Previous Article | Next Article 
J Virol, April 1998, p. 3394-3400, Vol. 72, No. 4
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Differentiation of Promonocytic U937 Subclones into
Macrophagelike Phenotypes Regulates a Cellular Factor(s) Which
Modulates Fusion/Entry of Macrophagetropic Human
Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1
Hiroyuki
Moriuchi,*
Masako
Moriuchi, and
Anthony
S.
Fauci
Laboratory of Immunoregulation, National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes
of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received 10 October 1997/Accepted 24 December 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
Monocytes/macrophages (M/M) and CD4+ T cells are two
important targets of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
Different strains of HIV-1 vary markedly in their abilities to infect
cells belonging to the M/M lineage. Macrophagetropic (M-tropic) HIV-1 strains replicate well in primary lymphocytes as well as in primary macrophages; however, they generally infect T-cell lines poorly, if at
all. Although promonocytic cell lines such as U937 have been used as in
vitro models of HIV-1 infection of M/M, these cell lines are
susceptible to certain T-cell-tropic (T-tropic) HIV-1 strains but are
resistant to M-tropic HIV-1. In this study, we demonstrate that (i)
certain U937 clones ("plus" clones), which are susceptible only to
T-tropic HIV-1, become highly susceptible to M-tropic HIV-1 upon
differentiation with retinoic acid (RA); (ii) other U937 clones
("minus" clones), which are resistant to both T- and M-tropic
HIV-1, remain resistant to both viruses; and (iii) RA treatment induces
expression of CCR5, a fusion/entry cofactor for M-tropic HIV-1 in both
types of U937 clones, and yet enhances the fusogenicity of the plus
clones, but not the minus clones, with M-tropic Env's. These results
indicate that the major restriction of M-tropic HIV-1 infection in
promonocytic cells occurs at the fusion/entry level, that
differentiation into macrophage-like phenotypes renders some of these
cells highly susceptible to infection with M-tropic HIV-1, and that CD4
and CCR5 may not be the only determinants of fusion/entry of M-tropic HIV-1 in these cells.
 |
TEXT |
Monocytes/macrophages (M/M) and
CD4+ T cells are two important targets of human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (17, 21). Different
strains of HIV-1 vary markedly in their abilities to infect cells
belonging to the M/M lineage (19, 31, 39). During primary
infection most HIV-1 isolates are macrophagetropic (M-tropic) or
dualtropic (43); however, during the course of HIV infection
and especially as disease progresses, M-tropic viruses tend to become
less prominent and are generally replaced by HIV-1 strains that have a
broader coreceptor usage (10) and are referred to as
T-cell-tropic (T-tropic) viruses (9, 37).
Promonocytic cell lines such as U937 and THP-1 have been used as in
vitro models to investigate HIV-1 infection of M/M (reviewed in
reference 7); however, these cells are actually
resistant to M-tropic HIV-1 and susceptible to certain T-tropic HIV-1
strains, thereby differing markedly from their in vivo counterparts
(38). Of note is the fact that treatment with certain
differentiating agents may render these cell lines susceptible to
M-tropic HIV-1 infection (20), although the mechanisms of
acquisition of susceptibility remain unknown. We have previously
demonstrated that certain subclones of U937 cells ("plus" clones)
do but that others ("minus" clones) do not support replication of
T-tropic HIV-1 (16), and that restriction of HIV-1 infection
in minus clones occurs at the level of viral fusion/entry
(24). In the present study, we investigate whether viral
fusion/entry is also responsible for restriction of M-tropic HIV-1
infection in undifferentiated promonocytic cells and whether cells
acquire susceptibility to M-tropic HIV-1 upon differentiation. We
demonstrate that U937 plus clones become susceptible to M-tropic HIV-1
after treatment with retinoic acid (RA), an agent that is known to
induce differentiation of promonocytic cells into cells with more
mature phenotypes (32), and that RA treatment induces
expression of CCR5, a major fusion/entry cofactor for M-tropic HIV-1,
leading to increased fusogenicity with M-tropic Env.
(This research was conducted by M. Moriuchi in partial fulfillment of
the requirements of the Ph.D. program of the Department of Microbiology
at Howard University, Washington, D.C.)
Effects of differentiating agents on the susceptibilities of U937
plus clones to M-tropic HIV-1 infection.
In order to investigate
whether differentiation into cells with M/M-like phenotypes modulates
susceptibility of promonocytic cells to M-tropic HIV-1 infection, U937
clones were treated with either phorbol 12-myristate 13-phosphate
(PMA), all trans RA, or 1
,25-dihydrovitamin
D3 (Vit.D3), all of which are known to induce
differentiation of U937 cells into cells with M/M-like phenotypes
(18, 32, 33), for 7 days before infection with M- or
T-tropic HIV-1. All these differentiating agents induced morphological
changes as well as expression of differentiation-associated cell
surface markers in each U937 clone (26). As shown in Fig. 1, plus clone 10 became highly
susceptible to M-tropic HIV-1 after treatment with RA and, to a lesser
extent, with PMA but not with Vit.D3; plus clone 30 became
susceptible to M-tropic HIV-1 only after treatment with RA. The levels
of M-tropic HIV-1 replication in these clones, judged by reverse
transcription (RT) activity, were comparable to that in
monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) (26). In contrast, none
of these differentiating agents rendered minus clones susceptible to
M-tropic HIV-1. These results suggest that differentiation of cells
belonging to the M/M lineage into cells with more mature phenotypes is
critical for acquisition of susceptibility to M-tropic HIV-1; however,
this phenomenon is not a consequence of differentiation in general,
since the effect was not seen with every differentiation agent
employed.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
RA-differentiated U937 plus clones become highly
susceptible to M-tropic HIV-1. U937 plus clones 10 and 30 and minus
clones 17 and 34 were either untreated or treated with PMA
(10 8 M; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.), all
trans RA (10 6 M; Sigma Chemical Co.), or
Vit.D3 (10 6 M; a gift of M. Uskokovic,
Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Nutley, N.J.) for 7 days and infected with
ADA8 at an approximate multiplicity of infection of 0.05. ADA8 virus
stocks were propagated by transfecting 293T cells with pAD8 (a gift of
T. Theodore [41]), as described previously
(24). Approximately half of the volume of each cell-free
supernatant was collected every four days for RT assays
(25), and peak RT titers on day 16 postinfection are shown.
Experiments were repeated three times with similar results.
|
|
Treatment of U937 plus clones with RA renders these cells
infectable and highly fusogenic with M-tropic HIV-1 Env's.
In
order to further investigate at which step(s) the replication of
M-tropic HIV-1 is regulated in undifferentiated or differentiated U937
clones, representative clones were either untreated or treated with RA
and infected with replication-incompetent, luciferase reporter viruses
pseudotyped by Env from either M- or T-tropic HIV-1. Luciferase
activity in the infected cell lysates reflects the ability of the virus
to pass through early events of its replicative cycle (from binding,
fusion/entry, uncoating, RT, and integration of proviral DNA into the
host genome to early transcription). As expected, RA-differentiated
U937 plus clone 10 efficiently supported infection with M-tropic
Env-carrying virus, while undifferentiated plus clone 10 did not (Fig.
2A). Minus clone 17 did not support infection with M-tropic Env
carrying virus even when it was treated with RA (Fig.
2A). As expected, plus clone 10, but not
minus clone 17, exhibited a high level of luciferase activity after
infection with a reporter virus carrying a T-tropic Env; RA treatment
had little effect on infectivity (Fig. 2B). In contrast, a reporter virus carrying amphotropic murine leukemia virus (AMV) Env as a control
was able to infect these clones at comparable levels (Fig. 2C). Since
amphotropic viruses enter cells independently of cell surface receptors
and coreceptors that are used by HIV-1 for entry (11), the
results with the reporter virus carrying AMV Env suggest that the
effects of the differentiating agent on the susceptibility of U937
clones to infection with HIV of various tropisms are mediated at the
level of envelope interaction with the cell membrane.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effects of RA treatment on susceptibility of U937 clones
in single-round virus replication assays. Replication-incompetent,
luciferase reporter virus NL4-3-Luc-R E was
pseudotyped with Env from M-tropic HIV-1 JRFL (A), T-tropic HIV-1 HXB2
(B), or AMV (C), as described previously (11). The indicated
U937 clones were treated as described in the legend to Fig. 1 and
infected with the pseudotyped viruses, and luciferase activities in the
infected cell lysates were measured. Experiments were repeated four
times, and representative results are shown.
|
|
In order to investigate whether susceptibility or resistance of the
U937 clones to HIV-1 is regulated at the level of viral
fusion/entry,
efficiency of cell-cell fusion mediated by HIV-1
Env was assayed for
these clones. As described previously (
24),
plus clone 10 was highly fusogenic with cells expressing T-tropic
HIV-1 Env (strain
IIIB) but not with those expressing M-tropic
HIV-1 Env (JRFL). Of note,
RA treatment had dichotomous effects
on M-tropic versus T-tropic
HIV-mediated fusion in plus clones:
RA treatment rendered the plus
clones highly fusogenic with M-tropic
HIV-1 Env (Fig.
3A); however, it reduced fusogenic
activity with
T-tropic HIV-1 Env (Fig.
3B). In contrast, fusogenic
activities
of minus clones 17 and 34 with either T-tropic or M-tropic
Env
were not markedly altered with RA treatment. These results suggest
that viral fusion/entry is a critical step for acquisition of
susceptibility of U937 plus clones to M-tropic HIV-1.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
RA-differentiated U937 plus clones become highly
fusogenic with M-tropic HIV-1 Env. The indicated U937 clones were
treated as described in the legend for Fig. 1, infected with
recombinant vaccinia virus vTF7-3 (expressing T7 RNA polymerase), and
mixed with BSC-1 cells infected with vCB21R (encoding the
lacZ gene driven by the T7 promoter) and either vCB16
(expressing the nonfusogenic mutant form of HIV-1 IIIB Env), vCB41
(expressing wild-type IIIB Env), or vCB28 (expressing HIV-1 JRFL Env),
and the -galactosidase activities in the cell lysates were measured,
as described previously (15, 24, 29). Fusion index is the
fold increase in optical density at 570 nm in vCB28 (A)- or vCB41
(B)-infected cell lysates relative to that in vCB16-infected cell
lysates. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results.
|
|
Treatment of U937 clones with RA induces expression of CCR5, a
coreceptor for M-tropic HIV-1.
In order to investigate whether
cellular factors known to modulate viral fusion/entry are
differentially expressed among the U937 clones and whether their
expression is regulated upon differentiation of the cells, expression
of CD4 (a receptor for HIV-1), CXCR4 (a fusion/entry cofactor for
T-tropic HIV-1 [15]), or CCR5 (a fusion/entry cofactor
for M-tropic HIV-1 [2, 5, 11-13]) was
evaluated for representative plus clone 10 and minus clone 17 after
stimulation with RA.
As previously reported (
16,
28), both plus clone 10 (which
is susceptible to T-tropic HIV-1) and minus clone 17 (which
is
resistant to T-tropic HIV-1) express CD4 (Table
1) as well
as CXCR4 (Table
1; Fig.
4A, middle blots). RA treatment did not
markedly alter CD4 expression in these clones (Table
1). In contrast,
while RA treatment of clone 17 did not markedly influence CXCR4
expression, a 7-day treatment with RA of clone 10 decreased cell
surface CXCR4 expression (Table
1). Furthermore, RA treatment
of plus
clone 10 and minus clone 17 induced expression of CCR5
mRNA (Fig.
4A,
top blots) up to 3- to 10-fold (densitometrically
judged by the
intensity of the CCR5 mRNA bands relative to those
of
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [
26]).
However,
anti-hCCR5 monoclonal antibody (MAb) 2D7 stained only 2.0 and
3.9% of RA-differentiated clones 10 and 17, respectively, compared
to
less than 0.1% of either undifferentiated clone (Table
1),
whereas the
MAb stained 5 to 10% of primary CD4
+ T cells (data not
shown). These results suggest either that the
level of cell surface
CCR5 expression is very weak or that CCR5
expressed on the clones is
conformationally different or associated
with other cellular
molecule(s), making the MAb inaccessible to
its target epitope. In
contrast to RA, other differentiating agents
(Vit.D
3 and
PMA) had less pronounced effects on induction of CCR5
expression (Table
1).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Expression and functional properties of HIV-1
coreceptors in U937 clones upon differentiation. Plus clone 10 and
minus clone 17 were treated with RA for the indicated periods. The same
cell samples were subjected to Northern blot analysis (A), chemotaxis
assays (B and C), and fusion assays (D and E). (A) Total cellular RNAs
from the indicated clones were analyzed by Northern blotting, as
described previously (28). The same blot was repeatedly
hybridized with probes specific to CCR5 (top),
CXCR4 (middle), and GAPDH (bottom) genes, which
were prepared as described previously (25). (B and C)
Chemotactic responsiveness of plus clone 10 or minus clone 17 to either
MIP-1 (B) or SDF-1 (C) was determined by chemotaxis assays, as
described previously (24). The chemokines were purchased
from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, Minn.). Chemotaxis index is the fold
increase in migrated cells relative to that in the absence of
chemokine. The values at optimal concentrations of the chemokine in a
range between 100 ng/ml and 2.5 µg/ml are shown. (D and E) Cells were
infected with vTF7-3 and mixed with BSC-1 cells infected with vCB21R
and either vCB16 (nonfusogenic mutant of IIIB Env), vCB41 (IIIB Env),
or vCB28 (JRFL Env), and the -galactosidase activities in the cell
lysates were measured. Fusion index was calculated as described in the
legend to Fig. 3.
|
|
In order to demonstrate functional expression of CCR5 and CXCR4 in the
U937 clones, their responsiveness to MIP-1

(specific
to CCR5
[
8,
34,
35]) or SDF-1 (specific to CXCR4 [
3,
30]) was measured in chemotaxis assays. Neither plus clone 10
nor minus clone 17 migrated in response to MIP-1

when either
clone
was untreated; however, after differentiation with RA, both
clones
became responsive to MIP-1

(Fig.
4B), in agreement with
CCR5 mRNA
expression after RA treatment (Fig.
4A, top blots).
In contrast,
responsiveness of clone 10 to SDF-1 was modestly
decreased with RA
treatment (Fig.
4C), in agreement with decreased
levels of cell surface
CXCR4 expression after RA treatment (Table
1), while the chemotactic
responsiveness of clone 17 to SDF-1
was not markedly changed with RA
treatment (Fig.
4C). Although
responsiveness to SDF-1 of clone 10 was
modestly increased shortly
after RA treatment in some experiments (Fig.
4C, day 1), that
increase was not consistently reproducible (data not
shown).
In order to demonstrate whether the kinetics of CCR5 expression
correlate well with fusogenicity of the cells with Env's from
M-tropic
HIV-1, fusion assays were performed with the same samples
used for
Northern blot analysis and flow cytometry analysis described
above.
While expression of CCR5 mRNA was clearly induced in clone
10 as early
as day 1 after stimulation (Fig.
4A, top blots), fusogenic
activity
with Env from M-tropic HIV-1 JRFL was gradually increased
over the 7 days of the experimental period (Fig.
4D). Therefore,
levels of CCR5
expression may not be the only determinant of fusogenic
activity of the
clone with an M-tropic HIV-1 Env. Fusogenic activity
of clone 17 with
an M-tropic HIV-1 Env was not beyond the background
activity throughout
the experimental period, despite the fact
that CCR5 expression was also
induced in this clone (Fig.
4A).
In contrast, 7 days of RA treatment of
clone 10 reduced its fusogenic
activity with T-tropic Env (Fig.
4E), in
agreement with reduced
expression of CXCR4 after the 7-day treatment
with RA (Table
1).
Thus, fusogenicity of clone 10 with either M-tropic or T-tropic Env
correlates with the level of expression of CCR5 or CXCR4,
respectively;
however, induction of CCR5 or the presence of CXCR4
did not confer
fusogenicity to clone 17 with M-tropic or T-tropic
Env, respectively,
suggesting that cell-type specific modification
of HIV coreceptors or
association with another cellular molecule(s)
may affect coreceptor
functions.
M-tropic HIV-1 infection in RA-differentiated U937 plus clones is
inhibited by ligands for CCR5.
In order to demonstrate whether
CCR5 serves as the major coreceptor for M-tropic HIV-1 in
RA-differentiated U937 plus clones, we infected plus clone 10 with
M-tropic HIV-1 in the presence or absence of ligands for CCR5.
In single-round virus replication assays, RANTES and MIP-1

,
natural ligands for CCR5, reduced infectivity of M-tropic Env-carrying
virus (70% reduction at 5 µg/ml) while pretreatment of the
RA-differentiated
clone 10 with MCP-1, eotaxin, or SDF-1, which are not
ligands
for CCR5, did not suppress infection with the virus (Fig.
5A),
suggesting that CCR5 plays a
critical role in M-tropic HIV-1 infection
in the differentiated plus
clone. Modest (up to 50 to 60%) increases
of HIV-1 infectivity in the
presence of MCP-1 were observed in
several experiments; however, those
increases were not consistently
reproducible (
26). Of note
is the fact that antiviral effects
of RANTES or MIP-1

(
6) were more pronounced in primary CD4
+ T cells
than in the plus clone or primary macrophages, while
AOP-RANTES, a
modified chemokine which has potent anti-HIV activity
in both T cells
and macrophages (
40), efficiently suppressed
M-tropic HIV-1
infection in all cell types tested (Fig.
5B; data
not shown). Limited
sensitivity of the U937 clone to antiviral
activity of the natural
chemokines is probably analogous to that
of primary macrophages
(
11,
25,
36,
40).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Ligands for CCR5 inhibit M-tropic HIV-1 infection of
RA-differentiated clone 10. Clone 10 differentiated with RA for 7 days,
MDM, and primary CD4+ T cells were either untreated or
treated with the indicated chemokine at the indicated concentrations
for 1 h before and throughout infection with
NL4-3-Luc-R E virus pseudotyped by M-tropic
HIV-1 JRFL Env. AOP-RANTES was kindly provided by R. Offord
(40), and other chemokines were purchased from R&D Systems.
Results were representative of four (A) or three (B) independent
experiments.
|
|
In this study, we have demonstrated that in undifferentiated
promonocytic U937 cells, M-tropic HIV-1 infection is blocked
at
the level of viral fusion/entry and that differentiation into
cells
with more mature phenotypes renders certain U937 clones
(plus
clones) susceptible to M-tropic HIV-1 infection, probably
by regulating
expression of a cellular factor(s) that modulates
viral fusion/entry.
Induction of fusogenic activity with M-tropic
HIV-1 Env was also
reported for another monocytic cell line, THP-1,
which was treated with
RA (
1). Northern blot analysis clearly
demonstrated
induction of mRNA for CCR5 (a fusion/entry cofactor
for M-tropic HIV-1)
after RA differentiation, and we have recently
demonstrated that RA
induction of CCR5 expression in U937 cells
occurs at the promoter level
(
26,
27); the functional expression
of CCR5 was confirmed by
chemotaxis assays. Receptor competition
studies using MIP-1

,
RANTES, and AOP-RANTES (ligands for CCR5)
also indicated that
CCR5 is critical for M-tropic HIV-1 entry
into these cells. The
difficulty in detecting CCR5 expression
by flow cytometry may reflect
very low levels of expression on
the cell surface or may suggest that
CCR5 that is expressed on
the clone (and possibly on M/M) is modified
or associated with
another cellular molecule(s), resulting in
relatively poor accessibility
of the MAb (2D7) to its epitope.
In contrast to U937 plus clones, induction of CCR5 expression in other
U937 clones (minus clones) did not confer susceptibility
to M-tropic
HIV-1 infection. These cells are also resistant to
T-tropic HIV-1
infection despite the fact that they express CD4
and CXCR4
(
24) (Table
1). The resistance to HIV-1 of minus
clones
occurs, at least in part, at the level of fusion/entry
(
24)
(Fig.
4). However, since these cells efficiently allowed
entry of virus
carrying amphotropic Env (Fig.
3C), an intrinsic
defect in the ability
to fuse in general does not seem to be responsible
for their resistance
to HIV-1. Possible explanations for a defect
in HIV entry despite
adequate receptor and coreceptor expression
include the possibility
that cell-type-specific modification and/or
association of HIV
coreceptors with other cell surface molecule(s)
may alter their
coreceptor function.
Differentiation of M/M lineage cells may have dichotomous effects
on fusogenicity of cells with either M-tropic or
T-tropic
Env. Upon differentiation with RA, cell surface CXCR4
expression
in plus clone 10 was downregulated, resulting in less
fusogenic
activity with T-tropic Env, whereas the same treatment
induced
CCR5 expression and conferred fusogenic activity with M-tropic
Env. Downregulation of cell surface CXCR4 expression upon
differentiation
has also been reported for MDM (
22). We are
currently investigating
what cellular events that occur during
monocytic differentiation
are critical for the regulation of expression
of HIV-1 fusion/entry
cofactors and other cellular factors involved in
viral fusion/entry.
Cells of the M/M lineage are known to vary in their susceptibilities to
HIV-1 infection. Macrophages in skin, lung, lymph
nodes, or brain
harbor HIV-1, while HIV-1 is rarely detected in
Kupfer cells in the
liver (
23). Various factors (i.e., growth
factors,
cytokines, or extracellular matrix) at the sites of terminal
differentiation may differentially influence phenotypic features
of
cells belonging to the M/M system in vivo, and the in vitro
heterogeneity observed in the present study among the U937 subclones
may partially reflect such heterogeneity in their in vivo counterparts.
Our in vitro U937 subclone model may provide a useful experimental
system to investigate which cellular factor(s) is critical for
HIV-1
infection of cells of the M/M system and how expression
of this
factor(s) is regulated upon differentiation of cells into
more mature
phenotypes.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
H.M. and M.M. contributed equally to this project.
We thank G. Franzoso, U. Siebenlist, T. Theodore, N. Landau,
E. Berger, J. Hoxie, C. Mackay, R. Offord, and K. Uskokovic
for providing materials; J. Weddle for graphic work; and P. Walsh for editorial assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of
Immunoregulation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 6A11,
Bethesda, MD 20892. Phone: (301) 402-2617. Fax: (301) 402-4122. E-mail: hmoriuchi{at}atlas.niaid.nih.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alkhatib, G.,
C. C. Broder, and E. A. Berger.
1996.
Cell type-specific fusion cofactors determine human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tropism for T-cell lines versus primary macrophages.
J. Virol.
70:5487-5494[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Alkhatib, G.,
C. Combadiere,
C. C. Broder,
Y. Feng,
P. E. Kennedy,
P. M. Murphy, and E. A. Berger.
1996.
CC CKR5: a RANTES, MIP-1 , MIP-1 receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1.
Science
272:1955-1958[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Bleul, C. C.,
M. Farzan,
H. Choe,
C. Parolin,
I. Clark-Lewis,
J. Sodroski, and T. A. Springer.
1996.
The lymphocyte chemoattractant SDF-1 is a ligand for LESTR/fusin and blocks HIV-1 entry.
Nature
382:829-833[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bleul, C. C.,
L. Wu,
J. A. Hoxie,
T. A. Springer, and C. R. Mackay.
1997.
The HIV coreceptors CXCR4 and CCR5 are differentially expressed and regulated on human T lymphocytes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:1925-1930[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Choe, H.,
M. Farzan,
Y. Sun,
N. Sullivan,
B. Rollins,
P. D. Ponath,
L. Wu,
C. R. Mackay,
G. LaRosa,
W. Newman,
N. Gerard,
C. Gerard, and J. Sodroski.
1996.
The -chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 facilitate infection by primary HIV-1 isolates.
Cell
85:1135-1148[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Cocchi, F.,
A. L. DeVico,
A. Garzino-Demo,
S. K. Arya,
R. C. Gallo, and P. Lusso.
1995.
Identification of RANTES, MIP-1 , and MIP-1 as the major HIV-suppressive factors produced by CD8+ T cells.
Science
270:1811-1815[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Collman, R.
1992.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tropism for human macrophages.
Pathobiology
60:213-218[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Combadiere, C.,
S. K. Ahuja,
H. L. Tiffany, and P. M. Murphy.
1996.
Cloning and functional expression of CC CKR5, human monocyte CC chemokine receptor selective for MIP-1 , MIP-1 , and RANTES.
J. Leukocyte Biol.
60:147-152[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Connor, R. I., and D. D. Ho.
1994.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants with increased replicative capacity develop during the asymptomatic stage before disease progression.
J. Virol.
68:4400-4408[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Connor, R. I.,
K. E. Sheridan,
D. Ceradini,
S. Choe, and N. R. Landau.
1997.
Change in coreceptor use correlates with disease progression in HIV-1-infected individuals.
J. Exp. Med.
185:621-628[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Deng, D.,
R. Liu,
W. Ellmeier,
S. Choe,
D. Unutmaz,
M. Burkhart,
P. DiMarzio,
S. Marmon,
R. E. Sutton,
C. M. Hill,
C. B. Davis,
S. C. Peiper,
T. J. Schall,
D. R. Littman, and N. R. Landau.
1996.
Identification of a major co-receptor for primary isolates of HIV-1.
Nature
381:661-666[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Doranz, B. J.,
J. Rucker,
Y. Yi,
R. J. Smyth,
M. Samson,
S. C. Peiper,
M. Parmentier,
R. G. Collman, and R. W. Dom.
1996.
A dual-tropic primary HIV-1 isolate that uses Fusin and the -chemokine receptors CKR-5, CKR-3, and CKR-2b as fusion cofactors.
Cell
85:1149-1158[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Dragic, T.,
V. Litwin,
G. P. Allaway,
S. R. Martin,
Y. Huang,
K. A. Nagashima,
C. Cayanan,
P. J. Maddon,
R. A. Koup,
J. P. Moore, and W. A. Paxton.
1996.
HIV-1 entry into CD4+ cells is mediated by the chemokine receptor CC-CKR-5.
Nature
381:667-673[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Endres, M. J.,
P. R. Clapham,
M. Marsh,
M. Ahuja,
J. Davis Turner,
A. McKnight,
J. F. Thomas,
B. Stoebenau-Haggarty,
S. Choe,
P. J. Vance,
T. N. C. Wells,
C. A. Power,
S. S. Sutterwala,
R. W. Doms,
N. R. Lindau, and J. A. Hoxie.
1996.
CD4-independent infection by HIV-2 is mediated by fusin/CXCR4.
Cell
87:745-756[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Feng, Y.,
C. Broder,
P. E. Kennedy, and E. A. Berger.
1996.
HIV-1 entry cofactor: functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor.
Science
272:872-877[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Franzoso, G.,
P. Biswas,
G. Poli,
L. M. Carlson,
K. D. Brown,
M. Tomita-Yamaguchi,
A. S. Fauci, and U. Siebenlist.
1994.
A family of serine proteases expressed exclusively in myelo-monocytic cells specifically processes the nuclear factor- B subunit p65 in vitro and may impair human immunodeficiency virus replication in these cells.
J. Exp. Med.
180:1445-1456[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Gartner, S.,
P. Markovitz,
D. M. Markovitz,
M. H. Kaplan,
R. C. Gallo, and M. Popovic.
1986.
The role of mononuclear phagocytes in HTLV-III/LAV infection.
Science
233:215-219[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Goletti, D.,
A. L. Kinter,
P. Biswas,
S. M. Bende,
G. Poli, and A. S. Fauci.
1995.
Effect of cellular differentiation on cytokine-induced expression of human immunodeficiency virus in chronically infected promonocytic cells: dissociation of cellular differentiation and viral expression.
J. Virol.
69:2540-2546[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Hwang, S. S.,
T. J. Boyle,
H. K. Lyerly, and B. R. Cullen.
1991.
Identification of the envelope V3 loop as the primary determinant of cell tropism in HIV-1.
Science
253:71-74[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Kitano, K.,
G. C. Baldwin,
M. A. Raines, and D. W. Golde.
1990.
Differentiating agents facilitate infection of myeloid leukemic cell lines by monocytotropic HIV-1 strains.
Blood
10:1980-1988.
|
| 21.
|
Koenig, S.,
J. M. Gendelman,
J. M. Orenstein,
M. C. Dal Canto,
G. D. Pezeshkpour,
M. Yungbluth,
F. Janotta,
A. Akasamit,
M. A. Martin, and A. S. Fauci.
1986.
Detection of AIDS virus in macrophages in brain tissues from AIDS patients with encephalopathy.
Science
233:1089-1093[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
McKnight, A.,
D. Wilkinson,
G. Simmons,
S. Talbot,
L. Picard,
M. Ahuja,
M. Marsh,
J. A. Hoxie, and P. R. Clapham.
1997.
Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus fusion by a monoclonal antibody to a coreceptor (CXCR4) is both cell type and virus strain dependent.
J. Virol.
71:1692-1696[Abstract].
|
| 23.
|
Meltzer, M. S.,
D. L. Hoover,
D. S. Finbloom,
J. A. Turpin,
D. C. Kalter,
R. M. Friedman,
M. P. Moyer,
P. Naya, and H. E. Gendelman.
1992.
Mononuclear phagocytes in the pathogenesis of human immunodeficiency virus disease, p. 147-175. In
G. Lopez-Berestein, and J. Klostergaard (ed.), Mononuclear phagocytes in cell biology.
CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 24.
|
Moriuchi, H.,
M. Moriuchi,
J. Arthos,
J. Hoxie, and A. S. Fauci.
1997.
Promonocytic U937 subclones expressing CD4 and CXCR4 are resistant to infection with and cell-to-cell fusion by T-cell-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
71:9664-9671[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Moriuchi, H.,
M. Moriuchi,
C. Combadiere,
P. M. Murphy, and A. S. Fauci.
1996.
CD8+ T cell-derived soluble factor(s), but not -chemokines RANTES, MIP-1 , and MIP-1 , suppress HIV-1 replication in monocyte/macrophages.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:15341-15435[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
| Moriuchi, H., M. Moriuchi, and A. S. Fauci.
Unpublished data.
|
| 27.
|
Moriuchi, H.,
M. Moriuchi, and A. S. Fauci.
1997.
Cloning and analysis of the promoter region of CCR5, a coreceptor for HIV-1 entry.
J. Immunol.
159:5441-5449[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Moriuchi, H.,
M. Moriuchi,
H. A. Smith,
S. E. Straus, and J. I. Cohen.
1992.
Varicella-zoster virus open reading frame 61 protein is functionally homologous to herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP0.
J. Virol.
66:7303-7308[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Nussbaum, O.,
C. C. Broder, and E. A. Berger.
1994.
Fusogenic mechanisms of enveloped-virus glycoproteins analyzed by a novel recombinant vaccinia virus-based assay quantitating cell fusion-dependent reporter gene activation.
J. Virol.
68:5411-5422[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Oberlin, E.,
A. Amara,
F. Bachelerie,
C. Bessia,
J.-L. Virelizier,
F. Arenzana-Seisdedos,
O. Schwartz,
J.-M. Heard,
I. Clark-Lewis,
D. F. Legler,
M. Loetscher,
M. Baggiolini, and B. Moser.
1996.
The CXC chemokine SDF-1 is the ligand for LESTR/fusin and prevents infection by T-cell-line-adapted HIV-1.
Nature
382:833-835[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
O'Brien, W.,
Y. Koyanagi,
A. Namazie,
J.-Q. Zho,
A. Diagne,
K. Idler,
J. Zack, and I. S. Y. Chen.
1990.
HIV-1 tropism for mononuclear phagocytes can be determined by regions of gp120 outside the CD4-binding domain.
Nature
348:69-73[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Olsson, I. L., and T. R. Breitman.
1983.
Induction of differentiation of the human histocytic lymphoma cell line U-937 by retinoic acid and cyclic adenosine 3':5'-monophosphatate-inducing agents.
Cancer Res.
42:3924-3927[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Olsson, I. L.,
U. Gullberg,
I. Ivhed, and K. Nilsson.
1982.
Induction of differentiation of human histiocytic lymphoma cell line U-937 by 1 ,25-dihydroxychelocalciferol.
Cancer Res.
43:5862-5867[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Raport, C. J.,
J. Gosling,
V. L. Schweickart,
P. W. Gray, and I. F. Charo.
1996.
Molecular cloning and functional characterization of a novel human CC chemokine receptor (CCR5) for RANTES, MIP-1 , and MIP-1 .
J. Biol. Chem.
271:17161-17166[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Samson, M.,
O. Labbe,
C. Mollereau,
G. Vassart, and M. Parmentier.
1996.
Molecular cloning and functional expression of a new human CC-chemokine receptor gene.
Biochemistry
35:3362-3367[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Schmidtmayerova, H.,
B. Sherry, and M. Bukrinsky.
1996.
Chemokines and HIV replication.
Nature
382:767[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Schuitemaker, H.,
M. Koot,
N. A. Kootsra,
M. W. Dercksen,
R. E. de Goede,
R. P. van Steenwijk,
J. M. Lange,
J. K. Schattenkerk, and F. Miedema.
1992.
Biological phenotype of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clones at different stages of infection: progression of disease is associated with a shift from monocytotropic to T-cell-tropic virus population.
J. Virol.
66:1354-1360[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Schuitemaker, H.,
M. Koot,
M. Groenink,
R. E. de Goede,
F. Miedema, and M. Tersmette.
1992.
Differential tropism of clinical HIV-1 isolates for primary monocytes and promonocytic cell lines.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
8:1679-1682[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Shioda, T.,
J. A. Levy, and C. Cheng-Mayer.
1991.
Macrophage and T cell-line tropisms of HIV-1 are determined by specific regions of the envelope gp120 gene.
Nature
349:167-169[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Simmons, G.,
P. R. Clapham,
L. Picard,
R. E. Offord,
M. M. Rosenkilde,
T. W. Schwarts,
R. Buser,
T. N. C. Wells, and A. E. I. Proudfoot.
1997.
Potent inhibition of HIV-1 infectivity in macrophages and lymphocytes by a novel CCR5 antagonist.
Science
276:276-279[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Theodore, T. S.,
G. Englund,
A. Buckler-White,
C. E. Buckler,
M. A. Martin, and K. W. Peden.
1996.
Construction and characterization of a stable full-length macrophage-tropic HIV type 1 molecular clone that directs the production of high titers of progeny virions.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
12:191-194[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Wu, L.,
W. A. Paxton,
N. Kassam,
N. Ruffing,
J. B. Rottman,
N. Sullivan,
H. Choe,
J. Sodroski,
W. Newman,
R. A. Koup, and C. R. Mackay.
1997.
CCR5 levels and expression pattern correlate with infectability by macrophage-tropic HIV-1, in vitro.
J. Exp. Med.
185:1681-1691[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Zhu, T.,
H. Mo,
N. Wang,
D. S. Nam,
Y. Cao,
R. A. Koup, and D. D. Ho.
1993.
Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of HIV-1 patients with primary infection.
Science
261:1179-1181.
|
J Virol, April 1998, p. 3394-3400, Vol. 72, No. 4
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Bristow, C. L., Wolkowicz, R., Trucy, M., Franklin, A., Di Meo, F., Kozlowski, M. T., Winston, R., Arnold, R. R.
(2008). NF-{kappa}B Signaling, Elastase Localization, and Phagocytosis Differ in HIV-1 Permissive and Nonpermissive U937 Clones. J. Immunol.
180: 492-499
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cassol, E., Alfano, M., Biswas, P., Poli, G.
(2006). Monocyte-derived macrophages and myeloid cell lines as targets of HIV-1 replication and persistence. J. Leukoc. Biol.
80: 1018-1030
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bannert, N., Farzan, M., Friend, D. S., Ochi, H., Price, K. S., Sodroski, J., Boyce, J. A.
(2001). Human Mast Cell Progenitors Can Be Infected by Macrophagetropic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 and Retain Virus with Maturation In Vitro. J. Virol.
75: 10808-10814
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Genois, N., Robichaud, G. A, Tremblay, M. J.
(2000). Mono Mac 1: a new in vitro model system to study HIV-1 infection in human cells of the mononuclear phagocyte series. J. Leukoc. Biol.
68: 854-864
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Scadden, D. T., Shen, H., Cheng, T.
(2000). Hematopoietic Stem Cells in HIV Disease. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr
2000: 24-29
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
SAVARINO, A., BOTTAREL, F., CALOSSO, L., FEITO, M. J., BENSI, T., BRAGARDO, M., ROJO, J. M., PUGLIESE, A., ABBATE, I., CAPOBIANCHI, M. R., DIANZANI, F., MALAVASI, F., DIANZANI, U.
(1999). Effects of the human CD38 glycoprotein on the early stages of the HIV-1 replication cycle. FASEB J.
13: 2265-2276
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gordon, C. J., Muesing, M. A., Proudfoot, A. E. I., Power, C. A., Moore, J. P., Trkola, A.
(1999). Enhancement of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection by the CC-Chemokine RANTES Is Independent of the Mechanism of Virus-Cell Fusion. J. Virol.
73: 684-694
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shen, H., Cheng, T., Preffer, F. I., Dombkowski, D., Tomasson, M. H., Golan, D. E., Yang, O., Hofmann, W., Sodroski, J. G., Luster, A. D., Scadden, D. T.
(1999). Intrinsic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Resistance of Hematopoietic Stem Cells Despite Coreceptor Expression. J. Virol.
73: 728-737
[Abstract]
[Full Text]