Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, June 1999, p. 4670-4677, Vol. 73, No. 6
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Effect of Bovine Papillomavirus E2 Protein-Specific
Monoclonal Antibodies on Papillomavirus DNA Replication
Reet
Kurg,1,2
Jüri
Parik,3
Erkki
Juronen,4
Tiina
Sedman,1
Aare
Abroi,1,2
Ingrid
Liiv,1
Ülo
Langel,5 and
Mart
Ustav1,*
Department of Microbiology and
Virology1 and Department of Evolutionary
Biology,3 Institute of Molecular and Cell
Biology, and Institute of General and Molecular
Pathology,4 Tartu University, and Estonian
Biocentre,2 Tartu, Estonia, and
Arrheniuslaboratories, Department of Neurochemistry and
Neurotoxicology, Stockholm University, Stockholm,
Sweden5
Received 5 October 1998/Accepted 23 February 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1) E2 protein is the master
regulator of papillomavirus replication and transcription. We have
raised a panel of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against the BPV-1 E2
protein and used them to probe the structure and function of the
protein. Five MAbs reacted with linear epitopes, and four MAbs
recognized conformation-dependent epitopes which mapped within the
C-terminal DNA-binding and dimerization domain. MAb 1E2 was able to
recognize the replication- and transactivation-defective but not the
competent conformation of the transactivation domain of the E2 protein.
MAb 5H4 prevented efficiently the formation of E2-DNA as well as
E2-dependent E1-E2-origin complexes and also dissociated preformed
complexes in a concentration-dependent manner. Cotransfection of
several MAbs with the BPV-1 minimal origin plasmid pUCAlu into CHO4.15
cells resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of replication.
Inhibition of replication by MAb 5H4 and the Fab' fragment of 5H4
correlated with their ability to dissociate the E2 protein from the
DNA. MAb 3F12 and MAbs 1H10 and 1E4, directed against the hinge region,
were also capable of inhibiting BPV-1 origin replication in CHO4.15
cells. However, the Fab' fragments of 1H10 and 3F12 had no effect in
the transient replication assay. These data suggest that MAbs directed
against the hinge region sterically hinder the inter- or intramolecular
interactions required for the replication activity of the E2 protein.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1)
has been studied extensively as a model for papillomavirus replication
and transcription. The viral E2 protein is the master regulator of the
viral life cycle
this protein modulates the transcription of viral
genes (41) and is responsible for the initiation of DNA
replication (43, 44, 48) and for the stable maintenance of
the viral genome (31), which is achieved presumably through
facilitation of the association of the viral genome with chromatin
(19a, 23, 40). E2 is a sequence-specific DNA-binding
protein, and it interacts with the components of the cellular
transcription (33, 49) and replication (24)
machinery. The viral E2 and E1 proteins interact with each other
(2, 4, 30, 35) during the initiation of replication,
resulting in cooperative binding of E1 and E2 on the BPV-1 replication
origin (25-27, 35-39).
The BPV-1 E2 protein, like other transcription factors, is composed of
relatively well-defined function-specific modules. Structural and
mutational analyses have revealed three distinct domains. The
amino-terminal part (residues 1 to 210) is an activation domain for
transcription (12, 28) and replication (43). It
is followed by the unstructured hinge region and the carboxy-terminal DNA-binding and dimerization domain (residues 310 to 410)
(29). Deletion analysis of the E2 protein has shown that the
transactivation domain and the DNA-binding and dimerization domains are
necessary for both replication and transcription, while large deletions in the hinge region affect replication preferentially and transcription less (46). The structure of the carboxy-terminal DNA-binding and dimerization domain has been solved by X-ray analysis and has
revealed a dimeric DNA-binding and dimerization motif (15, 16). Most of the information about structural and functional determinants in the amino-terminal activation domain of the E2 protein
has been obtained by mutational analysis (7, 12, 14, 46).
These data confirm that the E2 amino-terminal domain, like the
C-terminal domain, has a highly organized structure and that even a
single point mutation can inactivate the function of the E2 protein in
the activation of transcription, replication, or both (1, 5, 9,
13, 34).
Antibodies are efficient and highly specific tools for identifying the
structural determinants of macromolecules and/or for studying the role
of a protein in functional assays (18, 19, 21, 42, 45).
Antibodies have been used for the characterization of the human
papillomavirus (HPV) E2 protein. For example, polyclonal antibodies
against overlapping synthetic peptides that cover the HPV type 16 (HPV-16) E2 protein have been used to test the structure of this
protein (10), and the interaction of the HPV-16 E2 protein with the E1 protein could be blocked by a monoclonal antibody (MAb)
that bound E2 in the region of amino acids 18 to 41 (17).
In this study, we describe the production of a set of MAbs against the
BPV-1 E2 protein and characterize their ability to interfere with the
functions of the E2 protein in vivo and in vitro in biochemical and
functional assays.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Production of the BPV-1 E2 protein.
E2 protein was expressed
in the pET11c-based system in Escherichia coli and was
purified to homogeneity by conventional methods (37) with
modifications. First, we precipitated nucleic acids from clarified cell
lysates by the slow addition of polyethylenimine (Polymin P; Sigma) to
a final concentration of 0.6%. Precipitation was carried out on ice
for 30 min, and the pellet was collected by centrifugation. Proteins
were recovered from the supernatant by precipitation with 35% ammonium
sulfate and purified to homogeneity by conventional chromatography.
Production of MAbs.
Female BALB/C mice were injected with 50 µg of purified BPV-1 E2 protein five times at 3- to 4-week intervals.
The injections were intraperitoneal, with E2 suspended initially in
Freund's complete adjuvant and subsequently in phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS). Following the final injection, mice were allowed to rest for 5 weeks and then were injected with 100 µg of antigen. One week
later, final boosts with 100, 200, and 200 µg of protein in PBS at 4, 3, and 2 days before fusion, respectively, were performed. Sp2/0
myeloma cells and cells from one third of the spleen were washed three
times with sterile PBS. The final pellet was mixed by tapping the tube,
and 1 ml of 50% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4000 (Merck) was added over
1 min with gentle shaking. The cells were centrifuged at 100 × g for 5 min, the PEG solution was removed, and the resuspended
cells were plated on five 96-well microtiter plates containing
hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine medium. Supernatants were tested 10 days after fusion as described below by a direct enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Screening of hybridomas.
Wells of ELISA plates (Maxisorp;
Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were coated with 100 µl of E2 (2 µg/ml in
PBS) overnight at 4°C. After the coating step, the plates were washed
three times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS/T) and blocked
with PBS/T containing 0.05% casein for 30 min. Then, 80 µl of PBS/T
and 20 µl of hybridoma supernatants were added to the wells, and the
plates were incubated for 60 min on a shaker at room temperature. The
plates were washed with PBS/T, followed by the addition of 100 µl of
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) (LabAS
Ltd., Tartu, Estonia) diluted 1:2,500 in PBS/T supplemented with 2%
PEG 6000 (Merck). The plates were incubated for 15 min and then washed
with PBS/T. Then, 100 µl of TMB substrate solution
(3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine-H2O2 in 0.1 M
acetate-citrate buffer [pH 4.5]) was added.
The antibody subclasses were determined by an ELISA as described above
with peroxidase-labelled goat anti-mouse isotype antibodies (LabAS).
Purification of MAbs.
The MAbs were purified from ascitic
fluid by ammonium sulfate precipitation and ion-exchange chromatography
on Blue DEAE-Toyopearl 650S with a Pharmacia standard fast protein
liquid chromatography system (20). The IgG concentration was
estimated at 280 nm by use of an extinction coefficient of 14. The
purified MAbs were stored in PBS containing 50% glycerol at
20°C.
Preparation of Fab' fragments.
Fab' fragments were prepared
from the MAbs as described by Porter (32) with
modifications. The MAbs were dialyzed against 0.1 M sodium acetate
buffer (pH 5.5) containing 1 mM EDTA and 25 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. The
antibodies were digested with papain at an enzyme/antibody ratio of
1:10 (wt/wt) for 24 h at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by the
addition of iodoacetamide to a final concentration of 30 mM. The
digested antibodies were dialyzed against 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH
7.2), and Fab' fragments were purified on a Mono Q column.
Peptide synthesis.
Peptides were assembled in a stepwise
manner on a solid support with a model 431A peptide synthesizer
(Applied Biosystems) by the standard NMP/HOBt solvent activation
strategy on a 0.1-mmol scale (22).
ELISA with peptides.
The surfaces of the microtiter wells
were activated with 0.25% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 30 min at 60°C.
The plates were washed three times with PBS, and a peptide solution at
a concentration of 20 µg/ml in PBS was added to the wells. The plates
were incubated overnight at room temperature, washed with PBS/T, and
blocked with 1% nonfat dry milk in PBS/T for 2 h. The plates were
washed with PBS/T, and antibodies diluted in PBS/T were added to the wells, incubated, and processed as described above.
Plasmids.
The pET-E2 vector used for the expression of E2 in
E. coli was generated by PCR amplification with specific
primers and was cloned between the NdeI and BamHI
sites of plasmid pET11c. The E2 expression constructs pCGE2, pCGE2C,
pCGE8/E2, and pCGE2(D92-161) have been described previously (43,
44). Plasmid VP16:E2 (24) contains 80 C-terminal amino
acids from VP16 fused to the C terminus of E2 (starting from amino acid
250) in the context of pCG. The E2 N-terminal deletion mutants
E2(D1-23), E2(D1-85), E2(D1-112), and E2(D1-183) were generated by PCR
with appropriate oligonucleotide primers containing an initiation
methionine codon in the optimal Kozak context and were cloned into the
pCGE2 expression vector at the XbaI-BamHI sites.
For the E2 C-terminal deletion mutants E2(D219-410), E2(D284-410), and
E2(D310-410), PCR primer pairs were designed with terminal recognition
sequences for KpnI-BclI and were cloned into the
corresponding sites in pCGE2. The replication reporter plasmid pUCAlu
has been described previously (43). pHookAlu was made by
cloning the Alu fragment from pUCAlu at the HindIII-BamHI sites of pHook-2 (Invitrogen)
and deleting the cytomegalovirus promoter with restriction enzymes
HindIII and BssHI.
Cells and transfections.
E2 expression constructs (100 ng)
were electroporated at 180 V into COS-7 cells (2 × 106 to 6 × 106) in 250 µl of Dulbecco
modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and
50 µg of denatured salmon sperm DNA at room temperature
(43). For replication assays, CHO4.15 cells were
trypsinized, centrifuged, and resuspended in F12 medium containing 10%
FCS at a density of 107 cells/ml. The cell suspension (250 µl) was mixed with 100 ng of pUCAlu DNA, 50 µg of salmon sperm DNA,
and various concentrations of MAbs or Fab' fragments in a disposable
electroporation cuvette and subjected to an electric discharge of 230 V
from an Invitrogen Gene Pulser. After the discharge, the cell
suspension was left at room temperature for 15 min, and then the cells
were washed and plated in F12 medium supplemented with 10% FCS. The
extraction of episomal DNA from cells and its analysis by Southern
blotting were performed as described previously (43). For
Western blot analysis, 500 ng of pHookAlu was cotransfected with MAbs
(80 µg/ml), and transiently transfected cells were separated from the
total population of CHO4.15 cells with magnetic beads (Invitrogen)
according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Immunoblotting of E2.
COS-7 cells transfected with E2
proteins in 60-mm diameter dishes were lysed 36 h after
electroporation in 200 µl of Laemmli sample buffer. Transfected
CHO4.15 cells were separated from the magnetic beads by boiling in 100 µl of Laemmli sample buffer. Proteins were separated by sodium
dodecyl sulfate-10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). After
transfer, the nitrocellulose membranes were incubated with mouse
E2-specific MAbs and a secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
antibody by use of an ECL detection kit (Amersham) according to the
manufacturer's recommendations. To analyze the E2 protein level in
CHO4.15 cells transfected with MAbs, rabbit anti-E2 polyclonal antibody
was used.
Mobility shift assays.
For preparation of COS-7 cell
extracts, transfected cells were removed from semiconfluent growth on
100-mm-diameter plates with a rubber policeman, washed, and lysed in
100 µl of lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 100 mM NaCl, 30 mM
KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.35% Nonidet P-40, 10 mM dithiothreitol, protease
inhibitors) on ice for 30 min. Cell debris was removed by
centrifugation, glycerol was added to a final concentration of 20%,
and the extracts were divided into aliquots and stored at
70°C. For
gel shift assays, 2 µl of cell extract was incubated in 10 µl of
binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 100 mM KCl, 2 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 15% glycerol, 5 mg of bovine serum albumin per ml, 1 µg of leupeptin per ml, 1 µg
of aprotinin per ml) at room temperature for 15 min in the presence of
1 µg of sonicated salmon sperm DNA and 0.2 ng of
32P-labelled oligonucleotide containing the E2 binding
site. For bacterially expressed E2, 2 ng of protein was used per
reaction. Double-stranded high-affinity binding site 9 of BPV-1
(5'-ACAAAGTACCGTTGCCGGTCGAA-3') was
used as a probe. Protein-DNA complexes were resolved by 6% PAGE
(acrylamide-N,N-methylene-bisacrylamide, 80:1) with 0.25× Tris-borate-EDTA. Gels were dried and exposed to X-ray film. MAbs (1 to
10 ng/µl) were added either before or after DNA binding and were
incubated for an additional 20 min. For protease digestion experiments,
bacterially expressed E2 protein was incubated with 2 µg of pronase
for 5 min. The E1-E2-origin complex formation assay was performed as
described by Sedman and Stenlund (35). The effect of
antibodies on E1-E2-origin complex formation was tested either before
or after the assembly of the complex.
 |
RESULTS |
Generation of E2-specific MAbs.
The soluble E2 protein was
purified to apparent homogeneity from lysates of
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-induced E. coli
overexpressing BPV-1 E2 from the pET11c expression vector by
conventional chromatography (37). BALB/c mice were immunized with the purified functionally active E2 protein as described in
Materials and Methods. We obtained nearly 200 hybridoma cell lines, 17 of which were positive for the E2 protein in both ELISAs and immunoblot
assays, while 5 hybridomas were positive in ELISAs only. Nine MAbs that
were deemed most useful were purified from the ascitic fluids of the
respective hybridoma cell lines and studied in various assays as
described below (Table 1). All studied antibodies belonged to the IgG1 subtype, with the exception of 3C1,
which belonged to the IgG2a subtype. All of these MAbs had high
affinities for and fast kinetics of binding to their respective epitopes, as found by the concentration dependence of antibody binding
in ELISAs (data not shown).
Epitope mapping.
To define the continuous epitopes recognized
by the antibodies, the reactivity of each MAb to full-length and
truncated E2 proteins expressed in COS-7 cells was determined by
Western blot analysis. The linear epitopes for the initially isolated
17 MAbs were mapped in the region between amino acids 184 and 309; for 12, the epitopes were found within the region between residues 184 and
218 (data not shown). We concluded from these results that the sequence
of the 34 amino acids within the region from residues 184 to 218 is the
major immunodominant determinant of the BPV-1 E2 protein. The results
of immunoblot analysis for five selected purified antibodies with the
linear epitopes are shown in Fig. 1A. To
map the epitopes for the 1E2, 3F12, and 1H10 antibodies more precisely,
we synthesized four overlapping peptides covering the region between
amino acids 162 and 210. The sequences of the synthesized peptides and
the ability of the MAbs to bind to these peptides in an ELISA are shown
in Fig. 1B. Peptides P2 (residues 171 to 192) and P3 (residues 184 to
201) were recognized by 1E2, while peptide P4 was recognized by 3F12.
To narrow down the sizes of the epitopes, two additional peptides, P5
(residues 179 to 190) and P6 (residues 197 to 208), were synthesized
and confirmed by an ELISA to contain the recognition sequences for the
1E2 and 3F12 antibodies, respectively. 1H10 did not recognize any of
the synthesized peptides and was therefore mapped by the Western blot analysis to the region between amino acids 208 and 218.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Epitope mapping of E2-specific MAbs. (A) Schematic
representation of the truncated E2 proteins used and the results of the
immunoblot analysis of the E2 proteins (diagram at right). wt, wild
type; conf., MAbs with discontinuous epitopes. (B) Reactivity of MAbs
to synthetic peptides (P1 to P6) covering the region from amino acids
162 to 210 of E2 in an ELISA. +, positive result; , negative
result.
|
|
To test the ability of the antibodies to recognize their respective
linear epitopes on the E2 protein in the E2-DNA complex, a mobility
shift assay was used. All MAbs against the linear epitopes, with the
exception of 1E2, were able to induce a supershift (Fig. 2A), indicating that their epitopes are
exposed on the surface of the DNA-bound E2 molecule.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Characterization of E2-specific MAbs. (A) Reactivity of
E2-specific MAbs with the native E2 protein. The mobility shift assay
was carried out with 2 ng of bacterially expressed and purified E2
protein and 0.2 ng of radiolabelled E2 binding site for 15 min at room
temperature. (B) Lanes 1 to 10 show reactivity of MAbs with
discontinuous epitopes with truncated E2 proteins expressed in COS-7
cells. Band shift assays were performed with 2 µl of cell extract.
Lanes 11 to 16 show reactivity of MAbs to the E2 DNA-binding domain
(DBD). Bacterially expressed E2 protein was treated with 2 µg of
pronase for 10 min at room temperature, and then reactivity was
determined. (C) Reactivity of MAb 1E2 with truncated E2 proteins
expressed in COS-7 cells. MAbs were added after E2 was mixed with its
DNA target. neg., cells transfected with carrior only; wt, wild type.
Protein-DNA complexes were resolved by 6% PAGE with 0.25×
Tris-borate-EDTA.
|
|
Accessibility of the MAb 1E2 epitope in the E2 protein.
The
epitope for MAb 3F12 (residues 199 to 206) is efficiently exposed in
the DNA-bound E2 protein, while the epitope for MAb 1E2, located 8 residues upstream, is poorly recognized by the respective antibody in
the full-length E2 protein in complex with DNA (Fig. 2A, compare lanes
2 and 3 with lanes 4 and 5). However, the epitope for MAb 1E2 was
readily exposed in truncated E2 proteins bound to DNA
E2(D1-23),
E2(D1-85), E2(D1-112), E2(D1-183), and E2C (Fig. 2C)
as well as in the
internal deletion mutant E2(D92-161) (data not shown). All of these
deletion mutants were inactive for the activation of transcription and
replication (21a). Therefore, the epitope for MAb 1E2 could
be identified as a transactivation domain denaturation-specific epitope
of the E2 protein; the exposure of the 1E2 epitope indicates that the
E2 protein transactivation domain has an inactive conformation for
transcription and replication.
Antibodies against the C-terminal domain of the E2 protein.
MAbs 3E8, 3H5, 5F10, and 5H4 did not react with the E2 protein on
immunoblots, indicating that the epitopes of these MAbs are sensitive
to denaturation. To define further the epitopes for these MAbs, the
reactivity of each MAb to the full-length or truncated E2 protein
expressed in COS-7 cells was determined by a gel shift assay. All four
studied antibodies were able to react with both the full-length E2
protein (data not shown) and E2C expressed in COS-7 cells (Fig. 2B,
lanes 1 to 5). MAbs 3E8, 3H5, and 5F10 were able to induce a
supershift, and MAb 5H4 prevented the formation of the E2-DNA or
E2C-DNA complex (Fig. 2B, lane 5; see also Fig. 5A, lanes 2 to 5). MAb
5H4 not only prevented the formation of the E2-DNA complex but also
dissociated the preformed E2-DNA complex, and this effect was dependent
on the concentration of the antibody. The dissociation of the preformed
complex required concentrations of MAb 5H4 higher than those required
to block complex formation. The chimeric protein VP16-E2, which
contains amino acids 250 to 410 of the E2 protein, was recognized by
MAbs 3E8, 3H5, and 5H4 but poorly, if at all, by MAb 5F10 (Fig. 2B, lanes 6 to 10).
The carboxy-terminal DNA-binding and dimerization domain of the E2
protein forms a protease-resistant core (8). When the E2
protein was incubated with pronase prior to the addition of antibodies,
the DNA-binding domain of the E2 protein was still able to interact
with MAbs 3E8, 3H5, and 5H4 and weakly with MAb 5F10 (Fig. 2B, lanes 11 to 16), resulting in a supershift or dissociation of the E2-DNA
complex. These data allowed us to map the epitopes for the
conformational MAbs 3E8, 3H5, 5F10, and 5H4 within the carboxy-terminal
~100 residues of the E2 protein. Immunoprecipitation studies with
truncated E2 proteins mapped the epitopes for these MAbs within amino
acids 310 to 410 (data not shown). The epitope mapping for MAb 5F10 was
less definitive because the accessibility of the epitope for this MAb
was dependent on the context of the protein. Although this MAb
recognized an epitope in the E2-DNA and E2C-DNA complexes, the same
epitope in VP16-E2 and the E2 DNA-binding and dimerization domain (Fig.
2B, compare lanes 4, 9, and 15) was poorly recognized.
Effect of MAbs on E1-E2-origin complex formation.
The BPV-1
minimal origin of replication comprises the E1 binding site, the
A/T-rich region, and the E2 binding site (44). The E1 and E2
proteins bind cooperatively to the origin and form an E1-E2-origin
complex (27, 35, 39). It has been shown that the ability of
the E2 protein to form a complex with the E1 protein on DNA correlates
with the efficiency of initiation of replication in vivo (11,
36). We studied the effect of the antibodies on E2-dependent
E1-E2-origin complex formation. Antibodies 3F12, 1H10, 1E4, 3C1, 3E8,
3H5, and 5F10 all recognized their respective E2 epitopes in the
E1-E2-origin complex and supershifted this complex (Fig.
3A, lanes 3 to 9). Interestingly, MAbs
which recognize the C-terminal part of the E2 molecule resulted in an E1-E2-origin MAb complex which migrated much more slowly than complexes
in which the MAbs bound to epitopes closer to the center of the E2
molecule. The epitope for MAb 1E2 is masked in the DNA-bound E2 protein
and remains nonaccessible to this antibody in the E1-E2-DNA complex
(Fig. 3A, lane 2). MAb 5H4, which specifically dissociated E2 from DNA,
prevented the formation of the E1-E2-origin complex (Fig. 3A, lane 10).
None of the antibodies had any effect on the mobility of the E1-origin
complex formed at a high E1 protein concentration (Fig. 3B). These
results showed that the epitopes for the most studied MAbs, with the
exception of 1E2, are exposed in the E1-E2-origin complex and that MAb
5H4 is the only antibody which interferes with E2-dependent
E1-E2-origin complex formation.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effect of E2-specific MAbs on the formation of the
E1-E2-origin (ori) complex. (A) A gel mobility shift assay was
performed with 2 ng of E1 protein and 5 ng of E2 protein for 20 min.
MAbs were added to a final concentration of 10 ng/µl and incubated
for an additional 20 min. (B) A gel mobility shift assay was used to
analyze the complex formed in the presence of E1 only. The resulting
complexes were treated with 0.4% glutaraldehyde and separated on
agarose gels.
|
|
Effect of anti-E2 MAbs on BPV-1 origin replication in cells.
The observation that antibodies recognized their respective epitopes in
the DNA-bound E2 protein raised the possibility that some of these
antibodies could interfere with some functions of the E2 protein in the
initiation of DNA replication in vivo. Therefore, the purified
antibodies were tested in a transient replication assay in vivo for
their ability to block E2 protein functions in BPV-1 origin
replication. Transfer of the MAbs into mammalian cells was carried out
by electroporation (6). The transfection conditions were
optimized to a level which allowed the uptake of both DNA and protein
into CHO4.15 cells, which constitutively express viral E1 and E2
proteins (31) (see Materials and Methods). The presence of
the relatively high concentrations of antibodies in the transfection
mixture had no effect on CHO4.15 cell growth. We estimated that 1 to
2% of the input antibody was taken up by the cells under these
conditions, as determined by Western blot analysis. Analysis of the
cells immediately and 24 and 48 h after transfection showed
structurally intact immunoglobulin heavy chains within the cells,
indicating that no active degradation of the transfected antibodies
took place in the cells (data not shown).
Different amounts of E2-specific MAbs were cotransfected with 100 ng of
origin-containing plasmid pUCAlu by electroporation into CHO4.15 cells.
Episomal DNA was extracted by alkaline lysis at 2 or 3 days after
transfection, purified, digested with DpnI and linearizing
enzyme HindIII, and analyzed by Southern blotting as
described earlier (43). The effect of the E2-specific
antibodies on the replication of the BPV-1 origin was dependent on the
antibody concentration used (Fig. 4A). At
a low concentration (20 µg/ml), MAb 1H10 strongly inhibited and MAbs
3F12 and 1E4 moderately inhibited the replication of origin-containing
plasmid pUCAlu in CHO4.15 cells. The inhibition of replication by MAbs
3F12, 1H10, and 1E4 became almost complete when the antibody
concentration in the cell suspension was increased to 80 µg/ml (Fig.
4A and B, lanes 3 to 5). MAb 5H4, which efficiently inhibited the
formation of both E2-DNA and E1-E2-origin complexes in vitro, exhibited
only a weak inhibitory effect in the transient replication assay at a
low concentration. However, at a higher concentration (80 µg/ml), strong inhibition of replication was achieved with MAb 5H4 (Fig. 4A and
B, lane 10). MAbs 1E2, 3C1, 3E8, 3H5, and 5F10 exhibited only weak
inhibition, and a nonrelated anti-
-galactosidase MAb had no effect
on origin-containing plasmid pUCAlu replication at all concentrations
tested. The differences in the abilities of the MAbs to inhibit
replication were not caused by differential uptake of MAbs by cells,
since equivalent concentrations of intracellular MAbs were used in the
cell suspension during electroporation and comparable amounts of the
antibodies were detected in the cells by Western blotting (data not
shown). The affinities of all of these antibodies were similar, as
indicated by the concentration-dependent binding of the antibodies in
the ELISA (data not shown).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effect of E2-specific MAbs on papillomavirus
replication. (A) CHO4.15 cells constitutively expressing BPV-1 E1 and
E2 proteins were electroporated with 100 ng of reporter plasmid pUCAlu
and various concentrations of MAbs. Cells were harvested 72 h
after electroporation. Episomal DNA was digested with DpnI
and linearizing enzyme HindIII and analyzed by Southern
blotting. The replication signals of three independent experiments were
quantified with a PhosphorImager, and signals from cells transfected
with the origin-containing plasmid only were used as a control to
normalize the results. Symbols: , MAb 3F12; , MAb 1E4; , MAb
1H10; , MAb 5H4; , nonspecific anti- -galactosidase ( -gal)
MAb. (B) Southern blot analysis of transient replication of the BPV-1
origin-containing plasmid pUCAlu in the CHO4.15 cell line in the
presence of MAbs at a concentration of 80 µg/ml. Episomal DNA was
extracted from cells 72 h after transfection. Filters were probed
with radiolabelled plasmid pUCAlu. (C) Western blot analysis of E2
protein levels in transfected CHO4.15 cells with rabbit anti-E2
polyclonal antibody.
|
|
We next studied the effect of the E2-specific MAbs on the steady-state
level of the E2 protein and on the localization of this protein in
transfected cells. To select and isolate transiently transfected cells
from the total population of CHO4.15 cells, a Capture-Tec Hook-2 kit
(Invitrogen) was used. Briefly, MAbs were cotransfected with 500 ng of
the origin-containing plasmid pHookAlu, which expresses a fusion
protein comprised of the PDGFR transmembrane domain fused to the
variable region of the antibody capable of recognizing phOx
(4-etoxymethylene-2-phenyl-2-oxazolin-5-one), into CHO4.15 cells. At
24 h after electroporation, transfected cells were selected with
magnetic beads carrying immobilized phOx and analyzed for the level of
the E2 protein by Western blotting as well as for the localization of
the E2 protein by direct immunofluorescence analysis with rabbit
anti-E2 polyclonal antibody. We did not find any effect of the
cotransfected E2-specific MAbs on the localization (data not shown) or
steady-state level of the E2 protein in CHO4.15 cells (Fig. 4C).
Effect of Fab' fragments on DNA replication.
Our results
showed that MAbs 1H10, 1E4, 3F12, and 5H4 suppressed BPV-1 origin
replication in a dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 4A). At the same time,
MAbs 1H10, 3F12, and 1E4 did not influence the formation of the
E1-E2-origin complex and supershifted this complex efficiently (Fig. 3,
lanes 3 to 5). These data suggest that MAb 3F12 (epitope at residues
199 to 206) and MAbs 1H10 and 1E4, directed against the hinge region of
the E2 protein, would not interfere directly with E1 and E2
interactions with DNA; however, these antibodies can sterically
interfere with the inter- or intramolecular interactions required for
the replication activity of the E2 protein. In order to study the
possibility that antibodies would have an effect on replication due to
steric hindrance of the formation of the replication initiation
complexes, the Fab' fragments of MAbs 3F12, 1H10, and 5H4 were prepared
by a modified procedure (see Materials and Methods). An ELISA with
E2-coated microtiter plates showed that all of the Fab' fragments were
active in binding to the E2 protein. The affinities of the Fab'
fragments of 1H10 and 5H4 were similar, while the Fab' fragment of 3F12
had a lower affinity, as determined by titration on the ELISA plates
(data not shown).
The produced Fab' fragments were tested in biochemical assays as well.
The ability of the MAb 5H4 Fab' fragment to inhibit the formation of
the E2-DNA complex is shown in Fig.
5A. Concentrations of
MAb 5H4 and its Fab' fragment of 1 ng/µl and at least 10 ng/µl, respectively, were required to prevent the formation of the E2-DNA complex (Fig. 5A). The MAb 5H4 Fab' fragment was also capable of
dissociating the preformed E2-DNA complex (data not shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Effect of E2-specific Fab' fragments on DNA replication.
(A) Ability of MAb 5H4 and its Fab' fragment to inhibit the formation
of the E2-DNA complex at various antibody concentrations. The mobility
shift assay was carried out with 2 ng of bacterially expressed and
purified E2 protein and 0.2 ng of radiolabelled E2 binding site for 15 min at room temperature. MAb 5H4 or its Fab' fragment was added after
E2 was mixed with its DNA target, and incubation was carried out for an additional 20 min. (B) Inhibition of
DNA replication by E2-specific Fab' fragments at various
concentrations. Reporter plasmid pUCAlu (100 ng) was cotransfected
together with the Fab' fragment of 3F12 ( ), the Fab' fragment of
1H10 ( ), or the Fab' fragment of 5H4 ( ) into cell line CHO4.15.
At 72 h after electroporation, cells were harvested, and episomal
DNA was digested with DpnI and linearizing enzyme
HindIII and analyzed by Southern blotting. The
replication signals of three independent experiments were quantified
with a PhosphorImager, and signals from cells transfected with the
origin-containing plasmid only were used as a control to normalize the
results. (C) Southern blot analysis of transient replication of the
BPV-1 origin-containing plasmid pUCAlu in the CHO4.15 cell line in the
presence of Fab' fragments at a concentration of 0.3 mg/ml. Episomal
DNA was extracted from cells either 48 or 72 h
( ) after transfection.
Filters were probed with radiolabelled plasmid pUCAlu.
|
|
We transfected 100 ng of origin-containing plasmid pUCAlu in the
presence of increasing concentrations of Fab' fragments into CHO4.15
cells by electroporation. A representative replication assay is shown
in Fig. 5B and C. The Fab' fragment of MAb 1H10 had no significant
inhibitory effect on DNA replication at any concentration tested (Fig.
5B and 5C, lanes 5 and 6). The Fab' fragment of MAb 3F12 activated
rather than inhibited replication (Fig. 5B and C, lanes 3 and 4), and
the Fab' fragment of MAb 5H4 inhibited BPV-1 origin replication (Fig.
5B and 5C, lanes 7 and 8) in a dose-dependent fashion.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The crystal structure of the DNA-binding domain of the E2 protein
with and without DNA has been solved (15, 16). Until the
crystal structure of the full-length E2 protein is determined, we will
have to rely on other methods to examine the structural organization of
the whole protein and the molecular interactions that must occur to
accomplish the replication and/or transcription activity of the
protein. Even if the crystal structure were known, information about
possible interactions should be gathered by other methods. In this
study, we have produced and characterized a panel of MAbs as probes and
tools for studying the structure and function of the BPV-1 E2 protein.
A total of 22 MAbs that were reactive to the E2 protein in an enzyme
immunoassay were isolated. Seventeen of these MAbs were directed
against linear epitopes that were mapped within the region between
amino acids 180 and 309 of E2. In fact, the last part of the
amino-terminal transactivation domain and the first 10 amino acids of
the hinge region, residues 180 to 218, appear to constitute a highly
immunogenic "hot spot," since epitopes for 12 of these 17 MAbs were
found to be localized within this region. The reason for the highly
immunogenic properties of the region between residues 180 and 218 is
unknown. Epitopes for 5 of the 22 MAbs were mapped within the
C-terminal DNA-binding and dimerization domain. Interestingly, all of
these antibodies recognized the composite epitopes and did not react
with the denatured E2 protein. None of the epitopes for the MAbs tested
were mapped to the first 180 residues of the E2 protein.
When only a purified transactivation domain, residues 1 to 218, of E2
was used for immunization, four MAbs against the region between amino
acids 1 and 180 of E2 were obtained; however, none of them was able to
recognize the E2-DNA complex in a mobility shift assay
(21a). In contrast, Hibma and coworkers (17)
raised antibodies against the N-terminal part of the HPV-16 E2 protein, indicating that the HPV-16 and BPV-1 E2 proteins are considerably different in terms of structure and epitope presentation. The most
antigenic regions are usually the less ordered regions of the protein
without packed internal side chains. From this point of view, the
differential antigenicity may be a reflection of the differences in the
structures of the HPV-16 and BPV-1 E2 proteins. Gauthier and coworkers
(10) probed the structure of HPV-16 E2 with polyclonal
antibodies raised against synthetic peptides that cover the whole
region of the HPV-16 E2 protein. They found that antipeptide antibodies
against the hinge region but not against the transactivation domain or
the DNA-binding and dimerization domain were able to recognize the
native form of the HPV-16 E2 protein.
In our study, MAb 1E2 (epitope within residues 184 to 190) was able to
recognize neither E2-DNA nor E1-E2-origin complexes in a mobility shift
assay. Curiously, deletion of the first alpha helix from the BPV-1 E2
protein revealed the epitope for MAb 1E2, and the protein in the
protein-DNA complex was recognized by the antibody. Thus, the epitope
for this MAb is probably buried within the compact structure of the
N-terminal domain and is not accessible unless the structure of the
molecule is distorted in some fashion. These data suggest that the
transactivation domain of the E2 protein, unlike many other
transactivation domains, has remarkable structural integrity. As shown
by X-ray analysis, the C-terminal DNA-binding and dimerization domain
has a compact structure (15). Deletion of the last 13 C-terminal residues of E2 resulted in an inactive protein unable to
bind DNA and support replication (21a). So, our data confirm
that in a native context, both the transactivation domain and the
DNA-binding and dimerization domain of BPV-1 E2 have a complex and
relatively rigid structure, while the central, hinge region is highly
mobile and flexible.
MAb 5H4 and its Fab' fragment efficiently inhibited the formation of
both E2-DNA and E1-E2-origin complexes. They not only competed with DNA
for binding but also were able to dissociate the preformed E2-DNA
complex. In a transient replication assay, MAb 5H4 and its Fab'
fragment efficiently suppressed BPV-1 DNA replication. This assay is
another way to demonstrate that the BPV-1 E2 protein interaction with
the specific recognition sequence within an origin of replication is
essential for the initiation of viral DNA replication. In addition, the
results indicate that it is possible to target the E2 protein
interaction with DNA for therapeutic purposes by using this specific
MAb or Fab' fragment to block the replication of papillomaviruses.
In our study, MAb 3F12 (epitope at residues 199 to 206), directed
against the last 10 amino acids of the transactivation domain, and MAbs
that bind the hinge region, 1H10 (epitope at residues 208 to 218) and
1E4 (epitope at residues 250 to 280), efficiently suppressed BPV-1 DNA
replication. However, the Fab' fragments of 1H10 and 3F12 had no
inhibitory effect on and even activated replication. None of these
antibodies interfered with the formation of the E1-E2-origin complex.
These data suggest that antibodies 3F12 and 1H10 sterically hindered
the inter- or intramolecular interactions required for the replication
activity of the E2 protein. On the other hand, our results demonstrate
the importance of the hinge region for the replication activity of the
E2 protein. This hypothesis is based on results from several
laboratories. E2 proteins containing large internal in-frame deletions
of the hinge region (from amino acids 195 to 309, 213 to 309, and 220 to 309) were not able to support DNA replication (or had a decreased
efficiency) but could efficiently enhance the binding of E1 to the
replication origin (46, 47). A fusion protein which
contained the transactivation domain together with the hinge region of
BPV-1 E2 linked to the GCN4 DNA-binding domain supported replication
much more efficiently than a fusion protein in which only the
transactivation domain of E2 was linked to the GCN4 DNA-binding domain
(3). These data suggest that the conformational freedom of
the E2 protein is important for its role in replication and that the
inhibitory effect of the antibodies against the epitopes in the hinge
region as well as in the very last part of the transactivation domain may be explained by interference with conformational freedom, which
would not allow E2 to assume the proper conformation required for its
replication activity. However, another possibility is that this region
is important for interactions with replication factors, so that
antibodies that bind to the first part of the hinge region can but Fab'
fragments cannot prevent the binding of replication factors to the same
region of the E2 protein.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to Aire Allikas and Saul Kivimae for providing
the E2 deletion mutants, Marko Piirsoo for providing the pHookAlu construct, and Anne Kalling for technical assistance.
This work was supported by grants 2496 and 2497 from the Estonian
Science Foundation, grant HHMI 75195-541301 from the Howard Hughes
Medical Institute, grant CIPA-CT94-0154 from the EU, and a grant from
the Citrina Foundation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology and Virology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology,
Tartu University, 23 Riia St., 51010 Tartu, Estonia. Phone: 372 7 375047. Fax: 372 7 420286. E-mail: ustav{at}ebc.ee.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abroi, A.,
R. Kurg, and M. Ustav.
1996.
Transcriptional and replicational activation functions in the bovine papillomavirus type 1 E2 protein are encoded by different structural determinants.
J. Virol.
70:6169-6179[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Benson, J. D., and P. M. Howley.
1995.
Amino-terminal domains of the bovine papillomavirus type 1 E1 and E2 proteins participate in complex formation.
J. Virol.
69:4364-4372[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Berg, M., and A. Stenlund.
1997.
Functional interactions between papillomavirus E1 and E2 proteins.
J. Virol.
71:3853-3863[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Blitz, I., and L. A. Laimins.
1991.
The 68-kilodalton E1 protein of bovine papillomavirus is a DNA-binding phosphoprotein which associates with the E2 transcriptional activator in vitro.
J. Virol.
65:649-656[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Brokaw, J. L.,
M. Blanco, and A. A. McBride.
1996.
Amino acids critical for the function of the bovine papillomavirus type 1 E2 transactivator.
J. Virol.
70:23-29[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Chakrabarti, R.,
D. E. Wylie, and S. M. Schuster.
1989.
Transfer of monoclonal antibodies into mammalian cells by electroporation.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:15494-15500[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
DiMaio, D., and J. Settleman.
1988.
Bovine papillomavirus mutant temperature sensitive for transformation, replication and transactivation.
EMBO J.
7:1197-1204[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Dostatni, N.,
F. Thierry, and M. Yaniv.
1988.
A dimer of BPV-1 E2 containing a protease resistant core interacts with its DNA target.
EMBO J.
7:3807-3816[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Ferguson, M., and M. Botchan.
1996.
Genetic analysis of the activation domain of bovine papillomavirus protein E2: its role in transcription and replication.
J. Virol.
70:4193-4199[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Gauthier, J.-M.,
J. Dillner, and M. Yaniv.
1991.
Structural analysis of the human papillomavirus type 16-E2 transactivator with antipeptide antibodies reveals a high mobility region linking the transactivation and the DNA-binding domains.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:7073-7079[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Gillette, T.,
M. Lusky, and J. Borowiec.
1994.
Induction of structural changes in the bovine papillomavirus type 1 origin of replication by the viral E1 and E2 proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:8846-8850[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Giri, I., and M. Yaniv.
1988.
Structural and mutational analysis of E2 trans-activating proteins of papillomaviruses reveals three distinct functional domains.
EMBO J.
7:2823-2829[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Grossel, M. J.,
F. Sverdrup,
D. E. Breiding, and E. J. Androphy.
1996.
Transcriptional activation function is not required for stimulation of DNA replication by bovine papillomavirus type 1 E2.
J. Virol.
70:7264-7269[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Haugen, T. H.,
L. P. Turek,
F. M. Mercurio,
T. P. Cripe,
B. J. Olson,
R. D. Anderson,
D. Seidl,
M. Karin, and J. Schiller.
1988.
Sequence-specific and general transcriptional activation by the bovine papillomavirus-1 E2 transactivator requires an N-terminal amphipathic helix-containing E2 domain.
EMBO J.
7:4245-4253[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Hegde, R.,
S. R. Grossman,
L. A. Laimins, and P. Sigler.
1992.
Crystal structure at 1.7Å of the bovine papillomavirus-1 E2 DNA binding domain bound to its DNA target.
Nature
359:505-512[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Hegde, R.,
A. Wang,
S. Kim, and M. Schapira.
1998.
Subunit rearrangement accompanies sequence-specific DNA binding by the bovine papillomavirus-1 E2 protein.
J. Mol. Biol.
276:797-808[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Hibma, M.,
K. Raj,
S. J. Ely,
M. Stanley, and L. Crawford.
1995.
The interaction between human papillomavirus type 16 E1 and E2 proteins is blocked by an antibody to the N-terminal region of E2.
Eur. J. Biochem.
229:517-525[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Iguchi-Ariga, S. M. M.,
T. Itani,
Y. Kiji, and H. Ariga.
1987.
Possible function of the c-myc product: promotion of cellular DNA replication.
EMBO J.
6:2365-2371[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Iguchi-Ariga, S. M. M.,
T. Itani,
M. Yamaguchi, and H. Ariga.
1987.
c-myc protein can be substituted for SV40 T antigen in SV40 DNA replication.
Nucleic Acids Res.
15:4889-4899[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19a.
|
Ives, I.,
S. Kivi, and M. Ustav.
1999.
Long-term episomal maintenance of bovine papillomavirus type 1 plasmids is determined by attachment to host chromosomes, which is mediated by the viral E2 protein and its binding sites.
J. Virol.
73:4404-4412[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Juronen, E.,
J. Parik, and P. Toomik.
1991.
FPLC purification of mouse monoclonal antibodies from ascitic fluid using blue DEAE and thiophilic sorbents.
J. Immunol. Methods
136:103-109[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Kaczmarek, L.,
M. R. Miller,
R. A. Hammond, and W. E. Mercer.
1986.
A microinjected monoclonal antibody against human DNA polymerase- inhibits DNA replication in human, hamster and mouse cell lines.
J. Biol. Chem.
261:10802-10807[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21a.
| Kurg, R., and M. Ustav. Unpublished data.
|
| 22.
|
Langel, U.,
T. Land, and T. Bartfai.
1992.
Design of chimeric peptide ligands to galanin receptors and substance P receptors.
Int. J. Peptide Protein Res.
39:516-522[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Lehman, C., and M. Botchan.
1998.
Segregation of viral plasmids depends on tethering to chromosomes and is regulated by phosphorylation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:4338-4343[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Li, R., and M. R. Botchan.
1993.
The acidic transcriptional activation domains of VP16 and p53 bind the cellular replication protein A and stimulate in vitro BPV-1 DNA replication.
Cell
73:1207-1221[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Lusky, M., and E. Fontane.
1991.
Formation of the complex of bovine papillomavirus E1 and E2 proteins is modulated by E2 phosphorylation and depends upon sequences within the carboxyl terminus of E1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:6363-6367[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Lusky, M.,
J. Hurwitz, and Y. Seo.
1993.
Cooperative assembly of the bovine papilloma virus E1 and E2 proteins on the replication origin requires an intact E2 binding site.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:15795-15803[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Lusky, M.,
J. Hurwitz, and Y. Seo.
1994.
The bovine papillomavirus E2 protein modulates the assembly of but is not stably maintained in a replication-competent multimeric E1-replication origin complex.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:8895-8899[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
McBride, A. A.,
J. C. Byrne, and P. Howley.
1989.
E2 polypeptides encoded by bovine papillomavirus type 1 form dimers through the common carboxyl-terminal domain: transactivation is mediated by the conserved amino-terminal domain.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:510-514[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
McBride, A. A.,
R. Schlegel, and P. Howley.
1988.
The carboxy-terminal domain shared by the bovine papillomavirus E2 transactivator and repressor proteins contains a specific DNA binding activity.
EMBO J.
7:533-539[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Mohr, I. J.,
S. Clark,
S. Sun,
E. J. Androphy,
P. MacPherson, and M. Botchan.
1990.
Targeting the E1 replication protein to the papillomavirus origin of replication by complex formation with the E2 transactivator.
Science
250:1694-1699[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Piirsoo, M.,
E. Ustav,
T. Mandel,
A. Stenlund, and M. Ustav.
1996.
cis- and trans-requirements for stable episomal maintenance of the BPV-1 replicator.
EMBO J.
15:1-11[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Porter, R. R.
1959.
The hydrolysis of rabbit -globulin and antibodies with crystalline papain.
Biochem. J.
73:119-126[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Rank, N., and P. Lambert.
1995.
Bovine papillomavirus type 1 E2 transcriptional regulators directly bind two cellular transcription factors, TFIID and TBIIB.
J. Virol.
69:6323-6334[Abstract].
|
| 34.
|
Sakai, H.,
T. Yasugi,
J. Benson,
J. Dowhanick, and P. Howley.
1996.
Targeted mutagenesis of the human papillomavirus type 16 E2 transactivation domain reveals separable transcriptional activation and DNA replication functions.
J. Virol.
70:1602-1611[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Sedman, J., and A. Stenlund.
1995.
Co-operative interaction between the initiator E1 and the transcriptional activator E2 is required for replicator specific DNA replication of bovine papillomavirus in vivo and in vitro.
EMBO J.
14:6218-6228[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Sedman, J., and A. Stenlund.
1996.
The initiator protein E1 binds to the bovine papillomavirus origin of replication as a trimeric ring-like structure.
EMBO J.
15:5085-5092[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Sedman, T.,
J. Sedman, and A. Stenlund.
1997.
Binding of the E1 and E2 proteins to the origin of replication of bovine papillomavirus.
J. Virol.
71:2887-2896[Abstract].
|
| 38.
|
Seo, Y.,
F. Müller,
M. Lusky, and J. Hurwitz.
1993.
Bovine papilloma virus (BPV)-encoded E1 protein contains multiple activities required for BPV DNA replication.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:702-706[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Seo, Y.-S.,
F. Müller,
M. Lusky,
E. Gibbs,
H.-Y. Kim,
B. Phillips, and J. Hurwitz.
1993.
Bovine papilloma virus (BPV)-encoded E2 protein enhances binding of E1 protein to the BPV replication origin.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:2865-2869[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Skiadopoulus, M., and A. McBride.
1998.
Bovine papillomavirus type 1 genomes and the E2 transactivator protein are closely associated with mitotic chromatin.
J. Virol.
72:2079-2088[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Spalholz, B.,
Y. Yang, and P. Howley.
1985.
Transactivation of a bovine papilloma virus transcriptional regulatory element by the E2 gene product.
Cell
42:183-191[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Thompson, N. E.,
L. A. Strasheim,
K. M. Nolan, and R. R. Burgess.
1995.
Accessibility of epitopes on human transcription factor IIB in the native protein and in the complex with DNA.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:4735-4740[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Ustav, M., and A. Stenlund.
1991.
Transient replication of BPV-1 requires two viral polypeptides encoded by the E1 and E2 open reading frames.
EMBO J.
10:449-457[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Ustav, M.,
E. Ustav,
P. Szymanski, and A. Stenlund.
1991.
Identification of the origin of replication of bovine papillomavirus and characterization of the viral origin recognition factor E1.
EMBO J.
10:4321-4329[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Wietkowski, M.,
P. Broge, and H. Stahl.
1987.
Monoclonal antibodies as probes for a function of large T antigen during the elongation process of simian virus 40 DNA replication.
J. Virol.
61:411-418[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Winokur, P. L., and A. A. McBride.
1992.
Separation of the transcriptional activation and replication functions of the bovine papillomavirus-1 E2 protein.
EMBO J.
11:4111-4118[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Winokur, P. L., and A. A. McBride.
1996.
The transactivation and DNA binding domains of the BPV-1 E2 protein have different roles in cooperative origin binding with the E1 protein.
Virology
221:44-53[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Yang, L.,
R. Li,
I. Mohr,
R. Clark, and M. Botchan.
1991.
Activation of BPV-1 replication in vitro by the transcription factor E2.
Nature
353:628-632[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Yao, J. M.,
D. E. Breiding, and E. J. Androphy.
1998.
Functional interaction of the bovine papillomavirus E2 transactivation domain with TFIIB.
J. Virol.
72:1013-1019[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, June 1999, p. 4670-4677, Vol. 73, No. 6
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kurg, R., Tekkel, H., Abroi, A., Ustav, M.
(2006). Characterization of the Functional Activities of the Bovine Papillomavirus Type 1 E2 Protein Single-Chain Heterodimers. J. Virol.
80: 11218-11225
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ilves, I., Maemets, K., Silla, T., Janikson, K., Ustav, M.
(2006). Brd4 is involved in multiple processes of the bovine papillomavirus type 1 life cycle.. J. Virol.
80: 3660-3665
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Silla, T., Haal, I., Geimanen, J., Janikson, K., Abroi, A., Ustav, E., Ustav, M.
(2005). Episomal Maintenance of Plasmids with Hybrid Origins in Mouse Cells. J. Virol.
79: 15277-15288
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kurg, R., Sild, K., Ilves, A., Sepp, M., Ustav, M.
(2005). Association of Bovine Papillomavirus E2 Protein with Nuclear Structures In Vivo. J. Virol.
79: 10528-10539
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jarving, R., Jarving, I., Kurg, R., Brash, A. R., Samel, N.
(2004). On the Evolutionary Origin of Cyclooxygenase (COX) Isozymes: CHARACTERIZATION OF MARINE INVERTEBRATE COX GENES POINTS TO INDEPENDENT DUPLICATION EVENTS IN VERTEBRATE AND INVERTEBRATE LINEAGES. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 13624-13633
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Abroi, A., Ilves, I., Kivi, S., Ustav, M.
(2004). Analysis of Chromatin Attachment and Partitioning Functions of Bovine Papillomavirus Type 1 E2 Protein. J. Virol.
78: 2100-2113
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mannik, A., Runkorg, K., Jaanson, N., Ustav, M., Ustav, E.
(2002). Induction of the Bovine Papillomavirus Origin "Onion Skin"-Type DNA Replication at High E1 Protein Concentrations In Vivo. J. Virol.
76: 5835-5845
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kaldalu, N., Toots, U., de Lorenzo, V., Ustav, M.
(2000). Functional Domains of the TOL Plasmid Transcription Factor XylS. J. Bacteriol.
182: 1118-1126
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Koljak, R., Jarving, I., Kurg, R., Boeglin, W. E., Varvas, K., Valmsen, K., Ustav, M., Brash, A. R., Samel, N.
(2001). The Basis of Prostaglandin Synthesis in Coral. MOLECULAR CLONING AND EXPRESSION OF A CYCLOOXYGENASE FROM THE ARCTIC SOFT CORAL GERSEMIA FRUTICOSA. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 7033-7040
[Abstract]
[Full Text]