Previous Article | Next Article 
J Virol, April 1998, p. 2655-2662, Vol. 72, No. 4
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Involvement of Actin Microfilaments in the
Replication of Human Parainfluenza Virus Type 3
Sanhita
Gupta,1
Bishnu P.
De,2
Judith A.
Drazba,3 and
Amiya K.
Banerjee1,2,*
Molecular Virology Graduate Program,
Department of Biochemistry, Case Western Reserve University,
Cleveland, Ohio 44106,1 and
Departments
of Molecular Biology2 and
Neurosciences,3 The Lerner Research
Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Received 15 August 1997/Accepted 2 December 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
Several studies indicate that paramyxoviruses require a specific
cellular factor(s) for transcription of their genomic RNAs. We
previously reported that the cellular cytoskeletal protein actin, in
its polymeric form, participates in the transcription of human
parainfluenza virus type 3 (HPIV3) in vitro. In the present study, we
investigated the role of the polymeric form of actin, i.e., the actin
microfilaments of the cytoskeletal framework, in the
reproduction of HPIV3 in vivo. Pulse-chase labeling analyses indicate
that the viral nucleocapsid-associated proteins, NP and P, are present
predominantly in the cytoskeletal framework during infection. By in
situ hybridization, we found that viral mRNAs and genomic RNA were
synthesized from the nucleocapsids that were bound to the cytoskeletal
framework. Double immunofluorescent labeling and confocal microscopy of
the cytoarchitecture revealed that the viral nucleocapsids are
specifically localized on the actin microfilaments. Treatment of cells
with the actin-depolymerizing agent, cytochalasin D, resulted in the
inhibition of viral RNA synthesis and ribonucleoprotein accumulation.
These results strongly suggest that actin microfilaments play an
important role in the replication of HPIV3.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Human parainfluenza virus type 3 (HPIV3), a paramyxovirus, is an important pathogen that causes severe
respiratory tract illness in children (11). The
single-stranded RNA genome of HPIV3, 15,461 nucleotides long, is
contained within a helical nucleocapsid (20). Three
virus-encoded proteins, the nucleocapsid protein, NP (68 kDa), the phosphoprotein, P (90 kDa), and the RNA polymerase, L (257 kDa), are associated with the nucleocapsid to form a transcribing ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex (1, 2, 20). NP enwraps the
genome RNA, while L and P together constitute the RNA-dependent RNA
polymerase complex, similar to that characterized for vesicular stomatitis virus (14), that transcribes the NP-bound genome RNA both in vitro and in vivo. Previous studies indicate that in
addition to the RNP-associated viral proteins, cellular actin is
necessary for the activation of HPIV3 transcription in vitro (15,
16). Further analyses of this RNP-actin interaction demonstrated that the binding of the polymeric form of actin to the RNP results in
an alteration of structure of the RNP from a loosely coiled to a
moderately condensed form which appeared to be favorable for
transcription (17). Similar involvement of cytoskeletal proteins in transcription is also observed in several other
paramyxoviruses, namely, Sendai virus, measles virus, and respiratory
syncytial virus, where actin and tubulin have been shown to be involved in the activation of transcription (26, 30, 31). In the case
of HPIV3, the specific requirement of the polymeric form of actin in
transcription in vitro suggests an interaction between the viral RNP
and actin microfilaments in the infected cells. Thus, it appears that
paramyxoviruses perhaps use a common strategy for their gene
expression by exploiting cellular cytoskeletal components.
Actin is present in nonmuscle cells in two forms, a globular monomeric
form that represents the soluble pool of actin and a filamentous form
that constitutes the actin microfilaments of the cytoskeletal framework
(28). The actin microfilaments representing the polymeric
form of actin is present in a dynamic state which is constantly forming
and breaking within the cell in response to various external or
internal stimuli (28, 35, 37). Many enveloped viruses
utilize actin microfilaments during the process of budding and
maturation of virus particles from the infected cells (5, 13, 23,
36, 39, 45, 47). Furthermore, in Newcastle disease virus, the RNP
is attached to the cytoskeletal framework during RNA synthesis,
suggesting involvement of the cytoskeletal component(s) in viral RNA
synthesis (24). Thus, it appears that, consistent with the
in vitro requirement for cytoskeletal proteins in transcription,
paramyxoviruses in general may use the same proteins for their
reproduction in vivo.
In this study, we have made an effort to understand the role of the
actin microfilaments of the cytoskeletal framework in HPIV3 gene
expression in vivo. By biochemical and immunological analyses, we
demonstrate that the viral RNPs, following entry, are rapidly
associated with the cytoskeletal framework in the infected cells. These
RNPs are actively involved in RNA synthesis, as revealed by in situ
hybridization. By double immunofluorescent labeling and confocal
microscopy, we have demonstrated that the actin microfilaments but not
the microtubules are the site of interaction of RNP.
(This work forms part of the dissertation to be submitted by S.G. to
the Molecular Virology Program, Case Western Reserve University,
Cleveland, Ohio, as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
degree of Doctor of Philosophy.)
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells and viruses.
CV-1 (ATCC CCL 185) cells were propagated
in monolayers as described previously (15). HPIV3 (HA-1; NIH
47885) was grown in CV-1 cells and purified as described previously
(15).
Cell fractionation.
CV-1 cells (4 × 107)
were harvested, and the cell pellet was washed with phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS). The cell pellet was then gently resuspended in extraction
buffer (24) containing 10 mM
piperazine-N,N1-bis(2-ethenesulfonic
acid) (PIPES; pH 6.8), 100 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
CaCl2, 0.3 M sucrose, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Triton X-100 was added to a final concentration of 1%. After
gentle mixing, the slurry was left on ice for 3 min and centrifuged at
800 rpm for 3 min. The supernatant was referred to as the soluble (SOL)
fraction, and the pellet was referred to as the cytoskeletal (CSK)
fraction.
For cells that were grown on coverslips, the extraction buffer
(24) was directly added and the coverslips were kept on ice for 3 min. The coverslips were washed with extraction buffer and then
with PBS. The material retained on the coverslips were fixed with 1%
formaldehyde and used as the CSK fraction.
Protein analysis.
Infected cells were pulse-labeled with 50 µCi of [35S]methionine at 10 µCi/ml for 10 min and
chased for 60 min. The labeled proteins were resolved in a sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-10% polyacrylamide gel (29) and
detected by fluorography followed by exposure to X-ray film.
For Western blot analysis, the proteins were resolved in an SDS-10%
polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a nylon (GeneScreen)
membrane
(
44). The blot was incubated with the primary antibody,
and
the complex was detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
second
antibody and diaminobenzidine as the substrate.
Viral RNA detection in cells.
CV-1 cells were grown on
coverslips and were infected with HPIV3 at 1 PFU/cell. The CSK
structures were fixed on the coverslips and were hybridized (Boehringer
Mannheim) to digoxigenin-labeled sense and antisense NP-mRNA,
synthesized in vitro from pGEM-NP plasmid DNA as specified by the
manufacturer (Boehringer Mannheim) with T7 and SP6 RNA polymerase,
respectively. The hybridization signal was detected with
anti-digoxigenin antibody coupled to alkaline phosphatase followed by a
color reaction with nitroblue tetrazolium and
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate as substrates (Boehringer
Mannheim). The slides were visualized under a phase-contrast microscope.
For Northern hybridization, the cells were infected with HPIV3 at 1 PFU/cell and were harvested at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 36
h
postinfection. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation at
800 ×
g and fractionated in extraction buffer containing
ribonucleoside
vanadyl complex (Sigma Chemical Co.). The RNAs from the
CSK and
SOL fractions were purified by digestion with proteinase K and
then subjected to phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation.
The RNA
was analyzed in a formaldehyde-agarose gel and transferred
to a nylon
membrane (GeneScreen). The membrane was hybridized
with radiolabeled NP
cDNA to detect the virus-specific RNAs. The
gel was analyzed with a
phosphorimager, and the distribution of
RNAs between the SOL and CSK
fractions of cells was determined.
The NP cDNA insert was obtained by restriction digestion of an NP cDNA
clone in pGEM4Z and eluted from a 1% agarose gel with
GeneClean
(Bio-Rad). The cDNA was labeled by the random primed
labeling reaction
(Boehringer Mannheim) with [
32P]dCTP and used as a probe
in the hybridization reaction.
Plaque assay.
The virus titer was determined by the standard
plaque assay technique with CV-1 cell monolayers as previously
described (18).
CD treatment.
Cytochalasin D (CD) (Sigma Chemical Co.) was
initially resuspended in dimethyl sulfoxide at 5 mg/ml. Subsequent
dilutions were made in the culture media.
Isolation of viral RNP complex.
The HPIV3 RNP complex was
isolated from infected CV-1 cells by a method described previously
(43). CV-1 cells were infected at 5 PFU/cell and harvested
24 h postinfection. The cells were washed with PBS and then with
10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 0.15 M NaCl and finally
disrupted in 10 mM Tris-HCl by sonication. The cell debris were removed
by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min, and the
supernatant was further centrifuged at 100,000 × g for
1 h to pellet the RNP. The RNP was suspended in 0.1 ml of buffer
containing 10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol and further
purified by centrifugation through a 50% glycerol cushion (0.5 ml) at
150,000 × g in an SW 50.1 centrifuge.
Isolation of total RNA from infected cells.
Total RNA was
isolated from HPIV3-infected CV-1 cells by a method described
previously (9). The cells were washed with PBS and lysed in
solution D (4 M guanidinium thiocyanate, 25 mM sodium citrate [pH
7.0], 0.5% Sarkosyl, 0.1 M 2-mercaptoethanol). RNA was recovered from
the lysed cells by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol
precipitation.
Immunofluorescent staining.
Cells were grown on coverslips
and were infected with HPIV3 at 1 PFU/cell. At 12 to 14 h
postinfection, the cells were fractionated and stained with
rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin in extraction buffer (1:100, vol/vol)
in the dark followed by fixation with 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS at room
temperature. Microtubules were labeled either directly or after
extraction with CSK buffer on coverslips and were treated with
monoclonal anti-tubulin antibody (Boehringer Mannheim) followed by
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin
G (IgG). The coverslips were mounted on slides with Vectashield
(Vector) and visualized in a Leica CISM confocal laser-scanning
microscope. For double immunofluorescent staining, the infected cells
were fractionated and stained with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin in
extraction buffer (1:100, vol/vol) in the dark followed by fixation
with 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS at room temperature. The fixed cells
were stained with goat anti-HPIV3 antibody (Biodesign) and anti-goat
IgG conjugated with biotin followed by FITC-conjugated avidin. The
coverslips were mounted on slides with Vectashield and visualized in a
Leica CISM confocal laser-scanning microscope. For simultaneous
staining of microtubules and viral antigens, the cells were
fractionated with extraction buffer without phalloidin and fixed with
3.7% formaldehyde. The fixed cells were then treated with both
anti-tubulin antibody and anti-virus antibody and subsequently with
anti-mouse IgG conjugated to FITC for tubulin and anti-goat IgG
conjugated to biotin followed by Texas red-conjugated avidin for viral
antigens.
 |
RESULTS |
Association of HPIV3 RNP with the cytoskeletal framework.
In a
previous study, we demonstrated that the cytoskeletal protein actin
specifically binds to HPIV3 RNP to activate viral transcription in
vitro (17). Ultrastructural analysis of the RNP revealed
that the binding of the polymeric form of actin mediates a
conformational change of the RNP from a loosely coiled to a moderately
condensed form (17) that appeared to be involved in the
transcription activation process. This led us to postulate that the CSK
framework containing the polymeric form of actin as a major component
might play a direct role in HPIV3 gene expression. We therefore
investigated whether viral RNP associates with the CSK framework and,
more specifically, with actin microfilaments during infection. CV-1
cells, which are highly permissive for HPIV3 growth in culture medium,
were selected for this study. The cells were infected with HPIV3 and
were pulse-labeled at various times postinfection. The cells were lysed
in extraction buffer containing 1% Triton X-100 and separated into CSK
and SOL fractions. Polypeptides from each fraction were analyzed in
SDS-polyacrylamide gels and visualized by autoradiography. As shown in
Fig. 1A, the major RNP-associated
protein, NP, was clearly associated with the CSK fraction as early as
6 h postinfection and remained bound to the CSK at least up to
16 h postinfection. Western blot analysis with anti-RNP and
anti-actin antibodies confirmed the presence of NP and actin in the CSK
fraction (Fig. 1B). Similar analysis with anti-HPIV3 antibody
demonstrated the presence of P in the same CSK fraction (data not
shown). These results indicate that the viral RNP associates with the
CSK framework during the early period, i.e., the RNA-synthetic phase of
the virus life cycle.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Protein distribution between the SOL fraction and CSK
framework. (A) CV-1 cells were infected with HPIV3 and, at different
times postinfection (p.i.) (as indicated), pulse-labeled with
[35S]methionine for 10 min and chased for 60 min. The
labeled cells were fractionated into CSK and SOL fractions with an
extraction buffer as described by Hamaguchi et al. (24). The
fractions were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
followed by fluorography and autoradiography. The migration positions
of molecular size markers in kilodaltons are shown on the right. (B)
Western blot analysis of the proteins in soluble and cytoskeletal
fractions. The distribution of HPIV3 NP and the cytoskeletal
component actin between the SOL and CSK fractions was determined by the
same procedure as described above, except the cells were not labeled
and the NP and actin were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-RNP
that detects primarily NP and anti-actin antibodies, respectively.
|
|
Localization of viral RNAs on the CSK framework.
Association
of viral RNP with the CSK framework during the early period of
infection raised the question whether viral RNA synthesis also occurs
on the CSK structure. To investigate this possibility, we performed in
situ hybridization of CV-1 cells that were grown on coverslips and were
infected with HPIV3. At 12 h postinfection, the cells were
extracted with CSK buffer, with which the CSK structure was isolated on
the coverslip and was then fixed. The CSK structure on the coverslip
was hybridized with digoxigenin-labeled NP-mRNA sense and antisense
riboprobes, and the signal was detected by the color reaction as
described in Materials and Methods. As shown in Fig.
2, the viral mRNAs (Fig. 2B) and genomic
RNA (Fig. 2D) were clearly detected on the CSK framework of the
infected cells whereas no such signals were seen in mock-infected cells
(Fig. 2A and C). The presence of viral RNAs on the CSK structure
suggests that the RNA synthesis occurs on the CSK framework and that
actin microfilaments may be directly involved in the RNA synthetic
process. To confirm this observation biochemically, we examined the
distribution of viral RNA between the CSK and SOL fractions in cells
harvested at different times postinfection. The total RNA was isolated
from each fraction and analyzed by Northern blotting with
32P-labeled NP cDNA as the probe. As shown in Table
1, the viral NP mRNA was present on the
CSK framework during the early period of infection and after 16 h
postinfection the RNAs were released into the cytosol. These results
strongly suggest that initial synthesis of viral RNA occurs in the CSK
framework by CSK-associated RNP and that subsequently the RNP is
released into the cytosolic fraction.

View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Detection of HPIV3 RNAs in the CSK framework. CV-1
cells, grown on coverslips, were infected with HPIV3 at 1 PFU/cell. The
cells were treated with CSK buffer and hybridized with genome sense or
antisense NP RNA labeled with digoxigenin. The coverslips were treated
with anti-digoxigenin antibody coupled to alkaline phosphatase
(Boehringer Mannheim), and the signal was detected with nitroblue
tetrazolium and X-phosphate as the substrate. The coverslips were then
mounted on slides and visualized under a phase-contrast microscope.
Similarly treated mock-infected CV-1 cells served as the control.
Mock-infected CV-1 cells (A) and HPIV3-infected cells (B) hybridized
with antisense NP RNA (T7 transcript of NP cDNA clone in pGEM4Z) and
mock infected CV-1 cells (C) and HPIV3-infected cells (D) hybridized
with NP mRNA (SP6 transcript of NP clone in pGEM4Z) are shown.
|
|
Effect of CD on the production of HPIV3 virions.
To determine
the role of the CSK framework in HPIV3 reproduction, we disrupted the
CSK framework with CD, a potent actin-depolymerizing agent which has
been shown to disrupt the microfilaments in a dose-dependent manner
(7, 33, 38, 40, 42). We preferred CD over CB in these
studies because the latter is also known to inhibit hexose transport,
causing disturbances in sugar metabolism (27). Confluent
monolayers of CV-1 cells were infected with HPIV3 in the presence or
absence of different concentrations of CD. At 24 h postinfection,
the progeny virions were collected from the medium and quantitated by a
standard plaque assay. As shown in Fig.
3, the virus yield was reduced in the
presence of CD in a dose-dependent manner with increasing
concentrations up to 8 µg/ml. At 4 µg/ml, a reduction by about 4 log units was observed as compared to the control HPIV3 production in
the absence of CD. These data indicate that CD has a drastic effect on
HPIV3 production and thus confirms the direct involvement of actin
microfilaments in this process. When vesicular stomatitis virus was
grown under similar conditions, the virus titer was not affected to any
significant extent even at a CD concentration of 8 µg/ml (Fig. 3).
These results are not unexpected because neither the actin
microfilaments nor the CSK has been implicated in VSV reproduction
(22).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Inhibition of HPIV3 replication by CD. CV-1 cells were
infected with HPIV3 at 5 PFU/cell in the presence of different
concentrations of CD, as indicated. At 24 h post infection, the
progeny virus released into the medium was collected and measured by
plaque assay. CV-1 cells were infected with vesicular stomatitis virus
(VSV) at 5 PFU/cell in the presence of CD. At 12 h postinfection, the
progeny virus released into the medium was measured.
|
|
Effect of CD on the intracellular accumulation of viral RNP and
mRNAs.
We next examined whether the observed inhibition of progeny
virion release in the presence of CD was due to the inhibition of
intracellular RNP and mRNA syntheses. Viral RNPs were isolated from
cells grown in the absence or presence of CD (8 µg/ml) and were
resolved in SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The NP protein in the RNP was
detected by Western blotting with anti-RNP antibody. As shown in Fig.
4A), upon treatment with CD, the
intracellular RNP production decreased by 60% compared to the control.
Similarly, when RNP-associated proteins were analyzed in the total-cell
extract, comparable inhibition was observed, indicating that the
inhibition of RNP production was at the level of protein synthesis
rather than at the level of assembly (data not shown). To examine
whether the level of viral mRNAs in CD-treated cells also decreased,
total RNA was isolated from HPIV3-infected cells, grown in the
presence or absence of CD, and analyzed by Northern blotting with a
32P-labeled NP cDNA probe. As shown in Fig. 4B, the
presence of CD in the culture medium resulted in an inhibition of viral
mRNA synthesis by about 70% compared to the control. These results suggest that HPIV3 RNA synthesis is significantly affected by CD and,
consistent with previous findings (17), that the polymeric form of actin plays a critical role in the RNA synthesis. However, it
remains unknown whether the CSK framework also participates in viral
mRNA translation, although such involvement has not been reported
previously.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Inhibition of intracellular RNP synthesis by CD. (A)
CV-1 cells were infected with HPIV3 in the presence or absence of 8 mg
of CD per ml. Intracellular RNP was isolated by the method described by
Toneguzzo and Ghosh (43). The level of NP was determined by
Western blot analysis with anti-RNP antibody. RNP; purified viral RNP
was used as control. (B) Inhibition of mRNA synthesis by CD. CV-1 cells
were infected with HPIV3 in the presence or absence of 8 mg of CD per
ml. Total RNA was isolated from the cells, and the levels of NP mRNA
were determined by Northern blot analysis with 32P-labeled
NP cDNA. The same blot was hybridized with 32P-labeled
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA and used as an
internal control.
|
|
Colocalization of viral RNP with actin microfilaments.
To
directly investigate the involvement of actin microfilaments in the
interaction with viral RNP, we used double immunofluorescent labeling
and confocal microscopy. Cells were treated with CSK buffer to isolate
the CSK framework. In the isolated CSK framework, the actin
microfilaments were labeled with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin (Fig.
5A and C) and viral antigens were
similarly labeled with anti-HPIV3 antibody followed by anti-goat IgG
conjugated to FITC (Fig. 5B and D). As is evident from Fig. 5, the
distribution of viral RNP closely resembled that of the actin
microfilaments (compare Fig. 5C and D), suggesting an association
between actin microfilaments and the viral RNP. When we performed the
immunostaining with anti-RNP, a similar distribution of viral antigens
was observed, which confirmed the presence of RNP (data not shown).

View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Association of HPIV3 RNP with the CSK framework in vivo.
CV-1 cells grown on coverslips were infected with HPIV3 at 1 PFU/cell,
and at 12 h postinfection the cells were treated with CSK buffer
containing rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin. The cells were washed with
the same buffer followed by PBS and fixed. The fixed CSK structures
were treated with anti-HPIV3 antibody that detects the RNP-associated
proteins NP and P. The coverslips were then treated with
biotin-conjugated anti-goat antibody followed by fluorescein-conjugated
avidin. Similar staining of mock-infected cells served as control.
Mock-infected (A) or HPIV3-infected (C) CV-1 cells treated with CSK
buffer containing rhodamine-phalloidin and mock-infected (B) or
HPIV3-infected (D) CV-1 cells treated with anti-HPIV3 antibody followed
by biotin-conjugated anti-goat immunoglobulin plus
fluorescein-conjugated avidin are shown.
|
|
To determine the specificity of this interaction, we examined the
association of viral RNP with microtubules containing tubulin,
which
are also a part of the cytoskeletal framework. When similar
double
immunofluorescent labeling and confocal microscopy with
anti-tubulin
antibody were used, no similarity in the distribution
of microtubules
(Fig.
6A) and viral RNP (Fig.
6B) was
observed.
Moreover, when the cells were extracted with CSK buffer, the
microtubules
disintegrated and were removed (Fig.
6C), as described in
earlier
studies (
4), whereas the viral antigens remained on
the cytoskeletal
framework (Fig.
6D). These findings clearly indicate
that the
viral proteins are not associated with tubulin-containing
microtubules
in the infected cells but, rather, associate with the
actin microfilaments.
The slightly diffused staining of viral proteins
(Fig.
6) was
possibly due to their colocalization with actin
microfilaments
that are partially depolymerized in the absence of
phalloidin
in the staining buffer.

View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Specificity of the interaction between the RNP and actin
microfilaments. To determine the specificity of the RNP-actin
interaction, the association of RNP with another cytoskeletal protein,
tubulin, was examined. CV-1 cells, grown on coverslips, were infected
with HPIV3 at 1 PFU/cell and at 12 h postinfection either
incubated in PBS (A and B) or treated with CSK buffer (C and D) for 3 min on ice. The cells were washed with PBS and fixed. The coverslips
were treated with anti-tubulin or anti-HPIV3 antibody. They were then
treated with fluorescein-conjugated anti-mouse IgG for anti-tubulin (A
and C) or biotin-conjugated anti-goat antibody followed by Texas
red-conjugated avidin for HPIV3 antigens (B and D).
|
|
We further examined the role of actin microfilaments by using CD. As
shown in Fig.
7, treatment of cells with
CD severely
disrupted the distribution pattern of actin microfilaments
(compare
Fig.
5A and
7A), forming distinct patches. Interestingly, the
viral antigens also colocalized with the remnants of actin filaments,
indicating that the viral RNP remains associated with actin in
the
disrupted microfilaments (Fig.
7C and D). Taken together,
the above
findings indicate that the association of viral RNP
with the actin
microfilaments is strong and specific.

View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Effect of CD on the distribution of RNP in vivo. CV-1
cells, grown on coverslips, were infected with HPIV3 at 1 PFU/cell in
the presence of 8 µg of CD per ml. At 12 h postinfection, the
cells were extracted with CSK buffer containing rhodamine-conjugated
phalloidin. The CSK structures remaining on the coverslips were washed
with the CSK buffer followed by PBS. The CSK structures were fixed and
treated with anti-HPIV3 antibody followed by biotin-conjugated
anti-goat Ig and fluorescein-conjugated avidin. Similarly treated
HPIV3-infected CV-1 cells served as controls. Mock-infected (A) or
HPIV3-infected (C) CV-1 cells treated with 8 µg of CD per ml were
treated with CSK buffer containing rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin.
Mock-infected (B) or HPIV3-infected (D) CV-1 cells were treated with
anti-HPIV3 antibody followed by biotin-conjugated anti-goat Ig plus
fluorescein conjugated avidin.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present study, we have demonstrated that the
cytoskeletal framework plays an important role in the replication
of HPIV3 in vivo. The major finding of our study is that the viral RNP associates with the cytoskeletal framework at an early step during infection, i.e., the primary transcription phase (Fig. 1) and that
actin microfilaments but not microtubules of the cytoskeletal framework
are the sites of interaction (Fig. 5 through 7). The actin
microfilaments were found to be the site of viral RNA synthesis, as
revealed by in situ hybridization (Fig. 2) and further confirmed by the
findings that CD, which specifically disrupts actin microfilaments (40), inhibited viral RNA synthesis and RNP accumulation in cells (Fig. 4). Furthermore, double immunofluorescent labeling and
confocal microscopy revealed colocalization of RNP with the actin
microfilaments. Disruption of microfilaments with CD resulted in the
distribution of viral antigens together with the remnants of
microfilaments (Fig. 7). These results clearly indicate that the
polymeric form of actin is required for HPIV3 multiplication in
cells, which concurs with our previous observation that actin is
necessary for in vitro transcription by purified viral RNP (16).
The requirement for specific proteins of the CSK framework in the
transcription of paramyxoviruses in vitro have been well documented
(16, 21, 25, 26, 30-32). For example, HPIV3 and respiratory
syncytial virus both require cellular actin for transcription of
genomic RNA in vitro (16, 26). In contrast, Sendai virus and
measles virus transcription was activated by tubulin (30,
31), while canine distemper virus required hsp70, which also
associates with the CSK framework (32). These findings strongly suggest that the CSK framework plays a role in viral gene
expression in vivo. The involvement of the CSK framework in the virus
life cycle has also been suggested, although indirectly, by several
other studies (10). For example, RNA and DNA viruses including Newcastle disease virus (24), measles virus
(5, 39), vesicular stomatitis virus (8), rubella
virus (6), vaccinia virus (12), and
Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus
(46) have been shown to interact with the CSK during their life cycle (46). Although this interaction is believed to be involved in various activities such as viral genome replication, assembly and release of progeny virions, and protein synthesis, its
critical role in the virus life cycle has not yet been established. The
HPIV3 system appears to be unique in that the actin microfilaments seem
to be directly involved in the viral RNA synthesis in vivo (Fig. 2 and
4). Actin microfilaments are one of the major components of the CSK
framework and are involved in such normal cellular processes as
adhesion, motility, division, and intracellular transport of
organelles (28, 35, 37, 38, 40). Our findings that CD
completely inhibited HPIV3 progeny virus release whereas intracellular RNP accumulation was inhibited by about 40% suggest that actin microfilaments are perhaps also involved in the maturation and budding of HPIV3. Thus, it would be interesting to elucidate the various steps of morphogenesis of the HPIV3 virion with reference to
its interaction with the CSK framework. Conversely, it is of interest
to determine whether other paramyxoviruses, such as Newcastle disease virus, utilize the CSK components, namely, actin, tubulin, or
vimentin for RNA synthesis.
Actin microfilaments have recently been shown to be involved in the
spread of vaccinia virus between cells (12).
Immunofluorescence and video microscopy revealed that virus particles
move through the tip of actin-rich projections that extends from an
infected cell into an uninfected cell. A similar role of the CSK in the cell-to-cell transmission of human immunodeficiency virus has been
demonstrated (34). It is therefore possible that HPIV3 not
only utilizes actin for RNA synthesis but also recruits and exploits
actin to facilitate the spread of virus from cell to cell. Our data
indicate that HPIV3 RNP-associated proteins maintain their association
with the CSK framework, beginning with their syntheses and at least up
to 16 h postinfection (Fig. 1). Thus, it seems that the viral
proteins, once attached to the CSK framework following infection, do
not leave this cytoarchitecture until budding. This intimate
relationship between the viral proteins and actin microfilaments
suggests that the microfilaments may also play a role in the
translation of HPIV3 mRNAs. Furthermore, it is apparent that the virus
contains a protein(s) that interacts directly or indirectly with actin.
It would therefore be interesting to determine whether actin binds to
NP, the RNA polymerase complex proteins L and P, or the RNP complex.
Alternatively, other cellular proteins such as
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and La protein, which have
recently been shown to interact with HPIV3 cis-acting RNA
elements and to be packaged within the matured virions, may be
involved in recruiting actin (19). Regarding the mode
of action of actin microfilaments, it is tempting to speculate that
these microfilaments form the sites of interaction between the viral
RNA polymerase and the putative host factor(s). Many cellular proteins,
including some transcription factors, interact with actin (3,
41), which may be exploited by the virus for its
transcription/replication without having the proteins packaged within
the virions. Given that actin alters the HPIV3 RNP structure from a
loosely coiled to a moderately condensed form (17), it may
facilitate the interaction between RNA polymerase and the putative host
factors even when they bind to cis-acting elements at some
distance apart on the genome template. Further studies on these
interactions will shed light on this important area of host-virus
interaction.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Laura Tripepi for secretarial assistance.
This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service grant
AI32027 (to A.K.B.)
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Molecular Biology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., NC20, Cleveland, OH 44195. Phone: (216) 444-0625. Fax: (216) 444-0512. E-mail: banerja{at}cesmtp.ccf.org.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Banerjee, A. K.
1987.
Transcription and replication of rhabdoviruses.
Microbiol. Rev.
51:66-87[Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Banerjee, A. K.,
S. Barik, and B. P. De.
1991.
Gene expression of non-segmented RNA viruses.
Pharmacol. Ther.
51:47-70[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Behrens, J.,
J. P. von Kries,
M. Kuhl,
L. Bruhn,
D. Wedlich,
R. Grosschedl, and W. Birchmeier.
1996.
Functional interaction of beta catenin with the transcription factor LEF-1.
Nature
382:638-642[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bell, P. B., Jr.,
M. Lindorth, and B. A. Fredriksson.
1988.
Preparation of cytoskeletons of cells in culture for high resolution scanning and scanning transmission electron microscopy.
Scanning Microsc.
2:1647-1661[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Bohn, W.,
G. Rutter,
H. Hohenberg,
K. Mannweiler, and P. Nobis.
1986.
Involvement of actin microfilaments in the budding of measles virus: studies on cytoskeletons of infected cells.
Virology
149:91-106[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Bowden, D. S.,
J. S. Pederson,
B. H. Toh, and E. G. Westaway.
1987.
Distribution by immunofluorescence of viral products and actin containing cytoskeletal filaments in rubella virus infected cells.
Arch. Virol.
92:211-219[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Brown, S. S., and J. A. Spudich.
1981.
Mechanism of action of cytochalasin: evidence that it binds to actin filament ends.
J. Cell Biol.
88:487-491[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Cervera, M.,
G. Dreyfuss, and S. Penman.
1981.
Messenger RNA is translated when associated with the cytoskeletal framework in normal and VSV-infected HeLa cells.
Cell
23:113-120[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Chomczynski, P., and N. Sacchi.
1987.
Single step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal. Biochem.
162:156-159[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Ciampor, F.
1988.
The role of cytoskeleton and nuclear matrix in virus replication.
Acta Virol.
32:168-189[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Collins, P. L.,
R. M. Chanock, and K. Mackintosh.
1996.
The paramyxovirus, p. 1205-1241. In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Virology.
Raven Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 12.
|
Cudmore, S.,
P. Cossart,
G. Griffiths, and M. Way.
1995.
Actin based motility of vaccinia virus.
Nature
378:636-638[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Damsky, C. H.,
J. B. Sheffield,
G. P. Tuszynski, and L. Warren.
1977.
Is there a role for actin in virus budding?
J. Cell Biol.
75:593[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
De, B. P., and A. K. Banerjee.
1985.
Requirements and functions of vesicular stomatitis virus L and NS proteins in transcription process in vitro.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
126:40-49[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
De, B. P.,
M. S. Galinski, and A. K. Banerjee.
1990.
Characterization of an in vitro system for the synthesis of mRNA from human parainfluenza virus type 3.
J. Virol.
64:1135-1142[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
De, B. P.,
A. Lesoon, and A. K. Banerjee.
1991.
Human parainfluenza virus type 3 transcription in vitro: role of cellular actin in mRNA synthesis.
J. Virol.
65:3268-3275[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
De, B. P.,
A. L. Burdsall, and A. K. Banerjee.
1993.
Role of cellular actin in human parainfluenza virus type 3 genome transcription.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:5703-5710[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
De, B. P.,
S. Gupta,
S. Gupta, and A. K. Banerjee.
1995.
Cellular protein kinase C regulates HPIV-3 replication.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:5204-5208[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
De, B. P.,
S. Gupta,
H. Zhao,
J. A. Drazba, and A. K. Banerjee.
1996.
Specific interaction in vitro and in vivo of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and LA protein with cis acting RNAs of human parainfluenza virus-3.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:24728-24735[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Galinski, M. S., and S. L. Wechsler.
1991.
The molecular biology of the Paramyxovirus genus, p. 41-82. In
D. W. Kingsbury (ed.), Paramyxoviruses
Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, N.Y.
|
| 21.
|
Garcia-Barreno, B.,
J. L. Jorcano,
T. Aukenbauer,
C. Lopez-Galindez, and J. A. Melero.
1988.
Participation of cytoskeletal intermediate filaments in the infectious cycle of human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).
Virus Res.
9:307-322[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Genty, N., and F. Bussereau.
1980.
Is cytoskeleton involved in vesicular stomatitis virus reproduction?
J. Virol.
34:777-781[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Griffin, J. A., and R. W. Compans.
1979.
Effect of cytochalasin B on maturation of enveloped viruses.
J. Exp. Med.
150:379-391[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Hamaguchi, M.,
K. Nishikawa,
T. Toyoda,
T. Yoshida,
T. Hanaichi, and Y. Nagai.
1985.
Transcriptive complex of Newcastle disease virus: structural and functional assembly associated with the cytoskeletal framework.
Virology
147:295-308[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Hill, V. M., and D. F. Summers.
1990.
A minor microtubule-associated protein is responsible for the stimulation of vesicular stomatitis virus transcription in vitro.
J. Virol.
71:289-298.
|
| 26.
|
Huang, Y. T.,
R. R. Romito,
B. P. De, and A. K. Banerjee.
1993.
Characterization of the in vitro system for the synthesis of mRNA from human respiratory syncitial virus.
Virology
193:862-867[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Kletzien, R. F., and J. F. Perdue.
1973.
The inhibition of sugar transport in chick embryo fibroblast by cytochalasin B. Evidence for a membrane-specific effect.
J. Biol. Chem.
248:711-719[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Korn, E. D.
1982.
Actin polymerization and its regulation by proteins in non-muscle cells.
Physiol. Rev.
62:672-737[Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
1970.
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature
227:680-685[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Moyer, S. A.,
S. C. Baker, and J. L. Lessard.
1986.
Tubulin: a factor necessary for the synthesis of both Sendai virus and vesicular stomatitis virus RNAs.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:5405-5409[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Moyer, S. A.,
S. C. Baker, and S. M. Horikami.
1990.
Host cell proteins required for measles virus reproduction.
J. Gen. Virol.
71:775-783[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Oglesbee, M. J.,
Z. Liu,
H. Kenney, and C. L. Brooks.
1996.
The highly inducible member of the 70kDa family of heat shock proteins increases canine distemper virus polymerase activity.
J. Gen. Virol.
77:2125-2135[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Ohmori, H.,
S. Toyama, and S. Toyama.
1992.
Direct proof that the primary site of action of cytochalasin on cell motility process is actin.
J. Cell Biol.
116:933-941[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Pearce-Pratt, R.,
D. Malamud, and D. M. Phillips.
1994.
Role of the cytoskeleton in cell-to-cell transmission of human immunodeficiency virus.
J. Virol.
68:2898-2905[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Pollard, T. D., and J. A. Cooper.
1986.
Actin and actin binding proteins. A critical evaluation of mechanisms and functions.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
55:987-1035[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Sasaki, H.,
M. Nakamura,
T. Ohiro,
Y. Matsuda,
Y. Yuda, and Y. Nonomura.
1995.
Myosin-actin interaction plays an important role in HIV-1 release from host cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:2026-2030[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Schliwa, M., and J. Van Jerklom.
1981.
Structural interaction of cytoskeletal components.
J. Cell Biol.
90:222-235[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Spooner, B. S.,
K. M. Yamada, and N. K. Wessels.
1971.
Microfilaments and cell locomotion.
J. Cell Biol.
49:595[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Stallcup, K. C.,
C. S. Raine, and B. N. Fields.
1983.
Cytochalasin B inhibits the maturation of measles virus.
Virology
124:59-74[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Sundell, C. L., and R. H. Singer.
1991.
Requirement of microfilament in sorting of actin messenger RNA.
Science
253:1275-1277[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Tanaka, Y.,
T. Watanabe,
N. Chiba,
M. Niki,
Y. Kuroiwa,
T. Nishihira,
S. Satomi,
Y. Ito, and M. Satake.
1997.
The protooncogene product, PEBP2beta/CBFbeta, is mainly located in the cytoplasm and has an affinity with the cytoskeletal structures.
Oncogene
15:677-683[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Tanenbaum, J.
1978.
Approaches to the molecular biology of cytochalasin action, p. 521-559. In
S. W. Tannenbaum (ed.), Cytochalasins: biochemical and biological aspects.
Elsevier/North-Holland, New York, N.Y.
|
| 43.
|
Toneguzzo, F., and H. P. Ghosh.
1976.
Characterization and translation of methylated and unmethylated vesicular stomatitis virus mRNA synthesized in vitro by ribonucleoprotein particles from vesicular stomatitis virus-infected cells.
J. Virol.
17:477-491[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Towbin, H.,
T. Staehelin, and J. Gordon.
1979.
Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:4350-4354[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Tyrrel, D. L. J., and A. Erhn.
1979.
Transmembrane communication in cells chronically infected with measles virus.
J. Cell Biol.
81:396[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Volkman, L. E.,
P. A. Goldsmith, and R. T. Hess.
1987.
Evidence for microfilament involvement in budded Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus production.
Virology
156:32-39.
|
| 47.
|
Wang, E.,
B. A. Wolf,
R. A. Lamb,
P. W. Choppin, and A. R. Goldberg.
1976.
The presence of actin in enveloped viruses, p. 589-599. In
R. Goldman, T. Pollard, and J. Rozenbaum (ed.), Cell motility.
Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
J Virol, April 1998, p. 2655-2662, Vol. 72, No. 4
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Fernandes, L. B., Henry, P. J., Goldie, R. G.
(2007). Review: Rho kinase as a therapeutic target in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ther Adv Respir Dis
1: 25-33
[Abstract]
-
Naito, T., Momose, F., Kawaguchi, A., Nagata, K.
(2007). Involvement of Hsp90 in Assembly and Nuclear Import of Influenza Virus RNA Polymerase Subunits. J. Virol.
81: 1339-1349
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stuart, A. D., Brown, T. D. K.
(2006). Entry of feline calicivirus is dependent on clathrin-mediated endocytosis and acidification in endosomes.. J. Virol.
80: 7500-7509
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bose, S., Kar, N., Maitra, R., DiDonato, J. A., Banerjee, A. K.
(2003). Temporal activation of NF-{kappa}B regulates an interferon-independent innate antiviral response against cytoplasmic RNA viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 10890-10895
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liu, M., Li, X.-L., Hassel, B. A.
(2003). Proteasomes Modulate Conjugation to the Ubiquitin-like Protein, ISG15. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 1594-1602
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Broering, T. J., Parker, J. S. L., Joyce, P. L., Kim, J., Nibert, M. L.
(2002). Mammalian Reovirus Nonstructural Protein {micro}NS Forms Large Inclusions and Colocalizes with Reovirus Microtubule-Associated Protein {micro}2 in Transfected Cells. J. Virol.
76: 8285-8297
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Parker, J. S. L., Broering, T. J., Kim, J., Higgins, D. E., Nibert, M. L.
(2002). Reovirus Core Protein {micro}2 Determines the Filamentous Morphology of Viral Inclusion Bodies by Interacting with and Stabilizing Microtubules. J. Virol.
76: 4483-4496
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Choudhary, S., Gao, J., Leaman, D. W., De, B. P.
(2001). Interferon Action against Human Parainfluenza Virus Type 3: Involvement of a Novel Antiviral Pathway in the Inhibition of Transcription. J. Virol.
75: 4823-4831
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bose, S., Malur, A., Banerjee, A. K.
(2001). Polarity of Human Parainfluenza Virus Type 3 Infection in Polarized Human Lung Epithelial A549 Cells: Role of Microfilament and Microtubule. J. Virol.
75: 1984-1989
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mas, P., Beachy, R. N.
(2000). Role of microtubules in the intracellular distribution of tobacco mosaic virus movement protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97: 12345-12349
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
De, B. P., Hoffman, M. A., Choudhary, S., Huntley, C. C., Banerjee, A. K.
(2000). Role of NH2- and COOH-Terminal Domains of the P Protein of Human Parainfluenza Virus Type 3 in Transcription and Replication. J. Virol.
74: 5886-5895
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Choudhary, S., De, B. P., Banerjee, A. K.
(2000). Specific Phosphorylated Forms of Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Associate with Human Parainfluenza Virus Type 3 and Inhibit Viral Transcription In Vitro. J. Virol.
74: 3634-3641
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Duprex, W. P., McQuaid, S., Rima, B. K.
(2000). Measles Virus-Induced Disruption of the Glial-Fibrillary-Acidic Protein Cytoskeleton in an Astrocytoma Cell Line (U-251). J. Virol.
74: 3874-3880
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ogino, T., Iwama, M., Kinouchi, J., Shibagaki, Y., Tsukamoto, T., Mizumoto, K.
(1999). Involvement of a Cellular Glycolytic Enzyme, Phosphoglycerate Kinase, in Sendai Virus Transcription. J. Biol. Chem.
274: 35999-36008
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
van der Meer, Y., Snijder, E. J., Dobbe, J. C., Schleich, S., Denison, M. R., Spaan, W. J. M., Locker, J. K.
(1999). Localization of Mouse Hepatitis Virus Nonstructural Proteins and RNA Synthesis Indicates a Role for Late Endosomes in Viral Replication. J. Virol.
73: 7641-7657
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bukrinskaya, A., Brichacek, B., Mann, A., Stevenson, M.
(1998). Establishment of a Functional Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Reverse Transcription Complex Involves the Cytoskeleton. JEM
188: 2113-2125
[Abstract]
[Full Text]