Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, May 1999, p. 4062-4073, Vol. 73, No. 5
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Functional Dissection of CCR5 Coreceptor Function through the Use
of CD4-Independent Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Strains
Aimee L.
Edinger,1
Cedric
Blanpain,2
Kevin J.
Kunstman,3
Steven M.
Wolinsky,3
Marc
Parmentier,2 and
Robert W.
Doms1,*
Department of Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
191041; IRIBHN, Université Libre
de Bruxelles, Campus Erasme, B-1070 Brussels,
Belgium2; and Department of
Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois
606113
Received 26 October 1998/Accepted 1 February 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
With rare exceptions, all simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)
strains can use CCR5 as a coreceptor along with CD4 for viral infection. In addition, many SIV strains are capable of using CCR5 as a
primary receptor to infect CD4-negative cells such as rhesus brain
capillary endothelial cells. By using coupled fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) and infection assays, we found that even very low
levels of CCR5 expression could support CD4-independent virus infection. CD4-independent viruses represent valuable tools for finely
dissecting interactions between Env and CCR5 which may otherwise be
masked due to the stabilization of these contacts by Env-CD4 binding.
Based on the ability of SIV Env to bind to and mediate infection of
cells expressing CCR5 chimeras and mutants, we identified the N
terminus of CCR5 as a critical domain for direct Env binding and for
supporting CD4-independent virus infection. However, the activity of
N-terminal domain CCR5 mutants could be rescued by the presence of CD4,
indicating that other regions of CCR5 are important for post-binding
events that lead to viral entry. Rhesus CCR5 supported CD4-independent
infection and direct Env binding more efficiently than did human CCR5
due to a single amino acid difference in the N terminus. Interestingly,
uncleaved, oligomeric SIV Env protein bound to both CD4 and CCR5 less
efficiently than did monomeric gp120. Finally, several mutations
present in chronically infected monkey populations are shown to
decrease the ability of CCR5 to serve as a primary viral receptor for
the SIV isolates examined.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)
is frequently used as a model system for human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV) infection because it causes a syndrome very similar to human AIDS
in several Asian macaque species. Like HIV, SIV uses chemokine
receptors in conjunction with CD4 for viral entry (2, 6, 11, 13, 17, 21, 22, 24, 31, 45). With rare exceptions, all SIV strains
identified to date use CCR5 for entry regardless of cellular tropism
(11, 24, 37, 45, 47). CXCR4 is used as a coreceptor only
very rarely by SIV isolates, although rhesus CXCR4 is functional for X4
HIV-1 strains and several recently described pathogenic SHIVs use CXCR4
as a coreceptor (24, 33, 36, 44, 47). Thus, SIV tropism does
not follow the R5/X4 designations given to HIV-1 (5).
Although both T- and M-tropic SIVs use CCR5, they may interact with
CCR5 differently, and there is evidence to suggest that only M-tropic
Env proteins signal through CCR5 (24, 62). SIV typically
displays a broader coreceptor use pattern than HIV-1, with most SIV
strains using GPR15/BOB and/or STRL33/Bonzo as coreceptors in addition
to CCR5 (18, 25, 29, 47). Use of CCR8, ChemR23, GPR1, CCR2b,
and APJ as coreceptors by SIV is more restricted (12, 25, 26, 29, 47, 54, 56).
Several lines of evidence support the hypothesis that chemokine
receptors actually represent the primordial primate lentivirus receptors. A number of HIV-2 strains, including some primary isolates, are able to infect cells which express CXCR4 or CCR5 but lack CD4
(10, 13a, 14, 28, 52). Laboratory-adapted isolates of feline
immunodeficiency virus also use CXCR4 as a receptor in the absence of
CD4 (51, 64). Furthermore, a significant number of SIV
isolates can use CCR5 as a primary receptor and can infect
CCR5-positive, CD4-negative primary cells such as rhesus brain
capillary endothelial cells (27). In keeping with their decreased dependence on CD4 for infection, HIV-2 and SIV envelope (Env)
proteins have a lower affinity for CD4 than does HIV-1 Env and are
more resistant to inhibition by soluble CD4 (sCD4) (8, 57,
58). In fact, low to moderate levels of sCD4 enhance both syncytium formation and infection by a variety of HIV-2 and SIVagm strains (4, 14, 63).
We have extended our studies of CD4-independent infection by SIV
strains to better understand the factors that govern this entry process
and to identify regions of CCR5 important for SIV Env binding in the
absence of CD4. We found that CD4-independent SIV infection
occurred over a broad range of CCR5 expression levels, including levels
barely detectable by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). The
addition of CD4 in soluble or membrane-bound form enhanced infection
for most CD4-independent viruses, suggesting that CD4 is required
for optimal entry efficiency. While both human CCR5 (Hu CCR5) and
rhesus CCR5 (Rh CCR5) functioned equally well as coreceptors in the
presence of CD4, in its absence Rh CCR5 supported infection more
efficiently and for a larger number of virus strains. The increase in
CD4-independent infection through Rh CCR5 mapped to the Asp at
position 13 in the N terminus and correlated with direct Env binding.
Several mutations in the CCR5 N-terminal domain were identified that
blocked virus infection in the absence (but not in the presence) of
CD4, suggesting that the N-terminal domain of CCR5 is more important
for Env binding than for triggering the conformational changes that
lead to membrane fusion. Interestingly, we found that the ability of
uncleaved Env to bind both CCR5 and CD4 was markedly reduced relative
to gp120. Finally, several mutations in CCR5 which exist as
polymorphisms in chronically infected monkey populations were
identified as limiting CD4-independent infection for the SIV strains tested.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Reporter virus infections.
All SIV Env proteins, CD4, and
CCR5 constructs were cloned into the pcDNA3 or pcDNA3.1 vectors
(Invitrogen). Luciferase reporter viruses were produced by
cotransfecting 293T cells with the env gene of interest
under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter and with the
NL-Luc-R
-E
backbone plasmid in the presence
of 7.5 mM sodium butyrate (9, 15). Supernatant containing
virus was harvested 2 days posttransfection and used to infect 48-well
plates of 293T target cells transfected with 1 µg of CD4 and 0.5 µg
of CCR5 construct or vector as indicated. Infections were performed in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco-BRL) with 10% fetal
calf serum (FCS; Hyclone) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco-BRL)
and supplemented with 8 µg of DEAE-dextran (Sigma) per ml, except for
infections with the alanine scan mutants, which were done in the
absence of DEAE. Cells were lysed in 0.5% Triton X-100 in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) 3 days postinfection, and luciferase
activity in the cell lysate was quantified in a luminometer. sCD4 was
kindly provided by Jim Hoxie, University of Pennsylvania.
Flow cytometry.
293T cells were lifted with PBS, transferred
to FACS tubes, and washed once with FACS staining buffer (PBS plus 2%
FCS). The cells were incubated with the anti-CCR5 monoclonal antibody
CTC5 (Protein Design Labs, Mountain View, Calif.) at 10 µg/ml for 30 min at 4°C. They were then washed twice with FACS staining buffer and
incubated with phycoerythrin-conjugated horse anti-mouse antibody (Vector Laboratories) at 1 µg/ml for 30 min at 4°C in the dark. They were washed twice with FACS staining buffer and analyzed with a
Becton Dickinson FACScanner immediately following staining. Antibody
quantification was performed with a QuickCal kit (Sigma) and antibody
2D7 to CCR5 (Pharmigen). Hu CCR5 and RhCCR5 expression levels on
transfected 293T cells were assessed by FACS with two monoclonal
antibodies: 455519, a generous gift from R&D Systems, and mCR35.4,
kindly provided by Protein Design Labs. These antibodies bind to
regions in CCR5 that are identical between Rh CCR5 and Hu CCR5
(43).
Direct Env binding assay.
Secreted Env for the binding assay
was produced by infecting 293T cells with the recombinant vaccinia
virus vTF1.1 (which expresses T7 polymerase [1]) for
1 h in DMEM containing 2.5% FCS and then transfecting the cells
in DMEM-10% FCS with gp120 or gp140 constructs in pcDNA3 under the
control of the T7 promoter. At 4 h posttransfection, the cells
were washed twice with PBS and placed in serum-free DMEM. Approximately
24 h posttransfection, the medium was harvested and cleared by
centrifugation, and vaccinia virus inactivated by the addition of
Triton X-100 to a final concentration of 0.1% (wt/vol). Env was
purified from the medium by lectin chromatography (wheat germ
agglutinin coupled to agarose beads [Vector Laboratories]) and eluted
with 0.5 M N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (Sigma) in
PBS. Two buffer exchanges were performed in a 50-ml Amicon stir cell
with a YM30 membrane by using morpholineethanesulfonic acid (MES)
buffer, (pH 7.0). For the Env binding assay, 293T cells were
transfected with 3 µg of CCR5 construct or vector DNA per 24-well
plate as indicated and 24 h later were incubated in DMEM-10% FCS
containing 4 µg of soluble Env protein with or without 100 nM sCD4.
The cells were incubated for 2 h at 37°C, washed once with
1 ml of serum-free DMEM, lysed in 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS containing
protease inhibitors, and analyzed by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by Western blotting
with an anti-gp120 monoclonal antibody and enhanced chemiluminescence
(Amersham) detection. Alternatively, Env was quantified in cell lysates
by an antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ELISA
plates were prepared by an overnight incubation at 4°C of 96-well
plates with capture buffer (20 mM Tris, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.05%
NaN3 [pH 8.0]) containing three monoclonal antibodies
generated against SIVmacCP-MAC gp140 and mapped to the SU subunit,
i.e., 36D5, 115G2, and 168B2. The plates were then washed with a plate
washer and ELISA wash solution (0.05% Tween 20 in PBS), blocked for 1 to 2 h at room temperature in BLOTTO (5% nonfat dry milk, 0.1%
Tween 20, and 0.1% NaN3 in PBS), washed, and incubated
with 100 µl of lysate/well for 2.5 h at room temperature. After
being washed, the plates were incubated with a 1:500 dilution of serum
from a macaque infected with SIVmac251 (from the AIDS Research
and Reference Reagent Program) for 1.5 h at room temperature,
washed, incubated with rabbit anti-monkey horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Sigma) at a 1:4,000 dilution
for 30 min, and given a final wash.
2,2'-Azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazolinesulfonic acid) (ABTS) tablets
(Pierce) were dissolved in substrate buffer (0.1 M sodium acetate)
supplemented with 0.05% H2O2, the solution was
added to the plate, and the absorbance was measured at 405 nm.
AOP-RANTES was a generous gift of Timothy Wells and Amanda Proudfoot
(Serono Pharmaceutical Research Institute) (59), and 12G5
(28) was kindly provided by Jim Hoxie.
CCR5 constructs.
The majority of the chimeras and N-terminal
truncations have been described previously (20, 55). The
additional chimeras 55(25)5 and 55(52)5 were constructed by replacing a
ClaI-EcoRI cassette in wild-type CCR5 with a
fragment generated by PCR as described previously for N-terminal domain
chimeras (55). The junction between CCR5 and CCR2 sequences
corresponded to the conserved cysteine (C178) that is presumably
involved in a disulfide bond with the first
extracellular loop. The mutant cassettes were transferred as
needed in other backgrounds, such as CCR2b or a (52)222 chimera. All
final constructs were verified by sequencing before being used in
transfection experiments. The N13D reciprocal point mutants were
constructed with a Quickchange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The
cloning of vervet CCR5 is described in detail elsewhere
(40). Briefly, total cellular DNA was isolated from
peripheral blood by using the Puregene DNA Isolation kit (Gentra
Systems, Inc.) and amplified with primers in the flanking untranslated
regions of the Hu CCR5 gene 5' (CCR5A;
5'-GGAGGGCAACTAAATACATTCTAGG-3') and 3'
(CCR5B; 5'-GACTGGTCACCAGCCCACTTGAGTCC-3'). PCR-products were re-solved on a 1.0% agarose gel by electrophoresis, and the appropriately sized
band was excised, extracted by the QIAquick gel extraction method, and
inserted into the pCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen) by the TA method. The
inserts were sequenced in both orientations by using ABI dye-terminator chemistry.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of CCR5 expression levels on CD4-independent infection.
Previous studies have shown that multiple strains of SIV can use CCR5
as a receptor for viral infection in the absence of CD4 in both primary
and transiently transfected cells (27). Since surface levels
of CD4 and chemokine receptors can influence the efficiency of virus
entry (38, 50, 54), we performed linked pseudotyped virus
infection and FACS experiments on cells expressing decreasing amounts
of Rh CCR5 in the presence and absence of CD4. 293T cells were
transfected with variable amounts of Rh CCR5 plasmid and a constant
amount of CD4 or control vector plasmid. The next day, cells were
either infected with luciferase reporter virions bearing the SIV/17E-Fr
Env protein or analyzed by FACS for CCR5 and CD4 expression. Virions
containing the amphotropic murine leukemia virus Env protein
(which does not use either CD4 or CCR5 for infection) served as
positive controls.
CD4-independent infection was observed at all Rh CCR5 levels evaluated,
including levels barely detectable by FACS (Fig.
1). It should be noted that transfected
cells represent a population of cells expressing different levels of
the transfected genes and mean channel fluorescence (MCF) reflects only
the average cell in this population (Fig. 1a). Using the 2D7 antibody
to CCR5 and a quantitative FACS assay, we estimated that less
than an average of 400 copies of CCR5 were expressed on the surface of cells transfected with the smallest amount of Rh CCR5 plasmid (data not shown). CD4-independent infection by SIV/17E-Fr was roughly
half as efficient as infection in the presence of CD4 at any given MCF,
indicating that CD4-independent virus infection is not more dependent
on CCR5 expression levels than is infection in the presence of CD4
(Fig. 1b). In fact, we noted that CD4 expression gradually declined as
Rh CCR5 expression increased, with the MCF on Leu3A-stained cells
changing from 205 on cells lacking Rh CCR5 to 128 when maximal levels
of Rh CCR5 were expressed (data not shown). Since higher levels of CD4
may compensate for lower levels of coreceptor (50), the
ratio of CD4-dependent to -independent infection at low levels of CCR5
expression may even be falsely elevated under these experimental
conditions. Alternatively, coexpression of CCR5 may interfere with
Leu3A binding if CD4 and CCR5 colocalize on the cell surface. Neither
the presence or absence of CD4 nor the amount of Rh CCR5 on the cell
surface significantly affected the ability of MLV pseudotypes to enter
the target cells (data not shown). In summary, these results
suggest that CD4-dependent and -independent infection pathways are
similarly sensitive to CCR5 expression levels and that even low levels
of CCR5 expression can be sufficient to support CD4-independent
virus infection.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Effect of CCR5 expression levels on pseudotyped virus
infection. 293T cells were transiently transfected with from 0.5 to
0.0005 µg of Rh CCR5 plasmid per 48-well and 1 µg of CD4 or vector
plasmid as indicated. The next day, cells were either evaluated for
CCR5 expression by FACS (a) or infected with luciferase
reporter viruses pseudotyped with the SIV/17E-Fr Env protein (b) as
described in Materials and Methods. Data from one representative
experiment of six are presented.
|
|
Rh CCR5 is a more efficient primary receptor for SIV than is Hu
CCR5.
Hu CCR5 and Rh CCR5 function equally well as SIV coreceptors
in the presence of CD4 (11, 24, 45). To determine if this is
the case for CD4-independent virus infection, we expressed Hu CCR5 or
Rh CCR5 in 293T cells with or without CD4 and infected them with a
panel of luciferase reporter viruses bearing different SIVmac or SIVsm
Env proteins (Fig. 2). Rh CCR5 and Hu
CCR5 were expressed at nearly identical levels as judged by FACS with
two different CCR5 monoclonal antibodies (data not shown). To compare data from different experiments, relative light unit values are presented as the percentage of the luciferase signal obtained with Rh
CCR5 in the presence of CD4. We found that Hu CCR5 and Rh CCR5
functioned equally well as SIV coreceptors in the presence of CD4 but
that Rh CCR5 functioned more efficiently in its absence. In fact, Envs
derived from SIVmac1A11 and SIVsm
B670 clone 12 mediated the
infection of cells expressing Rh CCR5 equally well in the presence and
absence of CD4. Interestingly, SIVmacCP-MAC Env displayed complete CD4
dependence with Hu CCR5 while efficient CD4-independent infection was
observed with Rh CCR5. Only the SIVmac239 Env protein required CD4 for
infection via both Hu and Rh CCR5. These findings indicate that
CD4-independent interactions between Rh CCR5 and SIV Env are more
efficient than those with Hu CCR5.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Differential use of Rh CCR5 and Hu CCR5 by SIV. 293T
cells were transiently transfected with 0.5 µg of CCR5 plasmid and 1 µg of CD4 or vector plasmid as indicated and infected on the
following day with luciferase reporter viruses bearing the indicated
SIV Env proteins. Averaged values for data normalized to Rh CCR5 with
CD4 signal are presented from at least four separate experiments. Error
bars represent standard error of the mean.
|
|
Aspartic acid 13 is responsible for the increased efficiency of
CD4-independent infection through Rh CCR5.
Hu CCR5 and Rh CCR5 are
highly homologous, with only three amino acid changes in the
extracellular domains (I9T, N13D, and R171K) (Fig.
3a). The N13D change was shown by Martin
et al. to be important for CD4-independent binding of SIVmac239 gp120
to CCR5 (46). To determine whether the increased
ability of Rh CCR5 to support CD4-independent infection by
SIVmacCP-MAC was associated with this change, we generated
reciprocal point mutations at position 13 in Hu CCR5 and Rh CCR5 and
performed luciferase virus infections, in the presence and absence of
CD4 (Fig. 3b). In the presence of CD4, all receptor constructs served
equally well as virus coreceptors. However in the absence of CD4, Hu
CCR5(N13D) and Rh CCR5 functioned as efficient primary receptors
whereas Hu CCR5 and Rh CCR5(D13N) did not. Thus, consistent with
its proven role in the direct binding of SIVmac239 Env to CCR5
(46), Asp13 plays an important role in supporting
CD4-independent infection by some SIV strains.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Role of residue 13 in CCR5 receptor function. (a) The
putative extracellular domains of Rh CCR5 are shown, with the
differences from Hu CCR5 indicated by reverse shading. (b) Luciferase
reporter viruses bearing the SIVmacCP-MAC Env protein were used to
infect cells expressing the indicated CCR5 constructs in the presence
and absence of CD4. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.
|
|
We next examined the ability of these CCR5 constructs to bind the
SIV/17E-Fr Env protein. We used a direct Env binding assay
in which
purified, soluble gp120 was incubated with 293T cells
transiently
transfected with CCR5 constructs in the presence or
absence of 100 nM
sCD4 for 2 h at 37°C. The cells were then washed
once with
serum-free medium and lysed, and bound Env was detected
by Western
blotting. Because the enhanced chemiluminescence signals
were nonlinear
beyond a twofold concentration range, we also used
an ELISA to quantify
gp120 binding. In the absence of sCD4, SIV/17E-Fr
gp120 bound poorly to
Hu CCR5 and to Rh CCR5(D13N) but moderately
well to Hu CCR5(N13D) and
to Rh CCR5 (Fig.
4). Binding to all
CCR5
constructs was enhanced by sCD4, with Hu CCR5(N13D) and Rh
CCR5
supporting binding most efficiently. AOP-RANTES, 2D7 (an
antibody to
the ECL2 of CCR5), and CTC5 (an antibody to the CCR5
N terminus) all
blocked the binding of SIV/17E-Fr gp120 to Hu
CCR5 with various levels
of efficiency, demonstrating the specificity
of this assay, while an
antibody to CXCR4 (12G5) had no effect
(data not shown). These
results confirm that Asp13 in Rh CCR5
plays an important role in
the direct binding of a CD4-independent
SIV Env (
46).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Binding of SIV gp120 to CCR5. 293T cells were
transiently transfected with 3 µg of CCR5 or vector DNA per well of a
24-well plate and incubated on the following day for 2 h at 37°C
with medium containing purified, soluble SIV/17E-Fr gp120 with or
without 100 nM sCD4. The cells were washed once with serum-free medium
and lysed, and the lysate was analyzed for bound gp120 by Western
blotting with a monoclonal antibody to gp120 (a) or by antibody capture
ELISA (b). ELISA results represent the mean of duplicate determinations
from three separate experiments. Error bars represent standard error of
the mean.
|
|
Binding of oligomeric, non-cleaved Env gp140 to CCR5.
The
binding assays described above were performed with monomeric
gp120. Since SIV Env is oligomeric, we sought to determine whether the Env quaternary structure affected CCR5 binding. To investigate this, we generated a soluble SIV/17E-Fr Env containing all of the gp120 and the gp41 ectodomain. The bulk of this protein is
recovered in a noncleaved, oligomeric form (Fig.
5 and data not shown). The remainder is
cleaved to generate gp120 and gp41 ectodomain subunits which
exist either as monomers or unstable oligomers. This protein
mixture was tested for the ability to bind to Hu CCR5 and Rh CCR5, as
well as the N13D and D13N reciprocal mutants, in the presence and
absence of sCD4. Both gp140 and gp120 bound directly to Rh CCR5 and Hu
CCR5(N13D) in the absence of sCD4 (Fig. 5). However, gp120 bound
far more efficiently to CCR5 than did uncleaved gp140, as shown by the
inversion of the gp140/gp120 ratio in the Env-bound to CCR5 relative to
the input mixture. It is unclear whether the bound, uncleaved gp140
truly interacted with CCR5 or was bound as a consequence of forming
mixed oligomers with gp120. Addition of sCD4 enhanced the binding of
gp120 and gp140 to all of the CCR5 constructs, with gp120 binding again exceeding that of gp140. The gp120 also bound membrane-anchored CD4 more efficiently than did gp140, which could partially
account for differences in gp120 and gp140 binding to CCR5 in the
presence of sCD4 (Fig. 5). Taken together, our results indicate that
uncleaved, oligomeric SIV/17E Fr Env interacts much less efficiently
than does gp120 with both CD4 and CCR5.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Uncleaved, oligomeric SIV Env binds to CCR5 less
efficiently than does gp120. Purified, soluble Env containing
predominantly oligomeric SIV/17E-Fr gp140 and some gp120 (see input
lanes, 50, 100, and 500 ng) was used in direct Env binding assays as
described in the legend to Fig. 4 and Materials and Methods. Bound Env
was detected by Western blotting using a monoclonal antibody to
gp120.
|
|
CCR5 determinants for Env binding and conformational change
induction.
In the absence of CD4, CCR5 must bind Env and trigger
the conformational changes that lead to membrane fusion. In the
presence of CD4, high-affinity binding of Env to CCR5 may be less
important since CD4 may supply this function in trans. If
so, mutations in CCR5 which primarily affect Env binding should have a
greater effect on CD4-independent virus infection. To examine this, we selected two CD4-independent SIV Env proteins, SIV/17E-Fr and SIVsm
B670 clone 3, for infection studies with receptor chimeras generated between Hu CCR5 and CCR2b in the presence or absence of
membrane-anchored CD4 or sCD4. As always with analyses of chimeric receptors, greater emphasis should be placed on chimeras which function
rather than those which do not, since loss of function could be due to
specific alteration of an important region or to nonspecific,
conformational effects.
We found that ECL2 of Hu CCR5 was necessary (5525 does not function as
a coreceptor) and sufficient (2252 is an inefficient
but functional
coreceptor) for viral entry in the presence of
membrane-anchored CD4
for both virus strains (Fig.
6a and
b).
Inclusion of ECL1
(compare 2555 to 2255) or the N-terminal domain
of CCR5 (chimera 5252)
in conjunction with ECL2 increased coreceptor
efficiency to nearly
wild-type levels. The third ECL of CCR5 is
nearly identical to that of
CCR2b; as expected, substitution of
this region (chimera 5552) had
little effect on coreceptor function.
It is important to note that the
chimeras were expressed at equivalent
levels except for 2522 and 2555 (50 to 60% of wild-type MCF),
5525 (40 to 50%), and 5552 (10 to 20%)
(
43). Analysis of additional
receptor chimeras revealed that
the second half of ECL2 was critical
for coreceptor function whereas
the first half of this region
was less important (Fig.
6c). Once again,
more efficient coreceptor
function was obtained when both the
N-terminal domain (the first
20 residues) and the second half of ECL2
were derived from CCR5.
To further investigate the role of the
N-terminal domain, a series
of CCR5 N-terminal truncations were
examined. Removing four or
eight residues from the N terminus of Hu
CCR5 had no effect on
coreceptor function (Fig.
6a and b). However, the
deletion of
12 and 16 amino acids reduced coreceptor function to 30 to
40%
that observed with wild-type Hu CCR5.



View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Role of CCR5 domains in CD4-independent SIV infection.
Transiently transfected 293T cells were used as target cells in
luciferase reporter virus infections as described in the legend to Fig.
2 and in Materials and Methods, except that infections were performed
in the presence of 50 nM sCD4 where indicated. Chimera expression
levels were evaluated with a panel of CCR5 monoclonal antibodies as
described previously (43). Infections were performed with
viruses pseudotypes with the SIV/17E-Fr Env (a), the SIVsm B670 clone
3 Env (b), or the indicated Env proteins (c). mCD4, membrane-anchored
CD4. Chimera designations reflect whether each of the four
extracellular domains is derived from CCR5 or CCR2b.
|
|
These results show that residues within ECL2 of Hu CCR5 are critical
for SIV coreceptor function in the presence of CD4 but
that the
N-terminal domain after residue 8 also plays a significant
role. We
next examined the chimeras for their ability to serve
as primary
receptors in the absence of CD4 and found that none
of the chimeras
were able to serve as primary receptors at wild-type
levels (Fig.
6)
with the exception of 5552, which is nearly identical
to Hu CCR5.
Consistent with the idea that the efficiency of Env
binding to CCR5 is
a critical determinant of its ability to serve
as a primary receptor,
none of the chimeras supported SIV/17E-Fr
gp120 binding, with the
exception of 5552, to which weak Env binding
was detectable (data not
shown). The N-terminal truncation mutants
were inefficient primary
receptors for SIV/17E-Fr, with complete
loss of activity in the

12
mutant. Clone 3 was able to use the

4 mutant at wild-type levels,
showed decreased ability to use

8, and did not use

12. These
findings underscore the critical
importance of the N terminus for
direct binding of Env to Hu CCR5
and suggest that Env binding
determinants lie within the first
12 residues of
CCR5.
Effects of sCD4 on virus infection.
The addition of sCD4
enhances SIV infection under some circumstances (4, 63). We
reasoned that conformational changes induced in Env by sCD4 might
rescue the ability of some receptor chimeras to serve as primary viral
receptors for infection, possibly by increasing the efficiency of the
interaction with CCR5. Indeed, we found that sCD4 enhanced the ability
of 5255, 5252 (chimeras which contain the CCR5 N terminus but do not
function CD4 independently), and 5552 to serve as primary receptors for
one or both of the viruses tested (Fig. 6a and b). The addition of sCD4
did not affect the use of chimeras lacking the CCR5 N-terminus or
ECL2, consistent with their critical roles in virus infection as
described above. However, sCD4 could rescue infection through
4 and
8 for SIV/17E-Fr but not through
12 or
16 for either
SIV/17E-Fr or SIVsm
B670 clone 3. These results suggest that sCD4
enhances the affinity of Env for the N terminus of CCR5 and
that the N-terminal domain supporting direct Env binding is
disrupted in the
12 and
16 mutants. Because sCD4 enhancement
of SIV infection has been demonstrated with a variety of CCR5-negative
cell lines, we tested whether sCD4 could allow the use of
GPR15 or STRL33 as primary receptors. While GPR15 and STRL33
could serve as efficient coreceptors for infection by
SIV/17E-Fr and SIVsm
B670 clone 3, they did not serve as
primary receptors even in the presence of sCD4 concentrations as high
as 400 nM (data not shown). In addition, direct Env binding to GPR15
and STRL33 could not be detected in the presence of 100 nM sCD4 (data
not shown).
Residues in the N terminus and ECL2 are critical for primary
receptor function.
To further map the regions important for
CD4-independent coreceptor function, we examined CCR5 point mutants in
which the charged residues in the extracellular domains were
individually changed to alanine (20). In the presence of
CD4, all of these mutants served as efficient coreceptors (Fig.
7a). However, in the absence of CD4, D2A
and, in particular, D11A showed decreased activity as primary receptors
(Fig. 7b). Binding of SIV/17E-Fr gp120 was not detected to D2A or
D11A with or without sCD4 (data not shown). These results are
consistent with the fact that coreceptor function declined beginning
with
4 for SIV-17E/Fr, which is sensitive to the D2A mutation (Fig.
6a), and that both viruses tested lost CD4-independent and sCD4-rescued
infection between
8 and
12 (Fig. 6a and b). Since these point
mutations were constructed in a background of Hu CCR5 (which
lacks Asp13), the effects of D2A and D11A may be rendered more
apparent. Furthermore, a point mutation which changes the Ser at
position 180 in ECL2 of Hu and Rh CCR5 to a Pro affected
CD4-independent but not CD4-dependent viral infection (Fig. 7). Since
this mutant functions at wild-type levels in the presence of CD4, it
suggests that ECL2 contributes in some way to the Env binding site.
Interestingly, the S180P mutation is present in the sooty mangabey
population (10). In addition, a CCR5 clone isolated from an
African green monkey (AGM) (vervet) containing the D13N mutation found
in the AGM population (39) was evaluated (40).
Vervet CCR5 failed to serve as a primary receptor for SIV/17E-Fr and
allowed only inefficient infection by SIVsm
B670 clone 3, although it
functioned as an efficient coreceptor in the presence of CD4 for both
viruses (Fig. 7). These results are potentially interesting since sooty
mangabeys and African green monkeys become chronically infected with
SIV but do not progress to simian AIDS (3, 7, 49).

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Role of charged CCR5 residues in CD4-independent SIV
infection. Transiently transfected 293T cells were used as targets in
luciferase reporter virus assays as described in the legend to Fig. 2
and Materials and Methods in the presence (a) or absence (b) of
membrane-anchored CD4. The graphs represent the mean of at least three
experiments, and error bars show standard error of the mean.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Sequential interactions with CD4 and a coreceptor
ultimately result in conformational changes in HIV-1 Env that
lead to virus-mediated membrane fusion. In contrast to HIV-1, a number
of laboratory-adapted and primary HIV-2 and SIV strains have been
identified that short-circuit this normal entry process and
require only CCR5 or CXCR4 to infect cells (10, 14, 27,
28). CD4-independent infection may influence viral pathogenesis
in several ways. First, infection of CD4-negative, CCR5-positive cells
such as brain capillary endothelial cells may play a role in
neurotropism (27); B cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes
represent other CCR5+ CD4
cell types which
might be infected by CD4-independent viruses in vivo (34,
66). Second, since multimeric CD4 interactions are thought to be
required for HIV-1 entry (42, 48), viruses that can enter
independently of CD4 may be able to broaden their cellular tropism by
more efficiently infecting cells that express low levels of CD4.
Third, shed gp120 may affect CD4-negative cell types which express
chemokine receptors by mechanisms such as Env signaling and receptor
down-regulation (16, 62). In addition, these viruses
represent a means of examining the interaction between Env and
chemokine receptors in the absence of CD4, potentially allowing the
identification of determinants in both Env and CCR5 necessary to
support high-affinity binding. In this study, we extended our previous
observations that many SIV strains can infect CCR5+
CD4
cells, explored the consequences of receptor
expression levels on CD4-independent infection, and used
CD4-independent virus strains to identify domains in CCR5 important for
supporting Env binding.
Coreceptor expression levels can influence the efficiency of virus
entry (38, 50, 54). However, we found that
CD4-dependent and -independent SIV infection pathways exhibited
a similar dependence on CCR5 expression levels and that
CD4-independent infection occurred even at CCR5 levels barely
detectable by FACS (Fig. 1). Therefore, gross overexpression of CCR5 is
not required for infection in the absence of CD4, at least not for
infection by SIV/17E-Fr. This finding is consistent with our previous
work, which showed that levels of CCR5 on brain capillary endothelial
cells are sufficient to support CD4-independent virus entry
(27).
In our previous study, we demonstrated that some SIV
strains can infect cells that transiently express Hu CCR5
(27). Furthermore, we and others have found that Rh CCR5 and
Hu CCR5 function equally well as SIV coreceptors in the presence of CD4
(11, 24, 45). However, we found that Rh CCR5 supported
CD4-independent infection more efficiently and for a larger number of
virus strains than did Hu CCR5 (Fig. 2). In fact, with the exception of
SIVmac239, all SIV strains tested exhibited some degree of CD4
independence with cells transiently expressing Rh CCR5. We mapped the
enhanced infection through Rh CCR5 in the absence of CD4 to
residue 13 of the CCR5 N-terminal domain. These findings are consistent
with a previous study by Martin et al. which showed that
SIVmac239 gp120 can bind directly to Rh but not Hu CCR5 and that
residue 13 was responsible for this phenotype (46). In
summary, CD4 independence by SIV strains is more widespread than was
first suspected due to the more efficient use of Rh CCR5 than Hu
CCR5, and this difference maps to the CCR5 N terminus.
For most HIV-1 strains, CD4 binding to Env induces conformational
changes in gp120 that confer the ability to interact with the
coreceptor (41, 61, 65). These changes may include
increased exposure of a highly conserved region in gp120
thought to play a critical role in coreceptor binding (53).
Subsequent Env-coreceptor interactions are believed to trigger
additional conformational changes in Env that lead to membrane fusion.
It is likely that Env remains bound to CD4 when it associates with the
chemokine receptor (41). Consequently, direct, high-affinity
binding of gp120 to CCR5 might not be required in the presence of CD4
which could provide this function in trans. If true,
mutations in CCR5 which predominantly affect Env binding should have an
enhanced effect in the absence of CD4. Mutations which are defective in both the presence and absence of CD4 may not induce conformational changes in Env required for membrane fusion or may disrupt CCR5 binding
more dramatically (46).
We found that in the presence of CD4, numerous single-amino-acid
substitutions as well as truncations of the N-terminal domain of CCR5
were well tolerated. However, in the absence of CD4, many of these
mutations abolished or strongly suppressed virus infection. Several
previous studies have implicated the N terminus of CCR5, including
residues D2 and D11, as important for interaction with HIV-1 Env and,
in the case of D11, with SIVmac239 (20, 23, 30). Based on
our findings with the N-terminal domain mutants and the ability of
gp120 derived from SIV/17E-Fr to efficiently bind to Rh CCR5 in the
absence of CD4, we conclude that Env proteins derived from
CD4-independent SIV strains exist in a partially triggered conformation
that allows them to interact directly with CCR5, with the N-terminal
domain playing an important role. The enhancement of Env binding in the
presence of sCD4 is probably due to conformational changes in Env that
enable it to bind to CCR5 with even higher affinity.
The finding that membrane-anchored CD4 can rescue the activity of
N-terminal CCR5 mutants, presumably by providing a high-affinity binding site in trans, but has no effect on the activity of
chimeras lacking CCR5 ECL2 suggests that ECL2 may play a role in
triggering membrane fusion subsequent to Env binding, although ECL2
could also affect Env-CCR5 binding. In fact, the S180P mutation in ECL2 affected CD4-independent but not CD4-dependent virus infection. In an
effort to identify a CCR5 mutant which was able to support Env binding
but not virus infection, we examined the ability of SIV/17E-Fr gp120 to
bind 5525. Surprisingly, not only did Env fail to bind to 5525, but
also binding could not be detected to 5552, a chimera which can serve
as a primary receptor for infection even in the presence of sCD4. These
results suggest that the Env binding site on CCR5 involves the N
terminus but that binding is highly dependent on the overall
conformation of CCR5 and other domains are probably involved.
It is important to note that we used monomeric gp120 to measure
the ability of Env proteins to bind wild-type and mutant forms of
CCR5. As a consequence, low-affinity gp120-CCR5 interactions may not
have been detected by our assay. Since Env exists as an oligomer in the
viral membrane, multimeric Env-CCR5 interactions could stabilize
otherwise weak gp120-CCR5 binding events by increasing the avidity of
the interaction. We attempted to address this point by using a
secreted oligomeric form of SIV Env, gp140, that exists largely in an
uncleaved state. Surprisingly, oligomeric gp140 interacted with CD4 and
CCR5 much less efficiently than did gp120, suggesting that the
chemokine receptor binding site in gp120 is affected by Env cleavage.
This may have implications for vaccine development, since uncleaved Env
proteins may not elicit neutralizing, broadly cross-reactive antibodies
to the chemokine receptor binding site (60). If uncleaved
forms of Env are less able to interact with coreceptors, this may also
prevent nonproductive gp160-coreceptor interactions in the biosynthetic pathway.
For many years, it has been recognized that AGMs and sooty mangabey
monkeys are chronically infected with SIV in the wild and, while these
viruses cause no disease in their natural host, they produce an
immunodeficiency syndrome when transmitted to rhesus or pigtailed
macaques (3, 7, 19, 32, 35, 49). It is interesting that the
AGM population harbors a CCR5 allele which contains the D13N mutation,
which plays an important role in CD4-independent SIV infection
(39). Since SIV is thought to have existed in the AGM
population for many generations, it has been hypothesized that
mutations in CCR5 are likely to occur in regions of CCR5 which limit
SIV pathogenicity (39). Interestingly, a separate study
found that in four of four sooty mangabeys examined, CCR5 contained the
S180P mutation, which we also found to limit CD4-independent virus
infection (10). It is tempting to hypothesize that in AGMs
and sooty mangabey monkeys, host adaptation to limit viral pathogenesis
includes the limitation of CD4-independent infection, and it will be
important to evaluate primary AGM and sooty mangabey isolates for CD4
independence with AGM and sooty mangabey CCR5.
In conclusion, we found that multiple SIV strains can utilize Rh CCR5
independently of CD4 for virus infection, that some virus strains can
distinguish between CCR5 molecules that differ by only one amino acid
in the N terminus, and that the N-terminal domain of CCR5 plays an
important role in Env binding. In future studies, the CD4-independent
SIV phenotype can also be used to identify Env determinants that are
important for receptor interactions. By using closely related pairs of
virus strains, it will be possible to identify residues that are
involved in direct CCR5 interactions and in distinguishing Rh from Hu
CCR5. It will also be interesting to determine what role,
if any, CD4 independence plays in vivo through further
examination of SIV infection in AGMs and sooty mangabeys, evaluation of
the extent of infection of CCR5+ CD4
cells
such as B cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vivo, and infection of
rhesus macaques with closely related SIV strains that differ only in
their dependence upon CD4.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Trevor Hoffman, Joseph Rucker, and Benhur Lee for
helpful discussions and advice. SIVmac251 antiserum was obtained through the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of
AIDS, NIAID, NIH. CCR5 monoclonal antibodies were generously provided by Protein Design Labs and R&D Systems. sCD4 and 12G5 were a
kind gift of Jim "Arlo Guthrie" Hoxie.
A.L.E. was supported by MSTP grant 2T32GM07170. M.P. was
supported by the Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le SIDA, an Action de Recherche Concertée of the Communauté Française
de Belgique, and BIOMED EC grant BMH4-CT98-2343. C.B. is Aspirant
of the Belgian Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique. The work
was supported by grant R01-40880 to R.W.D.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathology, University of Pennsylvania, 806 Abramson, 34th St. and Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104. Phone: (215) 898-0890. Fax: (215)
573-2883. E-mail: doms{at}mail.med.upenn.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alexander, W. A.,
B. Moss, and T. R. Fuerst.
1992.
Regulated expression of foreign genes in vaccinia virus under the control of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase and the Escherichia coli lac repressor.
J. Virol.
66:2934-2942[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Alkhatib, G.,
C. Combadiere,
C. C. Broder,
Y. Feng,
P. E. Kennedy,
P. M. Murphy, and E. A. Berger.
1996.
CC CKR5: a RANTES, MIP-1 , MIP-1 receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1.
Science
272:1955-1958[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Allan, J. S.,
M. Short,
M. E. Taylor,
S. Su,
V. M. Hirsch,
P. R. Johnson,
G. M. Shaw, and B. H. Hahn.
1991.
Species-specific diversity among simian immunodeficiency viruses from African green monkeys.
J. Virol.
65:2816-2828[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Allan, J. S.,
J. Strauss, and D. W. Buck.
1990.
Enhancement of SIV infection with soluble receptor molecules.
Science
247:1084-1088[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Berger, E. A.,
R. W. Doms,
E.-M. Fenyö,
B. T. M. Korber,
D. R. Littman,
J. P. Moore,
Q. J. Sattentau,
H. Schuitemaker,
J. Sodroski, and R. A. Weiss.
1998.
HIV-1 phenotypes classified by co-receptor usage.
Nature
391:240[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Berson, J. F.,
D. Long,
B. J. Doranz,
J. Rucker,
F. R. Jirik, and R. W. Doms.
1996.
A seven transmembrane domain receptor involved in fusion and entry of T-cell tropic human immunodeficiency virus type-1 strains.
J. Virol.
70:6288-6295[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Bibollet-Ruche, F.,
C. Brengues,
A. Galat-Luong,
G. Galat,
X. Pourrut,
N. Vidal,
F. Veas,
J. P. Durand, and G. Guny.
1997.
Genetic diversity of simian immunodeficiency viruses from West African green monkeys: evidence of multiple genotypes within populations from the same geographical locale.
J. Virol.
71:307-313[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Byrn, R. A.,
I. Sekigawa,
S. M. Chamow,
J. S. Johnson,
T. J. Gregory,
D. J. Capon, and J. E. Groopman.
1989.
Characterization of in vitro inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus by purified recombinant CD4.
J. Virol.
63:4370-4375[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Chen, B. K.,
K. Saksela,
R. Andino, and D. Baltimore.
1994.
Distinct modes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proviral latency revealed by superinfection of nonproductively infected cell lines with recombinant luciferase-encoding viruses.
J. Virol.
68:654-660[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Chen, Z.,
A. Gettie,
D. D. Ho, and P. A. Marx.
1998.
Primary SIVsm isolates use the CCR5 coreceptor from sooty mangabeys naturally infected in West Africa: a comparison of coreceptor usage of primary SIVsm, HIV-2, and SIVmac.
Virology
246:113-124[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Chen, Z.,
P. Zhou,
D. D. Ho,
N. R. Landau, and P. A. Marx.
1997.
Genetically divergent strains of simian immunodeficiency virus use CCR5 as a coreceptor for entry.
J. Virol.
71:2705-2714[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Choe, H.,
M. Farzan,
M. Konkel,
K. Martin,
Y. Sun,
L. Marcon,
M. Cayabyab,
M. Berman,
M. Dorf,
N. Gerard,
C. Gerard, and J. Sodroski.
1998.
The orphan seven-transmembrane receptor apj supports the entry of primary T-cell-line-tropic and dualtropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
72:6113-6118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Choe, H.,
M. Farzan,
Y. Sun,
N. Sullivan,
B. Rollins,
P. D. Ponath,
L. Wu,
C. R. Mackay,
G. LaRosa,
W. Newman,
N. Gerard,
C. Gerard, and J. Sodroski.
1996.
The -chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 facilitate infection by primary HIV-1 isolates.
Cell
85:1135-1148[Medline].
|
| 13a.
| Clapham, P. R. Personal communication.
|
| 14.
|
Clapham, P. R.,
A. McKnight, and R. A. Weiss.
1992.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 infection and fusion of CD4-negative human cell lines: induction and enhancement by soluble CD4.
J. Virol.
66:3531-3537[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Connor, R. I.,
B. K. Chen,
S. Choe, and N. R. Landau.
1995.
Vpr is required for efficient replication of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 in mononuclear phagocytes.
Virology
206:935-944[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Davis, C. B.,
I. Dikic,
D. Unutmaz,
C. M. Hill,
J. Arthos,
M. A. Siani,
D. A. Thompson,
J. Schlessinger, and D. R. Littman.
1997.
Signal transduction due to HIV-1 envelope interactions with chemokine receptors CXCR4 or CCR5.
J. Exp. Med.
186:1793-1798[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Deng, H.,
R. Liu,
W. Ellmeier,
S. Choe,
D. Unutmaz,
M. Burkhart,
P. DiMarzio,
S. Marmon,
R. E. Sutton,
C. M. Hill,
C. B. Davis,
S. C. Peiper,
T. J. Schall,
D. R. Littman, and N. R. Landau.
1996.
Identification of a major coreceptor for primary isolates of HIV-1.
Nature
381:661-666[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Deng, H.,
D. Unutmaz,
V. N. Kewalramani, and D. R. Littman.
1997.
Expression cloning of new receptors used by simian and human immunodeficiency viruses.
Nature
388:296-300[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Desrosiers, R. C.
1990.
The simian immunodeficiency viruses.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
8:557-578[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Doranz, B. J.,
Z. Lu,
J. Rucker,
T. Zhang,
M. Sharron,
Y. Cen,
Z. Wang,
H. Guo,
J. Du,
M. A. Accavitti,
R. W. Doms, and S. C. Peiper.
1997.
Two distinct CCR5 domains can mediate coreceptor usage by human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
71:6305-6314[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Doranz, B. J.,
J. Rucker,
Y. Yi,
R. J. Smyth,
M. Samson,
S. C. Peiper,
M. Parmentier,
R. G. Collman, and R. W. Doms.
1996.
A dual-tropic primary HIV-1 isolate that uses fusin and the -chemokine receptors CKR-5, CKR-3, and CKR-2b as fusion cofactors.
Cell
85:1149-1158[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Dragic, T.,
V. Litwin,
G. P. Allaway,
S. R. Martin,
Y. Huang,
K. A. Nagashima,
C. Cayanan,
P. J. Maddon,
R. A. Koup,
J. P. Moore, and W. A. Paxton.
1996.
HIV-1 entry into CD4+ cells is mediated by the chemokine receptor CC-CKR-5.
Nature
381:667-673[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Dragic, T.,
A. Trkola,
S. W. Lin,
K. A. Nagashima,
F. Kajumo,
L. Zhao,
W. C. Olson,
L. Wu,
C. R. Mackay,
G. P. Allaway,
T. P. Sakmar,
J. P. Moore, and P. J. Maddon.
1998.
Amino-terminal substitutions in the CCR5 co-receptor impair gp120 binding and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 entry.
J. Virol.
72:279-285[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Edinger, A. L.,
A. Amedee,
K. Miller,
B. J. Doranz,
M. Endres,
M. Sharron,
M. Samson,
Z. Lu,
J. E. Clements,
M. Murphey-Corb,
S. C. Peiper,
M. Parmentier,
C. C. Broder, and R. W. Doms.
1997.
Differential utilization of CCR5 by macrophage and T-cell tropic SIV strains.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:4005-4010[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Edinger, A. L.,
T. L. Hoffman,
M. Sharron,
B. Lee,
B. O'Dowd, and R. W. Doms.
1998.
Use of GPR1, GPR15, and STRL33 as coreceptors by diverse human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and simian immunodeficiency virus envelope proteins.
Virology
249:367-378[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Edinger, A. L.,
T. L. Hoffman,
M. Sharron,
B. Lee,
Y. Yi,
W. Choe,
D. L. Kolson,
B. Mitrovik,
Y. Zhou,
D. Faulds,
R. G. Collman,
J. Hesselgesser,
R. Horuk, and R. W. Doms.
1998.
An orphan seven-transmembrane domain receptor expressed widely in the brain functions as a coreceptor for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and simian immunodeficiency virus.
J. Virol.
72:7934-7940[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Edinger, A. L.,
J. L. Mankowski,
B. J. Doranz,
B. J. Margulies,
B. Lee,
J. Rucker,
M. Sharron,
T. L. Hoffman,
J. F. Berson,
M. C. Zink,
V. M. Hirsch,
J. E. Clements, and R. W. Doms.
1997.
CD4-independent, CCR5-dependent infection of brain capillary endothelial cells by a neurovirulent simian immunodeficiency virus strain.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:14742-14747[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Endres, M. J.,
P. R. Clapham,
M. Marsh,
M. Ahuja,
J. D. Turner,
A. McKnight,
J. F. Thomas,
B. Stoebenau-Haggarty,
S. Choe,
P. J. Vance,
T. N. C. Wells,
C. A. Power,
S. S. Sutterwala,
R. W. Doms,
N. R. Landau, and J. A. Hoxie.
1996.
CD4-independent infection by HIV-2 is mediated by fusin/CXCR4.
Cell
87:745-756[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Farzan, M.,
H. Choe,
K. Martin,
L. Marcon,
W. Hofmann,
G. Karlsson,
Y. Sun,
P. Barrett,
N. Marchand,
N. Sullivan,
N. Gerard,
C. Gerard, and J. Sodroski.
1997.
Two orphan seven-transmembrane segment receptors which are expressed in CD4-positive cells support simian immunodeficiency virus infection.
J. Exp. Med.
186:405-411[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Farzan, M.,
H. Choe,
L. Vaca,
K. Martin,
Y. Sun,
E. Desjardins,
N. Ruffing,
L. Wu,
R. Wyatt,
N. Gerard,
C. Gerard, and J. Sodroski.
1998.
A tyrosine-rich region in the N terminus of CCR5 is important for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 entry and mediates an association between gp120 and CCR5.
J. Virol.
72:1160-1164[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Feng, Y.,
C. C. Broder,
P. E. Kennedy, and E. A. Berger.
1996.
HIV-1 entry cofactor: functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane domain, G-protein coupled receptor.
Science
272:872-877[Abstract].
|
| 32.
|
Fultz, P. N.,
H. M. McClure,
D. C. Anderson,
R. B. Swenson,
R. Anand, and A. Srinivasan.
1986.
Isolation of a T-lymphotropic retrovirus from naturally infected sooty mangabey monkeys.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:5286-5290[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Harouse, J. M.,
R. C. H. Tan,
A. Gettie,
P. Dailey,
P. A. Marx,
P. A. Luciw, and C. Cheng-Mayer.
1998.
Mucosal transmission of pathogenic CXCR4-utilizing SHIVSF33A variants in rhesus macaques.
Virology
248:95-107[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Hill, C. M.,
D. Kwon,
M. Jones,
C. B. Davis,
S. Marmon,
B. L. Daugherty,
J. A. DeMartino,
M. S. Springer,
D. Unutmaz, and D. R. Littman.
1998.
The amino terminus of human CCR5 is required for its function as a receptor for diverse human and simian immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoproteins.
J. Virol.
248:357-371.
|
| 35.
|
Hirsch, V. M.,
G. Dapolito,
P. R. Johnson,
W. R. Elkins,
W. T. London,
R. J. Montali,
S. Goldstein, and C. Brown.
1995.
Induction of AIDS by simian immunodeficiency virus from an African green monkey: species-specific variation in pathogenicity correlates with the extent of in vivo replication.
J. Virol.
69:955-967[Abstract].
|
| 36.
|
Hoffman, T. L.,
E. B. Stephens,
O. Narayan, and R. W. Doms.
1998.
HIV type 1 envelope determinants for use of the CCR2b, CCR3, STRL33, and APJ coreceptors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:11360-11365[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Kirchhoff, F.,
S. Pohlmann,
M. Hamacher,
R. E. Means,
T. Kraus,
K. Uberla, and P. D. Marzio.
1997.
Simian immunodeficiency virus variants with differential T-cell and macrophage tropism use CCR5 and an unidentified cofactor expressed in CEMX174 cells for efficient entry.
J. Virol.
71:6509-6516[Abstract].
|
| 38.
|
Kozak, S. L.,
E. J. Platt,
N. Madani,
F. E. Ferro,
K. Peden, and D. Kabat.
1997.
CD4, CXCR-4, and CCR5 dependencies for infections by primary patient and laboratory-adapted isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
71:873-882[Abstract].
|
| 39.
|
Kuhmann, S. E.,
E. J. Platt,
S. L. Kozak, and D. Kabat.
1997.
Polymorphisms in the CCR5 genes of African green monkeys and mice implicate specific amino acids in infections by simian and human immunodeficiency viruses.
J. Virol.
71:8642-8656[Abstract].
|
| 40.
| Kunstman, K., Z. Chen, B. Korber, J. Oprondek, J. Stanton, M. Agy, R. Shibata, A. Yoder, S. Pillai, C. Kuiken, P. Marx,
and S. Wolinsky. Nonhuman primate CCR5 homologues and their usage
by simian and humanimmunodeficiency viruses. Unpublished data.
|
| 41.
|
Lapham, C. K.,
J. Ouyang,
B. Chandrasekhar,
N. Y. Nguyen,
D. S. Dimitrov, and H. Golding.
1996.
Evidence for cell-surface association between fusin and the CD4-gp120 complex in human cell lines.
Science
274:602-605[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Layne, S. P.,
M. J. Merges,
M. B. Dembo,
J. L. Spouge, and P. L. Nara.
1990.
HIV requires multiple gp120 molecules for CD4-mediated infection.
Nature
346:277-279[Medline].
|
| 43.
| Lee, B., M. P. Sharron, C. Blainpai, B. J. Doranz, J. Vakili, P. Setoh, S. Durell, M. Parmentier, C. N. Chang, M. Tsang, and R. W. Doms. Dissection of CCR5 chemokine
and coreceptor function and identification of distinct conformational
states by monoclonal antibodies. J. Biol. Chem., in press.
|
| 44.
| Liu, Z. Q., S. Muhkerjee, M. Sahni, Z. Li, C. Wang,
S. V. Joag, V. H. Gattone, C. Qian, R. W. Doms, T. L. Hoffman, D. M. Pinson, R. Raghavan, O. Narayan, and E. B. Stephens. Derivation and biological characterization of a
molecular clone of SHIV KU-2 that causes AIDS, neurological and renal
disease in rhesus macaques. Submitted for publication.
|
| 45.
|
Marcon, L.,
H. Choe,
K. A. Martin,
M. Farzan,
P. D. Ponath,
L. Wu,
W. Newman,
N. Gerard,
C. Gerard, and J. Sodroski.
1997.
Utilization of C-C chemokine receptor 5 by the envelope glycoproteins of a pathogenic simian immunodeficiency virus, SIVmac239.
J. Virol.
71:2522-2527[Abstract].
|
| 46.
|
Martin, K. A.,
R. Wyatt,
M. Farzan,
H. Choe,
L. Marcon,
E. Desjardins,
J. Robinson,
J. Sodroski,
C. Gerard, and N. P. Gerard.
1997.
CD4-independent binding of SIV gp120 to rhesus CCR5.
Science
278:1470-1473[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Marx, P. A., and Z. Chen.
1998.
The function of simian chemokine receptors in the replication of SIV.
Semin. Immunol.
10:215-223[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Moore, J. P.,
J. A. McKeating,
W. A. Norton, and Q. J. Sattentau.
1991.
Direct measurement of soluble CD4 binding to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 virions: gp120 dissociation and its implications for virus-cell binding and fusion reactions and their neutralization by soluble CD4.
J. Virol.
65:1133-1140[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Muller, M. C.,
N. K. Saksena,
E. Nerrienet,
C. Chappey,
V. M. Herve,
J.-P. Durand,
P. Legal-Campodonico,
M.-C. Lang,
J.-P. Digoutte,
A. J. Georges,
M.-C. Georges-Courbot,
P. Sonigo, and F. Barre-Sinoussi.
1993.
Simian immunodeficiency viruses from central and western Africa: evidence for a new species-specific lentivirus in tantalus monkeys.
J. Virol.
67:1227-1235[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Platt, E. J.,
K. Wehrly,
S. E. Kuhnman,
B. Chesbro, and D. Kabat.
1998.
Effects of CCR5 and CD4 cell surface concentrations on infections by macrophage-tropic isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
72:2855-2864[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Poeschla, E. M., and D. J. Looney.
1998.
CXCR4 is required by a nonprimate lentivirus: heterologous expression of feline immunodeficiency virus in human, rodent, and feline cells.
J. Virol.
72:6858-6866[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Reeves, J. D.,
A. McKnight,
S. Potempa,
G. Simmons,
P. W. Gray,
C. A. Power,
T. Wells,
R. A. Weiss, and S. J. Talbot.
1997.
CD4-independent infection by HIV-2 (ROD/B): use of the 7-transmembrane receptors CXCR-4, CCR-3, and V28 for entry.
Virology
231:130-134[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Rizzuto, C. D.,
R. Wyatt,
N. Hernandez-Ramos,
Y. Sun,
P. D. Kwong,
W. A. Hendrickson, and J. Sodroski.
1998.
A conserved HIV gp120 glycoprotein structure involved in chemokine receptor binding.
Science
280:1949-1953[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Rucker, J.,
A. L. Edinger,
M. Sharron,
M. Samson,
B. Lee,
J. F. Berson,
Y. Yi,
R. G. Collman,
B. J. Doranz,
M. Parmentier, and R. W. Doms.
1997.
Utilization of chemokine receptors, orphan receptors, and herpesvirus encoded receptors by diverse human and simian immunodeficiency viruses.
J. Virol.
71:8999-9007[Abstract].
|
| 55.
|
Rucker, J.,
M. Samson,
B. J. Doranz,
F. Libert,
J. Berson,
Y. Yi,
R. G. Collman,
G. Vassart,
C. C. Broder,
R. W. Doms, and M. Parmentier.
1996.
Regions in -chemokine receptors CKR-5 and CKR-2b that determine HIV-1 cofactor specificity.
Cell
87:437-446[Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Samson, M.,
A. L. Edinger,
P. Stordeur,
J. Rucker,
V. Verhasselt,
M. Sharron,
C. Govaerts,
C. Mollereau,
G. Vassart,
R. W. Doms, and M. Parmentier.
1998.
ChemR23, a putative chemoattractant receptor, is expressed in dendritic cells and is a coreceptor for SIV and some primary HIV-1 strains.
Eur. J. Immunol.
28:1689-1700[Medline].
|
| 57.
|
Sattentau, Q. J.,
J. P. Moore,
F. Vignaux,
F. Traincard, and P. Poignard.
1993.
Conformational changes induced in the envelope glycoproteins of the human and simian immunodeficiency viruses by soluble receptor binding.
J. Virol.
67:7383-7393[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Sekigawa, I.,
S. M. Chamow,
J. E. Groopman, and R. A. Bryn.
1990.
CD4 immunoadhesin, but not recombinant soluble CD4, blocks syncytium formation by human immunodeficiency virus type 2-infected lymphoid cells.
J. Virol.
64:5194-5198[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 59.
|
Simmons, G.,
P. R. Clapham,
L. Picard,
R. E. Offord,
M. M. Rosenkilde,
T. W. Schwartz,
R. Buser,
T. N. C. Wells, and A. E. I. Proudfoot.
1997.
Potent inhibition of HIV-1 infectivity in macrophages and lymphocytes by a novel CCR5 antagonist.
Science
276:276-279[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 60.
|
Thali, M.,
J. P. Moore,
C. Furman,
M. Charles,
D. D. Ho,
J. Robinson, and J. Sodroski.
1993.
Characterization of conserved human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 neutralization epitopes exposed upon gp120-CD4 binding.
J. Virol.
67:3978-3988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61.
|
Trkola, A.,
T. Dragic,
J. Arthos,
J. M. Binley,
W. C. Olson,
G. P. Allaway,
C. Cheng-Mayer,
J. Robinson,
P. J. Maddon, and J. P. Moore.
1996.
CD4-dependent, antibody-sensitive interactions between HIV-1 and its co-receptor CCR-5.
Nature
384:184-187[Medline].
|
| 62.
|
Weissman, D.,
R. L. Rabin,
J. Arthos,
A. Rubbert,
M. Dybul,
R. Swofford,
S. Venkatesan,
J. M. Farber, and A. S. Fauci.
1997.
Macrophage-tropic HIV and SIV envelope proteins induce a signal through the CCR5 chemokine receptor.
Nature
389:981-985[Medline].
|
| 63.
|
Werner, A.,
G. Winskowsky, and R. Kurth.
1990.
Soluble CD4 enhances simian immunodeficiency virus SIVagm infection.
J. Virol.
64:6252-6256[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 64.
|
Willett, B. J.,
L. Picard,
M. J. Hosie,
J. D. Turner,
K. Adema, and P. R. Clapham.
1997.
Shared usage of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 by the feline and human immunodeficiency viruses.
J. Virol.
71:6407-6415[Abstract].
|
| 65.
|
Wu, L.,
N. P. Gerard,
R. Wyatt,
H. Choe,
C. Parolin,
N. Ruffing,
A. Borsetti,
A. A. Cardoso,
E. Desjardin,
W. Newman,
C. Gerard, and J. Sodroski.
1996.
CD4-induced interaction of primary HIV-1 gp120 glycoproteins with the chemokine receptor CCR-5.
Nature
384:179-183[Medline].
|
| 66.
|
Wu, L.,
W. A. Paxton,
N. Kassam,
N. Ruffing,
J. B. Rottman,
N. Sullivan,
H. Choe,
J. Sodroski,
W. Newman,
R. A. Koup, and C. R. Mackay.
1997.
CCR5 levels and expression pattern correlate with infectability by macrophage-tropic HIV-1, in vitro.
J. Exp. Med.
185:1681-1691[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, May 1999, p. 4062-4073, Vol. 73, No. 5
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kubo, Y., Yokoyama, M., Yoshii, H., Mitani, C., Tominaga, C., Tanaka, Y., Sato, H., Yamamoto, N.
(2007). Inhibitory role of CXCR4 glycan in CD4-independent X4-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection and its abrogation in CD4-dependent infection. J. Gen. Virol.
88: 3139-3144
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tomkowicz, B., Lee, C., Ravyn, V., Cheung, R., Ptasznik, A., Collman, R. G.
(2006). The Src kinase Lyn is required for CCR5 signaling in response to MIP-1beta and R5 HIV-1 gp120 in human macrophages. Blood
108: 1145-1150
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, C., Tomkowicz, B., Freedman, B. D., Collman, R. G.
(2005). HIV-1 gp120-induced TNF-{alpha} production by primary human macrophages is mediated by phosphatidylinositol-3 (PI-3) kinase and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways. J. Leukoc. Biol.
78: 1016-1023
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Overholser, E. D., Babas, T., Zink, M. C., Barber, S. A., Clements, J. E.
(2005). CD4-Independent Entry and Replication of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus in Primary Rhesus Macaque Astrocytes Are Regulated by the Transmembrane Protein. J. Virol.
79: 4944-4951
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Borda, J. T., Alvarez, X., Kondova, I., Aye, P., Simon, M. A., Desrosiers, R. C., Lackner, A. A.
(2004). Cell Tropism of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus in Culture Is Not Predictive of in Vivo Tropism or Pathogenesis. Am. J. Pathol.
165: 2111-2122
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liu, Y., Liu, H., Kim, B. O., Gattone, V. H., Li, J., Nath, A., Blum, J., He, J. J.
(2004). CD4-Independent Infection of Astrocytes by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1: Requirement for the Human Mannose Receptor. J. Virol.
78: 4120-4133
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McKenna, P. M., Pomerantz, R. J., Dietzschold, B., McGettigan, J. P., Schnell, M. J.
(2003). Covalently Linked Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp120/gp41 Is Stably Anchored in Rhabdovirus Particles and Exposes Critical Neutralizing Epitopes. J. Virol.
77: 12782-12794
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kunstman, K. J., Puffer, B., Korber, B. T., Kuiken, C., Smith, U. R., Kunstman, J., Stanton, J., Agy, M., Shibata, R., Yoder, A. D., Pillai, S., Doms, R. W., Marx, P., Wolinsky, S. M.
(2003). Structure and Function of CC-Chemokine Receptor 5 Homologues Derived from Representative Primate Species and Subspecies of the Taxonomic Suborders Prosimii and Anthropoidea. J. Virol.
77: 12310-12318
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lin, G., Baribaud, F., Romano, J., Doms, R. W., Hoxie, J. A.
(2002). Identification of gp120 Binding Sites on CXCR4 by Using CD4-Independent Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Env Proteins. J. Virol.
77: 931-942
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Reeves, J. D., Gallo, S. A., Ahmad, N., Miamidian, J. L., Harvey, P. E., Sharron, M., Pohlmann, S., Sfakianos, J. N., Derdeyn, C. A., Blumenthal, R., Hunter, E., Doms, R. W.
(2002). Sensitivity of HIV-1 to entry inhibitors correlates with envelope/coreceptor affinity, receptor density, and fusion kinetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 16249-16254
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Agrawal, L., Vanhorn-Ali, Z., Alkhatib, G.
(2002). Multiple determinants are involved in HIV coreceptor use as demonstrated by CCR4/CCL22 interaction in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). J. Leukoc. Biol.
72: 1063-1074
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Imamichi, H., Igarashi, T., Imamichi, T., Donau, O. K., Endo, Y., Nishimura, Y., Willey, R. L., Suffredini, A. F., Lane, H. C., Martin, M. A.
(2002). Amino acid deletions are introduced into the V2 region of gp120 during independent pathogenic simian immunodeficiency virus/HIV chimeric virus (SHIV) infections of rhesus monkeys generating variants that are macrophage tropic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 13813-13818
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Patrick, M. K., Johnston, J. B., Power, C.
(2002). Lentiviral Neuropathogenesis: Comparative Neuroinvasion, Neurotropism, Neurovirulence, and Host Neurosusceptibility. J. Virol.
76: 7923-7931
[Full Text]
-
Ryzhova, E., Whitbeck, J. C., Canziani, G., Westmoreland, S. V., Cohen, G. H., Eisenberg, R. J., Lackner, A., Gonzalez-Scarano, F.
(2002). Rapid Progression to Simian AIDS Can Be Accompanied by Selection of CD4-Independent gp120 Variants with Impaired Ability To Bind CD4. J. Virol.
76: 7903-7909
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Reeves, J. D., Doms, R. W.
(2002). Human immunodeficiency virus type 2. J. Gen. Virol.
83: 1253-1265
[Full Text]
-
Liu, J., Wang, S., Hoxie, J. A., LaBranche, C. C., Lu, M.
(2002). Mutations That Destabilize the gp41 Core Are Determinants for Stabilizing the Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-CPmac Envelope Glycoprotein Complex. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 12891-12900
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Puffer, B. A., Pohlmann, S., Edinger, A. L., Carlin, D., Sanchez, M. D., Reitter, J., Watry, D. D., Fox, H. S., Desrosiers, R. C., Doms, R. W.
(2002). CD4 Independence of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Envs Is Associated with Macrophage Tropism, Neutralization Sensitivity, and Attenuated Pathogenicity. J. Virol.
76: 2595-2605
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, P. F., Bouma, P., Park, E. J., Margolick, J. B., Robinson, J. E., Zolla-Pazner, S., Flora, M. N., Quinnan, G. V. Jr
(2002). A Variable Region 3 (V3) Mutation Determines a Global Neutralization Phenotype and CD4-Independent Infectivity of a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Associated with a Broadly Cross-Reactive, Primary Virus-Neutralizing Antibody Response. J. Virol.
76: 644-655
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lin, G., Lee, B., Haggarty, B. S., Doms, R. W., Hoxie, J. A.
(2001). CD4-Independent Use of Rhesus CCR5 by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Implicates an Electrostatic Interaction between the CCR5 N Terminus and the gp120 C4 Domain. J. Virol.
75: 10766-10778
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Del Corno, M., Liu, Q.-H., Schols, D., de Clercq, E., Gessani, S., Freedman, B. D., Collman, R. G.
(2001). HIV-1 gp120 and chemokine activation of Pyk2 and mitogen-activated protein kinases in primary macrophages mediated by calcium-dependent, pertussis toxin-insensitive chemokine receptor signaling. Blood
98: 2909-2916
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Baribaud, F., Pohlmann, S., Sparwasser, T., Kimata, M. T. Y., Choi, Y.-K., Haggarty, B. S., Ahmad, N., Macfarlan, T., Edwards, T. G., Leslie, G. J., Arnason, J., Reinhart, T. A., Kimata, J. T., Littman, D. R., Hoxie, J. A., Doms, R. W.
(2001). Functional and Antigenic Characterization of Human, Rhesus Macaque, Pigtailed Macaque, and Murine DC-SIGN. J. Virol.
75: 10281-10289
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kuhmann, S. E., Madani, N., Diop, O. M., Platt, E. J., Morvan, J., Muller-Trutwin, M. C., Barre-Sinoussi, F., Kabat, D.
(2001). Frequent Substitution Polymorphisms in African Green Monkey CCR5 Cluster at Critical Sites for Infections by Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVagm, Implying Ancient Virus-Host Coevolution. J. Virol.
75: 8449-8460
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Edwards, T. G., Hoffman, T. L., Baribaud, F., Wyss, S., LaBranche, C. C., Romano, J., Adkinson, J., Sharron, M., Hoxie, J. A., Doms, R. W.
(2001). Relationships between CD4 Independence, Neutralization Sensitivity, and Exposure of a CD4-Induced Epitope in a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Protein. J. Virol.
75: 5230-5239
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Martín, J., LaBranche, C. C., González-Scarano, F.
(2001). Differential CD4/CCR5 Utilization, gp120 Conformation, and Neutralization Sensitivity between Envelopes from a Microglia-Adapted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 and Its Parental Isolate. J. Virol.
75: 3568-3580
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Means, R. E., Matthews, T., Hoxie, J. A., Malim, M. H., Kodama, T., Desrosiers, R. C.
(2001). Ability of the V3 Loop of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus To Serve as a Target for Antibody-Mediated Neutralization: Correlation of Neutralization Sensitivity, Growth in Macrophages, and Decreased Dependence on CD4. J. Virol.
75: 3903-3915
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bannert, N., Schenten, D., Craig, S., Sodroski, J.
(2000). The Level of CD4 Expression Limits Infection of Primary Rhesus Monkey Macrophages by a T-Tropic Simian Immunodeficiency Virus and Macrophagetropic Human Immunodeficiency Viruses. J. Virol.
74: 10984-10993
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mori, K., Rosenzweig, M., Desrosiers, R. C.
(2000). Mechanisms for Adaptation of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus to Replication in Alveolar Macrophages. J. Virol.
74: 10852-10859
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Doms, R. W., Trono, D.
(2000). The plasma membrane as a combat zone in the HIV battlefield. Genes Dev.
14: 2677-2688
[Full Text]
-
Edinger, A. L., Ahuja, M., Sung, T., Baxter, K. C., Haggarty, B., Doms, R. W., Hoxie, J. A.
(2000). Characterization and Epitope Mapping of Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies Produced by Immunization with Oligomeric Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Envelope Protein. J. Virol.
74: 7922-7935
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Iyengar, S., Schwartz, D. H., Clements, J. E., Hildreth, J. E. K.
(2000). CD4-Independent, CCR5-Dependent Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Chemotaxis of Human Cells. J. Virol.
74: 6720-6724
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, Y.-j., Lou, B., Lal, R. B., Gettie, A., Marx, P. A., Moore, J. P.
(2000). Use of Inhibitors To Evaluate Coreceptor Usage by Simian and Simian/Human Immunodeficiency Viruses and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 in Primary Cells. J. Virol.
74: 6893-6910
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
D'Souza, M. P., Cairns, J. S., Plaeger, S. F.
(2000). Current Evidence and Future Directions for Targeting HIV Entry: Therapeutic and Prophylactic Strategies. JAMA
284: 215-222
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sharron, M., Pohlmann, S., Price, K., Lolis, E., Tsang, M., Kirchhoff, F., Doms, R. W., Lee, B.
(2000). Expression and coreceptor activity of STRL33/Bonzo on primary peripheral blood lymphocytes. Blood
96: 41-49
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Owen, S. M., Masciotra, S., Novembre, F., Yee, J., Switzer, W. M., Ostyula, M., Lal, R. B.
(2000). Simian Immunodeficiency Viruses of Diverse Origin Can Use CXCR4 as a Coreceptor for Entry into Human Cells. J. Virol.
74: 5702-5708
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pöhlmann, S., Lee, B., Meister, S., Krumbiegel, M., Leslie, G., Doms, R. W., Kirchhoff, F.
(2000). Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Utilizes Human and Sooty Mangabey but Not Rhesus Macaque STRL33 for Efficient Entry. J. Virol.
74: 5075-5082
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cormier, E. G., Persuh, M., Thompson, D. A. D., Lin, S. W., Sakmar, T. P., Olson, W. C., Dragic, T.
(2000). Specific interaction of CCR5 amino-terminal domain peptides containing sulfotyrosines with HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97: 5762-5767
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chabot, D. J., Chen, H., Dimitrov, D. S., Broder, C. C.
(2000). N-Linked Glycosylation of CXCR4 Masks Coreceptor Function for CCR5-Dependent Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolates. J. Virol.
74: 4404-4413
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Salzwedel, K., Smith, E. D., Dey, B., Berger, E. A.
(2000). Sequential CD4-Coreceptor Interactions in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Env Function: Soluble CD4 Activates Env for Coreceptor-Dependent Fusion and Reveals Blocking Activities of Antibodies against Cryptic Conserved Epitopes on gp120. J. Virol.
74: 326-333
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Binley, J. M., Sanders, R. W., Clas, B., Schuelke, N., Master, A., Guo, Y., Kajumo, F., Anselma, D. J., Maddon, P. J., Olson, W. C., Moore, J. P.
(2000). A Recombinant Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoprotein Complex Stabilized by an Intermolecular Disulfide Bond between the gp120 and gp41 Subunits Is an Antigenic Mimic of the Trimeric Virion-Associated Structure. J. Virol.
74: 627-643
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Blanpain, C., Doranz, B. J., Vakili, J., Rucker, J., Govaerts, C., Baik, S. S. W., Lorthioir, O., Migeotte, I., Libert, F., Baleux, F., Vassart, G., Doms, R. W., Parmentier, M.
(1999). Multiple Charged and Aromatic Residues in CCR5 Amino-terminal Domain Are Involved in High Affinity Binding of Both Chemokines and HIV-1 Env Protein. J. Biol. Chem.
274: 34719-34727
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Doranz, B. J., Baik, S. S. W., Doms, R. W.
(1999). Use of a gp120 Binding Assay To Dissect the Requirements and Kinetics of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Fusion Events. J. Virol.
73: 10346-10358
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Reeves, J. D., Hibbitts, S., Simmons, G., McKnight, A., Azevedo-Pereira, J. M., Moniz-Pereira, J., Clapham, P. R.
(1999). Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 (HIV-2) Isolates Infect CD4-Negative Cells via CCR5 and CXCR4: Comparison with HIV-1 and Simian Immunodeficiency Virus and Relevance to Cell Tropism In Vivo. J. Virol.
73: 7795-7804
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liu, Q.-H., Williams, D. A., McManus, C., Baribaud, F., Doms, R. W., Schols, D., De Clercq, E., Kotlikoff, M. I., Collman, R. G., Freedman, B. D.
(2000). HIV-1 gp120 and chemokines activate ion channels in primary macrophages through CCR5 and CXCR4 stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97: 4832-4837
[Abstract]
[Full Text]