Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, May 1999, p. 3920-3929, Vol. 73, No. 5
Area de Microbiología,
Received 28 December 1998/Accepted 8 February 1999
The temperate bacteriophage A2 forms stable lysogens in
Lactobacillus casei. The A2-encoded cI product
(CI), which is responsible for maintaining the A2 prophage in the
lysogenic state, has been purified. The CI protein, which is a monomer
of 25.3 kDa in solution, specifically binds to a 153-bp DNA fragment
that contains two divergent promoters, PL and
PR. These promoters mediate transcription from
cI and a putative cro, respectively. Three
similar, although not identical, 20-bp inverted repeated DNA segments
(operator sites O1, O2, and O3)
were found in this segment. CI selectively interacts with
O1, which is placed downstream from the transcription start point of the cro gene, and with O2 and
O3, which overlap with the Lysogenic phages regulate their
developmental fate by encoding a product (termed CI in the case of
phage Very little is known about the commitment between lytic and lysogenic
development from bacteriophages from gram-positive bacteria. Analysis
of the genomes of different lactococcal phages reveals that rlt
(24), BK5-T (4), and Tuc2009 (32) code
for a product that shows significant homology with the CI
repressor of lambdoid phages. Unlike them, the lactococcal phages
seem to have only one early region. In the case of phage rlt, this may
be subdivided into two regions (O1 and O2) with
dyad symmetry (21 bp) separated by a 2-bp spacer, into which the This paper deals with the molecular characterization of the CI
repressor protein of bacteriophage A2 and how it acts to control gene expression.
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and media.
Escherichia
coli XL-1 Blue (5) and DH10B (GIBCO BRL) were used as
recipients for plasmid constructions. E. coli
BL21(DE3)/pLys was used in expression studies of the genes cloned into
plasmid pET11a (31). Plasmids pLys (31) and pUC18
(35) have been previously described.
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Cooperative Interaction of CI Protein Regulates
Lysogeny of Lactobacillus casei by Bacteriophage
A2
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
35 region of the two
promoters. Using a heterologous RNA polymerase, we have determined
the transcription start points of PL and PR. CI
exerts a negative effect on the in vitro transcription of
PR by repositioning the RNA polymerase in a
concentration-dependent manner. CI, when bound to O1
and O2, enhances the positioning of the RNA polymerase with
the PL promoter. Our data indicate that the CI protein
regulates the lytic and lysogenic pathways of the A2 phage.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
) that acts as a transcriptional regulator. CI binds to two
operator regions on the phage genome, designated OR and
OL, which are each further divided into three closely
spaced binding sites (16 to 18 bp) termed operators OR1/L1
to OR3/L3 (reviewed in reference 27). Interspersed with the operators are two major promoters, PR
and PL. In the PR region, the binding of a CI
dimer to its highest-affinity binding site (ORI) turns off
the PR promoter, repressing the genes that mediate the
lytic development of the phage. Furthermore, this interaction
stabilizes the association of a second CI dimer to the OR2
site. This activates the PRM promoter, which is divergent from PR, thereby activating the transcription of genes
responsible for the maintenance of lysogeny (13, 17, 19, 21,
27). When the repressor concentration becomes high enough to
cause occupancy of the OR3 site, the transcription of
cI is prevented. This leads to a reduction of repressor
concentration which, in turn, provokes its unwinding from
OR3 and the resumption of cI expression. The
repressor behaves then as an autogenous regulator of its own synthesis
that functions positively at low concentrations and negatively at high
concentrations (reviewed in reference 27). In other
words, the commitment between lytic and lysogenic development is thus
critically dependent on the ability of the repressor to discriminate
between these different operators.
35
consensus regions of the two divergent promoters are embedded
(24). In the case of phage BK5-T, there are three regions
(O1 to O3) of dyad symmetry (18 bp) separated
by 10- and 24-bp spacers. The putative O1 and
O3 sites lie within the
35 and
10 consensus regions,
whereas O2 is placed between the two divergent promoters
(4). In the case of the temperate bacteriophage A2, which
infects Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus
paracasei strains (16), the CI protein shows
significant identity with the CI protein of lambdoid phages. The A2
cI gene encodes a 224-amino-acid polypeptide with a
predicted molecular mass of 25,277 Da. It appears to be the central
player in the maintenance of the lysogenic state because (i) it is
synthesized in lysogenic cultures, presumably blocking the lytic
development of superinfecting A2, and (ii) L. casei
derivatives containing a chromosomal copy of cI are
completely resistant to phage infection. In front of cI
there are three regions (O1 to O3) of 20 bp,
displaying partial symmetry, that are separated by 26- and 32-bp spacer
stretches, respectively (20) (Fig.
1).

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of the A2 genome showing the
location and organization of the development control region. (A)
EcoRI physical map of the A2 genome. (B) Organization of its
central region. The arrows refer to sequences functionally identified
or similar to cI (repressor), orfX (unknown
function), xis (putative excisionase), int
(integrase), cro (putative homologue of
cro),
ant (putative antirepressor), and attP (site of
attachment to the bacterial chromosome). (C) Scheme of the genetic
switch region, located in the intergenic stretch between cI
and cro. The transcription start sites of the PL
and PR promoters and the relative positions of the
10 and
35 hexamers with respect to the three operator sequences
(O1 to O3) are indicated.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
DNA manipulations. Plasmid DNA was obtained by the alkaline lysis method (3) and purified through a CsCl gradient (29). Analytical and preparative gel electrophoresis of plasmid DNA and restriction fragments was carried out in 0.8% (wt/vol) agarose-Tris-borate horizontal slab gels or 8% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide-Tris-borate gels. The purification of DNA fragments was carried out by electroelution (29).
The 153-bp DNA segment containing the intergenic region between cI and putative cro genes was obtained by PCR amplification with the primers 5'-TGGATTGCCTCCTTTCGTTTC-3' and 5'-ACCTCAAGAATGATTTTAACAC CG-3'. The amplified DNA fragment was purified and then cloned into HincII-cleaved pUC18 to generate pUO183. A 183-bp BamHI-HindIII segment containing the 153-bp intergenic region was purified by electroelution and end labeled by filling in the staggered ends with T7 DNA polymerase in the presence of [
-32P]dCTP (3,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham) and cold dTTP,
dATP, and dGTP.
Plasmid pET11a-cI was constructed as follows: primers
5'-GAGGTGAGACATATGAAAAC-3', which includes the
starting point for the translation of cI, and
5'-CAGCTTTTAACGTGGATCCGGG-3', which corresponds to a sequence located downstream of it, were used to amplify the encompassing region. The primers were designed to introduce
NdeI and BamHI restriction sites (underlined).
The amplified DNA segment was purified, digested with the above
enzymes, and ligated to NdeI-BamHI-cleaved
pET11a, and the ligation mixture was transferred into E. coli BL21(DE3)/pLys.
Protein purification.
The overexpression of CI was achieved
by the addition of 1 mM IPTG
(isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside) (Boehringer
Mannheim) to exponentially growing cultures of E. coli
BL21(DE3)/pLys carrying pET11a-cI. After 30 min, rifampin
was added (to a final concentration of 200 µg/ml), and the cells were
further incubated for 90 min. The cells were harvested, resuspended in
25 ml of buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 10 mM MgCl2,
1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 0.1% Tween 20) per liter of culture
containing 1 M NaCl, and broken by passage through a French press.
During the purification procedure all steps were performed at 4°C.
Crude extracts (total protein concentration of about 20 mg/ml) were
centrifuged (12,000 × g for 30 min), the supernatant
was discarded, and the pellet was washed twice with 25 ml of buffer A. The resulting pellet was thoroughly resuspended in the same volume of
buffer A containing 1 M NaCl, until complete dissolution was obtained,
and was then diluted four times in buffer A to achieve a final
concentration of 250 mM NaCl. This sample was loaded onto a Q-Sepharose
column (Pharmacia) equilibrated with the same buffer without DTT. The column was washed with 10 column volumes of buffer and eluted with a
gradient of increasing salt concentrations (250 mM to 1 M NaCl). The
fractions containing pure CI (as judged by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [SDS-PAGE]) were pooled,
diluted in glycerol (50% final concentration), and stored at
20°C.
The protein was measured by using the Bio-Rad protein assay.
Filter binding assays. The formation of DNA-protein complexes was measured as described previously (11). In short, the standard reaction was performed for 30 min at 30°C, and the mixture contained 475 pg (81 pM) of the 32P-labeled 183-bp DNA segment (see above) and 126 ng (100 nM) of CI in a total volume of 50 µl of buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 10 mM MgCl2, 0.01% Tween 20, 100 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol), unless stated otherwise. Buffer B (1 ml) was added to stop the reaction, and the mixture was filtered and extensively washed with buffer B. Filters were dried, and the radioactivity bound to them was determined by scintillation counting. The DNA retained on the filter was corrected for the retention of radioactively labeled DNA in the absence of protein (1 to 3%). The specific activity of the labeled DNA was measured as trichloroacetic acid-precipitable material. All reactions were performed in duplicate.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA).
The end-labeled
183-bp DNA fragment (240 pg or 81 pM) was incubated with increasing
amounts of CI protein in 25 µl of buffer B at 30°C for 30 min, in
the presence of poly(dI)-poly(dC) as an unspecific competitor (at a
final concentration of 4 ng/µl). The reaction mixture was loaded onto
a 5% (wt/vol) nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel. Similar reaction
conditions were used with the Bacillus subtilis vegetative
RNA polymerase (
A-RNAP) and in the competition
experiments between
A-RNAP and CI, except that the
reaction mixture was loaded onto a 4.5% (wt/vol) nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gel. Gels were run at 100 V in TAE buffer (40 mM
Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8]) at room temperature. Gels were vacuum
dried and analyzed by autoradiography. Quantification of the
repressor-operator complexes separated in these gels was performed by
using an Instant Imager (Packard). The degree of DNA-protein hybrid
formation was quantified by dividing the amount of complex formed by
the amount of residual free DNA.
DNase I footprinting.
The EcoRI-SphI
or HindIII-KpnI DNA fragments obtained from
pUO183 were end labeled at the EcoRI or
HindIII sites with Klenow DNA polymerase and
[
-32P]dATP (3,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham). End-labeled DNA
(81 pM) was incubated for 30 min at 30°C in the absence or presence
of CI and/or B. subtilis
A-RNAP in 20 µl of
buffer B plus poly(dI)-poly(dC) as an unspecific competitor (at a final
concentration of 50 ng/µl), followed by the addition of freshly
diluted DNase I (Boehringer Mannheim) (at a concentration to obtain, on
average, one cut per molecule). The mixture was incubated at 30°C for
3 min, and the digestion was stopped by the addition of 1 µl of 0.5 M
EDTA, pH 8. The DNA was precipitated, redissolved in a loading buffer,
electrophoresed on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel, and
autoradiographed. Chemical sequencing reactions (22) for
purines, obtained by an express protocol (2), were run in
parallel to determine the sizes of the DNA fragments generated.
In vitro runoff transcription assays.
Plasmid pUO183
digested with XmnI was used as a template for in vitro
transcription assays. The reaction mixtures contained, in 25 µl of a
solution consisting of 3 nM DNA, 0.2 mM each ATP, CTP, GTP, and UTP, 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 90 mM ammonium sulfate,
2 mM DTT, 7.5 U of RNasin (Promega), 30 nM B. subtilis
A-RNAP, and different amounts of CI. After 30 min of
incubation at 30°C, the reactions were stopped with 1 µl of 0.5 M
EDTA, pH 8. The RNAs were precipitated and then analyzed by primer
extension as follows. The pellet was dissolved in 10 µl of a solution
containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 40 mM KCl, 7 mM magnesium acetate,
2 mM DTT, 200 µM each dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP, 100 µM
[
-32P]dATP (3,000 Ci/mmol), 4 U of avian
myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Promega), 10 U of RNasin,
and 0.5 pmol of primers 5'-CGCCAGGGTTTTCCCAGTCACGA-3', for
the PR promoter, and 5'-GCGGATAACAATTTCACACAGG-3', for the PL promoter. The reaction mixture was
incubated at 42°C for 60 min, and the reaction was stopped by the
addition of 0.5 µl of 0.5 M EDTA, pH 8, and 100 µl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8). Unincorporated nucleotides were removed by
passing the sample through a Sephadex G-50 column. The resulting cDNAs obtained were precipitated, analyzed by denaturing PAGE (6%), and
autoradiographed. Chemical sequencing reactions of purines (2,
22) were run in parallel to determine the sizes of the cDNAs obtained.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Purification of the bacteriophage A2 CI repressor. The CI protein was overexpressed as described in Materials and Methods. Under those conditions most of the CI, which accounted for about 2% of the total cell protein, was in the pellet of the crude extract centrifugations. This allowed the removal of soluble proteins and washing of the protein aggregates, resulting in the solubilization of most proteins coprecipitated with CI. The resulting pellet was solubilized in buffer A containing 1 M NaCl, and the solution was then diluted to lower the salt concentration to 0.25 M. The solubilized CI protein was further purified by a conventional chromatographic step (Q-Sepharose), rendering a product that was more than 95% pure, as judged by SDS-PAGE (data not shown).
Purified CI migrated as a 28,000-Da polypeptide under denaturing conditions, which is slightly more than expected from its size as deduced from the nucleotide sequence of cI (25,277 Da). The native molecular mass of the CI protein was obtained by MALDI/TOF mass spectrometry and turned out to be 25,235 ± 13 Da at nanomolar concentrations, which indicates that CI is a monomer in solution.CI specifically binds to the A2 cI-cro intergenic DNA segment. Analysis of the genomic organization of the early region of phage A2 (1, 20) (Fig. 1) revealed that the putative rightward promoter (PR) would transcribe the cro and ant open reading frames, while the leftward promoter (PL) would govern the expression of the genes coding for CI and the site-specific recombination machinery. This organization allowed us to postulate that the decision between lytic and lysogenic development would be critically dependent on the ability of CI to act as the A2 repressor, probably by discriminating among possible operators located between PL and PR. In support of this hypothesis was the finding of a putative helix-turn-helix domain in the NH2-terminal half of CI that might mediate its DNA binding. To test whether the purified CI protein specifically binds to the early control region of the A2 genome, the 153-bp intergenic cI-cro region (obtained as a 183-bp DNA segment) was incubated with the CI protein and the mixture was subjected to filter binding assays.
The CI protein-DNA complex could be trapped on nitrocellulose filters, which allowed quantification of the affinity between its components. CI-DNA complex formation was strictly dependent on the presence of Mg2+, with an optimum concentration at 10 mM (Fig. 2A). The extent of the reaction was partially reduced by concentrations of NaCl above 150 mM (Fig. 2B), while the presence of Tween 20 (0.1 to 1%) in the reaction mixture had no significant effect on complex formation (data not shown). The binding of CI to the DNA segment was completed in 20 min (at least 80% of the radioactivity applied was retained by the filters).
|
Cooperative binding of CI to the cI-cro intergenic region. The rate of CI-DNA complex formation was determined as a function of CI concentration (Fig. 3A). The dependence of the DNA retention on protein concentration appeared to follow a sigmoidal curve. The apparent equilibrium constant (Kapp) of the CI-cI-cro-DNA complex is estimated to be 80 nM at pH 7.5 and 30°C, whereas the Kapp for nonspecific DNA is about 100 µM. The sigmoidal form of the curve suggested that the CI protein binds cooperatively to the cI-cro intergenic DNA segment.
|
, according to
the following equation:
= 4(F)(2R)/(1R)2
(34). The advantage of this method is that it allows for
internal controls, because all the necessary data are obtained from
within a single lane. Therefore,
can be calculated for each of the lanes, simply by quantifying the amount of DNA: unbound (F),
bound to one molecule of CI (1R), and bound to two or more
molecules of CI (2R). The cooperativity factor is defined as
the extent to which the formation of the doubly bound complex
exceeds the formation of the singly bound complex. Theoretically, a
value of
greater or less than 1 indicates, respectively, positive or negative cooperativity, whereas a value equal to 1 indicates a
lack of cooperativity. The value calculated from the data presented in
Fig. 3B (
= 9.97 ± 0.59) indicates that CI probably is a
protein that binds cooperatively to its cognate sites.
CI binds to three discrete sites. For determination of the precise location of the sequences recognized by CI, the CI-DNA complexes formed with the cI-cro intergenic region were analyzed by DNase I footprints. The top strand contained three domains of CI protection of 22, 34, and 38 bp. These were separated from each other by 12- and 38-bp intervals (Fig. 4A; also see Fig. 8). Within this interspaced region, phosphodiester bonds hypersensitive to DNase I cleavage were identified. One of them was located between O1 and O2. The several hypersensitive sites between O2 and O3 are separated from each other by 10 ± 1 nucleotides, which is about one helical turn (assuming 10.5 bp per turn) in double-stranded DNA.
|
nomenclature (reviewed in reference
27).
Localization and characterization of the promoters of the genetic
switch region.
Northern blot hybridization analysis of the mRNAs
produced from the genetic switch region, together with a visual
inspection of its nucleotide sequence, suggested that the promoters of
cI and cro were located in this intergenic region
and were divergently orientated (20) (Fig. 1). To map the
transcription start points of the two promoters, in vitro transcription
runoff experiments were performed with
A-RNAP and
linearized pUO183, which contains the 153-bp segment of the genetic
switch region, as a template DNA. After primer extension of the in
vitro-transcribed products with the oligonucleotides described in
Materials and Methods, we obtained two cDNA bands corresponding to
segments of 84 and 100 nucleotides from the left- and right-oriented
promoters, respectively (Fig. 5). These
promoters were consequently named PL and PR.
The cDNA bands seemed to indicate that the transcript from
PR would be about 10 times more abundant than the one from
PL. The 5' ends of transcription of these mRNA species map
at guanosine nucleotides located at positions 12 and 130 (see Fig. 8).
In both cases, 7 bp upstream from the transcription start sites,
extended
10 consensus sequences (with TG dinucleotides at positions
14 and
15) were observed. These were separated by canonical 14-bp
stretches from
35 consensus hexamers. Stretches of about 20 bp rich
in A+T nucleotides could be predicted immediately upstream of the
35
hexamers (12). Consequently, all the crucial elements for
RNAP promoter recognition in gram-positive bacteria, located near
positions
59 to
38,
35,
14,
15, and
10 relative to the
transcription start sites, were identified at both PL and PR (12, 15, 23, 33) (see Fig. 8). It is likely,
therefore, that the data obtained from this work with the B. subtilis
A-RNAP would correspond to those that
might be obtained if RNAP from Lactobacillus was used.
|
CI represses transcription from the PR promoter.
The CI repressor of lambdoid phages is known to repress the
transcription of early lytic genes and stimulate its own transcription by binding to its operator sites (reviewed in reference
27). Consequently, a likely role for the A2 CI
protein would be to repress the transcription of the PR
promoter. To address this question, we used B. subtilis
A-RNAP and linearized pUO183 DNA (3 nM) to follow, by in
vitro transcription assays, the expression of PR in the
presence of increasing amounts of CI. As shown in Fig. 5, CI reduced
PR utilization, in a concentration-dependent process, until
no expression was detected. We estimated that 2.5 CI monomers (7.4 nM)
per DNA molecule were enough to detect some repression from
PR, while about 60 polypeptides (180 nM) were needed to
block it completely.
35 hexamer of PR is embedded in O2
and O1 is located immediately after its transcription start
(see Fig. 8), it might be possible that CI repressed transcription from
PR, either by excluding the RNA polymerase (steric
hindrance) or by holding it at the promoter in such a way that it could
not start transcription. To analyze these two hypotheses EMSA
experiments were performed (Fig. 6). When
A-RNAP (13 to 34 nM) was incubated with the 153-bp A2
DNA segment (81 pM) two complexes (RPI and RPII) were readily detected,
but at a high protein concentration (44 nM) only the RPII complex was
observed. The Kapp of the
A-RNAP-DNA complex, which was estimated to be at a
concentration of 20 nM at pH 7.5 and 30°C, is about threefold higher
than the Kapp values obtained for the CI-DNA
complexes (Fig. 3C). When the
A-RNAP concentration was
limiting (22 nM), the rate of protein-DNA complex formation was
enhanced by the addition of CI at concentrations as low as 2.7 nM (Fig.
6, lanes 2, 5, and 9), with the subsequent formation of complex II
(CI-DNA), RPII, and a novel low-mobility complex termed CI-RP. At a CI
concentration approaching the KD (11 nM) (Fig.
6, lane 11), diffuse complexes II (II + II*) and CI-RP complexes
were observed. This result was obtained independently of the order of
addition of the proteins; i.e., CI and
A-RNAP could
remain bound to the DNA substrate. It is likely, therefore, that (i)
A-RNAP binds to two discrete, nonoverlapping sites in
the DNA fragment, (ii) both CI and
A-RNAP coexist on the
intergenic 153-bp cI-cro DNA fragment, and (iii) CI and
A-RNAP interact.
|
CI relocates the RNA polymerase to the cI-cro
intergenic region.
The PR and PL divergent
promoters are 81 bp apart and thus are located on the same face of the
DNA helix. To investigate the type of complexes formed by CI,
A-RNAP, or both proteins on the intergenic 153-bp
cI-cro DNA fragment, DNase I footprinting experiments were
performed. The binding of CI to DNA gives a characteristic DNase I
protection pattern already shown in Fig. 4 (Fig.
7A), while
A-RNAP shows an
extended protection (about 40 bp), in the region where O2
and the PR promoter overlap, at concentrations of 15 nM and
up (Fig. 7B).
|
A-RNAP (31 nM)
and increasing concentrations of CI, a protection pattern is observed that differs from the picture obtained with each of the proteins (Fig.
7C).
A-RNAP does not alter the CI footprint at the
O1 and O2 sites; this means that the polymerase
becomes displaced from its binding site at PR (which
overlaps with O2) even at low concentrations of the
repressor (3.5 nM). However, the polymerase competes with CI at the
O3 site (which covers most of PL), as is
indicated by the change in the pattern of CI protection in the presence
of
A-RNAP (a typical CI footprint at the O3
site requires that its concentration be about eightfold higher [28
nM] than when
A-RNAP is not present in the reaction
mixture [Fig. 7C and 8]). It is likely,
therefore, that
A-RNAP interacts with the PR
promoter in the absence of CI but that in its presence, at a low
concentration, the polymerase would become relocated to interact with
the PL promoter.
|
A-RNAP interacts
first with PR, forming the complex RPI (Fig. 6). As its
concentration increases, the polymerase would bind both promoters
(RPII). However, in the presence of CI at a low concentration (from 2.7 nM),
A-RNAP would become displaced from PR,
due to the higher affinity of the repressor for O1 and
O2. As a consequence, transcription from the early
PR promoter would be repressed. CI, in turn, would interact
with
A-RNAP to relocate it, by an as yet unidentified
mechanism, on the PL promoter originating the complex CI-RP
(Fig. 6) and presumably activating transcription from PL.
Finally, when the CI concentration increases to cause occupancy of
O3, transcription from PL would become prevented.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The deleterious effect of bacteriophages on industrial processes that rely on the activity of lactic acid bacteria is fuelling the interest in their biology as a first step towards devising rational interference systems that abolish phage development. Furthermore, phages may be a source of genetic tools for these bacteria. The utility of the CI product in strain defense (reference 20 and unpublished data) has moved us to undertake an in-depth study of the regulation of the early processes that lead to either the lytic or lysogenic cycle of phage A2.
Northern blots from the A2 immunity region made in vivo (20)
and in vitro transcription experiments showed that it is centered around a 153-bp segment comprised of the structural portions of the
divergently transcribed cro and cI genes (Fig.
1). In front of these genes there appeared the corresponding promoters,
PR and PL, respectively. Interspersed with
these two promoters are three discrete, nonoverlapping, operator sites
(O1, O2, and O3) to which the CI
protein was shown to bind specifically. Each of these operator
sequences contains a 20-bp imperfect inverted repeated sequence with a
dyad axis of symmetry. This organization suggests that CI, which is a
monomer in solution, could dimerize on the DNA through recognition of
each of the sides of the inverted repeats. The relative locations of
promoters and operators are as follows: O1 is centered 13 bp downstream from the transcription start point of PR,
while O2 and O3 have their axes of symmetry
33.5 and 86.5 bp upstream from that point and have embedded the
35
hexamers of PR and PL, respectively (Fig. 8).
At low concentrations, CI formed two complexes with the
intergenic cI-cro DNA segment, while only the most
retarded one was observed at high CI concentrations (Fig. 3). The
absence of a third intermediate complex suggests the strong cooperative
binding of CI to two operator sequences, probably O1 and
O2, based on its higher affinity to them than to
O3 (Fig. 4 and 7). This cooperative binding of CI probably provokes bending of the DNA, as judged by the pattern of increased sensitivity to DNase I cleavage with a periodicity of about 10 bp that
occurs between the O2 and O3 sites (Fig. 4).
However, the O1 and O2 sites are separated by a
nonintegral number of turns in the DNA helix (the center-to-center
distance is 46.5 bp, which means 4.4 turns), so we have to assume that
the helix undergoes an unfavorable twisting process upon CI
binding. At present the energetic cost of looping between
these two high-affinity operator sites is unknown. On the other
hand, O2 and O3 lay on the same face of the
DNA, thus favoring DNA looping (the center-to-center distance is about
52.5 bp, i.e., 5 helix turns).
The overall organization of the genetic switch region appears to be
significantly similar to the functionally homologous stretches of other
bacteriophages, although in most of these the operators are uniformly
spaced (14, 18, 26). However, the lambdoid phages HK022 and
80 also show asymmetric spacing (8, 25). Furthermore, A2
operators partially differ in their sequences, a feature previously
thought to be important in phage
for the lysis-lysogeny decision,
since they seem to be involved in the different affinities of CI and
Cro for these sites.
The phage A2 CI protein represses PR through binding to
O1 and O2, which results in the displacement of
the RNAP from its normal position, from nucleotide
2 to
50 upstream
of the transcription start point of PR, to place it on the
PL promoter, which presumably would result in the
enhancement of cI transcription. However, at high
concentrations of CI, even O3 becomes occupied, which in
turn provokes displacement of the RNAP from PL, resulting
in repression of cI.
The general arrangement of the operator sites relative to their
promoters indicates that repression of the lytic cycle in phage A2
occurs by a principle similar to that proposed for the lambdoid phages
(7, 27) but with clear mechanistic differences. First, the
promoters of the lytic-lysogenic commitment of the A2 phage have four
elements identified in bacterial promoters: the crucial
35 and
10
hexamers, the
14 to
15 TG dinucleotide which appears to be a basic
third element found in a large portion of gram-positive bacterial
promoters (15, 33), and a sequence rich in A+T called the UP
element, located upstream from the
35 hexamer (6, 23, 28).
The UP element, to which the C-terminal domain of the RNAP
subunit
(
-CTD) binds, has been located at positions
59 to
38 relative to
the transcription start and has the consensus sequence
5'-nnAAA(A/T)(A/T)T(A/T)TTTTnnAAAAnnn-3' (10). A poor match
with an UP element could be predicted in the
59 to
38 interval of
PL (8 of 17 nucleotides), whereas an almost perfect match
(15 of 17 nucleotides) was observed in the case of the PR
promoter (Fig. 8). These last two elements are not present in the
promoters of the genetic switch region of bacteriophage
.
Second, in vitro transcription of the cI gene from the
PL promoter of phage A2 takes place in the absence of CI,
albeit about 10-fold less abundantly than cro expression
which occurs from the PR promoter (Fig. 5). This contrasts
with the fate of the repressor synthesis from the PRM
promoter in phage
(13), which requires the presence of
the repressor itself.
Third, in the case of phage A2 the spacer regions have 26 bp between
O1 and O2 and 32 bp between O2 and
O3 (Fig. 8), while in
these are reduced to 7 and 6 bp,
respectively. The
CI protein activates transcription of
cI when bound at OR2 (which is centered at
position
42 of promoter PRM) (19, 21, 27). It
has been recently shown, by using artificial constructs, that the
CI repressor bound to OR2 at position
62 upstream of the
promoter transcription start point does not activate RNA synthesis,
because
CI cannot contact the
subunit of RNAP (9).
In the case of the A2 phage, we have shown that the CI repressor
bound to the O1 and O2 sites (centered at
positions
131 and
84.5 of promoter PL) helps in the
binding of RNAP to the PL promoter. This might be effected
through contact between the
subunit of the B. subtilis RNAP and CI (our unpublished data) which, in the end, would enhance the
expression from PL. It is likely, therefore, that this
situation is reproduced in vivo when an A2 genome enters a new host
cell. As a result of early transcription, CI would bind the
O1 and O2 sites, provoking repression of the
transcription from the PR promoter by covering part of the
surface that must be occupied by
A-RNAP, leading the
phage into a lysogenic cycle. The CI dimers bound to
O1-O2 help to position
A-RNAP at
the PL promoter, further enhancing the synthesis of CI until its concentration allows the occupancy of O3, which
would result in a halt of transcription from PL. In this
way, as it occurs in
, A2 CI would regulate its own synthesis and
the maintenance of the lysogenic state of the cells.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Margarita Salas for the kind gift of B. subtilis
A-RNAP holoenzyme. The help of Aranzazu
Gual and Silvia Fernández during part of this work is very much appreciated.
These studies were partially supported by grants BIOT CT96-0402 of the BIOTECH Programme (European Union) and BIO94-189 from CICYT (Spanish Ministry of Education) to J.E.S. and PB 96-0817 from CICYT and 06G/004/96 from Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid to J.C.A. V.L. was the recipient of an FPI fellowship associated with grant BIO94-189.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Area de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Oviedo, Julián Clavería s. n., 33007 Oviedo, Spain. Phone: 34 985 103559. Fax: 34 985 103148. E-mail: jsuarez{at}sauron.quimica.uniovi.es.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Alvarez, M. A., M. Herrero, and J. E. Suárez. 1998. Site-specific integration of bacteriophage A2 and construction of integrative vectors for lactic acid bacteria. Virology 250:185-193[Medline]. |
| 2. |
Belikov, S., and L. Wieslander.
1995.
Express protocol for generating G+A sequencing ladders.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:310 |
| 3. |
Birnboim, H. C., and J. Doly.
1979.
A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA.
Nucleic Acids Res.
7:1513-1523 |
| 4. | Boyce, J. D., B. E. Davidson, and A. J. Hillier. 1995. Identification of prophage genes expressed in lysogens of the Lactococcus lactis bacteriophage BK5-T. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:4099-4104[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Bullock, W. O., J. M. Fernández, and J. M. Short. 1987. XL1-Blue: a high efficiency plasmid transforming recA Escherichia coli strains with beta-galactosidase selection. BioTechniques 5:376-378. |
| 6. | Busby, S., and R. H. Ebright. 1994. Promoter structure, promoter recognition, and transcription activation in prokaryotes. Cell 79:743-746[Medline]. |
| 7. |
Cam, K.,
J. Oberto, and R. A. Weisberg.
1991.
The early promoters of bacteriophage HK022: contrasts and similarities to other lambdoid phages.
J. Bacteriol.
173:734-740 |
| 8. | Carlson, P. L., and J. W. Little. 1993. Highly cooperative DNA binding by the coliphage HK022 repressor. J. Mol. Biol. 230:1108-1130[Medline]. |
| 9. | Dove, S. L., J. K. Joung, and A. Hoschild. 1997. Activation of prokaryotic transcription through arbitrary protein-protein contacts. Nature 386:627-630[Medline]. |
| 10. |
Estrem, S. T.,
T. Gaal,
W. Ross, and R. L. Gourse.
1998.
Identification of an UP element consensus sequence for bacterial promoters.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:9761-9766 |
| 11. | García, P., J. C. Alonso, and J. E. Suárez. 1997. Molecular characterization of the cos region of the Lactobacillus casei bacteriophage A2. Gene product 3, gp3, specifically binds to its downstream cos region. Mol. Microbiol. 23:505-514[Medline]. |
| 12. | Gross, C. A., M. Lonetto, and R. Losick. 1992. Bacterial sigma factors, p. 129-176. In K. Yamamoto, and S. McKnight (ed.), Transcriptional regulation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 13. |
Guarente, L.,
J. S. Nye,
A. Hochschild, and M. Ptashne.
1982.
Mutant lambda phage repressor with a specific defect in its positive control function.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79:2236-2239 |
| 14. | Gussin, G., A. Johnson, C. Pabo, and R. Sauer. 1983. Repressor and Cro protein: structure, function, and role in lysogenization, p. 93-121. In R. W. Hendrix, J. W. Roberts, F. W. Stahl, and R. A. Weisberg (ed.), Lambda II. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 15. |
Helmann, J. D.
1995.
Compilation and analysis of Bacillus subtilis A-dependent promoter sequences: evidence for extended contact between RNA polymerase and upstream promoter DNA.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:2351-2360 |
| 16. | Herrero, M., C. G. de los Reyes-Gavilán, J. L. Caso, and J. E. Suárez. 1994. Characterization of 393-A2, a bacteriophage that infects Lactobacillus casei. Microbiology 140:2585-2590. |
| 17. | Hochschild, A., N. Irwin, and M. Ptashne. 1983. Repressor structure and the mechanism of positive control. Cell 32:319-325[Medline]. |
| 18. |
Johnson, A. D.,
A. R. Poteete,
G. Lauer,
R. T. Sauer,
G. K. Ackers, and M. Ptashne.
1981.
repressor and Cro components of an efficient molecular switch.
Nature
294:217-223[Medline].
|
| 19. |
Kuldell, N., and A. Hochschild.
1994.
Amino acid substitutions in the 35 recognition motif of 70 that result in defects in phage repressor-stimulated transcription.
J. Bacteriol.
176:2991-2998 |
| 20. |
Ladero, V.,
P. García,
V. Bascarán,
M. Herrero,
M. Alvarez, and J. E. Suárez.
1998.
Identification of the repressor-encoding gene of the Lactobacillus bacteriophage A2.
J. Bacteriol.
180:3474-3476 |
| 21. |
Li, M.,
H. Moyle, and M. M. Susskind.
1994.
Target of the transcriptional activation function of cI protein.
Science
263:75-77 |
| 22. | Maxam, A. M., and W. Gilbert. 1980. Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol. 65:499-560[Medline]. |
| 23. |
McAllister, C. F., and E. C. Achberger.
1988.
Effect of polyadenine-containing curved DNA affects promoter utilization in B. subtilis.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:11743-11749 |
| 24. | Nauta, A., D. van Sideren, M. Karsens, E. Smit, G. Venema, and J. Kok. 1996. Inducible gene expression mediated by a repressor-operator system isolated from Lactococcus lactis bacteriophage rlt. Mol. Microbiol. 19:1331-1341[Medline]. |
| 25. |
Ogawa, T.,
H. Ogawa, and J. Tomizawa.
1988.
Organization of the early region of bacteriophage 80. Genes and proteins.
J. Mol. Biol.
202:537-550[Medline].
|
| 26. | Poteete, A. R., and M. Ptashne. 1982. Control of transcription by the bacteriophage P22 repressor. J. Mol. Biol. 157:21-48[Medline]. |
| 27. | Ptashne, M. 1992. A genetic switch. Cell Press and Blackwell Scientific Publications, Cambridge, Mass. |
| 28. |
Ross, W.,
K. K. Gosink,
J. Salomon,
K. Igarashi,
C. Zou,
A. Ishihama,
K. Severinov, and R. L. Gourse.
1993.
A third recognition element in bacterial promoters: DNA binding by the subunit of RNA polymerase.
Science
262:1407-1413 |
| 29. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 30. | Schleif, R. 1992. DNA looping. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61:199-223[Medline]. |
| 31. | Studier, F. W., A. H. Rosenberg, J. J. Dunn, and J. W. Dubendorff. 1990. Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 185:60-89[Medline]. |
| 32. | van de Guchte, M., C. Daly, G. F. Fitzgerald, and E. K. Arendt. 1994. Identification of the putative repressor-encoding gene cI of the temperate lactococcal bacteriophage Tuc2009. Gene 144:93-95[Medline]. |
| 33. |
Voskuil, M. I., and G. H. Chambliss.
1998.
The 16 region of Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive promoters.
Nucleic Acids Res.
26:3584-3590 |
| 34. |
Wilson, D.,
G. Sheng,
T. Lecuit,
N. Dostatni, and C. Desplan.
1993.
Cooperative dimerization of paired class homeo domains on DNA.
Genes Dev.
7:2120-2134 |
| 35. | Yanisch-Perron, C., J. Vieira, and J. Messing. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33:103-119[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»