J Virol, August 1998, p. 6442-6447, Vol. 72, No. 8
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Biochemical Analysis of the Secreted and Virion
Glycoproteins of Ebola Virus
Anthony
Sanchez,1,*
Zhi-Yong
Yang,2
Ling
Xu,2
Gary J.
Nabel,2
Tamara
Crews,3 and
Clarence
J.
Peters1
Special Pathogens Branch, Division of Viral
and Rickettsial Diseases,1 and
Biotechnology Core Facility, Scientific Resources
Program,3 National Center for Infectious
Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta,
Georgia 30333, and
Departments of Internal Medicine and Biological
Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan
Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-06502
Received 12 January 1998/Accepted 17 April 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The glycoproteins expressed by a Zaire species of Ebola virus were
analyzed for cleavage, oligomerization, and other structural properties
to better define their functions. The 50- to 70-kDa secreted and
150-kDa virion/structural glycoproteins (SGP and GP, respectively),
which share the 295 N-terminal residues, are cleaved near the N
terminus by signalase. A second cleavage event, occurring in GP at a
multibasic site (RRTRR
) that is likely mediated by furin, results in
two glycoproteins (GP1 and GP2) linked by disulfide bonding. This furin
cleavage site is present in the same position in the GPs of all Ebola
viruses (R[R/K]X[R/K]R
), and one is predicted for Marburg
viruses (R[R/K]KR
), although in a different location. Based on the
results of cross-linking studies, we were able to determine that Ebola
virion peplomers are composed of trimers of GP1-GP2 heterodimers and
that aspects of their structure are similar to those of retroviruses,
paramyxoviruses, and influenza viruses. We also determined that SGP is
secreted from infected cells almost exclusively in the form of a
homodimer that is joined by disulfide bonding.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Ebola (EBO) viruses are members of
the Filoviridae and cause a severe, often fatal form of
hemorrhagic fever disease in human and/or nonhuman primates
(13). The disease is characterized by a widespread
involvement of tissues and the presence of massive amounts of viral
antigen in certain organs, such as the liver and spleen
(12). An important feature of the infection is an immunosuppression of the host response, as evidenced by a lack of
inflammation in infected tissues, degeneration and necrosis of the
spleen, and a lack of humoral responses in fatal cases (13,
26). It has been conjectured that the glycoproteins expressed by
filoviruses may have an important role in pathogenesis, possibly through immunosuppression of the host (17).
The glycoprotein (GP) gene of filoviruses is the fourth gene (of seven)
from the 3' end of the negative-strand RNA genome (16). All
EBO viruses characterized thus far have the same unconventional type of
GP gene organization that results in the expression of a secreted,
nonstructural glycoprotein (SGP) in preference to the structural GP
(17). The SGP is encoded in a single frame (0 frame), while
the GP is encoded in two frames (0 and
1 frames). Expression of the
GP occurs when the two frames are connected through a transcriptional
editing event that results in the insertion of a single extra adenosine
(added to a run of seven adenosines).
For Zaire species of EBO virus, the N-terminal 295 residues (including
signal sequence) of the SGP (364 total residues) and GP (676 total
residues) are identical, but the length and composition of their
C-terminal sequences are unique. The GP, a type 1 transmembrane protein, is found on the surface of the infectious virion and functions
in attachment structure in the binding and entry of the virus into
susceptible cells. Comparisons of GP predicted amino acid sequences for
all species of EBO virus show a general conservation in the N-terminal
and C-terminal regions (each approximately one-third of the total
sequence) and are separated by a highly variable middle section
(17, 20). This protein is highly glycosylated, containing
large amounts of N- and O-linked glycans, and for Marburg (MBG) virus
(another type of filovirus) has been shown to form trimers
(5). Just N terminal to the transmembrane anchor sequence of
the GP (residues 650 to 672) is a motif (residues 585 to 609) that is
highly conserved in filoviruses. This sequence also has a high degree
of homology with a motif in the glycoproteins of oncogenic retroviruses
that has been shown to be immunosuppressive in vitro (8, 17, 19,
23). Partially overlapping this motif is a heptad repeat sequence
(53 residues; positions 541 to 593) that is thought to function in the
formation of intermolecular coiled coils in the assembly of trimers,
similar to structures predicted for the surface glycoproteins of other
viruses (1, 2). Immediately N terminal to this sequence is a
predicted fusion peptide (6) followed closely by a putative
multibasic cleavage site for a subtilisin/kexin-like convertase, furin
(11). Cleavage by furin has been indirectly demonstrated by
use of specific inhibitors (21) and is predicted to occur at
the last arginine in the sequence RRTRR
(position 501 from the
beginning of the open reading frame [ORF]). Although the role of the
SGP is less defined, recent studies have shown that SGP can bind to
neutrophils, while GP binds to endothelial cells (24).
The different binding patterns of SGP and GP suggest that despite
having identical N-terminal amino acid sequences (~280 residues), these glycoproteins are structurally very distinct from one another. To
better characterize the structures and roles of SGP and GP, we have
biochemically examined these molecules expressed by an EBO virus
isolated from the original 1976 outbreak in Zaire.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Viruses and cell lines.
A Zaire species of EBO virus
isolated from a fatal case during the original 1976 outbreak (Mayinga
strain) (9) was examined. Low-passage stocks (isolated and
cultured two to three times in Vero or Vero E6 cells) were used in all
experiments. A low-passage stock of MBG virus (Musoke strain) was used
as a control in GP cross-linking studies (4, 10). Vero E6
cells were cultured in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium containing
10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (growth medium) as previously
described (3). All work with infectious virions was
performed under biosafety level 4 (maximum containment) conditions at
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.
Radiolabeling of EBO virus proteins.
E6 cells, cultured in
either T-25 flasks or 24-well plates, were infected at a multiplicity
of infection of approximately 1.0. Cells were incubated at 37°C for
48 h, washed twice with Hanks' balanced salt solution, and washed
once with cysteine- or glucose-deficient medium. Then labeling medium
(cysteine- or glucose-deficient Eagle's minimal essential medium, 2%
dialyzed fetal bovine serum, antibiotics, 100 µCi of either
[35S]cysteine or [3H]glucosamine per ml)
was added. For purified virion preparations, cultures were incubated
for 3 h, an equal volume of growth medium was added, and
incubation was continued for an additional 21 h. Virions were
purified by pelleting through a cushion of 20% sucrose as previously
described (5), and the supernatant fluids were used for
certain immunoprecipitation experiments. Pelleted virions were
resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) containing 150 mM NaCl and 3 mM
EDTA (TNE buffer) and either used immediately or stored in a nitrogen
vapor freezer until needed.
RIP and Western blot assays.
Radioimmunoprecipitation (RIP)
assays were performed on Triton X-100 (TX100)-treated, radiolabeled
glycoproteins present in tissue culture fluid (TCF) as described
elsewhere (17). High-titer polyclonal antisera reactive with
EBO virus glycoproteins were mixed with TCF and incubated for 1 h
at room temperature; typically 1 µl of antiserum was added for every
100 µl of TCF. Antigen-antibody complexes were isolated by binding to
staphylococcal protein A bacterial absorbent (Boehringer Mannheim).
Labeled proteins were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) as previously described
(5). Unless otherwise stated, immunoprecipitations were
performed with a high-titer anti-EBO virus SGP/GP serum derived from
rabbits immunized with glycoproteins from TCF of EBO virus-infected
RK13 cells (cultured in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium containing
antibiotics and 2% rabbit serum) extracted by concanavalin A-agarose
chromatography. In one experiment, pooled anti-SGP and pooled anti-GP
sera (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay titers of ~1:12,000 each),
derived from separate groups of five guinea pigs genetically immunized
by genetic immunization (plasmid DNA injections) of guinea pigs
(25), were used in RIP and Western blot assays. Western blot
analysis was performed on virion glycoproteins (5) that were
either mock treated or digested with a mixture of endoglycosidase F and
N-glycosidase F to remove all N-linked glycans, as
previously described (15). A chemiluminescence assay system
(Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories or Pierce) was used to visualize
protein bands.
Structural analysis of GP and SGP.
A preparation of
[35S]cysteine-labeled virions was made 1.7% in TX100
(from 10% in 1× TNE) and incubated at room temperature briefly; then
nucleocapsids were pelleted by centrifugation in a microcentrifuge at
14,000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant fluid was removed, and
the pellet (nucleocapsids) was resuspended in TNE (same volume as
supernatant fluid). Both pellet and supernatant fluid, together with an
untreated aliquot of virions, were mixed with an equal volume of 10%
SDS, divided equally, and subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis under
nonreducing or reducing (addition of 2-mercaptoethanol) conditions.
Oligomers of EBO virion glycoproteins were stabilized by using
bis(succinimidylproprionate) (Sigma) to cross-link untreated and
TX100-treated [3H]glucosamine-labeled virion preparations
as previously reported (4). Cross-linked and untreated
virion GP (nonreduced) were separated on 3.5% acrylamide gels
(large-format slab gel). Cross-linked forms of phosphorylase
b (Sigma) were included for molecular weight markers.
Electrophoresis was performed with an SDS-NaPO4 buffer system according to a protocol provided by the manufacturer of the
markers (18a).
Low-pH cleavage of immunoprecipitated SGP at a single Asp-Pro sequence
(residues 208 and 209) was performed by releasing the protein from
bacterial absorbent (by boiling for 3 min in 1% SDS), pelleting
bacterial cells, vacuum drying aliquots of the supernatant fluid,
resuspending the dried protein in 50 µl of 70% formic acid (freshly
prepared from 89%; Sigma) or 50 µl of water (untreated), and
incubating the material at 37°C for 40 h. Samples were vacuum dried and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
N-terminal sequencing was performed on GP isolated from unlabeled
virion preparations that had been treated with TX100 and pelleted to
remove nucleocapsids or from SDS-disrupted virions digested with
endoglycosidases. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and
electroblotted (semidry) onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Proteins were stained with a solution of 0.1% Ponceau S in 50% methanol-10% acetic acid; then specific bands were excised and used
in determining N-terminal sequences. Sequencing was performed by the
Edman degradation technique, using a model PI 2090 Integrated Microsequencing System (Beckman/Porton Instruments, Inc.). Blotting and
sequencing procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Pulse-chase analysis of SGP secretion.
Cultures of EBO
virus-infected and uninfected E6 cells in 24-well plates were pulsed
for 10 min with labeling medium ([35S]cysteine) and then
chased by being washed twice and incubated with prewarmed (37°C)
growth medium. TCF was harvested at 20, 40, 60, 120, and 240 min
following the initial addition of labeling medium. Fluids were
immediately treated to make them 1% in TX100, 1× in TNE, and 1 mM in
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and used immediately in
immunoprecipitation assays.
Tunicamycins and brefeldin A treatments.
Infected E6 cells
in 24-well plates were treated with cysteine-deficient medium
containing 1.0, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.06, 0.3, and 0.015 µg of
tunicamycin or brefeldin A (Sigma) per ml for 30 min. Untreated wells
were included as a negative control. Medium containing
[35S]cysteine and a corresponding amount of inhibitor was
added to appropriate wells and incubated for 3 h, after which time
the fluid was removed and treated with TX100 (as above) and used in RIP
assays.
Expression of GP and SGP by recombinant DNA techniques.
Recombinant retroviruses (GP pseudotyped) were produced in 293T cells
transfected with plasmids pLZRs-Luc-Gfp, pNGVL-MLVgag-pol, and
pVR1012-EBO-GP as described elsewhere (24). Supernatants from 24 to 48 h posttransfection were clarified by low-speed
centrifugation and either used immediately or stored at
80°C until
needed. Production of SGP was performed by transfection of plasmid
pVR1012-EBO-SGP (25) into 293 cells and then harvesting TCF
containing the secreted SGP.
 |
RESULTS |
Glycoproteins present in EBO virions.
From SDS-PAGE analysis
of detergent-disrupted EBO virions under reducing and nonreducing
conditions (Fig. 1), it was concluded that (i) two glycoproteins are present, (ii) they are membrane associated, and (iii) they are linked by disulfide bonding. These two
glycoproteins, named GP1 (~130 kDa) and GP2 (~24 kDa), are completely stripped from the virion by 1.7% TX100 in TNE, while the L
(polymerase), NP, VP35, and VP30 are strongly associated with the
nucleocapsid (pellet). The VP40 and VP24 appear to be incompletely
stripped from virions by this treatment. Lane 3 of Fig. 1B shows the
two glycoproteins dissociated by 2-mercaptoethanol treatment, and lane
6 shows a ~150-kDa band corresponding to disulfide-bonded GP1 and GP2
(nonreduced; shown more clearly in Fig. 1A). A small (~10-kDa)
unknown protein band is seen associated with membrane and was not
characterized.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Effects of nonionic detergent treatment on a purified
virion preparation of EBO virus. Shown are autoradiograms of
[35S]cysteine-labeled virion proteins run on 6% (A) and
10% (B) acrylamide gels (lanes contain the same samples). Lanes 1 to 3 contain reduced samples of untreated purified EBO virions, pelleted
nucleocapsids derived from detergent (TX100) treatment of the same
preparation, and membrane-associated proteins (supernatant fluid from
the TX100 treatment), respectively; lanes 4 to 6 contain the same
samples and in the same order, except that 2-mercaptoethanol was
omitted from treatment (nonreduced). Identified in the left margin are
the migration positions for the structural proteins; L (polymerase)
protein is putative. The question mark in panel B identifies an unknown
membrane-associated protein. Asterisks identify glycoprotein bands
absent from the nucleocapsid pellet and present in the supernatant
fluid.
|
|
N-terminal sequences of secreted and virion glycoproteins.
The
N-terminal sequences for SGP (isolated from culture supernatants) and
GP1 and GP2 (isolated from purified virions) were determined. The
predicted sites for signalase cleavage of SGP and GP and the furin
cleavage of GP0 to give GP1 and GP2 were all confirmed and are shown in
Fig. 2.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Diagrammatic representation of SGP and GP molecules of
EBO virus (Zaire species isolated in 1976) showing important structural
features. The white N-terminal regions of SGP and GP correspond to
identical (shared) sequences, while the black C termini identify
sequences unique to GP or SGP molecules. The common signalase cleavage
sites for both SGP and GP and the furin cleavage site for GP0
(uncleaved form of GP) ( ) were determined by N-terminal sequencing.
Also shown are cysteine residues (S), predicted N-linked glycosylation
sites (Y-shaped projections), a predicted fusion peptide, a heptad
repeat sequence, and a transmembrane anchor sequence. In EBO viruses,
the positions of these structures are conserved and their sequences are
very similar or, in the case of N-linked glycosylation sites, are at
least concentrated in the central region of GP.
|
|
Reactivities of antisera to GP and SGP.
Anti-SGP and anti-GP
sera were reacted with purified virus preparations in Western blot
assays or infected culture supernatant fluids in RIP assays. Western
blot assays showed strong cross-reactivity to untreated and
endoglycosidase-digested virion GP (Fig.
3A), with some subtle differences in
their binding patterns. The anti-GP serum reacts with certain products
in the endoglycosidase-treated lane (below the prominent band) that are
not detected by anti-SGP. Similarly, anti-SGP antisera reacts with
contaminating SGP protein in the preparations that was not detected by
the anti-GP serum. The strength of the anti-SGP reaction with the
glycosylated SGP is greater than that with the deglycosylated form
(amounts blotted were the same), suggesting that N-linked glycans may
be important components in the antigenicity of this molecule. Anti-GP
serum failed to react with the transmembrane-anchored GP2 molecule, which may reflect a lack of antigenicity and/or a skewing of humoral responses to more dominant epitopes on GP1. In RIP assays using infected culture fluid from which virions had been removed by pelleting, anti-GP showed a much stronger reactivity with GP1, despite
the fact that much (>50-fold [unpublished data]) greater amounts of
SGP than of free GP are found in the medium. Surprisingly, anti-SGP
serum did not react with GP1, while SGP was strongly bound. This result
suggests that part of the humoral response to SGP may have been
directed to conformational epitopes that are absent from GP; the
folding of the highly glycosylated GP1 may also affect the binding of
anti-SGP antibodies reactive to GP1 in Western blots. Little or no GP2
was immunoprecipitated with either serum, indicating that GP2 is
primarily associated with virions (or membranous particulate matter) in
the medium that were removed by centrifugation.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Reactivities of polyclonal antibodies to GP and SGP in
Western blot and RIP assays. (A) Paired lanes of untreated ( ) and
endoglycosidase F/N-glycosidase F-digested (+) virion
proteins labeled with [35S]cysteine, run on 10% gels,
and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Blots were directly exposed
to X-ray film (35S) to identify locations of structural
proteins and reacted in enzyme immunoassays (chemiluminescent) with
guinea pig antisera. Arrows indicate the decreased size of virion GP1
and GP2 glycoproteins due to removal of N-linked glycans. Sera were
derived from animals immunized with naked plasmid DNA which directed
the expression of GP ( -GP), SGP ( -SGP), or vector-only ( -VEC)
products. Asterisks identify SGP and deglycosylated SGP detected by
-SGP. Shown in panel B are lanes containing
[35S]cysteine-labeled proteins from an EBO virion
preparation (marker) and RIP products immunoprecipitated from
supernatant fluids depleted of virions (pelleted through 20% sucrose
cushion) with the same antisera as used for panel A.
|
|
Oligomerization of GP and SGP.
Results of cross-linking
experiments using purified EBO and MBG virions are shown in Fig.
4A. Monomeric, dimeric, and trimeric forms of GP were detected when either untreated or TX100-dissociated virions were cross-linked. The observed approximate molecular mass of
the trimeric form of the EBO virus spike structure (450 kDa) is
consistent with the predicted size of three GP1-GP2 molecules (150 kDa). The larger size of the MBG spike (~500 kDa) is also consistent
with previous calculations (4), given the greater number of
predicted N-linked glycosylation sites (monomer = 170 kDa).
Multimers of GP are not held together by disulfide bonding, as
nonreducing SDS-PAGE dissociates them into their monomeric form (Fig.
4B).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Autoradiograms of multimeric forms of GP and SGP
separated by SDS-PAGE. Numbers next to bands indicate monomeric,
dimeric, and trimeric forms of GP or monomeric and dimeric forms of
SGP. (A) EBO and MBG virion preparations that were untreated (lane 1),
cross-linked (lane 2), and TX100 disrupted and then cross-linked (lane
3). Virion glycoproteins were labeled with
[3H]glucosamine and separated on a 3.5% gel. Identified
on the left are the migration positions and sizes (in kilodaltons) of
cross-linked phosphorylase b marker proteins (195 kDa = dimer, 292 kDa = trimer, etc.; note that in 3.5% gels, proteins
under 200 kDa migrate anomalously). (B)
[3H]glucosamine-labeled EBO virion GP1 (lanes 1 and 3)
and SGP immunoprecipitated from TCF (lanes 2 and 4) separated on a
3.5% gel. Samples were run under reducing (lanes 1 and 2) or
nonreducing (lanes 3 and 4) conditions. The GP1 band in lane 3 corresponds to the monomeric form seen in lane 1 of panel A. GP and SGP
bands in panels A and B were also verified by Coomassie blue staining
of gels prior to autoradiography to identify the locations of purified
virion proteins. (C) Ten percent gel containing immunoprecipitated
[35S]cysteine-labeled SGPs that were either untreated or
cleaved with formic acid. Lanes 1 and 3 contain untreated samples of
SGP; lanes 2 and 4 contain SGP digested with formic acid (Asp-Pro
cleavage; asterisks identify cleavage products). Samples in lanes 1 and
2 were run under reducing conditions, while those in lanes 3 and 4 were
nonreduced.
|
|
SGP molecules were determined to form homodimers stabilized by
disulfide bonding (Fig. 4B), unlike the GP (GP1-GP2) multimers. It can
also be seen from Fig. 4B and C that SGP is secreted from infected
cells exclusively in the form of a dimer. In an attempt to characterize
the orientation of the SGP molecules in the homodimer, low-pH cleavage
of a single Asp-Pro linkage was performed and products were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE under reducing and nonreducing conditions (Fig. 4C). The
N-terminal cleavage fragment (166 residues) would have a peptide
predicted to be 19.2 kDa with two predicted N-linked glycans, and the
C-terminal fragment (156 residues) would have a 18.1-kDa peptide with
four N-linked glycans. The predicted sizes of these fragments should
migrate closely, and as shown in Fig. 4C (lane 2), the reduced cleavage
products can be seen as a single band (~25 to 26 kDa) that is absent
from the nonreduced preparation (lane 4). Nonreduced formic
acid-cleaved SGP yielded two bands (lane 4), the smaller of which
corresponds in size to uncleaved SGP. However, we believe that this
band contains SGP dimers in which both molecules have been cleaved but
migrate at the same position as uncleaved SGP due to disulfide bonding
on both sides of these cuts. The possible orientation for the SGP molecules in the dimer would be either a parallel or an antiparallel alignment.
Trimer formation of GP and dimer formation of SGP were also determined
to occur when these glycoproteins were expressed separately through
recombinant DNA techniques (Fig. 5). This
finding demonstrates that folding and assembly of multimers occurs
independently of other EBO virus proteins.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Biochemical analysis of SGP and GP expressed separately
through recombinant DNA techniques. Shown are the results of Western
blot assays (chemiluminescent) detecting proteins separated on SDS-4
to 15% gradient polyacrylamide gels. SGP was derived from cell
cultures transfected with plasmid DNA containing an unedited ORF
sequence, and GP was derived from partially concentrated GP-pseudotyped
retrovirus particles (GP expressed from an edited ORF sequence).
Preparations were cross-linked as for Fig. 3 and analyzed under
reducing (R) and nonreducing (NR) conditions. Migration positions of
size markers are shown on the right; monomeric and multimeric forms are
indicated on the left.
|
|
Secretion of SGP.
A pulse-chase experiment was performed to
determine the time required for SGP to be expressed and secreted.
Figure 6A shows that SGP is detected in
the culture medium after only 20 min (10-min pulse and 10-min chase).
After 60 to 80 min, significant amounts of GP1 were detected, while GP2
did not appear until approximately 80 min. Since GP2 is associated with
membranes of virions, the earlier appearance of GP1 in the TCF is
probably due to its release from the cell surface.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Production of EBO virus SGP in pulse-chase and
tunicamycin treatment experiments. (A) RIP products obtained from the
TCFs of EBO-infected (+) and uninfected ( ) E6 cells. Following a
10-min pulse ([35S]cysteine) and chasing with cold
medium, samples were taken from 20 to 240 min after the moment the
radiolabel was added. (B) RIP products from the TCFs of cultures
treated with tunicamycin at 1.0, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.062, 0.031, or
0.015 µg/ml (lanes 1 to 7, respectively) or untreated (lane 8).
|
|
Figure 6B shows the effect of tunicamycin secretion of SGP, and levels
of 1 µg/ml or greater clearly inhibit secretion. A small band seen
below SGP may be a secreted form lacking N-linked glycans, but the
amount of this protein is insignificant compared with the glycosylated
SGP produced in untreated cells. Treatment with brefeldin A completely
inhibited the secretion of SGP when as little as 0.015 µg/ml was
added to cultures (data not shown).
From analyses of amino acid sequences and cleavage events, we have
produced a diagrammatic structure for the virion GP heterodimer (Fig.
7), which is based on information
obtained from this study and results of prior predictions (6, 16,
17).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Diagrammatic representation of the structural GP. Shown
is the predicted orientation of the GP1-GP2 heterodimer linked by
undetermined disulfide bonding (indicated by the question mark).
Intramolecular disulfide bonds that are shown come from prior
predictions based on similarities to retrovirus glycoprotein structures
(6). See Fig. 2 for other features of the amino acid
sequence.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
SDS-PAGE studies of EBO virion glycoproteins (Fig. 1 and 3A) and
N-terminal sequencing have provided definitive evidence that GP is
cleaved (from GP0 form) into two molecules, GP1 and GP2. Cleavage of
the structural GP gene product of EBO virus was expected for the
N-terminal signal sequence and occurs at the predicted site. Cleavage
of GP by furin had been predicted from the RRTRR sequence, but
identification of the C-terminal fragment in virions was complicated by
its comigration with VP24 in SDS-PAGE. However, prior studies detected
GP2 in EBO-infected tissue culture fluids (17, 21), and it
was suggested that this uncharacterized glycoprotein might be derived
from a cleavage event involving GP. Indirect evidence for furin
cleavage of EBO virus GP was recently demonstrated through the use of
specific inhibitors of furin activity (21).
When GP sequences of all known EBO viruses are aligned, one finds that
the furin cleavage site is conserved but differs slightly from one EBO
species to another. The furin cleavage sites of Zaire species of EBO
viruses that caused outbreaks in Zaire in 1976 (RRTRR) and 1995 (RRARR)
and in Gabon in 1994 and 1996 (RRTRR) are identical or very similar,
while those of the Ivory Coast (RRKRR) and Sudan (RKRSRR) species have
some extra positively charged residues. The site for the Reston
species, however, deviates from the other EBO virus sequences in that a
lysine occupies the
4 position (RKQKR), which has been
viewed as requiring an arginine for efficient cleavage (11),
but cleavage at (R/K)X(K/R)R or (R/K)XXX(K/R)R sequences in other
proteins has been reported (22). Although the Reston species
replicates more slowly than some of the other EBO viruses in tissue
culture, ultimately large amounts of infectious virions are produced
and when inoculated into monkeys are quite capable of causing severe
disease (7). If the cleavage site is less than optimal, it
does not deviate greatly from the more commonly seen sequence (RRXRR),
and its slower growth in culture may be due to other factors. Further,
the Ivory Coast EBO virus (whose GP should be easily cleaved by furin)
replicates as slowly as or more slowly than the Reston species. A
predicted furin cleavage site for MBG viruses (residues 432 to 435;
R[R/K]KR) is found much further N terminal to the fusion peptide (68 residues) than those of EBO viruses; another potential cleavages site
is found in the alpha-helix region (residues 558 to 561; RLRR), though it may not be easily cleaved after trimer formation.
From cross-linking studies of EBO virion GP (Fig. 4A), we conclude that
it forms trimers that are ~450 kDa in size. This is in agreement with
predictions based on three 150-kDa GP1-GP2 heterodimers and is
consistent with trimer formation by MBG virus. We have also determined
that SGP is secreted from infected cells almost exclusively in the form
of a dimer (Fig. 4); together with structural differences from GP (Fig.
3), this finding suggests that it does not act to decoy the immune
response away from infected cells by mimicking the structure of GP.
Analysis of SGP fragments cleaved by formic acid treatment (Asp-Pro
bond) (Fig. 4C) has led us to conclude that disulfide bonding occurs
between cysteines (conserved in all EBO viruses) at both ends of the
SGP molecule. This close association of two SGP molecules would
undoubtedly confer a unique conformation and may explain why animals
genetically immunized to SGP produce antibodies that are not very
reactive with GP in RIP assays (Fig. 3B). We have not determined the
orientation in which dimerized SGP molecules are held together, but it
appears that relative to their N and C termini, they are aligned in a parallel or antiparallel orientation.
The formations of trimers by GP and dimers by SGP occur independently
of one another, as was demonstrated by expressing them separately (Fig.
5), and likely occur when these glycoproteins are folded in the
endoplasmic reticulum. It is not known if GP1 molecules (released from
GP2) that are free in the culture medium maintain a trimerized
structure, but given the fact that no disulfide bonding occurs between
GP1 molecules, they are probably dislodged from their association with
GP2 as monomers. SGP dimers are very rapidly transported through the
endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi stacks and secreted into the medium, as
quickly as 20 min or less (Fig. 6A), and secretion is inhibited by
tunicamycin and brefeldin A. The rapid movement of SGP through the
glycosidic pathway may affect processing and could account for the
heterogeneity of this glycoprotein, as evidenced by its wide range in
size (50 to 70 kDa).
The disulfide bond(s) that links the GP1 and GP2 molecules is yet to be
identified (as are those holding the SGP dimer together). However, if
the predicted intramolecular disulfide bonds of GP2 are correct, and
assuming that the cysteines located in the transmembrane anchor
sequence are unavailable for bonding to GP1, then only one cysteine in
GP2 should be available for bonding with one of the five cysteines in
GP1 (Fig. 7). The association of GP1 and GP2 in a heterodimer would
position the hydrophobic N terminus of GP1 close to the hydrophobic
GP2. The C terminus of GP1 is hydrophilic and highly glycosylated and
has mucin-like characteristics (due to O-linked glycans). An extended
mucin-like property would tend to project this end of the molecule away
from the membrane-anchored GP2, where it can interact with receptors in
an aqueous environment. The major role of the GP trimer is thus one of
receptor binding, but it could also function to protect the virion from
immune responses through its extensive glycosylation, as filovirus
virions are resistant to neutralization by antibody (13).
The role of GP2 appears to be one of trimer assembly, positioning of
GP1 for receptor binding and virus entry. GP2 contains the putative
fusion peptide, and in vitro studies have shown that in the presence of
calcium, a synthetic version of the fusion peptide (GAAIGLAWIPYFGPAAE) is efficiently inserted into membranes containing phosphatidylinositol and fuses them (14). The GP2 molecule is predicted to form
disulfide bonds between cysteine residues immediately flanking the
fusion peptide, which would position the fusion peptide in front of the coiled coils in the trimer and, following some conformational change,
would enter into a fusogenic state (2).
We conclude from our structural data that SGP has a function separate
from that of GP, a view supported by the results of binding studies
using SGP produced from plasmid-transfected cells and a GP-pseudotyped
murine retrovirus (24). These studies demonstrated that SGP
binds to neutrophils (via CD16b, the Fc
receptor) and not to
endothelial cells, whereas the opposite pattern of cell binding was
found for the GP-pseudotyped vector. In addition, there were
indications that SGP binding may also inhibit neutrophil activation,
which may influence inflammatory responses that normally provide innate
immunity. Such an effect in EBO virus disease in human and nonhuman
primates would likely contribute to pathogenesis, especially in light
of the large amount of SGP circulating in the blood during acute
infections and the lack of inflammation in tissues (26). It
is also conceivable that in addition of neutrophils, SGP also binds to
other cell types and/or soluble factors. One cannot overlook a possible
role for GP in immunosuppression, however, since it contains a
potential immunosuppressive motif in GP2 (17, 19).
It is clear from our study and prior investigations that the GP genes
of EBO viruses have evolved to express two glycoproteins that have
distinctly separate roles and that this aspect of their evolution has
occurred independently of the MBG virus lineage (18).
Aspects of the EBO virion spike structure are comparable to the
attachment/glycoprotein structures of viruses in the families Retroviridae, Paramyxoviridae, and
Orthomyxoviridae, indicating similar functions in virus
entry. Thus, the role for GP is one of targeting EBO virions into
specific cell types that allow replication and spread of the virus and
entry via membrane fusion. The role of SGP, on the other hand, appears
to be more subtle. The large amount of SGP produced by EBO viruses may
be linked to some process in the infection of their natural hosts, but
it might also have a pathogenic role outside of the natural host. By
studying the mechanisms EBO viruses have evolved to circumvent immune
defenses, investigators not only can discover aspects of their biology
but also can use these viruses (or virus genes) as tools in the study of human immune responses. In the future, we hope to further
characterize the in vivo and in vitro effects of these molecules and
gain clearer insights into their three-dimensional structures.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank John P. O'Connor for editing the text of the
manuscript, Danny L. Jue for assistance in protein chemistry, and
Stuart T. Nichol for valued discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd., Building 15, Room
SB611, Mail Stop G14, Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone: (404) 639-1119. Fax: (404) 639-1118. E-mail: ans1{at}cdc.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Chambers, P.,
C. R. Pringle, and A. J. Easton.
1990.
Heptad repeat sequences are located adjacent to hydrophobic regions in several types of virus fusion glycoproteins.
J. Gen. Virol.
71:3075-3080[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Chan, D. C.,
D. Fass,
J. M. Berger, and P. S. Kim.
1997.
Core structure of gp41 from the HIV envelope glycoprotein.
Cell
89:263-273[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Elliott, L. H.,
M. P. Kiley, and J. B. McCormick.
1985.
Descriptive analysis of Ebola virus proteins.
Virology
147:169-176[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Feldmann, H.,
C. Will,
M. Schikore,
W. Slenczka, and H.-D. Klenk.
1991.
Glycosylation and oligomerization of the spike protein of Marburg virus.
Virology
182:353-356[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Feldmann, H.,
S. T. Nichol,
H.-D. Klenk,
C. J. Peters, and A. Sanchez.
1994.
Characterization of filoviruses based on differences in structure and antigenicity of the virion glycoprotein.
Virology
199:469-473[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Gallaher, W. R.
1996.
Similar structural models of the transmembrane proteins of Ebola and avian sarcoma viruses.
Cell
85:477-478[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Jahrling, P. B.,
T. W. Geisbert,
N. K. Jaax,
M. A. Hanes,
T. G. Ksiazek, and C. J. Peters.
1996.
Experimental infection of cynomolgus macaques with Ebola-Reston filoviruses from the 1989-1990 U.S. epizootic.
Arch. Virol.
11:115-134.
|
| 8.
|
Kadota, J.-I.,
G. J. Cianciolo, and R. Snyderman.
1991.
A synthetic peptide homologous to retroviral transmembrane envelope proteins depresses protein kinase C mediated lymphocyte proliferation and directly inactivated protein kinase C: a potential mechanism for immunosuppression.
Microbiol. Immunol.
35:443-459[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Kiley, M. P.,
R. L. Regnery, and K. M. Johnson.
1980.
Ebola virus: identification of virion structural proteins.
J. Gen. Virol.
49:333-341[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Kiley, M. P.,
N. J. Cox,
L. H. Elliott,
A. Sanchez,
R. DeFries,
M. J. Buchmeier,
D. D. Richman, and J. B. McCormick.
1988.
Physicochemical properties of Marburg virus: evidence for three distinct virus strains and their relationship to Ebola virus.
J. Gen. Virol.
69:1957-1967[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Klenk, H.-D., and W. Garten.
1994.
Host cell proteases controlling virus pathogenicity.
Trends Microbiol.
2:39-43[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Ksiazek, T. G.,
P. E. Rollin,
P. B. Jahrling,
E. Johnson,
D. W. Dalgard, and C. J. Peters.
1992.
Enzyme immunosorbent assay for Ebola virus antigens in tissues of infected primates.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:947-950[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Peters, C. J.,
A. Sanchez,
P. E. Rollin,
T. G. Ksiazek, and G. A. Murphy.
1996.
Filoviridae: Marburg and Ebola viruses, p. 1161-1176.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, et al. (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed., vol. 1. Lippincott-Raven Press, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 14.
|
Ruiz-Argüello, M. B.,
F. M. Goñi,
F. B. Pereira, and J. L. Nieva.
1998.
Phosphatidylinositol-dependent membrane fusion induced by a putative fusogenic sequence of Ebola virus.
J. Virol.
72:1775-1781[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Sanchez, A., and T. K. Frey.
1991.
Vaccinia-vectored expression of the rubella virus structural proteins and characterization of the E1 and E2 glycosidic linkages.
Virology
183:636-646[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Sanchez, A.,
M. P. Kiley,
B. P. Holloway, and D. D. Auperin.
1993.
Sequence analysis of the Ebola virus genome: organization, genetic elements, and comparison with the genome of Marburg virus.
Virus Res.
29:215-240[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Sanchez, A.,
S. G. Trappier,
B. W. J. Mahy,
C. J. Peters, and S. T. Nichol.
1996.
The virion glycoproteins of Ebola viruses are encoded in two reading frames and are expressed through transcriptional editing.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:3602-3607[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Sanchez, A.,
S. G. Trappier,
U. Ströher,
S. T. Nichol,
M. D. Bowen, and H. Feldmann.
1998.
Variation in the glycoprotein and VP35 genes of Marburg virus strains.
Virology
240:138-146[Medline].
|
| 18a.
|
Sigma Chemical Co.
1988.
Technical bulletin no. MWS-877X.
Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.
|
| 19.
|
Volchkov, V. E.,
V. M. Blinov, and S. V. Netesov.
1992.
The envelope glycoprotein of Ebola virus contains an immunosuppressive-like domain similar to oncogenic retroviruses.
FEBS Lett.
305:181-184[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Volchkov, V. E.,
S. Becker,
V. A. Volchkova,
V. A. Ternovoj,
A. N. Kotov,
S. V. Netesov, and H.-D. Klenk.
1995.
GP mRNA of Ebola virus is edited by the Ebola virus polymerase and by T7 and vaccinia virus polymerases.
Virology
214:421-430[Medline].
|
| 21.
| Volchkov, V. E., H. Feldman, V. A. Volchkova,
and H.-D. Klenk. Processing of Ebola virus glycoprotein
by proprotein convertase furin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, in press.
|
| 22.
|
Watanabe, T.,
K. Murakami, and K. Nakayama.
1993.
Positional and additive effects of basic-amino-acids on processing of precursor proteins within the constitutive secretory pathway.
FEBS Lett.
320:215-218[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Will, C.,
E. Mühlberger,
D. Linder,
W. Slenczka,
H.-D. Klenk, and H. Feldmann.
1993.
Marburg virus gene 4 encodes the virion membrane protein, a type I transmembrane glycoprotein.
J. Virol.
67:1203-1210[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
| Yang, Z.-Y., R. Delgado, L. Xu, R. F. Todd, E. G. Nabel, A. Sanchez, S. T. Nichol, and G. J. Nabel. Differential cellular interactions of the secreted and
transmembrane Ebola virus glycoproteins: implication for viral
pathogenesis. Science 279:1034-1037.
|
| 25.
|
Xu, L.,
A. Sanchez,
Z.-Y. Yang,
S. R. Zaki,
E. G. Nabel,
S. T. Nichol, and G. J. Nabel.
1997.
Genetic immunization for Ebola virus infection.
Nat. Med.
4:37-42.
|
| 26.
|
Zaki, R. R.,
P. W. Greer,
C. S. Goldsmith,
L. M. Coffield,
P. E. Rollin,
P. Callain, et al.
1996.
Ebola virus hemorrhagic fever: pathologic, immunopathologic and ultrastructural studies, p. 35.
In
Abstracts of the Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Ebola Virus Research, Antwerp, Belgium.
|
J Virol, August 1998, p. 6442-6447, Vol. 72, No. 8
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.