Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
J Virol, March 1998, p. 2033-2039, Vol. 72, No. 3
Department of Biology, University of
California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0357
Received 25 September 1997/Accepted 19 November 1997
Previously, we reported that human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection
of fibroblasts markedly affects p53 and other regulatory proteins and
inhibits transit through the cell cycle (F. M. Jault, J.-M. Jault,
F. Ruchti, E. A. Fortunato, C. Clark, J. Corbeil, D. D. Richman, and D. H. Spector, J. Virol. 69:6697-6704, 1995). Although the p53 steady-state levels are elevated throughout the infection, evidence suggests that the ability of p53 to transactivate some of its downstream targets is compromised. To elucidate the mechanisms governing the accumulation of p53, we examined the synthesis, stability, and localization of the protein in HCMV-infected fibroblasts. Synthesis of p53 was not increased in the infected cells
during the first 24 h postinfection. In fact, pulse-chase experiments revealed that synthesis of p53 in infected fibroblasts was
lower than in mock-infected cells. However, after an initial decay, the
p53 was stabilized. In addition, beginning at approximately 30 h
postinfection, p53 was localized to discrete foci within the nuclei of
infected cells. The morphology of these foci suggested that they were
replication centers. We confirmed that these are sites of DNA
replication by demonstrating both incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine
and localization of UL44 (the viral polymerase processivity factor)
into these centers. The single-stranded DNA binding protein RPA was
also sequestered. In contrast, Rb and HCMV IE1 72 remained distributed
throughout the infected cell nuclei, indicating specific targeting of
certain proteins. Taken together, our results provide two alternative
mechanisms to account for the increased steady-state levels of p53
observed in HCMV-infected fibroblasts.
Beginning with the interaction of
viral particles with the plasma membrane, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)
disrupts the normal cellular functioning of the host cell. Initial
entry or contact of HCMV with the cell leads to a second messenger-type
response similar to what occurs during growth regulation via hormones
and/or growth factors (for a review, see reference
2). With the stimulation of expression of several
proteins involved in preparing the cell for DNA replication, including
the proto-oncogene products Fos, Jun, and Myc (4),
dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) (45), thymidine kinase
(14), DNA polymerase In addition to this block in transit, HCMV infection also results in
significant genotoxic effects to the infected cell. Major damage to the
cellular DNA, including breakage, deletions, and premature
condensation, is observed (1). Moreover, recent studies have
emphasized the mutagenic potential of the virus (3, 41). One
possible mechanism for inducing these genotoxic effects is the
interaction of the virus with the tumor suppressor protein p53, which
is involved in the regulation of the G1 and G2
cell cycle checkpoints (reviewed in reference 15).
Loss of p53 function is associated with a broad spectrum of human
cancers (19), and although mice lacking the p53 gene are
viable, they are susceptible to multiple types of tumors at a young age
(11).
Elevation of p53 protein levels is observed after several potentially
damaging events, including UV or gamma ray irradiation, exposure to
extreme heat, hypoxia, or starvation (reviewed in reference
28). These elevated levels of p53 can lead either to
cell cycle arrest, presumably to allow repair of damaged DNA, or to
apoptosis. p53 controls these two outcomes by sequence specific binding
to and transactivation of specific target genes, including those coding
for p21 (also known as WAF1 or CIP1) (13), GADD45 (27), cyclin G (36), IGF-BP3 (7), bax
(32), and mdm2 (25). In addition to p53's
regulation of the DNA damage response through transcriptional
activation of particular target genes, there is increasing evidence
that it participates in this response by binding to damaged regions
with its C-terminal domain and recruiting the repair machinery to the
site via protein-protein interactions. To this end, p53 directly
interacts with several proteins involved in nucleotide excision repair
and/or homologous recombination, including two of the RNA polymerase II
coactivator TFIIH components, XPB and XPD (47), CSB
(47), RAD51 (44), and the single-stranded DNA
binding protein RPA (12, 17, 31, 33, 44).
Several lines of evidence point to interactions between HCMV and p53.
As mentioned above, elevated steady-state levels of p53 are observed in
HCMV-infected fibroblasts by 24 h postinfection (hpi) (23,
34, 43). Like several other viruses, including simian virus 40 (SV40) (24), adenovirus (8, 52), hepatitis B
virus (46), and the high-risk-type human papillomaviruses (HPVs) (40, 49), HCMV encodes two proteins that can interact with p53: the mtrII oncoprotein (UL111a) (in vitro only)
(35) and the immediate early protein IE2 86 (UL122) (5,
43). Transient assays demonstrating downregulation of
p53-responsive promoters by coexpression of either mtrII or IE2 86 (35, 43) have led to speculation that interactions between
these two viral proteins and p53 block the latter's ability to
transactivate one of its main targets, p21 (6, 23). In
addition, there are reports that HCMV immediate early proteins IE1 72 and IE2 86 can block the induction of apoptosis (presumably p53
mediated) by tumor necrosis factor To better understand the effects of the HCMV-p53 interaction, we have
undertaken a study to determine the mechanism of p53 accumulation
within infected fibroblasts. We have investigated p53's stability and
subcellular localization and show in this work that the elevated
steady-state levels of p53 observed in infected fibroblasts are due not
to increased levels of synthesis but rather to a stabilization of the
protein. Moreover, there is a distinct sequestering of p53 into viral
replication centers within the nucleus which may also aid in p53
stabilization. p53 is localized to these viral replication centers as
early as 30 hpi and remains there throughout the duration of the
infection. The additional localization of RPA but not Rb into these
centers suggests a specific redistribution of certain nuclear proteins. Possible mechanisms by which HCMV alters the stability and localization of p53, as well as the role of these events in the viral life cycle,
are discussed.
Cells and virus.
Primary human foreskin fibroblasts were
obtained from the University of California, San Diego, Medical Center
and propagated in minimal essential medium with Earle's salts (MEM).
The cells were propagated in incubators maintained at 37°C and 5%
CO2, and the medium was supplemented with 10%
heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, L-glutamine (2 mM),
penicillin (200 U/ml), streptomycin (200 µg/ml), amphotericin B (1.5 µg/ml), and gentamicin sulfate (50 µg/ml). The Towne strain of HCMV
was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (VR 977) and
used at a multiplicity of infection of 5.
Cell cycle synchronization and infection conditions.
All
experiments using fibroblasts were performed under G0
synchronization conditions. Cells were seeded into flasks and allowed to become confluent. After 2 to 3 days at confluence, cells were reseeded onto 10-cm-diameter dishes at 106 cells/dish.
Approximately 1 h after plating, the medium was removed, and the
infection inoculum (either virus or an equivalent amount of
mock-conditioned medium, diluted 1:1 in fresh culture medium) was added
to the cells. At 6 hpi, the inoculum was removed, fresh culture medium
was added, and the cells were incubated for various times. All
experiments were performed at least twice, and data presented in the
present work are representative examples of those trials.
Western time course experiments.
Cells were synchronized,
plated, and infected as described above. At the desired time points,
cells were trypsinized, washed, and counted. Cells were then
resuspended in Laemmli reducing sample buffer (LRSB) (2% sodium
dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 10% glycerol, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 60 mM
Tris pH 6.8, bromophenol blue dye, aprotinin and leupeptin [2 µg/ml
each], and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [1 mM]) at a concentration
of 104 cells/µl of buffer. Cells were then sonicated,
boiled for 5 min, and spun at 16,000 × g for 10 min at
4°C to pellet any debris. Equal amounts of lysate (usually 25 to 30 µl) were then loaded onto an SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
minigel. Proteins were then transferred to Immobilon P (Millipore) and
detected with mouse anti-p53 primary antibody (Ab) (DO-1) (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology), followed by a goat anti-mouse secondary Ab conjugated
with horseradish peroxidase (Amersham). Proteins were visualized with
enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Pierce), used
according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Metabolic labeling and pulse-chase immunoprecipitations.
Cells were synchronized, plated, and infected as described above. Prior
to the radioactive pulse, normal culture medium was removed and cells
were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and refed with
MEM lacking methionine but supplemented with 10% dialyzed fetal bovine
serum. After 30 min, this starvation medium was removed and replaced
with 3 ml of the same medium supplemented with 300 µCi of
Tran35S label (ICN) per plate. For metabolic labeling,
cells were incubated in this labeling medium for a period of 2 h.
The cells were then harvested as described below. For pulse-chase
experiments, cells were incubated in labeling medium for 30 min and
then one set of plates was harvested (pulse) and the other plates were
washed twice with warm PBS, refed with normal culture medium
supplemented with 1 mM cold methionine, and incubated for various
lengths of time (chase). To harvest the cells, plates were washed twice
in cold PBS and the cells were then scraped in PBS and transferred to
15-ml conical tubes. Cells were pelleted at 4°C, resuspended in 1 ml
of cold PBS, and counted. Equal numbers of cells (approximately 5 × 105) were then pelleted and resuspended in 100 µl of
cold PBS. Three hundred microliters of RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris [pH
7.4], 120 mM NaCl, 0.1% deoxycholic acid, 2% Nonidet P-40, 0.2%
SDS, aprotinin and leupeptin [2 µg/ml each], and dithiothreitol and
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [1 mM each]) was added, and the cells
were sonicated for 2.5 min. After vortexing for an additional 10 min,
the lysate was cleared with a 16,000 × g spin and
transferred to a fresh tube containing an additional 600 µl of RIPA
buffer. After gentle mixing, an aliquot was removed for analysis of
total p53 concentration prior to incubation with Ab. The remaining
lysate was mixed with 20 µl of agarose-coupled DO-1 Ab (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology), an amount which we had determined would precipitate all
of the p53 in the sample, and rocked for 2 h at 4°C. After
incubation, 40 µl of a 50% protein A-Sepharose slurry was added, the
beads were pelleted, and another aliquot was removed for determination
of p53 concentration after incubation with Ab. The beads were washed three times in RIPA buffer, transferred to a fresh tube, and then washed once more. Proteins were eluted from the beads in LRSB and after
boiling were electrophoresed through an SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel.
Gels were stained and then subjected to fluorography, dried, and
autoradiographed. Quantitation of bands was performed with a
PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
Immunofluorescence.
Synchronized cells were seeded onto
glass coverslips and infected as described above. At the desired time
points, coverslips were washed twice in PBS and the cells were then
fixed in a 3% paraformaldehyde solution in PBS. After 10 min, this was
replaced with a 1% Triton X-100 solution in PBS. After a 5-min
incubation, the cells were rinsed three times in PBS and then stored at
4°C until all samples were taken. Coverslips were then incubated for 10 min in blocking solution (1% normal goat serum in PBS-0.2% gelatin), washed in PBS, and incubated with one of several mouse primary Abs diluted in PBS-0.2% gelatin for 10 min. After extensive washing in PBS, the cells were then incubated with a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary Ab (Jackson Labs)
(diluted in PBS-0.2% gelatin). Following more washes, the cells were
finally incubated in Hoechst dye (Calbiochem) for 2 min to illuminate
the DNA, washed and mounted onto slides using glycerol-paraphenylene
diamine (an antiphotobleaching agent). For analysis of replication,
cells were incubated for 30 min prior to harvesting at 48 hpi in
bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling mix diluted in normal media.
Coverslips were then harvested and fixed as described above. Prior to
Ab detection, these coverslips were incubated in 4 M HCl diluted in PBS
for 10 min to expose the BrdU residues. All slides were analyzed on a
Nikon EFD-3 flourescence microscope equipped with Neofluor objectives
and an MTT CCD2 camera, and images were captured by using NIH Image
1.59. Collected images were arranged and labeled by using Adobe
Photoshop 3.0 and Adobe Illustrator 6.0.2. Monoclonal Abs used for
fluorescence included commercially available anti-p53 (DO-1; Santa Cruz
Biotechnology), anti-Rb (G3-245; Pharmingen), antitrinitrophenol
(Pharmingen), and anti-BrdU (Boehringer Mannheim). Antibodies to HCMV
UL44 and IE1 72 were kind gifts from L. Pereira and W. Britt,
respectively. Anti-RPA was a kind gift from J. Wang. Note that attempts
to colocalize proteins by double labeling using other commercially
available Abs (raised in either rabbits or goats) proved unsuccessful
due to their lack of avidity and/or their binding by the virally
encoded immunoglobulin G Fc receptor-like protein.
RIPA buffer extractions.
Cells were harvested, counted, and
pelleted in aliquots of 5 × 105 cells/tube at 48 hpi.
The pellets were then resuspended in 10 µl of PBS, to which was added
50 µl of RIPA buffer. Parallel sets of tubes were processed; one with
and the other without a 2.5-min sonication before 10 min of vortexing.
Thirty microliters of 3× LRSB was added to the cleared lysates, and
the pelleted debris was resuspended in an equivalent amount of 1×
LRSB. Samples were boiled, and one half of each tube was loaded and
electrophoresed through an SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel and processed
as described above for Western time course experiments.
Increased steady-state levels of p53 in infected fibroblasts are
due to decreased degradation and not increased synthesis.
As we
had previously reported (23), infection of fibroblasts with
HCMV Towne strain induced elevated steady-state levels of p53 in
infected cells relative to mock infected cells 24 to 36 hpi (Fig.
1A). These elevated steady-state levels
could be due to an increase in the rate of synthesis and/or a decrease in the rate of degradation. In order to distinguish between these alternatives, we metabolically labeled cells every 2 h for the first 24 hpi and then again at 48 hpi. In our initial pilot
experiments, we found that resuspension in RIPA buffer alone was not
sufficient to extract all of the p53 from the infected cell nuclei
(Fig. 1B). We therefore incorporated an additional sonication step in our lysis procedure to ensure complete extraction. Even under these
extraction conditions, no burst of protein synthesis was found early in
the infection that could account for the increased steady-state levels.
A representative sample of these labelings is shown in Fig.
2A. In fact, when cells were
pulse-labeled for 30 min at 48 hpi, we found that the synthesis levels
of p53 in the infected cells were actually somewhat lower than in their mock-infected counterparts (approximately twofold) (Fig. 2B). Interestingly, analysis of the newly synthesized p53 during the chase
period revealed a dramatic difference between the infected and
uninfected cells; after an initial decrease to approximately half the
incorporated label by 3 h, the labeled p53 in the infected cells
became stabilized, with no further decrease observed for up to 6 h
of chase. In contrast, the p53 in the mock-infected cells steadily
decayed over the span of the experiment, going through approximately
three half-lives in 6 h (half-life, ~2 h). Preliminary
experiments performed at 24 hpi revealed the same pattern of lower
synthesis but extended stabilization as observed at 48 hpi (data not
shown). Therefore, a stabilization rather than an increase in synthesis
appeared to be the cause of the elevated steady-state levels of p53
observed in infected fibroblasts.
0022-538X/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
p53 and RPA Are Sequestered in Viral Replication
Centers in the Nuclei of Cells Infected with Human
Cytomegalovirus
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
(18), ornithine
decarboxylase (21), and proliferating-cell nuclear antigen
(PCNA) (10), the productive HCMV infection leads to a fully
activated state. In addition, early after infection, HCMV induces
elevated levels of active cyclins E and B, p53, and hyperphosphorylated
Rb but delays active cyclin A expression until late in the infection (23). Several studies have concluded that these HCMV-induced effects inhibit cell cycle transit (6, 10, 23, 30).
or by the adenovirus E1A protein
(53). Whether these proteins act alone or in conjunction
with other viral proteins, as is proposed by Bonin and McDougall
(5), remains to be determined. Nevertheless, these data
suggest that one mechanism by which HCMV may fully activate the
infected cell without triggering its death and may also precipitate the
genotoxic effects observed is by interfering with the ability of p53 to
regulate the repair of damaged cellular DNA through transcriptional
activation and protein-protein interactions.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
The p53 protein is stabilized in HCMV-infected
fibroblasts but is not easily extracted from their nuclei. (A)
Confluence-synchronized fibroblasts were collected at the indicated
times by trypsinization, counted, and lysed in LRSB as described in
Materials and Methods. Each lane of the SDS-15% polyacrylamide gel
was loaded with 3 × 105 cell equivalents. Proteins
were transferred to Immobilon and detected with the monoclonal Ab DO-1
directed against p53. (B) At 48 hpi, cells were harvested and aliquots
of 5 × 105 cells were lysed in RIPA buffer with or
without an additional sonication step (+Son and
Son, respectively) to
help improve extraction as indicated. Lysates were cleared, and the
pelleted debris was resuspended in an equivalent amount of LRSB. One
half of each aliquot, either pellet (P) or supernatant (S) was then
electrophoresed through an SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel, transferred to
Immobilon P, and probed with DO-1 Ab.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 2.
Stabilization of p53 is due to decreased degradation,
not increased synthesis. (A) Cells were metabolically labeled for 2-h
periods at the indicated times postinfection as described in Materials
and Methods. Approximately 5 × 105 cells were
sonicated in RIPA buffer as described in the legend to Fig. 1B to
ensure complete extraction of p53, and cleared lysates were incubated
with agarose-coupled DO-1 Ab for 2 h at 4°C with gentle rocking.
The beads were then washed several times in RIPA buffer and resuspended
in LRSB, and the eluted proteins were run on an 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel, fluorographed, dried, and exposed to film. M,
mock-infected cells; V, virally infected cells. (B) Cells were
pulse-labeled at 48 hpi, chased for the indicated times as described in
Materials and Methods, and then processed as described for panel A. An
agarose-coupled Ab to SV40 large-T antigen was used as a control for
specificity. (C) Quantitation of data from panel B by using
PhosphorImager software. For each set of data, the pulse was taken as
100% incorporation of label. m48, mock-infected cells pulse-labeled at
48 hpi; v48, virally infected cells pulse-labeled at 48 hpi.
p53 is sequestered into discrete foci within the nuclei of infected cells. The increased difficulty of extraction of p53 from the infected cell nuclei in the experiments described above led us to suspect that the subcellular localization of p53 might be altered in the infected fibroblasts. To investigate this possibility, cells were seeded onto glass coverslips and then infected or mock infected as described in Materials and Methods. At selected times postinfection, coverslips were removed, washed gently in PBS, fixed in paraformaldehyde, and then permeabilized with Triton X-100. We found this method of fixation coupled with the use of the DO-1 Ab to p53 to be the most reliable and reproducible combination for visualizing the staining pattern of p53 in both the mock-infected and infected cells. Surprisingly, we found that the p53 in infected cells was localized to discrete foci within the nuclei of virally infected cells beginning at approximately 30 hpi (Fig. 3a). These foci increased in size as the infection progressed and by 72 hpi almost completely covered the nucleus (data not shown). This pattern of staining was not apparent in mock-infected cells (Fig. 3b), where p53 was distributed uniformly throughout the entire nucleus. There was also no detectable staining observed when virally infected cells were incubated with a control Ab directed against trinitrophenol (Fig. 3c). These results support our hypothesis that a relocalization of p53 in the infected fibroblasts accounts for the increased difficulty of extraction and potentially for some of the stabilization of p53 observed in these cells.
|
p53 localizes to viral replication centers along with the HCMV protein UL44. The staining pattern observed for p53 in the infected fibroblasts was reminiscent of that seen for proteins associated with viral replication. Closer examination of these foci in the virally infected cells by phase microscopy at 48 hpi revealed the distinct morphology of the viral replication centers produced by both HCMV and another herpesvirus, herpes simplex virus (HSV) (9) (arrows in Fig. 4b, f, and j). It was also apparent that these structures were not present within the mock-infected cell nuclei (Fig. 4d, h, and l).
|
Localization to replication centers is observed with some cellular and viral proteins but not others. Previously, Wilcock and Lane (50) showed that HSV sequestered p53 as well as certain other host cell proteins, including Rb, PCNA, and RPA into viral replication centers. To determine whether HCMV also sequestered other cellular proteins into these centers and whether this might be a generalized phenomenon for cellular proteins normally present in the nucleus, we used indirect immunofluorescence staining to examine the viral and mock-infected fibroblasts at 30 hpi (Fig. 5); results obtained at 48 hpi were identical (data not shown). We focused on two cellular proteins: Rb, because we had previously observed modulation of both the steady-state levels and phosphorylation state of this protein upon infection, and RPA, because it is a protein involved in both cellular DNA replication and repair and is known to bind to p53. Figure 5 demonstrates that RPA but not Rb (Fig. 5e and a, respectively) localized to the replication centers. The viral immediate early protein IE1 72 (Fig. 5m) also did not localize to these foci, providing further evidence that there was specificity in the process. As noted above, the UL44 protein was clearly sequestered in these centers (Fig. 5i), and this localization could be observed as early as 24 hpi (data not shown). No foci were apparent in any of the mock-infected cells (Fig. 5c, g, k, and o). Furthermore, we observed the identical localization for each of these proteins in another permissive cell line, U373 (data not shown), providing evidence that this was not a cell type-specific phenomenon. Taken together, these results indicate that p53 and RPA are specifically sequestered into the viral replication centers of infected cells beginning at 30 hpi. This sequestering may in part contribute to the stabilization of p53 within infected fibroblasts.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Earlier studies have shown that upon infection of permissive fibroblasts with HCMV, there is a marked increase in the steady-state levels of p53, which appears to be wild type in genotype but unable to transactivate at least some of its normal target genes (6, 23, 34, 43). The present study confirms and extends these observations to address the reason for the marked rise in p53 steady-state levels within the infected fibroblast. We have shown that the elevated levels of p53 in infected fibroblasts are due to decreased degradation of the protein rather than increased synthesis. In addition, we find that p53 in HCMV-infected cells is specifically sequestered into viral replication centers within the nucleus beginning at 30 hpi. This sequestering is not a generalized phenomenon and is not cell type specific but is particular for certain cellular and viral proteins.
Many viruses have evolved mechanisms to sequester and/or functionally inactivate p53. SV40 large-T antigen binds to the core region of p53 and blocks its sequence-specific DNA binding (24). The adenovirus 55K E1B protein counters p53-initiated apoptosis (8), presumably by binding to the N terminus of p53 (26) and blocking its transactivation domain (16). Hepatitis B virus X protein can interact in vitro with the C terminus of p53, inhibiting both sequence-specific DNA binding and p53's ability to complex with XPB (46, 47). Finally, HPV counters the function of p53 by inhibiting its accumulation in infected cells. The E6 proteins of the high risk-type HPV bind in vitro to the core region of p53 (49) and induce a rapid ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the protein with the help of an associated cellular protein, E6 AP (40).
A key question raised by the studies presented here is this: how does HCMV stabilize p53 within the infected cell? The most probable explanation is that one or more proteins either induced or encoded by HCMV bind to p53 and counter the normal ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the protein. In support of this hypothesis, we found that when we infected fibroblasts stably expressing the HPV16 E6 protein, which normally causes a rapid degradation of p53, we saw a marked increase in the steady-state levels of p53 along with sequestering into the replication centers (data not shown).
Two HCMV-encoded proteins (mtrII and IE2 86) may contribute to the enhanced stabilization and apparent inability of p53 to transactivate its normal target genes within infected cells. NIH 3T3 cells stably expressing the nuclear protein mtrII alone have greatly increased p53 steady-state levels and decreased p53 degradation (35). mtrII binds to the N terminus of p53 in vitro and downregulates transactivation by p53 when transiently coexpressed (35). The immediate early protein IE2 86 also appears to block p53-mediated transactivation of a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter construct, at least when transiently cotransfected into smooth-muscle cells (43). IE2 86 forms a complex with p53 in vitro and in vivo (5, 43), and we have evidence that late in infection (after 48 hpi), a small proportion of IE2 86 localizes to the replication centers (data not shown). Therefore, binding by IE2 86 could be a means of transporting p53 into these centers and thus potentially contribute to its stabilization. However, observations by Bonin and McDougall (5) showing that p53 is not stabilized and appears to respond appropriately to DNA damage in a fibroblast line stably expressing IE2 86 indicate that this protein may not be able to affect p53 when expressed alone.
Our observations with HCMV infection of both fibroblasts and U373 cells show sequestering of p53 and RPA into viral replication centers, and PCNA has been localized to these sites by others (10). This is similar to what is observed during productive HSV-1 replication (50). However, unlike HCMV, HSV also sequesters Rb into these centers. Perhaps the key to this difference lies with the ability of HCMV to effectively counter the regulatory functioning of Rb by hyperphosphorylating it very early during infection (23), thus negating the need to sequester it from the cell. However, this does not address the reason why p53 and the other proteins are being sequestered by HCMV. Two alternatives come to mind: either they play an active role in viral replication and/or repair or they are being kept from performing their normal cellular functions.
The first alternative is quite appealing in the case of PCNA and RPA. Both are active participants in cellular DNA replication and could therefore be used in this capacity by the virus as they are for both bovine papillomavirus (29) and SV40 (39, 51) viral replication. RPA and PCNA also participate in the repair of damaged DNA via nucleotide excision repair and homologous recombination (17, 33, 42). p53 may also act in the repair process as an assembly factor, binding first to damaged DNA through its C terminus and then directly to several components of the repair machinery, including RPA, XPB, and XPD (15, 47). The virus could use this assembled complex to aid in the fidelity of its replication. The repair aspect also lends an alternative mechanism for the translocation of p53 into the replication centers. Miller and colleagues (31) hypothesize that an existing complex between RPA and p53 is translocated to sites of DNA damage and then disassociated in the presence of single-stranded DNA. HCMV may actively recruit RPA to help in damage control of viral replication or in excision repair of damage to the viral DNA and, by doing so, passively transport p53 into the centers.
The second alternative comes into play when considering the overall
effect achieved by infection with HCMV. It is well established that
HCMV infection stimulates gene expression of several cellular proteins
that aid in transit into S phase and are required for DNA replication
in normal cells: proteins like those encoded by the protooncogenes
fos, jun, and myc (2, 4),
dihydrofolate reductase (involved in nucleotide biosynthesis)
(45), thymidine kinase (14), DNA polymerase
(18), ornithine decarboxylase (involved in pyrimidine
biosynthesis) (21), PCNA (involved in DNA replication and
repair) (10), and cyclins E and B (23). This
activation might well trigger a p53-mediated response of either arrest
at the G1 damage checkpoint or apoptosis, both of which
would defeat the purpose of achieving concerted viral replication and
packaging. We hypothesize that viral protein binding and/or sequestering of wild-type p53 in the fibroblasts could be one mechanism
that HCMV has evolved to counter the known p53 damage response, while
keeping p53 available for protein-protein interactions and nonspecific
DNA binding potentially beneficial for viral replication and repair.
The experiments described in this work begin to provide insight into the mechanisms employed by HCMV to increase steady-state levels of p53 in infected fibroblasts. Other studies are currently in progress to elucidate the functional nature of the interactions between p53 and HCMV proteins and to resolve the question of whether p53 and the other sequestered cellular proteins play a role in HCMV replication and repair or are simply sequestered by the virus to block normal cellular functioning.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by NIH grant CA34729 and a grant from the University of California Cancer Research Coordinating Committee. E.A.F. was supported by NIH Training Grant T32AI07036.
We are indebted to Jeff Stack for countless helpful discussions and insightful critique of the manuscript. We also thank John O'Dowd and all the members of the Spector laboratory for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, 0357, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0357. Phone: (619) 534-9737. Fax: (619) 534-6083. E-mail: dspector{at}ucsd.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | AbuBakar, S., W. W. Au, M. S. Legator, and T. Albrecht. 1988. Induction of chromosome aberrations and mitotic arrest by cytomegalovirus in human cells. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 12:409-420[Medline]. |
| 2. | Albrecht, T., M. P. Fons, I. Bologh, S. AbuBakar, C. Z. Deng, and D. Millinoff. 1991. Metabolic and cellular effects of human cytomegalovirus infection. Transplant. Proc. 23:48-55. |
| 3. | Albrecht, T., M. P. Fons, C. Z. Deng, and I. Boldogh. 1997. Increased frequency of specific locus mutation following human cytomegalovirus infection. Virology 230:48-61[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Boldogh, I.,
S. AbuBakar,
C. Z. Deng, and T. Albrecht.
1991.
Transcriptional activation of cellular oncogenes fos, jun, and myc by human cytomegalovirus.
J. Virol.
65:1568-1571 |
| 5. | Bonin, L. R., and J. K. McDougall. 1997. Human cytomegalovirus IE2 86-kilodalton protein binds p53 but does not abrogate G1 checkpoint function. J. Virol. 71:5861-5870[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Bresnahan, W. A., I. Boldogh, E. A. Thompson, and T. Albrecht. 1996. Human cytomegalovirus inhibits cellular DNA synthesis and arrests productively infected cells in late G1. Virology 224:150-160[Medline]. |
| 7. | Buckbinder, L., R. Talbott, S. Velasco-Miguel, I. Takenaka, B. Faha, B. R. Seizinger, and N. Kley. 1995. Induction of the growth inhibitor IGF-binding protein 3 by p53. Nature 377:646-649[Medline]. |
| 8. |
Debbas, M., and E. White.
1993.
Wild-type p53 mediates apoptosis by E1A, which is inhibited by E1B.
Genes Dev.
7:546-554 |
| 9. |
de Bruyn Kops, A., and D. M. Knipe.
1994.
Preexisting nuclear architecture defines the intranuclear location of herpesvirus DNA replication structures.
J. Virol.
68:3512-3526 |
| 10. | Dittmer, D., and E. S. Mocarski. 1997. Human cytomegalovirus infection inhibits G1/S transition. J. Virol. 71:1629-1634[Abstract]. |
| 11. | Donehower, L. A., M. Harvey, B. L. Slagle, M. J. McArthur, C. Montgomery, Jr., J. S. Butel, and A. Bradley. 1992. Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours. Nature 356:215-221[Medline]. |
| 12. | Dutta, A., J. M. Ruppert, J. C. Aster, and E. Winchester. 1993. Inhibition of DNA replication factor RPA by p53. Nature 365:79-82[Medline]. (Comments.) |
| 13. | El-Deiry, W. S., T. Tokino, V. E. Velculescu, D. B. Levy, R. Parsons, J. M. Trent, D. Lin, W. E. Mercer, K. W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein. 1993. WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell 75:817-825[Medline]. |
| 14. |
Estes, J. E., and E.-S. Huang.
1977.
Stimulation of cellular thymidine kinases by human cytomegalovirus.
J. Virol.
24:13-21 |
| 15. | Gottlieb, T. M., and M. Oren. 1996. p53 in growth control and neoplasia. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1287:77-102[Medline]. |
| 16. | Grand, R. J., D. Owen, S. M. Rookes, and P. H. Gallimore. 1996. Control of p53 expression by adenovirus 12 early region 1A and early region 1B 54K proteins. Virology 218:23-34[Medline]. |
| 17. | He, Z., L. A. Henricksen, M. S. Wold, and C. J. Ingles. 1995. RPA involvement in the damage-recognition and incision steps of nucleotide excision repair. Nature 374:566-569[Medline]. |
| 18. |
Hirai, K., and Y. Watanabe.
1976.
Induction of -type DNA polymerases in human cytomegalovirus-infected WI-38 cells.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
447:328-339[Medline].
|
| 19. |
Hollstein, M.,
D. Sidransky,
B. Vogelstein, and C. C. Harris.
1991.
p53 mutations in human cancers.
Science
253:49-53 |
| 20. | Iskenderian, A. C., L. Huang, A. Reilly, R. M. Stenberg, and D. G. Anders. 1996. Four of eleven loci required for transient complementation of human cytomegalovirus DNA replication cooperate to activate expression of replication genes. J. Virol. 70:383-392[Abstract]. |
| 21. |
Isom, H. C.
1979.
Stimulation of ornithine decarboxylase by human cytomegalovirus.
J. Gen. Virol.
42:265-278 |
| 22. |
Iwayama, S.,
T. Yamamoto,
T. Furuya,
R. Kobayashi,
K. Ikuta, and K. Hirai.
1994.
Intracellular localization and DNA-binding activity of a class of viral early phosphoproteins in human fibroblasts infected with human cytomegalovirus (Towne strain).
J. Gen. Virol.
75:3309-3318 |
| 23. | Jault, F. M., J.-M. Jault, F. Ruchti, E. A. Fortunato, C. Clark, J. Corbeil, D. D. Richman, and D. H. Spector. 1995. Cytomegalovirus infection induces high levels of cyclins, phosphorylated RB, and p53, leading to cell cycle arrest. J. Virol. 69:6697-6704[Abstract]. |
| 24. |
Jenkins, J. R.,
P. Chumakov,
C. Addison,
H. W. Sturzbecher, and A. Wade-Evans.
1988.
Two distinct regions of the murine p53 primary amino acid sequence are implicated in stable complex formation with simian virus 40 T antigen.
J. Virol.
62:3903-3906 |
| 25. | Juven, T., Y. Barak, A. Zauberman, D. L. George, and M. Oren. 1993. Wild type p53 can mediate sequence-specific transactivation of an internal promoter within the mdm2 gene. Oncogene 8:3411-3416[Medline]. |
| 26. | Kao, C. C., P. R. Yew, and A. J. Berk. 1990. Domains required for in vitro association between the cellular p53 and the adenovirus 2 E1B 55K proteins. Virology 179:806-814[Medline]. |
| 27. | Kastan, M. B., Q. Zhan, W. S. el-Deiry, F. Carrier, T. Jacks, W. V. Walsh, B. S. Plunkett, B. Vogelstein, and A. Fornace, Jr. 1992. A mammalian cell cycle checkpoint pathway utilizing p53 and GADD45 is defective in ataxia-telangiectasia. Cell 71:587-597[Medline]. |
| 28. |
Ko, L. J., and C. Prives.
1996.
p53: puzzle and paradigm.
Genes Dev.
10:1054-1072 |
| 29. | Li, R., and M. R. Botchan. 1993. The acidic transcriptional activation domains of VP16 and p53 bind the cellular replication protein A and stimulate in vitro BPV-1 DNA replication. Cell 73:1207-1221[Medline]. |
| 30. | Lu, M., and T. Shenk. 1996. Human cytomegalovirus infection inhibits cell cycle progression at multiple points, including the transition from G1 to S. J. Virol. 70:8850-8857[Abstract]. |
| 31. | Miller, S. D., K. Moses, L. Jayaraman, and C. Prives. 1997. Complex formation between p53 and replication protein A inhibits the sequence-specific DNA binding of p53 and is regulated by single-stranded DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2194-2201[Abstract]. |
| 32. | Miyashita, T., and J. C. Reed. 1995. Tumor suppressor p53 is a direct transcriptional activator of the human bax gene. Cell 80:293-299[Medline]. |
| 33. |
Moore, S. P.,
L. Erdile,
T. Kelly, and R. Fishel.
1991.
The human homologous pairing protein HPP-1 is specifically stimulated by the cognate single-stranded binding protein hRP-A.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:9067-9071 |
| 34. |
Muganda, P.,
O. Mendoza,
J. Hernandez, and Q. Qian.
1994.
Human cytomegalovirus elevates levels of the cellular protein p53 in infected fibroblasts.
J. Virol.
68:8028-8034 |
| 35. | Muralidhar, S., J. Doniger, E. Medelson, J. C. Araujo, F. Kashanchi, N. Azumi, J. N. Brady, and L. J. Rosenthal. 1996. Human cytomegalovirus mtrII oncoprotein binds to p53 and down-regulates p53-activated transcription. J. Virol. 70:8691-8700[Abstract]. |
| 36. | Okamoto, K., and D. Beach. 1994. Cyclin G is a transcriptional target of the p53 tumor suppressor protein. EMBO J. 13:4816-4822[Medline]. |
| 37. |
Pari, G. S., and D. G. Anders.
1993.
Eleven loci encoding trans-acting factors are required for transient complementation of human cytomegalovirus oriLyt-dependent DNA replication.
J. Virol.
67:6979-6988 |
| 38. |
Pari, G. S.,
M. A. Kacica, and D. G. Anders.
1993.
Open reading frames UL44, IRS1/TRS1, and UL36-38 are required for transient complementation of human cytomegalovirus oriLyt-dependent DNA synthesis.
J. Virol.
67:2575-2582 |
| 39. | Prelich, G., M. Kostura, D. R. Marshak, M. B. Mathews, and B. Stillman. 1987. The cell-cycle regulated proliferating cell nuclear antigen is required for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. Nature 326:471-475[Medline]. |
| 40. | Scheffner, M., B. A. Werness, J. M. Huibregtse, A. J. Levine, and P. M. Howley. 1990. The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53. Cell 63:1129-1136[Medline]. |
| 41. |
Shen, Y.,
H. Zhu, and T. Shenk.
1997.
Human cytomegalovirus IE1 and IE2 proteins are mutagenic and mediate "hit-and-run" oncogenic transformation in cooperation with the adenovirus E1A proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:3341-3345 |
| 42. | Shivji, K. K., M. K. Kenny, and R. D. Wood. 1992. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen is required for DNA excision repair. Cell 69:367-374[Medline]. |
| 43. |
Speir, E.,
R. Modali,
E.-S. Huang,
M. B. Leon,
F. Sahwl,
T. Finkel, and S. E. Epstein.
1994.
Potential role of human cytomegalovirus and p53 interaction in coronary restenosis.
Science
265:391-394 |
| 44. | Sturzbecher, H. W., B. Donzelmann, W. Henning, U. Knippschild, and S. Buchhop. 1996. p53 is linked directly to homologous recombination processes via RAD51/RecA protein interaction. EMBO J. 15:1992-2002[Medline]. |
| 45. |
Wade, M.,
T. F. Kowalik,
M. Mudryj,
E. S. Huang, and J. C. Azizkhan.
1992.
E2F mediates dihydrofolate reductase promoter activation and multiprotein complex formation in human cytomegalovirus infection.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:4364-4374 |
| 46. |
Wang, X. W.,
K. Forrester,
H. Yeh,
M. A. Feitelson,
J. R. Gu, and C. C. Harris.
1994.
Hepatitis B virus X protein inhibits p53 sequence-specific DNA binding, transcriptional activity, and association with transcription factor ERCC3.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:2230-2234 |
| 47. | Wang, X. W., H. Yeh, L. Schaeffer, R. Roy, V. Moncollin, J. M. Egly, Z. Wang, E. C. Freidberg, M. K. Evans, B. G. Taffe, et al. 1995. p53 modulation of TFIIH-associated nucleotide excision repair activity. Nat. Genet. 10:188-195[Medline]. |
| 48. | Weiland, K. L., N. L. Oien, F. Homa, and M. W. Wathen. 1994. Functional analysis of human cytomegalovirus polymerase accessory protein. Virus Res. 34:191-206[Medline]. |
| 49. |
Werness, B. A.,
A. J. Levine, and P. M. Howley.
1990.
Association of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 E6 proteins with p53.
Science
248:76-79 |
| 50. | Wilcock, D., and D. P. Lane. 1991. Localization of p53, retinoblastoma and host replication proteins at sites of viral replication in herpes-infected cells. Nature 349:429-431[Medline]. |
| 51. |
Wold, M. S.,
D. H. Weinberg,
D. M. Virshup,
J. J. Li, and T. J. Kelly.
1989.
Identification of cellular proteins required for simian virus 40 DNA replication.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:2801-2809 |
| 51a. | Wright, D. 1989. . Ph.D. thesis. University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif. |
| 52. | Zantema, A., J. A. Fransen, A. Davis-Olivier, F. C. Ramaekers, G. P. Vooijs, B. DeLeys, and A. J. Van der Eb. 1985. Localization of the E1B proteins of adenovirus 5 in transformed cells, as revealed by interaction with monoclonal antibodies. Virology 142:44-58[Medline]. |
| 53. | Zhu, H., Y. Shen, and T. Shenk. 1995. Human cytomegalovirus IE1 and IE2 proteins block apoptosis. J. Virol. 69:7960-7970[Abstract]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»