Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, December 1999, p. 9934-9943, Vol. 73, No. 12
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Multimers Formed by the Rotavirus Nonstructural
Protein NSP2 Bind to RNA and Have Nucleoside Triphosphatase
Activity
Zenobia
Taraporewala,
Dayue
Chen, and
John T.
Patton*
Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, National
Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes
of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received 5 May 1999/Accepted 27 August 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The nonstructural protein NSP2 is a component of rotavirus
replication intermediates and accumulates in cytoplasmic inclusions (viroplasms), sites of genome RNA replication and the assembly of
subviral particles. To better understand the structure and function of
the protein, C-terminally His-tagged NSP2 was expressed in bacteria and
purified to homogeneity. In its purified form, the protein did not
exist as a monomer but rather was present as an 8S-10S homomultimer
consisting of 6 ± 2 subunits of recombinant NSP2 (rNSP2). As
shown by gel mobility shift assays, the rNSP2 multimers bound to RNA in
discrete cooperative steps to form higher-order RNA-protein complexes.
The RNA-binding activity of the rNSP2 multimers was determined to be
nonspecific and to have a strong preference for single-stranded RNA
over double-stranded RNA, for which it displayed little affinity.
Enzymatic analysis revealed that rNSP2 possessed an associated
nucleoside triphosphatase (NTPase) activity in vitro, which in the
presence of Mg2+ catalyzed the hydrolysis of each of the
four NTPs to NDPs with equal efficiency. Evidence indicating that the
hydrolysis of NTP resulted in the covalent linkage of the
-phosphate
to rNSP2 was obtained. Additional experiments showed that NSP2
expressed transiently in MA014 cells is phosphorylated. We propose that
NSP2 functions as a molecular motor, catalyzing the packaging of viral
mRNA into core-like replication intermediates through the energy
derived from its NTPase activity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Rotaviruses, members of the family
Reoviridae, are an important cause of diarrheal disease in
humans and many species of animals (7). The mature virion is
an icosahedron that consists of three concentric layers of protein and
contains a genome of 11 segments of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). The
major component of the innermost layer is VP2, a nonspecific
RNA-binding protein that can self-assemble into T=1 structures
(19, 35). VP2, the minor core proteins VP1 and VP3, and the
viral genome form the core of the virion (3). VP1 is the
viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (29, 42), and VP3 is
responsible for capping of viral mRNAs (20, 26, 33). Cores
which are purified from virions and disrupted by exposure to hypotonic
buffer (open cores) have replicase activity that catalyzes the
synthesis of dsRNA from viral mRNA in vitro (6). Cores
surrounded by VP6, the only component of the intermediate layer of the
virion, form double-layered particles (DLPs) (35). DLPs have
transcriptase activity and direct the synthesis of viral mRNA in
infected cells (8). The outer layer of the virion is made up
of the glycoprotein VP7 and the spike protein VP4 (35).
Rotavirus dsRNA synthesis and the morphogenesis of cores and DLPs are
believed to occur in cytoplasmic inclusions termed viroplasms (32). Free dsRNA has not been detected in infected cells,
suggesting that dsRNA is synthesized following packaging of the mRNA
template into subviral particles (SVPs) (27). Indeed,
characterization of replication intermediates isolated from infected
cells indicates that only after the association of mRNA with core-like
structures does the synthesis of dsRNA occur (11, 27).
Evidence that VP2 and the core play an essential role in dsRNA
synthesis has been provided by analysis of a rotavirus mutant with a
temperature-sensitive defect in VP2 assembly and by reconstitution of
replicase activity in vitro with VP1 and VP2 (21, 25, 29).
While cell-free systems containing only core proteins that support the
synthesis of dsRNA have been developed (6), the dsRNA
product of these systems is not packaged. So far, the only cell-free
system which supports RNA replication and packaging that has been
described is one that contains not only the core proteins but
nonstructural proteins as well (24). Thus, although not
required for dsRNA synthesis, the nonstructural proteins may be
essential for RNA packaging. The nonstructural proteins most likely to
be involved in the packaging process are NSP2 (NS35) and NSP5 (NS26),
since both of these proteins are components of intracellular
replication intermediates that can direct the synthesis of dsRNA in
vitro through an associated replicase activity (11, 14).
NSP2 (35 kDa) is a conserved basic protein that is expressed to high
levels in the infected cell. Immunofluorescence studies have shown that
NSP2 accumulates in viroplasms (32), a feature that is
consistent with its suspected role in genome packaging and replication.
Additional insights into the function of NSP2 have come from studies on
tsE, an SA11 mutant with a temperature-sensitive lesion in
the NSP2 gene (gene 8) (36). Cells infected with
tsE and maintained at nonpermissive temperatures contain few
viroplasms, lack replication intermediates with replicase activity, and
produce virus particles that are mostly empty, i.e., lack dsRNA
(5, 37). Results from the tsE studies have led to
the suggestion that NSP2 may play an essential role in RNA packaging
and may coordinate packaging with virion assembly. Two other lines of evidence also suggest that NSP2 has a role in packaging and
replication: (i) NSP2 has nonspecific affinity for
single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) in vitro and is bound to ssRNA
and partially replicated viral RNA in vivo (2, 17), and (ii)
cross-linking experiments have established that NSP2 forms complexes
with VP1 and possibly VP3 in vivo (2, 16).
To gain a better understanding of the function of NSP2 in rotavirus
replication, we have analyzed the structural and enzymatic properties
of purified recombinant NSP2 (rNSP2). Consistent with earlier reports,
rNSP2 was found to have nonspecific affinity for ssRNA but little
affinity for dsRNA. In its purified form the protein was found to exist
not as a monomer but rather as a stable homomultimer consisting of four
to eight subunits. Enzymatic analysis showed that rNSP2 has an
associated nucleoside triphosphatase (NTPase) activity which, in the
presence of Mg2+, catalyzes the hydrolysis of all four NTPs
to NDPs. Evidence was obtained indicating that the hydrolysis of NTP
results in the phosphorylation of NSP2 both in vitro and in vivo. The
NTPase activity of NSP2 may provide the energy necessary for the
protein to function as a molecular motor that directs the packaging of viral mRNA.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture and viruses.
Fetal rhesus monkey kidney (MA104)
cells were maintained in medium 199 (Gibco) supplemented with 5% fetal
bovine serum (HyClone), penicillin (100 IU/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml). Simian rotavirus SA11 and the reassortant virus DxRRV were
propagated and titered in MA104 cells. With the exception of the
segment encoding VP7, which originates from the human rotavirus D, the
genome segments of DxRRV are from rhesus rotavirus RRV (22).
Construction of the NSP2 expression vector.
Gene 8 was
amplified from pSP65g8 (17) by using the Ampli Taq system
(Life Technologies) and the positive-sense primer
CCGAAACCatggctgagctag (NcoI site is
underlined) and the negative-sense primer
CGGAGATCTacgccaacttgagaaac (BglII
site is underlined). Virus-specific sequences in primers are in
lowercase. The amplification conditions were as follows: 94°C for 5 min, 1 cycle; 94°C for 1 min, 37°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2.5 min, 10 cycles; 94°C for 1 min, 45°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2.5 min, 20 cycles. The 998-bp product was gel purified and ligated into
the PCR cloning vector pT7Blue (Novagen). Following transformation of
Escherichia coli DH5, bacteria containing the appropriate
plasmid (pT7Bg8) were identified based on antibiotic resistance,
plasmid size, and restriction enzyme digestion. The sequence accuracy
of the gene 8 insert in pT7B-g8 was confirmed by automated sequencing
with an ABI PRISM 310 genetic analyzer (PE Applied Biosystems). To
express rNSP2, pT7Bg8 was digested with NcoI and
BglII, and the gene 8 fragment was ligated into the
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible
expression vector pQE60 (Qiagen), similarly digested with
NcoI and BglII. Following transformation into
E. coli DH5
, bacteria with the appropriate plasmid
(pQE60g8) were identified and the plasmid was purified. pQE60g8 was
then electroporated into E. coli M15 carrying the pREP4
repressor plasmid. Appropriate transformants were identified based on
antibiotic resistance, restriction enzyme digestion, and expression of
rNSP2. In pQE60g8, the open reading frame (ORF) for NSP2 is situated
immediately upstream from six in-frame codons for His. Thus, rNSP2
expressed from pQE60g8 is tagged at its C terminus with six His residues.
Expression and purification of rNSP2.
E. coli
M15[pREP4] containing pQE60g8 were grown to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.5 in Terrific Broth (Quality Biologics), and the expression of
NSP2 was induced by adding IPTG to a final concentration of 1 mM. After
incubation for 4 to 5 h at 37°C, the bacteria were recovered by
centrifugation at 4,000 × g for 10 min, and the
His6-tagged rNSP2 was purified under native conditions on a
Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) agarose column (Qiagen) according to the
manufacturer's protocols. The final eluate was dialyzed against
low-salt buffer (LSB; 2 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.2], 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM
dithiothreitol [DTT]) for 48 h at 4°C. The concentration of
the purified protein was determined by Bradford assay using bovine
serum albumin as the protein standard and by comparison with known
amounts of bovine serum albumin coelectrophoresed on sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gels and Coomassie blue staining. Purified
rNSP2 was adjusted to a concentration of 0.5 mg per ml and stored at
4°C. The same protocol was used to express and purify His-tagged
recombinant dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). The expression plasmid
containing the DHFR gene was provided by Qiagen.
Purified 35S-labeled rNSP2 was produced as described above
except that rNSP2 expression was induced in Cys- and Met-free
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (MEM) containing 20 µCi of
35S-amino acids (35S-Express; 1,175 Ci/mmol;
NEN) per ml of medium.
In vitro synthesis of RNAs.
The DNA template for synthesis
of the Luc72 RNA probe was generated by amplifying a portion of the
luciferase gene in plasmid pGL2 (Promega) with Taq
polymerase (Life Technologies) and the positive-sense primer
TAATACGACTCACTATACCATGGAAGACGCCAAAAACATAAAGAAAGG (the T7 core promoter sequence is underlined), and negative-sense primer GTTGCTCTCCAGCGGTTC. 32P-labeled Luc72
probe was transcribed from the amplified DNA with an Ambion
MEGAshortscript kit according to the protocol of the manufacturer
except that the concentration of cold (unlabeled) UTP was reduced by
one-fourth and 50 µCi of [
-32P]UTP was included per
20 µl of reaction mixture (26). The
32P-labeled RNA probes were purified by electrophoresis on
and elution from 8% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea
(25).
The DNA template for synthesis of green fluorescent protein (GFP)
plus-sense RNA was amplified from the plasmid pGreen Lantern-1 (Life
Technologies) by using the positive-sense primer
AGAATGTATGTTATTGAATAT and the negative-sense primer,
ACATCATACAACTATAACTTC. To produce gene 8 plus- and
minus-sense RNAs, plasmids pSP65g8(+) and pSP65g8(
), respectively,
were linearized with SacII, blunt-ended by treatment with T4
DNA polymerase, and transcribed by using the Ambion MAXIscript system
(31). After runoff transcription, the RNA products were purified by phenol-chloroform extraction and isopropanol precipitation. The quality of GFP and gene 8 plus- and minus-sense RNAs was assessed by electrophoresis on 5% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea (25). RNA concentrations were calculated from optical
densities at 260 nm.
To generate gene 8 dsRNA, equal amounts of gene 8 plus- and minus-sense
RNAs were annealed for 18 h at 42°C in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH
8.3)-6 mM MgCl2-55 mM KCl. The sample was electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel, and the desired 1-kb gene 8 dsRNA was recovered with a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen).
Gel shift assays.
The procedure used for analysis of
rNSP2-RNA interactions by gel shift assay was similar to that described
earlier (25). Typically, 32P-labeled probe (1 to
10 pmol) was incubated with rNSP2 (1 to 25 pmol) in LSB in a final
volume of 15 to 35 µl for 30 min at room temperature in the presence
or absence of competitor RNA. The reaction mixtures were analyzed by
electrophoresis for 3 to 4 h at 175 V on nondenaturing 6%
polyacrylamide gels containing 50 mM Tris-HCl and 50 mM glycine (pH
8.8) (25). Protein-probe complexes were detected on the gel
by autoradiography, and intensities of the radiolabeled bands were
quantitated with a phosphorimager.
Rate zonal centrifugation.
35S-labeled rNSP2,
32P-labeled probe, 35S-labeled rNSP2-RNA probe
complexes, and protein standards were layered onto 12-ml 5 to 20%
(wt/vol) sucrose gradients in LSB and centrifuged at 200,000 × g for 16 h in a Beckman SW40Ti rotor at 4°C. The
proteins used as size markers in the gradients were thyroglobulin (650 kDa, 19S), catalase (250 kDa, 11.3S), and
-globulin (156 kDa, 7S). One-milliliter fractions were collected from the gradients and analyzed
for protein content by electrophoresis on 12% polyacrylamide gels
containing SDS (SDS-12% PAGE) (18) and for RNA content by
electrophoresis on 8% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea (25).
Preparation of subviral particles.
SVPs were purified from
MA104 cells infected with 10 to 20 PFU of DXRRV per cell as previously
described (24). The infected cells were harvested at 6 h postinfection (p.i.) by washing and resuspension in cold hypotonic
buffer (dilute reticulocyte standard buffer; 3 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.1],
0.5 mM MgCl2, 3 mM NaCl) and then lysed by Dounce
homogenization. Nuclei and large cellular debris were removed by
centrifugation for 10 min at 10,000 × g, and SVPs were
recovered from the supernatant by centrifugation at 200,000 × g for 2 h through 3-ml 15 to 30% (wt/vol) sucrose
gradients in dilute reticulocyte standard buffer. The pellets were
resuspended in HGD buffer (10 mM HEPES-HCl [pH 7.6], 10% glycerol, 2 mM DTT) and stored on ice until used. Approximately 100 µl of SVP
suspension was prepared from 5 × 107 infected cells.
NTPase assay.
Typically, reaction mixtures for the NTPase
assay contained 1 to 2 µg of rNSP2, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM
MgCl2 and 10 µCi of
-32P-labeled ATP, GTP,
CTP, or UTP (3,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham) in a final volume of 20 µl.
After incubation at 37°C for 1 h, 1 µl of 0.5 mM EDTA was
added to the reaction mixtures, and the samples were then deproteinized
by phenol-chloroform extraction. One-microliter aliquots of each were
spotted onto polyethyleneimine-cellulose F sheets (EM Science), and
NTP, NDP, and Pi were resolved by ascending thin-layer
chromatography (TLC) in 1.2 M LiCl. Radiolabeled spots on the sheets
were detected by autoradiography and quantitated with a phosphorimager.
NDP and NMP markers were made by limited hydrolysis of the radiolabeled
NTP with 5 U of tobacco acid pyrophosphatase (Epicentre, Madison,
Wis.).
In vitro phosphorylation of rNSP2 and NSP2 in SVPs.
The
standard reaction mixture for in vitro phosphorylation contained 2 µg
of rNSP2 or 2 µl of SVPs, 20 µCi of [
-32P]NTP (800 to 3,000 Ci/mmol), 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and 5 mM MgCl2
in a final volume of 20 µl and was incubated at 37°C for 1 h.
One-half of each reaction mixture was then combined with 10 µl of a
solution containing 10 U of calf intestinal phosphatase (CIP; New
England Biolabs), 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM
MgCl2, and 1 mM DTT and incubated at 37°C for 1 h.
The phosphorylation and dephosphorylation assays were terminated by
adding SDS sample buffer and heating to 100°C for 2 min. The
phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of proteins was evaluated by
SDS-12% PAGE and autoradiography.
In vivo phosphorylation of NSP2.
To determine whether NSP2
made during infection was phosphorylated, MA104 cells were infected at
a multiplicity of infection of 10 to 50 with SA11 rotavirus. At 2 h p.i., the inoculum was replaced with MEM containing 5 µg of
actinomycin D per ml. At 5 h p.i., the medium was replaced with
either Cys- and Met-free MEM or phosphate-free MEM (LifeTechnologies).
At 6 h p.i., 25 µCi of 35S-amino acids per ml of
Cys- and Met-free MEM and 25 µCi of [32P]orthophosphate
(150 mCi/ml, NEN) per ml of phosphate-free MEM were added. After
incubation for 2 h, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered
saline and lysed by resuspension in radioimmunoprecipitation assay
(RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.5] 0.5% SDS, 1% Triton X-100,
1% sodium deoxycholate, 20 mM EDTA, 2 µg of aprotinin and 0.5 µg
of leupeptin per ml). The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at
10,000 × g for 2 min.
The recombinant vaccinia virus vTF7.3 (10) was used to
transiently express NSP2 in vivo. MA104 cells were grown to near confluency and infected with vTF7.3 at a multiplicity of infection of
10. At 1 h p.i., the inoculum was removed and replaced with transfection mixture made up of 4% Lipofectamine and 4 µg of pSP65g8 (17) per ml in medium 199. Beginning at 18 h p.i., the
cells were labeled with 35S-amino acids and
[32P]orthophosphate and harvested as described above.
Immunoprecipitation of NSP2 and Western blot analysis.
Polyclonal anti-NSP2 and anti-NSP5 antisera, were produced in guinea
pigs by immunizing initially with 1 mg of rNSP2 and rNSP5, respectively, in Freund's complete adjuvant and then immunizing at
weeks 2 and 4 with 1 mg of rNSP2 and rNSP5 in Freund's incomplete adjuvant. For immunoprecipitation, the polyclonal NSP2 and NSP5 antisera were added to clarified cell lysates in RIPA buffer at a
dilution of 1:250, and the samples were gently mixed for 18 h at
4°C. After addition of protein A-Sepharose, the samples were incubated for an additional hour under the same conditions. The beads
were recovered by low-speed centrifugation and washed three times with
RIPA buffer. The immunoprecipitated proteins were released from the
beads by boiling in SDS sample buffer and were identified by SDS-12%
PAGE and autoradiography.
For Western blot analysis, proteins were resolved by SDS-12% PAGE and
then electroblotted onto nitrocellulose sheets (Millipore). The blots
were blocked by soaking in phosphate-buffered saline containing 5%
skim milk suspension. Subsequently, the blots were incubated with
either guinea pig anti-NSP2 polyclonal antisera, mouse anti-NSP2
monoclonal antibody (kindly provided by H. B. Greenberg), or mouse
anti-Penta-His monoclonal antibody (Qiagen) at a dilution of 1:500.
Goat anti-guinea pig and goat anti-mouse horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated antibodies were used as secondary antibodies at a
dilution of 1:5,000. The blots were developed by the Sigma Fast system.
 |
RESULTS |
Expression of rNSP2.
To study the structure and enzymatic
properties of NSP2 in the absence of other viral proteins, a cDNA
containing the NSP2 ORF of SA11 rotavirus was cloned into the
IPTG-inducible bacterial expression vector pQE60. The NSP2 ORF was
engineered into the vector such that the recombinant protein contained
a C-terminal tag of six His residues. IPTG induction resulted in the
expression of high levels of soluble rNSP2 in E. coli which
could be purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography to near homogeneity
as evaluated by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining (Fig.
1A). The identity of the rNSP2 was
confirmed by Western blot analysis with an anti-NSP2 monoclonal
antibody (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Expression and purification of rNSP2. Proteins were
resolved by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue (A) or blotted
onto nitrocellulose and probed with anti-NSP2 antibody (B). Lane 1, protein standards; lane 2, His-tagged rNSP2 eluted from
Ni2+-NTP agarose column; lane 3, bacterial lysate after
induction with 1 mM IPTG; lane 4, bacterial lysate prior to
induction.
|
|
Specificity of the RNA-binding activity of rNSP2.
NSP2
synthesized in rotavirus-infected cells has been shown to have
nonspecific RNA-binding activity (2, 17). To determine if
rNSP2 had such an activity, the purified protein was incubated with
32P-labeled Luc72, an RNA probe of 72 nucleotides made from
a gene encoding luciferase. rNSP2-probe complexes in the mixture were identified by electrophoresis on a nondenaturing 6% polyacrylamide gel
in Tris-glycine buffer. The gel mobility shift assay indicated that
rNSP2 bound the probe to produce a complex migrating in the upper
one-third of the gel (Fig. 2A, lane 2).
The suspected complex was not detected when the rNSP2-probe mixture was
treated with proteinase K, confirming the presence of a protein
component (Fig. 2A, lane 3). The presence of rNSP2 in complex eluted
from the gel was verified by SDS-PAGE and Western blot assay (data not shown). These results demonstrated that rNSP2 possessed a
sequence-independent RNA-binding activity.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Specificity of the RNA-binding activity of rNSP2. (A)
rNSP2 (175 ng) and 32P-labeled Luc72 RNA (32 ng) were
incubated alone or with a 1-, 2.5-, 5-, 10-, or 20-fold excess (in
mass) of cold competitor RNA over probe RNA. The cold competitor RNAs
were full-length rotavirus gene 8 mRNA (lanes 4 to 8), GFP mRNA (lanes
9 to 13), and rotavirus gene 8 dsRNA (14 to 18). In one case, after
incubation of rNSP2 and probe, 40 µg of proteinase K was added and
the sample was incubated for 15 min at room temperature (lane 3).
Probe-protein complexes were detected by electrophoresis on a 6%
nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel and autoradiography. The quantity of
probe in the shifted band was determined with a phosphorimager. The
amount of probe in the protein-RNA complexes of the competition
reactions was normalized to the amount of probe in the protein-RNA
complexes formed in the absence of cold competitor RNA (100%). (B) The
extent of competition was assessed by plotting the ratio of cold
competitor RNA over probe RNA ( , gene 8 ssRNA; , GFP ssRNA; ,
gene 8 dsRNA) versus the percentage of probe bound to rNSP2.
|
|
The specificity of the RNA-binding activity of rNSP2 was addressed
further by incubating rNSP2 and the 32P-labeled Luc72 probe
with three cold competitor RNAs (gene 8 plus-sense RNA [mRNA], GFP
RNA, and gene 8 dsRNA) and using the gel mobility shift assay to
monitor the formation of rNSP2-probe complexes. In the presence of 1- to 2.5-fold (mass)-excess gene 8 mRNA and GFP RNA, the amounts of
rNSP2-probe complex formed were reduced to 60% and 25 to 45%,
respectively, of the amount of complex formed in the absence of
competitor RNA (Fig. 2). With the addition of 10- to 20-fold-excess
gene 8 mRNA and GFP RNA, the amounts of complex formed were reduced to
10 to 20% and <10%, respectively, of the amount formed by the
control. In contrast, rNSP2 binding to the probe was not affected by
the presence of up to 5-fold-excess cold gene 8 dsRNA and was only
slightly affected (<10%) by the presence of 10-fold-excess dsRNA
(Fig. 2). At 20-fold-excess dsRNA, the formation of the rNSP2-probe
complex was reduced by only 25%. Overall, these results demonstrated
that rNSP2 has sequence independent affinity for ssRNA and
comparatively weak affinity for dsRNA.
Multiple subunits of rNSP2 bind to RNA.
The gel mobility shift
assays described above were performed under conditions of probe excess.
To investigate whether higher-order rNSP2-RNA complexes could form
under conditions where probe was limiting, increasing amounts of rNSP2
were titrated with fixed amounts of the 32P-labeled Luc72.
The formation of rNSP2-probe complexes in the reaction mixtures was
analyzed by gel mobility shift assay. The results showed that when 1 to
7.5 pmol of rNSP2 was added to 1 pmol of RNA probe (Fig.
3, lanes 2 to 5), probe was in excess and
only a single rNSP2-probe complex (complex I) was detected. Complex I
corresponds to the rNSP2-probe complex described above (Fig. 2). An
increase of rNSP2 to 10 pmol resulted in the formation of low levels of
another rNSP2-probe complex, designated complex II, which migrated in
the gel more slowly than complex I. In the presence of 10 pmol of
rNSP2, all of the probe was in the bound form (Fig. 3, lane 6). A
further increase in rNSP2 from 10 to 15 pmol resulted in the loss of
complex I and the concomitant formation of complexes II and III, the
latter two migrating close to one another (Fig. 3, lane 7). In the
presence of even greater amounts of rNSP2 (20 to 25 pmol), only complex
III was detected (Fig. 3, lanes 8 and 9), indicating a complete
conversion of complexes I and II to complex III. The addition of more
than 25 pmol of rNSP2 to the reaction mixture resulted in the
appearance of probe in the well and a partial or complete loss of
complex III (data not shown). This finding suggests the formation of
rNSP2-probe complexes even larger than complex III that cannot be
resolved by these electrophoretic conditions. These data suggest that
multiple copies of rNSP2 can bind to a single RNA probe, even one that is only 72 nucleotides in length.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Formation of higher-order complexes by rNSP2 and RNA.
Complexes formed by incubating 1 pmol of 32P-labeled Luc72
RNA (probe) with 0 to 25 pmol of rNSP2 (lanes 1 to 9) were resolved by
electrophoresis on a nondenaturing 6% polyacrylamide gel and detected
by autoradiography. Reversibility of complex formation was evaluated by
incubating 1 pmol of 32P-labeled Luc72 RNA with 14 pmol of
rNSP2 for 30 min, then adding an additional 0, 1.5, 4, and 9 pmol of
radiolabeled probe (final probe concentrations, 1 [lane 10], 2.5 [lane 11], 5 [lane 12], and 10 [lane 13] pmol), and incubating
the mixture for another 30 min. The positions of unbound (free) probe,
complex I (CI), complex II (CII), and complex III (CIII) are
indicated.
|
|
The possibility that rNSP2-probe interactions were reversible was
examined by adding 1 pmol of 32P-labeled Luc72 RNA to 14 pmol of rNSP2, incubating the mixture to allow probe-rNSP2 complexes to
form, and then adding 1.5, 4, and 9 pmol of additional probe (final
probe concentrations, 2.5, 5, and 10 pmol, respectively) to the
reaction mixtures. As shown in Fig. 3 (lane 10), coincubation of 1 pmol
of probe with 14 pmol of rNSP2 (14 pmol) resulted in the formation of
complexes II and III but little or no complex I. In this reaction
mixture, no free probe was present, indicating that probe was limiting
(lane 10). The addition of greater amounts of probe led to the
appearance of complex I and the loss of complexes II and III (Fig. 3,
lanes 11 to 13), indicating that the interaction between protein and RNA in complexes II and III is reversible.
The transient nature of complex II (Fig. 3, lanes 7 and 10) indicated
that cooperativity between free (unbound) rNSP2 and rNSP2 which was
bound to RNA could be a factor in the formation of higher-order
rNSP2-probe complexes, i.e., complexes II and III. Hence, as defined by
the following binding reactions, the formation of complexes II and III
would be more efficient than the formation of complex I: step I,
rNSP2 + probe
complex I; step II, rNSP2 + complex I
complex II + complex III. To test this possibility, we performed
an experiment whereby increasing amounts of rNSP2 (0 to 24 pmol), in
steps of 1.5 pmol, were added to a constant amount (3 pmol) of the
32P-labeled Luc72 probe. The complexes were resolved by
electrophoresis, and the percentage of probe in complex I and in
complex II and complex III combined (complex II + III) in
comparison to total probe in the reaction mixtures was determined. The
results showed that when the rNSP2 concentration in the reaction
mixtures was increased between 0 to 12 pmol, a corresponding and near
linear increase was detected in the formation of complex I while the level of free probe decreased proportionally (Fig.
4). When the rNSP2 concentration was
increased to 13.5 pmol, free probe was no longer detected, and of the
bound probe, ~65% was in complex I and ~35% was in complex
II + III. Further increase in rNSP2 resulted in a decrease in the
level of complex I to the point that it was no longer detected (21 pmol) and resulted in a corresponding and near linear increase in the
accumulation of complex II + III (Fig. 4). Comparison of the
slopes calculated for the linear portion of the curves representing the
formation of complex I and complex II + III showed that over a
constant step increase of rNSP2 concentration, complex II + III
was formed more efficiently than complex I. This finding suggests a
positive cooperativity between rNSP2 subunits as they sequentially bind
to RNA.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Cooperativity between rNSP2 multimers in forming
higher-order RNA-probe complexes. 32P-labeled Luc72 RNA (3 pmol) was incubated with 0 to 21 pmol of rNSP2, added in steps of 1.5 pmol, and the complexes in the mixtures were resolved by
electrophoresis on a 6% nondenaturing gel and quantitated with a
phosphorimager. The formation of complex I ( ) and complex II + III ( ) in the reaction mixtures was compared by plotting the percent
probe bound in the final product of each step [for step I, complex I;
for step 2, complex II + III) as a function of the amount of rNSP2
in each reaction mixture. Slopes were determined for the linear
portions of the curves representing the formation of complex I
(m1) and of complex II + III (m2). The
percent free probe ( ) in each reaction mixture was also plotted as a
function of rNSP2 concentration.
|
|
rNSP2 is a 10S homomultimer.
To determine the multimeric state
of rNSP2 and rNSP2-RNA complexes, purified 35S-labeled
rNSP2 in the absence and presence of Luc72 RNA and protein size markers
was sedimented through linear 5 to 20% sucrose gradients. Electrophoretic analysis of the gradient fractions revealed that in the
absence of RNA, nearly all of the rNSP2 migrated with a size of 8 to
10S and with a molecular mass of 140 to 250 kDa (Fig. 5A). From this
information, we calculated that rNSP2 self-assembles into
homomultimers, each made up of 6 ± 2 monomers. Notably, no rNSP2
was detected in fractions of the gradient expected to contain the
protein monomer.
In the presence of unlabeled Luc72 RNA, one-half the rNSP2 migrated in
the sucrose gradient with a size of 12 to 15S and with a molecular mass
of 280 to 500 kDa. The other half of the rNSP2 was detected in the
pellet fraction of the gradient, suggesting the formation of even
larger protein-RNA complexes (Fig. 5B). Addition of RNase A to the rNSP2-RNA sample prior to sedimentation caused most of the 35S-labeled rNSP2 to shift back in size
to 10S (Fig. 5C). By itself, Luc72 RNA barely sedimented into the
gradient (Fig. 5D). Hence, the observed migration of the rNSP2-RNA to
12 to 15S and to the pellet fraction is probably a result of multiple
copies of the 8S-10S rNSP2 homomultimer binding to the same RNA
molecule and not due to the increase in mass contributed by the RNA.
Aliquots of the fractions containing rNSP2-RNA complexes (Fig. 5B,
fractions 8, 9, and pellet), when analyzed by gel mobility shift assay, revealed the presence of complexes I and III (data not shown). This
finding is consistent with the idea that complex III and the 12 to 15S
material both contain RNA molecules to which multiple copies of the
rNSP2 are bound.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Sedimentation analysis of rNSP2 and rNSP2-RNA complexes.
The following samples were centrifuged through 5 to 20% sucrose
gradients: 35S-labeled rNSP2 (1.5 nmol) (A),
35S-labeled rNSP2 (1.5 nmol) incubated with cold Luc72 RNA
(200 pmol) of which one-half was directly applied to the gradient (B)
and the other half was treated with 5 µg of RNase A for 10 min at
room temperature prior to being applied (C), and
32P-labeled Luc72 RNA (50 pmol) (D). Fractions (1 ml) from
the gradients were analyzed by SDS-12% PAGE and autoradiography (A to
C) and by electrophoresis on 8% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M
urea and autoradiography (D). 35S-labeled rNSP2 (A to C)
and 32P-labeled Luc72 (D) were coelectrophoresed as markers
(M). The pellet (P) is contained within fraction 12.
|
|
rNSP2 has an NTPase activity.
Earlier studies have suggested
that NSP2 may be required for the assembly of replication intermediates
with replicase activity, possibly functioning to package viral mRNA
into viral cores where the RNA undergoes replication (2, 5,
27). As packaging of viral nucleic acids into capsids is thought
to represent an energy-dependent process, we postulated that NSP2 might
have an associated NTPase activity from which it could derive
energy. To test rNSP2 for NTPase activity, we incubated the purified
recombinant protein at 37°C with [
-32P]GTP and
MgCl2 and resolved the products of the reaction by TLC. As
shown in Fig. 6 (lane 3), in the presence
of rNSP2, [
-32P]GTP was hydrolyzed to
[
-32P]GDP, suggesting that rNSP2 possessed NTPase
activity. Two control assays were performed to exclude the possibility
that a copurifying bacterial protein, and not rNSP2, was responsible
for the NTPase activity. First, a similar volume of His-tagged DHFR,
expressed and purified in the same manner as rNSP2, was assayed for
NTPase activity; second, purified rNSP2 and DHFR were each assayed for NTPase activity at 65°C, since characteristically bacterial NTPases are thermoresistant. The NTPase activity displayed by rNSP2 at 37°C
was completely inhibited at 65°C, and no such activity was detected
for DHFR at either temperature (Fig. 6). These results demonstrated
that rNSP2 was responsible for the NTPase activity observed in the
assay.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
rNSP2 possesses an NTPase activity. Reaction mixtures
containing no added protein or containing 1 µg of rNSP2 or 2 µg of
DHFR and 10 µCi of [ -32P]GTP were incubated for
1 h at 37 or 65°C. The products of the reaction mixtures
were resolved by TLC and detected by autoradiography. The positions of
GDP and GMP were determined by cochromatography of markers prepared by
partial digestion of [ -32P]GTP with tobacco acid
pyrophosphatase (lane 1).
|
|
Properties of the NTPase activity of rNSP2.
To determine if
the NTPase activity of rNSP2 preferentially hydrolyzed one or more of
the NTPs, we incubated rNSP2 with
-32P-labeled ATP, CTP,
GTP, or UTP and analyzed the products by TLC. The specificity was
further addressed by adding rNSP2 to reaction mixtures containing one
of the radiolabeled NTPs and a 10-fold excess of each of the three
other (cold) NTPs. The results showed that rNSP2 hydrolyzed all four
NTPs to NDPs and did so to similar extents both in the assays
containing only a single radiolabeled NTP and in the assays containing
a single radiolabeled NTP along with cold competitor NTPs (Fig.
7). Thus, the NTPase activity of rNSP2 is
nonspecific. Remarkably, the extent of hydrolysis in the assays ranged
between 15 and 25%, regardless of whether 0.625 or 6.25 µM total
NTPs were present in the reaction mixtures (Fig. 7). The most likely
explanation for this phenomenon is that the products of NTP hydrolysis
interacted with the NTPase to prevent an additional net increase in the
accumulation of NDP and Pi when the ratio of substrate to
product reached ~4:1. Although the enzyme kinetics of the NTPase of
rNSP2 have yet to be fully examined, these results suggest that the
NTPase activity was being affected by the products of hydrolysis
through uncompetitive or noncompetitive feedback inhibition.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Specificity of the NTPase activity of rNSP2. Reaction
mixtures contained no protein or 1 µg of rNSP2 and 0.625 µM one of
the four [ -32P]NTPs. In some cases, 6.25 µM each of
the three (cold) NTPs not represented by the radiolabeled NTP were also
added to the reaction mixture. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C,
the products of the reactions were resolved by TLC, detected by
autoradiography, and quantitated with a phosphorimager. Percent
hydrolysis = (quantity of [32P]NDP)/(quantity of
[32P]NDP and [32P]NTP) × 100. Markers
were generated by partial digestion of [ -32P]NTPs with
tobacco acid pyrophosphatase.
|
|
Analysis of the cofactor requirement for NTP hydrolysis showed that
Mg2+ was essential and that NTPase activity was maximal at
1 to 5 mM Mg2+ (data not shown). Higher concentrations (20 mM) of Mg2+ inhibited the NTPase activity of rNSP2.
Ca2+ did not serve as a cofactor for NTP hydrolysis (data
not shown).
NTP hydrolysis results in rNSP2 phosphorylation.
To examine
the effect of NTP hydrolysis on the status of rNSP2, the protein was
incubated with
-32P-labeled ATP or GTP or
-32P-labeled ATP or GTP and then analyzed by SDS-PAGE
and Coomassie blue staining. The results showed that the NTPase
assay neither affected the migration nor caused the degradation of
rNSP2 (Fig. 8A). However, autoradiography
revealed that rNSP2 became radiolabeled in the NTPase assay when
-32P-labeled ATP or GTP was present and not when
-32P-labeled ATP or GTP was present (Fig. 8B). This
finding indicated that rNSP2 was phosphorylated as a result of NTP
hydrolysis and that the cleaved
-phosphate of NTP was transferred to
the protein. The fact that the protein was not radiolabeled when
incubated with
-32P-labeled ATP or GTP ruled out the
possibility that uncleaved NTPs were being linked to the protein. The
nature of the bond between the protein and the
-phosphate was
further examined by treatment of
-32P-labeled rNSP2 with
phosphatase. As shown in Fig. 8A and B (lanes 2 and 6), exposure to
phosphatase did not affect the integrity of rNSP2 but did decrease the
extent of phosphorylation. Thus, rNSP2 catalyzed the hydrolysis of NTPs
to NDP, and in doing so became phosphorylated by the covalent linkage
of the cleaved
-phosphates.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Autophosphorylation of rNSP2. Purified rNSP2 was
incubated with -32P-labeled ATP or GTP or with
-32P-labeled ATP or GTP for 1 h at 37°C.
Afterwards, 10 U of CIP was added to some reaction mixtures, which were
then incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Proteins in the samples were
detected by SDS-12% PAGE and staining with Coomassie blue (A).
32P-labeled proteins in the gel shown in (A) were
identified by autoradiography (B). CIP becomes radiolabeled due to its
affinity for NTPs.
|
|
Phosphorylation of NSP2 expressed in vivo.
While there are no
reports in the literature of the phosphorylation of NSP2 in infected
cells, the results presented above led us to reassess this possibility.
As a first approach, we examined whether the NSP2 that is associated
with SVPs isolated from rotavirus-infected cells could be
phosphorylated in vitro under the conditions used to assay rNSP2 for
phosphorylation. The results showed that SVP NSP2 was radiolabeled when
incubated with [
-32P]ATP and that the 32P
label was lost upon treatment with phosphatase (Fig.
9A, lanes 2 and 3). The identity of the
protein in the 32P-labeled band was confirmed to be NSP2 by
Western blot assay (Fig. 9B). NSP2 expressed in vivo had a slightly
greater mobility upon electrophoresis than did rNSP2 (Fig. 9); this is
because the His6 tag of rNSP2 increases its molecular mass
by approximately 700 Da. Together, these data demonstrated that NSP2
made in infected cells, like rNSP2, can be a substrate for
phosphorylation.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Phosphorylation of NSP2 from infected cells. Subviral
particles were incubated with 10 µCi of [ -32P]ATP
for 1 h at 37°C. One-half of the reaction mixture was treated at
room temperature with 10 U of CIP for 1 h at 37°C, and then the
untreated (lane 2) and treated (lane 3) portions of the reaction
mixture were resolved by SDS-12% PAGE. Radiolabeled proteins in the
gel were detected by autoradiography (A). The position of NSP2 in the
gel was confirmed by Western blot assay with polyclonal anti-NSP2
antibody (B). 35S-labeled rNSP2 was coelectrophoresed in
lane 1.
|
|
As another approach for examining whether NSP2 expressed in vivo could
be phosphorylated, MA104 cells were programmed to transiently express
NSP2 with the vaccinia virus vTF7.3 expression system or were infected
with SA11 rotavirus. The cells were labeled with either
35S-amino acids or [32P]orthophosphate;
following harvesting and lysis in RIPA buffer, immunoprecipitates were
prepared from the total cell lysates with NSP2-specific antisera.
Transient expression of NSP2 in the presence of 35S-amino
acids and [32P]orthophosphate showed that the protein was
produced in the cells and that the protein, when expressed in the
absence of other rotavirus proteins in vivo, was phosphorylated (Fig.
10A, lanes 3 and 5).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
Phosphorylation of NSP2 synthesized in vivo. MA104
cells either were infected with vTF7.3 and programmed to express NSP2
by transfection with plasmid SP65g8 or were infected with SA11
rotavirus. After labeling with 35S-amino acids or
[32P]orthophosphate, NSP2 was recovered from lysates of
the cells by immunoprecipitation with anti-NSP2 (A) or anti-NSP5 (B)
polyclonal antisera. The immunoprecipitates were analyzed by SDS-12%
PAGE and autoradiography. (A) NSP2 immunoprecipitates from
mock-infected cells (lane 2), transfected cells (lanes 3 and 5), and
SA11-infected cells (lanes 4 and 6) that were maintained in
35S-amino acids (lanes 2 to 4) or
[32P]orthophosphate (lanes 5 and 6). An immunoprecipitate
of 35S-labeled rNSP2 was coelectrophoresed as a control
(lane 1). (B) NSP5 immunoprecipitates from SA11-infected cells
maintained in 35S-amino acids (lane 1) and
[32P]orthophosphate (lane 2).
|
|
Likewise, labeling with 35S-amino acids showed that NSP2
was produced in rotavirus-infected cells (Fig. 10A, lane 4). However, labeling with [32P]orthophosphate did not reveal the
presence of 32P-labeled NSP2 (Fig. 10A, lane 6), even
though in the same cell lysate, 32P-labeled NSP5 was
detected by immunoprecipitation with NSP5-specific antisera (Fig. 10B,
lane 2). In summary, our results suggest that the NTPase activity of
NSP2 leads to the phosphorylation of the protein, but that in the
infected cell, either the level of NTPase activity is lower, and thus
the extent of phosphorylation lower, or phosphorylation is more
transient due to the interaction of NSP2 with other viral components.
Phosphorylated rNSP2 retains RNA-binding activity.
To examine
the possibility that phosphorylation of rNSP2 prevented the protein
from binding to RNA, 32P-labeled rNSP2 was prepared by
incubating rNSP2 with [
-32P]ATP. The
32P-labeled rNSP2 was then incubated with unlabeled Luc72
RNA probe, and the mixture was analyzed for rNSP2-RNA complexes by gel
mobility shift assay. As shown in Fig.
11, 32P-labeled rNSP2 was
able to bind to the RNA probe, resulting in the formation of
radiolabeled complex I and complexes II and/or III (lane 2). Hence,
phosphorylated rNSP2 retains RNA-binding activity. Interestingly,
32P-labeled rNSP2 in the absence of any added RNA failed to
migrate into the gel (lane 1). This probably stems from the high pI of rNSP2 (9.02), which is greater than the pH 8.8 running buffer of the
electrophoretic system. By interaction with an RNA probe, the protein
gains a net negative charge sufficient to allow it to migrate into the
gel.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 11.
Phosphorylated rNSP2 retains RNA-binding activity.
32P-labeled rNSP2 was prepared by incubating 360 pmol
(~13 µg) with 10 µCi of [ -32P]ATP for 1 h
at 37°C. Sixty picomoles of 32P-labeled rNSP2 was
incubated for 30 min either alone (lane 1) or with 14 pmol of unlabeled
Luc72 RNA (lane 2 and 3). Afterwards, 40 µg of proteinase K was added
to one of the reaction mixtures containing 32P-labeled
rNSP2 and unlabeled Luc72, and the mixture was incubated for 15 min at
room temperature (lane 3). Probe-protein complexes were detected by
electrophoresis on a 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel and
autoradiography.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The aim of this study was to define structural and enzymatic
features of NSP2 that would provide a clearer understanding of the
protein's function in rotavirus replication. This was made possible by
expressing NSP2 as a recombinant protein with a C-terminal His tag in
bacteria and then successfully purifying large amounts of soluble rNSP2
by adsorption to Ni2+ columns. rNSP2, like its native
counterpart, formed stable homomultimers consisting of an estimated
four to eight subunits, suggesting that it retained the same fold and
structural organization. These multimers were shown to bind ssRNA
nonspecifically and to have an associated nonspecific NTPase activity.
In addition, rNSP2 was found to be phosphorylated in vitro and in vivo.
To our knowledge, this is the first report that demonstrates any
enzymatic activity for NSP2 and that establishes that the protein
undergoes phosphorylation. The only other rotavirus nonstructural
protein known to be phosphorylated is NSP5, the product of gene 11 of
rotavirus (4, 34, 40). The fact that rNSP2 has NTPase
activity suggests that the protein has an energy-dependent function in
the viral replication process.
NSP2 was shown previously to be a nonspecific RNA-binding protein
(2, 17); however, these analyses were carried out under conditions where other cellular and viral proteins and RNAs may have
been present and therefore may have influenced the activity of the
protein. Consequently, we reanalyzed NSP2-RNA interactions with
purified rNSP2 by two approaches: (i) sedimentation gradient analysis
and (ii) gel mobility shift assay. Sedimentation analysis revealed that
rNSP2 exists nearly exclusively as 8-to-10S homomultimers and that
these multimers, or multiples of them, have affinity for ssRNA. The
results were consistent with those of Kattoura et al. (16),
who showed that NSP2 derived from infected cells when subjected to
sedimentation gradient analysis formed a ~10S species capable of
binding RNA when immunoadsorbed onto protein A-Sepharose beads. As
shown by the gel mobility shift assays, RNA binding to rNSP2 occurred
in discrete cooperative steps to form higher-order RNA-protein
complexes. The formation of these complexes was driven solely by
increasing the concentration of rNSP2 relative to RNA. Based on the
amount of rNSP2 and RNA probe needed to drive all the probe into
complex I, and for the complete conversion of complex I to complex II
and of complex II to complex III, RNA binding to rNSP2 was estimated to
occur with a stoichiometry of 1:6 ± 2 (RNA:protein) for complex
I, 1:12 ± 4 for complex II, and 1:18 ± 6 for complex III.
Only three RNA-protein complexes were detected by the gel mobility
shift assay using the Luc72 RNA probe. The fact that at even higher
concentrations of rNSP2, complexes were found not to migrate out of the
well of the nondenaturing gel used in the mobility shift assay suggests
that RNA-rNSP2 complexes larger than complex III may exist (data not
shown). Likewise, the detection of rNSP2-Luc72 complexes in the pellet
of gradients used for sedimentation analysis suggests that such larger
structures may exist. It remains unclear how multiple copies of the
relatively large 8S-10S rNSP2 homomultimer can bind simultaneously to a
short RNA of 72 nucleotides; however, the length of the RNA would be expected to limit the number of higher-order RNA-rNSP2 complexes that
could be formed.
In the cell, NSP2 has been reported to exist in close association with
ssRNA and with viral dsRNA (2, 17). Our efforts to
quantitate the affinity of NSP2 for ssRNA and dsRNA by competition assay showed that rNSP2 has a significant preference for ssRNA over
dsRNA. The affinity of rNSP2 for dsRNA was indeed so low as to bring
into question whether in vivo there is any biological relevance to the
interaction of NSP2 with dsRNA. Experiments showing that NSP2 can be
cross-linked to dsRNA also indicated that the dsRNA was partially
single stranded and therefore likely represented a partially replicated
RNA (2). Since NSP2 is a component of replication
intermediates with replicase activity, it is conceivable that NSP2 is
bound to the mRNA template for minus-strand synthesis, and as RNA
replication occurs, the protein falls off the template and dissociates
from the intermediate as a result of its reduced affinity for the newly
formed dsRNA or as a result of displacement by another protein with
higher affinity for the template.
Several studies have shown that NSP2 is a component of intracellular
replication intermediates that possess replicase activity and direct
the synthesis of dsRNA (11, 14, 27). Analysis of core-like
replication intermediates recovered from infected cells indicates that
the mRNA templates for replication move from outside to inside the
core-like structure as dsRNA synthesis occurs. The two findings most
supportive of this model are (i) that the mRNA template associated with
core-like replication intermediates is sensitive to RNase digestion
whereas the dsRNA product is not (27) and (ii) that
replication intermediates undergo a continuous decrease in overall size
as dsRNA is synthesized (28). The reduction in size that
occurs during dsRNA synthesis can be mimicked by treating the
intermediates with RNase to remove their associated mRNA templates.
Since packaging of viral mRNA into core-like structures would be an
entropically unfavorable process, we postulate that NSP2 may function
as a molecular motor, by binding viral mRNA and catalyzing its
packaging through the energy generated by its NTPase activity.
We cannot rule out the possibility that NSP2 simply functions as an
unwindase during packaging, with the NTPase of the protein being used
to relax the secondary structure of the mRNA template for dsRNA
synthesis. However, given that the viral RNA polymerase can both
replicate and transcribe in vitro in the absence of NSP2, it seems less
likely that the primary function of NSP2 is as an unwindase. In
addition to its NTPase activity, we showed that NSP2 is
autophosphorylated following cleavage of the
-phosphate from NTP.
Removal of the linked phosphate by CIP clearly demonstrated that the
phosphate linkage was through a covalent bond. Phosphorylated rNSP2
retained the ability to bind to RNA hence it is unlikely that the
phosphorylation of NSP2 serves as a molecular switch for RNA binding.
NSP2 expressed in vivo in the absence of other rotavirus proteins was
phosphorylated. In contrast, we could not detect the presence of
phosphorylated NSP2 in infected cells. This suggests that during viral
replication, phosphorylation of NSP2 is extremely transient or that
other viral proteins interact with NSP2 to alter its NTPase activity
and thereby decrease its extent of phosphorylation. Several lines of
evidence suggest that NSP2 and the viral protein kinase NSP5 have
collaborative functions during viral replication and that NSP5 could
affect the phosphorylation status of NSP2: (i) NSP2 and NSP5 colocalize
to viroplasms in infected cells and only when transiently expressed
together in vivo will coassemble to form viroplasm-like inclusions
(9), (ii) NSP2 and NSP5 are both components of replication
intermediates with replicase activity (11, 27), and (iii)
transient expression of NSP2 in vivo induces the hyperphosphorylation
of NSP5 (1). The molecular basis of NSP5
hyperphosphorylation has not been defined but potentially may involve a
cascade of events initiated by the NTPase activity of NSP2 causing the
autophosphorylation of the protein. In this scenario, the interaction
of NSP5 with phosphorylated NSP2 would catalyze the transfer of the
-phosphate from NSP2 to NSP5 and cause the hyperphosphorylation of NSP5.
NSP2 shares a number of interesting parallels with other proteins
encoded by segmented dsRNA viruses whose functions have been implicated
in packaging and assembly. These include the nonstructural proteins of
two other members of the family Reoviridae,
NS of reovirus and NS2 of bluetongue virus. Like NSP2,
NS and NS2 form homomultimeric complexes and have nonspecific affinity for ssRNA (12, 15, 39), and like NSP2, NS2 accumulates in cytoplasmic inclusions (38). Although NS2 is phosphorylated in vivo,
neither NS2 nor
NS has been demonstrated to possess an NTPase
activity. Except that it is a structural protein, the P4 protein of the dsRNA phage
6 shares two important features with NSP2: it has nonspecific NTPase activity and forms homomultimers consisting of
similar numbers of subunits (23).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We appreciate the assistance of Melinda Jones and Vladimir
Chizhikov on this project. We also thank Robert Chanock, Albert Kapikian, and Kim Green for critically reviewing the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of
Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 7 Center Dr., MSC 0720, Room
117, Bethesda, MD 20892. Phone: (301) 496-3372. Fax: (301)
496-8312. E-mail: jpatton{at}atlas.niaid.nih.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Afrikanova, I.,
E. Fabretti,
M. C. Miozzo, and O. R. Burrone.
1998.
Rotavirus NSP5 phosphorylation is up-regulated by interaction with NSP2.
J. Gen. Virol.
79:2679-2686[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Aponte, C.,
D. Poncet, and J. Cohen.
1996.
Recovery and characterization of a replicase complex in rotavirus-infected cells using a monoclonal antibody against NSP2.
J. Virol.
70:985-991[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Bican, P.,
J. Cohen,
A. Charpilienne, and R. Scherrer.
1982.
Purification and characterization of bovine rotavirus cores.
J. Virol.
43:1113-1117[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Blackhall, J.,
A. Fuentes,
K. Hansen, and G. Magnusson.
1997.
Serine protein kinase activity associated with rotavirus phosphoprotein NSP5.
J. Virol.
71:138-144[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Chen, D. J. L.,
Gombold, and R. F. Ramig.
1990.
Intracellular RNA synthesis directed by temperature-sensitive mutants of simian rotavirus SA11.
Virology
178:143-151[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Chen, D. Y.,
C. Y. Zeng,
M. J. Wentz,
M. Gorziglia,
M. K. Estes, and R. F. Ramig.
1994.
Template-dependent, in vitro replication of rotavirus RNA.
J. Virol.
68:7030-7039[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Christensen, M. S.
1989.
Human viral gastroenteritis.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
2:51-89[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Cohen, J.
1977.
Ribonucleic acid polymerase activity associated with purified calf rotavirus.
J. Gen. Virol.
36:395-402[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Fabbretti, E.,
I. Afrikanova,
F. Vascotto, and O. R. Burrone.
1999.
Two non-structural rotavirus proteins, NSP2 and NSP5, form viroplasm-like structures in vivo.
J. Gen. Virol.
80:333-339[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Fuerst, R. T.,
G. E. Niles,
W. F. Studier, and B. Moss.
1986.
Eucaryotic transient-expression system based on recombinant vaccinia virus that synthesized bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:8122-8126[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Gallegos, C. O., and J. T. Patton.
1989.
Characterization of rotavirus replication intermediates: a model for the assembly of single-shelled particles.
Virology
172:616-627[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Gillian, A. L., and M. L. Nibert.
1998.
Amino terminus of reovirus nonstructural protein NS is important for ssRNA binding and nucleoprotein complex formation.
Virology
240:1-11[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Gonzales, S. A., and O. Burrone.
1991.
Rotavirus NS26 is modified by addition of a single O-linked residue of N-acetylglucosamine.
Virology
182:8-16[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Helmberger-Jones, M., and J. T. Patton.
1986.
Characterization of subviral particles in cells infected with simian rotavirus SA11.
Virology
155:655-665[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Huismans, H., and W. K. Joklik.
1972.
Reovirus-coded polypeptides in infected cells: Isolation of two native monomeric polypeptides with affinity for single-stranded and double-stranded RNA, respectively.
Virology
70:411-424.
|
| 16.
|
Kattoura, M. D.,
X. Chen, and J. T. Patton.
1994.
The rotavirus RNA-binding protein NS35 (NSP2) forms 10S multimers and interacts with the viral RNA polymerase.
Virology
202:803-813[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Kattoura, M. D.,
L. L. Clapp, and J. T. Patton.
1992.
The rotavirus nonstructural protein, NS35, is a nonspecific RNA-binding protein.
Virology
191:698-708[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
1970.
Cleavage of the structural proteins during the assembly of the head bacteriophage T4.
Nature
227:680-685[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Lawton, J. A.,
C. Q.-Y. Zeng,
S. K. Mukherjee,
J. Cohen,
M. K. Estes, and B. V. V. Prasad.
1997.
Three-dimensional structural analysis of recombinant rotavirus-like particles with intact and amino-terminal deleted VP2: implications for the architecture of the VP2 capsid layer.
J. Virol.
71:7353-7360[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Lui, M.,
N. M. Mattion, and M. K. Estes.
1992.
Rotavirus VP3 expressed in insect cells possesses guanylyltransferase activity.
Virology
188:77-84[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Mansell, E. A., and J. T. Patton.
1990.
Rotavirus RNA replication: VP2, but not VP6, is necessary for viral replicase activity.
J. Virol.
64:4988-4996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Midthun, K.,
H. B. Greenberg,
Y. Hoshino,
A. Z. Kapikian,
R. G. Wyatt, and R. M. Chanock.
1985.
Reassortant rotaviruses as potential live rotavirus vaccine candidates.
J. Virol.
53:949-954[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Paatero, A. O.,
J. E. Syvaoja, and D. H. Bamford.
1995.
Double-stranded RNA bacteriophage 6 protein P4 is an unspecific nucleoside triphosphatase activated by calcium ions.
J. Virol.
69:6729-6734[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Patton, J. T.
1986.
Synthesis of simian rotavirus SA11 double stranded RNA in a cell-free system.
Virus Res.
6:217-223[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Patton, J. T.
1996.
Rotavirus VP1 alone specifically binds to the 3' end of viral mRNA but the interaction is not sufficient to initiate minus-strand synthesis.
J. Virol.
70:7940-7947[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Patton, J. T., and D. Chen.
1999.
RNA-binding and capping activities of proteins in rotavirus open cores.
J. Virol.
73:1382-1391[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Patton, J. T., and C. O. Gallegos.
1988.
Structure and protein composition of the rotavirus replicase particle.
Virology
166:358-365[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Patton, J. T., and C. O. Gallegos.
1990.
Rotavirus RNA replication: single-stranded RNA extends from the replicase particle.
J. Gen. Virol.
71:1087-1094[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Patton, J. T.,
M. T. Jones,
A. N. Kalbach,
Y. W. He, and J. Xiaobo.
1997.
Rotavirus RNA polymerase requires the core shell protein to synthesize the double-stranded RNA genome.
J. Virol.
71:9618-9626[Abstract].
|
| 30.
|
Patton, J. T.,
L. Salter-Cid,
A. Kalbach,
A. E. Mansell, and M. D. Kattoura.
1993.
Nucleotide and amino acid sequence analysis of the rotavirus non-structural RNA binding protein NS35.
Virology
192:438-446[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Patton, J. T.,
M. Wentz,
J. Xiaobo, and R. F. Ramig.
1996.
cis-acting signals that promote genome replication in rotavirus mRNAs.
J. Virol.
70:3961-3971[Abstract].
|
| 32.
|
Petrie, B. L.,
H. B. Greenberg,
D. Y. Graham, and M. K. Estes.
1984.
Ultrastructural localization of rotavirus antigens using colloidal gold.
Virus Res.
1:133-152[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Pizarro, J. L.,
A. M. Sandino,
J. M. Pizarro,
J. Fernandez, and E. Spencer.
1991.
Characterization of rotavirus guanylyltransferase activity associated with polypeptide VP3.
J. Gen. Virol.
72:325-332[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Poncet, D.,
P. Lindenbaum,
R. L. Haridon, and J. Cohen.
1997.
In vivo and in vitro phosphorylation of rotavirus NSP5 correlates with its localization in viroplasms.
J. Virol.
71:34-41[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Prasad, B. V. V.,
G. J. Wang,
J. P. M. Clerx, and W. Chiu.
1988.
Three-dimensional structure of rotavirus.
J. Mol. Biol.
199:269-275[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Ramig, R. F.
1982.
Isolation and genetic characterization of temperature-sensitive mutants of simian rotavirus SA11.
Virology
120:93-105[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Ramig, R. F., and B. L. Petrie.
1984.
Characterization of temperature-sensitive mutants of simian rotavirus SA11: protein synthesis and morphogenesis.
J. Virol.
49:665-673[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Thomas, C. P.,
T. F. Booth, and P. Roy.
1990.
Synthesis of bluetongue virus encoded phosphoprotein and formation of inclusion bodies by recombinant baculovirus in insect cells: it binds the single stranded RNA species.
J. Gen. Virol.
71:2073-2083[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Uitenweerde, J. M.,
J. Theron,
M. A. Stoltz, and H. Huismans.
1995.
The multimeric nonstructural proteins of bluetongue virus, African horsesickness virus, and epizootic haemorrhagic disease virus differ in their single-stranded RNA binding ability.
Virology
209:624-632[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Welch, S. K.,
S. E. Crawford, and M. K. Estes.
1989.
Rotavirus SA11 genome segment 11 protein is a nonstructural phosphoprotein.
J. Virol.
63:3974-3982[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Yeager, M.,
K. A. Dryden,
N. H. Olsen,
H. B. Greenberg, and T. S. Baker.
1990.
Three-dimensional structure of rhesus rotavirus by cryoelectron microscopy and image reconstruction.
J. Cell Biol.
110:2133-2144[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Zeng, C. Q.-Y.,
M. J. Wentz,
M. K. Estes, and R. F. Ramig.
1996.
Characterization and replicase activity of double-layered and single-layered rotavirus-like particles expressed from baculovirus recombinants.
J. Virol.
70:2736-2742[Abstract].
|
Journal of Virology, December 1999, p. 9934-9943, Vol. 73, No. 12
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kumar, M., Jayaram, H., Vasquez-Del Carpio, R., Jiang, X., Taraporewala, Z. F., Jacobson, R. H., Patton, J. T., Prasad, B. V. V.
(2007). Crystallographic and Biochemical Analysis of Rotavirus NSP2 with Nucleotides Reveals a Nucleoside Diphosphate Kinase-Like Activity. J. Virol.
81: 12272-12284
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Su, Y. P., Shien, J. H., Liu, H. J., Yin, H. S., Lee, L. H.
(2007). Avian reovirus core protein {micro}A expressed in Escherichia coli possesses both NTPase and RTPase activities. J. Gen. Virol.
88: 1797-1805
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Arnoldi, F., Campagna, M., Eichwald, C., Desselberger, U., Burrone, O. R.
(2007). Interaction of Rotavirus Polymerase VP1 with Nonstructural Protein NSP5 Is Stronger than That with NSP2. J. Virol.
81: 2128-2137
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jiang, X., Jayaram, H., Kumar, M., Ludtke, S. J., Estes, M. K., Prasad, B. V. V.
(2006). Cryoelectron Microscopy Structures of Rotavirus NSP2-NSP5 and NSP2-RNA Complexes: Implications for Genome Replication. J. Virol.
80: 10829-10835
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Taraporewala, Z. F., Jiang, X., Vasquez-Del Carpio, R., Jayaram, H., Prasad, B. V. V., Patton, J. T.
(2006). Structure-Function Analysis of Rotavirus NSP2 Octamer by Using a Novel Complementation System.. J. Virol.
80: 7984-7994
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sen, A., Agresti, D., Mackow, E. R.
(2006). Hyperphosphorylation of the Rotavirus NSP5 Protein Is Independent of Serine 67 or NSP2, and the Intrinsic Insolubility of NSP5 Is Regulated by Cellular Phosphatases. J. Virol.
80: 1807-1816
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Silvestri, L. S., Tortorici, M. A., Vasquez-Del Carpio, R., Patton, J. T.
(2005). Rotavirus Glycoprotein NSP4 Is a Modulator of Viral Transcription in the Infected Cell. J. Virol.
79: 15165-15174
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Campagna, M., Eichwald, C., Vascotto, F., Burrone, O. R.
(2005). RNA interference of rotavirus segment 11 mR