Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, October 1999, p. 8831-8836, Vol. 73, No. 10
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Targeting Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Type 2 Integrase Protein into HIV Type 1
Hongmei
Liu,1
Xiaoyun
Wu,1
Hongling
Xiao,1 and
John C.
Kappes1,2,3,*
Departments of
Medicine1 and
Microbiology,2 University of Alabama at
Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, and Birmingham Veterans
Affairs Medical Center, Research Service, Birmingham, Alabama
352333
Received 17 March 1999/Accepted 2 July 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Integrase (IN) is the only retroviral enzyme necessary for the
integration of retroviral cDNA into the host cell's chromosomes. The
structure and function of IN is highly conserved. The human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) IN has been shown to efficiently support 3' processing and strand transfer of HIV-1 DNA substrate in
vitro. To determine whether HIV-2 IN protein (IN2) could
substitute for HIV-1 IN function in vivo, we used HIV-1 Vpr to deliver
the IN2 into IN mutant HIV-1 virions by expression in
trans as a Vpr-IN fusion protein.
Trans-complementation with IN2 markedly
increased the infectivity of IN-minus HIV-1. Compared with the
homologous trans-IN protein, infectivity was increased to a
level of 16%. Since IN has been found to play a role in reverse transcription (Wu et al., J. Virol. 73:2126-2135, 1999), cells infected with IN2-complemented HIV-1 were analyzed for DNA
products of reverse transcription. DNA levels of approximately 18% of
that of wild type were detected. The homologous trans-IN
protein restored the synthesis of viral cDNA to approximately 86% of
that of wild-type virus. By complementing integration-defective HIV-1
IN mutant viruses, which were not impaired in cDNA synthesis, the
trans-IN2 protein was shown to support
integration up to a level of 55% compared with that of the homologous
trans-IN protein. The delivery of heterologous IN protein
into HIV-1 particles in trans offers a novel approach to
understand IN protein function in vivo.
 |
TEXT |
Like all other retroviruses, human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 integrate a DNA copy of
their RNA genome into the host cell's chromosomes. Integration of the
viral cDNA is catalyzed by the integrase (IN) protein (3).
Sequence analysis has shown that many features of the primary structure
of IN are highly conserved among retroviruses and retrotransposons. The amino-terminal domain contains an array of histidine and cysteine residues that form a zinc finger motif (5, 6, 18). The central domain contains the catalytic core, which is defined by three
acidic residues with stereotyped spacing. This D,D-35-E motif is a
universal feature of integrase proteins and is essential for catalytic
activity (9, 10, 22, 25, 36). The carboxy-terminal domain is
the least conserved region of IN. It binds to the viral DNA ends and
also exhibits nonspecific DNA binding properties (19, 24, 30, 31,
37). The sequence conservation of integrase suggests strong
structure-function relationships. IN function has been studied
extensively in vitro by using purified enzyme and short oligonucleotide
substrate that mimics the ends of the viral DNA molecule (8, 21,
32). Such analysis has shown that IN proteins can utilize
different retroviral DNA substrates in the in vitro integration
reaction. The HIV-2 IN (IN2) has been shown to efficiently
support 3' processing and strand transfer of HIV-1 substrate in vitro
(37). Similarly, the feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) IN
can cleave and integrate HIV and Moloney murine leukemia virus (MoMLV)
DNA ends (38). HIV-1 IN is active on FIV substrate but is
barely active on MoMLV substrate (35, 38). While the
analysis of the integration reaction in vitro has provided a great deal
of information on IN function and has helped to elucidate the molecular
mechanism of viral DNA integration, the conditions used to study IN in
vitro do not fully duplicate those in vivo.
In the context of a replicating virus, HIV-1 IN is expressed and
assembled into virions as the C-terminal component of a larger 160-kDa
Gag-Pol polyprotein (Pr160Gag-Pol). After proteolytic
processing of Pr160Gag-Pol and entry of the virus core into
the host cell, IN exists as a 32-kDa protein together with other viral
and cellular proteins that make up the viral nucleoprotein complex
(34). Several in vivo studies have suggested that the IN
protein may be involved in other step of the virus life cycle. Host
cell proteins that bind to IN or the HIV-1 preintegration complex (PIC)
and promote integration have been identified (13, 20).
Through analysis in nondividing cells, mutations in the C terminus of
IN have been shown to disrupt the movement of the viral PIC into the
nucleus (15), suggesting a role of IN in the nuclear import
machinery pathway (15, 16). In other studies, some IN
mutations, including those in highly conserved amino acids residues,
were found to have no apparent effect on IN activity in vitro while
dramatically reducing the formation of the provirus in infected cells
(11, 12, 26, 29). These results were initially explained in
part by changes in the structure of the Pr160Gag-Pol
precursor protein, resulting in aberrant virus assembly and maturation. By incorporating IN protein into virions in trans,
independently of Pr160Gag-Pol, we recently demonstrated
that the mature IN protein itself promotes the initiation of viral DNA
synthesis (40). These results indicate that IN may play
important roles in the virus life cycle at several different levels.
To examine whether IN2 could function in place of HIV-1 IN
during virus infection, two experimental approaches were undertaken. In
the first, we replaced the HIV-1 IN coding region with that of the
IN2, generating a virus that contained an HIV-1-HIV-2
chimeric pol gene (Fig. 1). In
the second approach, the IN2 protein was incorporated into
HIV-1 virions in trans by expression as a fusion partner of
Vpr (Vpr-IN). This strategy is based on our previously findings and
those of others, which have shown that Vpr can be used as a vehicle to
deliver enzymatically active IN into HIV-1 virions in trans,
independently of Pr160Gag-Pol (14, 28, 40, 41).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Analysis of IN2 protein function when
expressed in cis with the HIV-1 genome. (A) Insertion of
IN2 into the pol gene of HIV-1. The HIV-1
SG3wt DNA (41) was cut with the BamHI
and SalI endonucleases to remove IN,
vif, and the 5' half of vpr from the DNA genome.
A fragment of pSG3wt DNA encompassing 16 bp of 3'
IN sequence, vif and the 5' half of
vpr was amplified by PCR, wherein the sense primer contained
a MluI restriction site. In a separate reaction, an
IN-containing DNA fragment was PCR amplified from the HIV-2 ST clone,
wherein the sense and antisense primers contained BamHI and
MluI restriction sites, respectively. The two PCR-amplified
DNA fragments were ligated into the
BamHI-SalI-cut pSG3wt DNA, generating
the chimeric virus pSG3IN2. Sequence analysis confirmed an
open chimeric pol reading frame (PR-RT-IN2). The
3' 18 nucleotides of the HIV-1 IN are retained in the chimeric protein.
(B) Infectivity of SG3IN2 virions. 293T cells were
transfected by calcium phosphate DNA precipitation methods with
pSG3IN2 DNA. Forty-eight hours later, the culture
supernatants were collected, filtered through 0.45-µm-pore-size
filters, and analyzed for HIV-1 p24 antigen by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (Coulter Inc.). Next, 25, 5, and 1 ng of each virus
(p24 antigen equivalents) was used to infect monolayer cultures of P4
indicator cells (7). Two days later, the cells were stained,
and infection-positive cells were counted as described earlier
(41). The virus infectivity results represent infectious
units per 25-ng equivalent of p24 antigen. These results were highly
reproducible in three independent experiments. The data shown are from
a single representative experiment.
|
|
Characterization of HIV-1 that encodes an HIV-1-HIV-2 chimeric Pol
protein.
An IN-containing DNA fragment was PCR amplified from the
HIV-2 ST proviral clone (23) and ligated into the
BamHI and MluI restriction sites of the HIV-1
pSG3wt molecular clone, generating pSG3IN2
(Fig. 1A). To determine whether the SG3IN2 virus was
infectious, 293T cell monolayers were transfected with pSG3IN2 DNA. For controls, HIV-1 wild-type
(SG3wt) and IN-minus (pSG3S-IN; see references
28 and 41) viruses were also
transfected. The supernatants of the transfected cultures were
collected 72 h later and divided into three aliquots. One aliquot
was ultracentrifuged to pellet virus for immunoblot analysis, the
second aliquot was analyzed for reverse transcriptase (RT) activity and
p24 antigen concentration (Coulter Inc.), and the third was used to
infect CD4-LTR-
-galactosidase indicator cells (P4) (7).
No differences between the wild-type and SG3IN2 virions
with respect to RT activity (relative to p24 antigen concentration) and
proteolytic processing of the Gag and Pol proteins were detected (data
not shown). However, the SG3IN2 virions exhibited a marked
decrease in infectivity (Fig. 1B). Compared with the IN-minus
SG3IN2 virions, the SG3IN2 virions were
reproducibly more infectious.
The HIV Gag-Pol precursor protein not only serves to incorporate the
viral enzymes in the virus particle but also plays an
important role in
virion assembly. Several studies have shown
that mutations within IN
can cause defects in virus particle production,
and virion composition
and morphology (
1,
2,
4,
11,
33). While our results show
that the chimeric SG3
IN2 virus was impaired in infectivity,
they do not precisely show
at what step(s) in the life cycle the virus
was defective. Therefore,
it was not possible to understand whether
virus infection was
blocked because the chimeric Gag-Pol protein was
not properly
folded and caused a defect in the late stages of the virus
life
cycle or whether the heterologous IN protein itself was unable
to
mimic the function of the HIV-1 IN protein during the early
stages of
the virus life
cycle.
Incorporation of IN2 protein into HIV-1 virions by
expression in trans.
To avoid the possible dominant-negative
effects of the chimeric Gag-Pol precursor protein, we fused the HIV-1
vpr gene with the HIV-2 IN gene
(IN2) and placed the
vpr-IN2 gene fusion into the pLR2P
expression plasmid (pLR2P-vprIN2) for complementing
HIV-1 IN mutant viruses in trans. The
pLR2P-vprIN2 plasmid was cotransfected into 293T cells with
the pSG3S-IN IN-minus clone. As controls,
pSG3S-IN was cotransfected with the Vpr HIV-1 IN expression
vector (pLR2P-vprIN; references 28, 40, 41) and the
pLR2P vector. Immunoblot analysis of the progeny virions detected two
species of anti-HIV-1 IN-reactive proteins (Fig.
2A), a 47-kDa protein, which is
consistent with the combined masses of IN (32 kDa) and Vpr (15 kDa),
and a 32-kDa protein. The detection of the 32-kDa protein in
SG3S-IN virions complemented with Vpr-IN indicated
proteolytic processing of the fusion protein and liberation of IN. The
Vpr-IN2 fusion protein was not detected with the HIV-1
anti-IN antiserum. However, using antiserum (F0784) obtained from
an HIV-2-infected individual as a probe, the 47- and 32-kDa proteins
were detected in both SG3wt and SG3S-IN virions
that were complemented with either the Vpr-IN or
Vpr-IN2 fusion proteins (Fig. 2B). Using anti-Vpr antibody,
the 47-kDa Vpr-IN and Vpr-IN2 fusion proteins and
their respective Vpr cleavage products were detected (Fig. 2C). While
SG3 contains an open vpr reading frame, the virally encoded
Vpr protein was not detected under the conditions used. Anti-Gag
antibody detected approximately similar amounts of viral Gag
proteins (Fig. 2D). These results confirmed that the IN2
protein can be incorporated into HIV-1 virions when expressed in
trans as a fusion partner of Vpr, and subsequently liberated during proteolytic maturation of the virus particle.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Incorporation of the Vpr-IN fusion protein into IN-minus
virions. (A) pSG3S-IN and pSG3wt were
separately cotransfected into 293T cells with pLR2P-vprIN2,
pLR2P-vpr-IN, and pLR2P (vector alone), respectively. As described
earlier (41), the extracellular progeny virions were
concentrated from the supernatants of each culture by
ultracentrifugation, lysed, and analyzed by immunoblot analysis using
anti HIV-1 IN peptide antibody (A), human anti-HIV-2 antiserum (B),
anti-Vpr (C), and anti-Gag (D) antibodies as probes.
|
|
The IN2 protein restores the infectivity of HIV-1
IN-minus virus.
To analyze whether the IN2 protein was
functional, SG3S-IN virions complemented with the
trans-IN2 protein were analyzed on P4 indicator
cells. Our results indicated that virus infectivity was rescued to a
level of 16% compared with virions complemented with the homologous
HIV-1 trans-IN protein (Table
1). This result represents an increase of
approximately 100-fold over noncomplemented SG3S-IN
virions. Immunoblot analysis performed on the viral stocks that were
used for infection confirmed that the trans-IN- and
trans-IN2-complemented virions contained
approximately equal amounts of the respective fusion protein (data not
shown). These results suggested that the IN2 protein can
function in place of the HIV-1 IN in vivo, albeit with significantly
reduced efficiency.
IN2 supports integration of the HIV-1 provirus.
To
directly examine whether the heterologous
trans-IN2 protein could complement the defect in
integration of IN-minus HIV-1, a single-cycle integration assay was
used. This assay utilized VSV-G-pseudotyped virus, which contains the
hygromycin resistance gene within the HIV-1 genome in place of
env. In cells infected with pseudotyped virus, where viral
DNA is synthesized, integrated, and expressed, the hygromycin
resistance gene allows for the outgrowth of cells in the presence of
selection medium. VSV-G-pseudotyped, hygromycin-resistant, IN-minus
virus (hy-SG3S-IN) was complemented by DNA cotransfection
with Vpr-IN2 and Vpr-IN, respectively.
Transfection-derived viral stocks were filtered through
0.45-µm-pore-size filters, and divided into two aliquot sets.
One aliquot set was subjected to ultracentrifugation to pellet virions
and was examined by immunoblot analysis. Similar levels (relative to CA
protein) of virion associated Vpr-IN and Vpr-IN2 were
detected (data not shown). The second aliquot set was normalized for
p24 antigen concentration and was used to infect HeLa CD4 cells in
hygromycin selection medium as described earlier (40). Complementation with the IN2 protein produced 22% of the
number of resistant colonies produced by complementation with the
homologous trans-IN protein (Table 2). Complementation of wild-type virions
(hy-SG3wt) with either Vpr-IN or Vpr-IN2
resulted in a slight reduction (approximately twofold) in CFU (data not
shown). These result are consistent with the infectivity results (Table
1).
We have recently reported that in addition to catalyzing integration,
the HIV-1 IN protein plays a nonenzymatic role in the
initiation of RT
(
40). Therefore, to directly analyze the ability
of the
heterologous IN to catalyze proviral DNA integration, independently
of
its role in viral DNA synthesis, the Vpr-IN and Vpr-IN
2
fusion proteins were used to complement the hy-SG3
D116A and
the hy-SG3
AA35A mutant viruses (
40). The
hy-SG3
AA35A mutant contains alanine substitutions in each
of the three amino
acid residues that make up the catalytic triad of
IN. While defective
in integration, these mutants produce near
wild-type levels of
viral DNA following infection. Transfection-derived
virions were
normalized for p24 antigen and used to infect HeLa-CD4
cells.
The Vpr-IN
2-complemented hy-SG3
D116A and
hy-SG3
AA35A viruses produced resistant colonies at levels
of 28 and 55%,
respectively, compared with those complemented with the
homologous
trans-IN protein (Table
2). Taken together, these
results clearly
show that heterologous IN
2 protein can
catalyze integration of the HIV-1 provirus. Moreover,
these data
confirm reports that the IN
2 protein can efficiently
support the integration of HIV-1 DNA
substrate in vitro
(
36-38).
IN2 protein does not efficiently promote HIV-1 DNA
synthesis.
Several reports have shown that viruses containing
certain mutations in IN, including IN deletion mutants, are defective
in the synthesis of their viral DNA. We reported that this is
predominately due to a role that the IN protein plays in the initiation
step of RT. Our published data demonstrated that IN-minus virions
(SG3S-IN) synthesize reduced levels of viral cDNA (5 to
10% of that of wild-type virus) and that this defect can be overcome
by providing IN in trans (40). Therefore, the
above results (Tables 1 and 2) would suggest that the defect in the
infectivity of IN2-complemented SG3S-IN virus
was largely due to a block in viral DNA synthesis after infection. To
test this directly, we analyzed the synthesis of the nascent viral cDNA
in infected cells. SG3S-IN virions containing
Vpr-IN2 were derived by DNA cotransfection and used to
infect HeLa-CD4 cells. Eighteen hours later, the cell monolayers were
trypsinized, washed extensively, and divided into two aliquot. One
aliquot set was lysed and analyzed for intracellular p24 antigen
concentration as described earlier (28, 39). DNA was
extracted from the other aliquot set, normalized for intercellular p24
antigen concentration, and analyzed for early (R-U5) and late (R-Gag)
viral DNA products as described earlier (40). Serial
fivefold dilutions of the SG3wt DNA were prepared and
analyzed in parallel as a reference to assess the relative amounts of
DNA synthesized by the mutant viruses. The IN-minus SG3S-IN
virus (lane 7) produced significantly less R-U5 DNA compared with
wild-type SG3wt virions (Fig.
3A). When complemented with the
trans-IN2 protein the SG3S-IN
virions produced 18% of the wild-type levels of R-U5 DNA (lane 5).
This represents an increase in DNA synthesis of approximately four- to
fivefold. Complementation of SG3S-IN with the homologous
trans-IN proteins generated 86% the levels of R-U5 DNA
compared with SG3wt. For control, an equivalent (p24
antigen) amount of the SG3D116A mutant virus was
analyzed and found to contain near wild-type levels (89%) of R-U5 DNA.
No R-U5 DNA was detected in cells infected with the RT-IN-minus
SG3S-RT virions (40), confirming that the R-U5
DNA detected by PCR was the product of reverse transcription. The
absence of this DNA product in cells infected with SG3S-RT
also indicates that the band migrating slightly slower than the R-Gag
band is not a product of viral DNA contamination. Nearly identical
results were obtained using the R-Gag primer pair to detect late
products of viral DNA synthesis (Fig. 3B). These results show that the
IN2 protein can support the synthesis of HIV-1
DNA, but with significantly reduced efficiency compared with HIV-1 IN.
They are also in strong agreement with our results on virus infectivity
(Table 1) and together suggest that the factor limiting infectivity was
primarily the defect in the synthesis of viral cDNA.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Reverse transcription of
Vpr-IN2-complemented viruses. pSG3S-IN was
cotransfected into 293T cells by calcium phosphate DNA transfection
methods with pLR2P-vpr-IN2, pLR2P-vprIN, and pLR2P,
respectively. As controls, pSG3wt, pSG3S-RT,
and pSG3D116A were also transfected. Forty-eight hours
later, culture supernatants were filtered through 0.45-µm-pore-size
filters and analyzed by HIV-1 p24 antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA) (Coulter Inc.). The virus-containing culture supernatants
were normalized to 500 ng of p24 antigen (CA), treated with RNase-free
DNase H (20 U/ml for 2 h) (Promega Corporation) and placed on
cultures of HeLa-CD4 cells at 37°C. After 4 h, the cell
monolayers were washed, trypsinized, resuspended in fetal bovine serum,
and divided into two aliquot sets. One aliquot set (which contained
one-tenth of the total number of cells) was lysed in phosphate-buffered
saline containing 1% Triton X-100 and analyzed by p24 antigen ELISA to
quantify intracellular CA protein. The other aliquot set was placed
back in culture medium at 37°C for an additional 14 h. The cells
were then washed and total DNA was extracted by organic methods. Next,
250-pg equivalents (p24 antigen) of each DNA extract was analyzed by
PCR methods for early (R-U5) (A) and late (R-gag) (B) viral DNA
products of RT. The amplified products were resolved on 1.5% agarose
gels and stained with ethidium bromide. To assess the relative amount
of each of the amplified DNA products, four serial fivefold dilutions
of the wild-type (SG3wt) DNA were analyzed in parallel. The
undiluted 250-pg sample was arbitrarily set to 100. As a control for
the efficiency of DpnI cleavage of potential carryover
plasmid DNA, 6,250 copies of pSG3wt DNA were analyzed after
digestion with DpnI as described previously (17,
40). The ethidium bromide staining intensity of each amplified
DNA product was measured with a Lynx 5000 molecular biology workstation
(Applied Imaging) as described previously (27). The data
shown is from a representative experiment that was repeated three
times, each time with independent transfection-derived virus
preparations.
|
|
Complementation of SG3IN2 virus with
trans-IN.
To better understand the defect in the
infectivity of the SG3IN2 virus (Fig. 1),
pSG3IN2 was cotransfected with the HIV-1
trans-IN protein (Vpr-IN) and analyzed for infectivity.
Figure 4 shows a 27-fold increase in infectivity. This represented an increase that was near that of wild-type virus when complemented with Vpr-IN. This result suggested that the expression of a chimeric Gag-Pol precursor protein did not
cause a severe defect in the assembly or maturation of the SG3IN2 virions. Rather, these data may support our earlier
findings for a role of an RT-IN intermediate in the formation of
infectious HIV-1 particles (41).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Complementation of SG3IN2 virus with
homologous trans-IN protein. pSG3IN2 and
pSG3wt were transfected alone and separately cotransfected
into 293T cells with pLR2P-vprIN. The culture supernatants were
collected 48 h later, filtered through 0.45-µm-pore-size
filters, and analyzed for HIV-1 p24 antigen by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (Coulter Inc.). Next, 25, 5, and 1 ng of each virus
(p24 antigen equivalents) was used to infect monolayer cultures of P4
indicator cells. Two days later, the cells were stained and
infection-positive cells were counted. The virus infectivity results
represent infectious units per 25-ng equivalent of p24 antigen. The
data shown are the means from three independent experiments.
|
|
In this report, we examined whether the IN
2 protein could
mimic the DNA synthesis and integration activities of the HIV-1 IN
at
the virus replication level. Our data show that while the heterologous
IN protein can support HIV-1 DNA synthesis, it is significantly
less
efficient than the homologous IN protein. The
trans-IN
2 protein causes an increase in viral
DNA synthesis of IN-minus
virus of four- to fivefold. However, the
HIV-2
trans-IN protein
appeared to support integration of
the provirus with greater efficiency,
the integration frequency of the
integration-defective D116A mutant
virus was increased by almost
200-fold. It was noteworthy that
the
trans-IN
2
protein was consistently less efficient in rescuing the DNA synthesis
defect of the SG3
D116A mutant virus compared with that of
the SG3
AA35A mutant. It is possible that the D116A mutant
IN protein has a
dominant-negative effect, perhaps through the
formation of nonfunctional
heterodimers with the IN
2
protein. The ability of the IN
2 protein to support
integration with relatively high efficiency
indicates that it
associates with the reverse transcription and
preintegration complexes.
Moreover, these results suggest that
the mere association of the
heterologous IN protein with the RT
complex is not sufficient to
efficiently promote viral DNA synthesis,
but rather that specific
interactions between the IN protein and
other viral components are
required. The delivery of heterologous
IN protein into HIV-1 particles
in
trans offers a novel approach
to understand IN protein
function in
vivo.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grant
CA73470 and by the facilities of the AIDS Central Virus and Protein
Expression Cores of the Birmingham Center for AIDS Research
(P30-AI-27767). This research was also supported by a Merit Review
Award funded by the Office of Research and Development, Medical
Research Service, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of
Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, 1900 University Blvd., THT 513H, Birmingham, AL 35294. Phone: (205) 934-0051. Fax: (205) 975-7300. E-mail: KappesJC{at}uab.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ansari-Lari, M. A.,
L. A. Donehower, and R. A. Gibbs.
1995.
Analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase mutants.
Virology
211:332-335[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Ansari-Lari, M. A., and R. A. Gibbs.
1996.
Expression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase in trans during virion release and after infection.
J. Virol.
70:3870-3875[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Brown, P.
1997.
Integration, p. 161-204.
In
J. M. Coffin, S. H. Hughes, and H. E. Varmus (ed.), Retroviruses. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 4.
|
Bukovsky, A., and H. Göttlinger.
1996.
Lack of integrase can markedly affect human immunodeficiency virus type 1 particle production in the presence of an active viral protease.
J. Virol.
70:6820-6825[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Burke, C. J.,
G. Sanyal,
M. W. Bruner,
J. A. Ryan,
R. L. LaFemina,
H. L. Robbins,
A. S. Zeft,
C. R. Middaugh, and M. G. Cordingley.
1992.
Structural implication of spectroscopic characterization of a putative zinc-finger peptide from HIV-1 integrase.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:9639-9644[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Bushman, F. D.,
A. Engelman,
I. Palmer,
P. Wingfield, and R. Craigie.
1993.
Domains of the integrase protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 responsible for polynucleotidyl transfer and zinc binding.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:3428-3432[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Clavel, F., and P. Charneau.
1994.
Fusion from without directed by human immunodeficiency virus particles.
J. Virol.
68:1179-1185[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Craigie, R.,
T. Fujiwara, and F. Bushman.
1990.
The IN protein of Moloney murine leukemia virus processes the viral DNA ends and accomplishes their integration in vitro.
Cell
62:829-837[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Drelich, M.,
R. Wilhelm, and J. Mous.
1992.
Identification of amino acid residues critical for endonuclease and integration activities of HIV-1 IN in vitro.
Virology
188:459-468[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Engelman, A., and R. Craigie.
1992.
Identification of conserved amino acid residues critical for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase function in vitro.
J. Virol.
66:6361-6369[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Engelman, A.,
G. Englund,
J. M. Orenstein,
M. A. Martin, and R. Craigie.
1995.
Multiple effects of mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase on viral replication.
J. Virol.
69:2729-2736[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Engelman, A.,
Y. Liu,
H. Chen,
M. Farzan, and F. Dyda.
1997.
Structure-based mutagenesis of the catalytic domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase.
J. Virol.
71:3507-3514[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Farnet, C. M., and F. D. Bushman.
1997.
HIV-1 cDNA integration: requirement of HMGI(Y) protein for function of preintegration complexes in vitro.
Cell
88:483-492[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Fletcher, T. M., III,
M. A. Soares,
S. McPhearson,
H. Hui,
M. Wiskerchen,
M. A. Muesing,
G. M. Shaw,
A. D. Leavitt,
J. D. Boeke, and B. H. Hahn.
1997.
Complementation of integrase function in HIV-1 virions.
EMBO J.
16:5123-5138[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Gallay, P.,
T. Hope,
D. Chin, and D. Trono.
1997.
HIV-1 infection of nondividing cells through the recognition of integrase by the importin/karyopherin pathway.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:9825-9830[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Gallay, P.,
S. Swingler,
J. Song,
F. Bushman, and D. Trono.
1995.
HIV nuclear import is governed by the phosphotyrosine-mediated binding of matrix to the core domain of integrase.
Cell
83:569-576[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Heinzinger, N. K.,
M. I. Bukrinsky,
S. A. Haggerty,
A. M. Ragland,
V. Kewalramani,
M.-A. Lee,
H. E. Gendelman,
L. Ratner,
M. Stevenson, and M. Emerman.
1994.
The Vpr protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 influences nuclear localization of viral nucleic acids in nondividing host cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:7311-7315[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Johnson, M. S.,
M. A. McClure,
D.-F. Feng,
J. Gray, and R. F. Doolittle.
1986.
Computer analysis of retroviral pol genes: assignment of enzymatic functions to specific sequences and homologies with nonviral enzymes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:7648-7652[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Kahn, E.,
J. P. G. Mack,
R. A. Katz,
J. Kulkosky, and A. M. Skalka.
1991.
Retroviral integrase domains: DNA binding and the recognition of LTR sequences.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:851-860[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Kalpana, G. V.,
S. Marmon,
W. Wang,
G. R. Crabtree, and S. P. Goff.
1994.
Binding and stimulation of HIV-1 integrase by a human homolog of yeast transcription factor SNF5.
Science
266:2002-2006[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Katzman, M.,
R. A. Katz,
A. M. Skalka, and J. Leis.
1989.
The avian retroviral integration protein cleaves the terminal sequences of linear viral DNA at the in vivo site of integration.
J. Virol.
63:5319-5327[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Kulkosky, J.,
K. S. Jones,
R. A. Katz,
J. P. G. Mack, and A. M. Skalka.
1992.
Residues critical for retroviral integrative recombination in a region that is highly conserved among retroviral/retrotransposon integrases and bacterial insertion sequences transposases.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:2331-2338[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Kumar, P.,
H. Hui,
J. C. Kappes,
B. S. Haggarty,
J. A. Hoxie,
S. K. Arya,
G. M. Shaw, and B. H. Hahn.
1990.
Molecular characterization of an attenuated human immunodeficiency virus type 2 isolate.
J. Virol.
64:890-891[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
LaFemina, R. L.,
P. L. Callahan, and M. G. Cordingley.
1991.
Substrate specificity of recombinant human immunodeficiency virus integrase protein.
J. Virol.
65:5624-5630[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
LaFemina, R. L.,
C. L. Schneider,
H. L. Robbins,
P. L. Callahan,
K. LeGrow,
E. Roth,
W. A. Schlief, and E. A. Emini.
1992.
Requirement of active human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase enzyme for productive infection of human T-lymphoid cells.
J. Virol.
66:7414-7419[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Leavitt, A. D.,
G. Robles,
N. Alesandro, and H. E. Varmus.
1996.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase mutants retain in vitro integrase activity yet fail to integrate viral DNA efficiently during infection.
J. Virol.
70:721-728[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Liu, H.,
X. Wu,
M. Newman,
G. M. Shaw,
B. H. Hahn, and J. C. Kappes.
1995.
The Vif protein of human and simian immunodeficiency viruses is packaged into virions and associates with viral core structures.
J. Virol.
69:7630-7638[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Liu, H.,
X. Wu,
H. Xiao,
J. A. Conway, and J. C. Kappes.
1997.
Incorporation of functional human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase into virions independent of the Gag-Pol precursor protein.
J. Virol.
71:7701-7710.
|
| 29.
|
Masuda, T.,
V. Planelles,
P. Krogstad, and I. S. Y. Chen.
1995.
Genetic analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase and the U3 att site: unusual phenotype of mutants in the zinc finger-like domain.
J. Virol.
69:6687-6696[Abstract].
|
| 30.
|
Miller, M. D.,
C. M. Farnet, and F. D. Bushman.
1997.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 preintegration complexes: studies of organization and composition.
J. Virol.
71:5382-5390[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Mumm, S. R., and D. P. Grandgenett.
1991.
Defining nucleic acid-binding properties of avian retroviruses integrase by deletion analysis.
J. Virol.
65:1160-1167[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Sherman, P. A., and J. A. Fyfe.
1990.
Human immunodeficiency virus integration protein expressed in Escherichia coli processes selective DNA cleavage activity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:5119-5123[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Shin, C.-G.,
B. Taddeo,
W. A. Haseltine, and C. M. Farnet.
1994.
Genetic analysis of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase protein.
J. Virol.
68:1633-1642[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Swanstrom, R., and J. W. Wills.
1997.
Synthesis, assembly, and processing of viral proteins, p. 263-334.
In
J. M. Coffin, S. H. Hughes, and H. E. Varmus (ed.), Retroviruses. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 35.
|
van Gent, D. C.,
Y. Elgersma,
M. W. J. Bolk,
C. Vink, and R. H. A. Plasterk.
1991.
DNA binding properties of the integrase protein of human immunodeficiency viruses types 1 and 2.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:3821-3837[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
van Gent, D. C.,
A. A. M. Oude Groeneger, and R. H. A. Plasterk.
1992.
Mutational analysis of the integrase protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 2.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:9598-9601[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
van Gent, D. C.,
C. Vink,
A. A. M. Oude Groeneger, and R. H. A. Plasterk.
1993.
Complementation between HIV integrase proteins mutated in different domains.
EMBO J.
12:3261-3267[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Vink, C.,
K. H. van der Linden, and R. H. A. Plasterk.
1994.
Activities of the feline immunodeficiency virus integrase protein produced in Escherichia coli.
J. Virol.
68:1468-1474[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
von Schwedler, U.,
J. Song,
C. Aiken, and D. Trono.
1993.
Vif is crucial for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proviral DNA synthesis in infected cells.
J. Virol.
67:4945-4955[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Wu, W.,
H. Liu,
H. Xiao,
J. A. Conway,
E. Hehl,
G. V. Kalpana,
V. Prasad, and J. C. Kappes.
1999.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase protein promotes reverse transcription through specific interactions with the nucleoprotein reverse transcription complex.
J. Virol.
73:2126-2135[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Wu, X.,
H. Liu,
H. Xiao,
J. A. Conway,
E. Hunter, and J. C. Kappes.
1997.
Functional RT and IN incorporated into HIV-1 particles independently of the Gag/Pol precursor protein.
EMBO J.
16:5113-5122[Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, October 1999, p. 8831-8836, Vol. 73, No. 10
0022-538X/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Parveen, Z., Mukhtar, M., Goodrich, A., Acheampong, E., Dornburg, R., Pomerantz, R. J.
(2004). Cross-Packaging of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vector RNA by Spleen Necrosis Virus Proteins: Construction of a New Generation of Spleen Necrosis Virus-Derived Retroviral Vectors. J. Virol.
78: 6480-6488
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Padow, M., Lai, L., Deivanayagam, C., DeLucas, L. J., Weiss, R. B., Dunn, D. M., Wu, X., Kappes, J. C.
(2003). Replication of Chimeric Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Containing HIV-2 Integrase (IN): Naturally Selected Mutations in IN Augment DNA Synthesis. J. Virol.
77: 11050-11059
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Priet, S., Navarro, J.-M., Querat, G., Sire, J.
(2003). Reversion of the Lethal Phenotype of an HIV-1 Integrase Mutant Virus by Overexpression of the Same Integrase Mutant Protein. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 20724-20730
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lai, L., Liu, H., Wu, X., Kappes, J. C.
(2001). Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus Integrase Protein Augments Viral DNA Synthesis in Infected Cells. J. Virol.
75: 11365-11372
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Holmes-Son, M. L., Chow, S. A.
(2000). Integrase-LexA Fusion Proteins Incorporated into Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 That Contains a Catalytically Inactive Integrase Gene Are Functional To Mediate Integration. J. Virol.
74: 11548-11556
[Abstract]
[Full Text]