Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, June 1999, p. 5064-5069, Vol. 73, No. 6
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Visualization of Alternative Epstein-Barr Virus Expression
Programs by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization at the Cell
Level
Anna
Szeles,*
Kerstin
I.
Falk,
Stephan
Imreh, and
George
Klein
Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center,
Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
Received 15 December 1998/Accepted 23 February 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) transforms human B lymphocytes into
immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). They regularly express
six virally encoded nuclear proteins (EBNA1 to EBNA6) and three
membrane proteins (LMP1, LMP2A, and LMP2B). In contrast, EBV-carrying
Burkitt lymphoma (BL) cells in vivo and derived type I
cell lines that maintain the BL phenotype express only EBNA1. During
prolonged in vitro culturing, most EBV-carrying BL lines drift toward a
more immunoblastic (type II or III) phenotype. Their viral antigen
expression is upregulated in parallel. We have used fluorescent in situ
hybridization to visualize viral transcripts in type I and III BL lines
and LCLs. In type I cells, EBNA1 is encoded by a monocistronic message
that originates from the Qp promoter. In type III cells, the EBNA1
transcript is spliced from a giant polycistronic message that
originates from one of several alternative Wp or Cp promoters and
encodes all six EBNAs. We have obtained a "track" signal with a
BamHI W DNA probe that could hybridize with the
polycistronic but not with the monocistronic message in two type III BL
lines (Namalwa-Cl8 and MUTU III) and three LCLs (LCL IB4-D, LCL-970402,
and IARC-171). A BamHI K probe that can hybridize to both
the monocistronic and the polycistronic message visualized the same
pattern in the type III BLs and the LCLs as the BamHI W
probe. A positive signal was obtained with the BamHI K but
not the BamHI W probe in the type I BL lines MUTU I and
Rael. The RNA track method can thus distinguish between cells that use
a type III and those that use a type I program. The former cells
hybridize with both the W and the K probes, but the latter cells
hybridize with only the K probe. Our findings may open the way for
studies of the important but still unanswered question of whether
cells with type I latency arise from immunoblasts with a full type III
program or are generated by a separate pathway during primary infection.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The spatial organization of nuclear
components participating in functions like DNA replication,
transcription, RNA processing, and nuclear RNA transport has been
increasingly clarified by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
techniques (19, 25, 27).
In order to visualize the target site by in situ hybridization, the
target sequence has to be represented in a sufficiently high
concentration to provide a good contrast against signal-negative regions. The nuclear abundance and spatial configuration of pre-mRNA are likely to depend on the position of the gene, size of the primary
transcript, extent of processing, and level of transcription (2). Specific RNA transcripts could be localized in cell
nuclei in earlier studies. Lawrence et al. (17) detected
transcripts of integrated EBV genomes as "tracks" in Namalwa cell
nuclei. They extended between the interior of the nucleus and the
nuclear membrane and were conserved in a nuclear matrix preparation
(32). Specific transcripts could be detected in the form of
nuclear tracks in other systems as well (4, 10, 25, 34).
They were not always in contact with the nuclear envelope, however, raising doubts about their postulated involvement in RNA transport to
nuclear pores. It has been speculated that they may represent RNA
accumulation sites that emit processed transcripts on their way to the
cytoplasm by diffusion (4, 16, 30, 33).
In this study, we have visualized Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) transcripts
in B-cell-derived human cell lines known to carry integrated and/or
episomal EBV genomes. At least three programs of viral gene expression
have been demonstrated for latently EBV-infected B cells
(14). EBV-transformed immunoblasts (lymphoblastoid cell lines [LCLs] in vitro and immunoblasts in vivo) use the latency III
program, expressing nine virally encoded proteins (EBNA1 to EBNA6
and LMP1, LMP2A, and LMP2B). The latency I (EBNA1 only) program
is used by Burkitt lymphoma (BL) biopsy cells and BL-derived cell lines
as long as they maintain a tumor-representative phenotype (28). In the course of prolonged in vitro culturing, BL
cells may drift to a more immunoblastic (type II or III) phenotype, with concomitant switching to a type III program (12). Type I latency is also found in EBV-carrying resting B cells in healthy individuals (3).
Latency II (expression of EBNA1 and the LMPs) is characteristic of
EBV-carrying non-B cells, such as Reed-Sternberg cells in Hodgkin's
disease, T-cell lymphomas, and nasopharyngeal and other EBV-carrying
carcinomas (5, 9, 23). Freshly infected B cells undergo
blast transformation by using the type III program. This is a
prerequisite for viral immortalization.
The developmental history of latently infected normal B cells is one of
the major remaining puzzles of EBV strategy. One possibility is that
they are already generated during primary infection. Conceivably, a
small minority of the infected cells may fail to follow the immunoblastic activation program, giving rise to a differently regulated subpopulation of latently infected cells. According to a more
likely alternative, a certain function of the activated immunoblasts
may change to resting cells by a phenotypic switch that may be
identical with, or akin to, the formation of B memory cells. If so,
even proliferating EBV-carrying lymphoblastic lines may generate
resting B cells and concomitantly downregulate the type III to
the type I program.
In order to visualize individual cells that use different viral
expression programs, we wished to explore whether the FISH method could
be used to distinguish between the Wp- or Cp-initiated, immunoblast-specific polycistronic EBNA1 to -6 (type III) program and the Qp-initiated, monocistronic EBNA1 only (type I) program. We
found that the RNA track method permits such a distinction.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
(i) Cell culture and nuclear preparation.
Cell lines and
their characteristics are listed in Table
1. LCL-970402 was a kind gift of
László Székely (Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center
[MTC], Karolinska Institute [KI], Stockholm, Sweden). All cell
lines were grown in RPMI medium with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco,
Grand Island, N.Y.) at 37°C. Interphase nuclei and metaphase
chromosomes were analyzed on standard cytogenetic preparations, as
previously described (17). Cells were incubated with 0.015 µg of Colcemid per ml for 2 to 3 h, pelleted, and resuspended in
0.075 M KCl at 37°C for 20 min. The cell suspension was fixed by
three changes of a 3:1 dilution of fresh methanol-acetic acid and
gently dropped onto ethyl alcohol (EtOH)-cleaned slides in a humid
environment. Slides were air dried overnight and stored at
80°C
with a desiccant.
(ii) FISH analysis. (a) Probes.
Figure
1 shows a BamHI restriction
endonuclease map of EBV, with the regions used as probes in the
hybridization experiments indicated. EBV-specific probes were derived
from cloned BamHI-digested fragments (BamHI W and
BamHI K) of the B95-8 strain of EBV DNA, kindly provided by
Lars Rymo, Gothenburg, Sweden (1). The 3.1-kb BamHI W fragment and the 5.1-kb BamHI K fragment
were purified from the gels and used for FISH. Probes were
labeled by nick translation with either biotinylated 16-dUTP
(Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany), fluorescein-12-dUTP, or Texas
red-5-dUTP (Dupont) with a BIONICK labeling kit (Gibco-BRL). Human
chromosome X and four paints were labeled with cyanine 3 (Cy3) (CAMBIO,
Cambridge, United Kingdom).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Patterns of viral gene expression and regulation in
cells latently infected with EBV. Diagrams were adapted from references
21 and 26. A BamHI
restriction endonuclease map of the 172-kb B95.8 EBV strain was used to
assign promoter and exon positions (top). Two viral programs,
designated type I and type III, are used alternatively in EBV-carrying
B-cell lines and tumor biopsies. In type III, all six EBNA messages are
spliced from a polycistronic message originating from alternative
promoters in the W or C region (flags). In type I, only EBNA1 is
expressed from a monocistronic message, initiated at the Qp promoter
(flag) (29).
|
|
(b) Hybridization.
Hybridization was performed as described
previously (31). Nuclear and chromosome preparations were
rinsed for 10 min in 2× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M
sodium citrate) and dehydrated with 70 and 95% EtOH for 5 min each
before air drying. For DNA-specific hybridization, RNase A (100 µg/ml
in 2× SSC) treatment was done at 37°C for 1 h before
hybridization. Slides were denatured for 2 to 3 min in 70%
formamide-2× SSC at 70°C. This step was omitted for hybridization
to RNA. Preparations were dehydrated with cold 70, 90, and 100% EtOH
for 5 min each and air dried. For each sample, 50 ng of probe, 5 µg
of sonicated salmon sperm DNA, and 20 µg of Escherichia
coli tRNA were suspended in 5 µl of deionized formamide and
heated at 70 to 80°C for 10 min. An equal volume of hybridization
buffer was added, so that the final hybridization solution contained
50% formamide, 2× SSC, and 10% dextran sulfate (17). The
slides were incubated at 37°C overnight.
(c) Detection.
Biotin-labeled DNA was detected by
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated avidin (Vector
Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif.) as described previously
(24). Chromosomes and nuclei were counterstained with
4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The slides were examined with a
Leica DMRBE microscope equipped with a cooled charge-coupled-device camera (Hamamatsu 4800) and filter sets specific for the fluorochromes (DAPI, FITC, and Texas red).
 |
RESULTS |
(i) EBV integration site.
RNase A treatment followed by
DNA denaturation and hybridization with the BamHI W sequence
detected the viral integration site in the telomeric portion of
Xp in Namalwa-Cl8 cells and in 4q25 in IB4-D cells (Fig. 2A and
D). Corresponding signals were obtained
in interphase nuclei (data not shown). These localizations were
confirmed with chromosome X- and chromosome 4-specific
probes (Fig. 2A and D).

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
FISH to metaphase chromosomes and nuclei of cells with
integrated EBV DNA with the EBV BamHI W DNA probe. (A to C)
Hybridization to cytogenetic preparations of Namalwa-Cl8 cells; (D to
F) hybridization to LCL IB4-D. (A) Simultaneous hybridization to both
viral (EBV BamHI W) DNA and chromosome X in denatured and
RNase A-treated samples. Yellow signals (arrow) on each sister
chromatid of chromosome X (red) indicates the localization of
integrated EBV genomes in the telomeric region of Xp. The chromosome
X-painting probe was labeled with Cy3 and the EBV BamHI W
DNA was labeled with biotin and detected with FITC-conjugated avidin.
Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI. (B) Track of the EBV
BamHI fragment W (BamHI W) RNA (green)
within a nondenatured interphase nucleus. The EBV
BamHI W DNA was labeled with biotin, and hybridization was
detected with FITC-avidin. The nucleus was counterstained with DAPI.
(C) Simultaneous hybridization of the BamHI W DNA probe and
the chromosome X-specific probe in denatured samples indicates the X
chromosome domain (red) and the BamHI W nuclear RNA (green)
in a DAPI-stained nucleus. The chromosome X-painting probe was labeled
with Cy3, and the EBV BamHI W DNA was labeled with biotin
and detected with FITC-conjugated avidin. Note that the RNA track
extends from the chromosome X interphase domain into a more peripheral
position. (D) Simultaneous hybridization to viral (EBV BamHI
W) DNA and chromosome 4 in denatured and RNase A-treated samples.
Yellow signals on each sister chromatid on q25 of one chromosome 4 (red) indicate the localization of integrated EBV genomes. The
chromosome 4-painting probe was labeled with Cy3, and the EBV
BamHI W DNA was labeled with biotin and detected with
FITC-conjugated avidin. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI. (E)
Nuclear RNA from the BamHI W region of EBV (green) in
nondenatured preparations. EBV BamHI W DNA was labeled with
biotin, and hybridization was detected with FITC-conjugated avidin. The
nucleus was counterstained with DAPI. Note the large accumulation of
RNA at the end of the track. (F) Simultaneous hybridization of the
BamHI W probe and the chromosome 4-specific probe in
denatured samples indicate the two chromosome 4 domains (red) and the
BamHI W nuclear RNA track (green) in a DAPI-stained nucleus
of an IB4-D cell. Note that the RNA track extends from the chromosome 4 interphase domain across almost half of the nucleus.
|
|
(ii) Nuclear EBV-specific RNA detection in LCLs and in type I and
type III BL lines. (a) Cell lines with integrated EBV DNA and
type III latency (Namalwa-CL8 and IB4-D).
The EBV
BamHI W probe was used to localize the complementary RNA
sequences in the type III BL line Namalwa-Cl8 and in the LCL IB4-D,
known to carry only integrated EBV DNA (6, 8, 11). Viral
transcripts were detected in 90 to 92% of the cells in both lines.
They were restricted to a single site in each nucleus (Fig. 2B and
E). Accumulating transcripts appeared as bright curvilinear tracks, similar to the earlier description of Lawrence et al. (17). In large decondensed nuclei the tracks extended
across almost half of the nucleus.
(b) Simultaneous detection of chromosome-specific nuclear domains
containing EBV integration sites and BamHI W RNA tracks in
Namalwa-Cl8 and IB4-D cells.
Namalwa-Cl8 and IB4-D cells
were stained with chromosome X- and chromosome 4-specific probes,
respectively. Hybridization solution containing a differently
labeled BamHI W probe was applied in parallel. The
BamHI W RNA tracks were regularly associated with chromosome
X domains in Namalwa-Cl8 cells and with chromosome 4 domains in IB4-D
cells (Fig. 2C and F). Analysis of over 100 Namalwa-Cl8 and IB4-D cells
showed that 73 and 70% of BamHI W RNA tracks, respectively,
appeared to be in direct contact with chromosome X and 4 domains, with
no visible separation between the domain and the RNA.
(c) Simultaneous detection of BamHI K and
BamHI W RNA in Namalwa-Cl8 and IB4-D cells.
Two-color labeling experiments were performed with the BamHI
K and BamHI W probes on nondenatured preparations.
Both probes hybridized to the same nuclear foci in both cell lines
(Fig. 3A and B).

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Nuclear EBV-specific RNA detection in LCLs and in type I
and type III BL cells. Two viral programs, designated type I and type
III, are used alternatively in EBV-carrying B-cell lines and tumor
biopsies. In type III, all six EBNA messages are spliced from a
polycistronic message. In type I, only EBNA1 is expressed from a
monocistronic message (Fig. 1). A biotin- or Texas red-labeled EBV
BamHI K DNA probe that can hybridize to both the
monocistronic and the polycistronic message and a Texas red- or
biotin-labeled BamHI W DNA probe that can hybridize to the
polycistronic but not to the monocistronic message were used to
distinguish between cells that use type III and type I programs in
two-color FISH. The biotin-labeled probes were detected with
FITC-conjugated avidin. The nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (A)
Simultaneous detection of EBV BamHI K (red) and
BamHI W (green) RNA tracks on a nucleus from the type III BL
line Namalwa-Cl8. Both probes hybridized to the same nuclear foci. (B)
Simultaneous detection of EBV BamHI K (green) and
BamHI W (red) RNA tracks on a nucleus from an LCL IB4-D
cell. (C) Two-color FISH with EBV BamHI K (green) and
BamHI W (red) probes on a nucleus of the type III BL line
MUTU III with multiple episomal EBV shows that both probes hybridized
to the same nuclear foci, creating the appearance of two-colored
tracks. (D) Simultaneous detection of EBV BamHI K (red) and
BamHI W (green) RNA tracks on a nucleus of an LCL-970402
cell that carries numerous episomal genomes. FISH shows many
two-colored RNA foci or tracks. (E and F) Detection of BamHI
K (green) but not BamHI W RNA in the type I BL lines Rael
(E) and MUTU I (F) in two-color experiments.
|
|
(d) Simultaneous detection of BamHI K and
BamHI W RNAs in cells with multiple episomal EBV DNA
copies.
Cell lines with episomal EBV-DNA such as the type
III BL line MUTU III and LCL-970402 gave positive signals with both
BamHI W and BamHI K. Two-color fluorescence
showed that both probes hybridized to the same nuclear foci, creating
the appearance of elongated two-colored dots (Fig. 3C and D). We have
found that the nuclear RNA tracks were shorter in cell lines carrying
episomal EBV genomes (i.e., MUTU and LCLs) than in cell lines with an
integrated EBV genome (i.e., Namalwa-Cl8 and IB4-D). This may be
related to the level of transcription or to the location of the
integrated EBV DNA in a more internal nuclear compartment.
(e) Detection of BamHI K but not BamHI W
RNA in type I BL lines and heterogeneous expression in the LCL
IARC-171.
Type I BL lines (MUTU I and Rael), which carry episomal
EBV, hybridize only with the BamHI K but not the
BamHI W probe in two-color experiments (Fig. 3E and F). In
LCL-970402, two positive signals were found in 96% of the cells while
no positive signals were found in 4% of the cells (Fig.
4D). In IARC-171 three categories of
cells were observed. Ninety percent of the cells hybridized with both
probes, 5% hybridized with BamHI K but not BamHI
W (Fig. 4A to C), and 5% failed to hybridize with either one of the
two probes. All three categories of cells appeared equally viable. These results suggest that a proportion of the IARC-171 but not the
LCL-970402 cells may shift from a type III to a type I program and also
raise the question of whether a latency 0 program exists as well. We
cannot entirely exclude technical reasons for the occasional lack of
hybridization signals. We have tried to minimize this problem, however,
by scoring only regions where the signal-positive and signal-negative
cells were close to each other, as exemplified in Fig. 4. The
difference between LCL-970402 and IARC-171 also speaks against the
technical artifact.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Heterogenous EBV RNA expression in LCLs. The
BamHI W probe was labeled with Texas red, and the
BamHI K probe was labeled with biotin and detected with
FITC-conjugated avidin. (A to C) Two-color FISH using EBV
BamHI K (green) and BamHI W (red) probes on
nuclei of cells of the LCL IARC-171 show two-colored (green and red)
tracks in one nucleus and only green (BamHI K RNA) but not
red (BamHI W RNA) tracks in the other nucleus, suggesting
that a proportion of the cells may shift from a type III to a type I
program. (C) Merged images of the red and green signals. Note that the
signals of the upper nucleus are green but that those of the lower one
have two colors. (D) Simultaneous detection of EBV BamHI K
(green) RNA and BamHI W (red) RNA in nuclei of LCL-970402
cells. One of the nuclei failed to hybridize with either one of the two
probes, suggesting that the latency 0 program may exist.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Latent EBV genomes are differentially expressed in different cell
types, as was clearly stated in the introduction. We found that a
double-RNA-track FISH technique can distinguish between cells using a
type I or a type III program. This finding may permit the study of EBV
program switches in LCLs and other EBV-carrying cell populations in
vitro and, at a later stage, hopefully in vivo as well. It may open the
way to the analysis of program switches during primary infection as in
mononucleosis. Immunoblastic transformation and rapid proliferation is
followed by immune rejection, mediated largely by CD8+
cytotoxic T lymphocytes, targeted against major histocompatibility complex class I-associated peptides derived from EBNA2 to -6 or the
LMPs. EBNA1 is not a rejection target, due to the impairment of its
processing by the glycine-alanine repeat (20). The first phase raises the number of virus-carrying cells to a ceiling level, prior to rejection. The rejection response secures the survival of the
host. The survival of the virus is secured by its persistence in
resting B lymphocytes that express EBNA1 only, do not expand, and
are not rejected. A latently infected reservoir is established in
all infected individuals, including immunodefective hosts with large
immunoblastomas that have been successfully treated by adoptive transfer of T cells.
We have previously postulated (14) that a small fraction of
the proliferating immunoblast population regularly switches to a
resting B-cell phenotype, perhaps by a process akin to the generation
of memory B cells, with a concomitant program switch from III to I. The
opposite program switch, from I to III, is well known. It occurs in BL
type I lines drifting to type III and can be induced in stable type I
BL cells by 5-azacytidine-induced DNA demethylation
(22). So far, the III-to-I switch is only a postulate that
has been inaccessible to direct study. We hope that the method
described in this paper will open the way to direct experimentation on
this important problem.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank László Székely (MTC, KI) for
LCL-970402. We gratefully appreciate the technical assistance of
Katalin Benedek, Hajnalka Kiss, Agneta Manneborg Sandlund, and Ying
Yang (MTC, KI).
This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society
(Cancerfonden), the Karolinska Institute, the Swedish Medical Research
Council, and the Cancer Research Institute/Cancer Foundation, New York,
N.Y.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Microbiology and
Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institute, Box 280, Doctorsringen 13, S-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. Phone: (46) 8 728 6770. Fax: (46) 8 33 04 98. E-mail: Anna.Szeles{at}mtc.ki.se.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Arrand, J. R.,
L. Rymo,
J. L. Walsh,
E. Bjorck,
T. Lindhal, and B. E. Griffin.
1981.
Molecular cloning of the complete Epstein-Barr virus genome as a set of overlapping restriction endonuclease fragments.
Nucleic Acids Res.
9:2999-3014[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Carter, K. C., and J. B. Lawrence.
1991.
DNA and RNA within the nucleus: how much sequence-specific spatial organization?
J. Cell. Biochem.
47:124-129[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Chen, F.,
J. Z. Zou,
L. di Renzo,
G. Winberg,
L. F. Hu,
E. Klein,
G. Klein, and I. Ernberg.
1995.
A subpopulation of normal B cells latently infected with Epstein-Barr virus resembles Burkitt lymphoma cells in expressing EBNA-1 but not EBNA-2 or LMP1.
J. Virol.
69:3752-3758[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Dirks, R. W.,
K. C. Daniel, and A. K. Raap.
1995.
RNAs radiate from gene to cytoplasm as revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
J. Cell Sci.
108:2565-2572[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Fåhraeus, R.,
H. L. Fu,
I. Ernberg,
J. Finke,
M. Rowe,
G. Klein,
K. Falk,
E. Nilsson,
M. Yadav,
P. Busson,
T. Tursz, and B. Kallin.
1988.
Expression of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded proteins in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Int. J. Cancer
42:329-338[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Gargano, S.,
D. Caporossi,
G. Gualandi, and E. Calef.
1992.
Different localization of Epstein-Barr virus genome in two subclones of the Burkitt lymphoma cell line Namalwa.
Genes Chromosome Cancer
4:205-210[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Gregory, C. D.,
M. Rowe, and A. B. Rickinson.
1990.
Different Epstein-Barr virus-B cell interactions in phenotypically distinct clones of a Burkitt's lymphoma cell line.
J. Gen. Virol.
71:1481-1495[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Henderson, A.,
S. Ripley,
M. Heller, and E. Kieff.
1983.
Chromosome site for Epstein Barr virus DNA in a Burkitt tumor cell line and in lymphocytes growth-transformed in vitro.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
80:1987-1991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Herbst, H.,
H. Stein, and G. Niedobitek.
1993.
Epstein-Barr virus and CD30+ malignant lymphomas.
Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.
4:191-239.
|
| 10.
|
Huang, S., and D. L. Spector.
1991.
Nascent pre-mRNA transcripts are associated with nuclear regions enriched in splicing factors.
Genes Dev.
5:2288-2302[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Hurley, E. A.,
L. D. Klaman,
S. Agger,
J. B. Lawrence, and D. A. Thorley-Lawson.
1991.
The prototypical Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cell line IB4 is an unusual variant containing integrated but not episomal viral DNA.
J. Virol.
65:3958-3963[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Kieff, E.
1996.
Epstein-Barr virus and its replication, p. 2343-2396.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, R. M. Chanock, J. L. Melnick, T. P. Month, B. Roizman, and S. E. Straus (ed.), Fields virology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 13.
|
King, W.,
A. L. Thomas-Powell,
N. Raab-Traub,
M. Hawke, and E. Kieff.
1980.
Epstein-Barr virus RNA. V. Viral RNA in a restringently infected, growth-transformed cell.
J. Virol.
36:506-518[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Klein, G.
1994.
Epstein-Barr virus strategy in normal and neoplastic B cells.
Cell
77:791-793[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Klein, G.,
L. Dombos, and B. Gothoskar.
1972.
Sensitivity of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) producer and non-producer human lymphoblastoid cell lines to superinfection with EB-virus.
Int. J. Cancer
10:44-57[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Lawrence, J. B.,
K. C. Carter, and X. Xing.
1993.
Probing functional organization within the nucleus: is genome structure integrated with RNA metabolism?
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
58:807-818[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Lawrence, J. B.,
R. H. Singer, and L. M. Marselle.
1989.
Highly localized tracks of specific transcripts within interphase nuclei visualized by in situ hybridization.
Cell
57:493-502[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Lenoir, G. M.,
M. Vuillaume, and C. Bonnardel.
1985.
The use of lymphomatous and lymphoblastoid cell lines in the study of Burkitt's lymphoma.
IARC (Int. Agency Res. Cancer) Sci. Publ.
60:309-318.
|
| 19.
|
Lestou, V. S.,
S. Strehl,
T. Lion,
H. Gadner, and P. F. Ambros.
1996.
High-resolution FISH of the entire integrated Epstein-Barr virus genome on extended human DNA.
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
74:211-217[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Levitskaya, J.,
M. Coram,
V. Levitsky,
S. Imreh,
P. M. Steigerwald-Mullen,
G. Klein,
M. G. Kurilla, and M. G. Masucci.
1995.
Inhibition of antigen processing by the internal repeat region of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen-1.
Nature
375:685-688[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Masucci, M. G., and I. Ernberg.
1994.
Epstein-Barr virus: adaptation to a life within the immune system.
Trends Microbiol.
2:125-130[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Masucci, M. G.,
B. Contreras-Salazar,
E. Ragnar,
K. Falk,
J. Minarovits,
I. Ernberg, and G. Klein.
1989.
5-Azacytidine up regulates the expression of Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA-2) through EBNA-6 and latent membrane protein in the Burkitt's lymphoma line Rael.
J. Virol.
63:3135-3141[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Pallesen, G.,
S. J. Hamilton-Dutoit, and X. Zhou.
1993.
The association of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) with T cell lymphoproliferations and Hodgkin's disease: two new developments in the EBV field.
Adv. Cancer Res.
62:179-239[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Pinkel, D.,
T. Straume, and J. W. Gray.
1986.
Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:2934-2938[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Raap, A. K.,
F. M. van de'Rijke,
R. W. Dirks,
C. J. Sol,
R. Boom, and M. van der Ploeg.
1991.
Bicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization to intron and exon mRNA sequences.
Exp. Cell Res.
197:319-322[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Rickinson, A. B., and E. Kieff.
1996.
Epstein-Barr virus, p. 2397-2476.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, R. M. Chanock, J. L. Melnick, T. P. Month, B. Roizman, and S. E. Straus (ed.), Fields virology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 27.
|
Rosbash, M., and R. H. Singer.
1993.
RNA travel: tracks from DNA to cytoplasm.
Cell
75:399-401[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Rowe, M.,
D. T. Rowe,
C. D. Gregory,
L. S. Young,
P. J. Farrell,
H. Rupani, and A. B. Rickinson.
1987.
Differences in B cell growth phenotype reflect novel patterns of Epstein-Barr virus latent gene expression in Burrkitt's lymphoma cells.
EMBO J.
6:2743-2751[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Schaefer, B. C.,
J. L. Strominger, and S. H. Speck.
1995.
Redefining the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded nuclear antigen EBNA-1 gene promoter and transcription initiation site in group I Burkitt lymphoma cell lines.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:10565-10569[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Spector, D. L.
1993.
Nuclear organization of pre-mRNA processing.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
5:442-447[Medline].
|
| 30a.
| Székely, L. Unpublished data.
|
| 31.
|
Szeles, A.,
S. Bajalica,
A. Lindblom,
T. Lushnikova,
V. I. Kashuba,
S. Imreh,
M. Nordenskjöld,
G. Klein, and E. R. Zabarovsky.
1996.
Mapping of a new MAP kinase activated protein kinase gene (3pK) to human chromosome band 3p21.2 and ordering of 3pK and two cosmid markers in 3p22-p21 tumor suppressor region by two color FISH.
Chromosome Res.
4:310-313[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Xing, Y., and J. B. Lawrence.
1991.
Preservation of specific RNA distribution within the chromatin-depleted nuclear substructure demonstrated by in situ hybridization coupled with biochemical fractionation.
J. Cell Biol.
112:1055-1063[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Xing, Y., and J. B. Lawrence.
1993.
Nuclear RNA tracks: structural basis for transcription and splicing?
Trends Cell Biol.
3:346-353.
[Medline] |
| 34.
|
Xing, Y.,
C. V. Johnson,
P. R. Dobner, and J. B. Lawrence.
1993.
Higher level organization of individual gene transcription and RNA splicing.
Science
259:1326-1330[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, June 1999, p. 5064-5069, Vol. 73, No. 6
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Rose, C., Green, M., Webber, S., Kingsley, L., Day, R., Watkins, S., Reyes, J., Rowe, D.
(2002). Detection of Epstein-Barr Virus Genomes in Peripheral Blood B Cells from Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 2533-2544
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wiener, F., Kuschak, T. I., Ohno, S., Mai, S.
(1999). Deregulated expression of c-Myc in a translocation-negative plasmacytoma on extrachromosomal elements that carry IgH and myc genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96: 13967-13972
[Abstract]
[Full Text]