Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, June 1999, p. 4600-4610, Vol. 73, No. 6
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
An Arginine-Faced Amphipathic Alpha Helix Is
Required for Adenovirus Type 5 E4orf6 Protein Function
Joseph S.
Orlando and
David A.
Ornelles*
Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North
Carolina 27157-1064
Received 9 November 1998/Accepted 23 February 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
A region in the carboxy terminus of the protein encoded by open
reading frame 6 in early region 4 (E4orf6) of adenovirus type 5 was
determined to be required for directing nuclear localization of the E1B
55-kDa protein and for efficient virus replication. A peptide
encompassing this region, corresponding to amino acids 239 through 255 of the E4orf6 protein, was analyzed by circular dichroism spectroscopy. The peptide showed evidence of
self-interaction and displayed the characteristic spectra of an
amphipathic
helix in the helix-stabilizing solvent
trifluoroethanol. Disrupting the integrity of this
helix in the
E4orf6 protein by proline substitutions or by removing amino acids 241 through 250 abolished its ability to direct the E1B 55-kDa protein to
the nucleus when both proteins were transiently expressed in HeLa
cells. Expression of E4orf6 variants that failed to direct nuclear
localization of the E1B 55-kDa protein failed to enhance replication of
the E4 mutant virus, dl1014, whereas expression of the
wild-type E4orf6 protein restored growth of dl1014 to
near-wild-type levels. These results suggest that the E4orf6 protein
contains an arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix that is critical for
a functional interaction with the E1B 55-kDa protein in the cell and
for the function of the E4orf6 protein during a lytic infection.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Open reading frame 6 of the E4
region (E4orf6) of the group C adenoviruses (Ad) encodes a
multifunctional protein that promotes virus replication and acts as an
oncoprotein (reviewed in reference 34). As
part of a complex with the E1B 55-kDa protein, the E4orf6 protein
promotes the export of late viral mRNA from the nucleus to the
cytoplasm and concomitantly inhibits the transport of most host cell
mRNA (4, 35, 46). In addition, the E4orf6 protein enhances
viral DNA replication, late protein synthesis, and the stability of
unprocessed late viral RNA in the nucleus (3, 4, 24).
Furthermore, the E4orf6 protein, as well as the
product of the E4 open reading frame 3 (E4orf3), stimulates the
accumulation of viral mRNA containing the tripartite leader
(38) and affects splicing patterns of late viral RNA
(41, 42). Finally, the E4orf6 protein has recently been
shown to act as an oncoprotein by binding the tumor suppressor p53 and
inhibiting its interaction with the transcriptional initiation complex
(10, 47).
Genetic analyses have demonstrated that the E4orf6 and E4orf3 proteins
share partially redundant and overlapping functions during lytic
infection. Ad mutants that fail to express the E4orf6 protein show a
modest reduction in virus yield and plaquing efficiency compared to the
wild-type virus (4, 24). By contrast, mutant Ads that lack
the entire E4 region or fail to express the E4orf6 and E4orf3 proteins
are severely restricted for growth (4, 24, 26).
However, E4 deletion mutants that express the E4orf6 protein in the
absence of all other E4-encoded proteins replicate to near-wild-type
levels (1, 24). Replication of a complete E4 deletion
virus could be restored by transfecting the mutant-virus-infected cells
with a cDNA expressing the E4orf6 protein (32).
A portion of the E4orf6 protein associates with the E1B 55-kDa protein
in the cell. Physical evidence for this complex derives from the
ability of E1B 55-kDa-specific antibodies to indirectly immunoprecipitate the E4orf6 protein from Ad-infected cells (46, 48, 49), after coexpression of the proteins by transfection (21), and from cellular lysates reconstituted in vitro
(49). Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy have
demonstrated that the E4orf6-E1B 55-kDa protein complex localizes to
the peripheries of the sites of viral transcription and RNA
processing within the nucleus of Ad type 5 (Ad5)-infected
cells (43). When transiently expressed, the E4orf6 protein
localizes to the nucleus and directs the E1B 55-kDa protein to
the nucleus. In the absence of the E4orf6 protein, the E1B 55-kDa
protein is retained in the cytoplasm (21). In addition,
expression of the E4orf6 protein relieved the apparent cytoplasmic
retention of the E1B 55-kDa protein in primate cells but not in mouse
or rat cells (21). Thus, a primate-specific cellular factor
may be required for the E4orf6 protein-directed nuclear localization of
the E1B 55-kDa protein. It has been proposed that the E4orf6-E1B
55-kDa protein complex modulates mRNA transport by sequestering a
cellular factor required for mRNA export, thus inhibiting host mRNA
export and directing this factor to the sites of viral
transcription, where it is available for viral mRNA export (43). It is also possible that such a factor enables
shuttling of the E4orf6-E1B 55-kDa protein complex as part of the
mechanism of mRNA transport control (9). The identity of
this hypothetical cellular factor is unknown, but recent studies have
demonstrated that overexpression of a cellular protein related to
hnRNP-U/SAF-A in Ad-infected cells overcomes the inhibition of host
cytoplasmic mRNA accumulation, implicating this cellular
protein as a potential factor used by the E4orf6-E1B 55-kDa
protein complex (18).
The structural features of the Ad E4orf6-E1B 55-kDa protein
interaction have been partially elucidated (48). The
association of the E4orf6 protein with E1B 55-kDa proteins
bearing small, in-frame insertions was measured by an
immunoprecipitation assay. This analysis suggested that the integrity
of two distinct segments of the E1B 55-kDa protein are required for
association with the E4orf6 protein in vivo. The portions of the
E1B 55-kDa protein important for the interaction with the E4orf6
protein map to amino acid 143 and the region between amino acids 262 and 326 (48). The investigators also showed that the amino
terminus of the E4orf6 protein, expressed in bacteria as a
translational fusion to glutathione S-transferase, could
bind the E1B 55-kDa protein in a protein blot assay. This study
provided additional evidence for an interaction between the amino
terminus of the E4orf6 protein and the E1B 55-kDa protein by using 293 cells transfected with an E4orf6/7 cDNA. The E4orf6/7 protein is
composed of the amino-terminal 58 residues of E4orf6 and 92 residues
encoded by E4orf7. A portion of the E4orf6/7 protein expressed by
transfection was indirectly recovered upon immunoprecipitation of the
endogenous E1B 55-kDa protein, suggesting that the amino-terminal 58 residues of E4orf6 mediated binding between the two proteins. However,
this result stands in contrast to prior results that failed to reveal
an interaction between the E4orf6/7 protein and the E1B 55-kDa protein
in Ad-infected cells (8, 24). The significance of an
interaction between the E1B 55-kDa protein and the amino terminus of
the E4orf6 protein is unclear at this time because the Ad E4orf6/7
mutant virus is essentially wild type in growth and the E4orf6/7
protein cannot replace the function of the E4orf6 protein during Ad infection.
Here we examine the structural elements of the E4orf6 protein required
for the functional interaction with the E1B 55-kDa protein by analyzing
intracellular localization of the viral proteins and virus replication.
We show that a domain in the E4orf6 protein near the carboxy terminus
is required for the nuclear colocalization of the E1B 55-kDa protein.
This domain is an arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix, and the
integrity of this domain in the E4orf6 protein is required for E1B
55-kDa protein nuclear colocalization. Disruption of the E4orf6
arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix not only abolishes E1B 55-kDa
protein nuclear colocalization but also disrupts the function of the
E4orf6 protein in an Ad infection. These findings suggest that the
arginine-faced
helix near the carboxy terminus of the E4orf6
protein is essential for the function of the E4orf6 protein during a
productive viral infection.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture and viruses.
Cell culture media, cell culture
supplements, and serum were obtained from Life Technologies
(Gaithersburg, Md.) through the Tissue Culture Core Laboratory of the
Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University. HeLa (CCL2.2)
and W162 cells (53) were maintained in Dulbecco modified
Eagle's minimal medium supplemented with 10% newborn calf serum as
previously described (20).
dl309 served as the wild-type Ad5 used in these studies.
dl309 lacks a portion of the E3 gene which has been shown to
be dispensable for growth in culture (30). The E4 deletion
virus, dl1014, was constructed by Bridge and Ketner and
described previously (3). This virus is able to express only
the orf4 protein from the E4 region. The wild-type virus,
dl309, was propagated in 293 cells (22), and
dl1014 was propagated in W162 cells (53). Virus stocks were prepared by sequential centrifugation through CsCl as
described previously (20).
The recombinant vaccinia virus used to express the T7 RNA polymerase,
vTF7.3, was created by Fuerst et al. (
17). Expression
of the
E1B 55-kDa and E4orf6 genes from the T7 promoter was achieved
as
described previously (
21). Briefly, cells were infected with
vTF7.3 in reduced serum medium and transfected with 1 µg of plasmid
DNA mixed with 3 µg of Lipofectin (Life Technologies) in accordance
with the manufacturer's recommendation. The cells were analyzed
by
immunofluorescence between 12 and 14 h postinfection-transfection.
Plasmids and site-directed mutagenesis.
The plasmids
carrying the E4orf6 and E1B 55-kDa genes were previously described
(21). The cDNA encoding the E4orf6/7 protein was originally
described by Freyer et al. (16). The coding region was
subcloned from this construct by standard methods with PCR and placed
under control of the T7 promoter in a pGEM plasmid (Promega, Madison,
Wis.). The E4orf6 carboxy-terminal-truncation mutations were
constructed in a pGEM plasmid (Promega) by removal of an appropriate
restriction fragment encompassing the carboxy terminus of the E4orf6
protein. The mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Site-directed mutagenesis (
27) was performed on the E4orf6
gene after transfer to the pAlter-1 plasmid (Promega). The leucine
codon at amino acid 245 of the 294-amino-acid E4orf6 protein was
changed to a proline codon (underlined) by using an oligonucleotide,
5'-CAAGGCGC
CCTATGCTGCG-3', to create the
L
245P E4orf6 variant.
Another oligonucleotide,
5'-CGCTGCTGTGCCAGG
CCTACAAGGCGCCCTA-3',
was used
to create an E4orf6 variant (R
241P) with a
StuI
restriction
site at bp 720 of the E4orf6 coding region and a proline at
amino
acid 241 of the E4orf6 protein. The R
241P E4orf6
variant cDNA
was modified with another oligonucleotide,
5'-GCTGCGGGCGTCGCGAATCATCGCT-3',
that introduced an
NruI restriction site at bp 750 of the E4orf6
coding region,
replacing valine 250 with serine. The internal-deletion
E4orf6 variant
was made by removing the DNA fragment between the
NruI and
StuI sites of the R
241P-V
250S DNA. A
proline residue
was inserted between amino acids 255 and 256 of the
E4orf6 protein
by using an oligonucleotide,
5'-CGAATCATCGCT
CCGGAGGAGACCACTG-3',
to create a
BspEI site at bp 765 of the E4orf6 coding region.
A proline
was inserted between amino acids 235 and 236 of the
E4orf6 protein
(RC
236RPC) by using an oligonucleotide that introduced
a
StuI restriction site at bp 708 of the E4orf6 coding region
(5'-AAGTGAGATCAGGGTGAGG
CCTTGCTGTGCCCGGAGG-3').
Finally, a proline
residue was substituted at amino acid 239 by
using an oligonucleotide,
5'-CAGGGTGCGCTGCTGT
CCTAGGAGGACAAGGCGCC-3', that
created a
AvrII
site at bp 717 of the E4orf6 coding region.
The mutations in the
E4orf6 gene were identified by restriction
analysis and confirmed
by DNA
sequencing.
Indirect immunofluorescence.
Indirect immunofluorescence and
photomicroscopy of whole cells was conducted as previously described
(43). Double-label immunofluorescence was performed with the
mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) 3 (38) specific for the
amino terminus of the E4orf6 protein and the rat MAb 9C10 (Oncogene
Science, Uniondale, N.Y. [54]) specific for the E1B
55-kDa protein. The secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West
Grove, Pa.) were multiple-label-qualified goat antibodies conjugated to
dichlorotriazinylamino fluorescein and lissamine rhodamine sulfonyl
chloride. Samples were examined with a Leitz Dialux 20 EB microscope
fitted for epifluorescent illumination and photographed with TMax film
(Eastman Kodak, Rochester, N.Y.) developed to an exposure index of 1600 ASA. Prints were prepared on high-contrast (no. 5) paper (Eastman
Kodak), scanned at 300 dpi, and then cropped and assembled with Canvas
5.0 software (Deneba, Miami, Fla.) operating on a Macintosh microcomputer.
Protein structure.
Peptides (E4orf6 peptide
[NH2-ARRTRRLMLRAVRIIAE-COOH]
and L245P peptide
[NH2-ARRTRRPMLRAVRIIAE-COOH]) were synthesized on an
Applied Biosystems model 430A automated peptide synthesizer, and the
amino and carboxy ends were left unblocked. Peptide concentrations were
determined by quantitative amino acid analysis. Each peptide (200 µl)
at a concentration (c) of 200 µM in 50 mM
Na2PO4-150 mM NaCl (pH 7.0) in 0 to 80%
trifluoroethanol (TFE) was dispensed in a stoppered optical cell with a
path length (l) of 0.05 cm. The temperature of the sample
was maintained at 25°C by circulation of water through a jacket
surrounding the cell. Spectra were obtained on a Jasco 600 spectrophotometer by taking readings every 1 nm with a bandwidth of 1 nm. An average of four independent scans were baseline corrected and
smoothed by using a third-order least-squared polynomial. Mean residue
molar ellipticity ([
]mean) in units of degrees times
square centimeters per mole was calculated from the equation
[
]mean = [
]observed × 1,000 × MRW/(10 × l × c).
[
]observed is the observed ellipticity in
millidegrees, and MRW is the mean residue weight of the peptide.
Structural and sequence analysis was performed with the assistance of
the Wisconsin Package version 9.1 software (Genetics Computer Group,
Madison, Wis.).
Complementation analysis and protein expression.
HeLa cells
were infected with dl309 (30) or
dl1014 (3) and simultaneously transfected with
the E4orf6 variant cDNA constructs (see Fig. 7 for analysis). For these
experiments, 4 × 105 cells in a 65-mm-diameter dish
were exposed to 1 µg of plasmid DNA, 3 µg of Lipofectin, and 4 × 106 PFU of virus in a 2-ml volume of OptiMEM (Life
Technologies). After 6 h at 37°C, the virus and plasmid mixture
was replaced with normal growth medium and the cells were returned to
normal growth conditions. After 48 h, the cells were collected,
resuspended in urea sample buffer (7.5 M urea, 50 mM Tris [pH 6.8],
1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 50 mM dithiothreitol, 5%
2-mercaptoethanol, 0.05% bromophenyl blue) and heated for 10 min at
65°C. The proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PAGE) and electrophoretically transferred to
nitrocellulose, and the E4orf6-related proteins were visualized on an
E4orf6 Western blot with MAb 3 and chemiluminescence (Pierce, Rockford,
Ill.). Replicate cultures of infected and transfected cells were
harvested at 48 h postinfection to quantify virus yields. Detailed
methods for Ad plaque assays have been described elsewhere
(29). In brief, virus was harvested from HeLa cells by
multiple cycles of freezing and thawing. The cell lysates were
clarified by centrifugation and serially diluted for infection of W162
cells grown in six-well tissue culture dishes for plaque assays. After
incubation with diluted lysates for 1 h, the W162 cells were
overlaid with 0.7% SeaKem ME agarose (FMC BioProducts, Rockland,
Maine) in Dulbecco modified Eagle's minimal medium supplemented with
0.75% sodium bicarbonate and 4% newborn calf serum. The cells were
overlaid with additional agarose in growth medium on the third and
sixth day after infection. Plaques were visualized by staining with neutral red in an agarose overlay on the ninth day. Typically, data
were collected from three dilutions in each series of dilutions. The
virus yield was determined by linear regression and expressed as the
number of plaques per milliliter of initial lysate. Replicate samples
were compared with the two-tailed Student's t test, where a
probability of <0.05 was considered to represent a significant difference.
 |
RESULTS |
The carboxy terminus of the E4orf6 protein is required for E1B
55-kDa protein nuclear colocalization.
In Ad-infected cells, the
E4orf6 protein directs the E1B 55-kDa protein to the peripheries of the
viral transcription centers within the nucleus (43).
Although the E1B 55-kDa protein is restricted to the cytoplasm
when transiently expressed, it is directed to the nucleus when
coexpressed with the E4orf6 protein (21). To determine if a
discrete region of the E4orf6 protein is required for the nuclear
localization of the E1B 55-kDa protein, a series of
carboxy-terminal-truncation variants was created in E4orf6 cDNA. The
E4orf6 sequences of these truncation variants are represented in Fig.
1, as well as the amino acids derived from vector sequences that are expressed in these variants, the E4orf7 sequence for the E4orf6/7 splice variant, and the MAb 3 (38) antibody recognition site, which is preserved in each
of these constructs. These truncation variants were coexpressed with the E1B 55-kDa protein in HeLa cells with the vaccinia virus/T7 RNA
polymerase infection-transfection expression system (17). The E4orf6 truncation variants (Fig. 2,
left column) and the E1B 55-kDa protein (Fig. 2, center column) were
visualized by indirect immunofluorescence. The nucleus was visualized
by staining DNA with DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Fig. 2,
right column). Unless otherwise noted, typical staining patterns are
represented in Fig. 2 and 6.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of the
carboxy-terminal-truncation variants of the E4orf6 protein and E4orf6/7
protein. The 294-residue E4orf6 protein is represented by the bar at
the top of the figure. The solid portion of the bar represents the
postulated extent of the arginine-faced, amphipathic helix
described in this report. Truncation variants are named according to
the number of E4orf6-derived amino acids included in the variant, where
the open bar represents E4orf6 amino acids. Amino acids encoded by
vector sequences are represented by shading. Amino acids encoded by
E4orf7 are indicated by cross-hatching. The solid black line over
residues 16 through 22 indicates the epitope recognized by the
E4orf6-specific antibody, MAb 3.
|
|

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
A region near the carboxy terminus of the E4orf6 protein
is required to direct the E1B 55-kDa protein to the nucleus. HeLa cells
were infected with the recombinant vaccinia virus vTF7.3 to establish
expression of the T7 RNA polymerase and then transfected with cDNA
under control of the T7 promoter encoding an E4orf6-related protein
(indicated on the left) and the E1B 55-kDa protein. The Ad proteins
were visualized by double-label immunofluorescence at 12 to 14 h
posttransfection, and representative cells are shown except as noted in
the text. E4orf6 proteins were visualized with the mouse MAb 3 (left
column; E4), E1B 55-kDa protein was visualized with the rat MAb 9C10
(center column; E1B), and DNA was visualized with DAPI (right
column; DNA). The asterisks in panels D, E, and F identify cells that
express both the N276 E4orf6 variant and the E1B 55-kDa protein; the
other cell in each field expresses only the N276 protein. The
arrowheads in panels M, N, and O identify cells displaying the typical
localization seen in approximately 90% of cells expressing the N108
E4orf6 protein.
|
|
As previously reported (
21), the E4orf6 protein localizes to
the nucleus (Fig.
2A) and directs the E1B 55-kDa protein into
the
nucleus (Fig.
2B). In the absence of the E4orf6 protein, the
E1B 55-kDa
protein was restricted to the cytoplasm (reference
21 and data not shown). Staining for the wild-type
viral proteins
appears coincident in the nucleus and was excluded from
the nucleoli
(Fig.
2A and B). Similar results were obtained when the
N276 E4orf6
truncation variant was coexpressed with the E1B 55-kDa
protein
(Fig.
2D and E). In both cells expressing the N276 variant seen
in Fig.
2D, staining for the N276 variant appears indistinguishable
from the wild-type E4orf6 staining pattern. Only one of the two
cells
seen in Fig.
2D also expressed the E1B 55-kDa protein; in
this cell,
most of the E1B 55-kDa protein appeared to localize
to the nucleus
(Fig.
2E).
Although the N276 E4orf6 truncation variant retained the ability to
direct the E1B 55-kDa protein to the nucleus, this effect
was not
uniformly observed in all cells. Rather, in most of the
cells
expressing the N276 variant, a fraction of the total E1B
55-kDa protein
remained in the cytoplasm. Thus, the N276 E4orf6
truncation variant
retained the ability to direct the E1B 55-kDa
protein to the nucleus,
although less effectively than the wild-type
E4orf6 protein (compare
Fig.
2B and E). The E4orf6-specific staining
pattern in the cell
expressing the E1B 55-kDa protein (Fig.
2D)
is the same as that seen in
the cell expressing the N276 protein
alone. This suggests that at the
level of resolution afforded
by immunofluorescence microscopy, the E1B
55-kDa protein does
not affect localization of the N276 protein. In a
similar manner,
the localization of the other E4orf6 variants examined
in this
study was not affected by E1B 55-kDa protein
expression.
The N244 E4orf6 truncation variant localized to the nucleus in a manner
identical to that of the wild-type E4orf6 protein
(Fig.
2G) but failed
to direct the E1B 55-kDa protein to the nucleus
(Fig.
2H). In
N244-expressing cells, the localization of the E1B
55-kDa protein was
identical to that of cells expressing the E1B
55-kDa protein alone. In
contrast to the N244 or N276 truncation
variants, a fraction of the
total N160 protein was observed in
the cytoplasm (Fig.
2J). In
addition, the N160 truncation variant,
like the N244 variant, failed to
direct the E1B 55-kDa protein
to the nucleus (Fig.
2K) in cells
expressing both proteins. Successively
larger carboxy-terminal
deletions of the E4orf6 protein gave rise
to proteins that partitioned
increasingly in the cytoplasm. This
is illustrated by the localization
of the N108 variant in Fig.
2M. Most of the E4orf6-related protein in
these cells accumulated
in brightly staining bodies in the cytoplasm
and nucleus, possibly
as aggregates of malfolded protein. In the 10%
of cells containing
the N108 variant in the nucleus, the staining
pattern did not
resemble the wild-type E4orf6 staining pattern because
nucleolar
exclusion of the protein was not evident. The E1B 55-kDa
protein
failed to localize to the nucleus in all cells expressing the
N108 variant (Fig.
2N). The E4orf6/7 protein, composed of the
first 58 residues of the E4orf6 protein and 92 residues of the
E4orf7 protein,
localized predominantly to the nucleus and was
excluded from the
nucleoli (Fig.
2P). The localization of the
E4orf6/7 protein was most
similar to that of the N160 truncation
variant because a fraction of
the total E4orf6/7 protein expressed
in cells was found in the
cytoplasm (Fig.
2P). Moreover, the E4orf6/7
protein failed to direct
the E1B 55-kDa protein to the nucleus
(Fig.
2Q).
The inability of the E4orf6 variants to direct nuclear localization of
the E1B 55-kDa protein was not due to reduced levels
of these proteins.
Lysates derived from parallel cultures of cells
expressing the E4orf6
truncation variants analyzed in Fig.
2 were
analyzed by an immunoblot
to determine the steady-state level
of the E4orf6-related proteins
(Fig.
3). With the exception of
the
E4orf6/7 protein, the levels of all protein variants seen
in Fig.
3
were comparable to or exceeded the level of the wild-type
E4orf6
protein. The N108 variant (Fig.
3, lane 5) appeared to
be expressed to
levels significantly greater than any of the other
E4orf6 variants.
This amount of protein was not anticipated on
the basis of the weak
immunofluorescence intensity seen in Fig.
2M. Perhaps the MAb 3 epitope
is less accessible in aggregates
of N108 within the cell prepared for
immunofluorescence. Finally,
the apparent mobilities of the E4orf6
variant proteins shown in
Fig.
3 agree with the predicted values,
although the aberrant
electrophoretic mobility of E4orf6-related
proteins is evident
in Fig.
3. Note that the wild-type E4orf6 protein
(Fig.
3, lane
1) migrates with an apparent molecular mass of 29 kDa
(
49),
although the protein has a predicted molecular mass of
34 kDa.
In a similar manner, the E4orf6/7 protein (Fig.
3, lane 6)
migrates
at an apparent molecular mass of 20 kDa (
8),
although it has
a predicted molecular mass of 17 kDa.

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Carboxy-terminal truncation variants of the E4orf6
protein are expressed to comparable levels in HeLa cells. The E1B
55-kDa protein and E4orf6 variant proteins depicted in Fig. 1 were
expressed by the vaccinia virus/T7 RNA polymerase system as described
in the legend to Fig. 2. Total cell protein was isolated 14 h
post-infection-transfection, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to
a solid support. The E4orf6-related protein was visualized by
immunoblotting with MAb 3 (38). The approximate positions of
molecular mass standards are indicated in kilodaltons on the left.
|
|
From these results it seemed likely that the region between amino acids
244 and 276 of the E4orf6 protein was important for
E1B 55-kDa protein
nuclear localization. Therefore the primary
structure and potential
secondary structure of this region were
closely examined. The region is
predominantly composed of arginine
and hydrophobic residues. Both the
empirical secondary structure
algorithm of Chou and Fasman and the
theoretical algorithm of
Garnier, Osguthorpe, and Robson predict that
an

helix exists
between amino acids 244 and 260 (Fig.
4A) (
6,
19). However,
the Chou
and Fasman secondary-structure prediction algorithm predicts
that this

helix begins at amino acid 239. A hydrophilicity (
33)
plot predicts that this region is flanked by two hydrophilic,
surface-exposed regions (Fig.
4A). In addition, the region has
a
significant hydrophobic moment at approximately 100° of rotation
between adjacent residues from amino acids 239 through 253 of
the
E4orf6 protein (Fig.
4B), corresponding to the writhe of an

helix
(
45). Since this region is predicted to exist as an

helix, a helical-wheel diagram of this region was constructed
(Fig.
4C). Strikingly, this structure appears as an amphipathic

helix
consisting of a hydrophobic face and a hydrophilic face
that is almost
exclusively composed of arginine residues. Furthermore,
an Eisenberg
plot of this region yields maximum values for the
mean hydrophobic
moment (µH = 0.58) and the mean hydrophobicity
(H = 0.023)
that are characteristic of amphipathic

helix that
lies at a
boundary between the hydrophobic core of the protein
and a
surface-exposed face of the protein (
12,
13). From these
considerations, it seemed possible that such a striking feature
in the
E4orf6 polypeptide may govern the nuclear localization
of the E1B
55-kDa protein.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
The region of the E4orf6 protein required to direct E1B
55-kDa protein to the nucleus is predicted to contain an
arginine-faced, amphipathic helix. (A) The E4orf6 protein between
amino acids 194 and 294 of the E4orf6 protein was analyzed for
hydrophilicity by the method of Kyte and Doolittle (33), for
surface probability by the method of Emini et al. (14), and
for predicted helices by the methods of Chou and Fasman
(6) and Garnier et al. (19). Regions of striking
hydrophilicity and high surface probability are highlighted by shading.
The hatched region indicates predicted -helical segments that are
analyzed further below. (B) The hydrophobic moment of the E4orf6
protein between amino acids 225 and 260 is shown for all possible
angles of rotation. Contour lines are plotted for values of 0.35 and
0.45 as determined by the method of Finer-Moore and Stroud
(15) with a window of 11 amino acids. The dashed lines flank
the region of the plot corresponding to the angle of rotation
associated with an helix (100° ± 5°). (C) A
helical-wheel presentation of amino acids 239 through 255 of
E4orf6 depicts an amphipathic structure dominated by arginine residues
on one face and hydrophobic residues on the other face. Charged amino
acids are indicated by the charge at neutral pH, and hydrophobic amino
acids are boxed.
|
|
An arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix exists within the E4orf6
protein.
To test if the amino acids of the predicted E4orf6
-helical region can adopt an
-helical secondary structure, a
synthetic peptide corresponding to amino acids 239 to 255 of the E4orf6 protein was prepared and tested for secondary structure by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. CD and proton magnetic resonance studies
of peptides derived from proteins of known secondary structure show
that the conformational preference of the peptides correlates well with
the secondary structures of the respective regions in the proteins
(11). In near-physiological conditions, the CD spectrum of
the E4orf6 peptide resembles spectra correlated with the atypical
conformation (Fig. 5A), a conformation
previously identified as random coil, consisting of a large negative
band around 200 nm and a peak or shoulder with a small negative value at 220 nm (23). This is the expected behavior for a peptide composed of over 50% hydrophobic residues (9 of 17) in an aqueous environment. TFE, an organic polar solvent, stabilizes
-helical structure by strengthening intermolecular hydrogen bonding and fostering peptide-peptide dimerization of amphipathic peptides (28, 39). Although TFE-induced multimerization of the E4orf6 peptide (data not shown), the spectra of the peptide in 30% or less
TFE were not characteristic of any known secondary structures (Fig.
5A). However, the E4orf6 peptide spectra obtained in 30% or less TFE
intersect at an isobestic point at 209 nm, which is indicative of a
biphasic secondary-structure transition. By contrast, in greater than
30% TFE, the CD spectra of the E4orf6 peptide resembled the spectra of
an
helix containing a positive peak around 190 to 195 nm and two
negative peaks at 208 and 222 nm (Fig. 5A) (23, 25). In
addition, the E4orf6 peptide spectra in 30% or greater TFE cross at an
isobestic point at 201 nm that is indicative of a second biphasic
transition (Fig. 5A). Although the magnitudes of the minima at 208 and
222 nm exceed the theoretical values for a monomeric
-helical
peptide (5, 25), recent studies have demonstrated that
multimers of amphipathic peptides produce CD spectra with minima at 222 and 208 nm comparable to those observed for the E4orf6 peptide in Fig.
5A (44, 52).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Peptides corresponding to the predicted arginine-faced,
amphipathic helix of the E4orf6 protein exhibit -helical spectra
when analyzed by CD spectroscopy in the presence of TFE. CD spectra of
the E4orf6 peptide (A) and L245P peptide (B) at a
concentration of 200 µM in 50 mM Na2PO4-150
mM NaCl (pH 7.0) at 25°C in various concentrations of TFE. The
measured CD values were converted to mean residue molar ellipticities,
[ ]mean, and plotted as a function of the incident
wavelength. The arrowheads above the x axis identify
the minima associated with an -helical spectrum. (C) Changes
in [ ]mean measured at 222 nm in increasing
concentrations of TFE reveal a triphasic transition in the secondary
structure of the E4orf6 peptide. The value for [ ]mean
measured at 222 nm is plotted on the y axis as a function of
the percent TFE on the x axis.
|
|
A second peptide, corresponding to the sequence of the E4orf6 protein
between residues 239 and 255 with leucine 245 of the
E4orf6 protein
changed to proline, L
245P, was synthesized and
tested for
secondary structure by CD spectroscopy. Proline was
introduced into the
E4orf6 peptide because its rigid-ringed backbone
cannot conform to the
phi and psi angles required for an

helix
(
37). Thus, the
introduction of a proline residue in the E4orf6
peptide should disrupt
its

-helical secondary structure. In near-physiological
buffer
conditions, the spectra of the L
245P peptide resembled
those of an atypical structure (Fig.
5B). The addition of TFE
also
induced multimerization of the L
245P peptide (data not
shown),
and like the E4orf6 peptide, the L
245P peptide
exhibited an atypical
conformation in less than 30% TFE (Fig.
5B). By
contrast, in the
presence of 30% or more TFE, the CD spectra of the
L
245P peptide
resembled spectra of an

-helical peptide.
In addition, all of
the L
245P peptide spectra cross at an
isobestic point at 204 nm,
which is indicative of an
atypical-to-

-helical two-phase transition.
A similar biphasic
transition from atypical to

-helical secondary
structure has been
reported for the 26-residue melittin peptide
upon dimerization
(
52).
The multiphasic transition of the E4orf6 peptide and the biphasic
transition of the L
245P peptide in increasing TFE
concentrations
are more apparent upon plotting the
[
]mean at 222 nm versus TFE concentration (Fig.
5C).
The curves
obtained from the E4orf6 peptide exhibit two saturation
points
that may reflect a triphasic transition, whereas the
L
245P peptide
does not achieve saturation even in 80% TFE.
As expected, the
proline residue in the L
245P peptide
encumbers

-helix formation.
Indeed, the helical content of both
peptides in greater than 30%
TFE is directly proportional to the
[
]mean at 222 nm. Therefore, although both peptides
are able to
adopt an

-helical conformation in greater than 30% TFE,
the E4orf6
peptide has a greater helical content than the
L
245P
peptide.
The integrity of an arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix is
required for E1B 55-kDa protein nuclear localization.
To test
whether the arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix of the E4orf6 protein
is important for the nuclear localization of the E1B 55-kDa protein, a
small in-frame deletion and proline replacement or insertion mutations
were introduced into this region (Table
1). These E4orf6 variants were then
tested for their ability to direct the E1B 55-kDa protein to the
nucleus. The E4orf6 variants were coexpressed with the E1B 55-kDa
protein by the vaccinia virus/T7 RNA polymerase infection-transfection
system (17), and the localization of the E4orf6 variants and
the E1B 55-kDa protein was determined by indirect immunofluorescence.
The variant bearing the internal deletion,
241-250, localized to
the nucleus to the same extent as the wild-type E4orf6 protein (Fig.
6D) but failed to direct the E1B 55-kDa
protein to the nucleus (Fig. 6E), thus supporting the importance of
this region of the E4orf6 protein for nuclear localization of the E1B
55-kDa protein.

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Disruption of the predicted arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix in the E4orf6 protein abolishes its ability to direct nuclear
localization of the E1B 55-kDa protein. Coexpression of the E1B
55-kDa protein and the indicated E4orf6 protein variants (described in
Table 1) was established, and the localization of the Ad proteins was
determined as described in the legend to Fig. 2. E4orf6 proteins were
visualized with the mouse MAb 3 (left column; E4), E1B 55-kDa
protein was visualized with the rat MAb 9C10 (center column;
E1B), and DNA was visualized with DAPI (right column; DNA).
Representative cells are shown for all constructs analyzed.
|
|
Proline residues were introduced at the beginning, middle, and end of
the predicted

helix to potentially disrupt the

helix.
These
E4orf6 variants were coexpressed with the E1B 55-kDa protein,
and the
localization of each protein was determined. The R
241P
variant localized to the nucleus to the same extent as the wild-type
E4orf6 protein (compare Fig.
6A and G). However, the R
241P
variant
failed to direct the nuclear localization of the E1B 55-kDa
protein
(Fig.
6H). Although the introduction of proline at position 241
replaced the charged arginine residue with a neutral amino acid,
when
arginine 241 was replaced with leucine, this variant directed
E1B
55-kDa protein nuclear localization as well as the wild-type
E4orf6
protein (data not shown). Therefore, it seems likely that
the
introduction of proline at position 241, rather than the loss
of the
charged arginine, disrupted the function of the E4orf6
protein. It
should be noted that when the R
241P variant protein
was
coexpressed with the E1B 55-kDa protein under control of the
cytomegalovirus (CMV) major immediate-early promoter, rather than
by
the vaccinia virus/T7 RNA polymerase system, a portion of the
E1B
55-kDa protein localized to the nucleus in a small fraction
of cells (6 of 86) expressing both proteins. This suggested that
this variant may
retain some ability to interact with the E1B
55-kDa protein (data not
shown). The basis for the difference
in behavior between the proteins
expressed by these two systems
is not known. However, the limited
ability of the R
241P protein
to direct nuclear localization
of the E1B 55-kDa protein may give
rise to the partial function of this
mutant protein that was measured
in the experiment described below (see
Fig.
7).
The L
245P variant, like the R
241P variant, also
localized to the nucleus (Fig.
6G) and failed to direct the nuclear
localization
of the E1B 55-kDa protein (Fig.
6H). By contrast, the
AE
255APE
variant acted like the wild-type E4orf6 protein
with respect to
the localization of both E4orf6 protein (Fig.
6M) and
the E1B
55-kDa (Fig.
6N) protein. Unlike the R
241P variant,
both the L
245P
and AE
255APE variants expressed
from the CMV immediate-early promoter
affected the E1B 55-kDa protein
in a manner identical to that
seen with the vaccinia virus expression
system. Additional variant
proteins containing a proline replacement,
A
239P, and a proline
insertion, RC
236RPC, were
unable to direct nuclear localization
of the E1B 55-kDa protein,
although these variants were also localized
to the nucleus (data
not shown). These results are consistent
with the suggestion that the
arginine-faced, amphipathic

helix
of the E4orf6 protein is required
for its ability to direct the
E1B 55-kDa protein to the nucleus
because this property can be
abolished by disrupting the integrity of
this

helix with proline
residues.
Disrupting the ability of the E4orf6 protein to direct nuclear
localization of the E1B 55-kDa protein abolishes E4orf6 function during
a lytic Ad infection.
Introduction of a proline residue into
the predicted arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix of the E4orf6
protein not only reduced the
-helical content of this region (Fig.
5) but also disrupted nuclear colocalization of the E1B 55-kDa protein
(Fig. 6). To determine if the E4orf6 variants containing proline
mutations could complement growth of the E4 mutant virus,
dl1014, which expresses only the E4orf4 protein
(32), HeLa cells were infected with dl1014 and
simultaneously transfected with cDNAs expressing the E4orf6 proline
variants. Forty-eight hours after infection, the amount of virus in
these cells was quantified by a plaque assay with an E4-complementing
cell line, W162 (53).
Cells infected with a phenotypically wild-type virus,
dl309,
produced the same amount of virus whether transfected with
the
E4orf6 cDNA or untransfected (Fig.
7A). Therefore, ectopic expression
of the E4orf6 protein did not alter virus production. As expected,
cells infected with
dl1014 produced nearly
1,000-fold less virus
than
dl309-infected cells (Fig.
7A). However, cells infected with
dl1014 and
simultaneously transfected with an E4orf6 cDNA produced
200-fold
more virus than untransfected
dl1014-infected
cells (Fig.
7A). This yield corresponds to a fivefold
reduction compared to
wild-type
dl309-infected cells.
The infected and transfected cells
were evaluated by
immunofluorescence for expression of an early
viral protein, the E1B
55-kDa protein, and the E4orf6-related
protein. Essentially all of the
cells expressed the E1B 55-kDa
protein and therefore were infected with
the virus. However, only
20 to 30% of the cells expressed the
E4orf6-related protein (data
not shown). Thus, the limited transfection
efficiency may account
for most, if not all of the decreased virus
yield from
dl1014-infected
cells transfected with the
wild-type E4orf6 cDNA. By contrast,
expression of the E4orf6/7 protein
in
dl1014-infected cells failed
to affect growth of
the mutant virus. These cells produced statistically
the same amount of
virus as untransfected
dl1014-infected cells
(Fig.
7A),
indicating that the E4orf6/7 protein cannot supply
E4orf6 function
during Ad infection.

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
E4orf6 protein variants that retain the ability to
direct the E1B 55-kDa protein to the nucleus rescue growth of an E4
deletion virus. HeLa cells were infected with the wild-type virus,
dl309, or the E4 mutant virus lacking all but orf4,
dl1014, at 10 PFU per cell and simultaneously transfected
with cDNAs expressing the E4orf6-related constructs indicated at the
left (Plasmid). The E4orf6-related proteins were expressed under the
control of the major immediate-early promoter of CMV. (A) Virus was
harvested after 48 h and quantified by plaque assay on the
E4-complementing W162 cell line. The average amount of virus (expressed
as PFU per milliliter) from three independent infections is shown with
the standard deviations indicated. (B) In a parallel experiment,
extracts of the infected and transfected cells were prepared at 48 h post-infection-transfection, and the proteins were separated by
SDS-PAGE and transferred to a solid support. The E4orf6-related protein
was visualized by immunoblotting with MAb 3 (38); the
portion of the membrane containing the E4orf6 protein is shown.
|
|
The E4orf6 proline variants that failed to direct the E1B 55-kDa
protein to the nucleus largely failed to complement growth
of
dl1014. E4orf6-R
241P expression in
dl1014-infected cells increased
virus yields twofold over
those of untransfected or L
245P-transfected
cells (Fig.
7A). This slight, albeit significant (
P < 0.05),
increase
may reflect the limited ability of the
E4orf6-R
241P protein to
direct E1B 55-kDa protein nuclear
localization in a small number
of cells when expressed from the CMV
immediate-early promoter.
Expression of the E4orf6-L
245P
protein completely failed to rescue
growth of
dl1014. Cells
infected with
dl1014 and transfected with
a cDNA encoding
E4orf6-L
245P protein produced the same amount
of virus as
untransfected
dl1014-infected cells (Fig.
7A). By
contrast,
expression of the E4orf6-AE
255APE variant in
dl1014-infected
cells complemented virus growth to the same
extent that the wild-type
E4orf6 cDNA complemented virus growth (Fig.
7A). The amount of
viral DNA synthesized in the simultaneously infected
and transfected
cells was measured by hybridization analysis and was
found to
reflect the yield of virus (data not shown). Thus, the
severity
of the defect measured for the proline variants
R
241P and L
245P
suggests that the
arginine-faced, amphipathic

helix may be important
for the multiple
roles of the E4orf6 protein, including viral
DNA synthesis, viral mRNA
transport, and the stability of nuclear
viral
mRNA.
In a parallel experiment, levels of the E4orf6 proteins were measured
to determine if aberrant expression of the E4orf6-related
proteins
could account for decreased virus yields. A portion of
the cells used
to determine virus yields were used to determine
E4orf6 expression
levels by E4orf6 immunoblotting. Expression
of the E4orf6
protein from a plasmid in
dl309-infected cells
increased
E4orf6 expression 10-fold compared to that of
untransfected
dl309-infected
cells (Fig.
7B). As
expected, neither the E4orf6/7-transfected
nor
untransfected
dl1014-infected cells expressed a
wild-type
E4orf6 protein.
dl1014-infected cells
that were transfected with
cDNAs encoding the E4orf6-related
proteins contained approximately
the same amount of
E4orf6-related protein (Fig.
7B). Expression
of the
E4orf6 variant was greatest in cells expressing the
E4orf6-L
245P
protein, yet this mutation was the most
defective in its ability
to rescue
dl1014. From this
analysis, it seems unlikely that aberrant
expression levels of the
E4orf6 proline variants could account
for differences in virus
yields.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we identified a structural element of the E4orf6
protein required for its functional interaction with the E1B 55-kDa
protein in the cell and demonstrated that this element is required for
productive Ad infection. This element is an arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix that is essential for E1B 55-kDa protein nuclear colocalization. E4orf6 protein variants lacking or containing disruptions within this arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix failed to
direct the E1B 55-kDa protein to the nucleus when the proteins were
transiently expressed. Furthermore, E4orf6 variants that could not
direct the nuclear colocalization of the E1B 55-kDa protein also failed
to supply E4orf6 function in cells infected with an E4 deletion virus.
The severity of the defect of these E4orf6 variants during an Ad
infection suggests that the arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix is
crucial for the multiple functions of the E4orf6 protein.
A region within the carboxy terminus of the E4orf6 protein is required
for the nuclear colocalization of the E1B 55-kDa protein. By contrast,
a recent study of Rubenwolf et al. suggests that a region within the
amino-terminal 58 amino acids of the E4orf6 protein mediates
E4orf6-E1B 55-kDa protein binding in vitro (48). In this
study, carboxy-terminal E4orf6 protein fragments failed to bind
the E1B 55-kDa protein whereas amino-terminal E4orf6
protein fragments, including the E4orf6/7 protein, bound the E1B
55-kDa protein in vitro. These investigators also were able to
indirectly immunoprecipitate the E4orf6/7 protein with E1B 55-kDa
protein-specific antibodies after expressing the E4orf6/7 protein
by transfection in 293 cells. However, these same investigators, as
well as others, failed to detect an interaction between the
E4orf6/7 protein and the E1B 55-kDa protein during Ad infection
(8, 24, 48). The reason for these discrepancies is not known
but may be due to the different experimental approaches used to measure
the E4orf6-E1B 55-kDa protein interaction. Further support for the
significance of the carboxy terminus of E4orf6 in E1B 55-kDa protein
nuclear localization can be derived from an unpublished
observation from our laboratory. An E4orf6 protein variant lacking the
first 58 amino acids failed to localize to the nucleus and failed to
promote E1B 55-kDa protein nuclear colocalization; however, the
addition of a nuclear localization signal from the large T antigen of
simian virus 40 to this variant promoted the nuclear localization of the protein and concurrently restored its ability to direct the E1B
55-kDa protein to the nucleus. Although we cannot exclude the
possibility that the amino terminus of the E4orf6 protein is involved
in binding the E1B 55-kDa protein, the results presented in this study
suggest that the carboxy terminus of the E4orf6 protein is essential
for E1B 55-kDa protein nuclear localization.
The region of the E4orf6 protein required for the nuclear localization
of the E1B 55-kDa protein is an arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix.
A synthetic peptide corresponding to this region adopted an
-helical
structure as measured by CD spectroscopy. Although the shapes of the
L245P peptide CD spectra resembled the shapes of the
spectra for the wild-type E4orf6 peptide in the presence of TFE, the
magnitudes of the minima of the L245P peptide at 208 and
222 nm are less than that of the wild-type E4orf6 peptide. The behavior
of the L245P peptide suggests that the L245P
protein may retain some
-helical structure in this region.
Nonetheless, this mutant protein was unable to promote the nuclear
localization of the E1B 55-kDa protein. Similarly, E4orf6 protein
variants containing proline residues at amino acids 239 and 241 also
failed to direct the E1B 55-kDa protein to the nucleus. However, an
E4orf6 protein variant encoding proline after amino acid 255 promoted the nuclear localization of the E1B 55-kDa protein as well as the
wild-type E4orf6 protein. These results are consistent with the
possibility that an
helix extends from amino acids 239 through 245, but not beyond amino acid 255. A hydrophobic-moment plot of this region
reveals that an
helix between amino acids 239 and 253 would exhibit
a strong hydrophobic moment (Fig. 4B). This observation leads us to
propose the existence of an
helix through residue 253. In addition,
amino acid 251 of the E4orf6 protein is an arginine. Therefore, if the
arginine face of this
helix is critical for E4orf6 function, it
seems likely that the
helix would include arginine 251. Since amino
acids 252 and 253 of this region are
-helix-favoring isoleucine
residues, it also seems likely that these residues would be part of the
arginine-faced amphipathic
helix. Because the proline-containing
variants, RC236RPC and A239P, were defective at
directing nuclear localization of the E1B 55-kDa protein, we cannot
definitively identify the amino terminus of the arginine-faced,
amphipathic
helix. However, it seems reasonable that amino acid 239 is the amino-terminal residue of this
helix, since amino acid 239 is an
-helix-favoring alanine residue and amino acids 237 and 238 are non-
-helix-promoting cysteine residues. From these
considerations, we suggest that an arginine-faced amphipathic
helix
exists between amino acids 239 and 253 and that this
helix lies at
an interface between the hydrophobic core of the protein and a
solvent-exposed face.
Most amphipathic
helices that have been described are membrane
associated and frequently contribute to the aqueous pore of a protein
channel through a membrane (reference 51 and
references therein). However, an arginine-rich, amphipathic
helix
that mediates protein-protein interaction has been identified in the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Nef protein (2).
The Nef protein is dispensable for virus growth in vitro but is a
key factor in the pathogenesis of HIV (31, 36). In
HIV-infected cells, the Nef protein modulates the activity of kinases
involved in T-cell activation pathways; the arginine-rich, amphipathic
helix in the amino-terminal region of Nef is required for Nef binding to an uncharacterized serine kinase and the Lck tyrosine kinase
(2, 7, 50). To our knowledge, the Nef and E4orf6 proteins
are the only two examples of proteins that use an arginine-rich amphipathic
helix to mediate protein-protein interaction.
Previous studies in our laboratory suggest that the interaction between
the E4orf6 protein and the E1B 55-kDa protein in vivo is indirect and
that a primate-specific cellular factor is required for the
E4orf6-mediated nuclear localization of the E1B 55-kDa protein. Perhaps
the arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix of the E4orf6 protein
interacts with such a cellular factor. Additional support for the
existence of an interaction between this
helix and unknown cellular
factors derives from unpublished observations on the long-term
expression of the E4orf6 protein and the L245P protein. We
found that expression of the wild-type E4orf6 protein in HeLa or 293 cells could not be sustained for greater than 4 weeks, whereas
expression of the L245P protein could be maintained indefinitely (42a). Perhaps both the Nef and E4orf6 viral
proteins recruit cellular factors to modulate host activities through
an arginine-rich, amphipathic
helix.
A recent report from Dobbelstein et al. suggests that the
arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix of the E4orf6 protein acts as a
nuclear retention signal (9). These investigators failed to
observe shuttling of the wild-type E4orf6 protein between nuclei within
a heterokaryon formed of HeLa and mouse cells, whereas an E4orf6
variant containing a glutamic acid in place of arginine 248 was
observed to shuttle. However, in previous studies, we found that the
wild-type E4orf6 protein does shuttle between nuclei within
heterokaryons formed of HeLa or rat cells alone (21) or
within heterokaryons of HeLa and rat cells (unpublished data). The
reason for these differences is unclear but may reflect the use of
different cell lines or different experimental conditions. Although we
did not directly measure shuttling of the E4orf6 variants in the
experiments reported here, we failed to detect a difference between the
intracellular distribution of any E4orf6 proteins bearing mutations in
the arginine-faced
helix and the wild-type E4orf6 protein. However,
carboxy-terminal truncations that removed the
helix as well as 80 or more amino acids on the amino-terminal side of the
helix created
proteins that partitioned more strongly in the cytoplasm than the
wild-type E4orf6 protein. These results suggest that sequences within
the E4orf6 protein indeed affect the extent to which the protein
partitions between the nucleus and cytoplasm; however, these sequences
appear to be amino terminal to the
helix identified in this report.
Expression of the E4orf6 protein restored growth of the E4 deletion
virus, dl1014, to near-wild-type levels (Fig. 7). Two previously published observations led us to anticipate this result. Ketner et al. (32) demonstrated that ectopically expressed
E4orf6 protein restored growth of a larger E4 deletion mutant.
Similarly, E4 mutant viruses that express only the E4orf6 protein grow
to near-wild-type levels (1, 3, 26). Strikingly, the
L245P E4orf6 variant, which failed to direct nuclear
localization of the E1B 55-kDa protein (Fig. 6), completely failed to
enhance replication of dl1014 (Fig. 7). By contrast,
expression of the R241P variant provided a slight but
significant (P < 0.05) enhancement to
dl1014 growth over untransfected or
L245P-transfected cells. Unlike the L245P
variant, the R241P variant displayed a limited ability to
direct nuclear localization of the E1B 55-kDa protein when expressed
from the CMV immediate-early promoter (data not shown). The reason for
this limited ability is not clear, but it may, for example, be
indicative of a truncated, arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix.
Nonetheless, this result reinforces the correlation between the ability
of the E4orf6 protein to direct the E1B 55-kDa protein to the nucleus
and the ability of the E4orf6 protein to function during Ad lytic growth.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that an arginine-faced
helix
near the carboxy terminus of the E4orf6 protein is essential for the
E4orf6 protein to direct nuclear localization of the E1B 55-kDa
protein. Furthermore, we suggest that the arginine-faced
helix is
critical for the function of the E4orf6 protein during a productive
viral infection. These findings are consistent with the possibility
that in the absence of the E4orf3 protein, the E4orf6 protein can
enhance virus growth only through its interaction with the E1B 55-kDa
protein. Alternatively, the arginine-faced, amphipathic
helix of
the E4orf6 protein may be important for the multiple functions of the
E4orf6 protein during an Ad infection. Perhaps the basic face of the
amphipathic
helix mediates interactions with multiple cellular
factors in a manner similar to that described for the Nef protein of
HIV. The identity of such factors should provide valuable insight into
the means by which the E4orf6 protein can mediate mRNA export, promote
viral mRNA accumulation, modulate viral mRNA splicing, enhance viral
DNA synthesis and act as an oncoprotein.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant AI35589
from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease. J.S.O.
was supported in part by NIH Training Grant T32 AI07401 to the
Department of Microbiology and Immunology. Tissue culture reagents and
services were provided by the Tissue Culture Core Laboratory and
oligonucleotide synthesis was performed by the DNA Synthesis Core
Laboratory, both at the Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest
University supported in part by NIH grant CA12197. Peptide synthesis
and amino acid analysis were performed in the Protein Analysis Core
Laboratory of the Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest
University, supported in part by NIH grants CA-12197 and RR-04869, as
well as by a grant from the North Carolina Biotechnology Center.
We gratefully acknowledge Gary Ketner (Johns Hopkins University) for
the dl1014 virus and W162 cells and Tom Shenk (Princeton University) for the dl309 virus. We also thank John Parks
for the use of the Jasco 600 CD spectrophotometer. We acknowledge Mark
Lively and Mark Morris for assistance with peptide synthesis and
analysis and Roy Hantgan for assistance with protein structure analysis. Felicia Goodrum, Doug Lyles, and Griff Parks provided valuable advice on the work in progress and on manuscript preparation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology and Immunology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Bowman Gray Campus, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1064. Phone: (336) 716-9332. Fax: (336) 716-9928. E-mail: ornelles{at}wfubmc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Armentano, D.,
C. C. Sookdeo,
K. M. Hehir,
R. J. Gregory,
J. A. St. George,
G. A. Prince,
S. C. Wadsworth, and A. E. Smith.
1995.
Characterization of an adenovirus gene transfer vector containing an E4 deletion.
Hum. Gene Ther.
6:1343-1353[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Baur, A. S.,
G. Saas,
B. Laffert,
D. Willbold,
C. Cheng-Mayer, and B. M. Peterlin.
1997.
The N-terminus of Nef from HIV-1/SIV associates with a protein complex containing Lck and a serine kinase.
Immunity
6:283-291[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bridge, E., and G. Ketner.
1989.
Redundant control of adenovirus late gene expression by early region 4.
J. Virol.
63:631-638[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bridge, E., and G. Ketner.
1990.
Interaction of adenoviral E4 and E1B products in late gene expression.
Virology
174:345-353[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chen, Y. H.,
J. T. Yang, and K. H. Chau.
1974.
Determination of the alpha-helix and beta-form of proteins in aqueous solution by circular dichroism.
Biochemistry
13:3350-3359[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Chou, P. Y., and G. D. Fasman.
1978.
Empirical predictions of protein conformation.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
47:251-276[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Collette, Y.,
H. Duartre,
A. Benziane,
F. Ramos-Morales,
R. Benarous,
M. Harris, and D. Olive.
1996.
Physical and functional interaction of Nef with Lck.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:6333-6341[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Cutt, J. R.,
T. Shenk, and P. Hearing.
1987.
Analysis of adenovirus early region 4-encoded polypeptides synthesized in productively infected cells.
J. Virol.
61:543-552[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Dobbelstein, M.,
J. Roth,
W. Taylor-Kimberly,
A. Levine, and T. Shenk.
1997.
Nuclear export of the E1B 55-kDa and E4 34-kDa adenoviral oncoproteins mediated by a rev-like signal sequence.
EMBO J.
16:4276-4284[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Dobner, T.,
N. Horikoshi,
S. Rubenwolf, and T. Shenk.
1996.
Blockage by adenovirus E4orf6 of transcriptional activation by the p53 tumor suppressor.
Science
272:1470-1473[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Dyson, H. J.,
G. Merutka,
J. P. Waltho,
R. A. Lerner, and P. E. Wright.
1992.
Folding of peptide fragments comprising the complete sequence of proteins. Models for initiation of protein folding. I. Myohemerythrin.
J. Mol. Biol.
226:795-817[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Eisenberg, D.,
E. Schwartz,
M. Komaromy, and R. Wall.
1984.
Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot.
J. Mol. Biol.
179:125-142[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Eisenberg, D.,
R. M. Weiss,
T. C. Terwilliger, and W. Wilcox.
1982.
Hydrophobic moments and protein structure.
Faraday Symp. Chem. Soc.
17:109-120.
|
| 14.
|
Emini, E. A.,
J. V. Hughes,
D. S. Perlow, and J. Boger.
1985.
Induction of hepatitis A virus-neutralizing antibody by a virus-specific synthetic peptide.
J. Virol.
55:836-839[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Finer-Moore, J., and R. M. Stroud.
1984.
Amphipathic analysis and possible formation of the ion channel in an acetylcholine receptor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:155-159[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Freyer, G. A.,
Y. Katoh, and R. J. Roberts.
1984.
Characterization of the major mRNAs from adenovirus 2 early region 4 by cDNA cloning and sequencing.
Nucleic Acids Res.
12:3503-3519[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Fuerst, T. R.,
E. G. Niles,
F. W. Studier, and B. Moss.
1986.
Eukaryotic transient-expression system based on recombinant vaccinia virus that synthesizes bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:8122-8126[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Gabler, S.,
H. Schütt,
P. Groitl,
H. Wolf,
T. Shenk, and T. Dobner.
1998.
E1B 55-kilodalton-associated protein: a cellular protein with RNA-binding activity implicated in nucleocytoplasmic transport of adenovirus and cellular mRNAs.
J. Virol.
72:7960-7971[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Garnier, J.,
D. J. Osguthorpe, and B. Robson.
1978.
Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins.
J. Mol. Biol.
120:97-120[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Goodrum, F. D., and D. A. Ornelles.
1997.
The early region 1B 55-kilodalton oncoprotein of adenovirus relieves growth restrictions imposed on viral replication by the cell cycle.
J. Virol.
71:548-561[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Goodrum, F. D.,
T. Shenk, and D. A. Ornelles.
1996.
Adenovirus early region 4 34-kilodalton protein directs the nuclear localization of the early region 1B 55-kilodalton protein in primate cells.
J. Virol.
70:6323-6335[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Graham, F. L.,
J. Smiley,
W. C. Russell, and R. Nairn.
1977.
Characteristics of a human cell line transformed by DNA from human adenovirus type 5.
J. Gen. Virol.
36:59-72[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Greenfield, N., and G. D. Fasman.
1969.
Computed circular dichroism spectra for the evaluation of protein conformation.
Biochemistry
8:4108-4116[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Halbert, D. N.,
J. R. Cutt, and T. Shenk.
1985.
Adenovirus early region 4 encodes functions required for efficient DNA replication, late gene expression, and host cell shutoff.
J. Virol.
56:250-257[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Holtzwarth, G., and P. Doty.
1965.
The ultraviolet circular dichroism of polypeptides.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
87:218-228.
|
| 26.
|
Huang, M. M., and P. Hearing.
1989.
Adenovirus early region 4 encodes two gene products with redundant effects in lytic infection.
J. Virol.
63:2605-2615[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Hutchison, C. A., III,
S. Phillips,
M. H. Edgell,
S. Gillam,
P. Jahnke, and M. Smith.
1978.
Mutagenesis at a specific position in a DNA sequence.
J. Biol. Chem.
253:6551-6560[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Ishii, Y.
1994.
The local and global unfolding of coiled-coil tropomyosin.
Eur. J. Biochem.
221:705-712[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Jones, N., and T. Shenk.
1978.
Isolation of deletion and substitution mutants of adenovirus type 5.
Cell
13:181-186[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Jones, N., and T. Shenk.
1979.
Isolation of adenovirus type 5 host range deletion mutants defective for transformation of rat embryo cells.
Cell
17:683-689[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Kestler, H. W., III,
D. J. Ringler,
K. Mori,
D. L. Panicali,
P. K. Sehgal,
M. D. Daniel, and R. C. Desrosiers.
1991.
Importance of the nef gene for maintance of high virus loads and for development of AIDS.
Cell
65:651-662[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Ketner, G.,
E. Bridge,
A. Virtanen,
C. Hemström, and U. Pettersson.
1989.
Complementation of adenovirus E4 mutants by transient expression of E4 cDNA and deletion plasmids.
Nucleic Acids Res.
17:3037-3048[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Kyte, J., and R. F. Doolittle.
1982.
A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein.
J. Mol. Biol.
157:105-132[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Leppard, K. N.
1997.
E4 gene function in adenovirus, adenovirus vector, and adeno-associated virus infections.
J. Gen. Virol.
78:2131-2138[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Leppard, K. N., and T. Shenk.
1989.
The adenovirus E1B 55 kd protein influences mRNA transport via an intranuclear effect on RNA metabolism.
EMBO J.
8:2329-2336[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Luria, S.,
I. Chambers, and P. Berg.
1991.
Expression of the type 1 human immunodeficiency virus Nef protein in T cells prevents antigen receptor-mediated induction of interleukin 2 mRNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:5326-5330[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
MacArthur, M. W., and J. M. Thorton.
1991.
Influence of proline residues on protein conformation.
J. Mol. Biol.
218:397-412[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Marton, M. J.,
S. B. Baim,
D. A. Ornelles, and T. Shenk.
1990.
The adenovirus E4 17-kilodalton protein complexes with the cellular transcription factor E2F, altering its DNA-binding properties and stimulating E1A-independent accumulation of E2 mRNA.
J. Virol.
64:2345-2359[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Nelson, J. W., and N. R. Kallenbach.
1986.
Stabilization of the ribonuclease S-peptide alpha-helix by trifluoroethanol.
Proteins
1:211-217[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Nordqvist, K., and G. Akusjärvi.
1990.
Adenovirus early region 4 stimulates mRNA accumulation via 5' introns.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:9543-9547[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Nordqvist, K.,
K. Öhman, and G. Akusjärvi.
1994.
Human adenovirus encodes two proteins which have opposite effects on accumulation of alternatively spliced mRNAs.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:437-445[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Öhman, K.,
K. Nordqvist, and G. Akusjärvi.
1993.
Two adenovirus proteins with redundant activities in virus growth facilitates tripartite leader mRNA accumulation.
Virology
194:50-58[Medline].
|
| 42a.
| Orlando, J. S., and D. A. Ornelles.
Unpublished data.
|
| 43.
|
Ornelles, D. A., and T. Shenk.
1991.
Localization of the adenovirus early region 1B 55-kilodalton protein during lytic infection: association with nuclear viral inclusions requires the early region 4 34-kilodalton protein.
J. Virol.
65:424-429[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Park, K.,
A. Perczel, and G. D. Fasman.
1992.
Differentiation between transmembrane helices and peripheral helices by the deconvolution of circular dichroism spectra of membrane proteins.
Protein Sci.
1:1032-1049[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Pauling, L., and R. Corey.
1951.
Atomic coordinates and structure factors for two helical configurations of polypeptide chains.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
37:235-240[Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Pilder, S.,
M. Moore,
J. Logan, and T. Shenk.
1986.
The adenovirus E1B-55K transforming polypeptide modulates transport or cytoplasmic stabilization of viral and host cell mRNAs.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6:470-476[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Querido, E.,
R. C. Marcellus,
A. Lai,
R. Charbonneau,
J. G. Teodoro,
G. Ketner, and P. E. Branton.
1997.
Regulation of p53 levels by the E1B 55-kilodalton protein and E4orf6 in adenovirus-infected cells.
J. Virol.
71:3788-3798[Abstract].
|
| 48.
|
Rubenwolf, S.,
H. Schütt,
M. Nevels,
H. Wolf, and T. Dobner.
1997.
Structural analysis of the adenovirus type 5 E1B 55-kilodalton-E4orf6 protein complex.
J. Virol.
71:1115-1123[Abstract].
|
| 49.
|
Sarnow, P.,
P. Hearing,
C. W. Anderson,
D. N. Halbert,
T. Shenk, and A. J. Levine.
1984.
Adenovirus early region 1B 58,000-dalton tumor antigen is physically associated with an early region 4 25,000-dalton protein in productively infected cells.
J. Virol.
49:692-700[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Sawai, E. T.,
A. S. Baur,
B. M. Peterlin,
J. A. Levy, and C. Cheng-Mayer.
1995.
A highly conserved region and membrane targeting of Nef from primate immunodeficiency viruses are required for association with a cellular serine kinase activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:15307-15314[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Segrest, J. P.,
D. W. Garber,
C. G. Brouillette,
S. C. Harvey, and G. M. Anantharamaiah.
1994.
The amphipathic alpha helix: a multifunctional structural motif in plasma apolipoproteins.
Adv. Protein Chem.
45:303-369[Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Takei, J.,
A. Remenyi,
A. R. Clake, and C. E. Dempsey.
1998.
Self-association of disulfide-dimerized melittin analogues.
Biochemistry
37:5699-5708[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Weinberg, D. H., and G. Ketner.
1983.
A cell line that supports the growth of a defective early region 4 deletion mutant of human adenovirus type 2.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
80:5383-5386[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Zantema, A.,
J. A. Fransen,
O. A. Davis,
F. C. Ramaekers,
G. P. Vooijs,
B. DeLeys, and A. J. van der Eb.
1985.
Localization of the E1B proteins of adenovirus 5 in transformed cells, as revealed by interaction with monoclonal antibodies.
Virology
142:44-58[Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, June 1999, p. 4600-4610, Vol. 73, No. 6
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Schwartz, R. A., Lakdawala, S. S., Eshleman, H. D., Russell, M. R., Carson, C. T., Weitzman, M. D.
(2008). Distinct Requirements of Adenovirus E1b55K Protein for Degradation of Cellular Substrates. J. Virol.
82: 9043-9055
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Marshall, L. J., Moore, A. C., Ohki, M., Kitabayashi, I., Patterson, D., Ornelles, D. A.
(2008). RUNX1 Permits E4orf6-Directed Nuclear Localization of the Adenovirus E1B-55K Protein and Associates with Centers of Viral DNA and RNA Synthesis. J. Virol.
82: 6395-6408
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liu, Y., Shevchenko, A., Shevchenko, A., Berk, A. J.
(2005). Adenovirus Exploits the Cellular Aggresome Response To Accelerate Inactivation of the MRN Complex. J. Virol.
79: 14004-14016
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schaley, J. E., Polonskaia, M., Hearing, P.
(2005). The Adenovirus E4-6/7 Protein Directs Nuclear Localization of E2F-4 via an Arginine-Rich Motif. J. Virol.
79: 2301-2308
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Blanchette, P., Cheng, C. Y., Yan, Q., Ketner, G., Ornelles, D. A., Dobner, T., Conaway, R. C., Conaway, J. W., Branton, P. E.
(2004). Both BC-Box Motifs of Adenovirus Protein E4orf6 Are Required To Efficiently Assemble an E3 Ligase Complex That Degrades p53. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 9619-9629
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chastain-Moore, A. M., Roberts, T., Trott, D. A., Newbold, R. F., Ornelles, D. A.
(2003). An Activity Associated with Human Chromosome 21 Permits Nuclear Colocalization of the Adenovirus E1B-55K and E4orf6 Proteins and Promotes Viral Late Gene Expression. J. Virol.
77: 8087-8098
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Harada, J. N., Shevchenko, A., Shevchenko, A., Pallas, D. C., Berk, A. J.
(2002). Analysis of the Adenovirus E1B-55K-Anchored Proteome Reveals Its Link to Ubiquitination Machinery. J. Virol.
76: 9194-9206
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Orlando, J. S., Ornelles, D. A.
(2002). E4orf6 Variants with Separate Abilities To Augment Adenovirus Replication and Direct Nuclear Localization of the E1B 55-Kilodalton Protein. J. Virol.
76: 1475-1487
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Querido, E., Blanchette, P., Yan, Q., Kamura, T., Morrison, M., Boivin, D., Kaelin, W. G., Conaway, R. C., Conaway, J. W., Branton, P. E.
(2001). Degradation of p53 by adenovirus E4orf6 and E1B55K proteins occurs via a novel mechanism involving a Cullin-containing complex. Genes Dev.
15: 3104-3117
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dosch, T., Horn, F., Schneider, G., Krätzer, F., Dobner, T., Hauber, J., Stauber, R. H.
(2001). The Adenovirus Type 5 E1B-55K Oncoprotein Actively Shuttles in Virus-Infected Cells, Whereas Transport of E4orf6 Is Mediated by a CRM1-Independent Mechanism. J. Virol.
75: 5677-5683
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Querido, E., Morisson, M. R., Chu-Pham-Dang, H., Thirlwell, S. W.-L., Boivin, D., Branton, P. E.
(2001). Identification of Three Functions of the Adenovirus E4orf6 Protein That Mediate p53 Degradation by the E4orf6-E1B55K Complex. J. Virol.
75: 699-709
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cathomen, T., Weitzman, M. D.
(2000). A Functional Complex of Adenovirus Proteins E1B-55kDa and E4orf6 Is Necessary To Modulate the Expression Level of p53 but Not Its Transcriptional Activity. J. Virol.
74: 11407-11412
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nevels, M., Rubenwolf, S., Spruss, T., Wolf, H., Dobner, T.
(2000). Two Distinct Activities Contribute to the Oncogenic Potential of the Adenovirus Type 5 E4orf6 Protein. J. Virol.
74: 5168-5181
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Weigel, S., Dobbelstein, M.
(2000). The Nuclear Export Signal within the E4orf6 Protein of Adenovirus Type 5 Supports Virus Replication and Cytoplasmic Accumulation of Viral mRNA. J. Virol.
74: 764-772
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Grifman, M., Chen, N. N., Gao, G.-p., Cathomen, T., Wilson, J. M., Weitzman, M. D.
(1999). Overexpression of Cyclin A Inhibits Augmentation of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus Transduction by the Adenovirus E4orf6 Protein. J. Virol.
73: 10010-10019
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Boyer, J. L., Ketner, G.
(2000). Genetic Analysis of a Potential Zinc-binding Domain of the Adenovirus E4 34k Protein. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 14969-14978
[Abstract]
[Full Text]