Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, September 1998, p. 7221-7227, Vol. 72, No. 9
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Heparin-Like Structures on Respiratory Syncytial
Virus Are Involved in Its Infectivity In Vitro
C.
Bourgeois,1,*
J. B.
Bour,1
K.
Lidholt,2
C.
Gauthray,1 and
P.
Pothier1
Laboratoire de Microbiologie Médicale
et Moléculaire, Faculté de Médecine, 21033 Dijon
Cedex, France,1 and
Department of
Medical and Physiological Chemistry, The Biomedical Center, University
of Uppsala, S-75 123 Uppsala, Sweden2
Received 12 January 1998/Accepted 5 June 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Addition of heparin to the virus culture inhibited syncytial plaque
formation due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Moreover, pretreatment of the virus with heparinase or an inhibitor of heparin, protamine, greatly reduced virus infectivity. Two anti-heparan sulfate
antibodies stained RSV-infected cells, but not noninfected cells, by
immunofluorescence. One of the antibodies was capable of neutralizing
RSV infection in vitro. These results prove that heparin-like
structures identified on RSV play a major role in early stages of
infection. The RSV G protein is the attachment protein. Both
anti-heparan sulfate antibodies specifically bound to this protein.
Enzymatic digestion of polysaccharides in the G protein reduced the
binding, which indicates that heparin-like structures are on the G
protein. Such oligosaccharides may therefore participate in the
attachment of the virus.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV),
which belongs to the Pneumovirus genus of the
Paramyxoviridae family, is the major cause of acute lower
respiratory tract illness in infants and young children
(17). Its envelope contains two glycoproteins, G and F, that
are responsible, respectively, for virus attachment to the cell and for
cell fusion (20). A third protein, named SH, has an unknown
function. Although it enhanced the fusion process when coexpressed with
the F and G glycoproteins (13), it was recently shown, by
using a virus without SH, that the SH protein is dispensable for the
fusion function (4). The G protein has unusual features
compared to other paramyxovirus glycoproteins. The RSV G protein is
synthesized as a precursor (36 kDa) (12, 28, 34) which is
modified by the addition of N-linked sugars to form an intermediate of
45 kDa. These sugars convert to the complex type, and then O-linked
sugars are added to yield a mature molecule of approximately 90 kDa
(8, 35). Because of its high serine, threonine, and proline
content, the RSV G protein has been described as mucin like. Such
proteins are secreted by epithelial cells (2). The structure
of the fusion protein (F) is similar to that of other paramyxoviruses
(6, 31). The F protein is N glycosylated, as shown by
tunicamycin treatment. It contains 13% N-glycans (19) and
is palmitylated (7). It has five or six potential
N-glycosylation sites, one of which is on the F1 subunit. The SH
protein is present in RSV-infected cells in nonglycosylated and
glycosylated forms with a variable degree of glycosylation (1,
25).
The precise structure of RSV oligosaccharides and the functional role
of the F and SH carbohydrates in infectivity are still not well
defined. By using inhibitors of N- or O-linked glycosylations or
endoglycosidases, partially glycosylated intermediates of the G protein
have been generated and virus infectivity has been shown to be greatly
reduced after removal of N- or O-linked oligosaccharides (19). Moreover, it has been shown that O-linked
carbohydrates are necessary for the binding of most anti-G protein
antibodies (26). Thus, oligosaccharides contribute either
directly or indirectly to antigenic sites on viral glycoproteins.
Sulfated polysaccharides, including heparin, were found to inhibit RSV
cytopathogenicity, and it has been suggested that these inhibitors
interfere with virus-cell binding and/or virus-cell fusion
(14). Heparin is composed of heterogeneous-sized sequences of alternating hexuronic acid and glucosamine. In addition, the degree
of sulfatation and acetylation varies in these sequences. We further
investigated, by using a variety of inhibition assays, on which
protagonist of the interaction, the virus or the cell, heparin acts.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Virus strains and cell cultures.
Human RSV (Long strain) was
propagated in HEp-2 cells grown in Eagle basal medium (modified) with
Hanks salts (HBME) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine,
2.08-g/ml sodium bicarbonate, 105 U of penicillin per
liter, and 100 mg of streptomycin per liter.
Antibodies.
Monoclonal antibodies to RSV were produced as
previously described (3). RS-A412 recognizes the G protein,
and RS-18B2 recognizes the fusion protein. Three anti-heparan sulfate
monoclonal antibodies were used throughout this study. Anti-HSPG
(heparan sulfate proteoglycan) antibody BMS4056 was purchased from
Boehringer Ingelheim Bioproducts, Ingelheim, Germany. Antibodies
F58-10E4 and HepSS-1 were purchased from Seikagaku, Tokyo, Japan.
Purification of the G protein.
The G protein was purified
from an RSV-infected culture supernatant by affinity chromatography
using antibody RS-A412 (32).
Compounds.
Heparin was obtained from Leo Pharmaceutical
(Ballerup, Denmark). Heparin chains are heterogeneous in size with a
mean value of around 50 monosaccharide residues and a molecular mass of
5 to 25 kDa. Low-molecular-weight heparin (Fragmine) and protamine were
purchased from Pharmacia (Uppsala, Sweden) and Sanofi Choay (Gentilly,
France), respectively. Fragmine is a mixture of short chains (around 18 residues) and has a molecular mass of around 6 kDa. Protamine was
dissolved in a glucose-cresol solution. An identical solvent was
prepared and used as a control. Heparinase II (heparin lyase II [no
assigned EC number]), heparinase III (heparin lyase III, heparitinase
I [EC 4.2.2.8]), chondroitinase ABC (EC 4.2.2.4), and bovine kidney
heparan sulfate were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis,
Mo.).
Inhibition of RSV-induced plaque formation by heparin, Fragmine,
or heparan sulfate.
Twofold serial dilutions (300 µl) of
heparin, Fragmine, or heparan sulfate in HBME were mixed with an equal
volume of virus (700 PFU/ml) and incubated for 1 h at 37°C.
Mixtures were then allowed to adsorb to cells grown in six-well tissue
culture plates for 2 h at 37°C. The inoculum was then removed,
and the cells were overlayered with 3 ml of HBME containing 0.5%
agarose. Five days later, the plates were stained with 0.5 mg of
neutral red per well. Viral plaques were counted after further
incubation at 37°C for 4 h. Fifty percent inhibitory
concentrations (IC50s) were determined by calculating the
efficiency of virus plaque formation relative to that of an untreated
infected control. In all assays carried out in vitro, syncytium
detection was done as described here.
Heparin treatment of cell monolayers.
HEp-2 cells were
incubated with serially diluted heparin or heparan sulfate for 1 h
at 37°C. The cells were then thoroughly washed and inoculated with
RSV. Two hours later, cells were overlaid with 0.5% agarose in HBME.
Activity of heparin. (i) Effect of incubation time.
In the
first experiment, diluted heparin (1 IC80) in HBME was
incubated in vials at 37°C with the virus (700 PFU/ml) for various periods. HBME was added in the same way to the virus in control vials.
These heparin-virus and HBME-virus mixtures were then allowed to adsorb
for 2 h at 37°C to monolayers of HEp-2 cells grown in six-well
plates. After adsorption of the virus, the inoculum was removed and the
cells were overlaid with 3 ml of HBME containing 0.5% agarose. In the
second experiment, a virus inoculum was allowed to adsorb to cells for
2 h at 37°C, and heparin (1 IC80) was added at
various times during this adsorption period, which was always the same,
i.e., 2 h. The cells were then thoroughly washed before being
overlaid with HBME agarose as described above.
(ii) Effect of temperature.
The virus was allowed to adsorb
to HEp-2 cells for 1.5 or 2 h at 37°C and for 1, 2, or 2.5 h at 4°C. The inoculum was then removed, and heparin (1 IC80) was added to the wells and left at 37°C until
neutral red staining. No heparin was added to control wells.
Effects of heparinase, chondroitinase, and protamine on RSV
infection.
(i) Serial dilutions (300 µl of each) of heparinase
(0.1 to 10 U/ml), chondroitinase (0.017 to 170 mIU/ml [170 mIU of
chondroitinase is equivalent to 100 U of heparinase]), protamine (0.1 to 10 IU/ml), or protamine solvent were mixed with an equal volume of
virus (700 PFU/ml) and incubated for 1 h in vials at 37°C.
Inhibitor-virus mixtures were then allowed to adsorb to cells for
2 h at 37°C. (ii) The same dilutions of inhibitors were
incubated with cells for 1 h at 37°C before virus infection (700 PFU/ml). Cells were thoroughly washed before virus infection. After
adsorption of the virus, the inoculum was removed and the cells were
overlaid with HBME-agarose.
Immunofluorescence.
RSV-infected and noninfected HEp-2 cells
were fixed on slides in acetone and incubated first with the anti-HSPG
antibody (purified immunoglobulin, 100 µg/ml), F58-10E4, or HepSS-1
(all were diluted 1:50). Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat
anti-mouse immunoglobulin (diluted 1:100; Pasteur Diagnostics) or
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse polyvalent
immunoglobulin (diluted 1:100; Sigma) was then added.
ELISA. (i) Antibody binding.
The binding of the three
anti-heparan sulfate antibodies was assessed by indirect enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The wells of microtiter plates were coated
overnight at room temperature either with intact RSV-infected HEp-2
cells or with intact noninfected HEp-2 cells in phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS). Nonspecific binding sites in the wells were saturated by
incubation with 2% nonfat milk for 30 min at 37°C. Antibodies were
incubated in the wells for 1 h at 37°C. Bound antibodies were
then detected with peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin
(1:1,000).
(ii) Sandwich ELISA.
An anti-HSPG antibody (diluted 1:5 in
PBS) or antibody F58-10E4 (diluted 1:10 in PBS) was used to coat
microtiter plate wells and incubated overnight at room temperature.
Binding sites in the wells were saturated by incubation with 3% nonfat
milk for 30 min at 37°C. Several dilutions of the purified G protein
in PBS were then added to the wells and incubated for 1 h at
37°C. Bound protein was then detected with peroxidase-conjugated
antibody RS-A412 or RS-18B2. To check reaction specificity, the G
protein was treated with heparinase or heparitinase (10 IU/well) for
1 h at 37°C before assessment of binding to the F58-10E4
antibody. In this assay, the protein was diluted in 0.1 M phosphate
buffer (pH 8.2).
Neutralization assay.
Long RSV (5 × 103
PFU) or parainfluenza 3 virus was mixed for 1 h with anti-HSPG
antibody (diluted from 10 to 2.5 µg/ml). Monolayers of HEp-2 cells in
six-well plates were then infected. Syncytia were counted after neutral
red staining. Neutralization was recorded when the mean reciprocal of
the antibody dilution gave 50% plaque reduction compared to the well
infected without antibody. In a parallel experiment, monolayers of
HEp-2 cells were treated with the anti-HSPG antibody and then washed
with PBS before infection with RSV or parainfluenza 3 virus.
 |
RESULTS |
IC50 determination.
We first examined the
inhibitory effects of heparin, Fragmine, and heparan sulfate on RSV
infection in vitro. Serially diluted reagents were incubated with RSV
prior to inoculation onto the cells (Fig.
1). The IC50s of heparin and
Fragmine were similar at about 0.024 IU/ml. Heparin is composed of
heterogeneous-sized sequences. Low-molecular-weight heparin, i.e.,
Fragmine, was also inhibitory. Thus, heparin with a molecular size
below 8 kDa is still active. These short sequences, which bear the
antithrombotic properties of heparin, are also able to inhibit RSV
infection. No inhibition of plaque formation was observed, whatever the
dilution of heparan sulfate used in the assay. In contrast to heparin, heparan sulfate had no inhibitory effect when this procedure was used.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Effects of various concentrations of heparin, Fragmine,
and heparan sulfate on RSV-induced plaque formation. Various
concentrations of heparin ( ), Fragmine ( ), and heparan sulfate
( ) were incubated for 1 h at 37°C with 700 PFU of RSV per ml,
and the ability to reduce virus infectivity was then assessed. mUI,
international milliunits.
|
|
HEp-2 cell treatment with heparin or heparan sulfate before
infection with RSV.
HEp-2 cells were then exposed to heparin or
heparan sulfate to determine how these reagents are able to reduce
infectivity. As shown in Fig. 2, cell
treatment with heparin before inoculation reduced infectivity in a
dose-dependent manner. As we obtained some inhibition, we can say that
binding of these reagents to the cells is not completely reversible by
washing, in particular when a higher concentration of heparin (more
than 0.45 IU/ml) is used. However, at low concentrations, the
inhibition obtained after cell treatment was lower than when heparin
was added simultaneously with the virus. In this case, washing removed
a major part of the unbound heparin. The viruses then occupy the free
binding sites, and the virus can adsorb to the cell surface without any free competing heparin. On the contrary, when an inoculum with heparin
is added to the cell culture, the virus and heparin compete simultaneously for cell surface area, which leads to 100% inhibition.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effect of the treatment of cells with various
concentrations of heparin ( ) and heparan sulfate ( ) on RSV
infectivity. Cells were washed before infection. mUI, international
milliunits.
|
|
Heparan sulfate activity followed a distinct pattern (Fig.
1 and
2).
Pretreatment of the cells with heparan sulfate also led
to inhibition
of infectivity. However, when an inoculum was added
with heparan
sulfate, leading to simultaneous competition between
the virus and
heparan sulfate for cell surface area, complete
infection resulted.
Thus, heparan sulfate has an inhibitory effect
on RSV infection only if
this reagent has already bound to the
cell surface. It may reflect the
fact that binding to the cells
by the virus is much quicker than that
of heparan sulfate.
Determination of the stage of infection at which heparin is
active.
Heparin was first preincubated with the virus before
infection. We observed complete inhibition of plaque formation,
whatever the length of the contact time (Fig.
3). Even when the virus and heparin were
added simultaneously to the cells, virus infection was abolished (Fig.
3,
and first
). No variation due to the incubation at 37°C
before inoculation was noticed in the control (Fig. 3,
), so the
diminution of the number of syncytia could not be attributed at all to
preincubation of the inoculum. Heparin was then added at different
times during adsorption. We observed a variation in the number of
syncytia depending on the length of the contact time. The longer the
contact time, the more the number of syncytia decreased (Fig. 3,
).
When heparin was added after 90 min of adsorption at 37°C and then
left for 30 min and the cells were subsequently washed, the number of
syncytia was the same as in the control. This suggests that heparin
only interferes with the first steps of infection. To check this, we
added heparin after 1.5 h of adsorption at 37°C and left the
heparin during culture under agarose. No decrease in the number of
syncytia was observed compared to controls. Thus, heparin was no longer
capable of inhibiting infectivity. To distinguish between the effect on virus-cell binding and that on the fusion process, heparin was added
during adsorption performed at either 37 or 4°C. Cells were washed
before being overlaid with agarose. When adsorption was done at 4°C,
only partial inhibition was obtained (60%) (Fig. 4). Heparin affects only early events of
infection, which are completed in 90 min at 37°C but not at 4°C.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effects of heparin added to RSV during different periods
before inoculation or during inoculation. Symbols: , virus
preincubated at 37°C for different times without heparin before
inoculation; , virus preincubated at 37°C for different times with
heparin before inoculation; , heparin added at different times
during inoculation, followed by washing of the cells before addition of
agarose.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Percent plaque reduction was determined per well after
adsorption for 1.5 h at 37°C (A), 2 h at 37°C (B), 1 h at 4°C (C), 2 h at 4°C (D), and 2.5 h at 4°C (E).
Heparin was added after adsorption and left during culture under
agarose in the assays. No heparin was added after adsorption of the
virus in the controls.
|
|
Effect of heparinase on RSV before adsorption to HEp-2 cells.
The virus was treated for 2 h with different concentrations of
heparinase (Fig. 5). This treatment with
progressively higher concentrations of heparinase decreased the number
of syncytia (Fig. 5,
). On the other hand, pretreatment of the cells
with heparinase did not affect virus infectivity (Fig. 5,
).
Preincubation of the virus with heparinase had an effect on its
infectivity only at concentrations of heparinase greater than about 0.5 U/ml. With heparinase at 10 U/ml, we obtained 80% plaque reduction. These results suggest that heparinase is able to destroy a heparin-like structure on the virus, thus leading to a decrease of virus
infectivity.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Effect of heparinase treatment on RSV before adsorption.
Symbols: , virus treated with heparinase before infection of cells
with RSV; , cells pretreated with heparinase and then washed before
infection with RSV.
|
|
Effect of chondroitinase on RSV before adsorption to HEp-2
cells.
To check the specificity of the inhibition observed with
heparinase treatment, the same kind of assay was performed with
chondroitinase ABC. This enzyme degrades chondroitin sulfate but not
heparin or heparan sulfate (30). No decrease of infectivity
was noted, whatever the enzyme concentration used (data not shown).
Effect of protamine on adsorption of RSV to HEp-2 cells.
RSV
was treated with protamine to inhibit heparin-like moieties on its
surface (Fig. 6). A similar assay was
done on cells as a control. With this inhibitor of heparin, the number
of syncytia was reduced by 80% (from 1- to 10-IU/ml protamine) (Fig.
6,
). Incubation of the virus with protamine solvent did not affect virus infectivity (Fig. 6,
). However, pretreatment of the cells with protamine led to a moderate decrease in infectivity (Fig. 6,
),
which could be due to a nonspecific interaction between protamine and
the cell surface. These results confirm that RSV infection is affected
by inhibition of heparin-like structures on the virus surface.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Effect of protamine treatment on RSV before adsorption.
Symbols: , virus treated with protamine before infection of cells
with RSV. Symbols: , cells pretreated with protamine and then washed
before infection with RSV; , virus treated with protamine solvent
(glucose-cresol solution) before infection of cells with RSV; ,
cells pretreated with protamine solvent (glucose-cresol solution) and
then washed before infection with RSV. UI, international units.
|
|
Neutralizing activity of anti-HSPG antibody.
As heparin was
shown to be a competitor of RSV infection, an anti-HSPG antibody was
investigated for its capacity to neutralize RSV infection in vitro. The
anti-HSPG antibody titer determined in a neutralization assay of RSV
infection was 7.8 µg/ml (Fig. 7).
Pretreatment of HEp-2 cells with the anti-HSPG antibody did not affect
RSV infectivity. No cytotoxicity was observed at the dilutions used in
the assay. On the other hand, the anti-HSPG antibody was not capable of
neutralizing the parainfluenza 3 virus (Fig. 7). Parainfluenza 3 virus
was shown not to be susceptible to heparin (29). This assay
confirms the specificity of the neutralization of RSV by the anti-HSPG
antibody.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Neutralizing effect of anti-HSPG antibody on RSV
infectivity ( ) or on parainfluenza 3 virus infectivity ( ).
|
|
Immunoreactivity of RSV with anti-heparan sulfate antibodies. (i)
Immunofluorescence.
Because HSPGs, which are similar to heparin,
are present on the surfaces of most cells, we expected that these
antibodies would also stain HEp-2 cells. In fact, two of the
antibodies, the anti-HSPG antibody and F58-10E4, stained only
RSV-infected cells (Fig. 8). No staining
was obtained with the third anti-heparan antibody, HepSS-1. RSV thus
has heparin-like structures at its surface; these are different from
the glycans that are probably carried by cells. HepSS-1 recognizes
low-sulfated species of heparan sulfate. These are structurally
different from heparin. Residues recognized by the anti-HSPG antibody
and F58-10E4 are exhibited on RSV.

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
RSV-infected (A) or noninfected (B) HEp-2 cells stained
with anti-HSPG antibody (left), F58-10E4 (middle), or HepSS-1 (right).
Magnification; ×400. A positive reaction is indicated by green
fluorescence.
|
|
(ii) ELISA.
We obtained the same results by ELISA as by
immunofluorescence. A stronger signal was detected with F58-10E4. We
checked that the anti-heparan sulfate antibodies reacted with heparin
and heparan sulfate by competitive ELISA of infected cells. F58-10E4
antibody binding was strongly inhibited by heparin and heparan sulfate; anti-HSPG antibody binding was more strongly inhibited by heparan sulfate than by heparin (data not shown).
As heparin was shown to inhibit early events of infection, we carried
out a sandwich ELISA involving the G protein to see
if this protein was
directly involved. The anti-HSPG and F58-10E4
antibodies strongly
reacted with the purified G protein. The binding
of the G protein was
antigen dose dependent (data not shown).
No signal was detected with
the labeled RS-18B2 antibody, which
recognizes the F protein. As a
weaker signal was obtained after
treatment of the G protein with
heparinase or heparitinase, we
conclude that the binding to the G
protein involved heparin-like
structures (Fig.
9).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Binding of purified G protein (A), heparinase-treated G
protein (B), and heparitinase-treated G protein (C) to antibody
F58-10E4. The signal/background ratio was above 2.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The data presented in this report confirm and extend previous
observations showing the antiviral activity of heparin (14). In the study of Hosoya et al., heparin and the virus were added to the
cells at the same time. In our study, we carried out assays which
allowed us to make a distinction between effects on the cells and on
the virus. We showed that heparin is an inhibitor of RSV infection. By
using either the labeled virus or the labeled, purified G protein, it
has been shown that binding to HEp-2 cells is not saturable and seems
to be of low affinity (33). This is corroborated by our data
which suggest that heparin may bind to the cell surface more rapidly
than does the G protein. Indeed, heparin inhibited viral infection even
when added to the cells at the same time as a viral inoculum. In our
assays, heparin was an inhibitor of viral infection only for a certain
time, 90 min at the most, when infection started at 37°C. Therefore,
inhibition by heparin is efficient only during the very early events of
infection. It is generally assumed that virus-cell binding can occur at
37 or 4°C and that the fusion process needs a temperature of 37°C to take place (5). Our assay did not allow us to
discriminate between attachment and fusion. If no inhibition of
infectivity had been observed after a long period of adsorption at
4°C, we could have concluded that heparin acts only on the attachment process. However, the addition of heparin led to partial inhibition. Thus, some viruses had already entered the cells and heparin could no
longer affect them. At 37°C, total infection was already obtained after 90 min of adsorption. Therefore, heparin-sensitive steps of
infection occur quickly at 37°C but proceed more slowly at 4°C. It
is also possible that there is a supplementary stage of infection that
occurs only at 37°C and that it is sensitive to heparin. Heparin
competes with heparin-like moieties to inhibit an early stage of
infection, probably a virion-cell surface interaction.
Heparin is a glycosaminoglycan composed of a sequence of alternating
hexuronic acid and glucosamine components. Heparinase attacks heparin
and produces fragments of varied lengths by cutting after glucosamine
when it has a N-sulfated or O-sulfated group in position 6 only. This
enzyme cuts also, but more slowly, if N-acetylated derivatives are the
substrates and does not cut at all when N-unsubstituted amino sugars,
apart from O-sulfated derivatives, are the substrates (9,
24). It has an unusual effect, as it hydrolyzes both
4)-iduronic and
4)-glucuronic linkages of glucosamine (1
. The
iduronic acid may be 2-O sulfated. This enzyme acts on both heparan
sulfate and heparin but not on any other glucosaminoglycans
(21). In our study, after treatment of the virus with
heparinase, we obtained a great loss of infectivity, i.e., 80%.
Heparinase cleaves glycosidic linkages present in heparin and in
heparan sulfate, while heparitinase selectively cleaves linkages
present in nonsulfated parts of heparan sulfate. Heparitinase cleaves
glucosamine (1
4)-glucuronic acid linkages, which is more common
within heparan sulfate sequences than in heparin. It needs glucosamine
N-acetylation or N-sulfatation but tolerates only O-sulfatation of C-6
in the amino sugar. Such structural features correspond especially to
heparan sulfate (21). The binding of the G protein to
antibody F58-10E4 was altered by digestion with both heparinase and
heparitinase. However, differences in the in vitro inhibitory effects
of heparin and heparan sulfate indicate that specific structures on
these oligosaccharides could be of importance in the functional
activity of RSV. The heparan sulfate group differs from the heparin
group because it is more acetylated and less sulfated than heparin.
Thus, heparin has a higher total polyanionic charge. Although our
results give additional information on the kind of sugars present on
RSV, it is difficult to assess the precise structure of these
oligosaccharides without further biochemical characterization.
The inhibitory effect of heparin on RSV infection has already been
reported. Recently, a mechanism different from that which we have
described has been proposed, suggesting that heparin inhibits virus
infectivity by binding to the G protein (18). Isolation of
the G protein on heparin-Sepharose CL6B supported this hypothesis. However, we also harvested the G protein by using Sepharose CL6B as a
control. This isolation was probably the result of nonspecific binding
of the G protein to Sepharose CL6B, independently of heparin (data not
shown). Other members of the family Paramyxoviridae (measles
virus and paramyxoviruses) are not at all susceptible to inhibitors
such as sulfated polysaccharides, dextran sulfate, and heparin
(14, 29, 36). At first, the G glycoprotein was thought to be
equivalent to the HN protein. However, the G protein differs radically
from the glycoprotein reported in other paramyxoviruses. The G protein
lacks hemagglutinating and neuraminidase activities (27).
The absence of these activities suggests that, in contrast to
paramyxoviruses such as Sendai virus, attachment does not occur via
sialic acid residues present on the host cells. Moreover, the RSV G
protein is heavily glycosylated. Far more of its molecular weight is
due to carbohydrates than to an amino acid backbone. Not only is the
amount of oligosaccharides greater, but the fundamental difference
between RSV and the other members of the family
Paramyxoviridae is that they are mainly O-linked
oligosaccharides. Thus, it is not surprising that the binding of RSV to
cells via its attachment protein involves different residues than for
the other paramyxoviruses and that inhibitors such as dextran sulfate
and heparin do not work on paramyxovirus.
Few studies have correlated RSV oligosaccharides and functional
properties. After treatment of virions with O-glycanase, which removed
O-linked oligosaccharides, only a small difference in electrophoretic
mobility was observed, but there was a 97% reduction of infectivity
(19). We also obtained a substantial reduction in
infectivity after virus treatment with heparinase and showed that the G
protein carries heparin-like sugars. Little information is available on
how the G protein mediates virus attachment. A model of the
three-dimensional structure of the G protein has recently been
published (23). In this model, close to the putative receptor binding site (15), there are two regions bearing
potential sites for O-glycosylations, regions which are therefore mucin like. Heparin-like structures, which are O-linked polysaccharides, seem
to play a role in the attachment of RSV to the cell surface. They are
therefore presumably close to the receptor binding site. They could
participate in the virus-cell interaction as a stabilizer of the
protein conformation needed for virus-cell contact. It could also be
that an initial interaction occurs by means of oligosaccharides and
that a second interaction, probably more specific and irreversible, involves a protein sequence.
Most monoclonal antibodies to the G protein need O-linked
oligosaccharides to bind the RSV G protein (26). Of the 18 used in the study of Palomo et al., 8 were of the immunoglobulin M type; these 8 recognized the O-glycosylated or mature form of the G
protein but not the precursor. Moreover, six of the eight were
neutralizing (10, 26). Thus, sugars, particularly O-linked sugars, are important for the functional properties of the G protein. The neutralizing activity of the anti-HSPG antibody highlights the
importance of oligosaccharides in infectivity. In addition, expression
of the G gene has been obtained in a prokaryotic system (22)
and has been shown to elicit much lower levels of neutralizing antibodies than the native G protein. It could be, in part, that the
antibodies induced by a glycosylated G protein are able to link
carbohydrate moieties, neutralizing the virus because they inhibit
binding of the G protein to the cell surface, either directly or by
steric inhibition.
In the study described here, heparin completely inhibited infectivity,
which led to the supposition that blocking of attachment blocks
infection. However, an RSV mutant without the G protein grew well in
Vero cells (16). This virus bears several mutations which
may be compensatory. It may also be, as suggested by Karron et al.
(16), that cell surface lectins on Vero cells serve as an
alternate receptor. On the other hand, this RSV mutant was only
slightly infectious for humans. Thus, a difference in the lectins on
the Vero cell surface and the human respiratory epithelium may exist.
The antigenicity of the G protein is associated with the infected cell
type (11). The RSV G protein from infected human tracheal
biopsies exhibited no difference in electrophoretic mobility from that
from HEp-2 cells, unlike the G protein obtained from some other cell
lines. (Vero cells were not tested in that study.) The authors deduced
that the G glycoprotein of RSV grown in HEp-2 cells is similar to the G
protein found in the RSV-infected respiratory tract. Thus, heparin-like
structures may also be found in infected human tracheal epithelium and
not be cell-specific glycosylations. Further characterization is needed
to determine if these glycans are also important during RSV infection
in vivo.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by grants from the INSERM, the CNAMTS
(no. 4API09), and the Conseil Régional de Bourgogne.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de
Microbiologie Médicale et Moléculaire, Faculté de
Médecine, 7 Bld. Jeanne d'Arc, 21033 Dijon Cedex, France. Phone:
33 3 80 29 38 56. Fax: 33 3 80 29 36 04. E-mail:
Pierre.Pothier{at}u-bourgogne.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Anderson, K.,
A. M. Q. King,
R. A. Lerch, and G. W. Wertz.
1992.
Polylactosaminoglycan modification of the respiratory syncytial virus small hydrophobic (SH) protein: a conserved feature among human and bovine respiratory syncytial viruses.
Virology
191:417-430[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Apostolopoulos, V., and I. F. C. McKenzie.
1994.
Cellular mucins: targets for immunotherapy.
Crit. Rev. Immunol.
14:293-309[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bourgeois, C.,
C. Corvaisier,
J. B. Bour,
E. Kohli, and P. Pothier.
1991.
Use of synthetic peptides to locate neutralizing antigenic domains on the fusion protein of respiratory syncytial virus.
J. Gen. Virol.
72:1051-1058[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bukreyev, A.,
S. S. Whitehead,
B. R. Murphy, and P. L. Collins.
1991.
Recombinant respiratory syncytial virus from which the entire SH gene has been deleted grows efficiently in cell culture and exhibits site-specific attenuation in the respiratory tract of the mouse.
J. Virol.
71:8973-8982[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Choppin, P. W., and A. Scheid.
1980.
The role of viral glycoproteins in adsorption, penetration and pathogenicity of viruses.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
2:40-61[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Collins, P. L.,
Y. T. Huang, and G. W. Wertz.
1984.
Nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding the fusion (F) glycoprotein of human respiratory syncytial virus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:7683-7687[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Collins, P. L., and G. Mottet.
1991.
Post-translational processing and oligomerization of the fusion glycoprotein of human respiratory syncytial virus.
J. Gen. Virol.
72:3095-3101[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Collins, P. L., and G. Mottet.
1992.
Oligomerization and post-translational processing of glycoprotein G of human respiratory syncytial virus: altered O-glycosylation in the presence of brefeldin A.
J. Gen. Virol.
73:849-863[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Desai, U. R.,
H. Wang, and R. J. Linhardt.
1993.
Specificity studies on the heparin lyases from Flavobacterium heparinum.
Biochemistry
32:8140-8145[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Garcia-Barreno, B.,
C. Palomo,
C. Penas,
T. Delgado,
P. Perez-Brena, and J. A. Melero.
1989.
Marked differences in the antigenic structure of human respiratory syncytial virus F and G glycoproteins.
J. Virol.
63:925-932[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Garcia-Beato, R.,
I. Martinez,
C. Franci,
F. X. Real,
B. Garcia-Barreno, and J. A. Melero.
1996.
Effect upon glycosylation and antigenicity of human respiratory syncytial virus G glycoprotein.
Virology
221:301-309[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Gruber, C., and S. Levine.
1985.
Respiratory syncytial virus polypeptides. IV. The oligosaccharides of the glycoproteins.
J. Gen. Virol.
66:417-432[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Heminway, B. R.,
Y. Yu,
Y. Tanaka,
E. Gustafson,
J. M. Bernstein, and M. S. Galinski.
1994.
Analysis of respiratory syncytial virus F, G, and SH proteins in cell fusion.
Virology
200:801-805[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Hosoya, M.,
J. Balzarini,
S. Shigeta, and E. De Clercq.
1991.
Differential inhibitory effects of sulfated polysaccharides and polymers on the replication of various myxoviruses and retroviruses, depending on the composition of the target amino acid sequences of the viral envelope glycoproteins.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
35:2515-2520[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Johnson, P. R.,
M. K. Spriggs,
R. A. Olmsted, and P. L. Collins.
1987.
The G glycoprotein of human respiratory syncytial viruses of subgroups A and B: extensive sequence divergence between antigenically related proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:5625-5629[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Karron, R. A.,
D. A. Buonagurios,
A. F. Georgius,
S. S. Whitehead,
J. E. Adamus,
M. L. Clements-Mann,
D. O. Harris,
V. B. Randolph,
S. A. Udem,
B. R. Murphy, and M. S. Sidhu.
1997.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) SH and G proteins are not essential for viral replication in vitro: clinical evaluation and molecular characterization of a cold-passaged, attenuated RSV subgroup B mutant.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:13961-13966[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Kim, H. W.,
J. O. Arrobio,
C. D. Brandt,
B. C. Jeffries,
G. Pyles,
J. L. Reid,
R. M. Chanock, and R. H. Parrot.
1973.
Epidemiology of RSV infection in Washington, D.C. Importance of virus in different respiratory tract disease syndromes and temporal distribution of infection.
Am. J. Epidemiol.
98:216-225[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Krusat, T., and H. J. Streckert.
1997.
Heparin-dependent attachment of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) to host cells.
Arch. Virol.
142:1247-1254[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Lambert, D. M.
1988.
Role of oligosaccharides in the structure and function of respiratory syncytial virus glycoproteins.
Virology
164:458-466[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Levine, S.,
R. Klaiber-Franco, and P. R. Paradiso.
1987.
Demonstration that glycoprotein G is the attachment protein of respiratory syncytial virus.
J. Gen. Virol.
68:521-524.
|
| 21.
|
Linhardt, R. J.,
J. E. Turnbull,
H. M. Wang,
D. Loganathan, and J. T. Gallagher.
1990.
Examination of the substrate specificity of heparin and heparan sulfate lyases.
Biochemistry
29:2611-2617[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Martin-Gallardo, A.,
E. Fleischer,
S. A. Doyle,
R. Arumugham,
P. L. Collins,
S. W. Hildreth, and P. R. Paradiso.
1993.
Expression of the G glycoprotein gene of human respiratory syncytial virus in Salmonella typhimurium.
J. Gen. Virol.
74:453-458[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Melero, J. A.,
B. Garcia-Barreno,
I. Martinez,
C. R. Pringle, and P. A. Cane.
1997.
Antigenic structure, evolution and immunobiology of human respiratory syncytial virus attachment (G) protein.
J. Gen. Virol.
78:2411-2418[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Moffat, C. F.,
M. W. McLean,
W. F. Long, and F. B. Williamson.
1991.
Heparinase II from Flavobacterium heparinum. HPLC analysis of the saccharides generated from chemically modified heparins.
Eur. J. Biochem.
202:531-541[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Olmsted, R. A., and P. L. Collins.
1989.
The 1A protein of respiratory syncytial virus is an integral membrane protein present as multiple, structurally distinct species.
J. Virol.
63:2019-2029[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Palomo, C.,
B. Garcia-Barreno,
C. Penas, and J. A. Melero.
1991.
The G protein of human respiratory syncytial virus: significance of carbohydrate side-chains and the C-terminal end to its antigenicity.
J. Gen. Virol.
72:669-675[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Richman, A. V.,
F. A. Pedreira, and N. M. Tarauso.
1971.
Attemps to demonstrate hemagglutination and hemadsorption by respiratory syncytial virus.
Appl. Microbiol.
21:1099-1100[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Satake, M.,
J. E. Coligan,
N. Elango,
E. Norrby, and S. Venkatesan.
1985.
Respiratory syncytial virus envelope glycoprotein (G) has a novel structure.
Nucleic Acids Res.
13:7795-7812[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Schols, D.,
E. De Clercq,
J. Balzarini,
M. Baba,
M. Witvrouw,
M. Hosoya,
G. Andrei,
R. Snoeck,
J. Neyts,
R. Pauwels,
M. Nagy,
J. Györgyi-Edelényi,
R. Machovich,
I. Horvath,
M. Löw, and S. Görög.
1990.
Sulphated polymers are potent and selective inhibitors of various enveloped viruses, including herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, vesicular stomatitis virus, respiratory syncytial virus, and toga-, arena- and retroviruses.
Antiviral Chem. Chemother.
1:233-240.
|
| 30.
|
Schomburg, D., and M. Salzmann (ed.).
1990.
Enzyme handbook. Class 4: lyases.
Springer-Verlag KG, Berlin, Germany.
|
| 31.
|
Spriggs, M. K.,
R. A. Olmsted,
S. Venkatesan,
J. E. Coligan, and P. L. Collins.
1986.
Fusion glycoprotein of human parainfluenza type 3: nucleotide sequence of the gene, direct identification of the cleavage-activation site, and comparison with other paramyxoviruses.
Virology
152:241-251[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Walsh, E. E.,
J. J. Schlesinger, and M. W. Brandriss.
1984.
Purification and characterization of GP90, one of the envelope glycoproteins of respiratory syncytial virus protein.
J. Gen. Virol.
66:761-767.
|
| 33.
|
Walter, A., and L. A. Downing.
1993.
Respiratory syncytial virus interactions with host cell membranes: an enigma among the Paramyxoviridae, p. 363-383.
In
J. Bentz (ed.), Viral fusion mechanisms. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 34.
|
Wertz, G. W.,
P. L. Collins,
Y. Huang,
C. Gruber,
S. Levine, and L. A. Ball.
1985.
Nucleotide sequence of the G protein gene of human respiratory syncytial virus reveals an unusual type of viral membrane protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:4075-4079[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Wertz, G. W.,
M. Krieger, and L. A. Ball.
1989.
Structure and cell surface maturation of the attachment glycoprotein of human respiratory syncytial virus in a cell line deficient in O glycosylation.
J. Virol.
63:4767-4776[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
White, J.,
K. Matlin, and A. Helenius.
1981.
Cell fusion by Semliki Forest, influenza, and vesicular stomatitis viruses.
J. Cell Biol.
89:674-679[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, September 1998, p. 7221-7227, Vol. 72, No. 9
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Crim, R. L., Audet, S. A., Feldman, S. A., Mostowski, H. S., Beeler, J. A.
(2007). Identification of Linear Heparin-Binding Peptides Derived from Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion Glycoprotein That Inhibit Infectivity. J. Virol.
81: 261-271
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Herd, K. A., Mahalingam, S., Mackay, I. M., Nissen, M., Sloots, T. P., Tindle, R. W.
(2006). Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Epitope Vaccination Protects against Human Metapneumovirus Infection and Disease in Mice. J. Virol.
80: 2034-2044
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Elliott, M. B., Pryharski, K. S., Yu, Q., Parks, C. L., Laughlin, T. S., Gupta, C. K., Lerch, R. A., Randolph, V. B., LaPierre, N. A., Dack, K. M. H., Hancock, G. E.
(2004). Recombinant Respiratory Syncytial Viruses Lacking the C-Terminal Third of the Attachment (G) Protein Are Immunogenic and Attenuated In Vivo and In Vitro. J. Virol.
78: 5773-5783
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Budge, P. J., Li, Y., Beeler, J. A., Graham, B. S.
(2004). RhoA-Derived Peptide Dimers Share Mechanistic Properties with Other Polyanionic Inhibitors of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), Including Disruption of Viral Attachment and Dependence on RSV G. J. Virol.
78: 5015-5022
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Budge, P. J., Lebowitz, J., Graham, B. S.
(2003). Antiviral Activity of RhoA-Derived Peptides against Respiratory Syncytial Virus Is Dependent on Formation of Peptide Dimers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
47: 3470-3477
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Douglas, J. L., Panis, M. L., Ho, E., Lin, K.-Y., Krawczyk, S. H., Grant, D. M., Cai, R., Swaminathan, S., Cihlar, T.
(2003). Inhibition of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion by the Small Molecule VP-14637 via Specific Interactions with F Protein. J. Virol.
77: 5054-5064
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schlender, J., Zimmer, G., Herrler, G., Conzelmann, K.-K.
(2003). Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Fusion Protein Subunit F2, Not Attachment Protein G, Determines the Specificity of RSV Infection. J. Virol.
77: 4609-4616
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Teng, M. N., Collins, P. L.
(2002). The Central Conserved Cystine Noose of the Attachment G Protein of Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Is Not Required for Efficient Viral Infection In Vitro or In Vivo. J. Virol.
76: 6164-6171
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schlender, J., Walliser, G., Fricke, J., Conzelmann, K.-K.
(2002). Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion Protein Mediates Inhibition of Mitogen-Induced T-Cell Proliferation by Contact. J. Virol.
76: 1163-1170
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Techaarpornkul, S., Barretto, N., Peeples, M. E.
(2001). Functional Analysis of Recombinant Respiratory Syncytial Virus Deletion Mutants Lacking the Small Hydrophobic and/or Attachment Glycoprotein Gene. J. Virol.
75: 6825-6834
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Goodfellow, I. G., Sioofy, A. B., Powell, R. M., Evans, D. J.
(2001). Echoviruses Bind Heparan Sulfate at the Cell Surface. J. Virol.
75: 4918-4921
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hallak, L. K., Spillmann, D., Collins, P. L., Peeples, M. E.
(2000). Glycosaminoglycan Sulfation Requirements for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection. J. Virol.
74: 10508-10513
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Martínez, I., Melero, J. A.
(2000). Binding of human respiratory syncytial virus to cells: implication of sulfated cell surface proteoglycans. J. Gen. Virol.
81: 2715-2722
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Feldman, S. A., Hendry, R. M., Beeler, J. A.
(1999). Identification of a Linear Heparin Binding Domain for Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Attachment Glycoprotein G. J. Virol.
73: 6610-6617
[Abstract]
[Full Text]