Previous Article | Next Article 
J Virol, March 1998, p. 2519-2525, Vol. 72, No. 3
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Extended Minus-Strand DNA as Template for R-U5-Mediated
Second-Strand Transfer in Recombinational Rescue of Primer Binding
Site-Modified Retroviral Vectors
Jacob Giehm
Mikkelsen,1
Anders H.
Lund,1
Karen
Dybkær,1
Mogens
Duch,1 and
Finn Skou
Pedersen1,2,*
Department of Molecular and Structural
Biology1 and
Department of Medical
Microbiology and Immunology,2 University of
Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
Received 14 August 1997/Accepted 13 November 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have previously demonstrated recombinational rescue of primer
binding site (PBS)-impaired Akv murine leukemia virus-based vectors
involving initial priming on endogenous viral sequences and template
switching during cDNA synthesis to obtain PBS complementarity in
second-strand transfer of reverse transcription (Mikkelsen et al.,
J. Virol. 70:1439-1447, 1996). By use of the same forced recombination system, we have now found recombinant proviruses of
different structures, suggesting that PBS knockout vectors may be
rescued through initial priming on endogenous virus RNA, read-through
of the mutated PBS during minus-strand synthesis, and subsequent
second-strand transfer mediated by the R-U5 complementarity of the plus
strand and the extended minus-strand DNA acceptor template. Mechanisms
for R-U5-mediated second-strand transfer and its possible role in
retrovirus replication and evolution are discussed.
 |
TEXT |
Retroviruses harbor a diploid
single-stranded RNA genome which constitutes the source for generation
of double-stranded DNA by reverse transcription. DNA synthesis is
initiated from the 3' end of a host-derived tRNA matching the
18-nucleotide primer binding site (PBS) located downstream from the U5
region. The resulting minus-strand strong-stop DNA is in turn
transferred to the 3' end of either one of the copackaged
RNAs. This first-strand transfer (or jump) is facilitated by the
complementarity of the terminal R regions and furthermore by the
reverse transcriptase RNase H-mediated degradation of 5' R and U5 RNA
in the RNA-DNA hybrid generated (3, 11, 29, 40, 57).
Minus-strand DNA molecules shorter than strong-stop DNA (designated
weak-stop DNA) are occasionally generated by premature termination and
strand transfer (2, 20, 21, 26, 44, 58, 67), indicating that
R-region homologies shorter than the entire length of R are sufficient
for transfer to occur. After transfer of weak- or strong-stop DNA,
minus-strand DNA synthesis advances toward the 5' end of the RNA
template. Plus-strand synthesis, which is primed from a purine-rich RNA
fragment upstream from the U3 region (18, 28, 45, 46), is
believed to proceed until the first modified tRNA nucleotide is
reached, leading to regeneration of the PBS matching the primer tRNA
(48, 56). The tRNA primer is subsequently removed by RNase
H-mediated degradation (5, 37, 50, 52). The complementarity
of the plus-strand 3' PBS obtained by copying the tRNA primer and the
minus-strand 3' PBS mediates the second-strand transfer (1,
10), and, finally, plus- and minus-strand syntheses are
completed.
Except for the apparent requirement for PBS complementarity in the
second jump of reverse transcription (10, 56, 58), little is
known about the transfer reaction and the acceptor template involved.
Clearly, correct strand transfer cannot occur before complementary
sequences have been copied during plus- and minus-strand synthesis
(58). In theory, such sequences may include not only the PBS
but also non-PBS sequences (22, 23, 36, 38, 41, 42) and, in
particular, the R-U5 region upstream from the PBS. Copying of the R-U5
region during minus-strand synthesis may depend on whether minus-strand
synthesis has been initiated from both PBSs in the genomic RNA dimer
(leading to degradation of R-U5 by RNase H) and whether read-through of
the PBS is influenced by potential tRNA occupancy of the PBS.
Copackaging of heterologous viral RNAs and a subsequent high rate of
recombination during reverse transcription have been demonstrated in
numerous studies (14-17, 39, 54, 55, 59, 66, 68). Reverse
transcription-mediated recombination may involve endogenous virus-like
elements, as seen in studies of various replication-defective
retroviral mutants (6, 7, 9, 31, 32, 34, 51). Endogenous
viral RNAs found to be encapsidated in virus particles (13, 32,
43, 49) may thus serve to provide the functional sequences
required for repair of deleterious viral mutations. Such
recombinational rescue mechanisms may include template shifting during
minus- or plus-strand DNA synthesis and may be influenced by the
character of the two strand transfers of reverse transcription
(39, 59, 66).
Forced recombination of PBS-modified vectors.
In agreement
with the essential role of the PBS in initiation and completion of
reverse transcription (35, 47, 62), we previously observed a
strong restriction in transduction of Akv murine leukemia virus (MLV)
vectors with PBSs having only partial (PBS-XXX) or no [PBS-UMU and
PBS-Met(i)int] homology with the 3' end of any known murine tRNA
molecule (32). In experiments based on virus production in
NIH 3T3 cell-derived packaging cell lines (
2 and
E) some of the
transduced proviruses were found to harbor sequences originating from
both vector and endogenous virus, suggesting that the impairment of the
PBS was circumvented in some cases by reverse transcription-mediated
minus-strand recombination with an endogenous virus containing a
functional PBS (32). Repair of PBS mutants involved
initiation of cDNA synthesis from the functional glutamine PBS of
copackaged MLV-like endogenous virus (MLEV) RNA, an interstrand
first-strand transfer followed by minus-strand synthesis through the
neo gene, and template shifting within the 5' untranslated
region (5' UTR) to allow for the interaction of complementary glutamine
PBS sequences during second-strand transfer. Hence, transduction of PBS
knockout vectors in a single-cycle transfer protocol, as delineated in
Fig. 1B, is performed under triple
selection for (i) reverse transcription initiation, (ii) second-strand
transfer, and (iii) expression of the neo gene (Fig. 1A). In
the present report, we focus on recombination-mediated transduction of
proviral sequences which have retained the original, mutationally
impaired PBS (referred to as type 2 proviruses in reference
32).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Principles of forced recombination. (A) Nonfunctional
PBS sequences introduced into Akv MLV-based vectors harboring the
neomycin resistance gene (neo). Selection for (i) initiation
of minus-strand synthesis, (ii) successful second-strand transfer, and
(iii) expression of the marker gene represents an effective selection
pressure that allows for detection of recombinational vector rescue.
(B) Experimental approach. PBS-modified vectors in a single-cycle
vector replication protocol were investigated utilizing NIH 3T3-derived
virus producer cells and NIH 3T3 target cells. Three different
PBS-modified constructs were utilized, harboring PBS sequences that
were designed to unlikely match the 3' end of any known murine tRNA
molecule (32). The PBS sequences introduced included PBS-XXX
(retaining the nucleotides complementing the tRNA CCA tail), PBS-UMU
(in which all of the wild-type PBS positions were altered), and
PBS-Met(i)int (matching an internal fragment of
tRNAiMet suggested to serve as a primer in
Drosophila copia retrotransposon replication
[19]). G418-resistant colonies were cloned and
subjected to sequence analysis in order to elucidate individual
transduction pathways. Genomic DNAs from G418-resistant clones were
prepared as previously described (27). -2
(30), E (33), and NIH 3T3 cells were cultured,
and transfections and virus infections were performed as previously
described (27, 32).
|
|
Sequence analysis of transduced PBS and LTR sequences.
Transduced G418-resistant NIH 3T3 target cells from five
different series of virus transfer experiments (more than 80 clones altogether) were individually screened by PCR to detect
proviruses resulting from recombination of the vector with MLEV.
Initially, the origin of the PBS was determined by sequence analysis of
a 1.37-kb PCR fragment spanning U3, R, U5, PBS, the 5' UTR, and part of
the neo gene; the proviruses harboring the original, mutated PBS were subjected to further analysis. According to the model for
reverse transcription (10), the minus-strand strong-stop DNA
containing the R and U5 regions copied during minus-strand strong-stop
synthesis is transferred to the 3' end of the genome in the first jump
of reverse transcription. Therefore, we then tested by PCR
amplification and subsequent sequence analysis whether the 3' long
terminal repeat (LTR) of mutant PBS-harboring subclones contained
non-Akv sequences. The PCR was performed with a neo primer
and a primer specifically recognizing the MLEV molecular marker XIV
(Fig. 2A). Indeed, in four cases (clones
P3, T1.2, KL#19, and 33E) we found the specific MLEV pattern of
scattered molecular differences from Akv (Fig. 2A, lower panel). In
contrast to the R and U5 regions, the U3 region was found to be
identical to Akv U3. These findings indicated that transduction of at
least some of the type 2 proviruses involved initiation of reverse
transcription on the functional glutamine PBS of MLEV.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Origin of nucleotide sequences in 5' and 3' LTRs of
transduced vectors harboring the modified PBS. (A) 5' and 3' LTR
sequences of four transduced proviruses containing the original
nonfunctional PBS. P3 and T1.2 contained PBS-XXX, whereas KL#19 and 33E
harbored PBS-UMU and PBS-Met(i)int, respectively. Akv and MLEV
sequences are shown at the top and bottom of the alignments,
respectively. The U5 and PBS of the MLEV sequence have been determined
by various PCR-based sequence approaches as previously described
(32); the sequences of MLEV R and U3 were identified in an
alternative series of experiments as part of chimeric 3' LTRs in
recombinant proviruses. Hence, the MLEV sequence listed in both
alignments consists of R-U5 from the upstream LTR and U3 from the
downstream LTR of the endogenous provirus. Nucleotides homologous to
positions in Akv are indicated by hyphens; nucleotides different from
those for Akv are indicated in the MLEV sequence. Nucleotide insertions
in Akv and MLEV are indicated by the introduction of colons in MLEV and
Akv sequences, respectively. Single nucleotide differences or clusters
of differences between Akv and MLEV are underlined and designated I to
XIV, as indicated below the MLEV sequence (molecular markers XII to XIV
correspond to markers I to III in reference 32).
U3-R and R-U5 borders are indicated above the Akv sequence. In the
lower panel (3' LTR), the 3' flanking sequences are listed for clones
P3, KL#19, and 33E. For comparison, the PBS-Gln2 sequence is listed
below the flanking sequences. N, nonidentified nucleotide positions;
ND, not determined. (B) Schematic representation of sequence data. All
proviruses shown harbored R and U5 of MLEV origin in the 3' LTR. Clones
P3 and T1.2 harbored MLEV molecular markers IX to XIII in the 5' LTR R
and U5 regions; the 5' LTR of KL#19 did not contain sequences of MLEV
origin, whereas clone 33E contained all 5' R-U5 MLEV markers (IX to
XIV). The primers used in PCR amplification (primer sets ON1-ON2 and
ON6-ON7 [indicated by black arrows]) and sequencing (primers ON3,
ON4, and ON5 [indicated by open arrows]) are indicated below the P3
provirus.
|
|
The sequence of the 5' LTR in the four relevant proviruses indicated a
complex transduction mechanism. The four clones thus
contained three
distinct 5' LTRs (Fig.
2A, upper panel); clone
KL#19 contained 5' LTR
sequences strictly of Akv vector origin,
whereas clone 33E harbored a
chimeric 5' LTR in which the R and
U5 regions contained all six MLEV
molecular markers (markers IX
to XIV). Clones P3 and T1.2 contained
markers IX through XIII
of MLEV origin and marker XIV of vector origin.
All sequence data
are summarized in Fig.
2B.
In conclusion, the structures of the transduced recombinants harboring
the marker gene suggest a transfer mechanism involving
initiation of
minus-strand synthesis at PBS-Gln of copackaged
MLEV RNA. Rescue by
utilization of the functional glutamine PBS
as a substitute for the
impaired PBS, therefore, provides a tool
to specifically study
plus-strand transfer based on non-PBS complementary
sequences. It is
noteworthy that our data also show that the rescue
mechanism involved
leads to the generation of proviruses, which
do not contain identical
5' and 3' LTR sequences.
Model for alternative recombinational vector rescue.
In our
previous work, we observed that type 1 PBS-Gln-containing proviruses
are generated through 5' UTR minus-strand recombination-based patch
repair of PBS-impaired vectors (Fig. 3A)
(32). Based on the observations presented here, we propose
that PBS-modified vectors are alternatively rescued through an
initial priming on the copackaged MLEV followed by interstrand
minus-strand transfer and minus-strand synthesis through the
neo gene and the impaired PBS.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Models for recombinational rescue of PBS-modified
vectors. (A) RT-mediated minus-strand recombination within the 5'
untranslated region. 1, initiation of reverse transcription on MLEV
which harbors a functional glutamine PBS; 2, minus-strand transfer to
the vector 3' end and cDNA synthesis through the neo gene
(template shifting within the 5' UTR allows for correct PBS
complementarity in plus-strand transfer); 3, glutamine tRNA copied in
plus-strand synthesis prior to the second jump of reverse
transcription; 4, the resulting Akv-MLEV chimeric provirus harboring
the MLEV glutamine PBS. (B) RT-mediated recombination involving an
R-U5-mediated second-strand transfer. 1, initiation of reverse
transcription on MLEV; 2, minus-strand transfer to the 3' end of vector
RNA and minus-strand synthesis through the PBS to the 5' end of the
vector RNA; 3, generation of the 3' R-U5 single-stranded DNA tail
allowing for plus-strand transfer; 4, various Akv-MLEV molecular marker
patterns that as a result may be observed in 5' R and U5 (3' R and U5
are strictly of MLEV origin). Dotted boxes, mutated PBS (PBS-Mut);
hatched boxes, glutamine PBS (PBS-Gln); thin lines, RNA; thick lines,
DNA; dotted lines, DNA synthesis prior to second-strand transfer.
|
|
Concomitantly, plus-strand DNA is generated and transferred to
complementary minus-strand R-U5 sequences. As such, generation
of a
minus-strand DNA 3' R-U5 tail allows for alternative plus-strand
transfer potentially leading to Akv-MLEV heteroduplex DNA formation
in
the 5' LTR R and U5 regions. However, none of the four clones
contained
mixed 5' LTR marker positions, most likely reflecting
that mismatches
were corrected prior to cell division by cellular
DNA mismatch repair
(
42) or that one of the daughter cells of
the infected cell
had died after the first cell division (
12).
Alternatively,
base pairing of growing minus- and plus-strand
3' ends may involve only
a limited region of complementarity (see
discussion below) that may not
lead to heteroduplex formation
at any marker position. Our data suggest
that proviruses P3 and
T1.2 result from second-strand transfer between
markers XIII and
XIV, whereas all MLEV markers have been copied prior
to strand
transfer in 33E. For KL#19, which harbors only Akv markers in
the 5' LTR, we cannot delineate whether strand transfer occurred
prior
to copying of MLEV marker IX or whether the proviral structure
is the
result of daughter cell death or correction after the Akv
strand. We
designate the alternative pathway for recombinational
rescue
R-U5-mediated second-strand transfer recombination (Fig.
3B).
R-U5-mediated second-strand transfer.
According to the
currently recognized model for reverse transcription of retroviral RNA
(10), the PBS copied during generation of full-length
plus-strand strong-stop DNA is unmasked by degradation of the tRNA
template by reverse transcriptase RNase H activity (5, 10, 37,
52), thereby allowing for subsequent PBS-mediated second-strand
transfer. In R-U5-mediated second-strand transfer transduction, in
contrast, strand transfer does not involve complementary PBS sequences.
Therefore, we were faced with the challenge of modeling unconventional
second-strand transfer of a nascent or partly degraded plus strand
being part of a DNA-DNA duplex to a nascent or possibly complete
R-U5-extended minus-strand DNA.
Considering the structural features of the circular RNA-DNA
intermediate in reverse transcription and the time course of minus-
and
plus-strand synthesis, we propose three distinct models for
non-PBS-mediated plus-strand transfer (Fig.
4). The suggested
models are based on the
assumption that minus-strand synthesis
is completed before plus-strand
synthesis (model I), that full-length
plus-strand strong-stop DNA is
generated before completion of
minus-strand synthesis (model II), or
that strand transfer is
mediated by the interaction of nascent minus
and plus strands
(model III). In model I, transfer of an incomplete
plus-strand
DNA may be the result of a reverse transcriptase-mediated
template
switch in which the nascent plus strand is transferred to the
completed minus strand, the template for continued plus-strand
synthesis. This mechanism would require exposure of R-U5 sequences
by
limited unwinding of the DNA-DNA duplex mediated potentially
by the
reverse transcriptase (
8) or by the nucleocapsid protein
which recently has been shown to facilitate DNA duplex melting
(
60). Model II, in contrast, implies that the 3' end of the
nascent minus strand invades the DNA duplex containing complete
plus-strand strong-stop DNA. Hence, this transfer mechanism involves
partial degradation of the plus strand, allowing for continued
plus-strand synthesis through the modified PBS sequence. Alternatively,
the template for the growing plus strand may be displaced by the
nascent minus strand, thereby mediating premature plus-strand
transfer
(model III). Although minus-strand-mediated displacement
may also
require limited unwinding of the DNA duplex, models II
and III are in
accordance with the fact that the invading minus
strand is unmasked by
RNase H degradation of the RNA template
and are moreover in accordance
with in vitro studies demonstrating
an extensive DNA duplex
displacement capacity of the Moloney MLV
reverse transcriptase
apparently coupled to minus-strand DNA synthesis
(
64).
Furthermore, in agreement with models II and III, it appears
from
previous studies that plus-strand synthesis is initiated
prior to
completion of the minus strand (
4,
24,
25). However,
in the
present study based on molecular markers within relevant
regions, we
cannot distinguish among the models discussed.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Models for R-U5-mediated second-strand transfer. Model
I, plus-strand template shifting. Plus-strand synthesis is initiated
from the polypurine tract (PPT) with complete minus-strand DNA as the
template; a circular DNA intermediate is generated based on R-U5
complementarity subsequent to limited DNA duplex unwinding and
plus-strand crossover within the R-U5 region. Model II, DNA duplex
invasion by nascent minus strand; conventional tRNA primer removal
during plus-strand strong-stop synthesis. Degradation of plus-strand
strong-stop 3'-terminal sequences copied from the glutamine tRNA is
required for continued plus-strand synthesis. Model III,
minus-strand-mediated displacement of plus-strand template. DNA duplex
unwound concomitantly with polymerization at the 3' end of nascent
minus-strand DNA. Thin and thick lines, RNA and DNA strands,
respectively; arrows, ongoing polymerization; vertical dotted lines,
recombinational crossover events; black dots (in model II), degraded
plus-strand DNA; PBS-Mut, mutated vector PBS.
|
|
Our observations support previous studies of spleen necrosis virus
(
38,
41,
42) and Rous sarcoma virus (
36)
indicating
that plus-strand synthesis may occasionally terminate
prematurely
either within the PBS of the primer tRNA or within regions
upstream
from the tRNA primer. Importantly, in work by Pulsinelli and
Temin
(
41), one class of PBS-deleted proviruses was found
most likely
to arise from an aberrant premature plus-strand transfer
apparently
caused by nucleotide misincorporation in the plus strand
prior
to strand transfer. Moreover, investigations of yeast Ty1
retrotransposon
replication have provided perhaps the most clear-cut
example of
premature plus-strand termination. Thus, it has been
demonstrated
that tRNA primer sequences are not inherited by Ty1
progeny during
replication (
22), suggesting that plus-strand
transfer in Ty1
reverse transcription is mediated by plus- and
minus-strand R-U5
complementary sequences. This observation correlates
with recent
findings which demonstrate that the 12 3' tRNA-templated
bases
of the full-length plus-strand strong-stop do not fully base pair
with the 10-bp Ty1 PBS (
23,
65). As a result, premature
plus-strand
transfers may be selectively seen in Ty1 replication.
tRNA removal in recombinational transduction mediated by
unconventional second-strand transfer.
Models I and III (Fig. 4)
predict that if the primer tRNA is removed (see below), it is removed
late in reverse transcription after synthesis of the complete plus
strand, since RNase H specifically degrades only RNA in DNA-RNA hybrids
(5) and, therefore, will not remove a tRNA that has not been
copied during plus-strand synthesis.
To test whether tRNA sequences could be found as part of the integrated
recombinant proviruses downstream from the 3' LTR,
we performed
sequence analysis of the unknown DNA flanking the
downstream proviral
LTR. Flanking DNA was amplified by a two-step
semirandomly primed PCR
approach (
53). Briefly, in the initial
PCR step, a specific
biotinylated primer matching Akv U3 and a
panel of degenerate primers
were utilized in a series of PCRs
performed with genomic DNA which had
previously been digested
with
PvuI (at a unique site
downstream from the Akv 5' LTR) to
avoid amplification of internal
proviral sequences. The PCR products
were purified and utilized as
templates in a second PCR in which
products of the initial PCR were
reamplified by using a nested
U3-specific primer together with a
linker-specific primer. The
resulting PCR products were purified and
sequenced. As shown in
Fig.
2A (lower panel), we were not able to
detect sequences originating
from the primer tRNA in the flanking
regions in any of the clones
analyzed, suggesting that the tRNA had
been removed correctly
before viral integration. Therefore, we propose,
in cases of premature
plus-strand transfer (models I and III), that the
tRNA primer
is removed subsequent to second-strand transfer after
completion
of viral DNA synthesis. However, it is noteworthy that such
late
tRNA removal would result in the generation of a single-stranded
18-nucleotide 3' extension that may be degraded by cellular nucleases
prior to integration or by the integrase during the process of
integration. Support for the latter explanation comes from in
vitro
studies by Vink et al. (
61), who found that human
immunodeficiency
virus type 1 substrates with single-stranded
6-deoxyribonucleotide
extensions 3' of the CA sequence could be cleaved
and integrated
by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase. It
should also
be noted that if our data reflect strand invasion by the
growing
minus strand (model II [Fig.
4]), the tRNA would be removed
conventionally
after completion of plus-strand strong-stop DNA.
R-U5 second-strand transfer in MLV replication.
The question
of whether transfer of an incomplete or degraded plus strand is a
frequent event in MLV reverse transcription or is seen here only as a
result of a marked selection pressure remains. Since specific PBS-tRNA
interactions are of major importance in MLV primer selection
(27), we do not expect any tRNA to bind the modified PBS in
our recombination system based on PBS nonfunctionality. Consequently,
cDNA synthesis is not initiated on the vector RNA and, moreover,
potential tRNA binding will not interfere with PBS read-through during
cDNA synthesis. The result is a minus-strand 3' R-U5 extension
generated due to the lack of RNase H-mediated RNA degradation
subsequent to minus-strand strong-stop synthesis. Evidence has not been
provided that both PBS sequences in a wild-type virus are bound by
their matching tRNAs. Indeed, studies by Whitcomb et al.
(63) have demonstrated that approximately 70% of the avian
leukosis virus PBS sequences are occupied by matching tRNA primers,
thus suggesting that minus-strand DNA synthesis is initiated from only
part of the PBS sequences in a virus population. Therefore, we cannot
exclude the possibility that interstrand minus-strand transfer in
reverse transcription sometimes is followed by an intrastrand
non-PBS-mediated plus-strand transfer. It was recently demonstrated
that genetically distinct retroviruses having similar PBS sequences may
recombine in vivo (66). Interestingly, R-U5-mediated second-strand transfer, as described in the present report, may allow
for recombination of distinct retroviral species that differ within the
PBS region but that have some homology within the R-U5 region. Hence,
generation and transfer of incomplete plus-strand DNA, which were here
selectively seen in reverse transcriptase-mediated recombinational
rescue of PBS-impaired retroviruses, may play a role in retrovirus
replication and evolution.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by the Danish Biotechnology Programme, the
Danish Cancer Society, the Novo Foundation, the Danish Natural Sciences
Research Council, the Karen Elise Jensen Foundation, and contracts
Biotech CT95-0100 and Biomed2 CT95-0675 of the European Commission.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Molecular and Structural Biology, University of Aarhus, C. F. Moellers Allé, Bldg. 130, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark. Phone: 45 89423188. Fax: 45 86196500. E-mail: fsp{at}mbio.aau.dk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ben-Artzi, H.,
J. Shemesh,
E. Zeelon,
B. Amit,
L. Kleiman,
M. Gorecki, and A. Panet.
1996.
Molecular analysis of the second template switch during reverse transcription of the HIV RNA template.
Biochemistry
35:10549-10557[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Berkhout, B.,
J. van Wamel, and B. Klaver.
1995.
Requirements for DNA strand transfer during reverse transcription in mutant HIV-1 virions.
J. Mol. Biol.
252:59-69[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Blain, S. W., and S. P. Goff.
1995.
Effects on DNA synthesis and translocation caused by mutations in the RNase H domain of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase.
J. Virol.
69:4440-4452[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Boone, L. R., and A. M. Skalka.
1981.
Viral DNA synthesized in vitro by avian retrovirus particles permeabilized with melittin. I. Kinetics of synthesis and size of minus- and plus-strand transcripts.
J. Virol.
37:109-116[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Champoux, J. J.
1993.
Roles of ribonuclease H in reverse transcription, p. 103-117. In
A. M. Skalka, and S. P. Goff (ed.), Reverse transcriptase.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 6.
|
Colicelli, J., and S. P. Goff.
1987.
Identification of endogenous retroviral sequences as potential donors for recombinational repair of mutant retroviruses: positions of crossover points.
Virology
160:518-522[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Colicelli, J., and S. P. Goff.
1987.
Isolation of a recombinant murine leukemia virus utilizing a new primer tRNA.
J. Virol.
57:37-45.
|
| 8.
|
Collett, M. S.,
J. P. Leis,
M. S. Smith, and A. J. Faras.
1978.
Unwinding-like activity associated with avian retrovirus RNA-directed DNA polymerase.
J. Virol.
26:498-509[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
DiFronzo, N. L., and C. A. Holland.
1993.
A direct demonstration of recombination between an injected virus and endogenous viral sequences, resulting in the generation of mink cell focus-inducing viruses in AKR mice.
J. Virol.
67:3763-3770[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Gilboa, E.,
S. W. Mitra,
S. Goff, and D. Baltimore.
1979.
A detailed model of reverse transcription and tests of crucial aspects.
Cell
18:93-100[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Götte, M.,
S. Fackler,
T. Hermann,
E. Perola,
L. Cellai,
H. J. Gross,
S. F. J. Le Grice, and H. Heumann.
1995.
HIV-1 reverse transcriptase-associated RNase H cleaves RNA/RNA in arrested complexes: implications for the mechanism by which RNase H discriminates between RNA/RNA and RNA/DNA.
EMBO J.
14:833-841[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Hajihosseini, M.,
L. Lavachev, and J. Price.
1993.
Evidence that retroviruses integrate into post-replication host DNA.
EMBO J.
12:4969-4974[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Hatzoglou, M.,
C. P. Hodgson,
F. Mularo, and R. W. Hanson.
1990.
Efficient packaging of a specific VL30 retroelement by 2 cells which produce MoMLV recombinant retroviruses.
Hum. Gene Ther.
1:385-397[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Hu, W.-S., and H. M. Temin.
1990.
Genetic consequences of packaging two RNA genomes in one retroviral particle: pseudoploidy and high rate of genetic recombination.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:1556-1560[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Hu, W.-S., and H. M. Temin.
1990.
Retroviral recombination and reverse transcription.
Science
250:1227-1233[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Hu, W.-S., and H. M. Temin.
1992.
Effect of gamma radiation on retroviral recombination.
J. Virol.
66:4457-4463[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Hu, W.-S.,
E. H. Bowman,
K. A. Delviks, and V. K. Pathak.
1997.
Homologous recombination occurs in a distinct retroviral subpopulation and exhibits high negative interference.
J. Virol.
71:6028-6036[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Huber, H. E., and C. C. Richardson.
1990.
Processing of the primer for plus strand DNA synthesis by human immunodeficiency virus 1 reverse transcriptase.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:10565-10573[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Kikuchi, Y.,
Y. Ando, and T. Shiba.
1986.
Unusual priming mechanism of RNA-directed DNA synthesis in copia retrovirus-like particles of Drosophila.
Nature (London)
323:824-826[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Klaver, B., and B. Berkhout.
1994.
Premature strand transfer by the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase during strong-stop DNA synthesis.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:137-144[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Kulpa, D.,
R. Topping, and A. Telesnitsky.
1997.
Determination of the site of first strand transfer during Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcription and identification of strand transfer-associated reverse transcriptase errors.
EMBO J.
16:856-865[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Lauermann, V., and J. D. Boeke.
1994.
The primer tRNA sequence is not inherited during Ty1 retrotransposition.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:9847-9851[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Lauermann, V.,
K. Nam,
J. Trambley, and J. D. Boeke.
1995.
Plus-strand strong-stop DNA synthesis in retrotransposon Ty1.
J. Virol.
69:7845-7850[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Lee, Y. M. H., and J. M. Coffin.
1991.
Relationship of avian retrovirus DNA synthesis to integration in vitro.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:1419-1430[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Li, P.,
A. J. Stephenson,
L. J. Kuiper, and C. J. Burrell.
1993.
Double-stranded strong-stop DNA and the second template switch in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) DNA synthesis.
Virology
194:82-88[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Lobel, L. I., and S. P. Goff.
1985.
Reverse transcription of retroviral genomes: mutations in the terminal repeat sequences.
J. Virol.
53:447-455[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Lund, A. H.,
M. Duch,
J. Lovmand,
P. Jørgensen, and F. S. Pedersen.
1993.
Mutated primer binding sites interacting with different tRNAs allow efficient murine leukemia virus replication.
J. Virol.
67:7125-7130[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Luo, G.,
L. Sharmeen, and J. Taylor.
1990.
Specificities involved in the initiation of retroviral plus-strand DNA.
J. Virol.
64:592-597[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Luo, G., and J. Taylor.
1990.
Template switching by reverse transcriptase during DNA synthesis.
J. Virol.
64:4321-4328[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Mann, R.,
R. C. Mulligan, and D. Baltimore.
1983.
Construction of a retrovirus packaging mutant and its use to produce helper-free defective retrovirus.
Cell
33:153-159[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Martinelli, S. C., and S. P. Goff.
1990.
Rapid reversion of a deletion mutation in Moloney murine leukemia virus by recombination with a closely related endogenous provirus.
Virology
174:135-144[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Mikkelsen, J. G.,
A. H. Lund,
K. D. Kristensen,
M. Duch,
M. S. Sørensen,
P. Jørgensen, and F. S. Pedersen.
1996.
A preferred region for recombinational patch repair in the 5' untranslated region of primer binding site-impaired murine leukemia virus vectors.
J. Virol.
70:1439-1447[Abstract].
|
| 33.
|
Morgenstern, J. P., and H. Land.
1990.
Advanced mammalian gene transfer: high titre retroviral vectors with multiple drug resistance markers and a complementary helper-free packaging cell line.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:3587-3596[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Murphy, J. E., and S. P. Goff.
1994.
Forced integration of Moloney murine leukemia virus DNA with a mutant integration site occurs through recombination with VL30 DNA.
Virology
204:458-461[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Nagashunmugam, T.,
A. Velpandi,
C. S. Goldsmith,
S. R. Zaki,
V. S. Kalyanaraman, and S. Srinivasan.
1992.
Mutation in the primer binding site of the type 1 human immunodeficiency virus genome affects virus production and infectivity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:4114-4118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Olsen, J. C.,
C. Bova-Hill,
D. P. Grandgenett,
T. P. Quinn,
J. P. Manfredi, and R. Swanstrom.
1990.
Rearrangements in unintegrated retroviral DNAs are complex and are the result of multiple genetic determinants.
J. Virol.
64:5475-5484[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Omer, C. A., and A. J. Faras.
1982.
Mechanism of release of the avian retrovirus tRNATrp primer molecule from viral DNA by ribonuclease H during reverse transcription.
Cell
30:797-805[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
O'Rear, J. J., and H. M. Temin.
1982.
Spontaneous changes in nucleotide sequence in proviruses of spleen necrosis virus, an avian retrovirus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79:1230-1234[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Panganiban, A. T., and D. Fiore.
1988.
Ordered interstrand and intrastrand DNA transfer during reverse transcription.
Science
241:1064-1069[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Peliska, J. A., and S. J. Benkovic.
1992.
Mechanism of DNA strand transfer reactions catalyzed by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.
Science
258:1112-1118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Pulsinelli, G. A., and H. M. Temin.
1991.
Characterization of large deletions occurring during a single round of retrovirus vector replication: novel deletion mechanism involving errors in strand transfer.
J. Virol.
65:4786-4797[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Pulsinelli, G. A., and H. M. Temin.
1994.
High rate of mismatch extension during reverse transcription in an single round of retrovirus replication.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:9490-9494[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Purcell, D. F.,
C. M. Broscius,
E. F. Vanin,
C. E. Buckler,
A. W. Nienhuis, and M. A. Martin.
1996.
An array of murine leukemia virus-related elements is transmitted and expressed in a primate recipient of retroviral gene transfer.
J. Virol.
70:887-897[Abstract].
|
| 44.
|
Ramsey, C. A., and A. T. Panganiban.
1993.
Replication of the retroviral terminal repeat sequence during in vivo reverse transcription.
J. Virol.
67:4114-4121[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Rattray, A. J., and J. J. Champoux.
1987.
The role of Moloney murine leukemia virus RNase H activity in the formation of plus-strand primers.
J. Virol.
61:2843-2851[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Resnick, R.,
C. A. Omer, and A. J. Faras.
1984.
Involvement of retrovirus reverse transcriptase-associated RNase H in the initiation of strong-stop (+) DNA synthesis and the generation of the long terminal repeat.
J. Virol.
51:813-821[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Rhim, H.,
J. Park, and C. D. Morrow.
1991.
Deletions in the tRNALys primer-binding site of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 identify essential regions for reverse transcription.
J. Virol.
65:4555-4564[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Roth, M. J.,
P. L. Schwartzberg, and S. P. Goff.
1989.
Structure of the termini of DNA intermediates in the integration of retroviral DNA: dependence on IN function and termini DNA sequence.
Cell
58:47-54[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Scadden, D. T.,
B. Fuller, and J. M. Cunningham.
1990.
Human cells infected with retrovirus vectors acquire an endogenous murine provirus.
J. Virol.
64:424-427[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Schultz, S. J.,
S. H. Whiting, and J. J. Champoux.
1995.
Cleavage specificities of Moloney murine leukemia virus RNase H implicated in the second strand transfer during reverse transcription.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:24135-24145[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Schwartzberg, P.,
J. Colicelli, and S. P. Goff.
1985.
Recombination between a defective retrovirus and homologous sequences in host DNA: reversion by patch repair.
J. Virol.
53:719-726[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Smith, C. M.,
W. B. Potts III,
J. S. Smith, and M. J. Roth.
1997.
RNase H cleavage of tRNAPro mediated by M-MuLV and HIV-1 reverse transcriptases.
Virology
229:437-446[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Sørensen, A. B.,
M. Duch,
P. Jørgensen, and F. S. Pedersen.
1993.
Amplification and sequence analysis of DNA flanking integrated proviruses by a simple two-step polymerase chain reaction method.
J. Virol.
67:7118-7124[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Stuhlmann, H., and P. Berg.
1992.
Homologous recombination of copackaged retrovirus RNAs during reverse transcription.
J. Virol.
66:2378-2388[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Swain, A., and J. M. Coffin.
1992.
Mechanism of transduction by retroviruses.
Science
255:841-845[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Swanstrom, R.,
J. M. Bishop, and H. E. Varmus.
1982.
Structure of a replication intermediate in the synthesis of Rous sarcoma virus DNA in vivo.
J. Virol.
42:337-341[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Tanese, N.,
A. Telesnitsky, and S. P. Goff.
1991.
Abortive reverse transcription by mutants of Moloney murine leukemia virus deficient in the reverse transcriptase-associated RNase H function.
J. Virol.
65:4387-4397[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Telesnitsky, A., and S. P. Goff.
1993.
Strong-stop strand transfer during reverse transcription, p. 49-84. In
A. M. Skalka, and S. P. Goff (ed.), Reverse transcriptase.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 59.
|
Temin, H. M.
1993.
Retrovirus variation and reverse transcription: abnormal strand transfers result in retrovirus genetic variation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:6900-6903[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 60.
|
Tsuchihashi, Z., and P. O. Brown.
1994.
DNA strand exchange and selective DNA annealing promoted by the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid protein.
J. Virol.
68:5863-5870[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61.
|
Vink, C.,
D. C. van Gent,
Y. Elgersma, and R. H. A. Plasterk.
1991.
Human immunodeficiency virus integrase protein requires a subterminal position of its viral DNA recognition sequence for efficient cleavage.
J. Virol.
65:4636-4644[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 62.
|
Wakefield, J. K.,
H. Rhim, and C. D. Morrow.
1994.
Minimal sequence requirements of a functional human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primer binding site.
J. Virol.
68:1605-1614[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 63.
|
Whitcomb, J. M.,
B. A. Ortiz-Conde, and S. H. Hughes.
1995.
Replication of avian leukosis viruses with mutations at the primer binding site: use of alternative tRNAs as primers.
J. Virol.
69:6228-6238[Abstract].
|
| 64.
|
Whiting, S. H., and J. J. Champoux.
1994.
Strand displacement synthesis capability of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase.
J. Virol.
68:4747-4758[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 65.
|
Wilhelm, M.,
T. Heyman,
S. Friant, and F.-X. Wilhelm.
1997.
Heterogeneous terminal structure of Ty1 and Ty3 reverse transcripts.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25:2161-2166[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 66.
|
Yin, P. D., and W.-S. Hu.
1997.
RNAs from genetically distinct retroviruses can copackage and exchange genetic information in vivo.
J. Virol.
71:6237-6242[Abstract].
|
| 67.
|
Yin, P. D.,
V. K. Pathak,
A. E. Rowan,
R. J. Teufel II, and W.-S. Hu.
1997.
Utilization of non-homologous minus-strand DNA transfer to generate recombinant retroviruses.
J. Virol.
71:2487-2494[Abstract].
|
| 68.
|
Zhang, J., and H. M. Temin.
1993.
Rate and mechanism of nonhomologous recombination during a single cycle of retroviral replication.
Science
259:234-238[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
J Virol, March 1998, p. 2519-2525, Vol. 72, No. 3
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sakuragi, J.-I., Shioda, T., Panganiban, A. T.
(2001). Duplication of the Primary Encapsidation and Dimer Linkage Region of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 RNA Results in the Appearance of Monomeric RNA in Virions. J. Virol.
75: 2557-2565
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lund, A. H., Duch, M., Pedersen, F. S.
(2000). Selection of functional tRNA primers and primer binding site sequences from a retroviral combinatorial library: identification of new functional tRNA primers in murine leukemia virus replication. Nucleic Acids Res
28: 791-799
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mikkelsen, J. G., Lund, A. H., Duch, M., Pedersen, F. S.
(2000). Mutations of the Kissing-Loop Dimerization Sequence Influence the Site Specificity of Murine Leukemia Virus Recombination In Vivo. J. Virol.
74: 600-610
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mikkelsen, J. G., Lund, A. H., Duch, M., Pedersen, F. S.
(1999). Forced recombination of {Psi}-modified murine leukaemia virus-based vectors with murine leukaemia-like and VL30 murine endogenous retroviruses. J. Gen. Virol.
80: 2957-2967
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Delviks, K. A., Pathak, V. K.
(1999). Effect of Distance between Homologous Sequences and 3' Homology on the Frequency of Retroviral Reverse Transcriptase Template Switching. J. Virol.
73: 7923-7932
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mikkelsen, J. G., Lund, A. H., Duch, M., Pedersen, F. S.
(1998). Recombination in the 5' Leader of Murine Leukemia Virus Is Accurate and Influenced by Sequence Identity with a Strong Bias toward the Kissing-Loop Dimerization Region. J. Virol.
72: 6967-6978
[Abstract]
[Full Text]