This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beddows, S.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beddows, S.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, J.

 Previous Article

Journal of Virology, February 1999, p. 1740-1745, Vol. 73, No. 2
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of the Antibody Repertoire Generated in Healthy Volunteers following Immunization with a Monomeric Recombinant gp120 Construct Derived from a CCR5/CXCR4-Using Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolate with Sera from Naturally Infected Individuals

Simon Beddows,1 Simon Lister,1 Rachanee Cheingsong,1 Claudine Bruck,2 and Jonathan Weber1,*

Department of GU Medicine and Communicable Diseases, Imperial College School of Medicine at St. Mary's, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom,1 and R&D Extramural Research, SmithKline Beecham Biologicals, 1330 Rixensart, Belgium2

Received 16 June 1998/Accepted 21 October 1998


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

We have characterized sera from healthy volunteers immunized with a monomeric recombinant gp120 (rgp120) derived from a CCR5/CXCR4 (R5X4)-using subtype B isolate of human immunodeficiency virus type (HIV-1), HIV-1W61D, in comparison to sera from long-term HIV-1-infected individuals, using homologous reagents. Sera from vaccinees and HIV-1 positive subjects had similar binding titers to native monomeric rgp120W61D and showed a similar titer of antibodies inhibiting the binding of soluble CD4 (sCD4) to rgp120W61D. However, extensive peptide binding studies showed that the overall pattern of recognition of vaccinee and HIV-1-positive sera is different, with vaccinee sera displaying a wider and more potent recognition of linear V1/V2 and V3 domain epitopes. Neutralization of homologous HIV-1W61D or heterologous HIV-1M2424/4 peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-derived virus lines by vaccinee sera could be achieved, but only after adaptation of the viruses to T-cell lines and was quickly lost on readaptation to growth in PBMC. Sera from HIV-positive individuals were able to neutralize both PBMC-grown and T-cell line-adapted viruses. Interestingly, rgp120W61D was recognized by monoclonal antibodies previously shown to neutralize primary HIV-1 isolates. The use of very potent adjuvants and R5X4 rgp120 led to an antibody response equivalent in binding activity and inhibition of binding of sCD4 to gp120 to that of HIV-positive individuals but did not lead to the induction of antibodies capable of neutralizing PBMC-grown virus.


    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

In the absence of confirmed immunological correlates of protection, vaccine strategies have thus far attempted to induce human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific broadly neutralizing antibodies and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity (16, 29). However, despite the generation of high-titer neutralizing antibodies to T-cell line-adapted (TCLA) strains in human trials using recombinant Env constructs derived from the prototype strains MN, IIIB, and SF2, the neutralization of heterologous primary isolates on mitogen-activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in vitro has not been demonstrated (19). Moreover, these approaches do not appear to provide unequivocal protection from acquisition of HIV-1 infection in vivo (5, 6, 11). Here we investigate the antibody repertoire of vaccinee sera following immunization of healthy seronegative volunteers with a monomeric recombinant envelope glycoprotein (rgp120) derived from a CCR5/CXCR4 (R5X4)-using subtype B HIV-1 isolate, HIV-1W61D.

Sera were collected from 30 healthy HIV-1-negative volunteers over an 18-month period. The vaccinations took place at weeks 0, 4, and 28, and 23 individuals completed the schedule. rgp120W61D (200 µg) was given with alum, QS21-MPL-A, or QS21-MPL-A-emulsion (SmithKline Beecham Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) as adjuvants. The serological and neutralization responses of individuals from this trial (MRC V001) are documented elsewhere (38). In summary, antibody binding titers to rgp120W61D, V3MN, V3W61D, and the soluble CD4 (sCD4)/rgp120IIIB binding site and neutralizing antibody titers to the heterologous HIV-1MN strain were maximal following the third immunization and of the same order of magnitude as that seen in natural infection. However, these immunized individuals did not elicit neutralizing antibodies to a range (n = 5) of PBMC-grown HIV-1 isolates, including the homologous isolate HIV-1W61D, when assayed on mitogen-activated PBMC. In this present study, we contrast the serological and neutralization responses of sera from nine of these immunized individuals (eight of whom completed the vaccination schedule), who were selected for high antibody binding titers to the Env epitopes listed above and high neutralizing antibody titers to the heterologous HIV-1MN strain, with a panel of sera from HIV-1-infected individuals.

Sera from 28 HIV-1-infected individuals were subdivided into two groups based on the ability to neutralize the PBMC-grown isolate, HIV-1W61D, on MT2 cells. Briefly, 50 µl of virus stock (diluted to 25 50% tissue culture infectious doses per 50 µl in RPMI 1640 medium [Gibco] supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum [Gibco] and antibiotics [Sigma, UK]) was preincubated with serial twofold dilutions (50 µl) of serum for 1 h at 37°C, before the addition of 2.5 × 104 (100 µl) uninfected MT2 cells. The reciprocal of the final dilution of serum to reduce the formation of syncytia by 90% (RNT90%) compared to that of control wells was scored after 5 to 7 days. Those which failed to neutralize the PBMC-grown HIV-1W61D isolate (RNT90% of <10; n = 19) were termed W61D-nonneutralizing, while those which neutralized the HIV-1W61D isolate (RNT90% range of 40 to 320; n = 9) were termed W61D-neutralizing. Sera from HIV-1-negative immunized individuals, though selected on the basis of their high neutralizing activities to the heterologous HIV-1MN virus grown on a T-cell line, failed to neutralize the HIV-1W61D isolate on MT2 cells (RNT90% of <10; n = 9) when the stock of the infectious virus was generated by growth on PBMC.

In the first instance, the ability of sera from vaccinees and HIV-1-infected individuals to bind rgp120W61D, a 22-mer V3W61D peptide (TRKGIHIGPGRAFYAARKIIGD; Peptide and Protein Research), and inhibit the binding of sCD4 to rgp120W61D was investigated (Table 1). Serological responses to the V3W61D peptide were performed essentially as previously described (9), except that serial, rather than fixed, serum dilutions were used. For quantification of anti-gp120 antibodies, rgp120W61D was captured onto D7324 (Aalto Bioreagents, Dublin, Ireland)-coated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plates and the antibody binding titer of immune sera or HIV-1 positive sera was then determined as for the V3 peptide ELISA (9). Quantification of antibodies to the sCD4/rgp120W61D-binding site was determined by inhibition of sCD4 binding to D7324-immobilized rgp120W61D, according to published methodologies (22), except that binding was visualized with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human immunoglobulin G IgG (Sigma) and OPD substrate (Dako).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1.   HIV-1-specific antibody titers in sera from vaccinees and infected individuals

End point titers to the V3W61D peptide were significantly higher in vaccinee sera compared with sera from HIV-1-infected individuals, which may be due to fact that the V3W61D peptide represents the homologous V3 loop for vaccinees but not for HIV-1-infected individuals. That antibody binding titers to a linear V3 peptide were not associated with the ability to neutralize the homologous PBMC-grown virus is likely to be due to the overwhelming evidence that the V3 domain is relatively occluded on the intact oligomer and that neutralization of such isolates by V3-specific antibodies is, at best, weak (3, 7, 24, 32, 37). Notably, there were no significant differences between sera from immunized or naturally infected individuals in terms of total rgp120W61D binding antibody or the ability to inhibit the binding of sCD4 to rgp120W61D. Antibodies which compete with the binding of sCD4 for gp120 or which compete with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) which have been mapped to this domain are highly prevalent in sera from infected individuals (17, 23, 25). The presence of antibodies inhibiting the binding of sCD4 to gp120 in vaccinee sera is not incompatible with the observation that these sera do not neutralize primary isolates, since only some of the MAbs mapped to the CD4 binding domain are able to neutralize primary HIV-1 isolates (24). Indeed, neutralizing and nonneutralizing CD4 binding site-directed MAbs form a single competition group for monomeric gp120 binding (28). Thus, conformational epitopes linked to the induction of antibodies capable of neutralizing primary isolates could be absent on monomeric rgp120W61D.

Next, we compared the ability of vaccinee sera and HIV-1-positive sera to bind a series of overlapping peptides (Fig. 1) spanning the C1 to C5 domains of gp120 from the HIV-1W61D isolate, using previously described methodologies (9). Peptides encompassing the V1/V2 and V3 domains were recognized by the majority of vaccinee sera (Fig. 2a). In contrast, while antibodies which bound the V3 domain peptides were found in the majority of sera from infected individuals, serological recognition of other linear peptides was poor (Fig. 2b and 2c). Of note, while there was a higher percentage of sera from these immunized individuals which bound peptides encompassing the V1 and V2 domains, the level of binding, represented as the mean optical density/assay cutoff (± standard deviation [SD]) of the positive responders, was similar to that observed with sera from HIV-1-infected individuals (Fig. 2d to f). Some recognition of the C1 and C5 domains was apparent in sera from both HIV-1-infected individuals and vaccinees, though as these domains are relatively inaccessible to MAb binding on the intact protein (26, 28), this is unlikely to be important in the context of primary isolate neutralization. Importantly, sera from the W61D-neutralizing group of individuals (Fig. 2c and 2f) bound few peptides outside the V3 domain, suggesting that the ability to neutralize the PBMC-grown HIV-1W61D isolate is not mediated by antibodies to linear epitopes. However, these differences in peptide recognition could be due to the fact that the W61D peptides represent homologous peptides for vaccinees but not for infected individuals.


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.   Amino acid sequences for a series of approximately 20-mer overlapping peptides spanning the C1 to C5 domains of gp120 derived from the isolate HIV-1W61D. The V1/V2 and V3 domains are located within peptides p9 to p18 and p25 to p29, respectively. Note that there was no available overlapping peptide to link the contiguous sequences represented by peptides p18-p19 and p21-p22.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.   Proportion and level of antibody binding to a series of overlapping peptides spanning the C1 to C5 domains of gp120 derived from the primary isolate HIV-1W61D. The percentage of sera samples which gave a positive reactivity (above the assay cutoff [CO] defined as the mean + 3 SD of a panel of HIV-1-negative serum controls) to each peptide is shown for vaccinee sera (a), W61D-nonneutralizing sera (b), or W61D-neutralizing sera (c). The level of antibody bound (expressed as the mean optical density [OD]/CO ± [SD for positively reactive sera) is shown for vaccinee sera (d), W61D-nonneutralizing sera (e), and W61D-neutralizing sera (f). Approximate positions of the conserved (C1 to C5) and variable (V1 to V5) domains are shown for clarity.

Direct sequencing of the PBMC-grown HIV-1W61D isolate (and the TCLA strain HIV-1W61D/SupT1) confirmed amino acid sequence identity between the virus-associated and linear peptide V1/V2 and V3 domains (data not shown). Several MAbs have been mapped to both linear and conformational epitopes within the V1/V2 domain (20, 27). The high proportion of vaccine sera with binding antibodies to the linear V1/V2 peptides compared to that of the HIV-1-positive sera, would appear to argue against V1/V2-specific antibodies playing a significant role in the neutralization of the PBMC-grown HIV-1W61D isolate. However, the presence of antibodies directed to conformational V1/V2 epitopes in the W61D-neutralizing sera, but not in the vaccinee or W61D-nonneutralizing sera, cannot be discounted.

Overall, these data appear to confirm and extend the observations of others (25, 36) that individuals immunized with monomeric gp120 predominantly elicit antibodies to linear epitopes in contrast to sera from infected individuals which predominantly contain antibodies to conformational epitopes and, where linear epitopes are recognized by sera from such individuals, these are directed against the V3 domain.

Following on from reports demonstrating that the propagation of PBMC-derived viruses in immortalized T-cell lines results in an increased neutralization sensitivity to antibodies generated by subunit immunization or natural infection (31, 39), we sought to compare the ability of vaccinee sera to neutralize the homologous HIV-1W61D isolate and a heterologous subtype B R5X4 HIV-1 isolate, HIV-1M2424/4 (3), before and after T-cell line adaptation (Table 2). Briefly, the HIV-1M2424/4 isolate was adapted by a series of stepwise acute infections of H9 cells and after nine such passages, readapted to growth in PBMC for a further five passages, while the HIV-1W61D isolate was adapted to growth in SupT1 cells after multiple passages (designated HIV-1W61D/SupT1). Neutralization of the PBMC-derived isolates and TCLA strains was performed in parallel on MT2 cells, as described above. Utilization of the HIV-1 coreceptors CCR5 and CXCR4 was determined by immunocytochemical staining of U87 cells stably expressing human CD4 and human CCR5 or CXCR4 4 to 5 days postchallenge, as described previously (12).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2.   Neutralization of HIV-1 isolates on MT2 cells following passage in PBMC and T-cell lines

In accordance with results of other studies (19, 39), neutralization sensitivity to vaccinee sera was only demonstrated in the T-cell line-grown viruses and, in the case of HIV-1M2424/4, was subsequently lost following readaptation to PBMC. Thus, neutralization sensitivity appeared to be determined by the cells on which the virus was amplified, rather than the cell substrate upon which neutralization was assayed. This acquired neutralization sensitivity also extended, to a greater or lesser extent, to diverse Env-specific MAbs and sera from HIV-1-infected individuals. Indeed, while the TCLA strains demonstrated an enhanced sensitivity to MAbs directed to diverse Env epitopes, by far the largest increase in susceptibility was to the V3-specific MAb, 447-52D, with a 32-fold increase between the HIV-1M2424/PBMC(p0) and HIV-1M2424/H9(p9) isolates and a >128-fold increase between the HIV-1W61D/PBMC and HIV-1W61D/SupT1 isolates. A similar but less striking increase in neutralization sensitivity was demonstrated with sCD4 and the CD4 binding site-directed MAb, IgG1b12. Thus, it is likely that the neutralization sensitivity of the TCLA strains to vaccine sera observed here is due, at least in part, to an increased exposure of the V3 domain and the CD4 binding site, especially as the V3 loop sequences of the PBMC-grown and T-cell line-grown isolates were identical throughout their passage history (data not shown). However, the contribution of differentially expressed host cell-acquired adhesion molecules (1, 2) on the surfaces of PBMC-grown and T cell line-grown viruses to this observed neutralization sensitivity, especially between sera from vaccinees and that of naturally infected individuals, cannot be excluded.

In addition, the ability of these HIV-1 isolates to utilize both CCR5 and CXCR4 coreceptors (designated R5X4 viruses [4]) was retained throughout their passage history, confirming recent observations that sensitivity to antibody-mediated neutralization of HIV-1 strains is independent of coreceptor usage (18, 21, 33).

Finally, the ability of diverse MAbs to bind the monomeric rgp120W61D was investigated (Fig. 3) by following published methodologies (24, 25, 34), except that binding was visualized with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG and OPD substrate. Three V3-specific MAbs (257-D, 268-D (15), and 447-52D (10)) bound rgp120W61D with estimated 50% maximal binding values of 0.006, 0.01, and 0.04 µg/ml, respectively. However, the finding that these MAbs only neutralized the homologous isolate following T-cell line adaptation (Table 2 and data not shown), despite potent antibody binding, only further underscores the dichotomy in epitope exposure between PBMC-grown and T-cell line-passaged strains. Importantly, two MAbs (IgG1b12 and 2G12 [8, 13, 35]) which recognize conformational/discontinuous epitopes and have been reported to efficiently neutralize diverse primary isolates did bind the monomeric rgp120W61D, albeit less potently than the V3-specific MAbs. Thus, their antibody binding epitopes are at least present on this protein and, as both the HIV-1M2424/4 and HIV-1W61D PBMC-grown isolates are relatively insensitive to neutralization by these two MAbs (Table 2), the presence of a low level of such antibodies in these vaccinee sera cannot be discounted. However, given that a disparity between antibody reactivity to monomeric gp120 and neutralization of the homologous isolate has been reported for these latter two MAbs (34) and the recent evidence that it is MAb reactivity to oligomeric, rather than monomeric, gp120 that is predictive of HIV-1 neutralization (14, 30), this appears to be unlikely.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.   Binding of human MAbs to immobilized monomeric rgp120 derived from the isolate HIV-1W61D. 447-52D (), 257-D (black-triangle), and 268-D (bullet ) are directed to the V3 domain, while IgG1b12 (triangle ), 2G12 (), and 2F5 (open circle ) are directed to the CD4-binding domain, a discontinuous epitope on gp120 and a linear epitope in gp41, respectively.

In summary, we have shown that immunization of healthy volunteers with a monomeric rgp120 derived from an R5X4 subtype B HIV-1 isolate formulated in potent adjuvants elicits antibodies to a range of linear epitopes and, despite the generation of equivalent levels of antibodies to the sCD4/ gp120W61D binding site and monomeric rgp120W61D as those found in sera from HIV-1-infected individuals, these vaccinee sera do not neutralize PBMC-grown HIV-1 isolates in vitro. Neutralization could only be demonstrated following viral adaptation to immortalized T-cell lines and was quickly lost upon readaptation to PBMC. These results indicate that monomeric rgp120s per se are unlikely to be of use in the strategic development of a therapeutic HIV vaccine.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the SmithKline Beecham Biologicals HIV Vaccine Project Team for production and characterization of the vaccine immunogen. We are also grateful to the V001 Steering Committee, who were responsible for the management of the vaccine trial, for advice and permission to conduct this study. We thank P. Easterbrook and M. Troop (Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom) for providing HIV-1-positive serum samples, D. Littman (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York University, New York, N.Y.) for providing the U87-CD4-CCR5 and U87-CD4-CXCR4 cells, S. Zolla-Pazner (New York University Medical Center, New York, N.Y.) for MAb 447-52D, and H. Holmes (Medical Research Council AIDS Reagent Programme, Potters Bar, United Kingdom) for the series of overlapping gp120 peptides and other reagents.

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of GU Medicine and Communicable Diseases, Jefferiss Trust Laboratories, Imperial College School of Medicine at St. Mary's, Praed St., London W2 1PG, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 171 886 1539. Fax: 44 171 886 6645. E-mail: j.weber{at}ic.ac.uk.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Arthur, L. O., J. W. Bess, Jr, R. C. Sowder II, R. E. Benveniste, D. L. Mann, J. C. Chermann, and L. E. Henderson. 1992. Cellular proteins bound to immunodeficiency viruses: implications for pathogenesis and vaccines. Science 258:1935-1938[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Bastiani, L., S. Laal, M. Kim, and S. Zolla-Pazner. 1997. Host cell-dependent alterations in envelope components of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 virions. J. Virol. 71:3444-3450[Abstract].
3. Beddows, S., S. Louisirirotchanakul, R. Cheingsong-Popov, P. J. Easterbrook, P. Simmonds, and J. Weber. 1998. Neutralization of primary and T-cell line adapted isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: role of V3-specific antibodies. J. Gen. Virol. 79:77-82[Abstract].
4. Berger, E. A., R. W. Doms, E. M. Fenyö, B. T. M. Korber, D. R. Littman, J. P. Moore, Q. J. Sattentau, H. Schuitemaker, J. Sodroski, and R. A. Weiss. 1998. A new classification for HIV-1. Nature 391:240[Medline].
5. Berman, P. W., A. M. Gray, T. Wrin, J. C. Vannari, D. J. Eastman, G. R. Nakamura, D. P. Francis, G. Gorse, and D. H. Schwartz. 1997. Genetic and immunologic characterization of viruses infecting MN-rgp120-vaccinated volunteers. J. Infect. Dis. 176:384-397[Medline].
6. Bolognesi, D. P., and T. J. Matthews. 1998. Viral envelope fails to deliver? Nature 391:638-639[Medline].
7. Bou Habib, D. C., G. Roderiquez, T. Oravecz, P. W. Berman, P. Lusso, and M. A. Norcross. 1994. Cryptic nature of envelope V3 region epitopes protects primary monocytotropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from antibody neutralization. J. Virol. 68:6006-6013[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Burton, D. R., J. Pyati, R. Koduri, S. J. Sharp, G. B. Thornton, P. W. Parren, L. S. Sawyer, R. M. Hendry, N. Dunlop, P. L. Nara, et al. 1994. Efficient neutralization of primary isolates of HIV-1 by a recombinant human monoclonal antibody. Science 266:1024-1027[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Cheingsong-Popov, R., S. Lister, D. Callow, P. Kaleebu, S. Beddows, and J. Weber. 1994. Serotyping HIV type 1 by antibody binding to the V3 loop: relationship to viral genotype. WHO Network for HIV Isolation and Characterization. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 10:1379-1386[Medline].
10. Conley, A. J., M. K. Gorny, J. A. Kessler II, L. J. Boots, M. Ossorio Castro, S. Koenig, D. W. Lineberger, E. A. Emini, C. Williams, and S. Zolla-Pazner. 1994. Neutralization of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates by the broadly reactive anti-V3 monoclonal antibody, 447-52D. J. Virol. 68:6994-7000[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Connor, R. I., B. T. M. Korber, B. S. Graham, B. H. Hahn, D. D. Ho, B. D. Walker, A. U. Neumann, S. H. Vermund, J. Mestecky, S. Jackson, E. Fenamore, Y. Cao, F. Gao, S. Kalams, K. J. Kunstman, D. McDonald, N. McWilliams, A. Trkola, J. P. Moore, and S. M. Wolinsky. 1998. Immunological and virological analyses of persons infected by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 while participating in trials of recombinant gp120 subunit vaccines. J. Virol. 72:1552-1576[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Dittmar, M. T., G. Simmons, S. Hibbitts, M. O'Hare, S. Louisirirotchanakul, S. Beddows, J. Weber, P. R. Clapham, and R. A. Weiss. 1997. Langerhans cell tropism of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype A through F isolates derived from different transmission groups. J. Virol. 71:8008-8013[Abstract].
13. D'Souza, M. P., D. Livnat, J. A. Bradac, S. H. Bridges, the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Antibody Selection Working Group, and Collaborating Investigators. 1997. Evaluation of monoclonal antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primary isolates by neutralization assays: performance criteria for selecting candidate antibodies for clinical trials. J. Infect. Dis. 175:1056-1062[Medline].
14. Fouts, T. R., J. M. Binley, A. Trkola, J. E. Robinson, and J. P. Moore. 1997. Neutralization of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primary isolate JR-FL by human monoclonal antibodies correlates with antibody binding to the oligomeric form of the envelope glycoprotein complex. J. Virol. 71:2779-2785[Abstract].
15. Gorny, M. K., J. Y. Xu, V. Gianakakos, S. Karwowska, C. Williams, H. W. Sheppard, C. V. Hanson, and S. Zolla-Pazner. 1991. Production of site selected neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies against the third variable domain of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:3238-3242[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Haynes, B. F. 1993. Scientific and social issues of human immunodeficiency virus vaccine development. Science 260:1279-1286[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Ho, D. D., J. A. McKeating, X. Ling Li, T. Moudgil, E. S. Daar, N. Sun, and J. E. Robinson. 1991. Conformational epitope on gp120 important in CD4 binding and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 neutralization identified by a human monoclonal antibody. J. Virol. 65:489-493[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. LaCasse, R. A., K. E. Follis, T. Moudgil, M. Trahey, J. M. Binley, V. Planelles, S. Zolla-Pazner, and J. H. Nunberg. 1998. Coreceptor utilization by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is not a primary determinant of neutralization sensitivity. J. Virol. 72:2491-2495[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Mascola, J. R., S. W. Snyder, O. S. Weislow, S. M. Belay, R. B. Belshe, D. H. Schwartz, M. L. Clements, R. Dolin, B. S. Graham, G. J. Gorse, M. C. Keefer, M. J. McElrath, M. C. Walker, K. F. Wagner, J. G. McNeil, F. E. McCutchan, D. S. Burke, and NIAID AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Group. 1996. Immunization with envelope subunit vaccine products elicits neutralizing antibodies against laboratory-adapted but not primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Infect. Dis. 173:340-348[Medline].
20. McKeating, J. A., C. Shotton, J. Cordell, S. Graham, P. Balfe, N. Sullivan, M. Charles, M. Page, A. Bolmstedt, S. Olofsson, S. C. Kayman, Z. Wu, A. Pinter, C. Dean, J. Sodroski, and R. A. Weiss. 1993. Characterization of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to linear and conformational-dependent epitopes within the first and second variable domains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120. J. Virol. 67:4932-4944[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21. Montefiori, D. C., R. G. Collman, T. R. Fouts, J. Y. Zhou, M. Bilska, J. A. Hoxie, J. P. Moore, and D. P. Bolognesi. 1998. Evidence that antibody-mediated neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by sera from infected individuals is independent of coreceptor usage. J. Virol. 72:1886-1893[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Moore, J. P. 1990. Simple methods for monitoring HIV-1 and HIV-2 gp120 binding to soluble CD4 by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay: HIV-2 has a 25-fold lower affinity than HIV-1 for soluble CD4. AIDS 4:297-305[Medline].
23. Moore, J. P., Y. Cao, D. D. Ho, and R. A. Koup. 1994. Development of the anti-gp120 antibody response during seroconversion to human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 68:5142-5155[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Moore, J. P., Y. Cao, L. Qing, Q. J. Sattentau, J. Pyati, R. Koduri, J. Robinson, C. F. Barbas III, D. R. Burton, and D. D. Ho. 1995. Primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 are relatively resistant to neutralization by monoclonal antibodies to gp120, and their neutralization is not predicted by studies with monomeric gp120. J. Virol. 69:101-109[Abstract].
25. Moore, J. P., and D. D. Ho. 1993. Antibodies to discontinuous or conformationally sensitive epitopes on the gp120 glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 are highly prevalent in sera of infected humans. J. Virol. 67:863-875[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26. Moore, J. P., Q. J. Sattentau, R. Wyatt, and J. Sodroski. 1994. Probing the structure of the human immunodeficiency virus surface glycoprotein gp120 with a panel of monoclonal antibodies. J. Virol. 68:469-484[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27. Moore, J. P., Q. J. Sattentau, H. Yoshiyama, M. Thali, M. Charles, N. Sullivan, S. Poon, M. S. Fung, F. Traincard, M. Pinkus, G. Robey, J. E. Robinson, D. D. Ho, and J. Sodroski. 1993. Probing the structure of the V2 domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 surface glycoprotein gp120 with a panel of eight monoclonal antibodies: human immune response to the V1 and V2 domains. J. Virol. 67:6136-6151[Abstract/Free Full Text].
28. Moore, J. P., and J. Sodroski. 1996. Antibody cross-competition analysis of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 exterior envelope glycoprotein. J. Virol. 70:1863-1872[Abstract].
29. Salk, J., P. A. Bretscher, P. L. Salk, M. Clerici, and G. M. Shearer. 1993. A strategy for prophylactic vaccination against HIV. Science 260:1270-1272[Free Full Text].
30. Sattentau, Q. J., and J. P. Moore. 1995. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 neutralization is determined by epitope exposure on the gp120 oligomer. J. Exp. Med. 182:185-196[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Sawyer, L. S. W., M. T. Wrin, L. Crawford-Miksza, B. Potts, Y. Wu, P. A. Weber, R. D. Alfonso, and C. V. Hanson. 1994. Neutralization sensitivity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is determined in part by the cell in which the virus is propagated. J. Virol. 68:1342-1349[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32. Stamatatos, L., and C. Cheng-Mayer. 1995. Structural modulations of the envelope gp120 glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 upon oligomerization and differential V3 loop epitope exposure of isolates displaying distinct tropism upon virion-soluble receptor binding. J. Virol. 69:6191-6198[Abstract].
33. Trkola, A., T. Ketas, V. N. Kewalramani, F. Endorf, J. M. Binley, H. Katinger, J. Robinson, D. R. Littman, and J. P. Moore. 1998. Neutralization sensitivity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primary isolates to antibodies and CD4-based reagents is independent of coreceptor usage. J. Virol. 72:1876-1885[Abstract/Free Full Text].
34. Trkola, A., A. B. Pomales, H. Yuan, B. Korber, P. J. Maddon, G. P. Allaway, H. Katinger, C. F. Barbas III, D. R. Burton, D. D. Ho, and J. P. Moore. 1995. Cross-clade neutralization of primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by human monoclonal antibodies and tetrameric CD4-IgG. J. Virol. 69:6609-6617[Abstract].
35. Trkola, A., M. Purtscher, T. Muster, C. Ballaun, A. Buchacher, N. Sullivan, K. Srinivasan, J. Sodroski, J. P. Moore, and H. Katinger. 1996. Human monoclonal antibody 2G12 defines a distinctive neutralization epitope on the gp120 glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 70:1100-1108[Abstract].
36. VanCott, T. C., F. R. Bethke, D. S. Burke, R. R. Redfield, and D. L. Birx. 1995. Lack of induction of antibodies specific for conserved, discontinuous epitopes of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein by candidate AIDS vaccines. J. Immunol. 155:4100-4110[Abstract].
37. VanCott, T. C., V. R. Polonis, L. D. Loomis, N. L. Michael, P. L. Nara, and D. L. Birx. 1995. Differential role of V3-specific antibodies in neutralization assays involving primary and laboratory-adapted isolates of HIV type 1. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 11:1379-1391[Medline].
38. Weber, J., and the MRC V001 Study. A comparative trial of rgp120 with novel adjuvants, p. 81-85. In M. Girard and B. Dodet (ed.), Onzième Colloque Des Cent Gardes: Retroviruses of human AIDS and related animal diseases, 27-29 October 1997. Marnes-la-Coquette, Paris, France.
39. Wrin, T., T. P. Loh, J. C. Vennari, H. Schuitemaker, and J. H. Nunberg. 1995. Adaptation to persistent growth in the H9 cell line renders a primary isolate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 sensitive to neutralization by vaccine sera. J. Virol. 69:39-48[Abstract].

Journal of Virology, February 1999, p. 1740-1745, Vol. 73, No. 2
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Li, Y., Cleveland, B., Klots, I., Travis, B., Richardson, B. A., Anderson, D., Montefiori, D., Polacino, P., Hu, S.-L. (2008). Removal of a Single N-Linked Glycan in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp120 Results in an Enhanced Ability To Induce Neutralizing Antibody Responses. J. Virol. 82: 638-651 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Buonaguro, L., Tornesello, M. L., Buonaguro, F. M. (2007). Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype Distribution in the Worldwide Epidemic: Pathogenetic and Therapeutic Implications. J. Virol. 81: 10209-10219 [Full Text]  
  • Dhillon, A. K., Donners, H., Pantophlet, R., Johnson, W. E., Decker, J. M., Shaw, G. M., Lee, F.-H., Richman, D. D., Doms, R. W., Vanham, G., Burton, D. R. (2007). Dissecting the Neutralizing Antibody Specificities of Broadly Neutralizing Sera from Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Donors. J. Virol. 81: 6548-6562 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Law, M., Cardoso, R. M. F., Wilson, I. A., Burton, D. R. (2007). Antigenic and Immunogenic Study of Membrane-Proximal External Region-Grafted gp120 Antigens by a DNA Prime-Protein Boost Immunization Strategy. J. Virol. 81: 4272-4285 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Li, M., Salazar-Gonzalez, J. F., Derdeyn, C. A., Morris, L., Williamson, C., Robinson, J. E., Decker, J. M., Li, Y., Salazar, M. G., Polonis, V. R., Mlisana, K., Karim, S. A., Hong, K., Greene, K. M., Bilska, M., Zhou, J., Allen, S., Chomba, E., Mulenga, J., Vwalika, C., Gao, F., Zhang, M., Korber, B. T. M., Hunter, E., Hahn, B. H., Montefiori, D. C. (2006). Genetic and Neutralization Properties of Subtype C Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Molecular env Clones from Acute and Early Heterosexually Acquired Infections in Southern Africa. J. Virol. 80: 11776-11790 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Derby, N. R., Kraft, Z., Kan, E., Crooks, E. T., Barnett, S. W., Srivastava, I. K., Binley, J. M., Stamatatos, L. (2006). Antibody Responses Elicited in Macaques Immunized with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) SF162-Derived gp140 Envelope Immunogens: Comparison with Those Elicited during Homologous Simian/Human Immunodeficiency Virus SHIVSF162P4 and Heterologous HIV-1 Infection.. J. Virol. 80: 8745-8762 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Li, M., Gao, F., Mascola, J. R., Stamatatos, L., Polonis, V. R., Koutsoukos, M., Voss, G., Goepfert, P., Gilbert, P., Greene, K. M., Bilska, M., Kothe, D. L., Salazar-Gonzalez, J. F., Wei, X., Decker, J. M., Hahn, B. H., Montefiori, D. C. (2005). Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 env Clones from Acute and Early Subtype B Infections for Standardized Assessments of Vaccine-Elicited Neutralizing Antibodies. J. Virol. 79: 10108-10125 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wang, S., Arthos, J., Lawrence, J. M., Van Ryk, D., Mboudjeka, I., Shen, S., Chou, T.-h. W., Montefiori, D. C., Lu, S. (2005). Enhanced Immunogenicity of gp120 Protein When Combined with Recombinant DNA Priming To Generate Antibodies That Neutralize the JR-FL Primary Isolate of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1. J. Virol. 79: 7933-7937 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Voss, G., Manson, K., Montefiori, D., Watkins, D. I., Heeney, J., Wyand, M., Cohen, J., Bruck, C. (2002). Prevention of Disease Induced by a Partially Heterologous AIDS Virus in Rhesus Monkeys by Using an Adjuvanted Multicomponent Protein Vaccine. J. Virol. 77: 1049-1058 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fouts, T., Godfrey, K., Bobb, K., Montefiori, D., Hanson, C. V., Kalyanaraman, V. S., DeVico, A., Pal, R. (2002). Crosslinked HIV-1 envelope-CD4 receptor complexes elicit broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies in rhesus macaques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 11842-11847 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Montefiori, D. C., Safrit, J. T., Lydy, S. L., Barry, A. P., Bilska, M., Vo, H. T. T., Klein, M., Tartaglia, J., Robinson, H. L., Rovinski, B. (2001). Induction of Neutralizing Antibodies and Gag-Specific Cellular Immune Responses to an R5 Primary Isolate of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in Rhesus Macaques. J. Virol. 75: 5879-5890 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Earl, P. L., Sugiura, W., Montefiori, D. C., Broder, C. C., Lee, S. A., Wild, C., Lifson, J., Moss, B. (2001). Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of Oligomeric Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp140. J. Virol. 75: 645-653 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beddows, S.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beddows, S.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, J.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»