP alone (without ATP) can be used as the
phosphate donor for both Thr and Ser phosphorylation in CDK9 and for
Ser phosphorylation in CTD3 (data not shown). The phosphorylation
efficiency with labeled GTP is about 50-fold less than that with
labeled ATP, confirming the results obtained in the competition experiments.
Requirement for Mg ions for Tat-TAK interaction.
Initially,
TAK activity was found in the nuclear fraction, but not the cytoplasmic
fraction, of HeLa cells (36). However, we detected high
levels of cytoplasmic TAK activity when 293, HeLa, or Jurkat cells were
fractionated by the same method (16) except for omission of
the last dialysis step. This dialysis was against a buffer lacking
Mg2+. We observed that TAK activity was lost when extracts
were dialyzed against this magnesium-free buffer (data not shown). To
determine whether the presence of magnesium ions is responsible for the differences observed, EDTA was added to the cytoplasmic extract at two
concentrations to chelate Mg2+ ions. As shown in Fig.
6A (lanes 2 and 3), this resulted in the loss of TAK activity, and the inhibitory effect of EDTA was reversed by
adding back excess MgCl2 (lanes 4 to 7). When the proteins bound to the beads were analyzed by Western blotting and probing with
antibody against CDK9, CTD3 phosphorylation correlated perfectly with
the binding of CDK9 to the beads (Fig. 6B). Similarly, TAK binding and
activity could be restored by adding low concentrations of
Zn2+ (up to 2 mM) (data not shown). To exclude the
possibility that prolonged incubation in the presence of EDTA caused
CDK9 degradation, the cytoplasmic extract was tested for CDK9 after the
binding reaction. Western blotting showed that CDK9 was not degraded in the presence of EDTA (Fig. 6C), indicating that CDK9-containing complexes are unable to bind to GST-Tat48
in the absence of
Mg2+. Two possibilities were considered: divalent cations
are necessary for the stability of CDK9/cyclin T complexes or for the
binding of such complexes to GST-Tat48
. To distinguish between these possibilities, we used anti-CDK9 antibody to immunoprecipitate CDK9/cyclin T-containing complexes from the same extracts. The phosphorylation of CTD3 by the immunoprecipitates was unaffected by the
removal of Mg ions (Fig. 6D), indicating that the CDK9/cyclin T
complexes are not disrupted by EDTA and suggesting that the binding of
TAK to the Tat activation domain is dependent on the presence of
divalent cations.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Effects of Mg and EDTA on TAK activity. (A) 293 cell
S100 fractions were treated with EDTA and MgCl2 at the
final concentrations indicated and then subjected to TAK assay. After
the kinase assay, the supernatant was examined for CTD3
phosphorylation. (B) Western blot analysis with anti-CDK9 antibody of
the proteins bound to GST-Tat48 beads in the same experiment as for
panel A. (C) Western blot analysis with anti-CDK9 antibody of proteins
remaining in the supernatant after binding to GST-Tat48 beads in the
same experiment as for panels A and B. Load, sample of 293 cell S100.
(D) IP-kinase assays conducted with 293 cell S100 (15 mg/ml) subjected
to treatment with EDTA and Mg2+ as indicated.
|
|
CDK9/cyclin T is present in large complexes.
By gel filtration
chromatography, Gariga et al. (24) found that CDK9 is
present in 293 cell extracts as two multisubunit complexes of 670 and
158 kDa. In keeping with this finding, multiple polypeptides were
detected when CDK9 complexes were immunoprecipitated from cell extracts
(24, 29, 78, 80). On the other hand, the molecular mass of
partially purified TAK has been reported to be ~110 kDa
(75). Since TAK is present in both nuclear and cytoplasmic
fractions, we considered the possibility that different TAK-containing
complexes exist in these subcellular fractions. We employed both gel
filtration chromatography and glycerol gradient sedimentation to
examine TAK-containing complexes and estimate their molecular weights.
To minimize possible disruption of the complexes, 293 cells were lysed
by the method of Dignam et al. (15), which results in a
transcriptionally active nuclear extract.
When cytoplasmic extracts of 293 cells were fractionated in a Sephacryl
S300 column equilibrated with isotonic buffer, TAK
activity was
detected predominantly in a large complex with an
estimated molecular
mass of ~950 kDa. In the experiment with the
results shown in Fig.
7A, this large complex represented 70%
of
the total TAK activity; 14% of the total TAK activity was present
in a second peak with a molecular mass of ~130 kDa. Similar results
were obtained with nuclear extracts of 293 cells (data not shown).
As
expected, TAK activity coeluted with CDK9 and cyclin T1 (Fig.
7B and
C), and CDK9 was detected bound to GST-Tat48

beads (by
Western
blotting) only in fractions with TAK activity (data not
shown). The
majority of CDK9 was detected in the fractions containing
the large
complex, with an additional minor peak in the fractions
containing the
small complex (Fig.
7B). Cyclin T1 was detected
in association with the
high-molecular-weight complex (Fig.
7C).
Its apparent absence from the
small complex is probably due to
the weakness of the anti-cyclin T1
antibody combined with the
smaller amount of this complex.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Separation of TAK complexes by gel filtration and
sedimentation. (A) CTD3 phosphorylation by TAK pulled down from
fractions after resolution of 293 cell S100 in a gel filtration column.
Molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are indicated by arrows.
Triangles show the estimated molecular masses of the large complex (950 kDa), CDK9/cyclin T complex (130 kDa), cyclin T (90 kDa), and CDK9 (40 kDa). (B and C) The same fractions were examined by Western blotting
with antibodies to CDK9 (B) and cyclin T1 (C). Load, sample of the 293 cell S100 loaded on the column. (D) Cytoplasmic extracts from 293 cells
in 150 mM KCl or adjusted to 1 M KCl were fractionated in glycerol
gradients. Fractions were subjected to TAK assays, and the
phosphorylated CTD3 bands were quantified, normalized, and plotted.
|
|
Since the larger complex eluted near the excluded volume of the column,
we considered the possibility that the peak of TAK
activity contains
more than one complex. However, the same two
complexes were detected
when either nuclear or cytoplasmic extracts
were sedimented through
glycerol gradients (Fig.
7D). Treatment
of the cytoplasmic extract with
0.8 to 1 M KCl prior to fractionation
caused all of the TAK activity to
shift to the position of the
low-molecular-weight complex (Fig.
7D).
This result is consistent
with our finding that chromatographically
purified TAK (Reactive
Blue column fractions) contained only the
smaller peak (not shown)
and with observations of Yang et al.
(
75). Treatment with an
intermediate concentration of salt
prior to fractionation revealed
both complexes in approximately the
same abundance (not
shown).
These results indicate that TAK activity is present in the cell chiefly
in a high-molecular-mass complex (~950 kDa) which
can dissociate into
a smaller complex (~130 kDa) apparently consisting
of CDK9 and its
regulatory subunit cyclin T1. This core complex
retains Tat binding and
CTD phosphorylation activities. Consistent
with the
coimmunoprecipitation data of Peng et al. (
67), neither
CDK9
or cyclin T1 was detected in fractions corresponding to molecular
masses of 42 and 87 kDa, implying that they are largely if not
exclusively present in
complexes.
 |
DISCUSSION |
TAK and P-TEFb.
TAK and P-TEFb have a common CTD kinase
activity conferred by CDK9 (74, 80). We show here that TAK,
like P-TEFb (67), contains CDK9's cyclin partner, cyclin
T1. However it is not clear whether P-TEFb and TAK consist solely of
the CDK9/cyclin T heterodimer and whether they are identical in
composition and properties. Price and colleagues showed that
CDK9-depleted HeLa nuclear extracts have diminished in vitro
transcription activity that can be complemented by the addition
of purified Drosophila P-TEFb or recombinant human CDK9/cyclin T (67, 80). This complementation suggests that the core complex, CDK9/cyclin T, is sufficient to restore in vitro transcription elongation, although a requirement for additional components that are not efficiently depleted cannot be excluded. In
this connection, it is noteworthy that, to date, Tat transactivation has been obtained only with preparations containing several additional polypeptides (49, 78).
Multiple proteins coimmunoprecipitate with CDK9 from nuclear or
whole-cell extracts (
24,
29,
78,
80). Polypeptides
with the
mobility of cyclin T are commonly seen, but it is not
clear whether the
other components of the immunoprecipitates are
identical. While
they remain to be identified, some of them are
probably substrates of
CDK9, since their phosphorylation is highly
sensitive to DRB
(
80). Our fractionation experiments suggest
that most of the
TAK activity in both nuclear and cytoplasmic
extracts is present in
very-high-molecular-mass complexes (~950
kDa). Similar large
complexes were detected by gel filtration
and sedimentation analysis,
but it remains possible that there
is more than one such complex. These
complexes, which also contain
most of the CDK9 and cyclin T1 in these
extracts, can be dissociated
by treatment with high salt concentrations
to give the core complex
CDK9/cyclin T1. Minor complexes of
intermediate size are also
detected. Conceivably, these different
CDK9-containing complexes
participate in the regulation of
transcription elongation by cellular
effectors; alternatively,
CDK9/cyclin T may engage in distinct
cellular functions executed
through phosphorylation of other substrates.
By analogy, CDK7/cyclin H
is a component of TFIIH as well as of
structurally and functionally
distinct CAK subassemblies (
32,
76).
TAK-Tat interactions.
Both TAK and P-TEFb were initially
identified in nuclear extracts (36, 54), while our
fractionation experiments detected TAK in cytoplasmic extracts as well
as nuclear extracts. The localization of at least a portion of
TAK/P-TEFb in the cytoplasm is supported by the properties of
transdominant Tat mutations. Such mutant Tat proteins interact with TAK
(19) and inhibit wild-type Tat function in a dominant
negative fashion. This phenotype is conferred by mutations in the Tat
basic region, which also contains the nuclear localization signal
(56). A Tat protein carrying a deletion in the basic region
localized exclusively to the cytoplasm and was a dominant negative
inhibitor. Inclusion of additional mutations in the activation domain
eliminated this transdominant activity (63). Taken together
with the observation that TAK binding requires an intact Tat activation
domain, these findings imply that TAK is squelched in the cytoplasm by
the transdominant Tat proteins. Interestingly, Tat interacts with
another nuclear and/or cytoplasmic factor(s) which renders Tat capable
of transactivating the HIV LTR in vitro without a lag period
(30). Thus, as suggested previously (6, 63), it
is likely that Tat is assembled with CDK9/cyclin T and perhaps other
transcription regulators in the cytoplasm before entering the nucleus.
The binding of Tat to TAK requires divalent cations. Previously
published studies had demonstrated the effect of metal ions
on Tat
structure (
22,
69) and the Tat-TAR interaction
(
39).
Similarly, the functional dependence of the Tat-TAK
interaction
on Mg or Zn ions could be due to stabilization of a Tat
conformation
necessary for TAK binding, but it is also possible that
metal
ions take a direct part in stabilizing Tat-TAK
interactions.
TAK, CAK, and CTD phosphorylation.
The CTD kinases are a
functionally heterogeneous group, including enzymes that phosphorylate
serines 5, 2 and 5, or 2 and 7 in the CTD heptad, as well as factors
participating in varied cellular functions and subjected to a spectrum
of controls. Together with some other serine 5-specific CTD kinases,
such as TFIIH and the mitogen-activated protein kinases, CDK9 belongs
to the proline-directed protein kinase family (25, 71). Even
though TFIIH and mitogen-activated protein kinases show the same
detailed specificity for the CTD motif [PX(S/T)P], their recognition
sites are not identical (71). Such differences in site
recognition may be the characteristic that confers functional
distinctions among these CTD kinases.
P-TEFb and TFIIH are both general transcription factors that can
phosphorylate the CTD and have been ascribed a function in
Tat
transactivation. Depletion experiments indicate that they
are not
present in the same complex (
49,
67,
74), and they
are
catalytically independent (
66). Nevertheless, several
investigators
have reported structural and functional interactions
between Tat
and TFIIH or CAK (
9,
23,
64). Contrary to these
findings,
but in agreement with data from other laboratories (
34,
49,
67,
74), in our assays neither the constituent polypeptides
of CAK nor the p62 subunit of TFIIH was pulled down by beads containing
GST-Tat fusion proteins. Moreover, TAK was unable to phosphorylate
a
CAK substrate, CDK2, and was not depleted by antibody to CDK7
(data not
shown). Therefore, if there is an interaction between
Tat and TFIIH or
between TFIIH and P-TEFb, it is too weak or unstable
to be detectable
under our experimental
conditions.
Species specificity and the mechanism of Tat transactivation.
A widely cited model of Tat transactivation views the process in terms
of the recruitment of P-TEFb to the elongating transcription complex by
TAR-associated Tat. This model is consistent with many studies, but the
findings presented here are more compatible with an alternative mode of
action. We suggest that Tat first binds to TAK/P-TEFb via cyclin T1;
the resultant Tat-TAK/P-TEFb complex then associates with the pol II
complex, and this elongation-competent pol II assembly is stabilized,
and possibly activated, by binding to both the loop and bulge
structures of TAR.
This model, depicted in Fig.
8, retains
essential features of earlier models in that it ascribes central
importance to the
interactions of Tat with TAR and with TAK/P-TEFb, and
it also
accommodates a number of additional observations. First, cyclin
T1 encoded by human chromosome 12 is required for elevated TAK
activity
(Fig.
2) and HIV-1 expression in human-rodent hybrid
cells
(
33). In CHO cells, Tat transactivates weakly, and this
effect requires the TAR bulge but is unaffected by TAR loop mutations
(
2). In vitro, cyclin T1 binds to the activation domain of
Tat and stabilizes Tat-TAR interactions in gel mobility shift
assays
(
73). This interaction is also dependent on the TAR loop.
Therefore, interactions with both Tat and TAR are required for
the
human cyclin T1 to mediate maximal Tat transactivation. Second,
P-TEFb
binds TAR in the absence of Tat via an 87-kDa protein which
is possibly
cyclin T1: this interaction was reduced by a loop
mutation
(
78). Tat and human P-TEFb interact with one another
in the
absence of TAR (
74,
80), and these two proteins synergize
to
bind TAR (
78). Chimeric P-TEFb, containing human cyclin T1
complexed with rodent proteins, also binds Tat (Fig.
2). Thus,
the
Tat-P-TEFb-TAR complex is stabilized by multiple pairwise
interactions between its components: TAR bulge with Tat, TAR loop
with
cyclin T1, and Tat with TAK/P-TEFb (Fig.
8).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Schematic representation of Tat delivery to its nuclear
transactivation site. The model depicts TAK assembly in the cytoplasm.
P-TEFb, composed of CDK9, cyclin T1, and other components, interacts
with the activation domain (AD) of Tat. In the nucleus, the TAK complex
(P-TEFb-Tat) interacts with the transcription complex via cyclin T1
and the basic domain (BD) of Tat, both of which bind to TAR. Through
phosphorylation of the pol II CTD, the elongating complex becomes more
processive and Tat transactivation is achieved. (See text for
details.)
|
|
Disruption of this complex by weakening any of these interactions can
result in a decrease or abrogation of Tat transactivation.
It is well
established that the binding of Tat to TAR, via the
Tat basic region
and the TAR bulge, is critical for high levels
of transactivation. Our
data demonstrate that the strength of
the interaction between the Tat
activation domain and TAK/P-TEFb
is greatly attenuated in CHO cells as
a result of differences
between human and CHO cyclin T. Previous work
implied that the
interaction of TAR with a cellular factor (now
identified as TAK/P-TEFb
and probably mediated by cyclin T1 and the TAR
loop) is also weak
in CHO cells (
2). Only when all of these
interactions occur
does Tat transactivation take place optimally. In
support of this
view, when Tat was supplied as a fusion protein with
the R17 coat
protein and TAR was replaced by the coat protein binding
site,
the level of transactivation in CHO and CHO(12) cells was
relatively
low, and the presence of human cyclin T1 conferred no
advantage.
Indeed, the level of transactivation was similar to that
elicited
by Tat in CHO cells from the wild-type HIV promoter
(
3).
Finally, our data and that of others show that TAR is not needed for
the binding of TAK/P-TEFb to Tat, suggesting that this
interaction may
precede the Tat-TAR binding. Consistent with this
order of
interactions, Tat mutants that are unable to bind TAR
can act as
dominant negative inhibitors. Moreover, such inhibition
can occur even
when the Tat mutants are restricted to the cytoplasm
(where TAK/P-TEFb
can also be found). Since the general elongation
factor P-TEFb has been
shown to interact with elongating pol II
complexes in
Drosophila nuclear extracts (
53), it is likely
that Tat is delivered to the vicinity of the elongation complex
by
P-TEFb and that this complex then docks with TAR. Hence, the
species
specificity conferred upon P-TEFb/TAK by human cyclin
T1 is twofold: it
facilitates high-affinity interaction with the
Tat activation domain
and with the loop structure of
TAR.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank David H. Price for reagents and helpful discussion and
Kathy A. Jones and David O. Morgan for reagents. We also thank Robert
J. Donnelly of the New Jersey Medical School Molecular Resource
Facility for CTD3 peptide synthesis and Adam P. Forman for excellent
technical assistance.
This work was supported by grant AI 31802.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, New Jersey Medical School, UMDNJ, 185 South Orange Ave., Newark, NJ 07103. Phone: (973) 972-4411. Fax:
(973) 972-5594. E-mail: peeryts{at}umdnj.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Akoulitchev, S.,
T. P. Makela,
R. A. Weinberg, and D. Reinberg.
1995.
Requirement for TFIIH kinase activity in transcription by RNA polymerase II.
Nature (London)
377:557-560[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Alonso, A.,
T. P. Cujec, and B. M. Peterlin.
1994.
Effects of human chromosome 12 on interactions between Tat and TAR of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
68:6505-6513[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Alonso, A.,
D. Derse, and B. M. Peterlin.
1992.
Human chromosome 12 is required for optimal interactions between Tat and TAR of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in rodent cells.
J. Virol.
66:4617-4621[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. G. Seidman,
J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl.
1991.
Current protocols in molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1.
John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
|
| 5.
|
Braddock, M.,
A. M. Thorburn,
A. J. Kingsman, and S. M. Kingsman.
1991.
Blocking of Tat-dependent HIV-1 RNA modification by an inhibitor of RNA polymerase II processivity.
Nature (London)
350:439-441[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Carroll, R.,
B. M. Peterlin, and D. Derse.
1992.
Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat activity by coexpression of heterologous trans activators.
J. Virol.
66:2000-2007[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Chun, R. F., and K.-T. Jeang.
1996.
Requirements for RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal domain for activated transcription of human retroviruses human T-cell lymphotropic virus I and HIV-1.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:27888-27894[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Cujec, T. P.,
H. Cho,
E. Maldonado,
J. Meyer,
D. Reinberg, and B. M. Peterlin.
1997.
The human immunodeficiency virus transactivator Tat interacts with the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:1817-1823[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Cujec, T. P.,
H. Okamoto,
K. Fujinaga,
J. Meyer,
H. Chamberlin,
D. O. Morgan, and B. M. Peterlin.
1997.
The HIV transactivator TAT binds to the CDK-activating kinase and activates the phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.
Genes Dev.
11:2645-2657[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Dahmus, M. E.
1996.
Phosphorylation of mammalian RNA polymerase II.
Methods Enzymol.
273:185-193[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Dahmus, M. E.
1996.
Reversible phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:19009-19012[Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Dahmus, M. E.
1994.
The role of multisite phosphorylation in the regulation of RNA polymerase II activity.
Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol.
48:143-179[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Dahmus, M. E.,
A. Shilatifard,
J. W. Conaway, and R. C. Conaway.
1995.
Phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1261:171-182[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
De Luca, A.,
V. Esposito,
A. Baldi,
P. P. Claudio,
Y. Fu,
M. Caputi,
M. M. Pisano,
F. Baldi, and A. Giordano.
1997.
CDC2-related kinase PITALRE phosphorylates pRb exclusively on serine and is widely expressed in human tissues.
J. Cell. Physiol.
172:265-273[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Dignam, J. D.,
R. M. Lebovitz, and R. G. Roeder.
1983.
Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:1475-1489[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Dignam, J. D.,
P. L. Martin,
B. S. Shastry, and R. G. Roeder.
1983.
Eukaryotic gene transcription with purified components.
Methods Enzymol.
101:582-598[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Dingwall, C.,
I. Ernberg,
M. J. Gait,
S. M. Green,
S. Hearphy,
J. Karn,
A. D. Lowe,
M. Singh,
M. A. Skinner, and R. Valerio.
1989.
Human immunodeficiency virus 1 tat protein binds trans-activation-responsive region (TAR) RNA in vitro.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:6925-6929[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Dvir, A.,
S. Tan,
J. W. Conaway, and R. C. Conaway.
1997.
Promoter escape by RNA polymerase II. Formation of an escape-competent transcriptional intermediate is a prerequisite for exit of polymerase from the promoter.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:28175-28178[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Echetebu, C. O.,
H. Rhim,
C. H. Herrmann, and A. P. Rice.
1994.
Construction and characterization of a potent HIV-2 Tat transdominant mutant protein.
J. Acquired Immune Defic. Syndr.
7:655-664.
|
| 20.
|
Fisher, R. P.,
P. Jin,
H. M. Chamberlin, and D. O. Morgan.
1995.
Alternative mechanisms of CAK assembly require an assembly factor or an activating kinase.
Cell
83:47-57[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Fisher, R. P., and D. O. Morgan.
1994.
A novel cyclin associates with MO15/CDK7 to form the CDK-activating kinase.
Cell
78:713-724[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Frankel, A. D.,
D. S. Bredt, and C. O. Pabo.
1988.
Tat protein from human immunodeficiency virus forms a metal-linked dimer.
Science
240:70-73[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
García-Martínez, L. F.,
G. Mavankal,
J. M. Neveu,
W. S. Lane,
D. Ivanov, and R. B. Gaynor.
1997.
Purification of a Tat-associated kinase reveals a TFIIH complex that modulates HIV-1 transcription.
EMBO J.
16:2836-2850[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Garriga, J.,
X. Mayol, and X. Graña.
1996.
The CDC2-related kinase PITALRE is the catalytic subunit of active multimeric protein complexes.
Biochem. J.
319:293-298.
|
| 25.
|
Garriga, J.,
E. Segura,
X. Mayol,
C. Grubmeyer, and X. Graña.
1996.
Phosphorylation site specificity of the CDC2-related kinase PITALRE.
Biochem. J.
320:983-989.
|
| 26.
|
Gaynor, R. B.
1995.
Regulation of HIV-1 gene expression by the transactivator protein Tat.
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
193:51-77[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Gebara, M. M.,
M. H. Sayre, and J. L. Corden.
1997.
Phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal repeat domain in RNA polymerase II by cyclin-dependent kinases is sufficient to inhibit transcription.
J. Cell. Biochem.
64:390-402[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Graeble, M. A.,
M. J. Churcher,
A. D. Lowe,
M. J. Gait, and J. Karn.
1993.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transactivator protein, tat, stimulates transcriptional read-through of distal terminator sequences in vitro.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:6184-6188[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Graña, X.,
A. DeLuca,
N. Sang,
Y. Fu,
P. P. Claudio,
J. Rosenblatt,
D. O. Morgan, and A. Giordano.
1994.
PITALRE, a nuclear CDC2-related protein kinase that phosphorylates the retinoblastoma protein in vitro.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:3834-3838[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Greenberg, M. E.,
D. A. Ostapenko, and M. B. Mathews.
1997.
Potentiation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat by human cellular proteins.
J. Virol.
71:7140-7144[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Harlow, E., and D. Lane.
1988.
Antibodies: a laboratory manual.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 32.
|
Harper, J. W., and S. J. Elledge.
1998.
The role of Cdk7 in CAK function, a retro-retrospective.
Genes Dev.
12:285-289[Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Hart, C. E.,
C. Y. Ou,
J. C. Galphin,
J. Moore,
L. T. Bacheler,
J. J. Wasmuth,
S. R. Petteway, Jr., and G. Schochetman.
1989.
Human chromosome 12 is required for elevated HIV-1 expression in human-hamster hybrid cells.
Science
246:488-491[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Herrmann, C. H.,
M. O. Gold, and A. P. Rice.
1996.
Viral transactivators specifically target distinct cellular protein kinases that phosphorylate the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain.
Nucleic Acids Res.
24:501-508[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Herrmann, C. H., and A. P. Rice.
1995.
Lentivirus Tat proteins specifically associate with a cellular protein kinase, TAK, that hyperphosphorylates the carboxyl-terminal domain of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II: candidate for a Tat cofactor.
J. Virol.
69:1612-1620[Abstract].
|
| 36.
|
Herrmann, C. H., and A. P. Rice.
1993.
Specific interaction of the human immunodeficiency virus Tat proteins with a cellular protein kinase.
Virology
197:601-608[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Hirose, Y., and J. L. Manley.
1998.
RNA polymerase II is an essential mRNA polyadenylation factor.
Nature (London)
395:93-96[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Hottiger, M. O., and G. J. Nabel.
1998.
Interaction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat with the transcriptional coactivators p300 and CREB binding protein.
J. Virol.
72:8252-8256[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Ippolito, J. A., and T. A. Steitz.
1998.
A 1.3-A resolution crystal structure of the HIV-1 trans-activation response region RNA stem reveals a metal ion-dependent bulge conformation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:9819-9824[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Jakobi, R., and J. A. Traugh.
1995.
Site-directed mutagenesis and structure/function studies of casein kinase II correlate stimulation of activity by the beta subunit with changes in conformation and ATP/GTP utilization.
Eur. J. Biochem.
230:1111-1117[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Jeang, K. T.,
B. Berkhout, and B. Dropulic.
1993.
Effects of integration and replication on transcription of the HIV-1 long terminal repeat.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:24940-24949[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Kao, S. Y.,
A. F. Calman,
P. A. Luciw, and B. M. Peterlin.
1987.
Anti-termination of transcription within the long terminal repeat of HIV-1 by tat gene product.
Nature (London)
330:489-493[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Kashanchi, F.,
G. Pira,
M. F. Radonovich,
J. F. Duval,
A. Fattaey,
C. M. Chian,
R. G. Roeder, and J. N. Brady.
1994.
Direct interaction of human TFIID with the HIV-1 transactivator Tat.
Nature (London)
367:295-299[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Kato, H.,
H. Sumimoto,
P. Pognonec,
C.-H. Chen,
C. A. Rosen, and R. G. Roeder.
1992.
HIV-1 tat acts as a processivity factor in vitro in conjunction with cellular elongation factors.
Genes Dev.
6:655-666[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Kessler, M., and M. B. Mathews.
1992.
Premature termination and processing of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-promoted transcripts.
J. Virol.
66:4488-4496[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Laspia, M. F.,
A. P. Rice, and M. B. Mathews.
1989.
HIV-1 Tat protein increases transcriptional initiation and stabilizes elongation.
Cell
59:283-292[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Laspia, M. F.,
A. P. Rice, and M. B. Mathews.
1990.
Synergy between HIV-1 Tat and adenovirus E1A is principally due to stabilization of transcriptional elongation.
Genes Dev.
4:2397-2408[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Makela, T. P.,
J. D. Parvin,
J. Kim,
L. J. Huber,
P. A. Sharp, and R. A. Weinberg.
1995.
A kinase-deficient transcription factor TFIIH is functional in basal and activated transcription.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:5174-5178[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Mancebo, H. S.,
G. Lee,
J. Flygare,
J. Tomassini,
P. Luu,
Y. Zhu,
J. Peng,
C. Blau,
D. Hazuda,
D. Price, and O. Flores.
1997.
P-TEFb kinase is required for HIV Tat transcriptional activation in vivo and in vitro.
Genes Dev.
11:2633-2644[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Marciniak, R. A.,
B. J. Calnan,
A. D. Frankel, and P. A. Sharp.
1990.
HIV-1 Tat protein trans-activates transcription in vitro.
Cell
63:791-802[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Marciniak, R. A., and P. A. Sharp.
1991.
HIV-1 Tat protein promotes formation of more-processive elongation complexes.
EMBO J.
10:4189-4196[Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Marshall, N. F.,
J. Peng,
Z. Xie, and D. H. Price.
1996.
Control of RNA polymerase II elongation potential by a novel carboxl-terminal domain kinase.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:27176-27183[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Marshall, N. F., and D. H. Price.
1992.
Control of formation of two distinct classes of RNA polymerase II elongation complexes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:2078-2090[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Marshall, N. F., and D. H. Price.
1995.
Purification of P-TEFb, a transcription factor required for the transition into productive elongation.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:12335-12338[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
McCracken, S.,
N. Fong,
K. Yankulov,
S. Ballantyne,
G. Pan,
J. Greenblatt,
S. D. Patterson,
M. Wickens, and D. L. Bentley.
1997.
The C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II couples mRNA processing to transcription.
Nature (London)
385:357-361[Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Modesti, N.,
J. Garcia,
C. Debouck,
M. Peterlin, and R. Gaynor.
1991.
Trans-dominant Tat mutants with alterations in the basic domain inhibit HIV-1 gene expression.
New Biol.
3:759-768[Medline].
|
| 57.
|
Mortillaro, M. J.,
B. J. Blencowe,
X. Wei,
H. Nakayasu,
L. Du,
S. L. Warren,
P. A. Sharp, and R. Berezney.
1996.
A hyperphosphorylated form of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II is associated with splicing complexes and the nuclear matrix.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:8253-8257[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Newstein, M.,
E. J. Stanbridge,
G. Casey, and P. R. Shank.
1990.
Human chromosome 12 encodes a species-specific factor which increases human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat-mediated transactivation in rodent cells.
J. Virol.
64:4565-4567[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 59.
|
Nonet, M.,
D. Sweetser, and R. A. Young.
1987.
Functional redundancy and structural polymorphism in the large subunit of RNA polymerase II.
Cell
50:909-915[Medline].
|
| 60.
|
O'Brien, T.,
S. Hardin,
A. Greenleaf, and J. T. Lis.
1994.
Phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain and transcriptional elongation.
Nature (London)
370:75-77[Medline].
|
| 61.
|
Okamoto, H.,
C. T. Sheline,
J. L. Corden,
K. A. Jones, and B. M. Peterlin.
1996.
Trans-activation by human immunodeficiency virus Tat protein requires the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:11575-11579[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 62.
|
Orphanides, G.,
T. Lagrange, and D. Reinberg.
1996.
The general transcription factors of RNA polymerase II.
Genes Dev.
10:2657-2683[Free Full Text].
|
| 63.
|
Orsini, M. J., and C. M. Debouck.
1996.
Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and type 2 Tat function by transdominant Tat protein localized to both the nucleus and cytoplasm.
J. Virol.
70:8055-8063[Abstract].
|
| 64.
|
Parada, C. A., and R. G. Roeder.
1996.
Enhanced processivity of RNA polymerase II triggered by Tat-induced phosphorylation of its carboxy-terminal domain.
Nature (London)
384:375-378[Medline].
|
| 65.
|
Patturajan, M.,
R. J. Schulte,
B. M. Sefton,
R. Berezney,
M. Vincent,
O. Bensaude,
S. L. Warren, and J. L. Corden.
1998.
Growth-related changes in phosphorylation of yeast RNA polymerase II.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:4689-4694[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 66.
|
Peng, J.,
N. F. Marshall, and D. H. Price.
1998.
Identification of a cyclin subunit required for the function of Drosophila P-TEFb.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:13855-13860[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 67.
|
Peng, J.,
Y. Zhu,
J. T. Milton, and D. H. Price.
1998.
Identification of multiple cyclin subunits of human P-TEFb.
Genes Dev.
12:755-762[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 68.
|
Rhim, H.,
C. O. Echetebu,
C. H. Herrmann, and A. P. Rice.
1994.
Wild-type and mutant HIV-1 and HIV-2 Tat proteins expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase.
J. Acquired Immune Defic. Syndr.
7:1116-1121.
|
| 69.
|
Rice, A. P., and F. Carlotti.
1990.
Structural analysis of wild-type and mutant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat proteins.
J. Virol.
64:6018-6026[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 70.
|
Serizawa, H.,
J. W. Conaway, and R. C. Conaway.
1993.
Phosphorylation of C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II is not required in basal transcription.
Nature (London)
363:371-374[Medline].
|
| 71.
|
Trigon, S.,
H. Serizawa,
J. W. Conaway,
R. C. Conaway,
S. P. Jackson, and M. Morange.
1998.
Characterization of the residues phosphorylated in vitro by different C-terminal domain kinases.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:6769-6775[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 72.
|
Weeks, K. M.,
C. Ampe,
S. Schultz,
T. Steitz, and D. M. Crothers.
1990.
Fragments of the HIV-1 Tat protein specifically bind TAR RNA.
Science
249:1281-1285[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 73.
|
Wei, P.,
M. E. Garber,
S. M. Fang,
W. H. Fischer, and K. A. Jones.
1998.
A novel CDK9-associated C-type cyclin interacts directly with HIV-1 Tat and mediates its high-affinity, loop-specific binding to TAR RNA.
Cell
92:451-462[Medline].
|
| 74.
|
Yang, X.,
M. O. Gold,
D. N. Tang,
D. E. Lewis,
E. Aguilar-Cordova,
A. P. Rice, and C. H. Herrmann.
1997.
TAK, an HIV Tat-associated kinase, is a member of the cyclin-dependent family of protein kinases and is induced by activation of peripheral blood lymphocytes and differentiation of promonocytic cell lines.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:12331-12336[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 75.
|
Yang, X.,
C. H. Herrmann, and A. P. Rice.
1996.
The human immunodeficiency virus Tat proteins specifically associate with TAK in vivo and require the carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II for function.
J. Virol.
70:4576-4584[Abstract].
|
| 76.
|
Yankulov, K. Y., and D. L. Bentley.
1997.
Regulation of CDK7 substrate specificity by MAT1 and TFIIH.
EMBO J.
16:1638-1646[Medline].
|
| 77.
|
Zhang, J.,
J. L. Corden,
A. Shilatifard,
J. W. Conaway, and R. C. Conaway.
1991.
Identification of phosphorylation sites in the repetitive carboxyl-terminal domain of the mouse RNA polymerase II largest subunit.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:2290-2296[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 78.
|
Zhou, Q.,
D. Chen,
E. Pierstorff, and K. Luo.
1998.
Transcription elongation factor P-TEFb mediates Tat activation of HIV-1 transcription at multiple stages.
EMBO J.
17:3681-3691[Medline].
|
| 79.
|
Zhou, Q., and P. A. Sharp.
1996.
Tat-SF1: cofactor for stimulation of transcriptional elongation by HIV-1 Tat.
Science
274:605-610[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 80.
|
Zhu, Y.,
T. Pe'ery,
J. Peng,
Y. Ramanathan,
N. Marshall,
T. Marshall,
B. Amendt,
M. B. Mathews, and D. H. Price.
1997.
Transcription elongation factor P-TEFb is required for HIV-1 tat transactivation in vitro.
Genes Dev.
11:2622-2632[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, July 1999, p. 5448-5458, Vol. 73, No. 7
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Desfosses, Y., Solis, M., Sun, Q., Grandvaux, N., Van Lint, C., Burny, A., Gatignol, A., Wainberg, M. A., Lin, R., Hiscott, J.
(2005). Regulation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gene Expression by Clade-Specific Tat Proteins. J. Virol.
79: 9180-9191
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Meinhart, A., Kamenski, T., Hoeppner, S., Baumli, S., Cramer, P.
(2005). A structural perspective of CTD function. Genes Dev.
19: 1401-1415
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hoque, M., Tian, B., Mathews, M. B., Pe'ery, T.
(2005). Granulin and Granulin Repeats Interact with the Tat{middle dot}P-TEFb Complex and Inhibit Tat Transactivation. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 13648-13657
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Xie, B., Calabro, V., Wainberg, M. A., Frankel, A. D.
(2004). Selection of TAR RNA-Binding Chameleon Peptides by Using a Retroviral Replication System. J. Virol.
78: 1456-1463
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pei, Y., Shuman, S.
(2003). Characterization of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cdk9/Pch1 Protein Kinase: Spt5 PHOSPHORYLATION, AUTOPHOSPHORYLATION, AND MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 43346-43356
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Young, T. M., Wang, Q., Pe'ery, T., Mathews, M. B.
(2003). The Human I-mfa Domain-Containing Protein, HIC, Interacts with Cyclin T1 and Modulates P-TEFb-Dependent Transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 6373-6384
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Reza, S. M., Shen, L.-M., Mukhopadhyay, R., Rosetti, M., Pe'ery, T., Mathews, M. B.
(2003). A Naturally Occurring Substitution in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Tat Increases Expression of the Viral Genome. J. Virol.
77: 8602-8606
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hoque, M., Young, T. M., Lee, C.-G., Serrero, G., Mathews, M. B., Pe'ery, T.
(2002). The Growth Factor Granulin Interacts with Cyclin T1 and Modulates P-TEFb-Dependent Transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 1688-1702
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ghose, R., Liou, L.-Y., Herrmann, C. H., Rice, A. P.
(2001). Induction of TAK (Cyclin T1/P-TEFb) in Purified Resting CD4+ T Lymphocytes by Combination of Cytokines. J. Virol.
75: 11336-11343
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Marcello, A., Cinelli, R. A. G., Ferrari, A., Signorelli, A., Tyagi, M., Pellegrini, V., Beltram, F., Giacca, M.
(2001). Visualization of in Vivo Direct Interaction between HIV-1 TAT and Human Cyclin T1 in Specific Subcellular Compartments by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 39220-39225
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Foskett, S. M., Ghose, R., Tang, D. N., Lewis, D. E., Rice, A. P.
(2001). Antiapoptotic Function of Cdk9 (TAK/P-TEFb) in U937 Promonocytic Cells. J. Virol.
75: 1220-1228
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Herrmann, C., Mancini, M.
(2001). The Cdk9 and cyclin T subunits of TAK/P-TEFb localize to splicing factor-rich nuclear speckle regions. J. Cell Sci.
114: 1491-1503
[Abstract]
-
Garber, M. E., Mayall, T. P., Suess, E. M., Meisenhelder, J., Thompson, N. E., Jones, K. A.
(2000). CDK9 Autophosphorylation Regulates High-Affinity Binding of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Tat-P-TEFb Complex to TAR RNA. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 6958-6969
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhou, M., Halanski, M. A., Radonovich, M. F., Kashanchi, F., Peng, J., Price, D. H., Brady, J. N.
(2000). Tat Modifies the Activity of CDK9 To Phosphorylate Serine 5 of the RNA Polymerase II Carboxyl-Terminal Domain during Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 5077-5086
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramanathan, Y., Rajpara, S. M., Reza, S. M., Lees, E., Shuman, S., Mathews, M. B., Pe'ery, T.
(2001). Three RNA Polymerase II Carboxyl-terminal Domain Kinases Display Distinct Substrate Preferences. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 10913-10920
[Abstract]
[Full Text]