Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, September 1998, p. 7181-7190, Vol. 72, No. 9
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule Is a Receptor for Rabies
Virus
Maria-Isabel
Thoulouze,1
Mireille
Lafage,1
Melitta
Schachner,2
Ursula
Hartmann,3
Harold
Cremer,4 and
Monique
Lafon1,*
Departement de Virologie, Institut
Pasteur, Paris,1 and
IBDM/LGPD,
CNRS/INSERM/Université de Méditerranée, Campus de
Luminy, Marseille,4 France, and
Zentrum
für Molekulare Neurobiologie, Universität Hamburg,
Hamburg,2 and
Institut für
Genetik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität,
Düsseldorf,3 Germany
Received 29 January 1998/Accepted 27 May 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Previous reports strongly suggest that, in addition to the
nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, rabies virus can use other,
as-yet-unidentified receptors. We found that laboratory cell lines
susceptible to rabies virus infection express the neural cell adhesion
molecule (NCAM) (CD56) on their surface, whereas resistant cells do
not, supporting the idea that NCAM could be a rabies virus receptor. We
observed that (i) incubation with rabies virus decreases the surface
expression of NCAM; (ii) treatment of susceptible cells with heparan
sulfate, a ligand for NCAM, or with NCAM antibodies significantly
reduces the rabies virus infection; and (iii) preincubation of rabies
virus inoculum with soluble NCAM protein as a receptor decoy
drastically neutralizes the capacity of rabies virus to infect
susceptible cells. Moreover, we demonstrated that transfection of
resistant L fibroblasts with the NCAM-encoding gene induces rabies
virus susceptibility whereas absence of NCAM in the primary cortical
cell cultures prepared from NCAM-deficient mice reduces the rabies
virus infection and virus production. This provides evidence that NCAM
is an in vitro receptor for the rabies virus. Moreover, the in vivo
relevance for the use of NCAM as a receptor was demonstrated by the
infection of NCAM-deficient mice, in which rabies mortality was delayed
and brain invasion by rabies virus was drastically restricted. Our
results showed that NCAM, which is expressed mainly in the adult
nervous system, plays an important role in rabies infection. However,
it cannot be excluded that receptors other than NCAM are utilized.
Thus, the description of NCAM as a new rabies virus receptor would be
another example of the use by viruses of more than one
receptor to gain entry into the host.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The rabies virus (RV) is an
enveloped bullet-shaped virus of the Rhabdoviridae family,
genus Lyssavirus. The viral particle is constituted of a
membrane made of host lipids and two proteins, G and M, surrounding a
helical nucleocapsid (NC). The trimeric G protein is the only protein
exposed on the surface of the virion. It is responsible for the
attachment to the target cell by interaction with several cell membrane
components. Following the attachment of G to the cell membrane, the
RV enters the cell by endocytosis. Fusion of the viral membrane
with endosomal membranes liberates the NC into the cytosol, where
transcription and replication occur. Although RV can infect
various types of cells, especially in laboratory culture conditions,
its main target is the neuron. The RV binds to carbohydrates,
phospholipids, and gangliosides and to protein receptors including the
nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AchR) (4). Lentz et al.
observed that RV accumulates at neuromuscular junctions and colocalizes
with
-bungarotoxin binding (21). They observed that
preincubation of fixed chick myoblasts with
-bungarotoxin or
D-turbocurarine, both of which specifically compete with
acetylcholine for the AchR
subunit, and with a monoclonal antibody
(MAb) against the
subunit of AchR reduced the number of myotubes
infected by RV. The same group recently used a virus overlay binding
assay to confirm that RV binds to the
subunit of AchR
(12). These findings strongly suggest that AchR may serve as
an RV receptor. However, the capacity of the RV to infect stretch
proprioceptors, sensory endings, and several cell lines that do not
express AchR implies that RV can use other, as-yet-unidentified
receptors (39). The identification of any such receptors
would be a significant contribution to our understanding of how the RV
infects cells.
The recent finding that lymphocytes support RV infection suggests
that these cells also express an RV receptor (37). There is evidence that neurons and lymphocytes have common surface
molecules, particularly cytokine and chemokine receptors and adhesion
molecules, which have been reported to be used by viruses and parasites
to infect the cells (2, 17, 28). Assuming that the RV
receptor is a member of this category of molecules, we extensively
surveyed the surface molecules on RV-susceptible and nonsusceptible
cell lines. All RV-susceptible cell lines have the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) on their surface, whereas it is not found on the surface of resistant cell lines. NCAM, also called CD56, D2CAM, Leu19,
or NKH-1, is a cell adhesion glycoprotein of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily which has been described for neurons, astrocytes, myoblasts, myotubes, activated T cells, and NK cells (13,
20). It is encoded by a single gene which is very well conserved
among vertebrate species. Three major isoforms of NCAM, with molecular masses of 120, 140, and 180 kDa, are generated by alternative mRNA
splicing (35). They all contain an almost identical
ectodomain composed of five Ig-like and two type III fibronectin-like
domains. The major differences among the three isoforms are in their
transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains: only NCAM-120 is linked to
the membrane via a phosphatidylinositol-glycan transmembrane
anchor, and NCAM-140 and NCAM-180 have cytoplasmic tails of
different lengths. Additional diversity among these subtypes is
generated by alternative splicing of transcripts encoded by several
small exons, resulting in differences in ectodomain size and
glycosylation. All three forms can be posttranslationally modified by
addition of polysialic acid, a carbohydrate moiety.
The goal of the work was to determine the role of NCAM in RV infection
both in vitro and in vivo. We assayed in vitro the effect of NCAM
blockage by ligands and the neutralization of virus by soluble NCAM. We
also analyzed RV infection of cells transfected with genetic constructs
encoding various NCAM isoforms (-140 or -180) (15). The role
of NCAM in vivo was investigated by using knockout mice lacking all
three isoforms of NCAM (9). We demonstrate that NCAM is a
receptor for the RV. Thus, the RV can utilize at least two different
receptors, AchR and NCAM, to invade the host.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells and viruses.
Mouse NCAM-negative L fibroblasts and
stable L NCAM-negative cells expressing the full-length mouse NCAM
isoform, D9 and A14 cells (15), and laboratory cell lines
were grown as described in the literature. RV laboratory strain CVS
(challenge virus standard) was obtained from the American Type Culture
Collection, Manassas, Va. (no. vr959). Vaccinia virus was a gift from
Robert Drillien. RV and vaccinia virus were propagated on BSR cells,
and cell culture supernatants were used as inocula. RV was also
purified from supernatants of infected cells on a sucrose gradient and
concentrated as previously described (37). For
35S labeling of the RV, cell culture medium was replaced 2 days after infection by methionine-free minimal essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 5 µCi of Trans35S per ml for 4 days,
purified on a sucrose gradient, and concentrated. Cells and viruses
were mycoplasma free as determined by the plaque assay technique.
Animal model.
NCAM-deficient mice were generated by gene
targeting and came from Harold Cremer (9). NCAM-positive or
-negative mice were tested either by allele-specific PCR analysis of
genomic DNA or by immunohistochemistry with an anti-NCAM antibody (Ab)
recognizing all three NCAM isoforms. Brain and cortical cell cultures
from genotype NCAM+/+ and NCAM+/
mice, found
to express NCAM by immunohistochemistry, were recorded as wild-type
phenotype, whereas material from genotype NCAM
/
mice,
presenting a total lack of NCAM protein expression, was classified as
NCAM-KO phenotype.
Antibodies (MAbs) and reagents.
Texas red-conjugated
streptavidin, MEM, RPMI, Ham's F-12 medium, and methionine-free MEM
were obtained from Gibco BRL (Cergy-Pontoise, France).
Phycoerythrin-conjugated streptavidin was from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark). Biotin-conjugated anti-mouse IgG goat Ab and the ECL kit were
purchased from Amersham (Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United
Kingdom). Mouse MAb directed against mouse NCAM (CD56), rat MAb
directed against the
6 chain of integrin (CD49f) or CD9 molecules,
and a mouse polyclonal Ab directed against human CD56 were obtained
from PharMingen (San Diego, Calif.). The rat H28 purified MAb (IgG2a),
directed against mouse brain tissue-extracted NCAM, was a gift from
Christo Goridis (16). The rat IgG2a MAb (anti-V
6 T-cell
receptor) used as the isotype matching control was from the laboratory.
Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated NC-specific rabbit Abs
were purchased from Sanofi Diagnostics (Marnes la Coquette, France).
Purified recombinant soluble NCAM protein, containing all five Ig
domains and the two type III fibronectin-like repeats, was produced in
bacteria and purified as previously described (11). Rabbit
polyclonal anti-IgG3 and Trans35S label were obtained from
ICN Pharmaceuticals (Costa Mesa, Calif.), and mouse anti-human CD3 was
obtained from Dako. DNase I; aprotinin; phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride;
laminin; heparan sulfate; and chondroitin sulfate A, B, and C were
purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, Mo.). Cell Fix buffer and
Cell Quest software were from Becton Dickinson and Co. (Mountain View,
Calif.). Vectashield medium was from Vector Laboratories, distributed
by Biosys, Compiegne, France.
NCAM modulation after virus binding.
BSR or N2a (5 × 105) cells were incubated in glass tubes with either 50 µl of CVS virus (10 to 30 PFU per cell) in MEM-2.5% fetal calf
serum (FCS), 50 µl of vaccinia virus inoculum, or 50 µl of
MEM-2.5% FCS as a control for 30 min at 37°C. Cell suspensions were
incubated for a further 30 min with 50 µl of either anti-NCAM MAb,
anti-
6 chain of integrin MAb, or MEM-2.5% FCS; washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-CaMg; and incubated for 30 min at
4°C with either FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG Ab or anti-rat IgG Ab.
Cells were then fixed in Cell Fix buffer and analyzed by flow cytometry
with a FACScalibur cytofluorimeter and Cell Quest software.
Western blot.
N2a, D9, A14, and control L cells were tested
for NCAM by Western blotting. For each cell line tested, 20 µl of
total cell extract (corresponding to 5 × 106 cells)
was subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. NCAM was
revealed by incubating the membranes with the mouse anti-CD56 MAb,
followed by biotinylated anti-mouse IgG Ab and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin with the ECL kit.
Cell infection assays.
RV infection was quantified by the
previously described fluorescent focus assay (19). The
degree of infection was expressed as percentage of infected cells per
well. To analyze the effect of anti-NCAM Ab on RV infection, N2a or BSR
cell monolayers in 96-well titration plates were incubated either with
rabbit Ab directed against NCAM or against an irrelevant protein (IgG3) or with a rat MAb directed against NCAM (H28) or another surface molecule (either
6 chain of integrin [CD49f] or CD9) or an
irrelevant protein (anti-V
6 T-cell receptor) in 50 µl of
MEM-2.5% FCS for 30 min at 4°C. Abs were removed before cells were
infected. To determine the effect of heparan sulfate on RV infection,
N2a, BSR, or L cell monolayers were treated with heparan sulfate or chondroitin sulfate A, B, or C as a control (10 µg/ml in 50 µl of
MEM-2.5% FCS) for 30 min at 37°C. Glycoaminoglycans were removed before cells were infected. For all cell infection assays, serial threefold dilutions of RV were added to the cultures in the same medium
and the samples were incubated for 1 h at 37°C under 5% CO2. The medium was replaced with MEM-8% FCS, and the
incubation was continued for 18 h at 37°C under 5%
CO2. Percentages of cells infected were determined for each
culture condition. The percentage of inhibition of infection was
calculated thus: 100 × (percentage of infected cells in the
control
percentage of infected cells in the assay)/(percentage
of infected cells in the control). Controls were either cells treated
with irrelevant Ab in the antibody competition experiments or
nontreated cells in inhibition experiments with glycosaminoglycans.
Binding assay.
N2a, D9, A14, or control cells (5 × 105 cells) were incubated with 35S-labeled
virus (15,000 cpm) in 100 µl of PBS containing 0.2% bovine serum
albumin for 1 h at 4°C. Cells were then centrifuged at low speed
(600 × g for 7 min) and washed twice in PBS-CaMg. Virus bound to cells was measured with a beta counter.
Virus neutralization.
To analyze the effect of soluble NCAM
protein on RV neutralization, BSR cells were infected with viral
inoculum preincubated with soluble NCAM or with control proteins (Ig
anti-human CD3 and laminin). Inocula containing 13 µg of concentrated
RV or vaccinia virus (as a control) were first incubated with 0.7 to 1 µg of soluble NCAM or control proteins for 40 min at 37°C. Residual infectious RV and vaccinia virus were then quantified with BSR cell
monolayers. Infection was monitored as the percentage of cells
infected, and results are expressed in percentages of viral neutralization.
Infection of cortical cell cultures.
The cortex was
dissected out from each newborn (less than 2 days old) littermate mouse
obtained from NCAM+/
female mice mated with
NCAM
/
male mice. The tissues were collected
individually in Ham's F-12 medium, triturated in trypsin (0.025%),
and incubated for 45 min at 37°C. DNase I was added to the mixture
for the last 15 min. Cortical cells were dissociated by several
passages through a glass Pasteur pipette and counted. Cells were seeded
on polyornithine-treated (15 µg/ml) round glass slides in 24-well
tissue culture plates (2 × 106 cells/ml) in Ham's
F-12 medium supplemented with 10% FCS and grown at 37°C under 7%
CO2. After 3 days, cortical cell cultures were washed and
infected with CVS RV at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 in 0.2 ml of Ham's F-12 medium-10% FCS or uninfected as a control, by a 1-h
contact at 37°C under 5% CO2. Cell cultures were then
washed to remove the viral inoculum and incubated at 37°C under 5%
CO2 for further analysis. Infection was monitored both as
the percentage of cells infected and as virus produced and released
into the culture supernatant 6 days after infection by the
plaque-forming assay with CER cells as described elsewhere (19). Results are expressed in virus production per a
definite number of cells in culture.
Immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry.
Double
immunostaining was performed in two steps. First, cells were surface
stained with anti-NCAM MAb diluted in staining buffer (PBS containing
1% heat-inactivated FCS and 0.1% [wt/vol] sodium azide) for 30 min
at 4°C, washed, and incubated with biotin-conjugated anti-mouse Ig
MAb and Texas red- or phycoerythrin-conjugated streptavidin under the
same conditions. Intracellular NC was then immunodetected by further
incubation with FITC-conjugated NC-specific Ab diluted in
permeabilization solution (PBS containing 0.2% Triton X-100 and 3%
heat-inactivated FCS) for 30 min and then by washing the cells in PBS.
The cells were then examined with a UV microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc.,
Thornwood, N.Y.) or by cytofluorimetry. Adult wild-type and
NCAM-deficient 6- to 8-week-old mice were inoculated with
107 PFU of the CVS strain in the right and left masseter
muscles. Mice were sacrificed. After perfusion with 4%
paraformaldehyde in PBS, brains were removed and fixed by immersion in
the same fixative overnight and then in 15% sucrose in PBS.
Twenty-micrometer-thick sections were cut on a cryostat and placed in
blocking buffer (PBS containing 10% heat-inactivated FCS) for 1 h
at 37°C. Floating sections were treated for 2 h at 37°C with
FITC-conjugated NC-specific Ab, diluted in PBS containing 2% FCS and
0.3% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, and then rinsed three times with PBS. The
sections were then placed onto slides, dried at room temperature,
coverslipped in Vectashield medium, and examined under a UV microscope.
Quantification of RV infection of the brain by ELISA.
Unfixed brains from RV-infected mice were removed 6 days postinfection,
washed in PBS, and separated into three parts: cortex, cerebellum plus
brain stem, and diencephalon. Tissues were then dissociated into RPMI
medium containing 2% bovine serum albumin, aprotinin, and
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and frozen until the analysis. RV N
protein was assayed by a capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA) as previously described (26). Results are expressed
in picograms of N protein per milliliter with a standard N protein (a
gift from André Aubert) preparation as reference.
NCAM-deficient and wild-type mouse mortality.
Six- to
eight-week-old female wild-type and NCAM-deficient mice were inoculated
intramuscularly in the thigh of both hind legs with the CVS strain of
RV (106 PFU per mouse). Deaths were scored daily for 15 days postinfection.
Statistical analysis.
Differences between NCAM-deficient and
wild-type mouse groups were analyzed by appropriate frequency analysis
including Fisher's exact test and Student's t test.
 |
RESULTS |
RV infects NCAM-positive cells.
Cell lines of human-simian,
chicken, or rodent (mouse, rat, and hamster) origin were tested for
their susceptibility to the rabies CVS strain at an MOI of 1. Percentages of cells infected 24 h after initial contact were
recorded (Table 1). The cell lines could
be classified into two groups. The first group consisted of susceptible
cell lines in which infection spread rapidly (80 to 100% of the cell
population infected within 24 h). A second group was composed of
RV-resistant cell lines: less than 10% of the total cells infected
after 24 h. The human MRC5 cell line was intermediate, with 30%
of cells infected. We tested whether different susceptibilities
corresponded to differences in the viral binding. Aliquots (5 × 105 N2a and L cells) were incubated for 1 h at 4°C
with 15,000 cpm of 35S metabolically labeled RV, and
2,968 ± 269 cpm bound to N2a whereas only 1,536 ± 241 cpm
bound to L cells (significant at P = 0.003) (data not
shown).
The cell lines were tested for surface expression of NCAM by an
anti-NCAM MAb staining technique. NCAM was found on the surface of the
susceptible cell lines (IMR-32, N2a, Vero, BSR, CER, CHO-K1, WEHI 7.1, NIH 3T3, and MRC5 cells) but not on that of the resistant cell lines (L
cells, L-929, YAC-1, HeLa, HEp-2, and undifferentiated PC12) (Table
1). Note that only 20% of the MRC5 cells, a line poorly susceptible to
infection (30%) were stained, suggesting that rabies susceptibility
correlated with the level of NCAM expression in the cell population. To
assess this possibility, we used nerve growth factor (NGF)
supplementation, a treatment which upregulates NCAM production in PC12
cell cultures (10). PC12 cells were supplemented with NGF
(50 ng/ml for 48 h). NCAM was consequently produced in 43% of
cells in the culture. This was paralleled by increased susceptibility
to RV (28% of NGF-treated PC12 cells were infected compared to 8% of
the undifferentiated PC12 cells). Thus, the susceptibility of
cultivated cell lines to RV correlates with NCAM expression.
In the experiments described below, we used three cell types as model
systems to study the role of NCAM in RV infection: N2a,
BSR, and L
cells. The RV-susceptible, mouse neuroblastoma N2a
line expresses both
NCAM and nicotinic AchR, the baby hamster
kidney BSR cells express NCAM
only, and the non-RV-susceptible,
mouse fibroblast L cells do not
produce either NCAM or AchR.
RV decreases surface expression of NCAM.
We analyzed the
effect of an incubation with RV on the expression of NCAM on the cell
surface of N2a and BSR cells. Cells were incubated at 37°C for 30 min
with a series of doses of RV (10 and 30 infectious particles per
cell) or PBS (mock treated). NCAM surface expression was compared
in the three populations by cytofluorimetry with an anti-NCAM Ab (Fig.
1). Exposure to the virus decreased the
intensity of fluorescence, and the effect was dose dependent: 61.4 mean
fluorescence in mock-treated BSR cells, 55.5 in BSR cells treated with
10 PFU per cell, and 33.3 in BSR cells treated with 30 PFU per cell.
The findings for NCAM fluorescence in N2a cells were similar (Fig. 1C).
This decrease in NCAM fluorescence intensity was not observed if the
virus and BSR or N2a cells were incubated at 4°C (data not shown), a
temperature that does not allow internalization despite virus
attachment to the cells. The fact that this phenomenon was observed
only at a physiological temperature is consistent with the binding of virus to the cell surface triggering internalization of NCAM surface molecules.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
RV modulates NCAM expression on the cell surface.
Modulation by RV of the amount of NCAM on the cell surface of BSR (A
and B) and N2a (C and D) cells was analyzed by cytofluorimetry. BSR
cells were either mock treated (incubation with medium alone) (solid
bold line) or treated with 10 (dashed line) or 30 (solid line) PFU of
RV per cell (A) or with 10 PFU of vaccinia virus per cell (dotted line)
as control virus (B). The samples were then incubated with anti-NCAM
MAb or culture medium (peak on the extreme left) followed by
FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. The specificity of NCAM modulation by
RV was tested by using N2a cells, which express both NCAM and 6
chain of integrin (C and D). N2a cells were either mock treated (solid
line) or treated (dotted line) with 10 PFU of RV per cell and then
anti-NCAM MAb (C) or an anti- 6 chain of integrin MAb (D) or culture
medium (left peak in diagrams) followed by FITC-conjugated anti-mouse
IgG Ab. Values are representative of five independent experiments.
|
|
We analyzed the effect of vaccinia virus on the surface NCAM on
BSR cells, which are also susceptible to this virus (Fig.
1B).
Incubation of BSR cells with vaccinia virus does not affect
surface
NCAM, indicating that the loss of surface NCAM is RV specific.
We
then analyzed the effect of RV on the surface behavior of other
integral proteins of the N2a cell membrane, the

6 chain of integrin
and CD9. The treatment of N2a cells with RV in the conditions
that
resulted in the loss of NCAM (Fig.
1C) did not modify the
amount of

6 chain of integrin molecules on the surface (Fig.
1D). Similarly,
RV did not affect the expression of CD9 molecules
on the surface of BSR
cells (data not shown).
These observations indicate that treatment with RV does not trigger a
general perturbation of the membrane structure and suggest
that RV
specifically modulates the surface expression of NCAM.
Since RV enters
cells by an adsorptive endocytosis pathway, the
partial disappearance
of NCAM from the cell surface may well be
the consequence of the
internalization of NCAM-virus complexes
in endocytosis vesicles.
Heparan sulfate and Ab directed against NCAM inhibit RV
infection.
We analyzed whether blocking NCAM decreased cell
susceptibility to RV infection. We first tested the effect of heparan
sulfate, a physiologically relevant natural ligand of NCAM
(7). NCAM-positive cells (BSR or N2a cells) and negative
cells (L cells) were either mock treated (PBS), or treated with heparan
sulfate or with chondroitin sulfate A, B, or C. Chondroitin sulfate A,
B, and C were used as controls for nonspecific inhibition
resulting from the charge characteristics of the glycosaminoglycan. At
a nontoxic concentration (10 µg/ml), heparan sulfate inhibited RV
infection by up to 60% in N2a cells and 55% in BSR cells but only by
13% in L cells (Fig. 2A). Unexpectedly,
unlike chondroitin sulfate A and B, chondroitin sulfate C strongly
inhibited RV infection in BSR cells (53%) and in NCAM-negative L cells
(43%). To our knowledge, chondroitin sulfate C has not been
reported to be an NCAM ligand and the mechanism of the antagonist
effect has not been described yet.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Glycosaminoglycans (A) and anti-NCAM Abs (B) inhibit RV
infection. (A) NCAM-negative (L cells) and NCAM-positive (BSR and N2a)
cell monolayers were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with 10 µg of
heparan sulfate (black bars) or chondroitin sulfate A (dark gray bars),
B (light gray bars), or C (white bars) per ml. (B) NCAM-positive (N2a)
cell monolayers were incubated for 30 min at 4°C with 5 µg of MAb
directed against the 6 chain of integrin (MAb CD49f) per ml, rabbit
serum directed against recombinant soluble NCAM protein, or their
respective controls. NCAM-positive (BSR) cell monolayers were incubated
with increasing doses of anti-NCAM (H28) MAb (5 to 20 µg/ml) or
isotype control MAb. After ligand or Ab treatment, cells were
inoculated with RV and infection was estimated as the percentage of
NC-positive cells 18 h postinfection. The percentage of inhibition
of infection was calculated thus: 100 × (percentage of infected
cells in the control percentage of infected cells in the
assay)/(percentage of infected cells in the control). Values are the
means of three independent experiments ± standard deviations.
|
|
To confirm the role of NCAM in virus entry, we treated N2a and BSR
cells with polyclonal Ab directed against NCAM or with
control Ab
before infection. NCAM-specific Abs were raised against
a native
NCAM preparation (
1). NCAM Ab pretreatment inhibited
infection of N2a cells by 60% (Fig.
2B, left part) as well as
that of
BSR cells (data not shown), whereas rabbit preimmune Ab
or irrelevant
Ab had no effect. Similar findings were obtained
when BSR cells were
treated with a rat MAb directed against NCAM
(H28 MAb). As shown in the
right part of Fig.
2B, pretreatment
of BSR cells with H28 MAb strongly
inhibited RV infection (49%
inhibition of infection with 10 µg of
H28 and up to 76% with 20
µg of H28 MAb).
A pretreatment of N2a cells with an anti-CD49f MAb directed against
the

6 chain of integrin, or with an isotype control MAb,
did not
modify the RV N2a susceptibility. This indicates that
the NCAM
Ab-mediated inhibition was NCAM specific.
These results indicate that occupancy of cell surface NCAM by Ab or
heparan sulfate can block RV infection of cells expressing
NCAM.
This strongly supports the hypothesis that NCAM is a receptor
for RV.
Soluble NCAM neutralizes RV infection.
Our next approach
was to test whether treatment of RV with a soluble NCAM
preparation neutralized the virus particles. Viral inocula
were incubated with a series of doses of soluble NCAM (0.7 to 1 µg) or with medium alone and assayed for their residual capacity to
infect BSR cells (Fig. 3). Pretreatment
of RV with concentrations of NCAM dose dependently reduced (up to
100%) the capacity of RV to infect cells (Fig. 3) and reduced virus
production by infected cultures by a factor of 1,000-fold (3-log
reduction in the virus titers) (data not shown). The NCAM
dose-effect curve was not linear (Fig. 3), indicating a
two-step reaction, consistent with the fact that G molecules are
associated in trimers on the surface of RV. In contrast, NCAM (0.75 or
1 µg) pretreatment of vaccinia virus did not decrease its
capacity to infect BSR cells (right part of Fig. 3), indicating that
NCAM treatment was not toxic either for the cells or for the viral
inoculum. Neither laminin (even at 100 µg) a component of the
basement membrane, nor an irrelevant protein had any effect (extreme
left of Fig. 3), indicating that the neutralization effect was NCAM
specific.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Soluble recombinant NCAM protein neutralizes RV
infection. RV and vaccinia virus inocula were incubated with 0.7 to 1 µg of soluble NCAM or with control proteins (irrelevant Ig domain and
laminin) for 40 min at 37°C. The effect of the different treatments
was estimated by measuring the residual infectious virus expressed as a
percentage of BSR cells infected after 18 h of culture (left part
for RV and right part for vaccinia virus). Values are the means of four
separate experiments ± standard deviations.
|
|
These observations suggest that RV G, the virion surface protein
responsible for the attachment of virus particle to cells,
has a
fixation site for NCAM and that occupancy of this site abolishes
further binding to RV receptors on the target cell.
Transfection of resistant L cells with NCAM cDNA
induces RV susceptibility.
We tested whether transfection of
resistant cells with NCAM cDNA resulted in susceptibility to
RV. Four different cell lines were used: L cells transfected with NCAM
genes coding for NCAM-180 (D9 cells) or -140 (cell line A14), N2a cells
that produce all three isoforms (180, 140, and 120), and negative
RV-resistant L cells (see Western blotting analysis in Fig. 4).
Cytofluorimetric analysis of NCAM expression in the four types of cells
revealed differences in intensity and distribution of fluorescence.
NCAM was detected on the surface of 79% of N2a, 89% of D9, and only 55% of A14 cells (Fig. 4). NCAM surface
fluorescence intensity was weaker on NCAM-transfected cells (mean
fluorescence of 62.9 and 34.7 for D9 and A14 cells, respectively) than
on N2a cells (mean of 142). Thus, unlike N2a cultures in which the
majority of cells were brightly NCAM fluorescent (36% of the
population had a fluorescence index higher than 141), strongly positive
NCAM cells constituted only a small fraction of transfected cell
populations (8.2 and 4% of cells in lines D9 and A14, respectively,
had a fluorescence index higher than 141).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Characteristics of NCAM-transfected cells. Expression of
NCAM was analyzed by Western blotting and cytofluorimetry in N2a,
NCAM-negative L cells transfected with either the plasmid (control
cells) or NCAM-180 (D9 cells) or NCAM-140 (A14 cells) isoform cDNA,
with a MAb directed against an epitope common to the three NCAM
isoforms. The solid line indicates the fluorescence profile obtained
with NCAM MAb. The left peak represents FITC-conjugated secondary Ab
binding. Bars and numbers represent the gated regions and percentages
of cells expressing NCAM, respectively.
|
|
The susceptibility of the transfected cells to RV infection was
compared to those of nontransfected control L and N2a cells
by
immunofluorescence analysis (microscopy and cytofluorimetry
[Fig.
5A and B]). RV antigen NC could not
be detected, 18 h after
infection, in the negative control
cells. In contrast, transfection
of NCAM-140 or -180 (A14 cells in Fig.
5A and D9 cells in Fig.
5B) conferred susceptibility to RV
infection. RV in nontransfected
L cells and NCAM-transfected A14 and D9
cells (Fig.
5C) was comparatively
titrated. The percentages of
infection at an MOI of 1 were 15%
in L cells, 40% in A14 cells, and
48% in D9 cells. Moreover, the
virus production was higher in
transfected cells (6.5-fold in
D9 cells and 5.8-fold in A14 cells) than
in the nontransfected
L cell control (1 × 10
6 PFU/ml
for L cells, 7.1 × 10
6 PFU/ml for D9 cells, and
6.4 × 10
6 PFU/ml for A14 cells).

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
RV susceptibility of transfected NCAM cells. (A and B)
Two-day cultures of RV-infected N2a, NCAM-transfected (D9 and A14), and
NCAM-negative (control) cells were double stained for NCAM (red) and
viral NC (green) and examined by microscopy (A) or analyzed by flow
cytometry (B). RV-infected NCAM-positive cells appear as yellow-stained
cells in the leftmost A panels and are located in the upper right
quadrant in the B panels. (C) RV susceptibility of D9 (dashed curve),
A14 (solid black curve), and control (dotted curve) cells was assessed
by infection with RV (MOI of 1.5 to 0.25). Results are expressed as the
percentages of cells infected 48 h after infection. (D) Inhibition
of RV infection of control, D9, A14, and N2a cells by heparan sulfate
and chondroitin sulfate A and B (left, middle, and right bars in each
set, respectively).
|
|
The characteristics of the transfected susceptible cells were
investigated by cytofluorimetric analysis with double staining
for
virus and NCAM (Fig.
5B). A large majority of the infected
cells were
those producing NCAM: 82% of infected D9 cells and
71.5% of infected
A14 cells expressed NCAM. In addition, brightly
NCAM-positive cells
were the preferential targets for RV infection
(left panel of Fig.
5B;
infected cells are concentrated in the
upper right quadrant, above the
dashed line). This feature is
shared with N2a cells. Brightly NCAM
fluorescent cells were the
preferential targets for RV (middle panel of
Fig.
5B, right upper
quarter) whereas a clearly distinguishable
population of cells
characterized by weak NCAM fluorescence (bottom of
the left quarter)
was poorly infected. In the cell population above the
dashed line,
which represents brightly NCAM positive cells, 31% of the
cells
are infected. In contrast, in the population under the dashed
line, which corresponds to cells expressing low levels of NCAM,
only
3.2% of cells are infected. This 10-fold enrichment in RV
susceptibility demonstrates that a high level of NCAM-180 expression
is
an important factor for RV infection.
To elucidate further the role of NCAM expression in susceptibility to
RV, experiments involving blocking RV infection with
heparan
sulfate and anti-NCAM Ab were performed. Heparan sulfate
treatment inhibited 37.5 and 33.3% of infection in A14 and D9
cells,
respectively (Fig.
5D), confirming that the acquired susceptibility
of
the transfected cells was a result of the expression of NCAM
and not of
the transfection manipulation.
Thus, transfection with
NCAM cDNA partially restores
susceptibility to RV, and NCAM-transfected cells appear to become
preferential
targets once they express a certain amount of NCAM on
their surface.
These results support the previous observation that RV
susceptibility
correlates with NCAM expression (Table
1) and strongly
suggest
that there is a minimum density of NCAM which allows virus
infection.
The absence of NCAM reduces the susceptibility of primary cortex
cultures to RV.
Day 3 primary cortex cultures were prepared
from individual early postnatal wild-type and NCAM-deficient
littermate mice (newborn to 2 days old). After 3 days of maintenance in
vitro, they were assayed for their susceptibility to CVS infection at
an MOI of 10. RV infection was evaluated by (i) the percentage of RV
NC-positive cells in each culture 4 days after infection and (ii) the
virus produced and released into day 7 cortex culture supernatants. The
NCAM phenotype of each cortex culture was determined by testing for
the presence or absence of NCAM on the surface of cortex cells with an anti-NCAM MAb and by allele-specific PCR analysis of DNA extracts from the tail of the each donor animal. The percentage of infected cortical cells was recorded for each phenotype (Fig. 6A). Cultures from wild-type cortex were
significantly more infected by RV than were the NCAM-deficient
cultures: the mean percentage of infected cells in the 11 wild-type
cultures was 18.6 ± 8.9 compared to 7.8 ± 3.9 in the 7 NCAM-deficient cultures (significant at P < 0.005).
Similarly, the wild-type cultures produced more virus than did
NCAM-deficient cultures (582.0 ± 219 virions per cell of
the wild-type culture and 147.6 ± 44.3 infectious
virions per cell of NCAM-deficient cultures) (Fig. 6B).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
RV infection of primary cortical cultures from
NCAM-deficient and wild-type mice. Three-day cortical cell cultures
prepared from postnatal wild-type or NCAM-deficient mice were infected
with CVS at an MOI of 10 and cultivated for 3 more days. Percentages of
infected cells (A) and virus production per cell in culture (B) were
determined for 11 NCAM-positive and 7 NCAM-negative cortical cell
cultures. NCAM-positive and NCAM-negative cortical cell cultures were
tested for NCAM expression by allele-specific PCR analysis and by
immunocytochemistry with an anti-NCAM MAb. Horizontal bars indicate the
mean values for infection and virus production per a definite number of
cells in culture ± standard deviations.
|
|
These data demonstrate that the absence of NCAM significantly reduces
the susceptibility of cortical cells to RV infection,
bringing evidence
that NCAM is used by RV as a receptor in the
nervous system.
RV invasion is restricted in NCAM-deficient mouse brain.
Progression of RV infection was monitored by immunohistochemistry on
sagittal sections of brain 6 days after RV (CVS) injection into the
right masseter of wild-type and NCAM-deficient mice. Although
some brain structures, such as hippocampus and cerebellar Purkinje
cells, were equally positive for rabies NC antigen in both groups of
mice, the virus was less extensively distributed in the brains of
NCAM-deficient mice. In particular, the cortex sections were only
faintly and scarcely fluorescent in NCAM-deficient mice whereas they
were strongly positive in wild-type mice (Fig. 7A). The amounts of RV NC
that accumulated in three different parts of the brain were
compared in wild-type and NCAM-deficient mice. Nervous tissue
suspensions of three parts of the brain (cerebellum plus brain stem,
diencephalon, and cortex) were assayed for N protein antigen by ELISA
(Fig. 7B). The suspension of cerebellum plus brain stem from
NCAM-deficient mice contained fourfold-less N protein than did the
wild-type cerebellum (514 ng/ml versus 2,310 ng of N protein per ml of
nervous tissue suspension). Diencephalon and cortex from NCAM-deficient
mice contained 16-fold less rabies antigen than those of wild-type mice
(14 ng/ml versus 234 ng of N protein/ml of nervous tissue
[P < 0.005]). These measures indicate that,
after injection into the masseter muscles, the RV invades brains
of NCAM-deficient mice much less efficiently than those of
wild-type mice and that progression of infection is severely impaired
after infection of the cerebellum and brain stem.

View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
RV infection and mortality in NCAM-deficient mice. (A
and B) RV infection in the brains of wild-type and NCAM-deficient mice,
6 days after inoculation of the masseter muscle, was assessed by
detecting RV NC by immunofluorescence (A) and N protein by
immunocapture ELISA (B). (A) RV infection in cortex sagittal slices of
NCAM-deficient (top) and wild-type (bottom) mice with FITC-conjugated
anti-NC Ab. Bars represent 5 µm. (B) Production of RV N protein in
three parts of the brain, cerebellum plus brain stem, diencephalon, and
cortex, of wild-type (black bars) and NCAM-deficient (gray bars) mice.
Numbers represent the N protein concentrations (picograms per
milliliter) of tissue suspension. (C) Day of death according to the
phenotype of mice. The mean day of death was 10.2 for the wild-type
group and 13.6 for the NCAM-deficient group. Each group included eight
animals. The difference was significant (P = 0.002).
|
|
RV mortality is delayed in NCAM-deficient mice.
We
investigated whether the absence of NCAM interfered with RV
infection in vivo. Adult wild-type and NCAM-deficient mice were
injected with rabies CVS in the muscle of both hind legs, and
the kinetics of RV-induced mortality were monitored. Nine days
after inoculation, 50% of the wild-type mice were dead,
whereas all the NCAM-deficient mice have survived. In the
NCAM-deficient group, 50% mortality was reached only at 13 days
postinjection. The mean length of survival was 13.6 days for
NCAM-deficient mice and 10 days for wild-type mice (Fig. 7C). This
4-day delay in NCAM-deficient mice is consistent with the restricted
viral invasion of the brain reported in Fig. 7A and B. This suggests
that the absence of NCAM limits the virus progression in vivo and
delays, but does not prevent, the rabies death.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We report strong evidence that NCAM expression plays an
important role in cell susceptibility to RV both in vitro and in vivo. We show that (i) transfection of NCAM-negative cells (L cells) with the
NCAM gene significantly enhances susceptibility to RV, (ii)
specific blocking (antibody or natural ligand) or removal (primary
cortical cell cultures prepared from NCAM-deficient mice) of NCAM
drastically reduces cell susceptibility to RV, and (iii) preincubation
with soluble NCAM protein as a decoy substantially decreases the
capacity of RV to infect cells. We demonstrated that NCAM is a receptor
for RV in vitro. The marked differences in the infection pathways and
the slower progression of the disease in NCAM-deficient mice were
consistent with these in vitro results and indicate that NCAM
plays a significant role in vivo.
NCAM appears early in the development of all germ layer tissues. In
later histogenesis, this molecule is mainly associated with muscle
formation and the development of the nervous system. During the
perinatal period, NCAM-positive cells include neurons and glial,
skeletal, cardiac, and kidney cells as well as muscle fibers
(31). The tissue distribution of NCAM is more limited in the
adult: NCAM persists in most neurons and astrocytes in the central
nervous system and on neural cell bodies, their nonmyelinated axons,
and nonmyelinating Schwann cells in the peripheral nervous system
(27). NCAM-140 is also found in adult hematopoietic tissues, where it is known as the human leukocyte differentiation antigen, CD56
(Leu19/NKH-1). CD56 is predominantly expressed on natural killer cells,
in peripheral blood T lymphocytes, and in immature bone marrow cells
(20). RV susceptibility of the laboratory cell lines
investigated was entirely consistent with the expression of
NCAM in these tissues and developmental stages. Embryos of chicken or
duck origin and suckling mouse brains have been used for decades as
tissues for the production of RV vaccine. Adaptation of wild strains of
RV to N2a cells and to suckling mouse brain is also very efficient.
Similarly, RV vaccines were or are still prepared with cells of kidney
origin such as fetal bovine kidney cells, Vero cells (African green
monkey cells), and, for experimental or veterinary uses, baby hamster
kidney cells (BHK-21). All these cells, as can be predicted from the
organ origin, are indeed highly positive for NCAM. In contrast, most
fibroblast cell lines are NCAM negative and resistant to RV infection.
NIH 3T3 cells are an exception and can be infected by RV.
This is probably due to their embryonic origin and the expression
of the NCAM-140 isoform (34). The recent observations
that macrophage-like lines (32) and lymphocytes
(37), such as the mouse Wehi-7 cells, are susceptible to RV
are consistent with CD56 antigen expression and the origin of
these cells.
We found that a soluble NCAM preparation (a protein composed
of the five Ig-like domains and the two fibronectin domains) blocked RV
infection. This suggests that the RV G protein binding site is located in the NCAM ectodomain. We showed that BSR or NIH
3T3 cells expressing only the NCAM-140 isoforms, differentiated PC12
cells expressing only NCAM-180, and cells transfected with either genes
encoding isoform 140 or genes encoding isoform 180 were susceptible to
RV infection. This indicates that both NCAM isoforms, -140 and -180, which contain almost identical ectodomains, have
similar receptor properties. Nevertheless, it can be envisaged that
association or stabilization of one isoform by the other could result
in a more efficient RV uptake: we showed that RV infects N2a cells
more efficiently than NCAM-transfected cells. This may be due to the
presence of three different NCAM isoforms in the N2a cells. The
flexibility of the two isoforms is different: NCAM-180 has been
reported to be less mobile than the -140 isoform because of its
association with spectrin (30). The NCAM-180 isoform is
found at high density at sites of cell-cell contact where it may
be involved in stabilization of synapses (29). The fact that
RV preferentially infects cells which express NCAM at a high
density strongly suggests that a particular spatial organization of the
receptors, in which each isoform could play a role, contributes to
susceptibility to RV.
The heparan sulfate binding site has been located in the first and
second Ig-like domains of NCAM (18) and mapped to a 25-kDa NH2-terminal fragment of NCAM and to the 17-amino-acid-long region of
the second Ig-like domain (5, 6). The capacity of
heparan sulfate to block RV infection suggests that the
virus binding site is located in the first two Ig-like domains
of NCAM. This conclusion need to be confirmed, for example,
by mapping experiments to rule out the possibility that heparan sulfate
binding has a steric occupancy effect or causes conformational changes
in NCAM (8). Possibly, identification of the RV binding site
in the first two Ig-like domains may help to elucidate the mechanisms by which RV induces neuronal dysfunction. NCAM is not only involved in
cell recognition but is also capable of transducing recognition events.
In particular, it has been shown that the stimulation of Ig-like I
and/or II domains induces intracellular changes of inositol phosphate
metabolim, Ca2+ flux, and pH (3, 23, 36). The
binding of RV to a receptor that is also a signaling molecule may
modify the metabolism of the neuronal cell target. This may contribute
to neuronal perturbations or the behavioral changes that characterize
rabies.
The membranes of hamster kidney cells, BHK-21 cells, contain a protein
complex which is a receptor for RV but which has not yet been
identified (33). This receptor was described as an RV-specific entity that functions independently of Ca2+ and
Mg2+. It consists of a doublet of high-molecular-weight
protein and of at least four other proteins migrating between 66 and
200 kDa (4). The high-molecular-weight protein carrying the
specific binding activity was described as an integral
glycosylated membrane component and as being sensitive to pronase
and subtilisin enzymatic treatment. We assessed whether
NCAM does not belong to this complex receptor. We found that BHK-21
cells express NCAM. Moreover, both major isoforms of NCAM (-140 and -180) are glycosylated integral membrane proteins and are
sensitive to pronase and subtilisin. NCAM binding activity does not
require Ca2+ or Mg2+. The properties shared by
NCAM and the BHK-21 receptor, as well as the evidence that BHK-21 cells
and their derived clone, BSR cells, use an NCAM-dependent pathway for
RV infection, suggest that a glycosylated NCAM isoform is
the main or even the only component of the BHK-21 receptor. However,
the NCAM pathway is not the only mediator of RV penetration
into kidney cells: RV infection can develop even in the
o-called resistant cell lines (10% compared to 80 to 100%
in NCAM-positive cells). This alternative route of entry was not
inhibited by heparan sulfate or by preincubation with an anti-NCAM Ab.
The nature of the NCAM-independent pathway used by the RV to infect
kidney cells is unknown, but the pathway may involve a
nonprotein receptor (4). Our data suggest, however, that
this pathway is sensitive to chondroitin sulfate C treatment.
There is strong evidence that nicotinic AchR, especially
-bungarotoxin-sensitive nicotinic AchR at the muscular junction, can be used by the virus as a receptor. It is difficult to assess the
respective roles of NCAM and AchR, as receptor analysis has been
performed in cells or tissues expressing both NCAM and AchR, such as
N2a cells (33), IMR-32 cells (22), myotubes,
mouse diaphragm cells, and neuromuscular junctions (14). In
blocking experiments, NCAM ligands were as efficient, or even more
efficient, in N2a cells expressing both NCAM and AchR as, or than, in
BSR cells expressing NCAM only. If AchR is functionally active in N2a
cells, this indicates that there may be functional synergy or a
close-contact relationship between the two molecules. However, evidence
is accumulating that NCAM and AchR function independently both in
vitro and in vivo. First, the capacity of RV to infect NCAM-transfected
cells lacking AchR clearly demonstrates that NCAM allows RV entry
independently of AchR. In vivo, RV infects cells that are AchR negative
such as microglia, Schwann cells, and spindle cells and reaches the
nervous system after inoculation into sites lacking AchR such as the
footpad or the anterior chamber of the eye or by intranasal
instillation. These different sites, especially the olfactory bulb
(25), express high levels of NCAM, consistent with NCAM
playing a major role in vivo. Nevertheless, RV can reach the nervous
system by routes lacking NCAM. Indeed, in NCAM-deficient mice some
parts of the brain remain susceptible to RV infection despite the total
lack of NCAM. These parts of the brain, which include the hippocampus
and cerebellar Purkinje cells, bear
-bungarotoxin binding
sites (24), suggesting that in NCAM-deficient mice the
residual infection results from the AchR pathway. Thus, we propose
that, like many other viruses and human immunodeficiency virus
(38), RV may use more than one receptor to gain entry into
the cell both in vitro and in vivo.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by an institutional grant from the
Institut Pasteur. M.-I. Thoulouze was awarded a fellowship from the
Fondation Marcel Mérieux, Lyon, France.
We are very grateful to Christo Goridis for helpful discussions,
Mohammed Hajihosseini for help with primary cortical cultures, Karine Jaffuel for help with cryostat sections, Daniel Scott-Algara for help in the initiation of the project, Robert Drillien from Transgene for the gift of vaccinia virus, and André Aubert from Virbac for the gift of recombinant N protein..
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut
Pasteur, Unité de Neurovirologie et
Régénération du Système Nerveux, Groupe de
Neuro-Immunologie Virale, 25, rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France. Phone: 33 1 45 68 87 52. Fax: 33 1 40 61 33 12. E-mail:
mlafon{at}pasteur.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alcaraz, G., and C. Goridis.
1991.
Biosynthesis and processing of polysialylated NCAM by AtT-20 cells.
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
55:165-173[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Atkinson, J. P.,
M. Krych,
M. Nickells,
D. Birmingham,
V. B. Subramanian,
L. Clemenza,
J. Alvarez, and K. Liszewski.
1994.
Complement receptors and regulatory proteins: immune adherence revisited and abuse by microorganisms.
Clin. Exp. Immunol.
2:1-3.
|
| 3.
|
Beggs, H. E.,
S. C. Baragona,
J. J. Hemperly, and P. F. Maness.
1997.
NCAM140 interacts with the focal adhesion kinase p125(fak) and the SRC-related tyrosine kinase p59(fyn).
J. Biol. Chem.
272:8310-8319[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Broughan, J. H., and W. H. Wunner.
1995.
Characterization of protein involvement in rabies virus binding to BHK-21 cells.
Arch. Virol.
140:75-93[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cole, G. J., and R. Akeson.
1989.
Identification of a heparin binding domain of the neural cell adhesion molecule N-CAM using synthetic peptides.
Neuron
2:1157-1165[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Cole, G. J., and L. Glaser.
1986.
A heparin-binding domain from N-CAM is involved in neural cell-substratum adhesion.
J. Cell Biol.
102:403-412[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Cole, G. J.,
A. Loewy, and L. Glaser.
1986.
Neuronal cell-cell adhesion depends on interactions of N-CAM with heparin-like molecules.
Nature
320:445-447[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Cole, G. J.,
D. Schubert, and L. Glaser.
1985.
Cell-substratum adhesion in chick neural retina depends upon protein-heparan sulfate interactions.
J. Cell Biol.
100:1192-1199[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cremer, H.,
R. Lange,
A. Christoph,
M. Plomann,
G. Vopper,
J. Roes,
R. Brown,
S. Baldwin,
P. Kraemer,
S. Scheff, et al.
1994.
Inactivation of the N-CAM gene in mice results in size reduction of the olfactory bulb and deficits in spatial learning.
Nature
367:455-459[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Doherty, P.,
D. A. Mann, and F. S. Walsh.
1988.
Comparison of the effects of NGF, activators of protein kinase C, and a calcium ionophore on the expression of Thy-1 and N-CAM in PC12 cell cultures.
J. Cell Biol.
107:333-340[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Frei, T.,
F. von Bohlen und Halbach,
W. Wille, and M. Schachner.
1992.
Different extracellular domains of the neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) are involved in different functions.
J. Cell Biol.
118:177-194[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Gastka, M.,
J. Horvath, and T. L. Lentz.
1996.
Rabies virus binding to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha subunit demonstrated by virus overlay protein binding assay.
J. Gen. Virol.
77:2437-2440[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Goridis, C., and J. F. Brunet.
1992.
NCAM: structural diversity, function and regulation of expression.
Semin. Cell Biol.
3:189-197[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Hall, Z. W., and J. R. Sanes.
1993.
Synaptic structure and development: the neuromuscular junction.
Cell
72:99-121.
|
| 15.
|
Hartmann, U.,
C. Vens,
G. Vopper,
W. Wille, and U. A. Heinlein.
1994.
Ectopic expression of NCAM in mouse fibroblasts stimulates self-aggregation, and promotes integration into primary cerebellum cell aggregates.
Cell Adhesion Commun.
2:287-298[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Hirn, M.,
M. Pierres,
H. Deagostini-Bazin,
M. R. Hirsch,
C. Goridis,
M. S. Ghandour,
O. K. Langley, and G. Gombos.
1982.
A new brain cell surface glycoprotein identified by monoclonal antibody.
Neuroscience
7:239-250[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Horuk, R.,
A. Martin,
J. Hesselgesser,
T. Hadley,
Z. H. Lu,
Z. X. Wang, and S. C. Peiper.
1996.
The Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines: structural analysis and expression in the brain.
J. Leukocyte Biol.
59:29-38[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Kiselyov, V. V.,
V. Berezin,
T. E. Maar,
V. Soroka,
K. Edvardsen,
A. Schousboe, and E. Bock.
1997.
The first immunoglobulin-like neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) domain is involved in double-reciprocal interaction with the second immunoglobulin-like NCAM domain and in heparin binding.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:10125-10134[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Lafon, M., and M. Lafage.
1987.
Antiviral activity of monoclonal antibodies specific for the internal proteins N and NS of rabies virus.
J. Gen. Virol.
68:3113-3123[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Lanier, L. L.,
R. Testi,
J. Bindl, and J. H. Phillips.
1989.
Identity of Leu-19 (CD56) leukocyte differentiation antigen and neural cell adhesion molecule.
J. Exp. Med.
169:2233-2238[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Lentz, T. L.,
T. G. Burrage,
A. L. Smith, and G. H. Tignor.
1983.
The acetylcholine receptor as a cellular receptor for rabies virus.
Yale J. Biol. Med.
56:315-322[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Lentz, T. L.,
Y. Fu, and P. Lewis.
1997.
Rabies virus infection of IMR-32 human neuroblastoma cells and effect of neurochemical and other agents.
Antiviral Res.
35:29-39[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Maness, P. F.,
H. E. Beggs,
S. G. Klinz, and W. R. Morse.
1996.
Selective neural cell adhesion molecule signaling by Src family tyrosine kinases and tyrosine phosphatases.
Perspect. Dev. Neurobiol.
4:169-181[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Marks, M. J.,
J. R. Pauly,
E. U. Grun, and A. C. Collins.
1996.
ST/b and DBA/2 mice differ in brain alpha-bungarotoxin binding and alpha 7 nicotinic receptor subunit mRNA levels: a quantitative autoradiographic analysis.
Mol. Brain Res.
39:207-222[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Miragall, F.,
G. Kadmon,
M. Husmann, and M. Schachner.
1988.
Expression of cell adhesion molecules in the olfactory system of the adult mouse: presence of the embryonic form of N-CAM.
Dev. Biol.
129:516-531[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Montano-Hirose, J. A.,
M. Lafage, and M. Lafon.
1995.
Measurement of rabies virus N protein in rabies vaccines.
Res. Virol.
146:217-224[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Nieke, J., and M. Schachner.
1985.
Expression of the neural cell adhesion molecules L1 and N-CAM and their common carbohydrate epitope L2/HNK-1 during development and after transection of the mouse sciatic nerve.
Differentiation
30:141-151[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Norkin, L. C.
1995.
Virus receptors: implications for pathogenesis and the design of antiviral agents.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
8:293-315[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Pollerberg, E. G.,
R. Sadoul,
C. Goridis, and M. Schachner.
1985.
Selective expression of the 180-kD component of the neural cell adhesion molecule N-CAM during development.
J. Cell Biol.
101:1921-1929[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Pollerberg, E. G.,
M. Schachner, and J. Davoust.
1986.
Differentiation state-dependent surface mobilities of two forms of the neural cell adhesion molecule.
Nature
324:462-465[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Prediger, E. A.,
S. Hoffman,
G. M. Edelman, and B. A. Cunningham.
1988.
Four exons encode a 93-base-pair insert in three neural cell adhesion molecule mRNAs specific for chicken heart and skeletal muscle.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:9616-9620[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Ray, N. B.,
L. C. Ewalt, and D. L. Lodmell.
1995.
Rabies virus replication in primary murine bone marrow macrophages and in human and murine macrophage-like cell lines: implications for viral persistence.
J. Virol.
69:764-772[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Reagan, K. J., and W. H. Wunner.
1985.
Rabies virus interaction with various cell lines is independent of the acetylcholine receptor.
Arch. Virol.
84:277-282[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Roubin, R.,
H. Deagostini-Bazin,
M. R. Hirsch, and C. Goridis.
1990.
Modulation of NCAM expression by transforming growth factor-beta, serum, and autocrine factors.
J. Cell Biol.
111:673-684[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Santoni, M. J.,
D. Barthels,
G. Vopper,
A. Boned,
C. Goridis, and W. Wille.
1989.
Differential exon usage involving an unusual splicing mechanism generates at least eight types of NCAM cDNA in mouse brain.
EMBO J.
8:385-392[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Schuch, U.,
M. J. Lohse, and M. Schachner.
1989.
Neural cell adhesion molecules influence second messenger systems.
Neuron
3:13-20[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Thoulouze, M. I.,
M. Lafage,
J. A. Montano-Hirose, and M. Lafon.
1997.
Rabies virus infects mouse and human lymphocytes and induces apoptosis.
J. Virol.
71:7372-7380[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Tufaro, F.
1997.
Virus entry: two receptors are better than one.
Trends Microbiol.
5:257-258[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Wunner, W. H.,
K. J. Reagan, and H. Koprowski.
1984.
Characterization of saturable binding sites for rabies virus.
J. Virol.
50:691-697[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, September 1998, p. 7181-7190, Vol. 72, No. 9
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Bhella, D., Gatherer, D., Chaudhry, Y., Pink, R., Goodfellow, I. G.
(2008). Structural Insights into Calicivirus Attachment and Uncoating. J. Virol.
82: 8051-8058
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pulmanausahakul, R., Li, J., Schnell, M. J., Dietzschold, B.
(2008). The Glycoprotein and the Matrix Protein of Rabies Virus Affect Pathogenicity by Regulating Viral Replication and Facilitating Cell-to-Cell Spread. J. Virol.
82: 2330-2338
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Klingen, Y., Conzelmann, K.-K., Finke, S.
(2008). Double-Labeled Rabies Virus: Live Tracking of Enveloped Virus Transport. J. Virol.
82: 237-245
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tuffereau, C., Schmidt, K., Langevin, C., Lafay, F., Dechant, G., Koltzenburg, M.
(2007). The Rabies Virus Glycoprotein Receptor p75NTR Is Not Essential for Rabies Virus Infection. J. Virol.
81: 13622-13630
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Assaf, C., Gellrich, S., Whittaker, S., Robson, A., Cerroni, L., Massone, C., Kerl, H., Rose, C., Chott, A., Chimenti, S., Hallermann, C., Petrella, T., Wechsler, J., Bagot, M., Hummel, M., Bullani-Kerl, K., Bekkenk, M. W, Kempf, W., Meijer, C. J L M, Willemze, R., Sterry, W.
(2007). CD56-positive haematological neoplasms of the skin: a multicentre study of the Cutaneous Lymphoma Project Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. J. Clin. Pathol.
60: 981-989
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Faber, M., Faber, M.-L., Li, J., Preuss, M. A. R., Schnell, M. J., Dietzschold, B.
(2007). Dominance of a Nonpathogenic Glycoprotein Gene over a Pathogenic Glycoprotein Gene in Rabies Virus. J. Virol.
81: 7041-7047
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, Z. W., Sarmento, L., Wang, Y., Li, X.-q., Dhingra, V., Tseggai, T., Jiang, B., Fu, Z. F.
(2005). Attenuated Rabies Virus Activates, while Pathogenic Rabies Virus Evades, the Host Innate Immune Responses in the Central Nervous System. J. Virol.
79: 12554-12565
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sissoeff, L., Mousli, M., England, P., Tuffereau, C.
(2005). Stable trimerization of recombinant rabies virus glycoprotein ectodomain is required for interaction with the p75NTR receptor. J. Gen. Virol.
86: 2543-2552
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, X.-Q., Sarmento, L., Fu, Z. F.
(2005). Degeneration of Neuronal Processes after Infection with Pathogenic, but Not Attenuated, Rabies Viruses. J. Virol.
79: 10063-10068
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nakamichi, K., Inoue, S., Takasaki, T., Morimoto, K., Kurane, I.
(2004). Rabies Virus Stimulates Nitric Oxide Production and CXC Chemokine Ligand 10 Expression in Macrophages through Activation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases 1 and 2. J. Virol.
78: 9376-9388
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Guyatt, K. J., Twin, J., Davis, P., Holmes, E. C., Smith, G. A., Smith, I. L., Mackenzie, J. S., Young, P. L.
(2003). A molecular epidemiological study of Australian bat lyssavirus. J. Gen. Virol.
84: 485-496
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Langevin, C., Tuffereau, C.
(2002). Mutations Conferring Resistance to Neutralization by a Soluble Form of the Neurotrophin Receptor (p75NTR) Map outside of the Known Antigenic Sites of the Rabies Virus Glycoprotein. J. Virol.
76: 10756-10765
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Langevin, C., Jaaro, H., Bressanelli, S., Fainzilber, M., Tuffereau, C.
(2002). Rabies Virus Glycoprotein (RVG) Is a Trimeric Ligand for the N-terminal Cysteine-rich Domain of the Mammalian p75 Neurotrophin Receptor. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 37655-37662
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Maillard, A. P., Gaudin, Y.
(2002). Rabies virus glycoprotein can fold in two alternative, antigenically distinct conformations depending on membrane-anchor type. J. Gen. Virol.
83: 1465-1476
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brudeseth, B. E., Castric, J., Evensen, O.
(2002). Studies on Pathogenesis Following Single and Double Infection with Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia Virus and Infectious Hematopoietic Necrosis Virus in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Veterinary Pathology
39: 180-189
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tuffereau, C., Desmezieres, E., Benejean, J., Jallet, C., Flamand, A., Tordo, N., Perrin, P.
(2001). Interaction of lyssaviruses with the low-affinity nerve-growth factor receptor p75NTR. J. Gen. Virol.
82: 2861-2867
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mebatsion, T.
(2001). Extensive Attenuation of Rabies Virus by Simultaneously Modifying the Dynein Light Chain Binding Site in the P Protein and Replacing Arg333 in the G Protein. J. Virol.
75: 11496-11502
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mazarakis, N. D., Azzouz, M., Rohll, J. B., Ellard, F. M., Wilkes, F. J., Olsen, A. L., Carter, E. E., Barber, R. D., Baban, D. F., Kingsman, S. M., Kingsman, A. J., O'Malley, K., Mitrophanous, K. A.
(2001). Rabies virus glycoprotein pseudotyping of lentiviral vectors enables retrograde axonal transport and access to the nervous system after peripheral delivery. Hum Mol Genet
10: 2109-2121
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Badrane, H., Tordo, N.
(2001). Host Switching in Lyssavirus History from the Chiroptera to the Carnivora Orders. J. Virol.
75: 8096-8104
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Badrane, H., Bahloul, C., Perrin, P., Tordo, N.
(2001). Evidence of Two Lyssavirus Phylogroups with Distinct Pathogenicity and Immunogenicity. J. Virol.
75: 3268-3276
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jacob, Y., Badrane, H., Ceccaldi, P.-E., Tordo, N.
(2000). Cytoplasmic Dynein LC8 Interacts with Lyssavirus Phosphoprotein. J. Virol.
74: 10217-10222
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Etessami, R., Conzelmann, K.-K., Fadai-Ghotbi, B., Natelson, B., Tsiang, H., Ceccaldi, P.-E.
(2000). Spread and pathogenic characteristics of a G-deficient rabies virus recombinant: an in vitro and in vivo study. J. Gen. Virol.
81: 2147-2153
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Krummenacher, C., Rux, A. H., Whitbeck, J. C., Ponce-de-Leon, M., Lou, H., Baribaud, I., Hou, W., Zou, C., Geraghty, R. J., Spear, P. G., Eisenberg, R. J., Cohen, G. H.
(1999). The First Immunoglobulin-Like Domain of HveC Is Sufficient To Bind Herpes Simplex Virus gD with Full Affinity, While the Third Domain Is Involved in Oligomerization of HveC. J. Virol.
73: 8127-8137
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bourhy, H., Kissi, B., Audry, L., Smreczak, M., Sadkowska-Todys, M., Kulonen, K., Tordo, N., Zmudzinski, J. F., Holmes, E. C.
(1999). Ecology and evolution of rabies virus in Europe. J. Gen. Virol.
80: 2545-2557
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bearzotti, M., Delmas, B., Lamoureux, A., Loustau, A.-M., Chilmonczyk, S., Bremont, M.
(1999). Fish Rhabdovirus Cell Entry Is Mediated by Fibronectin. J. Virol.
73: 7703-7709
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kissi, B., Badrane, H., Audry, L., Lavenu, A., Tordo, N., Brahimi, M., Bourhy, H.
(1999). Dynamics of rabies virus quasispecies during serial passages in heterologous hosts. J. Gen. Virol.
80: 2041-2050
[Abstract]
[Full Text]