Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, May 1999, p. 4513-4517, Vol. 73, No. 5
Department of Respiratory Medicine & Allergy,
Received 19 November 1998/Accepted 9 February 1999
The coxsackie B virus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) and the major
histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I The first step in human adenovirus
(Ad) infection consists of virus-cell recognition and attachment,
involving the viral fiber protein and host cell surface receptor(s)
(3, 4, 15). The existence of two classes of fiber
recognition sites with high and low affinities with respect to binding
has been previously reported (3). The coxsackie B virus and
Ad receptor (CAR) and the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class
I The MHC class I In the present study we address the role of the We tested whether HLA-A*0201 is a receptor for Ad5 fiber by first
exposing HLA-A*0201-transfected cells (CHO-HLA) to Ad5Luc3, a
replication-competent Ad vector, at different multiplicities of
infection (MOI) (Fig. 1a). Ad5Luc3, obtained from P. Boulanger, is a
replication-competent virus which contains the luciferase gene under
the control of the simian virus 40 early promoter inserted in the E3
region of the Ad5 genome. In a quantitative assay, using luciferase
activity as the end point assay, we found an 8- to 10-fold increase in
luciferase activity in HLA-A*0201-transfected cells compared to control
cells at an MOI of 10 or more (Fig. 1a).
In order to determine if the increased efficiency of Ad infection of
CHO-HLA cells was due to a specific interaction between Ad5 fiber and
cell surface receptors, we pretreated CHO-HLA and control cells with
recombinant Ad5 fiber knob (100 µg/ml) and/or Ad2 penton base (100 µg/ml) and then exposed the cells to Ad5Luc3 at an MOI of 100 for
1 h at 4°C. Cells were then washed and incubated at 37°C to
allow internalization and one cycle of virus replication (Fig.
2a and b). This assay measures fiber
attachment to functional cell surface receptors and dissociates virus
attachment from internalization, because at low temperatures only
virus-cell attachment occurs whereas endocytosis requires physiological
temperatures. We found that luciferase activity in control cells was
predominantly inhibited by Ad2 penton base (75% inhibition) but not by
Ad5 fiber (20% inhibition) (Fig. 2a). Pretreatment of control cells
with Ad2 mutant penton base R340G, which is mutated in the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) integrin binding motif (8), failed to inhibit Ad5Luc3 infection of these cells (Fig. 2a). These results indicate that Ad
infection of control cells is predominantly mediated by an interaction
between the viral penton base protein and its cell surface receptors.
In contrast, when CHO-HLA cells were preincubated with 100 µg/ml of
Ad5 fiber, luciferase expression was reduced by 50% (Fig. 2b). These
observations indicate that the increased susceptibility of
HLA-A*0201-transfected hamster cells to Ad5 infection was due to an
interaction between the Ad5 fiber protein and functional fiber
receptors on CHO-HLA cells.
Ad5 fiber attachment to CHO-HLA cells was assessed further by direct
binding experiments. Prechilled cells were incubated with increasing
concentrations of 125I-labelled Ad5 fiber knob in the
presence (nonspecific binding) and absence (total binding) of 100-fold
excess of unlabelled fiber knob. Counts per minute associated with
total and nonspecific 125I-labelled fiber knob binding to
cells were determined. There was no specific binding to control CHO
cells (data not shown), which is in agreement with previous findings
(1). Although we observed specific binding of
125I-labelled Ad5 fiber knob to CHO-HLA cells, specific
binding was at low levels (Fig. 3a).
Scatchard analysis showed that 125I-labelled Ad5 fiber knob
bound HLA-A*0201 with a binding constant that was higher than
10
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The Human HLA-A*0201 Allele, Expressed in
Hamster Cells, Is Not a High-Affinity Receptor for Adenovirus
Type 5 Fiber
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
2 domain have been
identified as high-affinity cell receptors for adenovirus type 5 (Ad5)
fiber. In this study we show that CAR but not MHC class I allele
HLA-A*0201 binds to Ad5 with high affinity when expressed on hamster
cells. When both receptors are coexpressed on the cell surface of
hamster cells, Ad5 fiber bind to a single high-affinity receptor, which
is CAR.
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
2 domain have been identified as putative cellular receptors
involved in Ad type 2 (Ad2) and Ad5 attachment (1, 6, 16).
CAR is also a receptor for subgroup A, C, D, E, and F Ad fibers but not
for subgroup B Ad fibers like those of serotype 3 (13, 13a).
The mouse homologue of human CAR also functions as a receptor for coxsackie B viruses and Ads (2, 16).
2 domain was characterized as a high-affinity
receptor for Ad5 fiber knob after reverse antibody biopanning of a
phage-displayed hexapeptide library identified a peptide motif that
showed homology with the
2 domain of human MHC class I
(6). This icosapeptide neutralized Ad5 in HeLa cells and interacted with Ad fibers in a subgroup-specific manner (6). In addition, Ad5 binding to B lymphoblastoid cells (Daudi cells) was
found to be dependent on cell surface expression of HLA class I
molecules (6). Daudi cells that lack surface expression of HLA class I molecules (Daudi HLA
cells) (12)
showed a weak capacity for Ad5 binding, in contrast to
2-microglobulin-transfected Daudi cells (Daudi
HLA+) (12), which bound to Ad5 with high
affinity (6). However, Ad5 fibers were shown to bind to HeLa
cells, which express both putative receptors (data not shown), and
CAR-transfected hamster cells, which express only CAR, with the same
affinity (1). This suggests that binding was to a common receptor.
2 domain of human
MHC class I as a high-affinity receptor for Ad5 fiber by permanently
expressing in hamster cells human HLA-A*0201 molecules alone and in
conjunction with CAR. The levels of cell surface expression of CAR and
HLA-A*0201 were determined by indirect flow cytometric analysis
(fluorescence-activated cell sorting [FACS]) using the anti-CAR
monoclonal antibody (MAb) RmcB (1, 7) and the anti-MHC class
I MAbs W6/32, BB7.2, and PA2.1, respectively. MAb W6/32 is specific for
the HLA class I H chain associated with conformation-stabilizing
2-microglobulin (12) (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), MAb BB7.2 recognizes the conformation-sensitive epitope on
HLA-A2 (10), and MAb PA2.1 recognizes the
conformation-sensitive epitope on HLA-A2 and HLA-A28 (9).

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Ad-mediated gene delivery to control hamster cells (CHO
cells) and HLA-A*0201-expressing CHO cells (CHO-HLA) (a) and
CAR-expressing CHO cells (CHO-CAR) and CAR- and HLA-A*0201-expressing
CHO cells (CHO-CAR-MHC). (b). Cells were seeded at 105
cells/well in triplicate in 24-well plates and 24 h later were
incubated with various amounts of Ad5Luc3 (MOI 0.001 to 1,000) for
1 h at 4°C in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium.
Cells were then washed, and after 18 h at 37°C, a cell extract
was measured by being mixed with a 100-µl aliquot of beetle
luciferase, being transferred to a luminometer tube, and measuring the
light generated on a Turner TD-20e Luminometer for 60 s. Data are
shown as means and standard errors of the means (error bars)
(n = 3). Note that the y axes in the two
panels differ. Below these panels, the CAR and MHC class I status of
each cell line, as determined by flow cytometry, is described. CAR and
MHC class I levels are represented as median fluorescence units ± standard deviations.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 2.
Effect of Ad5 fiber knob, Ad2 penton base, Ad2 mutant
penton base R340G, and anti-CAR functional blocking antibody (Ab) on
Ad-mediated gene transfer to CHO (a), CHO-HLA (b), CHO-CAR (c), and
CHO-CAR-HLA (d). Cells were seeded at 105 cells/well in
triplicate in 24-well plates and were either left untreated (control
cells) or were pretreated with Ad5 fiber knob (100 µg/ml), Ad2 penton
base (100 µg/ml), Ad2 mutant penton base R340G (8) (100 µg/ml), and anti-CAR functional blocking antibody (1:200 dilution;
gift of D. M. McDonald and G. E. Blair) for 10 min at 4°C prior to
the addition of Ad5Luc3 for 1 h at 4°C. Luciferase activity was
measured as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Results were expressed
as percentages of the control cells (i.e., no antibody = 100%).
Data are shown as means ± standard errors of the means (error
bars) (n = 3). CHO-CAR, CHO-CAR-HLA, and CHO cells were
infected with Ad5Luc3 at a constant MOI (10 PFU/cell). In the absence
of competing proteins, luciferase gene expression in CHO cells infected
with 10 PFU/cell of Ad5Luc3 was 1,333 relative light units (RLU),
compared to 380,000 RLU obtained with CHO-CAR cells and 360,000 RLU
obtained with CHO-CAR-HLA cells infected with Ad5Luc3 at the same MOI.
When infected with Ad5Luc3 at 100 PFU/cell, luciferase activity was
36,980 RLU in CHO-HLA cells and 3,670 RLU in CHO cells.
6 M (Fig. 4c). This value
is significantly higher than the binding constant reported for Ad2 and
HeLa cells (11, 14) or KB cells (3) and for
recombinant Ad5 fiber knob and HeLa cells (5). Our findings
therefore strongly suggest that HLA-A*0201 expressed on hamster cells
is not a high-affinity receptor for Ad5 fiber. The
2 domain of
HLA-A*0201 shows absolute homology with the
2 domain of MHC class I
consensus sequence and with the
2 domain of HLA-A and HLA-B
molecules which are expressed on the surface of Daudi HLA+
cells (12). The fact that cell surface expression of
HLA-A*0201 was confirmed by three different anti-MHC class I MAbs which
recognize conformational sensitive epitopes in HLA class I indicates
that HLA-A*0201 was correctly folded. Our findings therefore strongly suggest that the peptide domain around and including Try167 of the
2
domain of MHC class I molecules does not bind to Ad5 fiber with high
affinity.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 3.
Binding of 125I-labelled Ad5 fiber knob to
CHO-HLA (a), CHO-CAR (b), and CHO-CAR-HLA (c) cells. 125I
labelling of purified Ad5 knob was performed with iodination beads
(Pierce) according to the manufacturer's standard protocol. Cells
seeded at 105 cells well in triplicate in 24-well plates
were washed in serum-free medium and chilled on ice for 2 h.
Monolayers were incubated at 4°C for 1 h with increasing amounts
of 125I-labelled Ad5 knob and a fixed excess of unlabelled
Ad5 fiber knob (100-fold) in serum-free medium. The input ranged from 0 to 2.5 × 10
7 cpm. The specific activity of Ad5
fiber knob was approximately 4,030 cpm/ng (2.1 × 1013
cpm/mol). The cell monolayers were washed three times with
phosphate-buffered saline and after being removed from tissue culture
dishes, samples were placed into 5-ml aliquots of Ecoscint O (National
Diagnostics) and read in a model 1900CA Tri-carb liquid scintillation
analyzer (Packard) to determine
counts emitted per minute. Note
that the y axis in panel a differs from the y
axes in panels b and c.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 4.
Scatchard plot analysis of Ad5 fiber knob binding to
CHO-CAR (a), CHO-CAR-HLA (b), and CHO-HLA (c). cells. Scatchard
analysis was performed by using the Prism program as the standard
method for determining the dissociation constant
(Kd) (the concentration at equilibrium at which
50% of receptors are occupied). One representative experiment out of
three is shown. Below these panels, the Kd
values are shown as means, with standard errors of the means in
parentheses (n = 3).
We then tested Daudi HLA
and Daudi HLA+ cells
for CAR expression by FACS using anti-CAR MAb RmcB (1, 7).
We found that CAR is expressed on the cell surface of both Daudi
HLA
and Daudi HLA+ cells, at similar low
levels (data not shown). It is therefore possible that the increased
attachment and permissivity of Daudi HLA+ cells to Ad5
(6) may not be due to a direct interaction between MHC class
I molecules and Ad5 fiber, but due to the increased accessibility of
CAR as a consequence of expression of HLA class I molecules on the cell
surface. We addressed this question by investigating Ad5 infection and
Ad5 fiber knob attachment to hamster cells expressing CAR alone
(CHO-CAR) (1) and hamster cells expressing both CAR and
HLA-A*0201 (CHO-CAR-HLA) on their cell surface.
The susceptibility of CHO-CAR and CHO-CAR-HLA cells to Ad5 infection
was assessed by exposing these cells to Ad5Luc3 at increasing MOI (Fig.
1b). Luciferase expression was 100-fold higher in CHO-CAR cells than in
control cells at an MOI higher than 10 (Fig. 1b), which is in agreement
with previous findings (1). There was no significant
difference in luciferase activity between CHO-CAR and CHO-CAR-HLA cells
(Fig. 1b), both of which were more susceptible to Ad5Luc3 infection
than CHO-HLA cells (Fig. 1a). The luciferase signal was almost totally
abolished (95% inhibition) by preincubation of CHO-CAR and CHO-CAR-HLA
cells with the maximal inhibiting concentration of Ad5 fiber knob (100 µg/ml) (Fig. 2c and d), in contrast to control cells that showed no
significant inhibition (Fig. 2a) and CHO-HLA cells in which luciferase
activity was reduced by 50% (Fig. 2b). In order to assess if Ad5
infection was through a specific interaction with CAR, all transformed
cells were preincubated with an anti-CAR rabbit polyclonal blocking
antibody at a concentration of 1:200 (gift of D. M. McDonald and
G. E. Blair). We found that in the presence of this antibody,
luciferase activity was reduced by 50% in CHO-CAR (Fig. 2c) and
CHO-CAR-HLA cells (Fig. 2d). In contrast, there was no reduction in
luciferase expression in control hamster cells and CHO-HLA cells (Fig.
2a and b). We also found a similar, dose-dependent increase in specific
binding of 125I-labelled Ad5 fiber knob to CHO-CAR (Fig.
3b) and CHO-CAR-HLA cells (Fig. 3c), which was 20- to 50-fold higher
than the specific binding to CHO-HLA cells (Fig. 3a). Scatchard
analyses showed that Ad5 fiber knob bound to CHO-CAR and CHO-CAR-HLA
cells with affinity constants of 4.75 × 10
9 and
6.25 × 10
9 M, respectively (Fig. 4a and b). These
values are similar to the binding constant reported for Ad5 fiber knob
and HeLa cells (5). Our observations therefore demonstrate
that when both CAR and the MHC-class I are coexpressed on the cell
surface of hamster cells, Ad5 fiber binds to a single high-affinity
receptor, which is CAR, and there is no functional cooperativity
between the two receptors.
Ad5Luc3 infection of Daudi HLA
and Daudi HLA+
cells, which express CAR at similar low levels, was inhibited (50%
inhibition) by the anti-CAR function blocking polyclonal antibody (gift
of D. M. McDonald and G. E. Blair; data not shown). This
suggests that Ad5Luc3 infects Daudi cells, at least in part, through an interaction with CAR. Why Ad5 binds to and infects Daudi
HLA+ cells with increased efficiency (6) is
therefore unclear. FACS analysis showed that Daudi HLA+
cells express more HLA class I but fewer CAR molecules on their cell
surface than CHO-CAR-HLA cells (data not shown). This suggests that HLA
class I-dependent Ad attachment and permissivity may only be observed
when there is little or no surface expression of CAR. Alternatively, in
human cells such as Daudi HLA+ cells, MHC class I molecules
may interact with other cell surface cofactors, either to bind with
high affinity to Ad5 fiber directly or to increase CAR accessibility.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank J. M. Bergelson and R. W. Finberg for CHO-CAR cells; S.-S. Hong and P. Boulanger for Ad5Luc3, recombinant Ad2 penton base, and recombinant mutant Ad2 penton base R340G; and D. M. McDonald and G. E. Blair for the anti-CAR functional blocking polyclonal antibody.
This work was funded by grants from the Wellcome Trust and the Special Trustees for Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospitals to George Santis.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Respiratory Medicine & Allergy, The Guy's, King's College and St. Thomas' Hospitals School of Medicine, Thomas Guy House, Guy's Hospital, St. Thomas St., London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-171-9552758. Fax: 44-171-4038640. E-mail: george.santis{at}kcl.ac.uk.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Bergelson, J. M.,
J. A. Cunningham,
G. Droguett,
E. A. Kurt-Jones,
A. Krithivas,
J. Hong,
M. S. Horwitz,
R. L. Crowell, and R. W. Finberg.
1997.
Isolation of a common receptor for coxsackie B viruses and adenoviruses 2 and 5.
Science
275:1320-1323 |
| 2. |
Bergelson, J. M.,
A. Krithivas,
L. Celi,
G. Droguett,
M. S. Horwitz,
T. Wickham,
R. L. Crowell, and R. W. Finberg.
1998.
The murine CAR homolog is a receptor for coxsackie B viruses and adenoviruses.
J. Virol.
72:415-419 |
| 3. |
Defer, C.,
M.-T. Belin,
M.-L. Caillet-Boudin, and P. Boulanger.
1990.
Human adenovirus-host cell interactions: comparative study with members of subgroups B and C.
J. Virol.
64:3661-3673 |
| 4. | Hennache, B., and P. Boulanger. 1977. Biochemical study of KB-cell receptor for adenovirus. Biochem. J. 166:237-247[Medline]. |
| 5. |
Henry, L. J.,
D. Xia,
M. E. Wilke,
J. Deisenhofer, and R. D. Gerard.
1994.
Characterization of the knob domain of the adenovirus type 5 fiber protein expressed in Escherichia coli.
J. Virol.
68:5239-5246 |
| 6. | Hong, S. S., L. Karayan, J. Tournier, D. T. Curiel, and P. A. Boulanger. 1997. Adenovirus type 5 fiber knob binds to MHC class I alpha 2 domain at the surface of human epithelial and B lymphoblastoid cells. EMBO J. 16:2294-2306[Medline]. |
| 7. |
Hsu, K.-H. L.,
K. Lonberg-Holm,
B. Alstein, and R. L. Crowell.
1988.
A monoclonal antibody specific for the cellular receptor for the group B coxsackie viruses.
J. Virol.
62:1647-1652 |
| 8. | Karayan, L., S. S. Hong, B. Gay, J. Tournier, A. Dupuy d'Angeac, and P. Boulanger. 1997. Structural and functional determinants in adenovirus type 2 penton base recombinant protein. J. Virol. 71:8678-8689[Abstract]. |
| 9. | Parham, P., and W. F. Bodmer. 1978. Monoclonal antibody to a human histocompatibility alloantigen HLA-A2. Nature 276:397-399[Medline]. |
| 10. | Parham, P., and F. M. Brodsky. 1981. Partial purification and some properties of BB7.2. A cytotoxic monoclonal antibody with specificity for HLA-A2 and a variant of HLA-A28. Hum. Immunol. 3:277-678[Medline]. |
| 11. |
Persson, R.,
U. Svensson, and E. Everitt.
1985.
Virus-receptor interaction in the adenovirus system: characterization of the positive cooperative binding of virions in HeLa cells.
J. Virol.
54:92-97 |
| 12. |
Quillet, A.,
F. Presse,
C. Marchiol-Fournigault,
A. Haren-Bellan,
M. Benbunan,
H. Ploegh, and D. Fradelizi.
1988.
Increased resistance to non-MHC-restricted cytotoxicity related to HLA A, B expression: direct demonstration using 2-microglobulin-transfected Daudi cells.
J. Immunol.
141:17-20[Abstract].
|
| 13. |
Roelvink, P. W.,
A. Lizonova,
J. G. M. Lee,
Y. Li,
J. M. Bergelson,
R. W. Finberg,
D. E. Brough,
I. Kovesdi, and T. J. Wickham.
1998.
The coxsackie-adenovirus receptor protein can function as a cellular attachment protein for adenovirus serotypes from subgroups A, C, D, E, and F.
J. Virol.
72:7909-7915 |
| 13a. | Santis, G., V. Legrand, S. S. Hong, E. Davison, I. Kirby, J. L. Impez, R. W. Finberg, J. M. Bergelson, M. Mehtali, P. Boulanger. Molecular determinants of adenovirus type 5 fiber bindings to its cellular receptor CAR. J. Gen. Virol., in press. |
| 14. |
Seth, P.,
M. Rosenfeld,
J. Higginbotham, and R. G. Crystal.
1994.
Mechanism of enhancement of DNA expression consequent to cointernalization of a replication-deficient adenovirus and unmodified plasmid DNA.
J. Virol.
68:933-940 |
| 15. |
Svensson, U.,
R. Persson, and E. Everitt.
1981.
Virus-receptor interaction in the adenovirus system. I. Identification of virion attachment proteins of the HeLa cell plasma membrane.
J. Virol.
38:70-81 |
| 16. |
Tomko, R.,
R. Xu, and L. Philipson.
1997.
HCAR and MCAR: the human and mouse cellular receptors for subgroup C adenoviruses and group B coxsackieviruses.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:3352-3356 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»