Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, April 1999, p. 3491-3496, Vol. 73, No. 4
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Ebola Virus Selectively Inhibits Responses to
Interferons, but Not to Interleukin-1
, in Endothelial
Cells
Brian H.
Harcourt,1
Anthony
Sanchez,2 and
Margaret K.
Offermann1,3,*
Program in Genetics and Molecular
Biology1 and Winship Cancer Center and
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal
Medicine,3 Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
30322, and Special Pathogens Branch, Division of Viral and
Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
303332
Received 9 October 1998/Accepted 21 December 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Ebola virus infection is highly lethal and leads to severe
immunosuppression. In this study, we demonstrate that infection of
human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) with Ebola virus Zaire
(EZ) suppressed basal expression of the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) family of proteins and inhibited the induction of multiple genes by alpha interferon (IFN-
) and IFN-
, including those coding for MHC I proteins, 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase [2'-5'(A)N], and IFN regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1).
Induction of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and ICAM-1 by IL-1
was not
suppressed by infection with EZ, suggesting that the inhibition of IFN
signaling is specific. Gel shift analysis demonstrated that infection
with EZ blocked the induction by IFNs of nuclear proteins that bind to
IFN-stimulated response elements, gamma activation sequences, and IFN
regulatory factor binding site (IRF-E). In contrast, infection with EZ
did not block activation of the transcription factor NF-
B by
IL-1
. The events that lead to the blockage of IFN signaling may be
critical for Ebola virus-induced immunosuppression and would play a
role in the pathogenesis of Ebola virus infection.
 |
TEXT |
Filoviruses are enveloped,
negative-stranded single-stranded RNA viruses with nonsegmented genomes
belonging to the family Filoviridae in the order
Mononegavirales. Filoviruses cause a fulminating, febrile
hemorrhagic disease that is highly lethal to humans and other primates
(2, 12). Ebola virus Zaire (EZ) has the highest mortality
rate in humans of all known filoviruses, killing nearly 90% of those
infected (19) and was used in this report.
During filovirus infection, the virus grows to high titers in the
liver, spleen, lymph nodes, and lungs. These organs are severely
damaged during the course of disease (11, 25), but perhaps
the most striking observation is that patients with fatal filovirus
infections die with very high viremia, an absence of mononuclear
phagocytic infiltration into sites of infection, and little evidence of
a humoral or T-cell-mediated response (28). In addition,
filoviruses are resistant to the effects of the antivirus properties of
interferon (IFN) when used prophylactically in infected monkeys
(1, 7, 28). The mechanism(s) behind the failure of the
body to mount an immune response during infection is unknown.
Immunohistochemistry of biopsies from infected humans and other
primates demonstrates that endothelial cells are heavily infected with
EZ (13, 14). Although endothelial cells play an important role in the host antivirus response through the expression of a number
of immunomodulatory genes that are induced by viruses or cytokines
(10, 30), the lack of inflammatory infiltrate near
EZ-infected endothelial cells suggests that infection is somehow
disrupting the normal host antivirus response. Because IFNs are
especially important in the host antivirus response through the
induction of many genes, such as those coding for major
histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) proteins, 2'-5'
oligodenylate synthetase [2'-5'(A)N], and IFN regulatory
factor 1 (IRF-1), we examined the effect of EZ infection on IFN
signaling in endothelial cells.
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were isolated and grown
as previously described (17). HUVECs were infected with EZ
at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1.0. MHC I protein levels were
measured by flow cytometric analysis as previously described
(17). Basal levels of MHC I protein expression remained unchanged 24 h postinfection (p.i.), but expression decreased to
approximately 50% of the basal level by 72 h p.i. (data not shown) and remained at this level 96 h p.i. (Fig. 1A and
B). Since EZ infection suppressed basal
MHC I protein expression, we asked whether infection with EZ also
blocked induction of MHC I by IFNs. The cells were infected with EZ for
72 h prior to treatment. This time was chosen because the viral
infection of the cells is established, as evidenced by high levels of
virion RNA and protein and by the log-phase release of progeny virions
(data not shown). Treatment with IFN-
(Genzyme Diagnostics,
Cambridge, Mass.) induced a threefold increase of MHC I protein in
mock-infected cells (Fig. 1A and B). Infection with EZ for 72 h
prior to the addition of IFN-
completely blocked this induction and
led to a level of MHC protein expression lower than that in the
mock-infected uninduced cells. Furthermore, infection with EZ
completely blocked induction of MHC I by IFN-
(IFN-alfa-2b was from
the Schering Corporation, Kenilworth, N.J.), alone and in combination
with IFN-
(Fig. 1C). We found that infection with EZ for 24 h
prior to treatment with IFNs did not block MHC I induction by IFN-
,
IFN-
, or IFN-
and IFN-
added simultaneously (data not shown).
The ability of EZ to suppress basal MHC I protein expression in HUVECs
was in stark contrast to that of another negative-stranded RNA virus,
measles virus. Infection of HUVECs with the wild-type measles virus
strain NJ-2 (16, 29) induced higher levels of MHC I protein
expression than did incubation with IFN-
(Fig. 1D). Thus, the
decrease in basal expression of MHC I protein and the lack of induction
by IFN in EZ-infected cells were unique to EZ and were not a general function of infection with negative-stranded RNA viruses.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Effect of infection with EZ on MHC I protein expression.
The levels of MHC I protein expression were measured by flow cytometric
analysis in HUVECs infected at an MOI of 1.0 with EZ (17)
and harvested at 96 h p.i. (A) Histograms of MHC I induction.
Mock, mock infection for 96 h (MHC I shown in black and
nonreactive antibody [antimouse immunoglobulin G] shown in gray); EZ,
EZ infection for 96 h; Mock + IFN- , mock infection for
96 h with 150 U of IFN- per ml for the final 24 h; EZ + IFN- , EZ infection for 96 h followed by treatment with 150 U
of IFN- per ml for the final 24 h. The dotted line represents
the mean immunofluorescence for MHC I protein in cells mock infected
for 96 h. (B) Graphical representation of the relative mean
immunofluorescence of MHC I protein from panel A. (C) Relative mean
immunofluorescence for MHC I surface protein induction by IFN-
(1,000 U/ml), IFN- (150 U/ml), or both, when IFN was present for the
final 24 h of a 96-h incubation with cells undergoing mock
infection (solid bars) or EZ infection (stippled bars). Con, control.
(D) HUVECs were infected for 24 h with measles virus at an MOI of
1.0. MHC I protein levels were detected by flow cytometry, and values
are given as relative mean immunofluorescence. The relative mean
immunofluorescence is a relative number representing the fluorescence
intensity of fluorescein isothiocyanate presented on a linear scale.
|
|
The selectivity of inhibition of cytokine responsiveness was addressed
by examining the effect of EZ on responsiveness to interleukin-1
(IL-1
), a cytokine that transduces signals independent of the IFN
signaling pathway. IL-6 is not induced by either IFN-
or IFN-
but
is induced by IL-1
(31). IL-6 levels were measured by
sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as previously described (17). Figure 2 demonstrates
that IL-1
(Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.) induced high
levels of IL-6 protein in both mock-infected and EZ-infected cells.
Thus, EZ does not inhibit all signal transduction, but selectively
inhibits gene induction by IFNs, but not by IL-1
. In addition, the
ability of IL-1
to induce IL-6 protein demonstrates that infection
with EZ is not blocking de novo protein synthesis.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effect of infection with EZ on IL-6 protein induction.
Conditioned medium was collected from HUVECs that had been treated with
IL-1 (100 U/ml) for the final 24 h of a 96-h incubation with
cells undergoing mock infection (solid bar) or EZ infection (stippled
bar). IL-6 was measured by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Values are represented as means ± standard deviations. Samples
were tested in duplicate.
|
|
Northern blot analysis further demonstrated that
infection with EZ inhibited induction of a number of genes by IFN,
whereas responses to IL-1
appear unaffected. MHC I mRNA was induced
to high levels by IFN-
and IFN-
when added separately or in
combination in uninfected cells, whereas infection with EZ inhibited
these inductions by greater than 80% (Fig.
3). Induction of other genes by either
IFN-
or IFN-
, including those coding for IRF-1 and 2'-5'(A)N, was also found to be strongly suppressed in
EZ-infected cells. In contrast to the ability of EZ to inhibit gene
induction by the IFNs, infection with EZ did not inhibit responses to
IL-1
, as demonstrated by comparable levels of induction of ICAM-1
and IL-6 in uninfected and EZ-infected cells (Fig. 3, lanes 9 and 10).
Comparable levels of EZ glycoprotein gene mRNA were detected in all
infected samples, thereby confirming similar levels of infection.

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effect of infection with EZ on gene induction. HUVECs
were either mock infected or EZ infected at an MOI of 1.0 for 72 h
prior to treatment with IFN- (1,000 U/ml), IFN- (100 U/ml),
IFN- and - simultaneously, or IL-1 (100 U/ml) for 24 h.
Total cellular RNA (20 µg) was size fractionated and analyzed by
Northern blot analysis (17). All bands coincided with the
known size of the mRNA of each gene. The GAPDH probe confirmed similar
RNA loading between lanes.
|
|
Responses to IFNs occur through activation of transcription factors
that recognize and transactivate through IFN-responsive sequences found
in the regulatory regions of DNA (3, 6, 9, 20). Type I and
II IFNs each have their own signaling pathways using different
receptors. For both type and type II IFNs, ligand binding initiates a
tyrosine phosphorylation cascade leading to the activation of
transcription factors and gene induction. Type I IFN leads to the
formation of the transcription factor ISGF-3 (composed of
phosphorylated STAT-2 and STAT-1
and DNA binding protein p48), which
binds to IFN-stimulated response elements (ISREs), whereas type II IFN
leads to the formation of the gamma-activated factor (GAF), which is
composed of phosphorylated STAT-1
homodimers, which binds to
specific DNA recognition sequences known as gamma activation sequences
(GAS) and drives gene transcription. IFN-
can also induce formation
of STAT-1-STAT-1-p48 complexes that bind ISRE (5).
Furthermore, within the ISRE is found a related element, the IFN
regulatory factor binding site (IRF-E), that competitively binds IRF
family members (6), including the transcription factor
IRF-1, whose de novo synthesis is induced by both IFN-
and IFN-
in HUVECs (Fig. 3). In order to determine whether infection with EZ
affects the formation of complexes that bind to either ISRE or to GAS
elements in response to IFN-
and IFN-
, gel shift analysis was
performed. In mock-infected cells, both IFN-
and IFN-
induced the
formation of several specific complexes that bound to the ISRE (Fig.
4A, lanes 4 and 6, respectively), whereas these complexes were not induced by IFN-
and IFN-
in cells that were infected with EZ (Fig. 4A, lanes 5 and 7). Although the
compositions of the complexes that bound to the ISRE were not
characterized, the specificity of these complexes was confirmed by the
ability of nonradiolabeled ISRE, but not an unrelated sequence, to
specifically compete for binding to the complexes induced by IFN-
and IFN-
(Fig. 4A, lanes 8 and 9, respectively). IFN-
, but not
IFN-
, induced the binding of a single specific complex to the GAS
element in mock-infected cells (Fig. 4B). In EZ-infected cells, this
complex was induced by IFN-
, but at much lower levels. Supershift
analysis with an antibody (from Transduction Laboratories, Lexington,
Ky.) to STAT-1
revealed that this complex was composed of
STAT-1
. Thus, in HUVECs infected with EZ, cells were unable to form
complexes that bound to the ISRE in response to either IFN-
or
IFN-
and formed very low levels of complexes that bound to GAS in
response to IFN-
. In contrast to the ability of EZ to inhibit gene
induction by IFNs, responses to IL-1
were intact. IL-1
activates
the latent transcription factor NF-
B, a transcription factor
involved in the induced expression of IL-6 and ICAM-1 (8).
Gel shift analysis indicated that IL-1
activated NF-
B to similar
levels in either mock-infected or EZ-infected cells (Fig. 4C, lanes 4 and 5, respectively). These data provide further evidence of
selectivity in the inhibition of IFN-induced signals, but not
IL-1
-induced signals.


View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effect of EZ infection on binding to the ISRE, GAS, and
NF- B elements. HUVECs were either mock infected or EZ infected at an
MOI of 1.0 for 75 h and treated with either IFN- , IFN- , or
IL-1 for the final 3 h. Gel shift analysis was performed as
previously described (17, 33) with nuclear extracts by using
either the ISRE from the ISG54 gene (A), the GAS element from the IRF-1
gene (B), or the NF- B binding site from the IL-6 promoter (C) as a
probe. Both the specific and nonspecific competitor DNAs [IL-6 NF- B
site in panel A, the mouse immunoglobulin kappa light chain gene
NF- B site in panel B, and (IRF-E)2 in panel C] were
added in 30-fold excess and tested by using the mock IFN- sample in
panel A, mock IFN- sample in panel B, and mock-infected sample
treated with 100 µg of poly(I-C) per ml (Pharmacia Biotech,
Piscataway, N.J.) for 6 h in panel C. Supershift analysis (B) was
performed with a monoclonal antibody (Ab) to the N-terminal region of
STAT-1 . Binding complexes were resolved by 4% nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by autoradiography
(17, 33).
|
|
The mechanism by which EZ inhibits responses to both classes of IFNs
remains to be determined, but the inhibition clearly occurs before the
formation of nuclear complexes that specifically bind to ISRE or GAS.
IFN-
and IFN-
share several signaling molecules, including Jak-1
and STAT-1
(6, 20). It is possible that EZ infection
eliminates or inhibits the function of either Jak-1 or STAT-1
, which
would effectively block most, if not all, IFN signal transduction, but
other mechanisms of inhibition are also possible. Because IL-1
does
not transduce signals through any components of the Jak/STAT pathway
(4), an inhibition of this pathway would have no effect on
gene induction by IL-1
. The time lag associated with the inhibition
of IFN signaling suggests that EZ inhibits these functions through an
active process involving either the production of an inhibitory RNA or
protein species or the modulation of a cellular gene.
IFN is a mediator of the antiviral response of a cell through its
ability to induce the MHC I, PKR, and 2'-5'(A)N proteins and those coded for by other genes. Because the IFN signaling pathway
is ultimately detrimental to virus survival, many DNA and RNA viruses
have evolved mechanisms to eliminate either specific IFN-inducible gene
function or the IFN signaling pathway itself. Most of the targets for
disruption by viruses have been IFN-induced effector proteins. For
example, adenovirus, vaccinia virus, poliovirus, influenza virus,
reovirus, and human immunodeficiency virus have evolved means of
disrupting PKR function (for review, see references 18 and 21). PKR is a
serine/threonine protein kinase that upon activation by
double-stranded RNA, leads to the inhibition of protein synthesis
(21) and is thought to lead to the activation of the
transcription factor NF-
B through the phosphorylation of its
inhibitor, I
B (22, 26). These activities help contain viral infection. Adenovirus (27) and cytomegalovirus
(32) are well-known suppressors of MHC I expression.
Suppression of MHC I interferes with the generation of cytotoxic
T-lymphocyte responses, because MHC I is a surface protein that
presents antigen to CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (15).
In addition to disrupting IFN-inducible effector proteins, adenovirus
E1A protein also disrupts IFN signal transduction by decreasing the
amount of available STAT-1
and p48 (23, 24). Ebola virus
can now be added to the list of viruses that disrupt the IFN signaling
pathway. Although the site of inhibition has not been determined, it
occurs prior to the formation of nuclear complexes that recognize ISRE,
GAS, or IRF-E sequences. EZ infection of HUVECs globally affects
responses to IFN-
and IFN-
by disrupting induction of
IFN-responsive genes, and as a consequence, host antiviral defenses are subverted.
The ability of EZ to replicate and produce progeny virions in
endothelial cells while suppressing basal MHC I expression and inhibiting expression of antiviral genes in response to IFNs could play
a role in the pathogenesis of disease caused by EZ infection. Because
viral infection does not cause the induction of MHC I, the cell is
unable to signal the immune system to mount an immune response to EZ
infection. In addition, by inhibiting IFN signaling, IFN is not able to
upregulate genes, such as those coding for PKR and
2'-5'-(A)N, that are vital to the antiviral defense of the
infected cell. Disruption of these antiviral pathways could contribute
significantly to the pathogenesis of disease and to the
immunosuppression seen in fatal cases of infection with Ebola virus.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by NIH grant R01 CA60345.
We thank Siddhartha Mohanty for supplying reagents for the IL-6 assays,
Sam Gobin for supplying the sequence for the GAS gel shift probe, and
Paul A. Rota for supplying the measles virus.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Winship Cancer
Center, 1365 B Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30322. Phone: (404) 778-5808. Fax: (404) 778-5016. E-mail: mofferm{at}emory.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Agafonov, A. P.,
G. M. Ignat'ev,
V. A. Kuz'min,
Z. L. Akimenko,
T. V. Kosareva, and E. A. Kashentseva.
1992.
The immunogenic properties of Marburg virus proteins.
Vopr. Virusol.
37:58-61[Medline]. (In Russian.)
|
| 2.
|
Anonymous.
1978.
Ebola haemorrhagic fever in Zaire, 1976.
Bull. W.H.O.
56:271-293[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bandyopadhyay, S. K.,
G. T. Leonard, Jr.,
T. Bandyopadhyay,
G. R. Stark, and G. C. Sen.
1995.
Transcriptional induction by double-stranded RNA is mediated by interferon-stimulated response elements without activation of interferon-stimulated gene factor 3.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:19624-19629[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bankers-Fulbright, J. L.,
K. R. Kalli, and D. J. McKean.
1996.
Interleukin-1 signal transduction.
Life Sci.
59:61-83[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Bluyssen, H. A. R.,
R. Muzaffar,
R. J. Vlieststra,
A. C. van der Made,
S. Leung,
G. R. Stark,
I. M. Kerr,
J. Trapman, and D. E. Levy.
1995.
Combinatorial association and abundance of components of interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 dictate the selectivity of interferon responses.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:5645-5649[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Boehm, U.,
T. Klamp,
M. Groot, and J. C. Howard.
1997.
Cellular responses to interferon- .
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
15:749-795[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Bowen, E. T. W.,
A. Baskerville,
K. Cantell,
G. F. Mann,
D. I. H. Simpson, and A. J. Zuckerman.
1978.
The effect of interferon on experimental Ebola virus infection in rhesus monkeys, p. 245-253.
In
S. R. Pattyn (ed.), Ebola virus haemorrhagic fever. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
|
| 8.
|
Collins, T.,
M. A. Read,
A. S. Neish,
M. Z. Whitley,
D. Thanos, and T. Maniatis.
1995.
Transcriptional regulation of endothelial cell adhesion molecules: NF- B and cytokine-inducible enhancers.
FASEB J.
9:899-909[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Daly, C., and N. C. Reich.
1993.
Double-stranded RNA activates novel factors that bind to the interferon-stimulated response element.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:3756-3764[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Dianzani, U., and F. Malavasi.
1995.
Lymphocyte adhesion to endothelium.
Crit. Rev. Immunol.
15:167-200[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Fisher-Hoch, S. P.,
G. S. Platt,
G. H. Neild,
T. Southee,
A. Baskerville,
R. T. Raymond,
G. Lloyd, and D. I. Simpson.
1985.
Pathophysiology of shock and hemorrhage in a fulminating viral infection (Ebola).
J. Infect. Dis.
152:887-894[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Gear, J. S.,
G. A. Cassel,
A. J. Gear,
B. Trappler,
L. Clausen,
A. M. Meyers,
M. C. Kew,
T. H. Bothwell,
R. Sher,
G. B. Miller,
J. Schneider,
H. J. Koornhof,
E. D. Gomperts,
M. Isaacson, and J. H. Gear.
1975.
Outbreak of Marburg virus disease in Johannesburg.
Br. Med. J.
4:489-493.
|
| 13.
|
Geisbert, T.,
P. Jahrling,
M. Hanes, and P. Zack.
1992.
Association of Ebola-related Reston virus particles and antigen with tissue lesions of monkeys imported to the United States.
J. Comp. Pathol.
106:137-152[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Georges-Courbot, M. C.,
A. Sanchez,
C. Y. Lu,
S. Baize,
E. Leroy,
J. Lansout-Soukate,
C. Tevi-Benissan,
A. J. Georges,
S. G. Trappier,
S. R. Zaki,
R. Swanepoel,
P. A. Leman,
P. E. Rollin,
C. J. Peters,
S. T. Nichol, and T. G. Ksiazek.
1997.
Isolation and phylogenetic characterization of Ebola viruses causing different outbreaks in Gabon.
Emerg. Infect. Dis.
3:59-62[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Germain, R. N.
1994.
MHC-dependent antigen processing and peptide presentation: providing ligands for T lymphocyte activation.
Cell
76:287-299[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Harcourt, B. H.,
P. A. Rota,
K. B. Hummel,
W. J. Bellini, and M. K. Offermann.
1999.
Induction of ICAM-1 gene expression by measles virus in human umbilical vein endothelial cells.
J. Med. Virol.
57:9-16[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Harcourt, B. H.,
A. Sanchez, and M. K. Offermann.
1998.
Ebola virus inhibits induction of genes by double-stranded RNA in endothelial cells.
Virology
252:179-188[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Jagus, R., and M. M. Gray.
1994.
Proteins that interact with PKR.
Biochimie
76:779-791[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Johnson, K. M.,
J. V. Lange,
P. A. Webb, and F. A. Murphy.
1977.
Isolation and partial characterisation of a new virus causing acute haemorrhagic fever in Zaire.
Lancet
i:569-571.
|
| 20.
|
Kalvakolanu, D., and E. C. Borden.
1996.
An overview of the interferon system: signal transduction and mechanisms of action.
Cancer Investig.
14:25-53[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Katze, M. G.
1992.
The war against the interferon-induced dsRNA-activated protein kinase: can viruses win?
J. Interferon Res.
12:241-248[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Kumar, A.,
J. Haque,
J. Lacoste,
J. Hiscott, and B. R. Williams.
1994.
Double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase activates transcription factor NF-kappa B by phosphorylating I kappa B.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:6288-6292[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Leonard, G. T., and G. C. Sen.
1996.
Effects of adenovirus E1A protein on interferon-signaling.
Virology
224:25-33[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Leonard, G. T., and G. C. Sen.
1997.
Restoration of interferon responses of adenovirus E1A-expressing HT1080 cell lines by overexpression of p48 protein.
J. Virol.
71:5095-5101[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Murphy, F. A.,
D. I. H. Simpson,
S. G. Whitfield,
I. Zlotnik, and G. B. Carter.
1971.
Marburg virus infection in monkeys.
Lab. Investig.
24:279-291[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Offermann, M. K.,
J. Zimring,
K. H. Mellits,
M. K. Hagan,
R. Shaw,
R. M. Medford,
M. B. Mathews,
S. Goodbourn, and R. Jagus.
1995.
Activation of the double-stranded-RNA-activated protein kinase and induction of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 by poly (I) · poly (C) in endothelial cells.
Eur. J. Biochem.
232:28-36[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Paabo, S.,
L. Severinsson,
M. Andersson,
I. Martens,
T. Nilsson, and P. A. Peterson.
1989.
Adenovirus proteins and MHC expression.
Adv. Cancer Res.
52:151-163[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Peters, C. J.,
A. Sanchez,
P. E. Rollin,
T. G. Ksiazek, and F. A. Murphy.
1996.
Filoviridae: Marburg and Ebola viruses, p. 1161-1176.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed., vol. 1. Lippincott-Raven, New York, N.Y.
|
| 29.
|
Rota, J. S.,
J. L. Heath,
P. A. Rota,
G. E. King,
M. L. Celma,
J. Carabana,
R. Fernandez-Munoz,
D. Brown,
L. Jin, and W. J. Bellini.
1996.
Molecular epidemiology of measles virus: identification of pathways of transmission and implications for measles elimination.
J. Infect. Dis.
173:32-37[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Ruszczak, Z., and R. A. Schwartz.
1996.
Vascular endothelium in the regulation of immune response.
Res. Commun. Mol. Pathol. Pharmacol.
94:3-21[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Sironi, M.,
F. Breviario,
P. Proserpio,
A. Biondi,
A. Veechi,
J. Van Damme,
E. Dejana, and A. Mantovani.
1989.
IL-1 stimulates IL-6 production in endothelial cells.
J. Immunol.
142:549-553[Abstract].
|
| 32.
|
Yamashita, Y.,
K. Shimokata,
S. Mizuno,
H. Yamaguchi, and Y. Nishiyama.
1993.
Down-regulation of the surface expression of class I MHC antigens by human cytomegalovirus.
Virology
193:727-736[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Zimring, J. C.,
S. Goodbourn, and M. K. Offermann.
1998.
Human herpesvirus 8 encodes an interferon regulatory factor (IRF) homolog that represses IRF-1-mediated transcription.
J. Virol.
72:701-707[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, April 1999, p. 3491-3496, Vol. 73, No. 4
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Chahine, M. N., Pierce, G. N.
(2009). Therapeutic Targeting of Nuclear Protein Import in Pathological Cell Conditions. Pharmacol. Rev.
61: 358-372
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Prins, K. C., Cardenas, W. B., Basler, C. F.
(2009). Ebola Virus Protein VP35 Impairs the Function of Interferon Regulatory Factor-Activating Kinases IKK{varepsilon} and TBK-1. J. Virol.
83: 3069-3077
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Reid, St. P., Valmas, C., Martinez, O., Sanchez, F. M., Basler, C. F.
(2007). Ebola Virus VP24 Proteins Inhibit the Interaction of NPI-1 Subfamily Karyopherin {alpha} Proteins with Activated STAT1. J. Virol.
81: 13469-13477
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Feng, Z., Cerveny, M., Yan, Z., He, B.
(2007). The VP35 Protein of Ebola Virus Inhibits the Antiviral Effect Mediated by Double-Stranded RNA-Dependent Protein Kinase PKR. J. Virol.
81: 182-192
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Reid, St. P., Leung, L. W., Hartman, A. L., Martinez, O., Shaw, M. L., Carbonnelle, C., Volchkov, V. E., Nichol, S. T., Basler, C. F.
(2006). Ebola Virus VP24 Binds Karyopherin {alpha}1 and Blocks STAT1 Nuclear Accumulation.. J. Virol.
80: 5156-5167
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Alazard-Dany, N., Volchkova, V., Reynard, O., Carbonnelle, C., Dolnik, O., Ottmann, M., Khromykh, A., Volchkov, V. E.
(2006). Ebola virus glycoprotein GP is not cytotoxic when expressed constitutively at a moderate level.. J. Gen. Virol.
87: 1247-1257
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kash, J. C., Muhlberger, E., Carter, V., Grosch, M., Perwitasari, O., Proll, S. C., Thomas, M. J., Weber, F., Klenk, H.-D., Katze, M. G.
(2006). Global Suppression of the Host Antiviral Response by Ebola- and Marburgviruses: Increased Antagonism of the Type I Interferon Response Is Associated with Enhanced Virulence. J. Virol.
80: 3009-3020
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Huber, J. D., Campos, C. R., Mark, K. S., Davis, T. P.
(2006). Alterations in blood-brain barrier ICAM-1 expression and brain microglial activation after {lambda}-carrageenan-induced inflammatory pain. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
290: H732-H740
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sanchez, A., Lukwiya, M., Bausch, D., Mahanty, S., Sanchez, A. J., Wagoner, K. D., Rollin, P. E.
(2004). Analysis of Human Peripheral Blood Samples from Fatal and Nonfatal Cases of Ebola (Sudan) Hemorrhagic Fever: Cellular Responses, Virus Load, and Nitric Oxide Levels. J. Virol.
78: 10370-10377
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lin, R.-J., Liao, C.-L., Lin, E., Lin, Y.-L.
(2004). Blocking of the Alpha Interferon-Induced Jak-Stat Signaling Pathway by Japanese Encephalitis Virus Infection. J. Virol.
78: 9285-9294
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kaiser, W. J., Kaufman, J. L., Offermann, M. K.
(2004). IFN-{alpha} Sensitizes Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells to Apoptosis Induced by Double-Stranded RNA. J. Immunol.
172: 1699-1710
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Basler, C. F., Mikulasova, A., Martinez-Sobrido, L., Paragas, J., Muhlberger, E., Bray, M., Klenk, H.-D., Palese, P., Garcia-Sastre, A.
(2003). The Ebola Virus VP35 Protein Inhibits Activation of Interferon Regulatory Factor 3. J. Virol.
77: 7945-7956
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Simmons, G., Wool-Lewis, R. J., Baribaud, F., Netter, R. C., Bates, P.
(2002). Ebola Virus Glycoproteins Induce Global Surface Protein Down-Modulation and Loss of Cell Adherence. J. Virol.
76: 2518-2528
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sundstrom, J. B., McMullan, L. K., Spiropoulou, C. F., Hooper, W. C., Ansari, A. A., Peters, C. J., Rollin, P. E.
(2001). Hantavirus Infection Induces the Expression of RANTES and IP-10 without Causing Increased Permeability in Human Lung Microvascular Endothelial Cells. J. Virol.
75: 6070-6085
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bray, M.
(2001). The role of the Type I interferon response in the resistance of mice to filovirus infection. J. Gen. Virol.
82: 1365-1373
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Basler, C. F., Wang, X., Muhlberger, E., Volchkov, V., Paragas, J., Klenk, H.-D., Garcia-Sastre, A., Palese, P.
(2000). The Ebola virus VP35 protein functions as a type I IFN antagonist. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97: 12289-12294
[Abstract]
[Full Text]