INTRODUCTION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major pediatric pathogen that claims roughly 3 million lives annually throughout the world (19). It is a Pneumovirus belonging to the Paramyxoviridae family and contains a nonsegmented negative-strand RNA genome a little over 15 kb in length (13). The genome is wrapped with the nucleocapsid protein N, and the resultant N-RNA complex serves as the functional template for the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. In vitro (7, 30) and ex vivo reconstitution studies (17, 44) have shown that the minimal RNA polymerase of RSV consists of the large viral protein L and the accessory phosphoprotein P. Optimal transcription additionally requires viral antitermination protein M2 (14, 20), cellular actin (10, 22), and possibly additional cellular proteins (10).

Our laboratory has been investigating the role of phosphorylation of the RSV P protein in viral transcription over the last few years. Using a transcription system reconstituted with human RSV (HRSV, Long serotype) macromolecules in vitro, we have shown that phosphorylation of recombinant P protein by casein kinase 2 (CK2) occurs mainly at Ser²³² and that this phosphorylation is essential for the transcription function of P (7). Phosphorylation at Ser²³⁷ may additionally stimulate transcription to a small extent, thus playing a modest accessory role (7, 30).

Although most of our knowledge of the molecular biology and biochemistry of RSV has originated from studies of the human strains, there are other strains of RSV that infect nonhuman animals and therefore cause significant damage to the livestock industry and farming. Such strains include bovine RSV (BRSV), ovine RSV (ORSV), and caprine (goat) RSV that readily infect their respective host animals (1, 28, 37, 40, 45). Rapid advancement in gene sequencing and cloning in the recent past has led to the finding that in spite of their natural host preferences, these viruses are identical in genome organization and the predicted primary structures of their proteins are highly similar. For example, the amino acid identities between the N, P, and L proteins of HRSV and BRSV are 93, 77, and 84%, respectively (28, 37, 45). Thus, the transcriptional proteins of these viruses may all have domains in common and, by corollary, the structure and function of their transcription complexes may emulate those of the human prototype. Recently, use of a BRSV ex vivo complementation system based on a minigenome construct has, in fact, shown that BRSV transcription requires the N, P, and L proteins and is stimulated by the BRSV M2 protein (45), a situation identical to that of HRSV (13, 14, 17). A complementation system for ORSV is not available. To determine the functional homology between the transcriptional macromolecules of HRSV and nonhuman RSV in detail, we have used the P protein as a model and have demonstrated the ability of the BRSV and ORSV P proteins to substitute for HRSV P in an otherwise HRSV-based transcription reaction. In addition, we have mapped the major phosphorylation site of the BRSV and ORSV P proteins to Ser²³² and provided evidence that the protein kinase involved has properties of CK2.

Although recombinant HRSV P can be phosphorylated by purified and crude CK2 in vitro (7, 29, 30), the exact nature of the in vivo kinase for P remains elusive (7, 38). Drugs such as heparin, that inhibit CK2 in vitro, do not enter cultured cells (ex vivo). In an attempt to identify the intracellular kinase for P, we have therefore adopted two fundamentally different approaches. In the first, we expressed the P proteins and their CK2 site mutant forms in the available temperature-sensitive yeast CK2 mutant, which represents the only known CK2 mutation in any cell (12). In the second approach, we re-evaluated an antiviral xanthate compound, D609, which was previously shown to inhibit RSV P protein phosphorylation, as well as RSV growth in cell culture (42). During the course of these studies, we discovered that the RSV P protein is also an excellent substrate for purified CK1 in vitro and perhaps for a CK1-like activity in yeast. We then mapped the exact site of the CK1-mediated phosphorylation to Ser²¹⁵ and demonstrated a lack of its role in the transcriptional activity of the P protein.

The precise role of the phosphate groups in the activation of the RSV P protein remains unknown. We now show that the RSV L protein alone cannot initiate transcription and that the unphosphorylated P protein can aid in this process. However, transcription in the presence of the unphosphorylated P protein results in the production of short, discrete oligonucleotide transcripts from within the leader region of RSV. Use of phosphorylated P resulted in promoter clearance of RSV RNA polymerase and production of full-length transcripts. In addition, we have recently shown that the phosphate groups of P protein are susceptible to hydrolysis by the prokaryotic protein phosphatase encoded by phage lambda (PP) in vitro (2, 4). We have now successfully used this phosphatase to demonstrate a role of the phosphate groups of RSV P in the elongation phase of transcription. The RSV phosphoprotein, therefore, acts as an elongation factor for the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Together, our results present a comprehensive picture of the different phosphate groups of the RSV P protein in vitro, as well as ex vivo, and an evaluation of their roles, or lack thereof, in viral transcription.

(This work was submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. at the University of South Alabama by L. C. Dupuy.)

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Bacterial expression of BRSV and ORSV P proteins. BRSV strain A51908 (28) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. ORSV strain WSU 83-1578 was a kind gift from Howard D. Lehmkuhl. The P-encoding genes of BRSV and ORSV were cloned in bacterial expression vector pET-3a by using the same procedures that were adopted for the human strain (29). Briefly, the P-encoding genes were amplified by reverse transcription (RT) and PCR using specific primers containing NdeI and BamHI sites and cloned into the same sites in pET-3a. The recombinant proteins were purified through phosphocellulose and DEAE-cellulose chromatography, during which the proteins behaved essentially like their human counterpart (29). Site-directed mutagenesis was also carried out as described previously (5).

Expression and ³²P labeling of RSV P proteins in yeast. The HRSV P-encoding gene and its mutant forms were first cloned into pET-3a essentially as previously described (29) and then subcloned between BamHI and AvrII sites of the inducible yeast vector YEP-PGAL1 (a kind gift from James Wang; 16). The wild-type and mutant YEP-PGAL1-RSVP constructs and the YEP-PGAL1 vector alone were each introduced into both wild-type yeast and temperature-sensitive CK2 mutant yeast (kind gifts of Claiborne V. C. Glover, University of Georgia; 12). The growth of the transformants at various temperatures, induction of P protein synthesis by galactose, metabolic labeling of cells with [³²P]orthophosphate, lysis of cells, and immunoprecipitation of P protein were carried out essentially as previously described (12). CK1 and CK2 activities in yeast extracts were determined by using specific peptide substrates, RRREEESEEE for CK2 and KRRRALS(P)VASLPGL for CK1 in standard in vitro reactions (8, 24). Where mentioned, immunoblot (Western blot) analysis of P protein was performed by using anti-P antibody (29) and Ultra-signal chemiluminescence detection (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.).

Reconstituted RSV transcription. Transcription reactions based on unfractionated ribonucleoprotein were carried out essentially as described previously (3, 30). Reconstituted reactions (10 µl) were also performed as previously described (7, 30). In brief, 20-µl reaction mixtures contained 50 mM Tris-acetate (pH 7.5), 100 mM Na-acetate, 10% glycerol, 2 µg of actinomycin D per ml, 1 mM dithiothreitol; 120 ng of template N-RNA, 10 ng of L protein (both fractionated from ribonucleoprotein), 50 to 200 ng of purified recombinant (bacterial) P protein, 50 ng of HEp-2 extract containing actin, 50 µCi (50 µM) of [-³²P]UTP, and 500 µM each ATP, CTP, and GTP. The L preparation and the N-RNA complex each contributed about 2 to 4 ng of the M2 protein (22K protein), detectable by immunoblot analysis (data not shown). When phosphorylated P protein was used in a transcription, the bacterial P was phosphorylated by CK2 present in total HEp-2 cell extract (or purified CK1, where mentioned) and then purified away from kinases by phosphocellulose chromatography as previously described (7). HEp-2 extract, pretreated with excess anti-CK2 antibody, was used as the source of actin as previously described (7, 30). ³²P-labeled transcripts were quantitated by the DEAE (DE81) paper binding described previously (3).

Effect of the xanthate compound D609. To explore the effect of D609 (BIOMOL Research Laboratories, Plymouth Meeting, Pa.) on viral growth, HEp-2 cells grown in 10-cm-diameter dishes to 80% confluency were infected with RSV at a multiplicity of infection of 3. All of the media used in these experiments were brought to pH 7.0 by the addition of 1 M HCl (42). After 2 h of adsorption of the virus, the media were replaced with fresh, prewarmed media containing 0, 15, 30, 45, and 100 µM D609. To label P proteins, the media were removed 24 h later, the infected monolayers were washed twice with phosphate-free media, incubated with phosphate-free media for 2 h, and finally incubated with phosphate-free media plus [³²P]orthophosphate (1 mCi per dish) for 4 h. The cells were then processed for immunoprecipitation by using antibodies against RSV P proteins as described previously (29). To determine viral titers, parallel cultures were grown without the ³²P label and the supernatant titer was determined by serial dilution on CV-1 cells.

Sequencing of RNA. The details of the sequencing of the short transcripts produced in RSV transcription reactions in vitro (see Fig. 4) will be described elsewhere. In brief, the labeled RNAs were located by autoradiography and the bands were excised. RNA was eluted by overnight incubation in the presence of 1% SDS. A 2-µg sample of carrier tRNA was added to it, and the RNA was subjected to phenol-chloroform extraction, followed by precipitation with ethanol and ether. The triphosphate group at the 5' end was removed by calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase as previously described (25); the 5' end was then phosphorylated by using T4 polynucleotide kinase. The RNA was sequenced by two different methods. (i) In the ligation-RT-PCR method, the synthetic RNA, G₈, was first ligated to the 5' end of the transcript by using T4 RNA ligase. The 3' end of the product was then ligated to the phosphorylated 5' end of another synthetic RNA with the sequence GGU₁₂ to generate the chimeric RNA with the final sequence G₈-(RSV RNA)-GGU₁₂. This chimeric RNA was then amplified by RT followed by PCR using avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase, Pfu polymerase, and primers G₈ and A₁₂CC (complementary to the two synthetic termini). The product was cloned into an SmaI-cut vector by blunt-end ligation and then sequenced by using primers in the vector regions flanking the insert. (ii) In the enzymatic sequencing method, corresponding RNAs from a nonradioactive transcription reaction were gel purified and used in enzymatic analysis essentially as previously described (25). The nucleotide sequence at the 3' end was determined by ligation with 5'-[³²P]pCp, followed by digestion with RNase T2. The nucleotide sequence at the 5' end was determined by labeling of the 5' end of the RNA with polynucleotide kinase and [-³²P]ATP, followed by digestion with nuclease P1. For both the 5' and 3' nucleotides, the RNase-digested material was analyzed by two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography (25).

	RESULTS

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Ser²³² is the major site of phosphorylation in P proteins of all strains of RSV. We have previously shown that Ser²³² is the major site of phosphorylation of the P protein of HRSV ex vivo (expressed in HEp-2 cells) and in vitro by a cellular protein kinase activity that had the hallmarks of CK2 (7, 29, 38). Using an in vitro transcription assay, we also showed that the Ser²³² phosphate is the primary determinant of the transcriptional activity of the P protein while the phosphate at Ser²³⁷ makes a much smaller contribution (7). Since this offers an important mechanism of regulation of P function, we wanted to test whether this phenomenon is unique to HRSV or operational in the nonhuman strains also. To this end, we expressed the P proteins of the BRSV and ORSV strains and their S232A, S237A, and S232,237A mutants in bacteria. It should be recalled that the P proteins of the HRSV, BRSV, and ORSV strains are highly similar and have 77% amino acid identity with one another in pairwise alignment (1, 28). Particularly similar are the C-terminal ends of all three, and this area includes Ser²³² and Ser²³⁷ (7). We therefore expressed the wild-type and mutant P proteins of ORSV BRSV and tested them as substrates for phosphorylation by total HEp-2 cell extract in vitro. Results presented in Fig. 1 show that as in the case of HRSV P, mutation of Ser²³² also abrogated phosphorylation in the BRSV and ORSV P proteins. The inhibition of this phosphorylation by heparin and anti-CK2 antibody confirmed that the protein kinase involved is identical to or resembles CK2 (data not shown). Thus, Ser²³² appears to be the universal site of phosphorylation in the P proteins of all RSV strains.

View larger version (55K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1.   In vitro phosphorylation of recombinant BRSV and ORSV P proteins. The following purified proteins were phosphorylated by using total HEp-2 cell extract as described in Materials and Methods (lane designations are in parentheses): wild-type HRSV (WT), used as a standard marker and a positive control; an equivalent fraction from a pET-3a vector-only strain (Vector); wild-type BRSV P (WT); S237A mutant BRSV P (237); S232A mutant BRSV P (232); S232, 237A double mutant BRSV P (232,237); wild-type ORSV P (WT); S237A mutant ORSV P (237); S232A mutant ORSV P (232); and S232, 237A double mutant ORSV P (232,237). The phosphorylation reactions were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by staining (B) or autoradiography (A). The identity of the bands as P was confirmed by immunoblot analysis (C) using an antibody against HRSV P.

Essential role of CK2-mediated phosphorylation of Ser²³² in BRSV and ORSV P protein transcriptional activity. Due to the absence of a reconstituted in vitro transcription system for BRSV and ORSV, we were not able to test the role of Ser²³² phosphorylation of their P proteins in homologous viral transcription. Nevertheless, since the nonhuman proteins were highly similar to the human protein, we reasoned that they might be able to replace human P in the reconstituted transcription reaction of HRSV. Thus, standard P protein-responsive HRSV transcription reactions containing template N-RNA, L protein, 22K protein, and uninfected HEp-2 cell extract were reconstituted in which human P was replaced with recombinant bovine or ovine P. Results in Fig. 2 show that at optimal concentrations, transcription achieved by the bovine and ovine P proteins was about 40 and 25% of that achieved by the human counterpart. It is therefore obvious that these two heterologous P proteins are capable of functionally interacting with the transcriptional macromolecules of HRSV.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2.   Transcriptional activity of BRSV and ORSV P proteins. Recombinant P proteins of BRSV and ORSV were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified as described in Materials and Methods. Transcription reactions (10 µl) were reconstituted with the HRSV N-RNA template, HRSV L protein, HEp-2 cell extract (as a source of actin and CK2), and various amounts (25, 50, 100, and 150 ng) of recombinant wild-type (wt) and mutant P proteins, as indicated. incorp., incorporated.

Ser²³² phosphates of P protein are essential for RSV transcription elongation. The P protein is the only protein whose phosphorylation is known to be important in RSV transcription and is sensitive to lambda phosphatase (PP) (2, 7, 29, 30). There is no evidence that the L or N proteins of RSV are phosphorylated. We have recently shown that actin and its accessory proteins are also required for RSV transcription (10). Although the phosphorylation status of actin is uncertain, pretreatment of either actin or the accessory factor(s) with PP did not destroy its transcriptional activity (10). The susceptibility of the HRSV P phosphates to PP therefore provided us with a tool to remove the phosphates of P midway in transcription and determine the effect of their removal on transcription. As shown in Fig. 3A, addition of purified PP to an RSV transcription reaction completely inhibited transcription regardless of the time at which it was added. The bulk of the transcription measured as shown in Fig. 3 was transcription elongation, based on the following reasoning. (i) The transcripts were labeled by using -³²P-labeled UTP (Materials and Methods), and there is no known RSV transcript that starts with a U. In fact, U is extremely rare within the first 15 nucleotides of all RSV transcripts (for example, see Fig. 4A), A and G being predominant in this region. (ii) The DEAE-cellulose paper (DE81) that we used to measure RNA synthesis (Fig. 3) efficiently binds RNA molecules greater than 15 to 20-nucleotides long. Shorter RNA molecules bind much less efficiently and tend to get dissociated under our washing conditions (3; data not shown). (iii) In standard reconstituted RSV transcription reaction mixtures, full-length transcripts could be detected as early as 5 min (data not shown). In other words, a drastic shutdown of total UMP incorporation by PP, such as in Fig. 3A, would not be possible without cessation of RNA elongation. Thus, we conclude that phosphorylation of P is essential for the RNA elongation step of RSV transcription.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3.   Effects of wild-type (A) and mutant (B) PP on RSV transcription. In vitro transcription reactions (160 µl) were reconstituted as described in Materials and Methods by using wild-type (WT) recombinant P phosphorylated by total HEp-2 extract (, solid line). At 0, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min after the start of transcription (arrowheads), a 30-µl reaction volume was taken out in a fresh tube to which 40 ng of PP (1 µl) was added and incubation was continued. At 0, 10, and 20 min after the addition of PP (, dotted line), a 10-µl reaction volume was spotted onto DE81 paper. The paper was then processed for quantitation of labeled transcripts as described earlier (3). The various mutant forms of PP were similarly added at 20 min of transcription, and the reaction was monitored for another 20 min (B). The residual phosphatase activity of each mutant form of PP is shown as a percentage of that of the wild type (2). inc., incorporated.

The negative charge of the phosphate group at Ser²³² contributes to P function. The exact mechanism by which the phosphate groups activate the elongation function of the P protein is not known. Since a predominant feature of a phosphate group is its highly negative charge, we tested the possibility that a negatively charged amino acid, viz., Asp, may be able to functionally substitute for Ser at position 232 to produce a mutant P protein that will be constitutively active without CK2. Ser²³² was therefore mutated to Asp by site-directed mutagenesis, and the mutant was expressed in bacteria, purified, and employed in a reconstituted RSV transcription reaction. As shown in Table 1, the S232D mutant exhibited about 40% of wild-type transcription activity (line 3) that was not affected by the addition of either CK2 (line 4) or PP (line 5) to the reaction, suggesting that at least part of the transcriptional activity of the Ser²³² phosphate group is due to its negative charge. At the same time, these results suggest that the phosphate group itself, and not just its net negative charge, makes a large contribution to the total transcriptional activity of P. 

Phosphate-free P protein can promote transcription initiation, but phosphorylation is required for promoter clearance. Since phosphorylation of P was found to be important for transcription elongation, we sought to determine whether it is also important for initiation through direct analysis of the initiated transcripts. RSV transcription was reconstituted under two conditions, both of which would eliminate CK2-mediated phosphorylation of the P protein, i.e., by using S232A mutant P or by using wild-type bacterial (phosphate-free) P in the presence of anti-CK2 antibody and PP. The anti-CK2 antibody and PP were included to rule out any phosphorylation of the wild-type P protein during transcription by the HEp-2 extract that was needed to provide actin, an essential cellular factor required for RSV transcription. Results are shown in Fig. 4, where panel A depicts the short initiation products resolved on a 24% polyacrylamide gel containing 6 M urea and panel B depicts full-length mRNAs resolved on an acidified agarose-urea gel. Reactions devoid of either L or P produced no detectable transcript, suggesting that the P and L proteins alone are incapable of any aspect of transcription (lanes 1 and 2 in panels A and B). When unphosphorylated P protein was added together with L, however, a heterogeneous population of oligoribonucleotides was produced that represented abortive initiation products (panel A, lane 3). No full-length transcripts were still detectable (panel B, lane 3). An essentially identical RNA profile was obtained by using the S232A mutant P protein, which is nonphosphorylatable by CK2 (lane 4). When the sequences of the three major oligoribonucleotide products from lane 3 were determined, they were found to have identical 5' termini complementary to the 3' terminus of the negative-sense genomic RNA (13). The largest species was 24 nucleotides long and had the sequence 5'ACGGGAAAAAATGCGTACAACAAA3'; the two smaller transcripts (9 and 11 nucleotides long) also had the same sequence and were only shorter at the 3' end. All transcripts were devoid of a 5' cap and a poly(A) tail (data not shown).

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4.   Role of phosphorylation of P protein in a postinitiation step of transcription. HRSV transcription was reconstituted essentially as described in Materials and Methods, using all four -32P-labeled ribonucleoside triphosphates. The following P proteins were used: wild-type, phosphate-free recombinant P (in the presence of 5 µg of anti-CK2 antibody and 200 ng of PP per 160-µl reaction mixture) (WT-P; lane 3); wild-type, recombinant P prephosphorylated with total HEp-2 extract (WT-P-PO4; lanes 1 and 5); and Ser232Ala mutant recombinant P (S232A-P; lane 4). Following a 2-h transcription at 30°C, the 32P-labeled RNA was deproteinized and analyzed by electrophoresis on a 25% polyacrylamide gel (A) and an acid-agarose-urea gel (B) as described in Materials and Methods. Autoradiographs of the gels are shown. Each lane contains the equivalent of a 160-µl reaction mixture. In panel A, the arrowhead indicates the putative leader RNA of RSV; in this panel, the mRNAs did not enter the gel and remained in the loading slots, as indicated. The major labeled RNA bands, as shown, were excised from the gel and sequenced as described in Materials and Methods. Panel B shows the mRNAs for the various RSV genes (F, N, etc.), as indicated. Identical lane numbers in the two panels indicate identical reactions. In panel B, lanes 1 to 4 were slightly overexposed to detect any RNA band corresponding to lane 5 and none was found.

Xanthate compound D609 inhibits CK2 and P phosphorylation in vitro. D609 has been shown to inhibit the growth of a number of viruses, including VSV and RSV, in cell culture (33, 42). Subsequently, it was shown to inhibit the intracellular phosphorylation of RSV P protein and synthesis of RSV N protein; however, replication of viral genomic RNA was not affected. Although the exact target of D609 remained undefined, based on the foregoing, it was logical to test whether D609 inhibits P protein phosphorylation by CK2 in vitro. As shown in Fig. 5, D609 inhibited the phosphorylation of recombinant RSV P by purified CK2 with a 50% inhibitory concentration of about 30 µM. Similar inhibition of phosphorylation was also seen when the total HEp-2 extract was used as the source of CK2 (data not shown). However, in contrast to a previous study in which 30 µM D609 inhibited intracellular phosphorylation of RSV P or growth of RSV in cell culture (ex vivo), we failed to obtain appreciable inhibition of either of these (Fig. 5). We do not have any explanation for this apparent discrepancy of the ex vivo activity of D609. It is possible that minor differences in cell culture conditions or medium composition have large effects on the potency or cellular uptake of D609. In apparent contrast, under the same conditions (45 µM D609), growth of VSV (on BHK-21 cells) and intracellular phosphorylation of VSV P protein were inhibited by 60 and 95%, respectively (33; data not shown). Thus, we presume that inhibition of RSV growth by D609 is only observed under conditions in which RSV P protein phosphorylation is also inhibited, indicating a possible relationship between the two (42). Since we failed to reproduce ex vivo inhibition of either process, we could not study its mechanism further.

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 5.   Effect of D609 on RSV growth and P protein phosphorylation. The various concentrations of D609 used in vitro and ex vivo are indicated. The effect of D609 on CK2 activity in vitro () was tested by using recombinant RSV P as a substrate and total HEp-2 extract as the source of CK2 in a standard kinase reaction; use of purified CK2 produced essentially similar results. Ex vivo effects of D609 were determined by monitoring progeny viral titer () and metabolic labeling of RSV P protein () by 32Pi. All data are presented as percentages of values obtained with samples not treated with D609.

RSV P can be a substrate for CK1. Our investigations of a non-CK2 kinase for RSV P protein were based on two lines of evidence obtained earlier. First, when total HEp-2 extract was the source of the kinase, about 5% of the P protein phosphorylation remained resistant to D609 (data not shown). Second, P protein in which the two CK2 sitesSer²³² and Ser²³⁷were both mutated still contained about 5% of the wild-type phosphates ex vivo (7, 38). To identify the kinases involved in this residual phosphorylation, we tested two multipotent protein kinases, viz., CK1 and protein kinase A, for the ability to phosphorylate purified recombinant RSV P in vitro. CK1 was found to phosphorylate P protein efficiently, whereas protein kinase A did not (data not shown). The stoichiometry of CK1-mediated phosphorylation was found to be about 0.5, suggesting the existence of at least one phosphorylation site in the polypeptide.

Relative contributions of CK2 and CK1 to the intracellular phosphorylation states of RSV P protein. To investigate whether CK1 may also contribute to the phosphorylation of P protein ex vivo, we undertook a series of studies, the results of which will be summarized here without any data shown. First, we analyzed the phosphorylation status of recombinant mutant P proteins expressed in human cells (ex vivo) by metabolic labeling with ³²P followed by immunoprecipitation. The S232,237A double mutant was found to contain about 5 to 8% of the wild-type phosphates, confirming earlier findings (7, 38). This residual phosphorylation was found to occur at Ser²¹⁵, since the ³²P content of the S215,232,237A triple mutant was undetectable. Essentially similar results were obtained in vitro by using bacterially expressed recombinant P proteins as substrates for phosphorylation by a total HEp-2 cell extract. Phosphorylation of the S232,237A double mutant was also completely inhibited by including a CK1 inhibitor, CK1-7 (8), in the in vitro reaction mixture, further corroborating the finding that the small amounts (5 to 8%) of residual phosphorylation were indeed due to a CK1-like activity in the HEp-2 cells.

CK1-mediated phosphorylation of P is irrelevant for RSV transcription in vitro. To address the role of the newly discovered, albeit minor, phosphorylation of P by CK1, we phosphorylated recombinant RSV P protein by purified CK1 in vitro and then assayed its transcriptional activity in RSV transcription reconstituted in the presence of anti-CK2 antibody. The anti-CK2 antibody was previously shown to be effective in inhibiting the CK2 activity present in the HEp-2 extract that was needed to provide actin, which is essential for RSV transcription (7, 10, 30). As shown in Table 1, CK1-catalyzed phosphorylation did not bestow transcriptional function on the P protein (line 6). Furthermore, the S215A mutant P was transcriptionally as active as the wild type (Table 1, line 7). These results suggest that phosphorylation of RSV P by CK1 has no discernible role in RSV transcription in vitro. Its lack of biological relevance is further underscored by the fact that this Ser is not conserved in the BRSV and ORSV P proteins and is replaced with Lys and Asn, respectively. The possible role of this phosphorylation in HRSV P ex vivo could not be investigated due to the lack of a conditional lethal CK1 mutant host cell line or a highly specific cell-permeable inhibitor of CK1.

	DISCUSSION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

In this communication, we have provided a comprehensive account of the phosphate groups of the RSV P protein, the responsible kinases, and their potential role in RSV transcription. To sum up, we have shown the following. (i) Whereas Ser²³² is the primary site for CK2-mediated phosphorylation (7; also Fig. 1 and 2), the only site for CK1-mediated phosphorylation is Ser²¹⁵ both in vitro and ex vivo. These two residues and the minor CK2 site Ser²³⁷ account for all of the phosphates of the RSV P protein. (ii) L protein alone, in the absence of P, cannot initiate transcription (Fig. 4). (iii) Initiation of transcription per se does not require phosphorylation of P (Fig. 4 and 6). (iv) CK2-mediated phosphorylation of P is essential for productive exit of the polymerase from the promoter and for continued transcription elongation (Fig. 4 and 6). (v) Minor amounts of phosphorylation by CK1 occur at Ser²¹⁵ but are not required for transcription in vitro (Table 1).

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 6.   Model for the role of P protein in transcription initiation and elongation. (a) Even unphosphorylated P can stimulate loading of the L-P complex at the promoter sequence of the N-RNA template; i.e., phosphorylation is not required for this step. This complex generates abortive transcripts within the leader region. (b) Phosphorylation of P, likely resulting in allosteric conformational changes in the P and L proteins, leads to suppression of the abortive transcription, promoter clearance of the polymerase, and production of full-length transcripts (for details, see the text). The exact stoichiometry of L and P in the functional polymerase is not known.

Although the functional RNA polymerase of RSV requires both the L and P proteins, the relative contributions of the two proteins to polymerase function remain unknown. The essential role of both proteins derives from two kinds of evidence, viz., analysis of conditional lethal mutations and reconstitution experiments in vitro and ex vivo. First, the L protein was found to contain multiple mutations in a cold-sensitive RSV strain (23) and a T736A substitution in another attenuated strain (39). Also, the temperature sensitivity of the tsN19 mutant strain of RSV was due to a G172S mutation in the P protein (11). In an ex vivo cDNA-based reconstitution system, transfection of both L and P cDNAs was required for the synthesis of full-length viral mRNAs and genomic RNA (17, 44). Finally, in vitro, both L and P were absolutely required to reconstitute functional transcription that generated full-length mRNA (7, 30). These studies, however, did not address the role of these proteins or the role of phosphorylation of P in the various steps of the transcription process. Our in vitro results (Fig. 4) showed that the P protein, in the absence of L, did not produce any detectable transcript. The L protein alone was also incapable of transcription. These results suggest that the basic promoter-binding and ribonucleotide polymerase activities of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase require participation of both L and P. In this regard, RSV appears to be similar to VSV and Sendai virus, two nonsegmented negative-strand RNA viruses in both of which the P protein appears to be required for the binding of L to the template N-RNA (15, 21, 32).

When phosphate-free RSV P protein was added along with L, the resultant RSV transcription complex was capable of activating transcription although the transcripts were still short (Fig. 4). This was shown by using either unphosphorylated P (lane 3) or conducting transcription in the presence of PP (lane 4). The lack of a need for phosphorylation of RSV P in transcription initiation is also supported by our finding that phosphorylated and unphosphorylated P proteins bound equally well to the template N-RNA in a simple binding assay (30). The sequencing of the short transcripts indicated that they were uncapped, unpolyadenylated, and complementary to the 3' end of the genomic RNA and thus may be analogous to the leader RNAs that have been found in a number of other negative-strand RNA viruses, such as VSV and Sendai virus (26). Although the minimal promoter of RSV remains undefined, recent studies with VSV have shown that about 24 nucleotides of the terminal bases are absolutely essential for transcription (27, 43). Full transcriptional activity requires additional sequence elements within the leader at positions 19 to 29 and 34 to 46, and a separate element at nucleotides 47 to 50, in the nontranscribed leader-N gene junction (43). The longest abortive RSV transcript, of 24 nucleotides, detected by us in vitro (Fig. 4) is thus reminiscent of the minimal promoter length of VSV and may, in fact, define the minimal functional RSV promoter. To our knowledge, this is the first direct demonstration of free transcripts originating from the leader region of the RSV genome. Since the leader RNA of negative-strand RNA viruses is believed to play an important role in the initiation of encapsidation (binding of N protein to the genomic RNA) and hence in the regulation of the transcription-to-replication switch (9, 35), further characterization of the RSV leader RNAs will be an important breakthrough in RSV gene expression. This is currently in progress.

Full-length mRNAs were only produced when L was used together with phosphorylated P protein (30), suggesting that a major role of phosphorylation of P is to provide the L protein the initial processivity required for promoter clearance (Fig. 4, lanes 5). It should be pointed out that this is fundamentally different from the processivity imparted by the RSV M2 (22K) protein that results in the suppression of intra- as well as intergenic pause and termination throughout the genome (14, 20). Increasing amounts of M2, in fact, generated progressively higher readthrough of adjacent genes and resultant unnatural, chimeric transcripts (20). Phosphoprotein P, in contrast, only suppresses abortive transcription within the leader region at the promoter and does not unduly suppress the natural intergenic termination signals downstream, even at a relatively high concentration (7, 30; data not shown).

The finding that CK1 can phosphorylate recombinant HRSV P is intriguing, since this phosphorylation appears to occur primarily in yeast cells or by use of purified CK1 in vitro and is not important for transcription (Table 1). We do not known if it plays any role in replication. In HEp-2, which is the host cell for HRSV growth and therefore more relevant in our studies, CK2 is responsible for the vast majority of phosphates that are located mostly at Ser²³² of the P protein (7, 38) with only about a 5% contribution from Ser²¹⁵, the site of CK1-mediated phosphorylation. It is hard to ascertain why yeast and HEp-2 cells phosphorylate HSRV P on different residues and through CK1 and CK2, respectively, especially because the exact locations and nature of CK1 and CK2 in any cell are not definitively known (18, 36). Both enzymes are considered ubiquitous based on the fact that their activities can be measured in extracts of virtually all kinds of cells in vitro by using artificial and physiological substrates. However, one cannot rule out the possibility that they associate with various regulatory subunits in cells of different evolutionary origin in vivo (18, 36), which results in their differential accessibility to P protein. Alternatively, the catalytic subunits of CK1 and CK2 of yeast may have substrate recognition properties that differ from those of their HEp-2 counterparts. In any case, until new results are obtained to the contrary, we will consider it unlikely that the minor CK1-mediated phosphorylation of P has any significance in the HRSV life cycle.

Although the various steps of RSV transcription are still to be characterized, we suggest a working hypothesis of the P protein function modeled after our knowledge of eukaryotic transcription (Fig. 6). We believe that although L may encode many transcription-related domains, it cannot by itself recognize the promoter sequence at the 3' terminus of the N-RNA template (the leader region). P protein, in analogy to the eukaryotic transcription factors, may stabilize promoter-L interactions and thus lead to an active promoter-polymerase complex (46). This function of P does not require phosphorylation and results in the generation of the short leader-like transcripts free of caps and poly(A) tails. The RNA polymerase assembled with phosphate-free P is perhaps akin to a "closed" complex that is still in the initiation mode and fails to proceed beyond the promoter region (31). Phosphorylation of P allows this complex to attain an "open" conformation committed to elongation and necessary for promoter clearance and movement along the template. The transcripts produced in the absence of phosphorylation of P are therefore essentially analogous to the abortive transcription products of other, DNA-dependent, RNA polymerases (31, 41). Since dephosphorylation of P produced immediate loss of RNA elongation at all time points, we further postulate that the open conformation is essential for elongation throughout transcription and that the continued association of phosphorylated P is needed for the maintenance of this open conformation. Recently, use of reconstituted chromatin templates in vitro has led to the discovery of a novel protein factor, FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription), which acts subsequent to transcription initiation to release RNA polymerase II from a nucleosome-induced block to productive transcription (34). We postulate that the P protein acts in an analogous manner for RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, initiating transcription on RNA-based chromatin, i.e., RNA templates wrapped with N protein.