Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
J Virol, August 1998, p. 6907-6910, Vol. 72, No. 8
Department of Medical and Molecular
Parasitology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New
York 10010,1 and
Department of
Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
900332
Received 7 January 1998/Accepted 11 May 1998
Subcutaneous administration in mice of recombinant Sindbis viruses
expressing a class I major histocompatibility complex-restricted 9-mer
epitope of the Plasmodium yoelii circumsporozoite protein or the nucleoprotein of influenza virus induces a large
epitope-specific CD8+ T-cell response. This immunization
also elicits a high degree of protection against infection with malaria
or influenza A virus.
Alpha-RNA viruses such as Sindbis,
Semliki Forest, and Venezuelan equine encephalitis viruses are
attractive vectors for gene therapy and vaccine development because of
their capacities to express large amounts of foreign proteins (7,
10, 24). Sindbis virus offers certain additional advantages, such
as a broad range of susceptible host cells (23) and the
relative ease of engineering and manipulating recombinant (RE) RNA
molecules (10). It is also important that, in spite of its
small size of approximately 11.8 kb, this virus is capable of
expressing foreign inserts of up to 3.2 kb (18).
Earlier data demonstrated the potential of RE Sindbis viruses,
expressing foreign antigen, to induce immunity against a variety of
intracellular pathogens (10, 14, 18). We have determined the
capacity of these RE viruses expressing the corresponding foreign
antigen or epitope to generate CD8+ T-cell responses and
protection against infection by the malaria parasite Plasmodium
yoelii and the influenza A virus, respectively. In both systems,
CD8+ T cells were shown to play major roles in mediating
protective immunity (2, 8, 13, 19, 22).
RE Sindbis viruses expressing a minigene coding only for the
CD8+ T-cell epitope SYVPSAEQI of the circumsporozoite (CS)
protein of P. yoelii (SIN.Mal), recognized by
H-2d mice, or TYQRTRALV from the nucleoprotein
(NP) of the influenza A virus (SIN.Flu) were generated by using
infectious mRNA transcripts, as described elsewhere (12).
Six- to 8-week-old BALB/c mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine)
were immunized by various routes, namely, subcutaneously (s.c.),
intramuscularly (i.m.), intravenously (i.v.), intraperitoneally (i.p.),
and intranasally (i.n.) (17). The magnitudes of the epitope-specific CD8+ T-cell responses were measured 12 days after immunization with an ELISPOT assay. This assay has been
described in detail by us (15, 20) and other investigators
(4, 5, 11, 16) using various experimental models. In all of
these systems it was shown that the results of the ELISPOT correlate
closely with the chromium release assay, the ELISPOT being considerably
more sensitive and quantitative.
The largest numbers of CS-specific CD8+ T cells, detected
12 days after immunization, were elicited in mice immunized s.c. with
5 × 106 PFU of SIN.Mal (~2 × 103
CS-specific CD8+ T cells/106 spleen cells)
(Fig. 1A). The i.m. immunization was only
slightly less efficient. Thirty-two days after immunization, the total number of epitope-specific CD8+ T cells had decreased by
approximately 50%. As observed at day 12, the magnitude of the
CD8+ T-cell response closely depended on the route of
immunization, and the greatest response also resulted from s.c. or i.m.
inoculation (not shown). It is noteworthy that the magnitude of the
anti-SYVPSAEQI CD8+ T-cell response, induced by the RE
Sindbis virus, is the greatest we have observed so far, compared to
past immunization with other RE vaccinia, influenza, or adenoviruses
(17, 19).
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Recombinant Sindbis Viruses Expressing a Cytotoxic
T-Lymphocyte Epitope of a Malaria Parasite or of Influenza Virus
Elicit Protection against the Corresponding Pathogen in Mice
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Results of ELISPOT performed on spleen cells of mice
immunized by different routes with RE Sindbis viruses expressing a
CS-specific or an NP-specific CD8+ T-cell epitope. (A)
Groups of three BALB/c mice were immunized by inoculation with 5 × 106 PFU of SIN.Mal administered s.c., i.m., i.v., i.p.,
or i.n. (B) Groups of three BALB/c mice were immunized by inoculation
with 5 × 106 PFU of SIN.Flu administered by various
routes. The numbers of CS- and NP-specific CD8+ T cells in
the spleens of the immunized mice were established 12 days after RE
virus inoculation by an ELISPOT assay, which detects epitope-specific
gamma interferon (IFN-
) secretion by single cells. The corresponding
results are expressed as averages ± standard errors of triplicate
cultures.
The largest numbers of influenza virus NP-specific CD8+ T cells were also observed upon s.c. or i.m. immunization with SIN.Flu (Fig. 1B). The total numbers of NP-specific CD8+ T cells in the spleens of these mice were smaller than those elicited by inoculation of an equal number of PFU of SIN.Mal, but the rankings of results obtained by the different routes of inoculation were the same.
The number of CS-specific CD8+ T cells closely correlated with the viral dose used for immunization. Animals inoculated s.c. with 107 or 108 PFU of SIN.Mal displayed the largest numbers of CS-specific CD8+ T cells (Fig. 2A). Immunization with doses greater than 109 PFU of SIN.Mal failed to increase the frequency of CS-specific T cells (data not shown). The level of the NP-specific CD8+ T-cell response of s.c. immunized mice was also found to correlate closely with the inoculum size of SIN.Flu. Mice immunized with 108 PFU of the RE virus displayed the highest numbers of NP-specific CD8+ T cells in the spleen, while a larger dose of SIN.Flu, 109 PFU, elicited lower numbers of NP-specific CD8+ T cells (Fig. 2B). This close correlation between virus dose and CD8+ T-cell response may reflect a very low replication rate of the Sindbis virus in vivo. Although pTE3'2J-derived RE double-subgenomic Sindbis viruses are replication competent in vitro, as shown by amplification at a low multiplicity of infection without loss of either infectivity or foreign protein expression, the stability significantly depends on the length and protein product of the foreign gene insert (6, 10, 18). Inoculation with up to 109 PFU of double-subgenomic Sindbis virus recombinants causes inapparent infections in 6- to 8-week-old mice, independent of the route of immunization. Furthermore, productive replication in vivo may be very low, as virus titers in the serum were diminished within the first two days after i.p. inoculation with 5 × 107 PFU and were undetectable thereafter (2a).
|
In order to assess the in vivo antiparasite activity of the specific CD8+ T cells elicited by SIN.Mal, mice were injected s.c. with 108 PFU of this RE virus. For specificity control, other mice were given the same dose of RE virus expressing the influenza NP epitope, SIN.Flu. Two weeks after immunization, both groups of mice, as well as naive animals, were challenged i.v. with 2 × 104 P. yoelii sporozoites. Parasite development was determined 42 h later by measuring plasmodial rRNA levels in the livers of the challenged mice with a competitive reverse transcription-PCR assay, as described elsewhere (3). Mice immunized with SIN.Mal displayed a strong inhibition of parasite development in the liver, resulting in an approximate decrease of 80% of hepatic parasite rRNA levels compared to naive controls (Fig. 3A). The epitope specificity of this protective effect was demonstrated by the fact that mice immunized with SIN.Flu displayed a parasite development similar to that of nonimmunized mice. Furthermore, since SIN.Mal expressed only the 9-mer major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted epitope of the P. yoelii CS protein, the observed inhibition of parasite development could be mediated only by epitope-specific CD8+ T cells.
|
To determine whether immunization with SIN.Flu expressing the influenza NP epitope could elicit protection against influenza virus infection, mice were inoculated s.c. with 108 PFU of SIN.Flu. Other mice were given a comparable dose of SIN.Mal for use as a specificity control. Two weeks after immunization, these and nonimmunized mice were challenged i.n. with 103 PFU of influenza A/WSN/33 virus (subtype H1N1) (13). Viral titers in the lungs of these mice were measured either on day 4 or on day 7 after challenge by using a standard plaque assay to determine the numbers of PFU on Madin-Darby canine kidney cell monolayers (21). Mice immunized with SIN.Flu and challenged with the influenza virus developed much lower virus titers in their lungs than did naive mice or mice immunized with SIN.Mal (Fig. 3B). On day 4, and particularly on day 7, after challenge, the influenza virus titers in the lungs of SIN.Flu-immunized mice were nearly 2 log10 units lower than those of control mice. This supported the view that NP-specific CD8+ T cells, induced by the RE Sindbis virus, were effective in mediating protection against influenza virus infection.
Taken together, these findings reveal that immunization with RE Sindbis virus expressing a single CD8+ epitope of the influenza virus NP or malaria CS protein elicits strong CD8+ T-cell responses and protective immunity against these infections. Previous immunization studies with RE vaccinia viruses expressing the entire malaria CS antigen (13) or the influenza virus NP (1, 9) report the induction of apparently similar or less-efficient protective immunity against these infectious pathogens.
Although Sindbis virus infects humans, this infection is mostly limited to the local skin site, causing a minor rash. Moreover, recent advances in genetic engineering make it feasible to generate replication-defective Sindbis viruses which appear to be nonpathogenic (12). If the immunogenicity of these defective Sindbis viruses remains unaltered, they might be very attractive candidates for the development of safer vaccines against several infectious diseases.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Chui Ng for excellent technical assistance.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants AI-27458, AI-36526, and AI-33314.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medical and Molecular Parasitology, New York University School of Medicine, 341 E. 25th St., New York, NY 10010. Phone: (212) 263-6760. Fax: (212) 263-8116. E-mail: fz5{at}is2.nyu.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Andrew, M. E., B. E. H. Coupar, D. B. Boyle, and G. L. Ada. 1987. The roles of influenza virus haemagglutinin and nucleoprotein in protection: analysis using vaccinia virus recombinants. Scand. J. Immunol. 25:21-28[Medline]. |
| 2. | Bender, B. S., C. A. Rowe, S. F. Taylor, L. S. Wyatt, B. Moss, and P. A. Small, Jr. 1996. Oral immunization with a replication-deficient recombinant vaccinia virus protects mice against influenza. J. Virol. 70:6418-6424[Abstract]. |
| 2a. | Bergmann, C. Unpublished observations. |
| 3. | Briones, M. R. S., M. Tsuji, and V. Nussenzweig. 1996. The large difference in infectivity for mice of Plasmodium berghei and Plasmodium yoelii sporozoites cannot be correlated with their ability to enter into hepatocytes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 77:7-17[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Busch, D. H., and E. G. Pamer.
1998.
MHC class I/peptide stability: implications for immunodominance, in vitro proliferation, and diversity of responding CTL.
J. Immunol.
160:4441-4448 |
| 5. | Butz, E. A., and M. J. Bevan. 1998. Massive expansion of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells during an acute virus infection. Immunity 8:167-175[Medline]. |
| 6. | Chen, J. P., D. Miller, S. Katow, and T. K. Frey. 1995. Expression of the rubella virus structural proteins by an infectious Sindbis virus vector. Arch. Virol. 140:2075-2084[Medline]. |
| 7. | Davis, N. L., K. W. Brown, and R. E. Johnston. 1996. A viral vaccine vector that expresses foreign genes in lymph nodes and protects against mucosal challenge. J. Virol. 70:3781-3787[Abstract]. |
| 8. |
Doolan, D. L.,
M. Sedegah,
R. C. Hedstrom,
P. Hobart,
Y. Charoenvit, and S. L. Hoffman.
1996.
Circumventing genetic restriction of protection against malaria with multigene DNA immunization: CD8+ cell-, interferon gamma-, and nitric oxide-dependent immunity.
J. Exp. Med.
183:1739-1746 |
| 9. |
Endo, A.,
S. Itamura,
H. Iinuma,
S. Funabashi,
H. Shida,
F. Koide,
K. Nerome, and A. Oya.
1991.
Homotypic and heterotypic protection against influenza virus infection in mice by recombinant vaccinia virus expressing the haemagglutinin or nucleoprotein gene of influenza virus.
J. Gen. Virol.
72:699-703 |
| 10. |
Hahn, C. S.,
Y. S. Hahn,
T. J. Braciale, and C. M. Rice.
1992.
Infectious Sindbis virus transient expression vectors for studying antigen processing and presentation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:2679-2683 |
| 11. |
Lalvani, A.,
R. Brooks,
S. Hambleton,
W. J. Britton,
A. V. S. Hill, and A. J. McMichael.
1997.
Rapid effector function in CD8+ memory T cells.
J. Exp. Med.
186:859-865 |
| 12. |
LaStarza, M. W.,
J. A. Lemm, and C. M. Rice.
1994.
Genetic analysis of the nsP3 region of Sindbis virus: evidence for roles in minus-strand and subgenomic RNA synthesis.
J. Virol.
68:5781-5791 |
| 13. |
Li, S.,
M. Rodrigues,
D. Rodriguez,
J. R. Rodriguez,
M. Esteban,
P. Palese,
R. S. Nussenzweig, and F. Zavala.
1993.
Priming with recombinant influenza virus followed by administration of recombinant vaccinia virus induces CD8+ T-cell-mediated protective immunity against malaria.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:5214-5218 |
| 14. |
London, S. D.,
A. L. Schmaljon,
J. M. Dalrymple, and C. M. Rice.
1992.
Infectious enveloped RNA virus antigenic chimeras.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:207-211 |
| 15. | Miyahira, Y., K. Murata, D. Rodriguez, J. R. Rodriguez, M. Esteban, M. M. Rodrigues, and F. Zavala. 1995. Quantification of antigen specific CD8+ T cells using an ELISPOT assay. J. Immunol. Methods 181:45-54[Medline]. |
| 16. | Murali-Krishna, K., J. D. Altman, M. Suresh, D. J. D. Sourdive, A. J. Zajac, J. D. Miller, J. Slansky, and R. Ahmed. 1998. Counting antigen-specific CD8 T cells: a reevaluation of bystander activation during viral infection. Immunity 8:177-187[Medline]. |
| 17. | Murata, K., A. Garcia-Sastre, M. Tsuji, M. Rodrigues, D. Rodriguez, J. R. Rodriguez, R. S. Nussenzweig, P. Palese, M. Esteban, and F. Zavala. 1996. Characterization of in vivo primary and secondary CD8+ T cell responses induced by recombinant influenza and vaccinia viruses. Cell. Immunol. 173:96-107[Medline]. |
| 18. | Pugachev, K. V., P. W. Mason, R. E. Shope, and T. K. Frey. 1995. Double-subgenomic Sindbis virus recombinants expressing immunogenic proteins of Japanese encephalitis virus induce significant protection in mice against lethal JEV infection. Virology 212:587-594[Medline]. |
| 19. | Rodrigues, E. G., F. Zavala, D. Eichinger, J. M. Wilson, and M. Tsuji. 1997. Single immunizing dose of recombinant adenovirus efficiently induces CD8+ T cell-mediated protective immunity against malaria. J. Immunol. 158:1268-1274[Abstract]. |
| 20. | Rodrigues, M., S. Li, K. Murata, D. Rodriguez, J. R. Rodriguez, I. Bacik, J. R. Bennink, J. W. Yewdell, A. Garcia-Sastre, R. S. Nussenzweig, M. Esteban, P. Palese, and F. Zavala. 1994. Influenza and vaccinia viruses expressing malaria CD8+ T and B cell epitopes. Comparison of their immunogenicity and capacity to induce protective immunity. J. Immunol. 153:4636-4648[Abstract]. |
| 21. | Tite, J. P., C. Hughes-Jenkines, D. O'Callaghan, G. Dougan, S. M. Russel, X.-M. Gao, and F. Y. Liew. 1990. Anti-viral immunity induced by recombinant nucleoprotein of influenza A virus. II. Protection from influenza infection and mechanism of protection. Immunology 71:202-207[Medline]. |
| 22. |
Ulmer, J. B.,
J. J. Donnelly,
S. E. Parker,
G. H. Rhodes,
P. L. Felgner,
V. J. Dwarki,
S. H. Gromkowski,
R. R. Deck,
C. M. DeWitt,
A. Friedman,
L. A. Hawe,
K. R. Leander,
D. Martinez,
H. C. Perry,
J. W. Shiver,
D. L. Montgomery, and M. A. Liu.
1993.
Heterologous protection against influenza by injection of DNA encoding a viral protein.
Science
259:1745-1749 |
| 23. |
Xiong, C.,
R. Levis,
P. Shen,
S. Schlesinger,
C. Rice, and H. V. Huang.
1989.
Sindbis virus: an efficient, broad host range vector for gene expression in animal cells.
Science
243:1188-1191 |
| 24. |
Zhou, X.,
P. Berglund,
H. Zhao,
P. Liljeström, and M. Jondal.
1995.
Generation of cytotoxic and humoral immune responses by nonreplicative recombinant Semliki Forest virus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:3009-3013 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»