Previous Article | Next Article 
J Virol, May 1998, p. 4116-4126, Vol. 72, No. 5
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Role of Matrix in an Early Postentry Step in the
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Life Cycle
Rosemary E.
Kiernan,
Akira
Ono,
George
Englund, and
Eric O.
Freed*
Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology,
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0460
Received 22 December 1997/Accepted 6 February 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The matrix protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)
has been reported to play a crucial role in the targeting of the Gag
polyprotein precursor to the plasma membrane and in the incorporation
of viral envelope glycoproteins into budding virions. In this report,
we present evidence that mutation of a highly conserved Leu at matrix
amino acid 20 blocks or markedly delays virus replication in a range of
cell types, including T-cell lines, primary human peripheral blood
mononuclear cells, and monocyte-derived macrophages. These mutations do
not impair virus assembly and release, RNA encapsidation, or envelope
glycoprotein incorporation into virions but rather cause significant
defects in an early step in the virus life cycle, as measured by
single-cycle infectivity assays and the analysis of viral DNA synthesis
early postinfection. This infectivity defect is independent of the type
of envelope glycoprotein carried on mutant virions; similar results are
obtained in pseudotyping experiments using wild-type or truncated HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins, the amphotropic murine leukemia virus envelope,
or the vesicular stomatitis G protein. Intriguingly, matrix residue 20 mutations also increase the apparent binding of Gag to membrane,
accelerate the kinetics of Gag processing, and induce defects in
endogenous reverse transcriptase activity without affecting virion
density or morphology. These results help elucidate the function of
matrix in HIV-1 replication.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The human immunodeficiency virus
type 1 (HIV-1) matrix (MA) protein is initially synthesized as part of
a polyprotein precursor, Pr55Gag, which is proteolytically
cleaved by the viral protease (PR) to generate the mature Gag proteins:
MA (p17), CA (p24), NC (p7), and p6. During translation, the MA domain
of Pr55Gag is modified by the covalent attachment of a
myristic acid moiety to the N-terminal Gly residue (60). In
the virion, MA is located just inside the lipid bilayer of the viral
envelope and is attached to the bilayer by a multipartite membrane
binding domain (35; for reviews, see references
34, 42, and 71).
Two major functions for the HIV-1 MA protein have been clearly
established. (i) MA is critical to the targeting of the Gag precursor
to the plasma membrane. Mutation of the N-terminal Gly, which serves as
the acceptor site for Gag myristylation, abolishes virus assembly in
most systems (7, 30, 37, 56). Mutation of a highly basic
domain near the N terminus of MA (residues 17 to 31) disrupts proper
Gag targeting and virus assembly (24, 75, 78), and single
amino acid changes between MA residues 84 and 88 redirect virus
assembly to cytoplasmic compartments (30). A large
deletion in MA also retargets assembly to the cytoplasm (20,
33). (ii) MA is required for efficient incorporation of the
envelope (Env) glycoproteins into virions. Deletions and multiple-amino-acid substitutions throughout the majority of MA impair
Env incorporation (17, 74), and single-amino-acid
substitutions near the amino terminus of MA (e.g., at residues 10, 12, 30, and 34) abolish or significantly reduce Env incorporation (27,
28, 54).
It has also been suggested that MA plays a role in translocating the
viral preintegration complex to the nucleus (9, 38, 66),
although a significant amount of data is not consistent with this
hypothesis (21, 23-25) (see Discussion). An additional role
for retroviral MA proteins early in the virus life cycle has been
proposed; however, the mechanism responsible for this function has not
been elucidated. More than a decade ago, a set of deletions in the C
terminus of murine leukemia virus (MuLV) MA was reported to
dramatically reduce virus infectivity without affecting assembly and
release, RNA encapsidation, or virion reverse transcriptase (RT)
activity (15). More recently, mutations in an avian
retrovirus (Rous sarcoma virus) which impair virus infectivity without
affecting assembly and release were described (57). Several
reports have also implicated HIV-1 MA in an early step in the virus
life cycle prior to the completion of reverse transcription (11,
58, 73).
The events which immediately follow membrane fusion and the release of
the viral nucleocapsid into the host cell cytoplasm, which are often
referred to as uncoating, are poorly understood. In addition to the
reports mentioned above implicating MA in these steps, mutation of
other HIV-1 gene products has been observed to affect early, postfusion
events. These gene products include Vif (62, 63, 67), Nef
(2, 3, 12, 61), NC (4), and CA (16, 58,
68). Mutations in HIV-1 CA which prevent the incorporation of
cyclophilin A into virions have also been reported to impair an early
postentry step (6). In most of these studies, the synthesis
of viral DNA at early time points postinfection was used as a marker
for detecting early events.
During the course of our previous analysis of the MA basic domain
(24), we noted that a nonbasic residue within this region, the Leu at MA amino acid 20, is remarkably well conserved among lentiviral MA proteins (53). We report here that mutation of this residue, in particular to Lys, causes marked replication defects
in a range of cell types without impairing virus assembly and release,
RNA encapsidation, or the incorporation of Env glycoproteins into
virions. These mutants display significant infectivity defects in
single-cycle experiments in CD4+ HeLa cells and T-cell
lines, using the MAGI infectivity assay or molecular clones engineered
to express luciferase postinfection. An early defect is also observed
by PCR amplification of viral DNA at early time points after infection.
The residue 20 mutants display several additional phenotypes, including
accelerated Gag precursor processing, an apparent enhancement in Gag
membrane binding, and reduced activity in endogenous RT (ERT) assays.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells, viruses, and plasmids.
HeLa, CEM(12D-7), and MAGI
cells were maintained as described previously (27). Jurkat,
H9, MT-4, and A.301 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM glutamine, and
antibiotics. 293T cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium plus 10% FBS, 2 mM glutamine, and antibiotics. The
isolation and culture of primary human monocyte-derived macrophages
(MDM) have been described previously in detail (24). Human
peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were stimulated with 1 µg
of phytohemagglutinin per ml for 3 days and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium plus 10% FBS, 2 mM glutamine, antibiotics, and 20 U of
recombinant human interleukin-2 (Boehringer Mannheim) per ml. For
infection of T-cell lines, PBMC, and MAGI cells, virus was derived from
the T-cell line-tropic molecular clone pNL4-3 (1) and
derivatives containing the amino acid 20 mutations. For macrophage
infectivity analyses, we used the macrophage-tropic pNL4-3 derivative
pNL(AD8) (24). As described previously, since replication of
pNL4-3 is restricted in macrophages, this virus was included as a
negative control (24). We used the following Env expression
plasmids: for HIV-1 Env, pHenv (29); for amphotropic MuLV
(ampho-MuLV) Env, pSVAMLVenv (45); for vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein (VSV-G), pHCMV-G (72). pSVAMLVenv was
obtained from N. Landau and D. Littman through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program; pHCMV-G was kindly provided by J. Burns. The luciferase-expressing clone pNL4-3.Luc.R
E
was obtained from N. Landau
through the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program.
Transfections and infections.
For most assays, virus stocks
were prepared by HeLa transfection as described previously
(26). In the case of the luciferase-expressing (pNLuc)
clones, very low RT activity was obtained in HeLa cells relative to
that obtained with pNL4-3. In contrast, the amounts of RT activity
released into the media of pNLuc- and pNL4-3-transfected 293T cells
were comparable. Virus stocks of the pNLuc and pNLuc/20LK clones were
therefore prepared in 293T cells. Transfected cell supernatants were
harvested, passed through a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter, normalized for
RT activity, and used in infections as indicated.
Mutagenesis and cloning.
Our strategy for introducing MA
mutations into pNL4-3 by site-directed mutagenesis has been described
previously (30). The amino acid 20 mutations were introduced
into the macrophage-tropic molecular clone pNL (AD8) (24) by
cloning the env-containing SalI-BamHI
fragment (pNL4-3 nucleotides [nt] 5785 to 8465) from pNL(AD8) into
pNL4-3/20LE, pNL4-3/20LK, and pNL4-3/20LR. For use in pseudotyping
experiments, an env
derivative of the 20LK
mutant was constructed by cloning the KFS env frameshift
mutation (22) into pNL4-3/20LK on the
SalI-BamHI fragment. pNLuc and pNLuc/20LK were
constructed by cloning the SalI-NcoI fragment
(pNL4-3 nt 5785 to 10568) from
pNL4-3.Luc.R
E
(13) into pNL4-3
and pNL4-3/20LK. Because the vpr mutation present in
pNL4-3.Luc.R
E
is 5' of the SalI
site (13), pNLuc and pNLuc/20LK express full-length, functional vpr genes. The pHenvCTdel-144 HIV-1 Env
expression vector expressing a 144-amino-acid-truncated form of the
HIV-1 Env glycoprotein was constructed by introducing the
SalI-BamHI fragment from pNLTr712
(69; kindly provided by V. Bosch) into pHenv
(29). The protease-defective (PR
) version of
pNL4-3 contains an Asp
Asn mutation at PR residue 25, which lies in
the PR active site (47). To construct PR
versions of the 1GA and MA amino acid 20 mutants for use in membrane binding analyses, the SphI-EcoRI fragment (pNL4-3
nt 1443 to 5743) encompassing the PR coding region was introduced from
pNL4-3/PR
into pNL4-3/1GA, pNL4-3/20LK, pNL4-3/20LR, and
pNL4-3/20LE.
Pulse-chase analysis of Gag processing and virion release.
HeLa cells transfected with the indicated molecular clones were
pulse-labeled for 30 min in [35S]Cys and
[35S]Met. After the labeling period, the medium was
replaced with 10% FBS-RPMI 1640, and the cells were cultured at
37°C for a chase time of 1, 3, or 6 h. At each time point, the
cells were harvested and solubilized in lysis buffer. Labeled virions
were recovered by spinning the supernatants in 1.5-ml Sarstedt tubes in
a refrigerated Tomy microcentrifuge (26). The virion pellets
and the supernatant from the microcentrifuge spin were mixed with lysis
buffer. Recovery of the supernatant fraction permitted the evaluation
of proteins that are released from the cell in a soluble, virion-free
form. The three fractions (cell lysates, virion lysates, and
supernatants) were then separately immunoprecipitated with AIDS patient
serum and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE).
Radioimmunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis.
Methods
used for metabolically labeling transfected HeLa cells, preparing cell
and virion lysates, and immunoprecipitating viral proteins have been
detailed previously (26, 70). For Western blotting, proteins
were separated by SDS-PAGE (10% gel) and transferred to polyvinylidine
difluoride membranes (Millipore). Membranes were incubated with a
mixture of rabbit anti-gp120 antibody (a kind gift of K. Strebel) and
AIDS patient sera (human HIV immunoglobulin [Ig]; obtained from NIH
AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program) as primary antibodies.
Subsequently, membranes were incubated with a mixture of horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit Ig and anti-human Ig (Amersham).
Antigens recognized by antibodies were detected with enhanced
chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham).
RNA dot blot analysis.
Wild-type (wt) and mutant virions,
produced by transient transfection of HeLa cells, were centrifuged for
45 min at 100,000 × g in an SW55 rotor (Beckman), and
the pellets were resuspended in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.4), 100 mM NaCl, and 5 mM MgCl2. A 40-µl sample of each
virus preparation, normalized for RT activity, was digested with 10 U
of RNase-free DNase (Boehringer Mannheim) for 1 h at 37°C.
Virions were disrupted by incubation with 1% Nonidet P-40 for 30 min
at 37°C in the presence of 100 U of rRNasin (Promega), followed by
the addition of 30 µl of 20× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate) and 20 µl of formaldehyde on ice. The samples were
heated to 60°C for 15 min, diluted with 2 volumes of cold 20× SSC,
immobilized onto nylon membranes by using a dot blot manifold, and then
hybridized overnight at 45°C to a 32P-labeled
HIV-1-specific DNA probe. Membranes were washed twice with 2×
SSC-0.1% SDS at 65°C for 20 min, dried, and exposed to X-ray film.
PCR assays.
Virus stocks were obtained by cotransfection of
HeLa cells with the env
molecular clones
pNL4-3KFS or pNL4-3KFS/20LK and an ampho-MuLV Env expression vector
(pSVAMLVenv [45]) or an HIV-1 Env expression vector
(pHenv [29]). Transfection supernatants, normalized
for RT activity and adjusted to a 1-ml volume, were treated with 100 U
of DNase (Boehringer Mannheim) for 1 h at 37°C in the presence of 10 mM MgCl2. Virus (5 × 105 RT cpm)
was used to infect 106 CEM(12D-7) cells for 3 h at
37°C. Cells were washed three times in phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS), resuspended in growth medium, and incubated at 37°C. At
specified times postinfection, cells were washed in PBS, lysed, and
digested with proteinase K as described previously (19).
HIV-specific sequences were amplified in PCR mixtures containing
approximately 10 µl of lysate, 0.2 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates,
1 µM each oligonucleotide, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris-HCl,
50 mM KCl, and 1.25 U of Taq polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim) in a 50-µl volume. Samples were amplified for 30 cycles, using an annealing temperature of 60°C. Oligonucleotide primer pairs
used were as follows, with pNL4-3 positions indicated (53): long terminal repeat (LTR) (plus-sense primer, nt 9035 to 9055 [AGCTGTAGATCTTAGCCACTT]; minus-sense primer, nt 9541 to
9559 [AGGCTCAGATCTGGTCTAA]); Env (plus-sense primer, nt
6944 to 6966 [ACAGTACAATGTACACATGGAAT]; minus-sense
primer, nt 7466 to 7498 [CTGCCACATGTTTATAAATTGTTTTATTCTGCA]); circles (plus-sense primer, nt 9035 to 9055 [AGCTGTAGATCTTAGCCACTT]; minus-sense primer, nt 635 to 653 [GTCCCTGTTCGGGCGCCAC]). PCR products were electrophoresed
on 1% agarose gels in Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) running buffer, denatured
in 0.4 M NaOH-1.5 M NaCl, and transferred to Hybond-N+ (Amersham). PCR
products were hybridized to 32P-labeled oligonucleotides
and exposed to X-ray film. An oligonucleotide probe corresponding to
pNL4-3 nt 421 to 524 was used to detect LTR and circle PCR products,
and an oligonucleotide probe spanning nt 7150 to 7166 was used to
detect envelope-specific products. To ensure that all reactions were
performed within the linear range, PCR was done on a dilution series of
cell lysates. PCR amplification of human
-globin sequence was
performed as described above except that 2 µCi of
[32P]TTP was included in each reaction.
-Globin
primers (RS79/80) have been described previously (59). PCR
products were electrophoresed as described above, and gels were dried
and exposed to film.
ERT assays.
The ERT assay was performed by using a protocol
modified from that described by Goncalves et al. (36).
Virus, normalized for exogenous RT activity or p24 concentration, was
pelleted at 14,000 × g for 90 min and permeabilized
for 10 min at room temperature with the indicated detergent, followed
by the addition of an ERT reaction mixture containing a final
concentration of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 2 mM magnesium acetate, 10 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM dCTP, dGTP and dATP, and 10 µCi of
[32P]TTP in a final volume of 100 µl. After 16 h
of incubation at 37°C, 20 µg of RNase A was added, and samples were
incubated for 1 h at 37°C and then digested with 20 µg of
proteinase K for 3 h at 65°C. Reaction products were purified by
using a Wizard PCR Prep DNA purification kit (Promega) and denatured in
0.1 M NaOH for 1 h at 37°C prior to electrophoresis in 1%
agarose in TBE running buffer. 32P-labeled DNA molecular
weight markers (Gibco BRL) were denatured and run in parallel. The gels
were dried and exposed to film. As indicated by the size of the
products obtained, these conditions allow reverse transcription to
proceed beyond minus-strand strong-stop DNA. As a negative control in
ERT assays, we used the RT active-site mutant RT/D186N, kindly provided
by A. Engelman (19).
Luciferase assays.
Virus stocks were obtained by
cotransfecting the luciferase-expressing env
molecular clone pNLuc or pNLuc/20LK with an ampho-MuLV or HIV-1 Env
expression vector (see above). H9 or CEM(12D-7) cells (5 × 105) were incubated with 100 µl of luciferase-expressing
virus in the presence of DEAE-dextran (20 µg/ml) for 3 h at
37°C; 1 ml of growth medium was added, and cells were incubated at
37°C for 48 h. Cells were washed twice with PBS and then lysed
in 100 µl of reporter lysis buffer (Promega). Samples were subjected
to one freeze-thaw cycle, and cell membranes were removed by
centrifugation. Luciferase activity was measured following addition of
100 µl of substrate (Promega) to 10 µl of extract.
Membrane binding analysis.
HeLa cells were transfected with
PR
versions of pNL4-3, MA amino acid 20 mutant
derivatives, or the myristylation mutant pNL4-3/1GA (30).
Two days posttransfection, cell fractionations were performed as
follows. Cells were rinsed with ice-cold PBS, scraped, and centrifuged
at 600 × g for 5 min. Cell pellets were washed once with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 1 mM EGTA and once with 10 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 1 mM EDTA and then resuspended in 10 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 1 mM EDTA, 6% (wt/vol) sucrose, 0.2 mg of
leupeptin per ml, and 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Cells were
then disrupted by sonication in ice water. Lysis was monitored
microscopically and continued until 80% of cells had broken. Lysates
were centrifuged at 2,000 rpm in an Eppendorf Microfuge for 3 min to
remove unbroken cells and nuclei. The resulting supernatants were not
adjusted (no salt) or adjusted to 1 M NaCl (high salt) and centrifuged
at 100,000 × g for 1 h in a Beckman SW55Ti rotor.
Detergent treatments were performed by adjusting the mixture to 0.1%
SDS prior to the 100,000 × g centrifugation. The
supernatants, and the pellets resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)
containing 1 mM EDTA, 6% (wt/vol) sucrose, and 1 M NaCl (for high-salt
conditions), were subjected to Western blotting as described above. For
sucrose density gradient analysis, the sonicated supernatants, adjusted
to 1 M NaCl as described above, were loaded onto gradients composed of
20, 30, 40, 50, and 60% (wt/vol) sucrose in TE. The gradients were
centrifuged for 16 h at 100,000 × g at 4°C in a
Beckman SW55Ti rotor. Eleven 480-µl fractions were collected from the
tops of the tubes for Western blot analysis.
 |
RESULTS |
Mutation of MA amino acid 20 causes replication defects in
a variety of cell types.
Sequence comparison of MA from primate
lentiviruses (HIV-1, HIV-2, and simian immunodeficiency viruses from a
range of species) reveals a remarkable degree of conservation of a Leu
at MA amino acid 20 (53). Because of the high degree of
conservation at this position, and its location in the MA highly basic
domain (see the introduction), we sought to evaluate the role of this residue in HIV-1 replication. Three amino acid 20 mutations were introduced: Leu
Glu (20LE) (30), Arg (20LR), and Lys
(20LK) (Fig. 1A). Following mutagenesis,
these changes were introduced into the full-length, infectious
molecular clone pNL4-3 (1) and the macrophage-tropic pNL4-3
derivative pNL(AD8) (24).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Mutagenesis and replication kinetics of MA amino acid 20 mutants. (A) The sequence of the highly basic domain of wt pNL4-3 is
shown at the top. Beneath the wt sequence are indicated the residue 20 mutations. (B) Virus stocks obtained by transfection of HeLa cells with
the indicated molecular clones were normalized for RT activity and used
to infect the CEM(12D-7) or H9 T-cell line or primary MDM or PBMC. For
infection of CEM(12D-7), H9, and PBMC, wt virus was pNL4-3; for MDM
infection, wt virus was pNL(AD8). RT activity was monitored in the cell
supernatant over time.
|
|
Virus stocks were prepared by transfection of HeLa cells and were used
to infect a variety of T-cell lines, activated primary PBMC, and fully
differentiated MDM. The results indicated that in T-cell lines
[Jurkat, CEM(12D-7), H9, and MT-4], as well as in primary cell types
(PBMC and MDM), the amino acid 20 mutations imposed significant
replication defects (Fig. 1B and data not shown). This effect was
particularly pronounced for the basic substitutions (i.e., 20LK and
20LR) and was most marked in the primary cells. In most PBMC and in all
MDM donors tested, the 20LR and 20LK mutations completely blocked
the establishment of a productive infection. In certain PBMC donors, a
low level of virus replication was detected with all position 20 mutants (data not shown).
Amino acid 20 mutations do not impair virus production, Env
incorporation, or RNA encapsidation.
Previous results from our
laboratory indicated that HIV-1 MA mutations can block virus
replication by disrupting virus production or Env glycoprotein
incorporation into virions (27, 28, 30, 54). To determine
whether these aspects of virus assembly were affected by amino acid 20 mutations, we transfected HeLa cells in parallel with wt or mutant
molecular clones, metabolically labeled with [35S]Cys,
and immunoprecipitated cell- and virion-associated proteins with AIDS
patient serum (see Materials and Methods). The results (Fig.
2) demonstrated that the amount of
virion-associated protein produced from the transfected cells
[p24(CA), p17(MA), gp120, p66(RT) and p32(IN)] was not significantly
affected by the amino acid 20 mutations.

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Radioimmunoprecipitation analysis of cell- and
virion-associated proteins. HeLa cells were transfected with the
indicated molecular clones and metabolically labeled with
[35S]Cys. Cell (A) and virion (B) fractions were obtained
and immunoprecipitated with AIDS patient serum (Materials and Methods).
The positions of the Env glycoprotein precursor (gp160), the mature
surface Env glycoprotein (gp120), p66(RT), the Gag precursor
Pr55Gag, p32(IN), p24(CA), and p17(MA) are indicated.
|
|
The efficiency of virus assembly and release was also determined by
measuring the amount of virion-associated RT activity present in the
transfected cell supernatant. This analysis confirmed the lack of a
significant effect on steady-state virus particle production and
indicated that the amino acid 20 mutations did not affect exogenous RT
activity present in mutant virions (data not shown). Together with the
immunoprecipitation data (Fig. 2), the RT results also demonstrated
that these substitutions did not impair the incorporation or subsequent
processing of Pr160Gag-Pol in virions.
In contrast, the level of mutant Pr55Gag detected in the
cell-associated fraction of transfected HeLa cells was significantly reduced relative to the wt level (Fig. 2A). This effect was also observed in CEM(12D-7) cells acutely infected with the 20LK mutant (data not shown). To investigate this issue further, we performed pulse-chase analysis of HeLa cells transfected in parallel with pNL4-3
(wt) or the 20LK mutant (Fig. 3). The
results indicated that the residue 20 mutant Pr55Gag was
processed to the mature Gag proteins more rapidly than wt and that the
production of virion-associated p24(CA) was accelerated. No significant
difference was observed in the profiles of soluble (non-virion-associated) proteins released from wt- and 20LK-transfected cells (data not shown). We also analyzed 20LE Gag processing kinetics in parallel with wt and 20LK. 20LE displayed an accelerated rate of Gag
processing and virion release relative to wt, but the magnitude of the
effect was less pronounced than observed with the 20LK mutant (data not
shown). The results of these experiments (Fig. 2 and 3) indicate that
whereas the steady-state level of virus production is not affected by
the residue 20 mutations, these substitutions increase the rate of
Pr55Gag processing and the kinetics of virion release.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Pulse-chase analysis of Gag processing and virion
release. HeLa cells transfected with the wt or 20LK mutant molecular
clone were metabolically labeled for 30 min with [35S]Cys
and [35S]Met and then chased in cold medium for 1, 3, or
6 h. Cell- and virion-associated proteins were obtained and
immunoprecipitated with AIDS patient serum (Materials and Methods). The
positions of the viral proteins are indicated.
|
|
An effect of MA amino acid 20 mutations on RNA encapsidation appeared
unlikely, since deletion of the entire MA domain did not block the
amount of genomic viral RNA present in virions (46). However, to investigate this issue directly, we performed dot blot
analysis on RNA derived from wt pNL4-3 or 20LK mutant particles. As
controls, we used two mutants (in the 5' untranslated region) previously demonstrated to reduce viral RNA encapsidation
(51). As reported, the S1S3 and
42
21 mutants caused
significant defects in the encapsidation of viral RNA. In contrast, the
20LK mutant virions contained wt levels of virion RNA (data not shown).
These results suggest that the replication defects imposed by residue 20 mutations are not caused by impaired RNA encapsidation.
Single-cycle infectivity assays demonstrate a defect early in the
virus life cycle.
To determine whether early steps in the virus
life cycle might be affected by residue 20 mutations, we performed
single-cycle infectivity analyses using the MAGI assay (44).
The results indicated that the 20LE mutation caused a 2-fold reduction
in virus infectivity (45% ± 10% of wt pNL4-3 activity) whereas both 20LK and 20LR mutations reduced infectivity approximately 10-fold (12% ± 1% and 12% ± 5%, respectively, of wt activity). These
observations suggest that amino acid 20 mutations affect an early step
in the virus life cycle.
As an additional measure of virus infectivity, we made use of HIV-1
molecular clones modified to express luciferase following infection. We
constructed derivatives of the env
clone
pNL4-3.Luc.R
E
(13) in which the
vpr defect was repaired (Materials and Methods) and
cotransfected these molecular clones, expressing either wt or 20LK MA,
with the HIV-1 Env expression vector pHenv (29); virus
stocks were prepared and used to infect H9 and CEM(12D-7) cells.
Forty-eight hours postinfection, cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured. Consistent with the MAGI data (see above), the
results of these experiments indicated that the 20LK mutation markedly
reduced virus infectivity in a single round of replication (Fig.
4A).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Relative infectivities of 20LK in H9 and CEM(12D-7)
T-cell lines. Virus stocks obtained by cotransfecting 293T cells with
luciferase-expressing molecular clones and an HIV-1 or MuLV Env
expression vector were used for infection of cells as indicated
(Materials and Methods).
|
|
Infectivity defect imposed by amino acid 20 mutation is not
reversed by gp41 truncation or pseudotyping with heterologous Env
glycoproteins.
Previously, we and others demonstrated that the
effect of MA mutations on Env incorporation could be reversed by
truncating sequences within the long cytoplasmic domain of HIV-1 gp41
or by pseudotyping with heterologous retroviral Env glycoproteins containing short cytoplasmic tails (27, 28, 49). These and other results (14, 17, 74) suggested a direct interaction between MA and the long cytoplasmic tail of gp41. Although the residue
20 substitutions described here do not affect Env incorporation (Fig.
2), the possibility remained that these mutations might in some manner
affect membrane fusion and virus entry by perturbing the putative
interaction between MA and gp41. To evaluate this possibility, we
tested the effect of gp41 truncation on the infectivity of 20LK mutant
virus. The KFS env frameshift mutation (22) was introduced into pNL4-3 and pNL4-3/20LK as described in Materials and
Methods. These env
molecular clones were then
cotransfected in parallel with pHenv, which expresses the wt HIV-1 Env
glycoprotein, or pHenvCTdel-144, which expresses a
144-amino-acid-truncated HIV-1 Env glycoprotein (27, 69).
Virus stocks were harvested and tested in the MAGI infectivity assay.
The results (Table 1) indicated that the
length of the gp41 cytoplasmic tail did not influence the 20LK
phenotype. A similar analysis was performed with the ampho-MuLV Env
expression vector pSVAMLVenv (45). Again, the 20LK phenotype
was independent of the Env glycoprotein used in the analysis.
It was recently reported that the infectivity defect caused by mutation
of the nef gene was suppressed by pseudotyping with VSV-G
(2). This finding suggested that VSV-G, which directs entry
via receptor-mediated endocytosis rather than by fusion at the plasma
membrane (50), allowed HIV-1 to bypass the defect imposed by
the nef mutation (2). To assess whether the 20LK entry defect might be similarly affected by pseudotyping with VSV-G, we
cotransfected the env
clones pNL4-3KFS and
pNL4-3KFS/20LK with pHCMV-G (72) and tested the infectivity
of the pseudotyped virions in MAGI cells. We observed that the 20LK
defect was not reversed by VSV-G (Table 1), suggesting that the 20LK
block is independent of the route of HIV-1 entry.
To confirm that the 20LK infectivity defect was not suppressed by
pseudotyping with heterologous Env glycoproteins, molecular clones
pNLuc and pNLuc/20LK were cotransfected into HeLa cells with the
ampho-MuLV Env expression vector. The resulting virus stocks were
normalized for RT activity and used to infect H9 and CEM(12D-7) cells
(Fig. 4B). These data again demonstrate that the 20LK phenotype is
independent of the type of Env glycoprotein carried by the mutant
virions.
The 20LK MA mutation impairs the synthesis of viral DNA
postinfection.
The MAGI and luciferase assays described above
detect early events in the virus life cycle by measuring, directly or
indirectly, the synthesis of virally encoded gene products after DNA
integration. Thus, these assays cannot define the early step (reverse
transcription, nuclear import, or integration) which is affected by
these mutations. As a measure of early events prior to nuclear import,
we assessed the amount of viral DNA synthesized at early time points
postinfection. To ensure that only early events were measured (i.e.,
that second-round reinfections did not contribute to the signal
measured), we performed the assays using pseudotyped virions. The
env
pNL4-3KFS or pNL4-3KFS/20LK mutant clone
was cotransfected with an ampho-MuLV (Fig.
5A) or HIV-1 (Fig. 5B) Env expression
vector. The resulting virus was harvested, normalized for RT activity, and used to infect the CEM(12D-7) T-cell line. Nonpseudotyped pNL4-3KFS-derived virus was used as a negative control. At the indicated time points postinfection (Fig. 5), the cells were lysed and
the viral DNA was PCR amplified by using primers specific for LTR or
Env sequences or which amplify circular (nuclear) forms of viral DNA
(Materials and Methods). To ensure that PCRs were performed within the
linear template range, PCR was carried out on serially diluted infected
cell lysates (data not shown). As an additional PCR control, we
amplified cellular
-globin sequences. Amplified products were then
electrophoresed on agarose gels and Southern blotted with
HIV-1-specific probes. The results demonstrated that the 20LK mutant
was significantly impaired in its ability to synthesize viral DNA
postinfection. Interestingly, the magnitude of the effect appeared to
be consistently greater at later time points (particularly 48 h)
postinfection. These results are consistent with data presented above
and support the hypothesis that MA residue 20 mutations cause a defect
at an early step in the virus life cycle. In some assays (e.g., Fig.
5B), a greater difference was observed in the level of circular DNAs
relative to Env- or LTR-specific products. However, since 20LK is
deficient in synthesizing stable linear as well as circular DNAs, the
data presented in Fig. 5 indicate that the 20LK-imposed defect is
elicited prior to nuclear transport.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
PCR amplification of viral DNA at early time points
postinfection. Virus stocks obtained by cotransfection of
env molecular clones and ampho-MuLV (A) or
HIV-1 (B) Env expression vectors were normalized for RT activity and
used to infect the CEM(12D-7) T-cell line. At the indicated times
postinfection, cells were lysed and viral DNA was amplified by PCR
using primers whose positions and sequences are indicated in Materials
and Methods. The amplified DNA was then electrophoresed on agarose gels
and subjected to Southern blotting using HIV-1-specific probes.
Nonpseudotyped virus served as a negative control (pNL4-3KFS). As a
positive control for the PCRs, -globin sequences were amplified from
the same set of lysates. The size of each PCR product is shown on the
right; on the left is indicated the type of product amplified with each
pair of primers.
|
|
20LK virions are defective in ERT activity.
It was recently
reported that mutation of Vif, which appears to cause a defect early in
the virus life cycle when virus is produced in nonpermissive cells,
also causes a defect in ERT activity (36). The ERT assay
uses the viral genomic RNA as a template for reverse transcription,
rather than an exogenous template, which is provided in standard
(exogenous) RT assays. Because in ERT assays deoxynucleoside
triphosphates must diffuse into the virion core following gentle
disruption of the lipid bilayer with detergent, these assays not only
measure reverse transcription per se but also provide a tool for
probing virion structure and permeability. Under a range of
concentrations of Nonidet P-40, a significant defect in 20LK ERT
activity was observed (Fig. 6A). Similar
defects were also observed when other detergents (Triton X-100 and
-octylglucoside) were used (Fig. 6B). As anticipated, an RT
active-site mutant (RT/D186N [19]) showed no activity in these assays. As an additional negative control, zidovudine (AZT)-triphosphate (1 µM) was found to abolish all ERT activity.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
ERT activities of amino acid 20 mutants. (A) Virions
normalized for exogenous RT activity were permeabilized with different
concentrations of Nonidet P-40. Similar results were obtained if
virions were normalized for p24 content. (B) Virions were permeabilized
with either 1 mM -octylglucoside, 0.01% Triton X-100 (TX 100), or
0.01% Nonidet P-40 (NP40) as indicated. RT/D186N and the addition of 1 µM AZT-triphosphate (AZT-TP) were included as negative controls. (C)
Comparison of 20LE, 20LK, and 20LR ERT activities. Virions were
permeabilized with 0.01% Nonidet P-40.
|
|
The data presented in Fig. 1 indicate that MA residue 20 mutants
display a hierarchy of phenotypes, with the 20LE mutant in general
being the least, and 20LK being the most, affected. If the defect
observed in ERT activity is biologically meaningful, one would predict
that a parallel hierarchy would be observed in ERT assays. To test this
prediction, we performed ERT assays using all three residue 20 mutants
in parallel. The results (Fig. 6C) indicated that the severity of the
biological defect observed in spreading viral infections was reflected
in the ERT activity: the 20LE mutant showed small but reproducible
reductions in ERT activity, whereas 20LK displayed a markedly more
profound defect. The 20LR mutant was typically intermediate between
20LE and 20LK. This hierarchy of phenotypes was observed consistently
in several assays.
20LK virions show no detectable structural defects.
As
mentioned above, mutation of Vif has been reported to induce defects in
both virus entry and ERT activity as well as morphological aberrations
evident by electron microscopy (36, 40). In addition, mutations in HIV-1 MA and CA, which display apparent defects early in
the virus life cycle, have been reported to show morphological differences relative to wt (58). To ascertain whether 20LK
virions were morphologically distinct from wt virions, we performed
electron microscopy on HeLa cells transfected with molecular clone
pNL4-3 or pNL4-3/20LK. No morphological differences between wt and 20LK mutant virions were observed (data not shown).
We also measured the densities of wt and 20LK mutant virions by sucrose
density gradient ultracentrifugation (41). The major peak of
both wt and 20LK virion RT activity was observed at a density of
approximately 1.16 g/ml, which is within the expected range for
retroviral particles (5). This finding was confirmed in
assays using metabolically labeled virions which were banded on sucrose
gradients and analyzed by radioimmunoprecipitation (data not shown).
These results indicate that the 20LK mutation did not affect virion
morphology or density as measured by electron microscopy or sucrose
gradient analysis.
MA residue 20 mutants display an apparent increase in Gag membrane
binding.
As mentioned previously, amino acid 20 is located within
a cluster of basic amino acids which has been implicated in the binding of Gag to membrane. To evaluate a potential effect of MA amino acid 20 mutations on membrane binding, we performed cell fractionation and
sucrose density analysis of cell-associated material derived from cells
transfected with the residue 20 mutants. Because the very rapid rate of
amino acid 20 mutant Gag processing (Fig. 3) would confound the
assessment of Pr55Gag membrane binding, we analyzed wt and
mutant Gag in the context of a PR active-site mutation (see Materials
and Methods). The results of the cell fractionation experiments
demonstrated that the amount of Pr55Gag present in the
pelletable, membrane-containing fraction is significantly increased by
all residue 20 mutations and that the amount detected in the
supernatant fraction is reduced (Fig.
7A). As expected, the HIV-1 Env
glycoproteins (the Env precursor gp160 and the mature surface
glycoprotein gp120) localize primarily in the pellet (membrane) fraction. Both Gag and Env proteins were shifted from pellet to supernatant fractions by the addition of 0.1% SDS. These results were
obtained reproducibly in several independent assays and are observed in
the absence of NaCl and under high-salt (1 M NaCl) conditions. As a
control, we also analyzed the 1GA myristylation mutant (30),
which, as demonstrated previously (7), showed a reduced
level of Pr55Gag in the pellet fraction and an increase in
the supernatant fraction relative to wt.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Membrane binding analysis. HeLa cells transfected with a
PR version of pNL4-3, pNL4-3/20LK, or the myristylation
mutant pNL4-3/1GA (30) were sonicated, fractionated, and
subjected to centrifugation in 20 to 60% sucrose gradients (Materials
and Methods). The positions of the Env glycoproteins (gp160 and gp120)
and the Gag precursor Pr55Gag (Pr55) are indicated. (A)
Cell fractionation analysis. Pellet fractions (P) and supernatant
fractions (S) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and blotted with AIDS patient
serum. Conditions used: no NaCl (top); 1 M NaCl (middle); no NaCl plus
0.1% SDS (bottom). (B) Sucrose gradient analysis. After centrifugation
through 20 to 60% sucrose gradients, fractions were collected from the
top, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and blotted with AIDS patient serum.
Fraction 1, top of the gradient; fraction 11, bottom of gradient. The
soluble proteins are found at the top of the gradient; membrane-bound
proteins band primarily in fractions 6 to 9.
|
|
To investigate in more detail the effect of the 20LK mutation on
membrane binding, we performed sucrose density gradient analysis of
cell-associated material derived from pNL4-3/PR
,
pNL4-3/PR
/20LK, and
pNL4-3/PR
/1GA-transfected HeLa cells (Fig. 7B).
Membrane-associated material banded in fractions 6 to 9 (as determined
by peak levels of the Env glycoprotein precursor gp160); the soluble
material remained near the top of the gradient (primarily in fractions
1 and 2). Western blot analysis of similar gradients with an anti-gp41
antibody indicated that, as expected, the gp41 peak cosediments with
Gag in fractions 6 to 9 (data not shown). Consistent with the cell fractionation results (Fig. 7A), the 20LK mutation increased the amount
of Pr55Gag in the membrane (6 to 9) relative to cytosolic
(1 and 2) fractions. Again, as expected, the 1GA myristylation mutant
showed increased soluble and decreased amounts of membrane-bound Gag
relative to wt. Treatment of the lysates with detergent (0.5% Triton
X-100 or 0.1% SDS) before gradient ultracentrifugation resulted in a nearly complete loss of Pr55Gag and gp41 from the putative
membrane fractions (data not shown). These results argue that the amino
acid 20 mutations cause an increase in the binding of Gag to membrane.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this report, we describe a set of three single-amino-acid
substitution mutations in MA residue 20 which cause significant defects
in virus replication by impairing an early step in the life cycle.
These mutations impose infectivity defects in single-cycle assays using
the CD4+ HeLa (MAGI) cell line and in T-cell lines infected
with viruses engineered to express luciferase following infection. The
infectivity defects are independent of the type of Env glycoprotein
present on mutant virions. Analysis of viral DNA synthesis by PCR at
early time points postinfection indicates that the defect is manifested at an early, postentry step. In addition, the residue 20 mutations display impaired ERT activity, and cell fractionation and sucrose density gradient analyses suggest that they increase the binding of Gag
to membrane. Since the position 20 mutants release wt levels of virus
particles which appear normal in density, protein composition, and
morphology yet display reduced infectivity in single cycle assays, we
consider the defect imposed by MA residue 20 mutations to be at an
early step in replication. However, as discussed below, the defect is
probably influenced by events taking place during assembly.
The apparent involvement of MA amino acid 20 in membrane binding is of
interest in the context of previous studies. Residue 20 lies in a
highly basic domain of MA which is thought to face the lipid bilayer
(39) and which has been implicated in the targeting of Gag
to the plasma membrane (75, 78). It has been proposed
(78) that the basic residues in this cluster interact with
the negatively charged acidic phospholipids on the inner face of the
plasma membrane, thereby promoting membrane binding. Perhaps the
substitution of a charged residue for Leu at position 20 alters the
conformation of the basic domain, thereby increasing its affinity for
membrane. Interestingly, mutations in an analogous domain of the Rous
sarcoma virus MA which affect virus replication without impairing
assembly and release have recently been described (57).
Thus, the mechanism by which the mutations described here interfere
with infectivity may also be operative in other retroviral systems.
We emphasize that although the data presented in Fig. 7 strongly
suggest that the residue 20 mutations increase Gag membrane binding, we
cannot formally exclude other possible interpretations of these
results. For example, similar data might be obtained if these mutations
increased Gag multimerization into complexes which pelleted with
membrane in the fractionation experiments and banded with membrane in
the sucrose gradients. The treatment of samples with detergent prior to
sucrose gradient analysis resulted in a shift of both
Pr55Gag and the Env glycoproteins (both gp160 and gp41)
from the putative membrane fractions, arguing that this material does
in fact represent membrane-bound Gag. However, the detergent treatment
could also potentially disrupt the putative Gag aggregates, resulting
in their shift to the supernatant fraction or to the top of the
gradients. It is also possible that the residue 20 mutations increase
the association of Gag with the cytoskeleton and that
cytoskeleton-bound Gag behaves like membrane-bound Gag in the assays
used here. However, it has been reported that high-salt conditions
similar to those used in our cell fractionation and gradient
experiments disrupt the association of Gag with the cytoskeleton
(18). The ill-defined nature of Gag multimerization,
aggregation, membrane binding, and virus assembly makes direct
evaluation of these issues difficult, in particular since Gag
multimerization and membrane binding are likely to be closely linked
processes. We also note that in cell fractionation assays (Fig. 7A) all
three position 20 mutants showed similar effects on apparent membrane
binding, despite their different biological phenotypes. This
observation suggests that the membrane binding increase may not be
critical to the phenotype of these mutants. Alternatively, differences
may be too subtle to be detected in this analysis or may involve p17
rather than Pr55Gag membrane binding affinity. We are
currently developing assays to distinguish between membrane-bound and
multimeric Gag and to analyze p17 and Pr55Gag membrane
binding and Gag multimerization in a kinetic fashion.
It has been proposed that after virus entry, HIV-1 MA plays a role in
translocating the viral preintegration complex to the nucleus, thereby
enabling HIV-1 to infect nondividing cells. Mutations in the highly
basic domain near the N terminus of MA were reported to block or
markedly reduce infectivity in nondividing cells, including primary MDM
(9, 38, 66). Furthermore, it was reported that
phosphorylation of a Tyr residue at the C terminus of MA was required
for infectivity in macrophages (31). However, an extensive
mutational analysis of the MA basic domain failed to confirm a role for
these basic residues in infection of terminally differentiated MDM
(24, 25). In addition, mutation of the C-terminal Tyr of MA
had no effect on HIV-1 infectivity in MDM (23). Others also
reported that a C-terminal Tyr mutant displayed wild-type replication
kinetics in macrophages (8), and a recent publication by
Fouchier et al. (21) confirmed our earlier finding that MA
basic domain mutations do not specifically impair infectivity in MDM.
This latter study also used a variety of biochemical techniques to
demonstrate that neither intact MA nor the highly basic domain of MA
possessed the ability to target heterologous proteins to the nucleus
(21). These authors thus concluded that HIV-1 MA does not
contain a nuclear localization sequence. The mutations reported here
reduce infectivity in both dividing and nondividing cells, and defects
are observed in viral DNA synthesis at an early step in reverse
transcription prior to nuclear import.
Although what role, if any, HIV-1 MA plays in translocating the viral
preintegration complex to the nucleus is unclear, other functions for
MA early in the infection process can be envisioned. Whereas the
majority of MA appears to associate tightly with the lipid bilayer of
the viral envelope, several groups have reported the presence of some
MA in both the viral core (32) and the preintegration
complex (10, 52). The MA domain of Pr55Gag may
therefore bind tightly to membrane during assembly and then, to some
extent, dissociate from membrane after cleavage of Pr55Gag
by the viral protease. We speculate that the affinity of MA for membrane must be precisely balanced: weakening membrane binding interferes with virus assembly in the producer cell (as is observed for
mutations affecting MA myristylation) (7, 30, 37, 56); strengthening membrane binding (as apparently occurs with the residue
20 mutations) may disrupt or destabilize the core or preintegration complex, leading to defects in ERT activity in virions and virus entry
in the target cell. It has been observed that Pr55Gag binds
membrane more tightly than MA itself (55, 64, 79), suggesting that cleavage of Pr55Gag may trigger
conformational changes in MA which reduce its affinity for membrane. It
has also been proposed that phosphorylation of MA by kinase(s) present
within the virion may induce a partial release of MA from membrane
(8, 31, 32). In any case, MA may function to stabilize the
viral core and direct appropriate uncoating events, thereby
facilitating the synthesis of viral DNA postinfection. In the PCR
experiments presented in Fig. 5, we observed that the difference in the
amount of viral DNA present in wt- and 20LK-infected cells increased
with time. This observation, which has also recently been made with
both Vif (62) and NC (4) mutations, suggests that
the residue 20 changes may destabilize the viral core or preintegration
complex such that viral DNAs are degraded following reverse
transcription. Instability of the preintegration complex would also be
predicted to decrease the levels of circular (nuclear) DNAs if this
complex is degraded before reaching the nucleus. This hypothesis is
consistent with the observation that in some assays greater differences
are observed in the synthesis of circular versus linear DNAs. A related
model would propose that the increase in membrane binding affinity
induced by residue 20 mutations causes the formation of a tightly
packed shell of MA inside the lipid bilayer of the viral envelope; as a
result, appropriate uncoating events do not take place following membrane fusion, and defects in ERT activity are evident in mutant virions.
Although a defect in ERT activity has been observed previously with
other HIV-1 mutants (e.g., in Vif [36] and gp41
[76]), the biological ramifications of such a defect
are unclear. A low level of reverse transcription has been detected in
virions prior to infection (48, 65), and it has been
suggested that the synthesis of DNA in virions increases virus
infectivity (77). While a defect in virion reverse
transcription may directly contribute to the reduced infectivity
observed with MA amino acid 20 mutants, it is more likely that the
results of these assays indicate the presence of a structural
perturbation in the virion core which impairs uncoating steps after
virus entry. Thus, regardless of the biological consequences of ERT
activity, the assay provides information concerning the permeability
and integrity of the viral core and as such represents a useful
biochemical tool to probe virion structure. It is noteworthy that the
extent of the ERT defect measured with the three residue 20 mutations
parallels the defects observed in the ability of the mutants to
establish a productive spreading infection; 20LE is the least and 20LK
is the most affected.
Efforts are currently under way in our laboratory to further define the
role of MA early in the HIV-1 life cycle. The recent identification of
a viral revertant of 20LK (43) will assist in this effort.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank M. A. Martin for continued enthusiastic support and
critical review of the manuscript and R. Willey for comments on the
manuscript and many helpful discussions. We acknowledge D. Gabuzda for
helpful suggestions regarding the ERT assay, F. Maldarelli for
assistance with membrane binding assays, and J. M. Orenstein for
performing electron microscopy. We thank A. Engelman for the D186N RT
mutant, M. S. McBride and A. Panganiban for the
42
21 and
S1S3 RNA encapsidation mutants, and J. Burns for plasmid pHCMV-G.
The following reagents were obtained through the NIH AIDS Research
Reference and Reagent Program: pSVAMLVenv (from D. Littman and N. Landau), MAGI cells (from M. Emerman),
pNL4-3.Luc.R
E
(from N. Landau), and HIV-1
patient Ig (from A. Prince).
R.E.K. was supported by an Australian Commonwealth AIDS Research Grant
fellowship.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Bldg. 4, Rm.
307, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892. Phone: (301) 402-3215. Fax: (301) 402-0226. E-mail: EFreed{at}nih.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adachi, A.,
H. E. Gendelman,
S. Koenig,
T. Folks,
R. Willey,
A. Rabson, and M. A. Martin.
1986.
Production of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-associated retrovirus in human and non-human cells transfected with an infectious molecular clone.
J. Virol.
59:284-291[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Aiken, C.
1997.
Pseudotyping human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) by the glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus targets entry to an endocytic pathway and suppresses both the requirement for Nef and the sensitivity to cyclosporin A.
J. Virol.
71:5871-5877[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Aiken, C., and D. Trono.
1995.
Nef stimulates human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proviral DNA synthesis.
J. Virol.
69:5048-5056[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Berthoux, L.,
C. Pechoux,
M. Ottmann,
G. Morel, and J.-L. Darlix.
1997.
Mutations in the N-terminal domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid protein affect virion core structure and proviral DNA synthesis.
J. Virol.
71:6973-6981[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Bolognesi, D. P.,
R. Luftig, and J. H. Sharper.
1973.
Localization of RNA tumor virus polypeptides. I. Isolation of further virus substances.
Virology
56:549-564[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Braaten, D.,
E. K. Franke, and J. Luban.
1996.
Cyclophilin A is required for an early step in the life cycle of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 before initiation of reverse transcription.
J. Virol.
70:3551-3560[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Bryant, M., and L. Ratner.
1990.
Myristoylation-dependent replication and assembly of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:523-527[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Bukrinskaya, A. G.,
A. Ghropade,
N. K. Heinzinger,
T. E. Smithgall,
R. E. Lewis, and M. Stevenson.
1996.
Phosphorylation-dependent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection and nuclear targeting of viral DNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:367-371[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Bukrinsky, M. I.,
S. Haggerty,
M. P. Dempsey,
N. Sharova,
A. Adzhubei,
L. Spitz,
P. Lewis,
D. Goldfarb,
M. Emerman, and M. Stevenson.
1993.
A nuclear localization signal within HIV-1 matrix protein that governs infection of non-dividing cells.
Nature
365:666-669[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Bukrinsky, M. I.,
N. Sharova,
T. L. McDonald,
T. Pushkarskaya,
W. G. Tarpley, and M. Stevenson.
1993.
Association of integrase, matrix, and reverse transcriptase antigens of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with viral nucleic acids following acute infection.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:6125-6129[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Casella, C. R.,
L. J. Raffini, and A. T. Panganiban.
1997.
Pleiotropic mutations in the HIV-1 matrix protein that affect diverse steps in replication.
Virology
228:294-306[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Chowers, M. Y.,
M. W. Pandori,
C. A. Spina,
D. D. Richman, and J. C. Guatelli.
1995.
The growth advantage conferred by HIV-1 nef is determined at the level of viral DNA formation and is independent of CD4 downregulation.
Virology
212:451-457[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Connor, R. I.,
B. K. Chen,
S. Choe, and N. R. Landau.
1995.
Vpr is required for efficient replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in mononuclear phagocytes.
Virology
206:935-944[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Cosson, P.
1996.
Direct interaction between the envelope and matrix proteins of HIV-1.
EMBO J.
15:5783-5788[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Crawford, S., and S. P. Goff.
1984.
Mutations in Gag proteins p12 and p15 of Moloney murine leukemia virus block early stages of infection.
J. Virol.
49:909-917[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Dorfman, T.,
A. Bukovsky,
A. Ohagen,
S. Hoglund, and H. G. Gottlinger.
1994.
Functional domains of the capsid protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
68:8180-8187[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Dorfman, T.,
F. Mammano,
W. A. Haseltine, and H. G. Gottlinger.
1994.
Role of the matrix protein in the virion association of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein.
J. Virol.
68:1689-1696[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Edbauer, C. A., and R. B. Naso.
1983.
Cytoskeleton-associated Pr65gag and retrovirus assembly.
Virology
130:415-426[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Engelman, A.,
G. Englund,
J. M. Orenstein,
M. A. Martin, and R. Craigie.
1995.
Multiple effects of mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase on viral replication.
J. Virol.
69:2729-2736[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Facke, M.,
A. Janetzko,
R. L. Shoeman, and H.-G. Krausslich.
1993.
A large deletion in the matrix domain of the human immunodeficiency virus gag gene redirects virus particle assembly from the plasma membrane to the endoplasmic reticulum.
J. Virol.
67:4972-4980[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Fouchier, R. A. M.,
B. E. Meyer,
J. H. M. Simon,
U. Fischer, and M. H. Malim.
1997.
HIV-1 infection of non-dividing cells: evidence that the amino-terminal basic region of the viral matrix protein is important for Gag processing but not for post-entry nuclear import.
EMBO J.
16:4531-4539[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Freed, E. O.,
E. L. Delwart,
G. L. Buchschacher, Jr., and A. T. Panganiban.
1992.
A mutation in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmembrane glycoprotein gp41 dominantly interferes with fusion and infectivity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:70-74[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Freed, E. O.,
G. Englund,
F. Maldarelli, and M. A. Martin.
1997.
Phosphorylation of residue 131 of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix is not required for macrophage infection.
Cell
88:171-173[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Freed, E. O.,
G. Englund, and M. A. Martin.
1995.
Role of the basic domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix in macrophage infection.
J. Virol.
69:3949-3954[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Freed, E. O., and M. A. Martin.
1994.
HIV-1 infection of non-dividing cells.
Nature
369:107-108[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Freed, E. O., and M. A. Martin.
1994.
Evidence for a functional interaction between the V1/V2 and C4 domains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein gp120.
J. Virol.
68:2503-2512[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Freed, E. O., and M. A. Martin.
1995.
Virion incorporation of envelope glycoproteins with long but not short cytoplasmic tails is blocked by specific, single amino acid substitutions in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix.
J. Virol.
69:1984-1989[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Freed, E. O., and M. A. Martin.
1996.
Domains of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix and gp41 cytoplasmic tail required for envelope incorporation into virions.
J. Virol.
70:341-351[Abstract].
|
| 29.
|
Freed, E. O.,
D. J. Myers, and R. Risser.
1989.
Mutational analysis of the cleavage sequence of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein precursor gp160.
J. Virol.
63:4670-4675[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Freed, E. O.,
J. M. Orenstein,
A. J. Buckler-White, and M. A. Martin.
1994.
Single amino acid changes in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix protein block virus particle production.
J. Virol.
68:5311-5320[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Gallay, P.,
S. Swingler,
C. Aiken, and D. Trono.
1995.
HIV-1 infection of nondividing cells: C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation of the viral matrix protein is a key regulator.
Cell
80:379-388[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Gallay, P.,
S. Swingler,
J. Song,
F. Bushman, and D. Trono.
1995.
HIV nuclear import is governed by the phosphotyrosine-mediated binding of matrix to the core domain of integrase.
Cell
83:569-576[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Gallina, A.,
G. Mantoan,
G. Rindi, and G. Milanesi.
1994.
Influence of MA internal sequences, but not of the myristylated N-terminus sequence, on the budding site of HIV-1 Gag protein.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
204:1031-1038[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Gelderblom, H. R.
1991.
Assembly and morphology of HIV: potential effect of structure on viral function.
AIDS
5:617-638[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Gelderblom, H. R.,
E. H. S. Hausmann,
M. Ozel,
G. Pauli, and M. A. Koch.
1987.
Fine structure of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and immunolocalization of structural proteins.
Virology
156:171-176[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Goncalves, J.,
Y. Korin,
J. Zack, and D. Gabuzda.
1996.
Role of Vif in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcription.
J. Virol.
70:8701-8709[Abstract].
|
| 37.
|
Gottlinger, H. G.,
T. Dorfman,
J. G. Sodroski, and W. A. Haseltine.
1989.
Role of capsid precursor processing and myristylation in morphogenesis and infectivity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:5781-5785[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Heinzinger, N. K.,
M. I. Bukrinsky,
S. A. Haggerty,
A. M. Ragland,
V. Kewalramani,
M.-A. Lee,
H. E. Gendelman,
L. Ratner,
M. Stevenson, and M. Emerman.
1994.
The Vpr protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 influences nuclear localization of viral nucleic acids in nondividing host cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:7311-7315[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Hill, C. P.,
D. Worthylake,
D. P. Bancroft,
A. M. Christensen, and W. I. Sundquist.
1996.
Crystal structures of the trimeric human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix protein: implications for membrane association and assembly.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:3099-3104[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Hoglund, S.,
A. Ohagen,
K. Lawrence, and D. Gabuzda.
1994.
Role of vif during packing of the core of HIV-1.
Virology
201:349-355[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Huang, M.,
J. M. Orenstein,
M. A. Martin, and E. O. Freed.
1995.
p6Gag is required for particle production from full-length human immunodeficiency virus type 1 molecular clones expressing protease.
J. Virol.
69:6810-6818[Abstract].
|
| 42.
|
Hunter, E.
1994.
Macromolecular interactions in the assembly of HIV and other retroviruses.
Semin. Virol.
5:71-83.
|
| 43.
| Kiernan, R. E., and E. O. Freed.
Unpublished results.
|
| 44.
|
Kimpton, J., and M. Emerman.
1992.
Detection of replication-competent and pseudotyped human immunodeficiency virus with a sensitive cell line based on activation of an integrated -galactosidase gene.
J. Virol.
66:2232-2239[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Landau, N. R.,
K. A. Page, and D. R. Littman.
1991.
Pseudotyping with human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 broadens the human immunodeficiency virus host range.
J. Virol.
65:162-169[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Lee, P. P., and M. L. Linial.
1994.
Efficient particle formation can occur if the matrix domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag is substituted by a myristylation signal.
J. Virol.
68:6644-6654[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Loeb, D. D.,
R. Swanstrom,
L. Everitt,
M. Manchester,
S. E. Stamper, and C. A. Hutchinson, III.
1989.
Complete mutagenesis of the HIV-1 protease.
Nature
340:397-400[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Lori, F.,
F. di Marzo Veronese,
A. L. de Vico,
P. Lusso,
M. S. Reitz, Jr., and R. C. Gallo.
1992.
Viral DNA carried by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 virions.
J. Virol.
66:5067-5074[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Mammano, F.,
E. Kondo,
J. Sodroski,
A. Bukovsky, and H. G. Gottlinger.
1995.
Rescue of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix protein mutants by envelope glycoproteins with short cytoplasmic domains.
J. Virol.
69:3824-3830[Abstract].
|
| 50.
|
Matlin, K. S.,
H. Reggio,
A. Helenius, and K. Simons.
1982.
Pathway of vesicular stomatitis virus entry leading to infection.
J. Mol. Biol.
156:609-631[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
McBride, M. S., and A. T. Panganiban.
1996.
The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 encapsidation site is a multipartite RNA element composed of functional hairpin structures.
J. Virol.
70:2963-2973[Abstract].
|
| 52.
|
Miller, M. D.,
C. M. Farnet, and F. D. Bushman.
1997.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 preintegration complexes: studies of organization and composition.
J. Virol.
71:5382-5390[Abstract].
|
| 53.
|
Myers, G.,
B. H. Hahn,
J. W. Mellors,
L. E. Henderson,
B. Korber,
K.-T. Jeang,
F. E. McCutchan, and G. N. Pavlakis (ed.).
1995.
In
Human retroviruses and AIDS. A compilation and analysis of nucleic acid and amino acid sequences.
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.Mex.
|
| 54.
|
Ono, A.,
M. Huang, and E. O. Freed.
1997.
Characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 matrix revertants: effects on virus assembly, Gag processing, and Env incorporation into virions.
J. Virol.
71:4409-4418[Abstract].
|
|