Next Article 
Journal of Virology, April 1999, p. 2569-2575, Vol. 73, No. 4
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Residues Critical for Duck Hepatitis B Virus
Neutralization Are Involved in Host Cell Interaction
Claire
Sunyach,1
Christine
Rollier,1
Magdalena
Robaczewska,1,2
Christelle
Borel,1
Luc
Barraud,1
Alan
Kay,1
Christian
Trépo,1
Hans
Will,3 and
Lucyna
Cova1,*
Unité de Recherche sur les Virus des
Hépatites, les Rétrovirus Humains, et les Pathologies
Associées, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche
Médicale 271, 69424 Lyon Cedex 03, France1; Molecular Diagnostics
Division, Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk, 80-822 Gdansk, Poland2; and
Heinrich-Pette-Institut für Experimentelle Virologie und
Immunologie, D-20251 Hamburg, Germany3
Received 3 August 1998/Accepted 14 December 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
To date, no detailed analysis of the neutralization properties of
duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) has been reported, and it is not clear
whether any of the known neutralization epitopes correspond to the
viral receptor binding site or to sequences involved in the cell entry
pathway. We demonstrate here that antibodies directed against two
overlapping peptides (amino acids 83 to 97 and 93 to 107), covering the
sequences of most DHBV pre-S neutralizing epitopes, both inhibit virus
binding to primary duck hepatocytes and neutralize virus infectivity.
An extensive mutagenesis of the motif 88WTP90,
which is the shortest sequence of the epitope recognized by the
virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibody (MAb) 900 was performed in order
to define the amino acids involved in these interactions. Single point
mutations within this epitope affected neither virus replication nor
infectivity but abolished virus neutralization by MAb 900 completely.
Interestingly, mutants with two and three consecutive residue
replacements (SIP and SIH) within this epitope retained replication
competence but were no longer infectious. The loss of infectivity of
SIH and SIP mutant particles was associated with significantly reduced
binding to primary duck hepatocytes and could be rescued by
trans complementation with wild-type pre-S protein. Taken
together, these results indicate that each amino acid of the DHBV pre-S
sequence 88WTP90 is critical for recognition by
the neutralizing MAb 900 and that replacement of the first two or all
three residues strongly reduces virus interaction with hepatocytes and
abrogates infectivity. These data imply that the motif
88WTP90 contains key residues which are
critical for interaction with both the neutralizing MAb and the host cell.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV)
provides a very useful model system with which the role of the
hepadnavirus envelope proteins in infection, as well as in virus
neutralization by antibodies, can be studied. Two major
cocarboxy-terminal proteins have been identified within the DHBV
envelope: a large (L, 36 kDa) and a small (S, 18 kDa) surface protein,
both required for viral infectivity. The major DHBV neutralization
epitopes map within the pre-S region of L protein, which is thought to
mediate virus-hepatocyte interaction. During the last few years, a
number of studies have shown that this pre-S domain takes part in the
early steps of DHBV infection and that a 180-kDa carboxypeptidase D
protein (gp180), a putative component of the cell receptor protein
complex, is suspected of mediating this interaction (3, 13, 14,
16, 28, 30). A domain spanning about one-half of the DHBV pre-S
region, mapped to amino acids (aa) 43 to 108 by Ishikawa et al.
(13) and to aa 30 to 115 by Urban et al. (30),
has been identified as being involved in binding to gp180 and in
interaction with the cell surface receptor. In addition, an inner
subdomain, the deletion of which abolishes virus interaction with
gp180, has been defined within aa 87 to 102 by Tong et al.
(28) and aa 85 to 115 by Breiner et al. (3). This
region is a part of the highly conserved DHBV envelope protein domain
ranging from aa 58 to 107, which contains several neutralization
epitopes, i.e., type II (5, 32), type IV (5, 32),
M900 (4), and SD20 (4, 17). However, no detailed
analysis of the neutralization properties of DHBV has been reported,
and it is not clear whether the same residues are involved in both
virus neutralization and interaction with the host cell receptor. In
this regard, neutralization of viral infectivity by antibodies is a
complex and as yet poorly understood phenomenon. Recent studies on the
functional domains of proteins suggest that neutralization sites and
virus attachment sites are often distinct. Therefore, the binding of
neutralizing antibodies does not necessarily directly block attachment
to the host cell, as shown for a number of different viruses such as feline immunodeficiency virus (23), feline leukemia virus
(26) and influenza virus (22). The neutralizing
antibody may interfere with recognition of a host cell by a steric
hindrance, by aggregation of virions, or by inducing a conformational
change. There are only a few documented examples of residues within
neutralization epitopes which are also involved in the attachment of
the virus to its cellular receptor (for a review, see reference
10).
One experimental approach for defining residues involved in
neutralization is to select mutant viruses which are able to escape neutralization by monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) and to identify the
modified amino acids. Using this approach, we have previously reported
the in vivo selection of DHBV pre-S neutralization escape variants by
using a murine MAb (MAb 900) which recognizes an epitope mapped between
aa 83 and 90 within the DHBV pre-S region (27). These
variants harbored point mutations both at proline 90, within this
epitope, and at a distance, at position 5, which almost completely abolished virus recognition by neutralizing MAb without affecting viral
infectivity (27). However, the selection of
neutralization-resistant variants is a strategy which cannot
characterize every amino acid in an epitope, since any mutations which
interfere with receptor recognition would lead to noninfectious virus
and would thus not be detected in such a study.
In the present study, we have investigated the involvement of specific
DHBV pre-S residues in both antibody-mediated neutralization and
interaction with the host cell by using two complementary approaches.
First, with a binding test and antisera to synthetic peptides covering
the sequence of the clustered DHBV immunodominant epitopes (aa 83 to
107), we show that this domain is involved in virus neutralization and
interaction with hepatocytes. Second, site-directed mutagenesis within
the minimum sequence (88WTP90) recognized by
the well-characterized DHBV-neutralizing MAb 900 shows that the
substitution of a single amino acid is sufficient to abolish virus
neutralization but not infectivity, whereas the replacement of two or
three residues strongly reduces virus-hepatocyte interaction and
abolishes infectivity.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Antibodies.
The rabbit polyclonal antiserum (DPS) used in
this study was raised against the first 131 aa of the recombinant DHBV
L envelope protein (17). The MAb 900, generated with the
same DHBV pre-S domain polypeptide, recognizes a neutralization epitope
which was previously characterized and mapped between amino acids
I83 and Q90 (3). The MAb 7C-12,
kindly provided by J. Pugh, is directed against the aa 266 to 275 on
the S domain of the DHBV surface proteins (23, 24).
Generation of pre-S mutants.
Mutagenesis was performed by
two rounds of PCR as previously described (1) by using the
wild-type DHBV genome sequenced by Mandart et al. (21). The
mutations introduced led to the replacement of one, two, or three
residues within the epitope 88WTP90 (Fig.
1), which is the minimum sequence
recognized by MAb 900 in PEPSCAN analysis (4). All mutations
(except P90T) were designed to avoid introduction of modifications in
the overlapping polymerase amino acid sequence. To analyze the impact
of mutations on viral replication and infectivity, PCR-mutated
fragments were subcloned into an infectious pCMV-DHBV genome
(7) by using the appropriate restriction enzyme sites. All
mutations were confirmed by sequencing with the Sequenase Version 2.0 DNA sequencing Kit (USB; Amersham). For envelope protein
complementation, a pCI-pre-S/S vector was constructed in which the
expression of the entire pre-S/S sequence is driven by the early
cytomegalovirus promoter. The DHBV DNA fragment (nucleotides 801 to
1785) encoding the pre-S/S gene was PCR amplified and cloned into the
polylinker of the pCI expression vector (Promega, Lyon, France).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of amino acid substitutions in
the pre-S domain of the DHBV L envelope protein. The mutant names refer
to the location and the nature of the amino acid changes within the
88WTP90 neutralization epitope recognized by
MAb 900.
|
|
LMH cell transfection and detection of mutant virus.
The
avian hepatoma LMH cell line was transfected by the calcium phosphate
method with 20 µg of DNA plasmid per 100-mm dish as described
previously (27). For cotransfection assays the vector
pCI-pre-S/S, which expresses DHBV L protein, was used as a helper
plasmid to provide wild-type L protein. A total of 20 µg of mutated
pCMV-DHBV and pCI-pre-S/S plasmids (4:1 ratio) was used. Culture media
were collected daily between days 5 and 7 posttransfection, clarified
by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 10 min, and
concentrated by polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation or
ultracentrifugation on 10 to 20% sucrose gradients as previously described (27). The presence of mutations was confirmed by
PCR and direct sequencing of DHBV DNA extracted from DNase I-treated and immunoprecipitated viral particles as described previously (27).
Sedimentation analysis of viral particles in CsCl gradient.
Supernatants of LMH cells transfected with different plasmids were
first clarified and then ultracentrifuged for 2 h at 35,000 rpm
(SW41 rotor) at 4°C. The concentrated viral particles were then
placed on the top of a linear 1.14- to 1.36-g/ml CsCl gradient and
centrifuged to equilibrium in an SW41 rotor at 35,000 rpm for 20 h
at 4°C as described previously (2). The fractions containing enveloped viral particles and nonenveloped cores were identified by analysis of DHBV DNA by dot blotting and of pre-S protein
by immunoblotting.
Infection of PDH cultures and DHBV neutralization.
Primary
duck hepatocytes (PDHs) were isolated from 3-week-old Pekin ducklings
by in situ double-step collagenase perfusion of livers as previously
described (2) and seeded on six-well plates (2.5 × 105 cells/well). Cells were infected 1 day after seeding
with 100 µl of virus samples concentrated from transfected LMH cells
and containing about 5 × 1010 viral genomes (VGE)/ml.
For the neutralization tests, PDHs were infected with 2 × 108 VGE/well of wild-type virus or DHBV pre-S mutants,
preincubated overnight either with L15 culture medium (controls) or
with murine or rabbit antibody as described earlier (18).
The release of viral particles into cell culture media was monitored
for 8 days by quantitative dot blot hybridization. At the end of the
culture, PDHs were harvested, and intracellular viral DNA was analyzed by Southern blot as previously described (18). All infection and neutralization assays were performed in duplicate and reproduced twice by using two series of inocula prepared independently.
In vivo infectivity of DHBV mutants.
Three-day-old DHBV-free
Pekin ducklings were intravenously inoculated with quantified wild-type
or mutant DHBV inocula concentrated from transfected LMH cells (2 × 108 VGE/duck). Viremia was followed every day during the
first week and then every 2 days for the two following weeks as
described previously (8, 27).
Immunoblotting.
The expression of DHBV L protein was
monitored in transfected cells or PDHs by Western blotting with rabbit
polyclonal anti-DHBV pre-S serum (diluted 1:1,000), anti-peroxidase
conjugate (diluted 1:1,000; Biosys), and the ECL chemiluminescence
detection kit (Amersham) as reported previously (17, 27).
Analysis of DNA from infected primary hepatocytes and duck
livers.
Primary hepatocytes were collected in lysis buffer
containing 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at day 10 postinfection
and assayed for viral replicative intermediates. After proteinase K
digestion (100 µg/ml, 4 h at 37°C), the total DNA was
extracted as previously described (2, 27). The same
procedure was applied to homogenized duck liver samples. Equal amounts
of DNA from each sample were analyzed by electrophoresis through a 1%
agarose gel, transferred to a nylon membrane, and hybridized with a
32P-labelled full-length genomic DHBV DNA probe as
previously described (2, 11).
Peptide synthesis and preparation of anti-peptide
antibodies.
Two overlapping peptides PS1 (aa 83 to 97;
IPQPQWTPEEDQKAR) and PS2 (aa 93 to 107;
DQKAREAFRRYQEER) were synthesized in solid phase by using
9-fluoroenylmethoxycarbonyl technology and chemically coupled to a
carrier protein, keyhole limpet hemocyanin, by the method of Liu
(20). Two rabbits were immunized separately with 200 µg of
each peptide followed by three boosts at days 14, 28, and 56 by using
standard protocols (Neosystem, Strasbourg, France). The immune response
to the peptide was evaluated by determining the endpoint titer of
antibodies that reacted with recombinant DHBV pre-S protein in an
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described previously
(4).
Assay to detect DHBV particles bound to PDHs.
The assay we
have used is essentially the one described by Pugh et al.
(25). Briefly, PDHs were prepared as described above and
plated at high density in six-well plates. Two or three days after
plating, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and
incubated (1 h 30 min at room temperature) with DHBV diluted in
Opti-MEM medium (Life Technologies) or preincubated overnight with
different rabbit anti-preS sera (DPS, anti-PS1, and anti-PS2) diluted
to a similar anti-DHBV pre-S titer as assessed by ELISA. After three
washes, anti-S MAb 7C-12 (diluted 1/100 in PBS-5% normal duck serum
[NDS]) was added to the cells and incubated under the same
conditions. Cells were washed again and then incubated for 30 min with
125I-labeled goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG)
(Biosys) diluted in PBS-5% NDS. After three washes, cells were lysed
with PBS-1% SDS, and the cell-associated radioactivity was determined
in a gamma counter.
 |
RESULTS |
Antibodies to DHBV neutralization epitopes inhibit DHBV binding to
PDHs.
First, we determined whether virus binding to PDHs is
affected by anti-DHBV pre-S antibodies against recombinant pre-S
protein or synthetic peptides. The binding assay was performed by
measuring the amount of PDH-associated viral particles after incubation with DHBV-positive duck serum, detected by using the MAb 7C-12, which
is known to specifically detect DHBV S protein (25) and I125-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG. The results found with
PDHs incubated with DHBV-positive serum showed that DHBV binds to PDH,
whereas no significant binding was observed when hepatocytes were
incubated with DHBV-negative (mock) serum (Fig.
2). In addition, the cell-associated radioactivity was proportional to the amounts of viral particles used
(results not shown). Taken together, these results indicate that this
assay allows the detection of PDH-associated DHBV particles.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Binding of DHBV to PDHs is inhibited by antibodies to
neutralization epitopes. PDH monolayers were incubated with
concentrated DHBV-positive duck serum (DHBV) or uninfected duck serum
(Mock). To test the capacity of DHBV pre-S antisera to inhibit binding,
virus was preincubated with sera from a nonimmunized rabbit, DHBV pre-S
polypeptide (aa 1 to 131) rabbit antiserum (DPS), or
83I-R97 (PS1), or/and
93D-R107 (PS2) peptide antisera. All antisera
were diluted to similar anti-DHBV pre-S titers, as assessed by ELISA.
Bound virus was detected with anti-S MAb 7C-12 and
125I-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG as described in Materials
and Methods. The counts obtained for control DHBV are represented as
100%.
|
|
Preincubation of viral particles with nonimmunized rabbit serum has no
effect on binding, whereas preincubation with the recombinant
DHBV
pre-S polypeptide (aa 1 to 131) antiserum (DPS) reduced binding
by 75%
(Fig.
2). Both of the two antipeptide sera, which recognize
part of the
pre-S region thought to be involved in recognition
of the hepatocyte
receptor, namely, aa 83 to 97 (PS1) and aa 93
to 107 (PS2), reduced
binding by about 65%. Simultaneous addition
of both antipeptide sera
reduced the binding of viral particles
even further to levels similar
to those observed with the recombinant
DHBV pre-S polypeptide antiserum
directed against almost the entire
pre-S region. These data suggest
that either the major hepatocyte
binding domain of the pre-S protein or
a critical part of it is
located between aa 83 and
107.
Next, we tested whether the polyclonal antibodies against the
recombinant pre-S protein or the two peptides are neutralizing.
The in
vitro neutralizing test showed that 100% neutralization
was achieved
by using DPS, whereas serum from a nonimmunized rabbit
was not
neutralizing (Fig.
3). Both PS1 (aa 83 to
97) and PS2
(93 to 107) antisera are highly neutralizing, since a
decrease
by 89 and 94%, respectively, of released virions was observed
in PDHs infected with DHBV preincubated with these sera (Fig.
3). Taken
together, these results indicate that antibodies elicited
to the aa 83 to 107 domain within DHBV pre-S both inhibit virus
binding to PDHs and
neutralize DHBV infectivity.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
DHBV infectivity is neutralized in vitro by PS1 and PS2
peptide antisera. PDHs were infected with DHBV-positive duck serum
(2 × 108 VGE/well), preincubated with L15 medium
(infection controls), unimmunized rabbit serum, DPS, or PS1
(83I-R97), PS2
(93D-R107), or PS1 and PS2 rabbit antisera. The
release of viral particles into the supernatants was quantified by dot
blot hybridization as described in Materials and Methods. The means of
duplicate determinations are presented.
|
|
DHBV pre-S mutants are replication competent but differ in their
infectivity.
To define which, if any, of the amino acids within
this domain plays a role in virus infectivity, we chose to introduce
into the pCMV-DHBV plasmid 1-, 2-, or 3-amino-acid replacements in the
88WTP90 motif recognized by the highly
neutralizing MAb 900 (Fig. 1). From LMH cells transfected with all
eight mutated plasmids, designated W88L, W88S, T89I, P90H, P90T, WIH,
SIH, and SIP, and the wild type, a progressive release of viral DNA
into the cell culture medium was observed (Fig.
4A). That this represents secreted viral particles was further confirmed by the detection of similar amounts of
the 35- to 36-kDa DHBV pre-S/S proteins in the concentrated culture
medium of cells transfected either with the mutants or with the
wild-type plasmid (Fig. 4B). To ensure that all of the mutations were
maintained and that all of the mutants are replication competent and
really secreted enveloped DNA-containing viral particles, we have
immunoprecipitated viral particles from supernatants of transfected
cells after DNase I treatment and confirmed, by sequencing of the
entire DHBV pre-S region (nucleotides 628 to 1485), that the DHBV DNAs
had the same sequence as the respective constructions used for the
transfection (data not shown).

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
DHBV pre-S mutations do not affect virus replication
capacity. pCMV-DHBV DNA plasmids containing each mutation presented in
Fig. 1 were used to transfect the LMH hepatoma cell line. (A) Virus
release into the transfected cell supernatants was monitored by dot
blot hybridization as described in Materials and Methods. Lane 1, wild
type; lane 2, W88L; lane 3, W88S; lane 4, T89I; lane 5, P90H; lane 6, P90T; lane 7, WIH; lane 8, SIP; lane 9, SIH. (B) Viral particles from
the culture supernatants were concentrated and analyzed by
immunoblotting. Proteins were probed with rabbit anti-DHBV pre-S
antibody (DPS). Lane 1, wild type; lane 2, W88L; lane 3, W88S; lane 4, T89I; lane 5, P90H; lane 6, P90T; lane 7, WIH; lane 8, SIP; lane 9, SIH; lane 10, negative control. For comparison, circulating viral
particles concentrated from DHBV-positive duck serum were loaded into
lane 11.
|
|
To test the infectivity of the secreted viral particles, transfected
LMH cell culture media were concentrated with PEG and
used to infect
the PDHs. It was important to ascertain that the
infection with
different mutant or wild-type viruses was normalized
to the same number
of enveloped particles. To this end, we have
separated the completely
enveloped virions from unenveloped cores
by CsCl equilibrium
ultracentrifugation of LMH cell supernatants.
Quantification of the
DHBV DNA in all fractions by dot blot hybridization
and pre-S protein
by immunoblotting (data not shown) indicated
that approximately 60% of
the viral DNA sedimented at a density
of 1.18 g/ml corresponding to the
density of enveloped particles
and 40% of the viral DNA sedimented as
unenveloped cores at a
density of 1.3 g/ml, a finding consistent with
previous observations
(
2). The same respective proportions
were found to be similar
for wild-type and different mutant virus
preparations. The single-amino-acid
mutants W88L, W88S, P90T, and P90H
and the double-mutant WIH were
infectious in vitro, and the virus
titers were similar to those
obtained for the wild-type DHBV. The
mutant T89I was also infectious,
but the DNA levels in the cell culture
medium were about fourfold
lower (Table
1). However, the SIP and SIH mutants,
which have
2- and 3-amino-acid changes, respectively, failed to infect
hepatocyte
cultures, as shown by the absence of detectable viral
proteins
and DNA signals in cell culture lysates and media (Table
1
[see
also Fig.
7] and data not shown). Since the PDH infection assay
has a limited sensitivity and may not reflect all aspects of an
in vivo
infection, we also examined the infectivity of these two
mutants and of
all the other mutants in ducklings. Nine groups
of 3-day-old ducklings
were infected with concentrated viral particles
from transfected LMH
cells. As expected from the in vitro results,
all single mutants and
the WIH double mutant were infectious in
vivo (Table
1). In contrast,
no DHBV DNA was detected in the
sera of ducklings infected with the SIP
and SIH mutants (Table
1). Moreover, no intrahepatic DNA was detected
in the corresponding
livers of these ducklings by Southern blot
hybridization (Fig.
5A). This technique
allows the detection of viral DNA in as little
as 0.02 µg of total
liver DNA (Fig.
5B). The direct sequencing
of the DHBV pre-S DNA
fragments amplified from viremic sera indicated
that all mutations were
maintained after one in vivo passage (data
not shown). Altogether,
these results demonstrate that all single-amino-acid
mutants tested and
one double mutant (WIH) with the last 2 aa
changed in the WTP motif do
not or only marginally affect viral
infectivity in vitro or in vivo. In
contrast, changing of the
first 2 (SIP mutant) or all 3 aa (SIH mutant)
of the WTP motif
abrogates DHBV infectivity, which may imply a function
of these
amino acids in receptor recognition or downstream infection
events.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
SIP and SIH mutant viruses are not infectious in vivo.
Viral particles produced by LMH cells transfected with pCMV-DHBV
plasmids bearing the double (SIP) or triple (SIH) substitutions were
used to infect ducklings. (A) Intrahepatic DHBV DNA replicative forms
were analyzed by Southern blotting 3 weeks after inoculation in the
liver from one duckling inoculated with wild-type DHBV (control) and
two ducklings inoculated with either SIP or SIH mutant viruses. (B)
Sensitivity of intrahepatic DHBV DNA detection in successive dilutions
of the total liver DNA from a DHBV-positive liver. Arrows indicate the
relaxed circular (RC), linear (L), and single-stranded (SS) DHBV DNA
forms.
|
|
Neutralization of DHBV by MAb 900 is abolished by the WTP
mutations.
To investigate the impact of DHBV neutralization by MAb
900 on those mutants that retain infectivity, we performed an in vitro neutralization assay. As illustrated in Fig.
6 and summarized in Table 1, all mutants
were fully neutralized in vitro, when incubated with the highly
neutralizing DPS polyclonal antibody but none were neutralized by MAb
900. From these results we conclude that each of the residues of the
WTP motif is essential for the neutralization of virus infectivity by
MAb 900. The neutralization of DHBV mutants by DPS is in agreement with
our previous studies which showed that this polyclonal antibody
recognizes, in addition to the MAb 900 epitope, other neutralization
epitopes within the DHBV pre-S protein (27).

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Mutations within the WTP epitope abolish in vitro
neutralization of DHBV by MAb 900. PDH cultures were infected with
wild-type DHBV or P90H mutant particles preincubated either with L15
culture medium (controls), with MAb 900 ascites fluid, or with DPS
polyclonal antibody as described in Materials and Methods. Viral
release into the culture medium was monitored from days 5 to 10 postinfection by dot blot hybridization.
|
|
Wild-type DHBV L protein trans-complements mutant
infectivity.
The two mutants SIP and SIH were found to be
noninfectious. We examined whether their infectivity could be restored
by providing the wild-type DHBV L protein in trans by
cotransfecting LMH cells with SIP- or SIH-encoding plasmids and a
wild-type L protein expression vector. The virus stocks obtained were
then used to infect PDHs as described above. Cotransfection of LMH
cells with the SIH or SIP mutant and pCI-pre-S/S plasmid resulted in
the release of viral particles which infected PDH, as judged by
detection of both DHBV DNA in PDH media (Fig.
7A) and L proteins within cell lysates
(Fig. 7B). This indicates that the infectivity of both mutants can be
rescued by the wild-type envelope protein and implies that the
corresponding mutations affect the pre-S protein domain function only.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Wild-type (WT) DHBV L protein
trans-complements SIP and SIH mutant infectivity. LMH cells
were transfected with pCMV-DHBV plasmids bearing the double (SIP) or
triple (SIH) substitutions in the presence or absence of pCI-pre-S/S
vector, which expresses wild-type L protein. PDH cultures were infected
with viral particles produced by transfected LMH cells. (A) The viral
release into cell supernatants was monitored from days 3 to 8 postinfection by dot blot hybridization. (B) Cells were harvested 8 days postinfection, and the L protein was detected in the cell lysate
by immunoblotting with rabbit anti-DHBV pre-S antibody. For comparison,
circulating viral particles concentrated from DHBV-positive duck serum
were loaded in the right lane. The arrow shows the position of the
36-kDa DHBV L protein.
|
|
Binding of noninfectious mutant virus to PDHs is affected.
The
data presented above indicate that the lack of infectivity of the SIH
and SIP mutants is due to the mutant DHBV L envelope protein. It is not
clear whether this interferes negatively with the binding of the mutant
viral particles to the cellular receptor or with a subsequent step in
infection. In order to examine the first possibility, we performed a
binding assay with SIP and SIH mutant viral particles. In PDHs treated
with equivalent amounts of mutant or wild-type particles, 60% fewer
mutant pre-S particles were bound (Fig.
8), indicating that the amino acid
changes significantly reduce but do not abolish the binding of the
mutant particles to PDHs.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Binding of SIP and SIH mutant virus to PDH is reduced.
PDH monolayers were incubated with wild type (WT), SIP, or SIH viral
particles produced by transfected LMH cells as described in Materials
and Methods. The results are expressed as the percentages of counts
obtained with wild-type DHBV particles, after substraction of the
values obtained with concentrated medium from mock-transfected LMH
cells.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present study, we have demonstrated that residues 88 to 90 within the DHBV L envelope protein are critical for virus neutralization and are involved in the interaction with the host cell.
This is of particular interest, since the roles of hepadnavirus envelope protein in the earliest events of infection (i.e., virus interaction with the host cell membrane, penetration, and disassembly) and virus neutralization are still poorly understood. Our data are
consistent with and extend previous data and speculation about the type
of pre-S sequences involved in receptor interaction by pointing to the
involvement of a short-amino-acid motif in the pre-S region. A large
portion (aa 30 to 115) of DHBV L protein has recently been shown to
interact with carboxypeptidase gp180, which is thought to be part of a
cellular receptor for avian hepadnaviruses (3, 30). Within
this pre-S domain, a recombinant polypeptide covering the residues 87 to 102 has been shown to bind specifically to a gp180 in an in vitro
binding test (28). Since aa 87 to 102 harbor three major
neutralization epitopes (4, 5, 6, 17, 32), it has been
speculated that the sequences comprising the neutralization epitopes
are also involved in the interaction with hepatocyte (28).
However, the nature of viral epitopes involved in neutralization has
been analyzed in detail for only some viruses, and it has been shown
that they may be either identical to or distinct from the receptor
binding site (10, 22, 23, 26). In this regard, our data are
of particular interest since they provide the first experimental
support for the hypothesis that some residues involved in DHBV
neutralization are also involved in the early stages of interaction
with the host cell.
We found that rabbit antibodies elicited by two overlapping peptides
(I83-R97) and
(D93-R107) covering the cluster of three DHBV
pre-S neutralizing epitopes (aa 83 to 107) were able to both inhibit
virus binding to primary duck hepatocytes and neutralize virus
infectivity. To define these interactions at the amino acid level, we
have performed an extensive mutagenesis of the motif
88WTP90, which is the shortest sequence of the
epitope recognized by the previously characterized virus-neutralizing
MAb 900. Single point mutations as well as the double substitution
(mutant WIH) within this epitope affected neither virus replication nor
infectivity but completely abolished virus neutralization by MAb 900. The single-mutant T89I exhibited a slight but reproducible decrease of
infectivity in vitro. This residue forms part of an S/T-P motif that is
a potential protein phosphorylation site (12). The T89I mutation could lead to a modification of the phosphorylation state of
the DHBV L envelope protein. However, our laboratory has recently shown
that the T89I mutation does not affect phosphorylation of the DHBV L
protein (2). It is therefore probable that the reduction of
viral secretion observed after infection of primary hepatocyte cultures
with the mutant T89I is not due to an impact on phosphorylation.
By contrast, analysis of the SIP and SIH mutants has revealed that
these double and triple amino acid substitutions abrogate DHBV
infectivity in vitro and in vivo without affecting their replication
capacity. The wild-type-like replication capacity of these two mutant
plasmids in transfected LMH cells is consistent with the fact that none
of the mutations introduced altered the P-protein sequence. Moreover,
the wild-type-like efficiency of viral particle secretion of these
mutants indicates that no other transcription regulatory sequences are
affected by these mutations. Therefore, our results strongly suggest
that these mutations affect early stages of virus infection only. This
suggestion is corroborated by complementation assays that showed that
the DHBV L envelope protein provided in trans is able to
restore the infectivity of the mutants.
The question remained whether the mutations affect the initial step of
specific binding to hepatocyte membranes or subsequent steps in viral
penetration into the duck hepatocytes. Recent data provide evidence
that gp180, a Golgi-resident protein, is involved in the first step of
avian hepadnavirus uptake (3). This initial step involves
the interaction of gp180 with a defined subdomain of DHBV pre-S which
has been mapped between aa 85 and 115 by using recombinant DHBV pre-S
polypeptides in an in vitro infection competition assay (3,
30). Interestingly, within this pre-S region, a short sequence
spanning residues 85 to 96 has been recently identified as an
absolutely essential element for receptor interaction (31). Using a completely different approach, i.e., site-directed mutagenesis, we have demonstrated that mutants which harbor the replacement of
residues 88 and 89 within this short amino acid stretch completely lose
their infectivity in PDH cultures and in ducklings. These observations
are of particular interest since they provide the first evidence that
the portion of the DHBV pre-S protein which is prerequisite for gp180
recognition contains the residues which are essential for in vivo
initiation of DHBV infection. However, the direct interaction of the
noninfectious mutants SIP and SIH with gp180 was not investigated in
the present study. The binding assay we have developed showed that
these mutants bind to PDHs with an efficiency decreased by 60%
compared to that of wild-type particles. In spite of this significant
decrease in mutant binding, it is unclear why the 40% of residual
binding does not allow viral infection. Considering that gp180 is a
Golgi-resident protein which cycles to and from plasma membrane
(3), it is difficult to evaluate the number of binding sites
at the hepatocyte surface in our binding test. Further study of the
interaction of SIP and SIH mutants with recombinant gp180 protein will
provide a definite answer as to what extent, if at all, the lack of
infectivity of the SIH and SIP mutants is due to their inability to
recognize and/or strongly attach to the hepatocyte receptor via
interaction with gp180. In addition, the motif
88WT89 may be important for interaction with
other, as-yet-unidentified host-specific factors (coreceptors) which
are thought to be required for full viral uptake and infection (3,
30).
Taken together, our data indicate that the neutralization epitope
88WTP90 is also involved in the cell entry
pathway. The change of only one amino acid within this motif was
sufficient to affect immunoreactivity with MAb 900, while the
replacement of at least the first two residues was required for strong
reduction of virus interaction with hepatocytes and a loss of
infectivity. From these results we conclude that the motif
88WTP90 contains key residues which are
important for interaction with both the host cell and the neutralizing
MAb, although this does not mean that other portions of the DHBV L
protein are not involved in the recognition of the cellular receptor or
in virus neutralization. In this regard, it has been recently
demonstrated that recombinant polypeptides covering a large portion (aa
30 to 115) of DHBV or heron hepatitis B virus (HHBV) pre-S region
compete equally well for interaction with gp180, despite a 50%
difference in their amino acid sequences, suggesting that the
three-dimensional structure of DHBV pre-S is important for interaction
with the cellular receptor (30). The three-dimensional
structure of DHBV pre-S seems also important for virus neutralization,
since we have previously shown that P90 within the 83-90
epitope studied here and a distantly located residue, P5,
are both involved in DHBV neutralization (27). For HBV it has been demonstrated, by using the random peptide library approach, that an anti-pre-S1 MAb which prevents virus binding to liver membranes
is also able to recognize distantly located pre-S2 epitopes, suggesting
that the hepatocyte-binding domain of the surface proteins is
conformationally dependent (9). The use of combinatorial libraries to define mimotopes recognized by anti-DHBV pre-S MAbs will
be of interest in defining the tertiary structures involved in DHBV
neutralization and/or the cell entry pathway.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
C.S. was the recipient of fellowships from Institut Pasteur Lyon
and the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer. This work was supported in
part by the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, the French Association de la Recherche pour le Cancer (ARC), and Ligue Nationale de Recherche sur le Cancer.
We thank S. Urban for sharing unpublished observations. We are grateful
to C. Jamard for expert assistance with animals.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: INSERM U 271, 151 Cours Albert Thomas, F-69424 Lyon Cedex 03, France. Phone: (33)
472681981. Fax: (33) 472681971. E-mail:
cova{at}lyon151.inserm.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baowei, C., and A. E. Przyla.
1994.
An efficient site-directed mutagenesis method based on PCR.
BioTechniques
17:657-659[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Borel, C.,
C. Sunyach,
O. Hantz,
C. Trépo, and A. Kay.
1998.
Phosphorylation of DHBV pre-S: identification of the major site of phosphorylation and effects of mutations on the virus life cycle.
Virology
242:90-98[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Breiner, K.,
S. Urban, and H. Schaller.
1998.
Carboxypeptidase D (gp180), a Golgi-resident protein, functions in the attachement and entry of avian hepatitis B viruses.
J. Virol.
72:8098-8104[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Chassot, S.,
V. Lambert,
A. Kay,
C. Godinot,
B. Roux,
C. Trepo, and L. Cova.
1993.
Fine mapping of neutralization epitopes on duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) pre-S protein using monoclonal antibodies and overlapping peptides.
Virology
192:217-223[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cheung, R. C.,
W. Robinson,
P. L. Marion, and H. B. Greenberg.
1989.
Epitope mapping of neutralization monoclonal antibodies against duck hepatitis B virus.
J. Virol.
63:2445-2451[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cheung, R. C.,
D. E. Trujillo,
W. Robinson,
H. B. Greenberg, and P. L. Marion.
1990.
Epitope-specific antibody response to the surface antigen of duck hepatitis B virus in infected ducks.
Virology
176:546-552[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Condreay, L. D.,
C. E. Aldrich,
L. Coastes,
W. S. Mason, and T. Wu.
1990.
Efficient duck hepatitis B virus production by avian tumor cell line.
J. Virol.
63:2445-3258.
|
| 8.
|
Cova, L.,
C. P. Wild,
R. Mehrotra,
V. Turusov,
T. Shirai,
V. Lambert,
C. Jacquet,
L. Tomatis,
C. Trepo, and R. Montesano.
1990.
Contribution of aflatoxin B1 and hepatitis B virus infection in the induction of liver tumours in ducks.
Cancer Res.
50:2156-2163[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
D'Mello, F.,
C. D. Partidos,
M. W. Steward, and C. R. Howard.
1997.
Definition of the primary structure of hepatitis B virus pre-S hepatocyte binding domain using random peptide libraries.
Virology
237:319-326[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Dimmock, N. J.
1993.
Immunoglobulin G neutralization by inhibition of attachment of virus to the cell, p. 3-9.
In
Neutralization of animal viruses. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
|
| 11.
|
Fourel, I.,
P. Gripon,
O. Hantz,
L. Cova,
V. Lambert,
C. Jacquet,
K. Watanabe,
J. Fox,
C. Guillouzo, and C. Trepo.
1989.
Prolonged duck hepatitis B virus replication in duck hepatocytes cocultivated with rat epithelial cells: a useful system for antiviral testing.
Hepatology
10:186-191[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Grgacic, E. V. L., and D. A. Anderson.
1994.
The large surface protein of duck hepatitis B virus is phosphorylated in the pre-S domain.
J. Virol.
68:7344-7350[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Ishikawa, T.,
K. Kuroki,
R. Lenhoff,
J. Summers, and D. Ganem.
1994.
Analysis of a host cell surface glycoprotein to the pre-S protein of duck hepatitis B virus.
Virology
202:1061-1064[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Klingmüller, U., and H. Schaller.
1993.
Hepadnavirus requires interaction between the viral pre-S domain and a specific hepatocellular receptor.
J. Virol.
67:7414-7422[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Kuroki, K.,
R. Cheung,
P. L. Marion, and D. Ganem.
1994.
A cell surface protein that bind avian hepatitis B virus particles.
J. Virol.
68:2091-2096[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Kuroki, K.,
F. Eng,
T. Ishikawa,
C. Turck,
F. Harada, and D. Ganem.
1995.
gp180, a host cell glycoprotein that binds duck hepatitis B virus particles, is encoded by a member of the carboxypeptidase gene family.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:15022-15028[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Lambert, V.,
D. Fernholz,
R. Sprengel,
I. Fourel,
G. Deleage,
G. Wildner,
C. Peyret,
C. Trepo,
L. Cova, and H. Will.
1990.
Virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibody to a conserved epitope on the duck hepatitis B virus pre-S protein.
J. Virol.
64:1290-1297[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Lambert, V.,
S. Chassot,
A. Kay,
C. Trépo, and L. Cova.
1991.
In vivo neutralization of duck hepatitis B virus by antibodies specific to the N-terminal portion of pre-S protein.
Virology
185:446-450[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Lenhoff, R. J., and J. Summers.
1994.
Coordinate regulation of replication and virus assembly by the large envelope protein of an avian hepadnavirus.
J. Virol.
68:4565-4571[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Liu, F. T.
1979.
New procedures for preparation and isolation of conjugates of proteins and a synthetic copolymer of D-amino-acids and immunochemical characterization of such conjugates.
Biochemistry
18:690-697[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Mandart, E.,
A. Kay, and F. Galibert.
1984.
Nucleotide sequence of a cloned duck hepatitis B virus genome: comparison with woodchuck and human hepatitis B virus sequences.
J. Virol.
49:782-792[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Outlav, M. C., and N. J. Dimmock.
1990.
Mechanisms of neutralization of influenza virus on mouse tracheal epithelial cells by mouse monoclonal polymeric IgA and polyclonal IgM directed against the viral hemagglutinin.
J. Gen. Virol.
71:69-76[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Pancino, G., and P. Sonigo.
1997.
Retention of viral infectivity after extensive mutation of the highly conserved immunodominant domain of the feline immunodeficiency virus envelope.
J. Virol.
71:4339-4346[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Pugh, J. C., and H. Simmons.
1994.
Duck hepatitis B virus infection of muscovy duck hepatocytes and nature of resistance in vivo.
J. Virol.
68:2487-2494[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Pugh, J. C.,
D. Qu,
S. W. Mason, and H. Simmons.
1995.
Susceptibility to duck hepatitis B virus infection is associated with the presence of cell surface receptor sites that efficiently bind viral particles.
J. Virol.
69:4814-4822[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Ramsey, I. K.,
N. Spibey, and O. Jarret.
1998.
The receptor binding site of feline leukemia virus surface glycoprotein is distinct from the site involved in virus neutralization.
J. Virol.
72:3268-3277[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Sunyach, C.,
S. Chassot,
C. Jamard,
A. Kay,
C. Trepo, and L. Cova.
1997.
In vivo selection of duck hepatitis B virus pre-S variants which escape from neutralization.
Virology
234:291-299[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Tong, S.,
J.-S. Li, and J. R. Wands.
1995.
Interaction between duck hepatitis B virus and a 170-kilodalton cellular protein is mediated through a neutralizing epitope of the pre-S region and occurs during viral infection.
J. Virol.
69:7106-7112[Abstract].
|
| 29.
|
Tuttleman, J. S.,
J. C. Pugh, and J. W. Summers.
1986.
In vitro experimental infection of primary duck hepatocytes cultures with duck hepatitis B virus.
J. Virol.
58:17-25[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Urban, S.,
K. M. Breiner,
F. Fehler,
U. Kingmüller, and H. Schaller.
1998.
Avian hepatitis B virus infection is initiated by the species independent interaction of a distinc pre-S subdomain with its cellular receptor.
J. Virol.
72:8089-8097[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
| Urban, S. Personal communication.
|
| 32.
|
Yuasa, S.,
R. C. Cheung,
Q. Pham,
W. S. Robinson, and P. L. Marion.
1991.
Peptide mapping of neutralizing and nonneutralizing epitopes of duck hepatitis B virus pre-S polypeptide.
Virology
181:14-21[Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, April 1999, p. 2569-2575, Vol. 73, No. 4
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Gudima, S., Meier, A., Dunbrack, R., Taylor, J., Bruss, V.
(2007). Two Potentially Important Elements of the Hepatitis B Virus Large Envelope Protein Are Dispensable for the Infectivity of Hepatitis Delta Virus. J. Virol.
81: 4343-4347
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Narayan, R., Buronfosse, T., Schultz, U., Chevallier-Gueyron, P., Guerret, S., Chevallier, M., Saade, F., Ndeboko, B., Trepo, C., Zoulim, F., Cova, L.
(2006). Rise in gamma interferon expression during resolution of duck hepatitis B virus infection.. J. Gen. Virol.
87: 3225-3232
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lin, L., Prassolov, A., Funk, A., Quinn, L., Hohenberg, H., Frolich, K., Newbold, J., Ludwig, A., Will, H., Sirma, H., Steinbach, F.
(2005). Evidence from nature: interspecies spread of heron hepatitis B viruses. J. Gen. Virol.
86: 1335-1342
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Funk, A., Mhamdi, M., Lin, L., Will, H., Sirma, H.
(2004). Itinerary of Hepatitis B Viruses: Delineation of Restriction Points Critical for Infectious Entry. J. Virol.
78: 8289-8300
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Funk, A., Hohenberg, H., Mhamdi, M., Will, H., Sirma, H.
(2004). Spread of Hepatitis B Viruses In Vitro Requires Extracellular Progeny and May Be Codetermined by Polarized Egress. J. Virol.
78: 3977-3983
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thermet, A., Robaczewska, M., Rollier, C., Hantz, O., Trepo, C., Deleage, G., Cova, L.
(2004). Identification of Antigenic Regions of Duck Hepatitis B Virus Core Protein with Antibodies Elicited by DNA Immunization and Chronic Infection. J. Virol.
78: 1945-1953
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Prassolov, A., Hohenberg, H., Kalinina, T., Schneider, C., Cova, L., Krone, O., Frolich, K., Will, H., Sirma, H.
(2003). New Hepatitis B Virus of Cranes That Has an Unexpected Broad Host Range. J. Virol.
77: 1964-1976
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rollier, C., Charollois, C., Jamard, C., Trepo, C., Cova, L.
(2000). Maternally Transferred Antibodies from DNA-Immunized Avians Protect Offspring against Hepadnavirus Infection. J. Virol.
74: 4908-4911
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tong, S., Li, J., Wands, J. R.
(1999). Carboxypeptidase D Is an Avian Hepatitis B Virus Receptor. J. Virol.
73: 8696-8702
[Abstract]
[Full Text]