Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, May 1999, p. 3723-3732, Vol. 73, No. 5
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Attenuated Vesicular Stomatitis Viruses as
Vaccine Vectors
Anjeanette
Roberts,
Linda
Buonocore,
Ryan
Price,
John
Forman, and
John K.
Rose*
Department of Pathology, Yale University
School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510
Received 6 October 1998/Accepted 26 January 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
We showed previously that a single intranasal vaccination of mice
with a recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) expressing an
influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) protein provided complete protection
from lethal challenge with influenza virus (A. Roberts, E. Kretzschmar,
A. S. Perkins, J. Forman, R. Price, L. Buonocore, Y. Kawaoka, and
J. K. Rose, J. Virol. 72:4704-4711, 1998). Because some
pathogenesis was associated with the vector itself, in the present
study we generated new VSV vectors expressing HA which are completely
attenuated for pathogenesis in the mouse model. The first vector has a
truncation of the cytoplasmic domain of the VSV G protein and expresses
influenza virus HA (CT1-HA). This nonpathogenic vector provides
complete protection from lethal influenza virus challenge after
intranasal administration. A second vector with VSV G deleted and
expressing HA (
G-HA) is also protective and nonpathogenic and has
the advantage of not inducing neutralizing antibodies to the vector itself.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) is
the prototype of the family Rhabdoviridae and infects a
broad range of animals, including cattle, horses, and swine
(12). VSV infection of livestock is associated with
significant disease, including vesicular lesions around the mouth,
hoofs, and teats, and with loss of beef and milk production (3,
38). Although rarely fatal, VSV infection mimics early symptoms
caused by a notorious veterinary pathogen of horses and cattle,
foot-and-mouth disease virus (38). VSV infection of
livestock occurs periodically within the United States, is associated
with one of two serotypes of VSV (Indiana, VSVI, or New
Jersey, VSVNJ), and is usually not widespread. However, major VSV epizootics occur approximately every 10 to 15 years within
the United States, with the last two having occurred in 1982-1983 and
1966 (29, 39). In 1997, 183 confirmed cases of
VSVI were reported in four states (36).
Arthropod vectors, such as phlebomite sandflies (8, 27) and
Aedes mosquitoes (34), have been found to harbor
VSVI in nature and likely participate in the spread of the
virus from animal to animal and possibly from animals to humans.
Naturally occurring human infections with VSV are rare. However several
cases of VSV infection have been reported for individuals directly
exposed to infected livestock (6) and for researchers directly exposed within laboratory environments (12, 13,
25). Most VSV infections are thought to be asymptomatic in
humans; however, febrile illness, including chills, myalgia, and
nausea, has been reported in infected individuals (5, 10, 12,
13). A single case of encephalitis associated with
VSVI infection in a 3-year-old boy was reported in 1988 (28).
The seroprevalence of VSV antibodies within the general human
population is extremely low except in limited regions of enzooticity in
Georgia (VSVNJ) (11) and Central America
(VSVI and VSVNJ) (1). Seroprevalence
is also moderately high in individuals with a high risk for exposure
(i.e., laboratory workers who work with the virus directly and
veterinarians and ranchers exposed to infected livestock). An example
of high seroprevalence of VSV antibodies within a human population
(94% seropositive) was reported for a single rural Panamanian
community where VSV infection was enzootic in the surrounding wildlife
(35). The surrounding rural Panamanian communities had
seroprevalence rates ranging from 3 to 54% in adult lifetime
residents, and urban Panamanian populations had no seroprevalence of
VSV antibodies (35). The seroprevalence of VSV antibodies
has also been examined in high-risk groups for VSV exposure during
epizootics. A report on human infection during the 1965 epizootic
included a study of 41 individuals at high risk for exposure to VSV
(6). Eight of the 41 individuals (20%) had serological
evidence of VSV infection. This and other studies (11, 29,
39) indicate limited seroprevalence of antibodies to VSV in the
categories with the highest risk of exposure and demonstrate an absence
of antibodies to VSV in the general population. The low VSV
seropositivity in the general population and the lack of serious
pathogenicity in humans are advantages in the potential use of
recombinant VSV-vectored vaccines in humans.
In addition to the low seroprevalence of VSV antibodies in the general
population, other characteristics of VSV suggest that recombinant VSVs
expressing foreign viral glycoproteins would be very good vaccine
candidates. VSV elicits strong humoral and cellular immune responses in
vivo (3, 37, 41) and naturally infects at mucosal surfaces.
Mucosal immunization is a less invasive route of immunization and has
been shown to elicit both mucosal and systemic immunity (17, 21,
22). Additionally, recombinant VSVs are able to accommodate large
inserts and multiple genes in their genomes. This ability to
incorporate large gene inserts in replication-competent viruses offers
advantages over other RNA virus vectors, such as those based on
alphaviruses (2, 20, 40) and poliovirus (23).
Furthermore, like alphaviruses, VSV grows to very high titers in vitro,
and VSV infection shuts down host cell protein synthesis. This
inhibition of host cell protein synthesis allows rapid identification
of viral proteins in infected cell lysates and facilitates rapid
purification of large amounts of virus and viral proteins.
VSV recombinants would have advantages over other live recombinant
vaccine vectors as well. Compared to large, complex genomes of viruses
from the Poxviridae family, the VSV genome is relatively simple, more fully understood, and easier to manipulate. VSV's single-stranded RNA genome does not undergo reassortment and therefore lacks the potential of reassorting with wild-type viruses in vivo. Furthermore, VSV replicates within the cytoplasm of infected cells and
does not undergo genetic recombination.
Previously we reported that intranasal vaccination of mice with
recombinant VSV expressing influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) protein
(VSV-HA) was able to protect mice from lethal intranasal influenza
virus challenge (30). Prior to challenge, vaccinated mice
had high levels of serum neutralizing antibodies to influenza virus
A/WSN. After challenge, the mice were completely protected from death,
weight loss, pneumonia-associated pathology, and influenza virus
replication in the lungs. Although the mice were completely protected
from influenza virus challenge, there was pathogenesis associated with
the initial VSV-HA vaccination. Initial pathogenesis was indicated by
inactivity, ruffled coats, weight loss, and VSV-HA replication in the
lungs (assayed 48 h after inoculation). The vector-associated
pathogenesis remained a significant concern in the development of a
nonpathogenic VSV-vectored vaccine. In addressing this concern, we
reported the further attenuation of recombinant VSVs containing
truncations within the cytoplasmic tail of the glycoprotein (VSV-CT1
and VSV-CT9) (30). Here we report on the complete
attenuation of a VSV-CT1 recombinant expressing influenza virus HA
(CT1-HA), its immunogenicity, and its efficacy in protecting mice from
a lethal influenza virus challenge. Additionally, we report the
construction, recovery, and characterization of a recombinant VSV
containing a complete substitution of the VSV G protein with influenza
virus HA (
G-HA). We also examine and report the absence of
vector-associated pathogenesis and the immunogenicity and protective
efficacy of recombinant
G-HA in the mouse model system.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Construction of plasmids and recovery of recombinant viruses. (i)
pBSIIKS(
)HA.
The HA gene (influenza virus A/WSN HA protein) was
PCR amplified from pVSV-HA (16) with the following primers
(restriction sites are underlined): XmaI HA(+),
5'-GAGCCCGGGAAAATGAAGGCAAAAC-3' (containing an
XmaI restriction enzyme sequence followed by 5' sequence
from the HA gene), and XhoI ssHA(
),
5'-CCACTCGAGATCGATCTCTG TTAGTTTTTTTCATACCTCAGATGCATATTCTGC-3' (containing an XhoI
restriction enzyme site followed by reverse complements of the VSV
transcriptional START/STOP sequence and the 3' HA gene sequence). The
~1.7-kb HA PCR fragment was digested with restriction enzymes
XmaI and XhoI, agarose gel purified,
electroeluted, and ligated with T4 DNA ligase into pBSIIKS(
) vector
(product no. 212208; Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.) which had been
digested with XmaI and XhoI. C600 competent
bacteria were transformed with ligation reactions and plated on
Luria-Bertani medium agar plates containing ampicillin at 100 µg/ml.
Colonies were screened by PCR for the 1.7-kb HA insert. Positive
colonies were expanded in 250- to 500-ml Luria-Bertani medium-ampicillin cultures, and plasmids (pBSIIKS(
)HA) were purified from these cultures with a Plasmid Maxi kit (product no. 12163; Qiagen
Inc., Santa Clarita, Calif.). Expression of HA was confirmed by
indirect-immunofluorescence screening of BHK cells transfected with
pBSIIKS(
)HA and infected with vTF7-3, recombinant vaccinia virus
expressing T7 polymerase (7).
(ii) Recombinant CT1-HA.
Plasmid pVSVCT-1XMN (31)
(containing the VSV antigenome with an additional transcriptional
STOP/START sequence and an XmaI restriction enzyme site
downstream of the CT1-G) was digested with restriction enzymes
XmaI and NotI and purified. The 1.7-kb HA
fragment was PCR amplified from pBSIIKS(
)HA plasmid with primer XmaI
HA(+) and primer NotI HA(
),
5'-CTCGCGGCCGCTCAGATGCATATTCTGC-3' (containing a
NotI restriction enzyme site and reverse complement sequence
of the 3' HA gene). The HA-PCR fragment was digested with restriction
enzymes XmaI and NotI, purified, and ligated to
the XmaI and NotI sites of the pVSVCT-1XMN
vector. Plasmid pVSVCT1-HA was isolated and used in the standard VSV
recovery system (19) to generate the recombinant CT1-HA virus.
(iii) Recombinant VSV
G-HA.
Plasmid pVSVMXA2XN2 was
digested with restriction enzymes XmaI and XhoI
to generate a VSV
G vector fragment which was purified from the
excised G fragment. The HA gene, trailed by the VSV transcriptional STOP/START sequence, was excised from pBSIIKS(
)HA by digestion with
restriction enzymes XmaI and XhoI, purified, and
ligated to the VSV
G vector fragment. A plasmid confirmed for the HA
insert and VSV G deletion (pVSV
G-HA) was used in a modified VSV
recovery system previously described by Schnell, et al. (33)
to generate the recombinant VSV
G-HA virus.
(iv) Recombinant VSV
G.
Plasmid pVSV-XMN was digested with
restriction enzymes MluI and NheI to generate a
VSV
G vector fragment. The VSV
G fragment was made blunt with T4
DNA polymerase in the presence of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP and
ligated with T4 DNA ligase. Transformations, PCR screenings, and
expansions of positive colonies (those lacking VSV G) were performed as
described above. A plasmid confirmed for the VSV G deletion (pVSV
G)
was used in a modified VSV recovery system previously described by
Schnell et al. (33) to generate the recombinant VSV
G virus.
Indirect immunofluorescence assays (IFA).
Immunofluorescence
assays were performed on baby hamster kidney cells (BHK-21; American
Type Culture Collection) or BHK-G cells (expressing VSV G
[33]) as previously described (32). The
cells were either transfected with pBSIIKS(
)HA plasmid (10 µg/plate) and infected with vTF7-3 (multiplicity of infection [MOI] = 10) or infected with supernatants from VSV recovery assays. The cells
were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde, washed in phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS) and incubated with primary antibody (mouse monoclonal antibody
523/6 directed to influenza virus A/WSN HA protein; from Robert
Webster) at 1:100 dilutions in PBS-glycine with 5 mg of bovine serum
albumin/ml added. A second incubation was done in the presence of
secondary antibody (fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat
anti-mouse antibody) at 1:50 in PBS-glycine-bovine serum albumin.
Metabolic labeling of cells and recombinant viruses.
BHK or
BHK-G cells (in 3.5-cm-diameter dishes) were infected with recombinant
viruses (MOI = 1 to 10) and incubated at 37°C in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle medium (with L-glutamine, sodium pyruvate,
high glucose, and high bicarbonate [3.7 g/liter]) (product no. 56 499; JRH Biosciences, Lenexa, Kans.) (DMEM) containing 5% fetal bovine
serum (FBS) and 100 U of penicillin-streptomycin (PS)/ml for 1 h.
The medium was aspirated and replaced with 1 ml of DMEM-5% FBS-PS,
and the plates were incubated for an additional 3 h. The cells
were washed twice with PBS, and 1 ml of labeling medium (10% DMEM,
90% DMEM minus methionine and cysteine, 100 µCi of 35S
translabel [product no. NEG772, Easy Tag EXPRESS protein labeling mix;
NEN Life Sciences, Boston, Mass.]) was added to each plate. For
radiolabeled cell extracts, the cells were incubated for 1 h,
washed twice in PBS, and lysed in 500 µl of ice-cold detergent lysis
buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 0.4% deoxycholate, 66 mM EDTA, and 10 mM
Tris-Cl, pH 7.4) for 30 min on ice. The lysates were transferred to
cold 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 16,000 × g
for 2 min at 4°C. The supernatants were transferred to fresh, cold
1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes and stored at
20°C. For radiolabeled
viruses, the cells were incubated at 37°C overnight. The
supernatants, containing radiolabeled virus, were collected in 15-ml
conical tubes and clarified by spinning at 1,250 × g for 10 min at room temperature. The clarified supernatants were layered
onto 4 ml of 20% sucrose in Beckman polyallomer centrifuge tubes (13 by 51 mm) and centrifuged at 38,000 rpm for 1 h at 4°C in a
Beckman SW50.1 rotor in a Beckman L8-M ultracentrifuge. The pellets
were resuspended in 250 to 500 µl of Tris-EDTA, pH 7.6, and stored at
20°C until analyzed. Sample buffer containing 2-mercaptoethanol was
added to the purified viruses to a 1× final concentration, and samples
were boiled for 3 to 5 min before being loaded onto sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gels (10% acrylamide) for analysis.
Radiolabeled immunoprecipitation assays.
Primary antibody
was added to 200 to 300 µl of radiolabeled cell extracts at 1:100
dilutions, and SDS was added to 0.2% final concentration. The
antibody-extract solutions were incubated at 37°C for 45 min. Samples
were precipitated by adding 30 µl of fixed Staphylococcus
aureus (Pansorbin; Calbiochem) and incubating the mixture at
37°C for 30 min. Precipitates were pelleted by centrifugation, washed
in 1.5 ml of RIPA buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 1% deoxycholate, 0.1%
SDS, 150 mM NaCl, and 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4) three times, and pelleted
again. The pellets were resuspended in 30 to 40 µl of sample buffer
containing 2-mercaptoethanol, boiled for 3 to 5 min, and pelleted
again. The supernatants were carefully removed and loaded onto
SDS-10% polyacrylamide gels.
Viruses and inoculum.
Recombinant viruses were grown and
titers were determined as previously described for VSV-HA
(30). The plaque-purified recombinant CT1-HA was grown and
its titers were determined on BHK cells, and the plaque-purified
recombinants VSV
G-HA and VSV
G were grown on BHK-G cells
(33) and passaged once through BHK cells, and titers were
determined on BHK-G cells. All recombinants were thawed and diluted
with DMEM to appropriate titers immediately prior to inoculation.
Influenza virus A/WSN/33 (H1N1) (1.4 × 106 PFU/ml),
used for challenges and neutralization assays, was grown in MDBK cells
in DMEM-10% FBS-PS, and titers were determined by standard plaque
assay on MDBK cells with 1% agarose-1× DMEM (serum free)-2
µg · ml
1 acetylated trypsin (product no. T-6763;
Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) overlays. The WSN virus was thawed immediately
prior to challenge, diluted 1:10 in DMEM, and administered in a 50-µl
total volume (~7 × 104 PFU/mouse). Viruses or DMEM
were administered intranasally as described below.
Inoculation of mice.
Five- to 6-week-old female BALB/c mice
from Charles River Laboratories were housed in filter-isolette cages
upon arrival. The mice were inoculated no earlier than 4 days after
arrival. Prior to inoculation (day 0), the mice were lightly
anesthetized with Methoxyflurane (Mallinckrodt Veterinary, Inc.,
Mundelein, Ill.) and marked by ear punch. Twenty-five microliters of
inoculum were delivered intranasally by 200-µl pipette to the
anesthetized mice, and the mice were weighed in a plastic beaker to
±0.02 g. Boosts were administered in an identical fashion with viruses of equal kind, titer, and volume on day 21, unless otherwise indicated. Challenge was also administered as described but in a total volume of
50 µl per mouse on day 35, unless otherwise indicated. The mice were
observed and weighed unanesthetized on a daily basis.
Neutralization assays.
Blood samples were collected from
anesthetized mice by retro-orbital bleeds and allowed to clot at room
temperature. The clots were removed, and samples were centrifuged in a
TOMY MTX-150 centrifuge (TMA-11 fixed-angle rotor) at 4°C for 10 to
15 min at 5,500 rpm. The clarified sera were transferred to sterile
Eppendorf tubes and heat inactivated at 56°C for 45 to 60 min. The
heat-inactivated sera were diluted with PBS in serial twofold dilutions
in 96-well plates. Generally, 50 µl of serum was mixed with 50 µl
of PBS and 50 µl was transferred for serial dilutions. For analysis
of titers of neutralizing antibodies to influenza virus, equal volumes (50 µl) of influenza virus A/WSN (~200 PFU) were then added to the
diluted sera and mixed. The 96-well plates containing virus and sera
were incubated at 37°C for 30 to 45 min. Approximately 2,000 MDBK
cells in DMEM-20% FBS-PS (100-µl total volume) were added to each
well. The plates were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2, for 2 to 3 days. In each assay, the sera were diluted and analyzed in
duplicate, and each assay was repeated at least once. Neutralization titers are those dilutions which correspond to complete inhibition of
virus-associated cytopathic effect (CPE). Neutralization titers are
reported as averages from all assays. For neutralization to VSV, the
assays were identical except ~200 PFU of recovered wild-type VSV
(VSVrwt) was added to each well instead of influenza virus A/WSN and
~200 to 500 BHK cells in DMEM-10% FBS-PS were added to each well
instead of MDBK cells.
Recovery of viruses from tissue.
Two days after inoculation
or 2 days after challenge, two mice from each group were heavily
anesthetized. Blood was collected via cardiac puncture and transferred
into K2EDTA-treated 2-ml Microcontainer tubes (product no.
365974; Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) and stored at 4°C.
The lungs were excised bilaterally, rinsed externally in sterile PBS,
and placed in sterile, preweighed 2-ml Nunc cryotube vials. The
cryotube vials were immediately dropped in liquid nitrogen and later
transferred to
80°C storage. Plasma samples were prepared by
centrifugation as described earlier for serum samples. The lungs were
thawed, suspended in 9 volumes (wt/vol) of DMEM-2.5% FBS-PS, and
homogenized in Dounce homogenizers. To assay for recoverable virus from
initial infections with recombinant viruses, BHK or BHK-G cells ~80%
confluent in 6-well plates were infected with 40 µl of plasma or 200 µl of the 10% lung suspensions per well, incubated for 1 h at
room temperature, and washed in PBS. Two milliliters of DMEM-5%
FBS-PS was added to each well, and the plates were incubated at 37°C
and observed daily for 3 days for virus-associated CPE. The procedure
was the same for assaying for recoverable virus from challenge except
MDBK cells were used instead of BHK or BHK-G cells and DMEM-10%
FBS-PS was added after the PBS wash. The remainder of the 10% lung
suspensions were stored at
80°C for further analysis.
The lung suspensions were thawed and serially diluted in DMEM, and
viral titers were determined by standard plaque assays. Plaque assays
were done in duplicate on BHK cells with a 1% methyl cellulose-1×
DMEM (5% FBS-PS) overlay or on MDBK cells with 1% agarose-1× DMEM
(serum free)-2 µg · ml
1 acetylated trypsin
overlays. The plates were incubated at 37°C, and plaque formation was
observed and counted 2 to 3 days later.
 |
RESULTS |
To determine if attenuated VSV vectors could be employed for
vaccine applications, we generated three new VSV recombinants. The
first, designated VSVCT1-HA (CT1-HA), encodes a VSV G protein with 28 of its 29 cytoplasmic amino acids deleted (31) and expresses an additional protein, the influenza virus A/WSN HA (WSN HA), between
the truncated G gene and the L gene (Fig.
1). Because the VSV-CT1 mutant is greatly
attenuated (30, 31), we anticipated attenuation of the
CT1-HA recombinant also. A second recombinant, designated VSV
G-HA
(
G-HA), has a complete deletion of the VSV G gene and expresses the
WSN HA gene from the site of the G deletion between the VSV M and L
genes (Fig. 1). We anticipated that this virus would not be able to
propagate in culture without VSV G supplied in trans. A
VSV
G (
G) virus with VSV G deleted was prepared as a control. Our
standard recovery system was used to make the first recombinant
(19), and a modified recovery system in which VSV G protein
is provided in trans was used to recover the two recombinants with VSV G deleted (33).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Recombinant VSV-influenza virus A/WSN constructs. A
schematic representation of recombinant viruses indicating gene order
is shown 3' to 5' on the negative-strand genomic RNA. Each intergenic
region contains a transcriptional STOP/START signal recognized by the
VSV polymerase (32). Restriction enzyme sequences used for
constructing cDNAs of the recombinants are also shown.
|
|
Growth characteristics of the CT1 and
G recombinants.
Upon
recovery of recombinant CT1-HA,
G-HA, and
G viruses, we examined
the growth of each virus in culture. CT1-HA, containing a truncated VSV
G protein, could be grown and passaged on BHK cells, but both
G-HA
and
G viruses had to be maintained on BHK-G cells induced for G
expression (33). Infectivity of
G-HA and
G viruses was
lost after two low-multiplicity passages through BHK cells. However, it
is possible to passage
G-HA and
G recombinants through BHK cells
once and recover a low titer of infectious virus from the supernatant.
Although the levels of G protein in the first-passage virus were below
the limits of detection in IFA, radiolabeled immunoprecipitation
assays, and SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) analysis of
radiolabeled cell extracts and purified viruses, these recombinants
must contain a residual amount of G protein, since neutralization of
the infectivity was accomplished with antibody to VSV G protein.
Recombinant CT1-HA, like VSV-CT1 (31), grew to titers of
107 PFU/ml on BHK cells. In contrast, VSV-HA grew to titers
of 109 PFU/ml on BHK cells, comparable to the titers
obtained with VSVrwt. Recombinant CT1-HA made plaques on BHK cells much
smaller than those of VSV-HA and VSVrwt.
G-HA and
G recombinants
that were grown and had their titers determined on BHK-G cells reached
titers comparable to CT1-HA (107 PFU/ml). These
G
recombinants did not form plaques on BHK cells; however, they did form
large plaques on BHK-G cells. Single-cycle growth kinetics were
examined for all three recombinants (CT1-HA,
G-HA, and
G), and
all three showed similar growth kinetics, reaching peak titers at ~8
h after infection. Recombinant
G-HA and
G, passaged once on BHK
cells, were also assayed on BHK-G cells; the growth kinetics remained
the same, but the peak titers were reduced 1,000-fold.
CT1-HA and
G-HA recombinants express HA.
Recombinant
viruses were examined initially for protein expression in infected
cells by IFA. BHK cells infected with recombinant CT1-HA or
G-HA
expressed HA at the cell surface as detected by IFA with either
polyclonal rabbit serum raised to influenza virus A/WSN (16)
or mouse monoclonal antibody raised to WSN HA. BHK cells infected with
recombinant
G expressed VSV N but lacked HA expression as expected.
BHK cells infected with
G-HA and
G lacked detectable VSV G at the
cell surface, while VSV G was readily detected on CT1-HA-infected cells
(data not shown).
Protein expression from the recombinant viruses was also examined by
SDS-PAGE analysis of radiolabeled, infected cell lysates. BHK cells
were infected with VSVrwt, VSV-HA, or CT1-HA, and BHK-G cells were
infected with recombinant
G-HA or
G. The cells were infected at
high multiplicities for 1 h and metabolically labeled with
[35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine for 3 to
4 h, proteins were immunoprecipitated from cell lysates with mouse
monoclonal antibodies to VSV G or WSN HA protein, and the precipitates
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2). When
immunoprecipitated with
HA monoclonal antibody, recombinants containing the HA gene showed a characteristic band at ~85 kDa relative to molecular mass markers which was absent in recombinants lacking HA (Fig. 2A). VSVrwt and VSV-HA, immunoprecipitated with
G
monoclonal antibodies, showed a characteristic band at ~65 kDa for
full-length glycoprotein (Fig. 2A, lane 1, and B). A faster-migrating band, which corresponds to the truncated form of the glycoprotein, was
detected in the CT1-HA lane (Fig. 2B, lane 7). Precipitation of lysates
from
G-HA- or
G-infected cells with
G monoclonal antibodies
illustrated the absence of VSV G (Fig. 2B, lanes 3 to 4).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Immunoprecipitations of proteins from
35S-labeled cell extracts. Cells infected with recombinant
VSVs were metabolically labeled, lysed, and immunoprecipitated with
mouse monoclonal antibodies specific for influenza virus A/WSN HA
protein (A, lanes 2 to 8) or for VSV G protein (A, lane 1, and B).
VSV G and VSV G-HA were from BHK-G cell extracts; all other samples
were from BHK cell extracts. VSVrwt and VSV-HA recombinants were run on
all gels for comparison of immunoprecipitated proteins. Mock,
immunoprecipitations of uninfected BHK cell lysates.
|
|
Recombinant
G-HA incorporates large amounts of HA protein into
virions.
Previous studies showed that the influenza virus HA
protein, the major influenza virus spike glycoprotein in virions, was incorporated into virions of VSV-HA, although at lower efficiency than
with VSV G (16). To determine if the G truncation or the absence of VSV G affected the relative amount of HA incorporation into
VSV virions, cells infected with VSV-HA, CT1-HA,
G-HA, or
G were
labeled with [35S]methionine and
[35S]cysteine overnight. The cell supernatants were
collected when all cells showed signs of virus-associated CPE. Viruses
were purified from these supernatants, and the radiolabeled proteins
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Signal intensities of nucleocapsid and
phosphoprotein (N-P) were quantitated for each sample on a
phosphorimager after background subtraction, and a second gel was run
with volumes of each sample which were normalized for the content of
N-P. The phosphorimage of this second SDS-PAGE gel is shown in Fig.
3.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Sucrose-purified recombinant virions. Cells infected
with recombinant viruses were metabolically labeled with
35S translabel. Supernatants were collected, and viruses
were purified by centrifugation through 20% sucrose. The volumes
loaded were normalized for N-P protein content. Lane 1, 1% of total
VSV-HA virus from a 3.5-cm-diameter dish of BHK cells; lane 2, 18% of
total CT1-HA virus from a 3.5-cm-diameter dish of BHK cells, lane 3, 14% of total VSV G-HA virus from a 3.5-cm-diameter dish of BHK-G
cells; lane 4, 13% of total VSV G virus from a 3.5-cm-diameter dish
of BHK-G cells.
|
|
The incorporation of HA into virions is seen for all HA recombinants
(Fig. 3, lanes 1 to 3), while the HA band is absent from the
G
recombinant that does not express HA (Fig. 3, lane 4). The faster
mobility of the truncated VSV G in the CT1-HA recombinant is also
evident (Fig. 3, lane 2), and absence of VSV G is clear for both
G-HA and
G recombinants (Fig. 3, lanes 3 to 4). Furthermore, it
is evident that HA is present in greater amounts relative to N-P in the
G-HA recombinant than in either the VSV-HA or CT1-HA recombinant.
The relative amounts of HA and/or G protein incorporated into purified
virions was quantified and is shown in Table
1. The protein signals were corrected for
methionine and cysteine content, and background radioactivity was
subtracted from each sample so that relative molarities could be
calculated. As is clear from inspection of the SDS-PAGE gel, the amount
of HA incorporated into the
G-HA recombinant (relative to N-P) is at
least twofold greater than the amount of HA incorporated into either
CT1-HA or VSV-HA. The increased incorporation of HA in
G-HA virions is obvious even when samples have not been normalized for N-P content.
This difference could be due in part to increased synthesis of HA
following deletion of G, but it might also result from additional space
in the virion membrane in the absence of VSV G protein.
HA is found in the virion envelope.
To demonstrate that HA was
present specifically in the virion envelope and to examine the
morphology of the recombinant virions lacking VSV G protein, purified
VSVrwt and
G-HA were adsorbed onto carbon-coated grids and incubated
with
HA monoclonal antibody followed by labeling with
gold-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G as described precisely
by Schnell et al. (33). The grids were negatively stained
with 2% phosphotungstic acid and examined on a Zeiss EM910 electron
microscope. Strong labeling of HA proteins on the virion surface of
recombinant
G-HA was clear in greater than 70% of virions, and all
virions had the characteristic bullet shape expected for VSV (Fig.
4B). Although the background labeling is
high, it is clear that no label is specifically associated with the
surface of VSVrwt in the control (Fig. 4A).

View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Immunogold labeling of sucrose-purified recombinants.
Electron micrographs of recombinant VSVrwt (A) and VSV G-HA (B) bound
to carbon-coated grids, labeled with mouse monoclonal antibody to HA
and secondary gold-conjugated antibody, and negatively stained.
|
|
Recombinants CT1-HA and
G-HA are attenuated in mice.
Once
we had demonstrated the incorporation of HA into the recombinant CT1-HA
and
G-HA virions, we examined their potential as attenuated vaccines
for protection from influenza virus in a mouse model system.
Six-week-old female BALB/c mice were inoculated intranasally with
recombinant viruses at 5 × 104 PFU/mouse. The mice
were observed and weighed daily, and weight loss was used as an
indication of pathogenesis as previously reported (30). The
mice inoculated with recombinant VSV-HA began losing body weight the
day after inoculation, as seen previously (30). These mice
lost 17% of their initial body weight before they began regaining
weight (Fig. 5A). Weight loss
corresponded with decreased activity and poor grooming, all of which
indicate vector-associated pathogenesis. In contrast, the mice
receiving CT1-HA,
G-HA, or
G recombinants did not lose
significant amounts of weight (Fig. 5) compared to mice receiving
medium alone. Also, no change in activity or grooming was observed for
these mice in comparison to mice receiving medium alone. The lack of
significant weight loss and the lack of decreased activity and grooming
indicate that the CT1-HA and
G-HA vectors are attenuated in the
mouse model. The mice were inoculated a second time with identical
titers of virus 21 days after the initial inoculation. Weights,
activity, and grooming were unaffected in all groups in the days
following the second inoculation.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Attenuated recombinants provide protection from lethal
influenza virus challenge. Average daily weights of mice inoculated
with VSV recombinants and challenged with influenza virus A/WSN are
shown. (A) Mice were inoculated intranasally with VSV-HA (n = 5) or CT1-HA (n = 5) at 5 × 104 PFU/mouse on day 0. The mice were boosted with an equal
amount of inoculum on day 21. The mice were challenged with a lethal
dose of influenza virus A/WSN on day 35. (B) Conditions were the same
as for panel A, except the mice were inoculated and boosted with
VSV G (n = 4) or VSV G-HA (n = 5)
at 5 × 104 PFU/mouse. The error bars indicate
±0.5 × standard deviation.
|
|
Vector-associated pathogenesis may be associated with vector
replication within the host. Therefore, in addition to monitoring weight loss, we sacrificed two mice from each group at 6, 12, 24, and
48 h after initial inoculation, and their blood and lungs were
screened for recombinant virus. Virus was recovered from the lungs of
mice inoculated with VSV-HA at all times assayed, whereas viremia
(1.9 × 103 PFU/ml) was only detected at 24 h
after inoculation. No virus was recovered from mice inoculated with
CT1-HA from either the lungs or plasma at any time assayed. However
virus was detected in 10% lung suspensions of one
G-HA-inoculated
mouse at 6 h after inoculation and in 10% lung suspensions of
both
G-HA-inoculated mice at 12 h after inoculation. No virus
was detected in the lungs at 24 and 48 h after inoculation or in
any plasma sample from
G-HA-inoculated mice. Viral titers recovered
from the lungs of VSV-HA- and
G-HA-inoculated mice are summarized in
Table 2.
Recombinant viruses are immunogenic in mice.
To examine the
immunogenicity of the recombinants, mice were bled prior to initial
inoculations, second inoculations, and challenges, and surviving mice
were bled after challenge. Serum samples were pooled, unless otherwise
indicated, and screened for neutralizing antibodies to VSV and
influenza virus A/WSN. Serum neutralizing antibody titers correspond to
titers which provided complete inhibition of virus-associated CPE when
virus was preincubated with serum before the addition of susceptible cells (Table 3). All sera collected
before inoculation had no titers of antibody to either VSV or influenza
virus. Eighteen days after initial inoculation, mice receiving VSV-HA
and CT1-HA had titers of neutralizing antibody to both VSVrwt and
influenza virus in the serum. Mice inoculated with
G-HA and
G had
no measurable titers of neutralizing antibody to either VSVrwt or
influenza virus. Thirty-two days after the initial inoculation, which
was also after a second inoculation (boost), mice receiving the
G-HA recombinant had low-level titers of neutralizing antibody to influenza virus. No titers of antibody to VSVrwt were detected in
G-HA- or
G-inoculated mice. No titers of antibody to influenza virus were
detected in
G-inoculated mice. Titers of neutralizing antibody to
influenza virus in the sera of mice surviving challenge reached 1:4,096.
Efficacy of recombinants in generating protective immunity.
In
an initial experiment to examine the efficacy of recombinant VSVs
expressing influenza virus HA in protecting mice from a lethal
influenza virus challenge, mice were inoculated with recombinant virus
at 5 × 104 PFU/mouse. The mice were challenged 21 days after this single, initial immunizing inoculation. Fifty
microliters of a 1:2 dilution of influenza virus A/WSN in DMEM
(~3.5 × 105 PFU/mouse) was administered for
challenge. Mice which had been inoculated with CT1-HA or VSV-HA, which
also had titers of neutralizing antibody to influenza virus A/WSN in
the serum 18 days after inoculation, were completely protected from
lethal challenge as indicated by 100% survival. Mice inoculated with
the
G-HA recombinant, which lacked titers of neutralizing antibody
in the serum at day 18 after initial inoculation, were partially
protected from lethal challenge; only two of five mice survived.
In an experiment run simultaneously with the initial experiment, mice
were initially inoculated on day zero and boosted on day 21 with
recombinant VSVs (5 × 104 PFU/mouse/inoculation).
These mice were challenged on day 35 with 50 µl of a 1:10 dilution of
influenza virus A/WSN (~7 × 104 PFU/mouse). The
lethal dose of the challenge virus for mice was not determined, but
50-µl doses of 1:50 dilutions (1.4 × 104 PFU/mouse)
resulted in 100% lethality in unprotected mice; thus the challenge is
at least five 100% lethal doses. Mice which had been inoculated with
recombinants containing HA were completely protected from pathogenesis
as indicated by negligible weight loss after challenge (Fig. 5), no
change in activity or grooming, and 100% survival. Control mice that
had been inoculated with
G were not protected and died within 7 days
after challenge (Fig. 5B). These mice were increasingly inactive and
poorly groomed in the days preceding death.
In addition to monitoring weight loss, we sacrificed two mice from each
recombinant group in the second set of experiments 2 days after
challenge, and their blood and lungs were screened for influenza virus
to indicate the extent of protection from influenza virus challenge.
Virus was recovered from the lungs of both mice inoculated with
G
and
G-HA at average titers of 1.5 × 106 and
2.5 × 104 PFU/g, respectively, but not from the lungs
of CT1-HA- or VSV-HA-inoculated mice. No virus was found in any plasma
sample, indicating both a lack of measurable viremia 2 days after
challenge and that virus recovered from lung samples was not from blood
trapped in pulmonary tissues. Although influenza virus A/WSN was
recovered from the lungs of
G-HA-inoculated mice after challenge,
there was a 2 log unit reduction in virus titers compared to those of
unprotected
G-inoculated mice. The low level of serum neutralizing
antibodies in the
G-HA-inoculated mice preceding challenge was
obviously not high enough to provide sterilizing immunity to the
challenge virus. However, the
G-HA-inoculated mice were provided
enough protection to avoid death and the external signs of
pathogenesis, including weight loss, decreased activity, and poor
grooming, preceding death.
Efficacy of boost.
Because the preceding experiments did not
examine the direct efficacy of a second inoculating dose, a third set
of experiments was conducted. Three groups of eight mice each were
inoculated with VSV-HA, CT1-HA, or
G-HA (104 PFU/mouse).
Eighteen days after inoculation sera were collected and assayed for
titers of neutralizing antibody to influenza virus A/WSN. On day 21 after initial inoculation four mice from each group were inoculated
with DMEM and the other four mice from each group were boosted with an
equal titer of initial inoculum. Sera were collected on day 32 and
assayed for neutralizing antibodies to influenza virus A/WSN. The serum
neutralizing antibody titers are reported in Table
4 and indicate that boosting offers no significant advantage over single inoculations for CT1-HA or VSV-HA immunizations. Antibodies raised to the G protein encoded by these vectors probably prevent infection and could explain the lack of
boosting responses. In contrast, mice receiving two inoculations of the
G-HA virus had higher concentrations of serum neutralizing antibodies to influenza virus A/WSN than mice receiving a single inoculation at day 32. These data indicate that boosting is efficacious in the instance of
G-HA immunization, when the vector does not encode G protein.
Attenuation of CT1-HA to confer systemic immunity on mice.
The
ability of CT1-HA to provide complete protection from lethal challenge
following a single inoculation in the absence of vector-associated
pathogenesis led to further characterization of the vector's
immunogenicity. Thirty-six mice were divided into six groups of six
mice each and were inoculated with 10, 100, or 1,000 PFU/mouse of
either CT1-HA or VSV-HA. Sera were collected and screened 2 and 4 weeks
after inoculation. No mice receiving 10 PFU of CT1-HA virus had
neutralizing antibody titers to influenza virus A/WSN at 4 weeks
postinoculation (Table 5). In contrast, mice receiving 10 PFU of VSV-HA had various levels of serum
neutralizing antibodies to influenza virus A/WSN at 4 weeks
postinoculation (Table 5). The neutralizing antibody titers of mice
receiving 100 PFU of CT1-HA are comparable to those obtained in mice
receiving 10 PFU of VSV-HA. This pattern of a 10-fold-greater amount of CT1-HA necessary to elicit a neutralizing antibody response similar to
that generated by VSV-HA is consistent throughout the data (Table 5).
This demonstrates that CT1-HA is attenuated in immunogenicity in the
mouse model. Neutralizing titers at 2 weeks postinoculation were less
than those at 4 weeks postinoculation for all mice and therefore are
not shown.
Long-term immunity in CT1-HA- and VSV-HA-inoculated mice.
The
longevity of the humoral immune response induced by these vectors has
also been examined. Mice inoculated with a single dose of VSV-HA or
CT1-HA (104 PFU/mouse) have now been observed for 4 months
after an initial intranasal inoculation. These mice still have high
levels of serum neutralizing antibodies to influenza virus.
CT1-HA-inoculated mice have neutralizing antibody titers ranging from
1:512 to 1:2,048, and VSV-HA-inoculated mice have neutralizing titers
ranging from 1:1,024 to 1:4,096. These mice have not yet been
challenged with influenza virus, but in all previous experiments these
levels of antibody have correlated with 100% protection and little or no weight loss after challenge.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We report here the successful attenuation of VSV vectors (VSV-CT1
and VSV
G) which produce no measurable signs of pathogenesis as shown
by weight loss, inactivity, or poor grooming. The attenuated CT1-HA
vector was not detected in the lungs or blood of mice examined at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after inoculation and yet was able to elicit a
strong humoral immune response after a single intranasal inoculation. In mice inoculated with the CT1-HA recombinant, humoral immunity is
raised to both the VSV G protein and the foreign viral protein (HA).
The humoral immune response is also systemic, since serum neutralizing
antibody titers are present after a mucosal inoculation. Furthermore,
this vector is 100% effective in providing complete protection from a
subsequent lethal influenza virus challenge. No significant weight loss
is measured in mice after challenge, no change in activity or grooming
is observed, 100% of the mice survive challenge, and no influenza
virus is recovered from lungs or blood 2 days after challenge.
Although complete neutralization (sterilizing immunity) of the
challenge virus was not achieved in mice inoculated with
G-HA (low
titers of influenza virus were recovered from pulmonary tissues 2 days
after challenge), the mice were completely protected from weight loss
and lethality associated with more severe pathogenesis when given two
immunizing doses of
G-HA. A third immunizing inoculation with
G-HA virus may further boost the humoral immune response and provide
sterilizing immunity to the challenge virus. This possibility will be
examined in future assays.
The effectiveness of the VSV
G-HA vector is presumably due to an
ability to infect cells for at least one round of multiplication. We
believe the infection is mediated primarily by residual VSV G protein
derived from the BHK-G cell line, since neutralization of the
G-HA
virus is accomplished in vitro with
G antibodies but not with
HA
antibodies. We believe that a single round of infection is critical for
protective immunity because mice inoculated intranasally with large
doses of UV-inactivated VSV-HA did not produce neutralizing antibodies
to VSV or to influenza virus and the mice were not protected from
subsequent influenza virus challenge. Although the
G-HA recombinant
was measurable at low levels in the lungs 6 to 12 h after
inoculation, it was still highly attenuated, showing no sign of viremia
(6 to 48 h after initial inoculation) and causing no measurable
weight loss or observable change in activity after initial inoculations
or boosts.
The VSV
G vector also offers a unique attribute not offered by the
VSV-CT1 vector. Immunization with VSV
G recombinants indicates that
VSV
G is a reusable vector, since no neutralizing antibodies are
directed to the vector itself while a specific antibody response is
elicited to the foreign protein expressed from the vector. We have
examined the reusable characteristic of the VSV
G vector in more
detail by taking mice previously inoculated with VSV
G-HA, which have
measurable titers of antibody to influenza virus but not to VSVrwt, and
inoculating them with VSVrwt. These mice subsequently develop high
titers of neutralizing antibody to VSV in the serum (data not shown)
which correspond to production of antibodies to VSV G (14).
We have also shown that mice which have first been inoculated with a
VSV recombinant expressing VSV G (and have high VSV neutralizing
antibody titers) can subsequently be inoculated with a recombinant
lacking the VSVI G protein but expressing a G protein of
another vesiculovirus (Chandipura virus) and are able to raise high
titers of neutralizing antibody to Chandipura virus G (data not shown).
Not only is the VSV
G vector reusable, but an interesting observation
is that mice previously exposed to the VSV core proteins but not to G
protein do not lose as much weight when subsequently inoculated with
constructs containing G protein. This may be due to the time of
inoculation, since older mice may be less susceptible to pathogenesis
than younger mice (4, 9, 15, 18, 26), or it may be due to
partial protection elicited by cell-mediated immunity (24,
41). Cell-mediated immunity to these recombinant VSVs has not yet
been examined in the mouse model.
We believe there is significant potential for VSV as a highly
attenuated vaccine vector for the delivery of heterologous viral proteins. Vectors such as VSV-CT1 provide strong humoral responses without pathogenesis after single inoculations at doses as low as
103 PFU/mouse, and vectors such as VSV
G, which are also
highly attenuated, have potential as reusable vaccines within an
individual for multiple immunizations against heterologous viruses or
for viruses, such as influenza virus, which require annual
reimmunization. These live attenuated recombinants have the advantage
of immunizing with VSV-based vectors without the risks inherent in the
heterologous virus(es) themselves. They can be developed rapidly in the
native G, CT1, or
G backgrounds and can be delivered via the
intranasal route, providing systemic immunity. It is likely that
cell-mediated immunity and mucosal antibodies (not examined in this
report) also provide protection in VSV-immunized mice, since VSV
elicits a strong cell-mediated response (41) and since both
immunizing inoculations and challenges may be administered through the
mucosal, intranasal route. Furthermore, VSV vectors expressing foreign viral glycoproteins are likely to generate long-term immunity characteristic of natural infections. Development of the VSV vector system for vaccine delivery would complement other recombinant systems
currently employed and other systems which are being developed.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Karl Haglund for technical assistance, helpful
critiques, and editorial comments and Matthias Schnell for technical support. We thank JoAnn Falato for all her assistance. We thank Roxanne
Swinsick and other members of the Yale Animal Resource Center, BCMM, as
well as Deborah Caruso for their care and assistance with our mice.
This work was supported by NIH grant AI24345. Anjeanette Roberts is
supported by a Cancer Research Institute Fellowship. John Forman was
supported by a fellowship from Howard Hughes Medical Institute during
this work.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510. Phone: (203) 785-6794. Fax: (203) 785-7467. E-mail:
jrose{at}biomed.med.yale.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Cline, B. L.
1976.
Ecological associations of vesicular stomatitis virus in rural Central America and Panama.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
25:875-883.
|
| 2.
|
Davis, N. L.,
K. W. Brown, and R. E. Johnston.
1996.
A viral vaccine vector that expresses foreign genes in lymph nodes.
J. Virol.
70:3781-3787[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Dietzschold, B.,
C. E. Rupprecht,
Z. F. Fu, and H. Koprowski.
1996.
Rhabdoviruses, p. 1137-1159.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed., vol. 1. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 4.
|
Eldadah, A. H.,
N. Nathanson, and R. Sarsitis.
1967.
Pathogenesis of West Nile Virus encephalitis in mice and rats. 1. Influence of age and species on mortality and infection.
Am. J. Epidemiol.
86:765-775[Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Fellowes, O. N.,
G. T. Dimopoullos, and J. J. Callis.
1955.
Isolation of vesicular stomatitis virus from an infected laboratory worker.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
16:623-626[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Fields, B. N., and K. Hawkins.
1967.
Human infection with the virus of vesicular stomatitis during an epizootic.
N. Engl. J. Med.
277:989-994.
|
| 7.
|
Fuerst, T. R.,
E. G. Niles,
F. W. Studier, and B. Moss.
1986.
Eukaryotic transient-expression system based on recombinant vaccinia virus that synthesizes bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:8122-8126[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Galindo, P.,
S. Srihongse,
E. de Rodaniche, and M. A. Grayson.
1966.
An ecological survey for arboviruses in Almirante, Panama, 1959-1962.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
15:385-400.
|
| 9.
|
Griffin, D. E.,
J. Mullinix,
O. Narayan, and R. T. Johnson.
1974.
Age dependence of viral expression: comparative pathogenesis of two rodent-adapted strains of measles virus in mice.
Infect. Immun.
9:690-695[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Hanson, R. P., and C. A. Brandly.
1957.
Epizootiology of vesicular stomatitis.
Am. J. Public Health
47:205-209.
|
| 11.
|
Hanson, R. P., and L. Karstad.
1957.
Further studies on enzootic vesicular stomatitis.
Proc. U.S. Livestock Sanit. Assoc.
61:300-307.
|
| 12.
|
Hanson, R. P.,
A. F. Rasmussen, Jr.,
C. A. Brandly, and J. W. Brown.
1950.
Human infection with the virus of vesicular stomatitis.
J. Lab. Clin. Med.
36:754-758[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Johnson, K. M.,
J. E. Vogel, and P. H. Peralta.
1966.
Clinical and serological response to laboratory-acquired human infection by Indiana type vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV).
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
15:244-246.
|
| 14.
|
Kelley, J. M.,
S. U. Emerson, and R. R. Wagner.
1972.
The glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus is the antigen that gives rise to and reacts with neutralizing antibody.
J. Virol.
10:1231-1235[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Kim, G. R., and K. T. McKee, Jr.
1985.
Pathogenesis of Hantaan virus infection in suckling mice: clinical, virologic, and serologic observations.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
34:388-395.
|
| 16.
|
Kretzschmar, E.,
L. Buonocore,
M. J. Schnell, and J. K. Rose.
1997.
High-efficiency incorporation of functional influenza virus glycoproteins into recombinant vesicular stomatitis viruses.
J. Virol.
71:5982-5989[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Kuno-Sakai, H.,
M. Kimura,
K. Ohta,
R. Shimojima,
Y. Oh, and H. Fukumi.
1994.
Developments in mucosal influenza virus vaccines.
Vaccine
12:1303-1310[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Latham, P. S., and S. B. Sepelak.
1992.
Effect of macrophage source and activation on susceptibility in an age-dependent model of murine hepatitis caused by a phlebovirus, Punta Toro.
Arch. Virol.
122:175-185[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Lawson, N. D.,
E. A. Stillman,
M. A. Whitt, and J. K. Rose.
1995.
Recombinant vesicular stomatitis viruses from DNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:4477-4481[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Liljestrom, P., and H. Garoff.
1991.
A new generation of animal cell expression vectors based on the Semliki Forest virus replicon.
Bio/Technology
9:1356-1361[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Moldoveanu, Z.,
M. L. Clements,
S. J. Prince,
B. R. Murphy, and J. Mestecky.
1995.
Human immune responses to influenza virus vaccines administered by systemic or mucosal routes.
Vaccine
13:1006-1012[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Moldoveanu, Z.,
M. Novak,
W. Q. Huang,
R. M. Gilley,
J. K. Staas,
D. Schafer,
R. W. Compans, and J. Mestecky.
1993.
Oral immunization with influenza virus in biodegradable microspheres.
J. Infect. Dis.
167:84-90[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Morrow, C. D.,
D. C. Porter,
D. C. Ansardi,
Z. Moldoveanu, and P. N. Fultz.
1994.
New approaches for mucosal vaccines for AIDS: encapsidation and serial passages of poliovirus replicons that express HIV-1 proteins on infection.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
10:S61-S66.
|
| 24.
|
Murphy, B. R., and R. G. Webster.
1996.
Orthomyxoviruses, p. 1397-1445.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed., vol. 1. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 25.
|
Patterson, W. C.,
L. O. Mott, and E. W. Jenney.
1958.
A study of vesicular stomatitis in man.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
133:57-62[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Pekosz, A.,
C. Griot,
K. Stillmock,
N. Nathanson, and F. Gonzalez-Scarano.
1995.
Protection from La Crosse virus encephalitis with recombinant glycoproteins: role of neutralizing anti-G1 antibodies.
J. Virol.
69:3475-3481[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Peralta, P. H., and A. Shelokov.
1966.
Isolation and characterization of arboviruses from Almirante, Republic of Panama.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
15:369-378.
|
| 28.
|
Quiroz, E.,
N. Moreno,
P. H. Peralta, and R. B. Tesh.
1988.
A human case of encephalitis associated with vesicular stomatitis virus (Indiana serotype) infection.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
39:312-314.
|
| 29.
|
Reif, J. S.,
P. A. Webb,
T. P. Monath,
J. K. Emerson,
J. D. Poland,
G. E. Kemp, and G. Cholas.
1987.
Epizootic vesicular stomatitis in Colorado, 1982: infection in occupational risk groups.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
36:177-182.
|
| 30.
|
Roberts, A.,
E. Kretzschmar,
A. S. Perkins,
J. Forman,
R. Price,
L. Buonocore,
Y. Kawaoka, and J. K. Rose.
1998.
Vaccination with a recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus expressing an influenza virus hemagglutinin provides complete protection from influenza virus challenge.
J. Virol.
72:4704-4711[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Schnell, M. J.,
L. Buonocore,
E. Boritz,
H. P. Ghosh,
R. Chernish, and J. K. Rose.
1998.
Requirement for a non-specific glycoprotein cytoplasmic domain sequence to drive efficient budding of vesicular stomatitis virus.
EMBO J.
17:1289-1296[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Schnell, M. J.,
L. Buonocore,
M. A. Whitt, and J. K. Rose.
1996.
The minimal conserved transcription stop-start signal promotes stable expression of a foreign gene in vesicular stomatitis virus.
J. Virol.
70:2318-2323[Abstract].
|
| 33.
|
Schnell, M. J.,
J. E. Johnson,
L. Buonocore, and J. K. Rose.
1997.
Construction of a novel virus that targets HIV-1-infected cells and controls HIV-1 infection.
Cell
90:849-857[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Sudia, W. D.,
B. N. Fields, and C. H. Calisher.
1967.
The isolation of vesicular stomatitis virus (Indiana strain) and other viruses from mosquitoes in New Mexico, 1965.
Am. J. Epidemiol.
86:598-602[Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Tesh, R. B.,
P. H. Peralta, and K. M. Johnson.
1969.
Ecological studies of vesicular stomatitis virus. I. Prevalence of infection among animals and humans living in an area of endemic VSV activity.
Am. J. Epidemiol.
90:255-261[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service-Veterinary Services, Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health.
1997.
1997 vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) outbreak in the United States.
DxMonitor Anim. Health Rep.
Fall 1997:1-2.
|
| 37.
|
Wagner, R. R., and J. K. Rose.
1996.
Rhabdoviridae: the viruses and their replication, p. 1121-1135.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed., vol. 1. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 38.
|
Walton, T. E.,
P. A. Webb,
W. L. Kramer,
G. C. Smith,
T. Davis,
F. R. Holbrook,
C. G. Moore,
T. J. Schiefer,
R. H. Jones, and G. C. Janney.
1987.
Epizootic vesicular stomatitis in Colorado, 1982: epidemiologic and entomologic studies.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
36:166-176.
|
| 39.
|
Webb, P. A.,
T. P. Monath,
J. S. Reif,
G. C. Smith,
G. E. Kemp,
J. S. Lazuick, and T. E. Walton.
1987.
Epizootic vesicular stomatitis in Colorado, 1982: epidemiological studies along the northern Colorado front range.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
36:183-188.
|
| 40.
|
Xiong, C.,
R. Levis,
P. Shen,
S. Schlesinger,
C. M. Rice, and H. V. Huang.
1989.
Sindbis virus: an efficient, broad host range vector for gene expression in animal cells.
Science
243:1188-1191[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Zinkernagel, R. M.,
B. Adler, and J. J. Holland.
1978.
Cell-mediated immunity to vesicular stomatitis virus infections in mice.
Exp. Cell Biol.
46:53-70[Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, May 1999, p. 3723-3732, Vol. 73, No. 5
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Schoenly, K. A., Weiner, D. B.
(2008). Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vaccine Development: Recent Advances in the Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Platform "Spotty Business". J. Virol.
82: 3166-3180
[Full Text]
-
Cooper, D., Wright, K. J., Calderon, P. C., Guo, M., Nasar, F., Johnson, J. E., Coleman, J. W., Lee, M., Kotash, C., Yurgelonis, I., Natuk, R. J., Hendry, R. M., Udem, S. A., Clarke, D. K.
(2008). Attenuation of Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vaccine Vectors by Gene Translocations and G Gene Truncation Reduces Neurovirulence and Enhances Immunogenicity in Mice. J. Virol.
82: 207-219
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brandsma, J. L., Shylankevich, M., Su, Y., Roberts, A., Rose, J. K., Zelterman, D., Buonocore, L.
(2007). Vesicular Stomatitis Virus-Based Therapeutic Vaccination Targeted to the E1, E2, E6, and E7 Proteins of Cottontail Rabbit Papillomavirus. J. Virol.
81: 5749-5758
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Clarke, D. K., Nasar, F., Lee, M., Johnson, J. E., Wright, K., Calderon, P., Guo, M., Natuk, R., Cooper, D., Hendry, R. M., Udem, S. A.
(2007). Synergistic Attenuation of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus by Combination of Specific G Gene Truncations and N Gene Translocations. J. Virol.
81: 2056-2064
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Simon, I. D., Publicover, J., Rose, J. K.
(2007). Replication and Propagation of Attenuated Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Vectors In Vivo: Vector Spread Correlates with Induction of Immune Responses and Persistence of Genomic RNA. J. Virol.
81: 2078-2082
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ostertag, D., Hoblitzell-Ostertag, T. M., Perrault, J.
(2007). Cell-Type-Specific Growth Restriction of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus polR Mutants Is Linked to Defective Viral Polymerase Function. J. Virol.
81: 492-502
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bukreyev, A., Skiadopoulos, M. H., Murphy, B. R., Collins, P. L.
(2006). Nonsegmented negative-strand viruses as vaccine vectors.. J. Virol.
80: 10293-10306
[Full Text]
-
Majid, A. M., Ezelle, H., Shah, S., Barber, G. N.
(2006). Evaluating Replication-Defective Vesicular Stomatitis Virus as a Vaccine Vehicle. J. Virol.
80: 6993-7008
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Publicover, J., Ramsburg, E., Robek, M., Rose, J. K.
(2006). Rapid Pathogenesis Induced by a Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Matrix Protein Mutant: Viral Pathogenesis Is Linked to Induction of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha. J. Virol.
80: 7028-7036
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, J., Wang, J. T., Whelan, S. P. J.
(2006). A unique strategy for mRNA cap methylation used by vesicular stomatitis virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
103: 8493-8498
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Veits, J., Wiesner, D., Fuchs, W., Hoffmann, B., Granzow, H., Starick, E., Mundt, E., Schirrmeier, H., Mebatsion, T., Mettenleiter, T. C., Romer-Oberdorfer, A.
(2006). Newcastle disease virus expressing H5 hemagglutinin gene protects chickens against Newcastle disease and avian influenza. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
103: 8197-8202
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Natuk, R. J., Cooper, D., Guo, M., Calderon, P., Wright, K. J., Nasar, F., Witko, S., Pawlyk, D., Lee, M., DeStefano, J., Tummolo, D., Abramovitz, A. S., Gangolli, S., Kalyan, N., Clarke, D. K., Hendry, R. M., Eldridge, J. H., Udem, S. A., Kowalski, J.
(2006). Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Vectors Expressing Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 gD Elicit Robust CD4+ Th1 Immune Responses and Are Protective in Mouse and Guinea Pig Models of Vaginal Challenge. J. Virol.
80: 4447-4457
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bukreyev, A., Yang, L., Zaki, S. R., Shieh, W.-J., Rollin, P. E., Murphy, B. R., Collins, P. L., Sanchez, A.
(2006). A Single Intranasal Inoculation with a Paramyxovirus-Vectored Vaccine Protects Guinea Pigs against a Lethal-Dose Ebola Virus Challenge. J. Virol.
80: 2267-2279
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramsburg, E., Publicover, J., Buonocore, L., Poholek,